UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
Or
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 001-32609
Rockwood Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
52-2277366 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
100 Overlook Center, Princeton, New Jersey 08540
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(609) 514-0300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of May 4, 2011, there were 76,406,798 outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM 10-Q
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited).
ROCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts;
shares in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended |
| ||||
|
|
March 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Net sales |
|
$ |
914.0 |
|
$ |
778.4 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
592.9 |
|
522.5 |
| ||
Gross profit |
|
321.1 |
|
255.9 |
| ||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
180.6 |
|
164.9 |
| ||
Restructuring and other severance costs |
|
1.0 |
|
0.4 |
| ||
Asset write-downs and other |
|
0.1 |
|
1.8 |
| ||
Operating income |
|
139.4 |
|
88.8 |
| ||
Other expenses, net: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest expense, net (a) |
|
(23.0 |
) |
(41.8 |
) | ||
Loss on early extinguishment/modification of debt |
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
| ||
Foreign exchange gain on financing activities, net |
|
2.0 |
|
0.3 |
| ||
Other, net |
|
|
|
0.5 |
| ||
Other expenses, net |
|
(37.2 |
) |
(41.0 |
) | ||
Income from continuing operations before taxes |
|
102.2 |
|
47.8 |
| ||
Income tax provision |
|
28.8 |
|
15.7 |
| ||
Income from continuing operations |
|
73.4 |
|
32.1 |
| ||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
0.2 |
|
4.6 |
| ||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
114.5 |
|
|
| ||
Net income |
|
188.1 |
|
36.7 |
| ||
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
(10.1 |
) |
0.2 |
| ||
Net income attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc. |
|
$ |
178.0 |
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Amounts attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
63.3 |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
114.7 |
|
4.6 |
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
178.0 |
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic earnings per share attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
1.51 |
|
0.07 |
| ||
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
2.34 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
1.44 |
|
0.06 |
| ||
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Weighted average number of basic shares outstanding |
|
76,136 |
|
74,297 |
| ||
Weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding |
|
79,508 |
|
77,058 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
(a) Interest expense, net includes: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest expense on debt, net |
|
$ |
(28.0 |
) |
$ |
(42.3 |
) |
Mark-to-market gains on interest rate swaps |
|
6.3 |
|
2.1 |
| ||
Deferred financing costs |
|
(1.3 |
) |
(1.6 |
) | ||
Total |
|
$ |
(23.0 |
) |
$ |
(41.8 |
) |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
ROCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts;
shares in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
199.1 |
|
$ |
324.1 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
540.4 |
|
436.8 |
| ||
Inventories |
|
576.8 |
|
541.8 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
22.5 |
|
82.6 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
67.3 |
|
79.2 |
| ||
Assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
154.1 |
| ||
Total current assets |
|
1,406.1 |
|
1,618.6 |
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
1,622.4 |
|
1,566.9 |
| ||
Goodwill |
|
927.5 |
|
877.1 |
| ||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
594.1 |
|
587.6 |
| ||
Deferred debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $16.2 and $15.7, respectively |
|
18.8 |
|
17.2 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
18.6 |
|
18.4 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
45.0 |
|
38.5 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,632.5 |
|
$ |
4,724.3 |
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
237.1 |
|
$ |
249.6 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
38.8 |
|
20.2 |
| ||
Accrued compensation |
|
152.9 |
|
165.2 |
| ||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
163.9 |
|
164.9 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
2.7 |
|
2.6 |
| ||
Long-term debt, current portion |
|
60.2 |
|
465.7 |
| ||
Liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
27.6 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
655.6 |
|
1,095.8 |
| ||
Long-term debt |
|
1,728.0 |
|
1,695.3 |
| ||
Pension and related liabilities |
|
423.1 |
|
399.6 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
99.9 |
|
77.9 |
| ||
Other liabilities |
|
110.7 |
|
104.3 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
3,017.3 |
|
3,372.9 |
| ||
Restricted stock units |
|
8.0 |
|
10.1 |
| ||
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Rockwood Holdings, Inc. stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 400,000 shares authorized, 76,437 shares issued and 76,343 shares outstanding at March 31, 2011; 400,000 shares authorized, 75,991 shares issued and 75,897 shares outstanding at December 31, 2010) |
|
0.8 |
|
0.8 |
| ||
Paid-in capital |
|
1,213.7 |
|
1,202.6 |
| ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
191.5 |
|
132.7 |
| ||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(104.8 |
) |
(282.8 |
) | ||
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
(1.4 |
) |
(1.4 |
) | ||
Total Rockwood Holdings, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
1,299.8 |
|
1,051.9 |
| ||
Noncontrolling interest |
|
307.4 |
|
289.4 |
| ||
Total equity |
|
1,607.2 |
|
1,341.3 |
| ||
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
4,632.5 |
|
$ |
4,724.3 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
ROCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended |
| ||||
|
|
March 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
188.1 |
|
$ |
36.7 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
(0.2 |
) |
(4.6 |
) | ||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
(114.5 |
) |
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
65.4 |
|
65.2 |
| ||
Deferred financing costs amortization |
|
1.3 |
|
1.6 |
| ||
Loss on early extinguishment/modification of debt |
|
16.2 |
|
|
| ||
Foreign exchange gain on financing activities, net |
|
(2.0 |
) |
(0.3 |
) | ||
Fair value adjustment of derivatives |
|
(6.3 |
) |
(2.1 |
) | ||
Bad debt provision |
|
0.2 |
|
(0.5 |
) | ||
Stock-based compensation |
|
2.9 |
|
2.6 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
5.7 |
|
4.3 |
| ||
Asset write-downs and other |
|
0.1 |
|
1.8 |
| ||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the effect of foreign currency translation and acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable |
|
(84.4 |
) |
(55.9 |
) | ||
Inventories |
|
(14.5 |
) |
(10.2 |
) | ||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
11.9 |
|
(1.6 |
) | ||
Accounts payable |
|
(7.4 |
) |
(14.3 |
) | ||
Income taxes payable |
|
17.1 |
|
2.7 |
| ||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
(29.9 |
) |
37.6 |
| ||
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
|
49.7 |
|
63.0 |
| ||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
(1.8 |
) |
1.7 |
| ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
47.9 |
|
64.7 |
| ||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisitions, including transaction fees and payments for prior acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) | ||
Capital expenditures |
|
(54.2 |
) |
(34.3 |
) | ||
Proceeds on sale of assets |
|
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
| ||
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations |
|
(54.0 |
) |
(35.4 |
) | ||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of discontinued operations, representing net sale proceeds in 2011 |
|
305.7 |
|
(0.9 |
) | ||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
251.7 |
|
(36.3 |
) | ||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Issuance of common stock, net of fees |
|
6.4 |
|
4.4 |
| ||
Repayment of Titanium Dioxide Pigments revolving credit facility |
|
|
|
(14.3 |
) | ||
Prepayment of senior secured debt |
|
(408.9 |
) |
|
| ||
Repayment of senior secured debt |
|
(7.0 |
) |
(12.9 |
) | ||
Payments on other long-term debt |
|
(0.6 |
) |
(1.1 |
) | ||
Loan repayment to Viance noncontrolling shareholder |
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
| ||
Deferred financing costs |
|
(5.3 |
) |
(0.3 |
) | ||
Fees related to early extinguishment/modification of debt |
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
| ||
Distribution to noncontrolling shareholder |
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
| ||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(430.0 |
) |
(24.2 |
) | ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
(11.2 |
) |
4.9 |
| ||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(141.6 |
) |
9.1 |
| ||
Less net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents from discontinued operations |
|
(16.6 |
) |
0.8 |
| ||
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations |
|
(125.0 |
) |
8.3 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations, beginning of period |
|
324.1 |
|
286.2 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations, end of period |
|
$ |
199.1 |
|
$ |
294.5 |
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest paid |
|
$ |
28.5 |
|
$ |
31.8 |
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
|
5.9 |
|
8.6 |
| ||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Acquisition of capital equipment |
|
14.6 |
|
8.2 |
| ||
Fees related to early extinguishment/modification of debt |
|
1.0 |
|
|
| ||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
ROCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Dollars in millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
Rockwood |
|
|
|
|
|
Rockwood |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Stockholders |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total |
|
Stockholders |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total |
| ||||||
|
|
Equity |
|
Interest |
|
Equity |
|
Equity |
|
Interest |
|
Equity |
| ||||||
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
1,051.9 |
|
$ |
289.4 |
|
$ |
1,341.3 |
|
$ |
850.8 |
|
$ |
290.0 |
|
$ |
1,140.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
178.0 |
|
10.1 |
|
188.1 |
|
36.9 |
|
(0.2 |
) |
36.7 |
| ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
58.8 |
|
0.6 |
|
59.4 |
|
(64.8 |
) |
|
|
(64.8 |
) | ||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
236.8 |
|
10.7 |
|
247.5 |
|
(27.9 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
(28.1 |
) | ||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling shareholder |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
(7.2 |
) | ||||||
Issuance of common stock |
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
| ||||||
Deferred compensation, net of tax |
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
| ||||||
Balance at March 31 |
|
$ |
1,299.8 |
|
$ |
307.4 |
|
$ |
1,607.2 |
|
$ |
828.7 |
|
$ |
282.6 |
|
$ |
1,111.3 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
ROCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Business Description, Background Rockwood Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries is a global developer, manufacturer and marketer of high value-added specialty chemicals and advanced materials used for industrial and commercial purposes. Unless otherwise indicated, any references to we, our, us, the Company or Rockwood refer to Rockwood Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Basis of Presentation The accompanying condensed financial statements of Rockwood are presented on a consolidated basis. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full year. The condensed consolidated financial statements are presented based upon accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), except that certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, have been condensed or omitted. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto contained in the Companys 2010 Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, this information contains all adjustments necessary, consisting of normal and recurring accruals, for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented.
The Companys noncontrolling interest represents the total of the noncontrolling partys interest in certain investments (principally the Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture and the Viance, LLC timber treatment joint venture) that are consolidated but less than 100% owned.
The Companys condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to reflect discontinued operations for all periods presented as a result of the sale of the plastic compounding business in January 2011. See Note 3, Discontinued Operations, for further details.
Unless otherwise noted, all balance sheet-related items which are denominated in Euros are translated at the March 31, 2011 exchange rate of 1.00 = $1.4158.
Stock-Based Compensation Under the 2008 Amended and Restated Stock Purchase and Option Plan of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Plan) the Company granted stock options, restricted stock and other stock-based awards to the Companys employees and directors and allowed employees and directors to purchase shares of its common stock. However, the Company no longer issues equity awards under this Plan. In April 2009, the Company adopted the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the New Plan; together with the Plan, the Plans), which has 11,000,000 authorized shares. All equity awards granted after this date will be awarded under the New Plan.
The aggregate compensation cost for stock options, restricted stock units and Board of Director stock grants recorded under the Plans caused income from continuing operations before taxes to decrease by $2.9 million and $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The total tax benefit recognized related to stock options was $0.2 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
In December 2010, the Company approved 263,055 market-based restricted stock unit awards to its management and key employees which will vest on January 1, 2014 as long as the employee continues to be employed by the Company on this date and upon the achievement of certain performance targets approved by the Compensation Committee. In January 2011, the performance targets that formed the basis for vesting of these restricted stock units were set. As a result, the Company recognized compensation cost beginning in January 2011. A portion of the share units vest based on the percentage change in the price of the Companys common stock over the award period January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013. The remaining portion vest based upon the Companys total shareholder return as compared to the total shareholder return for the Dow Jones U.S. Chemical Index for the period January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013.
All restricted stock units contain a provision in which the units shall immediately vest and become converted into the right to receive a cash payment on the vesting date upon a change in control as defined in such agreement. As the provisions for redemption are outside the control of the Company, the fair value of these units as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 have been recorded as mezzanine equity (outside of permanent equity) in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Recent Accounting StandardsThe following represents the impact of recently issued accounting standards:
In October 2009, the FASB issued an accounting update that addressed the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable
vendors to account for products or services separately rather than as a combined unit. In addition, the amendments in this update significantly expand the disclosures related to a vendors multiple-deliverable arrangements. This update is effective for the Company in its first quarter beginning January 1, 2011. This update did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
2. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
Comprehensive income includes net income and the other comprehensive income components which include unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translation and from certain intercompany transactions that are of a long-term investment nature, pension-related adjustments that are recorded directly into a separate section of equity in the balance sheets and net investment and foreign exchange cash flow hedges. Foreign currency translation amounts and intercompany foreign currency loans are not adjusted for income taxes since they relate to indefinite length investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries.
Comprehensive income (loss) is summarized as follows:
|
|
Three months ended |
| ||||
|
|
March 31, |
| ||||
($ in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
188.1 |
|
$ |
36.7 |
|
Pension related adjustments, net of tax |
|
(1.7 |
) |
2.0 |
| ||
Foreign currency translation (a) |
|
23.5 |
|
(28.3 |
) | ||
Intercompany foreign currency loans |
|
45.2 |
|
(46.9 |
) | ||
Net investment hedges, net of tax |
|
(9.9 |
) |
8.4 |
| ||
Foreign exchange contracts, net of tax |
|
2.3 |
|
|
| ||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
247.5 |
|
(28.1 |
) | ||
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
(10.7 |
) |
0.2 |
| ||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc. |
|
$ |
236.8 |
|
$ |
(27.9 |
) |
(a) Includes $10.1 million reclassified to net income in the three months ended March 31, 2011 related to the sale of the plastic compounding business in January 2011.
3. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
On January 7, 2011, the Company completed the sale of its plastic compounding business. As of December 31, 2010, this business met the criteria for being reported as a discontinued operation. The plastic compounding business, which manufactured specialty plastic compounds for the wire and cable industry, medical applications and other uses, comprised substantially all of the assets of the Companys former Specialty Compounds segment. The Companys financial statements have been reclassified to reflect the plastic compounding business as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Operating results of the discontinued operations of the plastic compounding business for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
March 31, |
| ||||
($ in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Net sales |
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
$ |
55.5 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
3.4 |
|
44.7 |
| ||
Gross profit |
|
0.5 |
|
10.8 |
| ||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
0.3 |
|
4.4 |
| ||
Gain on sale of business |
|
(197.2 |
) |
|
| ||
Income before taxes |
|
197.4 |
|
6.4 |
| ||
Income tax provision |
|
82.7 |
|
1.8 |
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
114.7 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 includes the net gain on the sale of the plastic compounding business of $114.5 million (net of taxes of $82.7 million, a portion of which will be offset through the utilization of net operating losses of $76.5 million). The valuation allowance related to these net operating losses was reversed in the fourth quarter of 2010 as a benefit to income taxes in continuing operations. In addition, net income includes $0.2 million and $4.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, from operating the plastic compounding business that was sold on January 7, 2011.
The carrying value of the assets and liabilities of the plastic compounding business included as discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 are as follows:
($ in millions) |
|
|
| |
ASSETS |
|
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
32.9 |
| |
Inventories |
|
18.0 |
| |
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
63.0 |
| |
Other intangible assets, net |
|
16.2 |
| |
Other assets |
|
7.4 |
| |
Total assets |
|
$ |
154.1 |
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
| |
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
25.1 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
1.8 |
| |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
0.7 |
| |
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
27.6 |
|
4. SEGMENT INFORMATION:
Rockwood operates in four reportable segments according to the nature and economic characteristics of its products and services as well as the manner in which the information is used internally by the Companys key decision maker, who is the Companys Chief Executive Officer. The four segments are: (1) Specialty Chemicals, which consists of the surface treatment and fine chemicals business lines; (2) Performance Additives, which consists of color pigments and services, timber treatment chemicals and clay-based additives; (3) Titanium Dioxide Pigments; and (4) Advanced Ceramics.
Items that cannot be readily attributed to individual segments have been classified as Corporate and other. Corporate and other operating loss primarily represents payroll, professional fees and other operating expenses of centralized functions such as treasury, tax, legal, internal audit and consolidation accounting as well as the cost of operating the Companys central offices (including some costs maintained based on legal or tax considerations). The primary components of Corporate and other, in addition to operating loss, are interest expense on external debt (including the amortization of deferred financing costs), foreign exchange losses or gains, and mark-to-market gains or losses on derivatives. Major components within the reconciliation of income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes (described more fully below) include systems/organization establishment expenses, interest expense on external debt, foreign exchange losses or gains, and refinancing expenses related to external debt. Corporate and other identifiable assets primarily represent deferred financing costs that have been capitalized in connection with corporate external debt financing, deferred income tax assets and cash balances maintained in accordance with centralized cash management techniques. The Corporate and other classification also includes the results of operations, assets (primarily real estate) and liabilities (including pension and environmental) of legacy businesses formerly belonging to Dynamit Nobel, the wafer reclaim business and the rubber/thermoplastics compounding business. The wafer reclaim business works with semiconductor manufacturers to refurbish used test wafers and return them to the manufacturer for reuse in test and process monitor applications. The rubber/thermoplastics compounding business is active in the automotive market, with products made of rubber, thermoplastic and polyurethane materials.
Summarized financial information for each of the reportable segments is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Specialty |
|
Performance |
|
Dioxide |
|
Advanced |
|
Corporate |
|
|
| ||||||
($ in millions) |
|
Chemicals |
|
Additives |
|
Pigments |
|
Ceramics |
|
and other |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
333.3 |
|
$ |
192.8 |
|
$ |
226.6 |
|
$ |
154.1 |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
$ |
914.0 |
|
Total Adjusted EBITDA |
|
86.9 |
|
34.9 |
|
54.7 |
|
48.3 |
|
(18.2 |
) |
206.6 |
(a) | ||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
289.6 |
|
$ |
177.2 |
|
$ |
181.1 |
|
$ |
124.7 |
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
$ |
778.4 |
|
Total Adjusted EBITDA |
|
73.8 |
|
29.5 |
|
30.7 |
|
37.0 |
|
(14.1 |
) |
156.9 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
Specialty |
|
Performance |
|
Dioxide |
|
Advanced |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
($ in millions) |
|
Chemicals |
|
Additives |
|
Pigments |
|
Ceramics |
|
and other |
|
Eliminations (b) |
|
Consolidated (c) |
| |||||||
Identifiable assets as of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
2,218.9 |
|
$ |
766.4 |
|
$ |
981.3 |
|
$ |
894.6 |
|
$ |
190.8 |
|
$ |
(419.5 |
) |
$ |
4,632.5 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
2,107.7 |
|
759.4 |
|
897.4 |
|
828.8 |
|
397.2 |
|
(420.3 |
) |
4,570.2 |
| |||||||
(a) This amount does not include $0.2 million and $8.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, of Adjusted EBITDA from discontinued operations of the former plastic compounding business which was sold on January 7, 2011.
(b) Amounts contained in the Eliminations column represent the individual subsidiaries retained interest in their cumulative net cash balance (deposits less withdrawals) included in the corporate centralized cash system and within the identifiable assets of the respective segment. These amounts are eliminated as the corporate centralized cash system is included in the Corporate and other segments identifiable assets.
(c) This amount does not include $154.1 million of identifiable assets as of December 31, 2010 from the plastic compounding business sold on January 7, 2011. Total identifiable assets including these amounts were $4,724.3 million as of December 31, 2010.
Geographic information regarding net sales based on sellers location and long-lived assets are described in Note 3, Segment Information, in the Companys 2010 Form 10-K.
On a segment basis, the Company defines Adjusted EBITDA as operating income excluding depreciation and amortization, certain non-cash gains and charges, certain other special gains and charges deemed by senior management to be non-recurring gains and charges and certain items deemed by senior management to have little or no bearing on the day-to-day operating performance of its business segments and reporting units. The adjustments made to operating income directly correlate with the adjustments to net income in calculating Adjusted EBITDA on a consolidated basis pursuant to the senior secured credit agreement, which reflects managements interpretations thereof. The indenture governing the senior subordinated notes, due in 2014 (2014 Notes) and the facility agreement related to the Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture excludes certain adjustments permitted under the senior credit agreement. Senior management uses Adjusted EBITDA on a segment basis as the primary measure to evaluate the ongoing performance of the Companys business segments and reporting units. Because the Company views Adjusted EBITDA on a segment basis as an operating performance measure, the Company uses income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes as the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Specialty |
|
Performance |
|
Dioxide |
|
Advanced |
|
Corporate |
|
|
| ||||||
($ in millions) |
|
Chemicals |
|
Additives |
|
Pigments |
|
Ceramics |
|
and other |
|
Consolidated |
| ||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes |
|
$ |
49.0 |
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
$ |
38.7 |
|
$ |
24.8 |
|
$ |
(25.4 |
) |
$ |
102.2 |
|
Interest expense, net (a) |
|
9.6 |
|
2.5 |
|
(1.1 |
) |
6.2 |
|
5.8 |
|
23.0 |
| ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
19.4 |
|
14.2 |
|
17.1 |
|
13.4 |
|
1.3 |
|
65.4 |
| ||||||
Restructuring and other severance costs |
|
0.9 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
| ||||||
Systems/organization establishment expenses |
|
0.1 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
| ||||||
Acquisition and disposal costs |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
| ||||||
Loss on early extinguishment/modification of debt |
|
7.7 |
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
2.8 |
|
16.2 |
| ||||||
Asset write-downs and other |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
| ||||||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss on financing activities, net |
|
(0.1 |
) |
1.0 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
(2.8 |
) |
(2.0 |
) | ||||||
Other |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.3 |
| ||||||
Total Adjusted EBITDA (b) |
|
$ |
86.9 |
|
$ |
34.9 |
|
$ |
54.7 |
|
$ |
48.3 |
|
$ |
(18.2 |
) |
$ |
206.6 |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes |
|
$ |
39.8 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
$ |
(21.5 |
) |
$ |
47.8 |
|
Interest expense, net (a) |
|
16.4 |
|
7.7 |
|
4.6 |
|
8.2 |
|
4.9 |
|
41.8 |
| ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
18.6 |
|
14.7 |
|
17.7 |
|
12.6 |
|
1.6 |
|
65.2 |
| ||||||
Restructuring and other severance costs |
|
0.1 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.4 |
| ||||||
Systems/organization establishment expenses |
|
0.4 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
| ||||||
Acquisition and disposal costs |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.2 |
| ||||||
Asset write-downs and other |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
| ||||||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss on financing activities, net |
|
(1.0 |
) |
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
1.2 |
|
(0.3 |
) | ||||||
Other |
|
(0.6 |
) |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
(0.9 |
) | ||||||
Total Adjusted EBITDA (b) |
|
$ |
73.8 |
|
$ |
29.5 |
|
$ |
30.7 |
|
$ |
37.0 |
|
$ |
(14.1 |
) |
$ |
156.9 |
|
(a) Includes gains of $6.3 million and $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, representing the movement in the mark-to-market valuation of the Companys interest rate and cross-currency swaps.
(b) This amount does not include $0.2 million and $8.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, of Adjusted EBITDA from discontinued operations of the former plastic compounding business which was sold on January 7, 2011.
The summary of segment information above includes Adjusted EBITDA, a financial measure used by the Companys chief decision maker and senior management to evaluate the operating performance of each segment.
Items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA
Certain items are added to or subtracted from income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes to derive Adjusted EBITDA, as defined below. These items include the following:
· Restructuring and other severance costs: Restructuring and other severance costs of $1.0 million and $0.4 million were recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. See Note 15, Restructuring and Other Severance Costs, for further details.
· Systems/organization establishment expenses: For the three months ended March 31, 2011, expenses of $0.3 million were recorded primarily related to costs incurred in conjunction with a business acquired in the Performance Additives segment. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, expenses of $0.9 million were recorded primarily related to costs incurred in conjunction with reorganizing certain business functions within the Specialty Chemicals segment and the integration of the Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture completed in September 2008.
· Loss on early extinguishment/modification of debt: For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded a charge of $16.2 million comprised of related fees of $13.1 million and the write-off of deferred financing costs of $3.1 million in connection with the refinancing of the senior secured credit facility and the repayment of the senior secured term loans in February 2011.
· Asset write-downs and other: The Company recorded $0.1 million and $1.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to asset write-downs and other. The asset write-downs and other of $1.8 million recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2010 related to the elimination of a duplicate manufacturing facility in the Performance Additives segment.
· Foreign exchange (gain) loss, net: For the three months ended March 31, 2011, foreign exchange gains of $2.0 million were recorded due to the impact of the weaker Euro as of March 31, 2011 versus December 31, 2010, in connection with non-operating Euro-denominated transactions.
· Other: For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded income of $0.9 million primarily related to a gain recorded on the sale of an investment previously accounted for under the equity method in the Specialty Chemicals segment and the reversal of a reserve covering legacy obligations assumed in connection with the acquisition of the Dynamit Nobel businesses in 2004.
5. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES:
Viance LLC Joint Venture
In January 2007, Chemical Specialties, Inc. (CSI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company within the Timber Treatment Chemicals business of the Performance Additives segment, and Rohm and Haas Company (a subsidiary of The Dow Chemical Company) completed the formation of Viance, LLC (Viance), a joint venture that provides an extensive range of advanced wood treatment technologies and services to the global wood treatment industry. The Company has concluded that Rockwood is the primary beneficiary of Viance and as such has consolidated the joint venture and reported Rohm and Haas interest as noncontrolling interest. This conclusion was made as Rockwood has the obligation to absorb losses of Viance that could potentially be significant to Viance and/or the right to receive benefits from Viance that could potentially be significant to Viance. In addition, CSI has the power to direct the activities of Viance that most significantly impact Viances performance, as Viance does not own manufacturing facilities. As a result, Viance primarily relies on CSI to provide product and distribution requirements through a supply agreement.
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, no consolidated assets of the Company were pledged as collateral for any joint venture obligations and the general creditors of the joint venture had no recourse against the Company. The partners have provided $4.0 million of short-term financing to the venture. However, this financing is not subordinated and management believes that such financing could have been readily obtained externally. All intercompany accounts, balances and transactions have been eliminated. Viances assets can only be used to settle direct obligations of Viance.
The carrying values of the assets and liabilities of the Viance joint venture included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
8.7 |
|
7.1 |
| ||
Inventories |
|
1.3 |
|
0.8 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
3.3 |
|
9.8 |
| ||
Total current assets |
|
23.3 |
|
24.3 |
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
1.7 |
|
1.9 |
| ||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
70.0 |
|
71.6 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
1.7 |
|
1.7 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
96.7 |
|
$ |
99.5 |
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
| ||
Accrued compensation |
|
1.0 |
|
1.1 |
| ||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
5.2 |
|
6.1 |
| ||
Long-term debt, current portion |
|
|
|
2.0 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
7.2 |
|
10.2 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
| ||
Other liabilities |
|
0.9 |
|
0.9 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
Titanium Dioxide Pigments Venture
In September 2008, the Company completed the formation of a Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture with Kemira Oyj (Kemira) that focuses on specialty titanium dioxide pigments. The venture includes the combination of the Companys titanium dioxide pigments and functional additives businesses, including its production facility in Duisburg, Germany, and Kemiras titanium dioxide business, including Kemiras titanium dioxide plant in Pori, Finland. The Company has not identified significant variable interests in this venture and accordingly has concluded that this venture does not meet the definition of a variable interest entity (VIE). The Company owns 61% of the venture and consolidates it based on the voting interest model given its majority ownership and ability to control decision making. Kemira only has certain protective rights to limit Rockwoods control.
In conjunction with this venture, there is a power plant that is legally owned and operated by a Finnish power cooperative (PVO). Kemira is a cooperative participant and has an indirect interest in the power plant via ownership of a special share class. The venture utilizes the majority of power supplied. This power plant was determined to be a VIE as the equity holders of the power plant as a group (including Kemira) lack the ability to influence decision making since PVO effectively controls the power plant. It was determined that Rockwood and Kemira jointly form the primary beneficiary of the power plant. The venture has a long-term agreement expiring in August 2018 to purchase steam and electricity (energy) from Kemira. Due to the terms of this agreement under which Kemira has the risks and benefits of the majority of the expected life of the power plant, the Company concluded that Kemira is the party most closely associated with the venture and therefore is the primary beneficiary within the related party group. Accordingly, the Company does not consolidate the power plant. The venture purchased $10.9 million and $9.9 million of energy from Kemira in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Minimum annual payments under the energy agreement are approximately $17.0 million. In connection with this energy arrangement, the venture has approximately $30.3 million (including a contractual advance of $16.0 million made in 2009) of non-interest bearing notes receivable from Kemira that are due in
August 2028. The carrying value of the notes receivable were $5.8 million at March 31, 2011. Interest is imputed at an effective rate of 8.96%. The fair value of the note receivable is approximately $10 million at March 31, 2011. Apart from routine payables to Kemira or PVO in connection with this agreement, no results or balances of the power plant are reflected in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other
Rockwoods Specialty Chemicals segment has several unconsolidated ventures. Two of these ventures do not fit the criteria for classification as a VIE as they are financially self-sustaining, 50/50 ventures both as to control and economics. Other ventures manufacture and market products in China and an additional venture is a service provider at a key manufacturing facility. As the parties share risks and benefits disproportionate to their voting interests, the Company has concluded that these ventures are VIEs. However, the Company has also concluded that it should not consolidate these VIEs as it is not the primary beneficiary. The Company does not have the power and/or ability to direct the activities most affecting venture performance due to governance structure and significant expertise provided and/or functions performed by its venture partners. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Rockwoods aggregate net investment in these ventures was $16.5 million and $14.1 million, respectively. This investment is classified as Other assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and represents Rockwoods approximate exposure to losses on these investments. Rockwood does not guarantee debt for or have other financial support obligations to these ventures.
6. DERIVATIVES:
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company manages its exposure to these market risks through regular operating and financing activities and, from time to time, through the use of derivatives. When used, derivatives are employed as risk management tools and not for trading purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
After hedging, the Company had $858.9 million (the majority of which was subject to a Libor floor of 1.00%) and $908.9 million of variable rate debt outstanding as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Any borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility and the Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture revolving credit facility are at a variable rate. As of March 31, 2011, there were no outstanding borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility or the Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture revolving credit facility. Although we are not required under the terms of any of our long-term debt facilities to hedge, or otherwise protect against interest rate fluctuation in our variable rate debt, we have entered into interest rate swaps to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates related to variable-rate debt. As of March 31, 2011, these contracts cover notional amounts of 220.0 million (at interest rates of 1.40%) and were originally entered into to effectively convert all of the obligations under the Titanium Dioxide Pigments term loan facility to fixed rate obligations. These contracts will mature in June 2013. As of December 31, 2010, these contracts cover notional amounts of 488.8 million (at interest rates ranging from 1.40% to 4.416%) and were originally entered into to effectively convert a portion of the senior secured credit obligations and all of the obligations under the Titanium Dioxide Pigments term loan facility to fixed rate obligations. The Company has not applied hedge accounting for these interest rate swaps and has recorded the mark-to-market of these derivatives as a component of interest expense in its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company may in the future consider adjusting the amounts covered by these derivative contracts to better suit its capital structure. The Company may allow all or a portion of these swaps to lapse, enter into replacement swaps or settle these swaps prior to expiration. In February 2011, an interest rate swap with a notional amount of 262.9 million ($354.6 million based on the exchange rate in effect on the date of the payment) was terminated resulting in a payment of 10.8 million ($14.6 million based on the exchange rate in effect on the date of the payment).
Foreign Currency Risk
In October 2010, the Company entered into foreign currency forward contracts to manage its exposure to fluctuations in currency rates on cash flows on certain forecasted sales denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of a legal entity in its Specialty Chemicals segment. These foreign currency forward contracts hedge the exposure to movements in foreign exchange rates for forecasted transactions for twelve months, and expire in December 2011. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had notional amounts outstanding for these foreign currency forward contracts of $9.4 million and $12.5 million, respectively. The instruments are designated as foreign exchange cash flow hedges and are effective at generating offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item or transaction.
In January 2011, the Company entered into foreign currency forward contracts to manage its exposure to fluctuations in currency rates on cash flows on certain forecasted sales denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the Titanium Dioxide Pigments segment. These foreign currency forward contracts hedge the exposure to movements in foreign exchange rates for forecasted transactions for twelve months and expire in December 2011. As of March 31, 2011, the Company had notional amounts
outstanding for these foreign currency forward contracts of $27.0 million. The instruments are designated as foreign exchange cash flow hedges and are effective at generating offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item or transaction.
The Company designated a portion of its Euro-denominated debt that is recorded on its U.S. books as a net investment hedge of its euro-denominated investments (Euro debt of 85.5 million at March 31, 2011; $121.1 million). As a result, any foreign currency gains and losses resulting from the Euro-denominated debt discussed above are accounted for as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
The following table provides the fair value and balance sheet location of the Companys derivative instruments as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Fair Value as of |
|
Fair Value as of |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||||
($ in millions) |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate swaps |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.6 |
| ||||
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
| ||||
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
20.0 |
|
The following table provides the gains and losses reported in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) within Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in |
| ||||
|
|
OCI on Derivatives and Other Financial |
| ||||
|
|
Instruments (Effective Portion) |
| ||||
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
| ||||
($ in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Investment Hedging Relationships: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Euro-denominated debt |
|
$ |
(9.9 |
) |
$ |
8.4 |
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, gains of $0.3 million were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income. There were no gains or losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
The following table provides the gains reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Recognized in Income on Derivatives |
|
Location of Gain |
| ||||
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
Recognized in Income on |
| ||||
($ in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Derivatives |
| ||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
Interest expense |
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Interest expense |
| ||
Total derivatives |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
|
7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:
The Company follows a fair value measurement hierarchy to measure assets and liabilities. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are derivatives and marketable securities. In addition, the Company measures its pension plan assets at fair value (see Note 15, Employee Benefit Plans in the Companys 2010 Form 10-K for further details). The Companys financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:
Level 1 Inputs are unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs are directly or indirectly observable, which include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 Inputs are unobservable inputs that are used to measure fair value to the extent observable inputs are not available. The Company does not have any financial assets or liabilities that are classified as Level 3 inputs as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
In accordance with the fair value hierarchy, the following table provides the fair value of the Companys financial assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
|
|
As of |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
| ||||||||
($ in millions) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
| ||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Marketable securities (a) |
|
$ |
9.3 |
|
$ |
9.3 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swaps (b) |
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
| ||||
Foreign exchange contracts (b) |
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
| ||||
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
15.2 |
|
$ |
9.3 |
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
| ||||||||
($ in millions) |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
| ||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Marketable securities (a) |
|
$ |
154.5 |
|
$ |
154.5 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
154.5 |
|
$ |
154.5 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate swaps (b) |
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
19.5 |
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts (b) |
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
| ||||
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
20.0 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
20.0 |
|
$ |
|
|
(a) These primarily represent money market funds with an original maturity of three months or less.
(b) See Note 6, Derivatives, for further details of the Companys derivative instruments.
The fair values of marketable securities are based on unadjusted quoted market prices from various financial information service providers and securities exchanges. The fair values of derivatives are based on quoted market prices from various banks for similar instruments. The valuation of these instruments reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including forward curves.
Counter-party riskThe Company manages counter-party risk by entering into derivative contracts with only major financial institutions of investment grade quality and by limiting the amount of exposure to each financial institution. The Company has considered credit adjustments in its determination of the fair value of its derivative assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 based on market participant assumptions. In addition, based on the credit evaluation of each counter-party institution to its derivative assets as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company believes the carrying values to be fully realizable.
DebtThe Company estimates that its debt under the senior secured credit facilities and Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture facility agreement, based on current interest rates and terms, approximates fair value. Based on quoted market values at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company estimates the fair value of its 2014 Notes approximated $567.1 million and $547.6 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the principal carrying amount of the 2014 Notes was $554.1 million and $534.7 million, respectively.
Cash and Cash EquivalentsAll highly liquid instruments and money market funds with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. The carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short maturities of these instruments.
8. INVENTORIES:
Inventories are comprised of the following:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
($ in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Raw materials |
|
$ |
176.7 |
|
$ |
181.6 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
88.4 |
|
79.9 |
| ||
Finished goods |
|
304.2 |
|
272.6 |
| ||
Packaging materials |
|
7.5 |
|
7.7 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
576.8 |
|
$ |
541.8 |
|
9. GOODWILL:
Below are goodwill balances and activity by segment:
|
|
Specialty |
|
Advanced |
|
|
| |||
($ in millions) |
|
Chemicals |
|
Ceramics |
|
Total |
| |||
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
618.5 |
|
$ |
258.6 |
|
$ |
877.1 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
35.0 |
|
15.4 |
|
50.4 |
| |||
Balance, March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
653.5 |
|
$ |
274.0 |
|
$ |
927.5 |
|
10. OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET:
Other intangible assets, net consist of:
|
|
As of March 31, 2011 |
|
As of December 31, 2010 |
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
| ||||||
($ in millions) |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
| ||||||
Patents and other intellectual property |
|
$ |
386.3 |
|
$ |
(168.8 |
) |
$ |
217.5 |
|
$ |
369.5 |
|
$ |
(154.2 |
) |
$ |
215.3 |
|
Trade names and trademarks |
|
138.2 |
|
(40.5 |
) |
97.7 |
|
131.4 |
|
(37.2 |
) |
94.2 |
| ||||||
Customer relationships |
|
373.8 |
|
(153.3 |
) |
220.5 |
|
360.4 |
|
(140.4 |
) |
220.0 |
| ||||||
Supply agreements |
|
62.4 |
|
(19.6 |
) |
42.8 |
|
60.4 |
|
(17.6 |
) |
42.8 |
| ||||||
Other |
|
49.4 |
|
(33.8 |
) |
15.6 |
|
45.8 |
|
(30.5 |
) |
15.3 |
| ||||||
Total |
|
$ |
1,010.1 |
|
$ |
(416.0 |
) |
$ |
594.1 |
|
$ |
967.5 |
|
$ |
(379.9 |
) |
$ |
587.6 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets was $19.3 million and $20.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Estimated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows:
($ in millions) |
|
Amortization |
| |
Year ending |
|
Expense |
| |
2011 |
|
$ |
81.1 |
|
2012 |
|
77.7 |
| |
2013 |
|
74.5 |
| |
2014 |
|
67.8 |
| |
2015 |
|
61.6 |
| |
11. LONG-TERM DEBT:
Long-term debt and loans payable are summarized as follows:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
($ and in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Senior secured credit facilities - term loans |
|
$ |
850.0 |
|
$ |
1,260.0 |
|
2014 Notes (250.1 and $200.0 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010) |
|
554.1 |
|
534.7 |
| ||
Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture term loans (220.0) |
|
311.5 |
|
294.4 |
| ||
Capitalized lease obligations (28.9 and 29.4, respectively) |
|
41.0 |
|
39.4 |
| ||
Other loans |
|
31.6 |
|
32.5 |
| ||
|
|
1,788.2 |
|
2,161.0 |
| ||
Less current maturities |
|
(60.2 |
) |
(465.7 |
) | ||
|
|
$ |
1,728.0 |
|
$ |
1,695.3 |
|
On February 10, 2011, the Company completed a refinancing of its senior secured credit facility and entered into a new senior secured credit agreement comprised of an $850.0 million term loan and a $180.0 million revolving credit facility, and repaid $408.9 million of existing term loans. In connection with this transaction, the Company recorded a charge of $16.2 million in the first quarter of 2011 comprised of related fees of $13.1 million and the write-off of deferred financing costs of $3.1 million.
12. INCOME TAXES:
The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was 28.2% and 32.8%, respectively. The income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was favorably impacted by a beneficial foreign earnings mix. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company had domestic losses that were not tax benefited due to the recording of additional valuation allowances offset by a beneficial foreign earnings mix.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company decreased its worldwide valuation allowances by $2.5 million. The following table reflects the activity in the valuation allowance for worldwide net operating losses and other deferred income tax assets:
|
|
Valuation |
| |
($ in millions) |
|
Allowance |
| |
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
81.1 |
|
Decrease as reflected in income tax expense |
|
2.8 |
| |
Other (a) |
|
(5.3 |
) | |
Balance as of March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
78.6 |
|
(a) Primarily related to discontinued operations and the mark-to-market of the Companys Euro-denominated debt.
In the three months ended March 31, 2011, based on the Companys policy and review of available information, including the Companys steady-state analysis, it was determined that there was not sufficient positive evidence of future taxable income to release the U.S. federal valuation allowance that has been recorded. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Companys net U.S. federal deferred tax assets and liabilities were maintained at a zero level, other than a noncurrent deferred tax liability relating to goodwill with an indefinite reversal period.
Unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2011 were $28.2 million, all of which if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. The Company had accrued $8.9 million for interest and penalties as of March 31, 2011. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its income tax provision.
The Company is currently under audit in certain jurisdictions and during the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that resolution of these audits could result in a benefit of up to $3.1 million or a cost of up to $5.2 million. Audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements are subject to significant uncertainty.
The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S., various states, and foreign jurisdictions. The Companys tax filings in the Companys major jurisdictions are open to investigation by tax authorities; in the U.S. from 2006, in the U.K. from 2008 and in Germany from 2005.
13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS:
The Companys overall unfunded position in its defined benefit plans as of March 31, 2011 is $440.2 million and the funded status of our plans is 38%. However, 82% of the Companys unfunded position is concentrated in plans mostly in Germany, where funding is neither legally required nor customary. When only the plans that have funding requirements are considered, the unfunded portion is $78.0 million, and the funded status is 77%. The funding of the Companys pension plans was in compliance with local requirements as of March 31, 2011. Almost all of the Companys pension obligations are long-term in nature. The Companys annual cash outflows to meet funding requirements and benefit obligations historically have not significantly exceeded its pension expense. Such cash outflows were less than pension expense in 2010 and the three months ended March 31, 2011. The measurement of our pension obligations and plan assets is dependent on a variety of actuarial assumptions and is performed annually. Therefore, the funded status as of December 31, 2011 could differ significantly.
The following table represents the net periodic benefit costs and related components:
|
|
Three months ended |
| ||||
|
|
March 31, |
| ||||
($ in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Service cost |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
Interest cost |
|
8.3 |
|
8.6 |
| ||
Expected return on assets |
|
(4.2 |
) |
(3.8 |
) | ||
Amortization of actuarial losses |
|
0.6 |
|
0.6 |
| ||
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
| ||
Total pension cost |
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
14. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic and diluted earnings per common share (EPS) were computed using the following common share data:
|
|
Three months ended |
| ||||
|
|
March 31, |
| ||||
($ in millions, except per share amounts; shares in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
EPS Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Amounts attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
63.3 |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
114.7 |
|
4.6 |
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
178.0 |
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
EPS Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
76,136 |
|
74,297 |
| ||
Effect of dilutive stock options and other incentives |
|
3,372 |
|
2,761 |
| ||
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents |
|
79,508 |
|
77,058 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic earnings per common share attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
1.51 |
|
0.07 |
| ||
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
2.34 |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
1.44 |
|
0.06 |
| ||
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
2.24 |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
Stock-based awards under employee compensation plans representing common stock of 1,278,067 shares were outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2010, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, there were no outstanding shares that would have had an anti-dilutive effect.
15. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER SEVERANCE COSTS:
The Company records restructuring liabilities that represent charges incurred in connection with consolidations and cessations of certain of its operations, including operations from acquisitions, as well as headcount reduction programs. These charges consist primarily of severance and facility closure costs. Severance charges are based on various factors including the employees length of service, contract provisions, salary levels and local governmental legislation. At the time a related charge is recorded, the Company calculates its best estimate based upon detailed analysis. Although significant changes are not expected, actual costs may differ from these estimates.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded $1.0 million of restructuring charges, primarily related to severance costs and facility closure costs in connection with the future consolidation of its North American Surface Treatment business in the Specialty Chemicals segment.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company expensed $0.1 million of restructuring charges. Restructuring and other severance costs in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations also included other severance-related costs of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 related to headcount reductions undertaken throughout the Company.
All restructuring actions still in progress as of March 31, 2011 are expected to be substantially complete by the end of 2011, except for the North American Surface Treatment restructuring action described above. However, payouts of certain liabilities resulting from these actions will take place over several years. In particular, as of March 31, 2011, restructuring liabilities of $5.5 million includes $1.8 million in the Corporate and other segment related to an unexpired lease in connection with the 2006 restructuring of the Wafer Reclaim business. Management believes that the majority of the remaining $3.7 million obligation will be utilized in 2011. Selected information for outstanding liabilities from recent restructuring actions is as follows:
|
|
Severance/ |
|
Facility |
|
|
| |||
($ in millions) |
|
Relocation |
|
Closure |
|
Total |
| |||
Liability balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
Restructuring charge in 2011 |
|
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
1.0 |
| |||
Restructuring charge in 2011 - Discontinued operations |
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
| |||
Utilized |
|
(0.8 |
) |
(0.3 |
) |
(1.1 |
) | |||
Foreign exchange and other |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.2 |
| |||
Liability balance, March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
Restructuring reserves by segment are as follows:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
($ in millions) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Specialty Chemicals |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
Performance Additives |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
| ||
Advanced Ceramics |
|
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
| ||
Corporate and other |
|
2.1 |
|
1.9 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
Legal ProceedingsThe Company is involved in various legal proceedings, including commercial, intellectual property, product liability, regulatory and environmental matters of a nature considered normal to its business. The Company accrues for amounts related to these matters if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount can be reasonably estimated. The Company discloses such matters when there is at least a reasonable possibility that a material loss may have been incurred.
Advertising Matter
On March 3, 2009, Osmose, Inc. (OI) filed an action against Viance, the joint venture in the Timber Treatment Chemicals business, Rockwood Holdings, Inc., and certain individuals, in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, claiming that recent advertisements by Viance comparing its ACQ product and OIs MCQ product were false and misleading in violation of the Lanham Act, constituted unfair competition, violated the Georgia Deceptive Trade Practices Act, were defamatory and that Viance tortiously interfered with OIs business relationships. OI is seeking damages, including their attorneys fees and costs and punitive damages. OI also sought a temporary restraining order (TRO) and a preliminary injunction prohibiting Viance from continuing to make certain claims in advertisements related to their MCQ product. On March 20, 2009, the district court granted Osmoses motion for a TRO. Viance raised certain counterclaims related to OIs advertisements and both parties claims were heard. In September 2009, the district court issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting Viance from making certain claims related to MCQ in its advertisements and denied Viances request for a preliminary injunction related to certain claims in Osmoses advertisements, which Viance subsequently appealed. The U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit heard oral arguments on May 20, 2010 and rendered its decision on July 30, 2010 remanding in part, affirming in part, and vacating in part the preliminary injunction. The trial court entered an order revising the preliminary injunction and an order lifting the stay and commencing discovery. In April 2011, the parties executed a settlement agreement and the resolution of this matter did not have a material effect on the Companys business or financial condition.
Lanxess Matter
On January 18, 2010, Lanxess Deutschland GmbH filed suit in the District Court of Satakunta, Finland against Sachtleben Pigments Oy (Sachtleben), a subsidiary of the Companys Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture, claiming breach of contract in connection with Sachtlebens termination of a supply agreement with plaintiff. In October 2010, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper jurisdiction for this matter and later issued its decision in favor of the plaintiff ruling that the case will be heard in the District Court of Satakunta and not in arbitration. In January 2011, Lanxess filed its statement specifying its claims for damages in the amount of 3.2 million plus accrued interest and legal fees. The Company will continue to vigorously defend this matter. The Company believes Sachtleben has meritorious defenses against the plaintiffs claims. Although Sachtleben does not believe that resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on its business or financial condition, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this litigation, and the resolution of this matter may have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or cash flows in any quarterly or annual reporting period.
Former Glass Sealants Business
A subsidiary in the Specialty Chemicals segment formerly manufactured sealants for insulating glass. This subsidiary has been named as a defendant in several lawsuits relating to alleged defective sealants that were raised prior to and after the sale of this business in 2003. Pursuant to the sale and purchase agreement with respect to this divested business, this subsidiary may be required to pay damage claims asserted by the various plaintiffs. Although the Company expects its subsidiary to have coverage under its product liability insurance policies should damages ultimately be awarded or agreed to, in such an event, its insurance may not cover such claims and, if not, its subsidiary may not have sufficient cash flow to pay these claims. Although the Company does not believe that resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on its business or financial condition, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these claims or possible range of loss, if any, and the resolution of one or more of these claims may have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or cash flows in any quarterly or annual reporting period.
Inspector General Subpoena
In February 2010, a subsidiary of the Company received a subpoena from the Inspector General of the Department of Defense (DOD) seeking information related to a product in the Timber Treatment Chemicals business in the Performance Additives segment. This subsidiary has and will continue to comply with the requests of the DOD to provide the relevant information. The Company cannot predict the likelihood of further legal action or estimate the loss or possible range of loss, if any, in connection with this matter.
Other Matters
Although the Company expects to continue to pay legal fees in connection with the above matters and other legal actions such as chromated copper arsenate and other product liability matters, based on currently available facts, the Company does not believe that any other individual action will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
Reserves in connection with product liability matters do not individually exceed $1.8 million and in the aggregate $4.0 million as of March 31, 2011. The Companys reserve estimates are based on available facts, including damage claims and input from its internal and external legal counsel, past experience, and, in some instances where defense costs are being paid by its insurer, known insurance recoveries. The Company is unable to estimate the amount or range of any potential incremental charges should facts and circumstances change and may in the future revise its estimates based on new information becoming available. Further, the Company cannot predict the outcome of any litigation or the potential for future litigation.
Indemnity MattersThe Company is indemnified by third parties in connection with certain matters related to acquired businesses. Although the Company has no reason to believe that the financial condition of those parties who may have indemnification obligations to the Company is other than sound, in the event the Company seeks indemnity under any of these agreements or through other means, there can be no assurance that any party who may have obligations to indemnify the Company will adhere to their obligations and the Company may have to resort to legal action to enforce its rights under the indemnities. In cases where the Companys indemnification claims to such third parties are uncontested, the Company expects to realize recoveries within the short term.
Pension Receivable Matter
Rockwoods pension liability includes defined benefit obligations to employees of a previously divested company which cannot legally be transferred to the owners under local law. The owner of the business had agreed to indemnify the Company for these obligations, however, such company has filed for bankruptcy. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a reserve of 4.9 million ($6.9 million) against our related receivable of 5.4 million ($7.6 million) due from the current owner. The Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter. The Company does not believe this matter will have a material effect on its results of operations or cash flows in any quarterly or annual reporting period.
In addition, the Company may be subject to indemnity claims relating to properties or businesses it divested. The Company has agreed to indemnify the buyer of its former plastic compounding business, Electronics business, Groupe Novasep segment and pool and spa chemicals business. For example, the Company is required to indemnify the buyer of its Electronics business for certain known and unknown environmental actions which may arise in the future that relate to the period prior to the closing.
In the opinion of management, and based upon information currently available, the ultimate resolution of any indemnification obligations owed to the Company or by the Company is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, but may have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations or cash
flow in any quarterly or annual reporting period.
Safety, Health and Environmental Matters
General
The Company is subject to extensive environmental, health and safety laws in the United States, the European Union (EU) and elsewhere at the international, national, state, and local levels. Many of these laws impose requirements relating to clean up of contamination, and impose liability in the event of damage to human beings, natural resources or property, and provide for substantial fines, injunctions and potential criminal sanctions for violations. Other laws require post-closure reclamation of landfills and surface mining sites for damage resulting from normal operation of these facilities. The products, including the raw materials handled, are also subject to rigorous industrial hygiene regulations and investigation. The nature of the Companys operations exposes it to risks of liability for breaches of these laws and regulations as a result of the production, storage, transportation and sale of materials that can cause contamination or personal injury when released into the environment. Environmental laws are subject to change and have tended to become stricter over time. Such changes in environmental laws, or the enactment of new environmental laws, could result in materially increased capital, operating and compliance costs.
Safety, Health and Environmental Management Systems
The Company is committed to achieving and maintaining compliance with all applicable safety, health and environmental (SHE) legal requirements. The Companys subsidiaries have developed policies and management systems that are intended to identify the SHE legal requirements applicable to their operations, enhance compliance with such requirements, ensure the safety of the Companys employees, contractors, community neighbors and customers and minimize the production and emission of wastes and other pollutants. Although SHE legal requirements are constantly changing, these SHE management systems are designed to assist the Company in meeting its compliance goals and minimizing overall risk.
SHE Capital Expenditures
The Company will incur future costs for capital improvements and general compliance under SHE laws. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the capital expenditures for SHE matters totaled $19.2 million, excluding costs to maintain and repair pollution control equipment. For 2011, the Company estimates capital expenditures for compliance with SHE laws to be at similar levels; however, because capital expenditures for these matters are subject to changes in existing and new SHE laws, the Company cannot provide assurance that its recent expenditures will be indicative of future amounts required to comply with these laws.
Regulatory Developments
Greenhouse gases have increasingly become the subject of international, national, state and local attention. On September 22, 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) passed its final greenhouse gas monitoring and reporting rule that required certain facilities in the U.S. to record their greenhouse gases beginning January 1, 2010 and begin reporting these measurements on September 30, 2011. Currently, no facilities are required to report under this program; however, two facilities may be subject to these rules as production demand increases. The Company does not believe, based upon currently available information, that this rule will have a material impact on its results of operations. However, further legislation of greenhouse gases and carbon dioxide has been proposed in the U.S. and other jurisdictions. Certain European facilities are subject to different carbon emission trading schemes imposed by local governments, e.g. U.K. and Germany. Any such laws may directly and indirectly have a material adverse impact on our results of operations, such as through higher costs for energy and certain raw materials and additional capital expenditures to comply with such laws.
The Company is also subject to the Homeland Security Agencys regulations, which address chemical plant safety, the Kyoto Protocol, which relates to the emission of greenhouse gases and the European Union Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive, which relates to environmental permitting programs for individual facilities. In addition, legislation was recently introduced in Congress seeking to reform the Toxic Control Substances Act, which among other things, would require manufacturers to develop and submit additional safety data for each chemical it produces, similar to REACH. The Company does not believe, based upon currently available information, that these regulations will have a material adverse impact on its results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
Environmental Liabilities
Environmental laws have a significant effect on the nature and scope of any clean-up of contamination at current and former operating facilities, the costs of transportation and storage of chemicals and finished products and the costs of the storage and disposal of wastes.
In addition, Superfund statutes in the United States as well as statutes in other jurisdictions impose strict, joint and several liability for clean-up costs on the entities that generated waste and/or arranged for its disposal at contaminated third party sites, as well as the past and present owners and operators of contaminated sites. All responsible parties may be required to bear some or all clean-up costs regardless of fault, legality of the original disposal or ownership of the disposal site.
The following table provides a list of the Companys present and former facilities with environmental contamination or reclamation obligations for which the Company has reserved for at March 31, 2011:
Country |
|
Location |
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
(d) |
|
(e) |
Brazil |
|
Diadema |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Chile |
|
Salar de Atacama |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
China |
|
Shenzhen |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Finland |
|
Kipsikorpi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Pori |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
France |
|
Clichy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Sens |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany |
|
Duisburg |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Empelde |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Hainhausen |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liebenau |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schwarzheide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Marktredwitz |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plochingen |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|