e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number:
001-31216
McAfee, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
77-0316593
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
3965 Freedom Circle
Santa Clara, California
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
95054
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(408) 988-3832
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of April 30, 2009, 155,372,744 shares of the
registrants common stock, $0.01 par value, were
outstanding.
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
March 31,
2009
CONTENTS
2
PART I:
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
|
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except share data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
585,797
|
|
|
$
|
483,302
|
|
Short-term marketable securities
|
|
|
166,676
|
|
|
|
27,449
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
240,411
|
|
|
|
322,986
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
245,416
|
|
|
|
221,900
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
287,085
|
|
|
|
310,870
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
48,617
|
|
|
|
38,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,574,002
|
|
|
|
1,404,788
|
|
Long-term marketable securities
|
|
|
49,007
|
|
|
|
82,974
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
112,356
|
|
|
|
114,435
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
319,767
|
|
|
|
303,937
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
285,909
|
|
|
|
315,803
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,165,315
|
|
|
|
1,169,616
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
66,920
|
|
|
|
66,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,573,276
|
|
|
$
|
3,457,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
52,958
|
|
|
$
|
41,529
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
10,329
|
|
|
|
20,675
|
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
82,860
|
|
|
|
82,648
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
179,827
|
|
|
|
194,680
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
978,736
|
|
|
|
989,096
|
|
Bank term loan
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,404,710
|
|
|
|
1,328,628
|
|
Deferred revenue, less current portion
|
|
|
290,616
|
|
|
|
304,014
|
|
Accrued taxes and other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
59,201
|
|
|
|
72,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,754,527
|
|
|
|
1,705,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 8, 12 and 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized: 5,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding: none
in 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized: 300,000,000 shares; Issued:
183,151,610 shares at March 31, 2009 and
181,133,439 shares at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding: 154,975,786 shares at March 31, 2009 and
153,534,594 shares at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
1,812
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost: 28,175,824 shares at
March 31, 2009 and 27,598,845 shares at
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(836,365
|
)
|
|
|
(819,861
|
)
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,089,526
|
|
|
|
2,053,245
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(25,984
|
)
|
|
|
(18,992
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
589,740
|
|
|
|
536,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,818,749
|
|
|
|
1,752,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,573,276
|
|
|
$
|
3,457,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
3
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except per share data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and support
|
|
$
|
227,947
|
|
|
$
|
188,218
|
|
Subscription
|
|
|
182,398
|
|
|
|
160,974
|
|
Product
|
|
|
37,364
|
|
|
|
20,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
|
447,709
|
|
|
|
369,641
|
|
Cost of net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and support
|
|
|
24,084
|
|
|
|
14,844
|
|
Subscription
|
|
|
48,644
|
|
|
|
46,590
|
|
Product
|
|
|
20,934
|
|
|
|
14,942
|
|
Amortization of purchased technology
|
|
|
19,394
|
|
|
|
13,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of net revenue
|
|
|
113,056
|
|
|
|
89,936
|
|
Operating costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
78,904
|
|
|
|
58,625
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
148,764
|
|
|
|
121,108
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
40,160
|
|
|
|
41,314
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
9,995
|
|
|
|
5,340
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
5,060
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs
|
|
|
282,883
|
|
|
|
226,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
51,770
|
|
|
|
53,247
|
|
Interest and other income, net
|
|
|
2,811
|
|
|
|
13,035
|
|
Impairment of marketable securities
|
|
|
(710
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of investments, net
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
54,037
|
|
|
|
68,744
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
38,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
53,456
|
|
|
$
|
30,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net
|
|
$
|
(274
|
)
|
|
$
|
(937
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation (loss) gain
|
|
|
(6,718
|
)
|
|
|
18,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
46,464
|
|
|
$
|
47,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share basic
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculation basic
|
|
|
153,721
|
|
|
|
160,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculation diluted
|
|
|
156,169
|
|
|
|
164,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
53,456
|
|
|
$
|
30,169
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
41,909
|
|
|
|
28,489
|
|
Impairment of marketable securities
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4,113
|
|
|
|
34,587
|
|
Restructuring charge (benefit)
|
|
|
3,912
|
|
|
|
(281
|
)
|
Decrease in fair value of options accounted for as liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,483
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
24,035
|
|
|
|
11,657
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards
|
|
|
(4,241
|
)
|
|
|
(9,520
|
)
|
Other non-cash items
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
(3,247
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
74,018
|
|
|
|
45,321
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
5,865
|
|
|
|
(10,823
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
10,583
|
|
|
|
(7,741
|
)
|
Accrued taxes and other liabilities
|
|
|
(80,287
|
)
|
|
|
(32,860
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
10,934
|
|
|
|
(8,894
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
145,976
|
|
|
|
71,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities
|
|
|
(133,932
|
)
|
|
|
(178,052
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities
|
|
|
10,147
|
|
|
|
114,451
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities
|
|
|
17,292
|
|
|
|
151,464
|
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(11,029
|
)
|
|
|
(10,493
|
)
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(2,455
|
)
|
|
|
(55,041
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(119,977
|
)
|
|
|
22,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under stock option and
stock purchase plans
|
|
|
7,757
|
|
|
|
53,677
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards
|
|
|
4,241
|
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(16,504
|
)
|
|
|
(127,175
|
)
|
Bank borrowings
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
95,494
|
|
|
|
(63,978
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash
|
|
|
(18,998
|
)
|
|
|
30,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
102,495
|
|
|
|
60,154
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
483,302
|
|
|
|
394,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
585,797
|
|
|
$
|
454,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
5
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Business
|
McAfee, Inc. and our wholly owned subsidiaries (we,
us or our) are a global dedicated
security technology company that secures systems and networks
from known and unknown threats. We empower home users,
businesses, government agencies, service providers and our
partners with the ability to block attacks, prevent disruptions,
and continuously track and improve their security and
compliance. We operate our business in five geographic regions:
North America; Europe, Middle East and Africa
(EMEA); Japan; Asia-Pacific, excluding Japan; and
Latin America.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
include our accounts as of March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008. All intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
These condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared by us, without audit, pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
such rules and regulations. The December 31, 2008 condensed
consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited consolidated
financial statements, but does not include all disclosures
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. However, we believe that all
disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto,
included in our annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
In the opinion of our management, all adjustments (which consist
of normal recurring adjustments, except as disclosed herein)
necessary to fairly present our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented have
been included. The results of operations for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the full year or for any future
periods.
Significant
Accounting Policies
Marketable
Securities
All marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale
securities. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair
value with resulting unrealized gains and losses, net of related
taxes, reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income. Premium and discount on debt securities
recorded at the date of purchase are amortized and accreted,
respectively, to interest income using the effective interest
method. Short-term marketable securities are those with
remaining maturities at the balance sheet date of less than one
year. Long-term marketable securities have remaining maturities
at the balance sheet date of one year or greater. Realized gains
and losses on sales of all such investments are reported in
earnings and computed using the specific identification cost
method.
We assess the value of our available-for-sale marketable
securities on a regular basis to assess whether an
other-than-temporary decline in the fair value has occurred.
Factors which we use to assess whether an other-than-temporary
decline has occurred include, but are not limited to, the likely
reason for the unrealized loss, period of time the fair value
was below amortized cost, changes in underlying collateral,
changes in ratings, market trends and conditions, and our intent
and ability to hold until we recover such losses. Any
other-than-temporary decline in value is reported in
earnings and a new cost basis for the marketable security is
established. In the three months ended March 31, 2009, we
recorded additional impairment on previously impaired marketable
securities totaling $0.7 million for continued declines in
fair value. We had no other-than-temporary impairment of
marketable securities in the three months ended March 31,
2008.
6
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventory
Inventory, which consists primarily of finished goods held at
our warehouse and other fulfillment partner locations and
finished goods sold to our channel partners but not yet sold
through to the end-user, is stated at lower of cost or market.
Cost is computed using standard cost, which approximates actual
cost on a first in, first out basis. Inventory balances are
included in other current assets on our condensed consolidated
balance sheets and were $14.5 million as of March 31,
2009 and $10.2 million as of December 31, 2008.
Deferred
Costs of Revenue
Deferred costs of revenue, which consist primarily of costs
related to revenue-sharing and royalty arrangements, and the
direct cost of materials that are associated with product and
subscription revenues deferred over a service period, including
arrangements that are deferred due to lack of the
vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair
value on an undelivered element, are included in the prepaid
expenses line item and other assets line item on our condensed
consolidated balance sheets. We generally recognize such
deferred costs as revenue is recognized. At March 31, 2009,
our deferred costs were $213.5 million compared to
$184.6 million at December 31, 2008.
Reclassifications
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we
reclassified sales order operation department expenses
previously reported in general and administrative expenses to
sales and marketing expenses. This reclassification improves the
transparency of the cost of our sales process and does not
affect our total operating costs, income from operations or net
income. The following table sets forth, for all periods
presented, the reclassification to conform to our current period
presentation and the stock compensation expense included in the
reclassification (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
8,838
|
|
|
$
|
9,416
|
|
|
$
|
11,002
|
|
|
$
|
2,751
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
(8,838
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,416
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,002
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,751
|
)
|
Stock compensation
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
In the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, we have reclassified
$61.9 million within investing activities to properly
reflect partial pay downs received on asset-backed investments,
calls and redemptions as proceeds from maturities of
marketable securities rather than proceeds from
sales of marketable securities.
7
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair
Value Measurements
On January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157), which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands
disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurement. We
hold financial assets, such as available-for-sale securities and
foreign currency contracts, subject to valuation under
SFAS 157. The following table details the fair value
measurements within the fair value hierarchy of our financial
assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2009 Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)(1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)(2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Government notes and bonds(4)
|
|
$
|
71,046
|
|
|
$
|
68,464
|
|
|
$
|
2,582
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate notes and bonds(4)
|
|
|
110,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities(4)
|
|
|
22,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities(4)
|
|
|
11,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents(5)
|
|
|
54,886
|
|
|
|
33,492
|
|
|
|
21,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
270,569
|
|
|
|
101,956
|
|
|
|
168,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivatives(6)
|
|
|
(2,358
|
)
|
|
|
(2,358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
268,211
|
|
|
$
|
99,598
|
|
|
$
|
168,613
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Level 1 classification is applied to any asset that has a
readily available quoted price from an active market where there
is significant transparency in the executed/quoted price. |
|
(2) |
|
Level 2 classification is applied to assets that have
evaluated prices received from fixed income vendors with data
inputs which are observable either directly or indirectly, but
do not represent quoted prices from an active market for each
individual security. |
|
(3) |
|
Level 3 classification is applied to assets when prices are
not derived from existing market data. |
|
(4) |
|
Included in both short-term and long-term marketable securities
on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(5) |
|
Included in cash and cash equivalents on our condensed
consolidated balance sheets. |
|
(6) |
|
Included in other current assets and other accrued liabilities
on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. |
In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standard Board
(FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)
No. 157-2,
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157
(FSP 157-2),
which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are not
remeasured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least
annually).
FSP 157-2
was effective for us beginning January 1, 2009 and did not
have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows in the three months ended
March 31, 2009. We expect
FSP 157-2
to have an impact on us going forward.
In April 2009, the FASB issued three related Staff Positions:
(i) FSP
No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(FSP 157-4),
(ii) SFAS No. 115-2
and
SFAS No. 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments
(FSP 115-2
and
FSP 124-2),
which will be effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009, and
(iii) SFAS No. 107-1
and APB
No. 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments,
(FSP 107-1
and APB
28-1),
which will be effective for interim periods ending after
June 15, 2009.
FSP 157-4
provides guidance on how to determine the fair value of assets
and liabilities under SFAS 157 when there has been a
significant decline in market activity and volume and
reemphasizes that the objective of a fair value measurement
remains an exit price. If we were to conclude that there
8
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of
activity of the asset or liability in relation to normal
market activities, quoted market values may not be
representative of fair value and we may conclude that a change
in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation
techniques may be appropriate.
FSP 115-2
and
FSP 124-2
modify the requirements for recognizing other-than-temporarily
impaired debt securities and revise the existing impairment
model for such securities, by modifying the current intent and
ability indicator in determining whether a debt security is
other-than-temporarily impaired.
FSP 107-1
and APB 28-1
enhance the disclosure of instruments under the scope of
SFAS 157 for interim periods. We are currently evaluating
the impact that these Staff Positions will have on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows when adopted in the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions
In June 2008, the FASB issued
EITF 03-06-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities
(EITF 03-06-1).
EITF 03-06-1
provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents
(whether paid or unpaid) are participating
securities and shall be included in the computation of
earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method in
SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share.
EITF 03-06-1
was effective for us beginning January 1, 2009 and did not
have an impact on our consolidated results of operations as our
stock-based awards are not eligible to receive dividends.
Useful
Life of Intangible Assets
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets
(FSP 142-3).
FSP 142-3
amends the factors an entity should consider in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful
life of recognized intangible assets under FASB Statement
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets and the period of expected cash flows used to
measure the fair value under FASB Statement No. 141,
Business Combinations.
FSP 142-3
was effective for us beginning January 1, 2009 and did not
have an impact on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133 (SFAS 161).
SFAS 161 amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 133), to expand disclosures about an
entitys derivative instruments and hedging activities, but
does not change SFAS 133s scope of accounting.
SFAS 161 was effective for us beginning January 1,
2009. As a result, we have included additional disclosures for
our derivative financial instruments in Note 5.
Noncontrolling
Interests
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51 (SFAS 160).
SFAS 160 amends Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 was
effective for us beginning January 1, 2009. The adoption of
SFAS 160 did not have an impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
9
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Business
Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB revised SFAS No. 141,
Business Combinations
(SFAS 141(R)), to improve the relevance,
representational faithfulness, and comparability of the
information that a reporting entity provides in its financial
reports about a business combination and its effects.
SFAS 141(R) changes the accounting for business
combinations by requiring that an acquiring entity measures and
recognizes identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
at the acquisition date fair value with limited exceptions. The
changes include the treatment of acquisition related transaction
costs, the valuation of any noncontrolling interest at the
acquisition date fair value, the recording of acquired
contingent liabilities at acquisition date fair value and the
subsequent re- measurement of such liabilities after acquisition
date, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and
development, the accounting for acquisition-related
restructuring cost accruals subsequent to the acquisition date
and the recognition of changes in the acquirers income tax
valuation allowance (see Note 4). SFAS 141(R) was
effective for us beginning January 1, 2009.
SFAS 141(R) impacts our condensed consolidated financial
statements, but the nature and magnitude of the specific effects
depends upon the nature, terms and size of acquisitions we
consummate. At March 31, 2009, $20.2 million of the
$88.6 million liability for unrecognized tax benefits
relate to tax positions of acquired entities taken prior to our
acquisition. Liabilities settled for lesser or greater amounts
will affect the income tax expense in the period of adjustment.
Revision
to Contingencies under 141(R)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 141(R)-1,
Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
in a Business Combination That Arise from
Contingencies (FSP 141(R)-1).
FSP 141(R)-1 amends the provisions in Statement 141(R) for
the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement
and accounting, and disclosures for assets and liabilities
arising from contingencies in business combinations. The FSP
eliminates the distinction between contractual and
non-contractual contingencies, including the initial recognition
and measurement criteria in Statement 141(R) and instead carries
forward most of the provisions in SFAS 141 for acquired
contingencies. FSP 141(R)-1 is effective for contingent
assets and contingent liabilities acquired in business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after
January 1, 2009. We expect FSP 141(R)-1 will have an
impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements, but
the nature and magnitude of the specific effects will depend
upon the nature, term and size of the acquired contingencies
from future acquisitions.
|
|
3.
|
Employee
Stock Benefit Plans
|
We record compensation expense for stock-based awards issued to
employees and outside directors in exchange for services
provided based on the estimated fair value of the awards on
their grant dates. Stock-based compensation expense is
recognized over the required service or performance period of
the awards. Our stock-based awards include stock options
(options), restricted stock units
(RSUs), restricted stock awards (RSAs),
restricted stock units with performance-based vesting
(PSUs) and employee stock purchase rights issued
pursuant to our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP
grants).
10
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense
in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123(R)) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Amortization of fair value of options
|
|
$
|
6,292
|
|
|
$
|
5,577
|
|
Restricted stock awards and units
|
|
|
10,274
|
|
|
|
5,825
|
|
Restricted stock units with performance-based vesting
|
|
|
5,948
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit related to cash settlement of options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
Tender offer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
24,035
|
|
|
$
|
11,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of fair value of options. We
recognize the fair value of options issued to employees and
outside directors and assumed in acquisitions as stock-based
compensation expense over the vesting period of the awards.
These charges include stock-based compensation expense for
options granted prior to January 1, 2006 but not yet vested
as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the pro forma provisions of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123), and
stock-based compensation expense for options granted subsequent
to January 1, 2006 based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R).
Restricted stock awards and units. We
recognize the fair value of RSAs and RSUs issued to employees as
stock-based compensation expense over the vesting period of the
awards. Fair value is determined as the difference between the
closing price of our common stock on the grant date and the
purchase price of the RSAs and RSUs.
Restricted stock units with performance-based
vesting. We recognize stock-based compensation
expense for the fair value of PSUs issued to employees.
The PSUs can have performance-based vesting components that vest
only if performance criteria are met for each respective
performance period (performance component).
Additionally, the PSUs can have service-based vesting components
that have accelerated vesting provisions if performance criteria
are met for each respective performance period (service
component). The PSUs issued to employees have either
performance components or service components or both.
If the performance criteria are not met for a performance
period, then the related performance components that would have
vested are forfeited and the related service components do not
accelerate. Certain performance criteria allow for different
vested amounts based on the level of achievement of the
performance criteria.
For certain performance components, we do not communicate the
performance criteria to the employees. For these awards, the
accounting grant date does not occur until it is known whether
the performance criteria are met, and such achievement or
non-achievement is communicated to the employees. These awards
are marked-to-market at the end of each reporting period through
the accounting grant date, and recognized over the expected
vesting period, provided we determine it is probable that the
performance criteria will be met.
For performance components for which the performance criteria
have been communicated to the employees, the accounting grant
date is deemed to have occurred. Fair value has been measured on
the grant date and is recognized over the expected vesting
period, provided we determine it is probable that the
performance criteria will be met.
For the service components, each tranche is accounted for as a
separate award and the accounting grant date is deemed to have
occurred. Fair value is measured on the grant date, and is
recognized over the expected vesting period for each tranche.
The expected vesting period for each tranche is based off the
service-based vesting period
11
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
or the accelerated vesting period if the performance period has
been set and we determine it is probable that the performance
criteria will be met.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We recognize
stock-based compensation expense for the fair value of ESPP
grants. The estimated fair value of ESPP grants is based on the
Black-Scholes pricing model. Expense is recognized ratably based
on contributions and the total fair value of the ESPP grants
estimated to be issued.
Benefit related to cash settlement of
options. Certain options held by terminated
employees expired during the blackout period, the period between
July 2006 and December 21, 2007, as they could not be
exercised during the
90-day
period subsequent to termination. As of December 31, 2007,
we recorded a liability of $5.7 million based on the
intrinsic value of these options using our December 31,
2007 closing stock price. We paid $5.2 million in January
2008 to settle these options based on the average closing price
of our common stock subsequent to December 21, 2007, the
date we became current on our reporting obligations under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. For 2008, we
recognized a benefit of $0.4 million for the difference
between the December 31, 2007 liability and the amount paid
in 2008. All of these options were cash settled by
March 31, 2008.
Tender offer. In January 2008, after we became
current with our reporting obligations under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we filed a Tender Offer
Statement with the SEC. The tender offer extended an offer by us
to holders of certain outstanding options to amend the exercise
price on certain of their outstanding options. The purpose of
the tender offer was to amend the exercise price on options to
have the same price as the fair market value on the revised
measurement dates that were identified during the investigation
of our historical option grant practices. As part of this tender
offer, we became obliged to pay a cash bonus of
$1.7 million, of which $0.4 million was paid to
Canadian employees in the three months ended March 31,
2008, and $1.3 million was paid to U.S. employees in
the three months ended March 31, 2009, to reimburse
optionees who elected to participate in the tender offer for any
increase in the exercise price of their options resulting from
the amendment. The impact of the cash bonus, as recorded during
the three months ended March 31, 2008, resulted in
stock-based compensation expense of $0.6 million and a
decrease to additional paid-in capital of $1.1 million. We
will not recognize any further expense related to the tender
offer.
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense
recorded by condensed consolidated statements of income and
comprehensive income line item (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cost of net revenue service and support
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
Cost of net revenue subscription
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Cost of net revenue product
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense included in cost of net revenue
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
6,850
|
|
|
|
3,621
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
9,763
|
|
|
|
3,896
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,251
|
|
|
|
3,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense included in operating costs
|
|
|
22,864
|
|
|
|
11,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
24,035
|
|
|
|
11,876
|
|
Deferred tax benefit
|
|
|
(7,080
|
)
|
|
|
(3,207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense, net of tax
|
|
$
|
16,955
|
|
|
$
|
8,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had no stock based compensation costs capitalized
as part of the cost of an asset.
At March 31, 2009, the estimated fair value of all unvested
options, RSUs, RSAs, PSUs and ESPP grants that have not yet been
recognized as stock-based compensation expense was
$162.6 million, net of expected forfeitures. We expect to
recognize this amount over a weighted-average period of
2.4 years. This amount does not reflect stock-
12
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
based compensation expense relating to 0.6 million PSUs for
which the performance criteria had not been set as of
March 31, 2009.
2009
Acquisition
In January 2009, we acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of
Endeavor Security, Inc. (Endeavor), an intrusion
prevention and detection company, for $2.5 million. The
Endeavor purchase agreement provides for an earn-out payment
totaling $1.0 million contingent upon the achievement of
certain Endeavor financial targets during the two-year period
subsequent to the close of the acquisition. The fair value of
the earn-out of $0.7 million at acquisition has been
accrued, for a total purchase price of $3.2 million. We
recorded $1.4 million of goodwill, which is not deductible
for tax purposes. The results of operations for Endeavor have
been included in our results of operations since the date of
acquisition.
The purchase agreement also provides for a total of
$2.0 million in bonus payments to certain employees
contingent upon their continued employment for three years
post-acquisition.
2008
Acquisitions
In 2008, we acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of
ScanAlert, Inc. (ScanAlert) for $54.9 million,
100% of the outstanding shares of Reconnex Corporation
(Reconnex) for $46.6 million and 100% of the
outstanding shares of Secure Computing Corporation (Secure
Computing) for $490.1 million. The results of
operations for these acquisitions have been included in our
results of operations since their respective acquisition dates.
Our management determined the purchase price allocations for
these acquisitions based on estimates of the fair values of the
tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
These estimates were arrived at utilizing recognized valuation
techniques. We are continuing to assess uncertain tax positions
as well as continuing to assess measurement of certain deferred
tax assets and liabilities of Secure Computing. In the three
months ended March 31, 2009, we had no significant purchase
price adjustments.
Pro forma results of operations have not been presented for
ScanAlert because the effect of this acquisition was not
material to our results of operations. The following unaudited
pro forma financial information presents our combined results
with Secure Computing and Reconnex as if the acquisitions had
occurred at the beginning of 2008 (in thousands, except per
share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
Pro forma net revenue
|
|
$
|
421,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
$
|
(10,429
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per share basic
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per share diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculation basic
|
|
|
160,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in per share calculation diluted
|
|
|
160,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above unaudited pro forma financial information includes
adjustments for amortization of identifiable intangible assets
that were acquired, adjustments to interest income, adjustments
for incremental stock-based compensation expense related to the
unearned portion of Secure Computings RSAs and RSUs
assumed and converted, eliminations of intercompany transactions
and related tax effects. The pro forma financial information
excludes the effects of the SafeWord product line sold by Secure
Computing in 2008, the effects of the in-process
13
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
research and development charge for Secure Computing that was
expensed immediately upon acquisition and the effects of the
goodwill impairment charge recorded by Secure Computing in 2008.
No effect has been given to cost reductions or synergies in this
presentation. In managements opinion, the unaudited pro
forma combined results of operations are not indicative of the
actual results that would have occurred had the acquisitions
been consummated at the beginning of three months ended
March 31, 2008, nor are they indicative of future
operations of the combined companies.
Forward
Exchange Contracts
We conduct business globally. As a result, we are exposed to
movements in foreign currency exchange rates. From time to time
we enter into forward exchange contracts to reduce exposures
associated with certain nonfunctional monetary assets and
liabilities such as accounts receivable and accounts payable
denominated in the Euro, British Pound, and Canadian Dollar. The
forward contracts typically range from one to three months in
original maturity. We recognize derivatives, which are included
in other current assets and other accrued liabilities on the
condensed consolidated balance sheet, at fair value. Both the
remeasurement of the asset and liability and the change in value
of the derivative are recognized in interest and other income on
our condensed consolidated statements of income and
comprehensive income. On the condensed consolidated statements
of cash flows, the derivatives offset the increase or decrease
in cash related to the underlying asset or liability. In
general, we do not hedge anticipated foreign currency cash
flows, nor do we enter into forward contracts for trading or
speculative purposes.
The forward contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting and
accordingly are marked to market at the end of each reporting
period with any unrealized gain or loss being recognized in the
statement of income as interest and other income.
Forward contracts outstanding are presented below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Notional U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Asset Fair
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
Asset Fair
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Euro
|
|
$
|
33,275
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
(555
|
)
|
|
$
|
31,944
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
(757
|
)
|
British Pound
|
|
|
8,346
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(1,820
|
)
|
|
|
8,503
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(1,659
|
)
|
Canadian Dollar
|
|
|
2,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
2,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,477
|
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
(2,441
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,401
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
(2,471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we
recorded a $1.6 realized loss and a $0.5 million realized
gain, respectively, on derivatives. These amounts are recognized
in interest and other income on our condensed consolidated
statements of income and comprehensive income.
14
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill by geographic region is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
807,040
|
|
|
$
|
1,448
|
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
|
$
|
808,218
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
253,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(5,720
|
)
|
|
|
248,020
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
35,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,606
|
|
Asia-Pacific (excluding Japan)
|
|
|
52,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,413
|
|
Latin America
|
|
|
20,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
21,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,169,616
|
|
|
$
|
1,448
|
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,720
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,165,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The goodwill acquired during the three months ended
March 31, 2009 is due to the acquisition of Endeavor. The
adjustments to goodwill are a result of purchase accounting
adjustments for the Secure Computing acquisition.
The components of intangible assets are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Including
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Including
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Useful
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Exchange)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Exchange)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Other intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased technologies
|
|
|
4.1 years
|
|
|
$
|
385,129
|
|
|
$
|
(193,868
|
)
|
|
$
|
191,261
|
|
|
$
|
385,915
|
|
|
$
|
(176,072
|
)
|
|
$
|
209,843
|
|
Trademarks and patents
|
|
|
5.1 years
|
|
|
|
42,186
|
|
|
|
(35,905
|
)
|
|
|
6,281
|
|
|
|
42,282
|
|
|
|
(35,639
|
)
|
|
|
6,643
|
|
Customer base and other intangibles
|
|
|
5.5 years
|
|
|
|
180,832
|
|
|
|
(92,465
|
)
|
|
|
88,367
|
|
|
|
182,282
|
|
|
|
(82,965
|
)
|
|
|
99,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
608,147
|
|
|
$
|
(322,238
|
)
|
|
$
|
285,909
|
|
|
$
|
610,479
|
|
|
$
|
(294,676
|
)
|
|
$
|
315,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate amortization expenses for the intangible assets
listed above totaled $29.4 million and $18.9 million
in the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Expected future intangible asset amortization expense as of
March 31, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2009
|
|
$
|
81,867
|
|
2010
|
|
|
93,402
|
|
2011
|
|
|
68,866
|
|
2012
|
|
|
31,559
|
|
2013
|
|
|
6,222
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
285,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We have initiated certain restructuring actions to reduce our
cost structure and enable us to invest in certain strategic
growth initiatives to enhance our competitive position.
During 2009 (the 2009 Restructuring), we continued
our efforts to consolidate and took the following measures:
(i) realigned our sales and marketing workforce and
(ii) disposed of excess facilities.
During 2008 (the 2008 Restructuring), we took the
following measures: (i) eliminated redundant positions
related to the SafeBoot Holdings B.V. (SafeBoot) and
Secure Computing acquisitions, (ii) realigned our sales
force and (iii) realigned staffing across various
departments.
During 2006 (the 2006 Restructuring), we took the
following measures: (i) reduced our workforce and
(ii) continued our efforts to consolidate and dispose of
excess facilities. The remaining $0.1 million of lease
termination costs and severance and other benefits will be paid
in 2009.
During 2004 and 2003 (the 2004 and 2003
Restructurings), we took the following measures:
(i) reduced our workforce, (ii) consolidated and
disposed of excess facilities, (iii) moved our European
headquarters to Ireland and vacated a leased facility in
Amsterdam, (iv) consolidated operations formerly housed in
three leased facilities in Dallas, Texas into our regional
headquarters facility in Plano, Texas, (v) relocated
employees from the Santa Clara, California headquarters
site to our Plano facility as part of the consolidation
activities and (vi) sold our Sniffer and Magic product
lines in 2004. During the three months ended March 31,
2009, we recorded a $0.2 million decrease to the liability
primarily related to changes in previous estimates of sublease
income for the Santa Clara lease. We have a
$2.5 million accrual balance related to the 2004 and 2003
Restructurings, which will be paid through 2013.
Restructuring charges in the three months ended March 31,
2008 totaled $0.1 million, consisting of $2.5 million
related to 2008 restructuring charges partially offset by a
$2.4 million revision related primarily to previous
estimates of base rent and sublease income for the
Santa Clara lease which was restructured in 2003, net of
accretion.
Restructuring in the three months ended March 31, 2009
totaled $5.1 million, consisting of $2.9 million
related to the 2009 Restructuring and a $2.2 million
additional accrual over the service period for our 2008
elimination of certain positions at Secure Computing.
2009
Restructuring
Activity and liability balances related to our 2009
restructuring are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Severance and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
2,666
|
|
|
|
2,856
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(1,203
|
)
|
|
|
(1,260
|
)
|
Effects of foreign currency exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
1,508
|
|
|
$
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the total 2009 restructuring charge, $1.5 million and
$1.4 million was recorded in EMEA and North America,
respectively. Lease termination costs and severance and other
benefits are expected to be paid through 2009.
16
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2008
Restructuring
Activity and liability balances related to our 2008
restructuring are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Severance and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual
|
|
|
6,142
|
|
|
|
6,621
|
|
|
|
12,763
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,419
|
)
|
|
|
(5,419
|
)
|
Adjustment to liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Effects of foreign currency exchange
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Accretion
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
6,171
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
7,346
|
|
Restructuring accrual
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(833
|
)
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
(1,390
|
)
|
Adjustment to liability
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
2,871
|
|
Effects of foreign currency exchange
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Accretion
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
6,017
|
|
|
$
|
2,949
|
|
|
$
|
8,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the total 2009 restructuring charge for severance,
$0.2 million, and $2.1 million was recorded in EMEA
and North America, respectively. In 2008, the $6.1 million
accrual for lease termination costs was recorded on the opening
balance sheet for Secure Computing for costs associated with
permanently vacated facilities. In the three months ended
March 31, 2009, we recorded a $0.6 million purchase
price adjustment for additional lease related costs associated
with permanently vacated facilities. The 2009 accretion relates
to these lease termination costs. Lease termination costs will
be paid through 2015 and severance and other benefits will be
paid in 2009.
On December 22, 2008, we entered into a credit agreement
with a group of financial institutions (the Credit
Facility). The Credit Facility provides for a
$100.0 million unsecured term loan and a
$100.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a
$25.0 million letter of credit sublimit. The Credit
Facility also contains an expansion option permitting us to
arrange up to an aggregate of $200.0 million in additional
commitments from existing lenders
and/or new
lenders at the lenders discretion.
In January 2009, we borrowed $100.0 million against the
term loan in the Credit Facility. The principal together with
any accrued interest on the term loan is due on
December 22, 2009.
The credit facility, which is subject to certain quarterly
financial covenants, terminates on December 22, 2011, on
which date all outstanding principal of, together with accrued
interest on, any revolving loans will be due. We may prepay the
loans and terminate the commitments at any time, without premium
or penalty, subject to reimbursement of certain costs in the
case of eurocurrency loans.
Loans may be made in U.S. Dollars, Euros or other
currencies agreed to by the lenders. Loans will bear interest at
our election at the prime rate or at an adjusted LIBOR rate plus
a margin (ranging from 2.00% to 2.50%) that varies with our
consolidated leverage ratio (a eurocurrency loan).
Interest on the loans is payable quarterly in arrears with
respect to prime rate loans and at the end of an interest period
(or at each three month interval in the case of loans with
interest periods greater than three months) in the case of
eurocurrency loans. Commitment fees range from 0.25% to 0.45% of
the unused portion on the credit facility depending on our
consolidated leverage ratio.
17
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In addition, we have a 14 million Euro credit facility with
a bank (the Euro Credit Facility). The Euro Credit
Facility is available on an offering basis, meaning that
transactions under the Euro Credit Facility will be on such
terms and conditions, including interest rate, maturity,
representations, covenants and events of default, as mutually
agreed between us and the bank at the time of each specific
transaction. The Euro Credit Facility is intended to be used for
short-term credit requirements, with terms of one year or less.
The Euro Credit Facility can be canceled at any time. No
balances were outstanding under the Euro Credit Facility as of
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and
diluted net income per share is provided as follows (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Numerator basic and diluted net income
|
|
$
|
53,456
|
|
|
$
|
30,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common stock outstanding
|
|
|
153,721
|
|
|
|
160,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common stock outstanding
|
|
|
153,721
|
|
|
|
160,992
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options, RSUs, RSAs, PSUs and ESPP grants(1)
|
|
|
2,448
|
|
|
|
3,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares
|
|
|
156,169
|
|
|
|
164,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share basic
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
6.6 million and 4.6 million RSUs and options,
respectively, were excluded from the calculation since the
effect was anti-dilutive. In addition, we excluded
1.1 million and 1.2 million PSUs for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, because they
are contingently issuable shares. |
Our consolidated provision for income taxes for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $0.6 million and
$38.6 million, respectively, reflecting an effective tax
rate of 1% and 56%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 differs from the
U.S. federal statutory rate (statutory rate)
primarily due to the benefit of lower tax rates in certain
foreign jurisdictions, as well as tax benefits recognized in the
first quarter as a result of statute expirations in various
jurisdictions. The effective tax rate for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 differs from the statutory rate primarily as
a result of certain acquisition integration activities, which
resulted in an increase of 22 percentage points to our
effective tax rate. In October of 2008, we were granted
administrative relief by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service
from the negative tax consequences associated with certain
acquisition integration activities. As a result, we reversed the
tax expense in the fourth quarter of 2008.
The earnings from our foreign operations in India are subject to
a tax holiday. In May 2008, the Indian government extended the
period through which the holiday would be effective to
March 31, 2010. The tax holiday provides for zero percent
taxation on certain classes of income and requires certain
conditions to be met. We were in compliance with these
conditions as of March 31, 2009.
18
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We account for uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48).
As a result, we apply a more-likely-than-not recognition
threshold for all tax uncertainties. FIN 48 only allows the
recognition of those tax benefits that have a greater than 50%
likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the taxing
authorities. We believe it is reasonably possible that, in the
next 12 months, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits
related to the resolution of federal, state and foreign matters
could be reduced by $6.5 million to $9.6 million as
audits close and statutes expire.
The U.S. Internal Revenue Service is presently conducting
an examination of our federal income tax returns for the
calendar years 2006 and 2007. We cannot reasonably determine if
this examination will have a material impact on our financial
statements. We concluded pre-filing discussions with the Dutch
tax authorities with respect to the 2004 tax year in January
2009. As a result, a tax benefit of approximately
$2.2 million is reflected in the first quarter of 2009. In
addition, the statute of limitations related to various domestic
and foreign jurisdictions expired in the first quarter of 2009,
resulting in a tax benefit of approximately $9.1 million.
|
|
11.
|
Business
Segment Information
|
We have one business and operate in one industry. We develop,
market, distribute and support computer and network security
solutions for large enterprises, governments, and small and
medium-sized business and consumer users, as well as resellers
and distributors. Management measures operations based on our
five operating segments: North America; EMEA; Japan;
Asia-Pacific, excluding Japan; and Latin America. Our chief
operating decision maker is our chief executive officer.
We market and sell anti-virus and security software, hardware
and services through our geographic regions. These products and
services are marketed and sold worldwide primarily through
resellers, distributors, systems integrators, retailers,
original equipment manufacturers, internet service providers and
directly by us. In addition, we offer on our web site suites of
online products and services personalized for the user based on
the users personal computer configuration, attached
peripherals and resident software. We also offer managed
security and availability applications to corporations and
governments on the internet.
19
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our chief operating decision maker evaluates performance based
on income from operations, which includes only cost of revenue
and selling expenses directly attributable to a sale.
Historically, the measure of segment income from operations
included the allocation of cost of revenues, research and
development and certain sales and marketing expenses. We revised
the segment information for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 to conform to the 2009 presentation for
comparative purposes. Summarized financial information
concerning our net revenue and income from operations by
geographic region is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net revenue by region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
254,442
|
|
|
$
|
189,750
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
120,619
|
|
|
|
122,248
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
35,509
|
|
|
|
27,019
|
|
Asia-Pacific, excluding Japan
|
|
|
20,603
|
|
|
|
18,036
|
|
Latin America
|
|
|
16,536
|
|
|
|
12,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
447,709
|
|
|
$
|
369,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations by region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
189,234
|
|
|
$
|
143,794
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
92,862
|
|
|
|
90,702
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
27,271
|
|
|
|
18,835
|
|
Asia-Pacific, excluding Japan
|
|
|
13,590
|
|
|
|
11,753
|
|
Latin America
|
|
|
12,457
|
|
|
|
8,764
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
(283,644
|
)
|
|
|
(220,601
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$
|
51,770
|
|
|
$
|
53,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other includes research and development expenses,
cost of revenues and sales and marketing expenses not directly
related to the sale of our products and services, general and
administrative expenses, stock-based compensation, amortization
of purchased technology and other intangibles and restructuring
(benefit) charges. These expenses are not attributable to any
specific geographic region and are not included in the segment
measure of income from operations reviewed by our chief
operating decision maker. The difference between income from
operations and income before provision for income taxes is
reflected on the face of our condensed consolidated statements
of income and comprehensive income.
Settled
Cases
In July 2006, the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California consolidated several purported
stockholder derivative suits as In re McAfee, Inc. Derivative
Litigation, Master File No. 5:06CV03484 (JF) (the
Consolidated Action). In September 2006, three
identical lawsuits that had been filed in the Superior Court of
the State of California, County of Santa Clara, were
consolidated in that court (the State Action). The
Consolidated Action and State Action asserted that we improperly
backdated stock option grants for a period ending in May 2006.
In December 2007, we reached a tentative settlement with the
plaintiffs in both Actions. The Court preliminarily approved the
settlement in October 2008 and granted final approval in
February 2009. We paid $13.8 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2009 for this previously accrued settlement.
In the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded a
benefit of $6.5 million related to reimbursements from
insurance for legal fees we incurred related to cost of defense
incurred in connection with our stock option
20
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
investigation that commenced in May 2006. This benefit is
reflected in the general and administrative line on our
condensed consolidated statement of income.
Open
Cases
While we cannot predict the likelihood of future claims or
inquiries, we expect that new matters may be initiated against
us from time to time. The results of claims, lawsuits and
investigations also cannot be predicted, and it is possible that
the ultimate resolution of these matters, individually and in
the aggregate, may have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows.
In December 2008, Information Protection and Authentication of
Texas, LLC, (IPAT) filed a complaint in the Eastern
District of Texas against us, alleging infringement of two IPAT
patents. Although the patents relate to firewall technology, no
specific McAfee products have been identified in the suit and no
specific infringement allegations have yet been made. In January
2009, IPAT filed suit against many PC manufacturers in the
Southern District of Florida alleging infringement of the same
two patents.
In January 2007, a former executive filed an arbitration demand
with the American Arbitration Association in Dallas, Texas,
seeking the arbitration of claims associated with his
employment; we have filed counterclaims. The arbitration hearing
took place in March 2009 and we expect a final award by the
arbitrator on or before June 30, 2009. Until the final
award has been issued our liability, if any, cannot be
reasonably estimated and, therefore, no provision has been
recorded in our financial statements.
In June 2006, Finjan Software, Ltd. filed a complaint in the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
against Secure Computing, alleging Webwasher Secure Content
Management suite and CyberGuard TSP infringe three Finjan
patents. In March 2008, a jury found that Secure Computing
wilfully infringed certain claims of three Finjan patents and
awarded $9.2 million in damages. This was recorded as an
assumed liability in the allocation of the purchase price for
Secure Computing. We acquired Secure Computing in November 2008
and intend to vigorously challenge the verdict and Finjans
pending motions for an injunction and enhanced damages.
In July 2001, certain investment bank underwriters and McAfee,
along with certain of our officers and directors were named in a
putative class action for alleged violation of federal
securities laws. (United States District Court for the Southern
District of New York, In re McAfee.com Corp. Initial Public
Offering Securities Litigation, 01 Civ.7034 (SAS). This is
one of a number of cases challenging underwriting practices in
the initial public offerings of more than 300 companies,
coordinated for pretrial as In re Initial Public Offering
Securities Litigation, 21 MC 92 (SAS). The McAfee complaint
alleges improper underwriting activities not disclosed in
registration statements for McAfee.coms IPO, and seeks
unspecified damages. The parties have reached a global
settlement, subject to court approval. Insurers will pay the
full McAfee settlement share. Neither the Company nor its
officer and director defendants will bear any financial
liability. McAfee, its officers and directors were dismissed
from the case through a tolling agreement, and such agreement is
pending court approval. If the litigation continues, we believe
we have meritorious defenses and plan to vigorously defend.
In addition, we are engaged in certain legal and administrative
proceedings incidental to our normal business activities and
believe that these matters will not have a material adverse
effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
21
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Warranty
Accrual and Guarantees
|
We offer a 90 day warranty on our hardware and software
products and record a liability for the estimated future costs
associated with warranty claims, which is based upon historical
experience and our estimate of the level of future costs. A
reconciliation of the change in our warranty obligation as of
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty
|
|
|
|
Accrual
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
489
|
|
Additional accruals
|
|
|
4,236
|
|
Costs incurred during the period
|
|
|
(3,615
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
Additional accruals
|
|
|
780
|
|
Costs incurred during the period
|
|
|
(799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of certain guarantee and
indemnification agreements as of March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of our software license agreements with our
customers, we agree that in the event the software sold
infringes upon any patent, copyright, trademark, or any other
proprietary right of a third-party, we will indemnify our
customer licensees against any loss, expense, or liability from
any damages that may be awarded against our customer. We include
this infringement indemnification in our software license
agreements and selected managed service arrangements. In the
event the customer cannot use the software or service due to
infringement and we can not obtain the right to use, replace or
modify the license or service in a commercially feasible manner
so that it no longer infringes, then we may terminate the
license and provide the customer a pro-rata refund of the fees
paid by the customer for the infringing license or service. We
have recorded no liability associated with this indemnification,
as we are not aware of any pending or threatened infringement
actions that are probable losses.
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of certain vendor agreements, in particular,
vendors used as part of our managed services, we have agreed
that in the event the service provided to the customer by the
vendor on behalf of us infringes upon any patent, copyright,
trademark, or any other proprietary right of a third-party, we
will indemnify our vendor, against any loss, expense, or
liability from any damages that may be awarded against our
vendor. No maximum liability is stipulated in these vendor
agreements. We have recorded no liability associated with this
indemnification, as we are not aware of any pending or
threatened infringement actions or claims that are probable
losses. We believe the estimated fair value of these
indemnification clauses is minimal.
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of our agreements to sell Magic in January 2004,
Sniffer in July 2004, and McAfee Labs assets in December 2004,
we agreed to indemnify the purchasers for any breach of
representations or warranties in the agreement as well as for
any liabilities related to the assets prior to sale that were
not included in the purchaser assumed liabilities (undiscovered
liabilities). Subject to limited exceptions, the maximum
potential loss related to the indemnifications is
$10.0 million, $200.0 million and $1.5 million,
respectively. To date, we have paid no amounts under the
representations and warranties indemnifications and we have not
recorded any accruals related to these agreements. We believe
the estimated fair value of these indemnification clauses is
minimal.
|
22
MCAFEE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
As permitted under Delaware law, we have agreements whereby we
indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or
occurrences while the officer or director is, or was, serving at
our request in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of
future payments we could be required to make under these
indemnification agreements is not limited; however, we have
director and officer insurance coverage that reduces our
exposure and may enable us to recover a portion or all of any
future amounts paid. We believe we will prevail in these
insurance coverage disputes.
|
|
|
|
Under the terms of the agreement entered into by Secure
Computing in July 2008 to sell its SafeWord assets, we are
obligated to indemnify the purchaser for any breach of
representations or warranties in the agreement as well as for
any liabilities related to the assets prior to sale that were
not included in the purchaser assumed liabilities (undiscovered
liabilities). Subject to limited exceptions, the maximum
potential loss related to the indemnification is
$64.3 million. To date, we have paid no amounts under the
representations and warranties indemnifications. We have not
recorded any accruals related to this agreement. We believe the
estimated fair value of these indemnification clauses is minimal.
|
If we believe a liability associated with any of the
aforementioned indemnifications becomes probable and the amount
of the liability is reasonably estimable or the minimum amount
of a range of loss is reasonably estimable, then an appropriate
liability will be established.
23
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Forward-Looking
Statements; Trademarks
This Report on
Form 10-Q
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Forward-looking statements are statements that look to future
events and consist of, among other things, statements about our
anticipated future income including the amount and mix of
revenue among type of product, category of customer, geographic
region and distribution method and our anticipated future
expenses and tax rates. Forward-looking statements include our
business strategies and objectives and include statements about
the expected benefits of our strategic alliances and
acquisitions, our plans for the integration of acquired
businesses, our continued investment in complementary
businesses, products and technologies, our expectations
regarding product acceptance, product and pricing competition,
continuation of our stock repurchase program, cash requirements
and the amounts and uses of cash and working capital that we
expect to generate, as well as statements involving trends in
the security risk management market and statements including
such words as may, believe,
plan, expect, anticipate,
could, estimate, predict,
goals, continue, project,
and similar expressions or the negative of these terms or other
comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements speak
only as of the date of this Report on
Form 10-Q
and are subject to business and economic risks, uncertainties
and assumptions that are difficult to predict, including those
discussed in Risk Factors in Part II,
Item 1A in this quarterly report and in Item 1,
Business, Item 1A, Risk
Factors and Item 7, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in our annual report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. Therefore, our
actual results may differ materially and adversely from those
expressed in any forward-looking statements. We cannot assume
responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of
forward-looking statements, and we undertake no obligation to
revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any
reason.
This report includes registered trademarks and trade names of
McAfee and other corporations. Trademarks or trade names owned
by McAfee
and/or its
affiliates include, but are not limited to: McAfee,
VirusScan, Total Protection,
SafeBoot, and ScanAlert. Any other
non-McAfee related products, registered
and/or
unregistered trademarks contained herein are only by reference
and are the sole property of their respective owners.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this report. The results shown herein are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the
full year or any future periods.
Overview
and Executive Summary
We are the leading dedicated security technology company that
secures systems and networks from known and unknown threats
around the world. We empower home users, businesses, government
agencies, service providers and our partners with the ability to
block attacks, prevent disruptions, enforce policy and
continuously track and improve their security and compliance. We
apply business discipline and a pragmatic approach to security
that is based on four principles of security risk management
(identify and prioritize assets; determine acceptable risk;
protect against threats; enforce and measure compliance). We
incorporate some or all of these principles into our solutions.
Our solutions protect systems and networks, blocking immediate
threats while proactively providing protection from future
threats.
Security has emerged as one of the most critical concerns facing
businesses and consumers. Security breaches have risen
dramatically in the past few years, fueled in part by the
proliferation of mobile devices such as laptop computers, cell
phones and smart phones with email and web-surfing
capabilities. For corporations, the increasing frequency of
security breaches has coincided with expanding regulatory
compliance requirements relating to security and more
specifically, to privacy. Failure to comply with these
requirements, and with the requirements of internal security
policies and procedures, creates an additional level of
enterprise risk. For consumers, the increasing frequency of
online fraud and security concerns discourages customers from
transacting online for example, visiting and
purchasing from
e-commerce
sites, using online banking services and preparing taxes online.
All of these trends point toward a growing demand for effective
security solutions.
We have one business and operate in one industry, developing,
marketing, distributing and supporting computer security
solutions for large enterprises, governments, small and
medium-sized businesses and consumers either directly or through
a network of qualified distribution partners. We derive our
revenue from three sources:
24
(i) service and support revenue, which includes support and
maintenance, training, consulting revenue;
(ii) subscription revenue, which consists of revenue from
customers who purchase licenses for products for the term of the
subscription; and (iii) product revenue, which includes
revenue from perpetual licenses (those with a one-time license
fee) and hardware product sales. In the three months ended
March 31, 2009, service and support revenue accounted for
51%, subscription revenue accounted for 41% and product revenue
accounted for 8% of total net revenue, respectively.
Operating
Results and Trends
We evaluate our consolidated financial performance utilizing a
variety of indicators. Three of the primary indicators that we
utilize to evaluate the growth and health of our business are
total net revenue, operating income and net income.
Net Revenue. As discussed more fully below,
our net revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2009
grew by $78.1 million, or 21%, to $447.7 million from
$369.6 million in the three months ended March 31,
2008. Our net revenue is directly impacted by corporate
information technology, government and consumer spending levels.
Net revenue from our 2008 acquisitions contributed
$47.1 million in the three months ended March 31,
2009. Changes in the U.S. Dollar compared to foreign
currencies negatively impacted our revenue growth by
$14.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009
when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Operating Income. The $1.5 million
decrease in operating income in the three months ended
March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2008 was primarily attributable to the following
factors: (i) amortization expense increased by
$10.5 million as a result of purchased technology and
intangibles acquired in recent acquisitions,
(ii) restructuring charges increased by $5.0 million
due to eliminating redundant positions from our Secure Computing
acquisition and reorganization of our sales and marketing
workforce and (iii) an increase in salaries and benefits
due to an increase in headcount, primarily as a result of our
Secure Computing acquisition. These decreases were offset
largely by the overall growth of our company, including
increased revenue and, to a lesser extent, increased operating
costs.
Net Income. The $23.3 million increase in
net income in the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared to three months ended March 31, 2008 was primarily
attributable to a decrease in our effective tax rate discussed
more fully in Provision for Income Taxes below,
offset by a $10.9 million decrease in interest income
attributable to lower yields and lower cash and marketable
securities balances.
Acquisitions. We continue to focus our efforts
on building a full line of system and network protection
solutions and technologies that support our multi-platform
strategy of personal computer, internet and mobile security
solutions. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we acquired Secure
Computing for $490.1 million. With the Secure Computing
acquisition, we plan to deliver the industrys most
complete network security solution to organizations of all
sizes. We expect that the acquisition of Secure Computing will
have a dilutive impact in the remainder of 2009, primarily due
to the amortization of intangibles.
Net Revenue by Product Groups and Customer
Category. Transactions from our corporate
business include the sale of product offerings intended for
enterprise, mid-market and small business use. Net revenue from
our corporate products increased $59.6 million, or 28%, to
$276.0 million during the three months ended March 31,
2009 from $216.4 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2008. The year-over-year increase in revenue was
due to a $17.6 million increase in revenue from our end
point solutions, which includes increased revenue from our
system security solutions and new revenue from data encryption
products integrated from our SafeBoot acquisition and a
$43.7 million increase in revenue from our network
offerings, which includes new revenue integrated from our Secure
Computing acquisition. These increases were offset in part by a
$1.7 million decrease in revenue from our vulnerability and
risk management offerings.
25
Transactions from our consumer business include the sale of
product offerings primarily intended for consumer use, as well
as any revenue or activities associated with providing an
overall safe consumer experience on the internet or cellular
networks. Net revenue from our consumer security market
increased $18.5 million, or 12%, to $171.7 million in
the three months ended March 31, 2009 from
$153.2 million in the three months ended March 31,
2008. The increase in revenue from our consumer market in the
three months ended March 31, 2009 was primarily
attributable to our strengthening relationships with strategic
channel partners, such as Acer, Dell, Sony Computer, and Toshiba.
Deferred Revenue. Our deferred revenue balance
at March 31, 2009 decreased 2% to $1,269.4 million,
compared to $1,293.1 million at December 31, 2008. The
decrease was attributable to the strengthening of the
U.S. Dollar compared to both the Euro and the Japanese Yen
during the three months ended March 31, 2009, which
negatively impacted our deferred revenue balance at
March 31, 2009. On a local currency basis, our deferred
revenue continued to increase as a result of growing sales of
maintenance renewals from our expanding customer base and
increased sales of subscription-based products. We receive up
front payments for maintenance and subscriptions but we
recognize revenue over the service or subscription term.
Approximately 75 to 85% of our total net revenue during 2008 and
the first quarter of 2009 came from prior-period deferred
revenue. As with revenue, we believe that deferred revenue is a
key indicator of the growth and health of our business.
Macro Economic Conditions. While we have
recently experienced strong growth in revenue, economic
conditions and financial markets have become increasingly
negative, and national and global economies and financial
markets have experienced a severe downturn stemming from a
multitude of factors, including adverse credit conditions
impacted by the sub-prime mortgage crisis, slower economic
activity, concerns about inflation and deflation, fluctuating
energy costs, decreased consumer confidence, reduced corporate
profits and capital spending, adverse business conditions and
liquidity concerns and other factors. Economic growth in the
U.S. and many other countries slowed in the fourth quarter
of 2007, remained slow for 2008 and the first quarter of 2009
and is expected to slow further or to recede in 2009 in the U.S.
and abroad. The severity or length of time these economic and
financial market conditions may persist is unknown. During
challenging economic times and in tight credit markets, many
customers may delay or reduce technology purchases. This could
result in reductions in sales of our products, longer sales
cycles, difficulties in collection of accounts receivable,
slower adoption of new technologies and increased price
competition. In the first quarter of 2009, we experienced delays
in closing certain transactions that we anticipated would close
during the quarter. In addition, weakness in the end-user market
could negatively affect the cash flow of our distributors and
resellers who could, in turn, delay paying their obligations to
us. This would increase our credit risk exposure and cause
delays in our recognition of revenue on future sales to these
customers. Specific economic trends, such as declines in the
demand for PCs, servers, and other computing devices, or
softness in corporate information technology spending, could
have a more direct impact on our business. Any of these events
would likely harm our business, including decreasing our
revenues, decreasing cash provided by operating activities and
negatively impacting our liquidity.
Foreign Exchange Fluctuations. We are unable
to predict the extent to which revenue in future periods will be
impacted by changes in foreign exchange rates. If international
sales become a greater portion of our total sales in the future,
changes in foreign currency rates may have a potentially greater
impact on our revenue and operating results. The Euro and
Japanese Yen are the two predominant
non-U.S. currencies
that affect our financial statements. As the U.S. Dollar
strengthens against foreign currencies, our revenues from
transactions outside the U.S. and operating income may be
negatively impacted. The U.S. Dollar has recently
depreciated against the Japanese Yen. As the U.S. Dollar
weakens against foreign currencies, our revenues may be
positively impacted. During the three months ended
March 31, 2009, on an average quarterly exchange basis, the
U.S. Dollar strengthened against the Euro and weakened
against the Yen compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2008. Overall, the U.S. Dollar strengthening
against the Euro had the most significant impact to our
financial statements and this has resulted in a decrease in the
revenue and expense amounts in certain foreign countries in our
statements of income for the three months ended March 31,
2009 as compared to the same prior-year period.
26
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
We had no significant changes in our critical accounting
policies and estimates during the three months ended
March 31, 2009 as compared to the critical accounting
policies and estimates disclosed in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included in our annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Results
of Operations
Net
Revenue
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a
year-over-year
comparison of the key components of our net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and support
|
|
$
|
227,947
|
|
|
$
|
188,218
|
|
|
$
|
39,729
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Subscription
|
|
|
182,398
|
|
|
|
160,974
|
|
|
|
21,424
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Product
|
|
|
37,364
|
|
|
|
20,449
|
|
|
|
16,915
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
447,709
|
|
|
$
|
369,641
|
|
|
$
|
78,068
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue by geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America
|
|
$
|
254,442
|
|
|
$
|
189,750
|
|
|
$
|
64,692
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
EMEA
|
|
|
120,619
|
|
|
|
122,248
|
|
|
|
(1,629
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Japan
|
|
|
35,509
|
|
|
|
27,019
|
|
|
|
8,490
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Asia-Pacific, excluding Japan
|
|
|
20,603
|
|
|
|
18,036
|
|
|
|
2,567
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Latin America
|
|
|
16,536
|
|
|
|
12,588
|
|
|
|
3,948
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue
|
|
$
|
447,709
|
|
|
$
|
369,641
|
|
|
$
|
78,068
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net service and support revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support and maintenance
|
|
$
|
206,862
|
|
|
$
|
175,941
|
|
|
$
|
30,921
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
Consulting, training and other services
|
|
|
21,085
|
|
|
|
12,277
|
|
|
|
8,808
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total service and support revenue
|
|
$
|
227,947
|
|
|
$
|
188,218
|
|
|
$
|
39,729
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net product revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licenses
|
|
$
|
13,382
|
|
|
$
|
9,634
|
|
|
$
|
3,748
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
Hardware
|
|
|
18,980
|
|
|
|
8,771
|
|
|
|
10,209
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Retail and other
|
|
|
5,002
|
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
|
|
2,958
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product revenue
|
|
$
|
37,364
|
|
|
$
|
20,449
|
|
|
$
|
16,915
|
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our net revenue in a specific period is an aggregation of
thousands of transactions ranging from high-volume, low-dollar
transactions to high-dollar, multiple-element transactions that
are individually negotiated. The impact of pricing and volume
changes on revenue is complex as substantially all of our
transactions contain multiple elements, primarily software
licenses and post-contract support (PCS).
Additionally, approximately 75 to 85% of our revenue in a
specific period is derived from prior-period transactions for
which revenue has been deferred and is being amortized into
income over the period of the arrangement. Therefore, the impact
of pricing and volume changes on revenue in a specific period
results from transactions in multiple prior periods.
The increase in net revenue during the three months ended
March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2008 reflected (i) a $59.6 million, or
28%, increase in our corporate business and (ii) an
$18.5 million, or 12%, increase in our consumer business.
27
Net revenue from our corporate business increased during the
three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2008 primarily due to a
$43.7 million increase in revenues from our network
protection offerings, which includes revenue from products
integrated from our Secure Computing acquisition, and a
$17.6 million increase in revenues from our end point
solutions, which includes revenue from data encryption products
integrated from our SafeBoot acquisition. These increases were
partially offset by a $1.7 million decrease in our
vulnerability and risk management offerings. During the three
months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2008, we experienced an increase in both
the number and size of larger transactions sold to customers
through a solution selling approach, bundling multiple products
and services into suite offerings, which positively impacted
deferred revenue and will impact our revenue in future periods.
Net revenue from our consumer market increased during the three
months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2008 primarily due to (i) online
subscriber growth due partly to an increase in our customer
base, (ii) increased online renewal subscriptions from both
a larger customer base and (iii) increased up-sell to
higher level suites with higher price points. We continued to
strengthen our relationships with strategic channel partners,
such as Acer, Dell, Sony Computer, and Toshiba.
Net
Revenue by Geography
Net revenue outside of North America accounted for approximately
43% and 49% of net revenue in the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Net revenue from
North America and EMEA has historically comprised between 80%
and 90% of our total net revenue.
The increase in total net revenue in North America during the
three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2008 was primarily attributable to
(i) a $55.4 million increase in corporate revenue due
to increased revenue from our network security offerings, which
includes new revenue from products integrated from our Secure
Computing acquisition and our end point solutions and
(ii) a $9.3 million increase in our consumer revenue.
We also experienced an increase in U.S. government spending
on our product offerings and larger transactions sold to
customers through a solution selling approach.
The decrease in net revenue in EMEA during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2008 was attributable to the negative impact of
the U.S. Dollar strengthening against the Euro, which
resulted in an approximate $19.0 million impact to EMEA net
revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared
to the three months ended March 31, 2008. Excluding the
negative impact from the strengthening U.S. Dollar against
the Euro, we continued to experience revenue growth in EMEA from
both our corporate and consumer offerings.
Our Japan, Latin America and Asia-Pacific operations combined
have historically comprised less than 20% of our total net
revenue, and we expect this trend to continue. Net revenue from
Japan was also positively impacted by the weakening
U.S. Dollar against the Japanese Yen, which resulted in an
approximate $4.4 million contribution to Japan net revenue
in the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the
three months ended March 31, 2008.
Service
and Support Revenue
The increase in service and support revenue in the three months
ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2008 was attributable to an increase in support
and maintenance primarily due to amortization of previously
deferred revenue from support arrangements and to an increase in
sales of support renewals to existing and new customers. In
addition, we have expanded our support offerings to include
premium-level services. Revenue from consulting increased due to
more consultants providing integration and implementation
services.
Although we expect our service and support revenue to continue
to increase, our growth rate and net revenue depend
significantly on renewals of support arrangements as well as our
ability to respond successfully to the pace of technological
change and our ability to expand our customer base. If our
renewal rate or our pace of new customer acquisition slows, our
net revenue and operating results would be adversely affected.
28
Subscription
Revenue
The increase in subscription revenue in the three months ended
March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2008 was attributable to (i) increases in
our online subscription arrangements due to our continued
relationships with strategic partners, such as Acer, Dell, Sony
Computer and Toshiba (ii) increases in revenue from our
McAfee Total Protection Service for small and mid-market
businesses, (iii) increases in royalties from sales by our
strategic channel partners and (iv) increases in
subscriptions from our Secure Computing acquisition.
Subscription revenue continues to be positively impacted by
McAfee Consumer Suites, including McAfee VirusScan Plus, McAfee
Internet Security, and McAfee Total Protection Solutions, as
these suites utilize a subscription-based model.
Product
Revenue
The increase in product revenue for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2008, was attributable to (i) increased
revenue from our network security solutions which have a higher
hardware content and, therefore, more upfront revenue
realization and (ii) increased revenue from our data
protection solutions and upgrade initiatives related to our
total protection solutions.
Cost
of Net Revenue
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated a
comparison of cost of net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of net revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and support
|
|
$
|
24,084
|
|
|
$
|
14,844
|
|
|
$
|
9,240
|
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
Subscription
|
|
|
48,644
|
|
|
|
46,590
|
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Product
|
|
|
20,934
|
|
|
|
14,942
|
|
|
|
5,992
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Amortization of purchased technology
|
|
|
19,394
|
|
|
|
13,560
|
|
|
|
5,834
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of net revenue
|
|
$
|
113,056
|
|
|
$
|
89,936
|
|
|
$
|
23,120
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Gross margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and support
|
|
$
|
203,863
|
|
|
$
|
173,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subscription
|
|
|
133,754
|
|
|
|
114,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
16,430
|
|
|
|
5,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of purchased technology
|
|
|
(19,394
|
)
|
|
|
(13,560
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross margin
|
|
$
|
334,653
|
|
|
$
|
279,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross margin percentage
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
Service and Support Revenue
Cost of service and support revenue consists principally of
salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation related to
employees, as well as expenses related to professional service
subcontractors, customer and technical support, training and
consulting services. The cost of service and support revenue
increased for the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008 due to
increased professional services costs related to consulting
services and increased costs related to customer and technical
support. The cost of service and support revenue as a percentage
of service and support revenue for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 increased compared to the same period in
2008 due primarily to the addition of Secure Computing customer
support, training and consulting personnel, mitigated in part by
increased service contracts and support renewals.
29
We anticipate the cost of service and support revenue will
increase in absolute dollars driven primarily by additional
growth in our consulting services, which provide end users with
product design, user training, and deployment support and the
expected impact related to the acquisition of Secure Computing.
Cost of
Subscription Revenue
Cost of subscription revenue consists primarily of costs related
to the sale of online subscription arrangements, the majority of
which include revenue-share arrangements and royalties paid to
our strategic partners, and the costs of media, manuals and
packaging related to McAfee Consumer Suites, as these suites
utilize a subscription-based model. The increase in subscription
costs for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to
the three months ended March 31, 2008 was primarily
attributable to an increase in the volume of online subscription
arrangements and revenue-share arrangements and royalties paid
to our online strategic partners. The cost of subscription
revenue as a percentage of subscription revenue decreased
slightly for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared
to the same period in 2008 due to lower costs per transaction
from sales originating with our strategic partners.
We anticipate that the cost of subscription revenue will
increase in absolute dollars due to expected increased demand
for our subscription-based products with associated royalty and
revenue-sharing costs.
Cost of
Product Revenue
Cost of product revenue consists primarily of the cost of media,
manuals and packaging for products distributed through
traditional channels and, with respect to hardware-based
security products, the cost of computer platforms, other
hardware and embedded third-party components and technologies.
The cost of product revenue for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 increased compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2008 due primarily to additional product-related
transactions related to the acquisition of Secure Computing.
Cost of product revenue for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 decreased as a percentage of product revenue
compared to the same period in 2008, due primarily to increased
margins on corporate revenue resulting from a shift in product
mix to higher-margin network protection solutions from
lower-margin hardware transactions.
We anticipate that cost of product revenue will increase in
absolute dollars due to mix and size of certain
enterprise-related transactions.
Amortization
of Purchased Technology
The increase in amortization of purchased technology in the
three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2008 was driven by the acquisitions
of Secure Computing in November 2008, Reconnex in August 2008,
and ScanAlert in January 2008. Amortization for the purchased
technology related to these acquisitions was $7.8 million
in the three months ended March 31, 2009.
We expect amortization of purchased technology to increase in
absolute dollars as a result of our 2008 acquisitions when
comparing 2009 to 2008.
Gross
Margin
Our gross margins decreased slightly for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2008 due mostly to increased cost of service and
support revenue as a percentage of service and support revenue
and increased amortization of purchased technology related to
acquisitions made during 2008.
Gross margins may fluctuate in the future due to various
factors, including the mix of products sold, upfront revenue
realization, sales discounts, revenue-sharing and royalty
arrangements, material and labor costs, warranty costs and
amortization of purchased technology.
Stock-based
Compensation Expense
Stock-based compensation expense consists of expense associated
with all stock-based awards made to our employees and outside
directors. Our stock-based awards include options, RSUs, RSAs,
PSUs and ESPP grants.
30
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a
comparison of our stock-based compensation expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
24,035
|
|
|
$
|
11,876
|
|
|
$
|
12,159
|
|
|
|
102
|
%
|
The $12.2 million increase in stock-based compensation
expense during the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008 was
primarily attributable to (i) a $5.7 million increase
in expense relating to increased grants of PSUs, of which a
significant portion were granted in February 2008, (ii) a
$4.4 million increase in expense relating to increased
grants of RSUs and assumed RSAs and RSUs from the 2008
acquisition of Secure Computing and (iii) a
$1.5 million increase in expense relating to reinstating
our ESPP in June 2008. See Note 3 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Operating
Costs
Research
and Development
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a
comparison of our research and development expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Research and development(1)
|
|
$
|
78,904
|
|
|
$
|
58,625
|
|
|
$
|
20,279
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Percentage of net revenue
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense of $6,850 and $3,621
in the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. |
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salary,
benefits, and stock-based compensation for our development and a
portion of our technical support staff, contractors fees
and other costs associated with the enhancements of existing
products and services and development of new products and
services. The increase in research and development expenses in
the three months ended March 31, 2009 was primarily
attributable to (i) a $12.5 million increase in salary
and benefit expense for individuals performing research and
development activities due to an increase in headcount primarily
from our Secure Computing acquisition and salary increases in
April 2008, (ii) a $3.2 million increase in
stock-based compensation expense and (iii) increases in
various other expenses associated with research and development
activities, offset by a $4.4 million decrease due to the
net impact of foreign exchange rates, primarily driven by the
average U.S. Dollar exchange rate strengthening against the
Euro during the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared
to the three months ended March 31, 2008.
We believe that continued investment in product development is
critical to attaining our strategic objectives. We expect
research and development expenses will increase in absolute
dollars during the remainder of 2009.
Sales and
Marketing
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a
comparison of our sales and marketing expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Sales and marketing(1)
|
|
$
|
148,764
|
|
|
$
|
121,108
|
|
|
$
|
27,656
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Percentage of net revenue
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense of $9,763 and $3,896
in the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. |
31
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salary,
commissions, stock-based compensation and benefits and costs
associated with travel for sales and marketing personnel,
advertising and promotions. The increase in sales and marketing
expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008 reflected
(i) a $19.8 million increase in salary and benefit
expense, including commissions, for individuals performing sales
and marketing activities due to an increase in headcount
primarily from our Secure Computing acquisition, salary
increases in April 2008 and increased commissions, (ii) a
$13.7 million increase related to agreements with certain
PC OEM partners, (iii) a $5.9 million increase in
stock-based compensation expense and (iv) increases in
various other expenses associated with sales and marketing
activities, offset by (i) a $9.3 million decrease due
to the net impact of foreign exchange rates, primarily driven by
the average U.S. Dollar exchange rate strengthening against
the Euro during the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
(ii) a $5.5 million decrease in marketing and
promotion expenses.
We anticipate that sales and marketing expenses will increase in
absolute dollars primarily due to agreements with our strategic
partners, primarily our PC OEM partners, where we have seen
growth in volume and an increase in the number of partner
agreements, our planned branding initiatives and our additional
investment in sales capacity.
General
and Administrative
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a
comparison of our general and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
$
|
40,160
|
|
|
$
|
41,314
|
|
|
$
|
(1,154
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
Percentage of net revenue
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense of $6,251 and $3,915
in the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. |
General and administrative expenses consist principally of
salary, stock-based compensation and benefit costs for executive
and administrative personnel, professional services and other
general corporate activities. The decrease in general and
administrative expenses during the three months ended
March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2008 reflected a (i) $12.2 million
decrease in legal expense primarily due to a $6.5 million
reimbursement from an insurance carrier for legal fees incurred
related to cost of defense incurred in connection with our stock
option investigation that commenced in May 2006 and (ii) a
$3.3 million decrease due to the net impact of foreign
exchange rates, primarily driven by the average U.S. Dollar
exchange rate strengthening against the Euro during the three
months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2008, offset by (i) a
$5.5 million benefit recognized in the three months ended
March 31, 2008 related to the change in fair value of
certain stock options subject to the provisions of
EITF 00-19,
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed
to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own
Stock, (ii) a $4.6 million increase in
salary and benefit expense for individuals performing general
and administrative activities due to an increase in headcount
primarily from our Secure Computing acquisition and salary
increases in April 2008 and (iii) increases in expense due
to various other expenses associated with general and
administrative activities.
We anticipate that general and administrative expenses will
increase in absolute dollars during the remainder of 2009.
32
Amortization
of Intangibles
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a
comparison of the amortization of intangibles:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
$
|
9,995
|
|
|
$
|
5,340
|
|
|
$
|
4,655
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
Intangibles consist of identifiable intangible assets such as
trademarks and customer lists. The increase in amortization of
intangibles was attributable to our 2008 and 2009 acquisitions,
in which we acquired approximately $68.8 million of
intangible assets related to the Secure Computing, ScanAlert,
Reconnex, and Endeavor acquisitions.
We expect amortization of intangibles to increase in absolute
dollars during the remainder of 2009 when compared to 2008 as a
result of our 2008 acquisitions.
Restructuring
Charges
Restructuring charges in the three months ended March 31,
2009 totaled $5.1 million, of which $2.7 million
related to the realignment of our sales and marketing workforce
and $2.2 million related to additional accrual over the
service period for our 2008 elimination of certain positions at
Secure Computing. Restructuring charges in the three months
ended March 31, 2008 totaled $0.1 million, of which
$2.5 million was related to the elimination of certain
positions at SafeBoot that were redundant to positions at McAfee
and the realignment of our sales force, offset by a
$2.4 million benefit related primarily to previous
estimates of base rent and sublease income for the
Santa Clara lease which was restructured in 2003 and 2004.
See Note 7 to our condensed consolidated financial
statements for a description of restructuring activities.
Interest
and Other Income
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a
comparison of our interest and other income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
$
|
2,811
|
|
|
$
|
13,035
|
|
|
$
|
(10,224
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)%
|
Interest and other income includes interest earned on
investments, as well as net foreign currency transaction gains
or losses and net forward contract gains and losses. The
decrease in interest income was primarily due to (i) a
decrease in our average cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities of approximately $596.9 million in the three
months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and (ii) a lower average rate of
annualized return on our investments, from approximately 4% in
the three months ended March 31, 2008 to less than 2% in
the three months ended March 31, 2009.
We recorded net foreign currency transaction gains of
$1.3 million during the three months ended March 31,
2009 in our condensed consolidated statements of income and
comprehensive income compared to a loss of $0.9 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
We anticipate that interest and other income will decrease
during 2009 as a result of lower cash balances in 2009 due to
acquisitions and our stock repurchases during 2008, the
declining interest rate environment and our shifting a large
percentage of our investment portfolio to shorter-term and
U.S. government and FDIC guaranteed investments which have
lower yields.
Impairment
of Marketable Securities
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded
impairments on certain of our marketable securities of
$0.7 million. These securities have previously been
impaired, have fair values significantly below par and had
further declines in fair value in the three months ended
March 31, 2009. We had no other-than-temporary
33
impairments of marketable securities during the three months
ended March 31, 2008. Current economic conditions have had
widespread negative effects on the markets for debt securities
in 2008 and 2009. Factors which we use to assess whether an
other-than-temporary
decline has occurred include, but are not limited to, the likely
reason for the unrealized loss, period of time the fair value
was below amortized cost, changes in underlying collateral,
changes in ratings, market trends and conditions, and our intent
and ability to hold until we recover such losses.
Gain on
Sale of Investment, Net
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we
recognized net gains on the sale of marketable securities of
$0.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Our
investments are classified as
available-for-sale
and we may sell securities from time to time to move funds into
investments with higher yields, for liquidity purposes, or into
investments that are considered more conservative, thus
resulting in gains and losses on sale.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, a
comparison of our provision for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
2009 vs. 2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
|
%
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
$
|
38,575
|
|
|
$
|
(37,994
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)%
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate our annual effective tax rate based on year to date
operating results and our forecast of operating results for the
remainder of the year, by jurisdiction, and apply this rate to
the year to date operating results. If our actual results, by
jurisdiction, differ from each successive interim periods
forecasted operating results or if we change our forecast of
operating results for the remainder of the year, our effective
tax rate will change accordingly, affecting tax expense for both
that successive interim period as well as
year-to-date
interim results.
The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31,
2009 differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate
(statutory rate) primarily due to the benefit of
lower tax rates in certain foreign jurisdictions; as well as tax
benefits recognized in the first quarter as a result of statute
expirations in various jurisdictions. The decrease in the
effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31,
2009 as compared to the prior period is primarily due to the tax
impact of a shift in jurisdictional earnings and the negative
tax consequences associated with certain acquisition integration
activities in the three months ended March 31, 2008. The
effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31,
2008 differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the
negative tax consequences associated with certain acquisition
integration activities.
The earnings from our foreign operations in India are subject to
a tax holiday. In May 2008, the Indian government extended the
period through which the holiday would be effective to
March 31, 2010. The tax holiday provides for zero percent
taxation on certain classes of income and requires certain
conditions to be met. We were in compliance with these
conditions as of March 31, 2009.
The U.S. Internal Revenue Service is presently conducting
an examination of our federal income tax returns for the
calendar years 2006 and 2007. We cannot reasonably determine if
this examination will have a material impact on our financial
statements. We concluded pre-filing discussions with the Dutch
tax authorities with respect to the 2004 tax year in January
2009. A tax benefit of approximately $2.2 million is
reflected in the first quarter of 2009. In addition, the statute
of limitations related to various domestic and foreign
jurisdictions expired in the first quarter of 2009, resulting in
a tax benefit of approximately $9.1 million.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
34
Acquisitions
Secure
Computing
In November 2008, we acquired Secure Computing for
$490.1 million. With this acquisition, we plan to deliver
the industrys most complete network security portfolio
covering intrusion prevention, firewall, web security, email
security and data protection, and network access control to
organizations of all sizes. The results of operations for Secure
Computing have been included in our results of operations since
the date of acquisition.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
145,976
|
|
|
$
|
71,374
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(119,977
|
)
|
|
|
22,317
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
95,494
|
|
|
|
(63,978
|
)
|
Overview
At March 31, 2009, our cash, cash equivalents and
marketable securities totaled $801.5 million. Our principal
sources of liquidity were our existing cash, cash equivalents
and short-term marketable securities of $752.5 million, and
our operating cash flows. Our principal uses of cash were
operating costs, which consist primarily of employee-related
expenses, such as compensation and benefits, as well as other
general operating expenses and purchases of marketable
securities.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we had
proceeds of $100.0 million from the draw down under an
unsecured term loan, net income of $53.5 million and
$7.8 million from proceeds from the issuance of common
stock under our stock option and stock purchase plans. We used
$16.5 million to repurchase shares of common stock in
connection with our obligation to holders of RSUs, RSAs and PSUs
to withhold the number of shares required to satisfy the
holders tax liabilities in connection with the vesting of
such shares, $11.0 million for purchases of property and
equipment and $2.5 million for the acquisition of Endeavor.
During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we had net
income of $30.2 million and we received $53.7 million
from proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our stock
option and stock purchase plans. We paid $49.0 million, net
of cash acquired, to purchase ScanAlert, Inc. and we paid
$6.0 million for direct acquisition costs accrued at
December 31, 2007 for our acquisition of SafeBoot. In
addition, we used $127.2 million for repurchases of our
common stock, including commissions, and $10.5 million for
purchases of property and equipment. Of the $127.2 million
used for stock repurchases, $113.5 million was used for
share repurchases in the open market and $13.7 million was
used to repurchase shares of common stock in connection with our
obligation to holders of RSUs, RSAs and PSUs to withhold the
number of shares required to satisfy the holders tax
liabilities in connection with the vesting of such shares.
We classify our investment portfolio as
available-for-sale,
and our investments are made with a policy of capital
preservation and liquidity as the primary objectives. We
generally hold investments in money market, U.S. government
fixed income, U.S. government agency fixed income,
mortgage-backed and investment grade corporate fixed income
securities to maturity; however, we may sell an investment at
any time if the quality rating of the investment declines, the
yield on the investment is no longer attractive or we are in
need of cash. We expect to continue our investing activities,
including holding investment securities of a short-term and
long-term nature. During these challenging markets, we are
investing new cash in instruments with short to medium-term
maturities of highly-rated issuers, including
U.S. government and FDIC guaranteed investments
On December 22, 2008, we entered into a credit agreement by
and among us, certain of our subsidiaries as guarantors, the
lenders from time to time party thereto and Bank of America,
N.A., as administrative agent and letter of credit issuer
(Credit Facility). The Credit Facility provides for
a $100.0 million unsecured term loan and a
$100.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a
$25.0 million letter of credit sublimit. The Credit
Facility also contains an expansion option permitting us to
arrange up to an aggregate of $200.0 million in additional
commitments from existing lenders
and/or new
lenders at the lenders discretion. We borrowed
$100.0 million under the term loan portion of the Credit
Facility in January 2009.
35
Our management continues to monitor the financial markets and
general global economic conditions as a result of the recent
distress in the financial markets. As we monitor market
conditions, our liquidity position and strategic initiatives, we
may seek either short-term or long-term financing from external
credit sources in addition to the credit facilities discussed
herein. Our ability to raise funds may be adversely affected by
a number of factors, including factors beyond our control, such
as the current weakness in the economic conditions in the
markets in which we operate and into which we sell our products,
and increased uncertainty in the financial, capital and credit
markets. There can be no assurance that additional financing
would be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all.
Our management plans to use our cash and cash equivalents for
future operations and potential acquisitions. We may in the
future repurchase our common stock on the open market. We
believe that our cash and cash equivalent balances and cash that
we generate over time from operations, along with amounts
available for borrowing under the Credit Facility, will be
sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash needs for working
capital and capital expenditures for at least the next
12 months and the foreseeable future.
Operating
Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities in the three months
ended March 31, 2009 was primarily the result of cash
collections on accounts receivable and our net income of
$53.5 million. Net cash provided by operating activities in
the three months ended March 31, 2008 was primarily the
result of our net income of $30.2 million and changes in
working capital, including cash collections on accounts
receivable. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, our
primary working capital source was decreased accounts receivable
primarily due to significant cash collections in the first
quarter of the year due to a higher accounts receivable balance
at December 31, 2008. Working capital uses of cash included
decreased accrued taxes and other liabilities primarily due to
payments of our derivative lawsuit settlement, taxes and
commissions.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, our primary
working capital source was decreased accounts receivable,
primarily due to decreased invoicing as compared to cash
collections in the first quarter of the year. Our primary
working capital use of cash was decreased accrued taxes and
other liabilities primarily due to payment of certain amounts
accrued at December 31, 2007 related to equity awards
classified as liability awards as a result of modifications and
decreases in income taxes payable.
Our cash and marketable securities balances are held in numerous
locations throughout the world, including substantial amounts
held outside the United States. As of March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, approximately $402.4 million and
$364.5 million, respectively, were held outside the United
States. We utilize a variety of tax planning and financing
strategies to ensure that our worldwide cash is available in the
locations in which it is needed.
We expect to meet our obligations as they become due through
available cash, borrowings under the Credit Facility, and
internally generated funds. We expect to continue generating
positive working capital through our operations. However, we
cannot predict whether current trends and conditions will
continue or what the effect on our business might be from the
competitive environment in which we operate. In addition, we
currently cannot predict the outcome of the litigation described
in Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Investing
Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $120.0 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to
net cash provided by investing activities of $22.3 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the primary
uses of cash in investing activities included
$106.5 million of net purchases of marketable securities,
purchases of property and equipment and the acquisition of
Endeavor.
Our cash used for acquisitions decreased to $2.5 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to
$55.0 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008. During January 2009, we paid $2.5 million, net of
cash acquired, to purchase Endeavor. During January 2008, we
paid $49.0 million, net of cash acquired, to purchase
ScanAlert and $6.0 million for direct acquisition costs
accrued at December 31, 2007 for our acquisition of
SafeBoot.
36
Our cash used for purchases of property and equipment increased
to $11.0 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009 compared to $10.5 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008. The property and equipment purchased during
the three months ended March 31, 2009 was primarily for
upgrades of our existing systems and purchases of computers,
equipment and software and for leasehold improvements at various
offices. The property and equipment purchased during the three
months ended March 31, 2008 was primarily for purchases of
computers, equipment and software. We expect to continue to have
capital expenditures at levels consistent with the prior year.
Financing
Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $95.5 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to
net cash used in financing activities of $64.0 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2008. During the
three months ended March 31, 2009, primary sources of cash
provided by financing activities included $100.0 million
borrowed under the term loan portion of the Credit Facility and
proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our stock
option and stock purchase plans. During the three months ended
March 31, 2009, we received proceeds of $7.8 million
compared to $53.7 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2008 from issuance of stock under such plans. During
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we used
$16.5 million and $13.7 million, respectively, to
repurchase shares of our common stock in connection with our
obligation to holders of RSUs, RSAs and PSUs to withhold the
number of shares required to satisfy the holders tax
liabilities in connection with the vesting of such shares. These
shares were not part of the publicly announced repurchase
program.
We had no repurchases of our common stock in the open market
during the three months ended March 31, 2009. We used
$113.5 million for repurchases of our common stock in the
open market during the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Pursuant to a stock repurchase program that has been authorized
by our board of directors, we may repurchase up to an additional
$250.3 million of our common stock in the open market or
through privately negotiated transactions through July 2009,
depending upon market conditions, share price and other factors.
While we expect to continue to receive proceeds from our stock
option and stock purchase plans in future periods, the timing
and amount of such proceeds are difficult to predict and are
contingent on a number of factors including the type of equity
awards grants to our employees, the price of our common stock,
the number of employees participating in the plans and general
market conditions.
Credit
Facilities
In December 2008, we entered into a Credit Facility that
provides for a $100.0 million unsecured term loan and a
$100.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a
$25.0 million letter of credit sublimit. The Credit
Facility also contains an expansion option permitting us to
arrange up to an aggregate of $200.0 million in additional
commitments from existing lenders
and/or new
lenders.
The principal of, together with accrued interest on, the term
loan is due on December 22, 2009. The revolving credit
facility terminates on December 22, 2011, on which date all
outstanding principal of, together with accrued interest on, any
revolving loans will be due. We may prepay the loans and
terminate the commitments at any time, without premium or
penalty, subject to reimbursement of certain costs in the case
of eurocurrency loans.
Loans may be made in U.S. Dollars, Euros or other
currencies agreed to by the lenders. Loans will bear interest at
our election at the prime rate or at an adjusted LIBOR rate plus
a margin (ranging from 2% to 2.5%) that varies with our
consolidated leverage ratio (a eurocurrency loan).
Interest on the loans is payable quarterly in arrears with
respect to prime rate loans and at the end of an interest period
(or at each three month intervals in the case of loans with
interest periods greater than three months) in the case of
eurocurrency loans. In December 2008, we paid $2.0 million
of debt issuance costs related to the Credit Facility.
Commitment fees range from 0.25% to 0.45% of the unused portion
on the credit facility depending on our consolidated leverage
ratio. The Credit Facility contains financial covenants,
measured at the end of each of our quarters, providing that our
consolidated leverage ratio (as defined in the credit agreement)
cannot exceed 2.0 to 1.0 and our consolidated interest coverage
ratio (as defined in the credit agreement) cannot be less than
3.0 to 1.0. Additionally, the Credit Facility contains
affirmative covenants, including covenants regarding the payment
of taxes, maintenance of insurance, reporting requirements and
compliance with applicable laws. The Credit Facility contains
negative covenants, among other things, limiting
37
our ability and our subsidiaries ability to incur debt,
liens, make acquisitions, make certain restricted payments and
sell assets. The events of default under the Credit Facility
include payment defaults, cross defaults with certain other
indebtedness, breaches of covenants, judgment defaults,
bankruptcy events and the occurrence of a change in control (as
defined in the credit agreement). At March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, we had $3.0 million of restricted
cash deposited at one of our lenders. This amount will be
reduced to $1.5 million when the term loan is repaid in
full. The deposit will be restricted until we have repaid the
outstanding balance on the term loan and on the expiration of
the revolving credit facility.
We borrowed $100.0 million under the term loan portion of
the Credit Facility in January 2009. No balances were
outstanding under the Credit Facility as of December 31,
2008. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we were
in compliance with all covenants in the Credit Facility.
In addition, we have a 14.0 million Euro credit facility
with a bank, (the Euro Credit Facility). The Euro
Credit Facility is available on an offering basis, meaning that
transactions under the Euro Credit Facility will be on such
terms and conditions, including interest rate, maturity,
representations, covenants and events of default, as mutually
agreed between us and the bank at the time of each specific
transaction. The Euro Credit Facility is intended to be used for
short-term credit requirements, with terms of one year or less.
The Euro Credit Facility can be canceled at any time. No
balances were outstanding under the Euro Credit Facility as of
March 31, 2009 or December 31, 2008.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Our market risks at March 31, 2009, are consistent with
those discussed in Item 7A of our annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the SEC.
During 2008, there were significant disruptions in the financial
markets. A number of large financial institutions failed, were
supported by the U.S. government or were merged into other
organizations. The market disruption has resulted in a lack of
liquidity in the credit markets and a decline in the market
value of debt securities. As a result of these effects, in the
three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded additional
impairment on previously impaired marketable securities totaling
$0.7 million for continued declines in fair value. We had
no impairment of marketable securities in the three months ended
March 31, 2008. We had a net unrealized gain of
$0.1 million on marketable securities at March 31,
2009, compared with a net unrealized gain of $0.6 million
at December 31, 2008.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive
officer and our chief financial officer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of March 31, 2009.
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can
provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives of the
control system are met. Our management, including our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect
that our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control
over financial reporting will prevent all errors and fraud.
Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact
that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of
the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation
of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control
issues within our company have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the reality that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur
because of simple errors or mistakes. The design of any control
system is also based, in part, upon certain assumptions about
the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance
that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under
all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Because of the inherent limitations in a control system,
misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be
detected.
38
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
We have had no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2009 that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II:
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
Information with respect to this item is incorporated by
reference to Note 12 to our condensed consolidated
financial statements included in this
Form 10-Q,
which information is incorporated into this Part II,
Item 1 by reference.
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
Some but not all of the risks we face are described below. Any
of the following risks could materially adversely affect our
business, operating results, financial condition and cash flows
and reduce the value of an investment in our common stock.
Adverse
conditions in the national and global economies and financial
markets may adversely affect our business and financial
results.
National and global economies and financial markets have
experienced a severe downturn stemming from a multitude of
factors, including adverse credit conditions impacted by the
sub-prime
mortgage crisis, slower or receding economic activity, concerns
about inflation and deflation, fluctuating energy costs,
decreased consumer confidence, reduced corporate profits and
capital spending, adverse business conditions and liquidity
concerns and other factors. Economic growth in the U.S. and
many other countries slowed or receded in the fourth quarter of
2008 and the first quarter of 2009. The severity or length of
time these economic and financial market conditions may persist
is unknown. During challenging economic times and in tight
credit markets, many customers may delay or reduce technology
purchases. This could result in reductions in sales of our
products, longer sales cycles, difficulties in collection of
accounts receivable, slower adoption of new technologies and
increased price competition. In addition, weakness in the
end-user market could negatively affect the cash flow of our
distributors and resellers who could, in turn, delay paying
their obligations to us. This would increase our credit risk
exposure and cause delays in our recognition of revenue on
future sales to these customers. Specific economic trends, such
as declines in the demand for PCs, servers, and other computing
devices, or softness in corporate information technology
spending, could have a more direct impact on our business. Any
of these events would likely harm our business, operating
results, cash flows and financial condition.
We
face intense competition and we expect competitive pressures to
increase in the future. This competition could have a negative
impact on our business and financial results.
The markets for our products are intensely competitive and we
expect both product and pricing competition to increase. If our
competitors gain market share in the markets for our products,
our sales could grow more slowly or decline. Competitive
pressures could also lead to increases in expenses such as
advertising expenses, product rebates, product placement fees,
and marketing funds provided to our channel partners.
Advantages of larger competitors. Our
principal competitors in each of our product categories are
described in Business Competition
of our annual report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. Our
competitors include some large enterprises such as Microsoft,
Cisco Systems, Symantec, IBM and Google. Large vendors of
hardware or operating system software increasingly incorporate
system and network protection functionality into their products,
and enhance that functionality either through internal
development or through strategic alliances or acquisitions. For
example, Cisco recently announced an agreement with Trend Micro
to embed internet security software on Ciscos Linksys
wireless routers. Some of our competitors have longer operating
histories, more extensive international operations, greater name
recognition, larger technical staffs, established
39
relationships with more distributors and hardware vendors,
significantly greater product development and acquisition
budgets,
and/or
greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do.
Consumer business competition. More than 35%
of our revenue comes from our consumer business. Our growth of
this business relies on direct sales and sales through
relationships with ISPs such as AOL, Cox and Comcast, and PC
OEMs, such as Acer, Dell, Sony Computer and Toshiba. As
competition in this market increases, we have and will continue
to experience pricing pressures that could have a negative
effect on our ability to sustain our revenue and market share
growth. As our consumer business becomes increasingly more
dependent upon the partner model, our retail businesses may
continue to decline. Further, as penetration of the consumer
anti-virus market through the ISP model increases, we expect
that pricing and competitive pressures in this market will
become even more acute.
Low-priced or free competitive
products. Security protection is increasingly
being offered by third parties at significant discounts to our
prices or, in some cases is bundled for free. For example,
Microsoft announced that beginning in 2009 it will offer in
emerging markets a free anti-malware consumer product dubbed
Morro. The widespread inclusion of lower-priced or free products
that perform the same or similar functions as our products
within computer hardware or other companies software
products could reduce the perceived need for our products or
render our products unmarketable even if
these incorporated products are inferior or more limited than
our products. It is possible that a major competitor may offer a
free anti-malware enterprise product. The expansion of these
competitive trends could have a significant negative impact on
our sales and financial results.
We also face competition from numerous smaller companies,
shareware and freeware authors and open source projects that may
develop competing products, as well as from future competitors,
currently unknown to us, who may enter the markets because the
barriers to entry are fairly low. Smaller
and/or newer
companies often compete aggressively on price.
We
face product development risks due to rapid changes in our
industry. Failure to keep pace with these changes could harm our
business and financial results.
The markets for our products are characterized by rapid
technological developments, continually-evolving industry trends
and standards and ongoing changes in customer requirements. Our
success depends on our ability to timely and effectively keep
pace with these developments.
Keeping pace with industry changes. We must
enhance and expand our product offerings to reflect industry
trends, new technologies and new operating environments as they
become increasingly important to customer deployments. For
example, we must expand our offerings for virtual computer
environments; we must continue to expand our security
technologies for mobile environments to support a broader range
of mobile devices such as mobile phones and personal digital
assistants; we must develop products that are compatible with
new or otherwise emerging operating systems, while remaining
compatible with popular operating systems such as Linux,
Suns Solaris, UNIX, Macintosh OS_X, and Windows XP, NT and
Vista; and we must continue to expand our business models beyond
traditional software licensing and subscription models,
specifically, software-as-a-service is becoming an increasingly
important method and business model for the delivery of
applications. We must also continuously work to ensure that our
products meet changing industry certifications and standards.
Failure to keep pace with any changes that are important to our
customers could cause us to lose customers and could have a
negative impact on our business and financial results.
Impact of product development delays or competitive
announcements. Our ability to adapt to changes
can be hampered by product development delays. We may experience
delays in product development as we have at times in the past.
Complex products like ours may contain undetected errors or
version compatibility problems, particularly when first
released, which could delay or adversely impact market
acceptance. We may also experience delays or unforeseen costs
associated with integrating products we acquire with products we
develop because we may be unfamiliar with errors or
compatibility issues of products we did not develop ourselves.
We may choose not to deliver a partially-developed product,
thereby increasing our development costs without a corresponding
benefit. This could negatively impact our business.
40
If
our products do not work properly, we could experience negative
publicity, damage to our reputation, legal liability, declining
sales and increased expenses.
Failure to protect against security
breaches. Because of the complexity of our
products, we have in the past found errors in versions of our
products that were not detected before first introduced, or in
new versions or enhancements, and we may find such errors in the
future. Because of the complexity of the environments in which
our products operate, our products may have errors or defects
that customers identify after deployment. Failures, errors or
defects in our products could result in security breaches or
compliance violations for our customers, disruption or damage to
their networks or other negative consequences and could result
in negative publicity, damage to our reputation, declining
sales, increased expenses and customer relation issues. Such
failures could also result in product liability damage claims
against us by our customers, even though our license agreements
with our customers typically contain provisions designed to
limit our exposure to potential product liability claims.
Furthermore, the correction of defects could divert the
attention of engineering personnel from our product development
efforts. A major security breach at one of our customers that is
attributable to or not preventable by our products could be very
damaging to our business. Any actual or perceived breach of
network or computer security at one of our customers, regardless
of whether the breach is attributable to our products, could
adversely affect the markets perception of our security
products and our stock price.
False alarms. Our system protection software
products have in the past, and these products and our intrusion
protection products may at times in the future, falsely detect
viruses or computer threats that do not actually exist. These
false alarms, while typical in the security industry, would
likely impair the perceived reliability of our products and may
therefore adversely impact market acceptance of our products. In
addition, we have in the past been subject to litigation
claiming damages related to a false alarm, and similar claims
may be made in the future.
Our email and web solutions (anti-spam, anti-spyware and safe
search products) may falsely identify emails, programs or web
sites as unwanted spam, potentially unwanted
programs or unsafe. They may also fail to
properly identify unwanted emails, programs or unsafe web sites,
particularly because spam emails, spyware or malware are often
designed to circumvent anti-spam or spyware products and to
incorrectly identify legitimate web sites as unsafe. Parties
whose emails or programs are incorrectly blocked by our
products, or whose web sites are incorrectly identified as
unsafe or as utilizing phishing techniques, may seek redress
against us for labeling them as spammers or unsafe
and/or for
interfering with their businesses. In addition, false
identification of emails or programs as unwanted spam or
potentially unwanted programs may discourage potential customers
from using or continuing to use these products.
Customer misuse of products. Our products may
also not work properly if they are misused or abused by
customers or non-customer third parties who obtain access and
use of our products. These situations may arise where an
organization uses our products in a manner that impacts their
end users or employees privacy or where our products
are misappropriated to censor private access to the internet.
Any of these situations could impact the perceived reliability
of our products, result in negative press coverage, negatively
affect our reputation and adversely impact our financial results.
We
face risks associated with past and future
acquisitions.
We may buy or make investments in complementary or competitive
companies, products and technologies. We may not realize the
anticipated benefits from these acquisitions. Future
acquisitions could result in significant acquisition-related
charges and dilution to our stockholders. In addition, we face a
number of risks relating to our acquisitions, including the
following, any of which could harm our ability to achieve the
anticipated benefits of our past or future acquisitions.
Integration. Integration of an acquired
company or technology is a complex, time consuming and expensive
process. The successful integration of an acquisition requires,
among other things, that we integrate and retain key management,
sales, research and development and other personnel; integrate
the acquired products into our product offerings from both an
engineering and sales and marketing perspective; integrate and
support pre-existing suppliers, distribution and customer
relationships; coordinate research and development efforts; and
consolidate duplicate facilities and functions and integrate
back-office accounting, order processing and support functions.
41
The geographic distance between the companies, the complexity of
the technologies and operations being integrated and the
disparate corporate cultures being combined may increase the
difficulties of integrating an acquired company or technology.
Managements focus on the integration of operations may
distract attention from our day-to-day business and may disrupt
key research and development, marketing or sales efforts. In
addition, it is common in the technology industry for aggressive
competitors to attract customers and recruit key employees away
from companies during the integration phase of an acquisition.
If integration of our acquired businesses or assets is not
successful, we may experience adverse financial or competitive
effects.
Internal controls, policies and
procedures. Acquired companies or businesses are
likely to have different standards, controls, contracts,
procedures and policies, making it more difficult to implement
and harmonize company-wide financial, accounting, billing,
information and other systems. Acquisitions of privately held
and/or
non-US companies are particularly challenging because their
prior practices in these areas may not meet the requirements of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and public accounting standards.
Use of cash and securities. Our available cash
and securities may be used to acquire or invest in companies or
products. Moreover, when we acquire a company, we may have to
incur or assume that companys liabilities, including
liabilities that may not be fully known at the time of
acquisition. To the extent we continue to make acquisitions, we
will require additional cash
and/or
shares of our common stock as payment. The use of securities
would cause dilution for our existing stockholders.
Key employees from acquired companies may be difficult to
retain and assimilate. The success of many
acquisitions depends to a great extent on our ability to retain
key employees from the acquired company. This can be
challenging, particularly in the highly competitive market for
technical personnel. Retaining key executives for the long-term
can also be difficult due to other opportunities available to
them. It could be difficult, time consuming and expensive to
replace any key management members or other critical personnel
that do not accept employment with McAfee following the
acquisition. In addition to retaining key employees, we must
integrate them into our company, which can be difficult and
costly. Changes in management or other critical personnel may be
disruptive to our business and might also result in our loss of
some unique skills and the departure of existing employees
and/or
customers.
Accounting charges. Acquisitions may result in
substantial accounting charges for restructuring and other
expenses, amortization of intangible assets and stock-based
compensation expense, any of which could materially adversely
affect our operating results.
Potential goodwill impairment. We perform an
impairment analysis on our goodwill balances on an annual basis
or whenever events occur that may indicate impairment. If the
fair value of each of our reporting units is less than the
carrying amount of the reporting unit, then we must write down
goodwill to its estimated fair value. We cannot be certain that
a future downturn in our business, changes in market conditions
or a long-term decline in the quoted market price of our stock
will not result in an impairment of goodwill and the recognition
of resulting expenses in future periods, which could adversely
affect our results of operations for those periods.
Establishment of VSOE. Following an
acquisition, we may be required to defer the recognition of
revenue that we receive from the sale of products that we
acquired, or from the sale of a bundle of products that includes
products that we acquired, if we have not established vendor
specific objective evidence (VSOE) of the separate
value of the acquired product. A delay in the recognition of
revenue from sales of acquired products or bundles that include
acquired products may cause fluctuations in our quarterly
financial results and may adversely affect our operating
margins. Similarly, companies that we acquire may operate with
different cost and margin structures, which could further cause
fluctuations in our operating results and adversely affect our
operating margins. If our quarterly financial results or our
predictions of future financial results fail to meet the
expectations of securities analysts and investors, our stock
price could be negatively affected.
Our
international operations involve risks that could divert the
time and attention of management, increase our expenses and
otherwise adversely impact our business and financial
results.
Our international operations increase our risks in several
aspects of our business, including but not limited to risks
relating to revenue, legal and compliance, currency exchange and
interest rate, and general operating. Net
42
revenue in our operating regions outside of North America
represented 43% of total net revenue in the three months ended
March 31, 2009 compared to 49% in the three months ended
March 31, 2008. The risks associated with our continued
focus on international operations could adversely affect our
business and financial results.
Revenue risks. Revenue risks include, among
others, longer payment cycles, greater difficulty in collecting
accounts receivable, tariffs and other trade barriers,
seasonality, currency fluctuations, and the high incidence of
software piracy and fraud in some countries. The primary product
development risk to our revenue is our ability to deliver new
products in a timely manner and to successfully localize our
products for a significant number of international markets in
different languages.
Legal and compliance risks. We face a variety
of legal and compliance risks. For example, international
operations pose a compliance risk with the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act (FCPA). Some countries have a
reputation for businesses to engage in prohibited practices with
government officials to consummate transactions. Although we
have implemented training along with policies and procedures
designed to ensure compliance with this and similar laws, there
can be no assurance that all employees and third-party
intermediaries will comply with anti-corruption laws. Any such
violation could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Another legal risk is that some of our computer security
solutions incorporate encryption technology that is governed by
U.S. export regulations. The cost of compliance with those
regulations can affect our ability to sell certain products in
certain markets and could have a material adverse effect on our
international revenue and expense. If we, or our resellers, fail
to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we may become
subject to penalties and fines or restrictions that may
adversely affect our business.
Other legal risks include international labor laws and our
relationship with our employees and regional work councils;
compliance with more stringent consumer protection and privacy
laws; unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; and
compliance with our code of conduct and other internal policies.
Our principal tax risks are potentially adverse tax consequences
due to foreign value-added taxes, restrictions on the
repatriation of earnings and changes in tax laws.
Currency exchange and interest rate risks. A
significant portion of our transactions outside of the
U.S. are denominated in foreign currencies. We translate
revenues and costs from these transactions into
U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. As a result, our
future operating results will continue to be subject to
fluctuations in foreign currency rates. This combined with
economic instability, such as higher interest rates in the
U.S. and inflation, could reduce our customers
ability to obtain financing for software products, or could make
our products more expensive or could increase our costs of doing
business in certain countries. We recorded net foreign currency
transaction gains of $1.3 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 in our condensed consolidated
statements of income and comprehensive income versus a loss of
$0.9 million during the three months ended March 31,
2008 We may be positively or negatively affected by fluctuations
in foreign currency rates in the future, especially if
international sales continue to grow as a percentage of our
total sales. Additionally, fluctuations in currency exchange
rates will impact our deferred revenue balance, which is a key
financial metric at each period end.
General operating risks. More general risks of
international business operations include the increased costs of
establishing, managing and coordinating the activities of
geographically dispersed and culturally diverse operations
(particularly sales and support and shared service centers)
located on multiple continents in a wide range of time zones.
We
face a number of risks related to our product sales through
distributors and other third parties.
We sell substantially all of our products through third-party
intermediaries such as distributors, value-added resellers, PC
OEMs, ISPs and other distribution channel partners (referred to
collectively as distributors). Reliance on third parties for
distribution exposes us to a variety of risks, some of which are
described below, that could have a material adverse impact on
our business and financial results.
Limited control over timing of product
delivery. We have limited control over the timing
of the delivery of our products to customers by third-party
distributors. We generally do not require our resellers and OEM
partners to meet minimum sales volumes, so their sales may vary
significantly from period to period. For example, the volume of
our products shipped by our OEM partners depends on the volume
of computers shipped by the PC OEMs, which
43
is outside of our control. These factors can make it difficult
for us to forecast our revenue accurately and they also can
cause our revenue to fluctuate unpredictably.
Competitive aspects of distributor
relationships. Our distributors may sell other
vendors products that compete with our products. Although
we offer our distributors incentives to focus on sales of our
products, they often give greater priority to products of our
competitors, for a variety of reasons. In order to maximize
sales of our products rather than those of our competitors, we
must effectively support these partners with, among other
things, appropriate financial incentives to encourage them to
invest in sales tools, such as online sales and technical
training and product collateral needed to support their
customers and prospects. If we do not properly support our
partners, they may focus more on our competitors products,
and their sales of our products would decline.
Our PC OEM partners are also in a position to exert competitive
pricing pressure. Competition for OEMs business continues
to increase, and it gives the OEMs leverage to demand lower
product prices from us in order to secure their business. Even
if we negotiate what we believe are favorable pricing terms when
we first establish a relationship with an OEM, at the time of
the renewal of the agreement, we may be required to renegotiate
our agreement with them on less favorable terms. Lower net
prices for our products would adversely impact our operating
margins.
Reliance on a small number of distributors. A
significant portion of our net revenue is attributable to a
fairly small number of distributors. Our top ten distributors
represented 35% and 37% of our net revenue in the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, respectively.
Reliance on a relatively small number of third parties for a
significant portion of our distribution exposes us to
significant risks to net revenue and net income if our
relationship with one or more of our key distributors is
terminated for any reason.
Risk of loss of distributors. We invest
significant time, money and resources to establish and maintain
relationships with our distributors, but we have no assurance
that any particular relationship will continue for any specific
period of time. The agreements we have with our distributors can
generally be terminated by either party without cause with no or
minimal notice or penalties. If any significant distributor
terminates its agreement with us, we could experience a
significant interruption in the distribution of our products and
our revenue could decline. We could also lose the benefit of our
investment of time, money and resources in the distributor
relationship.
Although a distributor can terminate its relationship with us
for any reason, one factor that may lead to termination is a
divergence of our business interests and those of our
distributors and potential conflicts of interest. For example,
our acquisition activity has resulted in the termination of
distributor relationships that no longer fit with the
distributors business priorities. Future acquisition
activity could cause similar termination of, or disruption in,
our distributor relationships, which could adversely impact our
revenue.
Credit risk. Some of our distributors may
experience financial difficulties, which could adversely impact
our collection of accounts receivable. Our allowance for
doubtful accounts was approximately $4.8 million as of
March 31, 2009. We regularly review the collectability and
credit-worthiness of our distributors to determine an
appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts. Our uncollectible
accounts could exceed our current or future allowances, which
could adversely impact our financial results.
We also face legal and compliance risks with respect to our use
of third party intermediaries operating outside the United
States. As described above in Our international
operations involve risks that could divert the time and
attention of management, increase our expenses and otherwise
adversely impact our business and financial results,
any violations by such third party intermediaries of FCPA or
similar laws could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
We
face numerous risks relating to the enforceability of our
intellectual property rights and our use of third-party
intellectual property, many of which could result in the loss of
our intellectual property rights as well as other material
adverse impacts on our business and financial results and
condition.
Limited protection of our intellectual property rights
against potential infringers. We rely on a
combination of contractual rights, trademarks, trade secrets,
patents and copyrights to establish and protect proprietary
rights in our technology. However, the steps we have taken to
protect our proprietary technology may not deter its misuse,
theft or misappropriation. Competitors may independently develop
technologies or products that are substantially
44
equivalent or superior to our products or that inappropriately
incorporate our proprietary technology into their products.
Competitors may hire our former employees who may misappropriate
our proprietary technology. We are aware that a number of users
of our security products have not paid license, technical
support, or subscription fees to us. Certain jurisdictions may
not provide adequate legal infrastructure for effective
protection of our intellectual property rights. Changing legal
interpretations of liability for unauthorized use of our
software or lessened sensitivity by corporate, government or
institutional users to refraining from intellectual property
piracy or other infringements of intellectual property could
also harm our business.
Frequency, expense and risks of intellectual property
litigation in the network and system security
market. Litigation may be necessary to enforce
and protect our trade secrets, patents and other intellectual
property rights. Similarly, we may be required to defend against
claimed infringement by others.
The security technology industry has increasingly been subject
to patent and other intellectual property rights litigation,
particularly from special purpose entities that seek to monetize
their intellectual property rights by asserting claims against
others. We expect this trend to continue and that in the future
as we become a larger and more profitable company, we can expect
this trend to accelerate and that we will be required to defend
against this type of litigation. The litigation process is
subject to inherent uncertainties, so we may not prevail in
litigation matters regardless of the merits of our position. In
addition to the expense and distraction associated with
litigation, adverse determinations could cause us to lose our
proprietary rights, prevent us from manufacturing or selling our
products, require us to obtain licenses to patents or other
intellectual property rights that our products are alleged to
infringe (licenses may not be available on reasonable commercial
terms or at all), and subject us to significant liabilities.
If we acquire technology to include in our products from third
parties, our exposure to infringement actions may increase
because we must rely upon these third parties to verify the
origin and ownership of such technology. Similarly, we face
exposure to infringement actions if we hire software engineers
who were previously employed by competitors and those employees
inadvertently or deliberately incorporate proprietary technology
of our competitors into our products despite efforts by our
competitors and us to prevent such infringement.
Litigation may be necessary to enforce and protect our trade
secrets, patents and other intellectual property rights.
Potential risks of using open source
software. Like many other software companies, we
use and distribute open source software in order to
expedite development of new products. Open source software is
generally licensed by its authors or other third parties under
open source licenses, including, for example, the GNU General
Public License. These license terms may be ambiguous, in many
instances have not been interpreted by the courts and could be
interpreted in a manner that results in unanticipated
obligations regarding our products. Depending upon how the open
source software is deployed by our developers, we could be
required to offer our products that use the open source software
for no cost, or make available the source code for modifications
or derivative works. Any of these obligations could have an
adverse impact on our intellectual property rights and revenue
from products incorporating the open source software.
Our use of open source code could also result in us developing
and selling products that infringe third-party intellectual
property rights. It may be difficult for us to accurately
determine the developers of the open source code and whether the
code incorporates proprietary software. We have processes and
controls in place that are designed to address these risks and
concerns, including a review process for screening requests from
our development organizations for the use of open source.
However, we cannot be sure that all open source is submitted for
approval prior to use in our products.
We also have processes and controls in place to review the use
of open source in the products developed by companies that we
acquire. Despite having conducted appropriate due diligence
prior to completing the acquisition, products or technologies
that we acquire may nonetheless include open source software
that was not identified during the initial due diligence. Our
ability to commercialize products or technologies of acquired
companies that incorporate open source software or to otherwise
fully realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition may be
restricted for the reasons described in the preceding two
paragraphs.
45
Pending
or future litigation could have a material adverse impact on our
results of operation, financial condition and
liquidity.
In addition to intellectual property litigation, from time to
time, we have been, and may be in the future, subject to other
litigation including stockholder derivative actions or actions
brought by current or former employees. If we continue to make
acquisitions in the future, we are more likely to be subject to
acquisition related shareholder derivative actions. Where we can
make a reasonable estimate of the liability relating to pending
litigation and determine that an adverse liability resulting
from such litigation is probable, we record a related liability.
As additional information becomes available, we assess the
potential liability and revise estimates as appropriate.
However, because of the inherent uncertainties relating to
litigation, the amount of our estimates could be wrong. In
addition to the related cost and use of cash, pending or future
litigation could cause the diversion of managements
attention. Managing, defending and indemnity obligations related
to these actions have caused significant diversion of
managements and the board of directors time and
resulted in material expense to us. See Note 12 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements for additional
information with respect to currently pending legal matters.
Our
financial results can fluctuate significantly, making it
difficult for us to accurately estimate operating
results.
Impact of fluctuations. Over the years our
revenue, gross margins and operating results have fluctuated
significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year, and
we expect this to continue in the future. Thus, our operating
results for prior periods may not be effective predictors of our
future performance. These fluctuations make it difficult for us
to accurately forecast operating results. We try to adjust
expenses based in part on our expectations regarding future
revenue, but in the short term expenses are relatively fixed.
This makes it difficult for us to adjust our expenses in time to
compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall in a given
period.
Volatility in our quarterly financial results may make it more
difficult for us to raise capital in the future or pursue
acquisitions that involve issuances of our stock. If our
quarterly financial results or our predictions of future
financial results fail to meet the expectations of securities
analysts and investors, our stock price could be negatively
affected.
Factors that may cause our revenue, gross margins and other
operating results to fluctuate significantly from period to
period, include, but are not limited to, the following:
Establishment of VSOE. We may in the future
sell products for which we have not established VSOE and would
be required to delay the recognition of revenue. A delay in the
recognition of revenue from sales of products may cause
fluctuations in our quarterly financial results and may
adversely affect our operating margins.
Timing of product orders. A significant
portion of our revenue in any quarter comes from previously
deferred revenue, which is a somewhat predictable component of
our quarterly revenue. However, a meaningful part of revenue
depends on contracts entered into or orders booked and shipped
in the current quarter. Typically we generate the most orders in
the last month of each quarter. Some customers believe they can
enhance their bargaining power by waiting until the end of our
quarter to place their order. Also, personnel limitations and
system processing constraints could adversely impact our ability
to process the large number of orders that typically occur near
the end of a quarter. Any failure or delay in closing
significant new orders in a given quarter could have a material
adverse impact on our results for that quarter.
Reliability and timeliness of expense data. We
increasingly rely upon third-party manufacturers to manufacture
our hardware-based products; therefore, our reliance on their
ability to provide us with timely and accurate product cost
information exposes us to risk, negatively impacting our ability
to accurately and timely report our operating results.
Issues relating to third-party distribution, manufacturing
and fulfillment relationships. We rely heavily on
third parties to manufacture and distribute our products. Any
changes in the performance of these relationships can impact our
operating results. Changes in our supply chain could result in
product fulfillment delays that contribute to fluctuations in
operating results from period to period. We have in the past and
may in the future make changes in our product delivery network,
which may disrupt our ability to timely and efficiently meet our
product delivery
46
commitments, particularly at the end of a quarter. As a result,
we may experience increased costs in the short term as temporary
delivery solutions are implemented to address unanticipated
delays in product delivery. In addition, product delivery delays
may negatively impact our ability to recognize revenue if
shipments are delayed at the end of a quarter.
Product mix. Another source of fluctuations in
our operating results and, in particular, gross profit margins,
is the mix of products we sell and services we offer, including
the mix between corporate versus consumer products;
hardware-based compared to software-based products; perpetual
licenses versus subscription licenses; and maintenance and
support services compared to consulting services or product
revenue. Product mix can impact operating expenses as well as
the amount of revenue and the timing of revenue recognition, so
our profitability can fluctuate significantly.
Timing of new products and customers. The
timing of the introduction and adoption of new products, product
upgrades or updates can have a significant impact on revenue
from period to period. For example, revenue tends to be higher
in periods shortly after we introduce new products compared to
periods without new products. Our revenue may decline after new
product introductions by competitors. In addition, the volume,
size, and terms of new customer licenses can cause fluctuations
in our revenue.
Additional cash and non-cash sources of
fluctuations. A number of other factors that are
peripheral to our core business operations also contribute to
variability in our operating results. These include, but are not
limited to, expenses related to our acquisition and disposition
activities, stock-based compensation expense, unanticipated
costs associated with litigation or investigations, costs
related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance efforts, costs and charges
related to certain extraordinary events such as restructurings,,
substantial declines in estimated values of long-lived assets
below the value at which they are reflected in our financial
statements, and changes in generally accepted accounting
principles, such as increased use of fair value measures and the
potential requirement that U.S. registrants prepare
financial statements in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) and changes in tax laws.
Material
weaknesses in our internal control and financial reporting
environment may impact the accuracy, completeness and timeliness
of our external financial reporting.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that
management report annually on the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting and identify any material
weaknesses in our internal control and financial reporting
environment. If management identifies any material weaknesses,
their correction could require remedial measures which could be
costly and time-consuming. In addition, the presence of material
weaknesses could result in financial statement errors which in
turn could require us to restate our operating results. This in
turn could damage investor confidence in the accuracy and
completeness of our financial reports, which could affect our
stock price and potentially subject us to litigation.
Our
strategic alliances and our relationships with manufacturing
partners expose us to a range of business risks and
uncertainties that could have a material adverse impact on our
business and financial results.
Uncertainty of realizing anticipated benefit of strategic
alliances. We have entered into strategic
alliances with numerous third parties to support our future
growth plans. For example, these relationships may include
technology licensing, joint technology development and
integration, research cooperation, co-marketing activities and
sell-through arrangements. We face a number of risks relating to
our strategic alliances, including those described below. These
risks may prevent us from realizing the desired benefits from
our strategic alliances on a timely basis or at all, which could
have a negative impact on our business and financial results.
Challenges relating to integrated products from strategic
alliances. Strategic alliances require
significant coordination between the parties involved,
particularly if an alliance requires that we integrate their
products with our products. This could involve significant time
and expenditure by our technical staff and the technical staff
of our strategic partner. The integration of products from
different companies may be more difficult than we anticipate,
and the risk of integration difficulties, incompatible products
and undetected programming errors or defects may be higher than
that normally associated with new products. The marketing and
sale of products that result from strategic alliances might also
be more difficult than that normally associated with new
products. Sales and
47
marketing personnel may require special training, as the new
products may be more complex than our other products.
We invest significant time, money and resources to establish and
maintain relationships with our strategic partners, but we have
no assurance that any particular relationship will continue for
any specific period of time. Generally, our strategic alliance
agreements are terminable without cause with no or minimal
notice or penalties. If we lose a significant strategic partner,
we could lose the benefit of our investment of time, money and
resources in the relationship. In addition, we could be required
to incur significant expenses to develop a new strategic
alliance or to determine and implement an alternative plan to
pursue the opportunity that we targeted with the former partner.
Less control of the manufacturing process and outcome with
third party manufacturing relationships. We rely
on a limited number of third parties to manufacture some of our
hardware-based network protection and system protection
products. We expect the number of our hardware-based products
and our reliance on third-party manufacturers to increase as we
continue to expand these types of solutions. We also rely on
third parties to replicate and package our boxed software
products. This reliance on third parties involves a number of
risks that could have a negative impact on our business and
financial results. These risks include, but are not limited to,
lack of control over the quality and timing of the manufacturing
process, limited control over the cost of manufacturing, and the
potential absence or unavailability of adequate manufacturing
capacity.
Risk of inadequate capacity with third party manufacturing
relationships. If any of our third-party
manufacturers fails for any reason to manufacture products of
acceptable quality, in required volumes, and in a cost-effective
and timely manner, it could be costly as well as disruptive to
product shipments. We might be required to seek additional
manufacturing capacity, which might not be available on
commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if additional
capacity was available, the process of qualifying a new vendor
could be lengthy and could cause significant delays in product
shipments and could strain partner and customer relationships.
In addition, supply disruptions or cost increases could increase
our costs of goods sold and negatively impact our financial
performance. Our risk is relatively greater in situations where
our hardware products contain critical components supplied by a
single or a limited number of third parties. Any significant
shortage of components could lead to cancellations of customer
orders or delays in placement of orders, which would adversely
impact revenue.
Risk of hardware obsolescence with third party manufacturing
relationships. Hardware-based products may face
greater obsolescence risks than software products. We could
incur losses or other charges in disposing of obsolete hardware
inventory. In addition, to the extent that our third-party
manufacturers upgrade or otherwise alter their manufacturing
processes, our hardware-based products could face supply
constraints or risks associated with the transition of
hardware-based products to new platforms. This could increase
the risk of losses or other charges associated with obsolete
inventory.
Our
global operations may expose us to tax risk.
We are generally required to account for taxes in each
jurisdiction in which we operate. This process may require us to
make assumptions, interpretations and judgments with respect to
the meaning and application of promulgated tax laws and related
administrative and judicial interpretations. The positions that
we take and our interpretations of the tax laws may differ from
the positions and interpretations of the tax authorities in the
jurisdictions in which we operate. We are presently under
examination in many jurisdictions, including notably the U.S.,
California, and Germany. An adverse outcome in one or more of
these ongoing examinations, or in any future examinations that
may occur, could have a significant negative impact on our cash
position and net income. Although we have established reserves
for these examination contingencies, there can be no assurance
that the reserves will be sufficient to cover our ultimate
liabilities.
Our provision for income taxes is subject to volatility and can
be adversely affected by a variety of factors, including but not
limited to changes in tax laws and regulations (including
various current proposals related to U.S. taxation of
non-U.S.
income) and accounting principles (including accounting for
uncertain tax positions), or interpretations of those changes.
Significant judgment is required to determine the recognition
and measurement attributes prescribed in FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Income Taxes
(FIN 48). In addition, FIN 48 applies
to all income tax positions, including the potential recovery of
previously paid taxes, which if settled unfavorably could
adversely impact our provision for income taxes or recorded
goodwill.
48
Critical
personnel may be difficult to attract, assimilate and
retain.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to attract and
retain senior management personnel, as well as technically
qualified and highly-skilled sales, consulting, technical,
finance and marketing personnel. Other than members of executive
management who have at will employment agreements,
our employees are not typically subject to an employment
agreement or non-competition agreement. It could be difficult,
time consuming and expensive to locate, replace and integrate
any key management member or other critical personnel. Changes
in management or other critical personnel may be disruptive to
our business and might also result in our loss of unique skills
and the departure of existing employees
and/or
customers.
Other personnel related issues that we may encounter include:
Competition for personnel; need for competitive pay
packages. Competition for qualified individuals
in our industry is intense and we must provide competitive
compensation packages, including equity awards. Increases in
shares available for issuance under our equity incentive plans
require stockholder approval, and there may be times, as we have
seen in the past, where we may not obtain the necessary
approval. Current adverse economic conditions could adversely
affect our ability to attract and retain qualified individuals.
If we are unable to attract and retain qualified individuals,
our ability to compete in the markets for our products could be
adversely affected, which would have a negative impact on our
business and financial results.
Risks relating to senior management changes and new
hires. From 2006 to 2008, we experienced
significant changes in our senior management team as a number of
officers resigned or were terminated and several key management
positions were vacant for a significant period of time. We may
continue to experience changes in senior management going
forward.
We continue to hire in key areas and have added a number of new
employees in connection with our acquisitions. For new
employees, including senior management, there may be reduced
levels of productivity as it takes time for new hires to be
trained or otherwise assimilated into the company.
Increased
customer demands on our technical support services may adversely
affect our relationships with our customers and negatively
impact our financial results.
We offer technical support services with many of our products.
We may be unable to respond quickly enough to accommodate
short-term increases in customer demand for support services. We
also may be unable to modify the format of our support services
to compete with changes in support services provided by
competitors or successfully integrate support for our customers.
Further customer demand for these services, without
corresponding revenue, could increase costs and adversely affect
our operating results.
We have outsourced a substantial portion of our worldwide
consumer support functions to third-party service providers. If
these companies experience financial difficulties, service
disruptions, do not maintain sufficiently skilled workers and
resources to satisfy our contracts, or otherwise fail to perform
at a sufficient level under these contracts, the level of
support services to our customers may be significantly
disrupted, which could materially harm our relationships with
these customers.
We
face risks related to customer outsourcing to system
integrators.
Some of our customers have outsourced the management of their
information technology departments to large system integrators.
If this trend continues, our established customer relationships
could be disrupted and our products could be displaced by
alternative system and network protection solutions offered by
system integrators that do not bundle our solutions. Significant
product displacements could negatively impact our revenue and
have a material adverse effect on our business.
49
If
we fail to effectively upgrade or modify our information
technology system, we may not be able to accurately report our
financial results or prevent fraud.
We may experience difficulties in transitioning to new or
upgraded information technology systems and in applying
maintenance patches to existing systems, including loss of data
and decreases in productivity as personnel become familiar with
new, upgraded or modified systems. Our management information
systems will require modification and refinement as we grow and
as our business needs change, which could prolong the
difficulties we experience with systems transitions, and we may
not always employ the most effective systems for our purposes.
If we experience difficulties in implementing new or upgraded
information systems or experience significant system failures,
or if we are unable to successfully modify our management
information systems and respond to changes in our business
needs, our operating results could be harmed or we may fail to
meet our reporting obligations. We may also experience similar
results if we have difficulty applying routine maintenance
patches to existing systems in a timely manner.
Computer
hackers may damage our products, services and
systems.
Due to our high profile in the network and system protection
market, we have been a target of computer hackers who have,
among other things, created viruses to sabotage or otherwise
attack our products and services, including our various web
sites. For example, we have seen the spread of viruses, or
worms, that intentionally delete anti-virus and firewall
software. Similarly, hackers may attempt to penetrate our
network security and misappropriate proprietary information or
cause interruptions of our internal systems and services. Also,
a number of web sites have been subject to denial of service
attacks, where a web site is bombarded with information requests
eventually causing the web site to overload, resulting in a
delay or disruption of service. If successful, any of these
events could damage users or our own computer systems. In
addition, since we do not control disk duplication by
distributors or our independent agents, media containing our
software may be infected with viruses.
Business
interruptions may impede our operations and the operations of
our customers.
We are continually updating or modifying our accounting and
other internal and external facing business systems.
Modifications of these types of systems are often disruptive to
business and may cause us to incur higher costs than we
anticipate. Failure to properly manage this process could
materially harm our business operations.
In addition, we and our customers face a number of potential
business interruption risks that are beyond our respective
control. Natural disasters or other events could interrupt our
business or the business of our customers, and each of us is
reliant on external infrastructure that may be antiquated. Our
corporate headquarters in California is located near a major
earthquake fault. The potential impact of a major earthquake on
our facilities, infrastructure and overall operations is not
known, but could be quite severe. Despite business interruption
and disaster recovery programs that have been implemented, an
earthquake could seriously disrupt our entire business process.
We are largely uninsured for losses and business disruptions
caused by an earthquake and other natural disasters.
Our
investment portfolio is subject to volatility, losses and
liquidity limitations. Continued negative conditions in the
global credit markets could impair the value of or limit our
access to our investments.
Investment income has been a significant component of our net
income. The ability to achieve our investment objectives is
affected by many factors, some of which are beyond our control.
We invest our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
in a variety of investment vehicles in a number of countries
with and in the custody of financial institutions with high
credit ratings. While our investment policy and strategy attempt
to manage interest rate risk, limit credit risk, and only invest
in what we view as very high-quality debt securities, the
outlook for our investment holdings is dependent on general
economic conditions, interest rate trends and volatility in the
financial marketplace, which can all affect the income that we
receive, the value of our investments, and our ability to sell
them. Current economic conditions have had widespread negative
effects on the financial markets and global economies. During
these challenging markets, we are investing new cash in
instruments with short to medium-term
50
maturities of highly-rated issuers, including
U.S. government and FDIC guaranteed investments. We do not
hold any sub-prime mortgages, auction rate securities or
structured investment vehicles.
The outlook for our investment income is dependent on the amount
of any share repurchases or acquisitions that we effect and the
amount of cash flows from operations that are available for
investment. Our investment income is also affected by the yield
on our investments and our recent shift to a larger percentage
of our investment portfolio to shorter-term and
U.S. government and FDIC guaranteed investments. This shift
may negatively impact our income from our investment portfolio
in light of declining yields. Any significant decline in our
investment income or the value of our investments could have an
adverse effect on our results of operations or financial
condition.
During 2008, we recorded an other-than-temporary impairment
charge of $18.5 million related to marketable securities.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded
additional impairment on previously impaired marketable
securities totaling $0.7 million. We believe that our
investment securities are carried at fair value. However, over
time the economic and market environment may provide additional
insight regarding the fair value of certain securities which
could change our judgment regarding impairment. This could
result in realized losses relating to other-than-temporary
declines being charged against future income. Given the current
market conditions involved, there is continuing risk that
further declines in fair value may occur and additional
impairments may be charged to income in future periods,
resulting in realized losses.
Most of our cash and investments held outside the U.S. are
subject to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. A
repatriation of these
non-U.S. investment
holdings to the U.S. under current law could be subject to
foreign and U.S. federal income and withholding taxes, less
any applicable foreign tax credits. These tax limitations, local
regulations and potential further capital market turmoil could
limit our ability to utilize these offshore funds.
Our
historical stock option granting practices have resulted in, and
could continue to result in, continued or new litigation,
regulatory proceedings, government enforcement actions and
remedial actions, all of which have had, and could in the future
have, a negative impact on our business and financial
results.
Shortly after we announced an internal investigation of our
historical stock option granting practices in May 2006, both the
SEC and the United States Department of Justice
(DOJ) commenced investigations of our stock option
practices. We have historically been engaged in discussions with
and have provided information to the SEC regarding certain of
our prior period consolidated financial statements. The
resolution of the SEC inquiry into our historical stock option
granting practices could require us to file additional
restatements of our prior consolidated financial statements or
require that we take other actions not presently contemplated.
As part of the remedial actions we have taken in connection with
the investigation and restatement of our consolidated financial
statements, we terminated certain employees, including former
executive officers. We are involved in litigation and other
legal proceedings in connection with one such termination. Any
future legal proceedings could require additional management
time and additional expense, and may require us to make
settlement or other related payments in the future. See
Note 12 to our condensed consolidated financial statements
for more details about ongoing legal proceedings.
We cannot predict the outcome of the pending government
inquiries or other lawsuits, and we may face additional
government inquiries and other legal proceedings. Any such
litigation, government inquiry or other legal proceeding could
require us to devote significant management time and to incur
significant accounting, legal, and other expenses and could
adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations.
Our
stock price has been volatile and is likely to remain
volatile.
During 2008 and through April 30, 2009, our stock price was
highly volatile, ranging from a high of $40.97 to a low of
$24.72. On April 30, 2009, our stocks closing price
was $37.54. Announcements, business developments, such as
material acquisitions or dispositions, litigation developments
and our ability to meet the expectations of
51
investors with respect to our operating and financial results,
may contribute to current and future stock price volatility. In
addition, third-party announcements such as those made by our
partners and competitors may contribute to current and future
stock price volatility. For example, future announcements by
major competitors related to consumer and corporate security
solutions may contribute to future volatility in our stock
price. Certain types of investors may choose not to invest in
stocks with this level of stock price volatility.
Our stock price may also experience volatility that is
completely unrelated to our performance or that of the security
industry. During 2008 through January 2009, the major
U.S. and international stock markets have been extremely
volatile. Fluctuations in these broad market indices can impact
our stock price regardless of our performance.
Our
charter documents and Delaware law may impede or discourage a
takeover, which could lower our stock price.
Under our certificate of incorporation, our board of directors
has the authority to issue up to 5.0 million shares of
preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences,
privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of those
shares without any further vote or action by our stockholders.
The issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of making
it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our
outstanding voting stock and could have the effect of
discouraging a change of control of the company or changes in
management.
Delaware law and other provisions of our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws could also delay or make a merger,
tender offer or proxy contest involving us or changes in our
board of directors and management more difficult. For example,
any stockholder wishing to make a stockholder proposal
(including director nominations) at our 2010 annual meeting must
meet the qualifications and follow the procedures specified
under both the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and our bylaws.
In addition, we have a classified board of directors; however,
our board of directors will be declassified over the three year
period ending with our annual meeting of stockholders in 2012.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
Common
Stock Repurchases
In January 2008, our board of directors authorized the
repurchase of up to $750.0 million of our common stock from
time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated
transactions through July 2009, depending upon market
conditions, share price and other factors. During the three
months ended on March 31, 2009, we repurchased
approximately 0.6 million shares of our common stock for
approximately $16.5 million in connection with our
obligation to holders of RSUs, RSAs and PSUs to withhold the
number of shares required to satisfy the holders tax
liabilities in connection with the vesting of such shares. These
shares were not part of the publicly announced repurchase
program.
The table below sets forth all repurchases by us of our common
stock during the three months ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Value of Shares
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
That May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased Under Our
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Announced Plan or
|
|
|
Stock Repurchase
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Repurchase Program
|
|
|
Program
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except price per share)
|
|
|
January 1, 2009 through January 31, 2009
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
$
|
30.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
250,290
|
|
February 1, 2009 through February 28, 2009
|
|
|
213,726
|
|
|
|
30.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,290
|
|
March 1, 2009 through March 31, 2009
|
|
|
349,430
|
|
|
|
28.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
563,919
|
|
|
$
|
29.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
None.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
None.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
(a) Exhibits. The exhibits listed in the
accompanying Exhibit Index are filed or incorporated by
reference as part of this Report.
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
McAfee Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Albert
A. Rocky Pimentel
|
Albert A. Rocky Pimentel
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
May 7, 2009
54
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
File
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filed with
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Form
|
|
Number
|
|
Number
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
This 10-Q
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant, as amended on April 27, 2009
|
|
8-K
|
|
001-31216
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
May 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Ownership and Merger between Registrant and
McAfee, Inc.
|
|
10-Q
|
|
001-31216
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
November 8, 2004
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.
|
|
8-K
|
|
001-31216
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
May 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock of
the Registrant
|
|
10-Q
|
|
000-20558
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
November 14, 1996
|
|
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences and Privileges
of Series B Participating Preferred Stock of the Registrant
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-20558
|
|
|
5
|
.0
|
|
October 22, 1998
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended
|
|
DEF 14A
|
|
001-31216
|
|
|
Appendix E
|
|
|
March 25, 2009
|
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Plan for Outside Directors
|
|
DEF 14A
|
|
001-31216
|
|
|
Appendix F
|
|
|
March 25, 2009
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
55