e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark one)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2011
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file number 1-2661
CSS INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
13-1920657
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
1845 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
19103
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(215) 569-9900
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Common Stock, $.10 par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant is $150,033,335. Such aggregate
market value was computed by reference to the closing price of
the common stock of the registrant on the New York Stock
Exchange on September 30, 2010, being the last trading day
of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter. Such calculation excludes the shares of common stock
beneficially owned at such date by certain directors and
officers of the registrant, by the Farber Foundation and by the
Farber Family Foundation, as described under the section
entitled Ownership of CSS Common Stock in the proxy
statement to be filed by the registrant for its 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders. In making such calculation, registrant
does not determine the affiliate or non-affiliate status of any
holders of the shares of common stock for any other purpose.
At May 17, 2011, there were outstanding
9,733,405 shares of common stock.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for
its 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by
reference into Part III of this
Form 10-K.
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2011
INDEX
PART I
General
CSS Industries, Inc. (CSS or the
Company) is a consumer products company primarily
engaged in the design, manufacture, procurement, distribution
and sale of seasonal and all occasion social expression
products, principally to mass market retailers. These seasonal
and all occasion products include decorative ribbons and bows,
boxed greeting cards, gift tags, gift wrap, gift bags, gift
boxes, gift card holders, decorative tissue paper, decorations,
classroom exchange Valentines, decorative ribbons and bows,
floral accessories, Halloween masks, costumes,
make-up and
novelties, Easter egg dyes and novelties, craft and educational
products, stickers, memory books, stationery, journals,
notecards, infant and wedding photo albums, scrapbooks, and
other gift items that commemorate lifes celebrations.
CSS product breadth provides its retail customers the
opportunity to use a single vendor for much of their seasonal
product requirements. A substantial portion of CSS
products are manufactured, packaged
and/or
warehoused in eleven facilities located in the United States,
with the remainder purchased primarily from manufacturers in
Asia and Mexico. The Companys products are sold to its
customers by national and regional account sales managers, sales
representatives, product specialists and by a network of
independent manufacturers representatives. CSS maintains a
purchasing office in Hong Kong to administer Asian sourcing
opportunities. The Companys principal operating
subsidiaries include Paper Magic Group, Inc. (Paper
Magic), BOC Design Group (consisting of Berwick Offray LLC
(Berwick Offray) and Cleo Inc (Cleo))
and C.R. Gibson, LLC (C.R. Gibson).
The Companys fiscal year ends on March 31. References
to a particular year refer to the fiscal year ending in March of
that year. For example fiscal 2011 refers to the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2011.
In fiscal 2007, the Company combined the operations of its Cleo
and Berwick Offray subsidiaries in order to improve
profitability and efficiency through the elimination of
redundant back office functions and certain management
positions. The Company consolidated its accounts receivable,
accounts payable and payroll functions into a combined back
office operation, which was substantially completed in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. Also completed in the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 was the implementation of a phase of the
Companys enterprise resource planning systems
standardization project.
In fiscal 2009, CSS completed acquisitions of several businesses
that are complementary to its existing businesses. On
May 16, 2008, a subsidiary of the Company completed the
acquisition of substantially all of the business and assets of
iotatm
(iota). iota is a designer and marketer of
stationery products such as notecards, journals and stationery
kits. On August 5, 2008, a subsidiary of the Company
completed the acquisition of substantially all of the business
and assets of Hampshire Paper Corp. (Hampshire
Paper) which is a manufacturer and supplier of pot covers,
waxed tissue, paper and foil to the wholesale floral and
horticultural industries. On February 20, 2009, a
subsidiary of the Company completed the acquisition of
substantially all of the business and assets of Seastone L.C.
(Seastone) which is a provider of specialty gift
card holders.
On May 27, 2009, a subsidiary of the Company completed the
acquisition of substantially all of the business and assets of
Designer Dispatch Ribbon, Inc. (Designer Dispatch
Ribbon). Designer Dispatch Ribbon was a manufacturer of
stock and custom ribbon and bows and related products.
On May 24, 2011, the Company, as part of a continuing
review of its Cleo gift wrap business, approved a plan to close
its manufacturing facility located in Memphis, Tennessee, with
an exit to be completed by no later than December 31, 2011.
As part of such closing, the Company plans to transition the
sourcing of all gift wrap products to foreign suppliers. We use
the Memphis, Tennessee facility primarily for the manufacture
and distribution of gift wrap products. The Company continually
evaluates the efficiency and productivity of its production and
distribution facilities to maintain its competitiveness, and
believes that it will experience better operational efficiencies
as a result of this action. In the fourth quarter of fiscal
2011, the Company recorded a non-cash pre-tax impairment charge
of $11,051,000 primarily due to a full impairment of the
tangible assets relating to our Cleo manufacturing facility
located in Memphis, Tennessee. The foregoing impairment charge
was partially offset by a $3,965,000 tax benefit. During our
fiscal year ending March 31, 2012, we expect to incur
pre-tax expenses of up to $10,300,000
1
associated with the approved plan, which costs primarily relate
to cash expenditures for facility and staff costs (approximately
$7,100,000) and non-cash asset write-downs (approximately
$3,200,000). Approximately half of these charges are expected to
be recognized in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012.
Additionally, the Company expects to incur $1,300,000 in cash
spending during fiscal 2012 which was expensed previously. The
Company expects to complete the restructuring plan by the end of
fiscal 2012.
The Companys goal is to expand by developing new or
complementary products, by entering new markets, by acquiring
companies that are complementary with its existing operating
businesses and by acquiring other businesses with leading market
positions.
Principal Products CSS designs, manufactures,
procures, distributes and sells a broad range of seasonal
consumer products primarily through the mass market distribution
channel. Christmas products include decorative ribbons and bows,
boxed greeting cards, gift tags, gift wrap, gift bags, gift
boxes, gift card holders, decorative tissue paper and
decorations. CSS Valentine product offerings include
classroom exchange Valentine cards and other related Valentine
products, while its Easter product offerings include
Dudleys®
brand of Easter egg dyes and related Easter seasonal products.
For Halloween, CSS offers a full line of Halloween merchandise
including
make-up,
costumes, masks and novelties. In addition to seasonal products,
CSS also designs and markets decorative ribbons and bows, all
occasion boxed greeting cards, gift wrap, gift bags, gift boxes,
gift card holders, decorative and waxed tissue, decorative films
and foils, stickers, memory books, stationery, journals,
notecards, infant and wedding photo albums, scrapbooks, floral
accessories and other gift and craft items to its mass market,
craft, specialty and floral retail and wholesale distribution
customers, and teachers aids and other learning oriented
products to the education market through mass market retailers,
school supply distributors and teachers stores.
Key brands include Paper
Magic®,
Berwick®,
Offray®,
Cleo®,
C.R.
Gibson®,
Markings®,
Creative
Papers®,
Tapestry®,
Seastone®,
Dudleys®,
Don Post
Studios®,
Eureka®,
Learning
Playground®,
Stickerfitti®
and
iota®.
CSS operates eleven manufacturing
and/or
distribution facilities located in Pennsylvania, Maryland, New
Hampshire, South Carolina, Alabama, Tennessee and Texas. A
description of the Companys product lines and related
manufacturing
and/or
distribution facilities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Boxed greeting cards are produced by Asian manufacturers to our
specifications. Domestically distributed products are warehoused
in a distribution facility in Pennsylvania.
|
|
|
|
Gift tags and classroom exchange Valentine products are
domestically manufactured or imported from Asian manufacturers.
Manufacturing processes include a wide range of finishing,
assembly and packaging operations. Domestically distributed
products are warehoused in a facility in Pennsylvania.
|
|
|
|
Halloween
make-up and
Easter egg dye products are manufactured in Asia to specific
formulae by contract manufacturers who meet regulatory
requirements for the formularization and packaging of such
products. Domestically distributed products are warehoused in a
distribution facility in Pennsylvania.
|
|
|
|
Ribbons and bows are primarily manufactured and warehoused in
seven facilities located in Pennsylvania, Maryland, South
Carolina and Texas. The manufacturing process is vertically
integrated. Non-woven ribbon and bow products are primarily made
from polypropylene resin, a petroleum-based product, which is
mixed with color pigment, melted and pressed through an
extruder. Large rolls of extruded film go through various
combinations of manufacturing processes before being made into
bows or packaged on ribbon spools or reels as required by
various markets and customers. Woven fabric ribbons are
manufactured domestically or imported from Mexico and Asia.
Imported woven products are either narrow woven or converted
from bulk rolls of wide width textiles. Domestic woven products
are narrow woven.
|
|
|
|
Gift wrap is primarily manufactured in one facility in Memphis,
Tennessee. Manufacturing includes web printing, finishing,
rewinding and packaging. Finished gift wrap products are
warehoused and shipped from the production facility in Memphis.
A small portion of gift wrap products are imported from Asia. As
noted above, a plan has been approved to close and exit this
facility no later than December 31, 2011 and to transition
the sourcing of all gift wrap products to foreign suppliers.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Memory books, stationery, journals and notecards, infant and
wedding photo albums, scrapbooks, and other gift items are
imported from Asian manufacturers and warehoused and distributed
from a distribution facility in Florence, Alabama.
|
|
|
|
Floral accessories, including pot covers, foil, waxed tissue,
shred, aisle runners, corsage bags and other paper and film
products, are manufactured in a facility located in Milford, New
Hampshire. Manufacturing includes gravure and flexo printing,
waxing and converting. Products are warehoused and distributed
from a distribution facility in Berwick, Pennsylvania.
|
Other products including, but not limited to, decorative tissue
paper, gift bags, gift boxes, gift card holders, Halloween
masks, costumes and novelties, Easter products, decorations and
school products are designed to the specifications of CSS and
are imported primarily from Asian manufacturers.
During our 2011 fiscal year, CSS experienced no material
difficulties in obtaining raw materials or finished goods from
suppliers.
Intellectual Property Rights CSS has a number of
copyrights, patents, tradenames, trademarks and intellectual
property licenses which are used in connection with its
products. Substantially all of its designs and artwork are
protected by copyright. Intellectual property license rights
which CSS has obtained are viewed as especially important to the
success of its classroom exchange Valentines, stickers and
juvenile gift wrap. It is CSS view that its operations are
not dependent upon any individual patent, tradename, trademark,
copyright or intellectual property license. The collective value
of CSS intellectual property is viewed as substantial and
CSS seeks to protect its rights in all patents, copyrights,
tradenames, trademarks and intellectual property licenses.
Sales and Marketing Most of CSS products are
sold in the United States and Canada by national and regional
account sales managers, sales representatives, product
specialists and by a network of independent manufacturers
representatives. CSS maintains permanent showrooms in New York
City, Memphis, Dallas, Atlanta, Las Vegas and Hong Kong where
buyers for major retail customers will typically visit for a
presentation and review of the new lines. Products are also
displayed and presented in showrooms maintained by various
independent manufacturers representatives in major cities
in the United States and Canada. Relationships are developed
with key retail customers by CSS sales personnel and independent
manufacturers representatives. Customers are generally
mass market retailers, discount department stores, specialty
chains, warehouse clubs, drug and food chains, dollar stores,
office supply stores, independent card, gift and floral shops
and retail teachers stores. Net sales to Walmart Stores,
Inc. and its affiliates and Target Corporation accounted for
approximately 24% and 12% of total net sales, respectively,
during fiscal 2011. No other customer accounted for 10% or more
of the Companys net sales in fiscal 2011. Approximately
59% of the Companys sales are attributable to seasonal
(Christmas, Halloween, Valentines Day and Easter)
products, with the remainder attributable to all occasion
products. Approximately 46% of CSS sales relate to the
Christmas season. Seasonal products are generally designed and
marketed beginning up to 18 to 20 months before the holiday
event and manufactured during an eight to ten month production
cycle. Due to these long lead time requirements, timely
communication with third party factories, retail customers and
independent manufacturers representatives is critical to
the timely production of seasonal products. Because the products
themselves are primarily seasonal, sales terms do not generally
require payment until just before or just after the holiday, in
accordance with industry practice. C.R. Gibsons social
stationery products are sold by a national organization of sales
representatives that specialize in the gift and specialty
channel, as well as by C.R. Gibsons key account
representatives. The Company also sells custom products to
private label customers, to other social expression companies,
and to converters of the Companys ribbon products. Custom
products are sold by both independent manufacturers
representatives and CSS sales managers. CSS products, with some
customer specific exceptions, are not sold under guaranteed or
return privilege terms. All occasion ribbon and bow products are
also sold through sales representatives or independent
manufacturers representatives to wholesale distributors
and independent small retailers who serve the floral, craft and
retail packaging trades.
Competition among retailers in the sale of the Companys
products to end users is intense. CSS seeks to assist retailers
in developing merchandising programs designed to enable the
retailers to meet their revenue objectives while appealing to
their consumers tastes. These objectives are met through
the development and manufacture of custom configured and
designed products and merchandising programs. CSS years of
experience in merchandising program development and product
quality are key competitive advantages in helping retailers meet
their objectives.
3
Competition CSS principal competitor in
Christmas products is American Greetings Corporation. Image
Arts, Inc., a subsidiary of Hallmark Cards, Incorporated
(Hallmark), is also a competitor in the boxed
greeting card business. CSS competes, to a limited extent, with
other product offerings of Hallmark and American Greetings
Corporation. These competitors are larger and have greater
resources than the Company. In addition, CSS also competes with
various domestic and foreign companies in each of its other
product offerings.
CSS believes its products are competitively positioned in their
primary markets. Since competition is based primarily on
category knowledge, timely delivery, creative design, price and,
with respect to seasonal products, the ability to serve major
retail customers with single, combined product shipments for
each holiday event, CSS focus on products combined with
consistent service levels allows it to compete effectively in
its core markets.
Employees
At May 17, 2011, approximately 1,830 persons were
employed by CSS (increasing to approximately 2,550 as seasonal
employees are added). The Company believes that relationships
with its employees are satisfactory.
With the exception of the bargaining units at the gift wrap
facilities in Memphis, Tennessee and the ribbon manufacturing
facility in Hagerstown, Maryland, which totaled approximately
600 employees as of May 17, 2011, CSS employees are
not represented by labor unions. Because of the seasonal nature
of certain of its businesses, the number of production employees
fluctuates during the year. The collective bargaining agreement
with the labor union representing the Hagerstown-based
production and maintenance employees remains in effect until
December 31, 2011. The collective bargaining agreement with
the labor union representing Cleos production and
maintenance employees at the Cleo gift wrap plant and warehouse
in Memphis, Tennessee also remains in effect until
December 31, 2011. The Company plans to close its Cleo
manufacturing facility located in Memphis, Tennessee, with an
exit to be completed by no later than December 31, 2011. As
part of such closing, the Company plans to transition the
sourcing of all gift wrap products to foreign suppliers.
SEC
Filings
The Companys Internet address is
www.cssindustries.com. Through its website, the
following filings are made available free of charge as soon as
reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with
or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission: its
annual report on
Form 10-K,
its quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
its current reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant
to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
You should carefully consider each of the risk factors we
describe below, as well as other factors described in this
annual report on
Form 10-K
and elsewhere in our SEC filings.
Our
results of operations fluctuate on a seasonal basis, and quarter
to quarter comparisons may not be a good indicator of our
performance. Seasonal demand fluctuations may adversely affect
our cash flow and our ability to sell our
products.
Approximately 59% of our sales are attributable to seasonal
(Christmas, Halloween, Valentines Day and Easter)
products, with the remainder being attributable to all occasion
products. Approximately 46% of our sales relate to the Christmas
season. The seasonal nature of our business has historically
resulted in lower sales levels and operating losses in our first
and fourth quarters, and higher sales levels and operating
profits in our second and third quarters. As a result, our
quarterly results of operations fluctuate during our fiscal
year, and a quarter to quarter comparison is not a good
indication of our performance or how we will perform in the
future. For example, our overall results of operations in the
future may fluctuate substantially based on seasonal demand for
our products. Such variations in demand could have a material
adverse effect on the timing of cash flow and therefore our
ability to meet our obligations with respect to our debt and
other financial commitments. Seasonal fluctuations also affect
our inventory levels. We must carry significant amounts of
inventory, especially before the Christmas retail selling
period. If we are not successful in selling the inventory during
the relevant period, we may have to sell the inventory at
significantly reduced prices, or we may not be able to sell the
inventory at all.
4
We
rely on a few mass market retailers, warehouse clubs and
national drug store chains for a significant portion of our
sales. The loss of sales, or a significant reduction of sales,
to one or more of our large customers may adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition. Past
and future consolidation within the retail sector also may lead
to reduced profit margins, which may adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial
condition.
A few of our customers are material to our business and
operations. Our sales to Walmart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates
and Target Corporation accounted for approximately 24% and 12%
of our sales, respectively, during our 2011 fiscal year. No
other single customer accounted for 10% or more of our sales in
fiscal 2011. Our ten largest customers, which include mass
market retailers, warehouse clubs and national drug store
chains, accounted for approximately 57% of our sales in our 2011
fiscal year. Our business depends, in part, on our ability to
identify and define product and market trends, and to
anticipate, understand and react to changing consumer demands in
a timely manner. There can be no assurance that our large
customers will continue to purchase our products in the same
quantities that they have in the past. The loss of sales, or a
significant reduction of sales, to one or more of our large
customers may adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition. Further, in recent years
there has been consolidation among our retail customer base. As
the retail sector consolidates, our customers become larger, and
command increased leverage in negotiating prices and other terms
of sale of our products, including credits, discounts,
allowances and other incentive considerations to these
customers. Past and future consolidation may lead to reduced
profit margins, which may adversely affect our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
Increases
in raw material and energy costs, resulting from general
economic conditions, acts of nature, such as hurricanes,
earthquakes or pandemics, or other factors, may raise our cost
of goods sold and adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Paper and petroleum-based materials are essential in the
manufacture of our products, and the cost of such materials is
significant to our cost of goods sold. Energy costs, especially
fuel costs, also are significant expenses in the production and
delivery of our products. Increased costs of raw materials or
energy resulting from general economic conditions, acts of
nature, such as hurricanes, earthquakes or pandemics, or other
factors, may result in declining margins and operating results
if market conditions prevent us from passing these increased
costs on to our customers through timely price increases on our
products.
Risks
associated with our use of foreign suppliers may adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
For a large portion of our product lines, particularly our
Halloween, Easter, Christmas boxed greeting cards, gift bags,
gift tags, gift boxes, gift card holders, decorative tissue
paper, classroom exchange Valentines, craft and educational
products, stickers, memory books, stationery, journals,
notecards, infant and wedding photo albums and scrapbook product
lines, we use foreign suppliers to manufacture a significant
portion of our products. Approximately 56% of our sales in
fiscal 2011 were related to products sourced from foreign
suppliers. Further, on May 24, 2011, the Company approved a
plan to close its Cleo manufacturing facility located in
Memphis, Tennessee, with an exit to be completed by no later
than December 31, 2011. As part of such closing, the
Company plans to transition the sourcing of all gift wrap
products to foreign suppliers. Our use of foreign suppliers
exposes us to risks inherent in doing business outside of the
United States, including risks associated with foreign currency
fluctuations, transportation costs and delays or disruptions,
difficulties in maintaining and monitoring quality control,
enforceability of agreed upon contract terms, compliance with
existing and new United States and foreign laws and regulations,
such as the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and
legislation and regulations relating to imported products, costs
relating to the imposition or retrospective application of
antidumping and countervailing duties or other trade-related
sanctions on imported products, economic, civil or political
instability, labor-related issues, such as labor shortages or
wage disputes or increases, international public health issues,
and restrictions on the repatriation of profits and assets.
5
Increased
overseas sourcing by our competitors and our customers may
reduce our market share and profit margins, adversely affecting
our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
We have relatively high market share in many of our seasonal
product categories. Most of our product markets have shown
little or no growth, and some of our product markets have
declined, in recent years, and we continue to confront
significant cost pressure as our competitors source certain
products from overseas and certain customers increase direct
sourcing from overseas factories. Increased overseas sourcing by
our competitors and certain customers may result in a reduction
of our market share and profit margins, adversely affecting our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Difficulties
encountered by our key customers may cause them to reduce their
purchases from us and/or increase our exposure to losses from
bad debts, and adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Many of our largest customers are national and regional retail
chains. The retail channel in the United States has experienced
significant shifts in market share among competitors in recent
years. In addition, leveraged buyouts of certain large retailers
in recent years have left these companies with significant
levels of debt. Furthermore, effects from the worldwide economic
slowdown that began in our 2009 fiscal year, including reduced,
delayed or foregone consumer spending and increased difficulty
and costs associated with obtaining the financing and capital
needed by retailers to operate their businesses, has adversely
affected retailers in general, including our key customers. A
prolonged economic slowdown or a slow economic recovery, or even
an uncertain economic outlook, could further adversely affect
our key customers. Our business, results of operations and
financial condition may be adversely affected if, as a result of
these factors, our customers file for bankruptcy protection
and/or cease
doing business, significantly reduce the number of stores they
operate, significantly reduce their purchases from us, do not
pay us for their purchases, or if their payments to us are
delayed because of bankruptcy or other factors beyond our
control.
Our
business, results of operations and financial condition may be
adversely affected by volatility in the demand for our
products.
Our success depends on the sustained demand for our products.
Many factors affect the level of consumer spending on our
products, including, among other things, general business
conditions, interest rates, the availability of consumer credit,
taxation, the effects of war, terrorism or threats of war, fuel
prices, consumer demand for our products based upon, among other
things, consumer trends and the availability of alternative
products, and consumer confidence in future economic conditions.
The worldwide economic slowdown that began in our 2009 fiscal
year, in addition to adversely affecting our customers, has
adversely affected consumer spending on discretionary items,
including our products, which, in turn, has adversely affected
our business, results of operations and financial condition. A
prolonged economic slowdown or a slow economic recovery, or even
an uncertain economic outlook, could further adversely affect
consumer spending on discretionary items, including our
products, which, in turn, could further adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition. We also
routinely utilize new artwork, designs or licensed intellectual
property in connection with our products, and our inability to
design, select, procure, maintain or sell consumer-desired
artwork, designs or licensed intellectual property could
adversely affect the demand for our products, which could
adversely affect our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Our
business, results of operations and financial condition may be
adversely affected if we are unable to compete successfully
against our competitors.
Our success depends in part on our ability to compete against
our competitors in our highly competitive markets. Our
competitors, including large domestic corporations, such as
Hallmark and American Greetings Corporation, foreign
manufacturers who market directly to our customer base,
importers of products produced overseas and small privately
owned businesses, may be able to offer similar products with
more favorable pricing
and/or terms
of sale or may be able to provide products that more readily
meet customer requirements or consumer preferences. Our
inability to successfully compete against our competitors could
adversely affect our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
6
Our
business, results of operations and financial condition may be
adversely affected if we are unable to hire and retain
sufficient qualified personnel.
Our success depends, to a substantial extent, on the ability,
experience and performance of our senior management. In order to
hire and retain qualified personnel, including our senior
management team, we seek to provide competitive compensation
programs. Our inability to retain our senior management team, or
our inability to attract and retain qualified replacement
personnel, may adversely affect us. We also regularly hire a
large number of seasonal employees. Any difficulty we may
encounter in hiring seasonal employees may result in significant
increases in labor costs, which may have an adverse effect on
our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our
business, results of operations and financial condition may be
adversely affected if we fail to extend or renegotiate our
collective bargaining contracts with our labor unions, or if our
unionized employees were to engage in a strike, or other work
stoppage.
Approximately 600 of our employees at our ribbon manufacturing
facility in Hagerstown, Maryland and at our gift wrap facilities
in Memphis, Tennessee are represented by labor unions. The
collective bargaining agreement with the labor union
representing the Hagerstown-based production and maintenance
employees will expire on December 31, 2011. The collective
bargaining agreement with the labor union representing
Cleos production and maintenance employees at the Cleo
gift wrap plant and warehouse in Memphis, Tennessee also will
expire on December 31, 2011. The Company plans to close its
Cleo manufacturing facility located in Memphis, Tennessee, with
an exit to be completed by no later than December 31, 2011.
As part of such closing, the Company plans to transition the
sourcing of all gift wrap products to foreign suppliers.
Although we believe our relations with our employees are
satisfactory, no assurance can be given that we will be able to
successfully extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining
agreements. If we fail to extend or renegotiate our collective
bargaining agreements, if disputes with our unions arise, or if
our unionized workers engage in a strike or other work related
stoppage, we could incur higher ongoing labor costs or
experience a significant disruption of operations, which could
have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
Employee
benefit costs may adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
We seek to provide competitive employee benefit programs to our
employees. Employee benefit costs, such as healthcare costs of
our eligible and participating employees, may increase
significantly at a rate that is difficult to forecast, in part
because we are unable to determine the impact that newly enacted
federal healthcare legislation may have on our
employer-sponsored medical plans. Higher employee benefit costs
could have an adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Our
acquisition strategy involves risks, and difficulties in
integrating potential acquisitions may adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial
condition.
We regularly evaluate potential acquisition opportunities to
support, strengthen and grow our business. We cannot be sure
that we will be able to locate suitable acquisition candidates,
acquire possible acquisition candidates, acquire such candidates
on commercially reasonable terms, or integrate acquired
businesses successfully. Future acquisitions may require us to
incur additional debt and contingent liabilities, which may
adversely affect our business, results of operations and
financial condition. The process of integrating acquired
businesses into our existing operations may result in operating,
contract and supply chain difficulties, such as the failure to
retain customers or management personnel. Also, prior to our
completion of any acquisition, we could fail to discover
liabilities of the acquired business for which we may be
responsible as a successor owner or operator in spite of any
investigation we may make prior to the acquisition. Such
difficulties may divert significant financial, operational and
managerial resources from our existing operations, and make it
more difficult to achieve our operating and strategic
objectives. The diversion of management attention, particularly
in a difficult operating environment, may adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
7
Our
inability to protect our intellectual property rights, or
infringement claims asserted against us by others, may adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
We have a number of copyrights, patents, tradenames, trademarks
and intellectual property licenses which are used in connection
with our products. While our operations are not dependent upon
any individual copyright, patent, tradename, trademark or
intellectual property license, we believe that the collective
value of our intellectual property is substantial. We rely upon
copyright and trademark laws in the United States and other
jurisdictions and on confidentiality agreements with some of our
employees and others to protect our proprietary rights. If our
proprietary rights were infringed, our business could be
adversely affected. In addition, our activities could infringe
upon the proprietary rights of others, who could assert
infringement claims against us. We could face costly litigation
if we are forced to defend these claims. If we are unsuccessful
in defending such claims, our business, results of operations
and financial condition could be adversely affected.
We seek to register our trademarks in the United States and
elsewhere. These registrations could be challenged by others or
invalidated through administrative process or litigation. In
addition, our confidentiality agreements with some employees or
others may not provide adequate protection in the event of
unauthorized use or disclosure of our proprietary information,
or if our proprietary information otherwise becomes known, or is
independently developed by competitors.
Various
laws and governmental regulations applicable to a manufacturer
or distributor of consumer products may adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Our business is subject to numerous federal, state, provincial,
local and foreign laws and regulations, including laws and
regulations with respect to labor and employment, product
safety, including regulations enforced by the United States
Consumer Products Safety Commission, import and export
activities, the Internet and
e-commerce,
antitrust issues, taxes, chemical usage, air emissions,
wastewater and storm water discharges and the generation,
handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of
waste materials, including hazardous materials. Although we
believe that we are in substantial compliance with all
applicable laws and regulations, because legal requirements
frequently change and are subject to interpretation, we are
unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance or the
consequences of non-compliance with these requirements, or the
affect on our operations, any of which may be significant. If we
fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we may be
subject to criminal sanctions or civil remedies, including
fines, injunctions, or prohibitions on importing or exporting. A
failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, or
concerns about product safety, also may lead to a recall or
post-manufacture repair of selected products, resulting in the
rejection of our products by our customers and consumers, lost
sales, increased customer service and support costs, and costly
litigation. There is risk that any claims or liabilities,
including product liability claims, relating to such
noncompliance may exceed, or fall outside the scope of, our
insurance coverage. Further, a failure to comply with applicable
laws and regulations with respect to the Internet and
e-commerce
activities, which cover issues relating to user privacy, data
protection, copyrights and consumer protection, may subject us
to significant liabilities. We cannot be certain that existing
laws or regulations, as currently interpreted or reinterpreted
in the future, or future laws or regulations, will not have an
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Our
business, results of operations and financial condition may be
adversely affected by national or global changes in economic or
political conditions.
Our business, results of operations and financial condition may
be adversely affected by national or global changes in economic
or political conditions, including foreign currency fluctuations
and fluctuations in inflation and interest rates, a national or
international economic downturn, and any future terrorist
attacks, and the national and global military, diplomatic and
financial exposure to such attacks or other threats.
Our
business, results of operations and financial condition may be
adversely affected by our ability to successfully manage our
information technology (IT)
infrastructure.
We rely upon our IT infrastructure to operate our business. If
we suffer damage, interruption, or impairment of our IT
infrastructure resulting from human error, vandalism, fire,
flood, power loss, telecommunications failure,
8
terrorist attacks, a computer virus or a malfunction of an IT
application, we could experience substantial operational issues,
including loss of data or information, unanticipated increases
in costs, disruption of operations or business interruption. Our
inability to successfully manage our IT infrastructure could
adversely affect our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
We are
subject to a number of restrictive covenants under our borrowing
arrangements, including customary operating restrictions and
customary financial covenants. Our business, results of
operations and financial condition may be adversely affected if
we are unable to maintain compliance with such
covenants.
Our borrowing arrangements contain a number of restrictive
covenants, including customary operating restrictions that limit
our ability to engage in activities such as incurring additional
debt, making investments, granting liens on our assets, making
capital expenditures, paying dividends and making other
distributions on our capital stock, and engaging in mergers,
acquisitions, asset sales and repurchases of our capital stock.
Under such arrangements, we are also subject to customary
financial covenants, including covenants requiring us to
maintain our capital expenditures below a maximum permitted
amount each year and to keep our tangible net worth and our
interest coverage ratio at or above certain minimum levels.
Compliance with the financial covenants contained in our
borrowing arrangements is based on financial measures derived
from our operating results.
If our business, results of operations or financial condition is
adversely affected by one or more of the risk factors described
above, or other factors described in this annual report on
Form 10-K
or elsewhere in our filings with the SEC, we may be unable to
maintain compliance with these covenants. If we fail to comply
with such covenants, our lenders under our borrowing
arrangements could stop advancing funds to us under these
arrangements
and/or
demand immediate payment of amounts outstanding under such
arrangements. Under such circumstances, we would need to seek
alternate financing sources to fund our ongoing operations and
to repay amounts outstanding and satisfy our other obligations
under our existing borrowing arrangements. Such financing may
not be available on favorable terms, if at all. Consequently, we
may be restricted in how we fund ongoing operations and
strategic initiatives and deploy capital, and in our ability to
make acquisitions and to pay dividends. As a result, our
business, results of operations and financial condition may be
further adversely affected if we are unable to maintain
compliance with the covenants under our borrowing arrangements.
If our
business, results of operations or financial condition is
adversely affected as a result of any of the risk factors
described above or elsewhere in this annual report on
Form 10-K
or our other SEC filings, we may be required to incur financial
statement charges, such as asset or goodwill impairment charges,
which may, in turn, have a further adverse affect on our results
of operations and financial condition.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, we recorded a non-cash
pre-tax impairment charge of $11,051,000 primarily due to a full
impairment of the tangible assets in our Cleo manufacturing
facility located in Memphis, Tennessee. In the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2010, we recorded a non-cash pre-tax impairment charge of
$44,315,000 due to a full impairment of goodwill in our BOC
Design Group and C.R. Gibson reporting units, and partial
impairments of trademarks used by such entities. If our
business, results of operations or financial condition are
adversely affected by one or more circumstances, such as any one
or more of the risk factors above or other factors described in
this annual report on
Form 10-K
and elsewhere in our SEC filings, we then may be required under
applicable accounting rules to incur additional charges
associated with reducing the carrying value on our financial
statements of certain assets, such as goodwill, intangible
assets or tangible assets.
Goodwill is subject to an assessment for impairment using a
two-step fair value-based test, the first step of which must be
performed at least annually, or more frequently if events or
circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. We
perform our required annual assessment as of our fiscal year
end. The first step of the test compares the fair value of a
reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill, as of
the date of the test. We use both a market approach and an
income approach to determine the fair value of our reporting
units because we believe that the use of multiple valuation
techniques results in a more accurate indicator of the fair
value of each of our reporting units. If the carrying amount of
the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is
performed. The second step compares the carrying amount of the
goodwill to the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the
implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the carrying
amount of the goodwill, an impairment loss will be reported.
9
Other indefinite lived intangible assets, such as our
tradenames, also are required to be tested annually. We
calculate the fair value of our tradenames using a relief
from royalty payments methodology. We also review
long-lived assets, except for goodwill and indefinite lived
intangible assets, for impairment when circumstances indicate
the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. If such
assets are considered to be impaired, we will recognize, for
impairment purposes, an amount by which the carrying amount of
the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
If we are required to incur any of the foregoing financial
charges, our results of operations and financial condition may
be further adversely affected.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments.
|
None.
The following table sets forth the location and approximate
square footage of the Companys manufacturing and
distribution facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Square Feet
|
|
Location
|
|
Use
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Danville, PA
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
133,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berwick, PA
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
|
213,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berwick, PA
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berwick, PA
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
226,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berwick, PA
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451,000
|
|
Memphis, TN(1)
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,006,000
|
|
Hagerstown, MD
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
|
284,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Batesburg, SC
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
229,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Paso, TX
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Florence, AL
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
Milford, NH
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
1,305,000
|
|
|
|
1,795,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On May 24, 2011, the Company approved a plan to close its
Cleo manufacturing facility located in Memphis, Tennessee, with
an exit to be completed by no later than December 31, 2011.
As part of such closing, the Company plans to transition the
sourcing of all gift wrap products to foreign suppliers. |
The Company also owns a former manufacturing facility
aggregating approximately 253,000 square feet which it is
in the process of selling, and utilizes owned and leased space
aggregating approximately 213,000 square feet for various
marketing and administrative purposes, including approximately
21,000 square feet utilized as an office and showroom in
Hong Kong. The Company also owns administrative office space of
approximately 2,000 square feet which has been leased to a
third party. The headquarters and principal executive office of
the Company are located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
CSS and its subsidiaries are involved in ordinary, routine legal
proceedings that are not considered by management to be
material. In the opinion of Company counsel and management, the
ultimate liabilities resulting from such legal proceedings will
not materially affect the consolidated financial position of the
Company or its results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
Item 4.
|
(Removed
and Reserved).
|
10
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
The common stock of the Company is listed for trading on the New
York Stock Exchange. The following table sets forth the high and
low sales prices per share of that stock, and the dividends
declared per share, for each of the quarters during fiscal 2011
and fiscal 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Declared
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
21.92
|
|
|
$
|
16.29
|
|
|
$
|
.15
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
19.13
|
|
|
|
14.87
|
|
|
|
.15
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
21.55
|
|
|
|
15.94
|
|
|
|
.15
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
21.54
|
|
|
|
16.07
|
|
|
|
.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Declared
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
23.53
|
|
|
$
|
15.20
|
|
|
$
|
.15
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
27.28
|
|
|
|
18.25
|
|
|
|
.15
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
21.93
|
|
|
|
17.19
|
|
|
|
.15
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
21.85
|
|
|
|
16.09
|
|
|
|
.15
|
|
At May 17, 2011, there were approximately 2,400 holders of
the Companys common stock and there were no shares of
preferred stock outstanding.
The ability of the Company to pay any cash dividends on its
common stock is dependent on the Companys earnings and
cash requirements and is further limited by maintaining
compliance with financial covenants contained in the
Companys credit facilities. The Company anticipates that
quarterly cash dividends will continue to be paid in the future.
11
Performance
Graph
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholders
return on the Companys common stock for the period from
April 1, 2006 through March 31, 2011, with
(i) the cumulative total return on the Standard and Poors
500 (S&P 500) Index and (ii) a peer group,
as described below (assuming the investment of $100 in our
common stock, the S&P 500 Index, and the peer group on
April 1, 2006 and reinvestment of all dividends).
The peer group utilized consists of American Greetings
Corporation, Blyth, Inc., Kid Brands, Inc. (formerly known as
Russ Berrie and Company, Inc.), JAKKS Pacific, Inc. and Lifetime
Brands, Inc. (the Peer Group). The Company selected
this group as its Peer Group because they are engaged in
businesses that are sometimes categorized with the
Companys business. However, management believes that a
comparison of the Companys performance to this Peer Group
will be flawed, because the businesses of the Peer Group
companies are in large part different from the Companys
business. In this regard, the Company competes with only certain
smaller product lines of American Greetings; Blyth is
principally focused on fragranced candle products and related
candle accessories, competing only with some of the
Companys products; Lifetime Brands is principally focused
on food preparation, tabletop and home décor, competing
only with some of the Companys products; and the other
companies principally sell toy
and/or
juvenile products.
12
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2011(a)
|
|
2010(b)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
450,700
|
|
|
$
|
448,450
|
|
|
$
|
482,424
|
|
|
$
|
498,253
|
|
|
$
|
530,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
8,751
|
|
|
|
(30,987
|
)
|
|
|
25,890
|
|
|
|
38,833
|
|
|
|
36,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
5,611
|
|
|
|
(23,739
|
)
|
|
|
16,986
|
|
|
|
25,358
|
|
|
|
23,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.58
|
|
|
$
|
(2.46
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
|
$
|
2.36
|
|
|
$
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.58
|
|
|
$
|
(2.46
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
|
$
|
2.31
|
|
|
$
|
2.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
146,896
|
|
|
$
|
130,897
|
|
|
$
|
114,371
|
|
|
$
|
136,000
|
|
|
$
|
188,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
286,923
|
|
|
|
281,762
|
|
|
|
322,259
|
|
|
|
345,041
|
|
|
|
343,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
10,479
|
|
|
|
10,246
|
|
|
|
10,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
10,192
|
|
|
|
20,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
235,659
|
|
|
|
233,045
|
|
|
|
259,254
|
|
|
|
262,353
|
|
|
|
261,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
.60
|
|
|
$
|
.60
|
|
|
$
|
.60
|
|
|
$
|
.56
|
|
|
$
|
.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company recorded a
non-cash pre-tax impairment charge of $11,051,000 primarily due
to a full impairment of the tangible assets in its Cleo
manufacturing facility located in Memphis, Tennessee. The
foregoing impairment charge was partially offset by a $3,965,000
tax benefit. |
|
(b) |
|
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded a
non-cash pre-tax impairment charge of $44,315,000 due to a full
impairment of goodwill in two of its reporting units, C.R.
Gibson, LLC and BOC Design Group (consisting of Berwick Offray
LLC and Cleo Inc), and partial impairments of tradenames used by
such entities. The foregoing impairment charge was partially
offset by an $11,692,000 tax benefit. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
Overview
Approximately 59% of the Companys sales are attributable
to seasonal (Christmas, Valentines Day, Easter and
Halloween) products, with the remainder being attributable to
all occasion products. Seasonal products are sold primarily to
mass market retailers, and the Company has relatively high
market share in many of these categories. Most of these markets
have shown little growth and in some cases have declined in
recent years, and the Company continues to confront significant
price pressure as its competitors source certain products from
overseas and its customers increase direct sourcing from
overseas factories. Increasing customer concentration has
augmented their bargaining power, which has also contributed to
price pressure. In recent fiscal years, the Company experienced
lower sales in its gift wrap, boxed greeting card, ribbon and
bow, gift tissue and gift bag lines. In addition, both seasonal
and all occasion sales declines were further exacerbated as the
current economic downturn resulted in slowness or reductions in
order patterns by our customers. In the fourth quarter of fiscal
2011, the Company recorded a non-cash pre-tax impairment charge
of $11,051,000 primarily due to an impairment of tangible assets
in its Cleo asset group. See Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the
Company recorded a non-cash pre-tax impairment charge of
$44,315,000 due to a full impairment of goodwill in the
Companys BOC Design Group and C.R. Gibson reporting units,
and partial impairments of trademarks used by such entities. See
Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements.
The Company has taken several measures to respond to sales
volume, cost and price pressures. The Company believes it
continues to have strong core Christmas product offerings which
has allowed it to compete effectively in
13
this competitive market. In addition, the Company is
aggressively pursuing new product initiatives related to
seasonal, craft and other all occasion products, including new
licensed and non-licensed product offerings. CSS continually
invests in product and packaging design and product knowledge to
assure that it can continue to provide unique added value to its
customers. In addition, CSS maintains an office and showroom in
Hong Kong to be able to provide alternatively sourced products
at competitive prices. CSS continually evaluates the efficiency
and productivity of its North American production and
distribution facilities and of its back office operations to
maintain its competitiveness. In the last seven fiscal years,
the Company has closed five manufacturing plants and seven
warehouses totaling 1,674,000 square feet. As described
elsewhere in this annual report on
Form 10-K,
in May 2011 the Company announced that its Memphis, Tennessee
manufacturing facility will be closed, with an exit to be
completed by no later than December 31, 2011. Additionally,
in fiscal 2007, the Company combined the management and back
office support for its Memphis, Tennessee based Cleo gift wrap
operation into its Berwick Offray ribbon and bow subsidiary. The
Company consolidated its human resources, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and payroll functions into a combined back
office operation, which was substantially completed in the first
quarter of fiscal 2010. Also completed in the first quarter of
fiscal 2010 was the implementation of a phase of the
Companys enterprise resource planning systems
standardization project.
The Companys all occasion craft, gift card holder,
stickers, stationery and memory product lines have higher
inherent growth potential due to higher market growth rates.
Further, the Companys all occasion craft, gift card
holder, stickers, stationery and floral product lines have
higher inherent growth potential due to CSS relatively low
current market share. The Company continues to pursue sales
growth in these and other areas.
The seasonal nature of CSS business has historically
resulted in lower sales levels and operating losses in the first
and fourth quarters and comparatively higher sales levels and
operating profits in the second and third quarters of the
Companys fiscal year, which ends March 31, thereby
causing significant fluctuations in the quarterly results of
operations of the Company.
Historically, significant revenue growth at CSS has come through
acquisitions. Management anticipates that it will continue to
utilize acquisitions to stimulate further growth.
On May 27, 2009, a subsidiary of the Company completed the
acquisition of substantially all of the business and assets of
Designer Dispatch Ribbon for $225,000 in cash. Designer Dispatch
Ribbon was a manufacturer of stock and custom ribbon and bows
and related products. The acquisition was accounted for as a
purchase and there was no goodwill recorded in this transaction.
On February 20, 2009, a subsidiary of the Company completed
the acquisition of substantially all of the business and assets
of Seastone for $1,139,000 in cash. The purchase price is
subject to adjustment, equal to 5% of net sales of certain
products sold, through fiscal 2014. During fiscal 2011 and 2010,
there was an increase in patents in the amount of $1,087,000 and
$161,000, respectively, related to the Seastone royalty earn
out, equal to 5% of the estimated net sales of certain products
through 2014. The Company believes that the obligation related
to the earn out is determinable beyond a reasonable doubt.
Seastone is a provider of specialty gift card holders. The
acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and there was no
goodwill recorded in this transaction.
On August 5, 2008, a subsidiary of the Company completed
the acquisition of substantially all of the business and assets
of Hampshire Paper for approximately $9,725,000 in cash,
including transaction costs of approximately $49,000. Hampshire
Paper is a manufacturer and supplier of pot covers, waxed
tissue, paper and foil to the wholesale floral and horticultural
industries. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and
was included in the BOC Design Group reporting unit. The excess
of cost over fair market value of the net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets acquired of $897,000 was recorded
as goodwill as of March 31, 2009. This goodwill was
subsequently written off as a result of the Companys
annual impairment testing performed in fiscal 2010 as further
described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements.
On May 16, 2008, a subsidiary of the Company completed the
acquisition of substantially all of the business and assets of
iota for approximately $300,000 in cash and a note payable to
the seller in the amount of $100,000. The purchase price is
subject to adjustment, based on future sales volume through
fiscal 2014, up to a maximum of $2,000,000. The amount recorded
through March 31, 2011 was immaterial. In addition, the
seller retains a 50% interest in royalty income associated with
the sale by third parties of licensed iota products through the
fifth
14
anniversary of the closing date. iota is a designer and marketer
of stationery products such as notecards, journals, and
stationery kits. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase
and there was no goodwill recorded in this transaction.
On May 24, 2011, the Company, as part of a continuing
review of its Cleo gift wrap business, approved a plan to close
its manufacturing facility located in Memphis, Tennessee, with
an exit to be completed by no later than December 31, 2011.
As part of such closing, the Company plans to transition the
sourcing of all gift wrap products to foreign suppliers. During
our fiscal year ending March 31, 2012, we expect to incur
pre-tax expenses of up to $10,300,000 associated with the
approved plan, which costs primarily relate to cash expenditures
for facility and staff costs (approximately $7,100,000) and
non-cash asset write-downs (approximately $3,200,000).
Approximately half of these charges are expected to be
recognized in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012.
Additionally, the Company expects to incur $1,300,000 in cash
spending during fiscal 2012 which was expensed previously. The
Company expects to complete the restructuring plan by the end of
fiscal 2012.
Litigation
CSS and its subsidiaries are involved in ordinary, routine legal
proceedings that are not considered by management to be
material. In the opinion of Company counsel and management, the
ultimate liabilities resulting from such legal proceedings will
not materially affect the consolidated financial position of the
Company or its results of operations or cash flows.
Results
of Operations
Fiscal
2011 Compared to Fiscal 2010
Consolidated net sales for fiscal 2011 increased 1% to
$450,700,000 from $448,450,000 in fiscal 2010. The increase in
net sales was primarily due to higher sales of ribbons and bows,
partially offset by lower sales of Christmas boxed greeting
cards, gift wrap and all occasion products.
Cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales, was 75% in fiscal
2011 and 2010 as higher freight and distribution costs were
substantially offset by improved plant efficiencies.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses decreased to $93,062,000 in fiscal 2011 from
$95,667,000 in fiscal 2010. The decrease in SG&A expenses
is primarily due to lower payroll and stock compensation
expenses.
An impairment of tangible assets of $11,051,000 was recorded in
fiscal 2011 related to the full impairment of the tangible
assets relating to our Cleo manufacturing facility located in
Memphis, Tennessee. See further discussion in Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements. There was no impairment of
tangible assets in fiscal 2010.
An impairment of goodwill and intangible assets of $44,315,000
was recorded in fiscal 2010 as a result of the full impairment
of goodwill in two of the Companys reporting units, C.R.
Gibson and BOC Design Group, and partial impairments of
tradenames used by such entities. See further discussion in
Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. There was
no impairment of goodwill and intangible assets in fiscal 2011.
Restructuring expenses were $164,000 in fiscal 2011 and $207,000
in fiscal 2010.
Interest expense, net decreased to $1,348,000 in fiscal 2011
from $1,885,000 in fiscal 2010. The decrease in interest
expense, net was primarily due to lower average borrowing levels
as a result of cash generated from operations in fiscal 2011
compared to the prior year.
Income before income taxes was $8,751,000, or 2% of net sales,
in fiscal 2011 compared to loss before income taxes of
$30,987,000, or 7% of net sales, in fiscal 2010. Excluding the
charge related to the impairment of tangible assets in fiscal
2011 and the charge related to the impairment of goodwill and
intangible assets in fiscal 2010, income before income taxes
increased 49% to $19,802,000 in fiscal 2011 from $13,328,000 in
fiscal 2010.
Income taxes, as a percentage of income before taxes, were 36%
in fiscal 2011. The income tax benefit, as a percentage of loss
before income taxes, was 23% in fiscal 2010. The increase in
income taxes in fiscal 2011 was
15
primarily attributable to a portion of the goodwill impairment
recorded in fiscal 2010 being non-deductible for tax purposes
which was non-recurring in fiscal 2011.
Net income for the year ended March 31, 2011 was $5,611,000
compared to a net loss of $23,739,000 in fiscal 2010. Excluding
the charge related to the impairment of tangible assets in
fiscal 2011 and the charge related to the impairment of goodwill
and intangible assets in fiscal 2010, net income increased 43%
to $12,696,000 in fiscal 2011 from $8,884,000 in fiscal 2010 and
diluted earnings per share increased 42% to $1.31 in fiscal 2011
compared to prior year diluted earnings per share of $0.92. The
increase in net income was primarily due to lower payroll and
stock compensation expenses and interest expense, as well as the
impact of higher sales volume, compared to the prior year.
Fiscal
2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009
Consolidated net sales for fiscal 2010 decreased 7% to
$448,450,000 from $482,424,000 in fiscal 2009. The decrease in
net sales was primarily due to reduced customer purchases
following weak retail sales in the preceding Christmas selling
season. Sales of all occasion products in the current fiscal
year have also been negatively impacted by the current economic
downturn as retailers replenishment rates were lower than
expected. Partially offsetting these declines were sales of
businesses acquired since the beginning of last fiscal year and
growth in our baby memory products business. Excluding sales of
businesses acquired since the beginning of last fiscal year,
sales declined 9%.
Cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales, was 75% in fiscal
2010 compared to 74% in fiscal 2009. The increase in cost of
sales was primarily due to lower gross margins on domestically
produced Christmas products resulting from competitive pricing
pressures and manufacturing inefficiencies, some of which were
compounded by difficulties encountered from the implementation
of a phase of our enterprise resource planning systems
standardization project, partially offset by improved margins on
imported seasonal products.
SG&A expenses decreased to $95,667,000 is fiscal 2010 from
$96,723,000 in fiscal 2009. The decrease in SG&A expenses
is primarily due to lower compensation expense and incentives in
fiscal 2010 compared to the prior year.
An impairment of goodwill and intangible assets of $44,315,000
was recorded in fiscal 2010 as a result of the full impairment
of goodwill in two of the Companys reporting units, C.R.
Gibson and BOC Design Group, and partial impairments of
tradenames used by such entities. See further discussion in
Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. There was
no impairment of goodwill and intangible assets in fiscal 2009.
Restructuring expenses were $207,000 in fiscal 2010 and
$1,138,000 in fiscal 2009. The decrease in restructuring
expenses was due to the absence of costs in the current year
related to a reduction in workforce that was announced in the
prior year. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial
statements for further discussion.
Interest expense, net decreased to $1,885,000 in fiscal 2010
from $2,551,000 in fiscal 2009. The decrease in interest
expense, net was primarily due to lower average borrowing levels
as a result of cash generated from operations in fiscal 2010
compared to the prior year as acquisitions and stock repurchases
required higher average borrowing levels during fiscal 2009.
The loss before income taxes was $30,987,000, or 7% of net
sales, in fiscal 2010 compared to income before income taxes of
$25,890,000, or 5% of net sales, in fiscal 2009. Excluding the
charge related to the impairment of goodwill and intangible
assets in fiscal 2010, income before income taxes decreased 49%
to $13,328,000 in fiscal 2010 from $25,890,000 in fiscal 2009.
The income tax benefit, as a percentage of loss before taxes,
was 23% in fiscal 2010. Income taxes, as a percentage of income
before taxes, were 34% in fiscal 2009. The decrease in income
taxes in fiscal 2010 was primarily attributable to a portion of
the goodwill impairment being non-deductible for tax purposes.
The net loss for the year ended March 31, 2010 was
$23,739,000 compared to net income of $16,986,000 in fiscal
2009. Excluding the charge related to the impairment of goodwill
and intangible assets in fiscal 2010, net income decreased 48%
to $8,884,000 in fiscal 2010 from $16,986,000 in fiscal 2009 and
diluted earnings per share decreased 46% to $0.92 in fiscal 2010
compared to prior year diluted earnings per share of $1.70. This
decline in net
16
income was primarily attributable to lower Christmas sales
volume and lower margins due to competitive pricing pressures
and Christmas product manufacturing inefficiencies combined with
difficulties encountered from the implementation of a phase of
our enterprise resource planning systems standardization
project. Partially offsetting these negative factors were
reduced SG&A expenses, lower restructuring expenses,
reduced interest expense and an increase in other income.
Reconciliation
of Certain Non-GAAP Measures
Management believes that presentation of results of operations
adjusted for the effects of non-recurring charges related to the
impairment of tangible assets in fiscal 2011 and the impairment
of goodwill and intangible assets in fiscal 2010 provides useful
information to investors because it enhances comparability
between the reporting periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
Income Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
|
$
|
5,611
|
|
|
$
|
.58
|
|
Impairment of tangible assets
|
|
|
11,051
|
|
|
|
7,085
|
|
|
|
.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Measurement
|
|
$
|
19,802
|
|
|
$
|
12,696
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Before Income
|
|
|
Net (Loss)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
$
|
(30,987
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.46
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
44,315
|
|
|
|
32,623
|
|
|
|
3.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Measurement
|
|
$
|
13,328
|
|
|
$
|
8,884
|
|
|
$
|
.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share for the year ended March 31,
2010 does not add due to rounding.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At March 31, 2011, the Company had working capital of
$146,896,000 and stockholders equity of $235,659,000.
Operating activities provided net cash of $32,219,000 in fiscal
2011 compared to $48,676,000 in fiscal 2010. Net cash provided
by operating activities in fiscal 2011 consisted primarily of
net income of $5,611,000, a non-cash impairment charge of
$11,051,000 related to tangible assets, depreciation and
amortization of $11,146,000, a decrease in accounts receivable
of $2,653,000, a decrease in other assets of $2,051,000 and an
increase in accounts payable of $5,914,000, offset by an
increase in inventories of $2,295,000 and a decrease of
$4,717,000 in accrued expenses and other long-term obligations.
Our investing activities used net cash of $3,305,000 in fiscal
2011, as compared to $3,920,000 in fiscal 2010, consisting
primarily of capital expenditures of $3,384,000. In fiscal 2010,
our investing activities consisted primarily of capital
expenditures of $4,447,000, partially offset by $752,000 from
sales of assets.
Our financing activities used net cash of $5,724,000 in fiscal
2011, consisting primarily of payments of cash dividends of
$5,823,000. In fiscal 2010, financing activities used net cash
of $19,718,000, consisting primarily of a $10,000,000 principal
repayment on our senior notes, repayments under our short term
credit facilities of $4,150,000 and payments of cash dividends
of $5,784,000.
The Company relies primarily on cash generated from its
operations and seasonal borrowings to meet its liquidity
requirements throughout the year. Historically, a significant
portion of the Companys revenues have been seasonal, with
approximately 75% of sales recognized in the second and third
quarters. As payment for sales of Christmas related products is
usually not received until just before or just after the holiday
selling season in accordance with general industry practice,
short-term borrowing needs increase throughout the second and
third
17
quarters, peaking prior to Christmas and dropping thereafter.
Seasonal financing requirements are met under a revolving credit
facility with two banks. Reflecting the seasonality of the
Companys business, the maximum credit available at any one
time under the credit facility (Commitment Level)
adjusts to $50,000,000 from February to June (Low
Commitment Period), $100,000,000 from July to October
(Medium Commitment Period) and $150,000,000 from
November to January (High Commitment Period) in each
respective year over the term of the agreement. The Company has
the option to increase the Commitment Level during part of any
Low Commitment Period from $50,000,000 to an amount not less
than $62,500,000 and not in excess of $125,000,000; provided,
however, that the Commitment Level must remain at $50,000,000
for at least three consecutive months during each Low Commitment
Period. The Company has the option to increase the Commitment
Level during all or part of any Medium Commitment Period from
$100,000,000 to an amount not in excess $125,000,000. Fifteen
days prior written notice is required for the Company to
exercise an option to increase the Commitment Level with respect
to a particular Low Commitment Period or Medium Commitment
Period. The Company may exercise an option to increase the
Commitment Level no more than three times each calendar year.
This facility is due to expire on March 17, 2016. This
financing facility is available to fund the Companys
seasonal borrowing needs and to provide the Company with sources
of capital for general corporate purposes, including
acquisitions as permitted under the revolving credit facility.
For information concerning this credit facility, see Note 9
to the consolidated financial statements. At March 31,
2011, there were no borrowings outstanding under the
Companys revolving credit facility. The Company made its
final repayment of 4.48% senior notes in December 2009. In
addition, the Company had approximately $66,000 of capital
leases outstanding at March 31, 2011.
Based on its current operating plan, the Company believes its
sources of available capital are adequate to meet its ongoing
cash needs for at least the next 12 months.
As of March 31, 2011, the Companys contractual
obligations and commitments are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
4-5
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
6,877
|
|
|
|
6,728
|
|
|
|
3,518
|
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
18,653
|
|
Other long-term obligations(1)
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
2,934
|
|
|
|
4,821
|
|
Purchase obligation(2)
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
Royalty obligation(3)
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,585
|
|
|
$
|
7,746
|
|
|
$
|
4,132
|
|
|
$
|
4,464
|
|
|
$
|
24,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other long-term obligations consist primarily of postretirement
medical liabilities, deferred compensation arrangements, an
asset retirement obligation and Seastone royalty earn out.
Future timing of payments for other long-term obligations is
estimated by management. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company is committed to purchase approximately $674,000 of
electric power from a vendor over a one year term. The Company
believes the minimum commodity purchases under this agreement
are well within the Companys annual commodity requirements. |
|
(3) |
|
The Company is committed to pay a guaranteed minimum royalty
attributable to sales of certain licensed products. |
The above table excludes any potential uncertain income tax
liabilities that may become payable upon examination of the
Companys income tax returns by taxing authorities. Such
amounts and periods of payment cannot be reliably estimated. See
Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further
explanation of the Companys uncertain tax positions.
As of March 31, 2011, the Companys other commitments
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1
|
|
1-3
|
|
4-5
|
|
After 5
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Years
|
|
Years
|
|
Years
|
|
Total
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
$
|
3,130
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,130
|
|
18
The Company has a reimbursement obligation with respect to
stand-by letters of credit that guarantee the funding of workers
compensation claims. The Company has no financial guarantees or
other similar arrangements with any third parties or related
parties other than its subsidiaries.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into
arrangements with vendors to purchase merchandise in advance of
expected delivery. These purchase orders do not contain any
significant termination payments or other penalties if cancelled.
Critical
Accounting Policies
In preparing our consolidated financial statements, management
is required to make estimates and assumptions that, among other
things, affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenue and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are most
significant where they involve levels of subjectivity and
judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or
matters susceptible to change, and where they can have a
material impact on our financial condition and operating
performance. Below are the most significant estimates and
related assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements. If actual results were to differ
materially from the estimates made, the reported results could
be materially affected.
Revenue
Revenue is recognized from product sales when goods are shipped,
title and risk of loss have been transferred to the customer and
collection is reasonably assured. The Company records estimated
reductions to revenue for customer programs, which may include
special pricing agreements for specific customers, volume
incentives and other promotions. In limited cases, the Company
may provide the right to return product as part of its customer
programs with certain customers. The Company also records
estimated reductions to revenue, based primarily on historical
experience, for customer returns and chargebacks that may arise
as a result of shipping errors, product damaged in transit or
for other reasons that become known subsequent to recognizing
the revenue. These provisions are recorded in the period that
the related sale is recognized and are reflected as a reduction
from gross sales, and the related reserves are shown as a
reduction of accounts receivable, except for reserves for
customer programs which are shown as a current liability. If the
amount of actual customer returns and chargebacks were to
increase or decrease significantly from the estimated amount,
revisions to the estimated allowance would be required.
Accounts
Receivable
The Company offers seasonal dating programs related to certain
seasonal product offerings pursuant to which customers that
qualify for such programs are offered extended payment terms.
While some customers are granted return rights as part of their
sales program, customers generally do not have the right to
return product except for reasons the Company believes are
typical of our industry, including damaged goods, shipping
errors or similar occurrences. The Company is generally not
required to repurchase products from its customers, nor does the
Company have any regular practice of doing so. In addition, the
Company endeavors to mitigate its exposure to bad debts by
evaluating the creditworthiness of its major customers utilizing
established credit limits and purchasing credit insurance when
warranted in managements judgment and available on terms
that management deems satisfactory. Bad debt and returns and
allowances reserves are recorded as an offset to accounts
receivable while reserves for customer programs are recorded as
accrued liabilities. The Company evaluates accounts receivable
related reserves and accruals monthly by specifically reviewing
customers creditworthiness, historical recovery
percentages and outstanding customer deductions and program
arrangements.
Inventory
Valuation
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is
primarily determined by the
first-in,
first-out method although certain inventories are valued based
on the
last-in,
first-out method. The Company writes down its inventory for
estimated obsolescence in an amount equal to the difference
between the cost of the inventory and the estimated market value
based upon assumptions about future demand, market conditions,
customer planograms and sales forecasts. Additional inventory
write downs could result from unanticipated additional carryover
of finished goods and raw materials, or from lower proceeds
offered by parties in our traditional closeout channels.
19
Goodwill,
Other Intangibles and Long-Lived Assets
When a company is acquired, the difference between the fair
value of its net assets, including intangibles, and the purchase
price is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is subject to an
assessment for impairment using a two-step fair value-based
test, the first step of which must be performed at least
annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate
that goodwill might be impaired. The Company performs its
required annual assessment as of the fiscal year end. The first
step of the test compares the fair value of a reporting unit to
its carrying amount, including goodwill, as of the date of the
test. The Company uses a dual approach to determine the fair
value of its reporting units including both a market approach
and an income approach. The market approach computes fair value
using a multiple of earnings before interest, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization which was developed considering
both the multiples of recent transactions as well as trading
multiples of consumer products companies. The income approach is
based on the present value of discounted cash flows and a
terminal value projected for each reporting unit. The income
approach requires significant judgments including the
Companys projected net cash flows, the weighted average
cost of capital (WACC) used to discount the cash
flows and terminal value assumptions. The projected net cash
flows are derived using the most recent available estimate for
each reporting unit. The WACC rate is based on an average of the
capital structure, cost of capital and inherent business risk
profiles of the Company and peer consumer products companies. We
believe the use of multiple valuation techniques results in a
more accurate indicator of the fair value of each reporting
unit. Changes to our judgments regarding assumptions and
estimates could result in a significantly different estimate of
the fair market value of the reporting units, which could result
in an impairment of goodwill.
Other indefinite lived intangible assets consist primarily of
tradenames which are also required to be tested annually. The
fair value of the Companys tradenames is calculated using
a relief from royalty payments methodology. This
approach involves first estimating reasonable royalty rates for
each trademark then applying these royalty rates to a net sales
stream and discounting the resulting cash flows to determine the
fair value. The royalty rate is estimated using both a market
and income approach. The market approach relies on the existence
of identifiable transactions in the marketplace involving the
licensing of tradenames similar to those owned by the Company.
The income approach uses a projected pretax profitability rate
relevant to the licensed income stream. We believe the use of
multiple valuation techniques results in a more accurate
indicator of the fair value of each tradename. This fair value
is then compared with the carrying value of each tradename.
Long-lived assets (including property, plant and equipment),
except for goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets, are
reviewed for impairment when circumstances indicate the carrying
value of an asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability
of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the
carrying amount of the asset group to future net cash flows
estimated by the Company to be generated by such assets. If such
asset group is considered to be impaired, the impairment to be
recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the
asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset group. Assets to
be disposed of are recorded at the lower of their carrying value
or estimated net realizable value.
In connection with the Companys review of the
recoverability of its goodwill, intangibles and long-lived
assets as it prepared its financial statements for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded a non-cash
pre-tax impairment charge of $11,051,000 primarily due to a full
impairment of the tangible assets relating to its Cleo
manufacturing facility located in Memphis, Tennessee. See
Note 1 for further discussion. The fair value of all
goodwill and other intangible assets reflected on the
Companys consolidated balance sheet as of March 31,
2011 was in excess of the carrying value. In the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2010, the Company recorded a non-cash pre-tax
impairment charge of $44,315,000 due to a full impairment of
goodwill in two of its reporting units, C.R. Gibson and BOC
Design Group, and partial impairments of tradenames used by such
entities. See Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements for further discussion.
Accounting
for Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial
statements, we are required to estimate our actual current tax
expense or benefit (state, federal and foreign), including the
impact of permanent and temporary differences resulting from
differing bases and treatment of items for tax and accounting
purposes, such as the carrying value of intangibles,
deductibility of expenses, depreciation of property, plant and
equipment, and
20
valuation of inventories. Temporary differences and operating
loss and credit carryforwards result in deferred tax assets and
liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance
sheets. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax
assets will be recovered from future taxable income. Actual
results could differ from this assessment if sufficient taxable
income is not generated in future periods. To the extent we
determine the need to establish a valuation allowance or
increase such allowance in a period, we would record additional
tax expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations. The management of the Company periodically estimates
the probable tax obligations of the Company using historical
experience in tax jurisdictions and informed judgments. There
are inherent uncertainties related to the interpretation of tax
regulations. The judgments and estimates made at a point in time
may change based on the outcome of tax audits, as well as
changes to or further interpretations of regulations. If such
changes take place, there is a risk that the tax rate may
increase or decrease in any period.
Share-Based
Compensation
The Company accounts for its share-based compensation using a
fair-value based recognition method. Share-based compensation
cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of
the award and is expensed ratably over the requisite service
period of the award. Determining the appropriate fair-value
model and calculating the fair value of share-based awards at
the grant date requires considerable judgment, including
estimating stock price volatility and the expected option life.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to
value employee stock options. The Company estimates stock price
volatility based on historical volatility of its common stock.
Estimated option life assumptions are also derived from
historical data. Had the Company used alternative valuation
methodologies and assumptions, compensation cost for share-based
payments could be significantly different. The Company
recognizes compensation expense using the straight-line
amortization method for share-based compensation awards with
graded vesting.
Accounting
Pronouncements
See Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements for
information concerning recent accounting pronouncements and the
impact of those standards.
Forward-Looking
and Cautionary Statements
This report includes forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995, including statements regarding the Companys
goals of expanding and growing by developing complementary
products, aggressively pursuing new product initiatives,
pursuing sales growth within certain identified product
categories, entering new markets, and acquiring other companies
and businesses; the anticipated effects of measures taken by the
Company to respond to sales volume, cost and price pressures;
the Companys anticipation that quarterly cash dividends
will continue to be paid in the future; the expected future
impact of legal proceedings; the Companys expectation that
a facility held for sale will be sold within the next
12 months for an amount greater than the current carrying
value; the Companys view that its risk exposure with
regard to foreign currency fluctuations is insignificant; the
Companys belief that sourcing all of its gift wrap
products from foreign suppliers will be more efficient; the
amount of costs the Company expects to incur in fiscal 2012 in
connection with its plan to close the Memphis manufacturing
facility; and the Companys expectation that it will
complete the restructuring plan during fiscal 2012.
Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of the
Companys management as well as assumptions made by and
information currently available to the Companys management
as to future events and financial performance with respect to
the Companys operations. Forward-looking statements speak
only as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligation
to update any forward-looking statements to reflect the events
or circumstances arising after the date as of which they were
made. Actual events or results may differ materially from those
discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various
factors, including without limitation, general market and
economic conditions; increased competition (including
competition from foreign products which may be imported at less
than fair value and from foreign products which may benefit from
foreign governmental subsidies); difficulties entering new
markets
and/or
developing new and complementary products that drive incremental
sales; increased operating costs, including labor-related and
energy costs and costs relating to
21
the imposition or retrospective application of duties on
imported products; currency risks and other risks associated
with international markets; difficulties identifying and
evaluating suitable acquisition opportunities; risks associated
with acquisitions, including realization of intangible assets
and recoverability of long-lived assets, and acquisition
integration costs and the risk that the Company may not be able
to integrate and derive the expected benefits from such
acquisitions; risks associated with the Companys
restructuring plan to close its Memphis manufacturing facility,
including the risk that the cost of implementing the plan will
exceed expectations, the risk that the expected benefits of the
plan will not be realized and the risk that implementation of
the plan will interfere with and adversely affect the
Companys operations, sales and financial performance; the
risk that customers may become insolvent, may delay payments or
may impose deductions or penalties on amounts owed to the
Company; costs of compliance with governmental regulations and
government investigations; liability associated with
non-compliance with governmental regulations, including
regulations pertaining to the environment, Federal and state
employment laws, and import and export controls and customs
laws, and other factors described more fully elsewhere in this
annual report on
Form 10-K
and in the Companys previous filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. As a result of these factors, readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking
statements included herein or that may be made elsewhere from
time to time by, or on behalf of, the Company.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
The Companys activities expose it to a variety of market
risks, including the effects of changes in interest rates and
foreign currency exchange rates. These financial exposures are
monitored and, where considered appropriate, managed by the
Company as described below.
Interest
Rate Risk
The Companys primary market risk exposure with regard to
financial instruments is to changes in interest rates. Pursuant
to the Companys variable rate lines of credit in effect
during fiscal 2011, a change in either the lenders base
rate or the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) would have
affected the rate at which the Company could borrow funds
thereunder. Based on average borrowings under its credit
facilities of $29,912,000 for the year ended March 31,
2011, a 1% increase or decrease in floating interest rates would
have increased or decreased annual interest expense by
approximately $299,000. Based on an average cash balance of
$9,938,000 for the year ended March 31, 2011, a 1% increase
or decrease in interest rates would have increased or decreased
annual interest income by approximately $99,000.
Foreign
Currency Risk
Approximately 2% of the Companys sales in fiscal 2011 were
denominated in a foreign currency. The Company considers its
risk exposure with regard to foreign currency fluctuations
insignificant as it enters into foreign currency forward
contracts to hedge the majority of firmly committed transactions
and related receivables that are denominated in a foreign
currency. The Company has designated its foreign currency
forward contracts as fair value hedges. The gains or losses on
the fair value hedges are recognized in earnings and generally
offset the transaction gains or losses on the foreign
denominated assets that they are intended to hedge.
22
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
29-51
|
|
Financial Statement Schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
23
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
CSS Industries, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
CSS Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2011
and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations
and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
March 31, 2011. In connection with our audits of the
consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the
financial statement schedule. These consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of CSS Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
March 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 31, 2011, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in note 14 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective April 1, 2008, CSS Industries, Inc.
adopted
EITF 06-10,
Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life
Insurance Agreements (incorporated into Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 715, Compensation
Retirement Benefits).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), CSS
Industries, Inc.s internal control over financial
reporting as of March 31, 2011, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated May 26,
2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
May 26, 2011
Philadelphia, PA
24
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
50,407
|
|
|
$
|
27,217
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $3,050 and $4,742
|
|
|
42,615
|
|
|
|
45,711
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
80,767
|
|
|
|
78,851
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4,051
|
|
|
|
6,165
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
1,363
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
13,151
|
|
|
|
15,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
192,314
|
|
|
|
175,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
32,345
|
|
|
|
47,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
8,854
|
|
|
|
5,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
17,233
|
|
|
|
17,233
|
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $5,382 and
$3,676
|
|
|
31,408
|
|
|
|
32,027
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,769
|
|
|
|
3,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
|
|
53,410
|
|
|
|
53,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
286,923
|
|
|
$
|
281,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
25,509
|
|
|
|
19,595
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
Accrued payroll and other compensation
|
|
|
8,061
|
|
|
|
7,691
|
|
Accrued customer programs
|
|
|
4,726
|
|
|
|
8,380
|
|
Accrued other expenses
|
|
|
6,747
|
|
|
|
7,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
45,418
|
|
|
|
44,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, NET OF CURRENT PORTION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
5,846
|
|
|
|
4,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 10 and 12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, Class 2, $.01 par,
1,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.10 par, 25,000,000 shares authorized,
14,703,084 shares issued at March 31, 2011 and 2010
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
51,311
|
|
|
|
49,295
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
320,024
|
|
|
|
321,510
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Common stock in treasury, 4,969,679 and 5,027,306 shares,
at cost
|
|
|
(137,139
|
)
|
|
|
(139,156
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
235,659
|
|
|
|
233,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
286,923
|
|
|
$
|
281,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
25
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
NET SALES
|
|
$
|
450,700
|
|
|
$
|
448,450
|
|
|
$
|
482,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
336,446
|
|
|
|
337,852
|
|
|
|
356,115
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
93,062
|
|
|
|
95,667
|
|
|
|
96,723
|
|
Impairment of tangible assets
|
|
|
11,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring expenses, net
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
Interest expense, net of interest income of $16, $14 and $137
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
1,885
|
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441,949
|
|
|
|
479,437
|
|
|
|
456,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
8,751
|
|
|
|
(30,987
|
)
|
|
|
25,890
|
|
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)
|
|
|
3,140
|
|
|
|
(7,248
|
)
|
|
|
8,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$
|
5,611
|
|
|
$
|
(23,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
.58
|
|
|
$
|
(2.46
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
.58
|
|
|
$
|
(2.46
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
9,703
|
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
9,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
9,715
|
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
9,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
5,611
|
|
|
$
|
(23,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,986
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Postretirement medical plan, net of tax
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
5,676
|
|
|
$
|
(23,732
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
26
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
5,611
|
|
|
$
|
(23,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,986
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,146
|
|
|
|
12,560
|
|
|
|
13,195
|
|
Impairment of tangible assets
|
|
|
11,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
Deferred tax (benefit) provision
|
|
|
(1,336
|
)
|
|
|
(10,054
|
)
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale or disposal of assets
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(925
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,653
|
|
|
|
(2,080
|
)
|
|
|
(4,012
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in inventories
|
|
|
(2,295
|
)
|
|
|
21,245
|
|
|
|
9,127
|
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
2,151
|
|
|
|
(738
|
)
|
|
|
537
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
|
|
|
5,914
|
|
|
|
5,263
|
|
|
|
(3,943
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in accrued income taxes
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
(1,968
|
)
|
Decrease in accrued expenses and other long-term obligations
|
|
|
(4,717
|
)
|
|
|
(879
|
)
|
|
|
(7,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
32,319
|
|
|
|
48,676
|
|
|
|
27,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of businesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
(11,164
|
)
|
Final payment of purchase price for a business previously
acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,700
|
)
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(3,384
|
)
|
|
|
(4,447
|
)
|
|
|
(14,143
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
|
3,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
|
|
(3,305
|
)
|
|
|
(3,920
|
)
|
|
|
(24,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt obligations
|
|
|
(722
|
)
|
|
|
(10,609
|
)
|
|
|
(10,417
|
)
|
Borrowings on notes payable
|
|
|
309,075
|
|
|
|
346,405
|
|
|
|
545,385
|
|
Payments on notes payable
|
|
|
(309,075
|
)
|
|
|
(350,555
|
)
|
|
|
(541,235
|
)
|
Payment of financing transaction costs
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(5,823
|
)
|
|
|
(5,784
|
)
|
|
|
(5,939
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,687
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
743
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
Tax benefit realized for stock options exercised
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for financing activities
|
|
|
(5,824
|
)
|
|
|
(19,718
|
)
|
|
|
(29,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
23,190
|
|
|
|
25,038
|
|
|
|
(25,930
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
27,217
|
|
|
|
2,179
|
|
|
|
28,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
50,407
|
|
|
$
|
27,217
|
|
|
$
|
2,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
27
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
in Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
BALANCE, APRIL 1, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
14,703,084
|
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
44,150
|
|
|
|
342,688
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(4,437,325
|
)
|
|
|
(125,865
|
)
|
|
|
262,353
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of EITF
06-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(566
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(566
|
)
|
Tax benefit associated with exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,572
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
Increase in treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(687,000
|
)
|
|
|
(16,687
|
)
|
|
|
(16,687
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Cash dividends ($.60 per common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,939
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,939
|
)
|
Postretirement medical plan, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,703,084
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
46,813
|
|
|
|
352,674
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
(5,097,753
|
)
|
|
|
(141,622
|
)
|
|
|
259,254
|
|
Tax benefit associated with exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,641
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,447
|
|
|
|
2,466
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
Cash dividends ($.60 per common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,784
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,784
|
)
|
Postretirement medical plan, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,739
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,739
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,703,084
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
|
49,295
|
|
|
|
321,510
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(5,027,306
|
)
|
|
|
(139,156
|
)
|
|
|
233,045
|
|
Tax benefit associated with exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,627
|
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
|
|
743
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Cash dividends ($.60 per common share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,823
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,823
|
)
|
Postretirement medical plan, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, MARCH 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
14,703,084
|
|
|
$
|
1,470
|
|
|
$
|
51,311
|
|
|
$
|
320,024
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(4,969,679
|
)
|
|
$
|
(137,139
|
)
|
|
$
|
235,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
28
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
MARCH 31, 2011
|
|
(1)
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
CSS Industries, Inc. (CSS or the
Company) and all of its subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Foreign
Currency Translation and Transactions
Translation adjustments are charged or credited to a separate
component of stockholders equity. Gains and losses on
foreign currency transactions are not material and are included
in other (income) expense, net in the consolidated statements of
operations.
Nature
of Business
CSS is a consumer products company primarily engaged in the
design, manufacture, procurement, distribution and sale of
seasonal and all occasion social expression products,
principally to mass market retailers. These seasonal and all
occasion products include decorative ribbons and bows, boxed
greeting cards, gift tags, gift wrap, gift bags, gift boxes,
gift card holders, decorative tissue paper, decorations,
classroom exchange Valentines, decorative ribbons and bows,
floral accessories, Halloween masks, costumes,
make-up and
novelties, Easter egg dyes and novelties, craft and educational
products, stickers, memory books, stationery, journals,
notecards, infant and wedding photo albums, scrapbooks, and
other gift items that commemorate lifes celebrations.
CSS product breadth provides its retail customers the
opportunity to use a single vendor for much of their seasonal
product requirements. A substantial portion of CSS
products are manufactured, packaged
and/or
warehoused in eleven facilities located in the United States,
with the remainder purchased primarily from manufacturers in
Asia and Mexico. The Companys products are sold to its
customers by national and regional account sales managers, sales
representatives, product specialists and by a network of
independent manufacturers representatives. CSS maintains a
purchasing office in Hong Kong to administer Asian sourcing
opportunities.
The Companys principal operating subsidiaries include
Paper Magic Group, Inc. (Paper Magic), BOC Design
Group (consisting of Berwick Offray LLC (Berwick
Offray) and Cleo Inc (Cleo)) and C.R. Gibson,
LLC (C.R. Gibson). In fiscal 2007, the Company
combined the operations of its Cleo and Berwick Offray
subsidiaries in order to improve profitability and efficiency
through the elimination of redundant back office functions and
certain management positions. The Company consolidated its human
resources, accounts receivable, accounts payable and payroll
functions into a combined back office operation, which was
substantially completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2010.
Also completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 was the
implementation of a phase of the Companys enterprise
resource planning systems standardization project.
Approximately 600 of its 1,830 employees (increasing to
approximately 2,550 as seasonal employees are added) are
represented by labor unions. The collective bargaining agreement
with the labor union representing the production and maintenance
employees in Hagerstown, Maryland remains in effect until
December 31, 2011. The collective bargaining agreement with
the labor union representing the production and maintenance
employees in Memphis, Tennessee also remains in effect until
December 31, 2011. The Company plans to close its Cleo
manufacturing facility located in Memphis, Tennessee, with an
exit to be completed by no later than December 31, 2011. As
part of such closing, the Company plans to transition the
sourcing of all gift wrap products to foreign suppliers.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets
29
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Judgments and assessments of uncertainties are required
in applying the Companys accounting policies in many
areas. Such estimates pertain to the valuation of inventory and
accounts receivable, the assessment of the recoverability of
goodwill and other intangible and long-lived assets, income tax
accounting, the valuation of share-based awards and resolution
of litigation and other proceedings. Actual results could differ
from these estimates.
Accounts
Receivable
The Company offers seasonal dating programs related to certain
seasonal product offerings pursuant to which customers that
qualify for such programs are offered extended payment terms.
With some exceptions, customers do not have the right to return
product except for reasons the Company believes are typical of
our industry, including damaged goods, shipping errors or
similar occurrences. The Company generally is not required to
repurchase products from its customers, nor does the Company
have any regular practice of doing so. In addition, the Company
mitigates its exposure to bad debts by evaluating the
creditworthiness of its major customers utilizing established
credit limits and purchasing credit insurance when appropriate
and available on terms satisfactory to the Company. Bad debt and
returns and allowances reserves are recorded as an offset to
accounts receivable while reserves for customer programs are
recorded as accrued liabilities. The Company evaluates accounts
receivable related reserves and accruals monthly by specifically
reviewing customers creditworthiness, historical recovery
percentages and outstanding customer deductions and program
arrangements.
Inventories
The Company records inventory when title is transferred, which
occurs upon receipt or prior to receipt dependent on supplier
shipping terms. The Company adjusts unsaleable and slow-moving
inventory to its estimated net realizable value. Substantially
all of the Companys inventories are stated at the lower of
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) cost or market. The remaining portion of the
inventory is valued at the lower of
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) cost or market, which was $791,000 and $996,000
at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Had all
inventories been valued at the lower of FIFO cost or market,
inventories would have been greater by $863,000 and $854,000 at
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Inventories
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Raw material
|
|
$
|
12,232
|
|
|
$
|
12,696
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
20,127
|
|
|
|
20,881
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
48,408
|
|
|
|
45,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
80,767
|
|
|
$
|
78,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
Held for Sale
Assets held for sale in the amount of $1,323,000 at
March 31, 2011 and $1,363,000 as of March 31, 2010
represents a former manufacturing facility which the Company is
in the process of selling. The Company expects to sell this
facility within the next 12 months for an amount greater
than the current carrying value. The Company ceased depreciating
this facility at the time it was classified as held for sale.
30
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and include the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
2,508
|
|
|
$
|
2,508
|
|
Buildings, leasehold interests and improvements
|
|
|
44,127
|
|
|
|
45,165
|
|
Machinery, equipment and other
|
|
|
119,784
|
|
|
|
147,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,419
|
|
|
|
194,978
|
|
Less Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(134,074
|
)
|
|
|
(147,192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
32,345
|
|
|
$
|
47,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2011, the Company identified and wrote off certain
property, plant and equipment that was fully depreciated and no
longer in use. The net effect was to decrease gross cost and
accumulated depreciation by $23,951,000. There was no effect on
net property, plant and equipment.
Depreciation is provided generally on the straight-line method
and is based on estimated useful lives or terms of leases as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings, leasehold interests and improvements
|
|
|
Lease term to 45 years
|
|
Machinery, equipment and other
|
|
|
3 to 15 years
|
|
In conjunction with negotiating certain lease extensions during
the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company identified a
previously unrecognized asset retirement obligation at one of
its leased facilities. The Company believes that this obligation
existed since the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) No. 143, Asset Retirement
Obligations, which was later codified as
ASC 420-20,
which became effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2004.
The Company calculated the historical impact as if it had
appropriately adopted the standard in fiscal 2004, and the
impact was not material to any individual period from fiscal
2004 through fiscal 2010. The impact of recording the asset
retirement obligation resulted in an asset and a liability, each
in the amount of $1,704,000, as of April 1, 2003.
Additionally, on April 1, 2010, a reduction in income of
$1,326,000 was recorded related to depreciation and accretion
from fiscal 2004 through fiscal 2010 in the amount of $712,000
and $614,000, respectively. In December 2010, the Company
entered into a lease amendment which resulted in a reduction in
the asset retirement obligation of $1,049,000 and a reduction of
depreciation expense of $134,000 during the third quarter of
fiscal 2011. During the year ended March 31, 2011, the
impact of the asset retirement obligation included $76,000 of
depreciation expense and $91,000 of accretion expense. Accretion
expense was recorded as a component of depreciation expense and
amortization. The asset retirement obligation of $110,000 and
$1,082,000 is included in current and other long-term
obligations, respectively, at March 31, 2011.
Additionally, during the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the
Company determined that the useful lives used to amortize
leasehold improvements at the same leased facility from fiscal
2006 to fiscal 2010 did not follow the guidance in the
codification referenced above. Leasehold improvements were being
amortized through the lease end date without consideration of
lease renewal periods that were reasonably assured. The Company
calculated the historical impact as if it had used the proper
useful life of the assets, and such impact was not material to
any individual period from fiscal 2006 to fiscal 2010. The
impact of adjusting the leasehold improvement amortization
periods resulted in additional net book value of $1,293,000 as
of April 1, 2010 that was recorded as a reduction of
depreciation expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
The correction of these items did not have a material impact on
the Companys consolidated statement of cash flows.
Management evaluated the quantitative and qualitative impact of
the corrections on previously reported periods as well as the
three months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended
March 31, 2011. Based upon this
31
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
evaluation, management concluded that these adjustments were not
material to the Companys consolidated financial statements.
When property is retired or otherwise disposed of, the related
cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization are
eliminated from the consolidated balance sheet. Any gain or loss
from the disposition of property, plant and equipment is
included in other (income) expense, net with the exception of a
gain of $761,000 recorded in fiscal 2009 related to the sale of
two facilities associated with a restructuring program.
Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred while
improvements are capitalized and depreciated over their
estimated useful lives.
The Company leased $1,125,000 of computer equipment (which had
total accumulated amortization of $963,000) under capital leases
as of March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2010, the
Company leased $1,125,000 of computer equipment and $184,000 of
trucks (which had total accumulated amortization of $712,000)
under capital leases as of March 31, 2010. The amortization
of capitalized assets is included in depreciation expense.
Depreciation expense was $8,735,000, $10,967,000 and $10,936,000
for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets including Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets
and Property, Plant and Equipment
When a company is acquired, the difference between the fair
value of its net assets, including intangibles, and the purchase
price is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is subject to an
assessment for impairment using a two-step fair value-based
test, the first step of which must be performed at least
annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate
that goodwill might be impaired. The Company performs its
required annual assessment as of the fiscal year end. The first
step of the test compares the fair value of a reporting unit to
its carrying amount, including goodwill, as of the date of the
test. The Company uses a dual approach to determine the fair
value of its reporting units including both a market approach
and an income approach. The market approach computes fair value
using a multiple of earnings before interest, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization which was developed considering
both the multiples of recent transactions as well as trading
multiples of consumer products companies. The income approach is
based on the present value of discounted cash flows and a
terminal value projected for each reporting unit. The income
approach requires significant judgments including the
Companys projected net cash flows, the weighted average
cost of capital (WACC) used to discount the cash
flows and terminal value assumptions. The projected net cash
flows are derived using the most recent available estimate for
each reporting unit. The WACC rate is based on an average of the
capital structure, cost of capital and inherent business risk
profiles of the Company and peer consumer products companies. We
believe the use of multiple valuation techniques results in a
more accurate indicator of the fair value of each reporting unit.
The Company then corroborates the reasonableness of the total
fair value of the reporting units by reconciling the aggregate
fair values of the reporting units to the Companys total
market capitalization adjusted to include an estimated control
premium. The estimated control premium is derived from reviewing
observable transactions involving the purchase of controlling
interests in comparable companies. The market capitalization is
calculated using the relevant shares outstanding and an average
closing stock price which considers volatility around the test
date. The exercise of reconciling the market capitalization to
the computed fair value further supports the Companys
conclusion on the fair value. If the carrying amount of the
reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step is
performed. The second step compares the carrying amount of the
goodwill to the implied fair value of the goodwill. If the
implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the carrying
amount of the goodwill, an impairment loss would be reported.
Other indefinite lived intangible assets consist primarily of
tradenames which are also required to be tested annually. The
fair value of the Companys tradenames is calculated using
a relief from royalty payments methodology. This
approach involves first estimating reasonable royalty rates for
each trademark then applying these royalty rates to a net sales
stream and discounting the resulting cash flows to determine the
fair value. The royalty rate is estimated using both a market
and income approach. The market approach relies on the existence
of
32
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
identifiable transactions in the marketplace involving the
licensing of tradenames similar to those owned by the Company.
The income approach uses a projected pretax profitability rate
relevant to the licensed income stream. We believe the use of
multiple valuation techniques results in a more accurate
indicator of the fair value of each tradename. This fair value
is then compared with the carrying value of each tradename.
Long-lived assets (including property, plant and equipment),
except for goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets, are
reviewed for impairment when circumstances indicate the carrying
value of an asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability
of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the
carrying amount of the asset group to future net cash flows
estimated by the Company to be generated by such assets. If such
asset group is considered to be impaired, the impairment to be
recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the
asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset group. Assets to
be disposed of are recorded at the lower of their carrying value
or estimated net realizable value.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company
performed the required annual impairment test of the carrying
amount of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets. Refer
to Note 3 for the results of the annual impairment testing
performed in fiscal 2010. The Company determined that no
impairment existed in fiscal 2011 and 2009.
In connection with the Companys review of the
recoverability of its long-lived assets as it prepared its
financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2011, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the long-lived
asset group primarily related to the Cleo gift wrap
manufacturing and distribution facility. In accordance with the
guidance in the codification on testing long-lived assets for
impairment, the Company considered the indicators that led to
this test which included projected future operating and cash
flow losses as well as various options available to the Company.
The Company uses a dual approach to determine the fair value of
the Cleo asset group, including both a market approach and an
income approach, using a weighted average of various scenarios.
As a result of this analysis, it was determined that the fair
value of the Cleo asset group was less than the carrying value.
This resulted in an impairment charge of $11,051,000, which was
recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011.
On May 24, 2011, the Company, as part of a continuing
review of its Cleo gift wrap business, approved a plan to close
its manufacturing facility located in Memphis, Tennessee, with
an exit to be completed by no later than December 31, 2011.
As part of such closing, the Company plans to transition the
sourcing of all gift wrap products to foreign suppliers. During
our fiscal year ending March 31, 2012, we expect to incur
pre-tax expenses of up to $10,300,000 associated with the
approved plan, which costs primarily relate to cash expenditures
for facility and staff costs (approximately $7,100,000) and
non-cash asset write-downs (approximately $3,200,000).
Approximately half of these charges are expected to be
recognized in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012.
Additionally, the Company expects to incur $1,300,000 in cash
spending during fiscal 2012 which was expensed previously. The
Company expects to complete the restructuring plan by the end of
fiscal 2012.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
The Company uses certain derivative financial instruments as
part of its risk management strategy to reduce foreign currency
risk. Derivatives are not used for trading or speculative
activities.
The Company recognizes all derivatives on the consolidated
balance sheet at fair value. On the date the derivative
instrument is entered into, the Company generally designates the
derivative as either (1) a hedge of the fair value of a
recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm
commitment (fair value hedge), or (2) a hedge
of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows
to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or
liability (cash flow hedge). Changes in the fair
value of a derivative that is designated as, and meets all the
required criteria for, a fair value hedge, along with the gain
or loss on the hedged asset or liability that is attributable to
the hedged risk, are recorded in current period earnings.
Changes in the fair value of a derivative that is designated as,
and meets all the required criteria for, a cash flow hedge are
recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income and
reclassified into earnings as the underlying hedged item affects
earnings. The portion of the change in
33
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
fair value of a derivative associated with hedge ineffectiveness
or the component of a derivative instrument excluded from the
assessment of hedge effectiveness is recorded currently in
earnings. Also, changes in the entire fair value of a derivative
that is not designated as a hedge are recorded immediately in
earnings. The Company formally documents all relationships
between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its
risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various
hedge transactions. This process includes relating all
derivatives that are designated as fair value or cash flow
hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the consolidated
balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted
transactions.
The Company also formally assesses, both at the inception of the
hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether each derivative is highly
effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of
the hedged item. If it is determined that a derivative is not
highly effective as a hedge or if a derivative ceases to be a
highly effective hedge, the Company will discontinue hedge
accounting prospectively.
The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts in
order to reduce the impact of certain foreign currency
fluctuations. Firmly committed transactions and the related
receivables and payables may be hedged with forward exchange
contracts. Gains and losses arising from foreign currency
forward contracts are recognized in income or expense as offsets
of gains and losses resulting from the underlying hedged
transactions. There were no open forward exchange contracts as
of March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss
and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences
and carryforwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The
effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date.
Uncertain tax positions are recognized and measured under
provisions in ASC 740. These provisions require that the
Company recognize in its consolidated financial statements the
impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than
not of being sustained on audit, based solely on the technical
merits of the position. See Note 8 for further discussion.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue from product sales when the goods
are shipped, title and risk of loss have been transferred to the
customer and collection is reasonably assured. Provisions for
returns, allowances, rebates to customers and other adjustments
are provided in the same period that the related sales are
recorded.
Product
Development Costs
Product development costs consist of purchases of outside
artwork, printing plates, cylinders, catalogs and samples. For
seasonal products, the Company typically begins to incur product
development costs approximately 18 to 20 months before the
applicable holiday event. Historically, these costs have been
amortized monthly over the selling season, which is generally
within two to four months of the holiday event. Development
costs related to all occasion products are incurred within a
period beginning six to nine months prior to the applicable
sales period. Historically, these costs generally have been
amortized over a six to twelve month selling period. During
fiscal 2010, the Company revised the period to two years over
which certain product development costs are amortized to better
align with the period over which the Company expects to utilize
these assets. The expense of certain product development costs
that are related to the manufacturing process are recorded in
cost of sales while the portion that relates to creative and
selling efforts are recorded in selling, general and
administrative expenses.
34
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Product development costs capitalized as of March 31, 2011
and 2010 were $7,165,000 and $6,747,000, respectively, and are
included in other current assets in the consolidated financial
statements. Product development expense of $9,912,000,
$10,009,000 and $9,809,000 was recognized in the years ended
March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Shipping
and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are reported in cost of sales in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Share-Based
Compensation
Effective April 1, 2006, the Company used the modified
prospective transition method, and began accounting for its
share-based compensation using a fair-value based recognition
method. Share-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant
date based on a fair-value model. Calculating the fair value of
share-based awards at the grant date requires considerable
judgment, including estimating stock price volatility and
expected option life.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to
value employee stock options. The Company estimates stock price
volatility based on historical volatility of its common stock.
Estimated option life assumptions are also derived from
historical data. Had the Company used alternative valuation
methodologies and assumptions, compensation cost for share-based
payments could be significantly different. The Company
recognizes compensation expense using the straight-line
amortization method for share-based compensation awards with
graded vesting.
Net
Income (Loss) Per Common Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic net
income (loss) per common share and diluted net income (loss) per
common share for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
5,611
|
|
|
$
|
(23,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic income (loss) per
common share
|
|
|
9,703
|
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
9,909
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted average shares outstanding for diluted income
(loss) per common share
|
|
|
9,715
|
|
|
|
9,637
|
|
|
|
9,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
.58
|
|
|
$
|
(2.46
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
.58
|
|
|
$
|
(2.46
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options on 705,000 shares, 942,000 shares and
1,434,000 shares of common stock were not included in
computing diluted net income (loss) per common share for the
years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
because their effects were antidilutive.
Statements
of Cash Flows
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the
Company considers all holdings of highly liquid debt instruments
with a maturity at time of purchase of three months or less to
be cash equivalents.
35
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Supplemental
Schedule of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
1,058
|
|
|
$
|
1,892
|
|
|
$
|
2,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
2,860
|
|
|
$
|
3,036
|
|
|
$
|
7,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets acquired
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
11,560
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
11,264
|
|
Amount due seller
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
11,164
|
|
Less cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid for acquisitions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
11,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
BUSINESS
ACQUISITIONS
|
On May 27, 2009, a subsidiary of the Company completed the
acquisition of substantially all of the business and assets of
Designer Dispatch Ribbon, Inc. (Designer Dispatch
Ribbon) for $225,000 in cash. Designer Dispatch Ribbon was
a manufacturer of stock and custom ribbon and bows and related
products. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and
there was no goodwill recorded in this transaction.
On February 20, 2009, a subsidiary of the Company completed
the acquisition of substantially all of the business and assets
of Seastone L.C. (Seastone) for $1,139,000 in cash.
The purchase price is subject to adjustment, equal to 5% of net
sales of certain products sold, through fiscal 2014. During
fiscal 2011 and 2010, there was an increase in patents in the
amount of $1,087,000 and $161,000, respectively, related to the
Seastone royalty earn out, equal to 5% of the estimated net
sales of certain products through 2014. The Company believes
that the obligation related to the earn out is determinable
beyond a reasonable doubt. Seastone is a provider of specialty
gift card holders. The acquisition was accounted for as a
purchase and there was no goodwill recorded in this transaction.
On August 5, 2008, a subsidiary of the Company completed
the acquisition of substantially all of the business and assets
of Hampshire Paper Corp. (Hampshire Paper) for
approximately $9,725,000 in cash, including transaction costs of
approximately $49,000. Hampshire Paper is a manufacturer and
supplier of pot covers, waxed tissue, paper and foil to the
wholesale floral and horticultural industries. The acquisition
was accounted for as a purchase and was included in the BOC
Design Group reporting unit. The excess of cost over fair market
value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets
acquired of $897,000 was recorded as goodwill. This goodwill was
subsequently written off as a result of the Companys
annual impairment testing performed in fiscal 2010 as further
described in Note 3.
On May 16, 2008, a subsidiary of the Company completed the
acquisition of substantially all of the business and assets of
iotatm
(iota) for approximately $300,000 in cash and a note
payable to the seller in the amount of $100,000. The purchase
price is subject to adjustment, based on future sales volume
through fiscal 2014, up to a maximum of $2,000,000. The amount
recorded through March 31, 2011 was immaterial. In
addition, the seller retains a 50% interest in royalty income
associated with the sale by third parties of licensed iota
products through the fifth anniversary of the closing date. iota
is a designer and marketer of stationery products such as
notecards,
36
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
journals, and stationery kits. The acquisition was accounted for
as a purchase and there was no goodwill recorded in this
transaction.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of
acquisitions in fiscal 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Currents assets
|
|
$
|
5,418
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
593
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
4,652
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
11,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
205
|
|
Other long-term obligations
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
11,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
GOODWILL,
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND LONG-LIVED ASSETS
|
The following table shows changes in goodwill for the fiscal
years ended March 31, 2010 and 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
49,258
|
|
Impairment charge
|
|
|
(32,025
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2010 and 2011
|
|
$
|
17,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of other
intangible assets as of March 31, 2011 and 2010 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Tradenames and trademarks
|
|
$
|
12,793
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,793
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
22,057
|
|
|
|
4,858
|
|
|
|
22,057
|
|
|
|
3,358
|
|
Non-compete
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
Patents
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,790
|
|
|
$
|
5,382
|
|
|
$
|
35,703
|
|
|
$
|
3,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2011, there was an increase in patents in the
amount of $1,087,000 related to the Seastone royalty earn out,
equal to 5% of the estimated net sales of certain products
through 2014. The Company believes that the obligation related
to the earn out is determinable beyond a reasonable doubt.
The weighted-average amortization period of customer
relationships, trademarks and patents are 7 years,
10 years and 10 years, respectively.
37
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Amortization expense was $1,706,000 for fiscal 2011, $1,593,000
for fiscal 2010 and $1,458,000 for fiscal 2009. The estimated
amortization expense for the next five fiscal years is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
$
|
1,694
|
|
Fiscal 2013
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
Fiscal 2014
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
Fiscal 2015
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
Fiscal 2016
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2009, the Company
performed the required annual impairment test of the carrying
amount of goodwill and indefinite lived intangibles and
determined that no impairment existed. Upon performing its
annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, the
Company determined that the C.R. Gibson reporting unit, as well
as the BOC Design Group reporting unit, had a fair market value
which was less than the carrying value and, therefore, failed
step one of the test. The factors that led to failing step one
of the test included a deterioration of the financial
performance in these reporting units during the fourth quarter
of fiscal 2010 as well as a decline in the outlook for future
periods. The second step of the test resulted in the Company
recording a non-cash pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of
$17,409,000 for the C.R. Gibson reporting unit and $14,616,000
for the BOC Design Group reporting unit.
During the fourth quarter annual impairment test of
indefinite-lived tradenames performed in fiscal 2010, the
Company determined that the carrying value of the C.R. Gibson
tradename exceeded its fair value. The decline in the fair value
of the C.R. Gibson tradename was due to the same circumstances
as those that caused the goodwill impairment for the C.R. Gibson
reporting unit. The Company recorded a non-cash pre-tax
tradename impairment charge of $8,000,000 related to the C.R.
Gibson tradename.
Additionally, the Company determined that it would discontinue
the use of the indefinite-lived tradename related to the Crystal
branded bag and tissue products. The Companys
determination to discontinue the tradename is part of a
strategic decision made by management to streamline the use of
product branding within the Companys portfolio of
products. In the future, the bag and tissue products will use
the Berwick tradename. As a result, the Company recorded a
non-cash pre-tax charge of $4,290,000 related to the Crystal
tradename.
The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets,
including identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization
and property and plant and equipment, whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Factors the Company considers important that could
trigger an impairment review include significant changes in the
use of any assets, changes in historical trends in operating
performance, changes in projected operating performance, stock
price, loss of a major customer, failure to pass step one of the
goodwill impairment test and significant negative economic
trends. In connection with the Companys review of the
recoverability of its long-lived assets as it prepared its
financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2011, the Company recorded a non-cash pre-tax impairment charge
of $11,051,000 primarily due to a full impairment of the
tangible assets relating to its Cleo manufacturing facility
located in Memphis, Tennessee. See Note 1 for further
discussion. Such test yielded no impairment in fiscal 2010 and
2009.
|
|
(4)
|
BUSINESS
RESTRUCTURING
|
During fiscal 2009, the Company reduced its workforce to improve
efficiency and to a lesser extent as a result of the
consolidation of various back office operations among its
subsidiaries. Involuntary termination benefits offered to
terminated employees were under the Companys pre-existing
severance program. The Company recorded approximately $1,321,000
in employee severance charges during fiscal 2009. During the
year ended March 31, 2010, the Company made payments of
$971,000 for costs related to severance. During fiscal 2010,
there was a reduction in the restructuring accrual of $44,000
for costs that were less than originally estimated.
38
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On January 4, 2008, the Company announced a restructuring
plan to close the Companys Elysburg, Pennsylvania
production facilities and its Troy, Pennsylvania distribution
facility. This restructuring was undertaken as the Company
shifted from domestically manufactured to foreign sourced boxed
greeting cards and gift tags. As part of the restructuring plan,
the Company recorded a restructuring reserve of $628,000,
including severance related to 75 employees. Under the
restructuring plan, both facilities were closed as of
March 31, 2008. Also, in connection with the restructuring
plan, the Company recorded an impairment of property, plant and
equipment at the affected facilities of $1,222,000, which was
included in restructuring expenses in the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2008. During the quarter ended December 31, 2008,
the Company sold two facilities associated with this
restructuring program and recognized a gain of $761,000 related
to this sale of assets. During fiscal 2009, there was an
increase in the restructuring reserve in the amount of $578,000
primarily related to the ratable recognition of retention
bonuses for employees providing service until their termination
date. During fiscal 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded $164,000
and $251,000, respectively, related to the carrying costs of its
Elysburg, Pennsylvania manufacturing facility that was closed
and remains held for sale as of March 31, 2011.
|
|
(5)
|
TREASURY
STOCK TRANSACTIONS
|
Under stock repurchase programs authorized by the Companys
Board of Directors, the Company repurchased 687,000 shares
of the Companys common stock for $16,687,000 in fiscal
2009. There were no repurchases of the Companys common
stock by the Company during fiscal 2011 and 2010. As of
March 31, 2011, the Company had 313,000 shares
remaining available for repurchase under the Boards
authorization.
Under the terms of the 2004 Equity Compensation Plan (2004
Plan), the Human Resources Committee
(Committee) of the Board of Directors
(Board) may grant incentive stock options,
non-qualified stock options, restricted stock grants, stock
appreciation rights, stock bonuses and other awards to officers
and other employees. Grants under the 2004 Plan may be made
through August 3, 2014. The term of each grant is at the
discretion of the Committee, but in no event greater than ten
years from the date of grant. The Committee has discretion to
determine the date or dates on which granted options become
exercisable. All options outstanding as of March 31, 2011
become exercisable at the rate of 25% per year commencing one
year after the date of grant. Outstanding time-vested restricted
stock units (RSUs) vest (subject to limited
exceptions) at the rate of 50% of the shares underlying the
grant on each of the third and fourth anniversaries of the date
on which the award was granted. At March 31, 2011,
1,230,269 shares were available for grant under the 2004
Plan.
Under the terms of the CSS Industries, Inc. 2006 Stock Option
Plan for Non-Employee Directors (2006 Plan),
which expired on December 31, 2010, non-qualified stock
options to purchase up to 200,000 shares of common stock
were available for grant to non-employee directors at exercise
prices of not less than the fair market value of the underlying
common stock on the date of grant. Under the 2006 Plan, options
to purchase 4,000 shares of the Companys common stock
were granted automatically to each non-employee director on the
last day that the Companys common stock was traded in
November from 2006 to 2010. Each option will expire five years
after the date the option was granted, and options vest and
become excisable at the rate of 25% per year on each of the
first four anniversaries of the grant date. Given that the 2006
Stock Plan is now expired, no further grants may be made under
such plan.
The Board of the Company adopted the CSS Industries, Inc. 2011
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (2011
Plan), subject to stockholder approval. If approved by the
stockholders, non-qualified stock options to purchase up to
150,000 shares of common stock would be available for grant
to non-employee directors at exercise prices of not less than
fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of
grant. Under the 2011 Plan, options to purchase
4,000 shares of the Companys common stock would be
granted automatically to each non-employee director on the last
day that the Companys common stock is traded in November
from 2011 to
39
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2015. Each option will expire five years after the date the
option is granted and options may be exercised at the rate of
25% per year commencing one year after the date of grant.
On May 24, 2011, in connection with the adoption of the
2011 Plan, our Board approved an amendment to our 2004 Plan to
reduce the number of shares of our common stock authorized for
issuance under the 2004 Plan by 500,000 shares. As a result
of this reduction, our 2004 Plan now provides that
1,500,000 shares of our common stock may be issued as
grants under the 2004 Plan. Prior to this amendment, our 2004
Plan provided that 2,000,000 shares of our common stock
could be issued as grants under the 2004 Plan.
Compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over
the vesting period during which employees perform related
services.
Stock
Options
Compensation cost related to stock options recognized in
operating results (included in selling, general and
administrative expenses) was $1,116,000, $1,797,000 and
$2,460,000 in the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and
2009, respectively, and the associated future income tax benefit
recognized was $404,000, $653,000 and $843,000 in the years
ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Company issues treasury shares for stock option exercises.
The cash flows resulting from the tax benefits from tax
deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for
those share awards (referred to as excess tax benefits) were
presented as financing cash flows in the consolidated statements
of cash flows.
Activity and related information pertaining to stock options for
the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,523,090
|
|
|
$
|
28.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
98,000
|
|
|
|
24.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(29,622
|
)
|
|
|
18.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled
|
|
|
(145,270
|
)
|
|
|
28.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,446,198
|
|
|
|
28.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
96,210
|
|
|
|
20.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(123,783
|
)
|
|
|
15.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled
|
|
|
(296,962
|
)
|
|
|
31.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,121,663
|
|
|
|
27.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
121,500
|
|
|
|
18.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(76,937
|
)
|
|
|
14.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled
|
|
|
(350,296
|
)
|
|
|
31.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
815,930
|
|
|
$
|
26.43
|
|
|
|
2.4 years
|
|
|
$
|
175,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
574,667
|
|
|
$
|
28.30
|
|
|
|
1.4 years
|
|
|
$
|
118,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of each stock option granted was estimated on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with
the following average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Expected dividend yield at time of grant
|
|
|
3.17
|
%
|
|
|
2.98
|
%
|
|
|
2.64
|
%
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.39
|
%
|
|
|
2.92
|
%
|
|
|
2.96
|
%
|
Expected life of option (in years)
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the
Companys common stock. The expected life of the option is
estimated using historical data pertaining to option exercises
and employee terminations. The risk-free interest rate is based
on U.S. Treasury yields in effect at the time of grant.
The weighted average fair value of options granted during fiscal
2011, 2010 and 2009 was $6.89, $7.40, and $6.77 per share,
respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised
during the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was
$343,000, $611,000, and $252,000, respectively.
As of March 31, 2011, there was $1,476,000 of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock
option awards granted under the Companys equity incentive
plans which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of 2.4 years.
Restricted
Stock Units
Compensation cost related to time-vested RSUs recognized in
operating results (included in selling, general and
administrative expenses) was $822,000, $526,000 and $172,000 in
the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, and the associated future income tax benefit
recognized was $298,000, $191,000 and $60,000 in the years ended
March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the
performance-based RSUs that were issued in the first quarter of
fiscal 2009, there was no compensation cost recognized in the
year ended March 31, 2009 as it was determined in the third
quarter of fiscal 2009 that the performance measures associated
with these RSUs were improbable of achievement. There were no
issuances of performance-based RSUs prior to fiscal 2009 and
none were issued in fiscal 2011 and 2010. All RSUs granted
during fiscal 2011 and 2010 were subject solely to service-based
vesting conditions.
41
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Activity and related information pertaining to RSUs for the
years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
of RSUs
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Outstanding at April 1, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
58,150
|
|
|
|
25.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled
|
|
|
(9,800
|
)
|
|
|
26.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
48,350
|
|
|
|
25.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
98,760
|
|
|
|
16.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled
|
|
|
(18,940
|
)
|
|
|
20.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
128,170
|
|
|
|
19.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
85,350
|
|
|
|
16.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled
|
|
|
(27,520
|
)
|
|
|
17.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011
|
|
|
186,000
|
|
|
$
|
17.80
|
|
|
|
4.7 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of each RSU granted was estimated on the day of
grant based on the closing price of the Companys common
stock reduced by the present value of the expected dividend
stream during the vesting period using the risk-free interest
rate.
As of March 31, 2011, there was $1,790,000 of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested RSUs
granted under the Companys equity incentive plans which is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2.3 years.
|
|
(7)
|
RETIREMENT
BENEFIT PLANS
|
Profit
Sharing Plans
The Company and its subsidiaries maintain defined contribution
profit sharing and 401(k) plans covering substantially all of
their employees as of March 31, 2011. Annual contributions
under the plans are determined by the Board of Directors of the
Company or each subsidiary, as appropriate. Consolidated expense
related to the plans for the years ended March 31, 2011,
2010 and 2009 was $326,000, $112,000 and $128,000, respectively.
Postretirement
Medical Plan
The Companys Cleo subsidiary administers a postretirement
medical plan covering certain persons who were employees or
former employees of Crystal at the time of Cleos
acquisition of Crystal in October 2002. The plan is unfunded and
was frozen to new participants prior to Crystals
acquisition by the Company.
42
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides a reconciliation of the benefit
obligation for the postretirement medical plan
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
996
|
|
|
$
|
1,022
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Actuarial gain
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
872
|
|
|
$
|
996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The benefit obligation of $872,000 and $996,000 as of
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, was recorded in
other long-term obligations in the consolidated balance sheet.
The net loss recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss
at March 31, 2011 was $12,000, net of tax, and there is no
actuarial gain or loss expected to be amortized from accumulated
other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost during
fiscal 2012.
The assumptions used to develop the net periodic benefit cost
and benefit obligation for the postretirement medical plan as of
and for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were
a discount rate of 5.75% (6% for 2010 and 6.25% for
2009) and assumed health care cost trend rates of 12% (13%
for 2010 and 14% for 2009) trending down to an ultimate
rate of 5% in 2022.
Net periodic pension and postretirement medical costs were
$56,000, $62,000 and $60,000 for the years ended March 31,
2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Income (loss) from operations before income tax expense
(benefit) was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
(443
|
)
|
|
$
|
(41,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,478
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
9,194
|
|
|
|
10,170
|
|
|
|
7,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,751
|
|
|
$
|
(30,987
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the provision for
U.S. federal, state and foreign taxes on income (loss) (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
2,332
|
|
|
$
|
1,099
|
|
|
$
|
4,451
|
|
State
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,441
|
|
|
|
2,806
|
|
|
|
5,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(1,261
|
)
|
|
|
(9,439
|
)
|
|
|
2,994
|
|
State
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(615
|
)
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,301
|
)
|
|
|
(10,054
|
)
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,140
|
|
|
$
|
(7,248
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The differences between the statutory and effective federal
income tax rates on income (loss) before income taxes were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
U.S. federal statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, less federal benefit
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
.4
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Tax exempt interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.1
|
)
|
Changes in tax reserves and valuation allowance
|
|
|
(.2
|
)
|
|
|
.5
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
Nondeductible goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
(.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
%
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
34.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company receives distributions from its foreign operations
and, therefore, does not assume that the income from operations
of its foreign subsidiaries will be permanently reinvested.
Income tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options
reduced current taxes payable and increased additional paid-in
capital by $78,000 in fiscal 2011, $159,000 in fiscal 2010 and
$31,000 in fiscal 2009.
Deferred taxes are recorded based upon differences between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and
available net operating loss and credit carryforwards. The
following temporary differences gave rise to net deferred income
tax assets (liabilities) as of March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
229
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
3,074
|
|
|
|
4,155
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,275
|
|
|
|
3,316
|
|
State net operating loss and credit carryforwards
|
|
|
5,923
|
|
|
|
5,583
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
4,573
|
|
|
|
3,746
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
5,464
|
|
|
|
7,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,531
|
|
|
|
24,090
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(6,907
|
)
|
|
|
(6,325
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,624
|
|
|
|
17,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,257
|
|
Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
Other
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,719
|
|
|
|
6,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset
|
|
$
|
12,905
|
|
|
$
|
11,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had potential state
income tax benefits of $6,907,000 (net of federal tax of
$3,719,000) and $6,325,000 (net of federal tax of $3,406,000),
respectively, from state deferred tax assets and state net
operating loss carryforwards that expire in various years
through 2031. These benefits were fully offset by a
44
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
valuation allowance as the Company believes it is more likely
than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized
through future taxable earnings or implementation of tax
planning strategies.
Uncertain tax positions are recognized and measured under
provisions in ASC 740. These provisions require that the
Company recognize in its consolidated financial statements the
impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than
not of being sustained on audit, based solely on the technical
merits of the position. A reconciliation of the beginning and
ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at April 1
|
|
$
|
1,045
|
|
|
$
|
1,245
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
Reductions relating to settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of
limitations
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrecognized tax benefits at March 31
|
|
$
|
1,017
|
|
|
$
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits at
March 31, 2011 of $1,017,000 was classified in other
long-term obligations in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet and the amount that would favorably affect the effective
tax rate in future periods, if recognized, is $687,000. The
Company does not anticipate any significant changes to the
amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits in the next
12 months.
Consistent with the Companys historical financial
reporting, the Company recognizes potential accrued interest
and/or
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax
expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Approximately $264,000 of interest and penalties are accrued at
March 31, 2011, $51,000 of which was recorded during the
current year.
The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well
as income tax in multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. The
Companys March 31, 2005 through March 31, 2007
federal tax returns were examined and settled with the Internal
Revenue Service after minor adjustments. The Company has been
notified that its March 31, 2009 federal tax return will be
examined in fiscal 2012. State and foreign income tax returns
remain open back to March 31, 2005 in major jurisdictions
in which the Company operates.
|
|
(9)
|
LONG-TERM
DEBT AND CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS
|
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
496
|
|
Seller note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 17, 2011, the Company entered into a new revolving
credit facility with two banks. The credit facility replaced the
Companys $110,000,000 revolving credit facility, which was
due to expire on November 20, 2011, and its accounts
receivable securitization facility that had been due to expire
on July 5, 2011.
45
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
This new facility expires on March 17, 2016 and provides
for a revolving line of credit under which the maximum credit
available to the Company at any one time automatically adjusts
upwards and downwards on a periodic basis among low,
medium and high levels (each a
Commitment Level), as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitment Period Description
|
|
Commitment Period Time Frame
|
|
Commitment Level
|
|
Low
|
|
February 1 to June 30 (5 months)
|
|
$
|
50,000,000
|
|
Medium
|
|
July 1 to October 31 (4 months)
|
|
$
|
100,000,000
|
|
High
|
|
November 1 to January 31 (3 months)
|
|
$
|
150,000,000
|
|
The Company has the option to increase the Commitment Level
during part of any Low Commitment Period from $50,000,000 to an
amount not less than $62,500,000 and not in excess of
$125,000,000; provided, however, that the Commitment Level must
remain at $50,000,000 for at least three consecutive months
during each Low Commitment Period. The Company has the option to
increase the Commitment Level during all or part of any Medium
Commitment Period from $100,000,000 to an amount not in excess
$125,000,000. Fifteen days prior written notice is required for
the Company to exercise an option to increase the Commitment
Level with respect to a particular Low Commitment Period or
Medium Commitment Period. The Company may exercise an option to
increase the Commitment Level no more than three times each
calendar year. The Company may issue up to $20,000,000 of
letters of credit under the new credit facility.
At the Companys option, interest on the facility accrues
at per annum rates equal to either one-, two-, or three-month
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 0.95%, or
the LIBOR Market Index Rate plus 0.95%. In addition to interest,
the Company is required to pay unused fees equal to
0.25% per annum on the average daily unused amount of the
Commitment Level that is then applicable. From March 17,
2011 to March 31, 2011, there were no borrowings under this
credit facility. As of March 31, 2011, there was $3,130,000
of outstanding letters of credit under this new credit facility.
These letters of credit guarantee funding of workers
compensation claims. The loan agreement also contains financial
covenants which pertain to tangible net worth and an interest
coverage ratio. The Company is in compliance with all financial
debt covenants as of March 31, 2011.
The $110,000,000 revolving credit facility that terminated
effective March 17, 2011 contained provisions to increase
or reduce the interest pricing spread based on a measure of the
Companys leverage. At the Companys option, interest
on the facility accrued at (a) the one-, two-, three- or
six-month LIBOR plus 1.25% or (b) the greater of
(1) the prime rate (2) the federal funds open rate
plus 0.5%, and (3) the daily LIBOR plus 1.25%. The
revolving credit facility provided for commitment fees of 0.3%
per annum on the daily average of the unused commitment, subject
to adjustment based on a measure of the Companys leverage.
Financing costs for amounts funded under the accounts receivable
facility, which was also terminated effective March 17,
2011, were based on a variable commercial paper rate plus 1.5%
and commitment fees of 0.5% per annum on the unused commitment
were also payable under the facility. In addition, if the daily
amount outstanding was less than 50% of the seasonally adjusted
funding limit ($60,000,000 from July 2010 until January 2011 and
$15,000,000 from and after February 1, 2011), an additional
commitment fee of 0.25% per annum was also payable under the
facility.
The weighted average interest rate under the $110,000,000
revolving credit facility and the accounts receivable facility
for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, was
4.50%, 4.12% and 4.07%, respectively. The average and peak
borrowings were $29,912,000 and $84,000,000, respectively for
the year ended March 31, 2011 and $40,889,000 and
$97,140,000, respectively for the year ended March 31,
2010. Additionally, outstanding letters of credit under the
$110,000,000 revolving credit facility totaled $3,336,000 at
March 31, 2010. These letters of credit guaranteed funding
of workers compensation claims and guaranteed the funding of
obligations to a certain vendor.
The Company leases certain computer equipment under capital
leases. The future minimum annual lease payments, including
interest, associated with the capital lease obligations are
$66,000 and matures in fiscal 2012.
46
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company also had a note payable due to the seller of an
acquired business of approximately $51,000 at March 31,
2010 which was paid in fiscal 2011.
The Company maintains various lease arrangements for property
and equipment. The future minimum rental payments associated
with all noncancelable lease obligations are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
6,877
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,877
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2,345
|
|
2016
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense was $8,796,000, $9,509,000 and $10,229,000 for the
years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
|
(11)
|
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
The Company uses certain derivative financial instruments as
part of its risk management strategy to reduce foreign currency
risk. The Company recognizes all derivatives on the consolidated
balance sheet at fair value based on quotes obtained from
financial institutions. There were no foreign currency contracts
outstanding as of March 31, 2011 and 2010.
The Company maintains a Nonqualified Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan for highly compensated employees and invests
assets to mirror the obligations under this Plan. The invested
funds are maintained at a third party financial institution in
the name of CSS and are invested in publicly traded mutual
funds. The Company maintains separate accounts for each
participant to reflect deferred contribution amounts and the
related gains or losses on such deferred amounts. The
investments are included in other current assets and the related
liability is recorded as deferred compensation and included in
other long-term obligations in the consolidated balance sheets.
The fair value of the investments is based on the market price
of the mutual funds as of March 31, 2011 and 2010.
The Company maintains two life insurance policies in connection
with deferred compensation arrangements with two former
executives. The cash surrender value of the policies is recorded
in other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheets and
is based on quotes obtained from the insurance company as of
March 31, 2011 and 2010.
To increase consistency and comparability in fair value
measurements, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) established a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques, into a
three-level fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives
the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the
lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the
inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall
within different levels of the hierarchy, the categorization is
based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair
value measurement of the instrument.
The Companys recurring assets and liabilities recorded on
the consolidated balance sheet are categorized based on the
inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:
Level 1 Financial assets and liabilities whose
values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical
assets or liabilities in an active market that the Company has
the ability to access.
47
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Level 2 Financial assets and liabilities whose
values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active
or model inputs that are observable either directly or
indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or
liability. Examples of Level 2 inputs included quoted
prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in
non-active markets and pricing models whose inputs are
observable for substantially the full term of the asset or
liability.
Level 3 Financial assets and liabilities whose
values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require
inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall
fair value measurement.
The following table presents the Companys fair value
hierarchy for those financial assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis in its consolidated balance
sheet as of March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,567
|
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plans
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
$
|
821
|
|
|
$
|
821
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,684
|
|
|
$
|
821
|
|
|
$
|
863
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plans
|
|
$
|
821
|
|
|
$
|
821
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
821
|
|
|
$
|
821
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable
and accrued expenses are reflected at carrying value in the
consolidated balance sheets as such amounts are a reasonable
estimate of their fair values due to the short-term nature of
these instruments.
The fair value of long-term debt instruments is estimated using
a discounted cash flow analysis. The carrying amount and
estimated fair value of long-term debt was $66,000 and $547,000
as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and represents
capital lease obligations which are due within the next
12 months.
48
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
(12)
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
CSS and its subsidiaries are involved in ordinary, routine legal
proceedings that are not considered by management to be
material. In the opinion of Company counsel and management, the
ultimate liabilities resulting from such legal proceedings will
not materially affect the consolidated financial position of the
Company or its results of operations or cash flows.
The Company operates in a single reporting segment, the design,
manufacture, procurement, distribution and sale of non-durable
all occasion and seasonal social expression products, primarily
to mass market retailers in the United States and Canada. The
majority of the Companys assets are maintained in the
United States.
The Companys detail of revenues from its various products
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Christmas
|
|
$
|
205,660
|
|
|
$
|
206,641
|
|
|
$
|
242,127
|
|
All occasion
|
|
|
183,976
|
|
|
|
182,191
|
|
|
|
179,479
|
|
Other seasonal
|
|
|
61,064
|
|
|
|
59,618
|
|
|
|
60,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
450,700
|
|
|
$
|
448,450
|
|
|
$
|
482,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One customer accounted for sales of $108,330,000, or 24% of
total sales in fiscal 2011, $115,511,000, or 26% of total sales
in fiscal 2010 and $127,894,000, or 27% of total sales in fiscal
2009. One other customer accounted for sales of $55,704,000, or
12% of total sales in fiscal 2011, $46,973,000, or 10% of total
sales in fiscal 2010 and $47,437,000, or 10% of total sales in
fiscal 2009.
|
|
(14)
|
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
Accounting
Standards Codification
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which
replaced the previous hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP) and establishes the FASB
Codification as the single source of authoritative GAAP
recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities
and rules and interpretive releases of the SEC as authoritative
GAAP for SEC registrants. The FASB Codification superseded all
the existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards upon its
effective date, and on and after its effective date, the FASB
will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB
Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. This
guidance was effective for the Company in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have an
impact on the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
Subsequent
Events
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which
establishes general standards of accounting for, and disclosure
of, events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.
This guidance was effective for the Company as of June 30,
2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on
the Companys financial position or results of operations.
The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date the
accompanying consolidated financial statements were issued.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments Disclosure
In April 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance which
requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments
for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as
well as in annual financial statements. The Company adopted the
updated guidance effective June 30, 2009. Other than the
required
49
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
disclosures (see Note 11), the adoption of the updated
guidance has no impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which
requires separate disclosure of significant transfers in and out
of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements in
addition to the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and
settlements for Level 3 fair value measurements. It also
clarifies existing disclosures about the level of disaggregation
and inputs and valuation techniques. The new disclosure
requirements are effective for interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the
disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements
of Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are
effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2010. The adoption of the updated guidance had
no impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
Business
Combinations
In April 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance
related to the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent
measurement and accounting, and disclosures for assets and
liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations.
This guidance became effective for all business acquisitions
occurring on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
The Company adopted the updated guidance for business
combinations with an acquisition date on or after April 1,
2009.
Collateral
Assignment Split-Dollar Life Insurance Agreements
In March 2007, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue
No. 06-10
Accounting for Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Life
Insurance Agreement, which was later incorporated into
ASC 715, Compensation-Retirement Benefits,
(EITF 06-10).
EITF 06-10
provides guidance for determining a liability for the
postretirement benefit obligation as well as recognition and
measurement of the associated asset on the basis of the terms of
the collateral assignment agreement.
EITF 06-10
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2007. The Company adopted
EITF 06-10
on April 1, 2008 and recorded a cumulative effect of an
accounting change which resulted in a reduction to equity of
$566,000.
|
|
(15)
|
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters
|
|
2011
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
53,288
|
|
|
$
|
159,945
|
|
|
$
|
174,621
|
|
|
$
|
62,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
13,733
|
|
|
$
|
39,214
|
|
|
$
|
44,143
|
|
|
$
|
17,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(5,737
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,465
|
|
|
$
|
12,855
|
|
|
$
|
(9,972
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(1)
|
|
$
|
(.59
|
)
|
|
$
|
.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
(1.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
(.59
|
)
|
|
$
|
.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
(1.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
CSS
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters
|
|
2010
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
53,677
|
|
|
$
|
160,273
|
|
|
$
|
182,230
|
|
|
$
|
52,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
$
|
14,612
|
|
|
$
|
40,643
|
|
|
$
|
45,569
|
|
|
$
|
9,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(4,490
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,892
|
|
|
$
|
12,700
|
|
|
$
|
(40,841
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic(1)
|
|
$
|
(.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
.92
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
(4.22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
(.47
|
)
|
|
$
|
.92
|
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
(4.22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net (loss) income per common share amounts for each quarter are
required to be computed independently and may not equal the
amount computed for the total year. |
Fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 net loss included a charge of
$7,085,000 (net of tax) related to the impairment of tangible
assets as further described in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements.
Fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 net loss included a charge of
$32,623,000 (net of tax) related to the impairment of goodwill
and other intangible assets as further described in Note 3
to the consolidated financial statements.
The seasonal nature of CSS business has historically
resulted in comparatively lower sales and operating losses in
the first and fourth quarters and comparatively higher sales
levels and operating profits in the second and third quarters of
the Companys fiscal year, thereby causing significant
fluctuations in the quarterly results of operations of the
Company.
51
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
|
|
(a)
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
|
The Companys management, with the participation of the
Companys President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice
President Finance and Chief Financial Officer,
evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (Exchange Act)
Rules 13a-15(e)
or
15d-15(e))
as of the end of the period covered by this report as required
by paragraph (b) of Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15
or 15d-15.
Based upon that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive
Officer and Vice President Finance and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed by the
Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and procedures.
|
|
(b)
|
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
|
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting of the
Company. Internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
The Companys internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting based on the framework
in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that
the Companys internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of March 31, 2011. Managements
assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2011 has
been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included
herein.
|
|
(c)
|
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
|
There was no change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
52
|
|
(d)
|
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
CSS Industries, Inc.:
We have audited CSS Industries, Inc.s internal control
over financial reporting as of March 31, 2011, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (COSO). CSS Industries Inc.s
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, CSS Industries, Inc. maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of March 31, 2011, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of CSS Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income
(loss), stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2011, and
our report dated May 26, 2011 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
May 26, 2011
Philadelphia, PA
53
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
|
See Election of Directors, Our Executive
Officers, Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance, Code of Ethics and Internal
Disclosure Procedures (Employees) and Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics (Board of Directors), Board Committees;
Committee Membership; Committee Meetings and Audit
Committee in the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, which is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation.
|
See Compensation Discussion and Analysis,
Executive Compensation, Human Resources
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,
Director Compensation and Human Resources
Committee Report in the Proxy Statement for the 2011
Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.
|
See Ownership of CSS Common Stock and
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under CSS Equity
Compensation Plans in the Proxy Statement for the 2011
Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
|
See Board Independence and Related Party
Transactions in the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders of the Company, which is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services.
|
See Audit Committee and Our Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm, Their Fees and Their
Attendance at the Annual Meeting in the Proxy Statement
for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company,
which is incorporated herein by reference.
54
Part IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
(a) Following is a list of documents filed as part of this
report:
1. Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets March 31, 2011 and
2010
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Loss) for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010
and 2009
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years
ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
2. Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
3. Exhibits required by Item 601 of
Regulation S-K,
Including Those Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
|
|
Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed December 5,
1990 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed
May 8, 1992 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2
to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006).
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate eliminating Class 2, Series A, $1.35
Preferred stock filed September 27, 1991 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006).
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Certificate eliminating Class 1, Series B, Convertible
Preferred Stock filed January 28, 1993 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006).
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation filed
August 4, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated November 8, 2004).
|
|
3
|
.6
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended to date (as
last amended August 4, 2004) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated November 8, 2004).
|
|
3
|
.7
|
|
By-laws of the Company, as amended to date (as last amended
August 2, 2007) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated October 25, 2007).
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Credit Agreement dated March 17, 2011 among CSS Industries,
Inc., as borrower, certain subsidiaries of CSS Industries, Inc.,
as guarantors, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
administrative agent and as a lender, and Citizens Bank of
Pennsylvania, as a lender (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated March 23, 2011).
|
|
Management Contracts, Compensatory Plans or Arrangements
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to
the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002).
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. 1994 Equity Compensation Plan (as last
amended August 7, 2002) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.29 to the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004).
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of May 12, 2006 between CSS
Industries, Inc. and Christopher J. Munyan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated August 9, 2006).
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to
the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. Management Incentive Program (as last
amended June 3, 2008) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 9, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
2004 Equity Compensation Plan (as last amended July 31,
2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated July 31, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of September 5,
2008 between CSS Industries, Inc. and Christopher J. Munyan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated October 30, 2008).
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Amendment dated December 26, 2008 to Employment Agreement
between CSS Industries, Inc. and Christopher J. Munyan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated February 5, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. Severance Pay Plan for Senior Management
and Summary Plan Description (as last amended December 29,
2008) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated February 5, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Nonqualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Covering
Officer-Employees of CSS Industries, Inc. and its Subsidiaries
(Amended and Restated, Effective as of January 1, 2009)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated February 5, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. Change of Control Severance Pay Plan for
Executive Management effective May 27, 2009 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 2, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant for grants under the
CSS Industries, Inc. 2004 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 2, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Form of Stock Bonus Award Grant for time-vested restricted stock
units under the CSS Industries, Inc. 2004 Equity Compensation
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 2, 2009).
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of March 25, 2010 between CSS
Industries, Inc. and Vincent A. Paccapaniccia (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010).
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Separation Agreement and Release of Claims Agreement dated as of
March 30, 2010 between CSS Industries, Inc. and Clifford E.
Pietrafitta (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to
the Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010).
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Consulting Agreement dated as of April 15, 2010 between CSS
Industries, Inc. and Clifford E. Pietrafitta (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010).
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. FY 2011 Management Incentive Program
Criteria for CSS Industries, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated August 6, 2010).
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. FY 2011 Management Incentive Program
Criteria for BOC Design Group (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated August 6, 2010).
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. FY 2011 Management Incentive Program
Criteria for Paper Magic Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
dated August 6, 2010).
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. FY 2011 Management Incentive Program
Criteria for C.R. Gibson, LLC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated August 6, 2010).
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Employment Agreement dated July 26, 2010 between C.R.
Gibson, LLC and Laurie F. Gilner (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated November 4, 2010).
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Amendment dated August 31, 2010 to Employment Agreement
between C.R. Gibson, LLC and Laurie F. Gilner (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
dated November 4, 2010).
|
|
*10
|
.24
|
|
Amendment dated February 8, 2011 to Employment Agreement
between C.R. Gibson, LLC and Laurie F. Gilner.
|
|
*10
|
.25
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. FY 2012 Management Incentive Program
Criteria for CSS Industries, Inc.
|
|
*10
|
.26
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. FY 2012 Management Incentive Program
Criteria for Berwick Offray LLC.
|
|
*10
|
.27
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. FY 2012 Management Incentive Program
Criteria for Paper Magic Group, Inc.
|
|
*10
|
.28
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. FY 2012 Management Incentive Program
Criteria for C.R. Gibson, LLC.
|
|
*10
|
.29
|
|
CSS Industries, Inc. FY 2012 Management Incentive Program
Criteria for Cleo Inc.
|
|
Other
|
|
21
|
.
|
|
List of Significant Subsidiaries of the Registrant (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 21 to the Registrants Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008).
|
|
*23
|
.
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
*31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of CSS Industries,
Inc. required by
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
*31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of CSS Industries,
Inc. required by
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
*32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of CSS Industries,
Inc. required by
Rule 13a-14(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350.
|
|
*32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of CSS Industries,
Inc. required by
Rule 13a-14(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed or furnished with this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Column A
|
|
Column B
|
|
Column C
|
|
Column D
|
|
Column E
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at
|
|
to Costs
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
and
|
|
to Other
|
|
|
|
at End of
|
|
|
of Period
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Accounts
|
|
Deductions
|
|
Period
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable allowances
|
|
$
|
4,742
|
|
|
$
|
5,885
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,577
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
3,050
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable allowances
|
|
$
|
5,166
|
|
|
$
|
7,677
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,101
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
4,742
|
|
Accrued restructuring expenses
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable allowances
|
|
$
|
5,291
|
|
|
$
|
6,178
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
(c)
|
|
$
|
6,342
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
5,166
|
|
Accrued restructuring expenses
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
996
|
(d)
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
Accounts receivable allowances include $442,000, $110,000 and
$525,000 of bad debt expense in fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes amounts written off as uncollectible, net of recoveries. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes payments and non cash reductions. |
|
(c) |
|
Balance at acquisition of Hampshire Paper. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes payments. |
58
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this Annual Report to be signed on behalf of the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
CSS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Registrant
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/ Christopher
J. Munyan
|
Christopher J. Munyan, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
Dated: May 26, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Annual Report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
/s/ Christopher
J. Munyan
Christopher J. Munyan, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer and a director)
Dated: May 26, 2011
/s/ Vincent
A. Paccapaniccia
Vincent A. Paccapaniccia, Vice President Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
Dated: May 26, 2011
Jack Farber, Director
Dated: May 26, 2011
Scott A. Beaumont, Director
Dated: May 26, 2011
James H. Bromley, Director
Dated: May 26, 2011
John J. Gavin, Director
Dated: May 26, 2011
James E. Ksansnak, Director
Dated: May 26, 2011
Rebecca C. Matthias, Director
Dated: May 26, 2011
59