Camco Financial Corp. DEF 14A
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-11(c) or § 240.14a-12
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ |
|
No fee required. |
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and O-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
|
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) |
|
|
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) |
|
|
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule O-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4) |
|
|
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5) |
|
|
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule O-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the
offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the
date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1) |
|
|
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2) |
|
|
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3) |
|
|
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4) |
|
|
|
Date Filed: |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
6901 Glenn Highway
Cambridge, Ohio 43725
(740) 435-2020
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
The 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Camco Financial Corporation (Camco) will be held
at Camcos Corporate Center, 6901 Glenn Highway, Cambridge, Ohio 43725, on April 24, 2007, at 3:00
p.m., local time (the Annual Meeting), for the following purposes:
|
1. |
|
To elect four directors of Camco for terms expiring in 2010;
and |
|
|
2. |
|
To transact such other business as may properly come before the
Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof. |
Only Camco stockholders of record at the close of business on March 13, 2007, will be entitled
to vote at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments thereof. Whether or not you expect to attend
the Annual Meeting, we urge you to consider the accompanying proxy statement carefully and to SIGN,
DATE AND PROMPTLY RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY SO THAT YOUR SHARES MAY BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
YOUR WISHES AND THE PRESENCE OF A QUORUM MAY BE ASSURED. Giving a proxy does not affect your right
to vote in person in the event you attend the Annual Meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ D. Edward Rugg |
|
|
|
March 16, 2007
|
|
D. Edward Rugg, Secretary |
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
6901 Glenn Highway
Cambridge, Ohio 43725
(740) 435-2020
PROXY STATEMENT
PROXIES
The Board of Directors of Camco Financial Corporation (Camco) is soliciting proxies in the
form accompanying this Proxy Statement for use at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Camco
to be held at Camcos Corporate Center, 6901 Glenn Highway, Cambridge, Ohio 43725, on April 24,
2007, at 3:00 p.m., local time, and at any adjournments thereof (the Annual Meeting). Only
stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 13, 2007 (the Voting Record Date),
are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each such stockholder will be entitled to cast one
vote for each share owned. As of the Voting Record Date, there were 7,463,056 votes entitled to be
cast at the Annual Meeting.
Each properly executed proxy received prior to the Annual Meeting and not revoked will be
voted as specified thereon or, in the absence of specific instructions to the contrary, will be
voted FOR the reelection of Terry A. Feick, Edward D. Goodyear, Susan J. Insley and J.
Timothy Young as directors of Camco for terms expiring in 2010.
The directors, officers and other employees of Camco may solicit proxies in person or by
telephone, email or mail only for use at the Annual Meeting. The cost of soliciting proxies will
be borne by Camco. Proxies may be revoked by (a) delivering a written notice expressly revoking
the proxy to the Secretary of Camco at the above address prior to the Annual Meeting, (b)
delivering a later dated proxy to Camco at the above address prior to the Annual Meeting, or (c)
attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.
This Proxy Statement is first being mailed to stockholders of Camco on or about March 22,
2007.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors proposes the reelection of the following persons to terms that will
expire in 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position(s) held |
|
Since |
Terry A. Feick |
|
57 |
|
Director |
|
2000 |
Edward D. Goodyear |
|
59 |
|
Director |
|
2006 |
Susan J. Insley |
|
61 |
|
Lead Director |
|
2002 |
J. Timothy Young |
|
60 |
|
Director |
|
2005 |
Terry A. Feick retired as the Superintendent of Schools for the Washington Court House City
Schools in December 2001, a position he had held since 1991.
1
Edward D. Goodyear is treasurer of Agricultural Lands, Inc. and the Dispatch Printing Company,
publisher of the Columbus Dispatch, positions he has held since 1999.
Susan J. Insley retired as the Executive Vice President and Principal of Cochran Group Inc.,
Columbus, Ohio, in December 2005, a position she had held since 1996.
J. Timothy Young, a certified financial planner, is the Senior Vice President of Hamilton
Capital Management, Inc, Columbus, Ohio, a position he has held since 2003. From 2000 to 2003, Mr.
Young was self-employed as an attorney and consultant representing individuals and businesses.
Under Delaware law and Camcos Bylaws, the four nominees receiving the greatest number of
votes will be elected as directors. Abstentions, shares not voted by brokers, and votes withheld
are not counted toward the election of directors.
In accordance with Section 3.13 of the Bylaws, nominees for election as directors may be
proposed only by the directors or by a stockholder. Camcos Corporate Governance and Nominating
Committee recommended to Camcos Board of Directors this years director nominees. The Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee believes that candidates for director should have certain
minimum qualifications, including being able to read and understand basic financial statements,
having business experience, and exhibiting high moral character. However, the Committee retains
the right to modify these minimum qualifications from time to time. The Committee has a general
process for choosing nominees, which process considers both incumbent directors and new candidates.
In evaluating an incumbent director whose term of office is set to expire, the Committee reviews
such directors overall service to Camco during his or her term, including the number of meetings
attended, level of participation, quality of performance and any transactions of such director with
Camco during his or her term. If the Committee chooses to evaluate new director candidates, the
Committee uses its network of contacts to compile a list of potential candidates. Then, the
Committee determines whether such candidates are independent, which determination is based upon
applicable securities laws, the rules and regulations of the SEC, the rules of the National
Association of Securities Dealers and the advice of counsel, if necessary. Finally, the Committee
meets to discuss and consider all candidates qualifications and then chooses the candidates.
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider director candidates
recommended by stockholders, provided that the stockholder is entitled to vote for directors and
has submitted a written nomination to the Secretary of Camco by the 60th day before the
first anniversary of the most recent annual meeting of stockholders held for the election of
directors. Each written nomination must state the name, age, business and residence address of the
nominee, the principal occupation or employment of the nominee, the number of each class of shares
of Camco owned either beneficially or of record by each such nominee and the length of time such
shares have been owned. The Committee does not intend to alter the manner in which it evaluates
candidates, including the minimum criteria set forth above, when evaluating a candidate who was
recommended by a stockholder.
Camco has not implemented a formal policy regarding director attendance at the annual meeting
of stockholders. Typically, the Board of Directors holds a meeting immediately prior to the annual
meeting of stockholders, which results in most directors being able to attend the annual meeting.
In 2006, all directors except Susan J. Insley attended the annual meeting of stockholders.
2
INCUMBENT DIRECTORS
The following directors will continue to serve after the Annual Meeting for the terms
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Term |
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position(s) held |
|
Since |
|
Expires |
Carson K. Miller |
|
61 |
|
Director |
|
2002 |
|
2008 |
Jeffrey T. Tucker |
|
49 |
|
Director |
|
1987 |
|
2008 |
Richard C. Baylor |
|
52 |
|
Chairman of the Board |
|
2001 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
Robert C. Dix, Jr. |
|
67 |
|
Director |
|
1994 |
|
2009 |
Paul D. Leake |
|
65 |
|
Director |
|
1996 |
|
2009 |
Douglas F. Mock |
|
51 |
|
Director |
|
2005 |
|
2009 |
Carson K. Miller is the owner of Marietta Rare Coins & Collectibles, an internet-based
business. Dr. Miller retired in 2002 as the President of Washington State Community College in
Marietta, Ohio, a position he had held since 1985.
Jeffrey T. Tucker is a Certified Public Accountant and a partner in the accounting firm of
Tucker & Tucker, Cambridge, Ohio, a position he has held since 1984.
Richard C. Baylor was named Chairman of the Board on November 10, 2006. He has been Camcos
President since January 1, 2000, and Chief Executive Officer since January 1, 2001. He has been
Camcos Chief Operating Officer since October 21, 1998. From October 21, 1998 until January 1,
2000, Mr. Baylor was the Executive Vice President of Camco. From August 1989 to June 1998, Mr.
Baylor was employed as a Vice President of Lending by State Savings Bank, Columbus, Ohio. Mr.
Baylor also serves as a director of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati.
Robert C. Dix, Jr. is Publisher of The Daily Jeffersonian, Cambridge, Ohio, and is one
of the five principals of the group known as Dix Communication. Mr. Dix has been chairman of Dix
Communications since 2005 and president of Dix Communications since 1993.
Paul D. Leake retired in June 2001 as the President and Chief Executive Officer of First Bank
for Savings, a position he had held since 1976.
Douglas F. Mock is president of Mock Woodworking Co., Zanesville, Ohio, a position he has held
since 1986.
BOARD MEETINGS, COMMITTEES AND COMPENSATION
The Board of Directors of Camco met four times for regularly scheduled meetings during the
year ended December 31, 2006. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total
number of the Board of Directors meetings and the total number of meetings held by committees on
which such director served during 2006. The Board has determined that each director is independent
under Rule 4200(a)(15) of Nasdaqs listing standards, except Mr. Baylor.
3
The Board of Directors of Camco has a Compensation Committee whose 2006 members were Ms.
Insley and Messrs. Feick and Mock. The 2007 Committee members are Messrs. Feick, Mock, Miller, and
Ms. Insley. The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are discussed in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis below. The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to a written charter,
which is posted on the Charters and Policies page of Advantage Banks website at
www.advantagebank.com/site/camco_investor.html. The Compensation Committee met five times during
2006.
The Board of Directors of Camco has an Audit and Risk Management Committee whose 2006 members
were Messrs. Tucker, Dix, Goodyear, Miller and Young. The 2007 members are Messrs. Tucker, Dix,
Young, and Goodyear. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Tucker and Mr. Goodyear
qualify as a financial expert. The Audit Committees responsibilities include selecting an
independent accounting firm to audit Camco and its subsidiaries, overseeing the audit, and
evaluating the accounting firms performance. A more detailed description of the Audit Committees
functions is set forth in its charter, which is posted on the Charters and Policies page of
Advantage Banks website at
www.advantagebank.com/site/camco_investor.html. The Audit and Risk
Management Committee met 14 times during 2006.
The Board of Directors of Camco has a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee whose 2006
members were Ms. Insley and Messrs. Speck (retired 1/23/07), Dix and Feick. The 2007 members are
Ms. Insley, Messrs. Dix, Feick, and Young. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
provides a forum for independent directors to address issues of corporate governance, including the
selection of nominees for director, guide the Board in managing its affairs and operating in a
manner that best serves the stockholders. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
operates pursuant to a written charter, which is posted on the Charters and Policies page of
Advantage Banks website at
www.advantagebank.com/site/camco_investor.html. The Corporate
Governance and Nominating Committee met four times during 2006.
The Board of Directors of Camco has an Executive Committee whose 2006 members were Messrs.
Larry Caldwell (retired 11/11/06), Baylor, Feick and Tucker and Ms. Insley. The members for 2007
are Messrs. Baylor, Feick, Tucker, and Ms. Insley. The Executive Committee provides a forum for
exercising the power and authority of the Board of Directors when the Board is not in session,
subject to certain limitations. The Executive Committee did not meet during 2006.
4
2006 Director Compensation Table
During 2006, each non-employee director of Camco received a retainer of $5,000 per year for
service on the Board of Camco and $1,250 for each Board meeting attended, with one paid absence per
year. Each director of Camco is also a director of Advantage Bank. Each non-employee director
received a retainer of $6,000 per year for service on the Board of Advantage Bank and $500 per
Board meeting attended, with one paid absence per year. In addition, non-employee directors
received a fee of $300 for each scheduled committee meeting attended. The chair of each committee
received an additional fee of $200 or $300 per meeting. Per meeting fees are not paid for
telephonic meetings.
Directors received equity awards based upon Camcos achievement of certain performance
measures. The performance measures and calculations are described under Compensation Discussion
and Analysis Equity-Based Incentives. The maximum equity award potential for non-employee
directors is equal to 100% of the retainers and Board per meeting fees, which for 2006 totaled
$22,000. As a result, directors received option awards based upon the following calculation:
$22,000 x 100% x 10.36% = $2,278.24. The number of options to be awarded was then calculated as
follows: $2,278.24/ $12.31, which was the fair market value on the date of grant.
The total compensation paid to each director, other than Mr. Baylor, is set forth in the table
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned Or |
|
Option |
|
Total |
Name |
|
Paid in Cash(1) |
|
Awards(2) |
|
($) |
Larry A. Caldwell (Insider) (3) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
Robert Dix |
|
|
25,300 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
25,522 |
|
Terry Feick |
|
|
25,500 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
25,722 |
|
Susan Insley |
|
|
26,200 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
26,422 |
|
Paul Leake |
|
|
23,200 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
23,422 |
|
Carson Miller |
|
|
23,750 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
23,972 |
|
Doug Mock |
|
|
24,400 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
24,622 |
|
Samuel Speck (4) |
|
|
23,500 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
23,722 |
|
Jeffrey Tucker |
|
|
26,800 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
27,022 |
|
Tim Young |
|
|
23,800 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
24,022 |
|
Ed Goodyear |
|
|
14,900 |
(5) |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
15,122 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Each of the directors contributed all retainer fees received to the Director Deferred
Compensation Plan. These deferred fees were as follows: Mr. Dix $25,300; Messrs. Feick,
Leake, Miller, Speck, Tucker, Young and Ms. Insley $11,000; Mr. Mock $24,400; Mr.
Goodyear $5,500. Deferred fees are invested in Camco stock that is purchased and held by
the Director Deferred Compensation Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Camco granted stock options to directors on January 23, 2007 that were earned based on
Camcos 2006 performance. The options were granted under the 1995 Camco Stock Option Plan
and were immediately exercisable. Each of the directors received 185 nonqualified stock
options at an exercise price of $12.31. The values in the table represent the compensation
cost of those awards in accordance with FAS 123R. Assumptions used in the calculation of
these amounts are discussed in Note A, Item 11 Stock Option Plans to Camcos audited
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, which are included in
Camcos Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 15, 2007. |
|
(3) |
|
Retired November 11, 2006 |
|
(4) |
|
Retired January 23, 2007 |
|
(5) |
|
Include $3,000 for participation on the London Advisory Board prior to joining Camcos
Board. |
5
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following information is supplied for certain executive officers of Camco and Advantage
Bank who do not serve on Camcos Board of Directors.
D. Edward Rugg, 52 years, has served as the Secretary of Camco since January 2001 and as the
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Advantage Bank since May 2001. Mr. Rugg
was President and Chief Executive Officer of Cambridge Savings Bank from January 1996 until May
2001. Mr. Rugg joined Camco in 1976.
Mark A. Severson, 53 years, has served as the Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Camco
and Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Advantage Bank since November 2001. From
May 1990 to May 2001, Mr. Severson was a Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FCNB
Corp., Frederick, Maryland.
David S. Caldwell, 44 years, has served as the Senior Vice President in charge of retail
banking and financial services of Advantage Bank since December 2001. From July 2001 through
December 2001, Mr. Caldwell served as Division President of the Cambridge Division of Advantage
Bank. Mr. Caldwell joined Camco in September 2000 as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Westwood Homestead Savings Bank in Cincinnati, Ohio. Prior to joining Camco, Mr. Caldwell served
for three years as a Senior Vice President of Central Carolina Bank & Trust, Durham, North
Carolina. Mr. Caldwell is the son of Larry A. Caldwell, former Chairman.
Edward A. Wright, 45 years, has served as the Senior Vice President in charge of operations of
Advantage Bank since December 2001. Previously, Mr. Wright served as the Vice President of
Operations at Advantage Bank from July 2001 until December 2001. Mr. Wright joined Cambridge
Savings Bank in 1984 and served as Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Cambridge Savings
Bank from 1994 until July 2001.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) describes Camcos compensation philosophy
and policies for 2006 that applied to Camcos Named Executive Officers (as defined in the Summary
Compensation Table below). The CD&A explains the structure and rationale associated with each
material element of the Named Executive Officers total compensation, and it provides important
context for the more detailed disclosure tables and specific compensation amounts provided
following the CD&A.
COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES
The overall objective of the executive compensation program is to provide competitive levels
of compensation that will attract and retain qualified executives and reward individual
performance, initiative and achievement, while enhancing overall corporate performance and
stockholder value. The program is designed to align senior management compensation with the goals
of the Camco business plan by creating strong incentives to manage the business successfully from
both a financial and operating perspective. The executive compensation program is structured to
accomplish the following specific objectives:
|
1. |
|
Align the interests of management with the interests of the stockholders; |
|
|
2. |
|
Retain key personnel critical to Camcos long-term success; |
6
|
3. |
|
Emphasize formula-based components, such as incentive plans, in order to better focus
management efforts in its execution of the business plan; |
|
|
4. |
|
Clearly motivate management by maintaining pay for performance as an integral component
of the overall compensation program by utilizing incentive plans that emphasize corporate
success; and |
|
|
5. |
|
Maintain a corporate environment which encourages stability and a long-term focus for
both Camco and its management. |
SETTING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee recommends the Chief Executive Officers annual compensation to the
Board, which is responsible for approving all forms of compensation provided to the Chief Executive
Officer. Additionally, the Compensation Committee is responsible for determining all compensation
of the other Named Executive Officers which is approved by the Board based upon recommendations of
the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committees other responsibilities include
recommending the compensation to be paid to directors of Camco and its subsidiaries each year.
Each of the members of the Compensation Committee is independent within the meaning of the
listing standards of the NASDAQ, is a nonemployee director within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is an outside director within the meaning of Section
162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Consultants and Benchmarking
The Compensation Committee has historically engaged a compensation consultant to provide input
on executive compensation issues. In 2005, the Compensation Committee retained Clark Consulting, a
compensation consulting company specialized in the banking industry, to assist with a compensation
review for the top five officer positions; this review was used as reference information for 2006
officer compensation decisions.
Camco utilized information from the Americas Community Bankers and Ohio Bankers League
compensation surveys in setting salary and cash incentive compensation for 2006. In addition, the
compensation study prepared in 2005 by Clark Consulting was used as reference information. The
Clark Consulting study provided total compensation information for 20 peer banks that were similar
in size and geographic location to Camco. These peer banks are listed below:
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 PEER GROUP |
Company Name (Ticker) |
|
|
|
Company Name (Ticker) |
Citizens First Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
CTZN
|
|
Summit Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
SMMF |
Main Street Trust, Inc.
|
|
MSTI
|
|
Peoples Community Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
PCBI |
S.Y. Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
SYI
|
|
Bank of Kentucky Financial Corp.
|
|
BKYF |
First Defiance Financial
Corp.
|
|
FDEF
|
|
QCR Holdings, Inc.
|
|
QCRH |
Oak Hill Financial, Inc.
|
|
OAKF
|
|
First Mid-Illinois Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
FMBH |
Mercantile Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
MBR
|
|
Farmers National Banc Corp.
|
|
FMNB |
EFC Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
EFC
|
|
First Citizens Banc Corp.
|
|
FCZA |
HMN Financial, Inc.
|
|
HMNF
|
|
Firstbank Corporation
|
|
FBMI |
German American Bancorp
|
|
GABC
|
|
LNB Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
LNBB |
Horizon Bancorp
|
|
HBNC
|
|
PVF Capital Corp.
|
|
PVFC |
|
Role of Executives in Compensation Committee Deliberations
The Compensation Committee frequently requests the Chief Executive Officer to be present at
Committee meetings to discuss Camcos performance and the performance of individual executives.
Occasionally, other executives may attend a Committee meeting to provide pertinent financial,
business, operational or legal information. Executives in attendance may provide their insights
and suggestions, but only independent Compensation Committee members may vote on decisions
regarding executive compensation.
COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK
Camcos business consists primarily of the business of Advantage Bank. The financial results
of Camco are primarily a function of Advantage Banks achievement of its goals as set forth in its
business plan. Executives are compensated for their contribution to the achievement of these
goals, which benefits the stockholders, customers, employees, and the communities in which Camco
operates.
Pay Components. Executive compensation consists of the following components:
|
|
|
base salary, |
|
|
|
|
performance-based cash incentive plan, |
|
|
|
|
performance-based equity compensation, |
|
|
|
|
executive retirement benefits, and |
|
|
|
|
other compensation, including perquisites. |
During 2006, Mr. Baylor and Mr. Severson each received 50% of their compensation from
Advantage Bank and 50% from Camco. All other Named Executive Officers received all of their
compensation from Advantage Bank. The Compensation Committee and Board of Directors met in
December 2005 to establish salaries for 2006 and in January 2007 to award cash incentives and stock
options for 2006 performance.
Salary. Base salary forms the foundation of the compensation program as it represents income
not at risk. The Committee believes that base salary should function as an anchor: large enough
that the executive is comfortable remaining in Camcos employ, but not so large as to conflict with
the executives motivation to work diligently to increase stockholder value. An individuals base
salary is directly related to his or her position, job responsibilities, accountability,
performance and past and potential contribution to Camco and its subsidiaries.
8
At the end of 2005, Mr. Larry Caldwell who retired as Chairman of the Board in November 2006,
conducted a performance evaluation of Mr. Baylors performance during the year, providing this
information to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee provided this evaluation to the Compensation Committee and the full Board.
Based upon this evaluation and the peer group and compensation surveys discussed above, the
Compensation Committee provided a base salary recommendation for Mr. Baylor to the full Board of
Directors. The Board then set Mr. Baylors 2006 base salary in executive session, without Mr.
Baylor present.
Performance evaluations for other Named Executive Officers are conducted by Mr. Baylor. The
Compensation Committee meets with Mr. Baylor in December of each year to review these performance
evaluations and discuss salary recommendations of the other Named Executive Officers. The
Compensation Committee assesses each Named Executive Officers contribution to Camco, his or her
skills and experience, and the on-going potential contribution of each Named Executive Officer.
Adjustments to compensation for each Named Executive Officer are then made based upon the
performance evaluations, corporate performance, and independent compensation surveys of officers in
banks and other public companies, taking into account comparable asset bases and geographic
locations. The compensation study prepared in 2005 by Clark Consulting includes rankings based on
return on average equity, return on average assets, efficiency ratio, asset growth, net interest
margin, EPS growth and total return on a companys stock price, among other factors. Compensation
data utilized for comparisons is generally annual cash compensation, including base salary, and
most forms of cash incentive and annual incentive awards. The Compensation Committees
determinations are presented to the full Board of Directors. The salaries of each Named Executive
Officer are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 16.
On December 19, 2006, the Board approved Mr. Baylors salary and the Compensation Committee
approved the salaries for the other Named Executive Officers to be effective January 1, 2007. The
Compensation Committee and Board of Directors decided not to increase base salaries of the Named
Executive Officers for 2007 due to Camcos 2006 financial performance in a difficult economic
environment.
Annual Cash Incentive. Camco uses annual cash incentives to focus attention on current
strategic priorities and drive achievement of short-term corporate objectives. Incentive plan
awards for the Named Executive Officers are based on the achievement of corporate performance
objectives which are established annually by Camcos Compensation Committee and approved by the
Board (excluding Mr. Baylor) at the beginning of each year. Additional discretionary incentive
amounts may also be awarded under the cash incentive plan in recognition of other achievements,
such as merger and acquisition activities, which are not part of the established performance
objectives. For 2006, the cash incentive opportunity ranged from 0% to 50% of the Chief Executive
Officers base salary and 0% to 35% of other executive officers base salaries, subject to the
percentage of performance measurements achieved. The 2006 cash incentive awards were contingent on
performance relative to the following ten goals:
9
Corporate
Goals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Cash Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal Ranges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal |
|
Actual |
|
Goal |
Criteria |
|
Threshold |
|
Maximum |
|
Weighting |
|
Results |
|
Result |
Earnings Per Share |
|
$ |
0.910 |
|
|
$ |
1.010 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Return on Average Tangible Equity (ROATE) |
|
|
8.21 |
% |
|
|
9.07 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
6.98 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Net Interest Margin |
|
|
2.82 |
% |
|
|
2.95 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
2.94 |
% |
|
|
9.38 |
% |
Ratio of Non-Interest Income to Total Revenue |
|
|
16.68 |
% |
|
|
18.44 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
14.40 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Demand Deposit Account Growth ($ In Millions) |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
(.9 |
) |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Net Retail Deposit Growth ($ In Millions) |
|
$ |
17.2 |
|
|
$ |
34.3 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Loan Production Volume |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Commercial ($ In Millions) |
|
$ |
105.00 |
|
|
$ |
129.00 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
$ |
74.5 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
b) Consumer ($ In Millions) |
|
$ |
85.00 |
|
|
$ |
105.00 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
$ |
88.9 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
% |
c) Residential ($ In Millions) |
|
$ |
163.00 |
|
|
$ |
199.00 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
$ |
111.0 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Efficiency Ratio |
|
|
68.71 |
% |
|
|
63.76 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
71.27 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Non-Performing Assets as a % of Average Assets |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
0.90 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
2.06 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Stock Price |
|
$ |
14.43 |
|
|
$ |
17.22 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
$ |
12.75 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.36 |
% |
|
A cash award is paid only if Camcos actual performance results exceed the threshold annual
incentive goals.
After evaluating Camcos 2006 results, the Compensation Committee determined that the annual
incentive objectives for 2006 were achieved at the 10.36% level. The cash incentive award for each
Named Executive Officer was calculated as follows:
Base Salary X Goal Results % X Maximum Incentive Potential % = $ Cash Incentive Award
The table below shows the maximum cash incentive award opportunities as a percentage of
salary, as well as each executives actual award paid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
Actual Cash |
|
|
Maximum Incentive |
|
Potential |
|
Incentive Award |
Executive |
|
Award
Potential |
|
Incentive Award |
|
Paid |
Mr. Baylor |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
$ |
131,250 |
|
|
$ |
13,592 |
|
Mr. Rugg |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
$ |
61,670 |
|
|
$ |
6,386 |
|
Mr. Severson |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
$ |
48,840 |
|
|
$ |
5,058 |
|
Mr. Caldwell |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
$ |
43,230 |
|
|
$ |
4,477 |
|
Mr. Wright |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
$ |
38,100 |
|
|
$ |
3,945 |
|
Equity-Based Incentives. Camco uses equity awards to focus attention on strategic priorities
and drive achievement of corporate objectives. This element of the executive compensation program
is designed to align the interests of the executive with corporate stockholder objectives since the
price performance of Camcos common stock directly affects the value of these long-term awards.
Stock options are awarded based upon the achievement of performance measures. Camco does not have
a formal written policy guiding the timing of equity grants. However, stock options are typically
granted
10
near the end of January each year based on the prior years performance. All options are issued at
fair market value, have a term of ten years, and vest at a rate determined by the Compensation
Committee.
The performance goals used to determine option awards are the same as those used for awarding
cash incentives. For 2006, grants were determined by the Compensation Committee in January 2007
based upon Camcos goal result achievement at the 10.36% level as described above. Mr. Baylors
stock options were immediately vested and exercisable. This decision was made based on an
assessment of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Codes impact on Mr. Baylor and Camco. Stock
options awarded to the other Named Executive Officers vested 20% immediately and 20% in each of the
following four years. Each of the Named Executive Officers has a potential stock option award
ranging from 0% to a maximum of between 100% and 200% of the officers base salary. The value of
the options to be awarded are calculated as follows:
Base Salary X Maximum Award Potential % X Goal Result % = $ Value of Option Award
Then, to determine the number of shares underlying each option granted, the dollar value of
the option award is divided by the fair market value of Camcos stock on the date of grant. The
following table shows the maximum option incentive award opportunities as a percentage of salary,
as well as the actual awards granted as a percentage of salary and as the number of shares
underlying options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual Award |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Award |
|
Percent of |
|
Number of Shares |
Executive |
|
Potential |
|
Salary |
|
Underlying Options |
Mr. Baylor |
|
|
200 |
% |
|
|
20.72 |
% |
|
|
4,587 |
|
Mr. Rugg |
|
|
150 |
% |
|
|
15.54 |
% |
|
|
2,216 |
|
Mr. Severson |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
10.36 |
% |
|
|
1,365 |
|
Mr. Caldwell |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
10.36 |
% |
|
|
1,208 |
|
Mr. Wright |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
10.36 |
% |
|
|
1,064 |
|
Camco desires to motivate and reward executives relative to driving superior future
performance, so Camco does not currently consider prior stock compensation gains as a factor in
determining future compensation levels.
401(k) Salary Savings Plan/Profit Sharing. An employee is eligible to make elective deferrals
and receive matching contributions of a portion of the first 5% of the deferral immediately upon
hire. Camco matches 100% of the first 3% of each employees deferral and 50% of the next 2% of the
employees deferral. Camco also provides a retirement profit sharing contribution to eligible
employees 401(k) Salary Savings Plan accounts. Each employee of Camco who has contributed one
year of service or at least 1,000 hours will be eligible to receive a retirement profit sharing
contribution to his or her 401(k) plan account according to the following vesting schedule:
11
|
|
|
Years of Full-Time |
|
|
Employment |
|
Percent Vested |
1 year
|
|
0% |
2 years
|
|
20% |
3 years
|
|
40% |
4 years
|
|
60% |
5 years
|
|
80% |
6 years
|
|
100% |
The retirement profit sharing contribution is based on Camcos return on average equity (ROAE)
ratio for the calendar year. Profit sharing contributions are made into employee 401(k) accounts
in any year in which the ROAE is 10% or more. For plan years in which the ROAE is 10% or more, the
following contribution schedule shall be followed:
|
|
|
|
|
% of Annual Salary |
ROAE |
|
Contributed to Profit Sharing |
10% to 10.99%
|
|
1% |
11% to 11.99%
|
|
2% |
12% to 12.99%
|
|
3% |
13% to 13.99%
|
|
4% |
14% to 14.99%
|
|
5% |
15% to 15.99%
|
|
6% |
16% to 16.99%
|
|
7% |
17% to 17.99%
|
|
8% |
18% to 18.99%
|
|
9% |
19% to 19.99%
|
|
10% |
20% to 21%
|
|
11% (cap) |
The profit sharing contribution is invested as follows: 50% in Camco common stock and 50% in
funds selected by the employee.
Profit sharing contributions were not made to employee accounts for 2006 because Camcos ROAE
was 6.49%.
Executive Retirement Benefits. Advantage Bank has entered into Salary Continuation Agreements
with each of the Named Executive Officers. These Agreements provide that upon termination of
employment after the executive reaches age 65, he will receive a monthly payment for 15 years. Two
of the Named Executive Officers, Mr. Rugg and Mr. Wright, are also participants in the 1996 Salary
Continuation Plan. This Plan provides for 180 monthly payments following their retirement at age
65. See the Termination and Change in Control Payments discussion on page 22.
Each of the Named Executive Officers also has entered into an Executive Deferred Compensation
Agreement. Under these agreements, the executive may elect to defer annually a stated maximum
amount of his salary until a specified date or until he is no longer employed by Camco. See the
Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Table below for further information regarding these agreements.
Other Compensation. The Named Executive Officers participate in Camcos broad-based employee
welfare benefit plans, such as medical, dental, disability and term life insurance programs.
12
Due to the geographic distance between Camcos office locations, Camco determined it would be
beneficial to provide certain Named Executive Officers either a company car or a car allowance.
Camco provides a company car for Messrs. Baylor, Rugg, and Wright. Camco provides a car allowance
to Mr. Caldwell. Camco pays for country club dues for all Named Executive Officers and in
addition, a social club membership for Mr. Baylor.
Flexible payment universal life insurance policies, which are carried on the books of Camco as
tax-free earning assets and provide Camco with cost recovery of the benefit provided, have been
purchased on the lives of certain employees, including the Named Executive Officers. Upon the
death of a Named Executive Officer, a beneficiary named by the executive will receive two times the
executives base salary for the 12 months preceding the month in which the executive dies, up to a
maximum of $300,000. The current death benefit for the Named Executive Officers is as follows:
Messrs. Baylor, Rugg, and Severson- $300,000; Mr. Caldwell $288,200; and Mr. Wright $254,000.
Adjustment or Recovery of Awards
Camco has not adopted a formal policy or any employment agreement provisions that enable
recovery, or clawback, of incentive awards in the event of misstated or restated financial
results. However, Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act does provide some ability to recover
incentive awards in certain circumstances. If Camco is required to restate its financials due to
noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements as a result of misconduct, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer must reimburse Camco for (1) any bonus or other
incentive- or equity-based compensation received during the 12 months following the first public
issuance of the non-complying document, and (2) any profits realized from the sale of securities of
Camco during those 12 months.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
Camco takes into account tax and accounting implications in the design of its compensation
programs. Under current accounting rules (i.e., Financial Accounting Standard 123, as revised
2004), Camco must expense the grant-date fair value of share-based grants. The grant-date value is
amortized and expensed over the service period or vesting period of the grant.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code places a limit on the tax deduction for
compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the chief executive officer and four most highly
compensated executive officers of a corporation in a taxable year. All of the compensation Camco
paid in 2006 to the Named Executive Officers is expected to be deductible under Section 162(m).
The Committee retains the flexibility, however, to pay non-deductible compensation if it believes
doing so is in the best interests of Camco.
Director Ownership Requirements
In accordance with Section 3.13 of Camcos Bylaws, each director must acquire at least 1,000
shares of Camco stock during his or her first year of service on the Board. The Bylaws also state
that each director who has served on the Board of Directors for at least five years should, at a
minimum, own 5,000 shares of Camco stock or have invested $75,000 in Camco stock, and maintain this
minimum investment throughout his or her service on the Board.
13
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
In performing its oversight role, the Compensation Committee has considered and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis above (CD&A) with executive management. On March 7, 2007, the
Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in this
proxy statement.
Respectfully submitted by the 2006 members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors:
Terry Feick (Chair)
Susan Insley
Douglas Mock
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the compensation paid to Messrs. Baylor and Severson and the
other three most highly compensated executive officers of Camco who received total compensation in
excess of $100,000 for services rendered to Camco and its subsidiaries (the Named Executive
Officers):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity |
|
Nonqualified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive |
|
Deferred |
|
All |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option |
|
Plan |
|
Compensation |
|
Other |
|
|
Name & Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
Salary |
|
Awards |
|
Compensation |
|
Earnings |
|
Comp. |
|
Total |
Position |
|
Year |
|
($) |
|
(1)($) |
|
(2)($) |
|
(3)($) |
|
(4)($) |
|
($) |
Richard C. Baylor
President, CEO, COO |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
262,500 |
|
|
$ |
48,197 |
|
|
$ |
13,592 |
|
|
$ |
128,132 |
|
|
$ |
14,750 |
|
|
$ |
467,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark A. Severson
CFO, Treasurer |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
162,800 |
|
|
$ |
9,921 |
|
|
$ |
5,058 |
|
|
$ |
68,393 |
|
|
$ |
9,671 |
|
|
$ |
255,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.
Edward Rugg Secretary, EVP and COO of Advantage Bank |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
176,200 |
|
|
$ |
13,212 |
|
|
$ |
6,386 |
|
|
$ |
39,497 |
|
|
$ |
10,128 |
|
|
$ |
245,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David
S. Caldwell
SVP Retail Banking of Advantage Bank |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
144,100 |
|
|
$ |
7,310 |
|
|
$ |
4,477 |
|
|
$ |
21,907 |
|
|
$ |
16,051 |
|
|
$ |
193,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward
A. Wright SVP Operations of Advantage Bank |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ |
127,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,328 |
|
|
$ |
3,945 |
|
|
$ |
11,013 |
|
|
$ |
8,710 |
|
|
$ |
156,997 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts reflect the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting
purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, in accordance with FAS 123(R) of
awards pursuant to the stock option plans and, thus, include amounts from awards granted in
and prior to 2006. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are discussed in
Note A, Item 11 Stock Option Plans to Camcos audited financial statements for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006, which are included in Camcos Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2007. |
14
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The values represent the annual incentive earned in fiscal 2006 and paid in early 2007
under the terms of the annual cash incentive plan. |
|
(3) |
|
Camco has Salary Continuation Agreements with Messrs. Baylor, Severson, Rugg, Caldwell
and Wright. Camco has additional Salary Continuation Agreements with Messrs. Rugg and
Wright. The amounts listed reflect the 2006 change in the actuarial present value of the
accumulated benefits under these agreements. |
|
(4) |
|
The amounts listed include the following benefits and perquisites. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Car |
|
Split Dollar Life |
|
|
|
|
401(k) Match |
|
Car Allowance |
|
Club Dues |
|
Personal Use (W2) |
|
Insurance |
|
Total |
Richard C. Baylor |
|
$ |
8,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,415 |
|
|
$ |
3,129 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
14,750 |
|
Mark A. Severson |
|
|
6,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,716 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
9,671 |
|
D. Edward Rugg |
|
|
6,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,716 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
10,128 |
|
David S. Caldwell |
|
|
5,359 |
|
|
$ |
7,800 |
|
|
|
2,716 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
16,051 |
|
Edward A. Wright |
|
|
4,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,716 |
|
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
8,710 |
|
Camco has an employment agreement with Mr. Baylor and Change of Control Agreements with
each of Messrs. Severson, Rugg, Caldwell and Wright. The material terms of these agreements are
described in detail under the heading Employment and Change of Control Agreements on page 21.
2006 Grants of Plan Based Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible |
|
Estimated Possible |
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payouts Under |
|
Payouts Under |
|
or Base |
|
Closing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive |
|
Equity Incentive |
|
Price of |
|
Market |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards |
|
Plan Awards |
|
Option |
|
Price on |
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
Grant |
|
Maximum |
|
Maximum |
|
Awards |
|
Grant |
|
Option |
Name |
|
Date |
|
(1)($) |
|
(2)(#) |
|
(3)($/Sh) |
|
Date ($) |
|
Awards |
Richard C. Baylor |
|
|
2/1/2006 |
|
|
$ |
131,250 |
|
|
|
42,510 |
|
|
$ |
14.16 |
|
|
$ |
14.19 |
|
|
$ |
36,639 |
|
Mark A. Severson |
|
|
2/1/2006 |
|
|
|
48,840 |
|
|
|
13,182 |
|
|
|
14.10 |
|
|
|
14.19 |
|
|
|
11,124 |
|
D. Edward Rugg |
|
|
2/1/2006 |
|
|
|
61,670 |
|
|
|
21,401 |
|
|
|
14.10 |
|
|
|
14.19 |
|
|
|
17,955 |
|
David S. Caldwell |
|
|
2/1/2006 |
|
|
|
43,230 |
|
|
|
11,668 |
|
|
|
14.10 |
|
|
|
14.19 |
|
|
|
9,864 |
|
Edward A. Wright |
|
|
2/1/2006 |
|
|
|
38,000 |
|
|
|
10,283 |
|
|
|
14.10 |
|
|
|
14.19 |
|
|
|
8,327 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts represent the 2006 potential maximum awards of executives under the
annual cash incentive plan. Under the annual cash incentive plan, threshold awards are
$0. |
|
(2) |
|
The equity incentive plan compensation amounts represent the 2006 maximum awards for
the executives under the long-term incentive program. Under this plan, threshold awards
would be 0 shares. |
|
(3) |
|
Camco granted stock options to Mr. Richard C. Baylor under The Westwood Homestead
Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan, which defines fair market value as the average of
the highest and lowest selling price on the date of grant. Of the total options granted
to Mr. Baylor, 2,031 were incentive options granted to reach the $100,000 maximum fair
value for incentive stock options. The balance of Mr. Baylors grants were non-qualified
options. Stock options awarded to the other Named Executive |
15
|
|
|
|
|
Officers were granted pursuant to the Camco 2002 Equity Incentive Plan. The 2002 Plan
provides that the fair market value of awards is determined on the date of grant using the
mean between close bid and close ask. All of these awards were incentive stock options. |
Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Of Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of Securities |
|
Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised |
|
Unexercised |
|
Option Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Option Expiration |
|
100% Vesting |
Name |
|
(#) Exercisable |
|
(#) Unexercisable |
|
($) |
|
Date |
|
Date (1) |
Richard C. Baylor |
|
|
13,448 |
|
|
|
3,362 |
|
|
$ |
16.13 |
|
|
|
01/21/13 |
|
|
|
01/22/07 |
|
|
|
|
3,025 |
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
$ |
17.17 |
|
|
|
01/27/14 |
|
|
|
01/27/08 |
|
|
|
|
15,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16.51 |
|
|
|
01/27/15 |
|
|
|
01/27/05 |
* |
|
|
|
17,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.16 |
|
|
|
02/01/16 |
|
|
|
02/01/06 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David S. Caldwell |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9.75 |
|
|
|
09/28/10 |
|
|
|
09/28/00 |
* |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11.36 |
|
|
|
11/20/11 |
|
|
|
11/20/01 |
* |
|
|
|
3,880 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
$ |
16.13 |
|
|
|
01/22/13 |
|
|
|
01/22/07 |
|
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
$ |
17.17 |
|
|
|
01/27/14 |
|
|
|
01/27/08 |
|
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
$ |
16.51 |
|
|
|
01/27/15 |
|
|
|
01/27/09 |
|
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
3,758 |
|
|
$ |
14.10 |
|
|
|
02/01/16 |
|
|
|
02/01/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Edward Rugg |
|
|
2,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.65 |
|
|
|
11/23/08 |
|
|
|
11/24/98 |
* |
|
|
|
6,992 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
$ |
16.13 |
|
|
|
01/22/13 |
|
|
|
01/22/07 |
|
|
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
$ |
17.17 |
|
|
|
01/27/14 |
|
|
|
01/27/08 |
|
|
|
|
2,216 |
|
|
|
3,324 |
|
|
$ |
16.51 |
|
|
|
01/27/15 |
|
|
|
01/27/09 |
|
|
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
6,840 |
|
|
$ |
14.10 |
|
|
|
02/01/16 |
|
|
|
02/01/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward A. Wright |
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.65 |
|
|
|
11/23/08 |
|
|
|
11/24/98 |
* |
|
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
$ |
16.13 |
|
|
|
01/22/13 |
|
|
|
01/22/07 |
|
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
$ |
17.17 |
|
|
|
01/27/14 |
|
|
|
01/27/08 |
|
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
$ |
16.51 |
|
|
|
01/27/15 |
|
|
|
01/27/09 |
|
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
3,172 |
|
|
$ |
14.10 |
|
|
|
02/01/16 |
|
|
|
02/01/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark A. Severson |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11.36 |
|
|
|
11/20/11 |
|
|
|
11/20/01 |
* |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16.13 |
|
|
|
01/22/13 |
|
|
|
01/22/06 |
** |
|
|
|
4,332 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
$ |
16.13 |
|
|
|
01/22/13 |
|
|
|
01/22/07 |
|
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
$ |
17.17 |
|
|
|
01/27/14 |
|
|
|
01/27/08 |
|
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
2,060 |
|
|
$ |
16.51 |
|
|
|
01/27/15 |
|
|
|
01/27/09 |
|
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
4,238 |
|
|
$ |
14.10 |
|
|
|
02/01/16 |
|
|
|
02/01/10 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Options were immediately exercisable on grant date. |
|
** |
|
These options were subject to three year service vesting beginning one year after the date
of grant as part of his employment agreement. |
|
(1) |
|
Unless otherwise noted, all grants are subject to four year service vesting (20%
immediately, and 20% each of the following four years). Unlike the other Named Executive
Officers, grants made to Mr. Baylor in 2005 and 2006 vested 100% immediately; the decision to
immediately vest Mr. Baylors grants was based on an Internal Service Revenue Code 280G
assessment and analysis. |
16
2006 Pension Benefits Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Value Of |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
Benefit |
Name |
|
Plan Name |
|
($) |
Richard C. Baylor |
|
2002 Salary Continuation Agreement |
|
|
541,461 |
|
Mark A. Severson |
|
2002 Salary Continuation Agreement |
|
|
290,304 |
|
D. Edward Rugg |
|
2002 Salary Continuation Agreement |
|
|
135,577 |
|
|
|
1996 Salary Continuation Agreement |
|
|
44,365 |
|
David S. Caldwell |
|
2002 Salary Continuation Agreement |
|
|
87,182 |
|
Edward A. Wright |
|
2002 Salary Continuation Agreement |
|
|
33,927 |
|
|
|
1996 Salary Continuation Agreement |
|
|
18,742 |
|
Under the 2002 Salary Continuation Agreements, upon termination of employment after the
Named Executive Officer reaches age 65, such Named Executive Officer will receive the following
annual amounts, divided into 12 monthly payments, for 15 years: Mr. Baylor $410,100; Mr. Rugg -
$98,300; Mr. Severson $197,400; Mr. Caldwell $140,900; and Mr. Wright $50,800. The normal
retirement age is defined as age 65. The program also incorporates a ten year vesting schedule and
includes provisions for early termination, termination for cause, disability, death, and change in
control. Refer to the post-termination narrative for more detail. The present value of the
accumulated benefit for each officer is the accrual balance as of 12-31-2006. The accrual balance
is determined using a discount rate of 8%.
Under the 1996 Salary Continuation Agreements, upon termination of employment after Mr. Rugg
and Mr. Wright reach age 65, these officers will receive the following annual amounts, divided into
12 monthly payments, for 15 years: Mr. Rugg $20,500; Wright $15,800. The normal retirement age
is defined as age 65. The program also includes provisions for early retirement, termination for
cause, disability, death, and change in control. If the participant retires after age 55 or after
having completed 15 years of full-time service, and before age 65, the 1996 Salary Continuation
Plan provides for a reduced benefit with payment starting at age 65. The early retirement benefit
would be divided into 12 monthly payments, annually for 15 years: Mr. Rugg $13,711; Mr. Wright
$9,358. Both officers are currently eligible for this benefit. The present value of the accumulated
benefit for each officer is the accrual balance as of 12-31-2006. The accrual balance is
determined using a discount rate of 7.5%.
2006 Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive |
|
Aggregate |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Contributions in |
|
Earnings in Last |
|
Balance at Last |
Name |
|
Last Fiscal Year |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Fiscal Year |
Richard C. Baylor |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,502 |
|
|
$ |
146,083 |
|
Mark A. Severson |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
3,585 |
|
|
|
54,438 |
|
D. Edward Rugg |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
11,680 |
|
|
|
165,700 |
|
David S. Caldwell |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
7,839 |
|
|
|
111,654 |
|
Edward A. Wright |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
49,688 |
|
Each of the Named Executive Officers has entered into an Executive Deferred Compensation
Agreement under which he may elect to defer annually a stated maximum amount of his salary and cash
incentives until a specified date or until he is no longer employed by Camco. The maximum annual
amount of deferral permitted is as follows: $30,000- Messrs. Baylor, Severson and Rugg; $25,000-
Mr. Caldwell;
17
and $12,500- Mr. Wright. The interest accrued in 2006 on each Named Executive
Officers individual plan account balance is disclosed in the Aggregate Earnings column above.
Interest is credited on the deferral amounts at an annual rate equal to 75% of Camcos return on
equity rate for the preceding year, not to exceed a return on equity of 20%. The actual rate of
return for 2006 was 7.30%. Camco does not make any contributions to the executives deferred
accounts and no withdrawals or distributions have been made from these accounts.
EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENTS
Camco has an employment agreement with Richard C. Baylor for a term ending December 31, 2009.
The agreement provides for a base salary of not less than $262,500 and a performance review not
less often than annually, at which time the Board of Directors may extend the term of the
agreement. The agreement also provides for the inclusion of Mr. Baylor in any formally established
employee benefit, bonus, pension and profit-sharing plans for which senior management personnel are
eligible and provides for vacation and sick leave.
Mr. Baylors employment is terminable by Camco at any time. In the event of termination by
Camco other than for just cause or in connection with a change of control, as defined in the
agreement, Mr. Baylor will be entitled to (i) a continuation of salary payments for the remainder
of the term of his agreement and (ii) a continuation of health, life and disability insurance
benefits substantially equal to those being provided at the date of termination of employment until
the earliest to occur the end of the term of the agreement or the date Mr. Baylor becomes
employed full-time by another employer. In lieu of monthly payments, Mr. Baylor may choose to
receive a lump sum payment equal to the present value of the payments using a discount rate of 5%
per annum.
The agreement also contains provisions with respect to the occurrence within one year after a
change of control of the termination of Mr. Baylors employment for any reason other than just
cause. In the event of any such occurrence, Mr. Baylor will be entitled to payment of an amount
equal to three times his average annual compensation for the five taxable years immediately
preceding the termination of employment. In addition, Mr. Baylor is entitled to continued coverage
under all health, life and disability benefit plans until the earlier of the end of the term of the
agreement or the date on which Mr. Baylor is included in another employers benefit plans as a
full-time employee. Mr. Baylor is entitled to all directors fees he would have earned if he had
remained a director for a period of 36 months.
Camco has change of control agreements with Messrs. Rugg, Severson, Caldwell, and Wright. Each
agreement is for a term of one year with an expiration date of January 31, 2008, and provides for
annual performance reviews by the Board of Directors, at which time the Board of Directors may
extend the agreement for an additional one-year period. The agreements provide for an annual
salary effective January 1, 2007 as follows: Mr. Rugg-$176,200, Mr. Severson $162,800, Mr.
Caldwell $144,100, and Mr. Wright $127,000. Each agreement provides that if the officer is
terminated by Camco or its successors for any reason other than just cause, within six months prior
to a change of control, as defined in the agreement, or within one year after a change of control,
Camco will pay (1) the officer an amount equal to two times the amount of his annual compensation
and (2) the premiums required to maintain coverage under the health insurance plan in which the
officer is a participant immediately prior to the change of control until the earlier of (i) the
second anniversary of his termination or (ii) the date the officer is included in another
employers benefit plans. Annual compensation is defined in the agreements as base salary. The
officer will also be entitled to the above payments if he voluntarily terminates his employment
within twelve months following a change of control if (1) the capacity or circumstances in which
the officer is employed are changed (including, without limitation, a reduction in responsibilities
or authority, or a reduction in salary; (2) the officer is required to move his personal
18
residence, or perform his principal executive functions, more than thirty-five miles from his
primary office as of the date of the agreement; or (3) Camco otherwise breaches the agreement.
The Salary Continuation Agreements for Messrs. Baylor, Rugg, Severson, Caldwell, and Wright
discussed above under the 2006 Pension Benefits Table have noncompete provisions. These
noncompete provisions would not apply following a change of control. In the event of Termination
of Employment (meaning that the executive ceases to be employed by Camco for any reason, voluntary
or involuntary, other than by reason of a leave of absence approved by Camco), Camco shall not pay
any benefits under the Salary Continuation Agreements if the executive engages in, becomes
interested in, directly or indirectly, as a sole proprietor, as a partner in a partnership, or as a
substantial shareholder in a corporation, or becomes associated with, in the capacity of employee,
director, officer, principal, agent, or trustee, any enterprise conducted within a 50 mile radius
of the location of any facility of which Camco conducts its business, which enterprise is, or may
be deemed be, competitive with any business carried on by Camco as of the date of termination of
the executives employment or retirement.
The discussion and tables below reflect the amount of compensation that would be paid to each
of the Named Executive Officers in the specified event of termination of such executives
employment. The amounts shown are estimates and assume a termination date of December 31, 2006.
Amounts do not include compensation and benefits available generally to all of Camcos salaried
employees on a non-discriminatory basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camco Terminates |
|
|
Camco Terminates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment for |
|
|
Employment for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any Reason Other |
|
|
Any Reason Other |
|
|
Voluntary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and/or Benefits |
|
Early |
|
|
Than Just Cause - |
|
|
Than Just Cause - |
|
|
Termination - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable Upon Termination |
|
Termination |
|
|
Without COC |
|
|
After COC |
|
|
After COC |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
Death |
|
Richard C. Baylor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 Times Average Annual Compensation |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
705,469 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Heath, Life, & Disability Benefits (36 months) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
27,675 |
|
|
|
27,675 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Directors Fees (36 months) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,342 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
2002 Salary Continuation Plan Benefit1 |
|
|
311,283 |
|
|
|
0 |
2 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
311,293 |
|
|
|
311,293 |
|
|
|
3,827,925 |
|
3 Times Salary |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
731,090 |
3 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Split Dollar Life Insurance Death Benefit |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Stock Options |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
311,283 |
|
|
$ |
758,766 |
|
|
$ |
738,487 |
|
|
$ |
311,293 |
|
|
$ |
311,293 |
|
|
$ |
4,127,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Salary Continuation Plan value under Early Termination is the present value of the
benefit payment. For all other termination scenarios, incremental values are shown (i.e., the
difference between the present value of the benefit less the vested amount under Early
Termination). |
|
(2) |
|
Assumes the same benefit is paid under Early Termination. |
|
(3) |
|
Assumes the lump sum payment option is chosen. Amount is calculated using a discount rate of
5%, as specified in Mr. Baylors employment agreement. |
|
(4) |
|
Upon disability, after completing 15 years of service, the employee has the option to
continue the split dollar life insurance policy. |
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camco Terminates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment for Any |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reason Other Than Just |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early |
|
|
Cause - Prior to or After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination/ |
|
|
COC, Voluntary |
|
|
Voluntary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and/or Benefits |
|
Early |
|
|
Termination for Good |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable Upon Termination |
|
Retirement |
|
|
Reason After a COC |
|
|
- After COC |
|
|
Disability |
|
|
Death |
|
|
David E. Rugg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Times Annual Salary & Heath Insurance |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
365,683 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
2002 Salary Continuation Plan Benefit1 |
|
|
155,889 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
836,269 |
|
1996 Salary Continuation Plan Benefit |
|
|
67,554 |
2 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
3 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
139,356 |
|
Split Dollar Life Insurance Death Benefit |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Stock Options |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
223,443 |
|
|
|
365-683 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1,275,625 |
|
|
Mark A. Severson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Times Annual Salary & Heath Insurance |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
342,184 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
2002 Salary Continuation Benefit1 |
|
|
134,411 |
|
|
|
94,198 |
|
|
|
201,611 |
|
|
|
201,611 |
|
|
|
1,857,981 |
|
Split Dollar Life Insurance Death Benefit |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Stock Options |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
134,411 |
|
|
|
436,382 |
|
|
|
201,611 |
|
|
|
201,611 |
|
|
|
2,157,981 |
|
|
David S. Caldwell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Times Annual Salary & Heath Insurance |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
301,571 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
2002 Salary Continuation Benefit1 |
|
|
40,100 |
|
|
|
60,145 |
|
|
|
60,145 |
|
|
|
60,145 |
|
|
|
1,382,027 |
|
Split Dollar Life Insurance Death Benefit |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
288,200 |
|
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Stock Options |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
40,100 |
|
|
|
361,716 |
|
|
|
60,145 |
|
|
|
60,145 |
|
|
|
1,670,227 |
|
|
Edward A. Wright |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 Times Annual Salary & Heath Insurance |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
267,300 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
2002 Salary Continuation Plan Benefit1 |
|
|
39,010 |
|
|
|
0 |
2 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
473,723 |
|
1996 Salary Continuation Plan Benefit |
|
|
30,366 |
3 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
3 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
129,106 |
|
Split Dollar Life Insurance Death Benefit |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
254,000 |
|
Intrinsic Value of Unvested Stock Options |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
69,376 |
|
|
|
267,300 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
856,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Salary Continuation Plan value under Early Termination is the present value of the
benefit payment. For all other termination scenarios, incremental values are shown (i.e., the
difference between the present value of the benefit less the vested amount under Early
Termination). |
|
(2) |
|
Early retirement benefit. |
|
(3) |
|
Benefit payable upon a change of control while the executive is in the active service of the
Bank. |
|
(4) |
|
Upon disability, after completing 15 years of service, the employee shall have the option to
continue the split dollar life insurance policy. |
Early Termination / Early Retirement
Under the 2002 Salary Continuation Agreements, the Named Executive Officers are eligible
for an early termination benefit. Early termination is defined as the termination of employment
(voluntary or involuntary) before normal retirement age (65) for reasons other than death,
disability, termination for cause, or following a change of control. These Named Executive
Officers will receive payments based on their vested accrual balance starting the month following
termination for 15 years. Annual projected benefits under this plan include the following: Mr.
Baylor-$30,841, Mr. Rugg-$15,445, Mr. Severson-$13,317, Mr. Caldwell-$3,973, and Mr. Wright-$3,865.
Under the 1996 Salary Continuation
20
Agreements, Messrs. Rugg and Wright have early retirement benefits. Early retirement is
defined as attaining age 55 or completing 15 years of service. These two Named Executive Officers
will receive payments based on their vested accrual balances starting the month following age 65
for 15 years if they terminate employment after the early retirement date but before age 65 for
reasons other than death or disability. Annual projected benefits under this plan include the
following: Mr. Rugg-$13,711 and Mr. Wright-$9,358.
Camco Terminates Employment for Any Reason Other Than Just Cause Without Change of Control
(Mr. Baylor)
As specified in Mr. Baylors employment agreement, in the event of termination by Camco
other than for just cause and without a change of control, Mr. Baylor will be entitled to (i) a
continuation of salary payments for the remainder of the term of his agreement and (ii) a
continuation of health, life and disability insurance benefits substantially equal to those being
provided at the date of termination of employment until the earliest to occur the end of the term
of the agreement or the date Mr. Baylor becomes employed full-time by another employer (we assume
payments would occur until the end of the term of the agreement or 36 months). For illustration
purposes, in the table we assume an early termination benefit is paid under the 2002 Salary
Continuation Agreement.
Camco Terminates Employment for Any Reason Other Than Just Cause After Change of Control
(Mr. Baylor)
As specified in Mr. Baylors employment agreement, in the event of the termination of Mr.
Baylors employment for any reason other than just cause within one year after a change of control,
Mr. Baylor will be entitled to a payment equal to three times his average annual compensation as
defined in Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, Mr. Baylor is entitled to
continued coverage under all health, life and disability benefit plans until the earlier of the end
of the term of the agreement or the date on which Mr. Baylor is included in another employers
benefit plans as a full-time employee (we assume payments would occur until the end of the term of
the agreement or 36 months). Mr. Baylor is entitled to all directors fees he would have earned if
he had remained a director for a period of 36 months. As specified in the 2002 Salary Continuation
Agreement, benefits are only payable to the extent they would not create excise tax under the
excess parachute rules of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 280G). Under
this provision, Mr. Baylor would only receive vested benefits under the plan and not accelerated
payments relating to a change of control. Stock options granted under the Camco Financial
Corporation 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and the 2002 Equity Incentive Plan accelerate and
become immediately exercisable in the event of a change in control. Mr. Baylors unvested stock
options currently do not have any intrinsic value (because the grant price is greater than the
12-29-2006 stock price).
Camco Terminates Employment for Any Reason Other Than Just Cause Prior to or After Change of
Control, Voluntary Termination for Good Reason After Change of Control
As specified in the change of control agreements for Messrs. Rugg, Severson, Caldwell,
and Wright, if the officer is terminated by Camco for any reason other than just cause, within six
months prior to a change of control, or within one year after a change of control, Camco will pay
(1) the officer an amount equal to two times the amount of his annual compensation and (2) the
premiums required to maintain coverage under the health insurance plan in which the officer is a
participant immediately prior to the change of control until the earlier of (i) the second
anniversary of his termination or (ii) the date the officer is included in another employers
benefit plans. Annual compensation is defined in the agreements as base salary. The officer
will also be entitled to payments if he voluntarily terminates his employment within twelve months
following a change of control under the general definition of good
21
reason, which is defined in the agreements as (1) the capacity or circumstances in which the
officer is employed are changed (including, without limitation, a reduction in responsibilities or
authority, or a reduction in salary; (2) the officer is required to move his personal residence, or
perform his principal executive functions, more than thirty-five miles from his primary office as
of the date of the agreement; or (3) Camco otherwise breaches the agreement. Payments shown in the
table above are reduced to the maximum amount which may be paid under Section 280G without
triggering excise tax (as applicable). As specified in the 2002 Salary Continuation Agreement, for
Messrs. Rugg, Severson, Caldwell, and Wright, benefits are only payable to the extent they would
not create excise tax under Section 280G. Under this provision, Messrs. Rugg and Wright would
receive the full change in control benefit, as they are fully vested in this benefit. Mr. Caldwell
would receive the full change in control benefit, as this benefit would not trigger excise tax
under Section 280G. Mr. Severson would be eligible for a portion of the change in control benefit,
as his payment is capped to avoid excise tax under Section 280G. Under the 1996 Salary
Continuation Agreements for Messrs. Rugg and Wright, benefits are only payable to the extent that
they would not create excise tax under Section 280G. Messrs. Rugg and Wright would receive the
full change in control benefit, as they are fully vested in this benefit. Stock options granted
under the Camco Financial Corporation 2002 Equity Incentive Plan accelerate and become immediately
exercisable in the event of a change in control. The Named Executive Officers unvested stock
options currently do not have any intrinsic value because the grant price is greater than the
December 29, 2006 closing stock price.
Voluntary Termination After Change of Control
As specified in the 2002 Salary Continuation Agreements, the Named Executive Officers
will receive payments based on 100% of their vested accrual balance starting the month following
termination for 15 years. Annual projected benefits under this plan include the following: Mr.
Baylor-$61,683, Mr. Rugg-$15,445, Mr. Severson-$33,292, Mr. Caldwell-$9,932, and Mr. Wright-$3,865.
Under the 1996 Salary Continuation Agreements, Messrs. Rugg and Wright are eligible for a benefit
upon a change of control while the executive is in the active service of the Bank. These two Named
Executive Officers will receive a lump sum payment based on 100% of their vested accrual balance
after the change of control. The lump sum payments under this plan include the following: Mr.
Rugg-$44,365 and Mr. Wright-$18,742. Under both the 1996 and 2002 Salary Continuation Agreements,
the benefit is only payable up to the amount that would not trigger excise tax under Section 280G.
Disability
Under the 2002 Salary Continuation Agreements, the Named Executive Officers will receive
payments based on 100% of their vested accrual balance starting the month following termination due
to disability for 15 years. Annual projected benefits under this plan include the following: Mr.
Baylor-$61,683, Mr. Rugg-$15,445, Mr. Severson-$33,292, Mr. Caldwell-$9,932, and Mr. Wright-$3,865.
Under the 1996 Salary Continuation Agreements, Messrs. Rugg and Wright will receive payments based
on 100% of their vested accrual balance starting the month following termination due to disability
for 15 years. Annual projected benefits under this plan include the following: Mr. Rugg-$4,905
and Mr. Wright-$2,072. Stock options granted under the Camco Financial Corporation 2002 Equity
Incentive Plan accelerate and become immediately exercisable. In the event of termination for
reason of disability, after completing 15 years of service, each Named Executive Officer has the
option to continue the split dollar life insurance policy.
Death
Under the 2002 Salary Continuation Agreements, the Named Executive Officers
beneficiaries will receive payments starting the month following death for 15 years. Annual
projected benefits under this plan include the following: Mr. Baylor-$410,000, Mr. Rugg-$98,300,
Mr. Severson-$197,400,
22
Mr. Caldwell-$140,900, and Mr. Wright-$50,800. Under the 1996 Salary Continuation Agreements, the
beneficiaries for Messrs. Rugg and Wright will receive payments starting the month following death
for 15 years. Annual projected benefits under this plan include the following: Mr. Rugg-$20,500
and Mr. Wright-$15,800. Stock options granted under the Camco Financial Corporation 2002 Equity
Incentive Plan accelerate and become immediately exercisable. The beneficiaries will receive the
death benefits from the split dollar life insurance policies.
Termination For Cause
If Camco terminates any of the Named Executive Officers for cause, Camco shall have no
obligations to the executive after the date of termination.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2006, the Compensation Committee Members were Ms. Insley and Messrs. Feick and
Mock. None of these members was a current or former executive officer or employee of Camco or one
of its subsidiaries or had a reportable business relationship with Camco or one of its
subsidiaries.
OWNERSHIP OF CAMCO SHARES
As of the Voting Record Date, no persons were known by Camco to own beneficially more
than 5% of the outstanding shares of Camcos common stock.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the number of shares of common
stock of Camco beneficially owned by each incumbent director and nominee of Camco and by all
directors and executive officers of Camco as a group as of the Voting Record Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sole voting |
|
Shared voting |
|
Percentage of |
|
|
and |
|
and/or |
|
shares |
Name and address (1) |
|
investment power (2) |
|
investment power |
|
outstanding |
Richard C. Baylor |
|
|
26,529 |
|
|
|
82,826 |
|
|
|
1.45 |
% |
Robert C. Dix, Jr. |
|
|
19,523 |
|
|
|
13,254 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Terry A. Feick |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
15,636 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Edward D. Goodyear |
|
|
16,137 |
|
|
|
13,782 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Susan J. Insley |
|
|
3,182 |
|
|
|
8,740 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Paul D. Leake |
|
|
58,334 |
(3) |
|
|
25,470 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
% |
Carson K. Miller |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
8,740 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Douglas F. Mock |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,865 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Samuel W. Speck |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
31,087 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jeffrey T. Tucker |
|
|
15,245 |
|
|
|
9,790 |
|
|
|
* |
|
J. Timothy Young |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
2,077 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David S. Caldwell |
|
|
11,386 |
|
|
|
25,619 |
|
|
|
* |
|
D. Edward Rugg |
|
|
104,804 |
|
|
|
35,546 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
% |
Mark A. Severson |
|
|
10,524 |
|
|
|
16,159 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Edward A. Wright |
|
|
19,193 |
|
|
|
14,541 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive
officers as a group (15 persons) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% of the outstanding shares. |
|
(1) |
|
Each of the persons listed in this table may be contacted at the address of Camco, 6901 Glenn
Highway, Cambridge, Ohio 43725. |
|
(footnotes continued on next page) |
23
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes the following number of shares that may be acquired upon the exercise of options:
Mr. Baylor 58,797; Mr. Dix 6,977; Mr. Feick 5,927; Ms. Insley 5,927, Mr. Leake 5,927;
Mr. Miller 5,927; Mr. Mock 927; Mr. Speck 6,977; Mr. Tucker 6,977; Mr. Rugg 20,850;
Mr. Severson 16,159; Mr. D. Caldwell 14,971; Mr. Wright 10,602; Mr. Young 927; and Mr.
Goodyear 185. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes 38,548 shares pledged as security for a loan with an unaffiliated lender. |
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires Camcos executive officers and
directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of Camcos common stock, to file reports of
ownership and changes in ownership on Forms 3, 4 and 5 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and to provide Camco with a copy of such form. Based on Camcos review of the copies of such forms
it has received, Camco believes that its executive officers and directors complied with all filing
requirements applicable to them with respect to transactions during the fiscal year ended December
31, 2006, except that each of (i) Messrs. Tucker, Miller, Speck, Dix, Rugg, Goodyear and Ms. Insley
filed two late Form 4s reporting a total of two late transactions; (ii) Messrs. Severson and Larry
Caldwell each filed one late Form 4 reporting one late transaction; (iii) Mr. Feick filed four late
Form 4s reporting a total of four late transactions; (iv) Mr. Leake filed three late Form 4s
reporting a total of four late transactions; and (v) Messrs. Mock and Young each filed three late
Form 4s reporting a total of three late transactions.
RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
Some of the directors and executive officers of Camco have banking relationships with
Advantage Bank. All loans made to directors and executive officers (i) were made in the ordinary
course of business; (ii) were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and
collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to Camco;
and (iii) did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable
features.
Camco does not have any related person transactions as defined in Regulation S-K Item 404.
All loans to directors and executive officers are approved by a majority of the independent
directors even though such loans are not made on favorable terms. Camco does not make any
commercial loans to directors or other executive officers. The Code of Ethics provides that if any
director or executive officer has an interest in a transaction involving Camco, it must be reported
to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will determine if a conflict exists and the
disinterested directors will approve or disapprove the transaction.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit and Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors of Camco is comprised of
five directors, all of whom are considered independent under Rule 4200(a)(15) of Nasdaqs listing
standards. The Audit and Risk Management Committee is responsible for overseeing Camcos
accounting functions and controls, as well as selecting an accounting firm to audit Camcos
financial statements. The Audit and Risk Management Committee has adopted a charter.
The Audit and Risk Management Committee received and reviewed the report of Plante Moran, PLLC
(Plante Moran) regarding the results of their audit, as well as the written disclosures and the
letter from Grant Thornton required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1. The Audit and
Risk Management Committee determined that the provision by Plante Moran of the services included in
the table below under All Other Fees is compatible with maintaining Plante Morans independence.
The Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements with the management of Camco. A
24
representative of Plante Moran also discussed with the Audit and Risk Management Committee the
independence of Plante Moran from Camco, as well as the matters required to be discussed by
Statement of Auditing Standards 61, as may be amended from time to time. Discussions between the
Audit and Risk Management Committee and the representative of Plante Moran included the following:
|
|
|
Plante Morans responsibilities in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards |
|
|
|
|
The initial selection of, and whether there were any changes in, significant accounting
policies or their application |
|
|
|
|
Managements judgments and accounting estimates |
|
|
|
|
Whether there were any significant audit adjustments |
|
|
|
|
Whether there were any disagreements with management |
|
|
|
|
Whether there was any consultation with other accountants |
|
|
|
|
Whether there were any major issues discussed with management prior to Plante Morans
retention |
|
|
|
|
Whether Plante Moran encountered any difficulties in performing the audit |
|
|
|
|
Plante Morans judgments about the quality of Camcos accounting principles |
|
|
|
|
Plante Morans responsibilities for information prepared by management that is included
in documents containing audited financial statements |
Based on its review of the financial statements and its discussions with management and the
representative of Plante Moran, the Audit and Risk Management Committee did not become aware of any
material misstatements or omissions in the financial statements. Accordingly, the Audit and Risk
Management Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Jeffrey T. Tucker, Chairman
Robert C. Dix, Jr.
Edward D. Goodyear
Carson K. Miller
J. Timothy Young
CHANGE IN AUDITORS
On February 25, 2005, the Camcos Audit Committee approved the engagement of Plante Moran as
Camcos principal independent registered public accounting firm.
Prior to engaging Plante Moran, Camco did not consult with Plante Moran regarding either:
1. The application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either
completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Camcos
financial statements, and either a written report was provided to the Camco or oral advice
was provided that Plante Moran concluded was an important factor considered by Camco in
reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or
2. Any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item
304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304) or a reportable
event (as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).
25
SELECTION OF AUDITORS
The Board of Directors has selected Plante Moran as the auditors for the 2007 fiscal year.
Management expects that a representative from Plante Moran will be present at the Annual Meeting,
will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires and will be available to respond
to appropriate questions from stockholders.
AUDIT FEES
The aggregate fees billed by Plante Moran to Camco for the years ended December 31, 2006 and
2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
225,595 |
|
|
$ |
215,823 |
|
Audit Related Fees |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Tax Fees (1) |
|
|
23,750 |
|
|
|
4,540 |
|
All Other Fees (2) |
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees |
|
$ |
257,845 |
|
|
$ |
227,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Permissible tax services include tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice that do not
impair the independence of the auditor and that are consistent with the SECs rules on auditor
independence. |
|
(2) |
|
All other fees include the audit of Camcos employee benefit plans. |
26
PROPOSALS OF STOCKHOLDERS AND COMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD
Any proposals of stockholders intended to be included in Camcos proxy statement for the 2008
Annual Meeting of Stockholders (other than nominations for directors, as explained herein at
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS) should be sent to Camco by certified mail and must be received by Camco
not later than November 17, 2007. In addition, if a stockholder intends to present a proposal at
the 2008 Annual Meeting without including the proposal in the proxy materials related to the
meeting, and if the proposal is not received by February 6, 2008, then the proxies designated by
the Board of Directors of Camco for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Camco may vote in
their discretion on any such proposal any shares for which they have been appointed proxies without
mention of such matter in the proxy statement or on the proxy card for such meeting.
Camcos Board of Directors has adopted a formal process by which stockholders may communicate
with the Board. Stockholders who wish to communicate with the Board may do so by sending written
communications are delivered directly to the Audit and Risk Management Committee of Camco Financial
Corporation, at 6901 Glenn Highway, Cambridge, Ohio 43725.
Management knows of no other business which may be brought before the Annual Meeting. It is
the intention of the persons named in the enclosed Proxy to vote such Proxy in accordance with
their best judgment on any other matters which may be brought before the Annual Meeting.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON, YOU ARE
URGED TO FILL IN, SIGN AND RETURN THE PROXY IN THE ENCLOSED SELF-ADDRESSED POSTAGE PAID ENVELOPE.
|
|
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ D. Edward Rugg |
|
|
|
March 16, 2007
|
|
D. Edward Rugg, Secretary |
27
REVOCABLE PROXY
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
The undersigned stockholder of Camco Financial Corporation (Camco) hereby constitutes
and appoints Robert C. Dix, Jr. and Douglas F. Mock, or either one of them, as the proxies of the
undersigned with full power of substitution and resubstitution, to vote at the 2007 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders of Camco to be held at Camcos Corporate Center, 6901 Glenn Highway, Cambridge,
Ohio 43725, on April 24, 2007, at 3:00 p.m. local time (the Annual Meeting), all of the
shares of Camco common stock which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, or at
any adjournment thereof, on each of the following proposals, all of which are described in the
accompanying Proxy Statement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
The election of four directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
FOR all nominees
listed below
(except as marked to the contrary below):
|
|
o
|
|
WITHHOLD authority to
vote for all nominees
listed below: |
Terry A. Feick
Edward D. Goodyear
Susan J. Insley
J. Timothy Young
(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, write that nominees name
in the space provided below).
2. |
In their discretion, upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting
or any adjournments thereof. |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the nominees listed above.
IMPORTANT: Please sign and date this Proxy on the reverse side.
UNLESS THIS PROXY IS REVOKED, THE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS
DIRECTED. WHERE NO INSTRUCTIONS ARE INDICATED, PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE
VOTED FOR THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR SET FORTH ABOVE. THIS PROXY CONFERS DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY ON
THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE TO VOTE WITH RESPECT TO THE ELECTION OF ANY PERSON AS A DIRECTOR IF A
NOMINEE IS UNABLE TO SERVE OR FOR GOOD CAUSE WILL NOT SERVE AND MATTERS INCIDENT TO THE ANNUAL
MEETING.
At the present time, the Board of Directors knows of no other business to be presented at the
Annual Meeting.
All Proxies previously given by the undersigned are hereby revoked. Receipt of the Notice of
the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Camco and of the accompanying Proxy Statement is hereby
acknowledged.
Please sign exactly as your name appears on your Stock Certificate(s). Executors,
Administrators, Trustees, Guardians, Attorneys and Agents should give their full titles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Print or Type Name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: |
|
|
PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED
FOR MAILING IN THE U.S.A.