Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 


 

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

 

OR

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission file number: 1-14569

 


 

PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

76-0582150

(State or other jurisdiction of

 

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)

 

Identification No.)

 

 

 

333 Clay Street, Suite 1600, Houston, Texas

 

77002

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

(713) 646-4100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x  Yes   o  No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  x  Yes   o  No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  x

 

Accelerated filer  o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer  o

 

Smaller reporting company  o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  o  Yes   x  No

 

As of July 31, 2012, there were 163,918,293 Common Units outstanding.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

 PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets: June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011

3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations: For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income: For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

5

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income: For the six months ended June 30, 2012

5

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

6

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Partners’ Capital: For the six months ended June 30, 2012

7

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:

8

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

8

2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

9

3. Accounts Receivable

10

4. Acquisitions

10

5. Inventory, Linefill, Base Gas and Long-term Inventory

12

6. Goodwill

13

7. Debt

14

8. Net Income Per Limited Partner Unit

15

9. Partners’ Capital and Distributions

17

10. Equity Compensation Plans

19

11. Derivatives and Risk Management Activities

20

12. Commitments and Contingencies

28

13. Operating Segments

30

14. Related Party Transactions

31

 

 

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

32

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

49

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

50

 

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

52

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

52

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

52

Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

52

Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

52

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

52

Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION

52

Item 6. EXHIBITS

52

SIGNATURES

53

 

2



Table of Contents

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1.                                    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions, except units)

 

 

 

June 30,
2012

 

December 31,
2011

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

12

 

$

26

 

Trade accounts receivable and other receivables, net

 

3,174

 

3,190

 

Inventory

 

1,172

 

978

 

Other current assets

 

318

 

157

 

Total current assets

 

4,676

 

4,351

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

 

10,632

 

9,029

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

(1,388

)

(1,289

)

 

 

9,244

 

7,740

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

2,112

 

1,854

 

Linefill and base gas

 

645

 

564

 

Long-term inventory

 

291

 

135

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities

 

193

 

191

 

Other, net

 

645

 

546

 

Total assets

 

$

17,806

 

$

15,381

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

$

3,268

 

$

3,599

 

Short-term debt

 

997

 

679

 

Other current liabilities

 

549

 

233

 

Total current liabilities

 

4,814

 

4,511

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Senior notes, net of unamortized discount of $15 and $13, respectively

 

5,510

 

4,262

 

Long-term debt under credit facilities and other

 

283

 

258

 

Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits

 

554

 

376

 

Total long-term liabilities

 

6,347

 

4,896

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 12)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

Common unitholders (162,586,381 and 155,376,937 units outstanding, respectively)

 

5,909

 

5,249

 

General partner

 

226

 

201

 

Total partners’ capital excluding noncontrolling interests

 

6,135

 

5,450

 

Noncontrolling interests

 

510

 

524

 

Total partners’ capital

 

6,645

 

5,974

 

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

 

$

17,806

 

$

15,381

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in millions, except per unit data)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supply and Logistics segment revenues

 

$

9,442

 

$

8,586

 

$

18,319

 

$

16,021

 

Transportation segment revenues

 

158

 

147

 

307

 

288

 

Facilities segment revenues

 

186

 

126

 

378

 

244

 

Total revenues

 

9,786

 

8,859

 

19,004

 

16,553

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COSTS AND EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases and related costs

 

8,830

 

8,202

 

17,332

 

15,281

 

Field operating costs

 

319

 

223

 

568

 

420

 

General and administrative expenses

 

89

 

73

 

182

 

143

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

86

 

63

 

146

 

126

 

Total costs and expenses

 

9,324

 

8,561

 

18,228

 

15,970

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

462

 

298

 

776

 

583

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSE)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity earnings in unconsolidated entities

 

9

 

4

 

16

 

5

 

Interest expense (net of capitalized interest of $10, $6, $18 and $11, respectively)

 

(75

)

(62

)

(140

)

(128

)

Other income/(expense), net

 

 

2

 

2

 

(20

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME BEFORE TAX

 

396

 

242

 

654

 

440

 

Current income tax expense

 

(6

)

(8

)

(23

)

(18

)

Deferred income tax expense

 

(4

)

(1

)

(7

)

(4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME

 

386

 

233

 

624

 

418

 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

(8

)

(8

)

(15

)

(10

)

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO PLAINS

 

$

378

 

$

225

 

$

609

 

$

408

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO PLAINS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIMITED PARTNERS

 

$

303

 

$

170

 

$

465

 

$

299

 

GENERAL PARTNER

 

$

75

 

$

55

 

$

144

 

$

109

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BASIC NET INCOME PER LIMITED PARTNER UNIT

 

$

1.86

 

$

1.14

 

$

2.90

 

$

2.04

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DILUTED NET INCOME PER LIMITED PARTNER UNIT

 

$

1.85

 

$

1.13

 

$

2.88

 

$

2.03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE UNITS OUTSTANDING

 

162

 

149

 

159

 

146

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE UNITS OUTSTANDING

 

163

 

150

 

161

 

147

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in millions)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

(unaudited)

 

Net income

 

$

386

 

$

233

 

$

624

 

$

418

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

 

(108

)

220

 

(49

)

190

 

Comprehensive income

 

278

 

453

 

575

 

608

 

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

(6

)

(8

)

(9

)

(10

)

Comprehensive income attributable to Plains

 

$

272

 

$

445

 

$

566

 

$

598

 

 

PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in millions)

 

 

 

Derivative

 

Translation

 

 

 

 

 

Instruments

 

Adjustments

 

Total

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

 

$

(102

)

$

156

 

$

54

 

Reclassification adjustments

 

6

 

 

6

 

Deferred loss on cash flow hedges, net of tax

 

(28

)

 

(28

)

Currency translation adjustment

 

 

(27

)

(27

)

Total period activity

 

(22

)

(27

)

(49

)

Balance, June 30, 2012

 

$

(124

)

$

129

 

$

5

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in millions)

 

 

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

624

 

$

418

 

Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

146

 

126

 

Inventory valuation adjustments

 

121

 

2

 

Equity compensation expense

 

60

 

46

 

Gain on sales of linefill and base gas

 

(16

)

(15

)

Net cash received/(paid) for terminated interest rate and foreign currency hedging instruments

 

(23

)

12

 

(Gain)/loss on foreign currency revaluation

 

12

 

(5

)

Other

 

4

 

8

 

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions

 

(580

)

380

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

348

 

972

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid in connection with acquisitions, net of cash acquired

 

(1,534

)

(751

)

Change in restricted cash

 

 

20

 

Additions to property, equipment and other

 

(544

)

(287

)

Proceeds from sales of assets

 

19

 

1

 

Net cash received/(paid) for sales and purchases of linefill and base gas

 

20

 

(6

)

Other investing activities

 

1

 

(4

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(2,038

)

(1,027

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Net borrowings/(repayments) on PAA’s revolving credit facility

 

168

 

(592

)

Net borrowings/(repayments) on PAA’s hedged inventory facility

 

140

 

(200

)

Net borrowings/(repayments) on PNG’s credit agreements

 

37

 

(34

)

Proceeds from the issuance of senior notes

 

1,247

 

597

 

Repayments of senior notes

 

 

(200

)

Net proceeds from the issuance of common units (Note 9)

 

535

 

503

 

Cash received for sale of noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary

 

 

370

 

Short-term borrowings related to cash overdraft

 

48

 

 

Distributions paid to common unitholders (Note 9)

 

(328

)

(280

)

Distributions paid to general partner (Note 9)

 

(135

)

(102

)

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

(24

)

(16

)

Other financing activities

 

(10

)

(3

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

1,678

 

43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of translation adjustment on cash

 

(2

)

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

 

(14

)

(13

)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

26

 

36

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

12

 

$

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized

 

$

129

 

$

123

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for income taxes, net of amounts refunded

 

$

48

 

$

1

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

(in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Excluding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Units

 

General

 

Noncontrolling

 

Noncontrolling

 

Partners’

 

 

 

Units

 

Amount

 

Partner

 

Interests

 

Interests

 

Capital

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

 

155.4

 

$

5,249

 

$

201

 

$

5,450

 

$

524

 

$

5,974

 

Net income

 

 

465

 

144

 

609

 

15

 

624

 

Distributions

 

 

(328

)

(135

)

(463

)

(24

)

(487

)

Issuance of common units

 

6.8

 

524

 

11

 

535

 

 

535

 

Issuance of common units under LTIP

 

0.4

 

33

 

1

 

34

 

 

34

 

Equity compensation expense

 

 

8

 

5

 

13

 

1

 

14

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

(42

)

(1

)

(43

)

(6

)

(49

)

Balance, June 30, 2012

 

162.6

 

$

5,909

 

$

226

 

$

6,135

 

$

510

 

$

6,645

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

7



Table of Contents

 

PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

 

Note 1—Organization and Basis of Presentation

 

Organization

 

Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership formed in 1998. As used in this Form 10-Q and unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “Partnership,” “Plains,” “PAA,” “we,” “us,” “our,” “ours” and similar terms refer to Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. and its subsidiaries.  Also, references to our “general partner,” as the context requires, include any or all of PAA GP LLC, Plains AAP, L.P. and Plains All American GP LLC.

 

We engage in the transportation, storage, terminalling and marketing of crude oil and refined products, as well as in the processing, transportation, fractionation, storage and marketing of natural gas liquids (“NGL”).  The term NGL includes ethane and natural gasoline products as well as propane and butane, products which are also commonly referred to as liquid petroleum gas (“LPG”).  When used in this document, NGL refers to all NGL products including LPG.  Through our general partner interest and majority equity ownership position in PAA Natural Gas Storage, L.P. (NYSE: PNG), we also own and operate natural gas storage facilities.  Our business activities are conducted through three operating segments: (i) Transportation, (ii) Facilities and (iii) Supply and Logistics.  See Note 13 for further discussion of our three operating segments.

 

Definitions

 

Additional defined terms are used in this Form 10-Q and shall have the meanings indicated below:

 

AOCI

 

=

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

Bcf

 

=

 

Billion cubic feet

Btu

 

=

 

British thermal unit

CAD

 

=

 

Canadian dollar

CME

 

=

 

Chicago Mercantile Exchange

DERs

 

=

 

Distribution equivalent rights

EBITDA

 

=

 

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization

FASB

 

=

 

Financial Accounting Standards Board

FERC

 

=

 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

GAAP

 

=

 

Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States

ICE

 

=

 

IntercontinentalExchange

LIBOR

 

=

 

London Interbank Offered Rate

LLS

 

=

 

Light Louisiana Sweet

LTIP

 

=

 

Long-term incentive plan

Mcf

 

=

 

Thousand cubic feet

MLP

 

=

 

Master limited partnership

MQD

 

=

 

Minimum quarterly distribution

NGL

 

=

 

Natural gas liquids including ethane, natural gasoline products, propane and butane

NPNS

 

=

 

Normal purchases and normal sales

NYMEX

 

=

 

New York Mercantile Exchange

NYSE

 

=

 

New York Stock Exchange

PLA

 

=

 

Pipeline loss allowance

PNG

 

=

 

PAA Natural Gas Storage, L.P.

SEC

 

=

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

USD

 

=

 

United States dollar

WTI

 

=

 

West Texas Intermediate

WTS

 

=

 

West Texas Sour

 

8



Table of Contents

 

Basis of Consolidation and Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for interim reporting as set forth by the SEC.  All adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that in the opinion of management were necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods have been reflected.  All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.  As discussed further below, certain reclassifications have been made to information from previous years to conform to the current presentation.  The condensed balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011 was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP.  The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 should not be taken as indicative of results to be expected for the entire year.

 

Subsequent events have been evaluated through the financial statements issuance date and have been included in the following footnotes where applicable.

 

Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements

 

Limited Partner and General Partner Income Allocation

 

During 2011, we identified an error in the manner in which we allocate net income to our limited partners and general partner. Previously, we calculated net income available to limited partners based on the distribution paid during the period by first allocating the incentive distribution paid during the period to the general partner and then allocating the remaining net income based on ownership interests (98% limited partner and 2% general partner). We have revised our methodology for the calculation of this allocation to take into account the distributions attributable to the period, which include distributions paid in the subsequent period. This revision does not impact net income, net income attributable to Plains, net income per limited partner unit, total partners’ capital or cash flows. We have determined that the impact of this error is not material to the previously issued financial statements. We have presented these changes retrospectively in the condensed consolidated statement of operations, which resulted in the following changes (in millions):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30, 2011

 

June 30, 2011

 

 

 

As
Previously
Reported

 

As
Revised

 

As
Previously
Reported

 

As
Revised

 

Net Income Attributable to Plains:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Limited Partners

 

$

171

 

$

170

 

$

305

 

$

299

 

General Partner

 

54

 

55

 

103

 

109

 

 

 

$

225

 

$

225

 

$

408

 

$

408

 

 

Note 2—Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

Other than as discussed below and in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, no new accounting pronouncements have become effective during the six months ended June 30, 2012 that are of significance or potential significance to us.

 

In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance with the purpose of simplifying the goodwill impairment test by permitting entities to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary.  If qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, an entity need not perform the two-step goodwill impairment test.  This guidance became effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011.  We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2012.  Our adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance regarding the presentation of other comprehensive income, which was later amended in December 2011, with the purpose of increasing the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements.  This guidance, as amended, requires entities to present comprehensive income in either (i) a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or (ii) two separate but consecutive statements.  This guidance became effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.  We adopted the guidance, as amended, on January 1, 2012.  Since this guidance only impacts the presentation of comprehensive income and does not change the composition or calculation of such financial information, adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

9



Table of Contents

 

In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance to amend certain fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in an effort to improve consistency with international reporting standards.  The amendments generally clarify that the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise in fair value measurement are relevant only when measuring the fair value of non-financial assets and are not relevant when measuring the fair value of financial assets or of liabilities.  In addition, the guidance expanded disclosure requirements associated with (i) unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements and (ii) items that are not measured at fair value in the financial statements, but for which fair value is required to be disclosed.  This guidance became effective prospectively for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011.  We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2012.  Other than requiring additional disclosure, which is included in Note 7 and Note 11, our adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Note 3—Accounts Receivable

 

We review all outstanding accounts receivable balances on a monthly basis and record a reserve for amounts that we expect will not be fully recovered.  We do not apply actual balances against the reserve until we have exhausted substantially all collection efforts.  At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, substantially all of our accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts) were less than 30 days past their scheduled invoice date.  Our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable totaled approximately $5 million at both June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.  Although we consider our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable to be adequate, actual amounts could vary significantly from estimated amounts.

 

To mitigate credit risks related to our accounts receivable, we have in place a rigorous credit review process.  We closely monitor market conditions in order to make a determination with respect to the amount, if any, of credit to be extended to any given customer and the form and amount of financial performance assurances we require.  Such financial assurances are commonly provided to us in the form of standby letters of credit, parental guarantees or advance cash payments.  At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had received approximately $198 million and $186 million, respectively, of advance cash payments from third parties to mitigate credit risk.  In addition, we enter into netting arrangements (contractual agreements that allow us and the counterparty to offset receivables and payables against each other) that cover a significant portion of our transactions and also serve to mitigate credit risk.

 

Note 4—Acquisitions

 

The following acquisitions were accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and the determination of the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired has been estimated in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.

 

BP NGL Acquisition

 

On April 1, 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of BP Canada Energy Company (“BPCEC”), a wholly owned subsidiary of BP Corporation North America Inc. (“BP North America”) from Amoco Canada International Holdings B.V. (the “Seller”).  Total consideration for this acquisition (referred to herein as the “BP NGL Acquisition”), which was based on an October 1, 2011 effective date, was approximately $1.68 billion in cash, including $17 million of imputed interest, subject to working capital and other adjustments.

 

Upon completion of this acquisition, we became the indirect owner of all of BP North America’s Canadian-based NGL business and certain of BP North America’s NGL assets located in the upper-Midwest United States (collectively the “BP NGL Assets”). The BP NGL Assets acquired include varying ownership interests and contractual rights relating to approximately 2,600 miles of NGL pipelines; approximately 20 million barrels of NGL storage capacity; seven fractionation plants with an aggregate net capacity of approximately 232,000 barrels per day; four straddle plants and two field gas processing plants with an aggregate net capacity of approximately six Bcf per day; and long-term and seasonal NGL inventories of approximately 8 million barrels upon closing. Certain of these pipelines and storage assets are currently inactive. The acquired business also includes various third-party supply contracts at other field gas processing plants and a supply contract relating to a third-party owned straddle plant with throughput capacity of 2.5 Bcf per day, shipping arrangements on third-party NGL pipelines and long-term leases on 720 rail cars used to move product among various locations. We have also entered into an Integrated Supply and Trading Agreement, pursuant to which an affiliate of BP North America will, for a period of two years following the closing of the acquisition, continue to provide sourcing services for gas supply to feed certain of the straddle plants acquired as a result of the acquisition.

 

10



Table of Contents

 

The preliminary determination of the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired is as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciable

 

Description

 

Amount

 

Life (in years)

 

Working capital

 

$

253

 

N/A

 

Property and equipment

 

1,067

 

5 - 70

 

Linefill

 

84

 

N/A

 

Long-term inventory

 

166

 

N/A

 

Intangible assets (contract)

 

132

 

14

 

Goodwill

 

244

 

N/A

 

Deferred tax liability

 

(244

)

N/A

 

Environmental liability

 

(14

)

N/A

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

(5

)

N/A

 

Total

 

$

1,683

 

 

 

 

The determination of the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired is preliminary pending completion of internal valuation procedures and resolution of working capital and other adjustments. We expect to finalize our fair value determination during 2012. The purchase price was equal to the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, excluding the resulting deferred tax liability and goodwill. The deferred tax liability is determined by the difference between the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities and the tax basis for those assets and liabilities. The resulting liability gives rise to an equal and offsetting goodwill balance for this transaction.

 

The preliminary determination of fair value to intangible assets above is comprised of a contract with a 14 year life.  Amortization of the contract under the declining balance method of amortization for the five full or partial calendar years following the acquisition date is estimated as follows:

 

2012 (1)

 

$

39

 

2013

 

$

30

 

2014

 

$

10

 

2015

 

$

8

 

2016

 

$

7

 

2017

 

$

6

 

 


(1)            Estimated amortization is for the period of April 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.

 

The following table reflects the preliminary determination of total assets and total net assets by segment as a result of the BP NGL Acquisition (in millions):

 

 

 

Total

 

Total

 

 

 

Assets

 

Net Assets

 

Transportation

 

$

558

 

$

398

 

Facilities

 

1,067

 

787

 

Supply and Logistics

 

845

 

498

 

Total

 

$

2,470

 

$

1,683

 

 

The BP NGL Acquisition was pre-funded through various means, including the issuance of common units and senior notes in March 2012 for net proceeds of approximately $1.69 billion. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we incurred approximately $13 million of acquisition-related costs associated with the BP NGL Acquisition. Such costs are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.

 

11



Table of Contents

 

Pro Forma Results

 

Disclosure of the revenues and earnings from the BP NGL Acquisition in our results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 is not practicable as it is not being operated as a standalone subsidiary. Selected unaudited pro forma results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, assuming the BP NGL Acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2011, are presented below (in millions, except per unit amounts):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Total revenues

 

$

9,786

 

$

9,937

 

$

19,828

 

$

18,541

 

Net income attributable to Plains

 

$

378

 

$

239

 

$

600

 

$

498

 

Limited partner interest in net income attributable to Plains

 

$

303

 

$

186

 

$

460

 

$

394

 

Net income per limited partner unit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

1.86

 

$

1.20

 

$

2.83

 

$

2.60

 

Diluted

 

$

1.85

 

$

1.20

 

$

2.81

 

$

2.58

 

 

Other Acquisitions

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we completed three additional acquisitions for an aggregate consideration of approximately $22 million. The assets acquired primarily included trailers that are utilized in our transportation segment and terminal facilities included in our facilities segment. We recognized goodwill of approximately $10 million related to these acquisitions.

 

Note 5—Inventory, Linefill, Base Gas and Long-term Inventory

 

Inventory, linefill, base gas and long-term inventory consisted of the following (barrels in thousands, natural gas volumes in thousands of Mcf and total value in millions):

 

 

 

June 30, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

Unit of

 

Total

 

Price/

 

 

 

Unit of

 

Total

 

Price/

 

 

 

Volumes

 

Measure

 

Value

 

Unit (1)

 

Volumes

 

Measure

 

Value

 

Unit (1)

 

Inventory

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crude oil

 

7,786

 

barrels

 

$

636

 

$

81.69

 

5,361

 

barrels

 

$

483

 

$

90.10

 

NGL

 

11,202

 

barrels

 

469

 

$

41.87

 

6,885

 

barrels

 

438

 

$

63.62

 

Natural gas (2) 

 

23,530

 

Mcf

 

54

 

$

2.29

 

16,170

 

Mcf

 

51

 

$

3.15

 

Other

 

N/A

 

 

 

13

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

 

 

6

 

N/A

 

Inventory subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

1,172

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

978

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Linefill and base gas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crude oil

 

9,278

 

barrels

 

517

 

$

55.72

 

9,366

 

barrels

 

514

 

$

54.88

 

Natural gas (2)

 

14,105

 

Mcf

 

49

 

$

3.47

 

14,105

 

Mcf

 

48

 

$

3.40

 

NGL

 

1,685

 

barrels

 

79

 

$

46.88

 

31

 

barrels

 

2

 

$

64.52

 

Linefill and base gas subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

645

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

564

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term inventory

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crude oil

 

1,914

 

barrels

 

143

 

$

74.71

 

1,714

 

barrels

 

127

 

$

74.10

 

NGL

 

3,620

 

barrels

 

148

 

$

40.88

 

150

 

barrels

 

8

 

$

53.33

 

Long-term inventory subtotal

 

 

 

 

 

291

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

135

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

$

2,108

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,677

 

 

 

 


(1)                         Price per unit of measure represents a weighted average associated with various grades, qualities and locations.  Accordingly, these prices may not coincide with any published benchmarks for such products.

 

(2)                         The volumetric ratio of Mcf of natural gas to crude Btu equivalent is 6:1; thus, natural gas volumes can be approximately converted to barrels by dividing by 6.

 

12



Table of Contents

 

At the end of each reporting period we assess the carrying value of our inventory and make any adjustments necessary to reduce the carrying value to the applicable net realizable value. During the second quarter of 2012, we recorded a non-cash charge of approximately $121 million related to the writedown of our crude oil and NGL inventory due to declines in prices during the period. The recognition of this adjustment, which is a component of “Purchases and related costs” in our accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations, was substantially offset by the recognition of unrealized gains on derivative instruments being utilized to hedge the future sales of our crude oil and NGL inventory. Substantially all of such unrealized gains were recorded to “Supply and Logistics segment revenues” on our condensed consolidated statement of operations. See Note 11 for discussion of our derivative and risk management activities.

 

Note 6 — Goodwill

 

The table below reflects our changes in goodwill for the period indicated (in millions):

 

 

 

 

Transportation

 

Facilities

 

Supply and Logistics

 

Total (1)

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

 

$

818

 

$

609

 

$

427

 

$

1,854

 

2012 Goodwill Related Activity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BP NGL Acquisition (2)

 

75

 

139

 

30

 

244

 

Other acquisitions (2)

 

10

 

 

 

10

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

(2

)

(4

)

 

(6

)

Purchase price accounting adjustments and other (2) 

 

10

 

 

 

10

 

Balance, June 30, 2012

 

$

911

 

$

744

 

$

457

 

$

2,112

 

 


(1)                         As of June 30, 2012, the total carrying amount of goodwill is net of approximately $3 million of accumulated impairment losses.

 

(2)                         Goodwill is recorded at the acquisition date based on a preliminary fair value determination.  This preliminary goodwill balance may be adjusted when the fair value determination is finalized.

 

We completed our annual goodwill impairment test as of June 30 and determined that there was no impairment of goodwill.

 

13



Table of Contents

 

Note 7—Debt

 

Debt consisted of the following (in millions):

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

SHORT-TERM DEBT

 

 

 

 

 

Credit Facilities (1) :

 

 

 

 

 

Senior secured hedged inventory facility bearing a weighted-average interest rate of 1.3% and 1.5% at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively

 

$214

 

$75

 

PAA senior unsecured revolving credit facility, bearing a weighted-average interest rate of 1.9% and 1.6% at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively (2)

 

200

 

32

 

PNG senior unsecured revolving credit facility, bearing a weighted-average interest rate

 

 

 

 

 

of 2.1% at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (3)

 

80

 

68

 

4.25% senior notes due September 2012 (4)

 

500

 

500

 

Other

 

3

 

4

 

Total short-term debt

 

997

 

679

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LONG-TERM DEBT

 

 

 

 

 

Senior Notes:

 

 

 

 

 

5.63% senior notes due December 2013

 

250

 

250

 

5.25% senior notes due June 2015

 

150

 

150

 

3.95% senior notes due September 2015

 

400

 

400

 

5.88% senior notes due August 2016

 

175

 

175

 

6.13% senior notes due January 2017

 

400

 

400

 

6.50% senior notes due May 2018

 

600

 

600

 

8.75% senior notes due May 2019

 

350

 

350

 

5.75% senior notes due January 2020

 

500

 

500

 

5.00% senior notes due February 2021

 

600

 

600

 

3.65% senior notes due June 2022 (5)

 

750

 

 

6.70% senior notes due May 2036

 

250

 

250

 

6.65% senior notes due January 2037

 

600

 

600

 

5.15% senior notes due June 2042 (5)

 

500

 

 

Unamortized discounts

 

(15

)

(13

)

Senior notes, net of unamortized discounts

 

5,510

 

4,262

 

Credit Facilities and Other:

 

 

 

 

 

PNG senior unsecured revolving credit facility, bearing a weighted-average interest rate of 2.1% at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (3)

 

79

 

54

 

PNG GO Bond term loans, bearing a weighted-average interest rate of 1.5% at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011

 

200

 

200

 

Other

 

4

 

4

 

Total long-term debt

 

5,793

 

4,520

 

Total debt (2) (3) (6)

 

$6,790

 

$5,199

 

 


(1)                         During June 2012, we expanded and extended our senior secured hedged inventory facility and expanded PNG’s credit facility. See “Credit Facilities” below for further discussion.

 

(2)                         We classify as short-term certain borrowings under our PAA senior unsecured revolving credit facility.  These borrowings are primarily designated as working capital borrowings, must be repaid within one year and are primarily for hedged NGL and crude oil inventory and NYMEX and ICE margin deposits.

 

(3)                         PNG classifies as short-term debt any borrowings under the PNG senior unsecured revolving credit facility that have been designated as working capital borrowings and must be repaid within one year.  Such borrowings are primarily related to a portion of PNG’s hedged natural gas inventory.

 

14



Table of Contents

 

(4)                         Our $500 million 4.25% senior notes will mature in September 2012.  The proceeds from these notes are being used to supplement capital available from our hedged inventory facility, to fund working capital needs associated with base levels of waterborne cargos and for seasonal NGL inventory requirements.  After these notes mature, we intend to use our credit facilities to finance hedged inventory. See “Credit Facilities” section below for discussion of our recent expansion of certain of our facilities. Concurrent with the issuance of these senior notes in July 2009, we entered into interest rate swaps.  See Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of our interest rate swaps.

 

(5)                         In March 2012, we completed the issuance of $750 million, 3.65% senior notes due 2022 and $500 million, 5.15% senior notes due 2042.  The senior notes were sold at 99.823% and 99.755% of face value, respectively.  Interest payments are due on June 1 and December 1 each year, beginning on December 1, 2012.  We used the net proceeds from these offerings to fund a portion of the consideration for the BP NGL Acquisition and for general partnership purposes.  See Note 4 for more information regarding this acquisition.

 

(6)                         Our fixed-rate senior notes had a face value of approximately $6.0 billion and $4.8 billion as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.  We estimated the aggregate fair value of these notes as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 to be approximately $6.8 billion and $5.4 billion, respectively.  Our fixed-rate senior notes are traded among institutions, and these trades are routinely published by a reporting service.  Our determination of fair value is based on reported trading activity near quarter end.  We estimate that the carrying value of outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities approximates fair value as interest rates reflect current market rates.  The fair value estimates for both our senior notes and credit facilities are based upon observable market data and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

Credit Facilities

 

Senior unsecured 364-day revolving credit agreement. In December 2011, we entered into a 364-day credit facility agreement with a borrowing capacity of $1.2 billion.  Pursuant to its terms, we had the option to activate the facility at any time over a six-month period.  In March 2012, we elected to terminate this credit agreement.

 

Senior secured hedged inventory facility. In June 2012, we amended our senior secured hedged inventory facility which, among other things, increased the committed borrowing capacity from $850 million to $1.4 billion, of which $400 million (an increase from $250 million under the original facility) is available for the issuance of letters of credit. Subject to obtaining additional or increased lender commitments, the committed amount of the facility may be increased to $1.9 billion. The amendment also extended the maturity date of the facility by one year to August 2014 and provides for one or more one-year extensions, subject to applicable approval.

 

PNG senior unsecured credit agreement. In June 2012, PNG partially exercised the accordion feature of its original senior unsecured credit agreement and increased from $250 million to $350 million the aggregate amount of revolving credit facility commitments. Also in June 2012, PNG amended this credit agreement which, among other things, provides for the further increase of the committed amount to $550 million, subject to obtaining additional or increased lender commitments.  The amendment also provides for one or more one-year extensions of the revolving credit facility maturity date of August 2016 and the GO Bond mandatory put date, as defined in such amendment, in each case subject to lender approvals.

 

Letters of Credit

 

In connection with our crude oil supply and logistics activities, we provide certain suppliers with irrevocable standby letters of credit to secure our obligation for the purchase of crude oil.  At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $34 million and $33 million, respectively.

 

Note 8—Net Income Per Limited Partner Unit

 

Basic and diluted net income per limited partner unit is determined pursuant to the two-class method for Master Limited Partnerships as prescribed in the FASB guidance.  The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings to our general partner, common unit holders and participating securities according to distributions pertaining to the current period’s net income and participation rights in undistributed earnings.  Under this method, all earnings are allocated to our general partner, common unit holders and participating securities based on their respective rights to receive distributions, regardless of whether those earnings would actually be distributed during a particular period from an economic or practical perspective.

 

15



Table of Contents

 

The Partnership calculates basic and diluted net income per limited partner unit by dividing net income attributable to Plains, after deducting the amount allocated to the general partner’s interest, incentive distribution rights (“IDRs”) and participating securities, by the basic and diluted weighted-average number of limited partner units outstanding during the period.  Participating securities include LTIP awards that have vested distribution equivalent rights (“DERs”), which entitle the grantee to a cash payment equal to the cash distribution paid on our outstanding common units.

 

Diluted net income per limited partner unit is computed based on the weighted average number of units plus the effect of dilutive potential units outstanding during the period using the two-class method.  Our LTIP awards that contemplate the issuance of common units are considered dilutive unless (i) vesting occurs only upon the satisfaction of a performance condition and (ii) that performance condition has yet to be satisfied.  LTIP awards that are deemed to be dilutive are reduced by a hypothetical unit repurchase based on the remaining unamortized fair value, as prescribed by the treasury stock method in guidance issued by the FASB.  See Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion of our LTIP awards including specific discussion regarding DERs.

 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in millions, except per unit data):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Basic Net Income per Limited Partner Unit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Plains

 

$

378

 

$

225

 

$

609

 

$

408

 

Less: General partner’s incentive distribution (1)

 

(69

)

(52

)

(134

)

(103

)

Less: General partner 2% ownership (1)

 

(6

)

(3

)

(10

)

(6

)

Net income available to limited partners

 

303

 

170

 

465

 

299

 

Less: Undistributed earnings allocated and distributions to participating securities (1)

 

(2

)

 

(3

)

 

Net income available to limited partners in accordance with application of the two-class method for MLPs

 

$

301

 

$

170

 

$

462

 

$

299

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding

 

162

 

149

 

159

 

146

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic net income per limited partner unit

 

$

1.86

 

$

1.14

 

$

2.90

 

$

2.04

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted Net Income per Limited Partner Unit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Plains

 

$

378

 

$

225

 

$

609

 

$

408

 

Less: General partner’s incentive distribution (1)

 

(69

)

(52

)

(134

)

(103

)

Less: General partner 2% ownership (1)

 

(6

)

(3

)

(10

)

(6

)

Net income available to limited partners

 

303

 

170

 

465

 

299

 

Less: Undistributed earnings allocated and distributions to participating securities (1)

 

(1

)

 

(2

)

 

Net income available to limited partners in accordance with application of the two-class method for MLPs

 

$

302

 

$

170

 

$

463

 

$

299

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding

 

162

 

149

 

159

 

146

 

Effect of dilutive securities: Weighted average LTIP units

 

1

 

1

 

2

 

1

 

Diluted weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding

 

163

 

150

 

161

 

147

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted net income per limited partner unit

 

$

1.85

 

$

1.13

 

$

2.88

 

$

2.03

 

 


(1)                         We calculate net income available to limited partners based on the distributions pertaining to the current period’s net income.  After adjusting for the appropriate period’s distributions, the remaining undistributed earnings or excess distributions over earnings, if any, are allocated to the general partner, limited partners and participating securities in accordance with the contractual terms of the partnership agreement and as further prescribed under the two-class method.

 

The terms of our Partnership Agreement limit the general partner’s incentive distribution to the amount of Available Cash, which as defined in the Partnership Agreement is net of reserves deemed appropriate.  As such, IDRs are not allocated undistributed earnings or distributions in excess of earnings for EPU calculation purposes.  If, however, undistributed earnings were allocated to our IDRs beyond amounts distributable to them under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, both basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit would decrease by $0.38 per unit for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and by $0.37 per unit for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  Similarly, both basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit would decrease by $0.08 per unit for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and by $0.02 per unit for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

 

16



Table of Contents

 

Note 9—Partners’ Capital and Distributions

 

PAA Distributions

 

The following table details the distributions paid during or pertaining to the first half of 2012, net of reductions to the general partner’s incentive distributions (in millions, except per unit amounts):

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions Paid

 

Distributions

 

 

 

 

 

Common

 

General Partner

 

 

 

per limited

 

Date Declared

 

Date Paid or To Be Paid

 

Units

 

Incentive

 

2%

 

Total

 

partner unit

 

July 9, 2012

 

August 14, 2012 (1)

 

$

174

 

$

69

 

$

4

 

$

247

 

$

1.0650

 

April 10, 2012

 

May 15, 2012

 

$

169

 

$

65

 

$

3

 

$

237

 

$

1.0450

 

January 10, 2012

 

February 14, 2012

 

$

159

 

$

63

 

$

3

 

$

225

 

$

1.0250

 

 


(1)                         Payable to unitholders of record at the close of business on August 3, 2012, for the period April 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012.

 

In order to enhance our distribution coverage ratio and liquidity following a significant acquisition, our general partner has, from time to time, agreed to reduce the amounts due to it as incentive distributions.  In connection with the BP NGL Acquisition, our general partner agreed to reduce the amount of its incentive distributions by $3.75 million per quarter through February 2014 and $2.5 million per quarter thereafter.  Through June 30, 2012, our general partner’s incentive distributions had been reduced by $3.75 million related to this acquisition. See Note 4 for further discussion of the BP NGL Acquisition.

 

PAA Equity Offerings

 

Continuous Offering Program. On May 9, 2012, we entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement (the “Agreement”) with a financial institution (“Manager”). Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, we may from time to time, through Manager, as our sales agent, offer and sell common units representing limited partner interests having an aggregate offering price of up to $300 million. Sales of such common units will be made by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the NYSE at market prices, in block transactions or as otherwise agreed upon by Manager and us. Under the terms of the Agreement, we may also sell common units to Manager as principal for its own account at a price to be agreed upon at the time of the sale. For any such sales, we will enter into a separate terms agreement with Manager.

 

Through June 30, 2012, we sold an aggregate of 1,434,790 common units under the Agreement, generating proceeds of approximately $114 million, net of approximately $2 million of commissions to Manager. A portion of these units were issued and the associated proceeds received during early July 2012. The net proceeds from sales, including our general partner’s proportionate capital contribution, were used for general partnership purposes.

 

Other Equity Offerings. During the first six months of 2012, we completed an equity offering of our common units that was not associated with our Continuous Offering Program, as shown in the table below (in millions, except unit and per unit data):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Proceeds

 

Partner

 

 

 

Net

 

Date

 

Units Issued

 

Unit Price

 

from Sale

 

Contribution

 

Costs

 

Proceeds

 

March 2012 (1)

 

5,750,000

 

$

80.03

 

$

460

 

$

9

 

$

(14

)

$

455

 

 


(1)                         This offering of common units was an underwritten transaction that required us to pay a gross spread.  The net proceeds from this offering were used to fund a portion of the BP NGL Acquisition, to reduce outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities and for general partnership purposes.

 

LTIP Vesting

 

In connection with the settlement of vested LTIP awards, we issued 449,654 common units during the six months ended June 30, 2012, which resulted in an increase to partners’ capital of approximately $34 million.

 

17



Table of Contents

 

Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries

 

As of June 30, 2012, noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries consisted of the following: (i) an approximate 36 % interest in PNG and (ii) a 25% interest in SLC Pipeline LLC.

 

Modification of Conversion of PNG Subordinated Units

 

In February 2012, PNG modified the terms of the first three tranches of the PNG Series B subordinated units held by PAA. The Series B subordinated units do not participate in quarterly distributions. Instead, the Series B subordinated units convert into Series A subordinated units in five distinct tranches upon the achievement of defined benchmarks tied to the amount of capacity in service at Pine Prairie and increases in PNG’s quarterly distributions. Any Series B subordinated units that remain outstanding as of December 31, 2018 will automatically be cancelled. The February 2012 modification increased the quarterly distribution benchmark for Tranche 1, 2 and 3 from annualized levels of $1.44 per unit, $1.53 per unit and $1.63 per unit, respectively, to an annualized level of $1.71 per unit. The following table presents the operational and financial benchmarks, as modified, for conversion of the Series B subordinated units into Series A subordinated units for each tranche (units in millions):

 

 

 

Series B Subordinated Units to Convert into
Series A Subordinated Units

 

Working Gas Storage Capacity (Bcf)

 

Annualized
Distribution Level 
(1)

 

Tranche 1

 

2.6

 

29.6

 

$

1.71

 

Tranche 2

 

2.8

 

35.6

 

$

1.71

 

Tranche 3

 

2.1

 

41.6

 

$

1.71

 

Tranche 4

 

3.0

 

48.0

 

$

1.71

 

Tranche 5

 

3.0

 

48.0

 

$

1.80

 

 


(1)                         For satisfaction of this benchmark, PNG must, for two consecutive quarters, (i) generate distributable cash flow sufficient to pay a quarterly distribution of at least the annualized distribution benchmark on the weighted average number of common units and Series A subordinated units and all of such Series B subordinated units outstanding during such quarter plus (ii) distribute available cash of at least the annualized distribution benchmark on all outstanding common units and Series A subordinated units and the corresponding distributions on PNG’s general partner’s 2% interest and the related distributions on the incentive distribution rights.  See Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion of our Series B subordinated units.

 

Noncontrolling Interests Rollforward

 

The following table reflects the changes in the noncontrolling interests in partners’ capital (in millions):

 

 

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Beginning balance

 

$

524

 

$

231

 

Sale of noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary

 

 

306

 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 

15

 

10

 

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

 

(24

)

(16

)

Equity compensation expense

 

1

 

2

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss):

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassification adjustments

 

(7

)

 

Net deferred gain on cash flow hedges

 

1

 

 

Ending balance

 

$

510

 

$

533

 

 

18



Table of Contents

 

Note 10—Equity Compensation Plans

 

For a complete discussion of our equity compensation awards, see Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

PNG Long-term Incentive Plan Award Modification.  In February 2012, the Board of Directors of PNG’s general partner approved the modification of certain awards previously granted under the PNG Plan.  As a result of the modification, approximately 232,500 equity-classified phantom unit awards will now vest in the following manner: (i) approximately 70,000 awards, with distribution equivalent rights also modified to begin payment in February 2012, will vest upon the date PNG pays an annualized distribution of at least $1.45, (ii) approximately 70,000 awards, with distribution equivalent rights also modified to begin payment in May 2013, will vest upon the date PNG pays an annualized distribution of at least $1.50 and (iii) the remainder, with distribution equivalent rights also modified to begin payment in May 2014, will vest upon the date PNG pays an annualized distribution of at least $1.55.  Fifty percent of any awards that have not vested as of the November 2016 distribution date will vest at that time and the remainder will expire.  Additionally, 232,500 of equity-classified phantom unit awards with vesting terms originally tied to the conversion of PNG’s Series A and Series B subordinated units were modified such that all these awards will now fully vest upon conversion of the Series A subordinated units to common units.  Distribution equivalent rights were also granted with respect to these awards to begin payment in February 2012.  There was no financial impact at the time of the modification; however, we anticipate that we will recognize additional equity compensation expense in the future as a result of the modification.

 

Class B Units of Plains AAP, L.P. The following table contains a summary of Plains AAP, L.P. Class B Unit awards:

 

 

 

Reserved for Future
Grants

 

Outstanding

 

Outstanding Units
Earned

 

Grant Date
Fair Value of Oustanding
Class B Units 
(1)

 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

 

16,500

 

183,500

 

80,063

 

$

44

 

Forfeitures

 

1,000

 

(1,000

)

 

$

 

Earned

 

 

 

24,250

 

$

 

Balance as of June 30, 2012

 

17,500

 

182,500

 

104,313

 

$

44

 

 


(1)                         Of the grant date fair value, approximately $5 million was recognized as expense during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

 

Other Equity Compensation Information.  Our equity compensation activity for awards denominated in PAA and PNG units is summarized in the following table (units in millions):

 

 

 

PAA Units (1)(5)

 

PNG Units (2)(3)(4)(6)

 

 

 

Units

 

Weighted Average Grant
Date
Fair Value per Unit

 

Units

 

Weighted Average Grant
Date
Fair Value per Unit

 

Outstanding, December 31, 2011

 

4.0

 

$

43.53

 

0.8

 

$

20.55

 

Granted

 

0.7

 

$

66.28

 

0.1

 

$

15.05

 

Vested

 

(1.5

)

$

39.30

 

 

$

23.67

 

Cancelled or forfeited

 

(0.1

)

$

59.32

 

 

$

 

Outstanding, June 30, 2012

 

3.1

 

$

50.58

 

0.9

 

$

17.56

 

 


(1)                         Amounts do not include Class B units of Plains AAP, L.P.

(2)                        Amounts do not include Class B units of PNGS GP LLC.

(3)                         Amounts include PNG Transaction Grants.

(4)                         Weighted average grant date fair value per unit for PNG Units outstanding at June 30, 2012 is impacted by the modification of PNG awards during the first quarter of 2012 as discussed above.

(5)                         Approximately 0.4 million common units were issued, net of approximately 0.3 million units withheld for taxes, for PAA units that vested during the six months ended June 30, 2012. The remaining 0.8 million PAA units that vested were settled in cash.

(6)                         Less than 0.1 million common units vested during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

 

19



Table of Contents

 

The table below summarizes the expense recognized and the value of vesting (settled both in units and cash) related to our equity compensation plans (in millions):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Equity compensation expense

 

$

20

 

$

27

 

$

60

 

$

46

 

LTIP unit-settled vestings (1)

 

$

33

 

$

23

 

$

58

 

$

23

 

LTIP cash-settled vestings

 

$

29

 

$

18

 

$

65

 

$

18

 

DER cash payments

 

$

2

 

$

1

 

$

4

 

$

2

 

 


(1)                         For each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, approximately $1 million relates to unit vestings that were settled with PNG units.

 

Note 11—Derivatives and Risk Management Activities

 

We identify the risks that underlie our core business activities and use risk management strategies to mitigate those risks when we determine that there is value in doing so.  Our policy is to use derivative instruments for risk management purposes and not for the purpose of speculating on hydrocarbon commodity (referred to herein as “commodity”) price changes.  We use various derivative instruments to (i) manage our exposure to commodity price risk as well as to optimize our profits, (ii) manage our exposure to interest rate risk and (iii) manage our exposure to currency exchange rate risk.  Our commodity risk management policies and procedures are designed to help ensure that our hedging activities address our risks by monitoring our derivative positions, as well as physical volumes, grades, locations, delivery schedules and storage capacity.  Our interest rate and currency exchange rate risk management policies and procedures are designed to monitor our derivative positions and ensure that those positions are consistent with our objectives and approved strategies.  Our policy is to formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk management objectives for undertaking the hedge.  This process includes specific identification of the hedging instrument and the hedged transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged and how the hedging instrument’s effectiveness will be assessed.  Both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, we assess whether the derivatives used in a transaction are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows or the fair value of hedged items.

 

Commodity Price Risk Hedging

 

Our core business activities contain certain commodity price-related risks that we manage in various ways, including the use of derivative instruments.  Our policy is (i) to only purchase inventory for which we have a market, (ii) to structure our sales contracts so that price fluctuations do not materially affect our operating income and (iii) not to acquire and hold physical inventory or derivatives for the purpose of speculating on commodity price changes.  The material commodity-related risks inherent in our business activities can be divided into the following general categories:

 

Commodity Purchases and Sales — In the normal course of our operations, we purchase and sell commodities.  We use derivatives to manage the associated risks and to optimize profits.  As of June 30, 2012, net derivative positions related to these activities included:

 

·                  An approximate 245,700 barrels per day net long position (total of 7.6 million barrels) associated with our crude oil purchases, which was unwound ratably during July 2012 to match monthly average pricing.

 

·                  A net short spread position averaging approximately 26,200 barrels per day (total of 10.4 million barrels), which hedges a portion of our anticipated crude oil lease gathering purchases through September 2013.  These derivatives are time spreads consisting of offsetting purchases and sales between two different months.  Our use of these derivatives does not expose us to outright price risk.

 

·                  Approximately 8,300 barrels per day on average (total of 4.6 million barrels) of WTS/WTI crude oil basis swaps through December 2013, which hedge anticipated sales of crude oil (WTI).  These derivatives are grade spreads between two different grades of crude oil.  Our use of these derivatives does not expose us to outright price risk.

 

·                  Approximately 7,900 barrels per day on average (total of 1.2 million barrels) of LLS/WTI crude oil basis swaps from August 2012 through December 2012, which hedge anticipated sales of crude oil.  These derivatives are grade

 

20



Table of Contents

 

spreads between two different grades of crude oil. Our use of these derivatives does not expose us to outright price risk.

 

·                  An average of 2,400 barrels per day (total of 0.9 million barrels) of butane/WTI spread positions, which hedge specific butane sales contracts that are based on a percentage of WTI through June 2013.

 

·                  A short swap position of approximately 23.4 Bcf through December 2012 related to anticipated sales of natural gas.

 

Storage Capacity Utilization — We own approximately 100 million barrels of crude oil, NGL and refined products storage capacity other than that used in our transportation operations. This storage may be leased to third parties or utilized in our own supply and logistics activities, including for the storage of inventory in a contango market. For capacity allocated to our supply and logistics operations, we have utilization risk if the market structure is backwardated. As of June 30, 2012, we used derivatives to manage the risk of not utilizing approximately 1.6 million barrels per month of storage capacity through 2013. These positions are a combination of calendar spread options and futures contracts. These positions involve no outright price exposure, but instead enable us to profitably use the capacity to store hedged crude oil.

 

Inventory Storage — At times, we elect to purchase and store crude oil, NGL and refined products inventory in conjunction with our supply and logistics activities. When we purchase and store inventory, we enter into physical sales contracts or use derivatives to mitigate price risk associated with the inventory. As of June 30, 2012, we had derivatives totaling approximately 12.2 million barrels hedging our inventory. These positions are a combination of futures, swaps and option contracts.

 

Pipeline Loss Allowance Oil — As is common in the pipeline transportation industry, our tariffs incorporate a loss allowance factor that is intended to, among other things, offset losses due to evaporation, measurement and other losses in transit.  We utilize derivative instruments to hedge a portion of the anticipated sales of the allowance oil that is to be collected under our tariffs.  As of June 30, 2012, our PLA hedges included (i) a net short position consisting of crude oil futures and swaps for an average of approximately 1,400 barrels per day (total of 1.8 million barrels) through December 2015, (ii) a long put option position of approximately 0.1 million barrels through December 2012 and (iii) a long call option position of approximately 0.9 million barrels through December 2015.

 

Natural Gas Processing/NGL Fractionation – As part of our supply and logistics activities, we purchase natural gas for processing and NGL mix for fractionation, and we sell the resulting individual specification products (including ethane, propane, butane and condensate).  In conjunction with these activities, we hedge the purchase of natural gas and the subsequent sale of the individual specification products.  As of June 30, 2012, we had a long natural gas position of approximately 16.7 Bcf through October 2014, a short propane position of approximately 2.8 million barrels through October 2014, and a short butane and WTI position of approximately 0.8 and 0.3 million barrels, respectively, through December 2013.

 

Base Gas Management — Our gas storage facilities require minimum levels of base gas to operate.  For our natural gas storage facilities that are under construction, we anticipate purchasing base gas in future periods as construction is completed.  We use derivatives to hedge such anticipated purchases of natural gas.  As of June 30, 2012, we had a long swap position of approximately 4.1 Bcf through April 2016 related to anticipated base gas purchases.

 

All of our commodity derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting are designated as cash flow hedges.  We have determined that substantially all of our physical purchase and sale agreements qualify for the NPNS exclusion.  Physical commodity contracts that meet the definition of a derivative but are ineligible, or not designated, for the NPNS scope exception are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings.

 

Interest Rate Risk Hedging

 

We use interest rate derivatives to hedge interest rate risk associated with anticipated debt issuances and outstanding debt instruments.  The derivative instruments we use to manage this risk consist primarily of interest rate swaps and treasury locks.  As of June 30, 2012, AOCI includes deferred losses of approximately $160 million that relate to open and terminated interest rate derivatives that were designated for hedge accounting.  The terminated interest rate derivatives were cash-settled in connection with the issuance or refinancing of debt agreements.  The deferred gain related to these instruments is being amortized to interest expense over the terms of the hedged debt instruments.

 

We have entered into forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge the underlying benchmark interest rate related to forecasted debt issuances through 2015.  The following table summarizes the terms of our forward starting interest rate swaps as of June 30, 2012 (notional amounts in millions):

 

Hedged Transaction

 

Number and Types of
Derivatives Employed

 

Notional
Amount

 

Expected
Termination Date

 

Average Rate
Locked

 

Accounting
Treatment

Anticipated debt offering

 

6 forward starting swaps (30-year)

 

$

250

 

6/17/2013

 

4.24

%

Cash flow hedge

Anticipated debt offering

 

5 forward starting swaps (30-year)

 

$

125

 

6/16/2014

 

3.39

%

Cash flow hedge

Anticipated debt offering

 

10 forward starting swaps (30-year)

 

$

250

 

6/15/2015

 

3.60

%

Cash flow hedge

 

21



Table of Contents

 

During June 2011 and August 2011, PNG entered into three interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate on a portion of PNG’s outstanding debt.  The swaps have an aggregate notional amount of $100 million with an average fixed rate of 0.95%.  Two of these swaps terminate in June 2014 and the remaining swap terminates in August 2014.  These swaps are designated as cash flow hedges.

 

Concurrent with our March 2012 senior note issuances, we terminated four ten-year forward starting interest rate swaps.  These swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $200 million and an average fixed rate of 3.46%.  We paid out cash of approximately $24 million associated with the termination of the swaps.

 

Concurrent with our January 2011 senior notes issuance, we terminated three forward starting interest rate swaps.  These swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $100 million and an average fixed rate of 3.6%.  We received cash proceeds of approximately $12 million associated with the termination of these swaps.

 

During July 2009, concurrent with our senior notes issuance, we entered into four interest rate swaps for which we receive fixed interest payments and pay floating-rate interest payments based on three-month LIBOR plus an average spread of 2.42% on a semi-annual basis.  The swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $300 million with fixed rates of 4.25%.  Two of the swaps terminated in September 2011, and two of the swaps will terminate in September 2012.  The swaps that terminate in 2012 are designated as fair value hedges.

 

Currency Exchange Rate Risk Hedging

 

Because a significant portion of our Canadian business is conducted in CAD and, at times, a portion of our debt is denominated in CAD, we use foreign currency derivatives to minimize the risks of unfavorable changes in exchange rates.  These instruments include foreign currency exchange contracts, forwards and options.  As of June 30, 2012, AOCI includes net deferred gains of approximately $8 million that relate to open and settled foreign currency derivatives that were designated for hedge accounting.  These foreign currency derivatives hedge the cash flow variability associated with CAD-denominated interest payments on CAD-denominated intercompany notes as a result of changes in the exchange rate.

 

As of June 30, 2012, our outstanding foreign currency derivatives also include derivatives we use to hedge USD-denominated commodity purchases and sales in Canada.  In addition, we may from time to time hedge the commodity price risk associated with a CAD-denominated commodity transaction with a USD-denominated commodity derivative.  In conjunction with entering into the commodity derivative, we may enter into a foreign currency derivative to hedge the resulting foreign currency risk.  These foreign currency derivatives are generally short-term in nature.

 

The following table summarizes our open forward exchange contracts that exchange CAD for USD on a net basis (in millions):

 

 

 

CAD

 

USD

 

Average Exchange Rate

 

2012

 

$

64

 

$

64

 

CAD $1.01 to USD $1.00

 

2013

 

$

41

 

$

40

 

CAD $1.02 to USD $1.00

 

 

Summary of Financial Impact

 

For derivatives that qualify as a cash flow hedge, changes in fair value of the effective portion of the hedges are deferred in AOCI and recognized in earnings in the periods during which the underlying physical transactions impact earnings.  For our interest rate swaps that qualify as a fair value hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative and changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged item, attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized in earnings each period. Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting and the portion of cash flow hedges that are not highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items are recognized in earnings each period.  Cash settlements associated with our derivative activities are reflected as operating cash flows in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

 

22



Table of Contents

 

A summary of the impact of our derivative activities recognized in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives in

 

Not

 

 

 

Derivatives in

 

Not

 

 

 

 

 

Hedging

 

Designated

 

 

 

Hedging

 

Designated

 

 

 

Location of gain/(loss)

 

Relationships (1)(2)(3)

 

as a Hedge (4)

 

Total

 

Relationships (1)(2)

 

as a Hedge (4)

 

Total

 

Commodity Derivatives