UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark One)

x                               ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended September 29, 2006

OR

o                                  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to            

Commission file number:  000-51928

CPI International, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)

 

75-3142681
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

811 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, California 94303-1110

(Address of Principal Executive Offices
and Zip Code)

 

(650) 846-2900
(Registrant’s telephone number,
including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

Title of each Class

 

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

 

The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o  No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o  No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of each registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer  o

 

Accelerated Filer  o

 

Non-Accelerated Filer  x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Not Applicable

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 16,075,400 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, were outstanding at November 27, 2006.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Portions of the registrant’s definitive 2007 proxy statement, anticipated to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the registrant’s fiscal year, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 




CPI INTERNATIONAL, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Page

PART I.

 

 

 

Item

 

 

 

1.

Business

4

 

1A.

Risk Factors

15

 

1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

25

 

2.

Properties

25

 

3.

Legal Proceedings

26

 

4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

26

 

PART II.

 

 

 

Item

 

 

 

5.

Market Price of Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

27

 

6.

Selected Financial Data

27

 

7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

30

 

7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

58

 

8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

59

 

9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

59

 

9A.

Controls and Procedures

59

 

9B.

Other Information

59

 

PART III.

 

 

 

Item

 

 

 

10.

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

60

 

11.

Executive Compensation

60

 

12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

60

 

13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

60

 

14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

60

 

PART IV.

 

 

 

Item

 

 

 

15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

61

 

 




Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, readers can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue,” the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results projected, expected or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risk factors include, without limitation, competition in our end markets; our significant amount of debt; changes or reductions in the U.S. defense budget; U.S. government contracts laws and regulations; changes in technology; the impact of unexpected costs; inability to obtain raw materials and components; and currency fluctuations. All written and oral forward-looking statements made in connection with this report that are attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing risk factors and other cautionary statements included herein and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.

The information in this report is not a complete description of our business or the risks and uncertainties associated with an investment in our securities. You should carefully consider the various risks and uncertainties that impact our business and the other information in this report and in our other filings with the SEC before you decide to invest in our securities or to maintain or increase your investment.

3




PART I

Item 1.                        Business

Background

We are a leading provider of microwave and radio frequency (“RF”), power and control products for critical defense, communications, medical, scientific and other applications. We develop, manufacture and distribute products used to generate, amplify and transmit high-power/high-frequency microwave and RF signals and/or provide power and control for various applications.

Approximately half of our product sales for fiscal year 2006 were for U.S. and foreign government and military end use, particularly for radar and electronic warfare applications. We are one of three companies in the U.S. that have the facilities and expertise to produce a broad range of high-power microwave products to the demanding specifications required for advanced military applications. Our products are critical elements of high-priority U.S. and foreign military programs and platforms, including numerous planes, ships and ground-based platforms. Defense applications of our products include transmitting and receiving radar signals for locating and tracking threats, weapons guidance and navigation, as well as transmitting decoy and jamming signals for electronic warfare and transmitting signals for satellite communications. The U.S. Government is our only customer that accounted for more than 10% of our sales in the last three fiscal years.

In addition to our strong presence in defense applications, we have successfully applied our key technologies to commercial end markets, including communications, medical, industrial and scientific applications, which provides us with a diversified base of sales. Approximately half of our product sales for fiscal year 2006 were for commercial applications.

We continue to develop higher-power, wider-bandwidth and higher-frequency microwave products that enable significant technological advances for our defense and commercial customers. In fiscal year 2006, we generated approximately 57% of our total sales from products for which we believe we are the sole provider to our customers, enhancing our reputation and the stability of our business.

Many of our products “wear out,” having average lives of between three and seven years, and require replacement after that time. We estimate that approximately 47% of our total sales for fiscal year 2006 were generated from recurring sales of replacements, spares and repairs, including upgraded replacements for existing products, providing us with a stable, predictable business that is partially insulated from dramatic shifts in market conditions. We regularly work with our customers to create upgraded products with enhanced bandwidth, power and reliability. We estimate that our products are installed in over 125 U.S. defense systems in addition to over 180 commercial systems. This installed base and our sole-provider positioning on high-profile U.S. military and commercial programs provide us with a reputation and market visibility that we believe will help us generate profitable future sales growth.

In 1948, Russell and Sigurd Varian, the historical founders of our business and the inventors of the klystron, founded Varian Associates, Inc. and introduced the klystron as their first commercial product. The klystron is still a foundation of modern high-power microwave applications and makes possible the generation, amplification and transmission of high-fidelity electronic signals at high-power levels and high frequencies. Varian Associates’ first products became the progenitors of our current product lines. Over time, Varian Associates, through internal development and acquisition, developed new devices and new uses for its products, including applications for the radar, electronic warfare, communications, medical, industrial and scientific markets.

In 1995, a private equity fund, together with members of management, purchased the electron device business from Varian Associates and formed Communications & Power Industries Holding Corporation, our predecessor, which was the parent company of Communications and Power Industries, Inc. CPI

4




International, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in November 2003, under the name CPI Acquisition Corp. and was wholly owned at that time by affiliates of The Cypress Group (“Cypress”). In January 2004, CPI Acquisition Corp. acquired the predecessor in a merger and changed its name from CPI Acquisition Corp. to CPI Holdco, Inc. In January 2006, CPI Holdco, Inc. changed its name to CPI International, Inc. On May 3, 2006, we completed the initial public offering of the common stock of CPI International in which we sold 2.9 million shares of common stock and the selling stockholders sold 4.1 million shares at an initial public offering price of $18.00 per share.

Unless otherwise noted or dictated by context, (1) “CPI International” or “successor” means CPI International, Inc., (2) “predecessor” means Communications & Power Industries Holding Corporation, the predecessor to CPI International, (3) “Communications & Power Industries” means Communications & Power Industries, Inc., the direct, wholly owned operating subsidiary of CPI International and (4) “merger” or the “January 2004 merger” means the January 23, 2004 merger pursuant to which CPI International acquired the predecessor. The terms “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to CPI International and its direct and indirect subsidiaries on a consolidated basis after the merger, or to the predecessor and its direct and indirect subsidiaries on a consolidated basis prior to the merger, as applicable.

We are organized into five operating divisions: Microwave Power Products Division (Palo Alto, California), Beverly Microwave Division (Beverly, Massachusetts), Satcom Division and Communications & Medical Products Division (both in Ontario, Canada), and Econco Division (Woodland, California). In fiscal year 2006, we moved the operations of our Eimac business (“Eimac”), which was formerly a separate division, from San Carlos, California into our facility in nearby Palo Alto, California, and integrated those operations into our Microwave Power Products Division in order to realize increased efficiencies and achieve additional cost savings.

Markets

We develop, manufacture and distribute products used to generate, amplify and transmit high-power/high-frequency microwave and RF signals and/or provide power and control for various applications in defense and commercial markets. We serve six end markets: the radar, electronic warfare, communications, medical, industrial and scientific markets. Certain of our products are sold in more than one end market depending on the specific power and frequency requirements of the application and the physical operating conditions of the end product. End-use applications of these systems include:

·       the transmission of radar signals for navigation and location;

·       the transmission of deception signals for electronic countermeasures;

·       the transmission and amplification of voice, data and video signals for broadcasting, Internet and other types of communications;

·       providing power and control for medical diagnostic imaging;

·       generating microwave energy for radiation therapy in the treatment of cancer; and

·       generating microwave energy for various industrial and scientific applications.

Our end markets are described below.

Radar Market

We supply products used in various types of military systems, including search, fire control, tracking and weather radar systems. In radar systems, our products are used to generate or amplify electromagnetic energy pulses, which are transmitted via the radar system’s antenna through the air until they strike a

5




target. The return “echo” is read and analyzed by the receiving portion of the radar system, which then enables the user to locate and identify the target. Our products have been an integral element of radar systems for over five decades. Our sales in the radar market were $119.9 million in fiscal year 2006, compared to $109.4 million in fiscal year 2005. We believe that, on average, well over 50% of our sales in the radar market are generated from recurring sales of replacements, spares and repairs, including upgraded replacements for existing products.

Our radar products include microwave and power grid sources, microwave amplifiers, receiver protectors, multifunction integrated microwave assemblies, as well as complete transmitter subsystems consisting of the microwave amplifier, power supply and control system. Our products are used in air, ground and shipboard radar systems. We are a leading provider of power grid and microwave power sources for government radar applications, with an installed base of products on more than 125 systems and a sole provider position in numerous landmark programs.

Electronic Warfare Market

We supply microwave power amplifiers to the electronic warfare market. Electronic warfare systems provide protection for ships, aircraft and high-value land targets against radar-guided weapons by interfering with, deceiving or disabling the threats. Electronic warfare systems include onboard electronic equipment, pods that attach under aircraft wings and expendable decoys. Within an electronic warfare system, our components amplify low-level incoming signals received from enemy radar or enemy communications systems and amplify or modify those signals to enable the electronic warfare system either to jam or deceive the threat. We are a leading provider of microwave power sources for the electronic warfare market, having sold thousands of devices into the market, and we believe we have a sole provider position in products for high-power phased array systems and expendable decoys. The electronic warfare market also includes devices and subsystems being developed or supplied for high-power microwave applications, such as systems to disable and destroy improvised explosive devices (“IEDs”) and Active Denial (a new system, currently in testing, that uses microwave energy to deter unfriendly personnel). Our sales in the electronic warfare market were $26.8 million in fiscal year 2006, compared to $27.7 million in fiscal year 2005. Many of the electronic warfare programs on which we are a qualified supplier are well-entrenched current programs for which we believe there is ongoing demand.

Medical Market

Within the medical market, we focus on diagnostic and treatment applications. For diagnostic applications, we provide x-ray generators, subsystems, software and user interfaces, including state-of-the-art, high-efficiency, compact power supplies and modern microprocessor-based controls and operator consoles for diagnostic imaging. X-ray generators are used to generate and control the electrical energy being supplied to an x-ray vacuum electron device (“VED”) and, therefore, control the dose of radiation delivered to the patient during an x-ray imaging procedure. In addition, these x-ray generators include a user interface to control the operation of the equipment, including exposure times and the selection of the anatomic region of the body to be examined. These generators are interfaced with, and often power and control, auxiliary devices such as patient positioners, cameras and automatic exposure controls to synchronize the x-ray examination with this other equipment.

For treatment applications, we provide klystron VEDs and electron guns for high-end radiation therapy machines. Klystrons provide the microwave energy to accelerate a beam of energy toward a cancerous tumor.

Sales in the medical market were $57.6 million in fiscal year 2006, compared to $50.7 million in fiscal year 2005.

6




Since 1995, when Varian Associates sold its electron devices business to us, we have been the sole provider of klystron high-power microwave devices to Varian Medical Systems Inc.’s oncology systems division for use in its High Energy Clinac® radiation therapy machines for the treatment of cancer, and we expect this relationship to continue. Approximately 4,700 of Varian Medical Systems’ Clinac® and Trilogy™ medical linear accelerators for cancer radiotherapy are in service around the world, delivering more than 30 million cancer treatments each year.

The market for our x-ray generators and associated products is broad, ranging from dealers who buy only a few generators per year, up to large OEMs who buy hundreds per year. We sell our x-ray generators and associated equipment worldwide and have been growing both our geographic presence and our product portfolio. We believe we are a leading independent supplier of x-ray generators in the world, and we believe this market provides continued growth opportunities for us.

We have traditionally focused on hospital, or “mid- to high-end” applications, and have become a premier supplier to this part of the market. However, there exists substantial demand for private clinic, or “lower-end” applications, and we have introduced a new family of products that allows us to participate more fully in this part of the market.

Communications Market

In the communications market, we provide microwave amplifiers for communications links for broadcast, video, voice and data transmission. We divide the communications market into satellite, terrestrial broadcast and over-the-horizon communications applications. Our sales in the communications market were $106.7 million in fiscal year 2006, compared to $101.4 million in fiscal year 2005. The communications market is the most volatile of our end markets, and sales can vary significantly from quarter-to-quarter due, in part, to the size of our shipments for direct-to-home satellite communications applications during a particular quarter. Historically, we have focused on commercial communications applications, but we have recently expanded our focus to include military communications applications, as we believe there is a significant and growing market for our products for these applications.

In each of the satellite, terrestrial broadcast and over-the-horizon communications markets, our products amplify and transmit signals within an overall communications system. Ground-based satellite communications transmission systems use our products to enable the transmission of microwave signals, carrying either analog or digital information, from a ground-based station to the transponders on an orbiting satellite by boosting the power of the low-level original signal to desired power levels for transmission over hundreds or thousands of miles to the satellite. The signal is received by the satellite transponder, converted to the downlink frequency and retransmitted to a ground-based receiving station. Terrestrial broadcast systems use our products to amplify and transmit signals, including television and radio signals at very high (“VHF”) and ultra high (“UHF”) frequencies, or other signals at a variety of frequencies. Over-the-horizon (also referred to as “troposcatter”) systems use our amplifiers to send a signal through the atmosphere, bouncing the signal off the troposphere, the lowest atmospheric layer, and enabling receipt of the signal tens of miles to hundreds of miles away.

Satellite Communications

The majority of our communications products are sold into the satellite communications market. We are a leading producer of power amplifiers, amplifier subsystems and high-power microwave devices for satellite uplinks. We believe that we have a worldwide installed base of over 19,000 amplifiers. We believe we offer one of the industry’s most comprehensive lines of satellite communications amplifiers, with offerings for virtually every currently applicable frequency and power requirement for both fixed and mobile satellite communications applications in the military and commercial arena. Our technological expertise, our well-established worldwide service network and our ability to design and manufacture both

7




the fully integrated amplifier and either the associated high-power microwave device or the solid state radio frequency device allows us to provide a superior overall service to our customers.

We believe we are well equipped to participate in the newest growth areas, including: amplifiers for the 30 gigahertz (GHz) band (Ka-band), which is projected to be one of the major new satellite communications growth areas for both commercial and military applications; the growing application for direct-to-home satellite broadcast of conventional and high-definition television; the use of satellite communications for broadband data communications; and specialized amplifiers for the military communications market, such as tri-band amplifiers that operate at three discrete frequency bands.

Terrestrial Broadcast Communications

We serve the AM, FM and shortwave radio and VHF and UHF television broadcast market with high-quality, reliable and efficient high-power microwave and radio frequency devices. Eimac, which we consolidated into our Microwave Power Products Division in June 2006, supplies these products to transmitter original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) directly, and offers immediate delivery of products to the end users through our distributors. Our Econco Division, which we acquired in our October 2004 acquisition of Econco Broadcast Service, Inc., is a provider of rebuilding services for high-power power grid devices, allowing broadcasters to extend the life of their devices at a cost that is lower than buying a new device. Although the terrestrial broadcast industry is considered a mature market, we believe emerging shortwave digital radio technology will provide new opportunity for our high-power products. Through the years, we have established a customer base of several thousand customers in the broadcast market, which provides us with opportunities for replacement, spares, upgrade and rebuilding business.

Over-the-horizon Communications

The over-the-horizon communications market involves over-the-horizon, microwave-based communication systems. These systems transmit voice, video and data signals for several hundred miles by bouncing the signals off the troposphere, the lowest atmospheric layer, which is approximately six miles above the earth’s surface. Since no satellite is required, these systems can provide an easy-to-install, relocatable and cost-efficient alternative to satellite-based communications.

Industrial Market

The industrial market includes applications for a wide range of systems used for material processing, instrumentation and voltage generation. We offer a number of specialized product lines to address this diverse market. We produce fully integrated amplifiers that include the associated high-power microwave devices that are used in instrumentation applications for electromagnetic interference and compatibility testing. Our products are also installed in the power supply modules of industrial equipment to perform pipe and plastic welding using RF energy, textile drying and semiconductor wafer fabrication. Recently, we have introduced a line of fully integrated industrial RF generators that use high-power microwave technology for various industrial heating and material processing applications. Our sales in the industrial market were $22.1 million in fiscal year 2006, compared to $23.1 million in fiscal year 2005.

Scientific Market

The scientific market consists primarily of equipment used in reactor fusion programs and accelerators for the study of high-energy particle physics, referred to as “Big Science.” Generally, in scientific applications, our products are used to generate high levels of microwave or RF energy. Our sales in the scientific market were $6.6 million in fiscal year 2006, compared to $8.4 million in fiscal year 2005.

8




In these scientific applications, our products are used to generate microwave and RF energy to create a beam of electrons in order to study the atom and its elementary particles. Our products are also used in research related to the generation of electricity from fusion reactions.

Geographic Markets

We sell our products in more than 85 countries. In fiscal year 2006, the United States, Europe and Asia accounted for approximately 63%, 25% and 8% of our sales, respectively. No country other than the United States accounted for more than 10% of our sales in fiscal year 2006. We believe our global sales, marketing and service capabilities enhance our ability to make sales throughout the world. See “Sales, Marketing and Service.” For financial information about geographic areas, see Note 14 to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements.

Products

We have an extensive portfolio of over 4,500 products that includes a wide range of microwave and power grid VEDs, in addition to products such as:

·       satellite communications amplifier subsystems;

·       radar and electronic warfare subsystems;

·       solid state integrated microwave assemblies;

·       medical x-ray generators and control systems;

·       modulators and transmitters; and

·       various electronic power supply and control equipment and devices.

Additionally, we have developed complementary, more highly integrated, subsystems that contain additional integrated components for medical imaging and for satellite communications applications. These integrated subsystems generally sell for higher prices.

Generally, our products are used to:

·       generate or amplify (multiply) various forms of electromagnetic energy (these products are generally referred to as VEDs, vacuum electron devices, or simply as devices);

·       direct, measure and control electromagnetic energy;

·       provide the voltages and currents to power and control devices that generate electromagnetic energy; or

·       provide some combination of the above functions.

VEDs were initially developed for defense applications but have since been applied to many commercial markets. We use tailored variations of this key technology to address the different frequency and power requirements in each of our target markets. Generally our VED products derive from, or are enhancements to, the original VED technology on which our company was founded. All of our other products were natural offshoots of the original VED technology and were developed in response to the opportunities and requirements in the market for more fully integrated products. The type of device selected for a specific application is based on the operating parameters required by the system. Our products generally have selling prices ranging from $2,000 to $100,000, with certain, limited products priced up to $1,000,000.

9




We sell several categories of VEDs, including:

·       Klystrons and gyrotrons: Klystrons are typically high-power VEDs that operate over a narrow range of frequencies, with power output ranges from hundreds of watts to megawatts and frequencies from 500 kilohertz to over 30 gigahertz. We produce and manufacture klystrons for a variety of radar, communications, medical, industrial and scientific applications.

Gyrotron oscillators and amplifiers operate at very high-power and very high frequencies. Power output of one megawatt has been achieved at frequencies greater than 100 gigahertz. These devices are used in areas such as fusion research, electronic warfare and high-resolution radar.

·       Helix traveling wave tubes: Helix traveling wave tubes are VEDs that operate over a wide range of frequencies at moderate output power levels (tens of watts to thousands of watts). These devices are ideal for terrestrial and satellite communications and electronic warfare applications.

·       Coupled cavity traveling wave tubes: Coupled cavity traveling wave tubes are VEDs that combine some of the power generating capability of a klystron with some of the increased bandwidth (wider frequency range) properties of a helix traveling wave tube. These amplifiers are medium bandwidth, high-power devices, since power output levels can be as high as one megawatt. These devices are used primarily for high-power and multi-function radars, including front line radar systems.

·       Magnetrons: Magnetron oscillators are VEDs capable of generating high-power output at relatively low cost. Magnetrons generate power levels as high as 20 megawatts and cover frequencies up to the 40 gigahertz range. We design and manufacture magnetrons for radar, electronic warfare and missile programs within the defense market. Shipboard platforms include search and air traffic control radar on most aircraft carriers, cruisers and destroyers of NATO-country naval fleets. Ground-based installations include various military and civil search and air traffic control radar systems. We are also a supplier of magnetrons for use in commercial weather radar. Potential new uses for magnetrons include high-power microwave systems for disruption of enemy electronic equipment and the disabling or destruction of road-side bombs and other IEDs.

·       Cross-field amplifiers: Cross-field amplifiers are VEDs used for high-power radar applications because they have power output capability as high as 10 megawatts. Our cross-field amplifiers are primarily used to support the Aegis radar system used by the U.S. Navy and selected foreign naval vessels. We supply units for both new ships and replacements.

·       Power grid devices: Power grid devices are lower frequency VEDs that are used to generate, amplify and control electromagnetic energy. These devices are used in commercial and defense communications systems and radio and television broadcasting. We also supply power grid devices for the shortwave broadcast market. Our products are also widely used in equipment that serves the industrial markets such as textile drying, pipe welding and semiconductor wafer fabrication.

In addition to VEDs, we also sell:

·       Microwave transmitter subsystems: Our microwave transmitter subsystems are integrated assemblies generally built around our VED products. These subsystems incorporate specialized high-voltage power supplies to power the VED, plus cooling and control systems that are uniquely designed to work in conjunction with our devices to maximize life, performance and reliability. Microwave transmitter subsystems are used in a variety of defense and commercial applications. Our transmitter subsystems are available at frequencies ranging from one gigahertz all the way up to frequencies of 100 gigahertz and beyond.

·       Satellite communications amplifiers: Satellite communications amplifiers provide integrated power amplification for the transmission of voice, broadcast, data, internet and other communications

10




signals from ground stations to satellites in all frequency bands. We provide a broad line of complete, integrated satellite communications amplifiers that consist of a vacuum electron device or solid-state microwave amplifier, a power supply to power the device, radio frequency conditioning circuitry, cooling equipment, electronics to control the amplifier and enable it to interface with the satellite ground station, and a cabinet. These amplifiers are often combined in sub-system configurations with other components to meet specific customer requirements. We offer amplifiers for both defense and commercial applications. Our products include amplifiers based on traveling wave tubes, klystrons, solid state devices and millimeter wave devices.

·       Receiver protectors and control components: Receiver protectors are used in the defense market in radar systems to protect sensitive receivers from extraneous high-power signals, thereby preventing damage to the receiver. Our business has been designing and manufacturing receiver protector products for over 50 years. We believe we are the world’s largest manufacturer of receiver protectors and the only manufacturer offering the full range of available technologies. We also manufacture a wide range of other components used to control the RF energy in the customer’s system. Our receiver protectors and control components are integrated into prominent fielded military programs. As radar systems have evolved to improve performance and reduce size and weight, we have invested in solid state technology to develop the microwave control components to allow us to offer more fully integrated products, referred to as multifunction assemblies, as required by modern radar systems.

·       Medical x-ray imaging systems: We design and manufacture x-ray generators for medical imaging applications. These consist of power supplies, cooling, control and display subsystems that drive the x-ray equipment used by healthcare providers for medical imaging. The energy in an x-ray imaging system is generated by an x-ray tube which is another version of a VED operating in a different region of the electromagnetic spectrum. These generators use the high-voltage and control systems expertise originally developed by us while designing power systems to drive our other VEDs. We have introduced a new line of x-ray generators intended to address the low tier, high volume part of the market. We also provide the electronics and software subsystems that control and tie together much of the other ancillary equipment in a typical x-ray imaging system.

Backlog

As of September 29, 2006, we had an order backlog of $187.4 million compared to an order backlog of $193.5 million as of September 30, 2005. Backlog represents the cumulative balance, at a given point in time, of recorded customer sales orders that have not yet been shipped or recognized as sales. Backlog is increased when an order is received, and backlog is reduced when we recognize sales. We believe backlog and orders information is helpful to investors because this information may be indicative of future sales results. Although backlog consists of firm orders for which goods and services are yet to be provided, customers can, and sometimes do, terminate or modify these orders. Historically, however, the amount of modifications and terminations has not been material compared to total contract volume. Approximately 90% of our backlog as of September 29, 2006 is expected to be filled within fiscal year 2007.

Sales, Marketing and Service

Our global distribution system provides us with the capability to introduce, sell and service our products worldwide. Our distribution system primarily uses our direct sales professionals throughout the world. We have direct sales offices throughout North America and Europe, as well as in India, Singapore, China and Australia. As of September 29, 2006, we had over 130 direct sales, marketing and technical support individuals on staff. Our wide-ranging distribution capabilities enable us to serve our growing international markets, which accounted for approximately 37% of our sales in fiscal year 2006.

11




Our sales professionals receive extensive technical training and focus exclusively on our products. As a result, they are able to provide knowledgeable assistance to our customers regarding product applications, the introduction and implementation of new technology and at the same time provide local technical support.

In addition to our direct sales force, we use over 40 external sales organizations and one significant stocking distributor, Richardson Electronics, Ltd., to service the needs of customers in certain markets. The majority of the third-party sales organizations that we use are located outside the United States and Europe and focus primarily on customers in South America, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Eastern Europe. Through the use of third-party sales organizations, we are better able to meet the needs of our foreign customers by establishing a local presence in lower volume markets. Using both our direct sales force and our largest distributor, Richardson Electronics, Ltd., we are able to market our products to both end users and system integrators around the world and are able to deliver our products with short turn-around times.

Given the complexity of our products, their critical function in customers’ systems and the unacceptably high costs to our customers of system failure and downtime, we believe our customers view our product breadth, reliability and superior responsive service as key points of differentiation. We offer comprehensive customer support, with direct technical support provided by 17 strategically located service centers, primarily serving satellite communications customers. These service centers are located in the United States (California and New Jersey), Canada (Georgetown, Ontario), The Netherlands, Brazil, China (three), India (three), Taiwan, Japan, Russia, Singapore, Indonesia and South Africa. The service centers enable us to provide extensive technical support and rapid response to customers’ critical spare parts and service requirements throughout the world. In addition, we offer on-site installation assistance, on-site service contracts, a 24-hour technical support hotline and complete product training at our facilities, our service centers or customer sites. We believe that many of our customers specify our products in competitive bids due to our responsive global support and product quality.

Research and Development

Total research and development spending was $14.8 million, $13.1 million and $10.9 million during fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, consisting of company-sponsored research and development expense of $8.6 million, $7.2 million and $7.5 million during fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and customer-sponsored research and development of $6.2 million, $5.9 million and $3.5 million during fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Customer-sponsored research and development costs are charged to cost of sales to match revenue recognized.

Manufacturing

We manufacture our products at five manufacturing facilities in four locations in North America. We have implemented modern manufacturing methodologies based upon a continuous improvement philosophy, including just in time materials handling, demand flow technology, statistical process control and value managed relationships with suppliers and customers. We obtain certain materials necessary for the manufacture of our products, such as molybdenum, cupronickel, OFHC copper and some cathodes, from a limited group of, or occasionally sole, suppliers. Four of our facilities have achieved the ISO 9001 international certification standard.

Generally, each of our manufacturing divisions uses similar processes consisting of product development, purchasing, high-level assembly and testing. For satellite communications equipment, the process is primarily one of integration, and we use contract manufacturers whenever possible. Satellite communications equipment uses both VED and solid state technology, and the Satcom Division procures

12




certain of the critical components that it incorporates into its subsystems from our other manufacturing divisions.

Employees

As of September 29, 2006, we had approximately 1,610 employees. None of our employees is subject to a collective bargaining agreement although a limited number of our sales force members located in Europe are members of work councils or unions. We have not experienced any work stoppages and believe that we have good relations with our employees.

Competition

The industries and markets in which we operate are competitive. We encounter competition in most of our business areas from numerous other companies, including L-3 Communications, e2v technologies plc, the Xicom Division of Radyne Corporation, and Thales Electron Devices. Some of our competitors have parent entities that have resources substantially greater than ours. In certain markets, some of these competitors are also our customers and/or our suppliers, particularly for products for satellite communications applications. Our ability to compete in our markets depends to a significant extent on our ability to provide high-quality products with shorter lead times at competitive prices and our readiness in facilities, equipment and personnel.

We also continually engage in effective research and development efforts in order to introduce innovative new products for technologically sophisticated customers and markets. There is an inherent risk that advances in existing technology, or the development of new technology, could adversely affect our market position and financial condition. We provide both VED and solid state alternatives to our customers. Solid state devices are generally best suited for low-power applications, while only VEDs currently serve higher-power and higher-frequency demands. Because of the small dimensions of solid state components, solid state devices have challenges in dissipating the significant amount of excess heat energy that is generated in high-power, high-frequency applications. As a result, we believe that for the foreseeable future, solid-state devices will be unable to compete on a cost-effective basis in the high-power/high-frequency markets that represent the majority of our business. The extreme operating parameters of these applications necessitate heat dissipation capabilities that are best satisfied by our VED products. We believe that VED and solid state technology currently each serves its own specialized market without significant overlap in most applications.

Intellectual Property

Our business is dependent, in part, on our intellectual property rights, including trade secrets, patents and trademarks. We rely on a combination of nondisclosure and other contractual arrangements as well as upon trade secret, patent, trademark and copyright laws to protect our intellectual property rights. We do not believe that any single patent or other intellectual property right or license is material to our success as a whole.

On occasion, we have entered into agreements pursuant to which we license intellectual property from third parties for use in our business, and we also license intellectual property to third parties. As a result of contracts with the U.S. Government, some of which contain patent and/or data rights clauses, the U.S. Government has acquired royalty-free licenses or other rights in inventions and technology resulting from certain work done by us on behalf of the U.S. Government.

U.S. Government Contracts and Regulations

We deal with numerous U.S. Government agencies and entities, including the Department of Defense (“DoD”), and, accordingly, we must comply with and are affected by laws and regulations relating to the

13




formation, administration and performance of U.S. Government contracts. Similar government authorities exist with respect to our international business.

U.S. Government contracts are conditioned upon the continuing availability of Congressional appropriations. Congress usually appropriates funds on a fiscal year basis even though contract performance may extend over many years. Therefore long-term government contracts and related orders are subject to cancellation if appropriations for subsequent performance periods are not approved.

In addition, our U.S. Government contracts may span one or more base years and multiple option years. The U.S. Government generally has the right not to exercise option periods and may not exercise an option period if the applicable U.S. Government agency does not receive funding or is not satisfied with our performance of the contract. The U.S. Government, and other governments, may terminate any of our government contracts and, in general, subcontracts, at their convenience, as well as for default based on performance. Upon termination for convenience of a fixed-price contract, we normally are entitled to receive the purchase price for delivered items, reimbursement for allowable costs for work-in-process and an allowance for profit on the work performed. Upon termination for convenience of a cost reimbursement contract, we normally are entitled to reimbursement of allowable costs plus a portion of the fee. The amount of the fee recovered, if any, is related to the portion of the work accomplished prior to termination.

Additional risks associated with U.S. Government contracts are set forth in “Risk Factors.”

Environmental Matters

We are subject to a variety of U.S. federal, state and local, as well as foreign, environmental laws and regulations relating to, among other things, wastewater discharge, air emissions, handling of hazardous materials, disposal of hazardous wastes and remediation of soil and groundwater contamination. We use a number of chemicals or similar substances and generate wastes that are classified as hazardous, and we require environmental permits to conduct certain of our operations. Violation of such laws and regulations can result in fines, penalties and other sanctions.

In connection with the sale of Varian Associates, Inc.’s electron devices business to us in 1995, Varian Medical Systems, Inc. (as successor to Varian Associates) agreed to indemnify us for various environmental liabilities relating to Varian Associates’ electron devices business prior to August 1995. We are generally not indemnified by Varian Medical Systems with respect to liabilities resulting from our operations after August 1995. Pursuant to this agreement, Varian Medical Systems is undertaking environmental investigation and remedial work at our two manufacturing facilities in Palo Alto, California and Beverly, Massachusetts, that are known to require remediation.

To date, Varian Medical Systems has, generally at its expense, conducted required investigation and remediation work at our facilities and responded to environmental claims arising from Varian Medical Systems (or its predecessor’s) prior operations of the electron devices business.

We believe that we have been and are in substantial compliance with environmental laws and regulations, and we do not expect to incur material costs relating to environmental compliance.

Financial Information About Segments

For financial information about our segments, see Note 14 to the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements.

14




Item 1A.                Risk Factors

Investors should carefully consider the following risks and other information in this report and our other filings with the SEC before deciding to invest in us or to maintain or increase any investment. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties may also adversely impact and impair our business. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, results of operations, or financial condition would likely suffer. In such case, the trading price of our securities could decline and investors might lose all or part of their investment.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS

We face competition in the markets in which we sell our products.

The U.S. and foreign markets in which we sell our products are competitive. Our ability to compete in these markets depends on our ability to provide high-quality products with short lead times at competitive prices, as well our ability to create innovative new products. In addition, our competitors could introduce new products with greater capabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Certain of our competitors are owned by companies that have substantially greater financial resources than we do. Also, our foreign competitors may not be subject to U.S. Government export restrictions, which may make it easier in certain circumstances for them to sell to foreign customers. If we are unable to compete successfully against our current or future competitors, our business and sales will be harmed.

The end markets in which we operate are subject to technological change, and changes in technology could adversely affect our sales.

Both our defense and commercial end markets are subject to technological change. Advances in existing technology, or the development of new technology, could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Historically, we have relied on a combination of internal research and development and customer-funded research and development activities. To succeed in the future, we must continually engage in effective and timely research and development efforts in order to introduce innovative new products for technologically sophisticated customers and end markets and to benefit from the activities of our customers. If we fail to adapt successfully to technological changes or fail to obtain access to important technologies, our sales could suffer.

If we are unable to retain key management and other personnel, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our business and future performance depends on the continued contributions of key management personnel. Our current management team has an average of 25 years experience with us in various capacities. Since assuming their current leadership roles in 2002, this team has increased our sales, reduced our costs and grown our business. The unanticipated departure of any key member of our management team could have an adverse effect on our business and our results of operations. In addition, some of our technical personnel, such as our key engineers, could be difficult to replace.

A significant portion of our sales is, and is expected to continue to be, from contracts with the U.S. Government, and any significant reduction in the U.S. defense budget or any disruption or decline in U.S. Government expenditures could negatively affect our results of operations and cash flows.

Over 33%, 31% and 37% of our sales in our 2006, 2005 and 2004 fiscal years, respectively, were made to the U.S. Government, either directly or indirectly through prime contractors or subcontractors. Because U.S. Government contracts are dependent on the U.S. defense budget, any significant disruption or decline in U.S. Government expenditures in the future, changes in U.S. Government spending priorities, other legislative changes or changes in our relationship with the U.S. Government could result in the loss

15




of some or all of our government contracts, which, in turn, could result in a decrease in our sales and cash flow.

In addition, U.S. Government contracts are also conditioned upon continuing congressional approval and the appropriation of necessary funds. Congress usually appropriates funds for a given program each fiscal year even though contract periods of performance may exceed one year. Consequently, at the outset of a major program, multi-year contracts are usually funded for only the first year, and additional monies are normally committed to the contract by the procuring agency only as Congress makes appropriations for future fiscal years. We cannot ensure that any of our government contracts will continue to be funded from year to year. If such contracts are not funded, our sales may decline, which could negatively affect our results of operations and result in decreased cash flows.

We are subject to risks particular to companies supplying defense-related equipment and services to the U.S. Government. The occurrence of any of these risks could cause a loss of or decline in our sales to the U.S. Government.

U.S. Government contracts contain termination provisions and are subject to audit and modification

The U.S. Government has the ability to:

·       terminate existing contracts, including for the convenience of the government or because of a default in our performance of the contract;

·       reduce the value of existing contracts;

·       cancel multi-year contracts or programs;

·       audit our contract-related costs and fees, including allocated indirect costs;

·       suspend or debar us from receiving new contracts pending resolution of alleged violations of procurement laws or regulations; and

·       control and potentially prohibit the export of our products, technology or other data.

All of our U.S. Government contracts can be terminated by the U.S. Government either for its convenience or if we default by failing to perform under the contract. Termination-for-convenience provisions provide only for our recovery of costs incurred or committed, settlement expenses and profit on the work completed prior to termination. Termination-for-default provisions may provide for the contractor to be liable for excess costs incurred by the U.S. Government in procuring undelivered items from another source. Our contracts with foreign governments generally contain similar provisions relating to termination at the convenience of the customer.

The U.S. Government may review or audit our direct and indirect costs and performance on certain contracts, as well as our accounting and general business practices, for compliance with complex statutes and regulations, including the Truth in Negotiations Act, Federal Acquisition Regulations, Cost Accounting Standards and other administrative regulations. Like most government contractors, the U.S. Government audits our costs and performance on a continual basis, and we have outstanding audits. Based on the results of these audits, the U.S. Government may reduce our contract-related costs and fees, including allocated indirect costs. In addition, under U.S. Government regulations, some of our costs, including certain financing costs, research and development costs and marketing expenses, may not be reimbursable under U.S. Government contracts.

16




We are subject to laws and regulations related to our U.S. Government contracts business which may impose additional costs on our business.

As a U.S. Government contractor, we must comply with, and are affected by, laws and regulations related to our performance of our government contracts and our business. These laws and regulations may impose additional costs on our business. In addition, we are subject to audits, reviews and investigations of our compliance with these laws and regulations. In the event that we are found to have failed to comply with these laws and regulations, we may be fined, we may not be reimbursed for costs incurred in performing the contracts, our contracts may be terminated and we may be unable to obtain new contracts. If a government review, audit or investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil or criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including forfeiture of claims and profits, suspension of payments, statutory penalties, fines and suspension or debarment.

In addition, many of our U.S. Government contracts require our employees to maintain various levels of security clearances, and we are required to maintain certain facility clearances. Complex regulations and requirements apply to obtaining and maintaining security clearances and facility clearances, and obtaining such clearances can be a lengthy process. To the extent we are not able to obtain or maintain security clearances or facility clearances, we also may not be able to seek or perform future classified contracts. If we are unable to do any of the foregoing, we will not be able to maintain or grow our business, and our revenue may decline.

As a result of our U.S. Government business, we may be subject to false claim suits, and a judgment against us in any of these suits could cause us to be liable for substantial damages.

Our business with the U.S. Government, subjects us to “qui tam,” or “whistle blower,” suits brought by private plaintiffs in the name of the U.S. Government upon the allegation that we submitted a false claim to the U.S. Government, as well as to false claim suits brought by the U.S. Government. A judgment against us in a qui tam or false claim suit could cause us to be liable for substantial damages (including treble damages and monetary penalties) and could carry penalties of suspension or debarment, which would make us ineligible to receive any U.S. Government contracts for a period of up to three years. Any material judgment, or any suspension or debarment, could result in increased costs, which could negatively affect our results of operations. In addition, any of the foregoing could cause a loss of customer confidence and could negatively harm our business and our future prospects.

Some of our sole-provider business from the U.S. Government in the future may be subject to competitive bidding.

Some of the business that we will seek from the U.S. Government in the future may be awarded through a competitive bidding process. Competitive bidding on government contracts presents risks such as:

·       the need to bid on programs in advance of contract performance, which may result in unforeseen performance issues and costs; and

·       the expense and delay that may arise if our competitors protest or challenge the award made to us, which could result in a reprocurement, modified contract, or reduced work.

If we fail to win competitively bid contracts or fail to perform these contracts in a profitable manner, our sales and results of operations could suffer.

17




We generate sales from contracts with foreign governments, and significant changes in policies or to appropriations of those governments could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Approximately 16% of our fiscal year 2006 sales were made directly or indirectly to foreign governments. Significant changes to appropriations or national defense policies, disruptions of our relationships with foreign governments or terminations of our foreign government contracts could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our international operations subject us to the social, political and economic risks of doing business in foreign countries.

We conduct a substantial portion of our business, employ a substantial number of employees, and use external sales organizations, in Canada and in other countries outside of the United States. Direct sales to customers located outside the United States were 37%, 33% and 30% in fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As a result, we are subject to risks of doing business internationally. Circumstances and developments related to international operations that could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition include the following:

·       difficulties and costs of staffing and managing international operations;

·       currency restrictions, which may prevent the transfer of capital and profits to the United States;

·       changes in currency rates with respect to the U.S. dollar;

·       changes in regulatory requirements;

·       U.S. and foreign government policies;

·       potentially adverse tax consequences;

·       restrictions imposed by the U.S. Government on the export of certain products and technology;

·       the responsibility of complying with multiple and potentially conflicting laws;

·       the impact of regional or country specific business cycles and economic instability; and

·       geopolitical developments and conditions, including international hostilities, acts of terrorism and governmental reactions, trade relationships and military and political alliances.

Limitations on imports, currency exchange control regulations, transfer pricing regulations and tax laws and regulations could adversely affect our international operations, including the ability of our non-U.S. subsidiaries to declare dividends or otherwise transfer cash among our subsidiaries to pay interest and principal on our debt.

Laws and regulations restricting the sale of our products to foreign customers could impair our ability to make sales to foreign customers.

Licenses for the export of many of our products are required from government agencies in accordance with various regulations, including the United States Export Administration Regulations and the International Traffic In Arms Regulations. Under these regulations, we must obtain a license or permit from the U.S. Government before making foreign sales of certain of our products that have been designated as important for national security. These laws and regulations could adversely impact our sales and business in the following scenarios:

·       In order to obtain the license for the sale of such a product, we are required to obtain information from the potential customer and provide it to the U.S. Government. If the U.S. Government determines that the sale presents national security risks, it may not approve the sale.

18




·       Delays caused by the requirement to obtain the required license may cause us to lose potential foreign sales to overseas competitors who may not be subject to comparable restrictions and delays.

·       If we make a sale in violation of these laws and regulations, we could be subject to fines or penalties.

Our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected by increased or unexpected costs incurred by us on our contracts and sales orders.

The terms of virtually all of our contracts and sales orders require us to perform the work under the contract or sales order for a predetermined fixed price. As a result, we bear the risk of increased or unexpected costs associated with a contract or sales order, which may reduce our profit or cause us to sustain losses. Future increased or unexpected costs on a significant number of our contracts and sales orders could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Environmental laws and regulations and other obligations relating to environmental matters could subject us to liability for fines, clean-ups and other damages, require us to incur significant costs to modify our operations and/or increase our manufacturing costs.

Environmental laws and regulations could limit our ability to operate as we are currently operating and could result in additional costs.

We are subject to a variety of U.S. federal, state and local, as well as foreign, environmental laws and regulations relating, among other things, to wastewater discharge, air emissions, handling of hazardous materials, disposal of solid and hazardous wastes and remediation of soil and groundwater contamination. We use a number of chemicals or similar substances and generate wastes that are classified as hazardous. We require environmental permits to conduct many of our operations. Violations of environmental laws and regulations could result in substantial fines, penalties and other sanctions. Changes in environmental laws or regulations (or in their enforcement) affecting or limiting, for example, our chemical uses, certain of our manufacturing processes or our disposal practices, could restrict our ability to operate as we are currently operating or impose additional costs. In addition, we may experience releases of certain chemicals or discover existing contamination, which could cause us to incur material cleanup costs or other damages.

We could be subject to significant liabilities if Varian Medical Systems does not satisfy the obligations associated with existing environmental contamination.

When we purchased our electron devices business in 1995, Varian Medical Systems agreed to indemnify us for various environmental liabilities relating to the business prior to the sale, with certain exceptions and limitations. Varian Medical Systems is undertaking the environmental investigation and remedial work at the remaining two of our manufacturing facilities that are known to require environmental remediation, i.e. the manufacturing facilities in Palo Alto, California and Beverly, Massachusetts. In addition, Varian Medical Systems has been sued or threatened with suit with respect to environmental obligations related to these manufacturing facilities. If Varian Medical Systems does not comply fully with its indemnification obligations to us or does not continue to have the financial resources to comply fully with those obligations, we could be subject to significant liabilities.

We have only a limited ability to protect our intellectual property rights, which are important to our success.

Our success depends, in part, upon our ability to protect our proprietary technology and other intellectual property. We rely on a combination of trade secrets, confidentiality policies, nondisclosure and other contractual arrangements and patent, copyright and trademark laws to protect our intellectual

19




property rights. The steps we take to protect our intellectual property may not be adequate to prevent or deter infringement or other violations of our intellectual property, and we may not be able to detect unauthorized use or take appropriate and timely steps to enforce our intellectual property rights. In addition, we cannot be certain that our processes and products do not or will not infringe or otherwise violate the intellectual property rights of others. Infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights could cause us to incur significant costs, prevent us from selling our products and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our inability to obtain certain necessary raw materials and key components could disrupt the manufacture of our products and cause our sales and results of operations to suffer.

We obtain certain raw materials and key components necessary for the manufacture of our products, such as molybdenum, cupronickel, OFHC copper and some cathodes from a limited group of, or occasionally sole, suppliers. If any of our suppliers fails to meet our needs, we may not have readily available alternatives. Delays in component deliveries could cause delays in product shipments and require the redesign of certain products. If we are unable to obtain necessary raw materials and key components from our suppliers under favorable purchase terms and/or on a timely basis or to develop alternative sources, our ability to manufacture products could be disrupted or delayed, and our sales and results of operations could suffer.

We may not be successful in implementing part of our growth strategy if we are unable to identify and acquire suitable acquisition targets or integrate acquired companies successfully.

Finding and consummating acquisitions is one of the components of our growth strategy. Our ability to grow by acquisition depends on the availability of acquisition candidates at reasonable prices and our ability to obtain additional acquisition financing on acceptable terms. In making acquisitions, we may experience competition from larger companies with significantly greater resources. We are likely to use significant amounts of cash, issue additional equity securities and/or incur additional debt in connection with future acquisitions, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the necessary funds to carry out acquisitions on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

In addition, future acquisitions could place demands on our management and/or our operational and financial resources and could cause or result in the following:

·       difficulties in assimilating and integrating the operations, technologies and products acquired;

·       the diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns;

·       our operating and financial systems and controls being inadequate to deal with our growth; and

·       the potential loss of key employees.

Our backlog is subject to modifications and terminations of orders, which could negatively impact our sales.

Backlog represents firm orders for which goods and services are yet to be provided, including with respect to government contracts that are cancelable at will. As of September 29, 2006, we had an order backlog of $187.4 million. Although historically the amount of modifications and terminations of our orders has not been material compared to our total contract volume, customers can, and sometimes do, terminate or modify these orders. Cancellations of purchase orders or reductions of product quantities in existing contracts could substantially and materially reduce our backlog and, consequently, our future sales. Our failure to replace canceled or reduced backlog could negatively impact our sales and results of operations.

20




Fluctuations in our operating results, including quarterly net orders and sales, may result in volatility in our stock price, which could cause losses to our stockholders.

We have experienced and, in the future, expect to experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results, including net orders and sales. The timing of customers’ order placement and customers’ willingness to commit to purchase products at any particular time are inherently difficult to predict or forecast. Once orders are received, factors that may affect whether these orders become sales and translate into revenues in a particular quarter include:

·       delay in shipments due to various factors, including cancellations by customers, delays in customers’ own production schedules, natural disasters or manufacturing difficulties;

·       delay in a customer’s acceptance of a product; or

·       a change in a customer’s financial condition or ability to obtain financing.

Our quarterly operating results may also be affected by a number of other factors, including:

·       changes or anticipated changes in third-party reimbursement amounts or policies applicable to treatments using our products;

·       revenues becoming affected by seasonal influences;

·       changes in foreign currency exchange rates;

·       changes in the relative portion of our revenues represented by our various products;

·       timing of the announcement, introduction and delivery of new products or product enhancements by us and by our competitors;

·       disruptions in the supply or changes in the costs of raw materials, labor, product components or transportation services;

·       changes in the general economic conditions in the regions in which we do business;

·       the impact of changing levels of sales to sole purchasers of certain of our products; and

·       unfavorable outcome of any litigation.

We may not be able to timely comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

We anticipate that beginning in fiscal year 2007, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we will be required to perform and report our evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, and our independent registered public accounting firm on an annual basis must attest to and report on the adequacy of management’s evaluation and the effectiveness of such controls. Our efforts to comply with Section 404 have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, significant costs, the commitment of time and operational resources and the diversion of management’s attention. Because compliance with these requirements is complex and time consuming, there can be no assurance that we will be able to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely fashion. In addition, because of the time and expense required to evaluate our internal controls, our independent registered public accounting firm may have limited time before its attestation is required, which may prevent our accountants from being able to adequately test and subsequently to report on our internal controls. If we fail to timely complete our assessment of internal controls or if our independent registered public accounting firm cannot report on our assessment, we could suffer a loss of public confidence in our internal controls. In addition, any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in implementation, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to timely meet our regulatory reporting obligations.

21




RISKS RELATED TO OUR INDEBTEDNESS

We have a substantial amount of debt and we may incur substantial additional debt in the future, which could adversely affect our financial health, our ability to obtain financing in the future and our ability to react to changes in our business.

We have a substantial amount of debt and may incur additional debt in the future. As of September 29, 2006, our total consolidated indebtedness was $248 million and we had $36 million of additional borrowings available under the revolver under our senior credit facilities. Our substantial amount of debt could have important consequences to us and our stockholders, including, without limitation, the following:

·       it will require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations, in the near term, to make interest payments on our indebtedness, and in the longer term, to repay the outstanding principal amount of our indebtedness, each of which will reduce the funds available for working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate expenses;

·       it could limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business, the markets in which we compete and the economy at large;

·       it could limit our ability to borrow additional funds in the future, if needed, because of applicable financial and restrictive covenants of our indebtedness; and

·       it could make us more vulnerable to interest rate increases because a portion of our borrowings is, and will continue to be, at variable rates of interest.

A default under our debt obligations could result in the acceleration of those obligations. We may not have the ability to fund our debt obligations in the event of such a default. This may adversely affect our ability to operate our business and therefore could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition and, consequently, the price of our common stock. In addition, we may incur additional debt in the future. If debt levels increase, the related risks that we and our stockholders face could intensify.

The agreements and instruments governing our debt contain restrictions and limitations could limit our flexibility in operating our business.

Our senior credit facilities and the indentures governing our outstanding notes have a number of customary covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to:

·       incur additional indebtedness;

·       sell assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies;

·       pay dividends or repurchase or redeem capital stock;

·       make certain investments;

·       issue capital stock of our subsidiaries;

·       incur liens; and

·       enter into certain types of transactions with our affiliates.

These covenants could have the effect of limiting our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business and the markets in which we compete.

Under our senior credit facilities, we are required to satisfy and maintain specified financial ratios and tests. Events beyond our control may affect our ability to comply with those provisions, and we may not be able to meet those ratios and tests, which would result in a default under our senior credit facilities. In

22




addition, our senior credit facilities and the indenture governing Communications & Power Industries’ 8% senior subordinated notes restrict Communications & Power Industries’ ability to make distributions to CPI International. Because we are a holding company with no operations of our own, we rely on distributions from Communications & Power Industries, our wholly owned subsidiary, to satisfy our obligations under our floating rate senior notes. If Communications & Power Industries is unable make distributions to us, and we cannot obtain other funds to satisfy our obligations under our floating rate senior notes, a default under our floating rate senior notes could result.

The breach of any covenants or obligations in our senior credit facilities and the indentures governing our outstanding notes could result in a default under the applicable debt agreement or instrument and could trigger acceleration of (or the right to accelerate) the related debt. Because of cross-default provisions in the agreements and instruments governing our indebtedness, a default under one agreement or instrument could result in a default under, and the acceleration of, our other indebtedness. In addition, the lenders under our senior credit facilities could proceed against the collateral securing that indebtedness. If any of our indebtedness were to be accelerated, it could adversely affect our ability to operate our business or we may be unable to repay such debt, and, therefore, such acceleration could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and, consequently, the price of our common stock.

Our outstanding notes and our senior credit facilities are subject to change of control provisions. We may not have the ability to raise funds necessary to fulfill our obligations under our debt following a change of control, which could place us in default.

We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to fulfill our obligations under our outstanding notes and our senior credit facilities following a change of control. Under the indentures governing our notes, upon the occurrence of specified change of control events, we are required to offer to repurchase the notes. However, we may not have sufficient funds at the time of the change of control event to make the required repurchase of our notes. In addition, a change of control under our senior credit facilities would result in an event of default thereunder and permit the acceleration of the outstanding obligations under the senior credit facilities.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

The price of our common stock may fluctuate, which could negatively affect the value of stockholders’ investments.

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate widely as a result of various factors, such as period-to-period fluctuations in our actual or anticipated operating results, sales of our common stock by our existing equity investors, developments in our industry, the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock or changes in financial estimates by analysts, failure to meet financial estimates by analysts, competitive factors, general economic and securities market conditions and other external factors. Also, securities markets worldwide experience significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic or market conditions, and market conditions affecting the stock of companies in our industry in particular, could reduce the market price of our common stock in spite of our operating performance. Stockholders may be unable to resell their shares of our common stock at or above the purchase price for their shares or at all.

If our share price is volatile, we may be the target of securities litigation, which is costly and time-consuming to defend.

In the past, following periods of market volatility in the price of a company’s securities, securityholders have sometimes instituted class action litigation. If the market value of our common stock experiences adverse fluctuations and we become involved in this type of litigation, regardless of the

23




outcome, we could incur substantial legal costs and our management’s attention could be diverted from the operation of our business, causing our business to suffer.

Future sales of shares of our common stock in the public market could depress our stock price and make it difficult for stockholders to recover the full value of their investment.

We cannot predict the effect, if any, that market sales of shares of common stock or the availability of shares of common stock for sale will have on the market price of our common stock prevailing from time to time. Future sales, or the perception or availability for sale in the public market, of substantial amounts of our common stock could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

In addition, we may issue a substantial number of shares of our common stock under our stock incentive and stock purchase plans. As of September 29, 2006, we had options outstanding to purchase 3,163,057 shares of our common stock under our 2000 Stock Option Plan, our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and our 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan, of which 2,345,833 were exercisable as of such date. In addition, as of September 29, 2006, our 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan and 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan provide for the issuance of up to an additional 1,856,001 shares of our common stock to employees, directors and consultants. The issuance of significant additional shares of our common stock upon the exercise of outstanding options or otherwise pursuant to these stock plans could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and could significantly dilute the interests of other stockholders.

The controlling position of Cypress will limit other stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters.

As of November 27, 2006, entities affiliated with The Cypress Group collectively own over 55.2% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Accordingly, the entities affiliated with Cypress have significant influence over our management, affairs and most matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and the approval of significant corporate transactions. The entities affiliated with Cypress will also be able to deter any attempted change of control. This concentrated control will limit other stockholders’ ability to influence corporate matters and, as a result, we may take actions that some of our stockholders may not view as beneficial. Accordingly, the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected.

Our anti-takeover provisions could prevent or delay a change in control of our company, even if such change of control would be beneficial to our stockholders.

Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control of our company. These provisions include:

·       a board of directors that is classified such that only one-third of directors are elected each year;

·       “blank check” preferred stock that could be issued by our board of directors to increase the number of outstanding shares and thwart a takeover attempt;

·       limitations on the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders;

·       prohibiting stockholder action by written consent and requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;

·       establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings; and

24




·       requiring that the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds (66.7%) of the voting power of our issued and outstanding capital stock entitled to vote in the election of directors be obtained to amend certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation.

In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which will apply to us after affiliates of Cypress collectively cease to own at least 15% of the total voting power of our common stock, limits business combination transactions with 15% stockholders that have not been approved by the board of directors. These provisions and other similar provisions make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without negotiation. These provisions may apply even if the transaction may be considered beneficial by some stockholders.

Item 1B.               Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.                        Properties

We own, lease or sublease manufacturing, assembly, warehouse, service and office properties having an aggregate floor space of approximately 845,000 square feet, of which approximately 2,950 square feet are leased or subleased to third parties. The table that follows provides summary information regarding principal properties owned or leased by us:

 

 

Square Footage

 

 

 

Location

 

 

 

Owned

 

Leased/ Subleased

 

Segments Using the Property

 

Beverly, Massachusetts

 

169,385

(a)

 

 

 

VED

 

Georgetown, Ontario, Canada

 

126,000

 

 

21,975

 

 

VED and satcom equipment

 

Woodland, California

 

36,900

 

 

9,900

 

 

VED

 

Palo Alto, California

 

 

 

418,300

(b)

 

VED and satcom equipment

 

Mountain View, California

 

 

 

42,470

 

 

VED

 

Various other locations

 

 

 

20,019

(c)

 

VED and satcom equipment

 


(a)           The Beverly, Massachusetts square footage also includes approximately 2,950 square feet leased to two tenants.

(b)          This facility includes 49,100 square feet which are subleased from Varian, Inc. Varian, Inc. subleases the land from Varian Medical Systems, Inc. and Varian Medical Systems subleases the land from Stanford University.

(c)           Leased facilities occupied by our field sales and service organizations.

The lenders under our senior credit facilities have a security interest in certain of our interests in the real property that we own and lease. Our headquarters and one principal complex, including one of our manufacturing facilities, located in Palo Alto, California, are subleased from Varian Medical Systems or one of its affiliates or former affiliates. Therefore, our occupancy rights are dependent on the tenant’s fulfillment of its responsibilities to the master lessor, including its obligation to continue environmental remediation activities under a consent order with the California Environmental Protection Agency. The consequences of the loss by us of such occupancy rights could include the loss of valuable improvements and favorable lease terms, the incurrence of substantial relocation expenses and the disruption of our business operations.

In September 2006, we completed the sale of the land and facilities located in San Carlos, California, and the operations previously conducted in San Carlos have been consolidated into our existing facility in nearby Palo Alto, California. The square footage of the San Carlos facility was 322,000, and has been excluded from the table above.

25




Item 3.                        Legal Proceedings

We may be involved from time to time in various legal proceedings and various cost accounting and other government pricing claims. We do not expect that the legal proceedings in which we are currently involved will individually or in the aggregate have a significant impact on our business, financial condition, results of operation or liquidity.

Item 4.                        Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006.

26




PART II

Item 5.                        Market For Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, has traded on the Global Market (formerly the National Market) tier of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC under the symbol “CPII” since April 28, 2006, the date on which our common stock was first publicly traded. Prior to April 28, 2006, there was no established public trading market for our stock. The following table sets forth the high and low closing sale prices for our common stock as reported by The Nasdaq Stock Market’s Global Market during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006.

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Fiscal Year Ended September 29, 2006:

 

 

 

 

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

14.92

 

$

11.30

 

 

As of November 27, 2006, the number of our stockholders of record was 11.

We paid a special cash dividend of approximately $75.8 million in the aggregate, and $17.0 million, in the aggregate, to holders of our common stock in February 2005 and December 2005, respectively. We currently expect to retain any future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any additional cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends on our common stock will be dependent upon the ability of Communications & Power Industries, our wholly-owned subsidiary, to pay dividends or make cash payments or advances to us. The indenture governing Communications & Power Industries’ 8% senior subordinated notes imposes restrictions on Communications & Power Industries’ ability to make distributions to us, and the agreements governing our senior credit facilities generally do not permit Communications & Power Industries to make distributions to us for the purpose of paying dividends to our stockholders. In addition, the indenture governing our floating rate senior notes due 2015 also imposes restrictions on our ability to pay dividends or make distributions to our stockholders. Our future dividend policy will also depend on the requirements of any future financing agreements to which we may be a party and other factors considered relevant by our board of directors, including the Delaware General Corporation Law, which provides that dividends are only payable out of surplus or current net profits.

Item 6.                        Selected Financial Data

The selected consolidated financial and other data for CPI International and subsidiaries as of September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005, and for the fiscal years ended September 29, 2006 and September 30, 2005 and for the 36-week period ended October 1, 2004, and of Communications & Power Industries Holding Corporation, our predecessor, and subsidiaries for the 16-week period ended January 22, 2004, have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The selected consolidated financial and other data for CPI International and subsidiaries as of October 1, 2004 and for Communications & Power Industries Holding Corporation as of October 3, 2003 and September 27, 2002 and for the fiscal years ended October 3, 2003 and September 27, 2002, has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The audited consolidated financial statements as of the dates and periods noted above have been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm.

You should read the following data in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

27




FIVE-YEAR SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

36-Week

 

 

 

16-Week

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

Year Ended

 

Period Ended

 

 

 

Period Ended

 

Year Ended

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

September 29,

 

September 30,

 

October 1,

 

 

 

January 22,

 

October 3,

 

September 27,

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

 

 

(Successor)

 

(Successor)

 

(Successor)

 

 

 

(Predecessor)

 

(Predecessor)

 

(Predecessor)

 

Statement of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

 

$

339,717

 

 

 

320,732

 

 

 

202,266

 

 

 

 

 

79,919

 

 

 

265,434

 

 

 

251,245

 

 

Cost of sales(1)

 

 

236,063

 

 

 

216,031

 

 

 

141,172

 

 

 

 

 

56,189

 

 

 

183,957

 

 

 

192,189

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

103,654

 

 

 

104,701

 

 

 

61,094

 

 

 

 

 

23,730

 

 

 

81,477

 

 

 

59,056

 

 

Research and development

 

 

8,550

 

 

 

7,218

 

 

 

5,253

 

 

 

 

 

2,200

 

 

 

6,860

 

 

 

5,873

 

 

Selling and marketing

 

 

19,827

 

 

 

18,547

 

 

 

11,082

 

 

 

 

 

4,352

 

 

 

15,650

 

 

 

16,073

 

 

General and administrative

 

 

22,418

 

 

 

27,883

 

 

 

12,499

 

 

 

 

 

6,026

 

 

 

17,847

 

 

 

19,590

 

 

Merger expenses(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,374

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets(2)

 

 

2,190

 

 

 

7,487

 

 

 

13,498

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquired in-process research and development(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss on dispostion of fixed
assets

 

 

586

 

 

 

446

 

 

 

197

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

187

 

 

(Gain) loss on sale of Solid State Products Division(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(136

)

 

 

3,004

 

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

 

53,571

 

 

 

61,581

 

 

 

45,029

 

 

 

 

 

18,959

 

 

 

40,313

 

 

 

44,727

 

 

Operating income

 

 

50,083

 

 

 

43,120

 

 

 

16,065

 

 

 

 

 

4,771

 

 

 

41,164

 

 

 

14,329

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

23,806

 

 

 

20,310

 

 

 

10,518

 

 

 

 

 

8,902

 

 

 

14,540

 

 

 

16,508

 

 

Income tax expense

 

 

9,058

 

 

 

9,138

 

 

 

2,899

 

 

 

 

 

439

 

 

 

10,076

 

 

 

4,554

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

$

17,219

 

 

 

13,672

 

 

 

2,648

 

 

 

 

 

(4,570

)

 

 

16,548

 

 

 

(6,733

)

 

Earnings per share(4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

$

1.20

 

 

 

1.05

 

 

 

0.20

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

(5)

 

 

N/A

(5)

 

 

N/A

(5)

 

Diluted

 

 

$

1.09

 

 

 

0.98

 

 

 

0.19

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

(5)

 

 

N/A

(5)

 

 

N/A

(5)

 

Shares used to calculate net earnings per share(6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

14,311,367

 

 

 

13,078,954

 

 

 

13,062,753

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

(5)

 

 

N/A

(5)

 

 

N/A

(5)

 

Diluted

 

 

15,788,711

 

 

 

13,973,727

 

 

 

13,700,182

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

(5)

 

 

N/A

(5)

 

 

N/A

(5)

 

Cash dividend per share(7)

 

 

$

1.19

 

 

 

5.80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Financial Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EBITDA(8)

 

 

$

59,096

 

 

 

57,297

 

 

 

32,816

 

 

 

 

 

6,549

 

 

 

47,457

 

 

 

25,633

 

 

EBITDA margin(9)

 

 

17.4

%

 

 

17.9

%

 

 

16.2

%

 

 

 

 

8.2

%

 

 

17.9

%

 

 

10.2

%

 

Operating income margin(10)

 

 

14.7

%

 

 

13.4

%

 

 

7.9

%

 

 

 

 

6.0

%

 

 

15.5

%

 

 

5.7

%

 

Net income (loss) margin(11)

 

 

5.1

%

 

 

4.3

%

 

 

1.3

%

 

 

 

 

(5.7

)%

 

 

6.2

%

 

 

(2.7

)%

 

Depreciation and amortization(12)

 

 

$

9,013

 

 

 

14,177

 

 

 

16,751

 

 

 

 

 

1,778

 

 

 

6,293

 

 

 

11,304

 

 

Capital expenditures(13)

 

 

$

10,913

 

 

 

17,131

 

 

 

3,317

 

 

 

 

 

459

 

 

 

3,067

 

 

 

3,378

 

 

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(14)

 

 

2.08x

 

 

 

2.10x

 

 

 

1.51x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.78x

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

$

10,897

 

 

 

31,349

 

 

 

12,203

 

 

 

 

 

6,574

 

 

 

34,482

 

 

 

44,020

 

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working capital

 

 

$

77,113

 

 

 

65,400

 

 

 

72,385

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,241

 

 

 

1,101

 

 

Total assets

 

 

$

441,759

 

 

 

454,544

 

 

 

431,207

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

181,968

 

 

 

156,189

 

 

Long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock

 

 

$

245,067

 

 

 

284,231

 

 

 

210,606

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

128,907

 

 

 

128,693

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

 

 

$

99,673

 

 

 

52,667

 

 

 

107,594

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(65,445

)

 

 

(73,104

)

 


           (1) Includes charges of $5,500 for the amortization of inventory write-up incurred during the 36-week period ended October 1, 2004 in connection with our January 2004 merger and $351 of charges for the amortization of inventory write-up incurred in connection with the Econco acquisition for fiscal year 2005.

           (2) As a result of our January 2004 merger, we incurred charges for merger expenses during the 16-week period ended January 22, 2004, and charges for the amortization of intangible assets and a write off of in-process research and development during the 36-week period ended October 1, 2004. In fiscal years 2005 and 2006, we incurred charges for the amortization of intangible assets as a result of our January 2004 merger and in connection with the Econco acquisition.

           (3) On September 26, 2002, we sold our Solid State Products Division. The net pretax loss of $3,004 included approximately $2,525 for the write-off of goodwill.

28




           (4) Basic earnings per share represents net income divided by weighted average common shares outstanding, and diluted earnings per share represents net income divided by weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding.

           (5) Due to the significant change in capital structure at the closing date of its January 2004 merger, the predecessor amount has not been presented because it is not considered comparable to the amount for CPI International.

           (6) On April 7, 2006, in connection with the amendment and restatement of the certificate of incorporation of CPI International, we effected a 3.059-to-1 stock split of the outstanding shares of common stock of CPI International as of such date. All share and per share amounts for successor periods herein have been retroactively restated to reflect the stock split.

           (7) In February 2005 and in December 2005 we paid special cash dividends of $75,809 and $17,000, respectively, to stockholders of CPI International. Cash dividend per share is calculated by dividing the dollar amount of the dividend by weighted average common shares outstanding. We did not pay cash dividends on the common stock of CPI International or our predecessor, as applicable, in fiscal years 2002, 2003 or 2004.

           (8) EBITDA represents earnings before provision for income taxes, interest expense, net and depreciation and amortization. For the reasons listed below, we believe that GAAP-based financial information for highly leveraged businesses such as ours should be supplemented by EBITDA so that investors better understand our financial performance in connection with their analysis of our business:

·        EBITDA is a component of the measure used by our board of directors and management team to evaluate our operating performance;

·        our senior credit facilities contain covenants that require us to maintain certain interest expense coverage and leverage ratios that contain EBITDA as a component, and our management team uses EBITDA to monitor compliance with such covenants; see “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources-Covenant compliance;”

·        EBITDA is a component of the measure used by our management team to make day-to-day operating decisions;

·        EBITDA facilitates comparisons between our operating results and those of competitors with different capital structures and therefore is a component of the measure used by the management to facilitate internal comparisons to competitors’ results and our industry in general; and

·        the payment of bonuses to certain members of management is contingent upon, among other things, the satisfaction by us of certain targets that contain EBITDA as a component.

Other companies may define EBITDA differently and, as a result, our measure of EBITDA may not be directly comparable to EBITDA of other companies. Although we use EBITDA as a financial measure to assess the performance of our business, the use of EBITDA is limited because it does not include certain material costs, such as interest and taxes, necessary to operate our business. When analyzing our performance, EBITDA should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, net income (loss), cash flows from operating activities or other statements of operations or statements of cash flows data prepared in accordance with GAAP.

The following table reconciles net income (loss) to EBITDA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

36-Week

 

 

 

16-Week

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Period Ended

 

 

 

Period Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

Fiscal Year

 

October 1,

 

 

 

January 22,

 

Fiscal Year

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

 

 

(Successor)

 

(Successor)

 

(Successor)

 

 

 

(Predecessor)

 

(Predecessor)

 

(Predecessor)

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

$

17,219

 

 

 

13,672

 

 

 

2,648

 

 

 

 

 

(4,570

)

 

 

16,548

 

 

 

(6,733

)

 

Depreciation and amortization(12)

 

 

9,013

 

 

 

14,177

 

 

 

16,751

 

 

 

 

 

1,778

 

 

 

6,293

 

 

 

11,304

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

23,806

 

 

 

20,310

 

 

 

10,518

 

 

 

 

 

8,902

 

 

 

14,540

 

 

 

16,508

 

 

Income tax expense

 

 

9,058

 

 

 

9,138

 

 

 

2,899

 

 

 

 

 

439

 

 

 

10,076

 

 

 

4,554

 

 

EBITDA

 

 

$

59,096

 

 

 

57,297

 

 

 

32,816

 

 

 

 

 

6,549

 

 

 

47,457

 

 

 

25,633

 

 

 

           (9) EBITDA margin represents EBITDA divided by sales.

      (10) Operating income margin represents operating income divided by sales.

      (11) Net income (loss) margin represents net income (loss) divided by sales.

      (12) Depreciation and amortization excludes amortization of deferred debt issuance costs, which are included in interest expense, net.

      (13) Includes capital expenditures resulting from the relocation of our San Carlos, California facility to Palo Alto, California and Mountain View, California of $4.7 million for fiscal year 2006 and $13.1 million for fiscal year 2005. Fiscal year 2006 includes $2.3 million for the expansion of our building in Georgetown, Ontario, Canada.

      (14) For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes and fixed charges less capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, including amortization of debt issuance costs and that portion of rental expenses that management considers to be a reasonable approximation of interest. Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $4,131 for the 16-week period ended January 22, 2004, and $2,179 in fiscal year 2002.

29




Item 7.                        Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our fiscal years are the 52- or 53-week periods that end on the Friday nearest September 30. Fiscal year 2006 comprised the 52-week period ending September 29, 2006; fiscal year 2005 comprised the 52-week period ended September 30, 2005; and fiscal year 2004 comprised the 16-week predecessor period ended January 22, 2004 and the 36-week successor period ending October 1, 2004. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, of our predecessor and CPI International included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Overview

CPI International, headquartered in Palo Alto, California, is the parent company of Communications & Power Industries, a leading provider of microwave, radio frequency, power and control solutions for critical defense, communications, medical, scientific and other applications. Communications & Power Industries develops, manufactures and distributes products used to generate, amplify and transmit high-power/high-frequency microwave and radio frequency signals and/or provide power and control for various applications. End-use applications of these systems include the transmission of radar signals for navigation and location; transmission of deception signals for electronic countermeasures; transmission and amplification of voice, data and video signals for broadcasting, Internet and other types of communications; providing power and control for medical diagnostic imaging; and generating microwave energy for radiation therapy in the treatment of cancer and for various industrial and scientific applications.

Eimac Relocation

We began the relocation of Eimac from our former San Carlos, California facility to our nearby Palo Alto, California and Mountain View, California facilities during fiscal year 2005. The physical relocation of Eimac was completed in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006. In order to realize increased efficiencies from the relocation of Eimac to our Palo Alto and Mountain View facilities, on June 1, 2006, we made organizational changes and consolidated the operating activities of Eimac into our Microwave Power Products division, which also operates in our Palo Alto facility. We expect to complete the integration of Eimac into our Palo Alto operations by the end of calendar year 2006.

As part of this relocation, Eimac experienced planned manufacturing disruptions stemming from the decommissioning of our production equipment in San Carlos and the required reconfiguration, installation and testing of that equipment prior to production readiness in Palo Alto. During fiscal year 2005, in anticipation of these planned disruptions, customers accelerated the placement of orders with Eimac. As we expected, this order acceleration in fiscal year 2005, and the subsequent acceleration of product shipments, caused a reduction of customers’ demand requirements from Eimac during fiscal year 2006, particularly in our medical, communications and industrial markets. As a result, the relocation negatively impacted our orders and sales for fiscal year 2006 as compared to fiscal year 2005.

Orders and sales for Eimac have begun to recover from the impact of the relocation. Total sales for Eimac in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006 were $10.4 million, which was consistent with historical sales levels prior to the relocation and with expected future sales levels.

Management estimates that the relocation lowered fiscal year 2006 orders by approximately $5.6 million as compared to fiscal year 2005, and lowered fiscal year 2006 sales by approximately $11.4 million as compared to fiscal year 2005.

Econco Acquisition

On October 8, 2004, we purchased all of the outstanding stock of Econco Broadcast Service, Inc. of Woodland, California for cash consideration of approximately $18.3 million. Econco is a provider of

30




remanufactured high-power microwave devices, allowing broadcasters and other users of these critical products to extend the life of their devices at a cost that is lower than buying a new device.

Orders

We sell our products into six end markets: radar, electronic warfare, medical, communications, industrial and scientific.

Our customer sales contracts are recorded as orders when we accept written customer purchase orders or contracts. Customer purchase orders with an undefined delivery schedule, or blanket purchase orders, are not reported as orders until the delivery date is determined. Our government sales contracts are not reported as orders until we have been notified that the contract has been funded. Total orders for a fiscal period represent the total dollar amount of customer orders recorded by us during the fiscal period, reduced by the dollar amount of any order cancellations or terminations during the fiscal period.

Our orders by market for fiscal years 2006 and 2005 are summarized as follows (dollars in millions):

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 29, 2006

 

September 30, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of Total

 

 

 

of Total

 

Increase (Decrease)

 

 

 

Amount

 

Orders

 

Amount

 

Orders

 

Amount

 

Percentage

 

Radar

 

 

$

115.3

 

 

 

35

%

 

 

$

109.5

 

 

 

33

%

 

 

$

5.8

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

Electronic Warfare

 

 

24.6

 

 

 

7

%

 

 

25.9

 

 

 

8

%

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(5

)%

 

 

Medical

 

 

68.1

 

 

 

20

%

 

 

52.0

 

 

 

15

%

 

 

16.1

 

 

 

31

%

 

 

Communications

 

 

94.6

 

 

 

29

%

 

 

116.8

 

 

 

35

%

 

 

(22.2

)

 

 

(19

)%

 

 

Industrial

 

 

22.9

 

 

 

7

%

 

 

21.9

 

 

 

7

%

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

5

%

 

 

Scientific

 

 

5.7

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

6.3

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

(10

)%

 

 

Total orders

 

 

$

331.2

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

$

332.4

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

$

(1.2

)

 

 

(0.4

)%

 

 

 

Explanations for the order increase or decrease by market for fiscal year 2006 compared to fiscal year 2005 are as follows:

·       Radar and Electronic Warfare:   The majority of our sales in the radar and electronic warfare markets are for products for domestic and international defense and government end uses. Orders in these markets are characterized by many smaller orders in the $0.5 million to $3.0 million range by product or program, with no significant products or programs by themselves explaining the annual change. On a combined basis, orders for these two markets increased from an aggregate of $135.4 million in fiscal year 2005 to an aggregate of $139.9 million in fiscal year 2006. This approximately 3.3% overall increase in orders for these markets is consistent with our expectations of overall low-to-mid-single digit percentage annual growth in these markets taken on a combined basis for fiscal year 2006.

·       Medical:   The majority of the increase in medical orders from fiscal year 2005 to fiscal year 2006 was due to orders for x-ray generators both from U.S. and international customers, which included the following:

·        $4.0 million of one-time orders for Russia, due to the expansion of the Russian medical infrastructure.

·        A $6.0 million annual order was recorded in September 2006 from Varian Medical Systems, Inc. for x-ray generators, representing our largest single order ever from Varian Medical Systems for x-ray generators. We previously recorded orders from Varian Medical Systems on a quarterly basis. This large order was partly due to the success of the new imaging

31




options on Varian Medical Systems’ Clinac® medical linear accelerators for radiation therapy for the treatment of cancer.

·        A 15% increase in our core x-ray generator orders due to growth in the overall markets and in our share of this market.

·       Communications:   The decrease in communications orders was primarily attributable to the cyclical nature of orders in this market. The relocation of Eimac caused an order acceleration of approximately $2.3 million in fiscal year 2005 and a corresponding decrease of approximately $2.3 million in fiscal year 2006. In addition, $4.3 million in orders for troposcatter communications products for international customers were received in fiscal year 2005, but did not repeat in fiscal year 2006. A $13.9 million decrease in orders for GenIV satcom amplifiers also impacted communications orders, as satcom amplifier orders for the GenIV amplifier, primarily for the direct-to-home broadcast market, are cyclical. Customers in the direct-to-home broadcast market historically place large orders for satcom amplifiers when they are expanding their broadcast facilities and then reduce their orders as those products are deployed. We expect continued demand for our satcom amplifiers for direct-to-home broadcast applications, but we believe that orders for these products will remain at lower levels for a time before returning to fiscal year 2005 levels. These decreases were partially offset by order increases for certain newer satellite communications products that are gaining market acceptance, including a $3.3 million increase in new product orders for millimeter wave amplifiers and a $3.1 million increase in outdoor unit amplifiers used for commercial direct-to-home and military communications applications.

·       Industrial:   Orders in the industrial market, one of our smallest markets, are cyclical and generally reflect the performance of the overall economy. The increase in industrial orders was attributable to an increase in demand for power supply equipment for semiconductor manufacturing equipment applications and for amplifiers used in industrial test systems for U.S. and foreign military customers. This increase was partially offset by a $0.5 million reduction in order receipts for Eimac due to its relocation.

·       Scientific:   Orders in the scientific market, our smallest market, are historically one-time projects and can fluctuate significantly from period to period. The decrease in scientific orders was primarily the result of several smaller orders for fusion and other scientific programs that were recorded in fiscal year 2005 that did not repeat in fiscal year 2006.

Incoming order levels fluctuate significantly on a quarterly or annual basis, and a particular quarter’s or year’s order rate may not be indicative of future order levels. In addition, our sales are highly dependent upon manufacturing scheduling and performance and, accordingly, it is not possible to accurately predict when orders will be recognized as sales.

Backlog

As of September 29, 2006, we had an order backlog of $187.4 million compared to an order backlog of $193.5 million as of September 30, 2005. Based on our historical backlog experience, our backlog as of September 29, 2006 exceeds our typical backlog range of $175 to $185 million. Because our orders for government end-use products generally have much longer terms than our orders for commercial business (which require quicker turn-around), our backlog is primarily composed of government orders. As a result, we expect that our total backlog will not generally grow at the same rate as our total sales, because the markets where we are expecting higher growth (i.e., the medical and communications markets) are primarily commercial rather than governmental.

Backlog represents the cumulative balance, at a given point in time, of recorded customer sales orders that have not yet been shipped or recognized as sales. Backlog is increased when an order is received, and

32




backlog is decreased when we recognize sales. We believe backlog and orders information is helpful to investors because this information may be indicative of future sales results. Although backlog consists of firm orders for which goods and services are yet to be provided, customers can, and sometimes do, terminate or modify these orders. However, historically the amount of modifications and terminations has not been material compared to total contract volume.

Results of Operations

We derive our revenue primarily from the sale of microwave and radio frequency products, including high-power microwave amplifiers, satellite communications amplifiers, medical x-ray imaging subsystems, and other related products. Our products generally have selling prices ranging from $2,000 to $100,000, with certain limited products priced up to $1,000,000.

Cost of goods sold generally includes costs for raw materials, manufacturing costs, including allocation of overhead and other indirect costs, charges for reserves for excess and obsolete inventory, warranty claims and losses on fixed price contracts. Operating expenses generally consist of research and development, selling and marketing and general and administrative expenses.

As a result of purchase accounting charges in connection with our January 2004 merger, our results of operations are based on a different cost basis as compared to the results of operations of Communications & Power Industries Holding Corporation, our predecessor. However, our sales were not impacted by purchase accounting and are on the same basis for both us and our predecessor. In addition, our January 2004 merger did not result in any change in the management team or in the underlying operations of our predecessor, nor did it result in customer losses, headcount reductions, restructurings, or any other changes to the ongoing business operations.

For purposes of the following discussion and analysis of results of operations, sales discussed below for the 2004 fiscal year represent the unaudited consolidated combined sales of CPI International, Inc. for the 36-week period ended October 1, 2004 and our predecessor, Communications & Power Industries Holding Corporation, for the 16-week period ended January 22, 2004. Although this approach is not consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, we believe this presentation facilitates the ability of our investors to more meaningfully compare our sales for fiscal year 2004 with other fiscal years.

33




The following table sets forth our historical results of operations for each of the periods indicated (dollars in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36-Week

 

 

 

16-Week

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Periold Ending

 

 

 

Periold Ending

 

 

 

Fiscal Year 2006

 

Fiscal Year 2005

 

October 1,2004

 

 

 

January 22, 2004

 

 

 

(Successor)

 

(Successor)

 

(Successor)

 

 

 

(Predecessor)

 

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

 

 

% of

 

 

 

Amount

 

Sales

 

Amount

 

Sales

 

Amount

 

Sales

 

 

 

Amount

 

Sales

 

Sales

 

 

$

339.7

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

$

320.7

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

$

202.3

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

 

 

$

79.9

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

Cost of sales(a)(b)

 

 

236.1

 

 

 

69.5

 

 

 

216.0

 

 

 

67.4

 

 

 

141.2

 

 

 

69.8

 

 

 

 

 

56.2

 

 

 

70.3

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

103.7

 

 

 

30.5

 

 

 

104.7

 

 

 

32.6

 

 

 

61.1

 

 

 

30.2

 

 

 

 

 

23.7

 

 

 

29.7

 

 

Research and
development

 

 

8.6

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

7.2

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

5.3

 

 

 

2.6

 

 

 

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

Selling and marketing(a)

 

 

19.8

 

 

 

5.8

 

 

 

18.5

 

 

 

5.8

 

 

 

11.1

 

 

 

5.5

 

 

 

 

 

4.4

 

 

 

5.5

 

 

General and administrative(a)

 

 

22.4

 

 

 

6.6

 

 

 

27.9

 

 

 

8.7

 

 

 

12.5

 

 

 

6.2

 

 

 

 

 

6.0

 

 

 

7.5

 

 

Merger expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.4

 

 

 

8.0

 

 

Amortization of
acquisition-related
intangibles

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

7.5

 

 

 

2.3

 

 

 

13.5

 

 

 

6.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquired in-process research and
development

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.5

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss on disposition of assets

 

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

 

50.1

 

 

 

14.7

 

 

 

43.1

 

 

 

13.4

 

 

 

16.1

 

 

 

8.0

 

 

 

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

6.0

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

23.8

 

 

 

7.0

 

 

 

20.3

 

 

 

6.3

 

 

 

10.5

 

 

 

5.2

 

 

 

 

 

8.9

 

 

 

11.1

 

 

Income before taxes

 

 

26.3

 

 

 

7.7

 

 

 

22.8

 

 

 

7.1

 

 

 

5.5

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

 

 

(4.1

)

 

 

(5.1

)

 

Income tax expense

 

 

9.1

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

 

9.1

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

Net income

 

 

$

17.2

 

 

 

5.1

%

 

 

$

13.7

 

 

 

4.3

%

 

 

$

2.6

 

 

 

1.3

%

 

 

 

 

$

(4.6

)

 

 

(5.8

)%

 

Other Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EBITDA(c)

 

 

$

59.1

 

 

 

17.4

%

 

 

$

57.3

 

 

 

17.9

%

 

 

$

32.8

 

 

 

16.2

%

 

 

 

 

$

6.5

 

 

 

8.1

%

 


Note: Totals may not equal the sum of the components due to independent rounding. Percentages are calculated based on rounded dollar amounts presented.

(a)              Fiscal year 2006 includes a special bonus expense (see “Special Bonus” below) of $3.25 million, allocated as follows: $0.3 million to cost of sales, $0.2 million to selling and marketing and $2.75 million to general and administrative.

(b)             Includes a charge of $5.5 million for the amortization of inventory write-up incurred for the 36-week period ended October 1, 2004 in connection with our January 2004 merger and $0.4 million of charges for the amortization of inventory write-up in fiscal year 2005 in connection with the Econco acquisition.

(c)              EBITDA represents earnings before provision for income taxes, net interest expense and depreciation and amortization. For the reasons listed below, we believe that GAAP-based financial information for highly leveraged businesses such as ours should be supplemented by EBITDA so that investors better understand our financial performance in connection with their analysis of our business:

·        EBITDA is a component of the measures used by our board of directors and management team to evaluate our operating performance;

·        our senior credit facilities contain covenants that require us to maintain certain interest expense coverage and leverage ratios that contain EBITDA as a component, and our management team uses EBITDA to monitor compliance with such covenants;

·        EBITDA is a component of the measures used by our management team to make day-to-day operating decisions;

·        EBITDA facilitates comparisons between our operating results and those of competitors with different capital structures and therefore is a component of the measures used by the management to facilitate internal comparisons to competitors’ results and our industry in general; and

·        the payment of management bonuses is contingent upon, among other things, the satisfaction by us of certain targets that contain EBITDA as a component.

Other companies may define EBITDA differently and, as a result, our measure of EBITDA may not be directly comparable to EBITDA of other companies. Although we use EBITDA as a financial measure to assess the performance of our business, the use of EBITDA is limited because it does not include certain material costs, such as interest and taxes, necessary to operate our

34




business. When analyzing our performance, EBITDA should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, net income, cash flows from operating activities or other statements of operations or statements of cash flows data prepared in accordance with GAAP.

For a reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Income, see Note 14 of the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements.

Our results for fiscal year 2006 compared to our results for fiscal year 2005

Sales:   Our sales by market for fiscal years 2006 and 2005 are summarized as follows (dollars millions):

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 29, 2006

 

September 30, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

Percentage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of Total

 

 

 

of Total

 

Increase (Decrease)

 

 

 

Amount

 

Sales

 

Amount

 

Sales

 

Amount

 

Percentage

 

Radar

 

 

$

119.9

 

 

 

35

%

 

 

$

109.4

 

 

 

34

%

 

 

$

10.5

 

 

 

10

%

 

Electronic Warfare

 

 

26.8

 

 

 

8

%

 

 

27.7

 

 

 

9

%

 

 

(0.9

)

 

 

(3

)%

 

Medical

 

 

57.6

 

 

 

17

%

 

 

50.7

 

 

 

16

%

 

 

6.9

 

 

 

14

%

 

Communications

 

 

106.7

 

 

 

31

%

 

 

101.4

 

 

 

31

%

 

 

5.3

 

 

 

5

%

 

Industrial

 

 

22.1

 

 

 

7

%

 

 

23.1

 

 

 

7

%

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

(4

)%

 

Scientific

 

 

6.6

 

 

 

2

%

 

 

8.4

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

(1.8

)

 

 

(21

)%

 

Total sales

 

 

$

339.7

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

$

320.7

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

$

19.0

 

 

 

6

%

 

 

Sales for fiscal year 2006 of $339.7 million were $19.0 million, or six percent, higher than sales of $320.7 million for fiscal year 2005. Explanations for the sales increase or decrease by market for fiscal year 2006 as compared to fiscal year 2005 are as follows:

·       Radar and Electronic Warfare:   The majority of our sales in the radar and electronic warfare markets are for products for domestic and international defense and government end uses. On a combined basis, sales for these two markets increased from an aggregate of $137.1 million in fiscal year 2005 to an aggregate of $146.7 million in fiscal year 2006.

·        In the radar market, sales increased primarily due to increased shipments of products for various U.S. government and foreign military programs, including products that are used on the TPQ-37 Firefinder Artillery Locating Radar program, the LANTIRN navigation and targeting system, the SPN-35C Aircraft Landing System, the Aegis program and Federal Aviation Administration radar systems.

·        In the electronic warfare market, sales decreased primarily due to the timing of shipments for a prototype system for the Project Sheriff Active Denial System. In fiscal year 2005, we shipped $1.6 million in products for the Project Sheriff Active Denial System; these shipments did not repeat in fiscal year 2006. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in shipments for foreign military programs and products used on the SLQ-32 electronic countermeasures system, NULKA expendable decoy system and ALQ-187 electronic countermeasures system.

·       Medical:   The increase in sales in the medical market was due to an approximately 33% increase in shipments of our x-ray generators, including $4.5 million in shipments to Russia and South America which are not expected to repeat on a regular basis. Sales of our medical imaging and radiation therapy products increased approximately 15%. These increases were partially offset by a $3.9 million reduction in shipments from Eimac due to its relocation in fiscal year 2006.

·       Communications:   The increase in sales in the communications market was primarily the result of a $7.5 million increase in shipments of our newer satellite communications products, including our millimeter wave amplifiers and outdoor unit amplifiers, and a $3.9 million increase in shipments of

35




our indoor unit amplifiers. These increases were partially offset by a $6.3 million decrease in shipments of satellite communications amplifiers for direct-to-home broadcast applications. In addition, as expected, the relocation of Eimac resulted in a $5.0 million reduction in shipments of communications products in fiscal year 2006.

·       Industrial:   The decrease in industrial sales was primarily due to a $2.4 million decrease in shipments of industrial products from Eimac as a result of the acceleration of the shipment of products into fiscal year 2005 in preparation for the relocation of Eimac in fiscal year 2006. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in demand for power supplies used in semiconductor manufacturing equipment and for an upgrade to an amplifier used in industrial heating.

·       Scientific:   Sales in the scientific market, our smallest market, are historically one-time projects and can fluctuate significantly from period to period. The primary contributors to the decrease in scientific sales were product deliveries on programs for a European laboratory and for the Spallation Neutron Source at Oakridge National Laboratory in fiscal year 2005 that did not repeat in fiscal year 2006.

Gross Profit.   Gross profit of $103.7 million, or 30.5% of sales, for fiscal year 2006 was $1.0 million lower than fiscal year 2005 gross profit of $104.7 million, or 32.6% of sales. The decrease in gross profit in fiscal year 2006 as compared to fiscal year 2005 was primarily due to: the relocation of Eimac, which negatively impacted gross margins by $5.2 million; start-up costs for and a shift in the mix to newer, lower margin satcom products, which negatively impacted fiscal year 2006 gross margins as compared to fiscal year 2005 by $2.2 million; and $2.4 million due to the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar as compared to the Canadian dollar in fiscal year 2006 and the expiration of a favorable Canadian dollar hedge in March 2006. These decreases were mostly offset by approximately $9.0 million higher gross margin related primarily to higher sales in fiscal year 2006 compared to fiscal year 2005.

After the integration of Eimac is complete, we expect to realize operational savings from the consolidation of production facilities in Palo Alto, California, which we believe will improve our gross profit percentage.

Our satcom business has developed numerous new products over the past several years. The successful introduction of these new products has resulted in a gradual shift in our backlog to newer products. As we ramped up production of these new products in fiscal year 2006, we incurred start-up manufacturing costs, which contributed to lower margins in fiscal year 2006 as compared to fiscal year 2005.

Research and Development.   Research and development of $8.6 million, or 2.5% of sales, for fiscal year 2006 was $1.4 million higher than fiscal year 2005 research and development of $7.2 million, or 2.3% of sales. The increase was due to increased spending as we invest for future growth in medical diagnostic imaging products and VED products for the radar, electronic warfare and satellite communication markets. Total spending on research and development, including company-sponsored amounts charged to research and development and customer-sponsored amounts charged to cost of sales, increased from $13.1 million, or 4.1% of sales, in fiscal year 2005 to $14.8 million, or 4.3% of sales, in fiscal year 2006.

Selling and Marketing.   Selling and marketing expenses were $19.8 million in fiscal year 2006, a $1.3 million increase from fiscal year 2005. Selling and marketing expenses were 5.8% of sales in both fiscal year 2005 and 2006. This planned increase of $1.3 million in selling and marketing expenses in fiscal year 2006 was primarily due to additional headcount, tradeshows and other selling and marketing expenses to stimulate and support the growth of our business, as well as $0.2 million for the special bonus, discussed below.

36




General and Administrative.   General and administrative expenses were $22.4 million, or 6.6% of sales, for fiscal year 2006 as compared to $27.9 million, or 8.7% of sales, for fiscal year 2005. The following table further breaks out general and administrative expenses (in millions):

 

 

Fiscal Year

 

 

 

2006

 

2005

 

Stock-based compensation

 

$

0.2

 

7.0

 

Special bonus expense

 

2.7

 

 

Direct expenses for the Eimac relocation

 

1.2

 

1.0

 

Other general and administrative

 

18.3

 

19.9

 

Total

 

$

22.4

 

27.9

 

 

General and administrative expenses were lower in fiscal year 2006 due primarily to lower management bonuses (discussed under “—Calculation of Management Bonuses” below), which was partially offset by an increase in directors and officers insurance premiums, legal and accounting expenses and other expenses of approximately $0.5 million associated with being a public company.

Fiscal year 2005 includes $7.0 million of stock-based compensation expense for performance-based stock options. In September 2005, the Compensation Committee of our board of directors approved the acceleration of vesting of all outstanding performance-based stock options. Fiscal year 2005 stock-based compensation expense includes $2.8 million from the acceleration of vesting of performance-based stock options that were expected to vest in fiscal years 2006, 2007 and 2008 assuming that the performance criteria would have been achieved.

Special Bonus.   On December 15, 2005, our board of directors approved the payment of $3.25 million in special, one-time bonuses to our employees and directors (other than directors who are employees or affiliates of Cypress) to reward them for the increase in company value. The special bonus was not paid pursuant to our management incentive plan, our 2006 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan or any of our other formal compensation plans. The bonus amount was not determined based on a formula, but was instead an amount determined by our board of directors to be reasonable compensation for the increase in company value. The special bonus was charged to the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the same lines as cash compensation paid to the same employees and directors, as follows: $2.7 million to General and administrative, $0.3 million to Cost of sales, and $0.2 million to Selling and marketing.

Amortization of Acquisition-Related Intangibles.   Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles of $2.2 million for fiscal year 2006 was $5.3 million lower than fiscal year 2005. Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles consists of purchase accounting charges, primarily for customer backlog, technology and other intangible assets. Fiscal year 2005 included $5.3 million for the amortization of customer backlog, which was fully amortized in January 2005. Fiscal year 2007 expenses for amortization of acquisition-related intangibles are expected to be approximately $2.2 million. Acquisition-related intangible assets will continue to be amortized over periods of up to 50 years.

Interest Expense, net (“Interest Expense”).   Interest Expense of $23.8 million for fiscal year 2006 was $3.5 million higher than fiscal year 2005 Interest Expense of $20.3 million. Interest Expense increased primarily due to the issuance of the floating rate senior notes in February 2005, resulting in approximately seven months interest expense in fiscal year 2005 and twelve months interest expense in fiscal year 2006, with approximately $3.5 million higher interest expense in fiscal year 2006. Interest Expense was also impacted by higher interest rates on our term loan in fiscal year 2006 based on a general increase in interest rates, offset by a lower average balance on our term loan in fiscal year 2006, as proceeds from our initial public offering were used to repay a portion of our term loan in May 2006.

37




Income Tax Expense.   We recorded income tax expense of $9.1 million for fiscal years 2006 and 2005. The effective income tax rates were approximately 34% and 40% for fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively. The lower effective income tax rate in fiscal year 2006 is primarily due to a change in the tax rates in Canada as well as a change in filing position that was made as a result of foreign income tax planning activities, including the related adjustment for the difference between the estimated income tax expense for fiscal year 2005 and the actual taxes paid with the 2005 tax return based on the new tax filing position. The tax benefit from this change in filing position was partially offset by an increase in tax contingency reserves based on a tax examination by the Canada Revenue Agency for tax returns filed in fiscal years 2000 through 2003. Our ongoing tax rate is expected to be approximately 38%.

Net Income.   Net income of $17.2 million, or 5.1% of sales, for fiscal year 2006 was $3.5 million higher than net income for fiscal year 2005 of $13.7 million, or 4.3% of sales. Higher net income for fiscal year 2006 was primarily due to higher sales volume, lower amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and lower stock-based compensation expense, partially offset by the special bonus and lower gross margins due to the relocation of Eimac in fiscal year 2006.

EBITDA.   EBITDA of $59.1 million for fiscal year 2006 was $1.8 million higher than fiscal year 2005 primarily due to higher sales volume and lower stock based compensation, partially offset by lower gross margins due to the relocation of Eimac in fiscal year 2006.

Calculation of Management Bonuses.   Management bonuses were $2.5 million in fiscal year 2006 compared to $3.9 million in fiscal year 2005. Management bonuses for fiscal years 2006 and 2005 were calculated pursuant to our management incentive plan and were based on three factors: (1) EBITDA as adjusted for purposes of calculating management bonuses; (2) a measure of cash generated by operations; and (3) individual goals that were customized for certain participating members of management. The weight given to each of these factors varied for each person. Generally, for our officers, equal weight was generally given to the first two factors, and the third factor was not applicable. For our other members of management, equal weight was given to each of the three factors described above. Management bonuses for fiscal years 2006 and 2005 are paid in cash approximately three months after the end of the fiscal year. EBITDA as adjusted for purposes of calculating management bonuses is equal to EBITDA for the fiscal year adjusted to exclude the impact of certain non-recurring or non-cash charges as pre-determined in our management incentive plan for the fiscal year. EBITDA for purposes of calculating management bonuses for fiscal year 2006 was $67.2 million compared to $66.4 million in fiscal year 2005. The non-recurring and non-cash charges that were excluded from EBITDA in calculating management bonuses (a) for fiscal year 2006 were direct costs for the Eimac relocation of $4.6 million, stock-based compensation expense of $0.3 million and the special bonus of $3.25 million and (b) for fiscal year 2005 were directs costs for the Eimac relocation of $1.8 million, stock-based compensation expense of $7.0 million and $0.4 million of charges for the amortization of inventory write-up in connection with the Econco acquisition. We are presenting EBITDA as adjusted for purposes of calculating management bonuses here to help investors understand how our management bonuses were calculated, and not as a measure to be used by investors to evaluate our operating results or liquidity.

38




Our results for fiscal year 2005 compared to our results for the 36-week period ended October 1, 2004 and the results of our predecessor for the 16-week period ended January 22, 2004

Sales.   The following table compares total sales by market for fiscal years 2005 and 2004 (dollars in millions):

 

 

Fiscal Year 2005

 

Fiscal Year 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage
of Total

 

 

 

Percentage
of Total

 

Increase (Decrease)

 

 

 

Amount

 

Sales

 

Amount

 

Sales

 

Amount

 

Percentage

 

Radar

 

 

$

109.4

 

 

 

34

%

 

 

$

112.1

 

 

 

40

%

 

 

$

(2.7

)

 

 

(2

)%

 

 

Electronic Warfare

 

 

27.7

 

 

 

9

%

 

 

23.8

 

 

 

8

%

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

16

%

 

 

Medical

 

 

50.7

 

 

 

16

%

 

 

41.6

 

 

 

15

%

 

 

9.1

 

 

 

22

%

 

 

Communications

 

 

101.4

 

 

 

31

%

 

 

74.8

 

 

 

27

%

 

 

26.6

 

 

 

36

%

 

 

Industrial

 

 

23.1

 

 

 

7

%

 

 

20.2

 

 

 

7

%

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

14

%

 

 

Scientific

 

 

8.4

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

9.7

 

 

 

3

%

 

 

(1.3

)

 

 

(13

)%

 

 

Total Sales

 

 

$

320.7

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

$

282.2

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

$

38.5

 

 

 

14

%

 

 

 

Total sales for fiscal year 2005 of $320.7 million were $38.5 million, or 14%, higher than fiscal year 2004 sales of $282.2 million. Fiscal year 2004 sales include predecessor sales of $79.9 million for the 16-week period ended January 22, 2004 and successor sales of $202.3 million for the 36-week period ended October 1, 2004. The Econco acquisition represents $12.2 million of the sales increase in fiscal year 2005, while the remaining increase of $26.3 million was due to growth from our existing business. During fiscal year 2005, approximately $6 million of communications, industrial and medical sales were accelerated by several customers in anticipation of planned manufacturing disruptions due to the relocation of Eimac from the San Carlos, California facility to our Palo Alto, California and Mountain View, California facilities.

·       Radar.   Sales in the radar market of $109.4 million for fiscal year 2005 were $2.7 million, or 2%, less than fiscal year 2004 sales of $112.1 million in this market. Econco represented $2.1 million of fiscal year 2005 sales in the radar market. Our sales in the radar market have grown since 2002 due primarily to the DoD’s emphasis on addressing terrorism and homeland security, which has had a favorable impact on radar systems, including new system development and upgrade and replenishment programs, and increased demand for spare and replacement products. This growth stabilized in fiscal years 2004 and 2005.

·       Electronic Warfare.   Sales in the electronic warfare market of $27.7 million for fiscal year 2005 were $3.9 million, or 16%, higher than fiscal year 2004 sales of $23.8 million in this market. Our sales in the electronic warfare market have grown since 2002 due primarily to the DoD’s increased emphasis on protection of valuable military assets, resulting in the continuing funding of new, upgrade and replenishment programs in the electronic warfare market.

·       Medical.   Sales in the medical market of $50.7 million for fiscal year 2005 were $9.1 million, or 22%, higher than fiscal year 2004 sales of $41.6 million in this market. Our sales in the medical market have shown steady growth in the past three years, averaging 20% growth per year. Our sales grew in the diagnostic x-ray imaging part of the medical market as a result of:

·        worldwide growth in demand for diagnostic x-ray imaging products;

·        the addition to our product portfolio of new lower-cost products with fewer features;

·        the addition to our product portfolio of new high-end products with additional features; and

39




·        the outsourcing by certain major x-ray system original equipment manufacturers of a portion of their manufacturing to us.

In the radiation therapy part of the medical market we have been the sole supplier of high-power microwave devices to Varian Medical System Inc.’s high energy radiation therapy machines. Our annual growth in this portion of the market in the past three years has averaged in excess of 15%, driven largely by growth in demand from Varian Medical Systems.

·       Communications.   After several years of declining sales attributable to the global communications industry downturn, our fiscal year 2005 sales in the communications market of $101.4 million were $26.6 million, or 36%, higher than fiscal year 2004 sales of $74.8 million in this market. Econco represented $4.4 million of fiscal year 2005 sales in the communications market. The majority of our communications products are sold into the satellite communications market where we experienced a decrease in sales in the three fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2004. We believe this decrease was due, in part, to the large overcapacity that was built up in the late 1990s in anticipation of the need for a rapid expansion of telecommunications infrastructure to support overly-optimistic forecasts for growth of the internet. As of fiscal year 2005, this overcapacity has subsided, as demand from both military and commercial customers has increased, with a resulting increase in utilization of satellite communication systems and a resulting increase in demand for our satellite amplifiers and products. In fiscal year 2005 we saw an increase in demand for all of our satellite communication products, and in particular, products used by direct-to-home television providers, which are continuing to add capacity as they introduce service into new geographic markets and add new services such as high-definition television and satellite access to the internet.

·       Industrial.   The $2.9 million, or 14%, increase in sales for fiscal year 2005 was due to the addition of Econco industrial sales of $5.6 million, offset primarily by decreases of $2.7 million from the semiconductor market. Sales in the industrial market have generally fluctuated because of the volatile demand in the semiconductor equipment market.

·       Scientific.   Sales in the scientific market of $8.4 million for fiscal year 2005 were $1.3 million, or 13%, lower than fiscal year 2004 sales of $9.7 million in this market. Sales in the scientific market, our smallest market, are historically for one-time projects and can fluctuate significantly from period to period.

Gross Profit.   Gross profit was $104.7 million, or 32.6% of sales, for fiscal year 2005, $23.7 million, or 29.7% of sales, for the 16-week period ended January 22, 2004 and $61.1 million, or 30.2% of sales, for the 36-week period ended October 1, 2004. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of sales in fiscal year 2005 was primarily due to higher sales volume in fiscal year 2005 and purchase accounting charges related to our January 2004 merger of $5.5 million for amortization of acquisition-related inventory write-up for the 36-week period ended October 1, 2004. Cost of sales for fiscal year 2005 includes $0.8 million of expenses associated with the relocation of our San Carlos, California facility to our Palo Alto, California and Mountain View, California facilities.

40