e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
for the transition period from to .
Commission file number 1-10581
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
No. 59-1513162 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
Bentley Park |
|
|
2 Holland Way |
|
|
Exeter, New Hampshire
|
|
03833 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (603) 658-6100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, $0.02 par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act. YES o NO þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). YES o NO þ
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates
computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and
asked prices of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrants most recently
completed second fiscal quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Aggregate Market Value *
|
|
As of Close of Business on |
Common Stock, $0.02 par value
|
|
$193,688,276
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
Title of Class
Common Stock, $0.02 par value
|
|
Shares Outstanding
22,268,358
|
|
As of Close of Business on
March 9, 2007 |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders Incorporated by
Reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
|
|
|
* |
|
Excludes the Common Stock held by executive officers, directors and
stockholders whose ownership exceeds 5% of the Common Stock
outstanding at June 30, 2006. This calculation does not reflect a
determination that such persons are affiliates for any other purposes.
Calculation assumes no changes in ownership positions of institutional
holders with ownership positions greater than 5% from positions
reported on their Schedule 13 filings for the year ended December 31,
2005. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part I
Item 1. Business
Overview
We are an international specialty pharmaceutical company, headquartered in the U.S., that is
focused on:
|
|
|
Specialty Generics: development, licensing and sales of generic and branded generic
pharmaceutical products and active pharmaceutical ingredients, or API, and the
manufacturing of pharmaceuticals for others; and |
|
|
|
|
Drug Delivery: research, development and licensing/commercialization of advanced drug
delivery technologies and pharmaceutical products. |
Our pharmaceutical product sales and licensing activities are based primarily in Spain, where
we have a significant commercial presence and manufacture and market approximately 118 products of
various dosages and strengths through three wholly-owned Spanish subsidiaries: Laboratorios Belmac,
Laboratorios Davur and Laboratorios Rimafar. Our products include approximately 167 product
presentations, or SKUs, in four primary therapeutic areas: cardiovascular, gastrointestinal,
central nervous system and infectious diseases. Although most of the sales of these products are
currently in the Spanish market, we have recently focused on increasing sales in other European
countries and other geographic regions through strategic alliances with companies in these
territories. We continually add to our product portfolio in response to increasing market demand
for generic and branded generic therapeutic agents and, when appropriate, divest portfolio products
considered to be redundant or that have become non-strategic. We manufacture our finished dosage
pharmaceutical products in our Spanish manufacturing facility which recently received approval from
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for the manufacture of our first U.S. generic
product which was launched in the fourth quarter of 2006. Through our Spanish subsidiary Bentley
A.P.I., we also own a manufacturing facility in Spain that specializes in the manufacturing of
several APIs. This facility has also been approved by the FDA for the manufacture of one ingredient
for marketing and sale in the U.S. We market our API products through our Spanish subsidiary,
Bentley A.P.I. We also have an Irish subsidiary, Bentley Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited, which
received its first marketing approval by the Irish Medicines Board in 2005 and launched its first
product in the fourth quarter of 2006.
We have U.S. and international patents and other proprietary rights to technologies that
facilitate the absorption of drugs. We are developing products that incorporate our drug delivery
technologies and have licensed applications of our proprietary CPE-215® drug delivery technology to
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which launched Testim® in the U.S. market in February 2003.
Testim, which incorporates our CPE-215 drug delivery technology, is a gel indicated for
testosterone replacement therapy. We continue to seek other pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies to form additional strategic alliances to facilitate the development and
commercialization of other products using our drug delivery technologies, including product
candidates that deliver insulin to diabetic patients intranasally, deliver macromolecule
therapeutics using a biodegradable NanocapletTM technology and treat nail fungus
infections topically.
Our Common Stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the trade symbol BNT.
2
Our parent company, Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc., is incorporated in the State of Delaware.
References in this report to the Company, we, us or our refer to our parent company and its
subsidiaries as a group, without regard to the separate operations and obligations of each entity
in the group, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
Industry Overview
Pharmaceutical Industry in Europe
The European Union, with an increasingly affluent population of approximately half a billion
people and approximately $144 billion in pharmaceutical sales in 2004, represents the second
largest pharmaceutical market in the world, according to IMS Health.
Many European countries exercise strict controls over the prices of, and reimbursement for,
pharmaceutical products. These countries often have national health insurance systems that provide
reimbursement for prescription pharmaceuticals. The prices that these systems are willing to pay
for products affects the profitability of the product sales. However, given the varying priorities
and economies of each of the European countries, price consistency has not been achieved and both
the prices and reimbursement rates often vary dramatically from country to country.
A basic tenet of the European Union has been encouraging the free movement of goods among all
member states. Many European governments have policies in place that encourage sale of
pharmaceutical products at the lowest price available. As a result, an active network of parallel
importation has evolved in which products manufactured in one country flow into other European
countries. This effectively favors manufacturers whose cost of goods are lower, enabling them to
more effectively compete on the basis of price.
Since Spains entry into the European Union in 1986, the Spanish pharmaceutical market has
been evolving steadily into a market that is increasingly similar to those of other countries in
Western Europe and the U.S. With a population of approximately 44.7 million in 2006, Spain was
ranked as the seventh largest pharmaceutical market in the world and fifth largest in the European
Union. Pharmaceutical sales in Spain reached approximately $11.6 billion in 2006, according to IMS
Health.
Over the last decade, there has been significant evolution of patent protections of
pharmaceutical products in Spain. Prior to 1992, manufacturing processes for active pharmaceutical
ingredients could be patented in Spain, but not the active pharmaceutical ingredients resulting
from the manufacturing process. Commencing in late 1992 active ingredients could be patented in
Spain with protection running for 20 years from the date of application. This was followed by
Spanish legislation in December 1996 that created a legal class of generic pharmaceuticals. In
Spain, generic products are required to be therapeutically equivalent, have a similar composition
to that of the original branded product and have demonstrated safety and efficacy. Safety and
efficacy is presumed if the original reference product has been commercialized in Spain for 10
years. Generic products also must comply with product labeling requirements and be priced at a
discount, which is typically at least 30% lower than the original branded product price.
Although comprising approximately 5.4% of sales in the Spanish pharmaceutical market
(approximately 9.4% of the units of pharmaceutical products sold in Spain), generic pharmaceuticals
are expected to significantly increase their market penetration due to increases in drug usage
driven by an aging population and opportunities to launch new generic products as patents expire
for blockbuster drugs. In response to the rise in healthcare costs, several initiatives are
underway by the Spanish government to stimulate the use of generic pharmaceuticals, including
education, financial incentives to prescribing
3
physicians and public campaigns. Due to the
structure of the Spanish market for pharmaceutical products, producers generally market their
products to physicians and pharmacies to whom they emphasize a combination of quality and price.
Generic pharmaceutical products in other European countries have attained greater market
share, with generics in major markets such as the United Kingdom and Germany achieving over 40%
market share. Generic products have achieved a high proportion of the market in many of these
countries due to government programs that encourage the prescription of generic pharmaceuticals.
In some of these markets, competition has made price the single most significant factor in
determining market share. This has favored producers of products that have cost structures that
can support competitive pricing. In these markets, emphasis can be placed on selling to
distributors at favorable prices rather than the more expensive alternative of marketing to
physicians or consumers.
Drug Delivery Industry
Drug delivery companies develop technologies to improve the administration of therapeutic
compounds. These technologies are designed to enhance safety, efficacy, ease-of-use and patient
compliance with prescribed therapy. Drug delivery technologies provide opportunities for
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to extend their drug franchises as well as develop new
and innovative products.
The vast majority of the drugs currently on the market are taken orally or are administered by
injection. Oral drug delivery methods, while simple to use, typically subject drugs to degradation
in the stomach, and during first-pass metabolism in the liver, before reaching the bloodstream. In
order to achieve efficacy, higher drug dosages are often used, with increased risks of side
effects. The injection of pharmaceuticals, while avoiding first-pass metabolism in the liver, also
has limitations, including pain, which can lead to decreased patient acceptance and decreased
compliance with prescribed therapy. A decline in patient compliance can increase the risk of
medical complications and lead to higher healthcare costs. Also, the costs of injectable drugs
typically are higher as a result of the additional costs associated with medical personnel to
administer the injections, the need to prepare the product under sterile conditions and the costs
associated with the purchase and disposal of syringes.
Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies look to drug delivery enhancements as a way of
improving treatment as well as gaining a competitive advantage. Alternative drug delivery
technologies, which avoid first-pass metabolism and are less invasive, may also be sought by
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for product line extensions for a branded drug and, in
some cases, may possibly postpone competition from generic equivalents. In order to maintain the
competitiveness of their proprietary drug candidates, large pharmaceutical companies seek delivery
enhancements that will increase safety and efficacy, reduce side effects and make administration
more convenient. Further, drug delivery companies can apply their technologies to off-patent
products to formulate their own proprietary products, which they often commercialize by seeking
marketing collaborations with larger pharmaceutical companies that have greater capabilities and
resources.
Developing safer and more efficacious methods of delivering existing drugs generally is less
risky than attempting to discover new drugs, because of lower development costs. On average, it
takes 10 to 15 years for an experimental new drug to progress from the laboratory to
commercialization in the U.S., with an average cost estimated to be approximately $800 million to
$900 million. Typically, only one in 1,000 compounds entering preclinical testing advances into
human testing and only one in five compounds tested in humans is approved for commercialization.
By contrast, drug delivery companies typically target
4
drugs that already have been approved, have a track record of safety and efficacy and have
established markets for which there is a proven medical need. Consequently, clinical trials
related to drug delivery technologies applied to previously-approved pharmaceuticals need only show
that the new technologies deliver the drug without adverse side effects and with the same clinical
efficacy.
Our Strategy
Our objective is to be a leading specialty pharmaceutical company focused on:
|
|
|
development, licensing and sale of a broad range of generic and branded generic
pharmaceutical products and active pharmaceutical ingredients in Spain, other parts of
Europe, and other international markets, including the U.S. market; and |
|
|
|
|
advanced drug delivery and formulation technologies to improve the delivery of new
and existing pharmaceuticals. |
Our strategies to accomplish this objective include:
Increase our product sales in Spain through targeted promotion and expansion of our product
portfolio and increase international sales
We plan to increase our generic and branded generic product sales by expanding the portfolio
of products manufactured in Spain and by forming strategic alliances to increase our sales outside
of Spain. We are expanding our product portfolio through the acquisition or licensing of currently
marketed and late stage pharmaceutical products. We directly promote and sell these products in
Spain through our own sales force of approximately 170 full-time personnel focused on major cities
throughout Spain. Outside Spain we sell through alliances with partners in other countries in
Europe and elsewhere.
We focus on obtaining the rights to pharmaceutical products that are less actively promoted by
larger pharmaceutical companies or are in a late stage of development and have good potential for
acceptance in our markets. We believe that we have expertise in assessing potential market
opportunities related to particular pharmaceuticals and in negotiating and acquiring from
pharmaceutical companies the rights to market pharmaceuticals in Spain and other countries.
Products that already are selling in the U.S. or other major markets demonstrate commercial
viability and typically encounter fewer barriers to regulatory approval for introduction into other
countries. The acquisition and subsequent manufacture of these products will permit our Spanish
operations to more fully utilize our existing manufacturing capacity and allow us to further
leverage our sales force by providing them with more products to sell. We believe that we have
developed particular expertise in marketing pharmaceutical products to physicians and pharmacies in
Spain.
Additionally, we have a strategic alliance with Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, a
worldwide leader in generic pharmaceutical products, granting us the right to register and market
certain of Tevas pharmaceutical products in Spain through our sales force of approximately 170
full-time personnel who focus on major cities throughout Spain.
We are expanding the sales of products outside of Spain by developing alliances with strategic
partners in targeted markets that offer compatible regulatory approval regimes and attractive
margins. Most of these alliances relate to specific products that our partners have expertise in
marketing. We have already developed alliances in Portugal, Greece, the United Kingdom, Germany,
Austria, Morocco, Poland and the Czech Republic for targeted products in these and other countries.
In certain European countries that have a
5
highly developed competitive market for generics based primarily on price, we intend to sell either
directly or through our alliances to distributors. In countries that require a sales force to
market to physicians or consumers, we intend to continue to concentrate our efforts through
alliances with entities that have sales and marketing forces already in place. We have made and
will continue to make, as necessary, modifications to our finished pharmaceutical products
manufacturing facility so that it will comply with Good Manufacturing Practices, or GMP, of the
FDA. These modifications should enable us to submit our products for U.S. marketing approval by the
FDA.
Focus on commercializing our CPE-215® permeation platform technology and developing proprietary
products based on our other technologies
We apply our drug delivery and oral drug formulation technologies in an effort to improve the
performance of existing pharmaceutical products with respect to their method of delivery and
effectiveness. We also may be able to reduce manufacturing costs for certain products as a result
of our proprietary manufacturing processes.
Our CPE-215 technology enables the absorption of drugs across membranes of the skin, mouth,
nose, and eye. We believe our CPE-215 technology can be incorporated into a wide variety of
pharmaceutical formats and products, including those formulated as creams, ointments, gels,
solutions, lotions, sprays or patches. CPE-215 has a record of safety in humans as a food additive
and fragrance and is currently listed on the FDAs inactive ingredient list for approved drug
products. Testim, the first product incorporating our CPE-215 drug delivery technology, was
approved by the FDA in late 2002 and was launched in the U.S. market in 2003 by our licensee,
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a specialty pharmaceutical company that develops and markets
products for urologic and sexual health. We are optimistic that this past experience with CPE-215
may result in reduced preclinical development time relating to its use in new formulations of
previously approved compounds. We market our CPE-215 technology to pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies whose products we believe would benefit from its permeation properties.
We believe these benefits include:
|
|
|
improving efficacy as compared to oral administration, which subjects the drug to
the effects of first-pass metabolism; |
|
|
|
|
improving utilization of costly and/or scarce drugs and active ingredients; |
|
|
|
|
expanding the market to patients less suitable for injection, especially children
and the elderly; |
|
|
|
|
improving patient convenience and compliance, and lowering costs relative to a
doctors office visit for an injection; |
|
|
|
|
extending the period of market exclusivity for a branded compound based on the
grant of a patent that incorporates new drug delivery methods; and |
|
|
|
|
allowing branded and generic drug companies to differentiate their products from
those of competitors. |
6
In addition to marketing our CPE-215 technology to pharmaceutical companies for application
with their branded or generic products, we selectively apply this technology to our own development
of certain products. We target therapeutic areas with high clinical need with compounds that have
established market demand or that face limited market acceptance as a result of less efficient drug
delivery methods. We are currently focusing intensively on applications of the CPE-215 technology
to the intranasal delivery of insulin to diabetic patients.
We have also been granted a patent in the U.S. for our oral formulation of acetaminophen. We
have pending applications in Europe and elsewhere. We have also been granted a Spanish patent for
our oral formulations of omeprazole and lansoprazole. In the case of acetaminophen, we believe
that we have developed dosages that result in:
|
|
|
increased solubility in water for administration to patients who have difficulty
swallowing pills; |
|
|
|
|
faster relief of pain and inflammation; and |
|
|
|
|
better taste. |
With respect to omeprazole and lansoprazole, we believe that we have created manufacturing
processes that require less time to efficiently produce our versions of these products.
Once we bring our internally developed products to an advanced stage of development, we intend
to develop collaborative relationships that leverage the clinical development and marketing and
sales capabilities of our strategic partners. We believe that this will allow us to license our
products on terms that are more favorable than those that would be possible earlier in the
development cycle. In Spain, we may market these new products directly through our existing sales
force. We also seek to manufacture and supply our pharmaceutical partners with the products they
license from us.
Our Proprietary Drug Technologies
Proprietary Drug Manufacturing Technologies
We believe that there are several opportunities to enter into additional collaborations with
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and expand our product lines using our proprietary drug
technologies. For example, in November 2004, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Perrigo
Company, the largest U.S. manufacturer of over-the-counter pharmaceutical and nutritional products
for the store brand market, to co-develop and market generic simvastatin in the U.S. and
potentially other markets. Our generic simvastatin was launched in December 2006 and marks our
first U.S. generic product. Our agreement with Perrigo contains provisions which allow us to
collaborate on additional products in the future when mutually agreed upon.
CPE-215 Permeation Platform Technology
Our permeation platform technology consists of a series of related chemical compounds that
enable the absorption of a wide variety of products across various biological membranes. Our
primary compound and the foundation for our drug delivery platform technology is CPE-215
(pentadecalactone). CPE-215, when combined with certain drugs, has been shown to significantly
increase the amount and rate of absorption of those drugs through various biological membranes. By
controlling the formulation of CPE-215 that is combined with certain drugs, we have the ability to
positively affect the quantity and rate at which the drug is absorbed through biological membranes.
We believe that our CPE-215 technology is
7
superior to certain other non-injection and non-oral drug delivery systems based on the following
characteristics:
|
|
|
broad applicability - works with a wide range of pharmaceutical
compounds, including water soluble, oil soluble and insoluble compounds as well
as high and low molecular weight compounds, including peptides and proteins; |
|
|
|
|
format independence - can be formulated into creams, ointments, gels,
solutions, lotions and patches; |
|
|
|
|
biological membrane independence works across the biological membranes of
the skin, mouth, nose, and eye; and |
|
|
|
|
well tolerated - approved by the FDA for long-term topical use in
Testim. |
CPE-215 has a record of safety in humans as a food additive and fragrance and is currently
listed on the FDAs inactive ingredient list for approved drug products. Testim, the first product
incorporating our CPE-215 drug delivery technology, was approved by the FDA in October 2002 and was
launched in the U.S. market by our licensee, Auxilium, in February of 2003. We are optimistic that
this past experience with CPE-215 may result in reduced preclinical development activities required
for new product formulations of previously approved pharmaceutical compounds.
Solubility Enhancement Technology
Our solubility enhancement technology involves chemical and manufacturing procedures that
enhance compound solubility without changing the compounds therapeutic properties. Although this
technology may be applied to other chemical entities, to date we have incorporated this technology
only in acetaminophen compounds, which are known to have problems of insolubility and undesirable
taste. Based upon clinical studies completed in Europe in 2001 and 2002, we believe that our
technology enables us to develop and deliver dosages of acetaminophen that make it highly
dispersible, rapidly soluble in water, better tasting and faster in reaching peak blood levels to
deliver pain relief and reduce fever than other tablets or capsules. We believe the use of our
technology will increase solubility, which will lessen undesirable side effects, such as flatulence
in effervescent formulations and the bitter taste of pills, which commonly are associated with
acetaminophen and many other oral medications. We have filed patents on this technology, of which
one has been granted in the United States and others are pending in Europe and elsewhere.
Oral Formulation Technologies
Our oral formulation technologies involve the application of a proprietary manufacturing
process as well as specialized equipment, each of which plays a role in producing pharmaceutical
products, while reducing manufacturing time and costs. We have developed new methods for
manufacturing products such as omeprazole, lansoprazole and other similar products that are
stability-sensitive to humidity and temperature. We have been granted a Spanish patent relating to
these processes. The patent claims as innovative the manufacturing process that renders these
products more stable, while protecting active substances from gastric degradation utilizing
microgranulation and microencapsulation techniques. These patented technologies can contribute to
our ability to compete against other companies whose manufacturing processes are more costly and
time consuming.
8
Nanocaplet Technology
In May 2005 we announced the discovery and synthesis of a thermodynamically stable,
biodegradable Nanocaplet technology for the delivery of macromolecule therapeutics. This
proprietary technology was discovered as part of our four-year sponsored research program with the
University of New Hampshire Nanostructured Polymers Research Center. We have successfully
synthesized biodegradable nanovesicles, or nanocapsules, which are minute, chemical structures,
that have the potential to encapsulate and deliver insulin systematically through the intestinal
mucosa and reduce glucose levels.
Licensed Product
Topical Testosterone Gel
In February 2003, our licensee, Auxilium Pharmaceuticals launched Testim, a testosterone gel
containing our CPE-215 drug delivery system, in the United States. Testim is marketed by Auxilium
under a license of our drug delivery technology. Testim is approved for marketing in the U.S.,
Canada and 15 countries in Europe.
Testosterone replacement therapy is used to treat men whose bodies produce insufficient
amounts of testosterone (hypogonadism). Symptoms associated with low testosterone levels in men
include depression, decreased libido, erectile dysfunction, muscular atrophy, loss of energy, mood
alterations, increased body fat and reduced bone density. Currently marketed hormone replacement
therapies involve delivery of hormones by injections, through transdermal patches and by gels.
Injection therapy has limitations, including pain, which can lead to decreased patient acceptance
and decreased compliance with prescribed therapy. Although patches have been able to alleviate
many of the gastrointestinal side effects associated with oral delivery of hormones, patches, even
in their smallest form, are often conspicuous and may result in skin irritation or even inaccurate
dosing, should the patch fall off. The transdermal delivery of hormones through gels, creams and
lotions provides commercially attractive and efficacious alternatives to other current methods of
delivery. The worldwide testosterone replacement market has increased as more baby-boomers enter
middle age and more attention is focused on male hormonal deficiencies.
Testim resulted from our May 2000 research agreement with Auxilium, pursuant to which Auxilium
agreed to develop and test various pharmaceutical compositions of topical testosterone using our
CPE-215 technology. We licensed to Auxilium exclusive worldwide rights to develop, market and sell
Testim, which rights became effective in September 2000. After Auxilium conducted clinical trials,
a New Drug Application (NDA) was approved by the FDA on October 31, 2002. Testim was launched in
the United States by Auxilium in February 2003. Auxilium uses its sales force to market Testim in
the U.S. and has partnered with Paladin Labs Inc. to market the drug in Canada and Ipsen to market
the drug in Europe.
Manufactured and Marketed Products
In Spain, we manufacture and market approximately 118 products of various dosages and
strengths which include approximately 167 product presentations, or SKUs, in four primary
therapeutic areas: cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, central nervous system and infectious
diseases. We market these products primarily in Spain and have developed alliances with other
companies that market our products, pursuant to license and supply agreements, in other countries,
including Portugal, Greece, the United Kingdom, Germany, Austria, Morocco, Poland and the Czech
Republic. In addition, we manufacture products that are marketed by other companies both in Spain
and elsewhere. Our generic and branded generic products are marketed to physicians, pharmacists
and hospitals by our three Spanish sales and marketing organizations,
9
Laboratorios Belmac, Laboratorios Davur and Laboratorios Rimafar. We also market over-the-counter
products through Laboratorios Rimafar. There are approximately 179,000 physicians and 21,000
pharmacies in Spain.
We continually review and modify our product portfolio. We add to our portfolio to respond to
increasing market demand for generic and branded generic products in Spain and, when appropriate,
we divest from our portfolio products that we consider to be redundant or that have become
non-strategic. We export a growing percentage of the pharmaceuticals manufactured by Laboratorios
Belmac outside of Spain through local distributors and brokers, particularly in Europe and Northern
Africa.
Branded Generic Pharmaceutical Products
Our branded generic pharmaceutical product line consists of 43 products of various dosages and
strengths represented by approximately 20 trademarked brand names. Most of our branded generic
products are known in the industry as branded generics because they are being marketed by us
under a brand name even though we are not the innovator of the product. Sales of branded generic
pharmaceuticals accounted for approximately 22% of our revenues in 2006, compared to 23% in 2005
and 25% in 2004. We market our branded generic products and, to a lesser extent, certain of our
generic and over-the-counter products through our Laboratorios Belmac subsidiary, which has
approximately 77 full-time sales personnel who focus on major cities throughout Spain. Several of
our branded generic products are also marketed by the sales forces of Laboratorios Davur and
Laboratorios Rimafar. We supplement our sales and marketing efforts for branded generic products
through advertising in trade publications.
The following are descriptions of the branded generic products that contribute significantly
to our sales and gross profits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Branded Generic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Name |
|
Active Ingredient |
|
Innovator Product (Company) |
|
Used to Treat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belmalipâ
|
|
simvastatin
|
|
Zocorâ (Merck)
|
|
elevated cholesterol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belmazolâ
|
|
omeprazole
|
|
PrilosecÒ (AstraZeneca)
|
|
gastroesophageal
reflux
disease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cimascal D Forteâ
|
|
calcium carbonate
and vitamin D3
|
|
Calcite-Dâ (Riva)
|
|
osteoporosis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Codeisanâ
|
|
codeine
|
|
Tricodeinâ (Solco)
|
|
cough and bronchitis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enalapril Belmacâ
|
|
enalapril maleate
|
|
Vasotecâ (Merck)
|
|
cardiovascular disease
and hypertension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IbumacÒ
|
|
ibuprofen
|
|
Motrinâ (McNeil)
|
|
rheumatoid arthritis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lanzol®
|
|
lansoprazole
|
|
Prevacidâ (Tap)
|
|
gastroesophageal
reflux
disease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mio RelaxÒ
|
|
carisoprodol
|
|
Somaâ (MedPointe)
|
|
muscle spasms |
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Branded Generic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Name |
|
Active Ingredient |
|
Innovator Product (Company) |
|
Used to Treat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pentoxifilina Belmacâ
|
|
pentoxifylline
|
|
Trentalâ (Aventis)
|
|
peripheral arterial
disease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senioralâ
|
|
oxymetazoline and
chlorpheniramine
|
|
Denoralâ (Aventis)
|
|
cold and sinus
congestion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XetinÒ
|
|
paroxetine
|
|
Paxilâ (GlaxoSmithKline)
|
|
depression |
Generic Pharmaceutical Products
Our generic pharmaceutical product line consists of 75 products of various dosages and
strengths. We entered the generic pharmaceutical market in Spain in September 2000. Sales of
generic pharmaceuticals accounted for approximately 36% of our revenues in 2006 and 2005, compared
to 40% in 2004. Laboratorios Davur, our sales and marketing organization devoted primarily to
generic products, markets pharmaceutical products to physicians and pharmacists through a sales
force of approximately 68 full-time sales personnel who focus on major cities throughout Spain.
Laboratorios Rimafar, our sales and marketing organization devoted primarily to generics and
over-the-counter products, markets to pharmacists through a sales force of approximately 25
full-time sales personnel throughout Spain. Laboratorios Belmac, to a lesser extent, also sells
selected generic products through its sales force. We supplement our sales and marketing efforts
for generic products through advertising in trade publications.
We believe we can grow by providing a more extensive line of products to our generic products
sales force for marketing to our physician and pharmacy clients.
The following are descriptions of our generic products that contribute significantly to our
sales and gross profits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Generic Product Name |
|
Active Ingredient |
|
Innovator Product (Company) |
|
Used to Treat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amlodapino Davurâ
Amlodapino Rimafarâ
|
|
amlodapine
|
|
Norvasc® (Pfizer)
|
|
arterial hypertension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amoxicilina Davurâ
Amoxicilina Belmacâ
|
|
amoxicillin
trihydrate
|
|
Amoxilâ (GlaxoSmithKline)
|
|
infections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amox/Clavulanico Davurâ
|
|
amoxicillin/clavulanate
potassium
|
|
Augmentinâ (GlaxoSmithKline)
|
|
infections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Azitromicina Davurâ
|
|
azithromycin
|
|
Zithromaxâ (Pfizer)
|
|
infections |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cardidopa/Levodopa Davurâ
|
|
cardidopa/levodopa
|
|
Sinemet® (Bristol-Myers Squibb)
|
|
Parkinsons disease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ciprofloxacino Davurâ
|
|
ciprofloxacin
hydrochloride
|
|
Ciproâ (Bayer)
|
|
microbial infections,
including anthrax |
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Generic Product Name |
|
Active Ingredient |
|
Innovator Product (Company) |
|
Used to Treat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ebastina Davurâ
|
|
ebastine
|
|
Ebastel®, Ebastle Forte® (Almirall)
|
|
seasonal allergic
rhinitis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enalapril Davurâ
|
|
enalapril maleate
|
|
Vasotecâ (Merck)
|
|
cardiovascular disease
and hypertension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finasterida Davurâ
|
|
finasteride
|
|
Proscar® (Merk)
|
|
enlarged prostate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fluoxetina Davurâ
Fluoxetina Rimafarâ
Fluoxetina Belmacâ
|
|
fluoxetine
hydrochloride
|
|
Prozacâ (Eli Lilly)
|
|
depression |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ibuprofeno Davurâ
|
|
ibuprofen
|
|
Motrinâ (McNeil)
|
|
pain, fever |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lansoprazol Davurâ
Lansoprazol Rimafarâ
|
|
lanoprazole
|
|
Prevacidâ (TAP)
|
|
gastroesophageal
reflux disease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mirtazapina Davurâ
|
|
mirtazapine
|
|
Remeronâ (Organon)
|
|
depression |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omeprazol Davur â
Omeprazol Rimafarâ
|
|
omeprazole
|
|
Prilosecâ (AstraZeneca)
|
|
gastroesophageal
reflux disease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paroxetina Davurâ
Paroxetina Rimafarâ
|
|
paroxetine
|
|
Paxilâ (GlaxoSmithKline)
|
|
depression |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pentoxifilina Davurâ
|
|
pentoxifylline
|
|
Trentalâ (Aventis)
|
|
peripheral arterial
disease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pravastatina Davurâ
Pravastatina Rimafarâ
|
|
pravastatin
|
|
Pravachol® (Bristol-Myers Squibb)
|
|
elevated cholesterol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selegilina Davurâ
|
|
selegiline
hydrochloride
|
|
Eldeprylâ (Somerset)
|
|
Parkinsons disease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sertralina Davurâ
|
|
sertraline
hydrochloride
|
|
Zoloftâ (Pfizer)
|
|
Depression |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simvastatina Davurâ
Simvastatina Rimafarâ
|
|
simvastatin
|
|
Zocorâ (Merck)
|
|
elevated cholesterol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trimetazidina Davurâ
|
|
trimetazedine
|
|
Idaptanâ (Servier)
|
|
coronary therapy |
Sales to Licensees and Others
In addition to manufacturing and selling our own branded generic and generic products, we
license the right to market products to others within and outside of Spain. These license
agreements are usually accompanied by long-term exclusive supply agreements, whereby our licensees
purchase the licensed products from our manufacturing facility. As of December 31, 2006, our
Spanish operations have executed
12
184 license agreements, of which 20 with customers in Spain and 95 with customers outside of Spain
cover actively marketed products that are generating revenues. The remaining licenses, 9 with
customers in Spain and 60 with customers outside of Spain, are for products that are awaiting
regulatory approvals. Additionally, we have 16 contract manufacturing agreements in effect in Spain
and 6 contract manufacturing agreements in effect for international customers. Our Irish
operations have executed 9 license agreements which are for products that are awaiting regulatory
approvals. Our clients market these products under their own names and with their own labeling.
Many of the products we manufacture for others use the same active ingredients that are used in our
own marketed products.
Strategic Alliance with Perrigo Company
We entered into a product development, license and manufacturing agreement with Perrigo
Company in November 2004. Together, we have co-developed a generic version of simvastatin, which
is currently being marketed and sold by Perrigo in the U.S. The finish dosage forms are produced by
our manufacturing subsidiary, Laboratorios Belmac, which recently received approval from the FDA.
Our generic simvastatin was launched in December 2006 and marks our first U.S. generic product.
Although the highly competitive simvastatin market in the U.S. is not expected to yield any
material profits to our generic business, this approval for the U.S. market has added to our
capabilities and sharpened our focus on more profitable opportunities. Our agreement with Perrigo
contains provisions which allow us to collaborate on additional products in the future when
mutually agreed upon.
Alliance with Teva
In July 2000, we entered into a five year strategic alliance with Teva, pursuant to which we
were granted a royalty-free, non-exclusive license to register and sell certain of Tevas
pharmaceutical products. Under this license agreement, we register these products with Spains
Ministry of Health and, upon approval, sell these products in Spain. We have a non-exclusive
obligation to purchase the products from Teva, allowing us to purchase any of the products from
sources other than Teva if we can demonstrate that Tevas price for a product exceeds the current
price from another qualified source and if Teva has not exercised its right to match the lower
price. The original 5-year term of the collaboration with Teva expired in July 2005; however the
collaboration agreement has automatically renewed for one-year terms since the expiration of the
original term. The agreement will continually renew for additional one-year terms until terminated
by either party. We have received marketing approval for 12 of these products, of which one was
launched in 2004 and three were launched in 2006, and 27 other product registrations have been
submitted to the Ministry of Health and are pending approval. While there can be no assurance that
any future products will be co-developed and licensed from Teva beyond the existing term of July
2007, the existing licensed products (approved and pending) will remain the property of the Company
and we expect Teva to continue to supply either raw materials or finished goods for those products
for a period of at least five years from the launch of each product.
In addition, under a rights agreement entered into with Teva in July 2000, we have granted
Teva a right of first refusal to purchase Laboratorios Davur in the event that we decide to sell
Laboratorios Davur or Laboratorios Belmac. We also granted Teva the right to bid for Laboratorios
Belmac in the event we intend to sell Laboratorios Belmac.
13
Manufacturing
Our 108,000 square-foot pharmaceutical product manufacturing facility is located in Zaragoza,
Spain. Our manufacturing facility complies with GMP in Europe and is capable of producing tablets,
capsules, ointments, lotions, liquids and sachets, as well as microgranulated products. The
facility also includes analytical chemistry, quality control, quality assurance and formulation
research laboratories. We have also made modifications to this manufacturing facility so that it
complies with U.S. GMPs. We recently received FDA approval at this facility for simvastatin, our
first generic product in the U.S. Simvastatin is currently being marketed in the U.S. by our
partner, Perrigo Company.
In April 2004, we purchased an 11,000 square foot manufacturing facility located in Zaragoza,
Spain that specializes in the manufacture of active pharmaceutical ingredients. The facility has
been approved by the FDA for the manufacture of one ingredient for marketing and sale in the U.S.
We are manufacturing and marketing these products through our subsidiary, Bentley API.
We have fully integrated manufacturing support systems, including quality assurance, quality
control, regulatory compliance and inventory control. These support systems are designed to
maintain high standards of quality for our products and deliver reliable products and services to
our customers on a timely basis. We require a supply of quality raw materials and packaging
materials to manufacture and package drug products. Historically we have not had difficulty
obtaining raw materials and packaging materials from suppliers. Currently, we rely on over 100
suppliers to deliver our required raw materials and packaging materials, most of which are supplied
by approximately one third of these entities. We have no reason to believe that we will be unable
to procure adequate supplies of raw materials and packaging materials on a timely basis. Union
Quimico Farmaceutica, S.A. is our primary supplier of omeprazole. We believe that alternative
sources of omeprazole are available and we will obtain required governmental approval to source
from them, if necessary.
Products in Development
The following are our major priorities for products that we are currently developing. Before
they are commercialized, they must be approved by regulatory authorities, such as the FDA or the
Spanish Ministry of Health, in each jurisdiction where they will be marketed or sold. See
Regulation section of Item 1 for a discussion of the regulatory approval process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Candidate |
|
Technology |
|
Used to Treat |
|
Status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generic products
|
|
Various
|
|
Various
|
|
Bioequivalence
and/or submitted
for approval in the
U.S., Spain, Europe
and other
countries. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intranasal insulin
|
|
CPE-215
|
|
Diabetes
|
|
Phase I/II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oral peptide delivery
|
|
Nanocaplet
|
|
Various
|
|
Preclinical |
Generic Products
We continually evaluate which pharmaceutical products are good candidates for us to develop,
test and market as generic products in Spain, the U.S. and elsewhere. We select products based on
factors
14
including the timing of expiration of the patent on the innovators product, the ability of
our manufacturing facility to efficiently produce the product, the availability and cost of the raw
materials to produce the product as well as the potential market size and pricing that can be
obtained for the product. Once we select a product, our scientists develop a generic formulation
of the product, which then must be tested to determine if it is bioequivalent to the innovators
product. Products are then submitted for marketing approval by the relevant regulatory
authorities, generally starting with Spains Ministry of Health.
In addition, under strategic alliances, we plan to co-develop generic pharmaceutical products
for sale in the U.S. that can be manufactured by our active pharmaceutical ingredients
manufacturing subsidiary, Bentley API, and related finish dosage forms produced by our
manufacturing subsidiary, Laboratorios Belmac. Through our alliance with Perrigo, we have executed
this strategy and co-developed a generic simvastatin that Perrigo markets and sells in the U.S. Our
agreement with Perrigo contains provisions which allow us to collaborate on additional products in
the future when mutually agreed upon.
We attempt to have several generic products in each stage of development so that we can have a
steady pipeline of generic product introductions. For competitive reasons, we generally do not
disclose which generic products we are developing.
NasulinTM (Intranasal Insulin)
We are developing intranasal formulations of insulin to treat patients suffering from Type I
and Type II diabetes. Based on preclinical studies and the results of our Phase I and Phase II
studies, we believe our intranasal insulin formulation can potentially achieve higher levels of
bioavailability compared to other drug delivery systems currently being developed. Our product is
designed to deliver insulin through a small, discreet nasal spray that can be carried in a
patients pocket. Our formulation is designed to blunt the increase in glucose following meals. Our
formulation may greatly reduce the number of insulin injections required to be taken by Type I
diabetics (those required to take insulin) and it may reduce the number of medications currently
required to be taken by Type II diabetics (those not required to take insulin).
In January 2004, we completed a Phase I clinical trial of an intranasal insulin product
formulation in healthy volunteers. The study was conducted by a clinical research organization in
a hospital setting in Ireland in compliance with U.S. and European clinical standards, and provided
encouraging results. The clinical study consisted of 8 healthy (non-diabetic) human volunteers
who, over several weeks, each received up to four intranasal sprays of insulin utilizing our
proprietary drug delivery technology. The study, which is designed to demonstrate safety, also
demonstrated a consistent response in the group. Elevated blood insulin levels were detected
within 10 minutes of nasal administration, a peak increase at about 20 minutes and return to
pre-dose levels by 60-90 minutes. Baseline blood glucose levels were quickly depressed in a
dose-related manner, with a peak decrease at about 40 minutes after nasal insulin administration.
These results were also consistent with a decrease in the normal volunteers baseline blood insulin
levels, as measured by plasma C-peptide, which occurred at about 60 minutes after nasal insulin
dosing.
Based on the results of this Phase I study, we proceeded with a Phase II protocol for
evaluation in insulin-dependent diabetics, which was completed in late 2004. This study has shown
that a Bentley formulation of insulin designed for intranasal administration shows preliminary
evidence of efficacy, and appears to be well tolerated in patient volunteers with insulin dependent
diabetes mellitus. Additional studies, both preclinical and clinical, were performed in 2005 and
2006. Additional Phase II studies were initiated in the U.S. in late 2006 and both studies will
continue in the U.S. and India in 2007.
15
Diabetes is a
metabolic disorder affecting more than 200 million people worldwide. Diabetic
patients who must endure frequent injections prefer less invasive methods of administering their
medications. Alternative and more desirable methods of delivery would not only improve quality of
life but also would contribute to patient compliance with prescribed therapy.
Products Available for Licensing
Antifungal Nail Lacquer
We have developed a topical nail lacquer for treating fingernail and toenail fungal infections
(onychomycosis). We completed two Phase I/II clinical trials for the treatment of nail fungal
infections at the University of Alabama at Birmingham in 2002 and 2003 utilizing a clotrimazole
lacquer formulation containing CPE-215. According to the National Onychomycosis Society, nail
fungus affects almost 30 million people in the U.S., primarily between the ages of 40 and 65. Patients
electing to take oral therapy must undergo blood monitoring during the course of treatment to
monitor for liver damage.
Topical Hormonal Therapy
Our topical hormonal therapy incorporates the use of metabolic steroids that regulate most of
the hormonal action in adult males. Hormone replacement therapies using these metabolic steroids
may have significant benefits in treating a number of medical afflictions, including osteoporosis
and sexual dysfunction. We have granted to Auxilium a worldwide license to develop, market and sell
a topical hormonal therapy containing our CPE-215 technology. Auxilium, which has already
incorporated our CPE-215 technology into Testim, is evaluating the formulations of this topical
hormonal therapy product.
Intranasal Pain Management
Many people suffer from chronic moderate-to-severe pain that is related to cancer, back
problems and orthopedic injury. These people also may experience intermittent flares of pain that
can occur even though they are taking analgesic medications on a fixed schedule for pain control. A
severe flare of pain is called breakthrough pain because the pain breaks through the regular pain
medication. About one-half to two-thirds of patients with chronic cancer-related pain also
experience episodes of breakthrough cancer pain. Generally, breakthrough pain occurs without prior
onset symptoms and may last from seconds to minutes or hours. Recent regulatory concerns, as well
as civil litigation concerns, regarding the safety of COX-2 inhibitors and other non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs may provide opportunities for alternative methods for treating pain.
Orally delivered pain products may not provide rapid relief and typically demonstrate
considerable patient-to-patient variability in absorption. Injectable formulations of pain products
provide rapid and effective pain relief, but administration often requires professional assistance
or hospitalization. We believe an intranasal pain product could provide significant medical
benefits over oral and injectable formulations.
Under a research agreement with Auxilium, we formulated the intranasal delivery of a pain
management chemical agent using our CPE-215 technology. Auxilium has the right to license this
product application pursuant to our research agreement, but has not activated the license to date.
16
Intellectual Property
We actively seek to protect our products and proprietary information by means of U.S. and
foreign patents, trademarks and contractual arrangements. Our success will depend in part on our
ability to obtain and enforce patents on our products, processes and technologies to preserve our
trade secrets and other proprietary information and to avoid infringing on the patents or
proprietary rights of others. We have three U.S. patents and six foreign patents related to
our CPE-215 technology. This includes a new patent issued in 2006 for our intranasal insulin and peptide delivery platform which is based
on our CPE-215 technology. This is the first patent to issue of our comprehensive filings around
the world designed to protect our intranasal delivery platform. The patents for our CPE-215
technology expire in the U.S. in 2008 and in foreign countries between 2010 and 2024.
We have been granted a Spanish patent for our oral formulations of omeprazole and lansoprazole
which expires in 2023.
In 2003, we acquired a U.S. patent regarding our antifungal nail lacquer product which expires
in 2020. Patent applications for our antifungal nail lacquer are currently pending in Europe and
other foreign countries.
We own approximately 110 trademarks for pharmaceutical products in Spain. In addition, we also
rely on unpatented proprietary technologies in the development and commercialization of our
products. We also depend upon the unpatentable skills, knowledge and experience of our scientific
and technical personnel, as well as those of our advisors, consultants and other contractors. To
help protect our proprietary know-how that is not patentable, and for inventions for which patents
may be difficult to enforce, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to
protect our interests. To this end, we require employees, consultants and advisors to enter into
agreements that prohibit the disclosure of confidential information and, where applicable, require
disclosure and assignment to us of the ideas, developments, discoveries and inventions that arise
from their activities for us. Additionally, these confidentiality agreements require that our
employees, consultants and advisors do not bring to us, or use without proper authorization, any
third partys proprietary technology.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses were $10,459,000, $5,800,000 and $4,419,000 in the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The steady increase in these expenses is
attributed to continued investments in our research and development programs for our drug delivery
technologies, primarily for NasulinTM, our intranasal insulin product candidate. We
recently announced the expansion of our Nasulin Phase II studies to include clinical evaluations in
Type II diabetic patients in the U.S and India. Research and development expenses in 2006 also
include approximately $664,000 of non-cash, share-based compensation expense for which there was no
comparable expense recorded in prior years. We plan to incur increased research and development
costs as we continue to conduct our clinical trials. Although cost estimates and timing of our
trials are subject to change, we expect consolidated research and development expenses for 2007 to
be approximately $15,000,000 to $16,000,000.
17
Competition
All of our current and future products face strong competition both from new and existing
drugs and drug delivery technologies. This competition includes national and multi-national
pharmaceutical and healthcare companies of all sizes. Many of these other pharmaceutical and
healthcare companies have far greater financial resources, technical staffs, research and
development, and manufacturing and marketing capabilities. We believe that owning our own
development, manufacturing and marketing facilities in Spain allows us to effectively compete with
other pharmaceutical companies in many markets. Our access to these resources enables us to control
costs otherwise associated with contracting for the development, manufacture or marketing of our
products by other companies. These lower costs allow us to sell our products at competitive prices
while maintaining profitable margins.
In Spain, we compete with both large multinational companies and national Spanish companies,
several of which produce products that compete with most of the products that we manufacture and
market. In Spain, our principal competitors include companies such as Ratiopharm International
GmbH, Laboratorios Cinfa S.A., Laboratorios Bayvit S.A. and Merck Sharp & Dohme de España, S.A.
Customers
In Spain, our sales representatives from Laboratorios Belmac, Laboratorios Davur and
Laboratorios Rimafar actively promote our products to physicians and retail pharmacists. We sell
our products directly to pharmaceutical distributors and indirectly to customers who purchase our
products from distributors. Outside Spain, we currently sell our products to our strategic partners
who then distribute our products directly or through distributors in their respective territories.
We have begun to market certain products directly to distributors in selected markets outside of
Spain. Our manufacturing facility also supplies branded generic and generic products to customers
both within and outside of Spain, including the European Union, geographical Europe, Northern
Africa and the Middle East, under licensing and supply agreements or contract manufacturing
arrangements. The wholesale distributor network for pharmaceutical products in Europe and more
specifically in Spain in recent years has been subject to increasing consolidation, which we expect
will continue to increase our, and other industry participants, customer concentration.
In the United States, we have entered into research and license agreements with pharmaceutical
companies, whereby we perform research activities and license product candidates in exchange for
milestone payments and royalties and/or a share of profits derived from product sales.
In the past three years, only one of our customers, Cofares, accounted for more than ten
percent of our consolidated total revenues. Sales to this customer accounted for approximately 11%
of our consolidated total revenues in 2006, 12% in 2005 and 13% in 2004.
Financial Information About Geographic Areas
The majority of our revenues are generated from products sold in Spain. Spain revenues
totaled $77,228,000, $69,845,000, and $59,095,000 in the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively. Long-lived assets in Spain at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were
$56,435,000, $40,120,000 and $39,160,000, respectively. See Item 7 Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 15 for additional financial information regarding geographic areas.
18
Seasonality
See Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for information regarding the impact of seasonality on our results of operations.
Employees
We employ approximately 442 people, 22 of whom are employed in the U.S. and 420 of whom are
employed in Spain, as of March 1, 2007. Approximately 200 of these employees are principally
engaged in manufacturing activities, 170 in sales and marketing, 26 in product development and 46
in management and administration. In general, we consider our relations with our employees to be
good.
Regulation
Numerous governmental authorities in the U.S., Spain and other countries extensively regulate
the activities of pharmaceutical manufacturers. If we fail to comply with the applicable
requirements of governmental authorities, we may be subject to administrative or judicial sanctions
such as refusal of or delay in the approval of pending marketing applications or supplements to
approved applications, warning letters, total or partial suspension of production, fines,
injunctions, product seizures or recalls, as well as criminal prosecution.
United States
Prior to marketing most pharmaceutical products in the U.S., the product must first be
approved by the FDA. For new compounds, the regulatory approval process begins with preclinical
laboratory and animal testing. The approval process generally consists of the following five
principal stages:
|
|
|
Preclinical testing; |
|
|
|
|
Submission and review by the FDA of an Investigational New Drug Exemption (IND)
Application; |
|
|
|
|
Clinical trials; |
|
|
|
|
Preparation and submission of the NDA; and |
|
|
|
|
FDAs review and approval/disapproval of the NDA. |
In some cases, further clinical trials may also be required following approval.
The IND is submitted to the FDA when the appropriate preclinical studies are completed and
must be submitted to the FDA 30 days before beginning clinical studies. The IND becomes effective
if the FDA does not put the investigations described in the IND on clinical hold within 30 days of
receiving the IND for filing.
Human clinical trials typically are conducted in three sequential phases. Some clinical trials
may include aspects of more than one phase.
|
|
|
Phase I involves the initial introduction of the pharmaceutical compound into
patients or healthy human volunteers; the emphasis is on testing for dosage tolerance,
metabolism, excretion, clinical pharmacology, safety (adverse effects) and possibly
early evidence of effectiveness. |
19
|
|
|
Phase II involves the first controlled clinical trial involving patients who have
the targeted disease or condition and consists of safety and efficacy studies. The
studies may be divided into early Phase II (or II A), during which studies are
performed to determine initial efficacy and late Phase II (or II B) which may consist
of placebo-controlled trials in a larger number of patients. |
|
|
|
|
Phase III involves large scale, long-term, well controlled efficacy and safety
studies within an expanded patient population, frequently at multiple clinical study
sites. |
Throughout the drug development process, the IND must be updated continually with protocol
amendments, information amendments, IND Safety Reports and Annual Reports. The FDA carefully
reviews all data submitted and holds meetings with the sponsor at key stages to discuss the
preclinical and clinical plans and results.
The clinical, chemistry, statistics, biopharmaceuticals, microbiology (if applicable) and
nonclinical data that has been collected over many years of development is submitted to the FDA in
an NDA. Additionally, an NDA will contain complete chemistry, manufacturing and controls
information, demonstrating that the applicant is capable of consistently manufacturing a drug
product of appropriate strength, quality and purity. An NDA is an application requesting FDA
approval to market a new drug for human use in interstate commerce.
NDAs are allocated varying review priorities based on a number of factors, including the
severity of the disease, the availability of alternative treatments and the risks and benefits
demonstrated in clinical trials. Additional animal studies or clinical trials may be requested
during the FDA review process and may delay marketing approval. After FDA approval for the initial
indications, further clinical trials are necessary to gain approval for the use of the product for
any additional indications. The FDA may also require post-marketing testing to monitor for adverse
effects, and in some cases to provide additional information on efficacy, which can involve
significant expense. Our products under development and future products to be developed must go
through the approval process delineated above prior to gaining approval by the FDA for
commercialization.
FDA approval is also required for the marketing of generic equivalents of an existing drug. An
ANDA is required to be submitted to the FDA for approval. When processing an ANDA, the FDA, in lieu
of the requirement for conducting complete clinical studies, requires bioavailability and/or
bioequivalence studies. Bioavailability indicates the rate and extent of absorption and levels of
concentration of a drug product in the body. Bioequivalence compares the bioavailability of one
drug product (in this case, the generic product under review) with another (usually the innovator
product). When bioequivalence is established, the rate of absorption and levels of concentration
of the generic drug in the body will closely approximate those of the previously approved drug. An
ANDA may only be submitted for a drug on the basis that it is the equivalent to a previously
approved drug.
In addition to obtaining FDA approval for each product, each manufacturer of drugs must
register its manufacturing facilities with the FDA, and must list the drug products it manufactures
at each facility. Domestic manufacturing establishments are subject to biennial inspections by the
FDA and must comply with current GMPs for drugs. To supply products for use in the U.S., foreign
manufacturing establishments must also comply with U.S. GMPs and are subject to inspection by the
FDA. Such inspections generally take place upon submission of an NDA or ANDA to the FDA or at any
other time deemed necessary by the FDA and can impact both the approval of drugs, and a companys
ability to continue manufacturing following approval.
20
Europe
As a pharmaceutical manufacturer in Spain, which is a member of the European Union, we are
subject to the regulations enacted by the European Union that require us to obtain manufacturing,
marketing and pricing authorizations to commercialize pharmaceutical products in Spain.
Pharmaceutical manufacturers in Europe must obtain marketing approval from the regulatory
authority of each country in which they intend to market a product. In Spain, that authority is
the Spanish Ministry of Health. The development process in Europe is similar to that in the United
States described above, with the same three clinical phases for branded drugs and bioequivalence
studies for generic drugs to assure their safety and efficacy. A dossier must be prepared for each
pharmaceutical product and, upon approval of the product, it may be marketed in that country. In
Spain, generic products are generally approved approximately one year after submission, while
branded products take considerably longer. Spain and several other European countries also
regulate the price that can be charged to the patient for each product in addition to setting the
amount that the public insurance programs will reimburse for each product, which directly affects a
products profitability.
Spain, and many other European governments, have historically implemented reduced pricing
strategies to mitigate rising healthcare costs. The most recent price reduction will be effective
on March 1, 2007, which has required our sales force to begin marketing our products at lower
prices as early as February. In addition, the impending price changes reduced our sales levels in
the fourth quarter of 2006 as wholesalers and pharmacies reduced orders to minimum quantities until
they were able to purchase at the new lower prices. We faced similar regulation in Spain in late
October 2003 which reduced the prices of our top selling products. Since then we have continued to
seek out new ways to improve the efficiency of our manufacturing operations, reduce our costs and
increase sales volumes to help mitigate lower prices. We are also focused on increasing our sales
in other countries and other geographic regions, including the U.S., through strategic alliances
with distributors and collaborators in those territories. We also target markets that offer
compatible regulatory approval regimes and attractive product margins. In August 2005, we formed an
Irish subsidiary, Bentley Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited, to assist in our European expansion
strategy. Bentley Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited received its first marketing approval by the
Irish Medicines Board in November 2005 and launched its first product in the fourth quarter of
2006. (See Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for more discussion of regulations in Spain.)
In order to speed approvals within European Union countries, the European Union has
established a mutual recognition procedure. When a manufacturer submits a pharmaceutical product
for marketing approval, it must designate whether the filing will serve as a reference
authorization for other European Union countries and, if so, which specific European countries. If
the filing is not designated as a mutual recognition reference filing, then other applications must
be made individually to other countries for approval to be granted in those other countries. If
the filing is designated as a reference authorization, then the authority in the initial country is
required to evaluate the submission on the basis of its own domestic standards as well as the
standards of each of the countries listed by the manufacturer. As the standards for pharmaceutical
approvals have not been harmonized among the various European Union members, certain aspects of the
filing must comply with standards that vary by country. In addition, the process for initial
evaluation of mutual recognition filings is generally significantly longer than that for national
filings and, as a result, companies often choose not to use this process for their first approval.
However, if the filing is approved for the reference and the mutual recognition countries, the
manufacturer would be permitted to market the product in all of the jurisdictions selected.
A manufacturing facility is required to obtain a general permit to operate a pharmaceutical
business certifying that its facilities comply with European GMPs. These permits are granted by
the national
21
authorities in the country of manufacture and other European countries rely on regulation by the
authority of the country of manufacture.
Trends in Healthcare Regulation
The cost of healthcare continues to be a subject of investigation and action by governmental
agencies, legislative bodies and private organizations. Many countries, in Europe and elsewhere,
directly or indirectly through reimbursement limitations, control the selling prices and
reimbursement prices of certain healthcare products. For example, in Spain, prices for prescription
pharmaceutical products must be approved by Spains Ministry of Health. In order to help control
rising healthcare costs, the Ministry of Health, in recent years, has encouraged the substitution
of generic-equivalent products. However, as described above, the Spanish government has also
historically implemented reduced pricing strategies to mitigate rising healthcare costs. There can
be no assurance that the government in Spain or in other countries will not implement additional
price reductions in the future.
In Spain and in other European countries, there are regulations that prohibit a pharmacy from
substituting another product if a doctors prescription has specified a specific product for that
patient. Recently, there has been intense scrutiny of pharmacists to assure that they are
complying with this regulation. Other European countries permit the pharmacist to substitute
products more freely than Spain. Any change in this regulation may negatively affect our sales in
Spain, as our products are often prescribed by brand name by the physicians.
In Western Europe, efforts are under way by the European Union to harmonize technical
standards for many products, including drugs, to make more uniform the requirements for marketing
approval from the various regulatory agencies.
In the United States, most states have enacted generic substitution legislation requiring or
permitting a dispensing pharmacist to substitute a generic version of a prescribed innovator drug.
Federal and state governments continue their efforts to reduce costs of subsidized healthcare
programs, including restrictions on amounts agencies will reimburse for the use of products.
Efforts to reduce healthcare costs are also being made in the private sector. Healthcare providers
have responded by instituting various cost reduction and containment measures of their own. It is
not possible to predict the extent to which we or the healthcare industry in general might be
affected by these changes.
Continuing reviews of the utilization, safety and efficacy of healthcare products and their
components are being conducted by industry, government agencies and others. These studies, which
employ increasingly sophisticated methods and techniques, can call into question the utilization,
safety and efficacy of previously marketed products and in some cases have resulted, and may in the
future result, in the discontinuance of such products and give rise to claims for damages from
persons who believe they have been injured as a result of their use. Similar consequences can arise
as a result of adverse events, which can impact both innovator and generic versions of the same
drug. We maintain product liability insurance for such potential claims; however, no such claims
have ever been asserted against us.
Other Regulations
We believe that we comply with environmental laws that apply to us and we do not anticipate
that continuing compliance will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
22
Available Information
Copies of reports filed by us pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, including Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports
on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports may be accessed from our website at
www.bentleypharm.com, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically
file such reports with, or furnish such reports to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Alternatively, these reports can be accessed through a query at the website of the Securities and
Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the following discussion of risks and uncertainties relating to
our business and ownership of our securities. The risks described below are not the only risks we
face. Additional risks that we do not yet know of or that we currently think are immaterial may
also impair our business operations. If any of the events or circumstances described below actually
occurs, our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially adversely
affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all,
or part of your investment.
Our growth depends on identifying drugs suitable for our drug delivery technologies and expanding
our generic and branded generic drug operations.
We believe that our growth depends on the identification of pharmaceutical products that are
suitable for delivery using our proprietary technologies. Our principal drug delivery technology is
our CPE-215 technology. This technology, like certain other drug delivery technologies, operates
to increase the amount and rate of absorption of certain drugs across biological membranes. This
technology does not operate independently and must be coupled with suitable pharmaceutical products
in order to provide value. Consequently, our growth will depend to a great extent on identifying
and commercializing these suitable drugs with respect to which we intend to expend significant
resources and efforts. Identifying suitable products is a lengthy and complex process that may not
succeed. Even if identified, products may not be available to us or we may otherwise be unable to
enter into licenses or other agreements for their use. In our efforts to identify suitable
products, we compete with other drug delivery companies with greater research and development,
financial, marketing and sales resources. If we do not effectively identify drugs to be used with
our technologies, improve the delivery of drugs with our technologies and bring the improved drugs
to commercial success, then we may not be able to continue our growth and we will be adversely
affected.
We intend to expend significant resources and efforts toward identifying and commercializing
products and technologies to expand our generic and branded generic drug operations in Spain and to
expand sales of these products outside Spain. Although we already manufacture and market generic
and branded generic drugs in Spain, the growth of these operations in particular and the Company in
general will depend to a great extent on identifying and commercializing additional such drugs for
which we have existing capacity and infrastructure and, to a lesser extent, on increasing sales of
existing products. Identifying and pursuing these new opportunities involves significant time and
expense and we may not succeed. Even if identified, these products and technologies may not be
commercially successful. Once identified, products to be manufactured and/or marketed by us under
generic or branded generic names are subject to successful negotiation of acceptable economic and
legal terms, and successful progress of the product through commercialization, as to which we
cannot assure you. When expanding outside Spain, we expect to compete in new geographic areas which
are governed by regulatory regimes that we have not operated under before. In these efforts, we
compete with other pharmaceutical companies having generic
23
and branded drug operations with greater financial, marketing and sales resources and experience in
the geographic areas in which they operate. If we do not effectively identify generic and branded
generic drugs and technologies and bring them to commercial success, then we will not be able to
continue our growth and we will be adversely affected.
Products using our technologies are in various stages of development and may not achieve commercial
success.
Independently as well as in conjunction with strategic partners, we are investigating the use
of our technologies with respect to a variety of pharmaceutical compounds and products that are in
various stages of development. We are unable to predict whether any of these products will receive
regulatory approvals or be successfully developed, manufactured or commercialized. Further, due to
the extended testing and regulatory review process required before marketing clearance can be
obtained, the time periods before commercialization of any of these products are long and
uncertain. Risks during development include the possibility that:
|
|
|
any or all of the proposed products will be found to be ineffective; |
|
|
|
|
the proposed products will have adverse side effects or will otherwise fail to
receive necessary regulatory approvals; |
|
|
|
|
the proposed products may be effective but uneconomical to market; or |
|
|
|
|
other pharmaceutical companies may market equivalent or superior products. |
If medical doctors do not prescribe our products or the medical profession does not accept our
products, our ability to grow our revenues will be limited.
Our business is dependent on market acceptance of our products by physicians, hospitals,
pharmacists, patients and the medical community. Willingness to prescribe our products depends on
many factors, including:
|
|
|
perceived efficacy of our products; |
|
|
|
|
convenience and ease of administration; |
|
|
|
|
prevalence and severity of adverse side effects in both clinical trials and commercial use; |
|
|
|
|
availability of alternative treatments; |
|
|
|
|
cost effectiveness; |
|
|
|
|
effectiveness of our marketing strategy and the pricing of our products; |
|
|
|
|
publicity concerning our products or competing products; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain third-party coverage or reimbursement. |
Even though regulatory approval has been received for Testim, and even if we receive
regulatory approval and satisfy the above criteria for any other product candidates developed by us
or incorporating our drug delivery technology, physicians may not prescribe these products if we do
not promote the products effectively. Factors that could affect our success in marketing our
products include:
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our sales force; |
24
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our production, distribution and marketing capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
the success of competing products; and |
|
|
|
|
the availability and extent of reimbursement from third-party payors. |
If any of our products or product candidates fails to achieve market acceptance, we may not be
able to market and sell the products successfully, which would limit our ability to generate
revenue.
We will rely on strategic partners to conduct clinical trials and commercialize products that use
our drug delivery technologies.
In light of our limited development resources and the significant time, expense, expertise and
infrastructure necessary to bring new drugs and formulations from inception to market, we are
particularly dependent on resources from third parties to commercialize products incorporating our
technologies. Our strategy involves forming alliances with others to develop, manufacture, market
and sell our products in the United States and other countries. We entered into an agreement with
Perrigo Company in November 2004 and continue to pursue strategic partners for these purposes. We
may not be successful in finding other strategic partners or in otherwise obtaining financing, in
which case the development of our products would be delayed or curtailed.
We must enter into agreements with strategic partners to conduct clinical trials,
manufacturing, marketing and sales necessary to commercialize product candidates. In addition, our
ability to apply our drug delivery technologies to any proprietary drugs will depend on our ability
to establish and maintain strategic partnerships or other collaborative arrangements with the
holders of proprietary rights to such drugs. Arrangements with strategic partners may be
established through a single comprehensive agreement or may evolve over time through a series of
discrete agreements, such as letters of intent, research agreements and license agreements. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to establish such strategic partnerships or collaborative
arrangements on favorable terms or at all or that any agreement entered into with a strategic
partner will lead to further agreements or ultimately result in commercialization of a product.
In collaborative arrangements, we will depend on the efforts of our strategic partners and
will have limited participation in the development, manufacture, marketing and commercialization of
the products subject to the collaboration. We cannot assure you that these strategic partnerships
or collaborative arrangements will be successful, nor can we assure you that strategic partners or
collaborators will not pursue alternative technologies or develop alternative products on their own
or with others, including our competitors. In addition, our collaborators or contract manufacturers
may be subject to regulatory oversight which could delay or prohibit our development and
commercialization efforts. Moreover, we could have disputes with our existing or future strategic
partners or collaborators. Any such disagreements could lead to delays in the research, development
or commercialization of potential products or could result in time-consuming and expensive
litigation or arbitration.
If we are unable to meet our responsibilities under any of our agreements, we may lose potential
business and be subject to penalties and other damages.
We are a party to a number of agreements pursuant to which we are required to perform certain
tasks in accordance with specified schedules such as manufacturing of products, timing and success
of research and development goals, etc. Should we not meet these deadlines and requirements, our
counterparties can take actions specified in these agreements which could substantially reduce the
amount
25
of revenues the Company would receive, or terminate the related agreements. Additionally, in
accordance with the terms of these agreements, the Company may be forced to pay penalties or other
damages to our counterparties for breaching these agreements.
We expect to enter into additional agreements in the future. These agreements may impose
various development, funding or other obligations on us. If we breach any of these obligations, the
counterparty may have the right to terminate the agreement or seek other remedies, which could
significantly reduce expected profits to the Company.
Disputes may arise with respect to agreements regarding the manufacturing, development and
commercialization of any products, including products which incorporate our intellectual property.
These disputes could lead to delays in commercialization of products incorporating our technologies
or termination of the agreements.
A significant portion of our revenues are generated by the sale of products formulated from one
active ingredient.
Spanish sales from our omeprazole product line accounted for approximately 18% of our
consolidated total revenues in 2006 and 2005. The active pharmaceutical ingredient for our
omeprazole products is currently purchased from one supplier. If we lose and cannot effectively
replace our supplier or are otherwise unable to continue the sales of our omeprazole products, our
revenues would decline significantly.
Pharmaceutical pricing, changes in third-party reimbursement and governmental mandates are
uncertain and may adversely affect us.
Our revenues and profitability may be adversely affected by the continuing efforts of
governmental and third-party payors to contain or reduce the costs of healthcare. A substantial
portion of our operations consists of marketing and manufacturing, primarily in Spain and other
parts of Europe, generic and branded generic pharmaceutical products. The use of generic drugs is
regulated in Spain, the U.S. and many other countries, and is subject to many changing and
competing public policy considerations. In addition, in certain markets, such as Spain, pricing or
profitability of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to government control through
reimbursement limitations. Specifically, prices for prescription pharmaceutical products in Spain
must be approved by Spains Ministry of Health. In order to help control rising healthcare costs,
the Ministry of Health, in recent years, has encouraged the substitution of generic-equivalent
products. In further efforts to reduce healthcare costs, the Ministry of Health had been
contemplating new laws and regulations that would significantly reduce the market prices of certain
pharmaceutical products, including generic-equivalent drugs. For example, the Spanish government
enacted a regulation effective March 1, 2007 that reduced the prices that the government reimburses
for many prescription pharmaceutical products. This new regulation affects the majority of the
products we sell in Spain. Had this regulation been effective for 2006, our consolidated revenues
would have been reduced by approximately 10% to 12%.
Successful commercialization of many of our products, including those using our permeation
technologies as well as our generic and branded generic products, may depend on the availability of
reimbursement for the cost of such products and related treatment from third-party healthcare
payors, such as the government, private insurance plans and managed care organizations. Third-party
payors are increasingly challenging the price of medical products and services. Such reimbursement
may not be available for any of our products at all or for the duration of the recommended
treatment with a drug, which could materially adversely affect our ability to commercialize that
drug. The increasing emphasis on
26
managed care in the U.S. continues to increase the pressure on pharmaceutical pricing. Some
governmental agencies, including those in Spain, can compel companies to continue to produce
products that are not profitable for the company due to insufficient supply. In the U.S., there
have been a number of federal and state proposals to implement similar government controls. We
anticipate that there will continue to be a number of proposals in the U.S., as has been the case
in many foreign markets. The announcement or adoption of such proposals could adversely affect us.
Further, our ability to commercialize our products may be adversely affected to the extent that
such proposals materially adversely affect the business, financial condition and profitability of
companies that are prospective strategic partners.
The cost of healthcare in Spain, the U.S. and elsewhere continues to be a subject of
investigation and action by various governmental agencies. Certain resulting legislative proposals
may adversely affect us. For example, governmental actions to further reduce or eliminate
reimbursement for drugs may directly diminish our markets. In addition, legislative safety and
efficacy measures may be invoked that lengthen and increase the costs of drug approval processes.
Further, social, economic and other broad policy legislation may induce unpredictable changes in
the healthcare environment. If any of these measures are enacted in some form, they may have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations.
If our clinical trials fail, we will be unable to market products.
Any human pharmaceutical product developed by us would require clearance by the FDA for sales
in the United States, by Spains Ministry of Health for sales in Spain and by comparable regulatory
agencies for sales in other countries. In the case of non-generic products, the process of
conducting clinical trials and obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals is lengthy and
expensive and we cannot be assured of success. In order to obtain FDA approval of any new product
candidates using our technologies, an NDA must be submitted to the FDA demonstrating that the
product candidate, based on preclinical research, animal studies and human clinical trials, is safe
for humans and effective for its intended use. Positive results from preclinical studies and early
clinical trials do not ensure positive results in more advanced clinical trials designed to permit
application for regulatory approval. We may suffer significant setbacks in clinical trials, even in
cases where earlier clinical trials show promising results. Any of our new product candidates may
produce undesirable side effects in humans that could cause us or regulatory authorities to
interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials of a product candidate. We, the FDA or other regulatory
authorities, may suspend our clinical trials at any time if we or they believe the trial
participants face unacceptable health risks or if they find deficiencies in any of our regulatory
submissions. Other factors that can cause delay or terminate our clinical trials include:
|
|
|
slow or insufficient patient enrollment; |
|
|
|
|
slow recruitment and completion of necessary institutional approvals at clinical sites; |
|
|
|
|
longer treatment time required to demonstrate efficacy; |
|
|
|
|
lack of sufficient supplies of the product candidate; |
|
|
|
|
adverse medical reactions or side effects in treated patients; |
|
|
|
|
lack of effectiveness of the product candidate being tested; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory requests for additional clinical trials; and |
|
|
|
|
instability of the pharmaceutical formulations. |
A delay or termination of any of our clinical trials may have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations.
27
Our patent positions and intended proprietary or similar protections are uncertain.
We have filed numerous patent applications and have been granted licenses to, or have
acquired, a number of patents. We cannot assure you, however, that our pending applications will be
issued as patents or that any of our issued or licensed patents will afford adequate protection to
us or our licensees. We cannot determine the ultimate scope and validity of patents that are now
owned by or may be granted to third parties, the extent to which we may wish, or be required, to
acquire rights under such patents or the cost or availability of such rights. In the event that
patent protection for technologies expire, or are not extended, revenues derived from such
technologies may be reduced significantly.
Competitors may interfere with our patent process in a variety of ways. Competitors may claim
that they invented the claimed invention prior to us. Competitors also may claim that we are
infringing their patents, interfering with or preventing the use of our technologies. Competitors
also may contest our patents by showing the patent examiner that the invention was not original,
was not novel or was obvious. A competitor could claim that our issued patents are not valid for a
variety of other reasons as well.
Legal proceedings have been commenced against in recent years by Merck & Co. Inc. and its
Spanish subsidiary, GlaxoSmithKline S.A. and its Spanish subsidiaries, Ethypharm S.A. and its
Spanish subsidiaries, and Pfizer Inc and its Spanish subsidiary Pfizer, S.A., in each case alleging
that we violated their respective patents. As discussed in more detail in Item 3Legal
Proceedings we cannot assure you that similar actions will not be brought against us, or that
these actions or any such similar actions will not have an adverse effect on us.
We also rely on trade secrets, unpatented proprietary technologies and continuing
technological innovations in the development and commercialization of our products. We cannot
assure you that others will not independently develop the same or similar technologies or obtain
access to our proprietary technologies. It is unclear whether our trade secrets will be protected
under law. While we use reasonable efforts to protect our trade secrets, our employees or
consultants may unintentionally or willfully disclose our information to competitors. Our employees
and consultants with access to our proprietary information have entered into or are subject to
confidentiality arrangements with us and have agreed to disclose and assign to us any ideas,
developments, discoveries and inventions that arise from their activities for us. We cannot assure
you, however, that others may not acquire or independently develop similar technologies or, if
effective patents in applicable countries are not issued with respect to our products or
technologies, that we will be able to maintain information pertinent to such research as
proprietary technologies or trade secrets. Enforcing a claim that another person has illegally
obtained and is using our trade secrets, like patent litigation, is expensive and time consuming,
and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, we may be subject to the jurisdiction of courts
outside the U.S., some of which may be less willing to protect trade secrets.
Our generic and branded generic products may subject us to litigation and claims that we
infringe the intellectual property of others.
The growth of our generic and branded generic operations may be adversely impacted by claims
by others that our products infringe on the proprietary rights of their existing brand-name
products. Companies that produce brand pharmaceutical products routinely bring litigation against
companies who seek regulatory approval to manufacture and market generic and branded generic forms
of their branded products and may attempt to secure injunctions that will prevent competitors from
eroding their market share. These companies may allege patent infringement or other violations of
intellectual property rights, which must be decided by the courts.
28
If a company claims we infringe its technology, we could face a number of consequences,
including lawsuits, which take significant time and can be very expensive, payment of substantial
damages for infringement, prohibition from selling or licensing the product unless the patent
holder licenses the patent to us, or reformulation, if possible, of the product so it does not
infringe, which could require substantial time and expense.
Regulatory approvals must be obtained and maintained for products incorporating our technologies
and, if approvals are delayed or withdrawn, we will be unable to commercialize these products.
Government regulations in the United States, Spain and other countries have a significant
impact on our business and affect the research and development, manufacture and marketing of
products incorporating our technologies. In the United States, Spain and other countries,
governmental agencies have the authority to regulate the distribution, manufacture and sale of
drugs. Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can, among other things, result in
fines, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, product recalls, operating restrictions
and/or criminal prosecution. In addition, governmental regulations may be established that could
prevent, delay, modify or rescind regulatory approval of our products.
Our business will suffer if we fail to continue to comply with federal regulations and rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and New York Stock Exchange relating to corporate governance
reform.
As a public company, we are subject to certain federal regulations and the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange. The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 required more stringent accounting, corporate fraud and securities laws.
To implement this legislation, the Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted new rules and may
adopt additional rules pertaining to, among other things, additional disclosure and reporting
requirements, including requirements relating to internal control procedures. The New York Stock
Exchange has also adopted various rules relating to corporate governance. Our reputation and
financial results could be materially harmed by any failure by us to comply with any current or
future rules or regulations relating to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or to any other federal corporate or
stock exchange reform measures.
Sustained compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 may require a
reallocation of resources that would otherwise be dedicated to operating our business.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposed significant new administrative burdens on publicly
traded companies. We have incurred significant incremental costs in complying with the provisions
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We cannot assure you that these additional costs will result in any
increase in revenue or that they will not have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
In addition, because we are a small company with relatively few employees, the individuals
responsible for complying with the statutory and regulatory requirements also have responsibility
for business matters. As a result, our business may suffer if these individuals are forced to spend
a disproportionate amount of time on compliance matters.
29
Implementation of new information systems could cause business interruptions and negatively affect
our profitability and cash flows.
We recently implemented a new inventory warehouse system to enhance operational efficiencies
and provide more effective management of our logistics. This implementation enabled us to better
meet the challenges related to our continued growth and the needs of our customers. We plan to
continue to upgrade and replace certain of our systems, including our financial systems, to assist
us in continuing to meet the challenges of the regulatory environment, including regulations
imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We expect that, over time, new systems will result in
improved business processes and increased operating efficiencies. As our employees become familiar
with the new systems, we expect that some errors may occur, some of which could adversely impact
our business and financial results. There can be no assurance that the systems will perform as
expected or that the anticipated improvements in business processes and operating efficiencies will
be achieved. In the event of serious system malfunctions or deficiencies, we might experience
business interruptions, which could adversely impact on our results of operations, financial
condition and cash flows.
If we are unable to obtain marketing approvals to sell our products in countries other than Spain,
we may not be able to obtain additional revenues from sales in those countries.
We cannot assure you that products that have obtained marketing approval in Spain will be
approved for marketing elsewhere. If we are unable to obtain marketing approval for our products in
countries other than Spain, we may not be able to obtain additional revenues from sales in those
countries.
We must comply with Good Manufacturing Practices in the production of pharmaceutical products.
Any manufacturing facility for pharmaceutical products to be marketed in the United States is
subject to FDA inspection and inspections by other government agencies both before and after
approval of an NDA to determine compliance with the FDAs GMP requirements, as well as local, state
and other federal regulations. Manufacturing facilities for our compounds to be marketed in
European countries and elsewhere are also subject to European Union and/or other applicable GMP
regulations. Facilities used to produce our compounds may not achieve or maintain compliance with
GMP or other requirements. The GMP regulations are complex and, if we fail to comply with them, it
could lead to rejection or delay of an NDA or comparable application. Any delay in approval of an
NDA or comparable application would delay product launch. Violation of GMP requirements after
approval of an NDA or comparable application, could result in remedial action, penalties and/or
delays in production.
We are dependent on only one manufacturing facility that can be used to manufacture our
pharmaceutical products and only one manufacturing facility that can be used to manufacture active
pharmaceutical ingredients.
All of our manufactured pharmaceutical products are manufactured in one factory in Zaragoza,
Spain. Although we have constructed the factory with redundant lines for our most significant
products that are in separate areas of the factory, and installed a fire suppression system, the
destruction of the factory by a fire or other catastrophe would have a material impact on our
revenues until we are able to rebuild the factory or secure an alternative manufacturing site.
30
Similarly, all of our manufactured active pharmaceutical ingredients are manufactured in one
factory in Zaragoza, Spain. A fire or other catastrophe would have a material impact on our
revenues until we are able to rebuild the factory or secure an alternative manufacturing site.
We operate a significant portion of our business in, and plan to expand further into, markets
outside the United States, which subjects us to additional business risks.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, 71% of our revenues were derived from sales made by
our Spanish subsidiaries in Spain and 22% of our revenues were derived from sales made by our
Spanish subsidiaries to customers in other foreign countries. We believe that the most substantial
portion of our revenues will continue to be derived from sales in foreign countries. Conducting
business internationally subjects us to a number of risks and uncertainties, including:
|
|
|
unexpected delays or changes in regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs related to complying with a wide variety of complex foreign
laws and treaties; |
|
|
|
|
delays and expenses associated with tariffs and other trade barriers; |
|
|
|
|
restrictions on and impediments to repatriation of our funds and our customers
ability to make payments to us; |
|
|
|
|
political and economic instability; |
|
|
|
|
acts of terrorism or war; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs associated with staffing and managing international
operations and implementing, maintaining and improving financial controls; |
|
|
|
|
dependence upon independent sales representatives and other indirect resellers who
may not be as effective and reliable as our employees; |
|
|
|
|
inadequate or uncertain protection of intellectual property in foreign countries; |
|
|
|
|
increased difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer accounts
receivable cycles in certain foreign countries; |
|
|
|
|
adverse tax consequences or overlapping tax structures; and |
|
|
|
|
limitations on the remittance of dividends by foreign subsidiaries. |
Currency fluctuations could have a material adverse impact on our business.
Our revenues may be impacted by fluctuations in local currencies due to the fact that 92% of
our revenues currently are generated by our Spanish subsidiaries, Laboratorios Belmac, Laboratorios
Davur, Laboratorios Rimafar and Bentley API. Fluctuations in the value of the Euro, in relation to
the U.S. Dollar, had a significant impact on our operations during the interim periods of 2006,
but did not have a significant effect on our operations for the twelve months ended December 31,
2006. Our foreign operations also expose us to a number of currency related risks, including the
following:
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
limitations on the conversion of foreign currency; and |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations of the carrying value of long lived assets. |
31
We do not currently engage in foreign exchange hedging transactions to manage our foreign
currency exposure because much of our expenditures are in the same currency as our revenues.
However, one of our subsidiaries has entered into a hedging arrangement to reduce the variability
of future cash flows related to a foreign denominated liability recorded on its books.
If we cannot keep pace with rapid technological change and meet the intense competition in our
industry, we may not succeed.
Our success depends, in part, on achieving and maintaining a competitive position in the
development of products and technologies in a rapidly evolving industry. If we are unable to
continue to develop and/or acquire competitive products and technologies, our current and potential
strategic partners may choose to adopt the drug delivery technologies of our competitors. We also
compete generally with other drug delivery, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies engaged in
the development of alternative drug delivery technologies or new drug research and testing. Many of
these competitors have substantially greater financial, technological, manufacturing, marketing,
managerial and research and development resources and experience than we do and represent
significant competition for us. Our competitors may succeed in developing competing technologies or
obtaining governmental approval for products before we achieve success, if at all. The products of
our competitors may gain market acceptance more rapidly than our products. Developments by
competitors may render our existing or proposed products noncompetitive or obsolete.
Our competitive positions in our generic and branded generic drug operations as well as with
our drug delivery technologies are uncertain and subject to risks. In Spain, and in other
countries, we must demonstrate bioequivalence of our generic and branded generic products, which
may be challenged by branded and other generic competitors as well as regulatory authorities. In
order to demonstrate bioequivalence of our generic products, we must show that the rate and extent
of absorption and levels of concentration of our generic products are not statistically different
from innovators products that have previously been approved by the regulatory authorities of the
respective country, when administered at the same dosage level under similar clinical conditions.
The competitive position of our drug delivery technologies is subject to the possible
development by others of superior technologies. Other drug delivery technologies, including oral
and injection methods, have wide acceptance, notwithstanding certain drawbacks, and are the subject
of improvement efforts by other entities having greater resources. In addition, our drug delivery
technologies are limited by the number and commercial magnitude of drugs with which they can
successfully be combined.
We may be unable to meet increasing expenses and demands on our resources from future growth, if
any, or to effectively pursue additional business opportunities.
We routinely consider acquisition and investment opportunities, although we have no current
agreements or commitments with respect to any acquisitions or investments. Any future acquisitions
or investments would further challenge our resources. If we do not properly meet the increasing
expenses and demands on our resources from future growth, we will be adversely affected. To
properly manage our growth, we must, among other things, improve and implement additional
administrative, financial, marketing, operational and research and development systems, procedures
and controls on a timely basis. We may also need to expand our staff in these and other areas. We
may not be able to complete the improvements to our systems, procedures and controls necessary to
support our future operations in a timely manner. We may not be able to hire, train, integrate,
retain, motivate and manage required personnel, successfully integrate acquisitions or investments,
nor successfully identify, manage and pursue existing and
32
potential market opportunities. We plan to invest $13.0 million to $16.0 million in capital
expenditures during the year ending December 31, 2007, including $5.5 million that was budgeted in
2006, but now planned for 2007. We plan to expand our API manufacturing facility, expand our
pharmaceutical product manufacturing facility and add new production lines in order to be able to
accommodate the level of operations and growth that is anticipated as a result of the Companys
expansion beyond the borders of Spain and the U.S. market. We plan to finance these expenditures
from a combination of cash flow from operations, existing cash balances, and borrowings, if
necessary. If we fail to generate additional revenue in excess of increased operating expenses in
any fiscal period, we may incur losses.
Our operations could be adversely affected if we are unable to raise or obtain needed funding.
Substantial time and financial and other resources will be required to complete ongoing
development and clinical testing of our proprietary products. Regulatory efforts and collaborative
arrangements also will be necessary for our products that are currently under development and
testing in order for them to be marketed. Assuming we continue our operations as presently
conducted, we believe that we have sufficient working capital to meet our needs for at least the
next twenty-four months. However our revenues from operations and cash may not be sufficient over
the next several years for commercializing all of the products we are currently developing.
Consequently, we may seek strategic partners for various phases of development, marketing and
commercialization of product candidates employing our technologies. Further, we cannot assure you
as to the sufficiency of our resources or the time required to complete any ongoing development and
clinical testing, since the extent to which we conduct such testing is dependent on resource
allocation decisions that we make from time to time based on numerous financial as well as
operational conditions.
In addition to development and other costs, we expect to incur capital expenditures from time
to time. These capital expenditures will be influenced by our regulatory compliance efforts, our
success, if any, at developing collaborative arrangements with strategic partners, our needs for
additional facilities and capital equipment and the growth, if any, of our business in general.
There can be no assurance that we will receive additional funding on favorable terms if at all, or
that we will be successful in attracting strategic partners. If we cannot raise funds or engage
strategic partners on acceptable terms when needed, we may not be able to continue our research and
development activities, develop or enhance our products and services, take advantage of future
opportunities, grow our business or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements.
If we undertake an acquisition, we will incur a variety of costs, and we may never realize the
anticipated benefits of the acquisition.
One of our strategies for business expansion is the acquisition of additional technologies,
products and product candidates. We may attempt to acquire these product candidates, or other
potentially beneficial technologies, through the acquisition of businesses, services or products
that we believe are a strategic fit with our business. Although we currently have no commitments or
agreements with respect to any acquisitions, if we undertake an acquisition, the process of
integrating the acquired business, technology, service or product may result in unforeseen
operating difficulties and expenditures and may divert significant management attention from our
ongoing business operations. Moreover, we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of any
acquisition for a variety of reasons such as an acquired technology or product candidate proving to
not be safe or effective in later clinical trials. We may fund any future acquisition by issuing
equity or debt securities, which could dilute your ownership percentage or limit our financial or
operating flexibility as a result of restrictive covenants related to new debt. Acquisition efforts
can consume significant management attention and require substantial expenditures, which could
detract
33
from our other programs. In addition, we may devote resources to potential acquisitions that
are never completed.
If we do not successfully manage our growth, our business goals may not be achieved.
Expansion has placed, and is expected to continue to place, a significant strain on our
management, operational and financial resources. To manage further growth, we will be required to
continue to improve existing, and implement additional, operational and financial systems,
procedures and controls, and hire, train and manage additional employees. Our current and planned
personnel, systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support our anticipated growth
and we may not be able to hire, train, retain, motivate and manage required personnel. Our failure
to manage growth effectively could limit our ability to achieve our business goals.
If we cannot attract and retain key personnel, we may not be able to execute our business plan as
anticipated.
Our success is dependent on our ability to attract and retain qualified, experienced
personnel. We face significant competition in recruiting competent personnel. Because the location
of our headquarters is in an area with relatively few pharmaceutical companies recruiting
candidates has been more difficult, as many candidates prefer to work in places with a broad
pharmaceutical industry presence. The loss of key personnel, or the inability to attract and retain
additional, competent employees, could adversely affect our business and financial results.
We have assigned many key responsibilities within our company to, and are dependent on, a
relatively small number of individuals. If we lose the services of our Chief Executive Officer,
President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Medical Officer, or the Managing Director of European
Subsidiaries, our ability to execute our business plan in the manner we currently anticipate would
be adversely affected. We maintain key person life insurance only for our Chief Executive Officer
and President. We have an employment agreement with each of our key personnel.
We may incur substantial liabilities and may be required to limit commercialization of our products
in response to product liability claims.
The testing and marketing of medical products entails an inherent risk of product liability.
We may be held liable to the extent that there are any adverse reactions from the use of our
products. Some of our products involve new methods of delivery for drugs, some of which may require
precautions to prevent unintended use, especially since they are designed for patients self-use
rather than being administered by medical professionals. The FDA may require us to develop a
comprehensive risk management program for our products. The failure of these measures could result
in harmful side effects or death. As a result, consumers, regulatory agencies, pharmaceutical
companies or others might make claims against us. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves
against product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities, lose market share or be
required to limit commercialization of our products.
Our inability to obtain sufficient product liability insurance at an acceptable cost to
protect against potential product liability claims could inhibit or prevent the commercialization
of pharmaceutical products we develop alone or with corporate collaborators. In Spain, we maintain
product liability insurance in the amount of 3 million (approximately $3.9 million U.S.
Dollars) and clinical trial insurance in connection with our clinical testing activities in various
amounts on a study-by-study basis. In the U.S. we
maintain
34
$10.0 million in product liability and clinical trials insurance. While management
believes that this insurance is reasonable, we cannot assure you that any of this coverage will be
adequate to protect us in the event of a claim. We, or any corporate collaborators, may not be able
to obtain or maintain insurance at a reasonable cost, if at all. Even if our agreements with any
future corporate collaborators entitle us to indemnification against losses, such indemnification
may not be available or adequate if any claim arises.
Our revenues, operating results and cash flows may fluctuate in future periods and we may fail to
meet investor expectations, which may cause the price of our common stock to decline.
Variations in our quarterly and year-end operating results are difficult to predict and may
fluctuate significantly from period to period. If our sales or operating results fall below the
expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could decline
substantially. In addition to the other factors discussed under these Risk Factors, specific
factors that may cause fluctuations in our operating results include:
|
|
|
demand and pricing for our products, including changes in wholesaler purchasing; |
|
|
|
|
government or private healthcare reimbursement policies; |
|
|
|
|
physician, pharmacy and patient acceptance of any of our current or future products; |
|
|
|
|
patterns or cost structures for our products; |
|
|
|
|
introduction of competing products, including generics; |
|
|
|
|
any interruption in the manufacturing or distribution of Testim or any of our future
products; |
|
|
|
|
our operating expenses which fluctuate due to growth of our business; |
|
|
|
|
timing and size of any new product or technology acquisitions we may complete; and |
|
|
|
|
variations in our rates of product returns and allowances. |
Forecasting our revenues is complicated by difficulties in estimating inventory levels at our
wholesalers and pharmacies, the timing of purchases by wholesalers and retailers to replenish
inventory and the occurrence and amount of product returns.
Your percentage of ownership and voting power and the price of our common stock may decrease as a
result of events that increase the number of our outstanding shares.
As of December 31, 2006, we had the following capital structure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Shares |
Common stock outstanding |
|
|
22,262,413 |
|
|
Common stock issuable upon: |
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options which are outstanding |
|
|
3,636,979 |
|
Vesting of restricted stock units which are outstanding |
|
|
118,399 |
|
Contingently issuable shares |
|
|
20,000 |
|
Exercise/vesting of options and restricted stock units
which are available for grant |
|
|
736,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stock outstanding assuming exercise of
all of the above |
|
|
26,774,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
As of December 31, 2006, we had outstanding options to purchase 3,636,979 shares of common
stock at exercise prices ranging from $2.00 to $15.83 (exercisable at a weighted average of $9.80
per share), of which 2,834,644 were then vested and exercisable. We may conduct future offerings of
our common stock or other securities with rights to convert the securities into shares of our
common stock. Exercise of our outstanding options into shares of our common stock may significantly
and negatively affect the market price for our common stock as well as decrease your percentage
ownership and voting power.
Our stock price is volatile.
The market prices for our securities and for securities of emerging growth companies have
historically been highly volatile. During the two years ended March 9, 2007, the price of our
common stock has ranged from a high of $22.90 to a low of $6.50. Future announcements concerning
us or our competitors may have a significant impact on the market price of our common stock.
Factors which may affect our market price include:
|
|
|
progress of our relationships with strategic partners; |
|
|
|
|
results of clinical studies and regulatory reviews; |
|
|
|
|
technological innovations by us or our competitors; |
|
|
|
|
market conditions in the pharmaceutical, drug delivery and biotechnology industries; |
|
|
|
|
effect of regulatory authorities on pricing of products; |
|
|
|
|
competitive products; |
|
|
|
|
financings; |
|
|
|
|
sales or the possibility of sales of our common stock; |
|
|
|
|
our results of operations and financial condition; |
|
|
|
|
proprietary rights and related litigation; |
|
|
|
|
public concern as to the safety or commercial value of our products; and |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions. |
These uncertainties may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Furthermore,
the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuation unrelated to the
operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also adversely affect
the market price of our common stock.
Delaware law and provisions in our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and stockholder rights plan
may prevent or discourage third parties or stockholders from attempting to replace the management
of the Company.
As a Delaware company, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law,
as amended, which is a statutory provision intended to discourage certain takeover attempts that
are not approved by the board of directors. Section 203 prohibits a Delaware corporation from
engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three years
following the date that such stockholder became an interested stockholder subject to certain
exceptions.
36
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws include provisions that also may have the effect
of discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control or an unsolicited acquisition proposal
that a stockholder might consider favorable. Our board of directors is divided into three classes
with staggered three-year terms, which makes it more difficult for an acquiror to change the
overall composition of the board in a short period of time. The affirmative vote of at least
two-thirds of our outstanding shares is required to approve a merger, a sale or lease of all or
substantially all of our assets, certain other business combinations or dissolution or liquidation,
and an affirmative vote of two-thirds of our outstanding shares is required to amend or repeal any
provision in our certificate of incorporation relating to our directors and officers as well as
certain other provisions in our certificate of incorporation. Additionally, our certificate of
incorporation authorizes our board of directors to issue preferred stock in one or more series with
the rights, obligations and preferences of each series to be determined by our board without
stockholder approval.
To the same potential effect, we have a stockholder rights plan designed to prevent a
potential acquirer from gaining control of us without adequately compensating our shareholders and
to protect us from coercive takeover attempts. The rights will become exercisable only if any
person or group of affiliated persons beneficially acquires 15% or more of our common stock. Under
certain circumstances, each holder of a right (other than the person or group who acquired 15% or
more of our common stock) is entitled to purchase a defined number of shares of our common stock at
50% of its market price at the time that the right becomes exercisable.
Our staggered board, the super-majority voting provisions, the potential issuance of preferred
stock and our stockholder rights plan may have the effect of delaying, preventing or discouraging
third parties or stockholders from attempting to replace our management.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
We own a 15,700 square foot commercial building situated on approximately 14 acres of land in
Exeter, New Hampshire that serves as our corporate headquarters and research and development
laboratory. It is located approximately 45 minutes north of Boston, Massachusetts.
We also own a 108,000 square foot facility in Zaragoza, Spain, which accommodates our
pharmaceutical products manufacturing plant, warehouse, research and development laboratory and
office space.
We own an 11,000 square foot active pharmaceutical ingredients manufacturing facility in
Zaragoza, Spain and during 2005 we purchased adjacent parcels of land totaling approximately four
acres for expansion of our active pharmaceutical ingredients manufacturing operation. The API
manufacturing facility is located in an industrial park and we have acquired sufficient acreage
adjacent thereto to accommodate future expansion.
We lease a 13,000 square foot facility in San Sebastian de los Reyes, Spain, an area northwest
of Madrid, which houses the administrative offices for our Spanish and European operations. The
lease for this facility expires in 2008.
37
We believe that each of our facilities has sufficient space for our current needs and our
contemplated expansion in the near future. Our manufacturing facilities are currently operating at
approximately 70% of capacity, if operating for two shifts per day, five days per week.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
On September 27, 2004, we were served with a complaint in an action captioned Ethypharm
S.A. France & Ethypharm S.A. Spain v. Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc., U.S. District Court for
the District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 04-1300 (SLR). In this action, Ethypharm S.A. France
and Ethypharm S.A. Spain, which are referred to individually and collectively as Ethypharm, alleged
that since March 2002 our Spanish subsidiary Laboratorios Belmac, S.A. (Belmac) misappropriated
unspecified Ethypharm trade secrets and confidential information and used that information in the
manufacture of omeprazole, one of Belmacs pharmaceutical products. On April 11, 2005, Ethypharm
S.A. Spain filed suit against Belmac S.A. in the Commercial Court No. 5 of Madrid, Spain. The
complaint alleged that Belmac refused to renew its contract with Ethypharm for the manufacture of
omeprazole which expired on March 22, 2002, and that after that date Belmacs continued manufacture
of omeprazole pursuant to its own patented technology infringed Ethypharms Spanish Patent No.
ES9301319. In late 2006 Bentley and Belmac settled all outstanding litigation with Ethypharm.
Under the settlement terms, Belmac paid Ethypharm $4,000,000 in the fourth quarter of 2006 and will
make four additional payments of $1,000,000 each on the first four anniversaries of the first
payment.
In December 2004, Belmac, jointly with three other Spanish manufacturers, initiated a legal
proceeding in the 2nd Commercial Court of the City of Barcelona against Warner-Lambert Company
requesting the partial revocation in Spain of European patent EP 409.281 concerning atorvastatin
calcium. In turn, Warner-Lambert Company counterclaimed against the plaintiffs for alleged
infringement of the patent in suit. The court ruled in favor of Belmac in a decision rendered on
September 26, 2006, and Warner-Lambert Company has appealed the judgment. A decision on the appeal
is expected by the second half of 2007.
In January 2005, we were notified that a legal proceeding had been commenced against us by
Pfizer Inc. and its Spanish subsidiary Pfizer, S.A. requesting an order requiring us not to
manufacture or market our amlodipine products. The case was brought against Laboratorios Davur
S.L. in the 3rd Commercial Court of the City of Barcelona. After an initial hearing the court
imposed an interim injunction, preventing us from launching our amlodipine products. However, upon
appeal, the court lifted the requested injunction and awarded us our court costs and legal fees.
The underlying proceedings are still pending.
From time to time we are a party to various other legal actions that arise in the ordinary
course of business. We do not expect that resolution of these matters will have, individually or in
the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
38
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on May 12, 2004 and on NYSE Arca
(formerly the Pacific Exchange) on March 27, 1996. We voluntarily withdrew our securities from
listing with NYSE Arca in December of 2006. The withdrawal eliminates duplicative administrative
requirements inherent in dual listings and avoids substantial new listing fees following the NYSE
Groups recent merger with Archipelago Holdings, the parent company of NYSE Arca. The following
table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the range of quarterly high and low sales prices for
our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol BNT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
10.94 |
|
|
$ |
7.25 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
12.10 |
|
|
|
6.50 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
12.95 |
|
|
|
10.63 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
20.80 |
|
|
|
11.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
22.90 |
|
|
|
12.78 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
14.19 |
|
|
|
9.43 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
13.07 |
|
|
|
8.78 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
12.90 |
|
|
|
8.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (through March 9, 2007) |
|
|
10.34 |
|
|
|
7.52 |
|
As of March 9, 2007 there were 943 holders of record of our common stock, which does not
reflect stockholders whose shares are held in street name.
Dividends
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and we do not intend to pay dividends in
the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings in order to finance the growth and
development of our business.
39
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
(or approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
of Shares |
|
dollar value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
(or Units) |
|
of Shares (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price |
|
Purchased as |
|
Units) that |
|
|
(a) |
|
Paid |
|
Part of |
|
may yet be |
|
|
Total Number |
|
per |
|
Publicly |
|
Purchased |
|
|
of Shares |
|
Share |
|
Announced |
|
under the Plans |
|
|
(or Units) |
|
(or |
|
Plans or |
|
or |
|
|
Purchased (1) |
|
Unit)(2) |
|
Programs |
|
Programs |
|
|
|
October 1, 2006 through October 31, 2006 |
|
|
19,015 |
|
|
$ |
12.035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 1, 2006 through November 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
19,015 |
|
|
$ |
12.035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares tendered to the Company at fair market value from option
holders using mature stock to exercise vested stock options and satisfy minimum
tax withholding liabilities. |
|
(2) |
|
Weighted average of the high and low prices on the NYSE on the date of exercise. |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following sets forth the selected Consolidated Income Statement data for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and Consolidated Balance Sheet data as of December 31,
2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, all of which are derived from our audited Consolidated Financial
Statements and related notes. The following Consolidated Income Statement data for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 and Consolidated Balance Sheet data as of December 31, 2005 and
2006 should be read together with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes appearing
elsewhere in Item 15 and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Consolidated Income Statement data for the
years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003 and the Consolidated Balance Sheet data as of December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004 are derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related
notes not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
40
Consolidated Income Statement Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004(a) |
|
|
2005(b) |
|
|
2006(c)(d) |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
39,136 |
|
|
$ |
64,676 |
|
|
$ |
73,393 |
|
|
$ |
97,730 |
|
|
$ |
109,471 |
|
Cost of net product sales |
|
|
16,477 |
|
|
|
26,399 |
|
|
|
34,893 |
|
|
|
46,161 |
|
|
|
49,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
22,659 |
|
|
|
38,277 |
|
|
|
38,500 |
|
|
|
51,569 |
|
|
|
59,621 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
19,277 |
|
|
|
26,848 |
|
|
|
29,805 |
|
|
|
35,903 |
|
|
|
54,222 |
|
Gain on sale of drug licenses |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
Other income (expenses) |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
4,170 |
|
|
|
11,520 |
|
|
|
10,495 |
|
|
|
16,395 |
|
|
|
6,056 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
5,423 |
|
|
|
4,805 |
|
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,636 |
|
|
$ |
6,097 |
|
|
$ |
5,690 |
|
|
$ |
10,919 |
|
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding basic |
|
|
16,569 |
|
|
|
17,997 |
|
|
|
20,901 |
|
|
|
21,558 |
|
|
|
22,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding diluted |
|
|
19,798 |
|
|
|
21,637 |
|
|
|
22,627 |
|
|
|
22,929 |
|
|
|
23,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Other income (expenses) for the year ended December 31, 2004 includes the reversal of
previously accrued tax assessments totaling $1,467,000. These assessments had been accrued to
be paid to the Spanish government as a vehicle to help reduce the impact of the rising health
care costs in Spain. Due to changes in the pharmaceutical industry in Spain and a change in
the Spanish political environment, these liabilities no longer exist. Accordingly, these
accruals were reversed during the second quarter of 2004. Additionally, a reclassification
of approximately $342,000 has been made between Depreciation and amortization and Cost of net
product sales for depreciation on certain fixed assets to conform with the 2005 presentation
format. |
|
(b) |
|
Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 include a change in estimate of royalty
revenues earned of approximately $1,092,000 recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005. This
change in estimate of royalty revenues earned is based upon publicly available data
determined to be more accurate than the source of data previously relied upon by management
in estimating the sell-through of prescriptions dispensed. |
|
(c) |
|
Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 include an increase in royalty revenues
of approximately $479,000 recorded in the second quarter of 2006. This change in estimate
was due to the Companys ability to reasonably estimate future product returns on sales of
Testim based on actual historical data. |
|
(d) |
|
Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006 include litigation settlement
charges of approximately $7,546,000 recorded in the third
quarter of 2006 associated with the probable settlement of outstanding litigation claims.
The Company recorded a tax benefit of $2,746,000 in provision for income taxes upon
finalization of the settlement in the fourth quarter of 2006. The Company also incurred
related legal defense costs of approximately $3,368,000 during the year ended December 31,
2006. |
41
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006(a) |
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
30,703 |
|
|
$ |
46,181 |
|
|
$ |
47,114 |
|
|
$ |
46,397 |
|
|
$ |
40,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
43,972 |
|
|
$ |
66,899 |
|
|
$ |
74,710 |
|
|
$ |
75,077 |
|
|
$ |
67,690 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
20,720 |
|
|
|
33,564 |
|
|
|
47,220 |
|
|
|
49,143 |
|
|
|
66,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
64,692 |
|
|
$ |
100,463 |
|
|
$ |
121,930 |
|
|
$ |
124,220 |
|
|
$ |
134,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
13,269 |
|
|
$ |
20,718 |
|
|
$ |
27,596 |
|
|
$ |
28,680 |
|
|
$ |
27,387 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
2,327 |
|
|
|
3,211 |
|
|
|
4,328 |
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
|
6,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
15,941 |
|
|
$ |
24,298 |
|
|
$ |
32,273 |
|
|
$ |
32,631 |
|
|
$ |
34,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable preferred stock |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
$ |
48,751 |
|
|
$ |
76,165 |
|
|
$ |
89,657 |
|
|
$ |
91,589 |
|
|
$ |
100,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company reclassified certain
of its deferred tax items on its balance sheet to be consistent with the underlying
transactions to which they relate. The reclassifications resulted in a $1,244,000
decrease of its current deferred tax assets, an increase of $240,000 to its non-current
deferred tax assets, a $238,000 increase in income taxes payable (included in accrued
expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheet) and a decrease of $1,260,000 in its non-current
deferred tax liabilities. |
42
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Financial
Statements and related Notes included in Item 8 of this report. Except for the historical
information contained herein the foregoing discussion contains forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those projected in
the forward-looking statements discussed herein.
Words such as expect, anticipate, intend, believe, will, may, could, should,
project, estimate and similar words are used to identify forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements,
including, but not limited to, the statements in Business, Legal Proceedings, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Risk Factors and other
sections in this report, are not based on historical facts, but rather reflect our current
expectations concerning future results and events. The forward-looking statements include
statements about our strategy, the prospects of our technologies and research and development
efforts, our plans to enter into more collaborative relationships, our prospects for revenue growth
outside of Spain, anticipated financial results and the prospects for growth of our business.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are
reasonable, such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that
may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be different from any future results,
performance and achievements expressed or implied by these statements, including the risks outlined
in the Risk Factors section and elsewhere in this report. You are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as the result of new information, future events or
otherwise, except as may be required by law.
Change in Estimate
As discussed in Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates set forth below and explained in
Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Revenue recognition, during the
quarter ended June 30, 2006, we recorded an increase in royalty revenues of approximately $479,000,
or $0.02 per share, related to sales of Testim. In light of sufficient historical return experience
on sales of Testim we were able to reasonably estimate future product returns and record those
revenues upon shipment as opposed to when units were dispensed through patient prescriptions. This
increase is reported in Licensing and collaboration revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Litigation Settlement
We have settled all outstanding litigation with Ethypharm S.A. Spain and Ethypharm S.A. France
(together, Ethypharm). As a result of the settlement, we recorded a $7,546,000 charge in 2006
representing the present value of $4,000,000 paid in the fourth quarter of 2006 and four payments
of $1,000,000 to be paid on the first four anniversaries of the first payment. We have incurred
related litigation defense costs of approximately $3,368,000, $593,000 and $241,000 in the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The litigation and related charges incurred
in the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 reduced our net income by approximately
$7,819,000 or $0.34 per diluted share, $499,000 or $0.02 per diluted share, and $237,000 or $0.01
per diluted share, respectively. The litigation related charges are recorded in litigation
settlement expenses on the Consolidated Income Statement.
43
Adoption of New Accounting Standard
In the first quarter of 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 123 (Revised), Share-Based Payment, which requires us to record the expense associated with
the fair value of share-based compensation within our financial statements. The adoption of this
accounting standard resulted in incremental share-based compensation expense of approximately
$1,829,000, or $0.08 per diluted share, in 2006. We expect to incur significant, ongoing
share-based compensation expense resulting from equity grants that will reduce our overall net
income in the future.
Overview
We are a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on:
|
|
|
development, licensing and sales of generic and branded generic pharmaceutical
products and active pharmaceutical ingredients and the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals
for others in Spain, other parts of Europe and international markets, including the
U.S. market; and |
|
|
|
|
research, development and licensing/commercialization of advanced proprietary drug
delivery technologies for new and existing pharmaceutical products. |
Specialty Generic Pharmaceuticals
Our pharmaceutical product sales activities are based in Spain, where we have a significant
commercial presence and we manufacture and market approximately 118 pharmaceutical products of
various dosages and strengths. These products include approximately 167 product presentations or
SKUs, in four primary therapeutic areas: cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, central nervous system
and infectious diseases. In 2006, approximately 25% of our product revenues were derived from two
of our product lines. We market our branded generic and generic products to physicians, pharmacists
and hospitals through our three separate sales and marketing organizations based in Spain:
Laboratorios Belmac, Laboratorios Davur and Laboratorios Rimafar. The Spanish government controls
the price at which drugs can be sold in Spain. The government has historically implemented reduced
pricing strategies to mitigate rising healthcare costs. The most recent price reduction, effective
on March 1, 2007, caused our sales force to begin marketing our products at lower prices in Spain
as early as February. The impending price changes reduced sales levels in the fourth quarter of
2006 as wholesalers and pharmacies reduced orders to minimum quantities until they were able to
purchase at the new lower prices. We will continue to implement strategies to mitigate the impact
of the lower prices, including the addition of new products to our portfolio. We launched eight
generic products which added approximately $1,600,000 to our revenues in 2006. We will also intend
to continue to improve the efficiency of our manufacturing operations, reduce our costs and
increase sales volumes. We are also focused on increasing our sales in other countries and other
geographic regions, including the U.S., through strategic alliances with distributors and
collaborators in those territories. We also target markets that offer compatible regulatory
approval regimes and attractive product margins. In August 2005, we formed an Irish subsidiary,
Bentley Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited, to assist in our European expansion strategy. Bentley
Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited received its first marketing approval by the Irish Medicines Board
in November 2005 and launched its first product in the fourth quarter of 2006.
In addition, we expect to grow our business by acquiring rights to market additional products
to sell through our organization and our strategic alliances. We continually acquire rights to new
products in response to increasing market demand for generic and branded generic therapeutic
products. For example, in November 2004, we entered into a collaboration agreement with Perrigo
Company, the largest U.S. manufacturer of over-the-counter pharmaceutical and nutritional products
for the store brand market, to co-
44
develop and market generic simvastatin in the U.S. and potentially other markets. Our generic
simvastatin, which is manufactured at our FDA approved finish dosage facility in Spain, was
launched in December of 2006. While we do not expect to see any material contribution from U.S.
sales of our generic simvastatin, the entrance into the U.S. market marks a significant strategic
milestone for us.
We also manufacture and market active pharmaceutical ingredients through our subsidiary,
Bentley API. Our API facility has been approved by the FDA for the manufacture of one ingredient
for marketing and sale in the U.S. In addition, our Spanish pharmaceutical product manufacturing
facility produces pharmaceutical products that are marketed by other pharmaceutical companies both
in Spain and in other international markets, including the U.S.
Drug Delivery Technologies and Products
We develop and co-develop products that incorporate our drug delivery technologies. We have
licensed applications of our proprietary CPE-215 drug delivery technology to Auxilium
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which launched Testim the first product incorporating our CPE-215 drug
delivery technology, in the United States in February 2003. Testim is a gel indicated for
testosterone replacement therapy. Testim is also approved for marketing in 15 European countries
and Canada. We are in discussions with other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to form
additional strategic alliances to facilitate the development and commercialization of other
products using our drug delivery technologies, including delivery of insulin to diabetic patients
intranasally and delivery of macromolecule therapeutics using a biodegradable Nanocaplet
technology.
Research and Development Focus
In 2004 we concluded our Phase II study for the intranasal delivery of insulin in Type I
diabetes patients using our CPE-215 technology. We reported the results of that trial in an
abstract titled Intranasal Insulin Administration in Type I Diabetic Patients Utilizing CPE-215
Technology at the American Diabetes Association 65th Scientific Sessions, September 10-14, 2005,
in San Diego, California. The full results of that trial were published in 2006 in the journal
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, Volume 8, Number 1. In 2006, we completed our Phase II
intranasal insulin program studies in Ireland, advanced our Phase II studies in the U.S. and
initiated Phase II studies in India. The U.S. development and clinical programs for intranasal
insulin will continue and expand both outside and inside the U.S. We are continuing our clinical
programs to support our strategy for the distribution of certain of our Spanish generic
pharmaceutical products in other countries, including the U.S. through collaboration agreements
similar to our agreement with Perrigo Company. We expect to continue to invest our resources to
conduct clinical trials and support the required regulatory submissions for our clinical programs.
We expect to incur increased costs for product formulation and testing efforts.
Effect of Foreign Currency Fluctuations
A substantial amount of our business is conducted in Europe and is therefore influenced by
fluctuations in the U.S. Dollars value in relation to other currencies, particularly the Euro. An
increase in the weighted average value of the Euro in relation to the U.S. Dollar in 2006 compared
to 2005, had the following impact on the results of our operations when reported in U.S. Dollars:
(1) total revenues were increased by approximately $1,142,000, (2) gross profit was increased by
approximately $531,000, (3) operating expenses increased by approximately $677,000, (4) provision
for income taxes was decreased by approximately $259,000, which resulted in (5) a decrease to net
income of approximately $111,000.
45
Consolidated Results of Operations
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared To Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
2006 |
|
% |
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Generics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net product sales |
|
$ |
100,590 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
$ |
91,308 |
|
|
|
93 |
% |
|
$ |
9,282 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Licensing and collaboration
revenues |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,105 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
91,581 |
|
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
9,524 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drug Delivery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing and collaboration revenues |
|
|
8,366 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
2,217 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
109,471 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
97,730 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
11,741 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased 12% from the year ended
December 31, 2005. Our current year growth was driven primarily by increased net product sales in
Spain, increased sales to licensees and others and increased Testim royalties. Testim royalties in
2005 included $1,092,000 resulting from a revised estimate of sell-through of prescriptions
dispensed.
Our revenues are generated through our primary sales channels of branded generic
pharmaceuticals, generic pharmaceuticals, sales to licensees and others and licensing and
collaboration revenues. The following is a summary of our revenues by sales channel and top-selling
product lines:
For the year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues Within Spain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outside of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
Product Line |
|
Generics |
|
Generics |
|
Other |
|
Spain |
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
Omeprazole |
|
$ |
2,679 |
|
|
$ |
16,451 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,130 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Simvastatin |
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
5,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,471 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Enalapril |
|
|
4,826 |
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,650 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Paroxetine |
|
|
1,449 |
|
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,494 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Lansoprazole |
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,541 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
All other products |
|
|
10,628 |
|
|
|
11,263 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
|
24,449 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Sales to licensees and others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,741 |
|
|
|
22,114 |
|
|
|
34,855 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
Licensing and collaborations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
8,366 |
|
|
|
8,881 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
24,122 |
|
|
$ |
39,055 |
|
|
$ |
14,051 |
|
|
$ |
32,243 |
|
|
$ |
109,471 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
% of 2006 Revenues |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
46
For the year ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues Within Spain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outside of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
Product Line |
|
Generics |
|
Generics |
|
Other |
|
Spain |
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
Omeprazole |
|
$ |
2,779 |
|
|
$ |
15,394 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,173 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Simvastatin |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
5,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,746 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Enalapril |
|
|
4,153 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,859 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Paroxetine |
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
3,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,455 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Lansoprazole |
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
All other products |
|
|
10,810 |
|
|
|
9,282 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
21,875 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Sales to licensees and others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,589 |
|
|
|
20,225 |
|
|
|
31,814 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
Licensing and collaborations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
6,148 |
|
|
|
6,422 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
22,601 |
|
|
$ |
35,110 |
|
|
$ |
12,134 |
|
|
$ |
27,885 |
|
|
$ |
97,730 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
% of 2005 Revenues |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Spanish Operations. The increase in the net product sales for the year ended December
31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31, 2005 is primarily due to: (1) an aggregate
increase totaling $2,473,000 in sales of our three top selling product lines (omeprazole,
simvastatin and enalapril) and (2) an increase in sales to licensees and others totaling $3,041,000
fueled primarily by sales outside of Spain.
Branded Generic Pharmaceutical Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
2006 |
|
% |
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branded Generic Product Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enalapril |
|
$ |
4,826 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
$ |
4,153 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
$ |
673 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Codeisan |
|
|
3,001 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
-13 |
% |
Lansoprazole |
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
Omeprazole |
|
|
2,679 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
2,779 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
-4 |
% |
Simvastatin |
|
|
1,851 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
All other branded products |
|
|
9,076 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
8,706 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total branded generic sales |
|
$ |
24,122 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
22,601 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
1,521 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of our branded generic pharmaceutical products accounted for 22% of total revenues
during 2006 and increased 7%, or approximately $1,521,000 over branded generic sales in 2005.
Enalapril and lansoprazole, two of our top-selling branded generic products, accounted for the
majority of the increase in our branded generic sales from the prior year and represent 31% of our
2006 branded generic sales.
Generic Pharmaceutical Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
2006 |
|
% |
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generic Product Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omeprazole |
|
$ |
16,451 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
|
$ |
15,394 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
$ |
1,057 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Simvastatin |
|
|
5,620 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
5,080 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Paroxetine |
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
3,118 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
-2 |
% |
Pentoxifylline |
|
|
2,571 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Trimetazidine |
|
|
2,253 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
2,214 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
All other generic products |
|
|
9,115 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
6,764 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
2,351 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total generic sales |
|
$ |
39,055 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
35,110 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
3,945 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
Sales of our generic pharmaceutical products accounted for 36% of 2006 total revenues and
increased 11%, or approximately $3,945,000 over 2005 generic sales. Omeprazole and simvastatin
remain our top-selling generic products and accounted for 40% of the generic pharmaceutical product
growth. Additionally, eight generic product launches in 2006 (included in All other generic
products above) contributed approximately $1,663,000 to our 2006 generic sales and accounted for
42% of the generic sales growth from 2005.
Sales to Licensees and Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty
generics |
|
$ |
34,855 |
|
|
$ |
31,814 |
|
|
$ |
3,041 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Sales to licensees and others increased by $3,041,000 or 10% compared to 2005. The
increased sales are due to our increased focus on geographic expansion and growth. Sales under our
license agreements are generally larger order quantities which ship at less frequent intervals than
our net product sales within Spain. As a result, a delay in the timing of such shipments could have
a significant affect on recorded revenues from period to period.
Licensing and Collaboration Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
|
89 |
% |
Drug delivery |
|
|
8,366 |
|
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
|
2,217 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8,881 |
|
|
$ |
6,422 |
|
|
$ |
2,459 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing and collaboration revenues now account for approximately 8% of total revenues
and increased by approximately $2,459,000, or approximately 38%, in 2006. These revenues include
royalties totaling $8,341,000 from sales of Testim. During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, we
recorded an increase in royalty revenues of approximately $479,000, or $0.02 per share, due to a
change in estimate which, based on historical experience, allowed it to reasonably estimate future
product returns on sales of Testim. Testim is currently reported to have captured approximately 19%
of all testosterone replacement prescriptions in the market. Also included in licensing and
collaboration revenues are revenues of approximately $515,000 related to product licensing
activities in Europe in 2006 compared to $274,000 in 2005.
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
51,255 |
|
|
$ |
45,420 |
|
|
$ |
5,835 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Drug delivery |
|
|
8,366 |
|
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
|
2,217 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
59,621 |
|
|
$ |
51,569 |
|
|
$ |
8,052 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit increased by approximately $8,052,000, or 16%, in 2006, when compared to
2005. Gross margins on net product sales increased from 49% in 2005 to 50% in 2006. We expect to
experience a decline in our future gross margins as a result of the new price regulations in Spain.
However, we expect our margins to then gradually improve as we continue to implement our
strategies to mitigate the price reductions.
48
Selling and Marketing Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
16,153 |
|
|
$ |
16,347 |
|
|
$ |
(194 |
) |
|
|
-1 |
% |
Drug delivery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,153 |
|
|
$ |
16,347 |
|
|
$ |
(194 |
) |
|
|
-1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses decreased by approximately $194,000, or 1% in 2006, when
compared to 2005, partially through the efficient use of our selling and marketing resources.
Selling and marketing expenses decreased as a percentage of net product sales to 16% in 2006,
compared to 18% in 2005.
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
7,391 |
|
|
$ |
8,930 |
|
|
$ |
(1,539 |
) |
|
|
-17 |
% |
Drug delivery |
|
|
7,410 |
|
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
|
4,935 |
|
|
|
199 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,801 |
|
|
$ |
11,405 |
|
|
$ |
3,396 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses for 2006 increased by $3,396,000 or 30% over the
prior year. As a percentage of total revenues, general and administrative expenses were 14% in
2006, compared to 12% in 2005. The increase resulted in part from the recording of $1,126,000 of
share-based compensation in the current year which was not required to be recorded in prior years,
of which we have allocated $966,000 to our drug delivery segment. Drug delivery general and
administrative expenses also include approximately $600,000 of executive severance costs. General
and administrative expenses also include intersegment allocations between the drug delivery and
specialty generics businesses resulting from intercompany agreements.
However, except in the
presentation of our segment information, these allocations do not effect our consolidated results
of operations.
Research and Development Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
1,777 |
|
|
$ |
1,378 |
|
|
$ |
399 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
Drug delivery |
|
|
8,682 |
|
|
|
4,422 |
|
|
|
4,260 |
|
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,459 |
|
|
$ |
5,800 |
|
|
$ |
4,659 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses increased 80% when compared to 2005. The increase
resulted from continued investments in our research and development programs for our drug delivery
technologies, primarily for NasulinTM, our intranasal insulin product. We recently
announced the expansion of our Nasulin Phase II studies to include clinical evaluations in Type II
diabetic patients in the U.S and India. Research and development expenses also include
approximately $664,000 of non-cash, share-based compensation expense for which there was no
comparable expense recorded in the prior year. We plan to incur increased costs as we continue to
conduct our clinical trials. Although cost estimates and timing of our trials are subject to
change, we expect consolidated research and development expenses for 2007 to be approximately
$15,000,000 to $16,000,000.
49
Litigation Settlement Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
10,914 |
|
|
$ |
593 |
|
|
$ |
10,321 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Litigation settlement expenses include a $7,546,000 legal settlement and $3,368,000 of
related legal expenses in 2006. We recorded the present value of our legal settlement with
Ethypharm S.A. France and Ethypharm S.A. Spain in September 2006. All claims related to the
litigation were dismissed with prejudice in December 2006. See Other liabilities in Note 2 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Related legal costs previously
recorded in general and administrative expenses in 2006, 2005 and 2004 have been reclassified to
litigation settlement expenses on the Consolidated Income Statements.
Other Income (Expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
(64 |
) |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
|
|
-327 |
% |
Drug delivery |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
-8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
619 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
|
-15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses) in 2006 decreased by $110,000 compared to 2005 primarily due to
the reduction of interest income from reduced cash balances.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spain |
|
|
Ireland |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
16,239 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
(2,482 |
) |
|
$ |
13,786 |
|
Drug delivery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,447 |
) |
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
|
(7,730 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) before income
taxes |
|
|
16,239 |
|
|
|
(10,418 |
) |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
6,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
5,749 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
(1,982 |
) |
|
|
(667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
11,157 |
|
|
$ |
(10,418 |
) |
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective October 2005, we executed intercompany agreements between Bentley
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bentley Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited to license non-U.S. rights of
certain technologies owned by Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and provide for cost-sharing of
subsequent development efforts on those technologies. A net benefit of approximately $10,376,000
has been recorded to the U.S. income from operations (and a corresponding reduction to Irish income
from operations) in 2006 as a result of these agreements.
50
In 2006, we generated U.S. income before income taxes of approximately $235,000, compared to
approximately $1,042,000 in 2005. In both periods, we utilized U.S. federal net operating loss
carry-forwards in order to offset the resulting income tax liability. During 2006, approximately
$6,232,000 of U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards expired unutilized. As of December 31,
2006, the remaining U.S. federal net operating loss carry-forwards were approximately $50,216,000.
Bentley Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited generated a net operating loss of approximately $10,418,000
in 2006. As future operating profits cannot be reasonably assured, no tax benefit has been
recorded for these losses. Accordingly, we have established a valuation allowance equal to the
full amount of the deferred tax assets in Ireland.
Should we determine that it is more likely than not that we will realize certain of our net
deferred tax assets for which we have previously provided a valuation allowance, an adjustment
would be required to reduce the existing valuation allowance. In addition, we operate within
multiple taxing jurisdictions and are subject to audit in those jurisdictions. These audits can
involve complex issues, which may require an extended period of time for resolution. We have tax
contingencies totaling $530,000 at December 31, 2006, all of which have been recorded in prior
years. No additional potential tax contingencies were considered to be probable and reasonably
estimable as of December 31, 2006. However, there is the possibility that the ultimate resolution
of such potential contingencies could have an adverse effect on our Consolidated Financial
Statements in the future.
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
December 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Specialty Generics |
|
$ |
8,696 |
|
|
$ |
11,532 |
|
|
$ |
(2,836 |
) |
|
|
-25 |
% |
Drug Delivery |
|
|
(7,722 |
) |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
(7,109 |
) |
|
|
-1160 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net income |
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
$ |
10,919 |
|
|
$ |
(9,945 |
) |
|
|
-91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
(0.47 |
) |
|
|
-92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
(0.44 |
) |
|
|
-92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
22,141 |
|
|
|
21,558 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
23,068 |
|
|
|
22,929 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We reported 2006 income from operations of $5,437,000, compared to 2005 income from operations
of $15,666,000. In 2006, the combination of income from operations of $5,437,000 and the
non-operating items, primarily the provision for income taxes of $5,082,000, resulted in 2006 net
income of $974,000, or $.04 per basic common share ($.04 per diluted common share) on 22,141,000
weighted average basic common shares outstanding (23,068,000 weighted average diluted common shares
outstanding), compared to 2005 net income of $10,919,000, or $.51 per basic common share ($.48 per
diluted common share) on 21,558,000 weighted average basic common shares outstanding (22,929,000
weighted average diluted common shares outstanding).
51
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared To Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
2004 |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Generics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net product sales |
|
$ |
91,308 |
|
|
|
93 |
% |
|
$ |
69,942 |
|
|
|
95 |
% |
|
$ |
21,366 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
Licensing and collaboration
revenues |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
-55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,581 |
|
|
|
93 |
% |
|
|
70,549 |
|
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
21,032 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drug Delivery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing and collaboration revenues |
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3,305 |
|
|
|
116 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
97,730 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
73,393 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
24,337 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues for 2005 increased 33% from 2004. Growth was driven primarily by increased
net product sales. The increase in licensing and collaboration revenues was due to increased
royalty revenues from sales of Testim and included $1,092,000 resulting from a revised estimate of
sell-through of prescriptions dispensed that was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005.
The following is a summary of our revenues by sales channel and top-selling product lines:
For the year ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues Within Spain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outside of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
Product Line |
|
Generics |
|
Generics |
|
Other |
|
Spain |
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
Omeprazole |
|
$ |
2,779 |
|
|
$ |
15,394 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,173 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Simvastatin |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
5,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,746 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Enalapril |
|
|
4,153 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,859 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Paroxetine |
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
3,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,455 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Codeisan |
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
All other products |
|
|
9,225 |
|
|
|
9,812 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
20,820 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Sales to licensees and others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,589 |
|
|
|
20,225 |
|
|
|
31,814 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
Licensing and collaborations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
6,148 |
|
|
|
6,422 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
22,601 |
|
|
$ |
35,110 |
|
|
$ |
12,134 |
|
|
$ |
27,885 |
|
|
$ |
97,730 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
% of 2005 Revenues |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
52
For the year ended December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenues Within Spain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outside of |
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
Product Line |
|
Generics |
|
Generics |
|
Other |
|
Spain |
|
Total |
|
Revenues |
|
Omeprazole |
|
$ |
2,721 |
|
|
$ |
13,520 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,241 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
Simvastatin |
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,030 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Enalapril |
|
|
3,192 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,435 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Paroxetine |
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
2,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,973 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Codeisan |
|
|
3,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,131 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
All other products |
|
|
6,910 |
|
|
|
7,690 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
16,342 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
Sales to licensees and others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,502 |
|
|
|
10,288 |
|
|
|
20,790 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Licensing and collaborations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
3,451 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
18,391 |
|
|
$ |
29,019 |
|
|
$ |
11,685 |
|
|
$ |
14,298 |
|
|
$ |
73,393 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
% of 2004 Revenues |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Spanish Operations. The increase in net product sales for the year ended December 31,
2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004 was primarily due to: (1) increased sales to
licensees and others totaling $11,024,000 fueled primarily by sales outside of Spain; and (2) an
aggregate increase totaling $5,072,000 in sales of our three top selling product lines (omeprazole,
simvastatin and enalapril). Sales of active pharmaceutical ingredients from our API manufacturing
facility (included in All other products in the tables above) added $1,783,000 to consolidated
revenues in 2005.
Branded Generic Pharmaceutical Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
2004 |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branded Generic Product Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enalapril |
|
$ |
4,153 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
$ |
3,192 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
$ |
961 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
Codeisan |
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
3,131 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Omeprazole |
|
|
2,779 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
2,721 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Simvastatin |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
1,39 |
|
|
|
2 8 |
% |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Lansoprazole |
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All other branded products |
|
|
8,706 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
7,924 |
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total branded generic sales |
|
$ |
22,601 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
18,391 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
4,210 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of our branded generic pharmaceutical products accounted for 23% of total revenues
in 2005 and increased 23%, or approximately $4,210,000 over branded generic sales in 2004.
Enalapril, Codeisan and omeprazole were our top-selling branded generic products in 2005 and
accounted for approximately 46% of branded generic sales in 2005. Sales of lansoprazole, a branded
generic pharmaceutical launched in December 2004, increased to $1,856,000 in 2005 compared to
approximately $31,000 in 2004.
53
Generic Pharmaceutical Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
2004 |
|
% |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generic Product Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omeprazole |
|
$ |
15,394 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
$ |
13,520 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
$ |
1,874 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Simvastatin |
|
|
5,080 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
Paroxetine |
|
|
3,118 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
2,928 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Pentoxifylline |
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
2,622 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
-3 |
% |
Trimetazidine |
|
|
2,214 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
1,983 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
All other generic products |
|
|
6,764 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
4,328 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total generic sales |
|
$ |
35,110 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
29,019 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
6,091 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of our generic pharmaceutical products accounted for 36% of total revenues during
2005 and increased 21%, or approximately $6,091,000 over generic sales in 2004. Omeprazole,
simvastatin and paroxetine were our top-selling generic products in 2005 and accounted for 58% of
the generic pharmaceutical product growth from 2004. Additionally, sales of our generic
formulations of ibuprofen, enalapril, lansoprazole, and mirtazapine (included in All other generic
products above) accounted for approximately 26% of the growth in 2005 generic pharmaceutical
product sales.
Sales to Licensees and Others
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to licensees and
others |
|
$ |
31,814 |
|
|
$ |
20,790 |
|
|
$ |
11,024 |
|
|
|
53 |
% |
Sales to licensees and others increased $11,024,000 or 53% to $31,814,000 in 2005. An
increase in the weighted average value of the Euro, in relation to the U.S. Dollar, had the effect
of decreasing 2005 revenues from sales to licensees and others by approximately $223,000, or less
than 1.0%.
Licensing and Collaboration Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
$ |
(334 |
) |
|
|
-55 |
% |
Drug delivery |
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
3,305 |
|
|
|
116 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,422 |
|
|
$ |
3,451 |
|
|
$ |
2,971 |
|
|
|
86 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing and collaboration revenues accounted for approximately 7% of total revenues in
2005 and increased by approximately $2,971,000, or approximately 86% from 2004. These revenues
included royalties totaling $6,132,000 from the commercialization and continued sales of Testim.
Licensing and collaboration revenues in 2005 includes a change in our estimate of royalty revenues
earned on Testim sales of approximately $1,092,000, which was recorded in the fourth quarter of
2005. This change in our estimate of royalty revenues earned was based upon publicly available data
determined to be more accurate than the source of data previously relied upon by management in
recording estimated royalty revenues on Testim sales. Also included in licensing and collaboration
revenues in 2005 were revenues of approximately $274,000 related to product licensing activities in
Europe.
54
Gross Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
45,420 |
|
|
$ |
35,656 |
|
|
$ |
9,764 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
Drug delivery |
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
|
2,844 |
|
|
|
3,305 |
|
|
|
116 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
51,569 |
|
|
$ |
38,500 |
|
|
$ |
13,069 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit increased by approximately $13,069,000, or 34%, in 2005, when compared to
2004. Gross margins on net product sales decreased from 50% in 2004 to 49% in 2005, primarily due
to a Spanish pharmaceutical tax of approximately $1,555,000 charged to cost of sales.
Selling and Marketing Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
16,347 |
|
|
$ |
14,808 |
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Drug delivery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,347 |
|
|
$ |
14,808 |
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses increased by approximately $1,539,000, or 10% in 2005 when
compared to 2004. We realized an increase of $21,366,000 in net product sales in 2005, or 31%,
partially through the efficient use of our selling and marketing resources. Selling and marketing
expenses decreased as a percentage of net product sales to 18% in 2005, compared to 21% in 2004.
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
8,930 |
|
|
$ |
6,706 |
|
|
$ |
2,224 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
Drug delivery |
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
|
2,179 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11,405 |
|
|
$ |
8,885 |
|
|
$ |
2,520 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses for 2005 increased 28% over 2004. The $2,520,000
increase was the result of increased general and administrative activities required to support our
continuing growth and prepare for our anticipated growth. These expenditures included increased
costs in 2005 for additional employees, outside services, insurance and other costs to support the
growth of our organization and costs associated with our response to the requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. General and administrative expenses as a percent of total revenues
were 12% in 2005, which is consistent with 2004. General and administrative expenses for 2005 and
2004 exclude $593,000 and $241,000 of legal expenses which have been reclassified to litigation
settlement on the Consolidated Income Statements to conform with the 2006 presentation.
Research and Development Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
1,378 |
|
|
$ |
1,249 |
|
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Drug delivery |
|
|
4,422 |
|
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
1,252 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,800 |
|
|
$ |
4,419 |
|
|
$ |
1,381 |
|
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
Research
and development expenses for 2005 increased approximately 31% compared to
2004. The increase is directly attributable to the advancement of our research and development
programs.
Other Income (Expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
1,372 |
|
|
$ |
(1,387 |
) |
|
|
-101 |
% |
Drug delivery |
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
|
$ |
(1,071 |
) |
|
|
-60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses) in 2005 decreased by $1,071,000 in 2005 when compared to 2004.
The other income reported in 2004 included the reversal of previously accrued tax assessments
totaling $1,467,000, partially offset by interest and penalties totaling $193,000 associated with
the settlement of the tax audit of our Spanish subsidiary. Other income (expenses) in 2005
included interest income of approximately $928,000 compared to approximately $548,000 in 2004,
which increase was due to rising interest rates.
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Spain |
|
|
Ireland |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty generics |
|
$ |
17,433 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
(406 |
) |
|
$ |
17,008 |
|
Drug delivery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,061 |
) |
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income ( loss) before income
taxes |
|
|
17,433 |
|
|
|
(2,080 |
) |
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
16,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (Benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
5,414 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
11,957 |
|
|
$ |
(2,080 |
) |
|
$ |
1,042 |
|
|
$ |
10,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We recorded provisions for foreign income taxes totaling $5,476,000 and $4,805,000
($4,201,000 plus a $604,000 tax audit settlement recorded as a result of the tax audit by Spanish
authorities of our Spanish subsidiary for the tax years 1998, 1999 and 2000) for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
In 2005, we generated U.S. income before income taxes of approximately $1,042,000, compared to
a loss before income taxes of approximately $2,913,000 in 2004. We utilized U.S federal net
operating loss carry-forwards in order to offset the resulting income tax liability. As of
December 31, 2005, the remaining U.S federal net operating loss carry-forwards were approximately
$53,514,000. Bentley Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited, which is reported in our European
operations, generated a net operating loss of approximately $2,080,000 in 2005. As future
operating profits were not reasonably assured, no tax benefit was recorded for those losses in
2005. Accordingly, we established a valuation allowance equal to the full amount of the deferred
tax assets in Ireland.
56
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
Specialty Generics |
|
$ |
11,532 |
|
|
$ |
8,292 |
|
|
$ |
3,240 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
Drug Delivery |
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
(2,602 |
) |
|
|
1,989 |
|
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net income |
|
$ |
10,919 |
|
|
$ |
5,690 |
|
|
$ |
5,229 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
21,558 |
|
|
|
20,901 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
22,929 |
|
|
|
22,627 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We reported 2005 income from operations of $15,666,000, compared to 2004 income from
operations of $8,695,000. In 2005, the combination of income from operations of $15,666,000 and
the non-operating items, primarily the provision for income taxes of $5,476,000, resulted in 2005
net income of $10,919,000, or $.51 per basic common share ($.48 per diluted common share) on
21,558,000 weighted average basic common shares outstanding (22,929,000 weighted average diluted
common shares outstanding), compared to 2004 net income of $5,690,000, or $.27 per basic common
share ($.25 per diluted common share) on 20,901,000 weighted average basic common shares
outstanding (22,627,000 weighted average diluted common shares outstanding).
57
Selected Quarterly Financial Data
The following table sets forth certain operating data for our last eight quarters. We have
derived this data from our unaudited quarterly financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005 |
|
|
Fiscal 2006 |
|
|
Three Months Ended (Unaudited) |
|
|
3/31/05 |
|
|
6/30/05 |
|
|
9/30/05 |
|
|
12/31/05(a) |
|
|
3/31/06 |
|
|
6/30/06 |
|
|
9/30/06(b)(c) |
|
|
12/31/06(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
24,244 |
|
|
$ |
24,764 |
|
|
$ |
23,512 |
|
|
$ |
25,210 |
|
|
|
28,278 |
|
|
|
28,983 |
|
|
|
25,156 |
|
|
|
27,054 |
|
Cost of net product sales |
|
|
11,452 |
|
|
|
11,367 |
|
|
|
11,104 |
|
|
|
12,238 |
|
|
|
12,933 |
|
|
|
12,471 |
|
|
|
11,778 |
|
|
|
12,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
12,792 |
|
|
|
13,397 |
|
|
|
12,408 |
|
|
|
12,972 |
|
|
|
15,345 |
|
|
|
16,512 |
|
|
|
13,378 |
|
|
|
14,386 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
9,145 |
|
|
|
9,408 |
|
|
|
8,730 |
|
|
|
8,620 |
|
|
|
11,991 |
|
|
|
11,580 |
|
|
|
19,085 |
|
|
|
11,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of license |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
operations |
|
|
3,647 |
|
|
|
3,989 |
|
|
|
3,678 |
|
|
|
4,352 |
|
|
|
3,354 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
(5,707 |
) |
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses) |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Provision (benefit) for
income taxes |
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
2,484 |
|
|
|
1,730 |
|
|
|
(1,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(loss) |
|
$ |
2,170 |
|
|
$ |
2,608 |
|
|
$ |
2,485 |
|
|
$ |
3,656 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
2,635 |
|
|
|
(7,229 |
) |
|
|
4,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(loss) per
common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common
shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
21,316 |
|
|
|
21,395 |
|
|
|
21,652 |
|
|
|
21,862 |
|
|
|
21,954 |
|
|
|
22,170 |
|
|
|
22,194 |
|
|
|
22,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
22,531 |
|
|
|
22,603 |
|
|
|
22,970 |
|
|
|
23,564 |
|
|
|
23,807 |
|
|
|
22,876 |
|
|
|
22,194 |
|
|
|
22,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 included a change in estimate of
royalty revenues earned of approximately $1,092,000 recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005.
This change in estimate of royalty revenues earned is based upon publicly available data
determined to be more accurate than the source of data previously relied upon by management
in estimating the sell-through of prescriptions dispensed. |
|
(b) |
|
Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 include an increase in royalty
revenues of approximately $479,000 recorded in the second quarter of 2006. This change in
estimate was due to the Companys ability to reasonably estimate future product returns on
sales of Testim based on actual historical data. |
|
(c) |
|
Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006 include litigation settlement
charges of approximately $7,546,000 recorded in the third
quarter of 2006 associated with the probable settlement of outstanding litigation
claims. The Company recorded a tax benefit of $2,746,000 in provision for
incomes taxes upon finalization of the settlement in the fourth
quarter of 2006. Operating expenses also include related legal defense costs of
$604,000, $733,000, $1,386,000 and $645,000 in first, second, third and fourth quarters of
2006, respectively. |
58
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Total assets increased 8% from $124,220,000 at December 31, 2005 to $134,356,000 at December
31, 2006 and stockholders equity increased 10% from $91,589,000 at December 31, 2005 to
$100,331,000 at December 31, 2006. The increase in stockholders equity primarily reflects net
income during the year of $974,000 and the effect of fluctuations in the U.S. Dollar/Euro exchange
rate, which resulted in a net increase of $7,112,000 on our balance sheet.
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities decreased 53% from $32,846,000 at December
31, 2005 to $15,601,000 at December 31, 2006. Uses of cash primarily included additions to fixed
assets totaling $15,313,000, additions to drug licenses and related costs of $2,772,000 and the net
effect of financing activities as discussed below. Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2006
included approximately $357,000 of short-term liquid investments considered to be cash equivalents.
Total receivables increased from $26,916,000 at December 31, 2005 to $32,963,000 at December
31, 2006. Receivables increased $3,129,000, or 12% when expressed in constant currency.
Receivables from one international customer totaled $2,579,000 at December 31, 2006; however, we
owed the same customer approximately $492,000 for co-marketing expenses at December 31, 2006.
Revenues from this customer are recorded net of the related co-marketing costs. Receivables from
our international customers generally have extended payment terms; however, we have not experienced
any material delinquencies on any of our receivables that have had a material effect on our
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Inventories increased approximately $4,132,000 from $12,147,000 at December 31, 2005 to
$16,279,000 at December 31, 2006. The increase was a result of
recording $1,338,000 of consigned
inventory in the fourth quarter of 2006, an increase of $1,440,000 due to changes in foreign
currency exchange rates and increased raw materials purchases in anticipation of future orders.
The combined total of accounts payable and accrued expenses decreased $620,000 from
$24,890,000 at December 31, 2005 to $24,270,000 at December 31, 2006. This decrease was due to a
$1,527,000 decrease in purchases of fixed assets in accounts payable and accrued expenses and an
$827,000 decrease in co-marketing costs to one of our customers. Those decreases were partially
offset by foreign currency fluctuations which increased accounts payable and accrued expenses by
$2,041,000.
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt decreased from $2,995,000 at
December 31, 2005 to $554,000 at December 31, 2006. The decrease was primarily due to $2,638,000 of
net repayment of short-term borrowings in the year. The weighted average interest rate on our
short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt at December 31, 2006 was 4.8%.
We recorded other liabilities totaling $4,257,000 in 2006, of which $1,518,000 was classified
as current on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, primarily resulting from the settlement of litigation
in the year. At December 31, 2006, we have recorded a liability of $3,590,000, representing the net
present value of the remaining settlement liability, of which $1,000,000 is classified as current.
Other current liabilities also included $481,000 of payments received from our selling agent in
anticipation of future sales of consigned inventories.
Operating activities in 2006 provided net cash of $4,502,000 compared to $12,596,000 in 2005.
Net income, which decreased to $974,000 in 2006, and changes in working capital accounted for the
majority of the increase in cash flows from operations.
59
Investing activities, primarily capital expenditures in Spain for land, improvements and
equipment to upgrade the capacity of our manufacturing facilities in Spain and to increase our
manufacturing and packaging capabilities with new high speed equipment, along with additions to
drug licenses and related costs, used net cash of $18,085,000 in 2006.
Financing activities during 2006 used net cash of $4,136,000, and primarily represented the
cash proceeds of approximately $450,000 received from the exercise of stock options, offset by the
following: (1) the remittance of employee tax withholding liabilities of approximately $1,948,000
resulting from stock option exercises, and (2) net repayments of short-term borrowings totaling
$2,638,000.
Long-term debt, which totaled $307,000 at December 31, 2006, is classified as current in
anticipation of repayment during 2007.
Contractual Obligations
We have fixed contractual obligations under various agreements. Our contractual obligations
were comprised of the following as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period |
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1 |
|
|
1 3 |
|
|
3 5 |
|
|
More than 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
Longterm debt |
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations (1) |
|
|
6,570 |
|
|
|
6,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities (2) |
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other longterm liabilities (2) |
|
|
2,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations (3)(4) |
|
$ |
13,433 |
|
|
$ |
9,819 |
|
|
$ |
2,701 |
|
|
$ |
913 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in purchase obligations are contractual obligations for the purchase of
machinery, construction and engineering services and a new inventory management software
application. The construction and engineering services and new inventory management
software application are associated with the expansion of our manufacturing facilities in
Zaragoza, Spain. Purchase orders or contracts for the purchase of raw materials and other
goods and services are not included in the table above as our purchase orders represent
authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements. For the purposes of this table,
contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services are defined as agreements that
are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including:
fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions;
and the approximate timing of the transaction. Our purchase orders are based on our
current manufacturing needs and are fulfilled by our vendors within short time frame. We
do not have agreements for the purchase of raw materials or other goods specifying minimum
quantities. We also enter into contracts for outsourced services including payroll,
information technology and maintenance; however, the obligations under these contracts are
not significant and the contracts contain clauses allowing for cancellation at will,
without significant penalty. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in other liabilities at December 31, 2006 are the present value of four
annual payments of $1,000,000 to be paid in connection with the settlement of litigation
in 2006 and the value of a |
60
|
|
hedging instrument obtained to reduce the currency risk on the settlement obligation, of
which $2,739,000 is classified as long-term. There were no other contractual obligations
included in other long-term liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December
31, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Not included in the chart above are key executive compensation agreements that
have been renewed whereby we are currently obligated to pay approximately $2,247,000 to
our key executives in 2007. Such agreements renew annually unless terminated by any of
the parties or amended by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. |
|
(4) |
|
Also not included in the chart above is an aggregate of $1,362,0000 of deferred
taxes due to be paid to the Spanish Ministry of Taxes over the next four years which
resulted from the sale of certain drug licenses in prior years. These non-current
deferred tax liabilities are netted against the Companys non-current deferred tax assets
on the 2006 Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
The expected timing of payments of the obligations discussed above are estimated based on
current information. Timing of payments and actual amounts paid may be different depending on the
time of receipt of goods or services or changes to agreed-upon amounts for obligations.
We paid $4,000,000 in connection with our legal settlement with Ethypharm in 2006 and are
obligated to make annual payments of $1,000,000 in each of the next four years according to the
terms of the settlement.
We plan to continue making improvements to our manufacturing facilities during 2007 that
include the acquisition of additional manufacturing equipment and expansion of our active
pharmaceutical ingredients manufacturing facility, in order to accommodate our expected growth. We
plan to invest $13.0 million to $16.0 million in capital expenditures during 2007, including
approximately $5.5 budgeted in 2006, that is now planned for 2007. We plan to finance these
expenditures from a combination of cash flow from operations, existing cash balances, and
borrowings, if required. We also plan to continue our investments in research and development
projects, primarily Nasulin, our intranasal insulin product candidate. Although cost estimates and
timing of our trials are subject to change, we expect consolidated research and development
expenses for 2007 to be approximately $15,000,000 to $16,000,000.
Seasonality, Effect of Inflation and Liquidity. In the past, we have experienced lower
sales in the third calendar quarter and higher sales in the fourth calendar quarter due to
seasonality of our pharmaceutical business. The extent of such variations are dependent upon the
severity of the cough, cold and flu season. As we market more pharmaceutical products whose sales
are seasonal, seasonality of sales may become more significant. Neither inflation nor changing
prices has materially affected our revenues or income from operations for the periods presented. We
expect to have sufficient liquidity to fund operations for at least the next twelve months. We
continue to search both domestically and internationally for opportunities that will enable us to
continue expanding our business and explore alternative financing sources for these activities,
including the possibility of public and/or private offerings of our securities. In appropriate
situations, that will be strategically determined, we may seek financial assistance from other
sources, including contribution by others to joint ventures and other collaborative or licensing
arrangements for the development, testing, manufacturing and marketing of products under
development.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item
303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.
61
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Certain of our accounting policies are particularly important to the portrayal of our
financial position, and results of operations and cash flows and require the application of
significant judgment by our management; as a result they are subject to an inherent degree of
uncertainty. In applying those policies, our management uses judgment to determine the appropriate
assumptions to be used in the determination of certain estimates. Those estimates are based on our
historical experience, terms of existing contracts, our observance of trends in the industry,
information provided by our customers and information available from other outside sources, as
appropriate. Our critical accounting policies and estimates include:
|
|
|
Revenue recognition and accounts receivable. |
|
O |
|
Revenue on product sales is recognized when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, the price is fixed and final, delivery has occurred and there
is a reasonable assurance of collection of the sales proceeds. We generally obtain
purchase authorizations from our customers for a specified amount of product at a
specified price and consider delivery to have occurred when the customer takes
possession of the products and/or risk of loss has passed to the customer. We
provide our customers with a limited right of return. Revenue is generally
recognized upon delivery of products, at which time a reserve for sales returns is
recorded. We have demonstrated the ability to make reasonable and reliable
estimates of product returns in accordance with SFAS No. 48, Revenue Recognition
When Right of Return Exists, and of allowances for doubtful accounts based on
significant historical experience. |
|
|
O |
|
Revenue from service, research and development, and licensing and
supply agreements is recognized when the service procedures have been completed or
as revenue recognition criteria have been met for each separate unit of accounting
(as defined in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21, Accounting for
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables). |
|
|
O |
|
We earn royalties from Auxilium sales of Testim, which incorporates our
CPE-215 permeation enhancement technology. Since 2003, Auxilium has sold Testim to
pharmaceutical wholesalers and chain drug stores, which have the right to return
purchased product prior to the units being dispensed through patient prescriptions.
Historically, customer returns were not able to be reasonably estimated. Therefore,
in accordance with SFAS No. 48, we deferred the recognition of royalty revenues on
product shipments of Testim, until the units were dispensed through patient
prescriptions. During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, we recorded an increase in
royalty revenues of approximately $479,000, or $0.02 per share, due to a change in
estimate which, based on historical experience, allowed us to reasonably estimate
future product returns on sales of Testim. |
|
|
O |
|
Accounts receivable are recorded at their net realizable value,
generally as products are shipped or services are performed. Receivable balances
are reported net of an estimated allowance for uncollectible accounts. Estimated
uncollectible receivables are based on the amount and status of past due accounts,
contractual terms with customers, the credit worthiness of customers and the
history of our uncollectible accounts. |
62
|
|
Inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being
determined on the first-in, first-out method. Reserves for slow moving and obsolete
inventories are provided based on historical experience and current product demand. We
evaluate the adequacy of these reserves quarterly. |
|
|
Drug licenses and related costs. Drug licenses and related costs incurred in connection
with acquiring licenses, patents and other proprietary rights related to our commercially
developed products are capitalized. Capitalized drug licenses and related costs are being
amortized on a straight-line basis for periods not exceeding 15 years from the dates of
acquisition. Carrying values of such assets are reviewed at least annually by comparing the
carrying amounts to their estimated undiscounted cash flows and adjustments are made for
any diminution in value. |
|
|
Share-based compensation. Commencing January 1, 2006, we began accounting for
share-based compensation in accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS
No. 123 (Revised). Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (Revised),
share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the
award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. Determining the fair
value of equity awards at the grant date requires judgment. We estimate the grant date fair
value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. This option
valuation model requires the input of subjective assumptions including: (1) Expected life -
the expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of options granted is estimated
based on historical exercise behaviors; (2) Volatility the volatility of the Companys
stock is calculated on the grant date of each equity award using daily price observations
over a period of time commensurate with the related requisite service period; (3) Risk-free
rate the risk-free interest rate is based on the yield curve of U.S. Treasury securities
in effect at the date of the grant, having a duration commensurate with the estimated life
of the award; and (4) Dividends as we have not declared dividends, and we do not expect
to declare dividends in the future, we include an annual dividend rate of 0% when
calculating the grant date fair value of equity awards. Because share-based compensation
expense is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it is reduced for estimated
forfeitures. SFAS No. 123 (Revised) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of
grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from
those estimates. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience. While we
recognize share-based compensation under the accelerated expense attribution method
pursuant to FASB Interpretation No. 28 for all options previously accounted for under APB
Opinion No. 25, we have elected to recognize share-based compensation attributable to
equity awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005 under the straight-line method which
is an alternative allowed for under SFAS No. 123 (Revised). Had we elected to recognize
compensation expense for new equity awards under the accelerated expense attribution
method, recognition of the related compensation expense would be front-loaded in the
requisite service period as opposed to being recognized evenly over the period. |
|
|
|
SFAS No. 123 (Revised) requires a company to calculate the pool of excess tax benefits, or
APIC Pool, available to absorb tax deficiencies recognized subsequent to adopting the
accounting standard, as if the company had adopted SFAS No. 123, as originally issued, at
its effective date in 1995. There are two allowable methods to calculate the hypothetical
APIC Pool: (1) the long form method as set forth in SFAS No. 123 (Revised) or (2) the
short form method as set forth in FASB Staff Position No. 123(R)-3. We have elected to use
the long form method under which we track each award grant on an employee-by-employee basis
and grant-by-grant basis to determine if there is a tax benefit or tax deficiency for such
award. We then compared the fair value expense to the tax deduction received for each grant
and aggregated the benefits and deficiencies to establish its hypothetical APIC Pool. |
63
|
|
|
Due to the adoption of SFAS No. 123 (Revised), some exercises result in tax deductions in
excess of previously recorded benefits based on the option value at the time of grant, or
windfalls. We recognize windfall tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options
directly to stockholders equity only when realized. Accordingly, deferred tax assets are
not recognized for net operating loss carryforwards resulting from windfall tax benefits
occurring from January 1, 2006 onward. A windfall tax benefit occurs when the actual tax
benefit realized by the company upon an employees disposition of a share-based award
exceeds the deferred tax asset, if any, associated with the award that the company had
recorded. |
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes. We have provided for current and deferred U.S. federal,
state and foreign income taxes for the current and all prior periods presented. Current
and deferred income taxes have been provided with respect to jurisdictions where certain of
our subsidiaries produce taxable income. We have provided a valuation allowance with
respect to the remainder of our deferred income taxes, consisting primarily of net
operating loss carryforwards in the U.S. and Ireland, because of uncertainty regarding
their realization. |
|
|
|
|
Should we determine that it is more likely than not that we will realize certain of our net
deferred tax assets for which we have previously provided a valuation allowance, an
adjustment would be required to reduce the existing valuation allowance. In addition, we
operate within multiple taxing jurisdictions and are subject to audit in those
jurisdictions. These audits can involve complex issues, which may require an extended
period of time for resolution. Although we believe that adequate consideration has been
made for such issues, there is the possibility that the ultimate resolution of such issues
could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows. |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation. The financial position, results of operations and cash
flows of our foreign subsidiaries are measured using local currency as the functional
currency. Assets and liabilities of each foreign subsidiary are translated at the rate of
exchange in effect at the end of the period. Revenues and expenses are translated at the
average exchange rate for the period. Foreign currency translation gains and losses are
credited to or charged against other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. Foreign currency gains and losses arising from cash transactions are credited to or
charged against current earnings. |
New Accounting Standards
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No.
(FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which we adopted effective January 1, 2007.
The purpose of FIN 48 is to clarify and set forth consistent rules for accounting for uncertain tax
positions in accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes by requiring the application
of a more likely than not threshold for the recognition and derecognition of tax positions.
Although we adopted FIN No. 48 effective January 1, 2007, we are still in the process of assessing
what impact, if any, the adoption of this statement will have on our consolidated financial
statements; however, based upon our initial assessment, we do not expect the adoption of FIN 48 to
have a material impact on the Consolidated Balance Sheets or the Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows.
On September 13, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 108 Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements (SAB 108), which provides interpretive guidance on how the
effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be considered in
quantifying a current year misstatement. We adopted SAB No. 108 effective December 31, 2006. The
adoption of SAB
64
108 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements in the year ended December
31, 2006.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157), which
provides guidance for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities, and requires expanded
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 indicates that fair value should be determined
based on the assumptions marketplace participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, and
provides additional guidelines to consider in determining the market-based measurement. We adopted
SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2007 and we do not expect this adoption to have a material impact
on our consolidated financial statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign Currency. A substantial amount of our business is conducted in Europe and is
therefore influenced to the extent to which there are fluctuations in the U.S. Dollars value
against other currencies, specifically the Euro. Assets and liabilities of each foreign subsidiary
are translated at the rate of exchange in effect at the end of the period. Revenues and expenses
are translated at the average exchange rate for the period. Exchange rates for periods ending and
ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Dollars per Euro |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Weighted average exchange rate |
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
Exchange rate |
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
The net effect of foreign currency translation on our Consolidated Balance Sheet during the year
ended December 31, 2006 was an increase of $7,112,000 and the cumulative historical effect was an
increase of $8,872,000, as reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as accumulated other
comprehensive income. The carrying value of assets and liabilities can be materially impacted by
foreign currency translation, as can the translated amounts of revenues and expenses. Nonetheless,
we do not plan to modify our business practices.
We have relied primarily upon financing activities to fund our operations in the U.S. In the
event that we are required to fund U.S. operations or cash needs with funds generated in Europe or
cash requirements in Europe with U.S. funds, currency rate fluctuations in the future could have a
significant impact on us. However, at the present time, we do not anticipate altering our business
plans and practices to compensate for future currency fluctuations.
Interest Rates. The weighted average interest rate on our short-term borrowings and
current portion of long-term debt was 4.8% and the balance outstanding was $554,000 as of December
31, 2006. All amounts are due within one year and have been classified as current on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The effect of an increase in the
interest rate of one percentage point (one hundred basis points) to 5.8% on short-term borrowings
and current portion of long-term debt would have the effect of increasing interest expense by
approximately $6,000 annually.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
See Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
65
|
|
|
Item 9. |
|
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our reports that are filed or submitted under the under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) with the Securities and Exchange Commission
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required for each report
and that such information is reported to our management, including our principal executive officer
and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) under the Exchange Act as of
the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of December 31, 2006.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange
Act. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework. Based on its assessment under the framework in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework, our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2006, our
internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006, has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears below.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) identified in connection with the evaluation of our
internal controls that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
66
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Exeter, New Hampshire
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Annual
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Companys management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the companys board of directors, management, and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including
the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based
on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained,
in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2006, based on
67
the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the Companys consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006
and 2005, and the related consolidated income statements, statements of changes in stockholders
equity, and statements of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2006, and our report dated March 15, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial
statements, and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Companys adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(Revised), Share-Based Payment.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 15, 2007
68
Item 9B. Other Information
Not applicable.
69
Part III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position |
James R. Murphy
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Michael McGovern
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Vice Chairman and Director |
John A. Sedor
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
President |
Richard P. Lindsay
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |
Adolfo Herrera
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Managing Director of European Subsidiaries |
Miguel Fernandez
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
Director |
F. Ross Johnson
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
Director |
Edward J. Robinson
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Director |
John W. Spiegel
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Lead Director |
James R. Murphy has served as one of our directors since 1993. Mr. Murphy was President of
Bentley from September 1994 until August 2005, was named Chief Executive Officer effective January
1995 and became Chairman of the Board in June 1995. Prior to rejoining Bentley, Mr. Murphy served
as Vice President of Business Development at MacroChem Corporation, a publicly owned pharmaceutical
and drug delivery company, from March 1993 through September 1994. From September 1992 until March
1993, Mr. Murphy served as a consultant in the pharmaceutical industry with his primary efforts
directed toward product licensing. Prior thereto, Mr. Murphy served as Director - Worldwide
Business Development and Strategic Planning of Bentley from December 1991 to September 1992. Mr.
Murphy previously spent 14 years in pharmaceutical research and product development with SmithKline
Corporation and in international business development with contract research and consulting
laboratories. Mr. Murphy received a B.A. in Biology from Millersville University.
Michael McGovern has served as one of our directors since 1997 and was named Vice Chairman of
Bentley in October 1999. Mr. McGovern serves as President of McGovern Enterprises, a provider of
corporate and financial consulting services, which he founded in 1975. Mr. McGovern is Chairman of
the Board of Training Solutions Interactive, Inc. and Vice Chairman of the Board of Employment
Technologies, Inc. and is a Director on the corporate board of the Reynolds Development Company.
Mr. McGovern received a B.S. and M.S. in accounting and his Juris Doctor from the University of
Illinois. Mr. McGovern is a Certified Public Accountant.
John A. Sedor joined Bentley as President in August 2005. From 2001 to May 2005, he served as
President and Chief Executive Officer for Sandoz Inc., based in Princeton, N.J. In this role, Mr.
Sedor oversaw all aspects of Sandoz, the North American arm of Novartis Generics where his
responsibilities included Sales and Marketing, Research and Development, Operations and Product
Manufacturing, Business Development and Strategy. From 1998-2001, he served as President and Chief
Executive
70
Officer of Verion, Inc., a technology company, where he was responsible for the creation, launch
and direction of the joint venture. Prior thereto, Mr. Sedor served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Centeon, a joint venture between two major multinational corporations,
Rhône-Poulenc Rorer and Hoechst AG. Prior thereto, Mr. Sedor served as Executive Vice President
at Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Revlon Healthcare and Parke Davis. Mr. Sedor received his BS,
Pharmacy/Chemistry from Duquesne University in 1970.
Richard P. Lindsay, joined Bentley as the Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of Bentley in September 2006. Previously, Mr. Lindsay was a self-employed independent
consultant since October 2005. Mr. Lindsay served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of StockerYale, Inc., a publicly traded photonics company, from August 2004 to October 2005
and was the Interim Controller of the University of Rhode Island from August 2003 to July 2004. Mr.
Lindsay also served as Chief Financial Officer of Boston Beer Company, a publicly traded brewer of
craft beers, from 1999 to 2003, where he was responsible for all finance, IT and business
development functions for the company. Prior to his employment with Boston Beer Company, Mr.
Lindsay served as a Senior Consultant for KPMG, LLP, an international accounting firm, after
completing his service in the U.S. Navy, Submarine Service. Mr. Lindsay received his MBA (honors)
from Northeastern University and a BS in Management with a concentration in Accounting and a minor
in Economics from the University of Massachusetts. He is a Certified Public Accountant.
Adolfo Herrera serves as Managing Director of our European Subsidiaries, and has been employed
as General Manager of Bentleys Spanish subsidiaries since 1999. Prior to joining Bentley in 1997,
Mr. Herrera served as General Manager of Laboratorios Llorente-Juventus Group from 1993 to 1997,
where he was employed since 1990. Prior thereto, Mr. Herrera was employed by the Public Health
Ministry in Spain. Mr. Herrera received his degree in Veterinary Medicine from Complutense
University in Madrid, Spain in 1982 and his MBA degree from Instituto de Empresas in Madrid, Spain
in 1994.
Miguel Fernandez has served as one of our directors since 1999. Mr. Fernandez served from 1980
to 1996 as President of the International Division and corporate Vice President at Carter-Wallace,
Inc., where he was responsible for all product lines outside of the United States. Prior thereto,
Mr. Fernandez was employed for approximately eight years by SmithKline & French, where his last
position was President of the division that included France, Portugal and Switzerland. Mr.
Fernandez attended the University of British Columbia in Canada and received an M.B.A. from the
Ivey School of Business at the University of Western Ontario in London, Ontario, Canada. Mr.
Fernandez has been retired since 1996.
F. Ross Johnson has served as one of our directors since 2004. Mr. Johnson has been the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of RJM Group, a management advisory and investment firm, since
1989. Prior to 1989, Mr. Johnson served as President and Chief Operating Officer of RJR/Nabisco,
Inc., a public diversified holding company, having held various senior executive positions in
RJR/Nabisco, Inc. and its predecessors, Standard Brands and Nabisco Brands since 1971. He received
a Bachelor of Commerce from the University of Manitoba, Canada and a Master of Commerce from the
University of Toronto, Canada. Mr. Johnson serves on the board of directors of AuthentiDate
Holding Corporation, EdgeStone Capital Partners, and serves on the advisory boards of Wachovia
Bank-Florida, Bennett Advisory Group Palm Beach, Quebecor Ontario, University of Toronto, and
Black & McDonald Ltd.
Edward J. Robinson has served as one of our directors since 2004. Mr. Robinson served as
Chief Operating Officer of Meditrust Operating Company, a healthcare REIT, in 1998. Previously he
was the President and Chief Operating Officer of Avon Products, Inc., a public beauty products
company, from 1993 to 1997, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Avon
Products, Inc. from 1989 to 1992. Prior thereto, he held various positions with RJR Nabisco and
its predecessor companies, Standard Brands and Nabisco Brands, including Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President
71
Treasurer and Senior Vice President Controller. Mr. Robinson servers on the board of directors
of Medical Staffing Network Holdings, Inc. and also serves on the Advisory Board of W.R. Capital
Management L.P. He received a B.A. in Business Administration from Iona College. Mr. Robinson is a
Certified Public Accountant licensed by the State of New York. Mr. Robinson has been retired since
1998.
John W. Spiegel has served as one of our directors since June 2002. Mr. Spiegel served as Vice
Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of SunTrust Banks, Inc. from August 2000 until August 2004.
Prior to August 2000, Mr. Spiegel was an Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
SunTrust Banks since 1985. Mr. Spiegel also serves on the Board of Directors of HomeBanc Corp.,
Rock-Tenn Company, S1 Corporation and Colonial Properties Trust. Mr. Spiegel is also a trustee of
Childrens Healthcare of Atlanta, and is a member of the Deans Advisory Council of the Goizueta
Business School at Emory University. Mr. Spiegel received an MBA from Emory University.
Audit Committee
The information called for by this item regarding Bentleys Audit Committee, including the
Committees financial expert, is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2007
Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our executive
officers and directors, and any persons who own more than 10% of any class of our equity
securities, to file certain reports relating to their ownership of such securities and changes in
such ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange and to
furnish us with copies of such reports. To the best of our knowledge during the year ended
December 31, 2006, all Section 16(a) filing requirements have been satisfied.
Other Information
As required by Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, on
June 19, 2006, our Chief Executive Officer submitted the Annual CEO Certification to the New York
Stock Exchange, certifying that he was not aware of any violation by Bentley of the New York Stock
Exchanges corporate governance listing standards, without qualification.
We filed with the SEC as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (which exhibits are identified as Exhibit 31.1 and Exhibit 31.2) certifications
by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer regarding the quality of our public
disclosures in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Audit Committee
Procedures for Handling Complaints, Nominating and Governance Committee Charter, Audit Committee
Charter and Compensation Committee Charter are available on our
website at www.bentleypharm.com.
The information is also available in print to any shareholder who requests it. Additionally,
copies of reports filed by us pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, including Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on
Form 8-K may be accessed from the our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable
after we electronically file such reports with, or furnish such reports to, the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Alternatively, these reports can be accessed through a query at the website
of the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.
72
Our Board of Directors consists of six directors, four of whom (Messrs. John W. Spiegel,
Miguel Fernandez, F. Ross Johnson and Edward J. Robinson) are considered to be independent in
accordance with the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange and Rule 10A-3 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All four of the independent directors serve on our
Audit Committee. Since his retirement in 2004 as the Chief Financial Officer of SunTrust Banks,
Inc., John W. Spiegel has agreed to serve on a fourth public company audit committee, in addition
to his service for Bentley and two others. The Board of Directors has determined that in Mr.
Spiegels current circumstances this simultaneous service does not impair his ability to serve on
the Audit Committee of Bentley.
John W. Spiegel has been selected as the Lead Director (or Presiding Director) of our Board of
Directors. Mr. Spiegel presides at executive sessions of meetings of our non-management and
independent directors. Interested parties who wish to send communications on any topic to Mr.
Spiegel, the presiding director and the Chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee or
to Bentleys Board of Directors as a group, should address such communications to the Chairman of
the Nominating and Governance Committee, c/o the Corporate Secretary, Bentley Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., Bentley Park, 2 Holland Way, Exeter, New Hampshire, 03833.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics which applies to all of our
employees and directors, including our principal executive officer, principal financial
officer and principal accounting officer. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is
available on our website at www.bentleypharm.com and is also available in print to any
shareholder who requests it.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information called for by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement
for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
|
Item 12. |
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters |
The information called for by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement
for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
The information called for by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement
for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information called for by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement
for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
73
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page Herein |
(a) |
|
The following documents are filed as a part of this report: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Financial Statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements of Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and Subsidiaries
|
|
F-1 to F-36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Financial Statement Schedules: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Exhibits See index beginning on page 75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) The exhibits filed as a part of this annual report on Form 10-K are listed on the Exhibit Index
immediately preceding the signature page. The Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
74
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended and restated. (Reference is
made to Appendix B to the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders filed on May 18, 1999, Commission File No. 1-10581, which
exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amendment of Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant. (Reference is made
to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004,
Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended and restated. (Reference is made to Exhibit 3.1
to the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, Commission File
No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Renewed Rights Agreement dated as of December 21, 2004 between Bentley
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent,
including the form of Rights certificate as Exhibit B thereto and the Summary of
Rights to Purchase Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock as Exhibit C thereto.
(Reference is made to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Form 8-K, filed on December 21,
2004, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Registrants Amended and Restated 1991 Stock Option Plan. (Reference is made to
Appendix D to the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders filed on May 18, 1999, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is
incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Form of Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Registrants 1991 Stock
Option Plan. (Reference is made to Exhibit 4.25 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the
year ended June 30, 1992, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated
herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.3*
|
|
Registrants 2001 Employee Stock Option Plan. (Reference is made to Appendix B to
the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
filed on April 9, 2001, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated
herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.4*
|
|
Registrants 2001 Directors Stock Option Plan. (Reference is made to Appendix C to
the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
filed on April 9, 2001, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated
herein by reference.) |
75
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.5*
|
|
Form of Stock Option contract under the Registrants 2001 Employee Stock Option
Plan. (Reference is made to Exhibit 4.8 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated
herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.6*
|
|
Form of Stock Option contract under the Registrants 2001 Directors Stock Option
Plan. (Reference is made to Exhibit 4.9 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated
herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.7*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Registrants 2001 Employee Stock Option Plan. (Reference is
made to Exhibit 4.10 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.8*
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Registrants 2001 Employee Stock Option Plan. (Reference is
made to Exhibit 4.11 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.9*
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Registrants 2001 Directors Stock Option Plan. (Reference is
made to Exhibit 4.12 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.10*
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Registrants 2001 Directors Stock Option Plan. (Reference is
made to Exhibit 4.13 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.11*
|
|
Form of Incentive Stock Option Certificate under the Registrants Amended and
Restated 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, Commission File No.
1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.12*
|
|
Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Certificate under the Registrants Amended and
Restated 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, Commission File No.
1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan.
(Reference is made to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K
dated May 23, 2006, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein
by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Certificate (Non-employee Directors) under the
Registrants Amended and Restated 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan. (Reference is made
to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,
Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
76
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.15
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Certificate (Employees) under the Registrants Amended
and Restated 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.3 of
the Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Commission File No.
1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.16*
|
|
Ordinary Labor Contract dated as of February 12, 1998 between the Registrants
wholly-owned subsidiary, Laboratorios Belmac, S.A. and Adolfo Herrera. (Reference is
made to Exhibit 10.26 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.17*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2002 between the Registrant and James R.
Murphy. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registrants
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, Commission File No. 1-10581, which
exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.18*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of August 27, 2005 between the Registrant and John A.
Sedor. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2005, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is
incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.19*
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of September 11, 2006 by and between the Registrant
and Richard P. Lindsay. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K dated September 11, 2006, Commission File No. 1-10581, which
exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.20*
|
|
Separation Agreement dated as of September 15, 2006 by and between the Registrant
and Michael D. Price. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K dated September 11, 2006, Commission File No. 1-10581, which
exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.21*
|
|
Information on remuneration of non-employee members of the Board of Directors.
(Reference is made to Item 1.01 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated
May 23, 2006, Commission File No. 1-10581, which item is incorporated herein by
reference.) |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement between the Registrant and Yungtai Hsu dated February 1,
1999, effective as of December 31, 1998. (Reference is made to Exhibit 7.1 to the
Registrants Form 8-K filed on February 26, 1999, Commission File No. 1-10581, which
exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
License Agreement between the Registrant and Auxilium A2, Inc. dated May
31, 2000, including Amendment No. 1 thereto dated October 2000 and Amendment No. 2
dated May 31, 2001. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.10 to Amendment No. 2 to the
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, Commission File No.
1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
77
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.24
|
|
Supply Agreement, License Agreement and Rights Agreement between Laboratorios
Belmac, S.A., Laboratorios Davur, S.L. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. dated
July 18, 2000. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.12 to Amendment No. 2 to the
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, Commission File No.
1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.25
|
|
Amendment No. 3 dated September 6, 2002 to License Agreement between the Registrant
and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. dated May 31, 2000. (Reference is made to Exhibit
10.10 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, Commission
File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.26
|
|
Amendment No. 4 dated March 25, 2004 to License Agreement between the Registrant and
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. dated May 31, 2000. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.26
to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, Commission File
No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
License Agreement between the Registrant and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. dated
May 31, 2001 relating to products using Dihydrotestosterone. (Reference is made to
Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002,
Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.28
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated September 6, 2002 to License Agreement between the Registrant
and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. dated May 31, 2001 related to products using
Dihydrotestosterone. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrants Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002, Commission File No. 1-10581, which exhibit is
incorporated herein by reference.) |
|
|
|
10.29
|
|
Settlement Term Sheet Agreement, dated September 29, 2006, between Ethypharm S.A.
France, Ethypharm S.A. Spain, the Registrant and Laboratorios Belmac S. A. |
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
78
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
|
|
Filed herewith. |
79
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BENTLEY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ James R. Murphy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Murphy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 15, 2007 |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
/s/ James R. Murphy
|
|
Chairman, Chief
|
|
March 15, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Murphy
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
and Director (principal |
|
|
|
|
executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael McGovern
|
|
Vice Chairman and Director
|
|
March 15, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Michael McGovern |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard P. Lindsay
|
|
Vice-President,
|
|
March 15, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Richard P. Lindsay
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, |
|
|
|
|
Treasurer and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
(principal financial officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert P. Hebert
|
|
Controller, Assistant Treasurer
|
|
March 15, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Robert P. Hebert
|
|
and Assistant Secretary |
|
|
|
|
(principal accounting officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Miguel Fernandez
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Miguel Fernandez |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ F. Ross Johnson
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
F. Ross Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward J. Robinson
|
|
Director
|
|
March 15, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Edward J. Robinson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John W. Spiegel
|
|
Lead Director
|
|
March 15, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
John W. Spiegel |
|
|
|
|
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements of
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 |
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Income Statements for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 |
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 |
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 |
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
F-8 |
|
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Exeter, New Hampshire
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated income
statements, statements of changes in stockholders equity, and statements of cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (Revised), Share-Based Payment,
effective January 1, 2006.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
March 15, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on managements assessment of the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 15, 2007
F-2
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
12,424 |
|
|
$ |
32,384 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
3,177 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
32,963 |
|
|
|
26,916 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
16,279 |
|
|
|
12,147 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
67,690 |
|
|
|
75,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets, net |
|
|
48,556 |
|
|
|
33,366 |
|
Drug licenses and related costs, net |
|
|
16,026 |
|
|
|
13,858 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
66,666 |
|
|
|
49,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
134,356 |
|
|
$ |
124,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
14,566 |
|
|
$ |
15,462 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
9,704 |
|
|
|
9,428 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
2,608 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
27,387 |
|
|
|
28,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,665 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
3,899 |
|
|
|
2,286 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
6,638 |
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, authorized 2,000 shares,
issued and outstanding, none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.02 par value, authorized 100,000 shares,
issued and outstanding, 22,262 and 21,923 shares |
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
140,030 |
|
|
|
139,381 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(49,016 |
) |
|
|
(49,990 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
8,872 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
100,331 |
|
|
|
91,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
134,356 |
|
|
$ |
124,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-3
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Income Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net product sales |
|
$ |
100,590 |
|
|
$ |
91,308 |
|
|
$ |
69,942 |
|
Licensing and collaboration revenues |
|
|
8,881 |
|
|
|
6,422 |
|
|
|
3,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
109,471 |
|
|
|
97,730 |
|
|
|
73,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of net product sales |
|
|
49,850 |
|
|
|
46,161 |
|
|
|
34,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
59,621 |
|
|
|
51,569 |
|
|
|
38,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
16,153 |
|
|
|
16,347 |
|
|
|
14,808 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
14,801 |
|
|
|
11,405 |
|
|
|
8,885 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
10,459 |
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
4,419 |
|
Litigation settlement |
|
|
10,914 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,895 |
|
|
|
1,758 |
|
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
54,222 |
|
|
|
35,903 |
|
|
|
29,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of drug license |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
5,437 |
|
|
|
15,666 |
|
|
|
8,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
6,056 |
|
|
|
16,395 |
|
|
|
10,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
4,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
$ |
10,919 |
|
|
$ |
5,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
22,141 |
|
|
|
21,558 |
|
|
|
20,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
23,068 |
|
|
|
22,929 |
|
|
|
22,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-4
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
$0.02 Par Value |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Purchase |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at January
1, 2004 |
|
|
20,573 |
|
|
$ |
412 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
136,850 |
|
|
$ |
(66,599 |
) |
|
$ |
5,169 |
|
|
$ |
76,165 |
|
Comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,690 |
|
Other
comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,553 |
|
|
|
4,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock
options/warrants |
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
3,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,074 |
|
Equity-based
compensation |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December
31, 2004 |
|
|
21,312 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,418 |
|
|
|
(60,909 |
) |
|
|
9,722 |
|
|
|
89,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,919 |
|
Other
comprehensive
loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency
translation
Adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,962 |
) |
|
|
(7,962 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,075 |
|
Purchase of
treasury shares |
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,321 |
) |
Equity-based
compensation |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December
31, 2005 |
|
|
21,923 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,381 |
|
|
|
(49,990 |
) |
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
91,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
974 |
|
Other
comprehensive
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,112 |
|
|
|
7,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock
options |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,952 |
|
Purchase of
treasury shares |
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,450 |
) |
Equity-based
compensation |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December
31, 2006 |
|
|
22,262 |
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
140,030 |
|
|
$ |
(49,016 |
) |
|
$ |
8,872 |
|
|
$ |
100,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-5
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
$ |
10,919 |
|
|
$ |
5,690 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,570 |
|
|
|
5,096 |
|
|
|
3,918 |
|
Foreign currency gains |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of drug license |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-based compensation expense |
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Change in fair value of derivative
instrument |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-cash items |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in assets and
increase (decrease) in liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(3,129 |
) |
|
|
(2,529 |
) |
|
|
(7,715 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(2,691 |
) |
|
|
(3,701 |
) |
|
|
(2,083 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(1,731 |
) |
|
|
(1,160 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
(809 |
) |
|
|
(398 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(2,663 |
) |
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
4,022 |
|
Deferred income |
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
1,305 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
4,070 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities |
|
|
4,502 |
|
|
|
12,596 |
|
|
|
4,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to fixed assets |
|
|
(15,313 |
) |
|
|
(11,018 |
) |
|
|
(10,049 |
) |
Additions to drug licenses and related costs |
|
|
(2,772 |
) |
|
|
(2,045 |
) |
|
|
(1,204 |
) |
Proceeds from maturity of investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
150,352 |
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(2,409 |
) |
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
(149,477 |
) |
Purchase of API manufacturing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(20,494 |
) |
|
|
(13,063 |
) |
|
|
(13,687 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued on following page)
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-6
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Concluded)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options/warrants |
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
2,028 |
|
|
$ |
3,083 |
|
Remittance of employee tax liabilities in exchange for
common stock tendered to the Company |
|
|
(1,948 |
) |
|
|
(2,292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings |
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
5,759 |
|
Repayment of borrowings |
|
|
(4,281 |
) |
|
|
(1,659 |
) |
|
|
(5,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(4,136 |
) |
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
|
|
3,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(19,960 |
) |
|
|
(1,846 |
) |
|
|
(5,163 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
32,384 |
|
|
|
34,230 |
|
|
|
39,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
12,424 |
|
|
$ |
32,384 |
|
|
$ |
34,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company paid cash during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
204 |
|
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign income taxes |
|
$ |
4,555 |
|
|
$ |
4,231 |
|
|
$ |
4,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Financing and Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has issued Common Stock as equity-based compensation in
lieu of cash during the year as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts included in accounts payable at end of year for fixed asset
and drug license purchases |
|
$ |
1,869 |
|
|
$ |
2,675 |
|
|
$ |
3,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-7
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
NOTE 1 HISTORY AND OPERATIONS
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries (which may be referred to as Bentley
Pharmaceuticals, Bentley, or the Company), headquartered in the U.S., is an international specialty
pharmaceutical company, incorporated in the State of Delaware, focused on:
|
|
|
Specialty Generics: development, licensing and sales of generic and branded generic
pharmaceutical products and active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) and the manufacturing
of pharmaceuticals for others; and |
|
|
|
|
Drug Delivery: research, development and licensing/commercialization of advanced drug
delivery technologies and pharmaceutical products. |
Bentleys pharmaceutical product sales and licensing activities are based primarily in Spain,
where it has a significant commercial presence and manufactures and markets approximately 118
products of various dosages and strengths through three wholly-owned Spanish subsidiaries:
Laboratorios Belmac, Laboratorios Davur and Laboratorios Rimafar. Bentleys products include
approximately 167 product presentations (stock keeping units, or SKUs) in four primary therapeutic
areas: cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, central nervous system and infectious diseases. Although
most of the Companys sales of these products are currently in the Spanish market, it has recently
focused on increasing sales in other European countries and other geographic regions through
strategic alliances with companies in these territories. The Company continually adds to its
product portfolio in response to increasing market demand for generic and branded generic
therapeutic agents and, when appropriate, divests portfolio products considered to be redundant or
that have become non-strategic. The Company manufactures its finished dosage pharmaceutical
products in its Spanish manufacturing facility which recently received approval from the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) for the manufacture of Companys first U.S. generic product which
was launched in the fourth quarter of 2006. The Company owns a manufacturing facility in Spain that
specializes in the manufacturing of several API. This facility has also been approved by the FDA
for the manufacture of one ingredient for marketing and sale in the U.S. The Company markets its
API products through its Spanish subsidiary, Bentley A.P.I. The Company also has an Irish
subsidiary, Bentley Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited, which received its first marketing approval by
the Irish Medicines Board in 2005 and launched its first product in the fourth quarter of 2006.
The Company has U.S. and international patents and other proprietary rights to technologies
that facilitate the absorption of drugs. Bentley is developing products that incorporate its drug
delivery technologies and has licensed applications of its proprietary CPE-215® drug delivery
technology to Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which launched Testim® in the U.S. market in February
2003. Testim, which incorporates Bentleys CPE-215 drug delivery technology, is a gel indicated
for testosterone replacement therapy. Bentley continues to seek other pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies to form additional strategic alliances to facilitate the development and
commercialization of other products using its drug delivery technologies, including product
candidates that deliver insulin to diabetic patients intranasally, deliver macromolecule
therapeutics using a biodegradable NanocapletTM technology and treat nail fungus
infections topically.
F-8
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
NOTE 2
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of consolidation and foreign currency translation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Pharma de Espana, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries,
Bentley A.P.I. S.L. and Laboratorios Belmac S.A. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Laboratorios
Davur S.L. and Laboratorios Rimafar S.L.; Bentley Park, LLC; Bentley Healthcare Corporation and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Belmac Hygiene, Inc.; Belmac Health Corporation; Belmac Holdings,
Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Belmac A.I., Inc.; B.O.G. International Finance, Inc.; Belmac
Jamaica, Ltd.; and Bentley Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited. All intercompany balances have been
eliminated in consolidation. The financial position and results of operations of the Companys
foreign subsidiaries are measured using local currency as the functional currency. Assets and
liabilities of each foreign subsidiary are translated at the rate of exchange in effect at the end
of the period. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate for the period.
Foreign currency translation gains and losses are credited to or charged against other
comprehensive income in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Foreign currency gains and losses arising
from cash transactions are credited to or charged against current earnings. Exchange rates as of,
and for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollars per Euro |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Weighted average exchange rate |
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
Exchange rate |
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
The net effect of foreign currency translation on the Companys net assets during the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was an increase of $7,112,000, a decrease of $7,962,000 and an
increase of $4,553,000, respectively, which have been included in other comprehensive income. The
cumulative historical effect of foreign currency translation as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 was
an increase of $8,872,000 and $1,760,000, respectively, as reflected in accumulated other
comprehensive income.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with remaining maturities of three months
or less when purchased to be cash equivalents for purposes of classification in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Investments in securities that do not
meet the definition of cash equivalents are classified as marketable securities in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets.
Included in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2006 and 2005 are approximately $357,000
and $11,513,000, respectively, of short-term investments considered to be cash equivalents, as the
original maturity dates of such investments were three months or less when purchased.
F-9
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The Company acquired intellectual property during the year ended December 31, 2003 for
$1,000,000 plus future royalties on sales and licensing income. In connection with the acquisition,
the Company obtained a renewable, irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $1,000,000 in favor
of the assignor to guarantee future royalty payments. The $1,000,000 used to secure the letter of
credit has been classified as restricted cash in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31,
2006 and 2005.
Marketable securities
The Company has investments in Spanish government treasury bills, with maturities of greater
than three months when purchased, totaling $3,177,000 and $462,000 as of December 31, 2006 and
2005, respectively, which are classified as available-for-sale. The Companys investments are
carried at amortized cost, which approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these
investments. Accordingly, no unrealized gains or losses have been recognized with respect to these
investments. Should the fair values differ significantly from the amortized costs, changes in fair
market value resulting in unrealized gains or losses would be included as a component of other
comprehensive income.
Accounts receivable and allowances for doubtful accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded at their net realizable value, generally as products are
shipped or services are performed. Receivable balances are reported net of an estimated allowance
for uncollectible accounts. Estimated uncollectible receivables are based on the amount and status
of past due accounts, contractual terms with customers, the credit worthiness of customers and the
Companys history of uncollectible accounts.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined on the first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method. Reserves for slow moving and obsolete inventories are provided based on
historical experience and current product demand.
Fixed assets
Fixed assets are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over
the following estimated economic lives of the assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years |
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
30 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
3-7 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
5-7 |
|
Other |
|
|
5 |
|
Expenditures for replacements and improvements that significantly add to productive capacity
or extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized, while expenditures for maintenance and
repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life
of the respective lease. When assets are sold or retired, the cost of the asset and the related
accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is recognized
currently.
Drug licenses and related costs
Drug licenses and related costs incurred in connection with acquiring licenses, patents, and
other proprietary rights related to the Companys commercially developed products are capitalized.
Capitalized
F-10
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
drug licenses and related costs are amortized on a straight-line basis for periods not exceeding
fifteen years from the dates of acquisition. In accordance with the guidelines in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the Company
has reviewed its intangible assets for impairment in accordance with the recognition and
measurement provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets. Values of such assets are reviewed at least annually by the Company, by comparing the
carrying amounts to their estimated future undiscounted cash flows, and adjustments are made for
any diminution in value. The Company performed its annual review for diminution in value and has
concluded that no diminution in value has occurred. The Company has also reassessed the useful
lives of its drug licenses and related costs and has determined that the estimated useful lives are
appropriate for determining amortization expense.
Other liabilities
The Company and its subsidiary, Laboratorios Belmac, have settled all outstanding litigation
with Ethypharm S.A. Spain and Ethypharm S.A. France (together, Ethypharm). The Ethypharm claims
alleged that the manufacture and sale by Laboratorios Belmac of omeprazole and other pharmaceutical
products used Ethypharms proprietary pellet technology or infringed Ethypharms patents.
As a result of the settlement the Company recorded a $7,546,000 charge in 2006 representing
the present value of the $8,000,000 settlement, of which $4,000,000 was paid in the fourth quarter
of 2006 and four payments of $1,000,000 will be paid on the first four anniversaries of the first
payment, discounted at a rate of 4.72%. At December 31, 2006, the Company has recorded a liability
of $3,590,000 in the Consolidated Balance Sheet, representing the net present value of the
remaining liability, of which $1,000,000 is classified as current. The Company has incurred related
litigation defense costs of approximately $3,368,000, $593,000 and $241,000 in the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The litigation related charges are recorded in
litigation settlement expenses on the Companys Consolidated Income Statements.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity
The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 138, Accounting
for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activity, an Amendment of SFAS 133 and SFAS
No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Under these
standards, all derivative instruments are recorded as either assets or liabilities on the balance
sheet at their respective fair values. Generally, if a derivative instrument is designated as a
cash flow hedge, the change in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in other comprehensive
income to the extent the derivative is effective, and the change recognized in the statement of
operations when the hedged item affects earnings. If a derivative instrument is designated as a
fair value hedge, the change in fair value of the derivative and of the hedged item attributable to
the hedged risk are recognized in earnings in the current period.
In October of 2006 the Company entered into cash flow hedges designed to reduce the effect of
fluctuations in foreign currency on scheduled litigation settlement payments. At December 31, 2006,
there were four outstanding contracts, with an aggregate notional amount of $4.0 million that are
expected to mature over the next four years. These hedges are not expected to be highly effective
in offsetting the change in cash flows attributed to the scheduled payments. Therefore, changes in
the fair value of the hedges are recognized in earnings in the period of change. At December 31,
2006, the Company recorded a liability of $186,000 related to these hedges, of which $37,000 is
reported as current in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company recorded a corresponding loss in
other income (expenses) in the Consolidated Income Statement.
F-11
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying amounts of cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, receivables, accounts
payable, accrued expenses and short-term borrowings approximate fair value because of their
short-term nature. The carrying amounts of the Companys long-term obligations approximate fair
value, when considering the amounts outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The fair value
information presented herein is based on information available to management as of December 31,
2006.
Revenue recognition
Revenue on product sales is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the
price is fixed and final, delivery has occurred and there is a reasonable assurance of collection
of the sales proceeds. The Company generally obtains purchase authorizations from its customers for
a specified amount of product at a specified price and considers delivery to have occurred when the
customer takes possession of the product. The Company provides its customers with a limited right
of return. Revenue is recognized upon delivery and a reserve for sales returns is recorded when
considered appropriate. The Company has demonstrated the ability to make reasonable and reliable
estimates of product returns in accordance with SFAS No. 48, Revenue Recognition When Right of
Return Exists, and of allowances for doubtful accounts based on significant historical experience.
Revenue from service, research and development, and licensing agreements is recognized when
the service procedures have been completed or as revenue recognition criteria have been met for
each separate unit of accounting as defined in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21,
Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. The Company has deferred the
recognition of approximately $4,797,000 and $2,594,000 of licensing revenues as of December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively, for which the earnings process has not been completed.
The Company earns royalty revenues on Auxiliums sales of Testim, which incorporates the
Companys CPE-215 permeation enhancement technology. Since 2003, Auxilium has sold Testim to
pharmaceutical wholesalers and chain drug stores, which have the right to return purchased product
prior to the units being dispensed through patient prescriptions. Historically, customer returns
were not able to be reasonably estimated. Therefore, in accordance with SFAS No. 48, the Company
deferred the recognition of royalty revenues on product shipments of Testim until the units were
dispensed through patient prescriptions. During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the Company
recorded an increase in royalty revenues of approximately $479,000 due to a change in estimate
which, based on historical experience, allowed it to reasonably estimate future product returns on
sales of Testim. As a result of the change in estimate, there were no deferred Testim royalties as
of December 31, 2006. Deferred income from Testim royalties totaled $348,000 as of December 31,
2005. Total royalty revenues recognized for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 were
$8,341,000 and $6,132,000, respectively.
Research and development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities relating to the
expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Companys consolidated
financial statements and tax returns. As permitted by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion
No. 23, Accounting for Income
F-12
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Taxes Special Areas, provisions for income taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries that are considered permanently invested are not recognized in the Companys
consolidated financial statements. The cumulative amount of foreign earnings that have been
permanently reinvested is approximately $39,900,000.
Basic and diluted net income per common share
Basic and diluted net income per common share is based on the weighted average number of
shares of Common Stock outstanding during each period in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per
Share. The effect of the Companys outstanding stock options and stock purchase warrants were
considered in the diluted net income per share calculation for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004.
The following is a reconciliation between basic and diluted net income per common share for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. There were approximately 927,000, 1,371,000 and
1,726,000 incremental shares issuable as a result of various stock options, restricted stock units,
and/or warrants outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
Dilutive |
|
Diluted |
For The Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
EPS |
|
Securities |
|
EPS |
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) |
Net income |
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
974 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
22,141 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
23,068 |
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
Dilutive |
|
Diluted |
For The Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|
EPS |
|
Securities |
|
EPS |
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) |
Net income |
|
$ |
10,919 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,919 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
21,558 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
22,929 |
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
Dilutive |
|
Diluted |
For The Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
EPS |
|
Securities |
|
EPS |
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) |
Net income |
|
$ |
5,690 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,690 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
20,901 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
22,627 |
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, options and/or warrants to purchase
416,000, 736,000 and 672,000 shares of Common Stock, respectively, were excluded from the diluted
EPS presentation as determined under the treasury stock method, because their exercise prices were
greater than the average market value of the Common Stock during the period.
F-13
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Comprehensive income
The Company applies SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, which requires disclosure of
all components of comprehensive income on an annual and interim basis. Comprehensive income is
defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and
other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Companys comprehensive income includes
foreign currency translation gains (losses) and unrealized gains (losses). Should the fair values
of the Companys marketable equity securities differ significantly from their amortized costs,
unrealized gains or losses resulting from the change in fair market value would be included as a
component of other comprehensive income.
Share-based compensation plans
The Company has share-based employee compensation plans that are described more fully in Note
11. In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued SFAS No. 123
(Revised), Share-Based Payment. This Statement is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and its related implementation guidance. SFAS No. 123 (Revised) focuses primarily on
accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in exchange for
share-based payment transactions and requires that the cost resulting from those transactions be
recognized in the financial statements. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (Revised) effective
January 1, 2006 using the modified-prospective transition method. The Company uses the accelerated
expense attribution method pursuant to FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 28 for all options
previously accounted for under APB Opinion No 25. Share-based compensation attributable to
share-based awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005 is recognized using the straight-line
method pursuant to SFAS No. 123 (Revised). The adoption of SFAS No. 123 (Revised) in 2006 resulted
in incremental share-based compensation expense of approximately $1,829,000, or $0.08 per basic and
diluted share.
Segments of an enterprise and related information
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, redefines
how operating segments are determined and requires disclosure of certain financial and descriptive
information about a companys operating segments. The Company operates in two business segments
that are in two geographical locations. See Note 14 for the disclosures required by SFAS No. 131.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which
the Company adopted effective January 1, 2007. The purpose of FIN No. 48 is to clarify and set
forth consistent rules for accounting for uncertain tax positions in accordance with SFAS 109,
"Accounting for Income Taxes by requiring the application of a more likely than not threshold
for the recognition and derecognition of tax positions. Although the Company adopted FIN No. 48
effective January 1, 2007, the Company is still in the process of assessing what impact, if any, the
adoption of this statement will have on its consolidated financial statements; however, based upon
its initial assessment, the Company does not expect the adoption of FIN No. 48 to have a material
impact on its Consolidated Balance Sheets or the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
On September 13, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin (SAB) No. 108 Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, which provides interpretive guidance
F-14
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
on how the effects of the carryover or reversal of prior year misstatements should be
considered in quantifying a current year misstatement. The Company adopted SAB No. 108 effective
December 31, 2006. The adoption of SAB 108 did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements in the year ended December 31, 2006.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which provides
guidance for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities, as well as requires expanded
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 indicates that fair value should be determined
based on the assumptions marketplace participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, and
provides additional guidelines to consider in determining the market-based measurement. The Company
adopted SFAS No. 157 effective January 1, 2007 and does not expect this adoption to have a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain costs incurred in general and administrative expenses in prior periods associated with
litigation settlement in the current year have been reclassified from general and administrative
expenses to litigation settlement to conform with the current periods presentation.
NOTE 3 - RECEIVABLES
Receivables consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Trade receivables (of which $247 and $2,595, respectively,
collateralize short-term borrowings with Spanish financial institutions) |
|
$ |
27,880 |
|
|
$ |
21,293 |
|
VAT, income and social security taxes receivable |
|
|
3,151 |
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
Royalties receivable |
|
|
2,261 |
|
|
|
2,861 |
|
Other |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,374 |
|
|
|
27,118 |
|
Less-allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,963 |
|
|
$ |
26,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of the activity related to the allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
Net provisions charged to expenses |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
184 |
|
Write-offs reducing allowance |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
411 |
|
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
NOTE 4 - INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
8,669 |
|
|
$ |
6,414 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
7,621 |
|
|
|
5,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,290 |
|
|
|
12,283 |
|
Less-allowance for slow moving inventory |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,279 |
|
|
$ |
12,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included
in the Companys inventories at December 31, 2006 are
$1,338,000 of consigned goods
that have been shipped to the Companys collaborator in the fourth quarter of 2006. The Company has
received payments of $481,000 from its selling agent in anticipation of future sales of the
products which have been recorded in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The following is a summary of the activity related to the allowance for slow moving inventory:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
Provisions charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
Write-offs reducing allowance |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5 - FIXED ASSETS
Fixed assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Land |
|
$ |
2,875 |
|
|
$ |
2,673 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
17,538 |
|
|
|
14,151 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
20,591 |
|
|
|
16,742 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
Other |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,536 |
|
|
|
35,688 |
|
Capital in-progress |
|
|
20,213 |
|
|
|
7,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,749 |
|
|
|
43,436 |
|
Less-accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(15,193 |
) |
|
|
(10,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,556 |
|
|
$ |
33,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to support the Companys growth in Europe, management is adding additional capacity
to its manufacturing facilities through a series of improvements. During the years ended December
31, 2006 and 2005, the Company invested approximately $10,321,000 and $5,654,000, respectively,
renovating and
F-16
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
expanding the Companys manufacturing and warehouse facilities and approximately $4,628,000 and
$4,530,000, respectively, for related machinery and equipment.
In April 2004, the Company purchased a Spanish manufacturing facility, inventory and related
machinery and equipment used to manufacture active pharmaceutical ingredients, for approximately
$3,309,000. The Company is manufacturing and marketing some of these products through its
subsidiary, Bentley A.P.I. The 11,000 square foot facility is currently FDA approved for one
product, which the Company sells to several customers, including customers in the United States.
Depreciation expense of approximately $311,000, $309,000 and $288,000 has been charged to
operations as a component of depreciation and amortization expense in the Consolidated Income
Statements for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company has
included depreciation totaling approximately $3,675,000, $3,338,000 and $2,466,000 in cost of net
product sales during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
NOTE 6 - DRUG LICENSES AND RELATED COSTS
Drug licenses and related costs consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Drug licenses and related costs |
|
$ |
23,069 |
|
|
$ |
19,443 |
|
Less-accumulated amortization |
|
|
(7,043 |
) |
|
|
(5,585 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,026 |
|
|
$ |
13,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for drug licenses and related costs was approximately $1,584,000,
$1,403,000 and $1,140,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and
has been recorded in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying Consolidated Income
Statements.
Amortization expense for existing drug licenses and related costs for each of the next five
years and for all remaining years thereafter is estimated to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31, |
|
Future Amortization Expense |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
2007 |
|
|
1,555 |
|
2008 |
|
|
1,533 |
|
2009 |
|
|
1,787 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,543 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,516 |
|
2012 and beyond |
|
|
8,092 |
|
NOTE 7 - RELATED PARTY AND SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), the Chief
Medical Officer (CMO) and the former Chief Financial Officer (Former CFO) of the Company
exercised stock options to purchase an aggregate of 714,100 shares of the Companys Common Stock.
In
F-17
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
satisfaction of the option exercise prices, the Company received approximately $300,000 in cash
proceeds and an aggregate of approximately 269,900 shares of previously acquired Bentley Common
Stock, with a fair market value of approximately $3,502,000. The Company also withheld a total of
approximately 147,800 shares of Common Stock with a fair market value of approximately $1,941,000
from the shares to be issued to these executives in connection with their exercises, in order to
satisfy minimum federal and statutory tax withholding requirements. The shares of Common Stock
acquired by the Company in connection with these stock option exercises were recorded at fair
market value and are held by the Company as treasury shares. In addition, in accordance with the
September 2006 separation agreement with the Former CFO, an additional 1,604 shares of Common Stock
associated with a grant of restricted stock units were issued to the Former CFO. The Company
withheld a total of 584 shares of Common Stock with a fair market value of approximately $7,000
from the issuance of those shares in order to satisfy minimum federal and statutory tax withholding
requirements.
As of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company has recorded approximately 849,100
and 430,800 shares, respectively, as treasury stock, with an historical cost of $10,781,700 and
$5,321,000, respectively, which has been accounted for as a reduction of common stock and
additional paid in capital.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the CEO, the Former CFO and the CMO of the Company
exercised stock options to purchase an aggregate of 925,700 shares of the Companys Common Stock.
In satisfaction of the option exercise prices, the Company received approximately $1,218,000 in
cash proceeds and an aggregate of approximately 159,000 shares of previously acquired Bentley
Common Stock, with a fair market value of approximately $1,988,000. The Company also received a
total of approximately 181,500 shares of Common Stock, with a fair market value of approximately
$2,292,000 from the three employees in order to satisfy minimum federal and statutory tax
withholding requirements. The Company repurchased approximately 89,500 shares of Common Stock with
a fair market value of approximately $1,041,000 from the CEO and CMO in connection with these
options exercises. The shares of Common Stock acquired by the Company in connection with these
stock option exercises were recorded at fair market value and are held by the Company as treasury
shares.
NOTE 8 - ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Foreign income taxes payable |
|
$ |
2,463 |
|
|
$ |
2,107 |
|
Allowance for sales returns |
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
887 |
|
Accrued payroll and related taxes |
|
|
3,288 |
|
|
|
2,268 |
|
Spanish pharmaceutical taxes payable |
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
Other accrued expenses |
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
2,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,704 |
|
|
$ |
9,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The following is a summary of the activity related to the allowance for sales returns:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
887 |
|
|
$ |
597 |
|
|
$ |
446 |
|
Provisions charged to costs and expenses (a) |
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
Write-offs reducing allowance (a) |
|
|
(2,138 |
) |
|
|
(652 |
) |
|
|
(618 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
784 |
|
|
$ |
887 |
|
|
$ |
597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Company experienced an unforeseen level of product returns in 2004 as a result of
government imposed price reductions in Spain. The product returns exceeded the Companys
allowance for estimated sales returns, and were accounted for as a reduction in revenues of
approximately $2,705,000 in the year ended December 31, 2004. |
NOTE 9 - DEBT
Short-term borrowings consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Trade receivables discounted with
Spanish financial institutions, with
recourse, effective interest rate is 3.7%
and 3.3%, respectively |
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
$ |
2,595 |
|
Revolving line of credit facilities payable
to Spanish financial institutions, weighted
average interest rate is 3.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
$ |
2,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average stated interest rate on short-term borrowings outstanding at December 31,
2006 and 2005 was 3.7% and 3.3%, respectively.
The revolving line of credit facilities with Spanish financial institutions, entitle the
Company to borrow up to $6,438,000 as of December 31, 2006 at interest rates ranging from 3.2% to
3.4%. The facilities are scheduled to mature on various dates through December 15, 2007 and are
renewable.
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Loans payable to Spanish government |
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
Less-current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2002, the Company entered into a loan agreement with the Spanish government as
part of a research-funding program. The loan is non-interest bearing and payable in seven equal
annual installments of approximately $17,000 beginning in 2006. Accordingly, the Company imputed
interest at the market rate in Spain (5.2%) at the time of the borrowing, and recorded a discount
on the obligation of $33,000. Additionally, in December 2001, the Company entered into a loan
agreement with the Spanish
F-19
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
government as part of a research-funding program. The loan is non-interest bearing and payable in
seven equal annual installments of approximately $31,000 which began in 2005. Accordingly, the
Company imputed interest at the market rate in Spain (6%) at the time of the borrowing, and
recorded a discount on the obligation of $72,000. These obligations are classified as current in
anticipation of repayment during the year ending December 31, 2007.
NOTE 10 - PREFERRED STOCK
The Company has 2,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value, authorized for issuance.
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, no shares of Preferred Stock were outstanding.
NOTE 11 - EQUITY AND SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
At December 31, 2006 the Company had the following shares of Common Stock reserved for
issuance under various plans and agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
(In Thousands) |
For exercise of outstanding stock options and restricted stock units |
|
|
3,755 |
|
For future stock option and restricted stock unit grants |
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and restricted stock unit transactions
During the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company issued approximately 739,500 shares of
Common Stock upon exercise of stock purchase options, approximately 1,600 shares of Common Stock
upon the vesting of restricted stock units and approximately 16,400 shares of Common Stock as
share-based compensation in lieu of cash. The Company also received approximately 418,300 shares of
treasury stock in connection with the exercise of stock purchase options during the year ended
December 31, 2006 (See Note 7).
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company issued approximately 1,020,700 shares of
Common Stock upon exercise of stock purchase options and approximately 20,100 shares of Common
Stock as share-based compensation in lieu of cash. The Company also received approximately 430,000
shares of treasury stock in connection with the exercise of stock purchase options during the year
ended December 31, 2005 (See Note 7).
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued approximately 400,000 shares of
Common Stock upon exercise of Class B Warrants, approximately 325,600 shares of Common Stock upon
exercise of stock purchase options, and approximately 14,400 shares of Common Stock as share-based
compensation in lieu of cash.
The Company has never paid any cash dividends on its Common Stock. The current policy of the
Board of Directors is to retain earnings to finance the operation and growth of the Companys
business. Accordingly, it is anticipated that no cash dividends will be paid to the holders of the
Common Stock in the foreseeable future.
F-20
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Share-based compensation plans
The Company has in effect equity incentive plans (the Plans), pursuant to which directors,
officers, employees and consultants of the Company have been awarded grants of restricted stock
units and options to purchase the Companys Common Stock. The Companys shareholders voted to
increase the number of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance pursuant to the Companys
Amended and Restated 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan by 750,000 shares in May 2006. As of December
31, 2006, approximately 4,492,000 shares of Common Stock have been reserved for issuance under the
Plans, of which approximately 2,786,000 are outstanding that were issued under the predecessor
stock option plans. Approximately 969,000 shares are outstanding that were issued under the
Amended and Restated 2005 Equity and Incentive Plan, excluding 20,000 shares underlying restricted
stock units, contingently issuable to non-employee directors, that will be issued when the
directors cease to serve on the Board of Directors of the Company. The balance of approximately
737,000 shares is available for future issuance under the Amended and Restated 2005 Equity and
Incentive Plan, which is now the successor to all the other Plans. Of the shares available for
future issuance, approximately 290,000 are available for future stock options only and the
remainder are available for any type of award allowed under the plan.
A summary of stock option award activity under the Plans as of December 31, 2006 and changes
during the year then ended are presented below (shares and aggregate intrinsic values in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term (Years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2003 |
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
$ |
6.75 |
|
|
|
5.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
12.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
7.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and expired |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
10.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2004 |
|
|
4,087 |
|
|
|
7.44 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
9.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
|
|
3.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and expired |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
8.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
3,916 |
|
|
|
8.72 |
|
|
|
6.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
11.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
5.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and expired |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
10.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
3,637 |
|
|
$ |
9.80 |
|
|
|
6.56 |
|
|
$ |
4,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
3,611 |
|
|
$ |
9.80 |
|
|
|
6.54 |
|
|
$ |
4,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,835 |
|
|
$ |
9.66 |
|
|
|
5.87 |
|
|
$ |
3,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The table below summarizes options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2006
(number of options in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Currently Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Range of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining Life |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Prices |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Price |
|
|
(Years) |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Price |
|
|
$ |
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3.00 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
$ |
2.72 |
|
|
|
2.15 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
$ |
2.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.88 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.39 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
7.31 |
|
|
|
6.32 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
7.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
8.25 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.93 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
8.28 |
|
|
|
5.79 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
8.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
9.68 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
9.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.04 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
10.04 |
|
|
|
6.39 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
10.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
10.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.79 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
10.76 |
|
|
|
7.74 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
10.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
11.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.78 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
11.57 |
|
|
|
8.18 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
11.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
12.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.55 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
12.30 |
|
|
|
8.14 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
12.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.30 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
13.30 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
13.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.83 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
14.07 |
|
|
|
6.90 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
14.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15.83 |
|
|
|
3,637 |
|
|
$ |
9.80 |
|
|
|
6.56 |
|
|
|
2,835 |
|
|
$ |
9.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the activity for nonvested share awards as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004 is provided below with changes during the years then ended (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Grant |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Grant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
of |
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Date Fair |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Value |
|
Nonvested options
outstanding,
beginning of the
period |
|
|
840 |
|
|
$ |
4.35 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
$ |
5.58 |
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
$ |
4.85 |
|
Granted |
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
4.07 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
5.77 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(499 |
) |
|
|
(4.82 |
) |
|
|
(763 |
) |
|
|
(4.41 |
) |
|
|
(868 |
) |
|
|
(5.01 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(4.62 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(4.24 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(4.94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested options
outstanding, end of
the period |
|
|
802 |
|
|
$ |
4.76 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
$ |
4.35 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
$ |
5.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested
portion of the Companys stock options was approximately $2,501,000 and is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.8 years.
Options to purchase approximately 739,000, 1,021,000 and 326,000 shares of Common Stock were
exercised during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Net cash proceeds to the Company from these
option exercises totaled approximately $450,000, $2,028,000 and $2,483,000, respectively,
while the total intrinsic value (the excess of the market price over the exercise price) of those
option exercises was
F-22
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
approximately $5,586,000, $8,583,000 and $1,552,000, respectively. As future operating profits
in the U.S. cannot be reasonably assured, no tax benefit resulting from the settlement of U.S.
awards has been recorded. The total fair value of stock options that vested during the 2006, 2005
and 2004 was approximately $2,405,000, $3,365,000, and $4,349,000, respectively.
The Company generally issues previously unissued shares for the exercise of stock options and
to match eligible 401(k) Plan contributions; however, the Company may reissue previously acquired
treasury shares to satisfy these issuances in the future. The Company does not have a policy of
repurchasing shares on the open market to satisfy option exercises and matching contributions to
the 401(k) Plan.
A summary of restricted stock units award activity under the Amended and Restated 2005 Equity
and Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2006 and changes during the year then ended are presented
below (shares and aggregate intrinsic values in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Term (Years) |
|
|
Value |
|
Restricted stock units outstanding, December
31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
11.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
11.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
11.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units outstanding, December
31, 2006 |
|
|
118 |
|
|
$ |
11.39 |
|
|
|
1.69 |
|
|
$ |
1,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
114 |
|
|
$ |
11.41 |
|
|
|
1.69 |
|
|
$ |
1,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2006, the Company granted 106,000 restricted stock units to employees with a
weighted average grant date fair value of $11.35 and 40,000 restricted stock units to non-employee
directors with a weighted average grant date fair value of $11.78. Restricted stock units granted
to employees were awarded in the second and fourth quarters of 2006 and the restricted stock units
granted to non-employee directors were granted in the second quarter of 2006.
As of December 31, 2006, unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of
the Companys restricted stock units was approximately $1,153,000 and is expected to be recognized
over a weighted average period of approximately 2.4 years. The Companys restricted stock units are
outstanding until vested.
Included in the approximately 22,000 units that vested during the year are 20,000 shares
contingently issuable to non-employee directors that, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the
restricted stock unit agreements, will be issued when the directors cease to serve as directors of
the Company. The balance of restricted stock units that vested in 2006 resulted in the issuance of
2,000 shares of Common Stock to one employee. The intrinsic value of these shares when they vested
was approximately $20,000. As future operating profits in the U.S. cannot be reasonably assured,
the Company has not recorded any tax benefit resulting from the settlement of U.S. awards.
F-23
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Share-based compensation
The 2006 share-based compensation expense recorded for stock option and restricted stock unit
awards to employees and non-employee directors was approximately $1,929,000, of which approximately
$26,000 is included in cost of sales, approximately $13,000 is included in selling and marketing
expenses, approximately $1,226,000 (including approximately $97,000 of share-based compensation
expense recorded in the third quarter in accordance with the provisions of the Former CFOs
separation agreement) is included in general and administrative expenses and approximately $664,000
is included in research and development expenses. In addition, the Company reported $17,000 of
share-based compensation expense in research and development expenses related to a share-based
award to a consultant. No related compensation expense was capitalized as the cost of an asset and
there was no impact on net cash provided by operating activities or net cash used in financing
activities as a result of these share-based transactions.
At the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, the Company may
grant shares of its Common Stock to employees in lieu of cash compensation. The Company also
sponsors a 401(k) Plan for eligible employees and matches eligible contributions with shares of the
Companys Common Stock. The Company issued approximately 16,400, 20,100 and 14,400 shares of Common
Stock to its 401(k) Plan as matching contributions during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005
and 2004, respectively. These shares are recorded at their fair value on the last day of each
payroll period in which they are earned. All Company matching contributions vest 25% each year for
the first four years of each employees employment in which the employee works for the Company at
least 1,000 hours.
Share-based compensation expense attributable to the Companys 401(k) Plan matching
contributions and non-employee options represents the remainder of the Companys SFAS No. 123
(Revised) share-based compensation. General and administrative expenses include approximately
$102,000, $113,000 and $73,000 of such non-cash share-based compensation for the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Research and development expenses include
approximately $122,000, $167,000 and $122,000 of such non-cash share-based compensation for the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The Company entered into a separation agreement with its Former CFO, pursuant to which certain
share-based awards were modified during the quarter to allow for the acceleration of vesting and
extension of the post-employment exercise period. These modifications resulted in the recognition
of approximately $97,000 of share-based compensation which has been recorded in general and
administrative expenses in the year ended December 31, 2006.
As the Company previously adopted only the pro forma disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123,
compensation cost relating to the unvested portion of share-based awards granted prior to the date
of adoption will continue to be recognized using the same estimate of the grant-date fair value and
the same accelerated attribution method used to determine the pro forma disclosures under SFAS No.
123, except that the unamortized compensation expense related to those awards will be reduced for
estimated forfeitures, as required by SFAS No. 123 (Revised).
The following table details the reported effect that share-based compensation expense had on
net income and earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2006 and the pro forma effect
that share-based compensation expense would have had on net income and earnings per share for the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. The reported net income and earnings per share for the year
ended December 31, 2006 in the table below includes the share-based compensation expense actually
recorded in 2006 under the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (Revised). The amounts for 2005 and 2004 are
included in the table below only to provide a comparative presentation to the prior year required
disclosure (in
F-24
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
thousands, except per share data), which was prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 123, as
originally issued.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) |
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
$ |
10,919 |
|
|
$ |
5,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Stock-based employee
compensation expense
included in reported net
income |
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based
employee compensation
expense determined under
fair value method for all
awards |
|
|
(2,154 |
) |
|
|
(3,452 |
) |
|
|
(2,978 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
$ |
7,747 |
|
|
$ |
2,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic pro forma |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted pro forma |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model. Assumptions and the resulting fair value for option awards granted during
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 are provided below (results may vary depending on the
assumptions applied within the model):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
4.95 |
% |
|
|
3.90 |
% |
|
|
2.94 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Expected life |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
Volatility |
|
|
46.24 |
% |
|
|
45.28 |
% |
|
|
48.63 |
% |
Fair value of options granted |
|
$ |
5.54 |
|
|
$ |
4.04 |
|
|
$ |
5.77 |
|
The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield curve of U.S. Treasury securities in effect
at the date of the grant, having a duration commensurate with the estimated life of the award. The
Company has not declared dividends, and does not expect to declare dividends in the future.
Therefore, an annual dividend rate of 0% is used when calculating the grant date fair value of
equity awards. The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of options granted is
estimated based on historical exercise behaviors. The volatility of the Companys stock is
calculated on the grant date of each equity award using daily price observations over a period of
time commensurate with the related requisite service period. The maximum contractual term of the
Companys share-based awards is 10 years.
As share-based compensation expense is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it is
reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS No. 123 (Revised) requires forfeitures to be estimated at
the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ
from those estimates. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience.
F-25
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Stock purchase warrants
During the year ended December 31, 2004, approximately 400,000 stock purchase warrants with an
exercise price of $1.50 per share were exercised to acquire an aggregate of 400,000 shares of
Common Stock. The Company received net cash proceeds of approximately $600,000 from such exercises
during the year ended December 31, 2004. Approximately 20,000 stock purchase warrants with an
exercise price of $20.00 per share expired unexercised during the year ended December 31, 2004.
There were no stock purchase warrants issued subsequent to 2004 and there have not been any
warrants outstanding since 2004.
Stockholder Rights Plan
Effective December 21, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a new Stockholder
Rights Plan that replaced the Companys previous Stockholder Rights Agreement that expired on
December 21, 2004. Pursuant to the Renewed Rights Agreement, the Board of Directors declared a
dividend of one Preferred Stock Purchase Right for each outstanding share of the Companys Common
Stock, payable to stockholders of record at the close of business on December 21, 2004. Each
right, when exercisable, entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Company one
one-thousandth of a share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per
share, at a purchase price of $72.55 per one one-thousandth of a share of Series A Preferred Stock,
subject to adjustment. The plan is designed to prevent a potential acquirer from gaining control of
the Company without fairly compensating all of the Companys stockholders and to protect the
Company from coercive takeover attempts. The rights will become exercisable only if a person or
group of affiliated persons beneficially acquire(s) 15% or more of the Companys Common Stock.
In the event that an acquiring person becomes the beneficial owner of 15% or more of the then
outstanding shares of Common Stock (except pursuant to a qualifying offer), each holder of a right
will thereafter have the right to receive, upon payment of the purchase price, shares of Common
Stock (or, in certain circumstances, cash, property or other securities of the Company) having a
value (based on a formula set forth in the Renewed Rights Agreement) equal to two times the
purchase price of the right. The rights are not exercisable until the distribution date and will
expire at the close of business on December 19, 2014, unless earlier redeemed or exchanged by the
Company.
F-26
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
NOTE 12 - PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
See Note 14 for information regarding the components of income before income taxes. The
provision for income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
$ |
6,254 |
|
|
$ |
6,515 |
|
|
$ |
5,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
Federal |
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
(1,171 |
) |
|
|
(1,039 |
) |
|
|
(661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect of operating loss carryforwards: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
2,169 |
|
Federal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
(1,303 |
) |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
(680 |
) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(817 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
5,082 |
|
|
$ |
5,476 |
|
|
$ |
4,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation between the federal statutory rate and the Companys effective income tax
rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Statutory federal income taxes |
|
$ |
4,555 |
|
|
$ |
6,198 |
|
|
$ |
3,695 |
|
Permanent differences from foreign subsidiary |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
Foreign tax audit settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
State income taxes |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
Expiration/Reduction of loss carryforwards |
|
|
2,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
Impact of foreign tax rate changes |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credits |
|
|
(1,044 |
) |
|
|
(1,124 |
) |
|
|
(971 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(307 |
) |
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
(680 |
) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(817 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,082 |
|
|
$ |
5,476 |
|
|
$ |
4,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2006, the Spanish government enacted legislation which reduces the Spanish
statutory income tax rate from 35% in 2006 to 32.5% in 2007 and 30% in 2008. The Company has
recorded a $33,000 reduction in its deferred taxes and a corresponding reduction in its provision
for income taxes in the year ended December 31, 2006 as a result of the change in tax rates.
F-27
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The components of the Companys deferred taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOL carryforwards |
|
$ |
20,010 |
|
|
$ |
18,665 |
|
Disposition of subsidiary |
|
|
6,909 |
|
|
|
6,848 |
|
Foreign tax on deferred income |
|
|
1,767 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
Tax credit carryforwards |
|
|
1,303 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
31,155 |
|
|
|
28,312 |
|
Foreign deferred tax liability |
|
|
(2,074 |
) |
|
|
(1,665 |
) |
Other deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(27,575 |
) |
|
|
(26,998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset (liability), net |
|
$ |
1,289 |
|
|
$ |
(566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded provisions for foreign income taxes totaling $5,082,000, $5,476,000, and
$4,805,000 ($4,201,000 plus a $604,000 tax audit settlement recorded as a result of the 1998 2000
tax audit of its Spanish subsidiary), for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004
respectively. The 2006 effective tax rate was 84% compared to 33% in 2005 and 46% (40% excluding
the $604,000 tax audit settlement) in 2004. The 2006 effective tax rate on Spanish operations was
31% compared to 31% in 2005, and 36% (31% excluding the $604,000 tax audit settlement) in 2004.
The Company generated U.S. federal net operating income of approximately $235,000 in 2006 and
$1,042,000 in 2005, compared to a net operating loss of approximately $2,913,000 in 2004. Bentley
Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited generated a net operating loss of approximately $10,418,000 and
$2,080,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively. As future operating profits cannot be reasonably
assured, no tax benefit has been recorded for these losses. Accordingly, the Company has
established a valuation allowance equal to the full amount of the deferred tax assets in Ireland.
The Companys 2006 net current and non-current deferred tax assets of $1,049,000 and $240,000,
respectively, result from temporary differences arising at the Companys Spanish subsidiaries. Net
operating losses and taxes on deferred licensing and collaboration revenues represent the majority
of the assets, which are partially offset by the deferral of a gain for Spanish statutory purposes
on the sale of drug licenses in prior periods.
Should the Company determine that it is more likely than not that it will realize certain of
its net deferred tax assets for which we have previously provided a valuation allowance, an
adjustment would be required to reduce the existing valuation allowance. In addition, the Company
operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in those jurisdictions. These
audits can involve complex issues, which may require an extended period of time for resolution. The
Company has tax contingencies totaling $530,000 at December 31, 2006, all of which have been
recorded in the provision for income taxes in prior years. No other potential tax contingencies
were determined to be probable and reasonably estimable as of December 31, 2006. However, there is
the possibility that the ultimate resolution of such potential contingencies could have an adverse
effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements in the future.
Under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, certain substantial changes in the
Companys ownership may have limited, or may limit in the future, the amount of net operating loss
(the NOL) carryforwards that could be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and
income tax liabilities.
The amount of any annual limitation is determined based upon the Companys value prior to an
ownership change.
F-28
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
In October 2005, intercompany agreements were executed between Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and Bentley Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited to license non-U.S. rights of certain technologies
owned by Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and provide for cost-sharing of subsequent development
efforts on those technologies. A net benefit of approximately $10,376,000 has been recorded to the
U.S. income from operations in 2006, which contributed to U.S. income before income taxes of
$235,000 in the current year. The Company utilized U.S federal net operating loss carry-forwards in
order to offset the resulting U.S. income tax liability. The NOL carryforwards include the benefit
of 2006 compensation expense from nonqualified stock option dispositions and disqualifying
dispositions of incentive stock options of approximately $3,697,000, the tax effect of which
$(1,257,000) will be credited to additional paid-in capital if and when realized. The Company
calculates that use of its NOL carryforwards may be limited each year as a result of stock option
exercises resulting in an ownership change of more than 50% of the Companys outstanding equity.
During 2006, approximately $6,232,000 of U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards expired
unutilized. As of December 31, 2006, the remaining U.S. federal net operating loss carry-forwards
were approximately $50,216,000. If not offset against future taxable income, the NOL carryforwards
will expire in tax years 2007 through 2025. During 2004, the Company determined that a portion of
its State NOL carryforwards, generated during prior periods, were no longer available in the state
jurisdictions in which the Company conducts business. The Company therefore reduced the deferred
tax benefit related to its State NOL carryforwards by $2,199,000.
The valuation allowance increased (decreased) by approximately $577,000, $2,920,000, and
$(817,000) in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The 2006 increase consists of approximately
$1,257,000 related to the loss carryforward attributable to the deduction for stock options. The
loss carryforward attributable to the deductions for stock options in 2005 and 2004 was $2,858,000
and $375,000, respectively. The effect of the stock option deduction in 2004 was more than offset
by other book to tax differences, resulting in valuation allowance changes that are only
attributable to operating activities.
NOTE 13 - SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The following tables contain condensed information from the Companys Consolidated Income
Statements for each quarter of the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004. The Company has
derived this data from its unaudited quarterly financial statements. The Company believes that the
following information reflects all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation
of the information for the periods presented. The operating results for any quarter are not
necessarily indicative of results for any future period.
F-29
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
3/31/06(b) |
|
|
6/30/06(a)(b) |
|
|
9/30/06(b) |
|
|
12/31/06(b) |
|
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
28,278 |
|
|
$ |
28,983 |
|
|
$ |
25,156 |
|
|
$ |
27,054 |
|
Cost of net product sales |
|
|
12,933 |
|
|
|
12,471 |
|
|
|
11,778 |
|
|
|
12,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
15,345 |
|
|
|
16,512 |
|
|
|
13,378 |
|
|
|
14,386 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
11,991 |
|
|
|
11,580 |
|
|
|
19,085 |
|
|
|
11,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of license |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
3,354 |
|
|
|
4,932 |
|
|
|
(5,707 |
) |
|
|
2,858 |
|
Other income (expenses) |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
2,393 |
|
|
|
2,484 |
|
|
|
1,730 |
|
|
|
(1,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,154 |
|
|
$ |
2,635 |
|
|
$ |
(7,229 |
) |
|
$ |
4,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common
shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
21,954 |
|
|
|
22,170 |
|
|
|
22,194 |
|
|
|
22,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
23,807 |
|
|
|
22,876 |
|
|
|
22,194 |
|
|
|
22,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
3/31/05 |
|
|
6/30/05 |
|
|
9/30/05 |
|
|
12/31/05(c) |
|
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
24,244 |
|
|
$ |
24,764 |
|
|
$ |
23,512 |
|
|
$ |
25,210 |
|
Cost of net product sales |
|
|
11,452 |
|
|
|
11,367 |
|
|
|
11,104 |
|
|
|
12,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
12,792 |
|
|
|
13,397 |
|
|
|
12,408 |
|
|
|
12,972 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
9,145 |
|
|
|
9,408 |
|
|
|
8,730 |
|
|
|
8,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
3,647 |
|
|
|
3,989 |
|
|
|
3,678 |
|
|
|
4,352 |
|
Other income (expenses) |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,170 |
|
|
$ |
2,608 |
|
|
$ |
2,485 |
|
|
$ |
3,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common
shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
21,316 |
|
|
|
21,395 |
|
|
|
21,652 |
|
|
|
21,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
22,531 |
|
|
|
22,603 |
|
|
|
22,970 |
|
|
|
23,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
3/31/04 |
|
|
6/30/04(d) |
|
|
9/30/04 |
|
|
12/31/04 |
|
|
|
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data) |
Total revenues |
|
$ |
17,302 |
|
|
$ |
18,470 |
|
|
$ |
18,103 |
|
|
$ |
19,518 |
|
Cost of net product sales |
|
|
8,255 |
|
|
|
8,465 |
|
|
|
8,662 |
|
|
|
9,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
9,047 |
|
|
|
10,005 |
|
|
|
9,441 |
|
|
|
10,007 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
7,374 |
|
|
|
7,422 |
|
|
|
6,922 |
|
|
|
8,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
1,673 |
|
|
|
2,583 |
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
|
|
1,920 |
|
Other income (expenses) |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
809 |
|
|
$ |
1,490 |
|
|
$ |
1,413 |
|
|
$ |
1,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common
shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
20,597 |
|
|
|
20,644 |
|
|
|
21,049 |
|
|
|
21,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
22,784 |
|
|
|
22,800 |
|
|
|
22,746 |
|
|
|
22,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 includes an increase in royalty
revenues of approximately $479,000. This change in estimate was due to the Companys
ability to reasonably estimate future product returns on sales of Testim based on actual
historical data. |
|
(b) |
|
Operating expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 includes litigation
settlement charges of approximately $7,546,000. Provision
for income taxes for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 includes a tax benefit of
$2,746,000 from the finalization of the related legal settlement. Operating expenses also
include related legal defense costs of $604,000, $733,000, $1,386,000 and $645,000 in
first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2006, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Total revenues for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 includes a change in
estimate of royalty revenues earned of approximately $1,092,000 recorded in the fourth
quarter of 2005. This change in estimate of royalty revenues earned is based upon publicly
available data determined to be more accurate than the source of data previously relied
upon by management in estimating the sell-through of prescriptions dispensed. |
|
(d) |
|
Other income (expenses) for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 includes the reversal
of previously accrued tax assessments totaling $1,467,000. These assessments had been
accrued to be paid to the Spanish government as a vehicle to help reduce the impact of the
rising health care costs in Spain. Due to changes in the pharmaceutical industry in Spain
and a change in the Spanish political environment, these liabilities no longer exist.
Accordingly, these accruals were reversed during the second quarter of 2004. |
In the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company reclassified certain of
its deferred tax items on its balance sheet to be consistent with the underlying transactions to
which they relate. The reclassifications resulted in a $1,244,000 decrease of its current deferred
tax assets, an increase of $240,000 to its non-current deferred tax assets, a $238,000 increase in
income taxes payable (included in accrued expenses on the Consolidated Balance Sheet) and a
decrease of $1,260,000 in its non-current deferred tax liabilities.
F-31
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
NOTE 14 - BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company, headquartered in the U.S., is an international specialty pharmaceutical company
which operates in two business segments, specialty generics and drug delivery, and two geographical
locations (Europe and the U.S.).
The Companys specialty generics segment is based in Europe and develops and manufactures a
growing portfolio of generic and branded generic pharmaceuticals in Europe for the treatment of
cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, infectious and central nervous system diseases through its
subsidiary, Laboratorios Belmac, and markets these pharmaceutical products through its
subsidiaries, Laboratorios Belmac, Laboratorios Davur, Laboratorios Rimafar and Bentley
Pharmaceuticals Ireland. The U.S. operations of this segment include any sales of generic
pharmaceuticals in the U.S. and continued research and development activities to bring additional
generic pharmaceutical products into the U.S. This segment also manufactures and sells active
pharmaceutical ingredients through its subsidiary, Bentley A.P.I.
The Companys drug delivery segment is based in both the U.S. and Europe and is focused on the
advancement of proprietary drug delivery technologies that enhance or facilitate the absorption of
pharmaceutical compounds across various membranes. In the U.S., the Companys activities consist
primarily of licensing, product research and development, business development activities,
corporate management and administration.
Set forth in the tables below is certain financial information with respect to the Companys
business and geographical segments for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. The segments use
the same accounting policies as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies
in Note 2.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Generics |
|
Drug Delivery |
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
U.S. |
|
Europe |
|
U.S. |
|
Consolidated |
Net product sales |
|
$ |
100,546 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
100,590 |
|
Licensing and collaboration
revenues |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,366 |
|
|
|
8,881 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
101,061 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,366 |
|
|
|
109,471 |
|
Cost of net product sales |
|
|
49,766 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,850 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
51,295 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,366 |
|
|
|
59,621 |
|
Selling and marketing expense |
|
|
16,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,153 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
7,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
7,339 |
|
|
|
14,801 |
|
Research and development expense |
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,341 |
|
|
|
4,341 |
|
|
|
10,459 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
1,895 |
|
Litigation settlement |
|
|
8,543 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,914 |
|
Gain on sale of license |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
16,340 |
|
|
|
(2,498 |
) |
|
|
(4,412 |
) |
|
|
(3,993 |
) |
|
|
5,437 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
Income before income taxes |
|
|
16,260 |
|
|
|
(2,482 |
) |
|
|
(4,412 |
) |
|
|
(3,310 |
) |
|
|
6,056 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
11,178 |
|
|
|
(2,482 |
) |
|
|
(4,412 |
) |
|
|
(3,310 |
) |
|
|
974 |
|
Expenditures for fixed assets |
|
|
14,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
15,313 |
|
Expenditures for drug licenses |
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
2,772 |
|
F-32
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
As of December 31, 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Generics |
|
Drug Delivery |
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
U.S. |
|
Europe |
|
U.S. |
|
Consolidated |
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
30,558 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,366 |
|
|
$ |
32,963 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
21,758 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,631 |
|
|
|
34,727 |
|
Fixed assets |
|
|
45,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
48,556 |
|
Drug licenses and related costs |
|
|
10,697 |
|
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,496 |
|
|
|
16,026 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
109,636 |
|
|
|
3,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,510 |
|
|
|
134,356 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
24,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,736 |
|
|
|
27,387 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
6,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,638 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
31,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,736 |
|
|
|
34,025 |
|
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Generics |
|
Drug Delivery |
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
U.S. |
|
Europe |
|
U.S. |
|
Consolidated |
Net product sales |
|
$ |
91,308 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
91,308 |
|
Licensing and collaboration revenues |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
|
6,422 |
|
Total revenues |
|
|
91,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
|
97,730 |
|
Cost of net product sales |
|
|
46,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,161 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
45,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,149 |
|
|
|
51,569 |
|
Selling and marketing expense |
|
|
16,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,347 |
|
General and administrative expense |
|
|
8,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2,458 |
|
|
|
11,405 |
|
Research and development expense |
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,044 |
|
|
|
2,378 |
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense |
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
1,758 |
|
Litigation settlement |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
593 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
17,429 |
|
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
(2,061 |
) |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
15,666 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
928 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
17,414 |
|
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
(2,061 |
) |
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
16,395 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,476 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
11,938 |
|
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
(2,061 |
) |
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
10,919 |
|
Expenditures for fixed assets |
|
|
10,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
11,018 |
|
Expenditures for drug licenses |
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
2,045 |
|
F-33
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
As of December 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Generics |
|
Drug Delivery |
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
U.S. |
|
Europe |
|
U.S. |
|
Consolidated |
Receivables, net |
|
$ |
23,469 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,447 |
|
|
$ |
26,916 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
26,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,718 |
|
|
|
48,161 |
|
Fixed assets |
|
|
31,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,177 |
|
|
|
33,366 |
|
Drug licenses and related costs |
|
|
8,931 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,346 |
|
|
|
13,858 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
1,919 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
90,647 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,992 |
|
|
|
124,220 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
25,639 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,944 |
|
|
|
28,680 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
3,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
29,583 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,951 |
|
|
|
32,631 |
|
Interest income and interest expense are based upon the actual results of each operating
segments assets and borrowings.
The majority of the Companys revenues are generated from products sold in Spain. Revenues
from products sold in Spain totaled $76,713,000, $69,571,000, and $58,488,000 in the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Revenues from licensing and collaboration revenues
in Spain totaled $515,000, $274,000 and $607,000 in the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively.
NOTE 15 - COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND CONCENTRATIONS
The Company is obligated to pay certain royalty payments upon commercialization of products
using its CPE-215 technology acquired in 1999 and its intellectual property acquired in 2003.
The Company has entered into renewable employment agreements with key executives and certain
other personnel. These employment agreements provide for salaries, potential bonuses and other
benefits in exchange for services provided. The employment agreements also provide for certain
compensation in the event of termination or change in control of the Company. The Company is
currently obligated to pay approximately $2,247,000 in 2007 under such agreements, which are
scheduled to expire on December 31, 2007. In addition, the Company is obligated to grant an
aggregate of 100,000 stock options to executive officers in 2007.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, management of the Company identified certain tax
contingencies that were determined to be probable and reasonably estimable. Consequently, the
Company has included a charge totaling $180,000 related to these contingencies in the provision for
income taxes in the accompanying Consolidated Income Statements. No other potential tax
contingencies were considered probable and reasonably estimable by the Company at December 31,
2005. However, there is the possibility that the ultimate resolution of such potential
contingencies could have an adverse effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenues from one customer exceeded 10% of consolidated total revenues during the year ended
December 31, 2006, accounting for 11% of 2006 consolidated total revenues and 4% of the
consolidated receivables balance at December 31, 2006. Revenues from one customer exceeded 10% of
consolidated total revenues during the year ended December 31, 2005, accounting for 12% of 2004
consolidated total revenues and 4% of the consolidated receivables balance at December 31, 2005.
Revenues from one
F-34
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
customer exceeded 10% of consolidated total revenues during the year ended
December 31, 2004, accounting for 13% of 2003 consolidated total revenues and 4% of the
consolidated receivables balance at December 31, 2004.
Spanish sales from the Companys omeprazole product line accounted for approximately 18% in
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and 22% of the consolidated total
revenues in the year ended December 31, 2004. The active pharmaceutical ingredient for the
Companys omeprazole products is currently purchased from one supplier.
The Company leases certain equipment and facilities under non-cancelable operating leases,
which expire through the year 2008. Total charges to operations under operating leases were
approximately $1,236,000, $1,059,000 and $991,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003, respectively. Future minimum lease payments under operating leases are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31, |
|
Future Minimum Lease Payments |
2007 |
|
|
1,177 |
|
2008 |
|
|
747 |
|
2009 |
|
|
94 |
|
2010 |
|
|
27 |
|
2011 |
|
|
7 |
|
2012 and beyond |
|
|
0 |
|
The Company has committed approximately $6,600,000 for capital expenditures as of December 31,
2006 for continued improvements to its manufacturing facilities, including the acquisition of
additional manufacturing equipment and the expansion of its active pharmaceutical ingredients
manufacturing facility.
On September 27, 2004, the Company was served with a complaint in an action captioned
Ethypharm S.A. France & Ethypharm S.A. Spain v. Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc., U.S.
District Court for the District of Delaware, Civil Action No. 04-1300 (SLR). In this action,
Ethypharm S.A. France and Ethypharm S.A. Spain, which are referred to individually and collectively
as Ethypharm, alleged that since March 2002 Bentley and its Spanish subsidiary Laboratorios Belmac,
S.A. (Belmac) misappropriated unspecified Ethypharm trade secrets and confidential information
and used that information in the manufacture of omeprazole, one of Belmacs pharmaceutical
products. On April 11, 2005, Ethypharm S.A. Spain filed suit against Belmac S.A. in the Commercial
Court No. 5 of Madrid, Spain. The complaint alleged that Belmac refused to renew its contract with
Ethypharm for the manufacture of omeprazole which expired on March 22, 2002, and that after that
date Belmacs continued manufacture of omeprazole pursuant to its own patented technology infringed
Ethypharms Spanish Patent No. ES9301319. In its complaint, Ethypharm sought an order from the
court declaring Belmac to be in violation of Ethypharms patent, preventing further sales of
omeprazole by Belmac using processes that allegedly infringe Ethypharms patent, and awarding
monetary damages. In late 2006 Bentley and Belmac settled all outstanding litigation with
Ethypharm. Under the settlement terms, Belmac paid Ethypharm $4,000,000 in the fourth quarter of
2006 and will make four additional payments of $1,000,000 each on the first four anniversaries of
the first payment.
On December 2004, Belmac, jointly with three other Spanish manufacturers, initiated a legal
proceeding in the 2nd Commercial Court of the City of Barcelona against Warner-Lambert
Company requesting the partial revocation in Spain of European patent EP 409.281 concerning
atorvastatin calcium. In turn, Warner-Lambert Company counterclaimed against the plaintiffs for
alleged infringement of the patent in suit. The court ruled in favour of Belmac in a decision
rendered on September 26, 2006,
F-35
Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
and Warner-Lambert Company has appealed the judgment. A decision on
the appeal is expected by the second half of 2007.
In January 2005, the Company was notified that a legal proceeding had been commenced against
it by Pfizer Inc. and its Spanish subsidiary Pfizer, S.A. requesting an order requiring the Company
to not manufacture or market its amlodipine products. The case was brought against Laboratorios
Davur S.L. in the 3rd Commercial Court of the City of Barcelona. After an initial
hearing the court imposed an interim injunction, preventing the Company from launching its
amlodipine products. However, upon appeal, the court lifted the requested injunction and awarded
the Company with court costs and legal fees. The underlying proceedings are still pending.
From time to time the Company is party to various legal actions that arise in the ordinary
course of business. The Company does not expect that resolution of these matters will, individually
or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
F-36