10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 0-25196
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
51-0110823 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
814 Wheeling Avenue, Cambridge, Ohio 43725
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (740) 435-2020
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1 par value per share
|
|
NASDAQ Global Market |
|
|
|
(Title of Each Class)
|
|
(Name of exchange on which registered) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-Accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act).
Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed
by reference to the last sale reported as of June 30, 2010, was $18.1 million. There were 7,205,595
shares of the registrants common stock outstanding on March 26, 2011.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Part III of Form 10-K: Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
General
Camco Financial Corporation (Camco or the Corporation) is a bank holding company that was
organized under Delaware law in 1970. Camco is engaged in the financial services business in Ohio,
Kentucky and West Virginia, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Advantage Bank and Camco Title
Agency, Inc. In June 2001, Camco completed a reorganization in which it combined its banking
activities under one Ohio savings bank charter known as Advantage Bank (Advantage or the Bank).
Prior to the reorganization, Camco operated five separate banking subsidiaries serving distinct
geographic areas. The branch office groups in each of the regions previously served by the
subsidiary banks, except for the Banks Ashland, Kentucky, division, which was sold in 2004, now
operate as regions of Advantage. In 2003, Camco dissolved its second tier subsidiary, Camco
Mortgage Corporation, and converted its offices into branch offices of the Bank. In August 2004,
Camco completed a business combination with London Financial Corporation of London, Ohio, and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, The Citizens Bank of London. The acquisition was accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting and, therefore, the financial statements for prior periods have not
been restated. At the time of the merger, Advantage Bank merged into The Citizens Bank of London
and changed the name of the resulting institution to Advantage Bank. As a result, Camco became a
Federal Reserve Board (FRB) regulated bank holding company and Advantage became an Ohio-chartered
commercial bank.
Advantage is primarily regulated by the State of Ohio Department of Commerce, Division of Financial
Institutions (the Division), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC).
Advantage is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (the FHLB) of Cincinnati, and its deposit
accounts are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund (the DIF) administered
by the FDIC. Camco is regulated by the Federal Reserve Board.
Advantages lending activities include the origination of commercial real estate and business
loans, consumer loans, and residential conventional fixed-rate and variable-rate mortgage loans for
the acquisition, construction or refinancing of single-family homes located in Camcos primary
market areas. Camco also originates construction and permanent mortgage loans on condominiums,
two- to four-family, multi-family (over four units) and nonresidential properties. Camco continues
to diversify the balance sheet through increasing commercial, commercial real estate, and consumer
loans as well as retail and business checking and money market deposit accounts.
The financial statements for Camco and its subsidiaries are prepared on a consolidated basis. The
principal source of revenue for Camco on an unconsolidated basis has historically been dividends
from the Bank. Payment of dividends to Camco by the Bank is subject to various regulatory
restrictions and tax considerations.
References in this report to various aspects of the business, operations and financial condition of
Camco may be limited to Advantage, as the context requires.
Camcos Internet site, http://www.camcofinancial.com, provides Camcos annual report on
Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those
reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after Camco has filed the report with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Lending Activities
General. Camcos lending activities include the origination of commercial real estate and business
loans, consumer loans, and conventional fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgage loans for the
construction, acquisition or refinancing of single-family residential homes located in Advantages
primary market areas. Construction and permanent mortgage loans on condominiums, multifamily (over
four units) and nonresidential properties are also offered by Camco.
2
Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table presents certain information regarding the
composition of Camcos loan portfolio at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of loan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
$ |
26,530 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
$ |
5,798 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
$ |
19,083 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
$ |
35,162 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
$ |
29,596 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans |
|
|
12,454 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
23,867 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
27,498 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
26,648 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
27,619 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Residential |
|
|
375,583 |
|
|
|
56.2 |
|
|
|
434,367 |
|
|
|
65.9 |
|
|
|
526,069 |
|
|
|
69.5 |
|
|
|
552,175 |
|
|
|
68.0 |
|
|
|
590,545 |
|
|
|
72.2 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
163,951 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
135,371 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
131,518 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
122,345 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
100,189 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
3,828 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4,068 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4,354 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
11,848 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
6,328 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
28,943 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
25,668 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
26,425 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
30,852 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
27,637 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Multi Family |
|
|
74,342 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
46,138 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
37,087 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
39,529 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
43,392 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
685,631 |
|
|
|
102.7 |
|
|
$ |
675,277 |
|
|
|
102.4 |
|
|
$ |
772,034 |
|
|
|
102.1 |
|
|
$ |
818,559 |
|
|
|
100.8 |
|
|
$ |
825,306 |
|
|
|
100.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized yield adjustments |
|
|
(921 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(16,870 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(16,099 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(15,747 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(6,623 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(7,144 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net |
|
$ |
667,840 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
659,022 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
756,641 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
812,102 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
818,154 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Maturity Schedule. The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31,
2010, regarding the dollar amount of loans maturing in Camcos portfolio based on the contractual
terms to maturity of the loans. Demand loans, loans having no stated schedule of repayments and
loans having no stated maturity, are reported as due in one year or less.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
one |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year |
|
|
through |
|
|
Due after |
|
|
|
|
|
|
or less |
|
|
five years |
|
|
five years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
$ |
3,693 |
|
|
$ |
16,365 |
|
|
$ |
6,472 |
|
|
$ |
26,530 |
|
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans |
|
|
5,949 |
|
|
|
2,668 |
|
|
|
3,837 |
|
|
|
12,454 |
|
Residential |
|
|
29,471 |
|
|
|
81,956 |
|
|
|
264,156 |
|
|
|
375,583 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
6,110 |
|
|
|
88,842 |
|
|
|
68,999 |
|
|
|
163,951 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
3,828 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
11,678 |
|
|
|
15,629 |
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
28,943 |
|
Multi Family |
|
|
3,249 |
|
|
|
31,781 |
|
|
|
39,312 |
|
|
|
74,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
60,679 |
|
|
$ |
239,583 |
|
|
$ |
385,269 |
|
|
$ |
685,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after |
|
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Fixed rate of interest |
|
$ |
152,851 |
|
Adjustable rate of interest |
|
|
471,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
624,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
Generally, loans originated by Advantage are on a fully-amortizing basis. Advantage has no
rollover provisions in its loan documents and anticipates that loans will be paid in full by the
maturity date.
Residential Loans. A large portion of the lending activity of Advantage is the origination of
fixed-rate and adjustable-rate conventional loans for the acquisition, refinancing, home equity
lines of credit or construction of single-family residences. Home equity loans are made at fixed
and variable rates of interest for terms of up to 15 years. Excluding home equity lines of credit,
approximately 41.1% of total loans as of December 31, 2010, consisted of loans secured by mortgages
on one- to four-family residential properties.
3
Advantages home equity line of credit loan portfolio totaled $94.0 million, or 13.7%, of the total
loan portfolio at December 31, 2010. During 2010, management continued to tighten lending
standards on home equity lines of credit in response to significant economic weakness and declining
home values. These actions included increasing minimum credit scores and reducing the combined LTV
on new loans. At December 31, 2010, residential and home equity line of credits constituted $375.6
million, or 54.8% of Advantages total loans.
Federal regulations and Ohio law limit the amount which Advantage may lend in relationship to the
appraised value of the underlying real estate at the time of loan origination (the Loan-to-Value
Ratio or LTV). In accordance with such regulations and law, Advantage generally makes loans for
its own portfolio on single-family residences up to 95% of the value of the real estate and
improvements. Advantage generally requires the borrower on each loan with an LTV in excess of 80%
to obtain private mortgage insurance, loan default insurance or a guarantee by a federal agency.
Advantage permits, on an exception basis, borrowers to exceed a LTV of 80% without private mortgage
insurance, loan default insurance or a guarantee by a federal agency.
The interest rate adjustment periods on adjustable-rate mortgage loans (ARMs) offered by
Advantage are generally one, three, five and seven years. The interest rates initially charged on
ARMs and the new rates at each adjustment date are determined by adding a stated margin to a
designated interest rate index. Advantage has generally used one-year and three-year United States
Treasury note yields, adjusted to a constant maturity, as the index for one-year and three-year
adjustable-rate loans, respectively. Advantage has used the London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR) and FHLB advance rates as additional indices on certain loan programs to diversify its
concentrations of indices that may prove beneficial during re-pricing of loans throughout changing
economic cycles. The maximum adjustment on residential loans at each adjustment date for ARMs is
usually 2%, with a maximum adjustment of 6% over the term of the loan.
From time to time, Advantage originates ARMs which have an initial interest rate that is lower than
the sum of the specified index plus the margin. Such loans are subject to increased risk of
delinquency or default due to increasing monthly payments as the interest rates on such loans
increase to the fully indexed level. Advantage attempts to reduce the risk by underwriting ARMs at
rates ranging from note rate on longer term ARMs to the maximum possible rate on shorter term ARMs.
None of Advantages ARMs have negative amortization or payment option features.
Residential mortgage loans offered by Advantage are usually for terms of up to 30 years, which
could have an adverse effect upon earnings if the loans do not reprice as quickly as the cost of
funds. To minimize such effect, Advantage generally sells fixed-rate loans to Freddie Mac and
Fannie Mae. Furthermore, experience reveals that, as a result of prepayments in connection with
refinancing and sales of the underlying properties, residential loans generally remain outstanding
for periods which are substantially shorter than the maturity of such loans.
At December 31, 2010, fixed-rate loans comprised 27.1% of the 1-4 family residential loan
portfolios. Approximately 72.9% of the 1-4 family residential loan portfolios had adjustable rates
tied to U.S. Treasury note yields or LIBOR.
Construction and Development Loans. Advantage offers residential construction loans both to
owner-occupants and to builders for homes being built under contract with owner-occupants.
Advantage also makes loans to persons constructing projects for investment purposes. Loans for
developed building lots are generally made on an adjustable-rate basis for terms of up to two years
with an LTV of 65% or less.
Advantage offers construction loans to owner-occupants at adjustable-rate term loans on which the
borrower pays only interest on the disbursed portion during the construction period, which is
usually 9 months. At December 31, 2010, approximately $26.5 million, of Advantages total loans
consisted of construction loans of which $20.9 was undisbursed.
Construction loans for investment properties involve greater underwriting and default risks than
loans secured by mortgages on existing properties or construction loans for single-family
residences. Loan funds are advanced upon the security of the project under construction, which is
more difficult to value before the completion of construction. Moreover, because of the
uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, it is relatively difficult to evaluate
precisely the total loan funds required to complete a project and the related LTV ratios. In the
event a default on a construction loan occurs and foreclosure follows, Advantage could be adversely
affected because it would have to take control of the project and either arrange for completion of
construction or dispose of the unfinished project. Advantage mitigates these risks by working with
experienced developers which have substantial personal liquidity. At December 31, 2010, Advantage
had $25.5 million of multi-family and non-residential construction loans, of which $220.6 million
was undisbursed.
Nonresidential Real Estate Loans. Advantage originates loans secured by mortgages on
nonresidential real estate, including retail, office and other types of business facilities.
Nonresidential real estate loans are made on an adjustable-rate or fixed-rate basis for terms of up
to 10 years. Nonresidential real estate loans originated by Advantage generally have an LTV of 75%
or less. The largest nonresidential real estate loan outstanding at December 31, 2010, was $8.9
million loan secured by a skilled nursing
facility located in Steubenville, Ohio. Nonresidential real estate loans comprised $164.0 million,
or 20.5% of total loans at December 31, 2010.
4
Nonresidential real estate lending is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk than
residential lending due to the relatively larger loan amounts and the effects of general economic
conditions on the successful operation of income-producing properties. Advantage has endeavored to
reduce this risk by carefully evaluating the credit history and past performance of the borrower,
the location of the real estate, the quality of the management operating the property, the rent
roll, the propertys debt service coverage, the quality and characteristics of the income stream
generated by the property and appraisals supporting the propertys valuation.
Consumer and Other Loans. Advantage makes various types of consumer loans, including loans made to
depositors on the security of their savings deposits, automobile loans and unsecured personal
loans. Most other consumer loans are generally made at fixed rates of interest for terms of up to
10 years. The risk of default on consumer loans during an economic recession is greater than for
residential mortgage loans.
Loan Solicitation and Processing. Loan originations are developed from a number of sources,
including: solicitations by Advantages lending staff; referrals from real estate brokers, loan
brokers and builders; participations with other banks; continuing business with depositors, other
business borrowers and real estate developers; and walk-in customers. Advantages management
stresses the importance of individualized attention to the financial needs of its customers.
The loan origination process for each of Advantages regions is centralized in the processing and
underwriting of loans. Mortgage loan applications from potential borrowers are taken by loan
officers originating loans, and then forwarded to the loan department for processing. The Bank
typically obtains a credit report, verification of employment and other documentation concerning
the borrower and orders an appraisal of the fair market value of the collateral which will secure
the loan. The collateral is thereafter physically inspected and appraised by a staff appraiser or
by a designated fee appraiser approved by the Board of Directors of Advantage. Upon the completion
of the appraisal and the receipt of all necessary information regarding the borrower, the loan is
reviewed by an underwriter or officer with appropriate loan approval authority. If the loan is
approved, an attorneys opinion of title or title insurance is obtained on the real estate which
will secure the loan. Borrowers are required to carry satisfactory fire and casualty insurance
and, if applicable, flood and private mortgage insurance, and to name Advantage as an insured
mortgagee.
The procedure for approval of construction loans is the same as for residential mortgage loans,
except that the appraiser evaluates the building plans, construction specifications and
construction cost estimates. Advantage also evaluates the feasibility of the proposed construction
project, often utilizing independent architects as consultants.
Consumer loans are underwritten on the basis of the borrowers credit history and an analysis of
the borrowers income and expenses, ability to repay the loan and the value of the collateral.
Centralized processing and underwriting are utilized to add adequate controls over the credit
review process.
Loan Originations, Purchases and Sales. Generally, residential fixed-rate loans made by Advantage
are originated with documentation which will permit a possible sale of such loans to secondary
mortgage market investors. When a mortgage loan is sold to the investor, Advantage services the
loan by collecting monthly payments of principal and interest and forwarding such payments to the
investor, net of a servicing fee. Fixed-rate loans not sold and virtually all of the ARMs
originated by Advantage are held in Advantages loan portfolio. During the year ended December 31,
2010, Advantage sold approximately $88.7 million in loans. Loans serviced by Advantage for others
totaled $485.6 million at December 31, 2010.
The Corporations lending efforts have historically focused on loans secured by existing 1-4 family
residential properties. Generally, such loans have been underwritten on the basis of no more than
an 80% loan-to-value ratio, which has historically provided the Corporation with adequate
collateral coverage in the event of default. Nevertheless, Advantage, as with any lending
institution, is subject to the risk that residential real estate values could continue to
deteriorate in its primary lending areas within Ohio, West Virginia, and northern Kentucky, thereby
further impairing collateral values.
In 2009, our Commercial Banking Division was focused on reviewing the current portfolio and
assisting our Credit Administration Unit to implement aggressive strategies to decrease our
non-performing loans. In 2010, our Commercial Banking Division was a key revenue driver with
higher loan and origination fees and a significant amount of new commercial deposit relationships.
The increased commercial loan origination is reflective in the table below.
We believe that some of the key attributes of the new commercial business include the opportunity
to provide financial services to high net worth individuals, lower leveraged real estate projects
and high credit quality operating companies. The Commercial Banking Division continues to be
focused on relationship banking, credit quality and earning an acceptable interest rate margin.
Of the total loans originated by Advantage during the year ended December 31, 2010, 50.5% were ARM
and 49.5% were fixed-rate loans. Adjustable-rate loans comprised 72.9% of Advantages total loans
outstanding at December 31, 2010.
5
From time to time, Advantage sells participation interests in mortgage loans, business loans and
commercial loans originated by it and purchases whole loans or participation interests in loans
originated by other lenders. Advantage held whole loans and participations in loans originated by
other lenders of approximately $14.4 million at December 31, 2010. Loans which Advantage purchases
or participates must meet or exceed the normal underwriting standards utilized by the Bank.
The following table presents Advantages mortgage loan origination, purchase, sale and principal
repayment activity for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Loans originated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction (purchased and originated) |
|
$ |
15,929 |
|
|
$ |
2,310 |
|
|
$ |
7,774 |
|
|
$ |
41,323 |
|
|
$ |
23,752 |
|
Permanent |
|
|
105,427 |
|
|
|
190,662 |
|
|
|
107,776 |
|
|
|
80,900 |
|
|
|
86,613 |
|
Commercial, consumer and other |
|
|
146,993 |
|
|
|
55,243 |
|
|
|
127,604 |
|
|
|
173,070 |
|
|
|
172,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans originated |
|
|
268,349 |
|
|
|
245,905 |
|
|
|
243,154 |
|
|
|
295,293 |
|
|
|
282,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans purchased |
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
|
7,035 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
|
|
3,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments |
|
|
144,598 |
|
|
|
204,502 |
|
|
|
229,330 |
|
|
|
249,922 |
|
|
|
250,409 |
|
Loans sold |
|
|
88,697 |
|
|
|
108,481 |
|
|
|
45,330 |
|
|
|
49,953 |
|
|
|
50,924 |
|
Transfers from loans to real estate owned |
|
|
5,991 |
|
|
|
9,631 |
|
|
|
6,574 |
|
|
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
4,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reductions |
|
|
(239,286 |
) |
|
|
(322,614 |
) |
|
|
(281,234 |
) |
|
|
(305,365 |
) |
|
|
(305,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in other items, net (1) |
|
|
(21,066 |
) |
|
|
(29,655 |
) |
|
|
(18,614 |
) |
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
(959 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) |
|
$ |
10,551 |
|
|
$ |
(99,329 |
) |
|
$ |
(56,445 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,546 |
) |
|
$ |
(19,918 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other items primarily consist of amortization of deferred loan origination fees and the
provision for losses on loans. |
Lending Limit. Federal regulations and Ohio law generally impose a lending limit on the aggregate
amount that a depository institution can lend to one borrower to an amount equal to 15% of the
institutions total capital for risk-based capital purposes plus any loan reserves not already
included in total capital (the Lending Limit Capital). A depository institution may loan to one
borrower an additional amount not to exceed 10% of the institutions Lending Limit Capital, if the
additional amount is fully secured by certain forms of readily marketable collateral. Real
estate is not considered readily marketable collateral. In applying this limit, the regulations
require that loans to certain related or affiliated borrowers be aggregated.
The largest amount which Advantage could have loaned to one borrower at December 31, 2010, was
approximately $8.2 million. The largest amount Advantage had outstanding to one borrower and
related persons or entities at December 31, 2010, was $9.0 million, which consisted of loans
secured by 1-4 units within seven subdivisions. The amount outstanding to one borrower at December
31, 2010 exceeded the limit because the loan was closed at a time when Advantages loans to one
borrower limit was higher and, therefore, Advantage was in compliance at the time the loan was
closed.
Loan Concentrations. Advantage has historically originated loans secured by real estate. At
December 31, 2010, approximately 53.5% of total loans were secured by 1-4 family residential real
estate. Home equity lines of credit comprised 13.7% of total loans at December 31, 2010. We
continue to have a large amount of loans secured by real estate but there were no significant
concentrations of loans to specific industries at December 31, 2010.
Regulatory guidance suggests that financial institutions not exceed 3x risk based capital in a
concentration of commercial real estate. At December 31, 2010, Camcos ratio for this
concentration was 3.98x risk based capital, approximately $53.3 million over the guidance
limitation. Advantage has a number of significant pay downs approaching in the first half of 2011
which will decrease the risk based capital. Additionally, Camco plans to raise capital and we are
adopting a concentration management plan to monitor and control our exposure.
6
Loan Origination and Other Fees. In addition to interest earned on loans, Advantage may receive
loan origination fees or points relating to the loan amount, depending on the type of loan, plus
reimbursement of certain other expenses. Loan origination fees and other fees are a more volatile
source of income, varying with the volume of lending and economic conditions. All nonrefundable
loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and recognized as an
adjustment to yield over the life of the related loan.
Delinquent Loans, Nonperforming Assets and Classified Assets. Generally, after a loan payment is
15 days delinquent, a late charge of 5% of the amount of the payment is assessed and a collection
officer contacts the borrower to request payment. In certain limited instances, Advantage may
modify the loan or grant a limited moratorium on loan payments to enable the borrower to reorganize
his or her financial affairs. Advantage generally initiates foreclosure proceedings, in accordance
with applicable laws, when it appears that a modification or moratorium would not be or has not
been effective.
Real estate which has been acquired by Advantage as a result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of
foreclosure is classified as real estate owned until it is sold. Real estate owned is recorded
at the lower of the book value of the loan or the fair value of the property less estimated selling
expenses at the date of acquisition. Periodically, real estate owned is reviewed to ensure that
fair value is not less than carrying value, and any write-down resulting from the review is charged
to earnings as a provision for losses on real estate acquired through foreclosure. All costs
incurred from the date of acquisition are expensed in the period paid.
The following table reflects the amount of loans in a delinquent status as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans delinquent for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
one two payments |
|
$ |
10,545 |
|
|
$ |
12,590 |
|
|
$ |
13,338 |
|
|
$ |
18,210 |
|
|
$ |
13,833 |
|
three or more payments |
|
|
23,252 |
|
|
|
29,543 |
|
|
|
25,202 |
|
|
|
19,070 |
|
|
|
18,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total delinquent loans |
|
$ |
33,797 |
|
|
$ |
42,133 |
|
|
$ |
38,540 |
|
|
$ |
37,280 |
|
|
$ |
32,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of total
delinquent loans to
total net loans
(1) |
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
6.39 |
% |
|
|
5.09 |
% |
|
|
4.59 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total net loans include loans held for sale. |
Nonaccrual status denotes loans greater than three payments past due, loans for which, in the
opinion of management, the collection of additional interest is unlikely, or loans that meet
nonaccrual criteria as established by regulatory authorities. Payments received on a nonaccrual
loan are either applied to the outstanding principal balance or recorded as interest income,
depending on managements assessment of the collectability of the loan.
7
The following table sets forth information with respect to Advantages nonaccrual and delinquent
loans for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans accounted for on nonaccrual basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
$ |
1,791 |
|
|
$ |
1,244 |
|
|
$ |
3,676 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,139 |
|
|
|
4,967 |
|
|
|
5,449 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Residential(1) |
|
|
21,498 |
|
|
|
21,604 |
|
|
|
22,165 |
|
|
|
9,336 |
|
|
|
10,379 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
7,717 |
|
|
|
4,151 |
|
|
|
18,058 |
|
|
|
6,908 |
|
|
|
2,387 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
|
|
Multi Family |
|
|
2,028 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
3,139 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
4.682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans |
|
|
33,779 |
|
|
|
32,848 |
|
|
|
53,484 |
|
|
|
23,995 |
|
|
|
17,665 |
|
Accruing loans delinquent three months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi Family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accruing loans delinquent three months or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,601 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans |
|
|
33,779 |
|
|
|
36,449 |
|
|
|
53,528 |
|
|
|
25,515 |
|
|
|
18,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
10,096 |
|
|
|
9,660 |
|
|
|
5,841 |
|
|
|
5,034 |
|
|
|
3,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
43,875 |
|
|
$ |
46,109 |
|
|
$ |
59,369 |
|
|
$ |
30,549 |
|
|
$ |
22,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
16,870 |
|
|
$ |
16,099 |
|
|
$ |
15,747 |
|
|
$ |
6,623 |
|
|
$ |
7,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans as a percent of total net loans (2) |
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
6.91 |
% |
|
|
3.13 |
% |
|
|
2.23 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
|
|
5.38 |
% |
|
|
5.47 |
% |
|
|
5.93 |
% |
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
|
2.15 |
% |
Allowances for loan losses as a percent of nonperforming loans |
|
|
49.9 |
% |
|
|
44.2 |
% |
|
|
29.4 |
% |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
Memo section: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled debt restructurings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases restructured and in compliance with modified terms |
|
$ |
7,122 |
|
|
$ |
16,645 |
|
|
$ |
11,440 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases restructured and not in compliance with modified terms |
|
$ |
9,276 |
|
|
$ |
4,783 |
|
|
$ |
12,882 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes loans secured by first and junior liens and home equity lines of credit |
|
(2) |
|
Includes loans held for sale. |
The amount of interest income that would have been recorded had nonaccrual loans performed in
accordance with contractual terms totaled approximately $2.2 million for the year ended December
31, 2010. Interest collected on such loans and included in net earnings was $846,000.
Federal regulations require the Bank to classify its assets on a regular basis. Problem assets are
to be classified as either (i) substandard, (ii) doubtful or (iii) loss. Substandard assets
have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that the
insured institution will sustain some loss of principal and or interest if the deficiencies are not
corrected. Doubtful assets have the same weaknesses as substandard assets with the additional
characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and
improbable on the basis of existing facts, conditions and value. Assets classified as loss are
considered uncollectible and of such little value that their treatment as assets without the
establishment of a specific reserve is unwarranted. Loans classified and generally charged off in
the month are identified as a loss. Regulations provide for the reclassification of assets by
examiners. At December 31, 2010, the aggregate amounts of Advantages classified assets were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Classified loans: |
|
|
|
|
Substandard |
|
$ |
53,579 |
|
Doubtful |
|
|
|
|
Loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total classified loans |
|
$ |
53,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
8
The interpretive guidance of the regulations also includes a special mention category, consisting
of assets which do not currently expose an insured institution to a sufficient degree of risk to
warrant classification, but which possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving
managements close attention. Advantage had assets in the amount of $11.9 million designated as
special mention at December 31, 2010 compared to $22.6 million at December 31, 2009.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Lending money is a substantial part of Camcos business. However, every loan Camco makes carries a
risk of non-payment. This risk is affected by, among other things: cash flow of the borrower and/or
the project being financed; in the case of a collateralized loan, the changes and uncertainties as
to the future value of the collateral; the credit history of a particular borrower; changes in
economic and industry conditions; and the duration of the loan.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) requires management to make significant estimates
that affect the financial statements. One of Camcos most critical estimates is the level of the
allowance for loan losses. Due to the inherent nature of these estimates, Camco cannot provide
absolute assurance that it will not be required to charge earnings for significant unexpected loan
losses.
Camco maintains an allowance for loan losses that it believes is a reasonable estimate of known and
inherent losses within the loan portfolio. Camco makes various assumptions and judgments about the
collectability of Camcos loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of borrowers and the value
of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of loans. Through a
periodic review and consideration of the loan portfolio, management determines the amount of the
allowance for loan losses by considering general market conditions, credit quality of the loan
portfolio, the collateral supporting the loans and performance of customers relative to their
financial obligations with us. The amount of future losses is susceptible to changes in economic,
operating and other conditions, including changes in interest rates, which may be beyond Camcos
control, and these losses may exceed current estimates. Camco cannot fully predict the amount or
timing of losses or whether the loan loss allowance will be adequate in the future.
In originating loans, the Bank recognizes that credit losses will be experienced and that the risk
of loss will vary with, among other things, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of
the borrower over the term of the loan, general economic conditions and, in the case of a secured
loan, the quality of the security for the loan. It is managements policy to maintain an adequate
allowance for loan losses based on, among other things, the Banks historical loan loss experience,
evaluation of economic conditions and regular reviews of delinquencies and loan portfolio quality.
The Bank increases its allowance for loan losses by charging provisions for loan losses against the
Banks income.
General allowances are made pursuant to managements assessment of risk in the Banks loan
portfolio as a whole. Specific allowances are provided for individual loans when ultimate
collection is considered questionable by management after reviewing the current status of loans
which are contractually past due and considering the net realizable value of the security for the
loan. Management continues to actively monitor the Banks asset quality and to charge off loans
against the allowance for loan losses when appropriate or to provide specific loss reserves when
necessary. Although management believes it uses the best information available to make
determinations with respect to the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments may be necessary
if economic conditions differ substantially from the economic conditions in the assumptions used in
making the initial determinations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2010 |
|
|
December 31,
2009 |
|
General allowance |
|
$ |
15,273 |
|
|
$ |
11,700 |
|
Specific allowance |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
4,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance |
|
$ |
16,870 |
|
|
$ |
16,099 |
|
9
Managements approach includes establishing a specific valuation allowance by evaluating individual
non-performing loans for probable losses based on a systematic approach involving estimating the
realizable value of the underlying collateral. Additionally, management established a general
valuation allowance for pools of performing loans segregated by collateral type. For the general
valuation allowance, management is applying a prudent loss factor based on the Banks historical
loss experience, while considering trends based on changes to non-performing loans and foreclosure
activity, and the subjective evaluation of the
economic environment. The loan portfolio is segregated into categories based on collateral type and
a loss factor is applied to each category. The initial basis for each loss factor is the
Corporations loss experience for each category. Historical loss percentages are calculated and
adjusted by taking charge-offs (net of recoveries) in each risk category during the past 12
consecutive quarters and dividing the total by the balance of each category.
The following table sets forth an analysis of Advantages allowance for loan losses historical loss
experience:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
16,099 |
|
|
$ |
15,747 |
|
|
$ |
6,623 |
|
|
$ |
7,144 |
|
|
$ |
6,959 |
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Land, Farmland, Agriculture |
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
|
2,222 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
7,530 |
|
|
|
7,799 |
|
|
|
2,368 |
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
Commercial / Non-residential |
|
|
3,688 |
|
|
|
7,116 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
3,399 |
|
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Multi Family |
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
18,945 |
|
|
|
22,546 |
|
|
|
6,567 |
|
|
|
2,097 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
land, Farmland, Agriculture |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Commercial / Non-residential |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Multi Family |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries |
|
|
(17,689 |
) |
|
|
(21,440 |
) |
|
|
(5,668 |
) |
|
|
(2,016 |
) |
|
|
(1,255 |
) |
Provision for losses on loans |
|
|
18,460 |
|
|
|
21,792 |
|
|
|
14,792 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
16,870 |
|
|
$ |
16,099 |
|
|
$ |
15,747 |
|
|
$ |
6,623 |
|
|
$ |
7,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries to average loans |
|
|
(2.69 |
)% |
|
|
(3.21 |
)% |
|
|
(.74 |
)% |
|
|
(.25 |
)% |
|
|
(.15 |
)% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes home equity lines of credit |
10
The following table sets forth the allocation of Advantages allowance for loan losses by type
of loan at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Total |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
Construction |
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
$ |
338 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
land, Farmland, Agriculture |
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Residential |
|
|
8,050 |
|
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
10,519 |
|
|
|
64.3 |
|
|
|
10,697 |
|
|
|
68.1 |
|
|
|
4,126 |
|
|
|
67.5 |
|
|
|
4,450 |
|
|
|
71.6 |
|
Commercial / Non-residential |
|
|
3,638 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
3,148 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
2,643 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Multi Family |
|
|
2,860 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,870 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
16,099 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
15,747 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,623 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
7,145 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment and Mortgage-Backed Securities Activities
Federal regulations permit Camco to invest liquid assets, in United States Treasury obligations,
securities of various U.S. Government sponsored enterprises, certificates of deposit at FDIC
insured banks, corporate debt and equity securities or obligations of state and local political
subdivisions and municipalities. Camco is also permitted to make limited investments in
commercial paper and certain mutual funds.
The following table sets forth the composition of Camcos investment securities portfolio, except
its stock in the FHLB of Cincinnati, at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Value |
|
|
total |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Value |
|
|
total |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Value |
|
|
total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government
sponsored enterprises |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
$ |
10,955 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
$ |
11,044 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
2,608 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
.9 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
Securities |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
1,612 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1,910 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,948 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
3,993 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
13,406 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
13,530 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government
sponsored enterprises |
|
$ |
2,010 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
14,514 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
14,564 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
28,318 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
28,639 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate equity
securities |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
.5 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
.3 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
.2 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
27,040 |
|
|
|
81.5 |
|
|
|
28,605 |
|
|
|
82.3 |
|
|
|
39,690 |
|
|
|
70.3 |
|
|
|
41,298 |
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
|
55,218 |
|
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
|
56,469 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
29,207 |
|
|
|
88.1 |
|
|
|
30,768 |
|
|
|
88.5 |
|
|
|
54,361 |
|
|
|
96.3 |
|
|
|
55,950 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
|
|
|
83,793 |
|
|
|
86.2 |
|
|
|
85,352 |
|
|
|
86.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
and mortgage-backed
securities |
|
$ |
33,155 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
34,761 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
56,474 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
58,150 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
97,199 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
98,882 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
The following table presents the contractual maturities of Advantages investment securities,
except its stock in the FHLB of Cincinnati and corporate equity securities, and the
weighted-average yields for each range of maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After one |
|
|
After five |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less |
|
|
through five years |
|
|
through ten years |
|
|
After ten years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
yield |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
U.S. Government
Sponsored
enterprises |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
2,010 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
$ |
2,010 |
|
|
$ |
2,065 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
% |
Municipal bonds |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
6.65 |
|
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
|
|
2,608 |
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
|
Mortgage-backed
Securities |
|
|
4,126 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
20,973 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
3,281 |
|
|
|
5.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,380 |
|
|
|
29,994 |
|
|
|
4.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,376 |
|
|
|
3.90 |
% |
|
$ |
23,103 |
|
|
|
4.72 |
% |
|
$ |
3,351 |
|
|
|
5.37 |
% |
|
$ |
2,168 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
% |
|
$ |
32,998 |
|
|
$ |
34,663 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits and Borrowings
General. Deposits are a primary source of Advantages funds for use in lending and other
investment activities. In addition to deposits, Advantage derives funds from interest payments and
principal repayments on loans, advances from the FHLB of Cincinnati and income on earning assets.
Loan payments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows fluctuate
more in response to general interest rate and money market conditions. As part of Advantages
asset and liability management strategy, FHLB advances and other borrowings are used to fund loan
originations and for general business purposes. FHLB advances are also used on a short-term basis
to compensate for reductions in the availability of funds from other sources.
Deposits. Deposits are attracted principally from within Advantages primary market area through
the offering of a broad selection of deposit instruments, including interest-bearing and
non-interest bearing checking accounts, money market deposit accounts, regular savings accounts,
health savings accounts, term certificate accounts and retirement savings plans. In 2006,
Advantage began offering brokered certificates of deposit as an alternative to advances from the
FHLB; these offerings were discontinued in the latter half of 2009. In 2010, Advantage began
offerings with Qwick Rate as part of the Banks contingency funding plan. Qwick Rate is a
non-brokered deposit listing service that provides the Bank with access to institutional
certificate of deposits. The Bank pays an annual subscription fee to access the listing service.
Interest rates paid, maturity terms, service fees and withdrawal penalties for the various types of
accounts are established periodically by management of Advantage based on its liquidity
requirements, growth goals and interest rates paid by competitors.
Interest rates paid by Advantage on deposits became subject to limitations as a result of a consent
order Advantage entered into with the FDIC and Ohio Division of Financial Institutions in July 2009
(Consent Order). See Regulation-Regulatory Agreements below. Deposits solicited by the Bank
cannot significantly exceed the prevailing rates in its market areas. The FDIC has implemented by
regulation the statutory language significantly exceed as meaning more than 75 basis points.
Although the rule became effective January 1, 2010, Advantage has utilized these standards since
mid year 2009.
The following table sets forth the dollar amount of deposits in the various types of savings
programs offered by Advantage at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
average rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
average rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
average rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand |
|
$ |
46,597 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
38,911 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
37,526 |
|
|
|
|
% |
Interest-bearing demand |
|
|
65,679 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
70,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,199 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
Money market demand accounts |
|
|
96,294 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
96,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,749 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
|
Passbook and statement savings accounts |
|
|
38,665 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
36,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,838 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
Total certificate accounts |
|
|
404,581 |
|
|
|
1.98 |
|
|
|
417,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,644 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
651,816 |
|
|
|
1.38 |
% |
|
$ |
659,902 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
723,956 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camco expects overall deposit rates to remain suppressed in 2011 in response to the FRBs
current monetary policy of keeping interest rates low. In addition to the external interest rate
environment, the overall direction of rate movements in Advantages deposit base will largely
depend on the level of deposit growth it needs to maintain adequate liquidity and competitive
pricing considerations, which may be impacted by the repeal of federal prohibitions on the ability
of financial institutions to pay interest on demand deposit accounts under the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act).
12
The following table sets forth the amount and maturities of Advantages time deposits in excess of
$100,000 at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Three months or less |
|
$ |
8,915 |
|
Over three to six months |
|
|
48,414 |
|
Over six to twelve months |
|
|
270 |
|
Over twelve months |
|
|
56,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
113,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings. The twelve regional FHLBs function as central reserve banks, providing credit for
their member institutions. As a member in good standing of the FHLB of Cincinnati, Advantage is
authorized to apply for advances from the FHLB of Cincinnati, provided certain standards of
creditworthiness have been met. Advances are made pursuant to several different programs, each
having its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program, limitations on the
amount of advances are based either on a fixed percentage of an institutions regulatory capital or
on the FHLBs assessment of the institutions creditworthiness. Under current regulations, a
member institution must meet certain qualifications to be eligible for FHLB advances. FHLB
advances are secured by a blanket pledge on Advantages 1-4 family and multifamily residential
loans, home equity lines of credit, junior mortgages, commercial and FHLB stock. Advantage
currently provides its notes as collateral without recourse or warranty.
Borrowings also include repurchase agreements and subordinated debentures. Repurchase agreements
are collateralized by a portion of Advantages investment portfolio.
Competition
Advantage competes for deposits with other commercial banks, savings associations, savings banks,
insurance companies and credit unions and with the issuers of commercial paper and other
securities, such as shares in money market mutual funds. The primary factors in competing for
deposits are interest rates and convenience of office location. In making loans, Advantage
competes with other commercial banks, savings banks, savings associations, consumer finance
companies, credit unions and other lenders. Advantage competes for loan originations primarily
through the interest rates and loan fees it charges and through the efficiency and quality of the
services it provides to borrowers. Competition is affected by, among other things, the general
availability of lendable funds, general and local economic conditions, current interest rate levels
and other factors which are not readily predictable.
Holding Company Capital Resources
Camco is required to act as a source of strength to the Bank. Camco is obligated to pay its
expenses, as well as interest payments on the outstanding trust preferred securities. Camco has
limited capital resources to meet these obligations. As a result of the
written agreement entered into between Camco and the FRB discussed below, Camco was required to
defer the payment of dividends on the trust preferred securities beginning in the second quarter of
2009. Advantage has not been permitted to pay dividends to Camco since 2008. Advantage does not
anticipate receiving approval to pay dividends to Camco in the foreseeable future.
As of December 31, 2010, on a stand alone basis, Camco had an available cash balance of
approximately $3.9 million in order to meet its ongoing obligations. $3.8 million of the total cash
is due to an Internal Revenue Service refund for 2009 and amended returns related to 2007 and 2006.
The tax refund was moved to the Bank on February 28, 2011. Camco will need additional funds to
continue meeting its financial obligations sometime during the second half of 2011. If additional
funds are needed, Camco will seek approval from its regulators to obtain temporary financial
support from the Bank. No agreement as to any such support has yet been requested.
Camco has engaged an investment
banking firm and has submitted to the regulators a capital plan,
which may include implementation of balance sheet reductions, the sale of branches, issuing common
stock, preferred stock, debt or some combination of those issuances, or other financing
alternatives that will be treated as capital. Although, the Corporation anticipates raising
additional capital, the Board of Directors has not yet determined the type, timing, amount, or
terms of possible securities to be issued in the offering, and there are no assurances that an
offering will be completed or that the Corporation will succeed in this endeavor. In addition, a
transaction, which would likely involve equity financing would result in substantial dilution to
current stockholders and could adversely affect the price of the Corporations common stock.
13
Service Corporation Activities
Advantage has no operating subsidiaries. First S&L Corporation, a subsidiary of Advantage, is
inactive and was capitalized on a nominal basis at December 31, 2010.
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, Camco had 228 full-time employees and 26 part-time employees. Camco
believes that relations with its employees are stable. None of the employees of Camco are
represented by a collective bargaining unit.
REGULATION
General
As a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the
BHC Act), Camco is subject to regulation, examination and oversight by the FRB. Advantage is a
non-member of the FRB and is primarily subject to regulation by the Division and the FDIC. Camco
and Advantage must file periodic reports with these governmental agencies, as applicable,
concerning their activities and financial condition. Examinations are conducted annually by the
applicable regulators to determine whether Camco and Advantage are in compliance with various
regulatory requirements and are operating in a safe and sound manner.
Ohio Regulation
Regulation by the Division affects the internal organization of Advantage, as well as its
depository, lending and other investment activities. Periodic examinations by the Division are
usually conducted on a joint basis with the FDIC. Ohio law requires that Advantage maintain
federal deposit insurance as a condition of doing business. The ability of Ohio chartered banks to
engage in certain state-authorized investments is subject to oversight and approval by the FDIC.
See Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation State Chartered Bank Activities.
Any mergers involving or acquisitions of control of, Ohio banks must be approved by the Division.
The Division may initiate certain supervisory measures or formal enforcement actions against Ohio
chartered banks. Ultimately, if the grounds provided by law exist, the Division may place an Ohio
chartered bank in conservatorship or receivership.
In addition to being governed by the laws of Ohio specifically governing banks, Advantage is also
governed by Ohio corporate law, to the extent such law does not conflict with the laws specifically
governing banks.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Supervision and Examination. The FDIC is responsible for the regulation and supervision of all
commercial banks that are not members of the FRB (Non-member Banks). The FDIC is an independent
federal agency that insures the deposits, up to
prescribed statutory limits, of federally insured banks and thrifts and safeguards the safety and
soundness of the bank and thrift industries.
Non-member Banks are subject to regulatory oversight under various state and federal consumer
protection and fair lending laws. These laws govern, among other things, truth-in-lending and
truth-in-savings disclosure, equal credit opportunity, fair credit reporting and community
reinvestment. Failure to abide by federal laws and regulations governing community reinvestment
could limit the ability of an institution to open a new branch or engage in a merger transaction.
State Chartered Bank Activities. The ability of Advantage to engage in any state-authorized
activities or make any state-authorized investments, as principal, is limited if such activity is
conducted or investment is made in a manner different than that permitted for, or subject to
different terms and conditions than those imposed on, national banks. Engaging as a principal in
any such activity or investment not permissible for a national bank is subject to approval by the
FDIC. Such approval will not be granted unless certain capital requirements are met and there is
not a significant risk to the FDIC insurance fund. Most equity and real estate investments
(excluding office space and other real estate owned) authorized by state law are not permitted for
national banks. Certain exceptions are granted for activities deemed by the FRB to be closely
related to banking and for FDIC-approved subsidiary activities.
14
Liquidity. Advantage is not required to maintain a specific level of liquidity; however, the FDIC
expects it to maintain adequate liquidity to protect safety and soundness.
Regulatory Capital Requirements. Camco and Advantage are required by applicable law and
regulations to meet certain minimum capital requirements. The capital standards include a leverage
limit, or core capital requirement, a tangible capital requirement and a risk-based capital
requirement.
Pursuant to the Consent Order (defined below), Advantage is required to maintain Tier 1 risk based
capital of 8%. Tier 1 capital includes common stockholders equity, noncumulative perpetual
preferred stock and minority interest in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less all
intangibles, other than includable purchased mortgage servicing rights and credit card
relationships. For purposes of computing risk-based capital, assets and certain off-balance sheet
items are weighted at percentage levels ranging from 0% to 100%, depending on their relative risk.
Advantage did not meet this 8% requirement at December 31, 2010 as its Tier 1 was 5.61%. Advantage
was still not in compliance at February 28, 2011, as its Tier 1 was 5.75%. This failure to comply
could result in additional enforcement action by the FDIC or the Division.
Regulatory Agreements.
On March 4, 2009 Camco entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the MOU) with the FRB. The
MOU prohibits Camco from engaging in certain activities while the MOU is in effect, including,
without the prior written approval of the FRB, (1) the declaration or payment of dividends to
stockholders or (2) the repurchase of Camcos stock.
On April 30, 2009, Camco was notified by the FRB that it had conducted a surveillance review as
of December 31, 2008. Based on that review, the FRB notified Camco that it must (i) eliminate
shareholder dividends and (ii) defer interest payments on its 30-year junior subordinated
deferrable interest notes that were issued to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Camco Statutory Trust
I, in its trust preferred financing that was completed in July 2007. These prohibitions were
memorialized in a written agreement with the FRB on August 5, 2009. Camco and Camco Statutory
Trust I are permitted to defer interest and dividend payments, respectively, for up to five
consecutive years without resulting in a default. Camco may not resume these dividend or interest
payments until it receives approval from the FRB.
On August 5, 2009 Camco, entered into a written agreement with the FRB. The written agreement
requires Camco to obtain FRB approval prior to: (i) declaring or paying any dividends; (ii)
receiving dividends or any other form of payment representing a reduction in capital from
Advantage; (iii) making any distributions of interest, principal or other sums on subordinated
debentures or trust preferred securities; (iv) incurring, increasing or guaranteeing any debt; or
(v) repurchasing any Camco stock. The written agreement also required Camco to develop a capital
plan and submit it to the FRB for approval, which it has done.
Advantage entered into a consent agreement with the FDIC and the Division that provided for the
issuance of an order by the FDIC and the Division. That order was executed by the FDIC and
Division on July 31, 2009 (the Consent Order). The Consent Order requires Advantage to, among
other things, (i) increase its Tier 1 risk based capital to 8%; and (ii) seek regulatory approval
prior to declaring or paying any cash dividend. As a result of the Consent Order, Advantage is
disqualified as a public depository under Ohio law and will incur higher premiums for FDIC
insurance of its accounts.
The Bank will be considered adequately capitalized until the Consent Order is removed by the FDIC
and the Division.
A material failure to comply with the provisions of the Consent Order, Written Agreement or the
MOU could result in additional enforcement actions by the FDIC, the Division or the FRB.
On March 4, 2011, Camco was notified by the FRB that by March 31, 2011 it must divest of
activities conducted pursuant to section 4(k) of the BHC Act, which means Camco Title Agency, and
it must decertify as a financial holding company. Camco will comply with this request by
liquidating Camco Title Agency and decertifying on or before March 31, 2011. After it
decertifies, Camco will remain a bank holding company and will continue to be regulated by the
FRB.
Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders
All transactions between banks and their affiliates must comply with Sections 23A and 23B of the
Federal Reserve Act (the FRA) and the FRBs Regulation W. An affiliate is any company or entity
which controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the financial institution. In a
holding company context, the parent holding company of a bank and any companies that are controlled
by such parent holding company is affiliates of the institution. Generally, Sections 23A and 23B
of the FRA (i) limit the extent to which a financial institution or its subsidiaries may engage in
covered transactions with any one affiliate up to an amount equal to 10% of such institutions
capital stock and surplus for any one affiliate and 20% of such capital stock and surplus for the
aggregate of such transactions with all affiliates, and (ii) require that all such transactions be
on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the institution or the subsidiary, as
those provided to a non-affiliate. The term covered transaction includes the making of loans,
purchase of assets, issuance of a guarantee and similar types of transactions. Exemptions from
Sections 23A or 23B of the FRA may be granted only by the FRB. Advantage was in compliance with
these requirements at December 31, 2010.
15
Change in Control
Federal Law. The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the FDIA) provides that no person, acting
directly or indirectly or in concert with one or more persons, shall acquire control of any insured
depository institution or holding company, unless 60-days prior written notice has been given to
the primary federal regulator for that institution and such regulator has not issued a notice
disapproving the proposed acquisition. Control, for purposes of the FDIA, means the power,
directly or indirectly, alone or acting in concert, to direct the management or policies of an
insured institution or to vote 25% or more of any class of securities of such institution. Control
exists in situations in which the acquiring party has direct or indirect voting control of at least
25% of the institutions voting shares, controls in any manner the election of a majority of the
directors of such institution or is determined to exercise a controlling influence over the
management or policies of such institution. In addition, control is presumed to exist, under
certain circumstances where the acquiring party (which includes a group acting in concert) has
voting control of at least 10% of the institutions voting stock. These restrictions do not apply
to holding company acquisitions. See Holding Company Regulation.
Ohio Law. A statutory limitation on the acquisition of control of an Ohio bank requires the
written approval of the Division prior to the acquisition by any person or entity of a controlling
interest. Control exists, for purposes of Ohio law, when any person or entity which, either
directly or indirectly, or acting in concert with one or more other persons or entities, owns,
controls, holds with power to vote, or holds proxies representing, 15% or more of the voting shares
or rights of an association, or controls in any manner the election or appointment of a majority of
the directors. Ohio law also requires that certain acquisitions of voting securities that would
result in the acquiring shareholder owning 20%, 33-1/3% or 50% of the outstanding voting securities
of Camco must be approved in advance by the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding
voting shares represented at a meeting at which a quorum is present and a majority of the portion
of the outstanding voting shares represented at such a meeting, excluding the voting shares by the
acquiring shareholder. This statute was intended, in part, to protect shareholders of Ohio
corporations from coercive tender offers.
Holding Company Regulation
As a bank holding company, Camco has registered with the FRB and is subject to FRB regulations,
examination, supervision and reporting requirements.
Source of Strength Doctrine
FRB policy historically has required bank holding companies to act as a source of strength to their
bank subsidiaries and to commit capital and financial resources to support those subsidiaries. The
Dodd-Frank Act codifies this policy as a statutory requirement. Such support may be required by
the FRB at times when Camco might otherwise determine not to provide it. Any capital loan by a
bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks is subordinate in right of payment to deposits
and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary banks. The BHC Act provides that in the event
of a bank holding companys bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal
bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the
bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment.
Federal Reserve Requirements
FRB regulations currently require banks to maintain reserves of 3% of net transaction accounts
(primarily NOW accounts) up to $58.8 million (subject to an exemption of up to $10.7 million). At
December 31, 2010, Advantage was in compliance with its reserve requirements.
Like all financial companies, Camcos business and results of operations are subject to a number of
risks, many of which are outside of our control. In addition to the other information in this
report, readers should carefully consider that the following important factors, among others, could
materially impact our business and future results of operations.
16
Camco expects to continue to be subject to restrictions and conditions of the MOU, Written
Agreement and Consent Order. As a result, Camco has incurred and expect to continue to incur
significant additional regulatory compliance expense that will negatively effect our results of
operations.
Camco and the Bank continue to be under the conditions of the MOU, FRB Written Agreement and
Consent Order as a result of various regulatory concerns as of December 31, 2010. Camco has
incurred and expect to continue to incur significant additional regulatory compliance expense in
connection with these directives and will incur ongoing expenses attributable to compliance with
their terms. Although Camco does not expect it, it is possible regulatory compliance expenses
related to the directives could have a materially adverse impact on us in the future.
Our capital levels currently do not comply with the higher capital requirements required by the
Consent Order.
Under the Consent Order, the FDIC and the Division required the Bank to raise its Tier I capital to
8% by February 28, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, the Bank needed approximately $17.8 million in
additional capital based on assets at such date to meet this requirement. The Corporation currently
does not have any capital available to invest in the Bank. Camco is considering various strategies
to help us achieve the required capital level, but there is no assurance that any capital raising
strategy can be completed successfully in the near future. Moreover, any further increases to our
allowance for loan losses and operating losses would negatively impact our capital levels and make
it more difficult to achieve the capital level directed by the FDIC and the Division. Based on our
failure to meet the required capital level, the FDIC or the Division could take additional
enforcement action against us.
In addition to the Consent Order, the FRB Written Agreement, MOU, governmental regulation and
regulatory actions against us may further impair our operations or restrict our growth.
In addition to the requirements of the Consent Order, the FRB written agreement and the MOU,
Camco is subject to significant governmental supervision and regulation. These regulations are
intended primarily for the protection of depositors funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the
banking system as a whole, not security holders. These regulations affect our lending practices,
capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and growth, among other things. Congress
and federal regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for
possible changes. Statutes and regulations affecting our business may be changed at any time and
the interpretation of these statutes and regulations by examining authorities may also change.
There can be no assurance that such changes to the statutes and regulations or to their
interpretation will not adversely affect our business. Such changes could subject us to additional
costs, limit the types of financial services and products Camco may offer and/or increase the
ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things.
On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law. The Dodd-Frank Act represents a
comprehensive overhaul of the financial services industry within the United States. There are a
number of reform provisions that are likely to significantly impact the ways in which banks and
bank holding companies, including Camco and Advantage, do business. For example, the Dodd-Frank Act
changes the assessment base for federal deposit insurance premiums by modifying the deposit
insurance assessment base calculation to equal a depository institutions consolidated assets less
tangible capital and permanently increases the standard maximum amount of deposit insurance per
customer to $250,000 and non-interest bearing transaction accounts will have unlimited deposit
insurance through December 31, 2012. The Dodd-Frank Act creates the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau as a new agency empowered to promulgate new and revise existing consumer protection
regulations which may limit certain consumer fees or otherwise significantly change fee practices.
The Dodd-Frank Act also imposes more stringent capital requirements on bank holding companies by,
among other things, imposing leverage ratios on bank holding companies and prohibiting new trust
preferred issuances from counting as Tier I capital. The Dodd-Frank Act also repeals the federal
prohibition on the payment of interest on demand deposits, thereby permitting depository
institutions to pay interest on business transaction and other accounts. Other significant changes
from provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act include, but are not limited to: (i) changes to rules
relating to debit card interchange fees; (ii) new comprehensive regulation of the over-the counter
derivatives market; (iii)
reform related to the regulation of credit rating agencies; (iv) restrictions on the ability of
banks to sponsor or invest in private equity or hedge funds; and (v) the implementation of a number
of new corporate governance provisions, including, but not limited to, requiring companies to claw
back incentive compensation under certain circumstances, providing shareholders the opportunity to
cast a non-binding vote on executive compensation, new executive compensation disclosure
requirements and considerations regarding the independence of compensation advisors.
Many provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will not be implemented immediately and will require
interpretation and rule making by federal regulators. Camco is closely monitoring all relevant
sections of the Dodd-Frank Act to ensure continued compliance with laws and regulations. While the
ultimate effect of the Dodd-Frank Act on Camco cannot currently be determined, the law and its
implementing rules and regulations are likely to result in increased compliance costs and fees paid
to regulators, along with possible restrictions on our operations, all of which may have a material
adverse affect on Camcos operating results and financial condition.
17
Camco may not be able to attract and retain skilled people.
Our success depends in large part on our ability to attract and retain key people. There are a
limited number of qualified persons in Southeastern Ohio with the knowledge and experience required
to successfully implement our recovery plan. At this time, new senior executives are required to be
approved by our regulators. Suitable candidates for positions may decline to consider employment
with the Corporation given its financial condition and the current regulatory environment. In
addition, it may be difficult for us to offer compensation packages that would be sufficient to
convince candidates that are acceptable to our regulators and meet our requirements to agree to
become our employee and/or relocate. Our financial condition and the existing uncertainties may
result in existing employees seeking positions at other companies where these issues are not
present. The unexpected loss of services of other key personnel could have a material adverse
impact on our business because of a loss of their skills, knowledge of our market and years of
industry experience. If Camco is not able to promptly recruit qualified personnel, which Camco
requires to conduct our operations, our business and our ability to successfully implement our
recovery plan could be affected.
Camco has a relatively high percentage of non-performing loans and classified assets relative to
our total assets. If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover our actual loan
losses, our ability to become profitable will be adversely affected.
At December 31, 2010, our non-performing loans totaled $33.8 million, representing 4.9% of total
loans and 4.1% of total assets. In addition, loans which management has classified as either
substandard, doubtful or loss totaled $53.6 million, representing 7.9% of total loans and 6.6% of
total assets. At December 31, 2010, our allowance for loan losses was $16.9 million, representing
49.9% of non-performing loans. In the event our loan customers do not repay their loans according
to their terms and the collateral securing the payment of these loans is insufficient to pay any
remaining loan balance, Camco may experience significant loan losses, which could have a materially
adverse effect on our operating results. Camco makes various assumptions and judgments about the
collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value
of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans.
In determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses, Camco reviews loans and our loss and
delinquency experience, and evaluates economic conditions. If our assumptions are incorrect, our
allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover probable losses in our loan portfolio,
resulting in additions to our allowance. The additions to our allowance for loan losses would be
made through increased provision for loan losses, which would reduce our income.
Since 2008, our loan quality has been negatively impacted by deteriorating conditions within the
commercial real estate market and economy as a whole, which has caused declines in commercial real
estate values and deterioration in financial condition of various commercial borrowers.
Additionally, increases in delinquent real estate mortgage loans have occurred as a result of
deteriorating economic conditions and a decline in the housing market across our geographic
footprint that reflected declining home prices and increasing inventories of houses for sale.
These conditions have led Camco to downgrade the loan quality ratings on various commercial real
estate loans through its normal loan review process. In addition, several impaired loans have
become under-collateralized due to reductions in the estimated net realizable fair value of the
underlying collateral. As a result, Camcos provision for loans losses, net charge-offs and
nonperforming loans in recent quarters have continued to be higher than historical levels. The
additional provisions for loan losses in this period were largely attributed to the aforementioned
issues.
Bank regulators periodically review Advantages allowance for loan losses and may require it to
increase the allowance for loan losses. Any increase in the allowance for loan losses as required
by these regulatory authorities could have a material adverse effect on Camcos results of
operations and financial condition.
Camco may elect or be compelled to seek additional capital in the future, but that capital may not
be available when it is needed.
Camco and Advantage are required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate
levels of capital to support their operations. Currently, Advantage is not in compliance with the
Tier 1 capital requirement required by the Consent Order. As a result, Camco must raise additional
capital. Camco has engaged an investment banking firm and are in the process of developing a plan
to raise additional capital, the Corporation has not been in compliance with neither the Consent
Order nor its capital directive since June 2010. The financial condition of the Bank and the
Corporation has declined since that time, and, on December 31, 2010, the Corporations
shareholders equity totaled $46.1 million. Camcos ability to raise additional capital will
depend on its financial performance, conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a
number of other factors, many of which are outside of its control. Accordingly, there can be no
assurance that Camco can raise additional capital on terms it deems acceptable. If Camco cannot
raise additional capital, it may have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results
of operations and prospects, and may result in further enforcement action by the FRB, FDIC or
Division, including a potential federal conservatorship or receivership of the Bank, or a
requirement that Camco sell or transfer its assets or take other action which would likely result
in a significant loss of the value of Camcos ownership interest in the Bank and a significant loss
of the value of the shares held by Camcos stockholders.
18
The recent repeal of federal prohibitions on payment of interest on demand deposits could
increase our interest expense.
All federal prohibitions on the ability of financial institutions to pay interest on demand
deposit accounts were repealed as part of the Dodd-Frank Act. As a result, beginning on July 21,
2011, financial institutions could commence offering interest on demand deposits to compete for
clients. Camco does not yet know what interest rates other institutions may offer. Camcos
interest expense will increase and its net interest margin will decrease if Camco begins offering
interest on demand deposits to attract new customers or maintain current customers, which could
have a material adverse effect on Camcos business, financial condition and results of operation.
Camco is subject to examinations and challenges by tax authorities.
In the normal course of business, Camco and its subsidiaries, are routinely subject to examinations
from federal and state tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due in connection with
investments made and the businesses in which Camco has engaged. Recently, federal and state tax
authorities have become increasingly aggressive in challenging tax positions taken by financial
institutions. These tax positions may relate to tax compliance, sales and use, franchise, gross
receipts, payroll, property and income tax issues, including tax base, apportionment and tax credit
planning. The challenges made by tax authorities may result in adjustments to the timing or amount
of taxable income or deductions or the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions. Currently,
Camcos 2009 tax year is being audited by the Internal Revenue Service. If any challenges are made
and are not resolved in Camcos favor, they could have a material adverse effect on Camcos
financial condition and results of operations.
A large percentage of our loans are collateralized by real estate and continued deterioration in
the real estate market may result in additional losses and adversely affect our financial results.
Our results of operations have been, and in future periods will continue to be significantly
impacted by the economy in Ohio, and to a lesser extent, other markets Camco is exposed to,
including Kentucky and West Virginia.
Deterioration of the economic environment Camco is exposed to, including a continued decline or
worsening declines in the real estate market and single-family home re-sales or a material external
shock, may significantly impair the value of our collateral and our ability to sell the collateral
upon foreclosure. In the event of a default with respect to any of these loans, amounts received
upon sale of the collateral may be insufficient to recover outstanding principal and interest on
the loan. Over the past three years, material declines in the value of the real estate assets
securing many of our commercial real estate loans has led to significant credit losses in this
portfolio. Because of our high concentration of loans secured by real estate (the majority of which
were originated several years ago), it is possible that Camco will continue to experience some
level of credit losses and high provisions even if the overall real estate market stabilizes or
improves due to the continuing uncertainty surrounding many of the specific real estate assets
securing our loans and the weakened financial condition of some of our commercial real estate
borrowers and guarantors.
Difficult economic conditions and market volatility have adversely impacted the banking industry
and financial markets generally and may significantly affect our business, financial condition, or
results of operation.
The continued deteriorating economic conditions in our markets may negatively affect the
Corporation. Falling home prices and increasing foreclosures; unemployment and underemployment
have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage loans and resulted in significant
write-downs of asset values by financial institutions. The resulting write-downs to assets of
financial institutions have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital, to merge
with larger and stronger institutions and, in some cases, to seek government assistance or
bankruptcy protection.
Many lenders and institutional investors have reduced and, in some cases, ceased to provide funding
to borrowers, including to other financial institutions because of concern about the stability of
the financial markets and the strength of counterparties. It is difficult to predict how long these
economic conditions will exist, which of our markets, products or other businesses will ultimately
be affected, and whether managements actions will effectively mitigate these external factors.
Accordingly, the resulting lack of available credit, lack of confidence in the financial sector,
decreased consumer confidence, increased volatility in the financial markets and reduced business
activity could materially and adversely affect Camcos business, financial condition and results of
operations.
19
As a result of the challenges presented by economic conditions, Camco may face the following risks
in connection with these events:
|
|
|
Inability of borrowers to make timely repayments of their loans, or decreases in value
of real estate collateral securing the payment of such loans resulting in significant
credit losses, which could result in increased delinquencies, foreclosures and customer
bankruptcies, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. |
|
|
|
Increased regulation of the financial services industry, including heightened legal
standards and regulatory requirements or expectations. Compliance with such regulation will
likely increase costs and may limit Camcos ability to pursue business opportunities. |
|
|
|
Further disruptions in the capital markets or other events, including actions by rating
agencies and deteriorating investor expectations, may result in an inability to borrow on
favorable terms or at all from other financial institutions. |
|
|
|
Increased competition among financial services companies due to the recent
consolidation of certain competing financial institutions and the conversion of certain
investment banks to bank holding companies, which may adversely affect Camcos ability to
market our products and services. |
Volatility in the economy may negatively impact the fair value of our stock.
The market price for Camcos common stock has been volatile in the past, and several factors could
cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future, including:
|
|
|
announcements of developments related to our business; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
sales of substantial amounts of our securities into the marketplace; |
|
|
|
|
general conditions in our markets or the worldwide economy; |
|
|
|
|
a shortfall in revenues or earnings compared to securities analysts expectations; |
|
|
|
|
our inability to pay cash dividends |
|
|
|
|
changes in analysts recommendations or projections; and |
|
|
|
|
our announcement of other projects. |
Changes in interest rates could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our results of operations depend substantially on our net interest income, which is the difference
between (i) interest income on interest-earning assets, principally loans and investment
securities, and (ii) interest expense on deposit accounts and borrowings. These rates are highly
sensitive to many factors beyond our control, including general economic conditions, inflation,
recession, unemployment, money supply and the policies of various governmental and regulatory
authorities. While Camco has taken
measures intended to manage the risks of operating in a changing interest rate environment, there
can be no assurance that these measures will be effective in avoiding undue interest rate risk.
Increases in interest rates can affect the value of loans and other assets, including our ability
to realize gains on the sale of assets. Camco originates loans for sale and for our portfolio.
Increasing interest rates may reduce the volume of origination of loans for sale and consequently
the volume of fee income earned on such sales. Further, increasing interest rates may adversely
affect the ability of borrowers to pay the principal or interest on loans and leases, resulting in
an increase in non-performing assets and a reduction of income recognized.
In contrast, decreasing interest rates have the effect of causing clients to refinance mortgage
loans faster than anticipated. This causes the value of assets related to the servicing rights on
loans sold to be lower than originally anticipated. If this happens, Camco may need to write down
the value of our servicing assets faster, which would accelerate our expenses and lower our
earnings.
20
The Corporation relies, in part, on external financing to fund its operations and the availability
of such funds in the future could adversely impact its growth strategy and prospects.
The Bank relies on deposits, advances from the FHLB and other borrowings to fund its operations.
The Corporation also has previously issued subordinated debentures to raise additional capital to
fund its operations. Although the Corporation considers such sources of funds adequate for its
current capital needs, the Corporation may seek additional debt or equity capital in the future to
achieve its long-term business objectives. The sale of equity or convertible debt securities in the
future may be dilutive to the Corporation shareholders, and debt refinancing arrangements may
require the Corporation to pledge some of its assets and enter into covenants that would restrict
its ability to incur further indebtedness. Additional financing sources, if sought, might be
unavailable to the Corporation or, if available, could be on terms unfavorable to it. If additional
financing sources are unavailable, not available on reasonable terms or the Corporation is unable
to obtain any required regulatory approval for additional debt, the Corporations growth strategy
and future prospects could be adversely impacted.
Credit risks could adversely affect our results of operations.
There are inherent risks associated with our lending activities, including credit risk, which is
the risk that borrowers may not repay outstanding loans or that the value of the collateral
securing loans may decrease. Camco extends credit to a variety of customers based on internally
set standards and judgment. Camco attempts to manage credit risk through a program of underwriting
standards, the review of certain credit decisions and an on-going process of assessment of the
quality of the credit already extended. However, conditions such as inflation, recession,
unemployment, changes in interest rates, money supply and other factors beyond our control may
increase our credit risk. Such adverse changes in the economy may have a negative impact on the
ability of borrowers to repay their loans. Because Camco has a significant amount of real estate
loans, decreases in real estate values could adversely affect the value of property used as
collateral. In addition, substantially all of our loans are to individuals and businesses in Ohio.
Consequently, any decline in the economy of this market area could have a materially adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Camco operates in an extremely competitive market, and our business will suffer if Camco is unable
to compete effectively.
In our market area, Camco encounters significant competition from other commercial banks, savings
associations, savings banks, insurance companies, consumer finance companies, credit unions, other
lenders and with the issuers of commercial paper and other securities, such as shares in money
market mutual funds. The increasingly competitive environment is a result primarily of changes in
regulation and the accelerating pace of consolidation among financial service providers. Many of
our competitors have substantially greater resources and lending limits than Camco does and may
offer services that Camco does not or cannot provide.
Our ability to pay cash dividends is subject to prior FRB approval.
The MOU prohibits the Corporation from paying dividends without the FRBs prior approval. Camco
does not know how long this restriction will remain in place. Even if Camco is permitted to pay a
dividend, Camco is dependent primarily upon the earnings of our operating subsidiaries for funds to
pay dividends on our common stock. The payment of dividends by our subsidiaries is subject to
certain regulatory restrictions. Currently, Advantage is prohibited from paying any dividends to
Camco without the prior approval of the FDIC and the Division. In addition, federal law generally
prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distributions (including payment of a
dividend) to its parent holding company if the depository institution would thereafter and or
continue to be undercapitalized. As a result, any payment of dividends in the future by Camco
will be dependent, in large part, on our subsidiaries ability to satisfy these regulatory
restrictions and our subsidiaries earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other
factors.
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates about matters that
are inherently uncertain.
Managements accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how Camco records and reports our
financial condition and results of operations. Our management must exercise judgment in selecting
and applying many of these accounting policies and methods in order to ensure that they comply with
generally accepted accounting principles and reflect managements judgment as to the most
appropriate manner in which to record and report our financial condition and results of operations.
The most critical estimates are the level of the allowance of loan losses, the valuation of
mortgage servicing rights and the valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset. Due to the
inherent nature of these estimates, Camco cannot provide absolute assurance that it will not
significantly increase the allowance for loan losses or sustain loan losses that are significantly
higher than the provided allowance, nor that it will not recognize a significant provision for the
impairment of mortgage servicing rights.
21
Our organizational documents may have the effect of discouraging a third party from acquiring us.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that make it more difficult for a
third party to gain control over or acquire us. These provisions also could discourage proxy
contests and may make it more difficult for dissident stockholders to elect representatives as
directors and take other corporate actions. These provisions of our governing documents may have
the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a transaction or a change in control that might be
in the best interest of our stockholders.
Consumers may decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions.
Technology and other changes are allowing parties to utilize alternative methods to complete
financial transactions that historically have involved banks. For example, consumers can now
maintain funds in brokerage accounts or mutual funds that would have historically been held as bank
deposits. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills and/or transferring funds
directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating banks as intermediaries could
result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the related income
generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and the lower cost deposits as a
source of funds could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Camco may be named as a defendant from time to time in a variety of litigation and other actions.
Camco or one of its subsidiaries may be named as a defendant from time to time in a variety of
litigation arising in the ordinary course of their respective businesses. Such litigation is
normally covered by errors and omissions or other appropriate insurance. However, significant
litigation could cause Camco to devote substantial time and resources to defending its business or
result in judgments or settlements that exceed insurance coverage, which could have a material
adverse effect on Camcos financial condition and results of operation. Further, any claims
asserted against Camco, regardless of merit or eventual outcome may harm Camcos reputation and
result in loss of business. In addition, Camco may not be able to obtain new or different
insurance coverage, or adequate replacement policies with acceptable terms.
The Corporations allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses.
The Corporation maintains an allowance for loan losses to provide for loan defaults and
non-performance. The Corporations allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual
loan losses and future provisions for loan losses could materially and adversely affect the
Corporations operating results. The Corporations allowance for loan losses is based on its
historical loss experience, as well as an evaluation of the risks associated with its loans held
for investment. The amount of future losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and
other conditions, including changes in interest rates that may be beyond the Corporations control,
and these losses may exceed current estimates. Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of
their examination process, review the Corporations loans and allowance for loan losses. While the
Corporation believes that its allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover current losses, the
Corporation could need to increase its allowance for loan losses or regulators could require it to
increase this allowance. Either of these occurrences could materially and adversely affect the
Corporations earnings and profitability.
Our ability to use net operating loss carry forwards to reduce future tax payments may be limited
or restricted.
Camco has generated significant net operating losses (NOLs) as a result of our recent losses.
Canco generally is able to carry NOLs forward to reduce taxable income in future years. However,
our ability to utilize the NOLs is subject to the rules of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue
Code. Section 382 generally restricts the use of NOLs after an ownership change. An ownership
change occurs if, among other things, the shareholders (or specified groups of shareholders) who
own or have owned, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of a corporations common stock or are
otherwise treated as 5% shareholders under Section 382 and the Treasury regulations caused in
increase in their aggregate percentage ownership of that corporations stock by more than 50
percentage points over the lowest percentage of the stock owned by these shareholders over a
three-year rolling period. In the event of an ownership change, Section 382 imposes an annual
limitation on the amount of taxable income a corporation may offset with NOL carry forwards. This
annual limitation is generally equal to the product of the value of the corporations stock on the
date of the ownership, multiplied by the long-term tax-exempt rate published monthly by the
Internal Revenue Service. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years until the
applicable expiration date for the respective NOL carry forwards.
22
Camco does not anticipate that a planned recapitalization, rights offering will cause an ownership
change within the meaning of Section 382. In order to reduce the likelihood that future
transactions in our common shares will result in an ownership change, Camco could adopt a Tax
Benefits Preservation Plan, which provides an economic disincentive for any person or group to
become an owner, for relevant tax purposes, of 4.99% or more of our common shares. To further
protect our tax benefits, a Protective Charter Amendment could be proposed which would be submitted
for shareholder approval at our annual meeting of shareholders on May 24, 2011. However, Camco
cannot ensure that our ability to use our NOLs to offset income will not become limited in the
future. As a result, Camco could pay taxes earlier and in larger amounts than would be the case if
our NOLs were available to reduce our federal income taxes without restriction.
A material breach in Camcos security systems may have a significant effect on Camcos
business and reputation.
Camco collects processes and stores sensitive consumer data by utilizing computer systems and
telecommunications networks operated by both Camco and third party service providers. Camco has
security and backup and recovery systems in place, as well as a business continuity plan, to ensure
the computer systems will not be inoperable, to the extent possible. Camco also has security to
prevent unauthorized access to the computer systems and requires its third party service providers
to maintain similar controls. However, management cannot be certain that these measures will be
successful. A security breach of the computer systems and loss of confidential information, such
as customer account numbers and related information could result in a loss of customers confidence
and, thus, loss of business.
23
|
|
|
Item 1B. |
|
Unresolved Staff Comments. |
None.
The following table provides the location of, and certain other information pertaining to, Camcos
office premises as of December 31, 2010, with dollars in thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year facility |
|
|
Leased |
|
Net |
|
|
|
commenced |
|
|
or |
|
book |
|
Office Location |
|
operations |
|
|
owned |
|
value (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 E. Court Street
Washington Court House, Ohio
|
|
|
1963 |
|
|
Owned (2)
|
|
$ |
478.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1050 Washington Ave.
Washington Court House, Ohio
|
|
|
1996 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
470.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 N. Plum Street
Germantown, Ohio
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
436.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
675 West Main Street
New Lebanon, Ohio
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
58.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 East High Street
London, Ohio
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
506.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3002 Harrison Avenue
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
950.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1111 St. Gregory Street
Cincinnati, Ohio
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
Leased (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 S. 9th Street
Cambridge, Ohio
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
71.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 Third Street
Marietta, Ohio
|
|
|
1976 |
|
|
Owned (4)
|
|
|
490.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1925 Washington Boulevard
Belpre, Ohio
|
|
|
1979 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
209.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478 Pike Street
Marietta, Ohio
|
|
|
1998 |
|
|
Leased (5)
|
|
|
477.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814 Wheeling Avenue
Cambridge, Ohio
|
|
|
1963 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
869.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327 E. 3rd Street
Uhrichsville, Ohio
|
|
|
1975 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
67.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 N. 11th Street
Cambridge, Ohio
|
|
|
1981 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
284.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209 Seneca Avenue
Byesville, Ohio
|
|
|
1978 |
|
|
Leased (6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547 S. James Street
Dover, Ohio
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
Owned (7)
|
|
|
353.4 |
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Year facility |
|
commenced |
|
|
or |
|
book |
|
Office Location |
|
operations |
|
|
owned |
|
value (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2497 Dixie Highway
Ft. Mitchell, Kentucky
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
520.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401-7 Pike Street
Covington, Kentucky
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
75.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7550 Dixie Highway
Florence, Kentucky
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
392.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6901 Glenn Highway
Cambridge, Ohio
|
|
|
1999 |
|
|
Owned (8)
|
|
|
1,044.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1500 Grand Central Ave.- Suite #102
Vienna, West Virginia
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Leased (9)
|
|
|
118.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 Southgate Parkway
Cambridge, Ohio
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Leased (10)
|
|
|
110.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6360 Tylersville Road
Mason, Ohio
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Leased (11)
|
|
|
127.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1104 Eagleton Blvd.
London, Ohio
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Leased (12)
|
|
|
248.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
828 Wheeling Avenue
Cambridge, Ohio
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Leased (13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440 Polaris Parkway
Westerville, Ohio
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Leased (14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net book value amounts are for land, buildings, improvements and construction in progress. |
|
(2) |
|
The 134 E. Court Street facility also serves as the Camco Title Washington Court House
office. |
|
(3) |
|
The lease is on a month to month basis. |
|
(4) |
|
The 226 Third Street facility also serves as the Camco Title Marietta office. |
|
(5) |
|
The lease expires in November 2017. Advantage has the option to renew for two five-year
terms. The lease is for land only. |
|
(6) |
|
The lease expires in September 2015. |
|
(7) |
|
The 547 S. James Street facility also serves as the Camco Title Dover office. |
|
(8) |
|
The Camco Financial Corporation staff re-located to 814 Wheeling Avenue, Cambridge. Building
is currently vacant and listed with a local realtor. |
|
(9) |
|
The lease expires in October 2013. Advantage has the option to renew for three five-year
terms. |
|
(10) |
|
The lease expires in June 2012. Advantage has the option to purchase at a cost of $120,000. |
|
(11) |
|
The lease expires in October 2016. Advantage has the option to renew the lease for two
five-year terms. |
|
(12) |
|
The lease expires in May 2014. Advantage has the option to renew for three five-year terms. |
|
(13) |
|
The lease expires in June 2011. Advantage has the option to renew for a one-year term.
Advantage has the option to purchase at a cost of $185,000 with a 3% escalation. |
|
(14) |
|
The lease expires in August 2012. |
Camco also owns furniture, fixtures and equipment. The net book value of Camcos investment in
office premises and equipment totaled $1.6 million at December 31, 2010. See Note E of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in item 8 below.
25
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Legal Proceedings. |
In the ordinary course of their respective businesses or operations, Camco or its subsidiaries
may be named as a plaintiff, a defendant, or a party to a legal proceeding or any of their
respective properties may be subject to various pending and threatened legal proceedings and
various actual and potential claims. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome
of such matters, Camco cannot state what the eventual outcome of any such matters will be; however,
based on current knowledge and after consultation with legal counsel, management believes that
these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position,
results of operations or liquidity of Camco.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
(Removed and Reserved). |
Not applicable.
PART II
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Stock Information |
At February 28, 2011, Camco had 7,205,595 shares of common stock with approximately 2,704 holders
of record. Camcos common stock is listed on The Nasdaq Global Market (Nasdaq) under the symbol
CAFI. The table below sets forth the high and low daily closing price for the common stock of
Camco, together with the dividends declared per share of common stock, for each quarter of 2010 and
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
Declared |
|
Year ended December 31, 2010 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ending: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
2.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.0000 |
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
|
|
|
0.0000 |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
|
|
|
0.0000 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
3.40 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
|
|
|
0.0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ending: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
2.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.0000 |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
2.60 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
0.0000 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
1.56 |
|
|
|
0.0100 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
0.0100 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Liquidity and Capital Resources in Item 7 of this Form 10-K for discussion of
restrictions that materially limit Camcos ability to pay dividends. |
Camco did not repurchase any stock during 2009 or 2010.
26
|
|
|
Item 6. |
|
Selected Consolidated Financial Data. |
The following tables set forth certain information concerning the consolidated financial position
and results of operations of Camco for the periods indicated. This selected consolidated financial
data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere
in this report.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31: |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total amount of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
$ |
814,966 |
|
|
$ |
842,655 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,446 |
|
|
$ |
1,023,261 |
|
|
$ |
1,048,216 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions |
|
|
15,971 |
|
|
|
17,663 |
|
|
|
35,272 |
|
|
|
5,432 |
|
|
|
12,673 |
|
Securities available for sale at market |
|
|
30,768 |
|
|
|
55,950 |
|
|
|
85,352 |
|
|
|
88,919 |
|
|
|
107,506 |
|
Securities held to maturity |
|
|
3,948 |
|
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
13,406 |
|
|
|
2,769 |
|
|
|
3,449 |
|
Loans receivable net (1) |
|
|
670,048 |
|
|
|
659,497 |
|
|
|
758,826 |
|
|
|
815,271 |
|
|
|
821,818 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
651,816 |
|
|
|
659,902 |
|
|
|
723,956 |
|
|
|
692,184 |
|
|
|
684,782 |
|
FHLB advances and other borrowings |
|
|
104,464 |
|
|
|
109,232 |
|
|
|
183,833 |
|
|
|
220,981 |
|
|
|
257,139 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
46,103 |
|
|
|
60,514 |
|
|
|
71,700 |
|
|
|
88,634 |
|
|
|
91,092 |
|
|
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED OPERATING DATA: |
|
For the year ended December 31: |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
40,821 |
|
|
$ |
44,724 |
|
|
$ |
56,783 |
|
|
$ |
64,877 |
|
|
$ |
62,689 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
14,434 |
|
|
|
20,594 |
|
|
|
30,974 |
|
|
|
36,421 |
|
|
|
32,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
26,387 |
|
|
|
24,130 |
|
|
|
25,809 |
|
|
|
28,456 |
|
|
|
29,918 |
|
Provision for losses on loans |
|
|
18,460 |
|
|
|
21,792 |
|
|
|
14,793 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
1,440 |
|
Net interest income after provision for losses on loans |
|
|
7,927 |
|
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
|
11,016 |
|
|
|
26,961 |
|
|
|
28,478 |
|
Other income |
|
|
7,364 |
|
|
|
8,261 |
|
|
|
3,708 |
|
|
|
6,588 |
|
|
|
5,033 |
|
General, administrative and other expense |
|
|
29,332 |
|
|
|
28,113 |
|
|
|
28,481 |
|
|
|
26,985 |
|
|
|
24,910 |
|
Goodwill Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before federal income taxes (credits) |
|
|
(14,041 |
) |
|
|
(17,514 |
) |
|
|
(20,440 |
) |
|
|
6,266 |
|
|
|
8,601 |
|
Federal income taxes (credits) |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
(6,297 |
) |
|
|
(5,116 |
) |
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
2,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(14,559 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,217 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,324 |
) |
|
$ |
4,501 |
|
|
$ |
5,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(2.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.14 |
) |
|
$ |
.61 |
|
|
$ |
.78 |
|
Diluted (2) |
|
$ |
(2.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.14 |
) |
|
$ |
.61 |
|
|
$ |
.78 |
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.0000 |
|
|
$ |
0.0200 |
|
|
$ |
0.2625 |
|
|
$ |
0.6000 |
|
|
$ |
0.6000 |
|
|
Return on average assets (3) |
|
|
(1.72 |
)% |
|
|
(1.20 |
)% |
|
|
(1.50 |
)% |
|
|
0.43 |
% |
|
|
0.55 |
% |
Return on average equity (3) |
|
|
(26.39 |
)% |
|
|
(15.73 |
) |
|
|
(17.93 |
) |
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
6.46 |
|
Average equity to average assets (3) |
|
|
8.29 |
|
|
|
7.63 |
|
|
|
8.34 |
|
|
|
8.67 |
|
|
|
8.58 |
|
Dividend payout ratio (4) |
|
|
N/A |
(5) |
|
|
N/A |
(5) |
|
|
N/A |
(5) |
|
|
98.36 |
|
|
|
76.92 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes loans held for sale. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents a pro-forma presentation based upon net earnings from operations divided
by weighted-average basic and diluted shares outstanding. |
|
(3) |
|
Ratios are based upon the mathematical average of the balances at the end of each
month. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents dividends per share divided by basic earnings per share. |
|
(5) |
|
Not meaningful. |
|
|
|
Item 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. |
General
Since its incorporation in 1970, Camco Financial Corporation (Camco or the Corporation) has
evolved into a full-service provider of financial products through its subsidiaries, Advantage Bank
(Advantage or Bank) and Camco Title Agency. Utilizing a common marketing theme based on Camcos
commitment to personalized customer service, Camco has grown from $22.8 million of consolidated
assets in 1970 to $815.0 million of consolidated assets at December 31, 2010. Camcos rate of
growth is largely attributable to its acquisitions and its continued expansion of product lines
from the limited deposit and loan offerings which the Bank could offer in the heavily regulated
environment of the 1970s to the wider array of financial service products that commercial banks
traditionally offer.
27
Management believes that continued success in the financial services industry will be achieved by
those institutions with a rigorous dedication to building value-added customer-oriented
organizations. Toward this end, each of the Banks regions has the ability to make local decisions
for customer contacts and services, however back-office operations are consolidated and
centralized. Based on consumer and business preferences, the Banks management
designs financial service products with a view towards differentiating each of the constituent
regions from its competition. Management believes that the Bank regions ability to rapidly adapt
to consumer and business needs and preferences is essential to them as community-based financial
institutions competing against the larger regional and money-center bank holding companies.
Camcos profitability depends primarily on its level of net interest income, which is the
difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, principally loans, mortgage-backed
securities and investment securities, and interest expense on deposit accounts and borrowings. In
recent years, Camcos operations have also been heavily influenced by its level of other income,
including mortgage banking income and other fee income. Camcos operations are also affected by
general, administrative and other expenses, including employee compensation and benefits, occupancy
expense, data processing, franchise taxes, advertising, other operating expenses and federal income
tax expense.
Overview
During 2010, the economic environment for financial services companies continued to be challenging.
We continued to execute our long-term strategic plan to diversify the balance sheet by
strategically working to increase our commercial, commercial real estate and consumer loan
portfolios and improve our funding mix by reducing borrowings and increasing transaction-based
deposits.
We have found that core deposit growth continues to be challenging. Competition for deposits
continues to put pressure on marginal funding costs, despite continued low rates in 2010. During
fiscal 2010, deposits decreased 1.2%, primarily due to our decrease in public funds and brokered
deposits. The brokered deposits were not renewed in 2010 as loan balances decreased and cash was
utilized to decrease higher yielding non core funding and borrowed funds.
The real estate market continues to create a very challenging environment for most financial
institutions. In the first half of 2010, the homebuyer tax credit increased sales and temporarily
propped up prices. However, bankruptcies, foreclosures and high unemployment have continued in
Ohio and the oversupply of housing has continued to depress prices. We are working diligently to
manage delinquencies and work with our loan customers in order to reduce losses for them, as well
as our Corporation.
Nonperforming loans remained stable at $33.8 million at the end of 2010 compared to $36.4 million
at the end of 2009. We continue to deal with the economic challenges in our markets, through our
loan charge-offs and provision for loan losses as we recognize the results of these current
economic conditions and issues related to higher than normal unemployment. Net charge offs
totaled $17.7 million during 2010 as we continued to work with borrowers during these economic
conditions.
The Corporation has engaged an investment banking firm and is developing a capital plan that may
include balance sheet reduction, the sale of branches, issuing common stock, preferred stock, debt
or some combination of those issuances, or other financing alternatives that will be treated as
capital. Although, the Corporation anticipates raising additional capital, the Board of Directors
has not yet determined the type, timing, amount, or terms of possible securities to be issued in
the offering, and there are no assurances that an offering will be completed or that the
Corporation will succeed in this endeavor. In addition, a transaction, which would likely involve
equity financing would result in substantial dilution to current stockholders and could adversely
affect the price of the Corporations common stock.
We believe we are taking significant steps forward in managing our operational efficiency. We are
continuing our focus on improving noninterest income and controlling noninterest expense by exiting
unprofitable lines of business and refining our operations. We continue to analyze new products to
deepen relationships with our core customers and improve the structure of our balance sheet.
On March 4, 2011, Camco was notified by the FRB that by March 31, 2011 it must divest of activities
conducted pursuant to section 4(k) of the BHC Act, which means Camco Title Agency, and it must
decertify as a financial holding company. Camco will comply with this request by liquidating Camco
Title Agency and decertifying on or before March 31, 2011. After it decertifies, Camco will remain
a bank holding company and will continue to be regulated by the FRB. This transaction will reduce
profitability and earnings in the future.
28
Forward-Looking Statements
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
and this annual report include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Exchange Act), as amended, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such
as may, might, could, would, believe, expect, intend, plan, seek, anticipate, estimate, project or
continue or the negative thereof or comparable terminology. All statements other than statements of
historical fact included in this document regarding our outlook, financial position and results of
operation, liquidity, capital resources and interest rate sensitivity are forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements also include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
anticipated changes in industry conditions created by state and federal legislation and
regulations; |
|
|
|
anticipated changes in general interest rates and the impact of future interest rate
changes on our profitability, capital adequacy and the fair value of our financial assets
and liabilities; |
|
|
|
retention of our existing customer base and our ability to attract new customers; |
|
|
|
the development of new products and services and their success in the marketplace; |
|
|
|
the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; and, |
|
|
|
statements regarding our anticipated loan and deposit account growth, expense levels,
liquidity and capital resources and projections of earnings. |
These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
which may cause our actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. Although we believe the expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance such expectations will prove to
have been correct. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those in the forward-looking statements included herein include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
competition in the industry and markets in which we operate; |
|
|
|
levels of non-performing assets; |
|
|
|
changes in general interest rates; |
|
|
|
rapid changes in technology affecting the financial services industry; |
|
|
|
changes in government regulation; and |
|
|
|
general economic and business conditions. |
This MD&A is intended to give stockholders a more comprehensive review of the issues facing
management than could be obtained from an examination of the financial statements alone. This
analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related
footnotes and the selected financial data elsewhere in this annual report. As used herein and
except as the context may otherwise require, references to Camco, the Corporation, we, us,
or our means, collectively, Camco Financial Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries,
Advantage Bank and Camco Title Agency.
29
Critical Accounting Policies
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as well as
disclosures found elsewhere in this quarterly report, are based upon Camcos consolidated financial
statements, which are prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The preparation of these financial
statements requires Camco to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Several factors are considered in determining whether
or not a policy is critical in the preparation of financial statements. These factors include,
among other things, whether the estimates are significant to the financial statements, the nature
of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other information including
third parties or available prices, and sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic
conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be utilized under US GAAP.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate
to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of mortgage servicing rights
and the valuation of deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Summary. We believe the accounting estimates related to the allowance for loan losses, the
capitalization, amortization, and valuation of mortgage servicing rights and deferred income taxes
are critical accounting estimates because: (1) the estimates are highly susceptible to change
from period to period because they require us to make assumptions concerning the changes in the
types and volumes of the portfolios, rates of future prepayments, and anticipated economic
conditions, and (2) the impact of recognizing an impairment or loan loss could have a material
effect on Camcos assets reported on the balance sheet as well as its net earnings.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses reflect managements
evaluation of credit risk after careful consideration of all information available to management.
In developing this assessment, management must rely on estimates and exercise judgment regarding
matters where the ultimate outcome is unknown such as economic factors, developments affecting
companies in specific industries and issues with respect to single borrowers. Depending on changes
in circumstances, future assessments of credit risk may yield materially different results, which
may require an increase or a decrease in the allowance for loan losses.
Each quarter, management analyzes the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses based on review of
the loans in the portfolio along with an analysis of external factors (including current housing
price depreciation, homeowners loss of equity, etc) and historical delinquency and loss trends.
The allowance is developed through specific components; 1) the specific allowance for loans subject
to individual analysis, 2) the allowance for classified loans not otherwise subject to individual
analysis and 3) the allowance for non-classified loans (primarily homogenous).
Classified loans with indication or acknowledgment of deterioration are subject to individual
analysis. Loan classifications are those used by regulators consisting of Special Mention,
Substandard, Doubtful and Loss. In evaluating these loans for impairment, the measure of expected
loss is based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loans
effective interest rate, a loans observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if
the loan is collateral dependent. All other classified assets and non-classified assets are
combined with the homogenous loan pools and segregated into loan segments. The segmentation is
based on grouping loans with similar risk characteristics (one-to-four family, home equity, etc.).
Loss rate factors are developed for each loan segment which is used to estimate losses and
determine an allowance. The loss factors for each segment are derived from historical delinquency,
classification, and charge-off rates and adjusted for economic factors and an estimated loss
scenario.
The allowance is reviewed by management to determine whether the amount is considered adequate to
absorb probable, incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Managements evaluation of the
adequacy of the allowance is an estimate based on managements current judgment about the credit
quality of the loan portfolio. This evaluation includes specific loss estimates on certain
individually reviewed loans, statistical loss estimates for loan pools that are based on historical
loss experience, and general loss estimates that are based upon the size, quality, and
concentration characteristics of the various loan portfolios, adverse situations that may affect a
borrowers ability to repay, and current economic and industry conditions. Also considered as
part of that judgment is a review of the Banks trends in delinquencies and loan losses, as well as
trends in delinquencies and losses for the region and nationally, and
economic factors. While the Corporation strives to reflect all known risk factors in its
evaluations, judgment errors may occur.
30
Mortgage Servicing Rights
To determine the fair value of its mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) each reporting quarter, the
Corporation provides information to a third party valuation firm, representing loan information in
each pooling period accompanied by escrow amounts. The third party then evaluates the possible
impairment of MSRs as described below.
MSRs are recognized as separate assets or liabilities when loans are sold with servicing retained.
A pooling methodology, in which loans with similar characteristics are pooled together, is
applied for valuation purposes. Once pooled, each grouping of loans is evaluated on a discounted
earnings basis to determine the present value of future earnings that the Bank could expect to
realize from the portfolio. Earnings are projected from a variety of sources including loan
service fees, net interest earned on escrow balances, miscellaneous income and costs to service the
loans. The present value of future earnings is the estimated fair value for the pool, calculated
using consensus assumptions that a third party purchaser would utilize in evaluating a potential
acquisition of the MSRs.
Events that may significantly affect the estimates used are changes in interest rates and the
related impact on mortgage loan prepayment speeds and the payment performance of the underlying
loans. The interest rate for net interest earned on escrow balances, which is supplied by
management, takes into consideration the investment portfolio average yield as well as current
short duration investment yields. Management believes this methodology provides a reasonable
estimate. Mortgage loan prepayment speeds are calculated by the third party provider utilizing the
Economic Outlook as published by the Office of Chief Economist of Freddie Mac in estimating
prepayment speeds and provides a specific scenario with each evaluation. Based on the assumptions
discussed, pre-tax projections are prepared for each pool of loans serviced. These earnings
figures approximate the cash flow that could be received from the servicing portfolio. Valuation
results are presented quarterly to management. At that time, management reviews the information
and MSRs are marked to lower of amortized cost or fair value for the current quarter.
Deferred Income Taxes
Camco recognizes expense for federal income taxes currently payable as well as for deferred federal
taxes for estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and
liabilities and amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets. Realization of a deferred tax
asset is dependent upon generating sufficient taxable income in either the carry forward or carry
back periods to cover net operating losses generated by the reversal of temporary differences. A
valuation allowance is provided by way of a charge to income tax expense if it is determined that
it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. If
different assumptions and conditions were to prevail, the valuation allowance may not be adequate
to absorb unrealized deferred taxes and the amount of income taxes payable may need to be adjusted
by way of a charge or credit to expense. Furthermore, income tax returns are subject to audit by
the IRS. Income tax expense for current and prior periods is subject to adjustment based upon the
outcome of such audits. Camco believes it has adequately accrued for all probable income taxes
payable. Accrual of income taxes payable and valuation allowances against deferred tax assets are
estimates subject to change based upon the outcome of future events.
Discussion of Financial Condition Changes from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2009
At December 31, 2010, Camcos consolidated assets totaled $815.0 million, a decrease of $27.7
million, or 3.3%, from the December 31, 2009 total. The decrease in total assets was comprised
primarily of decreases in securities and cash and interest bearing deposits in other financial
institutions which were offset partially by the increase in loans receivable net. Further
deterioration of the residential loan market and fewer new purchases may continue to shift the loan
portfolio toward commercial loans. The current loan rates may slow residential lending and the
sale of fixed rate loans, therefore it is not likely that the profits on gain on sale will continue
to be as strong in 2011. Possible growth in deposits would most likely be used to reduce
outstanding borrowings and brokered deposits or fund commercial loan growth which is expected in
the second half of 2011. Managements overall focus at the Bank has been on managing credit,
reducing risk within the loan portfolio and enhancing liquidity and capital in a deteriorating
economic
environment. Continuous progress is being made on addressing these issues, but we expect the
distressed economic environment to continue through 2011.
31
Cash and interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions totaled $29.1 million at
December 31, 2010 a decrease of $9.0 million, or 23.7%, from December 31, 2009 levels. This
decrease is reflective of our decision to rely on core relationships and discontinuing purchases
of brokered deposits and bidding on public funds during 2010. Securities totaled $34.7 million at
December 31, 2010, a decrease of $23.3 million, or 40.2%, from the total at December 31, 2009.
Investment security purchases totaled $2.2 million, and principal repayments totaled $25.5 million.
The yield on securities purchased during the period was 4.26%.
Approximately 13.2% of the securities portfolio is expected to mature or prepay during 2011. We
have kept the duration and average life of the securities portfolio weighted throughout the
upcoming years in order to provide liquidity and to reduce borrowings, when available.
At December 31, 2010, other than $2.6 million of municipal bonds, all of our debt securities were
issued and guaranteed by US Government sponsored enterprises such as Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae,
Ginnie Mae and the FHLB. We held no private-label mortgage-backed securities or collateralized
debt obligations.
Loans receivable net and loans held for sale totaled $670.0 million at December 31, 2010, an
increase of $10.6 million, or 1.6%, from the total at December 31, 2009. The increase resulted
primarily from loan disbursements and purchases totaling $268.3 million and an increase of $18.5
million of provision relating to our allowance for loan and leases partially offset by repayments
of $144.6 million, loan sales of $88.7 million and $6.0 million of transfers to real estate owned.
Loan origination volume, including purchases of loans, increased from the comparable 2009 period by
$23.2 million, or 9.5%, while the volume of loan sales decreased by $19.8 million, or
18.2% year to year. The number of loans originated for sale in the secondary market continued to
increase significantly as rates decreased and customers re-financed at the current lower rates.
Instead of selling adjustable rate loans, we have typically held adjustable-rate mortgage loans for
investment as an integral part of our strategy.
Loan originations during the 12 month period were comprised primarily of $123.5 million in
commercial loans, $121.4 million of loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate
and $23.5 million in consumer and other loans. Our intent is to expand commercial real estate
lending in future periods as a means of increasing the yield on our loan portfolio and continue
with our strategic plan of moving to a more bank like institution. However, lending volumes of
acceptable risk have diminished somewhat due to a slowing economy and loan repayments are being
used to reduce borrowings and maintain liquidity.
During 2010, the yield on loans was 5.72% a decrease of 30 basis points as compared to 6.02% for
2009. The decrease in yield is due to lower average loan balances coupled with lower effective
rates in the loan portfolio during 2010. Adjustable rate loans re-priced lower to the current rate
environment and new loans are also at the lower market rates.
The allowance for loan losses totaled $16.9 million and $16.1 million at December 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively, representing 49.9% and 44.2% of nonperforming loans at those dates.
Nonperforming loans (three monthly payments or more delinquent plus nonaccrual loans) totaled $33.8
million and $36.4 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, constituting 4.9% and 5.4%
of total net loans, including loans held for sale, at those dates. Net charge-offs totaled $17.7
million for 2010 and were primarily comprised of $6.5 million of non residential real estate and
commercial and $6.0 million of 1-4 family loans with the additional $5.2 million being numerous
loans and loan types.
The following table details delinquent and nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 90 |
|
|
|
Loans 30- |
|
|
Loans 60- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
or More |
|
|
Loans 30- |
|
|
Loans 60- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
or More |
|
|
|
59 Days |
|
|
89 Days |
|
|
Non |
|
|
Days Past |
|
|
59 Days |
|
|
89 Days |
|
|
Non |
|
|
Days Past |
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Accrual |
|
|
Due |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Construction |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,791 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,244 |
|
|
$ |
305 |
|
Land, Farmland, Ag
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,139 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
Residential |
|
|
5,701 |
|
|
|
1,794 |
|
|
|
21,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,610 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
21,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,766 |
|
|
|
7,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,495 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
4,152 |
|
|
|
2,853 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and
industrial |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Multi Family |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
2,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,982 |
|
|
$ |
4,563 |
|
|
$ |
33,779 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,696 |
|
|
$ |
1,617 |
|
|
$ |
32,848 |
|
|
$ |
3,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Although we believe that the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2010 is adequate to
cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio at that date based upon the available facts and
circumstances, there can be no assurance that additions to the allowance for loan losses will not
be necessary in future periods, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
Unemployment rates in our markets and Ohio in general, are higher than the national average however
the rates have experienced a significant decline over the past year. This can be viewed as a
positive sign and a small economic recovery. Ohio registered the nations eighth-highest state
foreclosure rate in 2010. Additionally, Ohio is experiencing declining values of residential real
estate. However, Ohio in general has not experienced significant increases in home values over the
past five years like many regions in the U.S., which should comparatively mitigate losses on loans.
Nonetheless, these factors, compounded by a very uncertain national economic outlook, may continue
to increase the level of future losses beyond our current expectations.
At December 31, 2010, the Corporations real estate owned (REO) consisted of 150 repossessed
properties with a net book value of $10.1 million compared to $9.7 million at December 31, 2009.
Initial loss is recorded as a charge to the allowance for loan losses within 90 days of being
transferred to REO. Thereafter, if there is a further deterioration in value, a specific valuation
allowance is established and charged to operations. The Corporation reflects costs to carry REO as
period costs in operations when incurred. When property is acquired through foreclosure or deed in
lieu of foreclosure, it is initially recorded at the fair value of the related assets at the date
of foreclosure, less estimated costs to sell the property.
The Corporation works with borrowers to avoid foreclosure if possible and we continue to
aggressively work with borrowers to mitigate additional losses, if it becomes inevitable that a
borrower will not be able to retain ownership of their property, the Corporation often seeks a deed
in lieu of foreclosure in order to gain control of the property earlier in the recovery process.
The strategy of pursuing deeds in lieu of foreclosure should result in a reduction in the holding
period for nonperforming assets and ultimately reduce economic losses.
Deposits totaled $651.8 million at December 31, 2010 a decrease of $8.1 million, or 1.2% from
December 31, 2009. The following table details our deposit portfolio balances and the average rate
paid on our deposit portfolio at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Rate |
|
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
46,597 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
$ |
38,911 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
$ |
7,691 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Interest-bearing demand |
|
|
65,679 |
|
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
70,564 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
(4,885 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
Money market |
|
|
96,294 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
|
96,172 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
Savings |
|
|
38,665 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
36,638 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Certificates of deposit retail |
|
|
392,098 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
|
|
|
385,622 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
|
|
6,476 |
|
|
|
(0.77 |
) |
Certificates of deposit brokered |
|
|
12,483 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
|
|
|
31,995 |
|
|
|
3.19 |
|
|
|
(19,512 |
) |
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
651,816 |
|
|
|
1.38 |
% |
|
$ |
659,902 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
% |
|
$ |
(8,081 |
) |
|
|
(0.51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease was primarily due to decreases in brokered certificates of deposits,
interest-bearing demand accounts and public funds. We continue to focus and implement our
strategy of improving the long-term funding mix of the Banks deposit portfolio by developing core
relationships with small businesses, and adding commercial and retail checking accounts. In 2009,
we implemented a number of organizational and product development initiatives including a new suite
of commercial and small business checking accounts, enhancements to our online business cash
management system, and the launch of remote deposit capture solution. We believe these products
will continue to help us be more competitive for business checking accounts. See Liquidity and
Capital Resources in this MD&A for further discussion on our deposit strategy and additional
liquidity risks.
33
We have reduced the rates offered on some of our accounts and feel we are competitive with current
markets and are planning on strategic growth of core relationships. We also believe that if we
are able to maintain the majority of retail certificates of deposit maturing in 2011 we will
continue to slightly decrease our cost of funds which will help us remain stable and possibly incur
some reduction of costs in 2011. To reduce interest rate risk over the long term, we will increase
our efforts to lengthen the duration of our deposit structure and our FHLB borrowings.
We anticipate continuing to pay down brokered deposits in 2011 which will help maintain the Banks
margin, by growing core deposits. In the future we do not expect to use brokered deposits for
liquidity position but may be used in contingency funding if needed. We acknowledge that brokered
deposits are not core, franchise-enhancing deposits, and we intend to continue our strategy of
improving the long-term funding mix of the Banks deposit portfolio by aggregating small business,
commercial and retail checking accounts.
Advances from the FHLB and other borrowings decreased by $4.4 million, or 4.5%, to a total of $92.9
million at December 31, 2010. The Corporation continues to focus on our strategy of growing and
replacing a portion of these funding sources with core relationship deposits (checking, savings,
money market and CD accounts) in 2011 as they mature. Approximately $12.0 million of advances are
expected to mature in 2011.
Stockholders equity totaled $46.1 million at December 31, 2010, a decrease of $14.4 million, or
23.8% from December 31, 2009. The decrease resulted primarily from a net loss of $14.6 million.
See Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity on page 48 for additional information.
During 2009, management was notified by the FDIC that for Advantage to be categorized as
adequately-capitalized under the regulatory framework the Bank must have Tier 1 leverage to
average assets equating to 8.00%. To be categorized as adequately-capitalized Camco and
Advantage must maintain this minimum capital ratio per the FDIC. At December 31, 2010 the Banks
Tier 1 capital was 5.61%. A failure to comply with the provisions of either agreement could
result in additional enforcement actions by the FDIC, the Division or the FRB.
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
General. Camcos net loss of $14.6 million, or $2.02 per share for the year ended December 31,
2010, compared to a net loss of $11.2 million, or $1.56 per share for the same period in 2009. The
increase in the net loss primarily reflects a decrease in other income related to the valuation of
mortgage servicing rights an increase in general administrative and other expense and a 100%
valuation on our deferred tax asset offset, partially by increased net interest income.
Additionally, Camco continued to increase provisions as high levels of charge-offs continued in
2010. This is reflective of the impact of the distressed commercial real estate values and general
economic conditions.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2010, amounted to $26.4
million, an increase of $2.3 million, or 9.4%, compared to 2009, generally reflecting the effects
of re-pricing of liabilities in the current lower interest rate environment. Net interest margin
increased 59 basis points to 3.50% for the twelve months ending December 31, 2010 compared to 2.91%
for the comparable period in 2009. The increase in net interest margin during the 2010 period,
compared to the same period of 2009, was due primarily to lower volume of interest-bearing
liabilities and a lower cost of interest-bearing liabilities in the 2010 period offset partially by
a lower volume of interest-earning assets and a lower yield on those assets.
Margin pressure has continued in 2010 due to the yield on assets continuing to decline. The loan
portfolio has grown from previous year end and we are currently implementing strategies to continue
the volume and diversification of the loan portfolio. Growth in commercial and consumer loan
balances will support the margin as these types of loans are normally higher-yielding assets than
adjustable rate mortgages.
We have continued with our strategies and offset decreased interest earned by decreasing the
balances of our borrowed funds when applicable. Additionally, we continue to re-price deposits on
a year to year comparison, which helped reduce overall deposit funding costs by 58 basis points
throughout 2010. We also plan to continue to maintain cost of funds by banking our commercial
relationships and retrieving deposits instead of borrowing at higher yields.
34
Interest income on loans totaled $37.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of
$2.6 million, or 6.5%, from the comparable 2009 total. The decrease resulted primarily from a 30
basis point decrease in the average
yield, from 6.02% in 2009, to 5.72% in 2010, coupled with a $10.5 million, or 1.6%, decrease in the
average balance of loans outstanding year to year. Interest income on securities totaled $1.9
million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a $1.2 million, or 38.2%, decrease from the 2009
period. The decrease was due primarily to a $32.5 million, or 42.2%, decrease in the average
balance outstanding, offset partially by a 28 basis point increase in the average yield, to 4.29%
in 2010. Interest income on FHLB stock decreased by $74,000, or 5.4%, due primarily to a 25 basis
point decrease in the average yield, to 4.37% in 2010. Interest income on other interest-bearing
deposits decreased by $21,000, or 77.8%, due primarily to a $31.8 million, or 57.7% decrease in the
average balance outstanding year to year coupled with a 2 basis point decrease in the average yield
to 0.03% in 2010.
Interest expense on deposits totaled $10.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease
of $4.8 million, or 31.1%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. This was due primarily
to a 58 basis point decrease in the average cost of deposits, to 1.74% for 2010, coupled with a
$52.9 million, or 8.0%, decrease in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits outstanding
year to year. Interest expense on borrowings totaled $3.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2010, a decrease of $1.4 million, or 26.4%, from 2009. The decrease resulted primarily from a $24.3
million, or 16.4%, decrease in the average balance outstanding year to year coupled with a 43 basis
point decrease in the average rate to 3.11% in 2010.
Approximately $196.6 million, or 48.6%, of our certificate deposit portfolio will mature during
2011. While this presents an opportunity to continue reducing our cost of funds (as these deposits
are re-pricing into a slightly lower interest rate environment) we continue to experience
competition for deposits in our market areas. This competition is limiting our ability to further
reduce the marginal cost of deposits to a level reflective of the general rate environment.
Continued decreases in interest rates could compress our net interest margin due to continued
re-pricing between our loan and deposit portfolios. At the same time, the loan portfolio has not
grown enough to offset these tighter spreads. As noted earlier, we plan to continue to diversify
the loan portfolio by encouraging growth in commercial and consumer loan balances. This strategy
should slow net interest margin compression as these types of loans are normally higher-yielding
assets than conventional mortgage loans and investment securities.
Provision for Losses on Loans. A provision for losses on loans is charged to earnings to bring the
total allowance for loan losses to a level considered appropriate by management based on historical
experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by the Bank, the status of past due principal
and interest payments, general economic conditions, particularly as such conditions relate to the
Banks market areas, and other factors related to the collectability of the Banks loan portfolio.
Key drivers of the provision are declines in commercial real estate values on existing impaired
loans and loan downgrades. The higher allocation in recent years primarily reflects the impact of
distressed commercial real estate values and general economic conditions on specific reserves for
impaired loans, while the elevated level of charge-offs in the past three years has resulted in
higher loss factors and charge offs related to classified loans. The allowance allocated to the
real estate and consumer loan categories is based upon Camcos allowance methodology for
homogeneous pools of loans. The fluctuations and changes in these allocations are consistent with
the changes in loan quality, loss experience and economic factors in each of the loan categories.
Nonperforming loans (three monthly payments or more delinquent plus nonaccrual loans) totaled $33.8
million at December 31, 2010, a slight increase from $32.8 million from December 31, 2009.
Additionally, net charge offs totaled $18.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared
to $22.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Based upon an analysis of these factors and the continued uncertain economic outlook, we added
$18.5 million to the allowance for losses on loans for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010,
compared to $21.8 million for the same period in 2009. We believe our loans are adequately
reserved for at December 31, 2010. However, there can be no assurance that the loan loss allowance
will be adequate to absorb losses on known classified assets or that the allowance will be adequate
to cover losses in the future, understanding that all lending activity contains associated risks of
loan losses. In addition, the mix and composition of both portfolio loans and nonperforming loans
change from period to period. When the Company analyzes the allowance for loan losses various
ratios are considered. As of December 31, 2010 the ratio of allowance for loan losses to
nonperforming loans increased from the prior year and our loan reserves also increased,
representing 2.46% of total net loans versus 2.38% at December 31, 2009.
35
Other Income. Other income totaled $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease
of $897,000, or 10.9%, compared to 2009. The decrease in other income was primarily attributable to
a $1.3 million decrease in the value of our mortgage servicing rights net offset partially by a
$611,000 increase in gains on sales of loans.
The decrease in mortgage servicing rights net was due to increased volatility in the market, which
in turn increased the prepayment speeds utilized to value the portfolio. At December 31, 2010, we
serviced $485.6 million of one-to-four family residential mortgage loans for others, primarily
Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, which declined slightly from $497.0 million at December 31, 2009.
The increase in gain on sale of loans income for 2010 was due to increased spread on the gain
achieved per loan offset partially be a decrease in loan sales of $19.8 million, or 18.2% compared
to the prior year.
General, Administrative and Other Expense. General, administrative and other expense totaled $29.3
million for the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $1.2 million, or 4.3%, compared to
2009. The increase was due primarily to a $937,000 increase in loan expenses, a $765,000 increase
in real estate owned and other expense and a $482,000 increase in employee compensation and
benefits expense. These increases were offset partially by a decrease of FDIC insurance of
$350,000, and decreases of $244,000 in occupancy and equipment and $265,000 in postage supplies and
offices expense.
The increase in loan expenses relates to legal expenses incurred relating to classified commercial
assets and the costs of various consulting, legal and property management services necessary to
properly assist management in the workout and/or foreclosure process and safeguarding of assets.
Management has spent significant time and resources in workout initiatives for problem loans in
order to mitigate their adverse impact on the balance sheet and operating results.
The increase in real estate owned and other expenses is reflective of falling real estate values
that negatively impacted our portfolio value and caused write down to fair market value on
properties held. In addition, the increase in properties taken into real estate owned due to
foreclosures in 2010 resulted in increased expenses. As noted earlier home values in Ohio have
continued to decline from previous levels. These factors compounded by an uncertain economic
outlook and high unemployment may result in continued expenses going into 2011.
Employee compensation and benefits increased primarily due to normal merit increases, an increase
in incentives related to commercial originations coupled with increased salary continuation and
defined benefit retirement plan costs.
The decrease in FDIC premiums resulted from the non recurrence of certain expenses including the
reorganization of the Deposit Insurance Fund assessment of premiums by the FDIC which was coupled
with increased premium rates which occurred in 2009.
In November 2010, the FDIC issued a final rule to implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that
provide for temporary unlimited coverage for non-interest bearing transaction accounts. The
separate coverage for non-interest bearing transaction accounts became effective on December 31,
2010 and terminates on December 31, 2012.
The decrease in occupancy and equipment was due to decreased depreciation and repairs. The
decreases in postage, supplies and office expenses relates to 2009 including additional incurred
expenses related to the termination of a merger and additional re-advertising of our branches and
brand and re-ordering of pre-printed materials and supplies to regular inventory levels.
Federal Income Taxes. The Federal income taxes totaled $518,000 for the year ended December 31,
2010, an increase of $6.8 million, compared to the benefit provision recorded in 2009. During the
third quarter of 2010, management performed an analysis on its deferred tax assets and determined a
full valuation allowance was necessary. The current year increase reflects a 100% valuation
allowance on the Corporations deferred tax asset. As the Corporation executes plans to return to
profitability, future earnings will benefit from operating loss carry-forwards.
36
A valuation allowance is recognized for a deferred tax asset if, based on the weight of available
evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be
realized. The ultimate realization of
deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in
which those temporary differences become deductible. In making such judgments, significant weight
is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. As a result of the increased credit losses,
the consequence to the Bank resulted in a carry-forward loss position as of December 31, 2010. A
cumulative loss position is considered significant negative evidence in assessing the realization
of a deferred tax asset, which is difficult to overcome. Reversal of the valuation allowance is
possible in the future when the Corporation returns to profitability.
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008
General. Camcos net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009, totaled $11.2 million, a decrease
in loss of $4.1 million, or 26.8%, from the $15.3 million of net loss reported in 2008. The
decrease in the net loss was primarily due to additional expense in 2008 of $6.7 million in
goodwill impairment charges, and additional impairment of $3.4 million in mortgage servicing
rights, and $628,000 of expenses relating to the termination of the First Place Financial
Corporation merger which was offset partially by a $7.0 million increase in the provision for loan
losses and a $1.2 million increase in the federal taxes benefit.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009, amounted to $24.1
million, a decrease of $1.7 million, or 6.5%, compared to 2008, generally reflecting the effects of
a $100.7 million decrease in the average balance of interest earning assets. Net interest margin
increased to 2.91% for the twelve months ending December 31, 2009 compared to 2.77% for the
comparable period in 2008. The increase in net interest margin during the 2009 period, compared to
the same period of 2008, was due, nearly equally, to a lower volume of interest-earning assets and
a lower yield on those assets offset partially by lower volume of interest-bearing liabilities and
a lower cost of interest-bearing liabilities in the 2009 period.
Interest income on loans totaled $40.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of
$10.2 million, or 20.3%, from the comparable 2008 total. The decrease resulted primarily from a 56
basis point decrease in the average yield, from 6.58% in 2008, to 6.02% in 2009, coupled with a
$99.5 million, or 13.0%, decrease in the average balance of loans outstanding year to year.
Interest income on securities totaled $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a $1.3
million, or 29.4%, decrease from the 2008 period. The decrease was due primarily to a $21.3
million, or 21.7%, decrease in the average balance outstanding, coupled with a 44 basis point
decrease in the average yield, to 4.01% in 2009. Interest income on FHLB stock decreased by
$155,000, or 10.1%, due primarily to a 61 basis point decrease in the average yield, to 4.62% in
2009 offset partially by a $543,000 increase in the average balance outstanding year to year.
Interest income on other interest-bearing deposits decreased by $405,000, or 93.8%, due primarily
to a 116 basis point decrease in the average yield, to 0.05% in 2009 offset partially by a $19.5
million, increase in the average balance outstanding year to year.
Interest expense on deposits totaled $15.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease
of $7.4 million, or 32.5%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2008, due primarily to a 99
basis point decrease in the average cost of deposits, to 2.32% for 2009, coupled with a $24.3
million, or 3.5%, decrease in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits outstanding year to
year. Interest expense on borrowings totaled $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a
decrease of $3.0 million, or 36.4%, from 2008. The decrease resulted primarily from a $46.2
million, or 23.8%, decrease in the average balance outstanding year to year coupled with a 70 basis
point decrease in the average rate to 3.54% in 2009.
Provision for Losses on Loans. A provision for losses on loans is charged to earnings to bring the
total allowance for loan losses to a level considered appropriate by management based on historical
experience, the volume and type of lending conducted by the Bank, the status of past due principal
and interest payments, general economic conditions, particularly as such conditions relate to the
Banks market areas, and other factors related to the collectability of the Banks loan portfolio.
Key drivers of the provision are declines in commercial real estate values on existing impaired
loans and loan downgrades. The higher allocation in recent quarters primarily reflects the impact
of distressed commercial real estate values and general economic conditions on specific reserves
for impaired loans, while the elevated level of charge-offs in the fourth quarter and 2009 resulted
in higher loss factors and charge offs related to classified loans. The allowance allocated to the
real estate and consumer loan categories is based upon Camcos allowance methodology for
homogeneous pools of loans. The fluctuations and changes in these allocations are consistent with
the changes in loan quality, loss experience and economic factors in each of the loan categories.
Nonperforming loans (three monthly payments or more delinquent plus nonaccrual loans) totaled $32.8
million at
December 31, 2009, a decrease from $53.5 million from December 31, 2008. Additionally, net charge
offs totaled $21.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $6.6 million, for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
37
Based upon an analysis of these factors and the continued uncertain economic outlook, we added
$21.8 million to the allowance for losses on loans for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009,
compared to $14.8 million for the same period in 2008. We believe our loans are adequately
reserved for at December 31, 2009. However, there can be no assurance that the loan loss allowance
will be adequate to absorb losses on known classified assets or that the allowance will be adequate
to cover losses in the future, understanding that all lending activity contains associated risks of
loan losses. In addition, the mix and composition of both portfolio loans and nonperforming loans
change from period to period. As of December 31, 2009 the ratio of allowance for loan losses to
nonperforming loans increased from the prior year and our loan reserves also increased,
representing 2.38% of total net loans versus 2.04% at December 31, 2008.
Other Income. Other income totaled $8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase
of $4.6 million, or 122.8%, compared to 2008. The increase in other income was primarily
attributable to a $3.3 million increase in the value of our mortgage servicing rights coupled with
a $907,000 increase in gains on sales of loans.
The increase in mortgage servicing rights was due to decreased prepayment speeds. Balances
remained consistent year to year at $497.0 million and $497.4 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008
respectively. The servicing portfolios include one-to-four family residential mortgage loans for
others, which are primarily sold to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.
The increase in gain on sale of loans income for 2009 was due to an increase in loan sales of $63.2
million year to year.
General, Administrative and Other Expense. General, administrative and other expense totaled $28.1
million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $7.1 million, or 20.1%, compared to
2008. The decrease was due primarily to a $6.7 million of expense relating to impairment charges
taken on goodwill coupled with $628,000 in merger and acquisition related charges in 2008. These
decreases were offset partially by an increase of FDIC insurance of $2.1 million in 2009.
The increase in FDIC premiums resulted from increases in premium rates and deposit balances along
with the decreased credits issued in 2008 relating to the reorganization of the Deposit Insurance
Fund assessment of premiums by the FDIC.
Federal Income Taxes. The benefit for Federal income taxes totaled $6.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $1.2 million, compared to the benefit provision recorded in
2008. The effective tax rates amounted to 36.0% and 25.0% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The increase in federal income tax benefit was primarily attributable to tax
credits related to our investment in affordable housing partnerships totaling $571,000 in 2009
compared to $198,000 in 2008. Additionally the tax-exempt character of earnings on bank-owned life
insurance supplements the difference between the effective rate of tax benefits and the statutory
corporate tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
38
AVERAGE BALANCE, YIELD, RATE AND VOLUME DATA
The following table presents for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of interest income
from average interest-earning assets and the resulting yields, and the interest expense on average
interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates, and the net interest margin.
The table does not reflect any effect of income taxes. Balances are based on the average of
month-end balances which, in the opinion of management, do not differ materially from daily
balances. Some items in the prior-year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the
current years presentation, including the reclassification of nonaccrual loans, mortgage servicing
rights and the allowance for loan losses from loans receivable to noninterest-earning assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
earned |
|
|
yield/ |
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
earned |
|
|
yield/ |
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
earned / |
|
|
yield/ |
|
|
|
balance |
|
|
/ paid |
|
|
rate |
|
|
balance |
|
|
/ paid |
|
|
rate |
|
|
balance |
|
|
paid |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable (1) |
|
$ |
657,296 |
|
|
$ |
37,602 |
|
|
|
5.72 |
% |
|
$ |
667,746 |
|
|
$ |
40,231 |
|
|
|
6.02 |
% |
|
$ |
767,202 |
|
|
$ |
50,446 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
% |
Securities (2) |
|
|
44,426 |
|
|
|
1,906 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
% |
|
|
76,886 |
|
|
|
3,085 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
% |
|
|
98,212 |
|
|
|
4,369 |
|
|
|
4.45 |
% |
FHLB Stock |
|
|
29,888 |
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
|
29,888 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
4.62 |
% |
|
|
29,345 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
% |
Interest-bearing deposits and other |
|
|
23,311 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
55,074 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
|
35,610 |
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
754,921 |
|
|
|
40,821 |
|
|
|
5.41 |
% |
|
|
829,594 |
|
|
|
44,724 |
|
|
|
5.39 |
% |
|
|
930,369 |
|
|
|
56,783 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-earning assets (3) |
|
|
89,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Average Assets |
|
$ |
844,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
935,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,024,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
608,933 |
|
|
$ |
10,575 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
$ |
661,806 |
|
|
$ |
15,349 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
% |
|
$ |
686,116 |
|
|
$ |
22,728 |
|
|
|
3.31 |
% |
FHLB advances and other |
|
|
123,899 |
|
|
|
3,859 |
|
|
|
3.11 |
% |
|
|
148,223 |
|
|
|
5,245 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
% |
|
|
194,458 |
|
|
|
8,246 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
732,832 |
|
|
|
14,434 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
% |
|
|
810,029 |
|
|
|
20,594 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
% |
|
|
880,574 |
|
|
|
30,974 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
43,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
13,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Average Liabilities |
|
|
789,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
863,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
939,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Average Shareholders equity |
|
|
55,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/Interest rate spread |
|
$ |
844,744 |
|
|
$ |
26,387 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
% |
|
$ |
935,220 |
|
|
$ |
24,130 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
$ |
1,024,597 |
|
|
$ |
25,809 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.77 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103.01 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105.65 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes loans held for sale. Loan fees are immaterial. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes securities designated as available for sale and held to maturity |
|
(3) |
|
Includes nonaccrual loans, mortgage servicing rights and allowance for
loan losses |
|
(4) |
|
Net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets |
39
Rate/Volume Table
The following table describes the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in the
volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected Camcos interest
income and expense during the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (i) changes in
volume (change in volume multiplied by prior year rate), (ii) changes in rate (change in rate
multiplied by prior year volume) and (iii) total changes in rate and volume. The combined effects
of changes in both volume and rate, that are not separately identified, have been allocated
proportionately to the change due to volume and change due to rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) due to |
|
|
Increase/(decrease) due to |
|
Year ended December 31 |
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable (1) |
|
$ |
(622 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,007 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,629 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,207 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,008 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,215 |
) |
Securities |
|
|
(1,410 |
) |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
(1,179 |
) |
|
|
(885 |
) |
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
(1,284 |
) |
Interest-bearing deposits and other |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
|
|
(560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
(2,044 |
) |
|
|
(1,859 |
) |
|
|
(3,903 |
) |
|
|
(6,527 |
) |
|
|
(5,532 |
) |
|
|
(12,059 |
) |
Interest expense attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
(1,152 |
) |
|
|
(3,622 |
) |
|
|
(4,774 |
) |
|
|
(780 |
) |
|
|
(6,599 |
) |
|
|
(7,379 |
) |
Borrowings |
|
|
(801 |
) |
|
|
(585 |
) |
|
|
(1,386 |
) |
|
|
(1,769 |
) |
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
|
|
(3,001 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest expense |
|
|
(1,953 |
) |
|
|
(4,207 |
) |
|
|
(6,160 |
) |
|
|
(2,549 |
) |
|
|
(7,831 |
) |
|
|
(10,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in net interest income |
|
$ |
(91 |
) |
|
$ |
2,348 |
|
|
$ |
2,257 |
|
|
$ |
(3,978 |
) |
|
$ |
2,299 |
|
|
$ |
(1,679 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes loans held for sale. |
Yields Earned and Rates Paid
The following table sets forth the weighted-average yields earned on Camcos interest-earning
assets, the weighted-average interest rates paid on Camcos interest-bearing liabilities and the
interest rate spread between the weighted-average yields earned and rates paid by Camco at the
dates indicated. This does not reflect the spread that may eventually be achieved in 2011 or
beyond due to possible changes in weighted-average yields earned on interest-earning assets and
paid on interest-bearing liabilities in the upcoming year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average yield on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan portfolio (1) |
|
|
5.62 |
% |
|
|
5.88 |
% |
Investment portfolio (2) |
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
4.34 |
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
Weighted-average rate paid on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
1.38 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
3.17 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread |
|
|
3.93. |
% |
|
|
3.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes loans held for sale and the allowance for loan losses. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes earnings on FHLB stock and investment securities. Taxable
equivalent yield used. |
40
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the Corporations ability to generate adequate cash flows to meet the demands of its
customers and provide adequate flexibility for the Corporation to take advantage of market
opportunities. Cash is used to fund loans, purchase investments, fund the maturity of liabilities,
and at times to fund deposit outflows and operating activities. The Corporations principal sources
of funds are deposits; amortization, prepayments and sales of loans; maturities, sales and
principal receipts from securities; borrowings; and operations. Managing liquidity entails
balancing the need for cash or the ability to borrow against the objectives of maximizing
profitability and minimizing interest rate risk. The most liquid types of assets typically carry
the lowest yields.
Camco is a single bank holding company and its primary ongoing source of liquidity is from
dividends received from the Bank. Such dividends arise from the cash flow and earnings of the
Bank. Ohio statutes impose certain limitations on the payment of dividends and other capital
distributions by banks. Generally, absent approval of the Division, such statutes limit dividend
and capital distributions to earnings of the current and two preceding years. Currently, the
Consent Order prohibits the Bank from paying a dividend to Camco without prior approval of the FDIC
and Division. Camco currently has $5.0 million outstanding trust preferred securities with a
maturity date of 2037. If needed, Camcos agreement regarding these securities provides for a
deferment of interest payment for up to 20 consecutive quarters without default. Based on
notification received from the FRB on April 30, 2009, Camco was required to exercise this provision
to defer interest payments and has deferred a total of seven quarters as of December 31, 2010.
See Note K to the Financial statements in Item 8 below. If the Corporation desires to raise funds
in the future, it may consider engaging in further offerings of preferred securities, debentures or
other borrowings as well as issuance of capital stock, but any such strategic decisions would
require regulatory approval. Further, as a result of entering into the Written Agreement, and MOU
with the FRB on March 4, 2009, we are prohibited from paying dividends to our stockholders without
first obtaining the approval of the FRB. Our ability to pay dividends to stockholders is dependent
on our net earnings. A continued decline in earnings increases in loan losses, or higher regulatory
capital reserve requirements may jeopardize our ability to pay dividends at historical levels.
We monitor and assess liquidity needs daily in order to meet deposit withdrawals, loan commitments
and expenses. Camcos liquidity contingency funding plan identifies liquidity thresholds and red
flags that may evidence liquidity concerns or future crises. The contingency plan details specific
actions to be taken by management and the Board of Directors. It also identifies sources of
emergency liquidity, both asset and liability-based, should we encounter a liquidity crisis. In
conjunction with the Corporations asset/liability and interest rate risk management activities, we
actively monitor liquidity risk and analyze various scenarios that could impact or impair Camcos
ability to access emergency funding during a liquidity crisis.
Liquid assets consist of cash and interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions,
investments and mortgage-backed securities. Approximately $4.4 million, or 13.2%, of our investment
portfolio is expected to mature or prepay during 2011. These maturities could provide a significant
source of liquidity and due to not replacing or pricing public fund deposits and repurchase
agreements our ability to use these funds freely will increase in 2011. State and local political
subdivision deposits equaled $4.2 million at December 31, 2010, and $22.2 million at December 31,
2009. We may implement additional product strategies to lessen this restriction on our investment
portfolio to increase our liquidity options.
Additional sources of liquidity include deposits, borrowings and principal and interest
repayments on loans. While scheduled loan repayments and maturing investments are relatively
predictable, deposit flows and early loan and security prepayments are more influenced by interest
rates, general economic conditions, and competition and are difficult to predict.
41
Diversified and reliable sources of wholesale funds are utilized to augment core deposit
funding. Borrowings may be used on a long or short-term basis to compensate for reduction in other
sources of funds or on a long term basis to support lending activities. The Bank utilizes certain
loans and FHLB stock to provide collateral to support its borrowing needs. However, depositor or
counterparty behavior could change
in response to competition, economic or market situations or other unforeseen circumstances,
which could have liquidity implications that may require different strategic or operational
actions. One source of wholesale funding is brokered deposits. Consistent with its risk management
policy and in response to the general tightening of credit and liquidity conditions in the
financial markets at large, the Bank has utilized brokered deposits. At December 31, 2010, such
deposits totaled approximately $12.3 million, exclusive of CDARS deposits.
Approximately $196.6 million of the Corporations certificate of deposit portfolio is
scheduled to mature during 2011. Depositors continue a preference toward short-term certificates or
other issuances less than 18 months. This places additional liquidity pressure on the Corporation
as competition for deposits is very strong in Ohio, Kentucky and West Virginia. A material loss of
these short-term deposits could force us to seek funding through contingency sources, which may
negatively impact earnings.
FHLB advances are another funding source. In the past, Camco has depended heavily on
borrowings to fund balance sheet growth. While significant strategic and tactical focus is
currently being placed on deposit growth, borrowings and additional borrowing capacity at the FHLB
are still vital sources of liquidity. We have approximately $92.9 million of additional borrowing
capacity available as of December 31, 2010. However, our total borrowing capacity at the FHLB is
dependent on the level of eligible collateral assets held by the Bank and the Banks credit rating
with the FHLB. Our total borrowing capacity with the FHLB increased to $194.6 million at December
31, 2010, from $167.0 million at December 31, 2009. This capacity has increased due to the
additional pledging of our commercial estate and home equity lines of credit. We have improved
off-balance-sheet liquidity in response to higher collateral maintenance requirements.
We plan to continue to monitor our funding sources through brokered deposits and FHLB
borrowings, but recognize that our current credit risk profile may restrict these sources. Our
Funds Management Group will monitor the deposit rates in our markets to allow for competitive
pricing in order to raise funds through deposits.
42
The following table sets forth information regarding the Banks obligations and commitments to make
future payments under contract as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
Less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
|
|
|
|
|
than 1 |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
3-5 |
|
|
than 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Contractual obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
495 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
1,321 |
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
49,044 |
|
|
|
25,553 |
|
|
|
6,337 |
|
|
|
92,934 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
6,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,530 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
195,864 |
|
|
|
156,106 |
|
|
|
52,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,405 |
|
Subordinated debentures(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Ohio Equity Funds for Affordable Housing |
|
|
779 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of commitments per period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to originate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving, open-end lines |
|
|
45,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,069 |
|
1-4 family residential construction |
|
|
13,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,309 |
|
Commercial real estate, other construction loan and land development loans |
|
|
14,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,159 |
|
Commercial real estate, construction, and land development loans not secured by real estate |
|
|
9,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,595 |
|
Other unused commitments |
|
|
9,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,151 |
|
Stand-by letters of credit |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
307,213 |
|
|
$ |
205,849 |
|
|
$ |
78,716 |
|
|
$ |
11,502 |
|
|
$ |
603,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The subordinated debentures are redeemable at par, at Camcos option, commencing September 15, 2012. The debentures mature on September 15, 2037. |
We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds available to meet our current loan
commitments. Based upon historical deposit flow data, the Banks competitive pricing in its market
and managements experience, we believe that a significant portion of our core maturing
certificates of deposit in 2011 will remain with the Bank, but recognize the significance of the
risks discussed above.
Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term management process. In the event that we should
require funds beyond our ability to generate them internally, additional funds are available
through the use of FHLB advances, internet deposits, and through the sales of loans and/or
securities.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We engage in off-balance sheet credit-related activities that could require us to make cash
payments in the event that specified future events occur. The contractual amounts of these
activities represent the maximum exposure to the Bank (as further described in financial statement
footnote Note J Commitments). However, certain off-balance sheet commitments are expected to
expire or be only partially used; therefore, the total amount of commitments does not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. These off-balance sheet activities are necessary to meet the
financing needs of the Banks customers.
43
|
|
|
Item 8. |
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. |
Managements Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
Management of the Corporation is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting,
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
that is designed to produce reliable financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. The Companys internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records
that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition,
use or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
The system of internal control
over financial reporting as it relates to the financial statements is evaluated for effectiveness
by management and tested for reliability through a program of internal audits. Actions are taken
to correct potential deficiencies as they are identified. Any system of internal control, no
matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the possibility that a control can
be circumvented or overridden, and misstatements resulting from error or fraud may occur and not
be detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over
time. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control will provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.
The Companys management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Accounting Officer, assessed the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in
Internal ControlIntegrated
Framework. Based on the assessment, management believes that the Companys internal control
over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Camco Financial Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial condition of Camco Financial
Corporation as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Corporations management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The
Corporation is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Corporations internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Camco Financial Corporation as of December 31,
2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note K, the Corporations bank subsidiary is not in compliance with revised minimum
regulatory capital requirements under a formal regulatory agreement with the banking regulators.
Failure to comply with the regulatory agreement may result in additional regulatory enforcement
actions.
/s/Plante & Moran PLLC
March 29, 2011
Columbus, Ohio
44
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
December 31,
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
13,143 |
|
|
$ |
20,490 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions |
|
|
15,971 |
|
|
|
17,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
29,114 |
|
|
|
38,153 |
|
Securities available-for-sale, at market |
|
|
30,768 |
|
|
|
55,950 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity, at cost |
|
|
3,948 |
|
|
|
2,113 |
|
Loans held for sale at lower of cost or market |
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
Loans receivable net |
|
|
667,840 |
|
|
|
659,022 |
|
Office premises and equipment net |
|
|
9,928 |
|
|
|
10,870 |
|
Real estate acquired through foreclosure |
|
|
10,096 |
|
|
|
9,660 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock at cost |
|
|
29,888 |
|
|
|
29,888 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
3,521 |
|
|
|
3,979 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights at lower of cost or market |
|
|
3,841 |
|
|
|
4,433 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
4,426 |
|
|
|
5,712 |
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
|
19,388 |
|
|
|
18,838 |
|
Prepaid and refundable federal income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
814,966 |
|
|
$ |
842,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
651,816 |
|
|
$ |
659,902 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
11,530 |
|
|
|
11,941 |
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
|
92,934 |
|
|
|
97,291 |
|
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
10,170 |
|
|
|
11,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
768,863 |
|
|
|
782,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock $1 par value; authorized 100,000 shares; no shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $1 par value; authorized 14,900,000 shares; 8,884,508 shares issued at December 31, 2010 and 2009 |
|
$ |
8,885 |
|
|
$ |
8,885 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
60,260 |
|
|
|
60,124 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
14,695 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
Unearned compensation |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
Treasury stock - 1,678,913 shares at December 31, 2010 and 2009, at cost |
|
|
(24,114 |
) |
|
|
(24,114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
46,103 |
|
|
|
60,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
814,966 |
|
|
$ |
842,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest and dividend income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
37,602 |
|
|
$ |
40,231 |
|
|
$ |
50,446 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
1,906 |
|
|
|
3,085 |
|
|
|
4,369 |
|
Other interest-bearing accounts |
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
|
1,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
40,821 |
|
|
|
44,724 |
|
|
|
56,783 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
10,575 |
|
|
|
15,349 |
|
|
|
22,728 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
3,859 |
|
|
|
5,245 |
|
|
|
8,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
14,434 |
|
|
|
20,594 |
|
|
|
30,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
26,387 |
|
|
|
24,130 |
|
|
|
25,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for losses on loans |
|
|
18,460 |
|
|
|
21,792 |
|
|
|
14,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for losses on loans |
|
|
7,927 |
|
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
|
11,016 |
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent and other |
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
Title fees |
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
Loan servicing fees |
|
|
1,269 |
|
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
1,308 |
|
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
1,882 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights net |
|
|
(593 |
) |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
(2,625 |
) |
Service charges and other fees on deposits |
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
|
2,387 |
|
Gain on sale of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Gain on sale of premises and equipment |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Income on cash surrender value life insurance |
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
926 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
7,364 |
|
|
|
8,261 |
|
|
|
3,708 |
|
General, administrative and other expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits |
|
|
12,935 |
|
|
|
12,453 |
|
|
|
13,279 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
3,247 |
|
|
|
3,374 |
|
Federal deposit insurance premiums |
|
|
2,121 |
|
|
|
2,471 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
1,127 |
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
Advertising |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
Franchise taxes |
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
Postage, supplies and office expenses |
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
Travel, training and insurance |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
1,981 |
|
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
Transaction processing |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
Real estate owned and other expenses |
|
|
3,077 |
|
|
|
2,312 |
|
|
|
2,074 |
|
Loan expenses |
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
1,319 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,683 |
|
Merger expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general, administrative and other expense |
|
|
29,332 |
|
|
|
28,113 |
|
|
|
35,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before federal income taxes |
|
|
(14,041 |
) |
|
|
(17,514 |
) |
|
|
(20,440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income taxes |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
(6,297 |
) |
|
|
(5,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS |
|
|
(14,559 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,217 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(2.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(2.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(14,559 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,217 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,324 |
) |
Other comprehensive income net of tax effects: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities during the year,
net of taxes of $(10), $11 and $536 in 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in operations,
net of taxes of $0, $0 and $1 for the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(14,578 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,196 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Common |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
stockholders |
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
stock |
|
|
capital |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
compensation |
|
|
stock |
|
|
equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
|
7,155,595 |
|
|
$ |
8,835 |
|
|
$ |
59,842 |
|
|
$ |
44,083 |
|
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(24,114 |
) |
|
$ |
88,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared $0.02625 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,872 |
) |
Stock Option Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,324 |
) |
Change in accounting split dollar life insurance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(832 |
) |
Unrealized gains on securities designated as
available for sale, net of related tax benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
7,155,595 |
|
|
$ |
8,835 |
|
|
$ |
59,896 |
|
|
$ |
26,055 |
|
|
$ |
1,028 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(24,114 |
) |
|
$ |
71,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared $0.02 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
Stock Option Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153 |
|
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,217 |
) |
Restricted shares granted |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains of securities designated as
available for sale, net of related tax benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
7,205,595 |
|
|
$ |
8,885 |
|
|
$ |
60,124 |
|
|
$ |
14,695 |
|
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
|
$ |
(125 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,114 |
) |
|
$ |
60,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,559 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,559 |
) |
Restricted shares expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Unrealized losses of securities designated as
available for sale, net of related tax benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
7,205,595 |
|
|
$ |
8,885 |
|
|
$ |
60,260 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
1,030 |
|
|
$ |
(94 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,114 |
) |
|
$ |
46,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year |
|
$ |
(14,559 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,217 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,324 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of premiums and discounts on investment and
mortgage-backed securities net |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights net |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
3,229 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
Stock option, restricted stock expenses |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Deferred federal income taxes |
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
(2,373 |
) |
|
|
(4,403 |
) |
Provision for losses on loans |
|
|
18,460 |
|
|
|
21,792 |
|
|
|
14,793 |
|
Amortization of deferred loan origination fees |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
Loss and provision on real estate acquired through foreclosure |
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
1,364 |
|
Gain on sale of investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Gain on sale of premises and equipment, net |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,166 |
) |
Net increase in cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
(825 |
) |
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
(1,882 |
) |
|
|
(1,271 |
) |
|
|
(364 |
) |
Loans originated for sale in the secondary market |
|
|
(90,430 |
) |
|
|
(106,771 |
) |
|
|
(44,346 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans in the secondary market |
|
|
90,579 |
|
|
|
109,752 |
|
|
|
45,694 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,683 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash, due to changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
4,041 |
|
|
|
3,315 |
|
|
|
(1,388 |
) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
(928 |
) |
|
|
(5,731 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
9,662 |
|
|
|
10,185 |
|
|
|
9,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investment securities designated as available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,254 |
|
Purchase of securities designated as available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,019 |
) |
|
|
(50,175 |
) |
Purchase of securities designated as held to maturity |
|
|
(2,159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,104 |
) |
Principal repayments and maturities of investment-securities held to maturity |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
11,333 |
|
|
|
13,513 |
|
Principal repayments and maturities of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
25,146 |
|
|
|
56,432 |
|
|
|
50,962 |
|
Net (increase)decrease in loans |
|
|
(33,321 |
) |
|
|
66,086 |
|
|
|
31,100 |
|
Purchase of premises and equipment |
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
(476 |
) |
|
|
(366 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of office premises and equipment |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Proceeds from sale of real estate acquired through foreclosure |
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
4,025 |
|
|
|
3,825 |
|
Proceeds from surrender of life insurance |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
4,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(6,351 |
) |
|
|
115,030 |
|
|
|
29,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating and investing
activities (balance carried forward) |
|
$ |
3,311 |
|
|
$ |
125,215 |
|
|
$ |
38,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net cash provided by operating and investing
activities (balance brought forward) |
|
$ |
3,311 |
|
|
$ |
125,215 |
|
|
$ |
38,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits |
|
|
(8,086 |
) |
|
|
(64,054 |
) |
|
|
31,772 |
|
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
84,000 |
|
|
|
44,000 |
|
|
|
79,600 |
|
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(88,357 |
) |
|
|
(113,815 |
) |
|
|
(111,558 |
) |
Net change in repurchase agreements and other borrowings |
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
(4,786 |
) |
|
|
(5,190 |
) |
Dividends paid on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(2,953 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
(549 |
) |
|
|
(1,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(12,350 |
) |
|
|
(139,347 |
) |
|
|
(9,498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(9,039 |
) |
|
|
(14,132 |
) |
|
|
29,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
38,153 |
|
|
|
52,285 |
|
|
|
23,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
29,114 |
|
|
$ |
38,153 |
|
|
$ |
52,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits and borrowings |
|
$ |
14,457 |
|
|
$ |
20,726 |
|
|
$ |
30,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers from loans to real estate acquired through foreclosure |
|
$ |
5,991 |
|
|
$ |
9,631 |
|
|
$ |
6,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE A SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Camco Financial Corporation (Camco or the Corporation) is a bank holding company whose
business activities are limited primarily to holding the common stock of Advantage Bank
(Advantage or the Bank) and Camco Title Agency (Camco Title). Advantage conducts a general
banking business within Ohio, West Virginia and northern Kentucky which consists of attracting
deposits from the general public and applying those funds to the origination of loans for
residential, consumer and nonresidential purposes. Advantages profitability is significantly
dependent on net interest income, which is the difference between interest income generated from
interest-earning assets (i.e. loans and investments) and the interest expense paid on
interest-bearing liabilities (i.e. customer deposits and borrowed funds). Net interest income is
affected by the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and
the interest received or paid on these balances. The level of interest rates paid or received by
Advantage can be significantly influenced by a number of factors, such as governmental monetary
policy, that are outside of managements control. Camco Title provides title insurance, title
services, and loan closing services primarily for Advantage. In 2011, Camco will be liquidating
its investment in Camco Title. The balance sheet and results of operations of Camco Title are
not material to the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial information presented herein has been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) and
general accounting practices within the financial services industry. In preparing financial
statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from such estimates.
The following is a summary of the Corporations significant accounting policies which have been
consistently applied in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. Some items in the prior-year financial statements were reclassified to
conform to the current years presentation.
1. Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated.
2. Investment Securities
Investment securities are classified as held to maturity or available for sale upon acquisition.
Securities classified as held to maturity are carried at cost only if the Corporation has the
positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity. Securities designated as
available for sale are carried at fair value with resulting unrealized gains or losses recorded
to stockholders equity. Realized gains and losses on sales of securities are recognized on the
trade date using the specific identification method. In estimating other-than-temporary
impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair
value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer,
and (3) the intent and ability of the Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a
period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
3. Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Cincinnati. Members are required to
own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may invest
in additional amounts. FHLB stock is classified as restricted stock and is recorded at
redemption value which approximates fair value. The Corporation periodically evaluates the stock
for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value.
51
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE A SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued).
4. Loans Receivable
Loans held in the portfolio are stated at the principal amount outstanding, adjusted for deferred
loan origination fees and costs and the allowance for loan losses.
The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued at the time the loan is three monthly payments
delinquent unless the credit is well secured and in the process of collection. In all cases,
loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or
interest is considered doubtful. Uncollectible interest on loans that are contractually past due
is charged off, or an allowance is established based on managements periodic evaluation. The
allowance is established by a charge to interest income equal to all interest previously accrued
and not received, and income is not recognized until, in managements judgment, the borrowers
ability to make periodic interest and principal payments has returned to normal, in which case
the loan is returned to accrual status.
Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost (less principal payments received) or fair
value (market value), calculated on an aggregate basis. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, loans
held for sale were carried at cost.
5. Loan Origination and Commitment Fees
Currently, the Corporation accounts for loan origination fees and costs by deferring all loan
origination fees received, net of certain direct origination costs, on a loan-by-loan basis and
amortizing the interest income using the interest method, giving effect to actual loan
prepayments. Fees received for loan commitments are deferred and amortized over the life of the
related loan using the interest method.
6. Allowance for Loan Losses
It is the Corporations policy to provide valuation allowances for estimated losses on loans
based upon past loss experience, current trends in the level of delinquent and problem loans,
adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay, the estimated value of any
underlying collateral and current economic conditions in the Banks primary market areas. When
the collection of a loan becomes doubtful, or otherwise troubled, the Corporation records a
charge-off or an allowance equal to the difference between the fair value of the property
securing the loan and the loans carrying value. Such provision is based on managements
estimate of the fair value of the underlying collateral, taking into consideration the current
and currently anticipated future operating or sales conditions. As a result, such estimates are
particularly susceptible to changes that could result in a material adjustment to results of
operations in the near term. Recovery of the carrying value of such loans is dependent to a
great extent on economic, operating, and other conditions that may be beyond the Corporations
control.
The Corporation accounts for impaired loans by measurements based upon the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate or, as an
alternative, at the loans observable market price or fair value of the collateral.
A loan is defined as impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that
a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the
loan agreement. In applying the provisions, the Corporation considers its investment in
owner-occupied one- to four-family residential loans, home equity lines of credit and consumer
installment loans to be homogeneous and therefore excluded from separate identification for
evaluation of impairment. With respect to the Corporations investment in multi-family,
non-owner occupied residential, commercial and nonresidential loans, and its evaluation of any
impairment thereon, such loans are generally collateral-dependent and as a result are carried as a practical
expedient at the lower of cost or fair value. It is the Corporations policy to charge off
unsecured credits that are more than ninety days delinquent.
52
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTEA SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued).
7. Real Estate Acquired Through Foreclosure
Real estate acquired through foreclosure is carried at the lower of the loans unpaid principal
balance (cost) or fair value less estimated selling expenses at the date of acquisition. Real
estate loss provisions are recorded if the fair value of the property subsequently declines below
the amount determined at the recording date. In determining the lower of cost or fair value at
acquisition, costs relating to development and improvement of property are capitalized. Costs
relating to holding real estate acquired through foreclosure, net of rental income, are charged
against earnings as incurred.
8. Office Premises and Equipment
Office premises and equipment are carried at cost and include expenditures which extend the
useful lives of existing assets. Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are expensed as
incurred. For financial reporting, depreciation and amortization are provided on the
straight-line method over the useful lives of the assets, estimated to be ten to fifty years for
buildings and improvements and three to twenty-five years for furniture, fixtures and equipment.
An accelerated depreciation method is used for tax reporting purposes.
9. Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Corporation accounts for mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) as separate assets. Mortgage
servicing rights result from the origination of mortgage loans and the subsequent sale of those
loans with servicing rights retained. At that time, an allocation of the cost of the loan is
considered the mortgage servicing right asset.
The Corporation assesses the rights for impairment quarterly. Impairment is measured based on
fair value. The mortgage servicing rights recorded by the Bank are segregated into pools for
valuation purposes, using as pooling criteria the loan term and coupon rate.
To determine the fair value of the MSRs each reporting quarter, information is transmitted to a
third party provider who assists in determining the fair value of MSRs, as described below.
Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when loans are sold with servicing retained.
A pooling methodology to the servicing valuation, in which loans with similar characteristics are
pooled together, is applied for valuation purposes. Once pooled, each grouping of loans is
evaluated on a discounted earnings basis to determine the present value of future earnings that a
purchaser could expect to realize from the portfolio. Earnings are projected from a variety of
sources including loan service fees, interest earned on float, net interest earned on escrow
balances, miscellaneous income and costs to service the loans. The present value of future
earnings is the estimated market value for the pool, calculated using consensus assumptions that
a third party purchaser would utilize in evaluating a potential acquisition of the servicing.
Events that may significantly affect the
53
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTEA SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued).
9. Mortgage Servicing Rights (continued)
estimates used are changes in interest rates and the
related impact on mortgage loan prepayment speeds and the payment performance of the underlying loans. The interest rate for float is also calculated
utilizing the current period fed funds rate. Mortgage loan prepayment speeds are calculated by
taking into consideration Advantage Banks historical trends when estimating prepayment speeds
and helped provide scenarios with each evaluation. Based on the assumptions, pre-tax projections
are prepared for each pool of loans serviced. These earning figures approximate the cash flow
that could be received from the servicing portfolio. Valuation results are presented quarterly
to management. At that time, the information is reviewed and MSRs are marked to the lower of
amortized cost or fair value for the current quarter.
The Corporation recorded capitalization related to mortgage servicing rights totaling
approximately $1.0 million, $1.2 million and $604,000, for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Corporation recorded amortization related to mortgage servicing rights totaling approximately
$1.6 million, $360,000 and $3.3 million, for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The carrying value of the Corporations mortgage servicing rights, which
approximated their fair value, totaled approximately $3.8 million and $4.4 million at December
31, 2010 and 2009 respectively. Fair value was determined using discount rates ranging from 7.5%
to 9.0% in 2010 and 2009, and prepayment speeds ranging from 6.0% to 33.6% in 2010 and from 6.0%
to 31.4% in 2009.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Bank was servicing mortgage loans of approximately $485.6
million and $497.0 million, respectively, which were sold to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation, Federal National Mortgage Association and other investors.
10. Goodwill
In prior years, the Corporation expanded through mergers and acquisitions accounted for under the
purchase method of accounting. Under the purchase method, the Corporation is required to
allocate the cost of an acquired company to the assets acquired, including identified intangible
assets, and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition.
The excess cost over the net assets acquired represents goodwill.
Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment when indicators of impairment exist, or at
least annually. Potential goodwill impairment exists when the fair value of the reporting unit
(as defined by US GAAP) is less than its carrying value. In 2008, the goodwill was determined
to be impaired and was written off through the income statement.
54
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTEA SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued).
11. Federal Income Taxes
Income taxes are provided based on the liability method of accounting, which includes the
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the temporary differences between carrying
amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. In general,
the Corporation records deferred tax assets when the event giving rise to the tax benefit has
been recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
A valuation allowance is recognized to reduce any deferred tax assets that, based upon available
information, it is more-likely-than-not all, or any portion, of the deferred tax asset will not
be realized. Assessing the need for, and amount of, a valuation allowance for deferred tax
assets requires significant judgment and analysis of evidence regarding realization of the
deferred tax assets. In most cases, the realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the
Corporation generating a sufficient level of taxable income in future periods, which can be
difficult to predict. In 2010, the Corporation recorded a full valuation allowance against the
net deferral tax asset.
The calculation of tax liabilities is complex and requires the use of estimates and judgment
since it involves the application of complex tax laws that are subject to different
interpretations by the Corporation and the various tax authorities. These interpretations are
subject to challenge by the tax authorities upon audit or to reinterpretation based on
managements ongoing assessment of facts and evolving case law.
From time-to-time and in the ordinary course of business, the Corporation is involved in
inquiries and reviews by tax authorities that normally require management to provide supplemental
information to support certain tax positions taken in the tax returns. Uncertain tax positions
are initially recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position
will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Management believes it has taken
appropriate positions on its tax returns, although the ultimate outcome of any tax review cannot
be predicted with certainty. Still, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these
matters will not be different than what is reflected in the current and historical financial
statements.
55
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTEA SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued).
12. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed based upon the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share is computed
including the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under outstanding
stock options. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is not computed for periods in which an
operating loss is sustained. The computations were as follows for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended
(in thousands, except per share information) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(14,559 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,217 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
7,206 |
|
|
|
7,202 |
|
|
|
7,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share Basic |
|
$ |
(2.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(14,559 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,217 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
7,206 |
|
|
|
7,202 |
|
|
|
7,156 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common shares and dilutive potential common shares |
|
|
7,206 |
|
|
|
7,202 |
|
|
|
7,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(2.02 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.56 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 463,642, 260,833 and 260,703 shares of common stock at December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for
those years because of the loss incurred.
13. Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and due from banks and interest-bearing deposits in
other financial institutions with original maturities of three months or less.
14. Advertising
Advertising costs are expensed when incurred.
56
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTEA SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued).
15. New Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310), Disclosures about the Credit
Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. This ASU requires a greater
level of disaggregated information about the credit quality of loan and leases and the allowance
for loan and lease losses. This ASU also requires additional disclosures related to past due
information, credit quality indicators and information related to loans modified in a troubled
debt restructuring. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or
after December 15, 2010. We adopted this statement effective December 31, 2010.
In January 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) 2011-01, Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt
Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20, which temporarily delays the effective date for public
entities of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) in ASU 2010-20,
Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit
Losses. The deferral will allow the FASB to complete its deliberations on what constitutes a TDR,
and to coordinate the effective dates of the new disclosures about TDRs for public entities in
ASU 2010-20 and the guidance for determining what constitutes a TDR. We do not expect the
adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
16. Reclassifications
Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current
presentation.
57
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTE B |
|
INVESTMENT SECURITIES |
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and estimated fair values of
investment securities at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises |
|
$ |
2,010 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,065 |
|
Corporate equity securities |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
27,040 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale |
|
$ |
29,207 |
|
|
$ |
1,620 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
30,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
2,608 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
2,604 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities held to maturity |
|
$ |
3,948 |
|
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
3,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises |
|
$ |
14,514 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
14,564 |
|
Corporate equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
39,690 |
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
41,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale |
|
$ |
54,361 |
|
|
$ |
1,697 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
55,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
501 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
558 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
1,612 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities held to maturity |
|
$ |
2,113 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
2,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTEB |
|
INVESTMENT SECURITIES (continued). |
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities at December 31, 2010 by
contractual term to maturity are shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale |
|
|
Held to Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
fair |
|
|
|
cost |
|
|
value |
|
|
cost |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
2,608 |
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
27.040 |
|
|
|
28,605 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate equity securities |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
29,207 |
|
|
$ |
30,768 |
|
|
$ |
3,948 |
|
|
$ |
3,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008, totaled $0, $0 and $4.3 million respectively, resulting in gross realized gains of $0, $0
and $2,000 in those respective years.
59
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTEB |
|
INVESTMENT SECURITIES (continued). |
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, there were $2.3 million and $5.2 million securities in an
unrealized loss position less than twelve months and $11.1 million and $520,000 securities in an
unrealized loss position more than twelve months, respectively. The table below indicates the
length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at
December 31, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
More than 12 months |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate equity securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
Held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,112 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
More than 12 months |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
losses |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises |
|
|
4,976 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate equity securities |
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,089 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
567 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management has the intent and ability to hold these securities for the foreseeable future
and the decline in the fair value is primarily due to an increase in market interest rates. The
fair values are expected to recover as securities approach maturity dates.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, approximately $13.9 million and $34.0 million, respectively, of
investment securities were pledged in accordance with federal and state requirements to secure
deposits and repurchase agreements.
60
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTEC |
|
LOANS RECEIVABLE |
Loans receivable at December 31 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Construction |
|
$ |
26,530 |
|
|
$ |
5,798 |
|
Land, Farmland, Agriculture |
|
|
12,454 |
|
|
|
23,867 |
|
Residential |
|
|
375,583 |
|
|
|
434,367 |
|
Commercial / Non-residential |
|
|
163,951 |
|
|
|
135,371 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
3,828 |
|
|
|
4,068 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
28,943 |
|
|
|
25,668 |
|
Multi Family |
|
|
74,342 |
|
|
|
46,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
685,631 |
|
|
|
675,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized yield adjustments |
|
|
(921 |
) |
|
|
(156 |
) |
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(16,870 |
) |
|
|
(16,099 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable net |
|
$ |
667,840 |
|
|
$ |
659,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank, in the ordinary course of business, has granted loans to certain of its directors,
executive officers, and their related interests. Such loans are made on the same terms, including
interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with
unrelated persons and do not involve more than normal risk of collectability. The aggregate dollar
amount of these loans totaled approximately $663,000 and $691,000 at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. During 2010, no related party loans were made and repayments totaled $28,000.
|
|
|
NOTED |
|
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES |
The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established through a provision which is charged to
expense and represents managements best estimate of probable losses that could be incurred within
the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses
and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The Corporations allowance for possible loan loss
methodology is based on historical loss experience by type of credit and internal risk grade,
specific homogeneous risk pools and specific loss allocations, with adjustments for current events
and conditions. The provision for possible loan losses reflects loan quality trends, including the
levels of and trends related to non-accrual loans, past due loans, potential problem loans,
criticized loans and net charge-offs or recoveries, among other factors. The amount of the
provision reflects not only the necessary allowance for possible loan losses related to newly
identified criticized loans, but it also reflects actions taken related to other loans including,
among other things, any necessary increases or decreases in required allowances for specific loans
or loan pools.
61
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The current level of the allowance is directionally consistent with classified assets, non-accrual
and delinquency. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the
ultimate adequacy of the allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond the Corporations
control, including, among other things, the performance of the Corporations loan portfolio, the
economy, changes in interest rates and comments of the regulatory authorities toward loan
classifications.
The Corporations allowance for possible loan losses consists of three elements: (i) specific
valuation allowances on probable losses on specific loans; (ii) historical valuation allowances
based on historical loan loss experience for similar loans with similar characteristics and trends,
adjusted, as necessary, to reflect the impact of current conditions; and (iii) general valuation
allowances based on general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal
and external to the Corporation.
Loans identified as losses by management, internal loan review and/or bank examiners are
charged-off. Furthermore, consumer loan accounts are charged-off automatically based on regulatory
requirements.
Change in the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi- |
|
|
Land, Farm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands) |
|
Construction |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Family |
|
|
& Ag Loans |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
Residential |
|
|
C&I |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
338 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
628 |
|
|
$ |
10,519 |
|
|
$ |
3,148 |
|
|
$ |
637 |
|
|
$ |
16,099 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(482 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(1,535 |
) |
|
|
(2,283 |
) |
|
|
(7,530 |
) |
|
|
(3,688 |
) |
|
|
(3,399 |
) |
|
|
(18,945 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
Provision |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
3,561 |
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
4,571 |
|
|
|
4,021 |
|
|
|
3,612 |
|
|
|
18,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
2,860 |
|
|
$ |
849 |
|
|
$ |
8,050 |
|
|
$ |
3,638 |
|
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
|
$ |
16,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
1,171 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
1,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
166 |
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
2,860 |
|
|
$ |
849 |
|
|
$ |
7,794 |
|
|
$ |
2,467 |
|
|
$ |
891 |
|
|
$ |
15,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio balances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
26,530 |
|
|
$ |
3,828 |
|
|
$ |
71,162 |
|
|
$ |
10,905 |
|
|
$ |
369,755 |
|
|
$ |
155,326 |
|
|
$ |
27,607 |
|
|
$ |
665,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With no related allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,180 |
|
|
|
1,549 |
|
|
|
3,122 |
|
|
|
4,122 |
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
12,679 |
|
With related allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
4,503 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
7,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
26,530 |
|
|
$ |
3,828 |
|
|
$ |
74,342 |
|
|
$ |
12,454 |
|
|
$ |
375,583 |
|
|
$ |
163,951 |
|
|
$ |
28,943 |
|
|
$ |
685,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows for the previous two
years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
15,747 |
|
|
$ |
6,623 |
|
Provision for losses on loans |
|
|
21,792 |
|
|
|
14,793 |
|
Charge-offs of loans |
|
|
(22,546 |
) |
|
|
(6,567 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
16,099 |
|
|
$ |
15,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Non-accrual and Past Due Loans. Loans are considered past due if the required principal and
interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Loans are placed
on non-accrual status when, the loan is three payments past due as well as when required by
regulatory provisions. Loans may be placed on non-accrual status regardless of whether or not
such loans are considered past due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued
interest is reversed. Interest income is recognized when the loan is returned to accrual status
and all the principal and interest amounts contractually due is brought current for a minimum of
six months or future payments are reasonably assured.
Non accrual loans, segregated by class of loans at December 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
$ |
1,791 |
|
Land, Farmland, Agriculture |
|
|
|
|
Residential / prime |
|
|
6,776 |
|
Residential / subprime |
|
|
14,722 |
|
Commercial / Non-residential |
|
|
7,717 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
39 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
706 |
|
Multi Family |
|
|
2,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
33,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual and nonperforming loans totaled approximately $33.8 million, $36.4 million and $53.5
million at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest income that would have been
recognized had such nonaccrual loans performed pursuant to contractual terms totaled
approximately $2.2 million, $2.1 million and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
An age analysis of past due loans, segregated by class of loans, as of December 31, 2010 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 89 or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing |
|
|
|
Loans 30- |
|
|
More |
|
|
Loans 90+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 90 |
|
|
|
59 Days |
|
|
Days Past |
|
|
Days Past |
|
|
Total Past |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Days Past |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Past Due |
|
|
Due |
|
|
Due |
|
|
Due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Due |
|
Construction |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,057 |
|
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
|
$ |
25,398 |
|
|
$ |
26,530 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,454 |
|
|
|
12,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential / prime |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
6,333 |
|
|
|
280,266 |
|
|
|
286,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential / subprime |
|
|
5,077 |
|
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
11,119 |
|
|
|
17,647 |
|
|
|
71,337 |
|
|
|
88,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,766 |
|
|
|
3,301 |
|
|
|
6,067 |
|
|
|
157,884 |
|
|
|
163,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
3,771 |
|
|
|
3,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
28,152 |
|
|
|
28,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
Multi Family |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
|
72,572 |
|
|
|
74,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,982 |
|
|
$ |
4,563 |
|
|
$ |
23,252 |
|
|
$ |
33,797 |
|
|
$ |
651,834 |
|
|
$ |
685,631 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Impaired loans. Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it
is probable the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the
original contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled principal and interest
payments. Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of a similar nature and on
an individual loan basis for other larger commercial credits. If a loan is impaired, a specific
valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, of collateral
if payment is expected solely from the collateral or at the present value of estimated future
cash flows using the loans existing rate or at the loans fair sale value. Interest payments on
impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount
is reasonably assured in which case interest is recognized on an accrual basis. Impaired loans
or portions of loans are charged off when deemed uncollectible.
We have included the following information with respect to impairment measurements relating to
collateral-dependent loans for better understanding of our process and procedures relating to
fair value of financial instruments:
|
|
|
Based on policy, a loan is typically deemed impaired (nonperforming) once it has gone
over three payments or 90 days delinquent. Our management of the troubled credit will vary
as will the timing of valuations, loan loss provision and charge offs based on a multitude
of factors such as, cash flow of the business/borrower, responsiveness of the borrower,
communication with the commercial banker, property inspections, property deterioration, and
delinquency. Typically, a nonperforming, non-homogeneous collateral dependent loan will be
valued and adjusted (if needed) within a 90 day period after determination of impairment.
If impaired, the collateral is then evaluated and an updated appraisal is most typically
ordered. Upon receipt of an appraisal or other valuation, we complete an analysis to
determine if the impaired loan requires a specific reserve or to be charged down to
estimated net realizable value. The time frame may be as short as 30 days or as much as 180
days, when an appraisal is ordered. |
|
|
|
Camcos credit risk management process consistently monitors key performance metrics
across both the performing and non performing assets to identify any further degradation of
credit quality. Additionally, impaired credits are monitored in weekly loan committee asset
quality discussions, monthly Asset Classification Committee meetings and quarterly loan loss
reserve reviews. Strategy documents and exposure projections are completed on a monthly basis to
ensure that the current status of the troubled asset is clearly understood and reported. |
|
|
|
The Asset Classification Committee oversees the management of all impaired loans and any
subsequent loss provision or chargeoff that is considered. When a loan is deemed impaired, the
valuation is obtained to determine any existing loss that may be present as of the valuation
date. Policy dictates that any differences from fair market value, less costs to sell, are to be
recognized as loss during the current period (loan loss provision or chargeoff). Any deviations
from this policy will be identified by amount and contributing reasons for the policy departure
during our quarterly reporting process. |
|
|
|
Camcos policies dictate that an impaired loan subject to partial chargeoff will remain
in a nonperforming status until it is brought current. Typically, this occurs when a loan is
paid current and completes a period on on-time payments that demonstrate that the loan can
perform. Camco monitors through various system reports any loan whose terms have been modified.
These reports identify troubled debt restructures, modification, and renewals. |
|
|
|
When circumstances do not allow for updated collateral or Camco determines that an
appraisal is not needed, the underlying collaterals fair market value is estimated in the
following ways: |
|
|
|
Camco personnel property inspections combined with original appraisal
review |
|
|
|
|
Auditor values |
|
|
|
|
Broker price opinions |
|
|
|
|
Various on-line fair market value estimations programs (i.e. Freddie Mac,
Fannie Mae, etc). |
64
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Year-end impaired loans are set forth in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Income |
|
2010 |
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Recognized |
|
With no related allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
$ |
1,549 |
|
|
$ |
5,558 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,389 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
3,122 |
|
|
|
4,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
4,122 |
|
|
|
8,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,765 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Multi Family |
|
|
3,180 |
|
|
|
5,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,786 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,679 |
|
|
$ |
25,025 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,841 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With a related specific allowance
recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
3,306 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
3,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
4,503 |
|
|
|
4,521 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
4,589 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
Multi Family |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,839 |
|
|
$ |
8,457 |
|
|
$ |
1,597 |
|
|
$ |
8,050 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Banks impaired loan information for previous years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
At December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with related allowance |
|
$ |
7,509 |
|
|
$ |
25,012 |
|
Impaired loans with no related allowance |
|
|
18,473 |
|
|
|
24,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
25,982 |
|
|
$ |
49,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance on impaired loans |
|
$ |
4,399 |
|
|
$ |
5,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
For the year ended December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance of impaired loans |
|
$ |
40,544 |
|
|
$ |
25,936 |
|
Cash basis interest income recognized on impaired loans |
|
$ |
1,044 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
The Corporation categorizes loans and leases into risk categories based on relevant
information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial
information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current
economic trends, among other factors. The Corporation analyzes loans and leases individually by
classifying the loans and leases as to credit risk. The loans monitored utilizing the risk
categories listed below refer to commercial, commercial and industrial, construction, land,
farmland and agriculture loans. All non-homogeneous loans are monitored through delinquency
reporting. This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis. The Corporation uses the following
definitions for risk ratings:
Uncriticized assets exhibit no material problems, credit deficiencies or payment problems.
These assets generally are well protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of
the obligor or by the value of the asset or underlying collateral. Such credits are graded
as follows: Excellent (1), Good (2), Satisfactory (3) or Watch (4).
|
|
|
Special Mention Assets (Grade 5) |
Special Mention Assets have potential weaknesses or pose an unwarranted financial risk
that deserves managements close attention. If left uncorrected, these weaknesses may
result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Banks credit
position at some future date. Special Mention Assets are not adversely classified and do
not expose the Bank to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.
|
|
|
Substandard Assets (Grade 6) |
An asset classified Substandard is protected inadequately by the current net worth and
paying capacity of the obligor, or by the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified
must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the
debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility
that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. The
possibility that liquidation would not be timely requires a substandard classification
even if there is little likelihood of total loss.
65
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Assets classified as Substandard may exhibit one or more of the following weaknesses:
|
|
|
The primary source of repayment is gone or severely impaired and the Bank may have to
rely upon a secondary source. |
|
|
|
|
Loss does not seem likely but sufficient problems have arisen to cause the Bank to go to
abnormal lengths to protect its position in order to maintain a high probability of
repayment. |
|
|
|
|
Obligors are unable to generate enough cash flow for debt reduction. |
|
|
|
|
Collateral has deteriorated. |
|
|
|
|
The collateral is not subject to adequate inspection and verification of value (if the
collateral is expected to be the source of repayment). |
|
|
|
|
Flaws in documentation leave the Bank in a subordinated or unsecured position if the
collateral is needed for the repayment of the loan. |
|
|
|
|
For assets secured by real estate, the appraisal does not conform to FDIC appraisal
standards or the assumptions underlying the appraisal are demonstrably incorrect. |
|
|
|
Doubtful Assets (Grade 7) |
An asset classified Doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified as
Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or
liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values,
highly questionable and improbable.
An asset, or portion thereof, classified loss is considered uncollectible and of such
little value that its continuance on the books is not warranted. This classification does
not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value; rather, it is not
practical or desirable to defer writing off an essentially worthless asset (or portion
thereof), even through partial recovery may occur in the future.
66
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Loans and leases not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above
described process are considered to be pass rated loans and leases. As of December 31, 2010, and
based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans and leases is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
|
Watch |
|
|
Mention |
|
|
Substandard |
|
|
Total |
|
Construction |
|
$ |
12,743 |
|
|
$ |
10,514 |
|
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
$ |
2,944 |
|
|
$ |
26,530 |
|
Land, Farmland, Ag Loans |
|
|
11,822 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,454 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
124,478 |
|
|
|
11,982 |
|
|
|
6,158 |
|
|
|
21,333 |
|
|
|
163,951 |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
22,488 |
|
|
|
4,416 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
28,943 |
|
Multi Family |
|
|
66,074 |
|
|
|
1,861 |
|
|
|
3,227 |
|
|
|
3,180 |
|
|
|
74,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
237,575 |
|
|
$ |
29,405 |
|
|
$ |
9,879 |
|
|
$ |
29,331 |
|
|
$ |
306,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homogeneous loans are monitored at 60+ days delinquent. See page 63 segregated by class of
loans related to residential and consumer.
|
|
|
NOTEE |
|
OFFICE PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT |
Office premises and equipment at December 31, is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
2,120 |
|
|
$ |
2,120 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
13,107 |
|
|
|
13,134 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
8,796 |
|
|
|
9,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,023 |
|
|
|
24,579 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,095 |
|
|
|
13,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,928 |
|
|
$ |
10,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense amounted to $1.2 million, $1.3 million, and $1.3 million for years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.
67
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Deposit balances by type at December 31, 2010 and 2009, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Noninterest-bearing checking accounts |
|
$ |
46,597 |
|
|
$ |
38,911 |
|
NOW accounts |
|
|
65,679 |
|
|
|
70,564 |
|
Money market demand accounts |
|
|
96,294 |
|
|
|
96,172 |
|
Passbook and statement savings accounts |
|
|
38,665 |
|
|
|
36,638 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
404,581 |
|
|
|
417,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
651,816 |
|
|
$ |
659,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Corporation had certificate of deposit accounts with
balances in excess of $100,000 totaling $114.3 million and $136.3 million, respectively.
The contractual maturities of outstanding certificates of deposit are summarized as follows at
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31: |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
196,550 |
|
2012 |
|
|
133,342 |
|
2013 |
|
|
22,410 |
|
2014 |
|
|
39,196 |
|
2015 |
|
|
13,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certificate of deposit accounts |
|
$ |
404,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
68
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTEG |
|
ADVANCES FROM THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK |
The following table summarizes the types of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Cincinnati (FHLB) at December 31:
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Maturity (years) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate, balloon |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
4.50 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
Fixed-rate, interest only |
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
1.75 |
|
|
|
43,000 |
|
Fixed-rate, amortizing |
|
|
6.04 |
|
|
|
7.17 |
|
|
|
1,708 |
|
Fixed-rate, interest only, convertible |
|
|
3.84 |
|
|
|
3.79 |
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
Fixed-rate, interest only, putable |
|
|
4.34 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3.17 |
% |
|
|
2.81 |
|
|
$ |
92,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
Average Rate |
|
|
Maturity (years) |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overnight repurchase-based |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
Fixed-rate, interest only |
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
1.17 |
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
Fixed-rate, amortizing |
|
|
6.02 |
|
|
|
7.89 |
|
|
|
2,057 |
|
Fixed-rate, interest only, convertible |
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
3.62 |
|
|
|
38,000 |
|
Fixed-rate, interest only, putable |
|
|
4.39 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
2.86 |
|
|
$ |
97,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible fixed-rate advances may be converted to floating-rate advances, on a quarterly
basis, at the option of the FHLB. Putable fixed-rate advances may be terminated, on a quarterly
basis after a fixed period of time, at the option of the FHLB. The Corporation may only repay
convertible and putable advances upon conversion or termination by the FHLB without penalty,
prior to maturity.
69
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTEG |
|
ADVANCES FROM THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK AND OTHER BORROWINGS (continued). |
Advances from the FHLB, collateralized at December 31, 2010, by a blanket agreement using
substantially all of the Banks one- to four- family and multi-family mortgage portfolios and the
Banks investment in FHLB stock, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending December 31, |
|
|
Interest rate range |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
0.80%-4.93% |
|
|
$ |
12,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1.05%-4.70% |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1.80%-6.05% |
|
|
|
25,127 |
|
2014 |
|
|
4.26%-6.10% |
|
|
|
5,244 |
|
2015 |
|
|
3.25%-4.05% |
|
|
|
20,226 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
3.95%-7.00% |
|
|
|
6,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
92,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTEH |
|
OTHER BORROWINGS |
In July 2007, the Corporation formed a special purpose entity, Camco Statutory Trust I (Trust),
for the sole purpose of issuing $5.0 million trust preferred securities. Additionally, Camco
issued subordinated debentures to the Trust in exchange for the proceeds of the offering of the
trust preferred securities. The subordinated debentures represent the sole asset of the Trust.
The subordinated debentures are due on September 15, 2037 (Due Date). The subordinated debentures
carry a fixed rate of interest of 6.648% until September 15, 2012, at which point the interest
rate becomes variable at 133 basis points over the three month LIBOR rate. The Corporation may
redeem the subordinated debentures any time prior to the Due Date as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Call Date |
|
Terms |
|
9/15/2011 |
|
Callable at 100.785% of par |
9/15/2012 |
|
Callable until Due Date at par |
Camco and Camco Statutory Trust I are permitted to defer interest and dividend payments,
respectively, for up to five consecutive years without resulting in a default. These dividends
have been deferred since April, 2009.
Obligations for securities sold under agreements to repurchase were $6.5 million and $6.9 million
for December 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively. They were collateralized at December 31, 2010 and
2009, by investment securities with an amortized cost including accrued interest of approximately
$8.7 million and $6.4 million and a market value of approximately $9.1 million and $6.7 million,
respectively. The maximum balance of repurchase agreements outstanding at any month-end during
the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, was $9.1 million and $15.2 million, respectively, and
the average month-end balance outstanding for 2010 and 2009 was approximately $6.8 million and
$8.9 million, respectively.
70
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTEI |
|
FEDERAL INCOME TAXES |
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal current expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
(299 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,924 |
) |
|
$ |
(713 |
) |
Federal deferred expense (benefit) |
|
|
(5,038 |
) |
|
|
(2,373 |
) |
|
|
(4,403 |
) |
Valuation expense |
|
|
5,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Tax (Benefit) |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
(6,297 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the rate of taxes which are payable at the federal statutory rate are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income taxes computed at the expected statutory rate |
|
$ |
(4,774 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,955 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,950 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nontaxable dividend and interest income |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance net |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
(265 |
) |
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,272 |
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets |
|
|
5,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surrender of bank owned life insurance & penalty |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
(526 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax provision per consolidated financial statements |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
(6,297 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,116 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
The components of the Corporations net deferred tax liability at December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes (payable) refundable on temporary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
differences at statutory rate: |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General loan loss allowance |
|
$ |
5,736 |
|
|
$ |
5,495 |
|
Deferred loan fees |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
Non accrual interest |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Tax credits and low income housing credits |
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
NOL carryforward |
|
|
4,506 |
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
14,129 |
|
|
|
9,610 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB stock dividends |
|
$ |
(5,017 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,017 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
(1,306 |
) |
|
|
(1,507 |
) |
Book versus tax depreciation |
|
|
(771 |
) |
|
|
(976 |
) |
Original issue discount |
|
|
(583 |
) |
|
|
(525 |
) |
Unrealized gains on securities designated as available for sale |
|
|
(530 |
) |
|
|
(540 |
) |
Purchase price adjustments |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
Other liabilities, net |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(8,274 |
) |
|
|
(8,803 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance |
|
|
5,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camco is currently in process of an Internal Revenue Service audit for tax year 2009. The
Corporation does not expect any changes to its tax positions as a result of the audit.
72
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTE I |
|
FEDERAL INCOME TAXES (continued). |
At December 31, 2010, the Corporation has a $13 million net operating loss carry forward
available to reduce future income taxes through 2029. The ultimate realization of deferred tax
assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which
those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the reversal of deferred tax
assets and liabilities (including the impact of carryforward periods), projected future taxable
income and tax-planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the Corporations
cumulative three year loss position and projections for future taxable income over the periods in
which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is likely that the
Corporation will be able to realize the benefits of these deductible differences. The amount of
the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could change in the near term if estimates
of future taxable income during the carryforward period change.
For years prior to 1996, the Bank was allowed a special bad debt deduction generally limited to
8% of otherwise taxable income, subject to certain limitations based on aggregate loans and
savings account balances at the end of the year. If the amounts that qualified as deductions for
federal income taxes are later used for purposes other than for bad debt losses, including
distributions in liquidation, such distributions will be subject to federal income taxes at the
then current corporate income tax rate. The percentage of earnings bad debt deduction had
accumulated to approximately $12.1 million as of December 31, 2010. The amount of the
unrecognized deferred tax liability relating to the cumulative bad debt deduction was
approximately $4.1 million at December 31, 2010.
The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of its customers, including commitments to extend credit.
Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest-rate risk in excess
of the amount recognized in the consolidated statement of financial condition. The contract or
notional amounts of the commitments reflect the extent of the Banks involvement in such
financial instruments.
The Banks exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the
financial instrument for commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual notional
amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and
conditional obligations as those utilized for on-balance-sheet instruments.
The following table summarizes the Banks outstanding commitments to originate adjustable and
fixed-rate loans at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unused lines of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate |
|
|
Adjustable |
|
|
Credit HELOC |
|
|
Stand by |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Loans |
|
|
Rate Loans |
|
|
& Other |
|
|
letters of credit |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
42,521 |
|
|
$ |
2,734 |
|
|
$ |
46,028 |
|
|
$ |
397 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
4,984 |
|
|
$ |
44,831 |
|
|
$ |
54,286 |
|
|
$ |
493 |
|
Management believes that all loan commitments are able to be funded through cash flow from
operations and existing liquidity. Fees received in connection with these commitments have not
been recognized in earnings.
73
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE J COMMITMENTS (continued).
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of
the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customers
creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed
necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on managements credit evaluation of the
counterparty. Collateral on loans may vary but the preponderance of loans granted generally
include a mortgage interest in real estate as security.
The Corporation has entered into lease agreements for office premises and equipment under
operating leases which expire at various dates through the year ended December 31, 2017. The
following table summarizes minimum payments due under lease agreements by year:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
360 |
|
2012 |
|
|
294 |
|
2013 |
|
|
201 |
|
2014 |
|
|
160 |
|
2015 |
|
|
168 |
|
2016 and thereafter |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expense under operating leases totaled approximately $400,000, $395,000 and $395,000
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
NOTE K REGULATORY MATTERS AND REGULATORY CAPITAL
Camco and Advantage are subject to the regulatory capital requirements of the Federal Reserve
Board (the FRB) and Advantage is subject to the requirements of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (the FDIC). Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain
mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken,
could have a direct material effect on the Corporations consolidated financial statements.
Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the
Corporation and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures
of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory
accounting practices. The Corporation and Banks capital amounts and classification are also
subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other
factors.
The FRB and FDIC have adopted risk-based capital ratio guidelines to which the Corporation is
subject. The guidelines establish a systematic analytical framework that makes regulatory
capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banking organizations.
Risk-based capital ratios are determined by allocating assets and specified off-balance sheet
commitments to four risk-weighting categories, with higher levels of capital being required for
the categories perceived as representing greater risk.
74
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE K REGULATORY MATTERS AND REGULATORY CAPITAL (continued).
These guidelines divide the capital into two tiers. The first tier (Tier I) includes common
equity, certain non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock (excluding auction rate issues) and
minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill and certain
other intangible assets (except mortgage servicing rights and purchased credit card
relationships, subject to certain limitations). Supplementary (Tier II) capital includes,
among other items, cumulative perpetual and long-term limited-life preferred stock, mandatory
convertible securities, certain hybrid capital instruments, term subordinated debt and the
allowance for loan losses, subject to certain limitations, less required deductions. Banks and
bank holding companies are required to maintain a total risk-based capital ratio of 8%, of which
4% must be Tier I capital. The regulatory agencies may, however, set higher capital requirements
when particular circumstances warrant. Banks experiencing or anticipating significant growth are
expected to maintain capital ratios, including tangible capital positions, well above the minimum
levels.
The following tables present certain information regarding compliance by Camco and Advantage with
applicable regulatory capital requirements at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be well- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
under prompt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For capital |
|
|
corrective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequacy |
|
|
action |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
purposes |
|
|
provisions |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total capital to risk-weighted assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camco Financial Corporation |
|
$ |
57,849 |
|
|
|
8.96 |
% |
|
≥$ |
51,635 |
|
|
≥ |
8.0 |
% |
|
≥$ |
64,544 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Advantage Bank(1) |
|
$ |
54,593 |
|
|
|
8.48 |
% |
|
≥$ |
51,525 |
|
|
≥ |
8.0 |
% |
|
≥$ |
64,406 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camco Financial Corporation |
|
$ |
49,689 |
|
|
|
7.70 |
% |
|
≥$ |
25,818 |
|
|
≥ |
4.0 |
% |
|
≥$ |
38,726 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Advantage Bank(1) |
|
$ |
46,433 |
|
|
|
7.21 |
% |
|
≥$ |
25,762 |
|
|
≥ |
4.0 |
% |
|
≥$ |
38,643 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I leverage to average assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camco Financial Corporation |
|
$ |
49,689 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
≥$ |
33,241 |
|
|
≥ |
4.0 |
% |
|
≥$ |
41,551 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Advantage Bank (1) |
|
$ |
46,433 |
|
|
|
5.61 |
% |
|
≥$ |
33,103 |
|
|
≥ |
4.0 |
% |
|
≥$ |
41,378 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
75
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE K REGULATORY MATTERS AND REGULATORY CAPITAL (continued).
Federal law prohibits a financial institution from making a capital distribution to anyone or
paying management fees to any person having control of the institution if, after such distribution
or payment, the institution would be undercapitalized. Additionally, the payment of dividends by
Advantage Bank to its parent and by Camco Financial Corporation to shareholders is subject to
restriction by regulatory agencies. These restrictions normally limit dividends from the Bank to
the sum of the Banks current and prior two years earnings, as defined by the agencies.
On March 4, 2009, Camco entered into a MOU with the FRB. The MOU prohibits Camco from engaging in
certain activities while the MOU is in effect, including, without the prior written approval of the
FRB, (1) the declaration or payment of dividends to stockholders or (2) the repurchase of Camcos
stock.
On April 30, 2009, Camco was notified by the FRB that it had conducted a surveillance review as
of December 31, 2008. Based on that review, the FRB notified Camco that it must (i) eliminate
shareholder dividends and (ii) defer interest payments on its 30-year junior subordinated
deferrable interest notes that were issued to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Camco Statutory Trust
I, in its trust preferred financing that was completed in July 2007. These prohibitions were
memorialized in a written agreement with the FRB on August 5, 2009. Camco and Camco Statutory
Trust I are permitted to defer interest and dividend payments, respectively, for up to five
consecutive years without resulting in a default. Camco may not resume these dividend or interest
payments until it receives approval from the FRB.
As a result of the surveillance review, Camco entered into a Written Agreement (the Camco
Agreement) with the FRB on August 5, 2009. The Camco Agreement memorializes the requirements
imposed on April 30, 2009 and requires Camco to obtain FRB approval prior to: (i) declaring or
paying any dividends; (ii) receiving dividends or any other form of payment representing a
reduction in capital from Advantage; (iii) making any distributions of interest, principal or
other sums on subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities; (iv) incurring, increasing or
guaranteeing any debt; or (v) repurchasing any Camco stock.
Advantage entered into a consent agreement with the FDIC and the Division that provided for the
issuance of an order by the FDIC and the Division, which order was executed by the FDIC and
Division on July 31, 2009 (the Consent Order). The Consent Order requires Advantage to, among
other things, (i) increase its Tier 1 risk based capital to 8%; and (ii) seek regulatory approval
prior to declaring or paying any cash dividend. As a result of the Consent Order, Advantage is
disqualified as a public depository under Ohio law and will incur higher premiums for FDIC
insurance of its accounts. Currently, Advantage is not in compliance with the Tier 1 capital
requirement of the Consent Order.
A material failure to comply with the provisions of either agreement could result in additional
enforcement actions by the FDIC, the Ohio Division or the Federal Reserve.
76
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE K REGULATORY MATTERS AND REGULATORY CAPITAL (continued).
The
Corporations Tier 1 capital did not meet the requirements set forth in the Bank Agreement or
Camco Agreement. As a result
the Corporation will need to increase capital levels to meet the standards set forth by the FDIC,
Division and FRB. The Corporation has engaged an investment banking firm and is in the process of
developing a capital plan that may include balance sheet reduction, the sale of branches, issuing
common stock, preferred stock, debt or some combination of those issuances, or other financing
alternatives that will be treated as capital. Although, the Corporation anticipates raising
additional capital, the Board of Directors has not yet determined the type, timing, amount, or
terms of possible securities to be issued in the offering, and there are no assurances that an
offering will be completed or that the Corporation will succeed in this endeavor. In addition, a
transaction, which would likely involve equity financing would result in substantial dilution to
current stockholders and could adversely affect the price of the Corporations common stock.
The following tables present certain information regarding compliance by Camco and Advantage with
applicable regulatory capital requirements at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be well- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
under prompt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For capital |
|
|
corrective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequacy |
|
|
action |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
purposes |
|
|
provisions |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total capital to
risk-weighted assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camco Financial Corporation |
|
$ |
71,971 |
|
|
|
11.43 |
% |
|
≥$ |
50,389 |
|
|
≥ |
8.0 |
% |
|
≥$ |
62,987 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Advantage Bank |
|
$ |
67,285 |
|
|
|
10.72 |
% |
|
≥$ |
50,225 |
|
|
≥ |
8.0 |
% |
|
≥$ |
62,780 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital to
risk-weighted assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camco Financial Corporation |
|
$ |
64,022 |
|
|
|
10.16 |
% |
|
≥$ |
25,219 |
|
|
≥ |
4.0 |
% |
|
≥$ |
37,792 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Advantage Bank |
|
$ |
59,336 |
|
|
|
9.45 |
% |
|
≥$ |
25,112 |
|
|
≥ |
4.0 |
% |
|
≥$ |
37,668 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I leverage to average
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camco Financial Corporation |
|
$ |
64,022 |
|
|
|
7.33 |
% |
|
≥$ |
34,945 |
|
|
≥ |
4.0 |
% |
|
≥$ |
43,681 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Advantage Bank (1) |
|
$ |
59,336 |
|
|
|
6.82 |
% |
|
≥$ |
34,784 |
|
|
≥ |
4.0 |
% |
|
≥$ |
43,479 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Due to the consent order Advantage cannot be considered well capitalized until such
order is lifted by the FDIC and the Ohio Division |
77
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
As a financial services Corporation, the carrying value of certain financial assets and
liabilities is impacted by the application of fair value measurements, either directly or
indirectly. In certain cases, an asset or liability is measured and reported at fair value on a
recurring basis, such as available-for-sale investment securities. In other cases, management
must rely on estimates or judgments to determine if an asset or liability not measured at fair
value warrants an impairment write-down or whether a valuation reserve should be established.
Given the inherent volatility, the use of fair value measurements may have a significant impact
on the carrying value of assets or liabilities, or result in material changes to the financial
statements, from period to period.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair
value disclosures for financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions and/or
estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: The carrying amount reported in the consolidated
statements of financial condition for cash and cash equivalents is deemed to
approximate fair value.
Investment Securities: Fair values for investment securities are based on
quoted market prices and dealer quotes.
Loans Held for Sale: Fair value for loans held for sale is the contracted
sales price of loans committed for delivery, which is determined on the date of sale
commitment.
Loans Receivable: The loan portfolio has been segregated into categories
with similar characteristics, such as one- to four-family residential real estate,
multi-family residential real estate, installment and other. These loan categories
were further delineated into fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans. The fair values
for the resultant loan categories were computed via discounted cash flow analysis,
using current interest rates offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of
similar credit quality.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock: The carrying amount presented in the
consolidated statements of financial condition is deemed to approximate fair value.
Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable: The carrying value for accrued
interest approximates fair value.
Deposits: The fair values of deposits with no stated maturity, such as money
market demand deposits, savings and NOW accounts have been analyzed by management and
assigned estimated maturities and cash flows which are then discounted to derive a
value. The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposit is based on the
discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the
rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank: The fair value of these advances
is estimated using the rates currently offered for similar advances of similar
remaining maturities or, when available, quoted market prices.
78
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTE L |
|
FAIR VALUE (continued). |
Repurchase Agreements: The fair value of repurchase agreements is based
on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using rates currently offered for similar
maturities.
Subordinated Debentures: The fair value of subordinated debentures is based
on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using rates currently offered for
smaller maturities.
Advances by Borrowers for Taxes and Insurance: The carrying amount of
advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance is deemed to approximate fair value.
Commitments to Extend Credit: For fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loan
commitments, the fair value estimate considers the difference between current levels
of interest rates and committed rates. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the fair value
of loan commitments was not material.
Based on the foregoing methods and assumptions, the carrying value and fair value of the
Corporations financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
value |
|
|
value |
|
|
value |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
29,114 |
|
|
$ |
29,114 |
|
|
$ |
38,153 |
|
|
$ |
38,153 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
30,768 |
|
|
|
30,768 |
|
|
|
55,950 |
|
|
|
55,950 |
|
Investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
3,948 |
|
|
|
3,993 |
|
|
|
2,113 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
2,254 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
Loans receivable |
|
|
667,840 |
|
|
|
643,646 |
|
|
|
659,022 |
|
|
|
646,990 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
|
|
29,888 |
|
|
|
29,888 |
|
|
|
29,888 |
|
|
|
29,888 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
3,521 |
|
|
|
3,521 |
|
|
|
3,979 |
|
|
|
3,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
651,816 |
|
|
$ |
642,893 |
|
|
$ |
659,902 |
|
|
$ |
647,149 |
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank |
|
|
92,934 |
|
|
|
97,711 |
|
|
|
97,291 |
|
|
|
101,924 |
|
Repurchase agreements |
|
|
6,530 |
|
|
|
6,530 |
|
|
|
6,941 |
|
|
|
6,941 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
4,839 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
4,768 |
|
Advances by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
|
1,669 |
|
79
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTE L |
|
FAIR VALUE (continued). |
Listed below are three levels of inputs that Camco uses to measure fair value:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Level 1 inputs for assets or liabilities that are not actively traded. Also
consists of an observable market price for a similar asset or liability. This
includes the use of matrix pricing used to value debt securities absent the
exclusive use of quoted prices.
Level 3: Consists of unobservable inputs that are used to measure fair value when
observable market inputs are not available. This could include the use of internally
developed models, financial forecasting, etc.
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a
liability between market participants at the balance sheet date. When possible, the
Corporation looks to active and observable markets to price identical assets or liabilities.
When identical assets and liabilities are not traded in active markets, the Corporation
looks to observable market data for similar assets and liabilities. However, certain assets
and liabilities are not traded in observable markets and Camco must use other valuation
methods to develop a fair value. The fair value of impaired loans is based on the fair value
of the underlying collateral, which is estimated through third party appraisals or internal
estimates of collateral values.
The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis
for balances at December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
(in thousands) |
|
December 31, |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored enterprises |
|
$ |
2,065 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,065 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Corporate equity securities |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
28,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored enterprises |
|
$ |
14,564 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,564 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Corporate equity securities |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
41,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
80
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTE L |
|
FAIR VALUE (continued). |
The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring
basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value |
|
|
|
Balance at, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the year ended |
|
(in thousands) |
|
December 31, |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
December 31, |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
20,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,518 |
|
|
$ |
11,990 |
|
Real estate acquired through foreclosure |
|
|
10,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,096 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
25,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,982 |
|
|
$ |
13,081 |
|
Real estate acquired through foreclosure |
|
|
9,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,660 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
Impaired loans are measured and reported at fair value when management believes collection
of contractual interest and principal payments is doubtful. Managements determination of the
fair value for these loans represents the estimated net proceeds to be received from the sale
of the collateral based on observable market prices and market value provided by independent,
licensed or certified appraisers.
Fair value for real estate acquired through foreclosure is generally determined by obtaining
recent appraisals on the properties. Other types of valuing include broker price opinions and
valuations pertaining to the current and anticipated deterioration in the regional
economy and real estate market, as evidenced by, among other things, a net out migration of the
local population, unemployment rates, increasing vacancy rates, borrower delinquencies,
declining property values and rental prices, differences between foreclosure appraisals and
real estate owned sales prices, and an increase in concessions and other forms of discounting or other items approved by our asset classification committee. The fair
value under such appraisals is determined by using one of the following valuation techniques:
income, cost or comparable sales. The fair value is then reduced by managements estimate for
the direct costs expected to be incurred in order to sell the property. Holding costs or
maintenance expenses are recorded as period costs when occurred and are not included in the
fair value estimate.
81
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE M BENEFIT PLANS
The Corporation has a non-contributory retirement plan which provides benefits to certain key
officers. The Corporations future obligations under the plan have been provided for via the
purchase of single premium key man life insurance of which the Corporation is the beneficiary.
The Corporation recorded expense related to the plan totaling approximately $172,000, $62,000 and
$21,000 during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Corporation also has a 401(k) Salary Savings Plan covering substantially all employees.
Contributions by the employees are voluntary and are subject to matching contributions by the
employer under a fixed percentage, which may be increased at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. Total expense under this plan was $304,000, $267,000 and $330,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Stock Option Plans
The Corporation follows a fair-value based method for valuing stock-based compensation that
measures compensation cost at the grant date based on the fair value of the award.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the modified
Black-Scholes options-pricing model. The following table details the fair value and assumptions
used to value stock options as of the grant date that were granted in 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value, calculated |
|
$ |
1.65 |
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
Exercise Price |
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
|
$ |
2.46 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
2.66 |
% |
Expected stock price volatility |
|
|
51.62 |
% |
|
|
61.00 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.63 |
% |
Expected Life |
|
|
10 years |
|
|
|
10 years |
|
The following information applies to options outstanding at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Range of |
|
Number |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Exercisable |
|
|
Price |
|
$1.89 - $2.50 |
|
|
328,279 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
|
|
132,125 |
|
|
$ |
2.48 |
|
$8.92 - $9.75 |
|
|
21,514 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
8.92 |
|
|
|
12,894 |
|
|
|
8.92 |
|
$11.36 - $14.16 |
|
|
57,974 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
13.41 |
|
|
|
56,143 |
|
|
|
13.45 |
|
$14.55 - $17.17 |
|
|
55,875 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
16.45 |
|
|
|
55,875 |
|
|
|
16.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463,642 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
5.84 |
|
|
|
257,037 |
|
|
$ |
8.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE M BENEFIT PLANS (continued)
Stock Option Plans (continued)
A summary of unvested options as of, and changes during the year ended, December 31, 2010, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Unvested options: |
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
25,382 |
|
Granted |
|
|
260,729 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(14,160 |
) |
Vested during the period |
|
|
(65,346 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unvested options at December 31 |
|
|
206,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009,
and 2008, was $0 as no options were exercised in the respective years.
As of December 31, 2010, there was $308,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested stock options. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
A summary of the status of the Corporations stock option plans as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
260,833 |
|
|
$ |
10.59 |
|
|
|
260,703 |
|
|
$ |
14.11 |
|
|
|
318,238 |
|
|
$ |
15.10 |
|
Granted |
|
|
260,729 |
|
|
|
2.51 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
2.46 |
|
|
|
47,167 |
|
|
|
9.07 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited and Expired |
|
|
(57,920 |
) |
|
|
12.21 |
|
|
|
(79,870 |
) |
|
|
13.96 |
|
|
|
(104,702 |
) |
|
|
14.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year |
|
|
463,642 |
|
|
$ |
5.84 |
|
|
|
260,833 |
|
|
$ |
10.59 |
|
|
|
260,703 |
|
|
$ |
14.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at year-end |
|
|
257,037 |
|
|
$ |
8.24 |
|
|
|
235,451 |
|
|
$ |
10.54 |
|
|
|
195,717 |
|
|
$ |
15.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average fair value of
options granted during the year |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTE N |
|
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
The following condensed financial statements summarize the financial position of the Corporation
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each
of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
December 31,
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash in Advantage |
|
$ |
3,882 |
|
|
$ |
796 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
Investment securities designated as available for sale |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Investment in Advantage |
|
|
47,886 |
|
|
|
60,874 |
|
Investment in Camco Title |
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
Office premises and equipment net |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
56,250 |
|
|
$ |
66,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
$ |
931 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Payable to Advantage |
|
|
3,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
10,147 |
|
|
|
5,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
46,103 |
|
|
|
60,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
56,250 |
|
|
$ |
66,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTE N |
|
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (continued). |
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year ended December 31,
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from Advantage |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
Dividends from Camco Title |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Equity in undistributed loss of Advantage |
|
|
(12,963 |
) |
|
|
(10,555 |
) |
|
|
(16,168 |
) |
Excess distribution from Camco Title |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loss |
|
|
(12,669 |
) |
|
|
(10,269 |
) |
|
|
(14,029 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
General, administrative and other expense |
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before federal income tax credits |
|
|
(13,919 |
) |
|
|
(11,685 |
) |
|
|
(15,973 |
) |
Federal income tax (credits) |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(14,559 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,217 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,324 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTE N |
|
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION (continued). |
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year ended December 31,
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the year |
|
$ |
(14,559 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,217 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,324 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
flows provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed earnings (loss) of Advantage |
|
|
12,963 |
|
|
|
10,555 |
|
|
|
16,168 |
|
Equity in undistributed earnings of Camco Title |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
179 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash due to changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Accrued federal income taxes |
|
|
4,482 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(611 |
) |
Deferred federal income taxes |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
2,991 |
|
|
|
(719 |
) |
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash surrender value of life insurance |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in interest-bearing deposits in other
financial institutions |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(2,953 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(2,953 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,086 |
|
|
|
(1,082 |
) |
|
|
(2,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
1,878 |
|
|
|
4,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
3,882 |
|
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
1,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTE O |
|
QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) |
The following table summarizes the Corporations quarterly results for the years ended December
31, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
10,222 |
|
|
$ |
10,292 |
|
|
$ |
10,109 |
|
|
$ |
10,198 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
3,214 |
|
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
3,736 |
|
|
|
3,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
7,008 |
|
|
|
6,750 |
|
|
|
6,373 |
|
|
|
6,256 |
|
Provision for losses on loans (2) |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
11,407 |
|
|
|
5,212 |
|
|
|
905 |
|
Other income |
|
|
2,602 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
General, administrative and other expenses |
|
|
7,604 |
|
|
|
7,811 |
|
|
|
6,975 |
|
|
|
6,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes (credits) |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
(11,026 |
) |
|
|
(4,212 |
) |
|
|
127 |
|
Federal income taxes (credits) (1) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
1,009 |
|
|
$ |
(11,598 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,099 |
) |
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
(1.61 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
(1.61 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The change in 3rd quarter federal income taxes is related to 100% deferred
tax valuation. |
|
(2) |
|
The second and third quarter results were affected by sizeable loan charge offs that
were taken and the subsequent need to replenish the allowance for loan and lease losses
through a provision of $5.2 million and $11.4 million respectively. The Credit
Administration unit received information related to several larger commercial credits that
resulted in partial and full write downs based on impairment and collateral dependency that
was not received during the first quarter of 2010. |
87
CAMCO FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
|
|
|
NOTE O |
|
QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) (continued). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
10,616 |
|
|
$ |
10,987 |
|
|
$ |
11,234 |
|
|
$ |
11,887 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
4,394 |
|
|
|
4,808 |
|
|
|
5,350 |
|
|
|
6,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
6,222 |
|
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
5,884 |
|
|
|
5,845 |
|
Provision for losses on loans (2) |
|
|
19,914 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
Other income |
|
|
2,424 |
|
|
|
1,612 |
|
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
|
1,963 |
|
General, administrative and other expenses |
|
|
6,968 |
|
|
|
7,249 |
|
|
|
6,893 |
|
|
|
7,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
(18,236 |
) |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Federal income taxes (1) |
|
|
(6,427 |
) |
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) |
|
$ |
(11,809 |
) |
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
(1.64 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
(1.64 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The change in 2nd quarter federal income taxes is related to the surrender of
bank owned life insurance. |
|
(2) |
|
The fourth quarter results were significantly affected by sizeable loan charge offs that were
taken and the subsequent need to replenish the allowance for loan and lease losses through a
provision of $19.9 million. The Credit Administration unit received substantial information
related to several larger commercial credits that resulted in partial and full writedowns based on
impairment and collateral dependency that was not received during prior quarters of 2009.
Additionally consistent with accounting standards the company was required to consider events
subsequent to December 31, 2009 to determine the end of year loss position. Specifically, during
the fourth quarter and early 2010 we received information on three significant commercial
relationships that required a total writedown or full specific loss reserve totaling $10.1 million.
(included is a previously reported $2.6 million fraudulent loan). Additionally, we received
specific fourth quarter information relating to our identified concentration in non owner occupied
investors. A total of $1.8 million was required to be written off on four investors during the
fourth quarter of 2009. |
88
|
|
|
Item 9. |
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. |
Not applicable.
|
|
|
Item 9A. |
|
Controls and Procedures. |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Corporation has carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2010. As defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis. Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2010.
There were no changes in Camcos internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during
the quarter ended December 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting.
The information under the section
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING in Item 8 of
this Form 10-K, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
Item 9B. |
|
Other Information. |
Not applicable
PART III
|
|
|
Item 10. |
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. |
The information contained under the captions Election of Directors, Incumbent Directors,
Executive Officers, Board Meetings, Committees, Risk Oversight and Compensation of Directors
and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the Proxy Statement for the 2011
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed by Camco on or about April 19, 2011 (2011 Proxy
Statement), is incorporated herein by reference.
Camco has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all directors and employees. The Code of
Ethics is posted on Camcos website at www.camcofinancial.com.
|
|
|
Item 11. |
|
Executive Compensation. |
The information contained in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the captions, Board Meetings,
Committees, Risk Oversight and Compensation of Directors, Compensation of Executive Officers
and Employment and Change of Control Agreements is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
Item 12. |
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. |
The information contained in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the caption Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management is incorporated herein by reference.
Camco maintains the Camco Financial Corporation 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the
First Ashland Financial Corporation 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the Westwood Homestead
Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan, the Camco Financial Corporation 2002 Equity Incentive
Plan and the Camco Financial Corporation 2010 Equity Plan (collectively, the Plans). Each of the
Plans was approved by Camcos stockholders.
The following table shows, as of December 31, 2010, the number of common shares issuable upon
the exercise of outstanding stock options, the weighted-average exercise price of those stock
options, and the number of common shares remaining for future issuance under the Plans, excluding
shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options.
89
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remaining available for |
|
|
|
Number of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
future issuance under |
|
|
|
to be issued upon |
|
|
Weighted-average |
|
|
equity compensation plans |
|
|
|
exercise of |
|
|
exercise price of |
|
|
(excluding securities |
|
Plan Category |
|
outstanding options |
|
|
outstanding options |
|
|
reflected in column (a)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders |
|
|
463,642 |
|
|
$ |
5.84 |
|
|
|
831,246 |
|
|
|
|
Item 13. |
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
The information contained in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the captions Related Person
Transactions and Board Meetings, Committees, Risk Oversight and Compensation of Directors is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
Item 14. |
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services. |
The information contained in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the captions Audit and Risk
Management Committee Report and Audit Fees is incorporated herein by reference.
90
PART IV
|
|
|
Item 15. |
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. |
Exhibits.
|
|
|
3(i)
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation |
3(ii)
|
|
Bylaws |
4
|
|
Letter of Agreement to Furnish Copies of Long-term Debt Instruments and Agreements |
10(i)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Camco and James E. Huston |
10(ii)
|
|
Form of 2002 Salary Continuation Agreement |
10(iii)
|
|
Form of 1996 Salary Continuation Agreement |
10(iv)
|
|
Form of Executive Deferred Compensation Agreement |
10(v)
|
|
First Ashland Financial Corporation 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
10(vi)
|
|
Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement Pursuant to the First Ashland Financial Corporation 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
10(vii)
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement Pursuant to the First Ashland Financial Corporation 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
10(viii)
|
|
Camco Financial Corporation 2002 Equity Incentive Plan |
10(ix)
|
|
Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement Pursuant to the Camco Financial Corporation 2002 Equity and Incentive Plan |
10(x)
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement Pursuant to the Camco Financial Corporation 2002 Equity and Incentive Plan |
10(xi)
|
|
Camco Financial Corporation 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan |
10(xii)
|
|
Westwood Homestead Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan |
10(xiii)
|
|
Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement Pursuant to the Westwood Homestead Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan |
10(xiv)
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement Pursuant to the Westwood Homestead Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan |
10(xv)
|
|
Summary of Cash Bonus Plan |
10(xvi)
|
|
Change of Control Agreement including Attachment A listing participants |
10(xvii)
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement of James E. Huston |
10(xiiii)
|
|
Stock Option Award Agreement of James E. Huston |
10(xix)
|
|
Amendment to 1997 Stock Option Plan |
10(xx)
|
|
Amendment to 2002 Stock Option Plan |
10 (xxi)
|
|
Amendment to Change of Control Agreements |
10 (xxii)
|
|
Amendment to Salary Continuation Agreements |
10 (xxiii)
|
|
Cease and Desist Order |
10 (xxiv)
|
|
Camco Financial Corporation 2010 Equity Incentive Plan |
10(xxv)
|
|
Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement Pursuant to the Camco Financial Corporation 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan |
10(xxvi)
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement Pursuant to the Camco Financial Corporation 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan |
11
|
|
Statement regarding computation of per share earnings |
14
|
|
Code of Ethics |
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of Camco |
23
|
|
Consent of Plante & Moran PLLC regarding Camcos Consolidated Financial Statements and Form S-8 |
31(i)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
31(ii)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
32(i)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
32(ii)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
91
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camco Financial Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ James E. Huston
James E. Huston,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been duly
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey T. Tucker
Jeffrey T. Tucker,
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ James D. Douglas
James D. Douglas,
|
|
|
|
|
Lead Director
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 28, 2011 |
|
Date: March 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Carson K. Miller
Carson K. Miller,
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Terry A. Feick
Terry A. Feick,
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 28, 2011 |
|
Date: March 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Edward D. Goodyear
Edward D. Goodyear,
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Andrew S. Dix
Andrew S. Dix,
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 28, 2011 |
|
Date: March 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ J. Timothy Young
J. Timothy Young,
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Douglas F Mock
Douglas F. Mock,
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 28, 2011 |
|
Date: March 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Kristina K. Tipton
Kristina K. Tipton,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
DOCUMENT REFERENCE |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 3(i)
|
|
Third Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Camco Financial
Corporation, as amended
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2003,
Film no. 04668873 (2003 Form 10-K),
Exhibit 3(i) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 3(ii)
|
|
2003 Amended and Restated
By-Laws of Camco Financial
Corporation
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006, Exhibit 3(ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 4
|
|
Letter of Agreement to Furnish Copies of
Long-term Debt Instruments and
Agreements
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(i)
|
|
Employment Agreement dated
December 31, 2008, by and between
Camco Financial Corporation and
James E. Huston
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos
8-K filed on January 7, 2009, film no.
09512081 (2009 8-K), Exhibit 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(ii)
|
|
Form of 2002 Salary Continuation
Agreement, including individualized
Schedule As for each participant
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos
2003 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10(iv) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(iii)
|
|
Form of 1996 Salary Continuation
Agreement, including Schedule A
for Edward A. Wright
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
film no. 05684554 (2004 Form 10-K),
Exhibit 10(iv) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(iv)
|
|
Form of Executive Deferred
Compensation Agreement
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos
2003 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10(vi) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(v)
|
|
First Ashland Financial Corporation
1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos
Form S-8 filed on June 10, 2002, File Number
333-90142, Exhibit 4.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(vi)
|
|
Incentive Stock Option Award
Agreement Pursuant to the First
Ashland Financial Corporation
1995 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos
2004 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10(vii) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(vii)
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option Award
Agreement Pursuant to the First
Ashland Financial Corporation
1995 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos
2004 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10(viii) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(xiii)
|
|
Camco Financial Corporation 2002
Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos
Form S-8 filed on June 10, 2002, File
Number 333-90152, Exhibit 4.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(ix)
|
|
Incentive Stock Option Award
Agreement Pursuant to the Camco
Financial Corporation 2002 Equity
Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos
Form 8-K filed on February 2, 2005,
film no. 05570393 (2005 8-K),
Exhibit 10.5 |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
DOCUMENT REFERENCE |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(x)
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option Award
Agreement Pursuant to the Camco
Financial Corporation 2002 Equity
Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos 2004 Form 10-K,
Exhibit 10(xi) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(xi)
|
|
Camco Financial Corporation 1995
Stock Option and Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos
Form S-8 filed on June 10, 2002, File
Number 333-90166, Exhibit 4.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(xii)
|
|
Westwood Homestead Financial
Corporation 1997 Stock Option
and Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos
Form S-8 filed on January 5, 2000, File Number
333-94113, Exhibit 4.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(xiv)
|
|
Incentive Stock Option Award
Agreement Pursuant to the Westwood
Homestead Financial Corporation
1997 Stock Option Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the 2005
8-K, Exhibit 10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(xv)
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option Award
Agreement Pursuant to the Westwood
Homestead Financial Corporation
1997 Stock Option Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the 2005
8-K, Exhibit 10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(xvi)
|
|
2010 Incentive Award Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Form 8-K filed on February 1, 2010, as amended by the Form 8-K
on February 5, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(xvii)
|
|
Change of Control Agreement
including Attachment A listing
participants
|
|
Incorporated by reference to
Camcos Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 (2008
Form 10-K), Exhibit 10(xvii) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(xviii)
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement of
James E. Huston
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
2008 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10(xviii) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10(xix)
|
|
Stock Option Award Agreement of
James E. Huston
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the 2008 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10(xix) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10 (xx)
|
|
First Amendment to Westwood 1997
Stock Option and Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the 2008 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10(xx) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10 (xxi)
|
|
First Amendment to Camco 2002
Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the 2008 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10(xxi) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10 (xxii)
|
|
Second Amendment to Change of Control
Agreements
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the 2008 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10(xxii) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10 (xxiii)
|
|
First Amendment to Salary Continuation
Agreements
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the 2008 Form 10-K, Exhibit 10(xxiii) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10 (xxiv)
|
|
Cease and Desist Order
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the 2009 Form 10-K,
Exhibit 10(xxiv) |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10 (xxv)
|
|
2010 Camco Financial Stock Option
And Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference as Exhibit A
to the Definitive Proxy on April 19, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10 (xxvi)
|
|
Incentive Stock Option Award
Agreement Pursuant to the Camco
Financial Corporation 2010 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Form 8-K filed on
March 10, 2011, Exhibit 10.1 |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM |
|
DESCRIPTION |
|
DOCUMENT REFERENCE |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10 (xxvii)
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option Award
Agreement Pursuant to the Camco
Financial Corporation 2010 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Form 8K filed on March 10, 2011, Exhibit 10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 11
|
|
Statement regarding computation of per
share earnings
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 14
|
|
Code of Ethics
|
|
Camco elects to satisfy Regulation S-K
§229.406(c) by posting its Code of Ethics on
its website at www.camcofinancial.com |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 21
|
|
Subsidiaries of Camco
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Camcos
2003 Form 10-K, Exhibit 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 23
|
|
Consent of Plante & Moran PLLC
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 31(i)
|
|
Section 302 Certification by
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 31(ii)
|
|
Section 302 Certification by
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 32(i)
|
|
Section 1350 Certification by
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 32(ii)
|
|
Section 1350 Certification by
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
|
|
Filed herewith |