In Illinois divorce cases, dividing property is one of the most critical issues. According to Chicago Divorce Lawyer Russell D. Knight (https://rdklegal.com/forcing-the-sale-of-a-home-business-or-asset-in-an-illinois-divorce/), courts must classify property as either marital or non-marital to determine its distribution. Non-marital property, such as assets acquired before the marriage or through inheritance, is assigned to the spouse who owns it, as mandated by Illinois law under 750 ILCS 5/503(d): “The court shall assign each spouse’s non-marital property to that spouse.” Marital property, by contrast, is divided by the court based on what is fair rather than equal, with no consideration of marital misconduct.
Selling marital property often emerges as a practical solution during divorce proceedings. Liquidating assets can simplify the division process, convert tangible property into liquid funds, and provide both parties with a clear understanding of the property’s value. Illinois law permits courts to authorize the sale of marital property as part of temporary relief measures under 750 ILCS 5/501(a)(3). However, Chicago Divorce Lawyer Russell D. Knight states that courts exercise caution and typically allow such sales only under extraordinary circumstances, preferring to wait until the final division of the marital estate is determined.
Finalizing the sale of marital assets is frequently the most effective method for achieving equitable distribution. In cases where property values are disputed or assets are difficult to divide, selling the property and distributing the proceeds ensures transparency and fairness. Illinois courts have emphasized this approach, as demonstrated in In re Marriage of Hamilton, where the appellate court determined that selling marital assets was the most realistic way to achieve equity. According to Chicago Divorce Lawyer Russell D. Knight, this method also provides clarity, reducing the potential for one spouse to receive an asset whose value may later be contested.
Illinois law requires that asset division be equitable, though not necessarily equal. This principle, highlighted in In re Marriage of Jones, underscores that courts prioritize fairness over strict parity when distributing marital property. Selling assets allows for a direct and impartial valuation, ensuring that neither party receives an undue advantage.
The sale of marital property can also prevent inequitable divisions when assets are of differing natures or values. For instance, awarding one spouse a home and the other a retirement account may lead to an unfair outcome if the assets differ significantly in value. Liquidating property eliminates the need for subjective valuations and ensures both parties receive their fair share of the proceeds. This approach also avoids the complications that arise when one party disputes the valuation of an asset retained by the other.
However, forcing the sale of marital property can be contentious and, in some cases, strategic. For example, selling a marital home could disrupt child custody arrangements by introducing uncertainty about future living situations. Similarly, selling a business could result in undervaluation or allow one spouse to repurchase the business post-divorce under a new name. Courts aim to prevent such scenarios by requiring credible evidence to justify the sale and by considering the broader implications for both parties.
Valuing assets accurately is essential in divorce cases where forced sales are contested. Courts must determine the value of all marital and non-marital property under 750 ILCS 5/503(a), relying on evidence provided by the parties. When a party has substantial knowledge of an asset, their testimony may be admissible. For example, a business owner or real estate holder may have direct insight into the asset’s value. However, courts may deem such testimony inadmissible if the individual lacks sufficient familiarity, as outlined in Hill v. Ben Franklin Savings & Loan Ass’n.
Testimony from qualified witnesses is often the most reliable source for determining asset value. These witnesses provide independent and informed assessments, which courts use to establish fair market value without requiring asset sales. Illinois courts have consistently upheld valuations supported by such testimony, as seen in In re Marriage of Heroy. This reliance on informed evidence ensures accuracy and fairness in the division process, reducing the likelihood of disputes.
Some parties may attempt to force asset sales by withholding evidence of value, hoping the court will default to ordering liquidation. Illinois courts discourage such tactics, emphasizing that no party should benefit from failing to present competent evidence. In In re Marriage of Donald R., the court stated that parties should not gain an advantage from their lack of diligence in providing valuation evidence. Courts retain discretion to deny asset sales when credible valuations can be established through other means.
Illinois courts balance the need for accurate valuations with the goal of equitable outcomes. While selling assets can simplify the division process, courts consider each case’s unique circumstances before ordering liquidation. Decisions are guided by fairness, transparency, and the potential impact on both parties.
Navigating disputes over the sale of marital property requires careful preparation and a thorough understanding of Illinois law. By presenting credible valuations and evidence, divorcing parties can ensure fair resolutions without resorting to unnecessary asset sales. Legal guidance can play a critical role in protecting individuals’ rights and achieving equitable outcomes.
About The Law Office of Russell D. Knight:
The Law Office of Russell D. Knight is dedicated to helping clients resolve family law matters, including complex property division in Illinois divorces. Based in Chicago, the firm focuses on providing clear and practical guidance to individuals navigating the challenges of divorce. With a commitment to fairness and effective advocacy, the firm assists clients in securing equitable outcomes and protecting their interests throughout the divorce process.
Embeds:
Youtube Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wr6Napkp7F4
GMB: https://www.google.com/maps?cid=13056420905624162796
Email and website
Email: russell@rdklegal.com
Website: https://rdklegal.com/
Media Contact
Company Name: Law Office of Russell D. Knight
Contact Person: Russell D. Knight
Email: Send Email
Phone: (773) 334-6311
Address:1165 N Clark St #700
City: Chicago
State: Illinois 60610
Country: United States
Website: https://rdklegal.com/
