UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
Or
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 001-32609
Rockwood Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
52-2277366 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
100 Overlook Center, Princeton, New Jersey 08540
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(609) 514-0300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of May 3, 2010, there were 74,655,305 outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM 10-Q
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited).
ROCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts;
shares in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
833.9 |
|
$ |
660.0 |
|
Cost of products sold |
|
567.2 |
|
477.9 |
|
||
Gross profit |
|
266.7 |
|
182.1 |
|
||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
169.3 |
|
145.1 |
|
||
Restructuring and other severance costs |
|
2.2 |
|
7.8 |
|
||
Loss on sale of assets and other |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
||
Operating income |
|
95.2 |
|
29.1 |
|
||
Other expenses, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense, net (a) |
|
(41.8 |
) |
(49.3 |
) |
||
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
||
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net |
|
0.3 |
|
(5.6 |
) |
||
Other, net |
|
0.5 |
|
0.1 |
|
||
Other expenses, net |
|
(41.0 |
) |
(52.6 |
) |
||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes |
|
54.2 |
|
(23.5 |
) |
||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
17.5 |
|
(16.7 |
) |
||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
36.7 |
|
(6.8 |
) |
||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
36.7 |
|
(4.5 |
) |
||
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
0.2 |
|
3.0 |
|
||
Net income (loss) attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc. |
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Amounts attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
$ |
(3.8 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Weighted average number of basic shares outstanding |
|
74,297 |
|
74,064 |
|
||
Weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding |
|
77,058 |
|
74,064 |
|
(a) Interest expense, net includes: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense on debt, net |
|
$ |
(42.3 |
) |
$ |
(37.3 |
) |
Mark-to-market gains (losses) on interest rate swaps |
|
2.1 |
|
(9.6 |
) |
||
Deferred financing costs |
|
(1.6 |
) |
(2.4 |
) |
||
Total |
|
$ |
(41.8 |
) |
$ |
(49.3 |
) |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
ROCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts;
shares in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
309.6 |
|
$ |
300.5 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
496.1 |
|
450.4 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
510.9 |
|
517.0 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
13.7 |
|
12.5 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
64.3 |
|
66.5 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
1,394.6 |
|
1,346.9 |
|
||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
1,612.4 |
|
1,702.5 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
886.7 |
|
939.2 |
|
||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
656.4 |
|
704.7 |
|
||
Deferred debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $11.9 and $10.8, respectively |
|
23.4 |
|
26.0 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
23.2 |
|
24.9 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
37.6 |
|
37.5 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,634.3 |
|
$ |
4,781.7 |
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
215.5 |
|
$ |
237.3 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
13.8 |
|
11.5 |
|
||
Accrued compensation |
|
89.3 |
|
77.7 |
|
||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
168.2 |
|
156.9 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
2.4 |
|
2.6 |
|
||
Long-term debt, current portion |
|
77.9 |
|
94.2 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
567.1 |
|
580.2 |
|
||
Long-term debt |
|
2,352.8 |
|
2,434.1 |
|
||
Pension and related liabilities |
|
389.6 |
|
410.1 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
72.5 |
|
69.1 |
|
||
Other liabilities |
|
138.2 |
|
145.9 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
3,520.2 |
|
3,639.4 |
|
||
Restricted stock units |
|
2.8 |
|
1.5 |
|
||
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rockwood Holdings, Inc. stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 400,000 shares authorized, 74,581 shares issued and 74,487 shares outstanding at March 31, 2010; 400,000 shares authorized, 74,259 shares issued and 74,165 shares outstanding at December 31, 2009) |
|
0.7 |
|
0.7 |
|
||
Paid-in capital |
|
1,175.0 |
|
1,169.2 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
139.7 |
|
204.5 |
|
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(485.3 |
) |
(522.2 |
) |
||
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
(1.4 |
) |
(1.4 |
) |
||
Total Rockwood Holdings, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
828.7 |
|
850.8 |
|
||
Noncontrolling interest |
|
282.6 |
|
290.0 |
|
||
Total equity |
|
1,111.3 |
|
1,140.8 |
|
||
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
4,634.3 |
|
$ |
4,781.7 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
ROCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
36.7 |
|
$ |
(4.5 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
66.9 |
|
68.1 |
|
||
Deferred financing costs amortization |
|
1.6 |
|
2.4 |
|
||
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss, net |
|
(0.3 |
) |
5.6 |
|
||
Fair value adjustment of derivatives |
|
(2.1 |
) |
9.6 |
|
||
Bad debt provision |
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
||
Stock-based compensation |
|
2.6 |
|
0.8 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
5.3 |
|
(22.5 |
) |
||
Restructuring and other |
|
1.8 |
|
0.1 |
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of the effect of foreign currency translation and acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
(62.8 |
) |
22.2 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
(12.8 |
) |
15.7 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
(1.9 |
) |
9.7 |
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
(4.8 |
) |
(37.2 |
) |
||
Income taxes payable |
|
3.3 |
|
(0.5 |
) |
||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
31.6 |
|
(15.2 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
64.7 |
|
49.8 |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Acquisitions, including transaction fees and payments for prior acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
(1.2 |
) |
(0.7 |
) |
||
Capital expenditures, excluding capital leases |
|
(35.2 |
) |
(44.3 |
) |
||
Contractual advance to Titanium Dioxide Pigments noncontrolling shareholder |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
||
Proceeds on sale of assets |
|
0.1 |
|
2.1 |
|
||
Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations |
|
(36.3 |
) |
(44.2 |
) |
||
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(36.3 |
) |
(44.6 |
) |
||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Issuance of common stock, net of fees |
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
||
Prepayment of 2014 Notes |
|
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
||
Repayment of Titanium Dioxide Pigments revolving credit facility |
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
|
||
Prepayment of senior secured debt |
|
|
|
(102.3 |
) |
||
Repayment of senior secured debt |
|
(12.9 |
) |
(29.8 |
) |
||
Payments on other long-term debt |
|
(1.1 |
) |
(2.6 |
) |
||
Loan from Viance noncontrolling shareholder |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
||
Deferred financing costs |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(24.2 |
) |
(144.6 |
) |
||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
4.9 |
|
(2.2 |
) |
||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
9.1 |
|
(141.6 |
) |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
300.5 |
|
468.7 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
309.6 |
|
$ |
327.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest paid |
|
$ |
31.8 |
|
$ |
25.9 |
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
|
8.8 |
|
6.0 |
|
||
Non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Acquisition of capital equipment |
|
8.2 |
|
8.1 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
ROCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Dollars in millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Rockwood |
|
|
|
|
|
Rockwood |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Stockholders |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total |
|
Stockholders |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
Equity |
|
Interest |
|
Equity |
|
Equity |
|
Interest |
|
Equity |
|
||||||
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
850.8 |
|
$ |
290.0 |
|
$ |
1,140.8 |
|
$ |
823.5 |
|
$ |
315.4 |
|
$ |
1,138.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Net income (loss) |
|
36.9 |
|
(0.2 |
) |
36.7 |
|
(1.5 |
) |
(3.0 |
) |
(4.5 |
) |
||||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
(64.8 |
) |
|
|
(64.8 |
) |
(46.6 |
) |
(3.9 |
) |
(50.5 |
) |
||||||
Comprehensive loss |
|
(27.9 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
(28.1 |
) |
(48.1 |
) |
(6.9 |
) |
(55.0 |
) |
||||||
Change in estimate of fair value of assets contributed to the Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
(16.5 |
) |
||||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
(8.0 |
) |
||||||
Issuance of common stock |
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Deferred compensation, net of tax |
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
||||||
Balance at March 31 |
|
$ |
828.7 |
|
$ |
282.6 |
|
$ |
1,111.3 |
|
$ |
776.4 |
|
$ |
284.0 |
|
$ |
1,060.4 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
ROCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Business Description, Background Rockwood Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries is a global developer, manufacturer and marketer of high value-added specialty chemicals and advanced materials used for industrial and commercial purposes. Unless otherwise indicated, any references to we, our, us, the Company or Rockwood refer to Rockwood Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Basis of Presentation The accompanying financial statements of Rockwood are presented on a consolidated basis. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, this information contains all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented.
The interim financial statements included herein are unaudited. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full year. The condensed consolidated financial statements are presented based upon accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), except that certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, have been condensed or omitted. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto contained in the Companys 2009 Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, this information contains all adjustments necessary, consisting of normal and recurring accruals, for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented.
The Companys noncontrolling interest represents the total of the noncontrolling partys interest in certain investments (principally the Viance, LLC timber treatment joint venture and the Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture) that are consolidated but less than 100% owned.
Unless otherwise noted, all balance sheet related items which are denominated in Euros are converted at the March 31, 2010 exchange rate of 1.00 = $1.351.
Stock-Based Compensation The Company has previously granted awards under the 2008 Amended and Restated Stock Purchase and Option Plan of Rockwood Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Plan). Under the Plan, the Company granted stock options, restricted stock and other stock-based awards to the Companys employees and directors and allowed employees and directors to purchase shares of its common stock. There were 10,000,000 authorized shares available for grant under the Plan. However, the Company will no longer issue equity awards under this Plan. In April 2009, the Company adopted the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the New Plan; together with the Plan, the Plans), which has 11,000,000 authorized shares.
The aggregate compensation cost for stock options, restricted stock units and Board of Director stock grants recorded under the Plans caused income from continuing operations before taxes to decrease by $2.6 million and $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The total tax benefit recognized related to stock options was $0.2 million and less than $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
In December 2009, the Company approved an award of 233,657 performance-based restricted stock units to management and key employees which will vest on December 31, 2012 as long as the employee continues to be employed by the Company on this date and upon the achievement of certain performance targets approved by the Compensation Committee. The number of shares of the Companys common stock ultimately awarded upon vesting is determined based on the achievement of specified performance criteria over the period January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010. However, the Company did not recognize any compensation cost in 2009 for this issuance because the performance targets that form the basis for vesting of these restricted stock units were not known as of December 31, 2009. These performance targets were set in January 2010, when such performance targets were approved by the Compensation Committee, and as a result, the Company began recording compensation cost on a ratable basis over the vesting period. The grant date fair value of these restricted stock units was $22.00 per stock unit.
The Company granted additional stock options and time-based restricted stock units to management and key employees. All restricted stock units contain a provision in which the units shall immediately vest and become converted into the right to receive a cash payment on the vesting date upon a change in control as defined in such agreement. As the provisions for redemption are outside the control of the Company, the fair value of these units as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 have been recorded as mezzanine equity (outside of permanent equity) in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Recent Accounting StandardsThe following represents the impact of recently issued accounting standards:
In June 2009, the FASB issued a statement that requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises variable interest entity or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. It requires additional disclosures about involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. The Company adopted this statement on January 1, 2010. This statement did not have a material impact on its financial statements. See Note 3, Variable Interest Entities, for the disclosure requirements of this statement.
In January 2010, the FASB issued an accounting update that amended guidance and clarified the disclosure requirements about fair market value measurement. This required a reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and to describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, for measurements utilizing significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. The Company adopted this update on January 1, 2010. There was no impact upon adoption of this update on the Companys financial statements.
2. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income includes net income and the other comprehensive income components which include unrealized gains and losses from foreign currency translation and from certain intercompany transactions that are of a long-term investment nature, pension-related adjustments that are recorded directly into a separate section of equity in the balance sheets and net investment and foreign exchange cash flow hedges. Foreign currency translation amounts are not adjusted for income taxes since they relate to indefinite length investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries and certain intercompany debt.
Comprehensive income (loss) is summarized as follows:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
($ in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
36.7 |
|
$ |
(4.5 |
) |
Pension related adjustments, net of tax |
|
2.0 |
|
0.1 |
|
||
Foreign currency translation |
|
(28.3 |
) |
(62.0 |
) |
||
Intercompany foreign currency loans |
|
(46.9 |
) |
(37.6 |
) |
||
Net investment hedges, net of tax |
|
8.4 |
|
49.3 |
|
||
Foreign exchange contracts, net of tax |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
||
Comprehensive loss |
|
(28.1 |
) |
(55.0 |
) |
||
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
0.2 |
|
6.9 |
|
||
Comprehensive loss attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc. |
|
$ |
(27.9 |
) |
$ |
(48.1 |
) |
3. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES:
Viance LLC Joint Venture
In January 2007, Chemical Specialties, Inc. (CSI), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company within the Timber Treatment Chemicals business of the Performance Additives segment, and Rohm and Haas Company (a subsidiary of The Dow Chemical Company) completed the formation of Viance, LLC (Viance), a joint venture that provides an extensive range of advanced wood treatment technologies and services to the global wood treatment industry. The Company has concluded that Rockwood is the primary beneficiary of Viance and as such has consolidated the joint venture and reported Rohm and Haas interest as noncontrolling interest. This conclusion was made as Rockwood has the obligation to absorb losses of Viance that could potentially be significant to Viance and/or the right to receive benefits from Viance that could potentially be significant to Viance. In addition, CSI has the power to direct activities of Viance that most significantly impact Viances performance as Viance does not own manufacturing facilities. As a result, Viance primarily relies on CSI to provide product and distribution requirements through a supply agreement.
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, no consolidated assets of the Company were pledged as collateral for any joint venture obligations and the general creditors of the joint venture had no recourse against the Company. The partners have provided $4.0 million of short-term financing to the venture. However, this financing is not subordinated and management believes that such financing could have been readily obtained externally. All intercompany accounts, balances and transactions have been eliminated. Viances assets can only be used to settle direct obligations of Viance. The carrying values of the assets and liabilities of the Viance joint venture included in the condensed consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
9.8 |
|
6.9 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
0.9 |
|
1.1 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
4.7 |
|
4.4 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
19.9 |
|
18.7 |
|
||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
2.0 |
|
2.0 |
|
||
Other intangible assets, net |
|
76.3 |
|
78.0 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
1.9 |
|
1.9 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
100.1 |
|
$ |
100.6 |
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
||
Accrued compensation |
|
0.6 |
|
1.5 |
|
||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
2.2 |
|
2.0 |
|
||
Long-term debt, current portion |
|
2.0 |
|
2.0 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
7.0 |
|
7.1 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
||
Other liabilities |
|
0.8 |
|
0.8 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
Titanium Dioxide Pigments Venture
In September 2008, the Company completed the formation of a Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture with Kemira Oyj (Kemira) that focuses on specialty titanium dioxide pigments. The venture combines the Companys titanium dioxide pigments and functional additives businesses, which are part of the Titanium Dioxide Pigments segment, including its production facility in Duisburg, Germany, and Kemiras titanium dioxide business, including Kemiras titanium dioxide plant in Pori, Finland. The Company has not identified significant variable interests in this venture and accordingly has concluded that this venture does not meet the definition of a variable interest entity (VIE). The Company owns 61% of the venture and consolidates it based on the voting interest model given its majority ownership and ability to control decision making. Kemira only has certain protective rights to limit Rockwoods control.
In conjunction with this venture, there is a power plant that is legally owned and operated by a Finnish power cooperative (PVO). Kemira is a cooperative participant and has an indirect interest in the power plant via ownership of a special share class. The venture utilizes the majority of power supplied. This power plant was determined to be a VIE as the equity holders of the power plant as a group (including Kemira) lack the ability to influence decision making since PVO effectively controls the power plant. It was determined that Rockwood and Kemira jointly form the primary beneficiary of the power plant. The venture has a long-term agreement expiring in August 2018 to purchase steam and electricity (energy) from Kemira. Due to the terms of this agreement under which Kemira has the risks and benefits of the majority of the expected life of the power plant, the Company concluded that Kemira is the party most closely associated with the venture and therefore is the primary beneficiary within the related party group. Accordingly, the Company does not consolidate the power plant. The venture purchased $9.9 million and $8.0 million, respectively, of energy from Kemira in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In 2009, the venture also made a contractual advance of $16.0 million in connection with this energy agreement. Minimum annual payments under the energy agreement are approximately $16.2 million. In connection with this energy arrangement, the venture has approximately $28.9 million of non-interest bearing notes receivable from Kemira that are due in August 2028. The carrying value of the notes receivable were $5.2 million at March 31, 2010. Interest is imputed at an effective rate of 8.96%. Apart from routine payables to Kemira or PVO in connection with this agreement, no results or balances of the power plant are reflected in the Companys financial statements.
Other
Rockwoods Specialty Chemicals segment has several unconsolidated ventures. Two of these ventures do not fit the criteria for classification as a VIE as they are financially self-sustaining, 50/50 ventures both as to control and economics. Other ventures manufacture and market products in China and an additional venture is a service provider at a key manufacturing facility. As the parties share risks and benefits disproportionate to their voting interests, the Company has concluded that these ventures are VIEs. However, the Company has also concluded that it should not consolidate these VIEs as it is not the primary beneficiary. The Company does not have the power and/or ability to direct the activities most affecting venture performance due to governance structure and significant expertise provided and/or functions performed by its venture partners. As of March 31, 2010, Rockwoods aggregate net investment in these ventures was $11.0 million. This investment is classified as Other assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheet and represents Rockwoods approximate net exposure to losses on these investments. Rockwood does not guarantee debt or have other financial support obligations for these ventures.
4. SEGMENT INFORMATION:
Rockwood operates in five reportable segments according to the nature and economic characteristics of its products and services as well as the manner in which the information is used internally by the Companys key decision maker, who is the Companys Chief Executive Officer. The five segments are: (1) Specialty Chemicals, which consists of the surface treatment and fine chemicals business lines; (2) Performance Additives, which consists of color pigments and services, timber treatment chemicals and clay-based additives; (3) Titanium Dioxide Pigments; (4) Advanced Ceramics; and (5) Specialty Compounds.
Items that cannot be readily attributed to individual segments have been classified as Corporate and other. Corporate and other operating loss primarily represents payroll, professional fees and other operating expenses of centralized functions such as treasury, tax, legal, internal audit and consolidation accounting as well as the cost of operating the Companys central offices (including some costs maintained based on legal or tax considerations). The primary components of Corporate and other loss, in addition to operating loss, are interest expense on external debt (including the amortization of deferred financing costs), foreign exchange losses or gains, and mark-to-market gains or losses on derivatives. Major components within the reconciliation of income before taxes (described more fully below) include systems/organization establishment expenses, interest expense on external debt, foreign exchange losses or gains, and refinancing expenses related to external debt. Corporate and other identifiable assets primarily represent deferred financing costs that have been capitalized in connection with corporate external debt financing, deferred income tax assets and cash balances maintained in accordance with centralized cash management techniques. The Corporate and other classification also includes the results of operations, assets (primarily real estate) and liabilities (including pension and environmental) of legacy businesses formerly belonging to Dynamit Nobel and the wafer reclaim business. The wafer reclaim business works with semiconductor manufacturers to refurbish used test wafers and return them to the manufacturer for reuse in test and process monitor applications.
Summarized financial information for each of the reportable segments is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Specialty |
|
Performance |
|
Dioxide |
|
Advanced |
|
Specialty |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|||||||
($ in millions) |
|
Chemicals |
|
Additives |
|
Pigments |
|
Ceramics |
|
Compounds |
|
and other |
|
Consolidated |
|
|||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
289.6 |
|
$ |
177.2 |
|
$ |
181.1 |
|
$ |
124.7 |
|
$ |
59.8 |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
$ |
833.9 |
|
Total Adjusted EBITDA |
|
73.8 |
|
29.5 |
|
30.7 |
|
37.0 |
|
9.1 |
|
(15.1 |
) |
165.0 |
|
|||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
225.3 |
|
$ |
155.3 |
|
$ |
139.0 |
|
$ |
87.9 |
|
$ |
51.1 |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
$ |
660.0 |
|
Total Adjusted EBITDA |
|
50.3 |
|
20.6 |
|
21.5 |
|
17.8 |
|
7.8 |
|
(8.8 |
) |
109.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Specialty |
|
Performance |
|
Dioxide |
|
Advanced |
|
Specialty |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
($ in millions) |
|
Chemicals |
|
Additives |
|
Pigments |
|
Ceramics |
|
Compounds |
|
and other |
|
Eliminations (a) |
|
Consolidated |
|
||||||||
Identifiable assets as of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
2,047.6 |
|
$ |
756.7 |
|
$ |
871.9 |
|
$ |
829.9 |
|
$ |
133.3 |
|
$ |
339.5 |
|
$ |
(344.6 |
) |
$ |
4,634.3 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
2,088.9 |
|
762.7 |
|
945.1 |
|
866.3 |
|
124.9 |
|
323.6 |
|
(329.8 |
) |
4,781.7 |
|
||||||||
(a) Amounts contained in the Eliminations column represent the individual subsidiaries retained interest in their cumulative net cash balance (deposits less withdrawals) included in the corporate centralized cash system and within the identifiable assets of the respective segment. These amounts are eliminated as the corporate centralized cash system is included in the Corporate and other segments identifiable assets.
Geographic information regarding net sales based on sellers location and long-lived assets are described in Note 3, Segment Information, in the Companys 2009 Form 10-K.
On a segment basis, the Company defines Adjusted EBITDA as operating income excluding depreciation and amortization, certain non-cash gains and charges, certain other special gains and charges deemed by senior management to be non-recurring gains and charges and certain items deemed by senior management to have little or no bearing on the day-to-day operating performance of its business segments and reporting units. The adjustments made to operating income directly correlate with the adjustments to net income in calculating Adjusted EBITDA on a consolidated basis pursuant to the Companys senior secured credit agreement, which reflects managements interpretations thereof. The indenture governing the senior subordinated notes, due in 2014 (2014 Notes) and the facility agreement related to the Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture excludes certain adjustments permitted under the senior credit agreement. Senior management uses Adjusted EBITDA on a segment basis as the primary measure to evaluate the ongoing performance of the Companys business segments and reporting units. Because the Company views Adjusted EBITDA on a segment basis as an operating performance measure, the Company uses income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes as the most comparable GAAP measure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Specialty |
|
Performance |
|
Dioxide |
|
Advanced |
|
Specialty |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|||||||
($ in millions) |
|
Chemicals |
|
Additives |
|
Pigments |
|
Ceramics |
|
Compounds |
|
and other |
|
Consolidated |
|
|||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes |
|
$ |
39.8 |
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
$ |
(19.6 |
) |
$ |
54.2 |
|
Interest expense, net (a) |
|
16.4 |
|
7.7 |
|
4.6 |
|
8.2 |
|
2.5 |
|
2.4 |
|
41.8 |
|
|||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
18.6 |
|
14.7 |
|
17.7 |
|
12.6 |
|
2.1 |
|
1.2 |
|
66.9 |
|
|||||||
Restructuring and other severance costs |
|
0.1 |
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
2.2 |
|
|||||||
Systems/organization establishment expenses |
|
0.4 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|||||||
Acquisition and disposal costs |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.2 |
|
|||||||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss, net |
|
(1.0 |
) |
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|||||||
Other |
|
(0.6 |
) |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
(0.9 |
) |
|||||||
Total Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
73.8 |
|
$ |
29.5 |
|
$ |
30.7 |
|
$ |
37.0 |
|
$ |
9.1 |
|
$ |
(15.1 |
) |
$ |
165.0 |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes |
|
$ |
13.2 |
|
$ |
(5.4 |
) |
$ |
(7.4 |
) |
$ |
(6.8 |
) |
$ |
2.8 |
|
$ |
(19.9 |
) |
$ |
(23.5 |
) |
Interest expense, net (a) |
|
14.8 |
|
7.2 |
|
9.8 |
|
8.0 |
|
2.3 |
|
7.2 |
|
49.3 |
|
|||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
18.8 |
|
15.1 |
|
17.9 |
|
11.9 |
|
2.7 |
|
1.7 |
|
68.1 |
|
|||||||
Restructuring and other severance costs |
|
1.6 |
|
2.9 |
|
0.1 |
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
7.8 |
|
|||||||
Systems/organization establishment expenses |
|
0.3 |
|
0.5 |
|
1.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
2.1 |
|
|||||||
Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
(2.2 |
) |
|||||||
Loss on sale of assets and other |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|||||||
Foreign exchange loss, net |
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
5.6 |
|
|||||||
Other |
|
0.4 |
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
1.9 |
|
|||||||
Total Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
50.3 |
|
$ |
20.6 |
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
$ |
17.8 |
|
$ |
7.8 |
|
$ |
(8.8 |
) |
$ |
109.2 |
|
(a) Includes gains of $2.1 million and losses of $9.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, representing the movement in the mark-to-market valuation of the Companys interest rate and cross-currency hedging instruments.
The summary of segment information above includes Adjusted EBITDA, a financial measure used by the Companys chief decision maker and senior management to evaluate the operating performance of each segment.
Items excluded from Adjusted EBITDA
Certain items are added to or subtracted from income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes to derive Adjusted EBITDA, as defined below. These items include the following:
· Restructuring and other severance costs: Restructuring and other severance costs of $2.2 million and $7.8 million were recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for miscellaneous restructuring activities, including headcount reductions, asset write-offs and facility closures (see Note 14, Restructuring and Other Severance Costs, for further details).
· Systems/organization establishment expenses: For the three months ended March 31, 2010, expenses of $0.9 million were recorded primarily related to costs incurred in conjunction with reorganizing certain business functions within the Specialty Chemicals segment and the integration of the Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture completed in September 2008. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, expenses of $2.1 million were recorded related to the integration of businesses acquired, primarily related to the acquisition of the Elementis plc business in the Performance Additives segment in August 2007.
· Gain on early extinguishment of debt: For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded a gain of $2.2
million related to the repurchase of 12.2 million ($15.5 million based on the exchange rate in effect on the date of repurchase) of its senior subordinated notes due in 2014, and the prepayment of 63.2 million ($85.1 million based on the exchange rate in effect on the date of payment) and $17.2 million of its senior secured term loans related to amortization payments due between 2009 2011.
· Foreign exchange (gain) loss, net: For the three months ended March 31, 2009, foreign exchange losses of $5.6 million were recorded due to the impact of the weaker Euro as of March 31, 2009 versus December 31, 2008, in connection with non-operating Euro-denominated transactions.
· Other: For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded income of $0.9 million primarily related to a gain recorded on the sale of an investment previously accounted for under the equity method in the Specialty Chemicals segment and the reversal of a reserve covering legacy obligations assumed in connection with the acquisition of the Dynamit Nobel businesses in 2004. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded an expense of $1.9 million primarily related to an increase in reserves covering two legacy obligations assumed in connection with the acquisition of the Dynamit Nobel businesses in 2004.
5. DERIVATIVES:
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company manages its exposure to these market risks through regular operating and financing activities and through the use of derivatives. When used, derivatives are employed as risk management tools and not for trading purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company had $1,161.9 million (a portion of which is subject to a Libor or Euribor floor of 2.00%) and $1,186.9 million of variable rate debt (after hedging) outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Any borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility and the Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture revolving credit facility are at a variable rate (with the senior secured revolving credit facility subject to a Libor or Euribor floor of 2.00%). There were no outstanding borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility and the Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture revolving credit facility as of March 31, 2010. Historically, the Company has entered into interest rate swaps to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates related to variable rate debt. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, these contracts cover notional amounts of 477.2 million (at interest rates ranging from 2.995% to 4.416%) and 482.2 million (at interest rates ranging from 2.995% to 4.416%), respectively. These derivative contracts effectively convert a portion of the senior secured credit obligations and a portion of the obligations under the Titanium Dioxide Pigments term loan facility to fixed rate obligations. These hedges will mature between December 2010 and July 2012. The Company has not applied hedge accounting for these interest rate swaps and has recorded the mark-to-market of these derivatives as a component of interest expense in its condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company may in the future consider adjusting the amounts covered by these derivative contracts to better suit its capital structure. The Company may allow all or a portion of these swaps to lapse, enter into replacement swaps or settle these swaps prior to expiration.
During 2003, the Company entered into a cross-currency interest rate swap with a notional amount of $20.3 million that effectively converted $20.3 million U.S. dollar borrowings into Euro-based obligations at an effective interest rate of Euribor plus 4.00%. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the notional amounts of this cross-currency interest rate hedge were $19.0 million and 16.7 million and $19.1 million and 17.0 million, respectively. This contract had a final maturity date of July 2010. In April 2010, the Company settled this swap and paid $3.3 million to the counterparty. The Company has not applied hedge accounting for this cross-currency interest rate swap and has recorded the mark-to-market of this derivative as a component of interest expense in its condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Foreign Currency Risk
In December 2008, the Company entered into foreign currency forward contracts to manage its exposure to fluctuations in currency rates on certain forecasted sales denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the legal entity. These foreign currency forward contracts hedged the exposure to movements in foreign exchange rates for forecasted transactions for twelve months, and expired in December 2009. The instruments were designated as foreign exchange cash flow hedges and were effective at generating offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item or transaction. There was no gain or loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings as a result of the discontinuance of cash flow hedges because it was not probable that the original forecasted transactions would not occur.
In February 2010, the Company entered into foreign currency forward contracts to manage its exposure to fluctuations in currency rates on forecasted sales denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the legal entity. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had notional amounts outstanding for these foreign currency forward contracts of $4.1 million. The Company has not
applied hedge accounting for these foreign currency forward contracts.
In connection with the offering of the 2014 Notes, the Company entered into a cross-currency interest rate swap with a five-year term which expired in November 2009 and a notional amount of 155.6 million that effectively converts the U.S. dollar fixed rate debt in respect of the 2014 dollar-denominated notes sold into Euro fixed rate debt. The Company paid $32.9 million in connection with the settlement of this cross-currency swap in November 2009. The Company designated this contract as a hedge of the foreign currency exposure of its net investment in its Euro-denominated operations. In addition, the Company has designated a portion of its Euro-denominated debt that is recorded on its U.S. books as a net investment hedge of its Euro-denominated investments (Euro debt of 103.1 million at March 31, 2010; $139.3 million). Any foreign currency gains and losses resulting from the designated portion of Euro-denominated debt discussed above is accounted for as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income for as long as the hedge remains effective. There was no ineffective portion of the net investment hedge as of March 31, 2010.
The following table provides the fair value and balance sheet location of the Companys derivative instruments as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
Fair Value as of |
|
Fair Value as of |
|
||||||||
(in millions) |
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest rate swaps |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
23.5 |
|
||||
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
5.2 |
|
||||
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
The following table provides the gains and losses reported in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) within Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in |
|
||||
|
|
OCI on Derivatives and Other Financial |
|
||||
|
|
Instruments (Effective Portion) |
|
||||
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
||||
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Derivatives and Other Financial Instruments in Net Investment Hedging Relationships: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cross-currency interest rate swaps - net investment hedge |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
Euro-denominated debt |
|
8.4 |
|
47.4 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
$ |
57.5 |
|
In the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, no gains or losses were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income.
The following table provides the gains and losses reported in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Recognized in Income on Derivatives |
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
||||
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
||||
(in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Derivatives |
|
||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
$ |
(10.8 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
|
1.1 |
|
1.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
||
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
$ |
(9.6 |
) |
|
|
6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:
The Company follows a fair value measurement hierarchy to measure assets and liabilities. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are derivatives and marketable securities. In addition, the Company measures its pension plan assets at fair value (see Note 15, Employee Benefit Plans in the Companys 2009 Form 10-K for further details). The Companys financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:
Level 1 Inputs are unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs are directly or indirectly observable, which include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 Inputs are unobservable inputs that are used to measure fair value to the extent observable inputs are not available. The Company does not have any financial assets or liabilities that are classified as Level 3 inputs as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
In accordance with the fair value hierarchy, the following table provides the fair value of the Companys financial assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
As of |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
||||||||
(in millions) |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Marketable securities (a) |
|
$ |
232.9 |
|
$ |
232.9 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts (b) |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
||||
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
233.1 |
|
$ |
232.9 |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest rate swaps (b) |
|
$ |
30.9 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
30.9 |
|
$ |
|
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps (b) |
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
||||
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
||||||||
(in millions) |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Marketable securities (a) |
|
$ |
162.0 |
|
$ |
162.0 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
162.0 |
|
$ |
162.0 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest rate swaps (b) |
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
$ |
|
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps (b) |
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
||||
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
$ |
|
|
(a) These primarily represent money market funds with an original maturity of three months or less.
(b) See Note 5, Derivatives, for further details of the Companys derivative instruments.
The fair values of marketable securities are based on unadjusted quoted market prices from various financial information service providers and securities exchanges. The fair values of derivatives are based on quoted market prices from various banks for similar instruments. The valuation of these instruments reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including forward curves.
Counter-party risk The Company manages counter-party risk by entering into derivative contracts with only major financial institutions of investment grade quality and by limiting the amount of exposure to each financial institution. The Company has considered credit adjustments in its determination of the fair value of its derivative assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 based on market participant assumptions. In addition, based on the credit evaluation of each counter-party institution to its derivatives as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company believes the carrying values to be fully realizable.
Debt The Company estimates that its debt under the senior secured credit facility and Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture facility agreement, based on current interest rates and terms, approximates fair value. Based on quoted market prices at March 31, 2010, the Company estimates the fair value of its 2014 Notes approximated $543.4 million. As of March 31, 2010, the aggregate principal carrying amount of the 2014 Notes was $537.9 million.
Cash and Cash Equivalents - All highly liquid instruments and money market funds with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. The carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short maturities of these instruments.
7. INVENTORIES:
Inventories are comprised of the following:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
($ in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Raw materials |
|
$ |
151.7 |
|
$ |
165.6 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
72.5 |
|
73.7 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
279.7 |
|
270.7 |
|
||
Packaging materials |
|
7.0 |
|
7.0 |
|
||
Total |
|
$ |
510.9 |
|
$ |
517.0 |
|
8. GOODWILL:
Below are goodwill balances and activity by segment:
|
|
Specialty |
|
Advanced |
|
|
|
|||
($ in millions) |
|
Chemicals |
|
Ceramics |
|
Total |
|
|||
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
661.7 |
|
$ |
277.5 |
|
$ |
939.2 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
(36.4 |
) |
(16.1 |
) |
(52.5 |
) |
|||
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
625.3 |
|
261.4 |
|
886.7 |
|
|||
9. OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
Other intangible assets, net consist of:
|
|
As of March 31, 2010 |
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
||||||
($ in millions) |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
Net |
|
||||||
Patents and other intellectual property |
|
$ |
368.0 |
|
$ |
(133.9 |
) |
$ |
234.1 |
|
$ |
384.3 |
|
$ |
(133.0 |
) |
$ |
251.3 |
|
Trade names and trademarks |
|
138.7 |
|
(33.8 |
) |
104.9 |
|
146.3 |
|
(33.7 |
) |
112.6 |
|
||||||
Customer relationships |
|
374.9 |
|
(121.1 |
) |
253.8 |
|
390.1 |
|
(117.7 |
) |
272.4 |
|
||||||
Supply agreements |
|
60.7 |
|
(13.3 |
) |
47.4 |
|
62.8 |
|
(12.3 |
) |
50.5 |
|
||||||
Other |
|
43.1 |
|
(26.9 |
) |
16.2 |
|
48.8 |
|
(30.9 |
) |
17.9 |
|
||||||
Total |
|
$ |
985.4 |
|
$ |
(329.0 |
) |
$ |
656.4 |
|
$ |
1,032.3 |
|
$ |
(327.6 |
) |
$ |
704.7 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets was $20.0 million and $19.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Estimated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows:
($ in millions) |
|
Amortization |
|
|
Year ended |
|
Expense |
|
|
2010 |
|
$ |
79.1 |
|
2011 |
|
75.8 |
|
|
2012 |
|
72.3 |
|
|
2013 |
|
69.8 |
|
|
2014 |
|
65.6 |
|
|
10. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt and loans payable are summarized as follows:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
($ and in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Senior secured credit facilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Tranche A-1 term loans (3.8 and 4.2, respectively) |
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
Tranche A-2 term loans (32.8 and 36.5, respectively) |
|
44.4 |
|
52.3 |
|
||
Tranche E term loans |
|
138.7 |
|
139.4 |
|
||
Tranche G term loans (64.8 and 65.1, respectively) |
|
87.5 |
|
93.2 |
|
||
Tranche H term loans |
|
932.5 |
|
937.2 |
|
||
Tranche I term loans (193.7 and 194.7, respectively) |
|
261.7 |
|
278.8 |
|
||
2014 Notes (250.1 and $200.0 as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009) |
|
537.9 |
|
558.2 |
|
||
Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture term loans (240.0) |
|
324.2 |
|
343.7 |
|
||
Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture revolving short-term loans (10.0 as of December 31, 2009) |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
||
Capitalized lease obligations (31.2 and 31.9, respectively) |
|
42.2 |
|
45.7 |
|
||
Other loans |
|
56.5 |
|
59.5 |
|
||
|
|
2,430.7 |
|
2,528.3 |
|
||
Less current maturities |
|
(77.9 |
) |
(94.2 |
) |
||
|
|
$ |
2,352.8 |
|
$ |
2,434.1 |
|
11. INCOME TAXES:
The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was 32.3% and 71.1%, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate from the prior year is primarily related to the mix of domestic losses and foreign income in 2010 compared to 2009. In both periods, federal taxes were zero as a result of a full valuation allowance. The domestic losses in 2010 have been significantly reduced over 2009 resulting in a benefit in the effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The difference between the effective rate and the U.S. statutory rate of 35.0% in the three months ended March 31, 2010 primarily relates to favorable foreign rate differentials. The difference between the effective tax rate and the U.S. statutory rate of 35.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily relates to a nonrecurring tax benefit related to foreign currency changes as well as domestic tax benefits allocated from other comprehensive income.
In the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company decreased its worldwide valuation allowances by $2.0 million. The decrease in the valuation allowance was due to domestic gains recorded in other comprehensive income partially offset by an increase in domestic and foreign tax losses. The change in the valuation allowance for the three months ended March 31, 2010 increased the tax provision by $1.4 million. The following table reflects the activity in the valuation allowance for worldwide net operating losses and other deferred income tax assets:
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Allowance |
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
132.9 |
|
Increase as reflected in income tax expense |
|
1.4 |
|
|
Other (a) |
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
130.9 |
|
(a) Related to temporary differences of the mark-to-market of the Companys Euro-denominated debt.
In the three months ended March 31, 2010, based on the Companys policy and review of available information, including the Companys steady-state analysis, it was determined that there was not sufficient positive evidence of future taxable income to release the U.S. federal valuation allowance that has been recorded. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Companys net U.S. federal deferred tax assets and liabilities were maintained at a zero level, other than a noncurrent deferred tax liability relating to goodwill with an indefinite reversal period and a noncurrent deferred tax asset relating to a Federal Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) Credit. It is the Companys policy that the valuation allowance is reversed in the year management determines it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized.
Unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2010 were $20.0 million. The Company had accrued $8.2 million for interest and penalties as of March 31, 2010. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its income tax provision. Of the $28.2 million, there are tax benefits of $27.8 million that if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate, and tax benefits of $0.4 million that if recognized, would result in an adjustment to other tax accounts.
During the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that resolution of uncertain tax liabilities could result in a benefit of up to $11.9 million or a cost of up to $21.4 million. Audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements are subject to significant uncertainty.
The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S., various states, and foreign jurisdictions. The Companys tax filings in major jurisdictions are open to investigation by tax authorities; in the U.S. from 2005, in the U.K. from 2007, and in Germany from 2000.
12. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS:
The following table represents the net periodic benefit costs and related components in accordance with the accounting guidance on compensation and retirement benefits:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
($ in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
Service cost |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
Interest cost |
|
8.6 |
|
8.4 |
|
||
Expected return on assets |
|
(3.8 |
) |
(3.6 |
) |
||
Amortization of actuarial losses |
|
0.6 |
|
0.2 |
|
||
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
||
Total pension cost |
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
13. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share (EPS) were computed using the following common share data:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
($ in millions, except per share amounts; shares in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||
EPS Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Amounts attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
$ |
(3.8 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
$ |
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
EPS Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
74,297 |
|
74,064 |
|
||
Effect of dilutive stock options and other incentives |
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
||
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common stock equivalents |
|
77,058 |
|
74,064 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Rockwood Holdings, Inc.: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Stock-based awards under employee compensation plans representing common stock of 1,278,067 shares and 6,582,950 shares were outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect.
14. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER SEVERANCE COSTS:
The Company records restructuring liabilities that represent charges incurred in connection with consolidations and cessations of certain of its operations, including operations from acquisitions, as well as headcount reduction programs. These charges consist primarily of severance and facility closure costs. Severance charges are based on various factors including the employees length of service, contract provisions, salary levels and local governmental legislation. At the time a related charge is recorded, the Company calculates its best estimate based upon detailed analysis. Although significant changes are not expected, actual costs may differ from these estimates.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company expensed $1.9 million of restructuring charges, primarily representing an asset write-off in connection with the elimination of a duplicate manufacturing facility in the Performance Additives segment.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company expensed $1.4 million of restructuring charges. The major components of the restructuring charge included $0.8 million in the Color Pigments and Services business in the Performance Additives segment in connection with the integration of the businesses acquired from Elementis plc and $0.4 million in the Specialty Chemicals segment.
Restructuring and other severance costs in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 also included other severance-related costs of $0.3 million and $6.4 million, respectively, related to headcount reductions undertaken throughout the Company.
All restructuring actions still in progress as of March 31, 2010 are expected to be substantially complete by the end of the year. However, payouts of certain liabilities resulting from these actions will take place over several years. In particular, as of March 31, 2010, restructuring liabilities of $5.5 million includes $1.8 million in the Corporate and other segment related to an unexpired lease in connection with the 2006 restructuring of the Wafer Reclaim business. Management believes that the majority of the remaining $3.7 million obligation will be utilized in 2010. Selected information for outstanding liabilities from recent restructuring actions is as follows:
|
|
Severance/ |
|
Facility |
|
|
|
|||
($ in millions) |
|
Relocation |
|
Closure |
|
Total |
|
|||
Liability balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
Restructuring charge in 2010 (a) |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
|||
Utilized |
|
(1.2 |
) |
(0.6 |
) |
(1.8 |
) |
|||
Foreign exchange and other |
|
(0.2 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
(0.3 |
) |
|||
Liability balance, March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
(a) Excludes asset write-off described above.
Restructuring reserves by segment are as follows:
($ in millions) |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
Specialty Chemicals |
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
Performance Additives |
|
0.4 |
|
0.7 |
|
||
Advanced Ceramics |
|
0.8 |
|
1.0 |
|
||
Corporate and other |
|
2.0 |
|
2.1 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
Legal ProceedingsThe Company is involved in various legal proceedings, including commercial, intellectual property, product liability and environmental matters of a nature considered normal to its business. It is the Companys policy to accrue for amounts related to these matters if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount can be reasonably estimated. It is the Companys policy to disclose such matters when there is at least a reasonable possibility that a material loss may have been incurred.
Advertising Matter
On March 3, 2009, Osmose, Inc. (OI) filed an action against Viance, the joint venture in the Timber Treatment Chemicals business, Rockwood Holdings, Inc., and certain individuals, in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, claiming that recent advertisements by Viance comparing its ACQ product and OIs MCQ product were false and misleading in violation of the Lanham Act, constituted unfair competition, violated the Georgia Deceptive Trade Practices Act, were defamatory and that Viance tortiously interfered with OIs business relationships. OI is seeking damages related to their attorneys fees and costs and punitive damages. OI also sought a temporary restraining order (TRO) and a preliminary injunction prohibiting Viance from continuing to make certain claims in advertisements related to their MCQ product. On March 20, 2009, the district court granted Osmoses motion for a TRO. Viance raised certain counterclaims related to OIs advertisements and both parties claims were heard at a recent hearing. In September 2009, the district court issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting Viance from making certain claims related to MCQ in
its advertisements and denied Viances request for a preliminary injunction related to certain claims in Osmoses advertisements, which Viance subsequently appealed. The U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit has scheduled oral arguments for May 20, 2010. The Company will continue to vigorously defend this matter. While the Company believes the defendants have meritorious defenses against OIs claims and does not believe that resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on its business or financial condition, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this litigation, and the resolution of this matter may have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or cash flows in any quarterly or annual reporting period.
EC Heat Stabilizers Investigation
The European Commission (EC) has investigated possible infringement of certain antitrust regulations in the market for heat stabilizers from 1986 until at least 2000 by certain industry participants, which included a business sold by a subsidiary in the Specialty Chemicals segment in 2000. On March 23, 2009, the EC confirmed that it commenced a proceeding against certain participants in the heat stabilizers market, including the business formerly owned by this subsidiary and the Companys subsidiary. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries are active in the market for heat stabilizers; however, the business sold in 2000 was active in this market. On November 11, 2009, the EC issued its decision imposing fines on several companies including a fine jointly and severally against the Companys subsidiary and two other parties in the amount of 1.9 million, and against the Companys subsidiary and one other party in the amount of 1.4 million. By decision of February 8, 2010, the EC amended its decision of November 11, 2009 to apply the cap pursuant to the applicable European Council Regulation. The Company expects its portion of the fine to not exceed 1.1 million. The Company does not believe that resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations or financial condition.
Lanxess Matter
On January 18, 2010, Lanxess Deutschland GmbH filed suit in the District Court of Pori, Finland against Sachtleben Pigments Oy (Sachtleben), a subsidiary of the Companys Titanium Dioxide Pigments venture, claiming breach of contract in connection with Sachtlebens termination of a supply agreement with plaintiff. The plaintiff is seeking up to 7.0 million in damages plus accrued interest and legal fees. Sachtlebens answer was filed on March 19, 2010. The Company believes Sachtleben has meritorious defenses against the plaintiffs claims, and although Sachtleben does not believe that resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on its business or financial condition, the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this litigation, and the resolution of this matter may have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or cash flows in any quarterly or annual reporting period.