Washington, D.C. 20549

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

 

 

4582 SOUTH ULSTER STREET PARKWAY, SUITE 1100
DENVER, COLORADO 80237

 

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held On April 26, 2011

 

 

You are cordially invited to attend the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Meeting”) of APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY (“Aimco” or the “Company”) to be held on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. at Aimco’s corporate headquarters, 4582 S. Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100, Denver, CO 80237, for the following purposes:

 

1. To elect eight directors, for a term of one year each, until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualify;

 

2. To ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP, to serve as independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011;

 

3. To conduct an advisory vote on executive compensation;

 

4. To conduct an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation;

 

5. To approve an amendment to the charter to permit the Board of Directors to grant waivers of the ownership limit up to 12%; and

 

6. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof.

 

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on February 25, 2011, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof.

 

We are again pleased to take advantage of Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules that allow issuers to furnish proxy materials to their stockholders on the Internet. We believe these rules allow us to provide our stockholders with the information they need, while lowering the costs of delivery and reducing the environmental impact of our Meeting.

 

On or about March 14, 2011, we intend to mail our stockholders a notice containing instructions on how to access our 2011 proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”), Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and 2010 Corporate Citizenship Report and vote online. The notice also provides instructions on how you can request a paper copy of these documents if you desire, and how you can enroll in e-delivery. If you received your annual materials via email, the email contains voting instructions and links to these documents on the Internet.

 

WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO BE AT THE MEETING, PLEASE VOTE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO ENSURE THAT YOUR SHARES ARE REPRESENTED.

 

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Lisa R. Cohn
Secretary

March 14, 2011

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for
Aimco’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 26, 2011.

 

This Proxy Statement, Aimco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, and 2010 Corporate Citizenship Report are available free of charge at the following website: www.edocumentview.com/aiv.

 

Table of Contents

 

APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
4582 SOUTH ULSTER STREET PARKWAY, SUITE 1100
DENVER, COLORADO 80237

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Apartment Investment and Management Company (“Aimco” or the “Company”) has made these proxy materials available to you on the Internet, or, upon your request, has delivered printed versions of these materials to you by mail. We are furnishing this Proxy Statement in connection with the solicitation by our Board of proxies to be voted at our 2011 Annual Meeting (the “Meeting”). The Meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 26, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. at Aimco’s corporate headquarters located at 4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237, and at any and all adjournments or postponements thereof.

 

Pursuant to rules recently adopted by the SEC, we are providing access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to each stockholder entitled to vote at the Meeting. The mailing of such Notice is scheduled to begin on or about March 14, 2011. All stockholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials over the Internet and request to receive a printed copy of the proxy materials by mail. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. In addition, the Notice includes instructions on how stockholders may request proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis.

 

This solicitation is made by mail on behalf of Aimco’s Board. Costs of the solicitation will be borne by Aimco. Further solicitation of proxies may be made by telephone, fax or personal interview by the directors, officers and employees of the Company and its affiliates, who will not receive additional compensation for the solicitation. The Company has retained the services of Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, for an estimated fee of $3,500, plus out-of-pocket expenses, to assist in the solicitation of proxies from brokerage houses, banks, and other custodians or nominees holding stock in their names for others. The Company will reimburse banks, brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable expenses incurred by them in sending proxy material to stockholders.

 

Holders of record of the Class A Common Stock of the Company (“Common Stock”) as of the close of business on the record date, February 25, 2011 (the “Record Date”), are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting. Each share of Common Stock entitles the holder to one vote. At the close of business on the Record Date, there were 118,729,000 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

 

Whether you are a “stockholder of record” or hold your shares through a broker or nominee (i.e., in “street name”) you may direct your vote without attending the Meeting in person.

 

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote via the Internet by following the instructions on the Notice. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may also vote by signing and submitting your proxy card and returning by mail or by submitting your vote by telephone. You should sign your name exactly as it appears on the proxy card. If you are signing in a representative capacity (for example, as guardian, executor, trustee, custodian, attorney or officer of a corporation), you should indicate your name and title or capacity.

 

If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may be eligible to vote your shares electronically over the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the Notice. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may also vote by signing the voter instruction card provided by your bank or broker and returning it by mail. If you provide specific voting instructions by mail, telephone or the Internet, your shares will be voted by your broker or nominee as you have directed.

 

The persons named as proxies are officers of Aimco. All proxies properly submitted in time to be counted at the Meeting will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained therein. If you submit your proxy without voting instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board. Proxies may be

revoked at any time before voting by filing a notice of revocation with the Corporate Secretary of the Company, by filing a later dated proxy with the Corporate Secretary of the Company or by voting in person at the Meeting.

 

You are entitled to attend the Meeting only if you were an Aimco stockholder or joint holder as of the Record Date or you hold a valid proxy for the Meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record but hold shares in street name, you should provide proof of beneficial ownership as of the Record Date, such as your most recent account statement prior to February 25, 2011, a copy of the voting instruction card provided by your broker, trustee or nominee, or other similar evidence of ownership.

 

The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237.

 

Pursuant to Aimco’s Articles of Restatement (the “Charter”) and Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), directors are elected at each annual meeting of stockholders and hold office for one year, and until their successors are duly elected and qualify. Aimco’s Bylaws currently authorize a Board consisting of not fewer than three nor more than nine persons. The Board currently consists of eight directors.

 

The nominees for election to the Board selected by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board and proposed by the Board to be voted upon at the Meeting are:

 

 

Messrs. Bailey, Considine, Ellwood, Keltner, Martin, Miller, and Stein and Ms. Nelson were elected to the Board at the last Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Messrs. Bailey, Ellwood, Keltner, Martin, Miller, and Stein and Ms. Nelson are not employed by, or affiliated with, Aimco, other than by virtue of serving as directors of Aimco. Unless authority to vote for the election of directors has been specifically withheld, the persons named in the accompanying proxy intend to vote for the election of Messrs. Bailey, Considine, Ellwood, Keltner, Martin, Miller, and Stein and Ms. Nelson to hold office as directors for a term of one year until their successors are elected and qualify at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All nominees have advised the Board that they are able and willing to serve as directors.

 

If any nominee becomes unavailable for any reason (which is not anticipated), the shares represented by the proxies may be voted for such other person or persons as may be determined by the holders of the proxies (unless a proxy contains instructions to the contrary). In no event will the proxy be voted for more than eight nominees.

 

In an uncontested election at the meeting of stockholders, any nominee to serve as a director of the Company will be elected if the director receives a vote of the majority of votes cast, which means that the number of shares voted “for” a director exceeds the number of votes “against” that director. With respect to a contested election, a plurality of all the votes cast at the meeting of stockholders will be sufficient to elect a director. If a nominee who currently is serving as a director receives a greater number of “against” votes for his or her election than votes “for” such election (a “Majority Against Vote”) in an uncontested election, Maryland law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” However, under Aimco’s Bylaws, any nominee for election as a director in an uncontested election who receives a Majority Against Vote is obligated to tender his or her resignation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board for consideration. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider any resignation and recommend to the Board whether to accept it. The Board is required to take action with respect to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation.

 

Brokers holding shares of record for customers generally are not entitled to vote on certain matters unless they receive voting instructions from their customers. If you are a beneficial owner of shares and do not provide your broker, as stockholder of record, with voting instructions, your broker has the authority under applicable stock market rules to vote those shares for or against “routine” matters at its discretion. Where a matter is not considered routine, including the election of the board of directors, shares held by your broker will not be voted, a “broker non-vote,” absent specific instruction from you, which means your shares may go unvoted and not affect the outcome if you do not specify a vote.

 

For purposes of the election of directors, abstentions or broker non-votes as to the election of directors will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote. Unless instructed to the contrary in the proxy, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted FOR the election of the eight nominees named above as directors.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH
OF THE EIGHT NOMINEES.

 

The firm of Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2010, was selected by the Audit Committee to act in the same capacity for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011, subject to ratification by Aimco’s stockholders. The aggregate fees billed for services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, are described below under the caption “Principal Accountant Fees and Services.”

 

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the Meeting and will be given the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and to respond to appropriate questions.

 

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast regarding the proposal is required to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP. Abstentions or broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote on the proposal. Unless instructed to the contrary in the proxy, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted FOR the proposal to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF
THE SELECTION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP.

 

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted in July 2010, requires that we provide our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a nonbinding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.

 

As described in detail under the heading “Compensation Discussion & Analysis,” we seek to closely align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. Our compensation programs are designed to reward our named executive officers for the achievement of short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals and the achievement of increased total shareholder return, while at the same time avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk-taking.

 

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis, beginning on page 22 of this Proxy Statement, describes in more detail Aimco’s executive compensation program and the decisions made by Mr. Considine and the Compensation and Human Resources Committee for 2010. Highlights of the program include the following:

 

 

 

 

 

The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather, the vote relates to the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.

 

The vote is advisory, which means that the vote is not binding on the Company, our Board or the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board. To the extent there is any significant vote against our named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address the concerns of stockholders.

 

In order to be approved at the Meeting, Proposal 3 must receive the affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

 

We are asking the Company’s stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the 2010 Summary Compensation Table and the other related tables and disclosure.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF
THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS,
AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

 

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act also provides that stockholders must be given the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, for their preference as to how frequently we should seek future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, which we refer to as an advisory vote on executive compensation. By voting with respect to this Proposal 4, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer that we conduct future advisory votes on executive compensation once every one, two, or three years. Stockholders also may, if they wish, abstain from casting a vote on this proposal.

 

Our Board has determined that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation will allow our stockholders to provide timely, direct input on the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement each year. The Board believes that an annual vote is therefore consistent with the Company’s efforts to engage in an ongoing dialogue with our stockholders on executive compensation and corporate governance matters.

 

The Company recognizes that the stockholders may have different views as to the best approach for the Company, and therefore we look forward to hearing from our stockholders as to their preferences on the frequency of an advisory vote on executive compensation.

 

This vote is advisory and not binding on the Company or our Board in any way. The Board and the Compensation and Human Resources Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote, however, when considering the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation. The Board may decide that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and the Company to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the current recommendation of the Board or the frequency receiving the most votes cast by our stockholders.

 

The proxy card provides stockholders with the opportunity to choose among four options (holding the vote every one, two or three years, or abstaining) and, therefore, stockholders will not be voting to approve or disapprove the recommendation of the Board.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR”
AN ANNUAL ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

 

The Board has approved and adopted, subject to stockholder approval, an amendment to Aimco’s charter (the “Charter Amendment”) that would give the Board additional flexibility in granting waivers from the ownership limits in the charter.

 

In order for Aimco to maintain its qualification as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), not more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities) at any time during the last half of each taxable year. Our charter includes certain provisions that are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT, including limits on the ownership of our stock. Under these limits, no single stockholder (applying certain “beneficial ownership” rules under the Federal securities laws) can own shares of our Common Stock that exceed 8.7% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock. There are certain exceptions to these limits, and in the case of certain pension trusts, registered investment companies and Mr. Considine, the limit is 15% rather than 8.7%.

 

In addition, the Board may waive the ownership limits applicable to any individual holder, as long as that holder’s ownership of common stock does not exceed 9.8%. As a condition of granting any such waiver, the Board may require opinions of counsel or undertakings from the holder that will assist in preserving Aimco’s REIT status.

From time to time, the Board has granted these waivers, and there are currently two waivers in effect. However, situations have arisen in which investors have indicated a desire to purchase shares in excess of the 9.8% level in circumstances that would not create any risk to Aimco’s REIT status. In order to give the Board additional flexibility in responding to these requests, Aimco’s Board has determined that the charter should be amended to allow the Board to grant waivers up to the 12% level. The proposed text of the Charter Amendment is attached hereto as Annex A. The Board believes that the Charter Amendment is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

 

The affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock is required for approval of the Charter Amendment. Accordingly, abstentions or broker non-votes will have the effect of a vote against the proposal. Unless instructed to the contrary in the proxy, the shares represented by the proxies will be voted FOR the proposal to approve the Charter Amendment.

 

The Charter Amendment will not be effective unless and until it is filed with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland. If the Charter Amendment is authorized by a vote of the Company’s stockholders, the Board intends to file the Charter Amendment with the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland as soon as practicable following the Meeting.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A
VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE CHARTER AMENDMENT.

 

The executive officers of the Company and the nominees for election as directors of the Company, their ages, dates they were first elected an executive officer or director, and their positions with the Company or on the Board are set forth below.

 

 

The following is a biographical summary of the current directors and executive officers of the Company.

 

Terry Considine.  Mr. Considine has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since July 1994. Mr. Considine also serves on the board of directors of Intrepid Potash, Inc., a publicly held producer of potash, and, until its acquisition in early 2009, Mr. Considine served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of American Land Lease, Inc. Mr. Considine has over 40 years of experience in the real estate and other industries. Among other real estate ventures, in 1975, Mr. Considine founded and managed the predecessor companies that became Aimco at its initial public offering in 1994.

 

John E. Bezzant.  Mr. Bezzant was appointed Executive Vice President, Transactions in January 2011. He joined Aimco as Senior Vice President-Development in June 2006. Mr. Bezzant is responsible for portfolio management and analytics, disposition and acquisition activities, and asset management of the affordable portfolio. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Bezzant spent over 20 years with Prologis, Inc. and Catellus Development Corporation in a variety of executive positions, including those with responsibility for transactions, fund management, asset management, leasing, and operations.

 

Lisa R. Cohn.  Ms. Cohn was appointed Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in December 2007. In addition to serving as general counsel, Ms. Cohn has responsibility for insurance and risk management, human resources, compliance and asset management. From January 2004 to December 2007, Ms. Cohn served as Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel. She joined Aimco in July 2002 as Vice President and Assistant General Counsel. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Cohn was in private practice with the law firm of Hogan & Hartson LLP with a focus on public and private mergers and acquisitions, venture capital financing, securities and corporate governance.

Miles Cortez.  Mr. Cortez was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer in December 2007. He is responsible for administration, government relations, communications and special projects. Mr. Cortez joined Aimco in August 2001 as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Cortez was the senior partner of Cortez Macaulay Bernhardt & Schuetze LLC, a Denver, Colorado law firm, from December 1997 through September 2001. He served as president of the Colorado Bar Association from 1996 to 1997 and the Denver Bar Association from 1982 to 1983.

 

Ernest M. Freedman.  Mr. Freedman was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in November 2009. Mr. Freedman joined Aimco in 2007 as Senior Vice President of Financial Planning and Analysis and served as Senior Vice President of Finance from February 2009 to November 2009, responsible for financial planning, tax, accounting and related areas. From 2004 to 2007, Mr. Freedman served as Chief Financial Officer of HEI Hotels and Resorts. From 2000 to 2004, Mr. Freedman was at GE Real Estate in a number of capacities, including operations controller and finance manager for investments and acquisitions. From 1993 to 2000, Mr. Freedman was with Ernst & Young, LLP, including one year as a senior manager in the real estate practice. Mr. Freedman is a certified public accountant.

 

Keith M. Kimmel.  Mr. Kimmel was appointed Executive Vice President of Property Operations in January 2011. From September 2008 to January 2011, Mr. Kimmel served as the Area Vice President of property operations for the western region. Prior to that, from March 2006 to September 2008, he served as the Regional Vice President of property operations for California. He joined Aimco in March of 2002 as a Regional Property Manager. Prior to joining Aimco, Mr. Kimmel was with Casden Properties from 1998 through 2002, and was responsible for the operation of the new construction and high-end product line. Mr. Kimmel began his career in the multi-family real estate business in 1992 as a leasing consultant and on-site manager.

 

Daniel S. Matula.  Mr. Matula was appointed Executive Vice President of Redevelopment and Construction in January 2011. He joined Aimco as Senior Vice President of Redevelopment in January 2006. Mr. Matula oversees redevelopment, construction services, capital management, energy, service and quality and procurement. Prior to joining Aimco, from 2005 to 2006, Mr. Matula served as Senior Vice President of Development for Triad Partners, a private medical office development company headquartered in Irvine, CA. From 2000 to 2005, Mr. Matula served as Senior Vice President of Construction Services for Catellus Development Corporation.

 

James N. Bailey.  Mr. Bailey was first elected as a Director of the Company in June 2000 and is currently Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit and Compensation and Human Resources Committees. Mr. Bailey co-founded Cambridge Associates, LLC, an investment consulting firm, in 1973 and currently serves as its Senior Managing Director and Treasurer. He is also a co-founder, director and treasurer of The Plymouth Rock Company, and a director of SRB Corporation, Inc. and Homeowners Direct Company, all three of which are insurance companies and insurance company affiliates. He also serves as an Overseer for the New England Aquarium, and is on its audit and investment committees. Mr. Bailey is a member of the Massachusetts Bar and the American Bar Associations. Mr. Bailey, a long-time entrepreneur, brings particular expertise to the Board in the areas of investment and financial planning, capital markets, evaluation of institutional real estate markets and managers of all property types.

 

Richard S. Ellwood.  Mr. Ellwood was first elected as a Director of the Company in July 1994. Mr. Ellwood is currently a member of the Audit, Compensation and Human Resources, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. Ellwood was the founder and President of R.S. Ellwood & Co., Incorporated, which he operated as a real estate investment banking firm through 2004. Prior to forming his firm, Mr. Ellwood had 31 years experience on Wall Street as an investment banker, serving as: Managing Director and senior banker at Merrill Lynch Capital Markets from 1984 to 1987; Managing Director at Warburg Paribas Becker from 1978 to 1984; general partner and then Senior Vice President and a director at White, Weld & Co. from 1968 to 1978; and in various capacities at J.P. Morgan & Co. from 1955 to 1968. Mr. Ellwood served as a director of Felcor Lodging Trust, Incorporated, a publicly held company, from 1994 to 2009. He is as a trustee of the Diocesan Investment Trust of the Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey and is chairman of the diocesan audit committee. As one of the first real estate investment bankers, Mr. Ellwood brings particular expertise in real estate finance through corporate securities in both public and private markets as well as in direct property financings through mortgage placements, limited partnerships and joint ventures.

Thomas L. Keltner.  Mr. Keltner was first elected as a Director of the Company in April 2007 and is currently a member of the Audit, Compensation and Human Resources, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. Keltner served as Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer — Americas and Global Brands for Hilton Hotels Corporation from March 2007 through March 2008, which concluded the transition period following Hilton’s acquisition by The Blackstone Group. Mr. Keltner joined Hilton Hotels Corporation in 1999 and served in various roles. Mr. Keltner has more than 20 years of experience in the areas of hotel development, acquisition, disposition, franchising and management. Prior to joining Hilton Hotels Corporation, from 1993 to 1999, Mr. Keltner served in several positions with Promus Hotel Corporation, including President, Brand Performance and Development. Before joining Promus Hotel Corporation, he served in various capacities with Holiday Inn Worldwide, Holiday Inns International and Holiday Inns, Inc. In addition, Mr. Keltner was President of Saudi Marriott Company, a division of Marriott Corporation, and was a management consultant with Cresap, McCormick and Paget, Inc. Mr. Keltner brings particular expertise to the Board in the areas of property operations, marketing, branding, development and customer service.

 

J. Landis Martin.  Mr. Martin was first elected as a Director of the Company in July 1994 and is currently Chairman of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee. Mr. Martin is also a member of the Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees and serves as the Lead Independent Director of Aimco’s Board. Mr. Martin is the Founder and Managing Director of Platte River Ventures LLC, a private equity firm. In November 2005, Mr. Martin retired as Chairman and CEO of Titanium Metals Corporation, a publicly held integrated producer of titanium metals, where he served since January 1994. Mr. Martin served as President and CEO of NL Industries, Inc., a publicly held manufacturer of titanium dioxide chemicals, from 1987 to 2003. Mr. Martin is also a director of Crown Castle International Corporation, a publicly held wireless communications company, Halliburton Company, a publicly held provider of products and services to the energy industry, and Intrepid Potash, Inc., a publicly held producer of potash. As a former chief executive of four NYSE-listed companies, Mr. Martin brings particular expertise to the Board in the areas of operations, finance and governance.

 

Robert A. Miller.  Mr. Miller was first elected as a Director of the Company in April 2007 and is currently a member of the Audit, Compensation and Human Resources, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. Miller has served as the President of Marriott Leisure since 1997. Prior to joining Marriott Leisure, from 1984 to 1988, Mr. Miller served as Executive Vice President & General Manager of Marriott Vacation Club International and then as its President from 1988 to 1997. In 1984, Mr. Miller and a partner sold their company, American Resorts, Inc., to Marriott. Mr. Miller co-founded American Resorts, Inc. in 1978, and it was the first business model to encompass all aspects of timeshare resort development, sales, management and operations. Prior to founding American Resorts, Inc., from 1972 to 1978, Mr. Miller was Chief Financial Officer of Fleetwing Corporation, a regional retail and wholesale petroleum company. Prior to joining Fleetwing, Mr. Miller served for five years as a staff accountant for Arthur Young & Company. Mr. Miller is past Chairman and currently a director of the American Resort Development Association (“ARDA”) and currently serves as Chairman and director of the ARDA International Foundation. As a successful real estate entrepreneur and corporate executive, Mr. Miller brings particular expertise to the Board in the areas of operations, management, marketing, sales, and development, as well as finance and accounting.

 

Kathleen M. Nelson.  Ms. Nelson was first elected as a Director of the Company in April 2010 and is currently a member of the Audit, Compensation and Human Resources, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Ms. Nelson has an extensive background in commercial real estate and financial services with over 40 years of experience including 36 years at TIAA-CREF. She held the position of Managing Director/Group Leader and Chief Administrative Officer for TIAA-CREF’s mortgage and real estate division. Ms. Nelson developed and staffed TIAA’s real estate research department. She retired from this position in December 2004 and founded and serves as president of KMN Associates LLC, a commercial real estate investment advisory and consulting firm. In 2009, Ms. Nelson co-founded and serves as Managing Principal of Bay Hollow Associates, LLC, a commercial real estate consulting firm, which provides counsel to institutional investors. Ms. Nelson served as the International Council of Shopping Centers’ chairman for the 2003-04 term and has been an ICSC Trustee since 1991. She also is the chairman of the ICSC Audit Committee and is a member of various other committees. Ms. Nelson serves on the Board of Directors of CBL & Associates Properties, Inc., which is a publicly held REIT that develops and manages retail shopping properties. She is a member of Castagna Realty Company Advisory

Board and has served as an advisor to the Rand Institute Center for Terrorism Risk Management Policy and on the board of the Greater Jamaica Development Corporation. Ms. Nelson serves on the Advisory Board of the Beverly Willis Architectural Foundation and is a member of the Anglo American Real Property Institute. Ms. Nelson brings to the Board particular expertise in the areas of real estate finance and investment.

 

Michael A. Stein.  Mr. Stein was first elected as a Director of the Company in October 2004 and is currently the Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Stein is also a member of the Compensation and Human Resources and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. From January 2001 until its acquisition by Eli Lilly in January 2007, Mr. Stein served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ICOS Corporation, a biotechnology company based in Bothell, Washington. From October 1998 to September 2000, Mr. Stein was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nordstrom, Inc. From 1989 to September 1998, Mr. Stein served in various capacities with Marriott International, Inc., including Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1993 to 1998. Mr. Stein serves on the Board of Directors of Nautilus, Inc., which is a publicly held fitness company, and the Board of Directors of Providence Health & Services, a not-for-profit health system operating hospitals and other health care facilities across Alaska, Washington, Montana, Oregon and California. As the former chief financial officer of two NYSE-listed companies and a former partner at Arthur Andersen, Mr. Stein brings particular expertise to the Board in the areas of corporate and real estate finance, and accounting and auditing for large and complex business operations.

 

The Board has determined that to be considered independent, an outside director may not have a direct or indirect material relationship with Aimco or its subsidiaries (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the Company). A material relationship is one that impairs or inhibits — or has the potential to impair or inhibit — a director’s exercise of critical and disinterested judgment on behalf of Aimco and its stockholders. In determining whether a material relationship exists, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances, for example, whether the director or a family member is a current or former employee of the Company, family member relationships, compensation, business relationships and payments, and charitable contributions between Aimco and an entity with which a director is affiliated (as an executive officer, partner or substantial stockholder). In addition to the factors mentioned, the Board previously evaluated a potential investment relationship between a Considine family partnership and a fund managed by Mr. Martin, which investment later was made on the same terms as those offered to other investors. The Board consults with the Company’s counsel to ensure that such determinations are consistent with all relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of “independent director,” including but not limited to those categorical standards set forth in Section 303A.02 of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange as in effect from time to time.

 

Consistent with these considerations, the Board affirmatively has determined that Messrs. Bailey, Ellwood, Keltner, Martin, Miller, and Stein and Ms. Nelson are independent directors (collectively the “Independent Directors”).

 

The Board held four meetings during the year ended December 31, 2010. The Board has established three committees: Audit; Compensation and Human Resources; and Nominating and Corporate Governance. During 2010, no director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board, and each director was present at all such meetings. Except as described below, during 2010, no director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of meetings of any committee of the Board on which such director served. Due to long standing travel plans that conflicted with two meetings of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee that were scheduled with little advance notice, Mr. Ellwood attended 60% of the meetings of that committee.

 

The Corporate Governance Guidelines, as described below, provide that the Company generally expects that the Chairman of the Board will attend all annual and special meetings of the stockholders. Other members of the Board are not required to attend such meetings. All of the members of the Board and Ms. Nelson attended the

Company’s 2010 annual meeting of stockholders, and the Company anticipates that all of the members of the Board will attend the Meeting this year.

 

Below is a table illustrating the standing committee memberships and chairmen. Additional detail on each committee follows the table.

 

 

 

 

Audit Committee

 

The Audit Committee currently consists of the seven Independent Directors, and the Audit Committee Chairman is Mr. Stein. The Audit Committee makes determinations concerning the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement (including the audit of the Company’s financial statements and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting), reviews the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm and considers the range of audit and non-audit fees. The Audit Committee also provides oversight for the Company’s financial reporting process, internal control over financial reporting, the Company’s internal audit function and, in conjunction with the Board, the Company’s enterprise risk management processes. Areas involving risk that are reported on by management and considered by the Audit Committee, the other Board committees, or the Board, include: operations, liquidity, leverage, finance, financial statements, the financial reporting process, accounting, legal matters, regulatory compliance, and human resources.

 

The Audit Committee held five meetings during the year ended December 31, 2010. The Audit Committee has a written charter that is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com) and is also available in print to stockholders, upon written request to Aimco’s Corporate Secretary. As set forth in the Audit Committee’s charter, no director may serve as a member of the Audit Committee if such director serves on the audit committee of more than two other public companies, unless the Board determines that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of such director to effectively serve on the Audit Committee. No member of the Audit Committee serves on the audit committee of more than two other public companies.

 

Audit Committee Financial Expert

 

Aimco’s Board has designated Mr. Stein as an “audit committee financial expert.” In addition, several other members of the audit committee qualify as audit committee financial experts. Each member of the Audit Committee is independent, as that term is defined by Section 303A of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange relating to audit committees.

Compensation and Human Resources Committee

 

The Compensation and Human Resources Committee currently consists of the seven Independent Directors, and the Compensation and Human Resources Committee Chairman is Mr. Martin. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee’s purposes are to: oversee the Company’s compensation and employee benefit plans and practices, including its executive compensation plans and its incentive-compensation and equity-based plans; review and discuss with management the Compensation Discussion & Analysis; and direct the preparation of, and approve, a report on executive compensation to be included in the Company’s proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders or Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee held six meetings during the year ended December 31, 2010. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee has a written charter that is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com) and is also available in print to stockholders, upon written request to Aimco’s Corporate Secretary.

 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee currently consists of the seven Independent Directors, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman is Mr. Bailey. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s purposes are to: identify and recommend to the Board individuals qualified to serve on the Board; advise the Board with respect to Board composition, procedures and committees; develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to Aimco and its management; and oversee evaluation of the Board and management (in conjunction with the Compensation and Human Resources Committee). The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings during the year ended December 31, 2010. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has a written charter that is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com) and is also available in print to stockholders, upon written request to Aimco’s Corporate Secretary.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee selects nominees for director on the basis of, among other things, breadth and depth of experience, knowledge, skills, expertise, integrity, ability to make independent analytical inquiries, understanding of Aimco’s business environment and willingness to devote adequate time and effort to Board responsibilities. In considering nominees for director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to have a diverse range of experience and expertise relevant to Aimco’s business. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assesses the appropriate balance of criteria required of directors and makes recommendations to the Board.

 

When formulating its Board membership recommendations, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers advice and recommendations from others, including stockholders, as it deems appropriate. Such recommendations are evaluated on the basis of the same criteria noted above. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider as nominees to the Board for election at next year’s annual meeting of stockholders persons who are recommended by stockholders in writing, marked to the attention of Aimco’s Corporate Secretary, no later than July 1, 2011. During 2010, no Aimco stockholder expressed interest in serving on the Board.

 

The Board is responsible for nominating members for election to the Board and for filling vacancies on the Board that may occur between annual meetings of stockholders. Based on recommendations from the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board determined to nominate Messrs. Bailey, Considine, Ellwood, Keltner, Martin, Miller, and Stein and Ms. Nelson for re-election.

 

Board Leadership Structure

 

At this time, Aimco’s Board believes that combining the Chairman and CEO role is most effective for the Company’s leadership and governance. Having one person as Chairman and CEO provides unified leadership and direction to the Company and strengthens the ability of the CEO to develop and implement strategic initiatives and respond efficiently in various situations. The Board also believes the combination of Chairman and CEO positions is appropriate in light of the independent oversight provided by the Board. Aimco has a Lead Independent Director, currently Mr. Martin, who: presides over executive sessions of independent directors; serves as a liaison between the chairman and independent directors; reviews information sent to directors; approves meeting agendas and

schedules; may call meetings of independent directors; and, if asked by major stockholders, is available for direct communication if appropriate. In addition to the Lead Independent Director, the Board has a majority of independent directors. Seven out of the eight director nominees are independent. The Audit, Compensation and Human Resources, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are composed solely of independent directors.

 

Separate Sessions of Non-Management Directors and Lead Independent Director

 

Aimco’s Corporate Governance Guidelines (described below) provide that the non-management directors shall meet in executive session without management on a regularly scheduled basis, but no less than four times per year. The non-management directors, which group currently is made up of the seven Independent Directors, met in executive session without management four times during the year ended December 31, 2010. Mr. Martin was the Lead Independent Director who presided at such executive sessions in 2010, and he has been designated as the Lead Independent Director who will preside at such executive sessions in 2011.

 

The following table sets forth the number of meetings held by the Board and each committee during the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

 

Majority Voting for the Election of Directors

 

In an uncontested election at the meeting of stockholders, any nominee to serve as a director of the Company will be elected if the director receives a vote of the majority of votes cast, which means that the number of shares voted “for” a director exceeds the number of votes “against” that director. With respect to a contested election, a plurality of all the votes cast at the meeting of stockholders will be sufficient to elect a director. If a nominee who currently is serving as a director receives a greater number of “against” votes for his or her election than votes “for” such election (a “Majority Against Vote”) in an uncontested election, Maryland law provides that the director would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover director.” However, under Aimco’s Bylaws, any nominee for election as a director in an uncontested election who receives a Majority Against Vote is obligated to tender his or her resignation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board for consideration. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider any resignation and recommend to the Board whether to accept it. The Board is required to take action with respect to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation. Additional details are set out in Article II, Section 2.03 (Election and Tenure of Directors; Resignations) of Aimco’s Bylaws.

 

In formulating its recommendation for director compensation, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews director compensation for independent directors of companies in the real estate industry and companies of comparable market capitalization, revenue and assets and considers compensation trends for other

NYSE-listed companies and S&P 500 companies. For the year ended December 31, 2010, Aimco paid the directors serving on the Board as follows:

 

 

 

 

The dollar value shown above represents the grant date fair value and is calculated based on the closing price of Aimco’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on February 2, 2010, of $16.26 and in the case of Ms. Nelson is calculated based on the closing price of Aimco Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on April 27, 2010, of $21.67.

 

Compensation for each of the Independent Directors in 2011 is an annual fee of 6,000 shares of Common Stock, which shares were awarded on February 1, 2011. The closing price of Aimco’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on February 1, 2011, was $25.75. The Independent Directors will also receive a fee of $1,000 for attendance in person or telephonically at each meeting of the Board, and a fee of $1,000 for attendance at each meeting of any Board committee.

 

The Board has adopted a code of ethics entitled “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics” that applies to the members of the Board, all of Aimco’s executive officers and all employees of Aimco or its subsidiaries, including Aimco’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com) and is also available in print to stockholders, upon written request to Aimco’s Corporate Secretary. If, in the future, Aimco amends, modifies or waives a provision in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, rather than filing a Current Report on Form 8-K, Aimco intends to satisfy any applicable disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K by posting such information on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com), as necessary.

 

The Board has adopted and approved Corporate Governance Guidelines. These guidelines are available on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com) and are also available in print to stockholders, upon written request to Aimco’s Corporate Secretary. In general, the Corporate Governance Guidelines address director qualification standards, director responsibilities, the lead independent director, director access to management and independent advisors, director compensation, director orientation and continuing education, management succession, stock ownership guidelines and retention requirements, and an annual performance evaluation of the Board.

 

Any interested parties desiring to communicate with Aimco’s Board, the Lead Independent Director, any of the Independent Directors, Aimco’s Chairman of the Board, any committee chairman, or any committee member may directly contact such persons by directing such communications in care of Aimco’s Corporate Secretary. All communications received as set forth in the preceding sentence will be opened by the office of Aimco’s General Counsel for the sole purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to Aimco’s directors. Any contents that are not in the nature of advertising, promotions of a product or service, or patently offensive material will be forwarded promptly to the addressee. In the case of communications to the Board or any group or committee of directors, the General Counsel’s office will make sufficient copies of the contents to send to each director who is a member of the group or committee to which the envelope or e-mail is addressed.

 

To contact Aimco’s Corporate Secretary, correspondence should be addressed as follows:

 

Corporate Secretary
Office of the General Counsel
Apartment Investment and Management Company
4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100
Denver, Colorado 80237

 

The Audit Committee oversees Aimco’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. A written charter approved by the Audit Committee and ratified by the Board governs the Audit Committee. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

 

The Audit Committee reviewed with the independent registered public accounting firm, which is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, its judgment as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles. The Audit Committee also has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T. In addition, the Audit Committee has received from the independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures and letter required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Ethics and Independence Rule 3526, has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm its independence from the Company and its management, and has considered whether the independent registered public accounting firm’s provision of non-audit services to the Company is compatible with maintaining such firm’s independence.

 

The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for its audit. The Audit Committee meets with the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its examination, its evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting. The Audit Committee held five meetings during 2010.

 

None of the Audit Committee members have a relationship with the Company that might interfere with the exercise of the member’s independence from the Company and its management.

 

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited financial statements and management’s report on internal control over financial reporting be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee has also determined that provision by Ernst & Young LLP of other non-audit services is compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLP’s independence. The Audit Committee and the Board have also recommended, subject to stockholder ratification, the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2011.

 

Date: February 21, 2011

 

MICHAEL A. STEIN (CHAIRMAN)
JAMES N. BAILEY
RICHARD S. ELLWOOD
THOMAS L. KELTNER
J. LANDIS MARTIN
ROBERT A. MILLER
KATHLEEN M. NELSON

 

The above report will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates the same by reference.

 

The aggregate fees billed for services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were approximately $6.46 million and $7.15 million, respectively, and are described below.

 

Audit Fees

 

Fees for audit services totaled approximately $4.14 million in 2010 and approximately $3.97 million in 2009. These amounts include fees associated with the annual audit of the financial statements of Aimco, its internal control over financial reporting and the financial statements of certain of its consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated investees. Fees for audit services also include fees for the reviews of interim financial statements in Aimco’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, registration statements filed with the SEC, other SEC filings, equity or debt offerings, comfort letters and consents.

 

Audit-Related Fees

 

Fees for audit-related services totaled approximately $0.10 million in 2010 and approximately $0.13 million in 2009. Audit-related services principally include various audit and attest work not required by statute or regulation, benefit plan audits, and accounting consultations.

 

Tax Fees

 

Fees billed for tax services totaled approximately $2.22 million in 2010 and approximately $3.04 million in 2009. Such amounts included fees for tax compliance services for the Company and approximately 252 subsidiaries or affiliates of approximately $2.14 million in 2010 and approximately $2.54 million in 2009. The portion of the total representing fees for tax planning services amounted to approximately $0.08 million in 2010 and approximately $0.50 million in 2009.

 

All Other Fees

 

Fees for all other services not included above were zero in 2010 and 2009. There were no fees billed or incurred in 2010 and 2009 related to financial information systems design and implementation.

 

Included in the fees above are audit and tax compliance fees of $3.17 million and $3.77 million for 2010 and 2009, respectively, for services provided to consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships for which an Aimco subsidiary is the general partner. Audit services were provided to approximately 55 such partnerships, and tax compliance services were provided to approximately 252 such partnerships during 2010.

 

The Audit Committee has adopted the Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy (the “Pre-approval Policy”). The Pre-approval Policy describes the Audit, Audit-related, Tax and Other Permitted services that have the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee, typically subject to a dollar limit of $50,000. The term of any general pre-approval is generally 12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee considers a different period and states otherwise. At least annually, the Audit Committee will review and pre-approve the services that may be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm without obtaining specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee. In accordance with this review, the Audit Committee may add to or subtract from the list of general pre-approved services or modify the permissible dollar limit associated with pre-approvals. As set forth in the Pre-approval Policy, unless a type of service has received general pre-approval and is anticipated to be within the dollar limit associated with the general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee if it is to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. For both types of pre-approval, the Audit Committee will consider whether such services are consistent with the rules on independent registered public accounting firm independence. The Audit Committee will also consider whether the independent registered public accounting firm is best positioned to provide the most effective and efficient service, for reasons

such as its familiarity with Aimco’s business, people, culture, accounting systems, risk profile and other factors, and whether the service might enhance Aimco’s ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. All such factors will be considered as a whole, and no one factor will necessarily be determinative. All of the services described above were approved pursuant to the annual engagement letter or in accordance with the Pre-approval Policy; none were approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of SEC Regulation S-X.

 

The following table sets forth certain information available to the Company, as of February 25, 2011, with respect to Aimco’s equity securities beneficially owned by (i) each director, the chief executive officer, the chief financial officer and the three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at the end of the last completed fiscal year, and (ii) all directors and executive officers as a group. The table also sets forth certain information available to the Company, as of February 25, 2011, with respect to shares of Common Stock held by each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of such shares. This table reflects options that are exercisable within 60 days. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the securities beneficially owned by that person. The business address of each of the following directors and executive officers is 4582 South Ulster Street Parkway, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237, unless otherwise specified.

 

 

 

 

 

 

This CD&A addresses the following:

 

 

Overview of Aimco’s “Pay for Performance” Philosophy and 2010 Performance Results

 

Aimco is a “pay for performance” organization. Aimco starts by setting target total compensation near the median of target total compensation for Aimco’s peers as identified below, both as a measure of fairness and also to provide an economic incentive to remain with Aimco. In some cases, target total compensation may be lower or higher than the peer median because of the tenure of the executive officer in his or her position. Actual compensation is determined based on Aimco’s results and individual performance. Every officer’s annual cash incentive compensation, or STI, is based in part on Aimco’s performance against its annual corporate goals. The more senior level the officer, the greater the percentage of his or her annual cash incentive compensation that is based on Aimco’s performance against its corporate goals, all the way up through Mr. Considine, whose entire annual cash incentive compensation is based on Aimco’s performance against its corporate goals. Aimco’s long-term incentive compensation, or LTI, follows a similar tiered structure. Every officer’s LTI is based in part on Aimco’s one-year and three-year total shareholder return (“TSR”) as compared to the MSCI US REIT Index (the “REIT Index”), with executive officers having a greater share of their LTI based on TSR performance. LTI vests over time, typically a period of four years, so that officers bear longer term exposure to decisions made and to create “switching costs.” Aimco also requires substantial equity holdings by executive officers in order to increase their alignment with stockholders.

 

Aimco had a strong year of performance in 2010 as reflected in its total same store Net Operating Income (“NOI”) growth and TSR, shown graphically on the next page. Aimco also strengthened its balance sheet by paying off its recourse term debt. As set forth in detail below, Aimco outperformed on its corporate goals for 2010 and on TSR as compared to the REIT Index, resulting in 2010 incentive compensation payouts above target.

Aimco’s year-over-year total same store NOI growth, which for Aimco includes conventional and affordable property operations, was the second best in its sector, as shown on the graph below.

 

 

Aimco’s one-year and three-year TSR outperformed the REIT Index and the S&P 500 Total Return Index, as shown in the graph below.

 

Components of Executive Compensation

 

Total compensation for Aimco’s executive officers is comprised of the following components:

 

 

How the Committee determines the amount of target total compensation for executive officers.

 

The Compensation and Human Resources Committee (the “Committee”) reviews the performance of, and determines the compensation for, the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee also reviews the decisions made by the Chief Executive Officer as to the compensation of Aimco’s other executive officers.

 

Base compensation is set by, using as a guide, median base compensation paid by peer comparators (discussed further below) for similar positions. In general, base compensation for executives relatively new to their positions is set below the median, and base compensation for seasoned executives is set near the median.

 

STI is generally targeted to deliver total cash compensation (base compensation plus STI) levels at the median paid by peer comparators, with meaningful upside and downside. LTI is generally targeted to deliver total compensation (base compensation, STI and LTI) levels at the median paid by peer comparators.

 

How peer comparators are identified.

 

Aimco considers enterprise Gross Asset Value (“GAV”), which is Aimco’s estimation of the fair value of its assets, as an imprecise, but reasonable, representation of the complexity of a real estate business and of the responsibilities of its leaders. In addition to GAV, Aimco also reviews other factors, including gross revenues, number of properties, and number of employees, to determine if these factors provide any additional insight into the size and complexity factors of its analysis. Based on this analysis, Aimco includes as “peers” for 2010 compensation the following 20 real estate companies: AMB Property Corp., AvalonBay Communities Inc., Boston Properties, Inc., Brookfield Property Corp., CBL & Associates Properties, Inc., Developers Diversified Realty Corp., Duke Realty Corp., HCP, Inc., Health Care REIT, Inc., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., Kimco Realty Corp., Liberty Property Trust, Macerich Co., Prologis, Inc., Public Storage, Inc., Regency Centers Corp., SL Green Realty Corp., Taubman Centers, Inc., UDR, Inc., and Ventas, Inc. At the time 2010 compensation targets were established, approximately half of these real estate companies had a larger GAV, and approximately half of these real estate companies had a smaller GAV, than Aimco.

 

How the Committee determines the allocation of Mr. Considine’s target total compensation between base compensation, STI and LTI.

 

The Committee’s philosophy with respect to Mr. Considine’s base compensation is to set a fixed base compensation amount to provide a level of base compensation that is competitive with pay for comparable chief executive officer positions in real estate companies and companies in other industries with similar revenue size and management complexity. The Committee set that level at $600,000 in Mr. Considine’s employment agreement.

 

Mr. Considine’s employment agreement provides for an overall minimum target incentive amount, but does not specify a certain percentage of the target incentive to be in the form of STI versus LTI. In connection with renewing his employment agreement in December 2008, the Committee set Mr. Considine’s target STI and target LTI using median competitive target total cash compensation and median target total compensation for Aimco’s peers in 2008.

How Aimco determines the allocation of target total compensation for executive officers (other than the CEO) between base compensation, STI and LTI.

 

Base compensation amounts are generally the same for officers with comparable levels of responsibility to provide internal equity and consistency among executive officers. Executive officer base compensation is paid in cash. In some cases, base compensation varies from that of the market median or from that of officers with comparable levels of responsibility because of the current recruiting or retention market for a particular position, or because of the tenure of a particular officer in his or her position.

 

Target STI and LTI for executive officers was set using median competitive target total cash compensation and median target total compensation for Aimco’s peers. Target STI and LTI for executive officers relatively new to their positions was set below the median levels of target total cash compensation and target total compensation paid by Aimco’s peers.

 

How incentive compensation (STI and LTI) serves Aimco’s objectives.

 

Incentive compensation is used primarily to provide total compensation potential that is competitive with pay for comparable positions in real estate companies. Providing incentive compensation in the form of Aimco equity that vests over time (typically a period of four years) serves as a retention incentive, aligns executive compensation with stockholder objectives and serves as an incentive to take a longer-term view of Aimco’s performance. When the equity is in the form of restricted stock, the compensation is linked to performance because the future value of the equity depends on the performance of Aimco’s stock.

 

Risk analysis of Aimco’s compensation programs.

 

Neither Aimco’s executive compensation program nor any of its non-executive compensation programs create risk-taking incentives that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the organization. Aimco’s compensation programs align with the long-term interests of the Company, as follows:

 

 

Total Compensation for 2010

 

For 2010, total compensation is the sum of base compensation, STI and LTI.

 

Base Compensation for 2010

 

Mr. Considine’s Base Compensation

 

In 2010, Mr. Considine’s base compensation of $600,000 was paid in cash. His base compensation of $600,000 has remained unchanged since 2006.

 

Other Executive Officer Base Compensation

 

For 2010, base compensation for all other executive officers was set between $325,000 and $500,000, with no increases in base compensation rates as compared to 2009.

 

Incentive Compensation for 2010

 

The Compensation Committee determined Mr. Considine’s STI by the extent to which Aimco met five designated corporate goals, which are described below and are referred to as Aimco’s Key Performance Indicators, or KPI.

 

For the other executive officers, calculation of STI is determined by two components, Aimco’s performance against the KPI and each individual officer’s achievement of his or her MAP goals. For Messrs. Freedman and Beaudin and Ms. Cohn, given their roles in the implementation of company strategy, an allocation of the target STI is made primarily based on KPI as follows: 75% of the target STI is calculated based on KPI and 25% of the target STI is calculated based on MAP. For example, if an executive’s target STI is $500,000, then 75% of that amount, or $375,000, varies based on KPI results and 25% of that amount, or $125,000, varies based on MAP results. If KPI results are 50%, then the executive receives 50% of $375,000 (or $187,500) for that portion of his STI and if MAP results are 100%, then the executive receives 100% of the $125,000, for a total STI payment of $312,500.

 

For Mr. Cortez, an allocation of the target STI is made as follows: 50% of the target STI is calculated based on KPI and 50% of the target STI is calculated based on MAP. Mr. Cortez’s STI allocation reflects the greater amount of special project work he performs as compared to the other named executives.

 

Aimco’s KPI consisted of five corporate goals that were reviewed with, and approved by, the Committee — namely, property operations performance, portfolio quality, financial performance, balance sheet, and compliance and team member engagement. These goals and their expected successful outcome aligned executive officers with the long-term goals of the Company without encouraging them to take unnecessary and excessive risks. For most goals, Threshold performance paid out at 50%; Target performance paid out at 100%; and Maximum performance paid out at 200%. For some goals, performance was capped at Target. Performance below Threshold resulted in no payout. Where performance was between Threshold and Target or Target and Maximum, the proportion of the award earned was interpolated. Four of the five goals also carried components that were based on qualitative

assessments not based on numerical targets. The following were Aimco’s KPI for 2010 and the Company’s performance against those goals:

 

 

 

 

Due to Aimco’s outperformance on multiple goals, Aimco’s overall KPI performance was 128.52%. Accordingly, each executive officer was awarded 128.52% of the portion of his or her target STI attributable to KPI.

 

At the start of 2010, the Committee determined for Mr. Considine, and Mr. Considine determined for the other executive officers, that LTI for 2010 would be based in part on TSR. Specifically, one-third of each executive officer’s LTI target would be awarded for the purpose of attracting and retaining key talent integral to the success of Aimco. Two-thirds of the LTI target would be based on TSR, with half (one-third of the total LTI target) based on Aimco’s one-year TSR as compared to the REIT Index, and half (another one-third of the total LTI target) based on Aimco’s three-year TSR as compared to the REIT Index. Aimco TSR at greater than 110% of the REIT Index would result in a 125% payout of the LTI target attributable to TSR and Aimco TSR at less than 90% of the REIT Index would result in a 75% payout of the LTI target attributable to TSR. Aimco TSR between 90% and 110% of the REIT Index would result in a 100% payout of the LTI target attributable to TSR.

 

Each of Aimco’s one-year and three-year TSR were greater than 110% of the REIT Index, resulting in a 125% payout of those portions of target LTI attributable to TSR. Accordingly, each executive officer was awarded approximately 116.67% of his or her target LTI (i.e., one-third of the LTI target was for purposes of retention and paid at 100%; one-third of the LTI target was paid at 125% based on outperformance on one-year TSR; and one-third of the LTI target was paid at 125% based on outperformance on three-year TSR; and the net effect of these three components resulted in an overall award of 116.67% of target LTI).

 

Mr. Considine’s employment agreement provides for target incentive compensation (both STI and LTI combined) of not less than $3.9 million. As he did for 2009, Mr. Considine voluntarily reduced his target incentive compensation for 2010 in consideration of the economic turbulence. Specifically, Mr. Considine voluntarily reduced his target incentive compensation from $3.9 million to $3.21 million for 2009 and from $3.9 million to $3.05 million for 2010. Mr. Considine’s STI for 2010 was entirely based on Aimco’s performance against the five designated corporate goals. Mr. Considine’s STI was calculated by multiplying his STI target of $1.05 million by 128.52%, which was Aimco’s overall performance on the five corporate goals. Mr. Considine’s LTI was calculated by multiplying his LTI target of $2.0 million by 116.67%. This resulted in the following:

 

 

Mr. Considine’s STI is paid in cash and his LTI is in the form of 91,830 shares of restricted stock, which vest ratably over four years. The shares were granted on January 31, 2011. Because the equity award for 2010 LTI was made in 2011, pursuant to the applicable disclosure rules, such award will be reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table” and “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2011” table in Aimco’s proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders. Providing LTI in the form of Aimco equity that vests over time serves as a retention incentive, aligns Mr. Considine’s compensation with stockholder objectives and serves as an incentive to take a longer term view of Aimco’s performance. Mr. Considine’s compensation is highly variable, and has changed significantly with performance over the past five years.

 

As noted above, for Messrs. Freedman and Beaudin and Ms. Cohn, an allocation of the target STI is made as follows: 75% of the target STI was calculated based on Aimco’s performance against the KPI and 25% of the target STI was calculated based on each executive’s achievement of his or her individual MAP objectives. For Mr. Cortez, 50% of the target STI was calculated based on Aimco’s performance against the KPI and 50% of the target STI was calculated based on his achievement of his individual MAP goals. As noted above, Aimco’s KPI performance was 128.52%. Accordingly, each executive officer was awarded 128.52% of the portion of his or her STI (i.e., 75% of the target STI amount shown below for Messrs. Freedman and Beaudin and Ms. Cohn, and 50% of the target STI amount shown below for Mr. Cortez) attributable to KPI. In determining the MAP achievement component of 2010 STI, Mr. Considine determined that: Mr. Freedman’s MAP achievement would be paid at 112.5% for his contributions to finance and planning and information technology; Ms. Cohn’s MAP achievement would be paid at 112.5% for her leadership over legal matters, insurance, risk management and human resources; Mr. Cortez’s

MAP achievement would be paid at 112.5% for his role in addressing issues related to assets in the portfolio requiring specialized oversight and negotiation; and Mr. Beaudin’s MAP achievement would be paid at 100% for his contributions to operations, asset management, and transactions. The Committee reviewed Mr. Considine’s determinations.

 

 

Pursuant to the applicable disclosure rules, the STI shown above appears in the Summary Compensation Table under the column headed “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”

 

With respect to LTI, the shares of restricted stock were granted January 31, 2011, and vest ratably over four years. Because the equity awards for 2010 incentive compensation were made in 2011, pursuant to the applicable disclosure rules, such awards will be reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table” and “Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2011” table in Aimco’s proxy statement for the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders. For the purpose of calculating the number of shares of restricted stock to be granted, the dollars allocated to restricted stock were divided by $25.41 per share, which was the average of the closing trading prices of Aimco’s Common Stock on the five trading days up to and including the grant date. The five-day average was used to provide a more fair approximation of the value of the stock at the time of grant by muting the effect of any single day spikes or declines.

 

Mr. Beaudin announced his resignation from Aimco prior to the time incentive compensation for 2010 was awarded, and, therefore, received no LTI for 2010. Mr. Beaudin did not receive any payment in connection with his resignation.

 

Other Compensation

 

From time to time, Aimco determines to provide executive officers with additional compensation in the form of discretionary cash or equity awards. No such additional compensation was provided to the named executive officers in 2010.

 

On January 31, 2011, Aimco awarded each of Mr. Freedman and Ms. Cohn a restricted stock award of 39,355 shares, with an approximate fair market value at the grant date of $1 million. These grants, which vest primarily at the end of four and one-half years from the date of grant, were provided for the purposes of retention and brought the “switching costs” for Mr. Freedman and Ms. Cohn closer to the median switching costs of comparable positions within the Aimco peer group.

 

Post-Employment Compensation and Severance Arrangements

 

401(k)

 

Aimco provides a 401(k) plan that is offered to all Aimco team members. Effective January 29, 2009, Aimco suspended the employer matching contribution. As a result, participant contributions made on or after January 29, 2009, were not matched with an employer contribution. Aimco may resume employer matching contributions on a discretionary basis at any time.

 

Other than the 401(k) plan, Aimco does not provide post-employment benefits. Aimco does not have a pension plan, a SERP or any other similar arrangements.

 

Executive Severance Arrangements

 

In response to a stockholder proposal seeking certain limitations regarding executive severance arrangements, in July 2004, the Committee adopted an executive severance policy. That policy provides that Aimco shall seek stockholder approval or ratification of any future severance agreement for any senior executive officer that provides for benefits, such as lump-sum or future periodic cash payments or new equity awards, in an amount in excess of

2.99 times such executive officer’s base salary and bonus. Compensation and benefits earned through the termination date, the value of vesting or payment of any equity awards outstanding prior to the termination date, pro rata vesting of any other long-term awards, or benefits provided under plans, programs or arrangements that are applicable to one or more groups of employees in addition to senior executives are not subject to the policy. Even prior to the Committee’s response to the stockholder proposal, it had been Aimco’s longstanding practice not to enter into agreements with senior executives to provide excessive severance arrangements.

 

Executive Employment Arrangements

 

On December 29, 2008, Aimco entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Considine to replace his July 29, 1994, employment agreement and the 2002 non-competition and non-solicitation agreement between Mr. Considine and Aimco. The employment agreement was entered into to reflect current practice and update Aimco’s agreement with Mr. Considine, which had not been formally revised since the Company’s initial public offering in 1994, and to make the compensation arrangements compliant with certain Internal Revenue Service requirements, primarily Section 409A of the Code, which required documentary compliance by December 31, 2008. In connection with the execution of the employment agreement, Mr. Considine did not receive any additional equity awards or signing bonus. The Committee evaluated the terms of Mr. Considine’s employment agreement in comparison to those of the CEOs of Aimco’s peers and other comparable companies.

 

The employment agreement is for an initial five-year term, with automatic renewal for successive one-year terms until the year in which Mr. Considine reaches age 70, unless earlier terminated. The employment agreement eliminates the evergreen term in the prior employment agreement.

 

Mr. Considine continues to receive his current base pay of $600,000, subject to future increase. Mr. Considine also continues to be eligible to participate in Aimco’s performance-based incentive compensation plan with a target total incentive compensation amount of not less than $3.9 million, which may be paid in cash or in equity.

 

The employment agreement provides severance payments to Mr. Considine upon his termination of employment by Aimco without cause, by Mr. Considine for good reason and upon a termination for reason of disability.

 

Mr. Considine is not entitled to any additional or special payments upon the occurrence of a change in control. Mr. Considine’s “walk right” under the 1994 employment agreement (that is, his right to severance payments upon his terminating employment with the Company within two years following a change in control) was eliminated. The definition of change in control was also narrowed to increase the required percentage of change in ownership and to require the occurrence of the applicable change in control event, as opposed to shareholder approval of such event.

 

Upon his termination of employment by Aimco without cause, by Mr. Considine for good reason, or upon a termination for reason of disability, Mr. Considine is generally entitled to (a) a lump sum cash payment equal to two times the sum of base salary at the time of termination and $1.65 million, subject to certain limited reductions, (b) any STI earned but unpaid for a prior fiscal year, (c) a pro-rata portion of a $1.65 million STI amount for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, and (d) immediate full acceleration of any outstanding unvested stock options and equity awards with certain limitations on the term thereof.

 

In the event of Mr. Considine’s death, the Company will pay or provide to Mr. Considine’s estate any earned but unpaid base salary and vested accrued benefits and any STI earned but unpaid for a prior fiscal year, and all equity-based and other long-term incentive awards granted to Mr. Considine will become immediately fully vested and payable, as applicable, and all outstanding stock option awards will remain exercisable subject to certain limitations on the term thereof.

 

Under the employment agreement, in the event payments to Mr. Considine are subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, Mr. Considine is entitled to receive a limited gross-up payment, subject to a maximum of $5 million. If covered payments are less than 10% over the permitted limit, Mr. Considine is required to reduce his payments to avoid triggering a gross-up payment. The limited gross-up payment is intended to balance the interests of Aimco’s stockholders, eliminate the incentive for the early exercise of stock options and reflect competitive practice.

 

The employment agreement also contains customary confidentiality provisions, a limited mutual non-disparagement provision, and non-competition, non-solicitation and no-hire provisions.

None of Messrs. Freedman or Cortez or Ms. Cohn has an employment agreement or severance arrangement. The restricted stock and stock option agreements pursuant to which restricted stock and stock option awards have been made to Messrs. Considine, Freedman, Cortez, Beaudin, and Ms. Cohn provide that, upon a change of control, all outstanding shares of restricted stock become immediately and fully vested and all unvested stock options become immediately and fully vested and remain exercisable (along with all options already vested) for the remainder of the term of the option. Upon his resignation from Aimco, which became effective March 1, 2011, Mr. Beaudin forfeited all unvested restricted stock and unvested stock options.

 

Other Benefits; Perquisite Philosophy

 

Aimco’s executive officer benefit programs are substantially the same as for all other eligible officers and employees. Aimco does not provide executives with more than minimal perquisites, such as reserved parking places.

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines and Required Holding Periods After Vesting

 

Aimco believes that it is in the best interest of Aimco’s stockholders for Aimco’s executive officers to own Aimco stock. The Committee and management have established stock ownership guidelines for Aimco’s executive officers. Equity ownership guidelines for all executive officers are determined as a minimum of the lesser of a multiple of the executive’s base salary or a fixed number of shares. The Committee and Mr. Considine reviewed each executive officer’s holdings in light of the stock ownership guidelines and each executive officer’s accumulated realized and unrealized stock option and restricted stock gains.

 

Aimco’s stock ownership guidelines require the following:

 

 

Any executive who has not satisfied the stock ownership guidelines must, until the stock ownership guidelines are satisfied, hold 50% of after tax shares of restricted stock for at least three years from the date of vesting, and hold 50% of shares acquired upon option exercises (50% calculated after exercise price plus taxes) for at least three years from the date of exercise.

 

Each of Messrs. Considine, Freedman, Cortez, and Beaudin and Ms. Cohn exceed the ownership targets established in Aimco’s stock ownership guidelines.

 

Role of Outside Consultants and Executive Officers

 

The Committee has the authority under its charter to engage the services of outside advisors, experts and others to assist the Committee. The Committee has engaged Aon Consulting (“Aon”) as its independent compensation consultant. At the direction of the Committee, Aon coordinates and consults with Ms. Cohn and Jennifer Johnson, Senior Vice President — Human Resources, regarding executive compensation matters. Aon provides the Committee with an independent view of both market data and plan design. Aimco management has engaged Ferguson Partners to review Aimco’s executive compensation plan. Neither Aon nor Ferguson Partners provided other services to the Company in excess of $120,000.

 

Base Salary, Incentive Compensation, and Equity Grant Practices

 

Base salary adjustments typically take effect on July 1. The Committee (for Mr. Considine), and Mr. Considine, in consultation with the Committee (for the other executive officers), determine incentive compensation in late January or early February. STI is typically paid in February or March. LTI is awarded on a date determined by the Committee, typically in late January or in February.

Aimco grants equity in three scenarios: in connection with incentive compensation, as discussed above; in connection with certain new-hire or promotion packages; and for purposes of retention and attaining a competitive level of “switching costs.”

 

With respect to LTI, the Committee sets the grant date for the stock option and restricted stock grants. The Committee sets grant dates at the time of its final compensation determination, generally in late January or in February. The date of determination and date of award are not selected based on share price. In the case of new-hire packages that include equity awards, option grants are made on the employee’s start date or on a date designated in advance based on the passage of a specific number of days after the employee’s start date. For non-executive officers, as provided for in the 2007 Plan, the Committee has delegated the authority to make equity awards, up to certain limits, to the Chief Financial Officer (Mr. Freedman) and/or Corporate Secretary (Ms. Cohn). The Committee and Mr. Freedman and Ms. Cohn time grants without regard to the share price or the timing of the release of material non-public information and do not time grants for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation.

 

In 2010, other than with respect to year-end incentive compensation for 2009, Aimco made no equity awards, either as part of new-hire packages or as additional compensation.

 

2011 Compensation Targets

 

For 2009 and 2010, Mr. Considine proposed an incentive compensation target (both STI and LTI combined) that was less than the $3.9 million minimum target provided for in his employment agreement. Mr. Considine proposed lower target amounts for these years due to the economic uncertainty and consistent with the Company’s continued focus on cost control. The Committee accepted Mr. Considine’s proposals for those years. Given that the economy appears to be entering a recovery, the Company has achieved its goals on cost control (while remaining vigilant with respect thereto), and the Company’s strong performance in 2010, the Committee set Mr. Considine’s target total compensation (base compensation, STI and LTI) for 2011 at the minimum target provided for in his employment agreement of $4.5 million. Mr. Considine set target total compensation (base compensation, STI and LTI) for 2011 for the other named executive officers as follows: Mr. Freedman — $1.1 million; Ms. Cohn — $1.1 million; and Mr. Cortez — $845,000. Mr. Considine increased the target total compensation amounts for each of Mr. Freedman and Ms. Cohn by $100,000 over 2010 targets for the purpose of setting their target total compensation amounts closer to the median for comparable positions within Aimco’s peer group. Both Aimco and individual performance will determine the amount paid for 2011 incentive compensation, and such amounts may be less than, or in excess of, these target amounts. STI will be paid in cash, and LTI will be paid in the form of restricted stock, stock options and/or deferred cash.

 

The Compensation and Human Resources Committee held six meetings during fiscal year 2010. The Compensation and Human Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based upon such review, the related discussions and such other matters deemed relevant and appropriate by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee, the Compensation and Human Resources Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement to be delivered to stockholders.

 

Date: February 21, 2011

 

J. LANDIS MARTIN (CHAIRMAN)
JAMES N. BAILEY
RICHARD S. ELLWOOD
THOMAS L. KELTNER
ROBERT A. MILLER
KATHLEEN M. NELSON
MICHAEL A. STEIN

 

The above report will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing by Aimco under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that Aimco specifically incorporates the same by reference.

 

The table below summarizes the compensation attributable to the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, each individual who served as the principal financial officer, and the three other most highly compensated executives in 2010, 2009 and 2008.

 

 

 

 

The following table provides details regarding plan-based awards granted to the named executive officers during the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

 

 

 

The following table shows outstanding stock option awards classified as exercisable and unexercisable as of December 31, 2010, for the named executive officers, other than those awards that have been transferred for value. The table also shows unvested and unearned stock awards assuming a market value of $25.84 a share (the closing market price of the Company’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31, 2010).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth certain information regarding options and stock awards exercised and vested, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2010, for the persons named in the Summary Compensation Table above. The stock vestings reflected below include additional shares received as a result of the special dividends paid in January 2008, August 2008, December 2008, and January 2009.

 

 

 

 

In the table and discussion that follows, payments and other benefits payable upon early termination and change in control situations are set out as if the conditions for payments had occurred and/or the terminations took place on December 31, 2010. In setting out such payments and benefits, amounts that had already been earned as of the termination date are not shown. Also, benefits that are available to all full-time regular employees when their employment terminates are not shown. The amounts set forth below are estimates of the amounts which could be paid out to the named executive officers upon their termination. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such named executive officers’ separation from Aimco.