UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 17, 2007
Commission file number 1-11625
Pentair, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
41-0907434 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification number) |
|
|
|
5500 Wayzata Blvd, Suite 800, Golden Valley, Minnesota
|
|
55416 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
|
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (763) 545-1730
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy
the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
|
|
¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|
|
|
¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|
|
|
¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|
|
|
¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 8.01 Other Events
On January 17, 2007, Pentair, Inc. (the Company) issued a press release announcing that
substantially all of the jury verdict against its subsidiary, Essef Corporation (Essef), was
reversed. The following is a summary of the status of the proceedings as a result of such
decision:
Twenty-eight separate lawsuits involving 29 primary plaintiffs, a class action, and claims for
indemnity by Celebrity Cruise Lines, Inc. (Celebrity) were brought against Essef and certain of its
subsidiaries prior to our acquisition of Essef in August 1999. The claims against Essef and its
involved subsidiaries were based upon the allegation that Essef designed, manufactured, and
marketed two sand swimming pool filters that were installed as a part of the spa system on the
Horizon cruise ship, and allegations that the spa and filters contained Legionnaires disease
bacteria that infected certain passengers on cruises from April 1994 through July 1994.
The individual and class claims by passengers were tried and resulted in an adverse jury verdict
finding liability on the part of the Essef defendants (70%) and Celebrity and its sister company,
Fantasia (together 30%). After expiration of post-trial appeals, we paid all outstanding punitive
damage awards of $7.0 million in the Horizon cases, plus interest of approximately $1.6 million, in
January 2004. All of the personal injury cases have now been resolved through either settlement or
trial.
The only remaining unresolved claims in this case were those brought by Celebrity for damages
resulting from the outbreak. Celebrity filed an amended complaint seeking attorney fees and costs
for prior litigation as well as out-of-pocket losses, lost profits, and loss of business enterprise
value. On June 28, 2006, the jury returned a verdict against the Essef defendants in the total
amount of $193.0 million for its claims for out-of-pocket expenses ($10.4 million), lost profits
($47.6 million) and lost enterprise value ($135.0 million). The verdict was exclusive of
pre-judgment interest and attorneys fees.
On January 17, 2007, the Court ruled on our post-trial motions, granting judgment in our favor as a
matter of law with respect to Celebritys claim for lost enterprise value. The Court also granted
a new trial with respect to lost profits. In addition, the Court denied without prejudice our
claim for contribution to reduce Celebritys recovery by 30% to account for its contributory
negligence, with leave to renew the motion following retrial.
Celebritys claim for lost profits at trial amounted to approximately $60.3 million. We believe
that actual lost profits suffered, if any, are substantially less. In a new trial, there remain
questions of causation, contribution and proof of damages to be determined. We intend to
vigorously defend against Celebritys claims. We cannot predict whether Celebrity will appeal the
ruling on lost enterprise value, nor whether and to what extent Essef may eventually be found
liable on Celebritys claims.
Several issues have not been decided by the Court, including whether Celebrity is entitled to
recovery of its attorneys fees and related costs in the passenger claims phase of the case ($4.1
million), and, with respect to pre-judgment interest, the length of the interest period and the
rate of interest on any eventual judgment. We have assessed the impact of the ruling on our
previously established reserves for this matter and, based on information available at this time,
have not changed our reserves following this ruling, except to take into account quarterly interest
accruals.
We believe that any judgment we pay in this matter would be tax-deductible in the year paid or in
subsequent years. In addition to the impact of any loss on this matter on our earnings per share
when recognized, we may need to borrow funds from our banks or other sources to pay any judgment
finally determined after exhaustion of all appeals. We expect that we would have available
adequate funds to allow us to do so, based on discussions with our lending sources and our
estimates of the results of our business operations over the foreseeable future.
A copy of the press release is filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is
incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
(a) |
|
Financial Statements of Businesses Acquired
Not applicable. |
|
(b) |
|
Pro Forma Financial Information
Not applicable. |
|
(c) |
|
Shell Company Transactions
Not applicable |
|
(d) |
|
Exhibits |
The following exhibit is provided as part of the information filed
under Item 8.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K:
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
99.1
|
|
Pentair, Inc. press
release dated January
17, 2007 announcing
that a majority of
the jury verdict
against its
subsidiary, Essef
Corporation was
reversed. |