UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
OR
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 1-14569
PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
76-0582150 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
333 Clay Street, Suite 1600, Houston, Texas |
|
77002 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
(713) 646-4100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No
As of July 31, 2012, there were 163,918,293 Common Units outstanding.
PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Item 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in millions, except units)
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
(unaudited) |
| ||||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
Trade accounts receivable and other receivables, net |
|
3,174 |
|
3,190 |
| ||
Inventory |
|
1,172 |
|
978 |
| ||
Other current assets |
|
318 |
|
157 |
| ||
Total current assets |
|
4,676 |
|
4,351 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
|
10,632 |
|
9,029 |
| ||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
(1,388 |
) |
(1,289 |
) | ||
|
|
9,244 |
|
7,740 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Goodwill |
|
2,112 |
|
1,854 |
| ||
Linefill and base gas |
|
645 |
|
564 |
| ||
Long-term inventory |
|
291 |
|
135 |
| ||
Investments in unconsolidated entities |
|
193 |
|
191 |
| ||
Other, net |
|
645 |
|
546 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
17,806 |
|
$ |
15,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
3,268 |
|
$ |
3,599 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
997 |
|
679 |
| ||
Other current liabilities |
|
549 |
|
233 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
4,814 |
|
4,511 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Senior notes, net of unamortized discount of $15 and $13, respectively |
|
5,510 |
|
4,262 |
| ||
Long-term debt under credit facilities and other |
|
283 |
|
258 |
| ||
Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits |
|
554 |
|
376 |
| ||
Total long-term liabilities |
|
6,347 |
|
4,896 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 12) |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
PARTNERS CAPITAL |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common unitholders (162,586,381 and 155,376,937 units outstanding, respectively) |
|
5,909 |
|
5,249 |
| ||
General partner |
|
226 |
|
201 |
| ||
Total partners capital excluding noncontrolling interests |
|
6,135 |
|
5,450 |
| ||
Noncontrolling interests |
|
510 |
|
524 |
| ||
Total partners capital |
|
6,645 |
|
5,974 |
| ||
Total liabilities and partners capital |
|
$ |
17,806 |
|
$ |
15,381 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per unit data)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Supply and Logistics segment revenues |
|
$ |
9,442 |
|
$ |
8,586 |
|
$ |
18,319 |
|
$ |
16,021 |
|
Transportation segment revenues |
|
158 |
|
147 |
|
307 |
|
288 |
| ||||
Facilities segment revenues |
|
186 |
|
126 |
|
378 |
|
244 |
| ||||
Total revenues |
|
9,786 |
|
8,859 |
|
19,004 |
|
16,553 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Purchases and related costs |
|
8,830 |
|
8,202 |
|
17,332 |
|
15,281 |
| ||||
Field operating costs |
|
319 |
|
223 |
|
568 |
|
420 |
| ||||
General and administrative expenses |
|
89 |
|
73 |
|
182 |
|
143 |
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
86 |
|
63 |
|
146 |
|
126 |
| ||||
Total costs and expenses |
|
9,324 |
|
8,561 |
|
18,228 |
|
15,970 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
OPERATING INCOME |
|
462 |
|
298 |
|
776 |
|
583 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Equity earnings in unconsolidated entities |
|
9 |
|
4 |
|
16 |
|
5 |
| ||||
Interest expense (net of capitalized interest of $10, $6, $18 and $11, respectively) |
|
(75 |
) |
(62 |
) |
(140 |
) |
(128 |
) | ||||
Other income/(expense), net |
|
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
(20 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
INCOME BEFORE TAX |
|
396 |
|
242 |
|
654 |
|
440 |
| ||||
Current income tax expense |
|
(6 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(23 |
) |
(18 |
) | ||||
Deferred income tax expense |
|
(4 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(7 |
) |
(4 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
NET INCOME |
|
386 |
|
233 |
|
624 |
|
418 |
| ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
(8 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(15 |
) |
(10 |
) | ||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO PLAINS |
|
$ |
378 |
|
$ |
225 |
|
$ |
609 |
|
$ |
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO PLAINS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
LIMITED PARTNERS |
|
$ |
303 |
|
$ |
170 |
|
$ |
465 |
|
$ |
299 |
|
GENERAL PARTNER |
|
$ |
75 |
|
$ |
55 |
|
$ |
144 |
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
BASIC NET INCOME PER LIMITED PARTNER UNIT |
|
$ |
1.86 |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
$ |
2.90 |
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
DILUTED NET INCOME PER LIMITED PARTNER UNIT |
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
$ |
2.88 |
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE UNITS OUTSTANDING |
|
162 |
|
149 |
|
159 |
|
146 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE UNITS OUTSTANDING |
|
163 |
|
150 |
|
161 |
|
147 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
| ||||||||
Net income |
|
$ |
386 |
|
$ |
233 |
|
$ |
624 |
|
$ |
418 |
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
(108 |
) |
220 |
|
(49 |
) |
190 |
| ||||
Comprehensive income |
|
278 |
|
453 |
|
575 |
|
608 |
| ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
(6 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(9 |
) |
(10 |
) | ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Plains |
|
$ |
272 |
|
$ |
445 |
|
$ |
566 |
|
$ |
598 |
|
PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions)
|
|
Derivative |
|
Translation |
|
|
| |||
|
|
Instruments |
|
Adjustments |
|
Total |
| |||
|
|
(unaudited) |
| |||||||
Balance, December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
(102 |
) |
$ |
156 |
|
$ |
54 |
|
Reclassification adjustments |
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
| |||
Deferred loss on cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) | |||
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
(27 |
) | |||
Total period activity |
|
(22 |
) |
(27 |
) |
(49 |
) | |||
Balance, June 30, 2012 |
|
$ |
(124 |
) |
$ |
129 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
|
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
June 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(unaudited) |
| ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
624 |
|
$ |
418 |
|
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
146 |
|
126 |
| ||
Inventory valuation adjustments |
|
121 |
|
2 |
| ||
Equity compensation expense |
|
60 |
|
46 |
| ||
Gain on sales of linefill and base gas |
|
(16 |
) |
(15 |
) | ||
Net cash received/(paid) for terminated interest rate and foreign currency hedging instruments |
|
(23 |
) |
12 |
| ||
(Gain)/loss on foreign currency revaluation |
|
12 |
|
(5 |
) | ||
Other |
|
4 |
|
8 |
| ||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions |
|
(580 |
) |
380 |
| ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
348 |
|
972 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash paid in connection with acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
(1,534 |
) |
(751 |
) | ||
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
|
20 |
| ||
Additions to property, equipment and other |
|
(544 |
) |
(287 |
) | ||
Proceeds from sales of assets |
|
19 |
|
1 |
| ||
Net cash received/(paid) for sales and purchases of linefill and base gas |
|
20 |
|
(6 |
) | ||
Other investing activities |
|
1 |
|
(4 |
) | ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(2,038 |
) |
(1,027 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net borrowings/(repayments) on PAAs revolving credit facility |
|
168 |
|
(592 |
) | ||
Net borrowings/(repayments) on PAAs hedged inventory facility |
|
140 |
|
(200 |
) | ||
Net borrowings/(repayments) on PNGs credit agreements |
|
37 |
|
(34 |
) | ||
Proceeds from the issuance of senior notes |
|
1,247 |
|
597 |
| ||
Repayments of senior notes |
|
|
|
(200 |
) | ||
Net proceeds from the issuance of common units (Note 9) |
|
535 |
|
503 |
| ||
Cash received for sale of noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary |
|
|
|
370 |
| ||
Short-term borrowings related to cash overdraft |
|
48 |
|
|
| ||
Distributions paid to common unitholders (Note 9) |
|
(328 |
) |
(280 |
) | ||
Distributions paid to general partner (Note 9) |
|
(135 |
) |
(102 |
) | ||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
(24 |
) |
(16 |
) | ||
Other financing activities |
|
(10 |
) |
(3 |
) | ||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
1,678 |
|
43 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Effect of translation adjustment on cash |
|
(2 |
) |
(1 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(14 |
) |
(13 |
) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
26 |
|
36 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
129 |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash paid for income taxes, net of amounts refunded |
|
$ |
48 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS CAPITAL
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Capital |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Common Units |
|
General |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Partners |
| |||||||
|
|
Units |
|
Amount |
|
Partner |
|
Interests |
|
Interests |
|
Capital |
| |||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
| |||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2011 |
|
155.4 |
|
$ |
5,249 |
|
$ |
201 |
|
$ |
5,450 |
|
$ |
524 |
|
$ |
5,974 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
465 |
|
144 |
|
609 |
|
15 |
|
624 |
| |||||
Distributions |
|
|
|
(328 |
) |
(135 |
) |
(463 |
) |
(24 |
) |
(487 |
) | |||||
Issuance of common units |
|
6.8 |
|
524 |
|
11 |
|
535 |
|
|
|
535 |
| |||||
Issuance of common units under LTIP |
|
0.4 |
|
33 |
|
1 |
|
34 |
|
|
|
34 |
| |||||
Equity compensation expense |
|
|
|
8 |
|
5 |
|
13 |
|
1 |
|
14 |
| |||||
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(43 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(49 |
) | |||||
Balance, June 30, 2012 |
|
162.6 |
|
$ |
5,909 |
|
$ |
226 |
|
$ |
6,135 |
|
$ |
510 |
|
$ |
6,645 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Note 1Organization and Basis of Presentation
Organization
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership formed in 1998. As used in this Form 10-Q and unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms Partnership, Plains, PAA, we, us, our, ours and similar terms refer to Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. and its subsidiaries. Also, references to our general partner, as the context requires, include any or all of PAA GP LLC, Plains AAP, L.P. and Plains All American GP LLC.
We engage in the transportation, storage, terminalling and marketing of crude oil and refined products, as well as in the processing, transportation, fractionation, storage and marketing of natural gas liquids (NGL). The term NGL includes ethane and natural gasoline products as well as propane and butane, products which are also commonly referred to as liquid petroleum gas (LPG). When used in this document, NGL refers to all NGL products including LPG. Through our general partner interest and majority equity ownership position in PAA Natural Gas Storage, L.P. (NYSE: PNG), we also own and operate natural gas storage facilities. Our business activities are conducted through three operating segments: (i) Transportation, (ii) Facilities and (iii) Supply and Logistics. See Note 13 for further discussion of our three operating segments.
Definitions
Additional defined terms are used in this Form 10-Q and shall have the meanings indicated below:
AOCI |
|
= |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
Bcf |
|
= |
|
Billion cubic feet |
Btu |
|
= |
|
British thermal unit |
CAD |
|
= |
|
Canadian dollar |
CME |
|
= |
|
Chicago Mercantile Exchange |
DERs |
|
= |
|
Distribution equivalent rights |
EBITDA |
|
= |
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization |
FASB |
|
= |
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC |
|
= |
|
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
GAAP |
|
= |
|
Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States |
ICE |
|
= |
|
IntercontinentalExchange |
LIBOR |
|
= |
|
London Interbank Offered Rate |
LLS |
|
= |
|
Light Louisiana Sweet |
LTIP |
|
= |
|
Long-term incentive plan |
Mcf |
|
= |
|
Thousand cubic feet |
MLP |
|
= |
|
Master limited partnership |
MQD |
|
= |
|
Minimum quarterly distribution |
NGL |
|
= |
|
Natural gas liquids including ethane, natural gasoline products, propane and butane |
NPNS |
|
= |
|
Normal purchases and normal sales |
NYMEX |
|
= |
|
New York Mercantile Exchange |
NYSE |
|
= |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
PLA |
|
= |
|
Pipeline loss allowance |
PNG |
|
= |
|
PAA Natural Gas Storage, L.P. |
SEC |
|
= |
|
Securities and Exchange Commission |
USD |
|
= |
|
United States dollar |
WTI |
|
= |
|
West Texas Intermediate |
WTS |
|
= |
|
West Texas Sour |
Basis of Consolidation and Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for interim reporting as set forth by the SEC. All adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that in the opinion of management were necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods have been reflected. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. As discussed further below, certain reclassifications have been made to information from previous years to conform to the current presentation. The condensed balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011 was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 should not be taken as indicative of results to be expected for the entire year.
Subsequent events have been evaluated through the financial statements issuance date and have been included in the following footnotes where applicable.
Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements
Limited Partner and General Partner Income Allocation
During 2011, we identified an error in the manner in which we allocate net income to our limited partners and general partner. Previously, we calculated net income available to limited partners based on the distribution paid during the period by first allocating the incentive distribution paid during the period to the general partner and then allocating the remaining net income based on ownership interests (98% limited partner and 2% general partner). We have revised our methodology for the calculation of this allocation to take into account the distributions attributable to the period, which include distributions paid in the subsequent period. This revision does not impact net income, net income attributable to Plains, net income per limited partner unit, total partners capital or cash flows. We have determined that the impact of this error is not material to the previously issued financial statements. We have presented these changes retrospectively in the condensed consolidated statement of operations, which resulted in the following changes (in millions):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
June 30, 2011 |
| ||||||||
|
|
As |
|
As |
|
As |
|
As |
| ||||
Net Income Attributable to Plains: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Limited Partners |
|
$ |
171 |
|
$ |
170 |
|
$ |
305 |
|
$ |
299 |
|
General Partner |
|
54 |
|
55 |
|
103 |
|
109 |
| ||||
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
$ |
225 |
|
$ |
408 |
|
$ |
408 |
|
Note 2Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Other than as discussed below and in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, no new accounting pronouncements have become effective during the six months ended June 30, 2012 that are of significance or potential significance to us.
In September 2011, the FASB issued guidance with the purpose of simplifying the goodwill impairment test by permitting entities to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. If qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, an entity need not perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. This guidance became effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2012. Our adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2011, the FASB issued guidance regarding the presentation of other comprehensive income, which was later amended in December 2011, with the purpose of increasing the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements. This guidance, as amended, requires entities to present comprehensive income in either (i) a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or (ii) two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance became effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted the guidance, as amended, on January 1, 2012. Since this guidance only impacts the presentation of comprehensive income and does not change the composition or calculation of such financial information, adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance to amend certain fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in an effort to improve consistency with international reporting standards. The amendments generally clarify that the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise in fair value measurement are relevant only when measuring the fair value of non-financial assets and are not relevant when measuring the fair value of financial assets or of liabilities. In addition, the guidance expanded disclosure requirements associated with (i) unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements and (ii) items that are not measured at fair value in the financial statements, but for which fair value is required to be disclosed. This guidance became effective prospectively for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this guidance on January 1, 2012. Other than requiring additional disclosure, which is included in Note 7 and Note 11, our adoption did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
We review all outstanding accounts receivable balances on a monthly basis and record a reserve for amounts that we expect will not be fully recovered. We do not apply actual balances against the reserve until we have exhausted substantially all collection efforts. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, substantially all of our accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts) were less than 30 days past their scheduled invoice date. Our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable totaled approximately $5 million at both June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Although we consider our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable to be adequate, actual amounts could vary significantly from estimated amounts.
To mitigate credit risks related to our accounts receivable, we have in place a rigorous credit review process. We closely monitor market conditions in order to make a determination with respect to the amount, if any, of credit to be extended to any given customer and the form and amount of financial performance assurances we require. Such financial assurances are commonly provided to us in the form of standby letters of credit, parental guarantees or advance cash payments. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had received approximately $198 million and $186 million, respectively, of advance cash payments from third parties to mitigate credit risk. In addition, we enter into netting arrangements (contractual agreements that allow us and the counterparty to offset receivables and payables against each other) that cover a significant portion of our transactions and also serve to mitigate credit risk.
The following acquisitions were accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and the determination of the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired has been estimated in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.
BP NGL Acquisition
On April 1, 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of BP Canada Energy Company (BPCEC), a wholly owned subsidiary of BP Corporation North America Inc. (BP North America) from Amoco Canada International Holdings B.V. (the Seller). Total consideration for this acquisition (referred to herein as the BP NGL Acquisition), which was based on an October 1, 2011 effective date, was approximately $1.68 billion in cash, including $17 million of imputed interest, subject to working capital and other adjustments.
Upon completion of this acquisition, we became the indirect owner of all of BP North Americas Canadian-based NGL business and certain of BP North Americas NGL assets located in the upper-Midwest United States (collectively the BP NGL Assets). The BP NGL Assets acquired include varying ownership interests and contractual rights relating to approximately 2,600 miles of NGL pipelines; approximately 20 million barrels of NGL storage capacity; seven fractionation plants with an aggregate net capacity of approximately 232,000 barrels per day; four straddle plants and two field gas processing plants with an aggregate net capacity of approximately six Bcf per day; and long-term and seasonal NGL inventories of approximately 8 million barrels upon closing. Certain of these pipelines and storage assets are currently inactive. The acquired business also includes various third-party supply contracts at other field gas processing plants and a supply contract relating to a third-party owned straddle plant with throughput capacity of 2.5 Bcf per day, shipping arrangements on third-party NGL pipelines and long-term leases on 720 rail cars used to move product among various locations. We have also entered into an Integrated Supply and Trading Agreement, pursuant to which an affiliate of BP North America will, for a period of two years following the closing of the acquisition, continue to provide sourcing services for gas supply to feed certain of the straddle plants acquired as a result of the acquisition.
The preliminary determination of the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
Average |
| |
|
|
|
|
Depreciable |
| |
Description |
|
Amount |
|
Life (in years) |
| |
Working capital |
|
$ |
253 |
|
N/A |
|
Property and equipment |
|
1,067 |
|
5 - 70 |
| |
Linefill |
|
84 |
|
N/A |
| |
Long-term inventory |
|
166 |
|
N/A |
| |
Intangible assets (contract) |
|
132 |
|
14 |
| |
Goodwill |
|
244 |
|
N/A |
| |
Deferred tax liability |
|
(244 |
) |
N/A |
| |
Environmental liability |
|
(14 |
) |
N/A |
| |
Other long-term liabilities |
|
(5 |
) |
N/A |
| |
Total |
|
$ |
1,683 |
|
|
|
The determination of the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired is preliminary pending completion of internal valuation procedures and resolution of working capital and other adjustments. We expect to finalize our fair value determination during 2012. The purchase price was equal to the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, excluding the resulting deferred tax liability and goodwill. The deferred tax liability is determined by the difference between the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities and the tax basis for those assets and liabilities. The resulting liability gives rise to an equal and offsetting goodwill balance for this transaction.
The preliminary determination of fair value to intangible assets above is comprised of a contract with a 14 year life. Amortization of the contract under the declining balance method of amortization for the five full or partial calendar years following the acquisition date is estimated as follows:
2012 (1) |
|
$ |
39 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
30 |
|
2014 |
|
$ |
10 |
|
2015 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
2016 |
|
$ |
7 |
|
2017 |
|
$ |
6 |
|
(1) Estimated amortization is for the period of April 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.
The following table reflects the preliminary determination of total assets and total net assets by segment as a result of the BP NGL Acquisition (in millions):
|
|
Total |
|
Total |
| ||
|
|
Assets |
|
Net Assets |
| ||
Transportation |
|
$ |
558 |
|
$ |
398 |
|
Facilities |
|
1,067 |
|
787 |
| ||
Supply and Logistics |
|
845 |
|
498 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
2,470 |
|
$ |
1,683 |
|
The BP NGL Acquisition was pre-funded through various means, including the issuance of common units and senior notes in March 2012 for net proceeds of approximately $1.69 billion. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we incurred approximately $13 million of acquisition-related costs associated with the BP NGL Acquisition. Such costs are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Pro Forma Results
Disclosure of the revenues and earnings from the BP NGL Acquisition in our results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 is not practicable as it is not being operated as a standalone subsidiary. Selected unaudited pro forma results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, assuming the BP NGL Acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2011, are presented below (in millions, except per unit amounts):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Total revenues |
|
$ |
9,786 |
|
$ |
9,937 |
|
$ |
19,828 |
|
$ |
18,541 |
|
Net income attributable to Plains |
|
$ |
378 |
|
$ |
239 |
|
$ |
600 |
|
$ |
498 |
|
Limited partner interest in net income attributable to Plains |
|
$ |
303 |
|
$ |
186 |
|
$ |
460 |
|
$ |
394 |
|
Net income per limited partner unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
|
$ |
1.86 |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
$ |
2.83 |
|
$ |
2.60 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
$ |
2.81 |
|
$ |
2.58 |
|
Other Acquisitions
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we completed three additional acquisitions for an aggregate consideration of approximately $22 million. The assets acquired primarily included trailers that are utilized in our transportation segment and terminal facilities included in our facilities segment. We recognized goodwill of approximately $10 million related to these acquisitions.
Note 5Inventory, Linefill, Base Gas and Long-term Inventory
Inventory, linefill, base gas and long-term inventory consisted of the following (barrels in thousands, natural gas volumes in thousands of Mcf and total value in millions):
|
|
June 30, 2012 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Unit of |
|
Total |
|
Price/ |
|
|
|
Unit of |
|
Total |
|
Price/ |
| ||||
|
|
Volumes |
|
Measure |
|
Value |
|
Unit (1) |
|
Volumes |
|
Measure |
|
Value |
|
Unit (1) |
| ||||
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Crude oil |
|
7,786 |
|
barrels |
|
$ |
636 |
|
$ |
81.69 |
|
5,361 |
|
barrels |
|
$ |
483 |
|
$ |
90.10 |
|
NGL |
|
11,202 |
|
barrels |
|
469 |
|
$ |
41.87 |
|
6,885 |
|
barrels |
|
438 |
|
$ |
63.62 |
| ||
Natural gas (2) |
|
23,530 |
|
Mcf |
|
54 |
|
$ |
2.29 |
|
16,170 |
|
Mcf |
|
51 |
|
$ |
3.15 |
| ||
Other |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
13 |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
6 |
|
N/A |
| ||||
Inventory subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Linefill and base gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Crude oil |
|
9,278 |
|
barrels |
|
517 |
|
$ |
55.72 |
|
9,366 |
|
barrels |
|
514 |
|
$ |
54.88 |
| ||
Natural gas (2) |
|
14,105 |
|
Mcf |
|
49 |
|
$ |
3.47 |
|
14,105 |
|
Mcf |
|
48 |
|
$ |
3.40 |
| ||
NGL |
|
1,685 |
|
barrels |
|
79 |
|
$ |
46.88 |
|
31 |
|
barrels |
|
2 |
|
$ |
64.52 |
| ||
Linefill and base gas subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Long-term inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Crude oil |
|
1,914 |
|
barrels |
|
143 |
|
$ |
74.71 |
|
1,714 |
|
barrels |
|
127 |
|
$ |
74.10 |
| ||
NGL |
|
3,620 |
|
barrels |
|
148 |
|
$ |
40.88 |
|
150 |
|
barrels |
|
8 |
|
$ |
53.33 |
| ||
Long-term inventory subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,677 |
|
|
|
(1) Price per unit of measure represents a weighted average associated with various grades, qualities and locations. Accordingly, these prices may not coincide with any published benchmarks for such products.
(2) The volumetric ratio of Mcf of natural gas to crude Btu equivalent is 6:1; thus, natural gas volumes can be approximately converted to barrels by dividing by 6.
At the end of each reporting period we assess the carrying value of our inventory and make any adjustments necessary to reduce the carrying value to the applicable net realizable value. During the second quarter of 2012, we recorded a non-cash charge of approximately $121 million related to the writedown of our crude oil and NGL inventory due to declines in prices during the period. The recognition of this adjustment, which is a component of Purchases and related costs in our accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations, was substantially offset by the recognition of unrealized gains on derivative instruments being utilized to hedge the future sales of our crude oil and NGL inventory. Substantially all of such unrealized gains were recorded to Supply and Logistics segment revenues on our condensed consolidated statement of operations. See Note 11 for discussion of our derivative and risk management activities.
The table below reflects our changes in goodwill for the period indicated (in millions):
|
|
Transportation |
|
Facilities |
|
Supply and Logistics |
|
Total (1) |
| ||||
Balance, December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
818 |
|
$ |
609 |
|
$ |
427 |
|
$ |
1,854 |
|
2012 Goodwill Related Activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
BP NGL Acquisition (2) |
|
75 |
|
139 |
|
30 |
|
244 |
| ||||
Other acquisitions (2) |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
| ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
(2 |
) |
(4 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) | ||||
Purchase price accounting adjustments and other (2) |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
| ||||
Balance, June 30, 2012 |
|
$ |
911 |
|
$ |
744 |
|
$ |
457 |
|
$ |
2,112 |
|
(1) As of June 30, 2012, the total carrying amount of goodwill is net of approximately $3 million of accumulated impairment losses.
(2) Goodwill is recorded at the acquisition date based on a preliminary fair value determination. This preliminary goodwill balance may be adjusted when the fair value determination is finalized.
We completed our annual goodwill impairment test as of June 30 and determined that there was no impairment of goodwill.
Debt consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
SHORT-TERM DEBT |
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Facilities (1) : |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior secured hedged inventory facility bearing a weighted-average interest rate of 1.3% and 1.5% at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively |
|
$214 |
|
$75 |
|
PAA senior unsecured revolving credit facility, bearing a weighted-average interest rate of 1.9% and 1.6% at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively (2) |
|
200 |
|
32 |
|
PNG senior unsecured revolving credit facility, bearing a weighted-average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
of 2.1% at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (3) |
|
80 |
|
68 |
|
4.25% senior notes due September 2012 (4) |
|
500 |
|
500 |
|
Other |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
Total short-term debt |
|
997 |
|
679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
5.63% senior notes due December 2013 |
|
250 |
|
250 |
|
5.25% senior notes due June 2015 |
|
150 |
|
150 |
|
3.95% senior notes due September 2015 |
|
400 |
|
400 |
|
5.88% senior notes due August 2016 |
|
175 |
|
175 |
|
6.13% senior notes due January 2017 |
|
400 |
|
400 |
|
6.50% senior notes due May 2018 |
|
600 |
|
600 |
|
8.75% senior notes due May 2019 |
|
350 |
|
350 |
|
5.75% senior notes due January 2020 |
|
500 |
|
500 |
|
5.00% senior notes due February 2021 |
|
600 |
|
600 |
|
3.65% senior notes due June 2022 (5) |
|
750 |
|
|
|
6.70% senior notes due May 2036 |
|
250 |
|
250 |
|
6.65% senior notes due January 2037 |
|
600 |
|
600 |
|
5.15% senior notes due June 2042 (5) |
|
500 |
|
|
|
Unamortized discounts |
|
(15 |
) |
(13 |
) |
Senior notes, net of unamortized discounts |
|
5,510 |
|
4,262 |
|
Credit Facilities and Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
PNG senior unsecured revolving credit facility, bearing a weighted-average interest rate of 2.1% at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (3) |
|
79 |
|
54 |
|
PNG GO Bond term loans, bearing a weighted-average interest rate of 1.5% at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 |
|
200 |
|
200 |
|
Other |
|
4 |
|
4 |
|
Total long-term debt |
|
5,793 |
|
4,520 |
|
Total debt (2) (3) (6) |
|
$6,790 |
|
$5,199 |
|
(1) During June 2012, we expanded and extended our senior secured hedged inventory facility and expanded PNGs credit facility. See Credit Facilities below for further discussion.
(2) We classify as short-term certain borrowings under our PAA senior unsecured revolving credit facility. These borrowings are primarily designated as working capital borrowings, must be repaid within one year and are primarily for hedged NGL and crude oil inventory and NYMEX and ICE margin deposits.
(3) PNG classifies as short-term debt any borrowings under the PNG senior unsecured revolving credit facility that have been designated as working capital borrowings and must be repaid within one year. Such borrowings are primarily related to a portion of PNGs hedged natural gas inventory.
(4) Our $500 million 4.25% senior notes will mature in September 2012. The proceeds from these notes are being used to supplement capital available from our hedged inventory facility, to fund working capital needs associated with base levels of waterborne cargos and for seasonal NGL inventory requirements. After these notes mature, we intend to use our credit facilities to finance hedged inventory. See Credit Facilities section below for discussion of our recent expansion of certain of our facilities. Concurrent with the issuance of these senior notes in July 2009, we entered into interest rate swaps. See Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of our interest rate swaps.
(5) In March 2012, we completed the issuance of $750 million, 3.65% senior notes due 2022 and $500 million, 5.15% senior notes due 2042. The senior notes were sold at 99.823% and 99.755% of face value, respectively. Interest payments are due on June 1 and December 1 each year, beginning on December 1, 2012. We used the net proceeds from these offerings to fund a portion of the consideration for the BP NGL Acquisition and for general partnership purposes. See Note 4 for more information regarding this acquisition.
(6) Our fixed-rate senior notes had a face value of approximately $6.0 billion and $4.8 billion as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. We estimated the aggregate fair value of these notes as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 to be approximately $6.8 billion and $5.4 billion, respectively. Our fixed-rate senior notes are traded among institutions, and these trades are routinely published by a reporting service. Our determination of fair value is based on reported trading activity near quarter end. We estimate that the carrying value of outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities approximates fair value as interest rates reflect current market rates. The fair value estimates for both our senior notes and credit facilities are based upon observable market data and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Credit Facilities
Senior unsecured 364-day revolving credit agreement. In December 2011, we entered into a 364-day credit facility agreement with a borrowing capacity of $1.2 billion. Pursuant to its terms, we had the option to activate the facility at any time over a six-month period. In March 2012, we elected to terminate this credit agreement.
Senior secured hedged inventory facility. In June 2012, we amended our senior secured hedged inventory facility which, among other things, increased the committed borrowing capacity from $850 million to $1.4 billion, of which $400 million (an increase from $250 million under the original facility) is available for the issuance of letters of credit. Subject to obtaining additional or increased lender commitments, the committed amount of the facility may be increased to $1.9 billion. The amendment also extended the maturity date of the facility by one year to August 2014 and provides for one or more one-year extensions, subject to applicable approval.
PNG senior unsecured credit agreement. In June 2012, PNG partially exercised the accordion feature of its original senior unsecured credit agreement and increased from $250 million to $350 million the aggregate amount of revolving credit facility commitments. Also in June 2012, PNG amended this credit agreement which, among other things, provides for the further increase of the committed amount to $550 million, subject to obtaining additional or increased lender commitments. The amendment also provides for one or more one-year extensions of the revolving credit facility maturity date of August 2016 and the GO Bond mandatory put date, as defined in such amendment, in each case subject to lender approvals.
Letters of Credit
In connection with our crude oil supply and logistics activities, we provide certain suppliers with irrevocable standby letters of credit to secure our obligation for the purchase of crude oil. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $34 million and $33 million, respectively.
Note 8Net Income Per Limited Partner Unit
Basic and diluted net income per limited partner unit is determined pursuant to the two-class method for Master Limited Partnerships as prescribed in the FASB guidance. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings to our general partner, common unit holders and participating securities according to distributions pertaining to the current periods net income and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under this method, all earnings are allocated to our general partner, common unit holders and participating securities based on their respective rights to receive distributions, regardless of whether those earnings would actually be distributed during a particular period from an economic or practical perspective.
The Partnership calculates basic and diluted net income per limited partner unit by dividing net income attributable to Plains, after deducting the amount allocated to the general partners interest, incentive distribution rights (IDRs) and participating securities, by the basic and diluted weighted-average number of limited partner units outstanding during the period. Participating securities include LTIP awards that have vested distribution equivalent rights (DERs), which entitle the grantee to a cash payment equal to the cash distribution paid on our outstanding common units.
Diluted net income per limited partner unit is computed based on the weighted average number of units plus the effect of dilutive potential units outstanding during the period using the two-class method. Our LTIP awards that contemplate the issuance of common units are considered dilutive unless (i) vesting occurs only upon the satisfaction of a performance condition and (ii) that performance condition has yet to be satisfied. LTIP awards that are deemed to be dilutive are reduced by a hypothetical unit repurchase based on the remaining unamortized fair value, as prescribed by the treasury stock method in guidance issued by the FASB. See Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion of our LTIP awards including specific discussion regarding DERs.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (amounts in millions, except per unit data):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Basic Net Income per Limited Partner Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income attributable to Plains |
|
$ |
378 |
|
$ |
225 |
|
$ |
609 |
|
$ |
408 |
|
Less: General partners incentive distribution (1) |
|
(69 |
) |
(52 |
) |
(134 |
) |
(103 |
) | ||||
Less: General partner 2% ownership (1) |
|
(6 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(6 |
) | ||||
Net income available to limited partners |
|
303 |
|
170 |
|
465 |
|
299 |
| ||||
Less: Undistributed earnings allocated and distributions to participating securities (1) |
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
| ||||
Net income available to limited partners in accordance with application of the two-class method for MLPs |
|
$ |
301 |
|
$ |
170 |
|
$ |
462 |
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding |
|
162 |
|
149 |
|
159 |
|
146 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic net income per limited partner unit |
|
$ |
1.86 |
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
$ |
2.90 |
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Diluted Net Income per Limited Partner Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income attributable to Plains |
|
$ |
378 |
|
$ |
225 |
|
$ |
609 |
|
$ |
408 |
|
Less: General partners incentive distribution (1) |
|
(69 |
) |
(52 |
) |
(134 |
) |
(103 |
) | ||||
Less: General partner 2% ownership (1) |
|
(6 |
) |
(3 |
) |
(10 |
) |
(6 |
) | ||||
Net income available to limited partners |
|
303 |
|
170 |
|
465 |
|
299 |
| ||||
Less: Undistributed earnings allocated and distributions to participating securities (1) |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
| ||||
Net income available to limited partners in accordance with application of the two-class method for MLPs |
|
$ |
302 |
|
$ |
170 |
|
$ |
463 |
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding |
|
162 |
|
149 |
|
159 |
|
146 |
| ||||
Effect of dilutive securities: Weighted average LTIP units |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
| ||||
Diluted weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding |
|
163 |
|
150 |
|
161 |
|
147 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Diluted net income per limited partner unit |
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
$ |
2.88 |
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
(1) We calculate net income available to limited partners based on the distributions pertaining to the current periods net income. After adjusting for the appropriate periods distributions, the remaining undistributed earnings or excess distributions over earnings, if any, are allocated to the general partner, limited partners and participating securities in accordance with the contractual terms of the partnership agreement and as further prescribed under the two-class method.
The terms of our Partnership Agreement limit the general partners incentive distribution to the amount of Available Cash, which as defined in the Partnership Agreement is net of reserves deemed appropriate. As such, IDRs are not allocated undistributed earnings or distributions in excess of earnings for EPU calculation purposes. If, however, undistributed earnings were allocated to our IDRs beyond amounts distributable to them under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, both basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit would decrease by $0.38 per unit for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and by $0.37 per unit for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Similarly, both basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit would decrease by $0.08 per unit for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and by $0.02 per unit for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Note 9Partners Capital and Distributions
PAA Distributions
The following table details the distributions paid during or pertaining to the first half of 2012, net of reductions to the general partners incentive distributions (in millions, except per unit amounts):
|
|
|
|
Distributions Paid |
|
Distributions |
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
General Partner |
|
|
|
per limited |
| |||||||
Date Declared |
|
Date Paid or To Be Paid |
|
Units |
|
Incentive |
|
2% |
|
Total |
|
partner unit |
| |||||
July 9, 2012 |
|
August 14, 2012 (1) |
|
$ |
174 |
|
$ |
69 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
247 |
|
$ |
1.0650 |
|
April 10, 2012 |
|
May 15, 2012 |
|
$ |
169 |
|
$ |
65 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
237 |
|
$ |
1.0450 |
|
January 10, 2012 |
|
February 14, 2012 |
|
$ |
159 |
|
$ |
63 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
$ |
225 |
|
$ |
1.0250 |
|
(1) Payable to unitholders of record at the close of business on August 3, 2012, for the period April 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012.
In order to enhance our distribution coverage ratio and liquidity following a significant acquisition, our general partner has, from time to time, agreed to reduce the amounts due to it as incentive distributions. In connection with the BP NGL Acquisition, our general partner agreed to reduce the amount of its incentive distributions by $3.75 million per quarter through February 2014 and $2.5 million per quarter thereafter. Through June 30, 2012, our general partners incentive distributions had been reduced by $3.75 million related to this acquisition. See Note 4 for further discussion of the BP NGL Acquisition.
PAA Equity Offerings
Continuous Offering Program. On May 9, 2012, we entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement (the Agreement) with a financial institution (Manager). Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, we may from time to time, through Manager, as our sales agent, offer and sell common units representing limited partner interests having an aggregate offering price of up to $300 million. Sales of such common units will be made by means of ordinary brokers transactions on the NYSE at market prices, in block transactions or as otherwise agreed upon by Manager and us. Under the terms of the Agreement, we may also sell common units to Manager as principal for its own account at a price to be agreed upon at the time of the sale. For any such sales, we will enter into a separate terms agreement with Manager.
Through June 30, 2012, we sold an aggregate of 1,434,790 common units under the Agreement, generating proceeds of approximately $114 million, net of approximately $2 million of commissions to Manager. A portion of these units were issued and the associated proceeds received during early July 2012. The net proceeds from sales, including our general partners proportionate capital contribution, were used for general partnership purposes.
Other Equity Offerings. During the first six months of 2012, we completed an equity offering of our common units that was not associated with our Continuous Offering Program, as shown in the table below (in millions, except unit and per unit data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Proceeds |
|
Partner |
|
|
|
Net |
| |||||
Date |
|
Units Issued |
|
Unit Price |
|
from Sale |
|
Contribution |
|
Costs |
|
Proceeds |
| |||||
March 2012 (1) |
|
5,750,000 |
|
$ |
80.03 |
|
$ |
460 |
|
$ |
9 |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
$ |
455 |
|
(1) This offering of common units was an underwritten transaction that required us to pay a gross spread. The net proceeds from this offering were used to fund a portion of the BP NGL Acquisition, to reduce outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities and for general partnership purposes.
LTIP Vesting
In connection with the settlement of vested LTIP awards, we issued 449,654 common units during the six months ended June 30, 2012, which resulted in an increase to partners capital of approximately $34 million.
Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries
As of June 30, 2012, noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries consisted of the following: (i) an approximate 36 % interest in PNG and (ii) a 25% interest in SLC Pipeline LLC.
Modification of Conversion of PNG Subordinated Units
In February 2012, PNG modified the terms of the first three tranches of the PNG Series B subordinated units held by PAA. The Series B subordinated units do not participate in quarterly distributions. Instead, the Series B subordinated units convert into Series A subordinated units in five distinct tranches upon the achievement of defined benchmarks tied to the amount of capacity in service at Pine Prairie and increases in PNGs quarterly distributions. Any Series B subordinated units that remain outstanding as of December 31, 2018 will automatically be cancelled. The February 2012 modification increased the quarterly distribution benchmark for Tranche 1, 2 and 3 from annualized levels of $1.44 per unit, $1.53 per unit and $1.63 per unit, respectively, to an annualized level of $1.71 per unit. The following table presents the operational and financial benchmarks, as modified, for conversion of the Series B subordinated units into Series A subordinated units for each tranche (units in millions):
|
|
Series B Subordinated Units to Convert into |
|
Working Gas Storage Capacity (Bcf) |
|
Annualized |
| |
Tranche 1 |
|
2.6 |
|
29.6 |
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
Tranche 2 |
|
2.8 |
|
35.6 |
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
Tranche 3 |
|
2.1 |
|
41.6 |
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
Tranche 4 |
|
3.0 |
|
48.0 |
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
Tranche 5 |
|
3.0 |
|
48.0 |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
(1) For satisfaction of this benchmark, PNG must, for two consecutive quarters, (i) generate distributable cash flow sufficient to pay a quarterly distribution of at least the annualized distribution benchmark on the weighted average number of common units and Series A subordinated units and all of such Series B subordinated units outstanding during such quarter plus (ii) distribute available cash of at least the annualized distribution benchmark on all outstanding common units and Series A subordinated units and the corresponding distributions on PNGs general partners 2% interest and the related distributions on the incentive distribution rights. See Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a complete discussion of our Series B subordinated units.
Noncontrolling Interests Rollforward
The following table reflects the changes in the noncontrolling interests in partners capital (in millions):
|
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
June 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
524 |
|
$ |
231 |
|
Sale of noncontrolling interests in a subsidiary |
|
|
|
306 |
| ||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
15 |
|
10 |
| ||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
|
(24 |
) |
(16 |
) | ||
Equity compensation expense |
|
1 |
|
2 |
| ||
Other comprehensive income/(loss): |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Reclassification adjustments |
|
(7 |
) |
|
| ||
Net deferred gain on cash flow hedges |
|
1 |
|
|
| ||
Ending balance |
|
$ |
510 |
|
$ |
533 |
|
Note 10Equity Compensation Plans
For a complete discussion of our equity compensation awards, see Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
PNG Long-term Incentive Plan Award Modification. In February 2012, the Board of Directors of PNGs general partner approved the modification of certain awards previously granted under the PNG Plan. As a result of the modification, approximately 232,500 equity-classified phantom unit awards will now vest in the following manner: (i) approximately 70,000 awards, with distribution equivalent rights also modified to begin payment in February 2012, will vest upon the date PNG pays an annualized distribution of at least $1.45, (ii) approximately 70,000 awards, with distribution equivalent rights also modified to begin payment in May 2013, will vest upon the date PNG pays an annualized distribution of at least $1.50 and (iii) the remainder, with distribution equivalent rights also modified to begin payment in May 2014, will vest upon the date PNG pays an annualized distribution of at least $1.55. Fifty percent of any awards that have not vested as of the November 2016 distribution date will vest at that time and the remainder will expire. Additionally, 232,500 of equity-classified phantom unit awards with vesting terms originally tied to the conversion of PNGs Series A and Series B subordinated units were modified such that all these awards will now fully vest upon conversion of the Series A subordinated units to common units. Distribution equivalent rights were also granted with respect to these awards to begin payment in February 2012. There was no financial impact at the time of the modification; however, we anticipate that we will recognize additional equity compensation expense in the future as a result of the modification.
Class B Units of Plains AAP, L.P. The following table contains a summary of Plains AAP, L.P. Class B Unit awards:
|
|
Reserved for Future |
|
Outstanding |
|
Outstanding Units |
|
Grant Date |
| |
Balance as of December 31, 2011 |
|
16,500 |
|
183,500 |
|
80,063 |
|
$ |
44 |
|
Forfeitures |
|
1,000 |
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Earned |
|
|
|
|
|
24,250 |
|
$ |
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2012 |
|
17,500 |
|
182,500 |
|
104,313 |
|
$ |
44 |
|
(1) Of the grant date fair value, approximately $5 million was recognized as expense during the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Other Equity Compensation Information. Our equity compensation activity for awards denominated in PAA and PNG units is summarized in the following table (units in millions):
|
|
PAA Units (1)(5) |
|
PNG Units (2)(3)(4)(6) |
| ||||||
|
|
Units |
|
Weighted Average Grant |
|
Units |
|
Weighted Average Grant |
| ||
Outstanding, December 31, 2011 |
|
4.0 |
|
$ |
43.53 |
|
0.8 |
|
$ |
20.55 |
|
Granted |
|
0.7 |
|
$ |
66.28 |
|
0.1 |
|
$ |
15.05 |
|
Vested |
|
(1.5 |
) |
$ |
39.30 |
|
|
|
$ |
23.67 |
|
Cancelled or forfeited |
|
(0.1 |
) |
$ |
59.32 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Outstanding, June 30, 2012 |
|
3.1 |
|
$ |
50.58 |
|
0.9 |
|
$ |
17.56 |
|
(1) Amounts do not include Class B units of Plains AAP, L.P.
(2) Amounts do not include Class B units of PNGS GP LLC.
(3) Amounts include PNG Transaction Grants.
(4) Weighted average grant date fair value per unit for PNG Units outstanding at June 30, 2012 is impacted by the modification of PNG awards during the first quarter of 2012 as discussed above.
(5) Approximately 0.4 million common units were issued, net of approximately 0.3 million units withheld for taxes, for PAA units that vested during the six months ended June 30, 2012. The remaining 0.8 million PAA units that vested were settled in cash.
(6) Less than 0.1 million common units vested during the six months ended June 30, 2012.
The table below summarizes the expense recognized and the value of vesting (settled both in units and cash) related to our equity compensation plans (in millions):
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
Equity compensation expense |
|
$ |
20 |
|
$ |
27 |
|
$ |
60 |
|
$ |
46 |
|
LTIP unit-settled vestings (1) |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
$ |
58 |
|
$ |
23 |
|
LTIP cash-settled vestings |
|
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
18 |
|
$ |
65 |
|
$ |
18 |
|
DER cash payments |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
(1) For each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, approximately $1 million relates to unit vestings that were settled with PNG units.
Note 11Derivatives and Risk Management Activities
We identify the risks that underlie our core business activities and use risk management strategies to mitigate those risks when we determine that there is value in doing so. Our policy is to use derivative instruments for risk management purposes and not for the purpose of speculating on hydrocarbon commodity (referred to herein as commodity) price changes. We use various derivative instruments to (i) manage our exposure to commodity price risk as well as to optimize our profits, (ii) manage our exposure to interest rate risk and (iii) manage our exposure to currency exchange rate risk. Our commodity risk management policies and procedures are designed to help ensure that our hedging activities address our risks by monitoring our derivative positions, as well as physical volumes, grades, locations, delivery schedules and storage capacity. Our interest rate and currency exchange rate risk management policies and procedures are designed to monitor our derivative positions and ensure that those positions are consistent with our objectives and approved strategies. Our policy is to formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk management objectives for undertaking the hedge. This process includes specific identification of the hedging instrument and the hedged transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged and how the hedging instruments effectiveness will be assessed. Both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, we assess whether the derivatives used in a transaction are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows or the fair value of hedged items.
Commodity Price Risk Hedging
Our core business activities contain certain commodity price-related risks that we manage in various ways, including the use of derivative instruments. Our policy is (i) to only purchase inventory for which we have a market, (ii) to structure our sales contracts so that price fluctuations do not materially affect our operating income and (iii) not to acquire and hold physical inventory or derivatives for the purpose of speculating on commodity price changes. The material commodity-related risks inherent in our business activities can be divided into the following general categories:
Commodity Purchases and Sales In the normal course of our operations, we purchase and sell commodities. We use derivatives to manage the associated risks and to optimize profits. As of June 30, 2012, net derivative positions related to these activities included:
· An approximate 245,700 barrels per day net long position (total of 7.6 million barrels) associated with our crude oil purchases, which was unwound ratably during July 2012 to match monthly average pricing.
· A net short spread position averaging approximately 26,200 barrels per day (total of 10.4 million barrels), which hedges a portion of our anticipated crude oil lease gathering purchases through September 2013. These derivatives are time spreads consisting of offsetting purchases and sales between two different months. Our use of these derivatives does not expose us to outright price risk.
· Approximately 8,300 barrels per day on average (total of 4.6 million barrels) of WTS/WTI crude oil basis swaps through December 2013, which hedge anticipated sales of crude oil (WTI). These derivatives are grade spreads between two different grades of crude oil. Our use of these derivatives does not expose us to outright price risk.
· Approximately 7,900 barrels per day on average (total of 1.2 million barrels) of LLS/WTI crude oil basis swaps from August 2012 through December 2012, which hedge anticipated sales of crude oil. These derivatives are grade
spreads between two different grades of crude oil. Our use of these derivatives does not expose us to outright price risk.
· An average of 2,400 barrels per day (total of 0.9 million barrels) of butane/WTI spread positions, which hedge specific butane sales contracts that are based on a percentage of WTI through June 2013.
· A short swap position of approximately 23.4 Bcf through December 2012 related to anticipated sales of natural gas.
Storage Capacity Utilization We own approximately 100 million barrels of crude oil, NGL and refined products storage capacity other than that used in our transportation operations. This storage may be leased to third parties or utilized in our own supply and logistics activities, including for the storage of inventory in a contango market. For capacity allocated to our supply and logistics operations, we have utilization risk if the market structure is backwardated. As of June 30, 2012, we used derivatives to manage the risk of not utilizing approximately 1.6 million barrels per month of storage capacity through 2013. These positions are a combination of calendar spread options and futures contracts. These positions involve no outright price exposure, but instead enable us to profitably use the capacity to store hedged crude oil.
Inventory Storage At times, we elect to purchase and store crude oil, NGL and refined products inventory in conjunction with our supply and logistics activities. When we purchase and store inventory, we enter into physical sales contracts or use derivatives to mitigate price risk associated with the inventory. As of June 30, 2012, we had derivatives totaling approximately 12.2 million barrels hedging our inventory. These positions are a combination of futures, swaps and option contracts.
Pipeline Loss Allowance Oil As is common in the pipeline transportation industry, our tariffs incorporate a loss allowance factor that is intended to, among other things, offset losses due to evaporation, measurement and other losses in transit. We utilize derivative instruments to hedge a portion of the anticipated sales of the allowance oil that is to be collected under our tariffs. As of June 30, 2012, our PLA hedges included (i) a net short position consisting of crude oil futures and swaps for an average of approximately 1,400 barrels per day (total of 1.8 million barrels) through December 2015, (ii) a long put option position of approximately 0.1 million barrels through December 2012 and (iii) a long call option position of approximately 0.9 million barrels through December 2015.
Natural Gas Processing/NGL Fractionation As part of our supply and logistics activities, we purchase natural gas for processing and NGL mix for fractionation, and we sell the resulting individual specification products (including ethane, propane, butane and condensate). In conjunction with these activities, we hedge the purchase of natural gas and the subsequent sale of the individual specification products. As of June 30, 2012, we had a long natural gas position of approximately 16.7 Bcf through October 2014, a short propane position of approximately 2.8 million barrels through October 2014, and a short butane and WTI position of approximately 0.8 and 0.3 million barrels, respectively, through December 2013.
Base Gas Management Our gas storage facilities require minimum levels of base gas to operate. For our natural gas storage facilities that are under construction, we anticipate purchasing base gas in future periods as construction is completed. We use derivatives to hedge such anticipated purchases of natural gas. As of June 30, 2012, we had a long swap position of approximately 4.1 Bcf through April 2016 related to anticipated base gas purchases.
All of our commodity derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting are designated as cash flow hedges. We have determined that substantially all of our physical purchase and sale agreements qualify for the NPNS exclusion. Physical commodity contracts that meet the definition of a derivative but are ineligible, or not designated, for the NPNS scope exception are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings.
Interest Rate Risk Hedging
We use interest rate derivatives to hedge interest rate risk associated with anticipated debt issuances and outstanding debt instruments. The derivative instruments we use to manage this risk consist primarily of interest rate swaps and treasury locks. As of June 30, 2012, AOCI includes deferred losses of approximately $160 million that relate to open and terminated interest rate derivatives that were designated for hedge accounting. The terminated interest rate derivatives were cash-settled in connection with the issuance or refinancing of debt agreements. The deferred gain related to these instruments is being amortized to interest expense over the terms of the hedged debt instruments.
We have entered into forward starting interest rate swaps to hedge the underlying benchmark interest rate related to forecasted debt issuances through 2015. The following table summarizes the terms of our forward starting interest rate swaps as of June 30, 2012 (notional amounts in millions):
Hedged Transaction |
|
Number and Types of |
|
Notional |
|
Expected |
|
Average Rate |
|
Accounting | |
Anticipated debt offering |
|
6 forward starting swaps (30-year) |
|
$ |
250 |
|
6/17/2013 |
|
4.24 |
% |
Cash flow hedge |
Anticipated debt offering |
|
5 forward starting swaps (30-year) |
|
$ |
125 |
|
6/16/2014 |
|
3.39 |
% |
Cash flow hedge |
Anticipated debt offering |
|
10 forward starting swaps (30-year) |
|
$ |
250 |
|
6/15/2015 |
|
3.60 |
% |
Cash flow hedge |
During June 2011 and August 2011, PNG entered into three interest rate swaps to fix the interest rate on a portion of PNGs outstanding debt. The swaps have an aggregate notional amount of $100 million with an average fixed rate of 0.95%. Two of these swaps terminate in June 2014 and the remaining swap terminates in August 2014. These swaps are designated as cash flow hedges.
Concurrent with our March 2012 senior note issuances, we terminated four ten-year forward starting interest rate swaps. These swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $200 million and an average fixed rate of 3.46%. We paid out cash of approximately $24 million associated with the termination of the swaps.
Concurrent with our January 2011 senior notes issuance, we terminated three forward starting interest rate swaps. These swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $100 million and an average fixed rate of 3.6%. We received cash proceeds of approximately $12 million associated with the termination of these swaps.
During July 2009, concurrent with our senior notes issuance, we entered into four interest rate swaps for which we receive fixed interest payments and pay floating-rate interest payments based on three-month LIBOR plus an average spread of 2.42% on a semi-annual basis. The swaps had an aggregate notional amount of $300 million with fixed rates of 4.25%. Two of the swaps terminated in September 2011, and two of the swaps will terminate in September 2012. The swaps that terminate in 2012 are designated as fair value hedges.
Currency Exchange Rate Risk Hedging
Because a significant portion of our Canadian business is conducted in CAD and, at times, a portion of our debt is denominated in CAD, we use foreign currency derivatives to minimize the risks of unfavorable changes in exchange rates. These instruments include foreign currency exchange contracts, forwards and options. As of June 30, 2012, AOCI includes net deferred gains of approximately $8 million that relate to open and settled foreign currency derivatives that were designated for hedge accounting. These foreign currency derivatives hedge the cash flow variability associated with CAD-denominated interest payments on CAD-denominated intercompany notes as a result of changes in the exchange rate.
As of June 30, 2012, our outstanding foreign currency derivatives also include derivatives we use to hedge USD-denominated commodity purchases and sales in Canada. In addition, we may from time to time hedge the commodity price risk associated with a CAD-denominated commodity transaction with a USD-denominated commodity derivative. In conjunction with entering into the commodity derivative, we may enter into a foreign currency derivative to hedge the resulting foreign currency risk. These foreign currency derivatives are generally short-term in nature.
The following table summarizes our open forward exchange contracts that exchange CAD for USD on a net basis (in millions):
|
|
CAD |
|
USD |
|
Average Exchange Rate |
| ||
2012 |
|
$ |
64 |
|
$ |
64 |
|
CAD $1.01 to USD $1.00 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
41 |
|
$ |
40 |
|
CAD $1.02 to USD $1.00 |
|
Summary of Financial Impact
For derivatives that qualify as a cash flow hedge, changes in fair value of the effective portion of the hedges are deferred in AOCI and recognized in earnings in the periods during which the underlying physical transactions impact earnings. For our interest rate swaps that qualify as a fair value hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative and changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged item, attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized in earnings each period. Derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting and the portion of cash flow hedges that are not highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items are recognized in earnings each period. Cash settlements associated with our derivative activities are reflected as operating cash flows in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
A summary of the impact of our derivative activities recognized in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows (in millions):
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Derivatives in |
|
Not |
|
|
|
Derivatives in |
|
Not |
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Hedging |
|
Designated |
|
|
|
Hedging |
|
Designated |
|
|
| ||||||
Location of gain/(loss) |
|
Relationships (1)(2)(3) |
|
as a Hedge (4) |
|
Total |
|
Relationships (1)(2) |
|
as a Hedge (4) |
|
Total |
| ||||||
Commodity Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|