e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For fiscal year ended September 30,
2009
|
Commission File Number 1-14173
MarineMax, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
59-3496957
|
(State of
Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
18167 U.S. Highway 19 North
Suite 300
Clearwater, Florida 33764
(727) 531-1700
(Address, including zip
code, and telephone number,
including area code, of
principal executive offices)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Exchange Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
Rights to Purchase Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Exchange Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of common stock held by nonaffiliates
of the registrant (17,208,443 shares) based on the closing
price of the registrants common stock as reported on the
New York Stock Exchange on March 31, 2009, which was the
last business day of the registrants most recently
completed second fiscal quarter, was $33,728,548. For purposes
of this computation, all officers, directors, and 10% beneficial
owners of the registrant are deemed to be affiliates. Such
determination should not be deemed to be an admission that such
officers, directors, or 10% beneficial owners are, in fact,
affiliates of the registrant.
As of November 30, 2009, there were outstanding
21,921,384 shares of registrants common stock, par
value $.001 per share.
Documents
Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for
the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by
reference into Part III of this report.
MARINEMAX,
INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Introduction
Our
Company
We are the largest recreational boat dealer in the United
States. Through 55 retail locations in Alabama, Arizona,
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Maryland,
Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina,
Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Texas, we sell new
and used recreational boats, including pleasure and fishing
boats, with a focus on premium brands in each segment. We also
sell related marine products, including engines, trailers,
parts, and accessories. In addition, we arrange related boat
financing, insurance, and extended service contracts; provide
repair and maintenance services; offer boat and yacht brokerage
services; and, where available, offer slip and storage
accommodations.
We are the nations largest retailer of Sea Ray, Boston
Whaler, Cabo, Hatteras, and Meridian recreational boats and
yachts, all of which are manufactured by Brunswick Corporation.
Sales of new Brunswick boats accounted for approximately 51% of
our revenue in fiscal 2009. Brunswick is the worlds
largest manufacturer of marine products and marine engines. We
believe our sales represented approximately 6% of all Brunswick
marine sales, including approximately 31% of its Sea Ray boat
sales, during our 2009 fiscal year. We are parties to dealer
agreements with Brunswick covering Sea Ray products and are the
exclusive dealer of Sea Ray boats in almost all of our
geographic markets. We also are the exclusive dealer for
Hatteras Yachts throughout the state of Florida (excluding the
Florida panhandle) and the states of New Jersey, New York, and
Texas; the exclusive dealer for Cabo Yachts throughout the
states of Florida, New Jersey, and New York; the exclusive
dealer for Boston Whaler in many of our markets, including our
locations in the states of New York, North Carolina, and
portions of the states of Florida, California, and Texas; and
the exclusive dealer for Meridian Yachts in most of our
geographic markets. In addition, we are the exclusive dealer for
Italy-based Azimut-Benetti Group for Azimut and Atlantis
mega-yachts, yachts, and other recreational boats for the
Northeast United States from Maryland to Maine and the state of
Florida.
We commenced operations as a result of the March 1, 1998
acquisition of five previously independent recreational boat
dealers. Since that time, we have acquired 20 additional
previously independent recreational boat dealers, two boat
brokerage operations, and two full-service yacht repair
operations. We capitalize on the experience and success of the
acquired companies in order to establish a new national standard
of customer service and responsiveness in the highly fragmented
retail boating industry. As a result of our emphasis on premium
brand boats, our average selling price for a new boat in fiscal
2009 was approximately $133,000, an increase of approximately 5%
from fiscal 2008, compared with the industry average calendar
2008 selling price of approximately $37,000 based on industry
data published by the National Marine Manufacturers Association.
Our stores, which operated at least 12 months, averaged
approximately $11.3 million in annual sales in fiscal 2009.
We consider a store to be one or more retail locations that are
adjacent or operate as one entity. Our same-store sales
decreased 28% in fiscal 2008 and 29% in fiscal 2009, but
averaged an annual increase of approximately 11% for the
preceding five years.
We adopt the best practices developed by us and our acquired
companies as appropriate to enhance our ability to attract more
customers, foster an overall enjoyable boating experience, and
offer boat manufacturers stable and professional retail
distribution and a broad geographic presence. We believe that
our full range of services, no hassle sales approach, prime
retail locations, premium product offerings, extensive
facilities, strong management and team members, and emphasis on
customer service and satisfaction before and after a boat sale
are competitive advantages that enable us to be more responsive
to the needs of existing and prospective customers.
The U.S. recreational boating industry generated
approximately $33.6 billion in retail sales in calendar
2008, including sales of new and used boats; marine products,
such as engines, trailers, equipment, and accessories; and
related expenditures, such as fuel, insurance, docking, storage,
and repairs. Retail sales of new and used boats, engines,
trailers, and accessories accounted for approximately
$24.8 billion of these sales in 2008 based on industry data
from the National Marine Manufacturers Association. The highly
fragmented retail boating industry generally consists of small
dealers that operate in a single market and provide varying
degrees of merchandising, professional
1
management, and customer service. We believe that many small
dealers are finding it increasingly difficult to make the
managerial and capital commitments necessary to achieve higher
customer service levels and upgrade systems and facilities as
required by boat manufacturers and demanded by customers. We
also believe that many dealers lack an exit strategy for their
owners. We believe these factors contribute to our opportunity.
Strategy
Our goal is to enhance our position as the nations leading
recreational boat dealer. Key elements of our operating and
growth strategy include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
emphasizing customer satisfaction and loyalty by creating an
overall enjoyable boating experience, beginning with a
hassle-free purchase process, superior customer service,
company-led events called Getaways!, and premier facilities;
|
|
|
|
achieving efficiencies and synergies among our operations to
enhance internal growth and profitability;
|
|
|
|
promoting national brand name recognition and the MarineMax
connection;
|
|
|
|
emphasizing the best practices developed by us and
our acquired dealers as appropriate throughout our dealerships;
|
|
|
|
offering additional products and services, including those
involving higher profit margins;
|
|
|
|
pursuing strategic acquisitions to capitalize upon the
consolidation opportunities in the highly fragmented
recreational boat dealer industry by acquiring additional
dealers and related operations and improving their performance
and profitability through the implementation of our operating
strategies;
|
|
|
|
opening additional retail facilities in our existing and new
territories;
|
|
|
|
emphasizing employee training and development;
|
|
|
|
expanding our Internet retail operations and marketing;
|
|
|
|
operating with a decentralized approach to the operational
management of our dealerships; and
|
|
|
|
utilizing information technology throughout operations, which
facilitates the interchange of information sharing and enhances
cross-selling opportunities throughout our company.
|
Development
of the Company; Expansion of Business
MarineMax was founded in January 1998. MarineMax itself,
however, conducted no operations until the acquisition of five
independent recreational boat dealers on March 1, 1998, and
we completed our initial public offering in June 1998. Since the
initial acquisitions in March 1998, we have acquired 20
additional recreational boat dealers, two boat brokerage
operations, and two full-service yacht repair operations.
Acquired dealers operate under the MarineMax name.
We continually attempt to enhance our business by providing a
full range of services, offering extensive and high-quality
product lines, maintaining prime retail locations, pursuing the
MarineMax Value Price sales approach, and emphasizing the
highest level of customer service and customer satisfaction.
We also evaluate opportunities to expand our operations by
acquiring recreational boat dealers to expand our geographic
scope, expanding our product lines, opening new retail locations
within our existing territories, and offering new products and
services for our customers.
2
Acquisitions of additional recreational boat dealers represent
an important strategy in our goal to enhance our position as the
nations leading retailer of recreational boats. The
following table sets forth information regarding the businesses
that we have acquired and their geographic regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired Companies
|
|
Acquisition Date
|
|
Geographic Region
|
|
Bassett Boat Company of Florida
|
|
|
March 1998
|
|
|
Southeast Florida
|
Louis DelHomme Marine
|
|
|
March 1998
|
|
|
Dallas and Houston, Texas
|
Gulfwind USA, Inc.
|
|
|
March 1998
|
|
|
West Central Florida
|
Gulfwind South, Inc.
|
|
|
March 1998
|
|
|
Southwest Florida
|
Harrisons Boat Center, Inc. and Harrisons Marine
Centers of Arizona, Inc.
|
|
|
March 1998
|
|
|
Northern California (closed 2009) and Arizona
|
Stovall Marine, Inc.
|
|
|
April 1998
|
|
|
Georgia
|
Cochrans Marine, Inc. and C & N Marine
Corporation
|
|
|
July 1998
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
Sea Ray of North Carolina, Inc.
|
|
|
July 1998
|
|
|
North and South Carolina
|
Brevard Boat Company
|
|
|
September 1998
|
|
|
East Central Florida
|
Sea Ray of Las Vegas
|
|
|
September 1998
|
|
|
Nevada
|
Treasure Cove Marina, Inc.
|
|
|
September 1998
|
|
|
Northern Ohio
|
Woods & Oviatt, Inc.
|
|
|
October 1998
|
|
|
Southeast Florida
|
Boating World
|
|
|
February 1999
|
|
|
Dallas, Texas
|
Merit Marine, Inc.
|
|
|
March 1999
|
|
|
Southern New Jersey
|
Suburban Boatworks, Inc.
|
|
|
April 1999
|
|
|
Central New Jersey
|
Hansen Marine, Inc.
|
|
|
August 1999
|
|
|
Northeast Florida
|
Duce Marine, Inc.
|
|
|
December 1999
|
|
|
Utah (closed 2009)
|
Clarks Landing, Inc. (selected New Jersey locations and
operations)
|
|
|
April 2000
|
|
|
Northern New Jersey
|
Associated Marine Technologies, Inc.
|
|
|
January 2001
|
|
|
Southeast Florida
|
Gulfwind Marine Partners, Inc.
|
|
|
April 2002
|
|
|
West Florida
|
Seaside Marine, Inc.
|
|
|
July 2002
|
|
|
Southern California
|
Sundance Marine, Inc.
|
|
|
June 2003
|
|
|
Colorado
|
Killinger Marine Center, Inc. and Killinger Marine Center of
Alabama, Inc.
|
|
|
September 2003
|
|
|
Northwest Florida and Alabama
|
Emarine International, Inc. and Steven Myers, Inc.
|
|
|
October 2003
|
|
|
Southeast Florida
|
Imperial Marine
|
|
|
June 2004
|
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland
|
Port Jacksonville Marine
|
|
|
June 2004
|
|
|
Northeast Florida
|
Port Arrowhead Marina, Inc.
|
|
|
January 2006
|
|
|
Missouri, Oklahoma
|
Great American Marina(1)
|
|
|
February 2006
|
|
|
West Florida
|
Surfside 3 Marina, Inc.
|
|
|
March 2006
|
|
|
Connecticut, Maryland, New York and Rhode Island
|
Apart from acquisitions, we have opened 27 new retail locations
in existing territories, excluding those opened on a temporary
basis for a specific purpose. We also monitor the performance of
our retail locations and close retail locations that do not meet
our expectations. Based on these factors and the recent
depressed economic conditions,
3
we have closed 47 retail locations since March 1998, excluding
those opened on a temporary basis for a specific purpose,
including 26 in fiscal 2009.
As a part of our acquisition strategy, we frequently engage in
discussions with various recreational boat dealers regarding
their potential acquisition by us. In connection with these
discussions, we and each potential acquisition candidate
exchange confidential operational and financial information;
conduct due diligence inquiries; and consider the structure,
terms, and conditions of the potential acquisition. In certain
cases, the prospective acquisition candidate agrees not to
discuss a potential acquisition with any other party for a
specific period of time, grants us an option to purchase the
prospective dealer for a designated price during a specific time
period, and agrees to take other actions designed to enhance the
possibility of the acquisition, such as preparing audited
financial information and converting its accounting system to
the system specified by us. Potential acquisition discussions
frequently take place over a long period of time and involve
difficult business integration and other issues, including in
some cases, management succession and related matters. As a
result of these and other factors, a number of potential
acquisitions that from time to time appear likely to occur do
not result in binding legal agreements and are not consummated.
In addition to acquiring recreational boat dealers and opening
new retail locations, we also add new product lines to expand
our operations. The following table sets forth various current
product lines that we have added to our existing locations
during the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Line
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
Geographic Regions
|
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
West Central Florida; Stuart, Florida; Dallas, Texas
|
Hatteras Yachts
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
Florida (excluding the Florida panhandle)
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
North Palm Beach, Florida
|
Meridian Yachts
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Florida, Georgia, North and South Carolina, New Jersey,
Ohio, Minnesota, Texas, and Delaware
|
Grady White
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Houston, Texas
|
Hatteras Yachts
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Texas
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
North and South Carolina
|
Princecraft
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Houston and Dallas, Texas
|
Meridian Yachts
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Chattanooga, Tennessee
|
Azimut
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Northeast United States from Maryland to Maine
|
Atlantis
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Northeast United States from Maryland to Maine
|
Cabo
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
West coast of Florida
|
Cabo
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
East coast of Florida
|
Azimut
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Florida
|
Cabo
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
New Jersey and New York
|
Hatteras Yachts
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
New Jersey and New York
|
Meridian Yachts
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Arizona, and Colorado
|
Meridian Yachts
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Maryland and Delaware
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Southwest Florida
|
As we add a brand, we believe we are offering a migration path
for our existing customer base or filling a gap in our product
offerings. As a result, we do not believe that new product
offerings will compete with or cannibalize the business
generated from our other prominent brands. We also discontinue
offering product lines from time to time, primarily based upon
customer preferences.
During the nine-year period from the commencement of our
operations through our fiscal year ended September 30,
2007, our revenue increased from $291 million to
$1.2 billion. Our revenue and net income increased in seven
of those nine years over the prior year revenue and net income.
This period was marked by an increase in
4
retail locations from 41 on September 30, 1998 to 88 on
September 30, 2007, resulting from acquisitions and opening
new stores in existing territories.
Our growth was interrupted during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007, primarily as a result of factors
related to the deteriorating housing market. Substantially
deteriorating economic and financial conditions, reduced
consumer confidence and spending, increases in fuel prices,
lower credit availability, stock and bond market declines, and
asset value deterioration all contributed to substantially lower
financial performance in the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2009, including
significant losses.
We have taken a number of actions to address recent market and
economic conditions, including deferring our acquisition
program, slowing our new store openings, reducing our inventory
purchases, engaging in inventory reduction efforts, closing a
number of our retail locations, significantly reducing our
headcount, and modifying our debt structure and credit
agreement. We cannot predict the length or severity of the
current recessionary environment or the magnitude of the effects
it will have on our operating performance nor can we predict the
effectiveness of the measures we have taken to address this
environment.
Despite the foregoing, we are maintaining our core values of
customer service and satisfaction and plan to continue to pursue
strategies that will enable us to achieve long-term growth. We
believe that we are well positioned for long-term success and
growth when economic conditions improve. Upon a return to more
normal economic conditions, we plan to resume expanding our
business through acquisitions in new geographical territories,
new store openings in existing territories, and adding new
product lines. In addition, we plan to continue to expand other
services, including conducting used boat sales; offering yacht
and boat brokerage services; offering our customers the ability
to finance new or used boats; offering extended service
contracts; arranging insurance coverage, including boat
property, credit-life, accident, disability, and casualty
coverage; selling related marine products, including engines,
trailers, parts, and accessories; providing maintenance and
repair services at our retail locations and at stand-alone
service facilities; and expanding our ability to provide slip
and storage accommodations. Our expansion plans will depend upon
the return of normal economic conditions.
We maintain our executive offices at 18167 U.S. Highway 19
North, Suite 300, Clearwater, Florida 33764, and our
telephone number is
(727) 531-1700.
We were incorporated in the state of Delaware in January 1998.
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to
MarineMax mean MarineMax, Inc. prior to its
acquisition of five previously independent recreational boat
dealers in March 1998 (including their related real estate
companies) and all references to the Company,
our company, we, us, and
our mean, as a combined company, MarineMax, Inc. and
the 20 recreational boat dealers, two boat brokerage operations,
and two full-service yacht repair operations acquired to date
(the acquired dealers, and together with the
brokerage and repair operations, operating
subsidiaries, or the acquired companies).
Our website is located at www.MarineMax.com. Through our
website, we make available free of charge our annual report on
Form 10-K,
our quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
our current reports on
Form 8-K,
our proxy statements, and any amendments to those reports filed
or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These reports are available as
soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file
those reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
SEC. We also post on our website the charters of our Audit,
Compensation, and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees;
our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics, and Code of Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial
Officers, and any amendments or waivers thereto; and any other
corporate governance materials contemplated by SEC or the
regulations of the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE. These
documents are also available in print to any stockholder
requesting a copy from our corporate secretary at our principal
executive offices. Because our common stock is listed on the
NYSE, our Chief Executive Officer is required to make an annual
certification to the NYSE stating that he is not aware of any
violation by us of the corporate governance listing standards of
the NYSE. Our Chief Executive Officer made his annual
certification to that effect to the NYSE on February 18,
2009.
5
BUSINESS
General
We are the largest recreational boat dealer in the United
States. Through 55 retail locations in Alabama, Arizona,
California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Maryland,
Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina,
Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Texas, we sell new
and used recreational boats, including pleasure boats (such as
sport boats, sport cruisers, sport yachts, and yachts), and
fishing boats, with a focus on premium brands in each segment.
We also sell related marine products, including engines,
trailers, parts, and accessories. In addition, we arrange
related boat and yacht financing, insurance, and extended
service contracts; provide repair and maintenance services;
offer boat and yacht brokerage services; and, where available,
slip and storage accommodations.
We are the nations largest retailer of Sea Ray, Boston
Whaler, Cabo, Hatteras, and Meridian recreational boats and
yachts, all of which are manufactured by Brunswick Corporation.
Sales of new Brunswick boats accounted for approximately 51% of
our revenue in fiscal 2009. Brunswick is the worlds
largest manufacturer of marine products and marine engines. We
believe our sales represented approximately 6% of all Brunswick
marine sales, including approximately 31% of its Sea Ray boat
sales, during our 2009 fiscal year. We are parties to dealer
agreements with Brunswick covering Sea Ray products and are the
exclusive dealer of Sea Ray boats in almost all of our
geographic markets. We also are the exclusive dealer for
Hatteras Yachts throughout the state of Florida (excluding the
Florida panhandle) and the states of New Jersey, New York, and
Texas; the exclusive dealer for Cabo Yachts throughout the
states of Florida, New Jersey, and New York; the exclusive
dealer for Boston Whaler in many of our markets, including our
locations in the states of New York, North Carolina, South
Carolina, and portions of the states of Florida, California, and
Texas; and the exclusive dealer for Meridian Yachts in most of
our geographic markets, excluding California. In addition, we
are the exclusive dealer for Italy-based Azimut-Benetti Group
for Azimut and Atlantis mega-yachts, yachts, and other
recreational boats for the Northeast United States from Maryland
to Maine and the state of Florida.
U.S.
Recreational Boating Industry
The total U.S. recreational boating industry generated
approximately $33.6 billion in retail sales in calendar
2008, including retail sales of new and used recreational boats;
marine products, such as engines, trailers, parts, and
accessories; and related boating expenditures, such as fuel,
insurance, docking, storage, and repairs. Retail sales of new
and used boats, engines, trailers, and accessories accounted for
approximately $24.8 billion of such sales in 2008. Annual
retail recreational boating sales were $17.9 billion in the
late 1980s, but declined to a low of $10.3 billion in 1992
based on industry data published by the National Marine
Manufacturers Association. We believe this decline was
attributable to several factors, including a recession, the Gulf
War, and the imposition throughout 1991 and 1992 of a luxury tax
on boats sold at prices in excess of $100,000. The luxury tax
was repealed in 1993, and retail boating sales increased each
year thereafter except for 1998, 2003, 2007, 2008, and 2009.
The recreational boat retail market remains highly fragmented
with little consolidation having occurred to date and consists
of numerous boat retailers, most of which are small companies
owned by individuals that operate in a single market and provide
varying degrees of merchandising, professional management, and
customer service. We believe that many boat retailers are
encountering increased pressure from boat manufacturers to
improve their levels of service and systems, increased
competition from larger national retailers in certain product
lines, and, in certain cases, business succession issues.
Strategy
Our goal is to enhance our position as the nations leading
recreational boat dealer. Key elements of our strategy include
the following.
Emphasizing Customer Satisfaction and
Loyalty. We seek to achieve a high level of
customer satisfaction and establish long-term customer loyalty
by creating an overall enjoyable boating experience beginning
with a hassle-free purchase process. We further enhance and
simplify the purchase process by helping to arrange financing
and insurance at our retail locations with competitive terms and
streamlined
6
turnaround. We offer the customer a thorough in-water
orientation of boat operations where available, as well as
ongoing boat safety, maintenance, and use seminars and
demonstrations for the customers entire family. We also
continue our customer service after the sale by leading and
sponsoring MarineMax Getaways! group boating trips to various
destinations, rendezvous gatherings, and
on-the-water
organized events to provide our customers with pre-arranged
opportunities to enjoy the pleasures of the boating lifestyle.
We also endeavor to provide superior maintenance and repair
services, often through mobile service at the customers
wet slip and with extended service department hours and
emergency service availability, that minimize the hassles of
boat maintenance.
Achieving Operating Efficiencies and
Synergies. We strive to increase the operating
efficiencies of and achieve certain synergies among our
dealerships in order to enhance internal growth and
profitability. We centralize various aspects of certain
administrative functions at the corporate level, such as
accounting, finance, insurance coverage, employee benefits,
marketing, strategic planning, legal support, purchasing and
distribution, and management information systems. Centralization
of these functions reduces duplicative expenses and permits the
dealerships to benefit from a level of scale and expertise that
would otherwise be unavailable to each dealership individually.
We also seek to realize cost savings from reduced inventory
carrying costs as a result of purchasing boat inventories on a
national level and directing boats to dealership locations that
can more readily sell such boats; lower financing costs through
our credit sources; and volume purchase discounts and rebates
for certain marine products, supplies, and advertising. The
ability of our retail locations to offer the complementary
services of our other retail locations, such as offering
customer excursion opportunities, providing maintenance and
repair services at the customers boat location, and giving
access to a larger inventory, increases the competitiveness of
each retail location. By centralizing these types of activities,
our store managers have more time to focus on the customer and
the development of their teams.
Promoting Brand Name Recognition and the MarineMax
Connection. We are promoting our brand name
recognition to take advantage of our status as the nations
only
coast-to-coast
marine retailer. This strategy also recognizes that many
existing and potential customers who reside in Northern markets
and vacation for substantial periods in Southern markets will
prefer to purchase and service their boats from the same
well-known company. We refer to this strategy as the
MarineMax Connection. As a result, our signage
emphasizes the MarineMax name at each of our locations, and we
conduct national advertising in various print and other media.
Emphasizing Best Practices. We emphasize the
best practices developed by us and our acquired
dealers as appropriate throughout our locations. As an example,
we follow a no-haggle sales approach at each of our dealerships.
Under the MarineMax Value-Price approach, we sell our boats at
posted prices, generally representing a discount from the
manufacturers suggested retail price, thereby eliminating
the anxieties of price negotiations that occur in most boat
purchases. In addition, we adopt, where beneficial, the best
practices developed by us and our acquired dealers in terms of
location, design, layout, product purchases, maintenance and
repair services (including extended service hours and mobile or
dockside services), product mix, employee training, and customer
education and services.
Offering Additional Products and Services, Including Those
Involving Higher Profit Margins. We plan to
continue to offer additional product lines and services
throughout our dealerships or, when appropriate, in selected
dealerships. We are offering throughout our dealerships product
lines that previously have been offered only at certain of our
locations. We also may obtain additional product lines through
the acquisition of distribution rights directly from
manufacturers and the acquisition of dealerships with
distribution rights. In either situation, such expansion is
typically done through agreements that appoint us as the
exclusive dealer for a designated geographic territory. We have
increased our used boat sales and yacht brokerage services
through an increased emphasis on these activities, cooperative
efforts among our dealerships, and the use of the Internet. We
also plan to continue to grow our financing and insurance, parts
and accessories, service, and boat storage businesses to better
serve our customers and thereby increase revenue and improve
profitability of these higher margin businesses.
Pursuing Strategic Acquisitions. We capitalize
upon the significant consolidation opportunities available in
the highly fragmented recreational boat dealer industry by
acquiring independent dealers and
7
improving their performance and profitability through the
implementation of our operating strategies. The primary
acquisition focus is on well-established, high-end recreational
boat dealers in geographic markets not currently served by us,
particularly geographic markets with strong boating
demographics, such as areas within the coastal states and the
Great Lakes region. We also may seek to acquire boat dealers
that, while located in attractive geographic markets, have not
been able to realize favorable market share or profitability and
that can benefit substantially from our systems and operating
strategies. We may expand our range of product lines, service
offerings, and market penetration by acquiring companies that
distribute recreational boat product lines or boating-related
services different from those we currently offer. As a result of
our considerable industry experience and relationships, we
believe we are well positioned to identify and evaluate
acquisition candidates and assess their growth prospects, the
quality of their management teams, their local reputation with
customers, and the suitability of their locations. We believe we
are regarded as an attractive acquirer by boat dealers because
of (1) the historical performance and the experience and
reputation of our management team within the industry;
(2) our decentralized operating strategy, which generally
enables the managers of an acquired dealer to continue their
involvement in dealership operations; (3) the ability of
management and employees of an acquired dealer to participate in
our growth and expansion through potential stock ownership and
career advancement opportunities; and (4) the ability to
offer liquidity to the owners of acquired dealers through the
receipt of common stock or cash. We have entered into an
agreement regarding acquisitions with the Sea Ray Division of
Brunswick. Under the agreement, acquisitions of Sea Ray dealers
will be mutually agreed upon by us and Sea Ray with reasonable
efforts to be made to include a balance of Sea Ray dealers that
have been successful and those that have not been. The agreement
provides that Sea Ray will not unreasonably withhold its consent
to any proposed acquisition of a Sea Ray dealer by us, subject
to the conditions set forth in the agreement, as further
described in Business Brunswick Agreement
Relating to Acquisitions.
Opening New Facilities. We intend to continue
to establish additional retail facilities in our existing and
new markets. We believe that the demographics of our existing
geographic territories support the opening of additional
facilities, and we have opened 27 new retail facilities,
excluding those opened on a temporary basis for a specific
purpose, since our formation in January 1998. We also plan to
reach new customers through various innovative retail formats
developed by us, such as mall stores and floating retail
facilities. We continually monitor the performance of our retail
locations and close retail locations that do not meet our
expectations or that were opened for a specific purpose that is
no longer relevant. Based on these factors since March 1998, we
have closed 47 retail locations, excluding those opened on a
temporary basis for a specific purpose, including 26 in fiscal
2009 because of depressed economic conditions.
Emphasizing Employee Training and
Development. We devote substantial efforts to
train our employees to understand our core retail philosophies,
which focus on making the purchase of a boat and its subsequent
use as hassle-free and enjoyable as possible. Through our
MarineMax University, or MMU, we teach our retail philosophies
to existing and new employees at various locations and online,
through MMU-online. MMU is a modularized and instructor-led
educational program that focuses on our retailing philosophies
and provides instruction on such matters as the sales process,
customer service, F&I, accounting, leadership, and human
resources.
Utilization of the Internet. Our web
initiatives span across multiple websites including our core
site, www.MarineMax.com. The websites provide
customers with the ability to learn more about our company and
our products. Our website generates direct sales and provides
our stores with leads to potential customers for new and used
boats, brokerage services, finance and insurance products, and
repair and maintenance services. We also maintain multiple
online storefronts for customers to purchase a wide variety of
boating parts and accessories. In addition, we utilize various
feeder websites and social networking websites to drive
additional traffic and leads for our various product and service
offerings.
Operating with Decentralized Management. We
maintain a generally decentralized approach to the operational
management of our dealerships. The decentralized management
approach takes advantage of the extensive experience of local
managers, enabling them to implement policies and make
decisions, including the appropriate product mix, based on the
needs of the local market. Local management authority also
fosters responsive customer service and promotes long-term
community and customer relationships. In addition, the
8
centralization of certain administrative functions at the
corporate level enhances the ability of local managers to focus
their efforts on
day-to-day
dealership operations and the customers.
Utilizing Technology Throughout Operations. We
believe that our management information system, which currently
is being utilized by each of our dealerships and was developed
over a number of years through cooperative efforts with a common
vendor, enhances our ability to integrate successfully the
operations of our dealerships and future acquired dealers. The
system facilitates the interchange of information and enhances
cross-selling opportunities throughout our company. The system
integrates each level of operations on a company-wide basis,
including purchasing, inventory, receivables, financial
reporting, budgeting, and sales management. The system also
provides sales representatives with prospect and customer
information that aids them in tracking the status of their
contacts with prospects, automatically generates
follow-up
correspondence to such prospects, facilitates the availability
of boats company-wide, locates boats needed to satisfy
particular customer requests, and monitors the maintenance and
service needs of customers boats. Our representatives also
utilize the computer system to assist in arranging customer
financing and insurance packages. Our managers use a web-based
tool to access essentially all financial and operational data
from anywhere at any time.
Products
and Services
We offer new and used recreational boats and related marine
products, including engines, trailers, parts, and accessories.
While we sell a broad range of new and used boats, we focus on
premium brand products. In addition, we assist in arranging
related boat financing, insurance, and extended service
contracts; provide boat maintenance and repair services; provide
boat brokerage services; and offer slip and storage
accommodations.
New
Boat Sales
We primarily sell recreational boats, including pleasure boats
and fishing boats. The principal products we offer are
manufactured by Brunswick, the leading worldwide manufacturer of
recreational boats, including Sea Ray pleasure boats, Boston
Whaler fishing boats, Cabo Yachts, Hatteras Yachts, and Meridian
Yachts. In fiscal 2009, we derived approximately 51% of our
revenue from the sale of new boats manufactured by Brunswick. We
believe that we represented approximately 6% of all of
Brunswicks marine product sales during that period.
Certain of our dealerships also sell luxury yachts, fishing
boats, and pontoon boats provided by other manufacturers,
including Italy-based Azimut. During fiscal 2009, new boat sales
accounted for 60.7% of our revenue.
We offer recreational boats in most market segments, but have a
particular focus on premium quality pleasure boats and yachts as
reflected by our fiscal 2009 average new boat sales price of
approximately $133,000, an increase of approximately 5% from
fiscal 2008, compared with an estimated industry average
calendar 2008 selling price of approximately $37,000 based on
industry data published by the National Marine Manufacturers
Association. Given our locations in some of the more affluent,
offshore boating areas in the United States and emphasis on high
levels of customer service, we sell a relatively higher
percentage of large recreational boats, such as mega-yachts,
yachts, and sport cruisers. We believe that the product lines we
offer are among the highest quality within their respective
market segments, with well-established trade-name recognition
and reputations for quality, performance, and styling.
9
The following table is illustrative of the range and approximate
manufacturer suggested retail price range of new boats that we
currently offer, but is not all inclusive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturer Suggested
|
Product Line and Trade Name
|
|
Overall Length
|
|
Retail Price Range
|
|
Motor Yachts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hatteras Motor Yachts
|
|
|
60 to 100
|
+
|
|
$
|
3,000,000 to $10,000,000
|
+
|
Azimut
|
|
|
38 to 116
|
+
|
|
|
790,000 to 12,000,000
|
+
|
Convertibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hatteras Convertibles
|
|
|
54 to 77
|
+
|
|
|
2,300,000 to 7,000,000
|
+
|
Cabo
|
|
|
32 to 52
|
|
|
|
475,000 to 2,000,000
|
+
|
Pleasure Boats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sea Ray
|
|
|
17 to 60
|
|
|
|
21,000 to 2,500,000
|
|
Meridian
|
|
|
34 to 59
|
|
|
|
300,000 to 1,600,000
|
|
Fishing Boats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston Whaler
|
|
|
11 to 37
|
|
|
|
8,000 to 400,000
|
|
Grady White
|
|
|
18 to 36
|
|
|
|
40,000 to 500,000
|
|
Motor Yachts. Hatteras Yachts and Azimut are
two of the worlds premier yacht builders. The motor yacht
product lines typically include
state-of-the-art
designs with live-aboard luxuries. Hatteras offers a flybridge
with extensive guest seating; covered aft deck, which may be
fully or partially enclosed, providing the boater with
additional living space; an elegant salon; and multiple
staterooms for accommodations. Azimut yachts are known for their
Americanized open layout with Italian design and powerful
performance. The luxurious interiors of Azimut yachts are
accented by windows and multiple accommodations that have been
designed for comfort.
Convertibles. Hatteras Yachts and Cabo Yachts
are two of the worlds premier convertible yacht builders
and offer
state-of-the-art
designs with live-aboard luxuries. Convertibles are primarily
fishing vessels, which are well equipped to meet the needs of
even the most serious tournament-class competitor. Hatteras
features interiors that offer luxurious salon/galley
arrangements, multiple staterooms with private heads, and a
cockpit that includes a bait and tackle center, fishbox, and
freezer. Cabo is known for spacious cockpits and accessibility
to essentials, such as bait chests, livewells, bait prep
centers, and tackle lockers. Cabo interiors offer elegance,
highlighted by teak woodwork, halogen lighting, and ample
storage areas.
Pleasure Boats. Sea Ray and Meridian pleasure
boats target both the luxury and the family recreational boating
markets and come in a variety of configurations to suit each
customers particular recreational boating style. Sea Ray
sport yachts and yachts serve the luxury segment of the
recreational boating market and include
top-of-the
line living accommodations with a salon, a fully equipped
galley, and multiple staterooms. Sea Ray sport yachts and yachts
are available in cabin, bridge cockpit, and cruiser models. Sea
Ray sport boat and sport cruiser models are designed for
performance and dependability to meet family recreational needs
and include many of the features and accommodations of Sea
Rays sport yacht and yacht models. Meridian sport yachts
and yachts are known for their solid performance and thoughtful
use of space with
360-degree
views and spacious salon, galley, and stateroom accommodations.
Meridian sport yachts and yachts are available in sedan,
motoryacht, and pilothouse models. All Sea Ray and Meridian
pleasure boats feature custom instrumentation that may include
an electronics package; various hull, deck, and cockpit designs
that can include a swim platform; bow pulpit and raised bridge;
and various amenities, such as swivel bucket helm seats, lounge
seats, sun pads, wet bars, built-in ice chests, and refreshment
centers. Most Sea Ray and Meridian pleasure boats feature
Mercury or MerCruiser engines.
Fishing Boats. The fishing boats we offer,
such as Boston Whaler and Grady White, range from entry level
models to advanced models designed for fishing and water sports
in lakes, bays, and off-shore waters, with cabins with limited
live-aboard capability. The fishing boats typically feature
livewells, in-deck fishboxes, rodholders, rigging stations,
cockpit coaming pads, and fresh and saltwater washdowns.
10
Used
Boat Sales
We sell used versions of the new makes and models we offer and,
to a lesser extent, used boats of other makes and models
generally taken as trade-ins. During fiscal 2009, used boat
sales accounted for 22.5% of our revenue, and 74.7% of the used
boats we sold were Brunswick models.
Our used boat sales depend on our ability to source a supply of
high-quality used boats at attractive prices. We acquire
substantially all of our used boats through customer trade-ins.
We intend to continue to increase our used boat business as a
result of the availability of quality used boats generated from
our new boat sales efforts, the increasing number of used boats
that are well-maintained through our service initiatives,
including our Premium Certified Pre-Owned Program, our ability
to market used boats throughout our combined dealership network
to match used boat demand, and the experience of our yacht
brokerage operations. Additionally, substantially all of our
used boat inventory is posted on our website,
www.MarineMax.com, which expands the awareness and
availability of our products to a large audience of boating
enthusiasts.
To further enhance our used boat sales, we launched a Premium
Certified Pre-Owned Program, or PCPO, in fiscal 2008. Generally,
PCPO boats are less than four years old, have passed a 150+
point inspection, and carry a one year warranty. Additionally,
we offer the Sea Ray Legacy warranty plan available for used Sea
Ray boats less than six years old. The Legacy plan applies to
each qualifying used Sea Ray boat, which has passed a 48-point
inspection, and provides protection against failure of most
mechanical parts for up to three years. We believe these
programs enhance our sales of used Sea Ray boats by motivating
purchasers of used Sea Ray boats to complete their purchases
through our Sea Ray dealerships.
Marine
Engines, Related Marine Equipment, and Boating
Accessories
We offer marine engines and propellers, substantially all of
which are manufactured by Mercury Marine, a division of
Brunswick. We sell marine engines and propellers primarily to
retail customers as replacements for their existing engines or
propellers. Mercury Marine has introduced various new engine
models that reduce engine emissions to comply with current
Environmental Protection Agency requirements. See
Business Environmental and Other Regulatory
Issues. An industry leader for almost six decades, Mercury
Marine specializes in
state-of-the-art
marine propulsion systems and accessories. Many of our
dealerships have been recognized by Mercury Marine as
Premier Service Dealers. This designation is
generally awarded based on meeting certain standards and
qualifications.
We also sell related marine parts and accessories, including
oils, lubricants, steering and control systems, corrosion
control products, engine care, maintenance, and service products
(primarily Mercury Marines Quicksilver line);
high-performance accessories (such as propellers) and
instruments; and a complete line of boating accessories,
including life jackets, inflatables, and water sports equipment.
We also offer novelty items, such as shirts, caps, and license
plates bearing the manufacturers or dealers logo.
The sale of marine engines, related marine equipment, and
boating accessories accounted for 5.0% of our fiscal 2009
revenue.
Maintenance,
Repair, and Storage Services
Providing customers with professional, prompt maintenance and
repair services is critical to our sales efforts and contributes
to our success. We provide maintenance and repair services at
most of our retail locations, with extended service hours at
certain of our locations. In addition, in many of our markets,
we provide mobile maintenance and repair services at the
location of the customers boat. We believe that this
service commitment is a competitive advantage in the markets in
which we compete and is critical to our efforts to provide a
trouble-free boating experience. To further this commitment, in
certain of our markets, we have opened stand-alone maintenance
and repair facilities in locations that are more convenient for
our customers and that increase the availability of such
services. We also believe that our maintenance and repair
services contribute to strong customer relationships and that
our emphasis on preventative maintenance and quality service
increases the potential supply of well-maintained boats for our
used boat sales.
11
We perform both warranty and non-warranty repair services, with
the cost of warranty work reimbursed by the manufacturer in
accordance with the manufacturers warranty reimbursement
program. For warranty work, most manufacturers, including
Brunswick, reimburse a percentage of the dealers posted
service labor rates, with the percentage varying depending on
the dealers customer satisfaction index rating and
attendance at service training courses. We derive the majority
of our warranty revenue from Brunswick products, as Brunswick
products comprise the majority of products sold. Certain other
manufacturers reimburse warranty work at a fixed amount per
repair. Because boat manufacturers permit warranty work to be
performed only at authorized dealerships, we receive
substantially all of the warranted maintenance and repair work
required for the new boats we sell. The third-party extended
warranty contracts we offer also result in an ongoing demand for
our maintenance and repair services for the duration of the term
of the extended warranty contract.
Our maintenance and repair services are performed by
manufacturer-trained and certified service technicians. In
charging for our mechanics labor, many of our dealerships
use a variable rate structure designed to reflect the difficulty
and sophistication of different types of repairs. The percentage
markups on parts are similarly based on manufacturer suggested
prices and market conditions for different parts.
At many of our locations, we offer boat storage services,
including in-water slip storage and inside and outside land
storage. These storage services are offered at competitive
market rates and include in-season and winter storage.
Maintenance, repair, and storage services accounted for 7.9% of
our revenue during fiscal 2009. This includes warranty and
non-warranty services.
F&I
Products
At each of our retail locations, we offer our customers the
ability to finance new or used boat purchases and to purchase
extended service contracts and arrange insurance coverage,
including boat property, credit life, and accident, disability,
and casualty insurance coverage (collectively,
F&I).
We have relationships with various national marine product
lenders under which the lenders purchase retail installment
contracts evidencing retail sales of boats and other marine
products that are originated by us in accordance with existing
pre-sale agreements between us and the lenders. These
arrangements permit us to receive a portion of the finance
charges expected to be earned on the retail installment contract
based on a variety of factors, including the credit standing of
the buyer, the annual percentage rate of the contract charged to
the buyer, and the lenders then current minimum required
annual percentage rate charged to the buyer on the contract.
This participation is subject to repayment by us if the buyer
prepays the contract or defaults within a designated time
period, usually 90 to 180 days. To the extent required by
applicable state law, our dealerships are licensed to originate
and sell retail installment contracts financing the sale of
boats and other marine products.
We also offer third-party extended service contracts under
which, for a predetermined price, we provide all designated
services pursuant to the service contract guidelines during the
contract term at no additional charge to the customer above a
deductible. While we sell all new boats with the boat
manufacturers standard hull warranty of generally five
years and standard engine warranty of generally one year,
extended service contracts provide additional coverage beyond
the time frame or scope of the manufacturers warranty.
Purchasers of used boats generally are able to purchase an
extended service contract, even if the selected boat is no
longer covered by the manufacturers warranty. Generally,
we receive a fee for arranging an extended service contract.
Most required services under the contracts are provided by us
and paid for by the third-party contract holder.
We also are able to assist our customers with the opportunity to
purchase credit life insurance, accident and disability
insurance, and property and casualty insurance. Credit life
insurance policies provide for repayment of the boat financing
contract if the purchaser dies while the contract is
outstanding. Accident and disability insurance policies provide
for payment of the monthly contract obligation during any period
in which the buyer is disabled. Property and casualty insurance
covers loss or damage to the boat. We do not act as an insurance
broker or agent or issue insurance policies on behalf of
insurers. We do, however, provide marketing activities and other
related services to insurance companies and brokers for which we
receive marketing fees. One of our strategies is to generate
increased marketing fees by offering more competitive insurance
products.
12
During fiscal 2009, fee income generated from F&I products
accounted for 2.7% of our revenue. We believe that our
customers ability to obtain competitive financing quickly
and easily at our dealerships complements our ability to sell
new and used boats. We also believe our ability to provide
customer-tailored financing on a
same-day
basis gives us an advantage over many of our competitors,
particularly smaller competitors that lack the resources to
arrange boat financing at their dealerships or that do not
generate sufficient volume to attract the diversity of financing
sources that are available to us.
Brokerage
Services
Through employees or subcontractors that are licensed boat or
yacht brokers, we offer boat or yacht brokerage services at most
of our retail locations. For a commission, we offer for sale
brokered boats or yachts, listing them on the BUC
system, advising our other retail locations of their
availability through our integrated computer system, and posting
them on our web site, www.MarineMax.com. The BUC system,
which is similar to a real estate multiple listing service, is a
national boat or yacht listing service of approximately 900
brokers maintained by BUC International. Often sales are
co-brokered, with the commission split between the buying and
selling brokers. We believe that our access to potential used
boat customers and methods of listing and advertising
customers brokered boats or yachts is more extensive than
is typical among brokers. In addition to generating revenue from
brokerage commissions, our brokerage services also enable us to
offer a broad array of used boats or yachts without increasing
related inventory costs. During fiscal 2009, brokerage services
accounted for 1.2% of our revenue.
Our brokerage customers generally receive the same high level of
customer service as our new and used boat customers. Our
waterfront retail locations enable in-water demonstrations of an
on-site
brokered boat. Our maintenance and repair services, including
mobile service, also are generally available to our brokerage
customers. The purchaser of a boat brokered through us also can
take advantage of MarineMax Getaways! weekend and day trips and
other rendezvous gatherings and in-water events, as well as boat
operation and safety seminars. We believe that the array of
services we offer are unique in the brokerage business.
Retail
Locations
We sell our recreational boats and other marine products and
offer our related boat services through 55 retail locations in
Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida,
Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York,
North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and
Texas. Each retail location generally includes an indoor
showroom (including some of the industrys largest indoor
boat showrooms) and an outside area for displaying boat
inventories, a business office to assist customers in arranging
financing and insurance, and maintenance and repair facilities.
Many of our retail locations are waterfront properties on some
of the nations most popular boating locations, including
the Mission Bay in California; Norwalk Harbor in Connecticut;
multiple locations on the Intracoastal Waterway, the Atlantic
Ocean, Biscayne Bay, Boca Ciega Bay, Naples Bay (next to the
Gulf of Mexico), Tampa Bay, and the Caloosahatchee River in
Florida; Lake Lanier in Georgia; Chesapeake Bay in Maryland;
Leech Lake and the St. Croix River in Minnesota; Lake of
the Ozarks, Table Rock Lake, and the Mississippi River in
Missouri; Barnegat Bay, the Hudson River, Lake Hopatcong, Little
Egg Harbor, and the Manasquan River in New Jersey; Great Sound
Bay, the Hudson River, and Huntington Harbor in New York; the
Intracoastal Waterway in North Carolina; Lake Erie in Ohio;
Grand Lake in Oklahoma; Tennessee River in Tennessee; and Clear
Lake, and Lake Lewisville in Texas. Our waterfront retail
locations, most of which include marina-type facilities and
docks at which we display our boats, are easily accessible to
the boating populace, serve as in-water showrooms, and enable
the sales force to give customers immediate in-water
demonstrations of various boat models. Most of our other
locations are in close proximity to water.
Operations
Dealership
Operations and Management
We have adopted a generally decentralized approach to the
operational management of our dealerships. While certain
administrative functions are centralized at the corporate level,
local management is primarily responsible for the
day-to-day
operations of the retail locations. Each retail location is
managed by a store manager, who oversees
13
the
day-to-day
operations, personnel, and financial performance of the
individual store, subject to the direction of a regional
manager, who generally has responsibility for the retail
locations within a specified geographic region. Typically, each
retail location also has a staff consisting of an F&I
manager, a parts manager, and a service manager, sales
representatives, maintenance and repair technicians, and various
support personnel.
We attempt to attract and retain quality employees at our retail
locations by providing them with ongoing training to enhance
sales professionalism and product knowledge, career advancement
opportunities within a larger company, and favorable benefit
packages. We maintain a formal training program, called
MarineMax University or MMU, which provides training for
employees in all aspects of our operations. Training sessions
are held at our various regional locations covering a variety of
topics. MMU-online offers various modules over the Internet.
Highly trained, professional sales representatives are an
important factor to our successful sales efforts. These sales
representatives are trained at MMU to recognize the importance
of fostering an enjoyable sales process, to educate customers on
the operation and use of the boats, and to assist customers in
making technical and design decisions in boat purchases. The
overall focus of MMU is to teach our core retailing values,
which focus on customer service.
Sales representatives receive compensation primarily on a
commission basis. Each store manager is a salaried employee with
incentive bonuses based on the performance of the managed
dealership. Maintenance and repair service managers receive
compensation on a salary basis with bonuses based on the
performance of their departments. Our management information
system provides each store and department manager with daily
financial and operational information, enabling them to monitor
their performance on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis. We have
a uniform, fully integrated management information system
serving each of our dealerships.
Sales
and Marketing
Our sales philosophy focuses on selling the pleasures of the
boating lifestyle. We believe that the critical elements of our
sales philosophy include our appealing retail locations,
no-hassle sales approach, highly trained sales representatives,
high level of customer service, emphasis on educating the
customer and the customers family on boat usage, and
providing our customers with opportunities for boating. We
strive to provide superior customer service and support before,
during, and after the sale.
Each retail location offers the customer the opportunity to
evaluate a large variety of new and used boats in a comfortable
and convenient setting. Our full-service retail locations
facilitate a turn-key purchasing process that includes
attractive lender financing packages, extended service
agreements, and insurance. Many of our retail locations are
located on waterfronts and marinas, which attract boating
enthusiasts and enable customers to operate various boats prior
to making a purchase decision.
We sell our boats at posted value prices that generally
represent a discount from the manufacturers suggested
retail price. Our sales approach focuses on customer service by
minimizing customer anxiety associated with price negotiation.
As a part of our sales and marketing efforts, we also
participate in boat shows and
in-the-water
sales events at area boating locations, typically held in
January and February and toward the end of the boating season,
in each of our markets and in certain locations in close
proximity to our markets. These shows and events are normally
held at convention centers or marinas, with area dealers renting
space. Boat shows and other offsite promotions are an important
venue for generating sales orders. The boat shows also generate
a significant amount of interest in our products resulting in
boat sales after the show.
We emphasize customer education through
one-on-one
education by our sales representatives and, at some locations,
our delivery captains, before and after a sale, and through
in-house seminars for the entire family on boat safety, the use
and operation of boats, and product demonstrations. Typically,
one of our delivery captains or the sales representative
delivers the customers boat to an area boating location
and thoroughly instructs the customer about the operation of the
boat, including hands-on instructions for docking and trailering
the boat. To enhance our customer relationships after the sale,
we lead and sponsor MarineMax Getaways! group boating trips to
various destinations, rendezvous gatherings, and
on-the-water
organized events that promote the pleasures of the boating
lifestyle. Each company-sponsored event, planned and led by a
company employee, also provides a favorable
14
medium for acclimating new customers to boating, sharing
exciting boating destinations, creating friendships with other
boaters, and enabling us to promote actively new product
offerings to boating enthusiasts.
As a result of our relative size, we believe we have a
competitive advantage within the industry by being able to
conduct an organized and systematic advertising and marketing
effort. Part of our marketing effort includes an integrated
prospect management system that tracks the status of each sales
representatives contacts with a prospect, automatically
generates
follow-up
correspondence, facilitates company-wide availability of a
particular boat or other marine product desired by a customer,
and tracks the maintenance and service needs for the
customers boat.
Suppliers
and Inventory Management
We purchase substantially all of our new boat inventory directly
from manufacturers, which allocate new boats to dealerships
based on the amount of boats sold by the dealership. We also
exchange new boats with other dealers to accommodate customer
demand and to balance inventory.
We purchase new boats and other marine-related products from
Brunswick, which is the worlds largest manufacturer of
marine products, including Sea Ray, Boston Whaler, Cabo,
Hatteras, and Meridian. We also purchase new boats and other
marine related products from other manufacturers, including
Azimut, Grady White, and Tracker Marine. In fiscal 2009, sales
of new Brunswick boats accounted for approximately 51% of our
revenue. No other manufacturer accounted for more than 10% of
our revenue in fiscal 2009. We believe our Sea Ray boat
purchases represented approximately 31% of Sea Rays new
boat sales and approximately 6% of all Brunswick marine product
sales during fiscal 2009.
We have entered into agreements with Brunswick covering Sea Ray
products. The dealer agreements with the Sea Ray division of
Brunswick do not restrict our right to sell any Sea Ray product
lines or competing products. The terms of each dealer agreement
appoints a designated geographical territory for the dealer,
which is exclusive to the dealer so long as the dealer is not in
breach of the material obligations and performance standards
under the agreement and Sea Rays then current material
policies and programs following notice and the expiration of any
applicable cure periods without cure.
Upon the completion of the Surfside-3 acquisition, we became the
exclusive dealer for Azimut-Benetti Groups Azimut product
line in the Northeast United States. The Azimut dealer agreement
provides a geographic territory to promote the product line and
to network with the appropriate clientele through various
independent locations designated for Azimut retail sales.
We typically deal with each of our manufacturers, other than the
Sea Ray division of Brunswick, under an annually renewable,
non-exclusive dealer agreement. Manufacturers generally
establish prices on an annual basis, but may change prices in
their sole discretion. Manufacturers typically discount the cost
of inventory and offer inventory financing assistance during the
manufacturers slow seasons, generally October through
March. To obtain lower cost of inventory, we strive to
capitalize on these manufacturer incentives to take product
delivery during the manufacturers slow seasons. This
permits us to gain pricing advantages and better product
availability during the selling season. Arrangements with
certain other manufacturers may restrict our right to offer some
product lines in certain markets.
We transfer individual boats among our retail locations to fill
customer orders that otherwise might take substantially longer
to fill from the manufacturer. This reduces delays in delivery,
helps us maximize inventory turnover, and assists in minimizing
potential overstock or
out-of-stock
situations. We actively monitor our inventory levels to maintain
levels appropriate to meet current anticipated market demands.
We are not bound by contractual agreements governing the amount
of inventory that we must purchase in any year from any
manufacturer, but the failure to purchase at agreed upon levels
may result in the loss of certain manufacturer incentives. We
participate in numerous
end-of-summer
manufacturer boat shows, which manufacturers sponsor to sell off
their remaining inventory at reduced costs before the
introduction of new model year products, typically beginning in
July.
Inventory
Financing
Marine manufacturers customarily provide interest assistance
programs to retailers. The interest assistance varies by
manufacturer and may include periods of free financing or
reduced interest rate programs. The interest
15
assistance may be paid directly to the retailer or the financial
institution depending on the arrangements the manufacturer has
established. We believe that our financing arrangements with
manufacturers are standard within the industry.
We account for consideration received from our vendors in
accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification
605-50,
Revenue Recognition, Customer Payments and
Incentives (ASC
605-50),
previously referred to as Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 02-16,
Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for
Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor. ASC
605-50 most
significantly requires us to classify interest assistance
received from manufacturers as a reduction of inventory cost and
related cost of sales as opposed to netting the assistance
against our interest expense incurred with our lenders. Pursuant
to ASC
605-50,
amounts received by us under our co-op assistance programs from
our manufacturers are netted against related advertising
expenses.
We are party to a second amended and restated credit and
security agreement, which has been amended on various occasions
since its original execution in June 2006. As amended, our
credit facility provides for a line of credit with asset-based
borrowing availability up to approximately $230 million,
stepping down to $175 million by September 30, 2010,
with interim decreases between such dates. The amended facility
has certain financial covenants as specified in the agreement.
The covenants include provisions that our leverage ratio not
exceed 2.75 to 1; that our current ratio must be
greater than 1.25 to 1 or 1.20 to 1 depending on the time of
year; and that our maximum EBITDA loss and annual EBITDA, both
as defined in the agreement, comply with certain thresholds as
described below. The EBITDA covenant requires that we do not
exceed the allowable cumulative negative EBITDA, as defined in
the agreement, for the first nine months of fiscal 2010, which
is $22 million as of December 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2010 and $15 million as of June 30,
2010. We are required to have a cumulative EBITDA greater than
or equal to our interest expense for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2010. EBITDA, as defined in the agreement, is
our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and
amortization plus an add back for stock-based compensation
expense and 50% of the proceeds of our September 2009 stock
offering or approximately $10 million. The amended facility
provides for a variable interest rate margin of LIBOR plus
490 basis points through September 30, 2010 and
thereafter at LIBOR plus 150 to 400 basis points, depending
upon our financial and operating performance. We paid the
lenders approximately $2.4 million in amendment fees during
fiscal 2009. The amended facility matures in May 2011, but
includes two one-year renewal options, subject to lender
approval.
At September 30, 2009, we owed an aggregate of
$142 million under our revolving credit facility and were
in compliance with all of the credit facility covenants.
Advances under the facility accrued interest at a rate of 5.2%
as of September 30, 2009, and the facility provided us with
an additional net borrowing availability of approximately
$60 million. All indebtedness associated with our real
estate holdings were repaid during the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008.
Management
Information System
We believe that our management information system, which
currently is being utilized by each of our dealerships and was
developed over a number of years through cooperative efforts
with the vendor, enhances our ability to integrate successfully
the operations of our dealerships and future acquisitions,
facilitates the interchange of information, and enhances
cross-selling opportunities throughout our company. The system
integrates each level of operations on a company-wide basis,
including purchasing, inventory, receivables, financial
reporting and budgeting, and sales management. The system
enables us to monitor each dealerships operations in order
to identify quickly areas requiring additional focus and to
manage inventory. The system also provides sales representatives
with prospect and customer information that aids them in
tracking the status of their contacts with prospects,
automatically generates
follow-up
correspondence to such prospects, facilitates the availability
of a particular boat company-wide, locates boats needed to
satisfy a particular customer request, and monitors the
maintenance and service needs of customers boats. Company
representatives also utilize the system to assist in arranging
financing and insurance packages.
16
Brunswick
Agreement Relating to Acquisitions
We and the Sea Ray Division of Brunswick are parties to an
agreement extending through December 2015 that provides a
process for the acquisition of additional Sea Ray boat dealers
that desire to be acquired by us. Under the agreement,
acquisitions of Sea Ray dealers will be mutually agreed upon by
us and Sea Ray with reasonable efforts to be made to include a
balance of Sea Ray dealers that have been successful and those
that have not been. The agreement provides that Sea Ray will not
unreasonably withhold its consent to any proposed acquisition of
a Sea Ray dealer by us, subject to the conditions set forth in
the agreement. Among other things, the agreement provides for us
to provide Sea Ray with a business plan for each proposed
acquisition, including historical financial and five-year
projected financial information regarding the acquisition
candidate; marketing and advertising plans; service capabilities
and managerial and staff personnel; information regarding the
ability of the candidate to achieve performance standards within
designated periods; and information regarding the success of our
previous acquisitions of Sea Ray dealers. The agreement also
contemplates Sea Ray reaching a good faith determination whether
the acquisition would be in its best interest based on our
dedication and focus of resources on the Sea Ray brand and Sea
Rays consideration of any adverse effects that the
approval would have on the resulting territory configuration of
adjacent or other dealers and the absence of any violation of
applicable laws or rights granted by Sea Ray to others.
Dealer
Agreements with Brunswick
Brunswick, through its Sea Ray division, and we, through our
dealerships, are parties to Sales and Service Agreements
relating to Sea Ray products extending through December 2015.
Each of these dealer agreements appoints one of our dealerships
as a dealer for the retail sale, display, and servicing of
designated Sea Ray products, parts, and accessories currently or
in the future sold by Sea Ray. Each dealer agreement designates
a designated geographical territory for the dealer, which is
exclusive to the dealer as long as the dealer is not in breach
of the material obligations and performance standards under the
agreement and Sea Rays then current material policies and
programs following notice and the expiration of any applicable
cure periods without cure. Each dealer agreement also specifies
retail locations, which the dealer may not close, change, or add
to without the prior written consent of Sea Ray, provided that
Sea Ray may not unreasonably withhold its consent. Each dealer
agreement also restricts the dealer from selling, advertising
(other than in recognized and established marine publications),
soliciting for sale, or offering for resale any Sea Ray products
outside its territory without the prior written consent of Sea
Ray as long as similar restrictions also apply to all domestic
Sea Ray dealers selling comparable Sea Ray products. In
addition, each dealer agreement provides for the lowest product
prices charged by Sea Ray from time to time to other domestic
Sea Ray dealers, subject to the dealer meeting all the
requirements and conditions of Sea Rays applicable
programs and the right of Sea Ray in good faith to charge lesser
prices to other dealers to meet existing competitive
circumstances, for unusual and non-ordinary business
circumstances, or for limited duration promotional programs.
Among other things, each dealer agreement requires the dealer to
|
|
|
|
|
devote its best efforts to promote, display, advertise, and sell
Sea Ray products at each of its retail locations in accordance
with the agreement and applicable laws;
|
|
|
|
display and utilize at each of its retail locations signs,
graphics, and image elements with Sea Rays identification
that positively reflect the Sea Ray image and promote the retail
sale of Sea Ray products;
|
|
|
|
purchase and maintain at all times sufficient inventory of
current Sea Ray products to meet the reasonable demand of
customers at each of its locations and to meet Sea Rays
applicable minimum inventory requirements;
|
|
|
|
maintain at each retail location, or at another acceptable
location, a service department that is properly staffed and
equipped to service Sea Ray products promptly and professionally
and to maintain parts and supplies to service Sea Ray products
properly on a timely basis;
|
|
|
|
perform all necessary product rigging, installation, and
inspection services prior to delivery to purchasers in
accordance with Sea Rays standards and perform post-sale
services of all Sea Ray products sold by the dealer and brought
to the dealer for service;
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
provide or arrange for warranty and service work for Sea Ray
products regardless of the selling dealer or condition of sale;
|
|
|
|
exercise reasonable efforts to address circumstances in which
another dealer has made a sale to an original retail purchaser
who permanently resides within the dealers territory where
such sale is contrary to the selling dealers Sales and
Service Agreement;
|
|
|
|
provide appropriate instructions to purchasers on how to obtain
warranty and service work from the dealer;
|
|
|
|
furnish product purchasers with Sea Rays limited warranty
on new products and with information and training as to the safe
and proper operation and maintenance of the products;
|
|
|
|
assist Sea Ray in performing any product defect and recall
campaigns;
|
|
|
|
achieve sales performance in accordance with fair and reasonable
standards and sales levels established by Sea Ray in
consultation with the dealer based on factors such as
population, sales potential, market share percentage of Sea Ray
products sold in the territory compared with competitive
products sold in the territory, local economic conditions,
competition, past sales history, number of retail locations, and
other special circumstances that may affect the sale of Sea Ray
products or the dealer, in each case consistent with standards
established for all domestic Sea Ray dealers selling comparable
products;
|
|
|
|
provide designated financial information that are truthful and
accurate;
|
|
|
|
conduct its business in a manner that preserves and enhances the
reputation and goodwill of both Sea Ray and the dealer for
providing quality products and services;
|
|
|
|
maintain the financial ability to purchase and maintain on hand
and display Sea Rays current product models;
|
|
|
|
maintain customer service ratings in compliance with Sea
Rays criteria;
|
|
|
|
comply with those dealers obligations that may be imposed
or established by Sea Ray applicable to all domestic Sea Ray
dealers;
|
|
|
|
maintain a financial condition that is adequate to satisfy and
perform its obligations under the agreement;
|
|
|
|
achieve within designated time periods or maintain motor dealer
status (which is Sea Rays highest performance status) or
other applicable certification requirements as established from
time to time by Sea Ray applicable to all domestic Sea Ray
dealers;
|
|
|
|
notify Sea Ray of the addition or deletion of any retail
locations;
|
|
|
|
sell Sea Ray products only on the basis of Sea Rays
published applicable limited warranty and make no other warranty
or representations concerning the limited warranty, expressed or
implied, either verbally or in writing;
|
|
|
|
provide timely warranty service on all Sea Ray products
presented to the dealer by purchasers in accordance with Sea
Rays then current warranty program applicable to all
domestic Sea Ray dealers selling comparable Sea Ray
products; and
|
|
|
|
provide Sea Ray with access to the dealers books and
records and such other information as Sea Ray may reasonably
request to verify the accuracy of the warranty claims submitted
to Sea Ray by the dealer with regard to such warranty claims.
|
Sea Ray has agreed to indemnify each of our dealers against any
losses to third parties resulting from Sea Rays negligent
acts or omissions involving the design or manufacture of any of
its products or any breach by it of the agreement. Each of our
dealers has agreed to indemnify Sea Ray against any losses to
third parties resulting from the dealers negligent acts or
omissions involving the dealers application, use, or
repair of Sea Ray products, statements or representation not
specifically authorized by Sea Ray, the installation of any
after market components or any other modification or alteration
of Sea Ray products, and any breach by the dealer of the
agreement.
18
Each dealer agreement may be terminated
|
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray, upon 60 days prior written notice, if the
dealer fails or refuses to place a minimum stocking order of the
next model years products in accordance with requirements
applicable to all Sea Ray dealers generally or fails to meet its
financial obligations as they become due to Sea Ray or to the
dealers lenders;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray or the dealer, upon 60 days written notice to
the other, in the event of a breach or default by the other with
any of the of the material obligations, performance standards,
covenants, representations, warranties, or duties imposed by the
agreement or the Sea Ray manual that has not been cured within
60 days of the notice of the claimed deficiency or within a
reasonable period when the cure cannot be completed within a
60-day
period, or at the end of the
60-day
period without the opportunity to cure when the cause
constitutes bad faith;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray or the dealer if the other makes a fraudulent
misrepresentation that is material to the agreement or the other
engages in an incurable act of bad faith;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray or the dealer in the event of the insolvency,
bankruptcy, or receivership of the other;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray in the event of the assignment of the agreement by
the dealer without the prior written consent of Sea Ray;
|
|
|
|
by Sea Ray upon at least 15 days prior written notice
in the event of the failure to pay any sums due and owing to Sea
Ray that are not disputed in good faith; and
|
|
|
|
upon the mutual consent of Sea Ray and the dealer.
|
Employees
As of September 30, 2009, we had 1,245 employees,
1,195 of whom were in store-level operations and 50 of whom were
in corporate administration and management. We are not a party
to any collective bargaining agreements. We consider our
relations with our employees to be excellent.
Trademarks
and Service Marks
We have registered trade names and trademarks with the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for various names,
including MarineMax, MarineMax Getaways,
MarineMax Care, Delivering the Dream,
MarineMax Delivering the Boating Dream,
Newcoast Financial Services, MarineMax Boating
Gear Center, and Women on Water. We have
registered the name MarineMax in the European
Community. We have trade name and trademark applications pending
in Canada for various names, including MarineMax,
Delivering the Dream, and The Water
Gene. There can be no assurance that any of these
applications will be granted.
Seasonality
and Weather Conditions
Our business, as well as the entire recreational boating
industry, is highly seasonal, with seasonality varying in
different geographic markets. Over the three-year period ended
September 30, 2009, the average revenue for the quarters
ended December 31, March 31, June 30, and
September 30 represented approximately 20%, 25%, 30%, and 25%,
respectively, of our average annual revenues. With the exception
of Florida, we generally realize significantly lower sales and
higher levels of inventories and related short-term borrowings,
in the quarterly periods ending December 31 and March 31.
The onset of the public boat and recreation shows in January
stimulates boat sales and typically allows us to reduce our
inventory levels and related short-term borrowings throughout
the remainder of the fiscal year.
Our business is also subject to weather patterns, which may
adversely affect our results of operations. For example, drought
conditions (or merely reduced rainfall levels) or excessive
rain, may close area boating locations or render boating
dangerous or inconvenient, thereby curtailing customer demand
for our products. In addition, unseasonably cool weather and
prolonged winter conditions may lead to a shorter selling season
in certain locations. Hurricanes and other storms could result
in disruptions of our operations or damage to our boat
inventories and facilities, as has been the case when Florida
and other markets were affected by hurricanes. Although our
19
geographic diversity is likely to reduce the overall impact to
us of adverse weather conditions in any one market area, these
conditions will continue to represent potential, material
adverse risks to us and our future financial performance.
Environmental
and Other Regulatory Issues
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation, supervision,
and licensing under various federal, state, and local statutes,
ordinances, and regulations. While we believe that we maintain
all requisite licenses and permits and are in compliance with
all applicable federal, state, and local regulations, there can
be no assurance that we will be able to maintain all requisite
licenses and permits. The failure to satisfy those and other
regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The adoption of additional laws, rules, and regulations could
also have a material adverse effect on our business. Various
federal, state, and local regulatory agencies, including the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or OSHA, the
United States Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, and
similar federal and local agencies, have jurisdiction over the
operation of our dealerships, repair facilities, and other
operations with respect to matters such as consumer protection,
workers safety, and laws regarding protection of the
environment, including air, water, and soil.
The EPA has various air emissions regulations for outboard
marine engines that impose more strict emissions standards for
two-cycle, gasoline outboard marine engines. The majority of the
outboard marine engines we sell are manufactured by Mercury
Marine. Mercury Marines product line of low-emission
engines, including the OptiMax, Verado, and other four-stroke
outboards, have already achieved the EPAs mandated 2006
emission levels. Any increased costs of producing engines
resulting from EPA standards, or the inability of our
manufacturers to comply with EPA requirements, could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Certain of our facilities own and operate underground storage
tanks, or USTs, for the storage of various petroleum products.
The USTs are generally subject to federal, state, and local laws
and regulations that require testing and upgrading of USTs and
remediation of contaminated soils and groundwater resulting from
leaking USTs. In addition, if leakage from company-owned or
operated USTs migrates onto the property of others, we may be
subject to civil liability to third parties for remediation
costs or other damages. Based on historical experience, we
believe that our liabilities associated with UST testing,
upgrades, and remediation are unlikely to have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition or operating results.
As with boat dealerships generally, and parts and service
operations in particular, our business involves the use,
handling, storage, and contracting for recycling or disposal of
hazardous or toxic substances or wastes, including
environmentally sensitive materials, such as motor oil, waste
motor oil and filters, transmission fluid, antifreeze, freon,
waste paint and lacquer thinner, batteries, solvents,
lubricants, degreasing agents, gasoline, and diesel fuels.
Accordingly, we are subject to regulation by federal, state, and
local authorities establishing requirements for the use,
management, handling, and disposal of these materials and health
and environmental quality standards, and liability related
thereto, and providing penalties for violations of those
standards. We are also subject to laws, ordinances, and
regulations governing investigation and remediation of
contamination at facilities we operate to which we send
hazardous or toxic substances or wastes for treatment,
recycling, or disposal.
We do not believe we have any material environmental liabilities
or that compliance with environmental laws, ordinances, and
regulations will, individually or in the aggregate, have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or
results of operations. However, soil and groundwater
contamination has been known to exist at certain properties
owned or leased by us. We have also been required and may in the
future be required to remove aboveground and underground storage
tanks containing hazardous substances or wastes. As to certain
of our properties, specific releases of petroleum have been or
are in the process of being remedied in accordance with state
and federal guidelines. We are monitoring the soil and
groundwater as required by applicable state and federal
guidelines. In addition, the shareholders of the acquired
dealers have indemnified us for specific environmental issues
identified on environmental site assessments performed by us as
part of the acquisitions. We maintain insurance for pollutant
cleanup and removal. The coverage pays for the expenses to
extract pollutants from land or water at the insured property,
if the discharge, dispersal, seepage, migration, release, or
escape of the pollutants is caused by or results from a covered
cause of loss. We also have additional storage tank liability
insurance and Superfund coverage where applicable.
In addition, certain of our retail locations are located on
waterways that are
20
subject to federal or state laws regulating navigable waters
(including oil pollution prevention), fish and wildlife, and
other matters.
Two of the properties we own were historically used as gasoline
service stations. Remedial action with respect to prior
historical site activities on these properties has been
completed in accordance with federal and state law. Also, two of
our properties are within the boundaries of a
Superfund site, although neither property has been
nor is expected to be identified as a contributor to the
contamination in the area. We, however, do not believe that
these environmental issues will result in any material
liabilities to us.
Additionally, certain states have required or are considering
requiring a license in order to operate a recreational boat.
While such licensing requirements are not expected to be unduly
restrictive, regulations may discourage potential first-time
buyers, thereby limiting future sales, which could adversely
affect our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
Product
Liability
The products we sell or service may expose us to potential
liabilities for personal injury or property damage claims
relating to the use of those products. Historically, the
resolution of product liability claims has not materially
affected our business. Our manufacturers generally maintain
product liability insurance, and we maintain third-party product
liability insurance, which we believe to be adequate. However,
we may experience legal claims in excess of our insurance
coverage, and those claims may not be covered by insurance.
Furthermore, any significant claims against us could adversely
affect our business, financial condition, and results of
operations and result in negative publicity. Excessive insurance
claims also could result in increased insurance premiums.
Competition
We operate in a highly competitive environment. In addition to
facing competition generally from recreation businesses seeking
to attract consumers leisure time and discretionary
spending dollars, the recreational boat industry itself is
highly fragmented, resulting in intense competition for
customers, quality products, boat show space, and suitable
retail locations. We rely to a certain extent on boat shows to
generate sales. Our inability to participate in boat shows in
our existing or targeted markets could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
We compete primarily with single-location boat dealers and, with
respect to sales of marine equipment, parts, and accessories,
with national specialty marine stores, catalog retailers,
sporting goods stores, and mass merchants. Dealer competition
continues to increase based on the quality of available
products, the price and value of the products, and attention to
customer service. There is significant competition both within
markets we currently serve and in new markets that we may enter.
We compete in each of our markets with retailers of brands of
boats and engines we do not sell in that market. In addition,
several of our competitors, especially those selling boating
accessories, are large national or regional chains that have
substantial financial, marketing, and other resources. However,
we believe that our integrated corporate infrastructure and
marketing and sales capabilities, our cost structure, and our
nationwide presence enable us to compete effectively against
these companies. Private sales of used boats is an additional
significant source of competition.
21
Executive
Officers
The following table sets forth information concerning each of
our executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
William H. McGill Jr.
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer, and
Director
|
Michael H. McLamb
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
and Director
|
Edward A. Russell
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Executive Vice President of Operations and Sales
|
Kurt M. Frahn
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
|
Jack P. Ezzell
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, and Controller
|
Jay J. Avelino
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Vice President of Human Resources
|
Paulee C. Day
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Vice President, General counsel and Assistant Secretary
|
William H. McGill Jr. has served as the Chief
Executive Officer of MarineMax since January 23, 1998 and
as the Chairman of the Board and as a director of our company
since March 6, 1998. Mr. McGill served as the
President of our company from January 23, 1988 until
September 8, 2000 and re-assumed the position on
July 1, 2002. Mr. McGill was the principal owner and
president of Gulfwind USA, Inc., one of our operating
subsidiaries, from 1973 until its merger with us.
Michael H. McLamb has served as Executive Vice President
of our company since October 2002, as Chief Financial Officer
since January 23, 1998, as Secretary since April 5,
1998, and as a director since November 1, 2003.
Mr. McLamb served as Vice President and Treasurer of our
company from January 23, 1998 until October 22, 2002.
Mr. McLamb, a certified public accountant, was employed by
Arthur Andersen LLP from December 1987 to December 1997, serving
most recently as a senior manager.
Edward A. Russell has served as Executive Vice President
of Operations and Sales of our company since February 2008.
Mr. Russell served as Vice President of Operations of our
company from March 2006 until February 2008, and as a Vice
President of our company from October 22, 2002 until March
2006. Mr. Russell served as the Regional Manager of our
Florida operations from August 1, 2002 until
October 22, 2002 and as the District President for our
Central and West Florida operations from March 1998 until
August 1, 2002. Mr. Russell was an owner and General
Sales Manager of Gulfwind USA Inc., one of our operating
subsidiaries, now called MarineMax of Central Florida, from 1984
until its merger with our company in March 1998.
Kurt M. Frahn has served as Vice President of Finance and
Treasurer of our company since October 22, 2002.
Mr. Frahn served as Director of Taxes and Acquisitions of
our company from May 15, 1998 until October 22, 2002.
Mr. Frahn was employed by Arthur Andersen LLP from
September 3, 1991 until May 15, 1998, serving most
recently as a tax consulting manager.
Jack P. Ezzell has served as Vice President and Chief
Accounting Officer of our company since October 22, 2002
and as Corporate Controller of our company since June 1,
1999. Mr. Ezzell served as Assistant Controller from
January 13, 1998 until June 1, 1999. Mr. Ezzell,
a certified public accountant, was employed by Arthur Andersen
LLP from August 1996 until January 1998, serving most recently
as a senior auditor.
Jay J. Avelino has served as Vice President of Human
Resources of our company since February 2008. Mr. Avelino
served as Vice President of Team Development of our company from
May 2000 until February 2008. Previously, Mr. Avelino was
employed by Caliper Corporation, a New Jersey-based personality
assessment and human resources consulting company, most recently
as Senior Vice President.
Paulee C. Day has served as Vice President of our company
since February 2009 and as General Counsel and Assistant
Secretary since January 2003. Ms. Day, an active member of
the Florida Bar, was employed by Maxxim Medical from May 1999 to
November 2002, serving as Vice President, General Counsel, and
Secretary. Prior to that time, Ms. Day was Corporate
Attorney at Eckerd Corporation from June 1997 through May 1999
and a corporate attorney at the law firm Trenam, Kemker, Scharf,
Barkin, Frye, ONeill and Mullis, P.A. from January 1995
through June 1997. Ms. Day is a graduate of the Indiana
University School of Law and a graduate of Vanderbilt University
where she attained both her Bachelors and Masters in
Business Administration.
22
General
economic conditions and consumer spending patterns can
negatively impact our operating results, and the severe
recession that began in late 2007 has adversely affected the
boating industry and our company.
General economic conditions and consumer spending patterns can
negatively impact our operating results. Unfavorable local,
regional, national, or global economic developments or
uncertainties regarding future economic prospects could reduce
consumer spending in the markets we serve and adversely affect
our business. Economic conditions in areas in which we operate
dealerships, particularly Florida in which we generated 44%,
43%, and 45% of our revenue during fiscal 2007, 2008, and 2009,
respectively, can have a major impact on our operations. Local
influences, such as corporate downsizing and military base
closings, also could adversely affect our operations in certain
markets.
In an economic downturn, consumer discretionary spending levels
generally decline, at times resulting in disproportionately
large reductions in the sale of luxury goods. Consumer spending
on luxury goods also may decline as a result of lower consumer
confidence levels, even if prevailing economic conditions are
favorable. Although we have expanded our operations during
periods of stagnant or modestly declining industry trends, the
cyclical nature of the recreational boating industry or the lack
of industry growth could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, or results of operations in the future. Any
period of adverse economic conditions or low consumer confidence
has a negative effect on our business.
Lower consumer spending resulting from a downturn in the housing
market and other economic factors adversely affected our
business in fiscal 2007 and continued weakness in consumer
spending resulting from substantial weakness in the financial
markets and deteriorating economic conditions had a very
substantial negative effect on our business in fiscal 2008 and
2009. Our revenue decreased from $1.2 billion in fiscal
2007, to $885.4 million in fiscal 2008, to
$588.6 million in fiscal 2009. Our earnings have decreased
from a net income of $20.1 million in fiscal 2007 to a net
loss of $134.3 million in fiscal 2008 (including a
$122.1 million goodwill impairment charge) and a net loss
of $76.8 million in fiscal 2009. These substantially
deteriorating economic and financial conditions have had a
greater impact on many other participants in the boating
industry, with certain manufacturers and dealers ceasing
business operations or filing for bankruptcy. While the
reduction in boating industry participants might have a
long-term positive impact on our companys competitive
position, we are facing and expect to continue to face
short-term competitive pressure resulting from decreased selling
prices as a result of forced sales and other liquidations of
excess inventory.
These conditions caused us to defer our acquisition program,
slow our new store openings, reduce our inventory purchases,
engage in inventory reduction efforts, close some of our retail
locations, and reduce our headcount. While we believe the steps
we have taken to date will enable us to emerge from the current
economic environment as a stronger and more profitable company,
we cannot predict the length or severity of these unfavorable
economic or financial conditions or the extent to which they
will adversely affect our operating results nor can we predict
the effectiveness of the measures we have taken to address this
environment or whether additional measures will be necessary. A
continuation of depressed economic factors could have additional
negative effects on our company, including interfering with our
supply of certain brands by manufacturers, reduced marketing and
other support by manufacturers, decreased revenue, additional
pressures on margins, and our failure to satisfy covenants under
our credit agreement.
The
availability and costs of borrowed funds can adversely affect
our ability to obtain adequate boat inventory and the ability
and willingness of our customers to finance boat
purchases.
The availability and costs of borrowed funds can adversely
affect our ability to obtain and maintain adequate boat
inventory as well as the ability and willingness of our
customers to finance boat purchases. As of September 30,
2009, we had no long-term debt. We rely on our credit facility
to purchase and maintain our inventory of boats. Our ability to
borrow under our credit facility depends on our ability to
continue to satisfy our covenants and other obligations under
our credit facility. The aging of our inventory limits our
borrowing capacity as defined provisions in our credit facility
reduce the allowable advance rate as our inventory ages. Our
access to funds under our credit facility also depends upon the
ability of the banks that are parties to that facility to meet
their funding commitments,
23
particularly if they experience shortages of capital or
experience excessive volumes of borrowing requests from others
during a short period of time. A continuation of depressed
economic conditions, weak consumer spending, turmoil in the
credit markets, and lender difficulties could interfere with our
ability to maintain compliance with our debt covenants and to
utilize the credit agreement to fund our operations.
Accordingly, it may be necessary for us to close additional
stores, further reduce our expense structure, or modify the
covenants with our lenders. Any inability to utilize our credit
facility or the acceleration of amounts owed, resulting from a
covenant violation, insufficient collateral, or lender
difficulties, could require us to seek other sources of funding
to repay amounts outstanding under the credit agreement or
replace or supplement our credit agreement, which may not be
possible at all or under commercially reasonable terms.
Our current revolving credit facility, as amended, provides a
line of credit with asset-based borrowing availability of up to
approximately $230 million, stepping down to
$175 million by September 30, 2010. We have pledged
various of our assets, including boat inventories, accounts
receivable, equipment, fixtures, and real estate, to secure
borrowings under our credit facility. As of September 30,
2009, we were in compliance with all of the credit facility
covenants and our additional available borrowings under our
credit facility were approximately $60 million.
Similarly, the decreases in the availability of credit and
increases in the cost of credit adversely affect the ability of
our customers to purchase boats from us and thereby adversely
affects our ability to sell our products and impact the
profitability of our finance and insurance activities. Tight
credit conditions during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 adversely
affected the ability of customers to finance boat purchases,
which had a negative affect on our operating results.
Our
success depends to a significant extent on the well being, as
well as the continued popularity and reputation for quality of
the boating products, of our manufacturers, particularly
Brunswicks Sea Ray, Boston Whaler, Cabo, Hatteras, and
Meridian boat lines and Azimut-Benetti Groups Azimut and
Atlantis products.
Approximately 51% of our revenue in fiscal 2009 resulted from
sales of new boats manufactured by Brunswick, including
approximately 37% from Brunswicks Sea Ray division and
approximately 14% from Brunswicks other divisions. The
remainder of our fiscal 2009 revenue from new boat sales
resulted from sales of products from a limited number of other
manufacturers, none of which accounted for more than 10% of our
revenue.
We depend on our manufacturers to provide us with products that
compare favorably with competing products in terms of quality,
performance, safety, and advanced features, including the latest
advances in propulsion and navigation systems. Any adverse
change in the production efficiency, product development
efforts, technological advancement, marketplace acceptance,
marketing capabilities, and financial condition of our
manufacturers, particularly Brunswick given our reliance on Sea
Ray, Boston Whaler, Cabo, Hatteras, and Meridian, would have a
substantial adverse impact on our business. Any difficulties
encountered by any of our manufacturers, particularly Brunswick,
resulting from economic, financial, or other factors could
adversely affect the quality and amount of products that they
are able to supply to us and the services and support they
provide to us.
The interruption or discontinuance of the operations of
Brunswick or other manufacturers could cause us to experience
shortfalls, disruptions, or delays with respect to needed
inventory. Although we believe that adequate alternate sources
would be available that could replace any manufacturer other
than Brunswick as a product source, those alternate sources may
not be available at the time of any interruption, and
alternative products may not be available at comparable quality
and prices.
We maintain dealer agreements with Brunswick covering Sea Ray
products. Each dealer agreement has a multi-year term and
provides for the lowest product prices charged by the Sea Ray
division of Brunswick from time to time to other domestic Sea
Ray dealers. These terms are subject to
|
|
|
|
|
the dealer meeting all the requirements and conditions of Sea
Rays applicable programs; and
|
|
|
|
the right of Brunswick in good faith to charge lesser prices to
other dealers
|
|
|
|
|
|
to meet existing competitive circumstances;
|
|
|
|
for unusual and non-ordinary business circumstances; or
|
|
|
|
for limited duration promotional programs.
|
24
Each dealer agreement designates a specific geographical
territory for the dealer, which is exclusive to the dealer so
long as the dealer is not in breach of the material obligations
and performance standards under the agreement and Sea Rays
then current material policies and programs following notice and
the expiration of any applicable cure periods without cure.
We also maintain dealer agreements with Hatteras covering
Hatteras products. Each agreement allows Hatteras to revise
prices at any time, and such new prices will supersede previous
prices. Pursuant to the agreements, we must bear any losses we
incur as a result of such price changes and may not recover from
Hatteras for any losses. In addition, certain of our dealerships
may not represent manufacturers or product lines that compete
directly with Hatteras without its prior written consent.
Upon the completion of the Surfside-3 acquisition, we became the
exclusive dealer for Azimut-Benetti Groups Azimut product
line. In September 2008, our geographic territory was expanded
to include Florida. The Azimut dealer agreement provides a
geographic territory to promote the product line and to network
with the appropriate clientele through various independent
locations designated for Azimut retail sales.
As is typical in the industry, we generally deal with
manufacturers, other than the Sea Ray division of Brunswick,
under renewable annual dealer agreements. These agreements do
not contain any contractual provisions concerning product
pricing or required purchasing levels. Pricing is generally
established on a model year basis, but is subject to change in
the manufacturers sole discretion. Any change or
termination of these arrangements for any reason could adversely
affect product availability and cost and our financial
performance.
Boat
manufacturers exercise substantial control over our
business.
We depend on our dealer agreements. Through dealer agreements,
boat manufacturers, including Brunswick, exercise significant
control over their dealers, restrict them to specified
locations, and retain approval rights over changes in management
and ownership, among other things. The continuation of our
dealer agreements with most manufacturers, including Brunswick,
depends upon, among other things, our achieving stated goals for
customer satisfaction ratings and market share penetration in
the market served by the applicable dealership. Failure to meet
the customer satisfaction, market share goals, and other
conditions set forth in any dealer agreement could have various
consequences, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the termination of the dealer agreement;
|
|
|
|
the imposition of additional conditions in subsequent dealer
agreements;
|
|
|
|
limitations on boat inventory allocations;
|
|
|
|
reductions in reimbursement rates for warranty work performed by
the dealer;
|
|
|
|
loss of certain manufacturer to dealer incentives; or
|
|
|
|
denial of approval of future acquisitions.
|
Our dealer agreements with certain manufacturers, including
Brunswick, do not give us the exclusive right to sell those
manufacturers products within a given geographical area.
Accordingly, a manufacturer, including Brunswick, could
authorize another dealer to start a new dealership in proximity
to one or more of our locations, or an existing dealer could
move a dealership to a location that would be directly
competitive with us. These events could have a material adverse
effect on our competitive position and financial performance.
The
failure to receive rebates and other dealer incentives on
inventory purchases or retail sales could substantially reduce
our margins.
We rely on manufacturers programs that provide incentives
for dealers to purchase and sell particular boat makes and
models or for consumers to buy particular boat makes or models.
Any eliminations, reductions, limitations, or other changes
relating to rebate or incentive programs that have the effect of
reducing the benefits we receive, whether relating to the
ability of manufactures to pay or our ability to qualify for
such incentive programs, could increase the effective cost of
our boat purchases, reduce our margins and competitive position,
and have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.
25
Fuel
prices and supply may affect our business.
All of the recreational boats we sell are powered by diesel or
gasoline engines. Consequently, an interruption in the supply,
or a significant increase in the price or tax on the sale, of
fuel on a regional or national basis could have a material
adverse effect on our sales and operating results. Increases in
fuel prices (such as those that occurred during fiscal
2008) negatively impact boat sales. At various times in the
past, diesel or gasoline fuel has been difficult to obtain. The
supply of fuels may be interrupted, rationing may be imposed, or
the price of or tax on fuels may significantly increase in the
future, adversely impacting our business.
The
availability of boat insurance is critical to our
success.
The ability of our customers to secure reasonably affordable
boat insurance that is satisfactory to lenders that finance our
customers purchases is critical to our success.
Historically, affordable boat insurance has been available. With
the hurricanes that have impacted the state of Florida and other
markets over the past several years, insurance rates have
escalated and insurance coverage has become more difficult to
obtain. Any difficulty of customers to obtain affordable boat
insurance could impede boat sales and adversely affect our
business.
Other
recreational activities and poor industry perception can
adversely affect the levels of boat purchases.
Other recreational activities and poor industry perception can
adversely affect the levels of boat purchases. As a seller of
high-end consumer products, we must compete for discretionary
spending with a wide variety of other recreational activities
and consumer purchases. In addition, perceived hassles of boat
ownership and relatively poor customer service and customer
education throughout the retail boat industry represent
impediments to boat purchases. Our customer-centric strategy is
intended to overcome these perceptions.
Adverse
federal tax policies can have a negative effect on
us.
Changes in federal and state tax laws, such as an imposition of
luxury taxes on new boat purchases, increases in prevailing tax
rates, and weak stock market performance also influence
consumers decisions to purchase products we offer and
could have a negative effect on our sales. For example, during
1991 and 1992, the federal government imposed a luxury tax on
new recreational boats with sales prices in excess of $100,000,
which coincided with a sharp decline in boating industry sales
from a high of more than $17.9 billion in the late 1980s to
a low of $10.3 billion in 1992. Any increase in tax rates,
including those on capital gains and dividends, particularly
those on high-income taxpayers, could adversely affect our boat
sales.
Our
success depends, in part, on our ability to continue to make
successful acquisitions and to integrate the operations of
acquired dealers and each dealer we acquire in the
future.
Since March 1, 1998, we have acquired 20 recreational boat
dealers, two boat brokerage operations, and two full-service
yacht repair facilities. Each acquired dealer operated
independently prior to its acquisition by us. Our success
depends, in part, on our ability to continue to make successful
acquisitions and to integrate the operations of acquired
dealers, including centralizing certain functions to achieve
cost savings and pursuing programs and processes that promote
cooperation and the sharing of opportunities and resources among
our dealerships. We may not be able to oversee the combined
entity efficiently or to implement effectively our growth and
operating strategies. To the extent that we successfully pursue
our acquisition strategy, our resulting growth will place
significant additional demands on our management and
infrastructure. Our failure to pursue successfully our
acquisition strategies or operate effectively the combined
entity could have a material adverse effect on our rate of
growth and operating performance.
Unforeseen
expenses, difficulties, and delays frequently encountered in
connection with rapid expansion through acquisitions could
inhibit our growth and negatively impact our
profitability.
Our growth strategy of acquiring additional recreational boat
dealers involves significant risks. This strategy entails
reviewing and potentially reorganizing acquired business
operations, corporate infrastructure and systems, and financial
controls. Unforeseen expenses, difficulties, and delays
frequently encountered in connection with
26
rapid expansion through acquisitions could inhibit our growth
and negatively impact our profitability. We may be unable to
identify suitable acquisition candidates or to complete the
acquisitions of candidates that we identify. Increased
competition for acquisition candidates or increased asking
prices by acquisition candidates may increase purchase prices
for acquisitions to levels beyond our financial capability or to
levels that would not result in the returns required by our
acquisition criteria. Acquisitions also may become more
difficult in the future as we acquire more of the most
attractive dealers. In addition, we may encounter difficulties
in integrating the operations of acquired dealers with our own
operations or managing acquired dealers profitably without
substantial costs, delays, or other operational or financial
problems.
We may issue common or preferred stock and incur substantial
indebtedness in making future acquisitions. The size, timing,
and integration of any future acquisitions may cause substantial
fluctuations in operating results from quarter to quarter.
Consequently, operating results for any quarter may not be
indicative of the results that may be achieved for any
subsequent quarter or for a full fiscal year. These fluctuations
could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Our ability to continue to grow through the acquisition of
additional dealers will depend upon various factors, including
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the availability of suitable acquisition candidates at
attractive purchase prices;
|
|
|
|
the ability to compete effectively for available acquisition
opportunities;
|
|
|
|
the availability of borrowed funds or common stock with a
sufficient market price to complete the acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain any requisite manufacturer or governmental
approvals;
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain approval of our lenders under our current
credit agreement; and
|
|
|
|
the absence of one or more manufacturers attempting to impose
unsatisfactory restrictions on us in connection with their
approval of acquisitions.
|
As a part of our acquisition strategy, we frequently engage in
discussions with various recreational boat dealers regarding
their potential acquisition by us. In connection with these
discussions, we and each potential acquisition candidate
exchange confidential operational and financial information,
conduct due diligence inquiries, and consider the structure,
terms, and conditions of the potential acquisition. In certain
cases, the prospective acquisition candidate agrees not to
discuss a potential acquisition with any other party for a
specific period of time, grants us an option to purchase the
prospective dealer for a designated price during a specific
time, and agrees to take other actions designed to enhance the
possibility of the acquisition, such as preparing audited
financial information and converting its accounting system to
the system specified by us. Potential acquisition discussions
frequently take place over a long period of time and involve
difficult business integration and other issues, including in
some cases, management succession and related matters. As a
result of these and other factors, a number of potential
acquisitions that from time to time appear likely to occur do
not result in binding legal agreements and are not consummated.
We may
be required to obtain the consent of Brunswick and various other
manufacturers prior to the acquisition of other
dealers.
In determining whether to approve acquisitions, manufacturers
may consider many factors, including our financial condition and
ownership structure. Manufacturers also may impose conditions on
granting their approvals for acquisitions, including a
limitation on the number of their dealers that we may acquire.
Our ability to meet manufacturers requirements for
approving future acquisitions will have a direct bearing on our
ability to complete acquisitions and effect our growth strategy.
There can be no assurance that a manufacturer will not terminate
its dealer agreement, refuse to renew its dealer agreement,
refuse to approve future acquisitions, or take other action that
could have a material adverse effect on our acquisition program.
We and the Sea Ray Division of Brunswick have an agreement
extending through June 2015 that provides a process for the
acquisition of additional Sea Ray boat dealers that desire to be
acquired by us. Under the agreement,
27
acquisitions of Sea Ray dealers will be mutually agreed upon by
us and Sea Ray with reasonable efforts to be made to include a
balance of Sea Ray dealers that have been successful and those
that have not been. The agreement provides that Sea Ray will not
unreasonably withhold its consent to any proposed acquisition of
a Sea Ray dealer by us, subject to the conditions set forth in
the agreement. Among other things, the agreement requires us to
provide Sea Ray with a business plan for each proposed
acquisition, including historical financial and five-year
projected financial information regarding the acquisition
candidate; marketing and advertising plans; service capabilities
and managerial and staff personnel; information regarding the
ability of the candidate to achieve performance standards within
designated periods; and information regarding the success of our
previous acquisitions of Sea Ray dealers. The agreement also
contemplates Sea Ray reaching a good faith determination whether
the acquisition would be in its best interest based on our
dedication and focus of resources on the Sea Ray brand and Sea
Rays consideration of any adverse effects that the
approval would have on the resulting territory configuration and
adjacent or other dealers sales and the absence of any violation
of applicable laws or rights granted by Sea Ray to others.
Our growth strategy also entails expanding our product lines and
geographic scope by obtaining additional distribution rights
from our existing and new manufacturers. We may not be able to
secure additional distribution rights or obtain suitable
alternative sources of supply if we are unable to obtain such
distribution rights. The inability to expand our product lines
and geographic scope by obtaining additional distribution rights
could have a material adverse effect on the growth and
profitability of our business.
Our
growth strategy may require us to secure significant additional
capital, the amount of which will depend upon the size, timing,
and structure of future acquisitions and our working capital and
general corporate needs.
If we finance future acquisitions in whole or in part through
the issuance of common stock or securities convertible into or
exercisable for common stock, existing stockholders will
experience dilution in the voting power of their common stock
and earnings per share could be negatively impacted. The extent
to which we will be able and willing to use our common stock for
acquisitions will depend on the market value of our common stock
and the willingness of potential sellers to accept our common
stock as full or partial consideration. Our inability to use our
common stock as consideration, to generate cash from operations,
or to obtain additional funding through debt or equity
financings in order to pursue our acquisition program could
materially limit our growth.
Any borrowings made to finance future acquisitions or for
operations could make us more vulnerable to a downturn in our
operating results, a downturn in economic conditions, or
increases in interest rates on borrowings that are subject to
interest rate fluctuations. If our cash flow from operations is
insufficient to meet our debt service requirements, we could be
required to sell additional equity securities, refinance our
obligations, or dispose of assets in order to meet our debt
service requirements. In addition, our credit arrangements
contain financial and operational covenants and other
restrictions with which we must comply, including limitations on
capital expenditures and the incurrence of additional
indebtedness. Adequate financing may not be available if and
when we need it or may not be available on terms acceptable to
us. The failure to obtain sufficient financing on favorable
terms and conditions could have a material adverse effect on our
growth prospects and our business, financial condition, and
results of operations.
Our
internal growth and operating strategies of opening new
locations and offering new products involve risk.
In addition to pursuing growth by acquiring boat dealers, we
intend to continue to pursue a strategy of growth through
opening new retail locations and offering new products in our
existing and new territories. Accomplishing these goals for
expansion will depend upon a number of factors, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to identify new markets in which we can obtain
distribution rights to sell our existing or additional product
lines;
|
|
|
|
our ability to lease or construct suitable facilities at a
reasonable cost in existing or new markets;
|
|
|
|
our ability to hire, train, and retain qualified personnel;
|
|
|
|
the timely integration of new retail locations into existing
operations;
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to achieve adequate market penetration at favorable
operating margins without the acquisition of existing
dealers; and
|
|
|
|
our financial resources.
|
Our dealer agreements with Brunswick require Brunswicks
consent to open, close, or change retail locations that sell Sea
Ray products, and other dealer agreements generally contain
similar provisions. We may not be able to open and operate new
retail locations or introduce new product lines on a timely or
profitable basis. Moreover, the costs associated with opening
new retail locations or introducing new product lines may
adversely affect our profitability.
As a result of these growth strategies, we expect to expend
significant time and effort in opening and acquiring new retail
locations and introducing new products. Our systems, procedures,
controls, and financial resources may not be adequate to support
expanding operations. The inability to manage our growth
effectively could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our planned growth also will impose significant added
responsibilities on members of senior management and require us
to identify, recruit, and integrate additional senior level
managers. We may not be able to identify, hire, or train
suitable additions to management.
Our
business, as well as the entire recreational boating industry,
is highly seasonal, with seasonality varying in different
geographic markets. In addition, weather conditions may
adversely impact our business.
During the three-year period ended September 30, 2009, the
average revenue for the quarterly periods ended
December 31, March 31, June 30, and September 30
represented 20%, 25%, 30%, and 25%, respectively, of our average
annual revenue. With the exception of Florida, we generally
realize significantly lower sales in the quarterly periods
ending December 31 and March 31. The onset of the public
boat and recreation shows in January stimulates boat sales and
allows us to reduce our inventory levels and related short-term
borrowings throughout the remainder of the fiscal year. Our
business could become substantially more seasonal as we acquire
dealers that operate in colder regions of the United States.
Weather conditions may adversely impact our operating results.
For example, drought conditions, reduced rainfall levels, and
excessive rain may force boating areas to close or render
boating dangerous or inconvenient, thereby curtailing customer
demand for our products. In addition, unseasonably cool weather
and prolonged winter conditions may lead to shorter selling
seasons in certain locations. Many of our dealerships sell boats
to customers for use on reservoirs, thereby subjecting our
business to the continued viability of these reservoirs for
boating use. Although our geographic diversity and any future
geographic expansion will reduce the overall impact on us of
adverse weather conditions in any one market area, weather
conditions will continue to represent potential material adverse
risks to us and our future operating performance. As a result of
the foregoing and other factors, our operating results in some
future quarters could be below the expectations of stock market
analysts and investors.
In addition, hurricanes and other storms could result in the
disruption of our operations or damage to our boat inventories
and facilities as has been the case when Florida and other
markets has been affected by hurricanes. While we traditionally
maintain property and casualty insurance coverage for damage
caused by hurricanes and other storms, there can be no assurance
that such insurance coverage is adequate to cover losses that we
may sustain as a result of hurricanes and other storms.
We
face intense competition.
We operate in a highly competitive environment. In addition to
facing competition generally from non-boating recreation
businesses seeking to attract discretionary spending dollars,
the recreational boat industry itself is highly fragmented and
involves intense competition for customers, product distribution
rights, and suitable retail locations, particularly on or near
waterways. Competition increases during periods of stagnant
industry growth.
We compete primarily with single-location boat dealers and, with
respect to sales of marine parts, accessories, and equipment,
with national specialty marine parts and accessories stores,
catalog retailers, sporting goods stores,
29
and mass merchants. Competition among boat dealers is based on
the quality of available products, the price and value of the
products, and attention to customer service. There is
significant competition both within markets we currently serve
and in new markets that we may enter. We compete in each of our
markets with retailers of brands of boats and engines we do not
sell in that market. In addition, several of our competitors,
especially those selling marine equipment and accessories, are
large national or regional chains that have substantial
financial, marketing, and other resources. Private sales of used
boats represent an additional source of competition.
Due to various matters, including environmental concerns,
permitting and zoning requirements, and competition for
waterfront real estate, some markets in the United States have
experienced an increased waiting list for marina and storage
availability. In general, the markets in which we currently
operate are not experiencing any unusual difficulties. However,
marine retail activity could be adversely effected in markets
that do not have sufficient marine and storage availability to
satisfy demand.
We
depend on income from financing, insurance, and extended service
contracts.
A portion of our income results from referral fees derived from
the placement or marketing of various finance and insurance, or
F&I, products, consisting of customer financing, insurance
products, and extended service contracts, the most significant
component of which is the participation and other fees resulting
from our sale of customer financing contracts. During fiscal
2009, F&I products accounted for 2.7% of our revenue.
The availability of financing for our boat purchasers and the
level of participation and other fees we receive in connection
with such financing depend on the particular agreement between
us and the lender and the current rate environment. Lenders may
impose terms in their boat financing arrangements with us that
may be unfavorable to us or our customers, resulting in reduced
demand for our customer financing programs and lower
participation and other fees. Customer financing became more
difficult to secure during fiscal 2008, which continued in
fiscal 2009.
The reduction of profit margins on sales of F&I products or
the lack of demand for or the unavailability of these products
could have a material adverse effect on our operating margins.
We
depend on key personnel.
Our success depends, in large part, upon the continuing efforts
and abilities of our executive officers. Although we have
employment agreements with certain of our executive officers, we
cannot assure that these or other executive personnel will
remain with us. Expanding our operations may require us to add
additional executive personnel in the future. As a result of our
decentralized operating strategy, we also rely on the management
teams of our dealerships. In addition, we likely will depend on
the senior management of any significant businesses we acquire
in the future. The loss of the services of one or more of these
key employees before we are able to attract and retain qualified
replacement personnel could adversely affect our business.
The
products we sell or service may expose us to potential liability
for personal injury or property damage claims relating to the
use of those products.
Manufacturers of the products we sell generally maintain product
liability insurance. We also maintain third-party product
liability insurance that we believe to be adequate. We may
experience claims that are not covered by or that are in excess
of our insurance coverage. The institution of any significant
claims against us could subject us to damages, result in higher
insurance costs, and harm our business reputation with potential
customers.
Environmental
and other regulatory issues may impact our
operations.
Our operations are subject to extensive regulation, supervision,
and licensing under various federal, state, and local statutes,
ordinances, and regulations. The failure to satisfy those and
other regulatory requirements could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
Various federal, state, and local regulatory agencies, including
the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the
Environmental Protection Agency, or the EPA, and similar federal
and local agencies, have jurisdiction over the operation of our
dealerships, repair facilities, and other operations, with
respect to matters such as consumer protection, workers
safety, and laws regarding protection of the environment,
including air, water, and
30
soil. The EPA promulgated emissions regulations for outboard
marine engines that impose stricter emissions standards for
two-cycle, gasoline outboard marine engines. The majority of the
outboard marine engines we sell are manufactured by Mercury
Marine. Mercury Marines product line of low-emission
engines, including the OptiMax, Verado, and other four-stroke
outboards, have already achieved the EPAs mandated 2006
emission levels. Any increased costs of producing engines
resulting from EPA standards or the inability of our
manufacturers to comply with EPA requirements, could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Certain of our facilities own and operate underground storage
tanks, or USTs, for the storage of various petroleum products.
USTs are generally subject to federal, state, and local laws and
regulations that require testing and upgrading of USTs and
remediation of contaminated soils and groundwater resulting from
leaking USTs. In addition, we may be subject to civil liability
to third parties for remediation costs or other damages if
leakage from our owned or operated USTs migrates onto the
property of others.
Our business involves the use, handling, storage, and
contracting for recycling or disposal of hazardous or toxic
substances or wastes, including environmentally sensitive
materials, such as motor oil, waste motor oil and filters,
transmission fluid, antifreeze, freon, waste paint and lacquer
thinner, batteries, solvents, lubricants, degreasing agents,
gasoline, and diesel fuels. Accordingly, we are subject to
regulation by federal, state, and local authorities establishing
investigation and health and environmental quality standards,
and liability related thereto, and providing penalties for
violations of those standards.
We also are subject to laws, ordinances, and regulations
governing investigation and remediation of contamination at
facilities we operate or to which we send hazardous or toxic
substances or wastes for treatment, recycling, or disposal. In
particular, the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act, or CERCLA or
Superfund, imposes joint, strict, and several
liability on
|
|
|
|
|
owners or operators of facilities at, from, or to which a
release of hazardous substances has occurred;
|
|
|
|
parties that generated hazardous substances that were released
at such facilities; and
|
|
|
|
parties that transported or arranged for the transportation of
hazardous substances to such facilities.
|
A majority of states have adopted Superfund statutes comparable
to and, in some cases, more stringent than CERCLA. If we were to
be found to be a responsible party under CERCLA or a similar
state statute, we could be held liable for all investigative and
remedial costs associated with addressing such contamination. In
addition, claims alleging personal injury or property damage may
be brought against us as a result of alleged exposure to
hazardous substances resulting from our operations. In addition,
certain of our retail locations are located on waterways that
are subject to federal or state laws regulating navigable waters
(including oil pollution prevention), fish and wildlife, and
other matters.
Soil and groundwater contamination has been known to exist at
certain properties owned or leased by us. We have also been
required and may in the future be required to remove aboveground
and underground storage tanks containing hazardous substances or
wastes. As to certain of our properties, specific releases of
petroleum have been or are in the process of being remediated in
accordance with state and federal guidelines. We are monitoring
the soil and groundwater as required by applicable state and
federal guidelines. We also may have additional storage tank
liability insurance and Superfund coverage where applicable.
Environmental laws and regulations are complex and subject to
frequent change. Compliance with amended, new, or more stringent
laws or regulations, more strict interpretations of existing
laws, or the future discovery of environmental conditions may
require additional expenditures by us, and such expenditures may
be material.
Two of the properties we own were historically used as gasoline
service stations. Remedial action with respect to prior
historical site activities on these properties has been
completed in accordance with federal and state law. Also, two of
our properties are within the boundaries of a Superfund site,
although neither property has been identified as a contributor
to the contamination in the area.
Additionally, certain states have required or are considering
requiring a license in order to operate a recreational boat.
These regulations could discourage potential buyers, thereby
limiting future sales and adversely affecting our business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
31
The
market price of our common stock could be subject to wide
fluctuations as a result of many factors.
Factors that could affect the trading price of our common stock
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
variations in our operating results;
|
|
|
|
the thin trading volume and relatively small public float of our
common stock;
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue to secure adequate levels of financing;
|
|
|
|
variations in same-store sales;
|
|
|
|
general economic, political, and market conditions;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates published by analysts;
|
|
|
|
the level and success of our acquisition program and new store
openings;
|
|
|
|
the success of dealership integration;
|
|
|
|
relationships with manufacturers;
|
|
|
|
seasonality and weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
governmental policies and regulations;
|
|
|
|
the performance of the recreational boat industry in
general; and
|
|
|
|
factors relating to suppliers and competitors.
|
In addition, market demand for small-capitalization stocks, and
price and volume fluctuations in the stock market unrelated to
our performance could result in significant fluctuations in the
market price of our common stock.
The performance of our common stock could adversely affect our
ability to raise equity in the public markets and adversely
affect our acquisition program.
The
issuance of additional capital stock in the future, including
shares that we may issue pursuant to stock-based grants,
including stock option grants, and future acquisitions, may
result in dilution in the net tangible book value per share of
our common stock.
Our board of directors has the legal power and authority to
determine the terms of an offering of shares of our capital
stock, or securities convertible into or exchangeable for these
shares, to the extent of our shares of authorized and unissued
capital stock. The issuance of additional common stock in the
future, including shares that we may issue pursuant to
stock-based grants, including stock option grants, and future
acquisitions, may result in dilution in the net tangible book
value per share of our common stock. The issuance of additional
capital stock in the future, including shares that we may issue
pursuant to stock-based grants, including stock option grants,
and future acquisitions, may result in dilution in the net
tangible book value per share of our common stock.
A
substantial number of shares are eligible for future
sale.
As of September 30, 2009, there were outstanding
21,705,759 shares of our common stock. Substantially all of
these shares are freely tradable without restriction or further
registration under the securities laws, unless held by an
affiliate of our company, as that term is defined in
Rule 144 under the securities laws. Shares held by
affiliates of our company, which generally include our
directors, officers, and certain principal stockholders, are
subject to the resale limitations of Rule 144 described
below. Outstanding shares of common stock issued in connection
with the acquisition of any acquired dealers are available for
resale beginning six months after the respective dates of the
acquisitions, subject to compliance with the provisions of
Rule 144 under the securities laws.
As of September 30, 2009, we had issued options to purchase
approximately 1,995,232 shares of common stock and 740,957
restricted stock awards under our incentive stock plan, and we
issued 264,493 of the 500,000 shares of common stock
reserved for issuance under our 2008 employee stock
purchase plan. We have
32
filed a registration statement under the securities laws to
register the common stock to be issued under these plans. As a
result, shares issued under these plans will be freely tradable
without restriction unless acquired by affiliates of our
company, who will be subject to the volume and other limitations
of Rule 144.
We may issue additional shares of common stock or preferred
stock under the securities laws as part of any acquisition we
may complete in the future. If issued pursuant to an effective
registration statement, these shares generally will be freely
tradable after their issuance by persons not affiliated with us
or the acquired companies.
We do
not pay cash dividends.
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. Moreover,
financial covenants under our credit facility restrict our
ability to pay dividends.
Our
stockholders rights plan may adversely affect existing
stockholders.
Our Stockholders Rights Plan may have the effect of
deterring, delaying, or preventing a change in control that
might otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.
Under the Rights Plan, we issued a dividend of one Preferred
Share Purchase Right for each share of our common stock held by
stockholders of record as of the close of business on
September 7, 2001.
In general, subject to certain limited exceptions, the stock
purchase rights become exercisable when a person or group
acquires 15% or more of our common stock or a tender offer or
exchange offer for 15% or more of our common stock is announced
or commenced. After any such event, our other stockholders may
purchase additional shares of our common stock at 50% of the
then-current market price. The rights will cause substantial
dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on
terms not approved by our board of directors. The rights may be
redeemed by us at $0.01 per stock purchase right at any time
before any person or group acquires 15% or more of our
outstanding common stock. The rights should not interfere with
any merger or other business combination approved by our board
of directors. The rights expire on August 28, 2011.
Certain
provisions of our restated certificate of incorporation and
bylaws and Delaware law may make a change in the control of our
company more difficult to complete, even if a change in control
were in the stockholders interest or might result in a
premium over the market price for the shares held by the
stockholders.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws divide our board of
directors into three classes of directors elected for staggered
three-year terms. The certificate of incorporation also provides
that the board of directors may authorize the issuance of one or
more series of preferred stock from time to time and may
determine the rights, preferences, privileges, and restrictions
and fix the number of shares of any such series of preferred
stock, without any vote or action by our stockholders. The board
of directors may authorize the issuance of preferred stock with
voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the
voting power or other rights of the holders of common stock. The
certificate of incorporation also allows our board of directors
to fix the number of directors and to fill vacancies on the
board of directors.
We also are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which
prohibits us from engaging in a business combination
with an interested stockholder for a period of three
years after the date of the transaction in which the person
became an interested stockholder, unless the
business combination is approved in a prescribed manner.
Certain of our dealer agreements could also make it difficult
for a third party to attempt to acquire a significant ownership
position in our company. In addition, the stockholders
agreement and governance agreement will have the effect of
increasing the control of our directors, executive officers, and
persons associated with them.
Our
sales of Azimut products may be adversely affected by
fluctuations in currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar
and the euro.
Products purchased from Italy-based Azimut are subject to
fluctuations in the euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate,
which ultimately may impact the retail price at which we can
sell such products. As a result, fluctuations in the
33
value of the euro compared with the U.S. dollar may impact
the price points at which we can sell profitably Azimut
products, and such price points may not be competitive with
other product lines in the United States. Accordingly, such
fluctuations in exchange rates ultimately may impact the amount
of revenue, cost of goods sold, cash flows, and earnings we
recognize for the Azimut product lines. The impact of these
currency fluctuations could increase, particularly if our
revenue from the Azimut products increase as a percentage of our
total revenue. We also could incur losses from hedging
transactions designed to reduce our risk to fluctuation in
exchange rates. We cannot predict the effects of exchange rate
fluctuations or currency rate hedges on our operating results.
Therefore, in certain cases, we may, from time to time, enter
into foreign currency cash flow hedges to reduce the variability
of cash flows associated with firm commitments to purchase boats
and yachts from Azimut. We cannot assure that our strategies
will adequately protect our operating results from the effects
of exchange rate fluctuations.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
Not applicable.
We lease our corporate offices in Clearwater, Florida. We also
lease 30 of our retail locations under leases, many of which
contain multi-year renewal options and some of which grant us a
first right of refusal to purchase the property at fair value.
In most cases, we pay a fixed rent at negotiated rates. In
substantially all of the leased locations, we are responsible
for taxes, utilities, insurance, and routine repairs and
maintenance. We own the property associated with 25 other retail
locations we operate and one joint venture as noted below.
Additionally, we own four retail locations that are currently
closed and three retail locations that are closed and available
for sale.
The following table reflects the status, approximate size, and
facilities of the various retail locations we operate as of the
date of this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
|
Operated
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Location Type
|
|
Footage(1)
|
|
Facilities at Property
|
|
Since(2)
|
|
Waterfront
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Shores
|
|
Company owned
|
|
4,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1998
|
|
|
Gulf Shores
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
1,112
|
|
Retail only; 7 wet slips
|
|
2008
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Arizona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tempe
|
|
Company owned
|
|
34,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1992
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Diego (Shelter Island)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
930
|
|
Retail and service; 20 wet slips
|
|
2005
|
|
Mission Bay
|
Colorado
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Junction
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
9,300
|
|
Retail, service, and storage
|
|
1986
|
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Norwalk
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
7,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1994
|
|
Norwalk Harbor
|
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cape Haze
|
|
Company owned
|
|
18,000
|
|
Retail; 8 wet slips
|
|
1972
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Clearwater
|
|
Company owned
|
|
42,000
|
|
Retail and service; 20 wet slips
|
|
1973
|
|
Tampa Bay
|
Cocoa
|
|
Company owned
|
|
15,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1968
|
|
|
Coconut Grove
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
2,000
|
|
Retail only; 24 wet slips
|
|
2002
|
|
Biscayne Bay
|
Dania
|
|
Company owned
|
|
32,000
|
|
Repair and service; 16 wet slips
|
|
1991
|
|
Port Everglades
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
|
Operated
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Location Type
|
|
Footage(1)
|
|
Facilities at Property
|
|
Since(2)
|
|
Waterfront
|
|
Destin
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
2,200
|
|
Retail only; 24 wet slips
|
|
2005
|
|
Destin Harbor
|
Fort Myers
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
8,000
|
|
Retail and service; 18 wet slips
|
|
1983
|
|
Caloosahatchee River
|
Jacksonville
|
|
Company owned
|
|
15,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Jacksonville
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
1,000
|
|
Retail only; 7 wet slips
|
|
1995
|
|
St Johns River
|
Key Largo
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
8,900
|
|
Retail and service; 6 west slips
|
|
2002
|
|
Card Sound
|
Miami
|
|
Company owned
|
|
7,200
|
|
Retail and service; 15 wet slips
|
|
1980
|
|
Little River
|
Miami
|
|
Company owned
|
|
5,000
|
|
Service only; 11 wet slips
|
|
2005
|
|
Little River
|
Naples
|
|
Company owned
|
|
19,600
|
|
Retail and service; 14 wet slips
|
|
1997
|
|
Naples Bay
|
Pensacola
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
24,300
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1974
|
|
|
Pompano Beach
|
|
Company owned
|
|
23,000
|
|
Retail and service; 16 wet slips
|
|
1990
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Pompano Beach
|
|
Company owned
|
|
5,400
|
|
Retail and service; 24 wet slips
|
|
2005
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Sarasota
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
26,500
|
|
Retail, service, and storage; 15 wet slips
|
|
1972
|
|
Sarasota Bay
|
St. Petersburg(3)
|
|
Joint venture
|
|
15,000
|
|
Yacht service, 20 wet slips
|
|
2006
|
|
Boca Ciega Bay
|
Stuart
|
|
Company owned
|
|
29,100
|
|
Retail and service; 66 wet slips
|
|
2002
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Tampa
|
|
Company owned
|
|
13,100
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1995
|
|
|
Venice
|
|
Company owned
|
|
62,000
|
|
Retail, service, and storage; 90 wet slips
|
|
1972
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Georgia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buford (Atlanta)
|
|
Company owned
|
|
13,500
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Cumming (Atlanta)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
13,000
|
|
Retail and service; 50 wet slips
|
|
1981
|
|
Lake Lanier
|
Maryland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baltimore
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
7,600
|
|
Retail and service; 17 wet slips
|
|
2005
|
|
Baltimore Inner Harbor
|
Joppa
|
|
Company owned
|
|
28,400
|
|
Retail, service, and storage; 294 wet slips
|
|
1966
|
|
Gunpowder River
|
White Marsh
|
|
Company owned
|
|
19,800
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1958
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bayport
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
450
|
|
Retail only; 10 wet slips
|
|
1996
|
|
St Croix River
|
Rogers
|
|
Company owned
|
|
70,000
|
|
Retail, service, and storage
|
|
1991
|
|
|
Walker
|
|
Company owned
|
|
76,400
|
|
Retail, service, and storage
|
|
1989
|
|
|
Walker
|
|
Company owned
|
|
6,800
|
|
Retail and service; 93 wet slips
|
|
1977
|
|
Leech Lake
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
|
Operated
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Location Type
|
|
Footage(1)
|
|
Facilities at Property
|
|
Since(2)
|
|
Waterfront
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lake Ozark
|
|
Company owned
|
|
60,300
|
|
Retail and service; 300 wet slips
|
|
1987
|
|
Lake of the Ozarks
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brant Beach
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
3,800
|
|
Retail and service; 36 wet slips
|
|
1965
|
|
Barnegat Bay
|
Brick
|
|
Company owned
|
|
20,000
|
|
Retail and service; 225 wet slips
|
|
1977
|
|
Manasquan River
|
Lake Hopatcong
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
4,600
|
|
Retail and service; 80 wet slips
|
|
1998
|
|
Lake Hopatcong
|
Ship Bottom
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
19,300
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1972
|
|
|
Somers Point
|
|
Affiliate lease
|
|
31,000
|
|
Retail, service and storage; 33 wet slips
|
|
1987
|
|
Little Egg Harbor Bay
|
New York
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copiague
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
15,000
|
|
Retail only
|
|
1993
|
|
|
Huntington
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
1,200
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
1995
|
|
Huntington Harbor and Long Island Sound
|
Lindenhurst (Delivery Center)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
54,000
|
|
Retail, service, and dry storage
|
|
1968
|
|
Neguntatogue Creek to Great South Bay
|
Lindenhurst (Marina)
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
14,600
|
|
Marina and service; 370 wet slips
|
|
1968
|
|
Neguntatogue Creek to Great South Bay
|
Manhattan
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
1,200
|
|
Retail only; 75 wet slips
|
|
1996
|
|
Hudson River
|
New Rochelle
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
4,650
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
2008
|
|
Long Island Sound
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wrightsville Beach
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
34,500
|
|
Retail, service, and storage
|
|
1996
|
|
Intracoastal Waterway
|
Ohio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Port Clinton
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
93,300
|
|
Retail, service and storage; 8 wet slips
|
|
1997
|
|
Lake Erie
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Afton
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
3,500
|
|
Retail and service; 23 wet slips
|
|
2003
|
|
Grand Lake
|
Rhode Island
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wakefield
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
1,800
|
|
Retail only; 3 wet slips
|
|
2006
|
|
Narragansett Bay
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chattanooga
|
|
Third-party lease
|
|
3,000
|
|
Retail only; 12 wet slips
|
|
2005
|
|
Tennessee River
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lewisville (Dallas)
|
|
Company owned
|
|
22,000
|
|
Retail and service
|
|
2002
|
|
|
Seabrook
|
|
Company owned
|
|
32,000
|
|
Retail and service; 30 wet slips
|
|
2002
|
|
Clear Lake
|
36
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Square footage is approximate and does not include outside sales
space or dock or marina facilities. |
|
(2) |
|
Operated since date is the date the facility was opened by us or
opened prior to its acquisition by us. |
|
(3) |
|
Joint venture entered into with Brunswick to acquire marina and
service facility. |
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We are party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. While it is not feasible to determine the
actual outcome of these actions as of September 30, 2009,
we do not believe that these matters will have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results
of operations, or cash flows.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
Not applicable.
37
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Our common stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol HZO since our initial public offering on
June 3, 1998 at $12.50 per share. The following table sets
forth high and low sale prices of the common stock for each
calendar quarter indicated as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
26.10
|
|
|
$
|
20.01
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
24.05
|
|
|
$
|
18.80
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
21.96
|
|
|
$
|
14.30
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
16.68
|
|
|
$
|
13.50
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
16.18
|
|
|
$
|
10.38
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
13.82
|
|
|
$
|
6.99
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
9.66
|
|
|
$
|
4.92
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
7.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
3.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
6.05
|
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
8.36
|
|
|
$
|
3.08
|
|
Fourth quarter (through November 30, 2009)
|
|
$
|
8.34
|
|
|
$
|
6.55
|
|
On November 30, 2009, the closing sale price of our common
stock was $7.00 per share. On November 30, 2009, there were
approximately 100 record holders and approximately 5,000
beneficial owners of our common stock.
Dividends
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common
stock. We currently plan to retain any earnings to finance the
growth of our business rather than to pay cash dividends.
Payments of any cash dividends in the future will depend on our
financial condition, results of operations, and capital
requirements as well as other factors deemed relevant by our
board of directors. Moreover, financial covenants under certain
of our credit facilities also restrict our ability to pay
dividends.
38
Performance
Graph
The following line graph compares cumulative total stockholder
returns for the five years ended September 30, 2008 for
(i) our common stock, (ii) the Russell 2000 Index, and
(iii) the Nasdaq Retail Trade Index. The graph assumes an
investment of $100 on September 30, 2004. The calculations
of cumulative stockholder return on the Russell 2000 Index and
the Nasdaq Retail Trade Index include reinvestment of dividends.
The calculation of cumulative stockholder return on our common
stock does not include reinvestment of dividends because we did
not pay any dividends during the measurement period. The
historical performance shown is not necessarily indicative of
future performance.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among MarineMax, Inc., The Russell 2000 Index
And The NASDAQ Retail Trade Index
|
|
|
* |
|
$100 invested on 9/30/04 in stock or index, including
reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending September 30. |
The performance graph above shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section. The
performance graph above will not be deemed incorporated by
reference into any filing of our company under the Exchange Act
or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
39
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following table contains certain financial and operating
data and is qualified by the more detailed consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in
this report. The balance sheet and statement of operations data
were derived from the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto that have been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP, an independent registered certified public accounting firm.
The financial data shown below should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes
thereto and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations included
elsewhere in this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands except share, per share, and retail
location data)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
947,347
|
|
|
$
|
1,213,541
|
|
|
$
|
1,255,985
|
|
|
$
|
885,407
|
|
|
$
|
588,585
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
712,843
|
|
|
|
906,781
|
|
|
|
956,251
|
|
|
|
679,164
|
|
|
|
499,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
234,504
|
|
|
|
306,760
|
|
|
|
299,734
|
|
|
|
206,243
|
|
|
|
88,660
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
169,975
|
|
|
|
222,806
|
|
|
|
245,224
|
|
|
|
217,426
|
|
|
|
159,998
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
64,529
|
|
|
|
83,954
|
|
|
|
54,510
|
|
|
|
(133,274
|
)
|
|
|
(71,338
|
)
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
9,291
|
|
|
|
18,616
|
|
|
|
26,955
|
|
|
|
20,164
|
|
|
|
14,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
55,238
|
|
|
|
65,338
|
|
|
|
27,555
|
|
|
|
(153,438
|
)
|
|
|
(85,402
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
21,412
|
|
|
|
25,956
|
|
|
|
7,486
|
|
|
|
(19,161
|
)
|
|
|
(8,630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
33,826
|
|
|
$
|
39,382
|
|
|
$
|
20,069
|
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
(7.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
18,032,533
|
|
|
|
18,928,735
|
|
|
|
19,289,231
|
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
|
|
18,685,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data (as of year-end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of retail locations(2)
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Sales per store(3)(5)
|
|
$
|
16,386
|
|
|
$
|
17,064
|
|
|
$
|
15,246
|
|
|
$
|
12,492
|
|
|
$
|
11,285
|
|
Same-store sales growth(4)(5)
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(28
|
)%
|
|
|
(29
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
163,431
|
|
|
$
|
153,465
|
|
|
$
|
170,389
|
|
|
$
|
134,458
|
|
|
$
|
97,179
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
539,490
|
|
|
|
801,563
|
|
|
|
825,878
|
|
|
|
661,323
|
|
|
|
393,644
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)(6)
|
|
|
30,085
|
|
|
|
37,186
|
|
|
|
30,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
283,599
|
|
|
|
349,887
|
|
|
|
373,559
|
|
|
|
248,583
|
|
|
|
197,756
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts exclude the effects of stock-based compensation expense
recognized under the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards
Codification 718, Compensation Stock
Compensation (ASC 718), previously referred to as
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment, as the standard was adopted
October 1, 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes only those retail locations open at period end. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes only those stores open for the entire preceding
12-month
period. |
|
(4) |
|
New and acquired stores are included in the comparable base at
the end of the stores thirteenth month of operations. |
|
(5) |
|
A store is one or more retail locations that are adjacent or
operate as one entity. Sales per store and same-store sales
growth is intended only as supplemental information and is not a
substitute for revenue or net income presented in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. |
|
(6) |
|
Amount excludes our short-term borrowings for working capital
and inventory financing. |
40
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following should be read in conjunction with Part I,
including the matters set forth in the Risk Factors
section of this report, and our Consolidated Financial
Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
Overview
We are the largest recreational boat retailer in the United
States with fiscal 2009 revenue in excess of $588 million.
Through our current 55 retail locations in 18 states, we
sell new and used recreational boats and related marine
products, including engines, trailers, parts, and accessories.
We also arrange related boat financing, insurance, and extended
warranty contracts; provide boat repair and maintenance
services; and offer yacht and boat brokerage services, and where
available, offer slip and storage accommodations.
MarineMax was incorporated in January 1998. We commenced
operations with the acquisition of five independent recreational
boat dealers on March 1, 1998. Since the initial
acquisitions in March 1998, we have acquired 20 recreational
boat dealers, two boat brokerage operations, and two
full-service yacht repair facilities. As a part of our
acquisition strategy, we frequently engage in discussions with
various recreational boat dealers regarding their potential
acquisition by us. Potential acquisition discussions frequently
take place over a long period of time and involve difficult
business integration and other issues, including, in some cases,
management succession and related matters. As a result of these
and other factors, a number of potential acquisitions that from
time to time appear likely to occur do not result in binding
legal agreements and are not consummated. We did not complete
any significant acquisitions during the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009.
General economic conditions and consumer spending patterns can
negatively impact our operating results. Unfavorable local,
regional, national, or global economic developments or
uncertainties regarding future economic prospects could reduce
consumer spending in the markets we serve and adversely affect
our business. Economic conditions in areas in which we operate
dealerships, particularly Florida in which we generated 44%,
43%, and 45% of our revenue during fiscal 2007, 2008, and 2009,
respectively, can have a major impact on our operations. Local
influences, such as corporate downsizing, military base
closings, and inclement weather, also could adversely affect our
operations in certain markets.
In an economic downturn, consumer discretionary spending levels
generally decline, at times resulting in disproportionately
large reductions in the sale of luxury goods. Consumer spending
on luxury goods also may decline as a result of lower consumer
confidence levels, even if prevailing economic conditions are
favorable. Although we have expanded our operations during
periods of stagnant or modestly declining industry trends, the
cyclical nature of the recreational boating industry or the lack
of industry growth could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, or results of operations in the future. Any
period of adverse economic conditions or low consumer confidence
has a negative effect on our business.
Lower consumer spending resulting from a downturn in the housing
market and other economic factors adversely affected our
business in fiscal 2007, and continued weakness in consumer
spending resulting from substantial weakness in the financial
markets and deteriorating economic conditions had a very
substantial negative effect on our business in fiscal 2008 and
fiscal 2009. These conditions caused us to defer our acquisition
program, slow our new store openings, reduce our inventory
purchases, engage in inventory reduction efforts, close a
significant number of our retail locations, and significantly
reduce our headcount. We cannot predict the length or severity
of these unfavorable economic or financial conditions or the
extent to which they will adversely affect our operating results
nor can we predict the effectiveness of the measures we have
taken to address this environment or whether additional measures
will be necessary.
Although economic conditions have adversely affected our
operating results, we have capitalized on our core strengths to
substantially outperform the industry, resulting in leading
market share. Our ability to produce such market share supports
the alignment of our retailing strategies with the desires of
consumers. We believe the steps we have taken to address weak
market conditions will yield an increase in future revenue. As
general economic trends improve, we expect our core strengths
and retailing strategies will position us to capitalize on
growth opportunities as they occur and will allow us to emerge
from this challenging environment with greater earnings
potential.
41
Application
of Critical Accounting Policies
We have identified the policies below as critical to our
business operations and the understanding of our results of
operations. The impact and risks related to these policies on
our business operations is discussed throughout
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations when such policies affect our reported
and expected financial results.
In the ordinary course of business, we make a number of
estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results
of operations and financial condition in the preparation of our
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. We base our estimates
on historical experience and on various other assumptions that
we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. The results
form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results could differ significantly from those
estimates under different assumptions and conditions. We believe
that the following discussion addresses our most critical
accounting policies, which are those that are most important to
the portrayal of our financial condition and results of
operations and require our most difficult, subjective, and
complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make
estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently
uncertain.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue from boat, motor, and trailer sales, and
parts and service operations at the time the boat, motor,
trailer, or part is delivered to or accepted by the customer or
service is completed. We recognize commissions earned from a
brokerage sale at the time the related brokerage transaction
closes. We recognize revenue from slip and storage services on a
straight-line basis over the term of the slip or storage
agreement. We recognize commissions earned by us for placing
notes with financial institutions in connection with customer
boat financing when we recognize the related boat sales. We also
recognize marketing fees earned on credit life, accident and
disability, and hull insurance products sold by third-party
insurance companies at the later of customer acceptance of the
insurance product as evidenced by contract execution or when the
related boat sale is recognized. We also recognize commissions
earned on extended warranty service contracts sold on behalf of
third-party insurance companies at the later of customer
acceptance of the service contract terms, as evidenced by
contract execution or recognition of the related boat sale.
Certain finance and extended warranty commissions and marketing
fees on insurance products may be charged back if a customer
terminates or defaults on the underlying contract within a
specified period of time. Based upon our experience of
repayments and defaults, we maintain a chargeback allowance that
was not material to our financial statements taken as a whole as
of September 30, 2008 or 2009. Should results differ
materially from our historical experiences, we would need to
modify our estimate of future chargebacks, which could have a
material adverse effect on our operating margins.
Vendor
Consideration Received
We account for consideration received from our vendors in
accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification
605-50,
Revenue Recognition, Customer Payments and
Incentives (ASC
605-50),
previously referred to as Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 02-16,
Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for
Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor. ASC
605-50 most
significantly requires us to classify interest assistance
received from manufacturers as a reduction of inventory cost and
related cost of sales as opposed to netting the assistance
against our interest expense incurred with our lenders. Pursuant
to ASC
605-50,
amounts received by us under our co-op assistance programs from
our manufacturers are netted against related advertising
expenses.
Inventories
Inventory costs consist of the amount paid to acquire the
inventory, net of vendor consideration and purchase discounts,
the cost of equipment added, reconditioning costs, and
transportation costs relating to acquiring inventory for sale.
We state new boat, motor, and trailer inventories at the lower
of cost, determined on a specific-identification basis, or
market. We state used boat, motor, and trailer inventories,
including trade-ins, at the
42
lower of cost, determined on a specific-identification basis, or
market. We state parts and accessories at the lower of cost,
determined on an average cost basis, or market. We utilize our
historical experience, the aging of the inventories, and our
consideration of current market trends as the basis for
determining lower of cost or market valuation allowance. As of
September 30, 2008 and 2009, our lower of cost or market
valuation allowance was $5.1 million and
$17.7 million, respectively. If events occur and market
conditions change, causing the fair value to fall below carrying
value, the lower of cost or market valuation allowance could
increase.
Valuation
of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We account for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets in
accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification 350,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other (ASC
350), previously referred to as Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. Under this standard, we assess the
impairment of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets at
least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The
first step in the assessment is the estimation of fair value. If
step one indicates that impairment potentially exists, we
perform the second step to measure the amount of impairment, if
any. Goodwill and identifiable intangible asset impairment
exists when the estimated fair value is less than its carrying
value.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced
a significant decline in stock market valuation driven primarily
by weakness in the marine retail industry and an overall soft
economy, which hindered our financial performance. Accordingly,
we completed a step one analysis (as noted above) and estimated
the fair value of the reporting unit as prescribed by ASC 350,
which indicated potential impairment. As a result, we completed
a fair value analysis of indefinite lived intangible assets and
a step two goodwill impairment analysis, as required by ASC 350.
We determined that indefinite lived intangible assets and
goodwill were impaired and recorded a non-cash charge of
$121.1 million based on our assessment. We will not be
required to make any current or future cash expenditures as a
result of this impairment charge.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
360-10-40,
Property, Plant, and Equipment, Impairment of Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets (ASC
360-10-40),
previously referred to as Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, requires that long-lived
assets, such as property and equipment and purchased intangibles
subject to amortization, be reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the
asset is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to
undiscounted future net cash flows the asset is expected to
generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which
the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair market value.
Estimates of expected future cash flows represent our best
estimate based on currently available information and reasonable
and supportable assumptions. Any impairment recognized in
accordance with ASC
360-10-40 is
permanent and may not be restored. As of September 30,
2009, we had not recognized any impairment of long-lived assets
in connection with ASC
360-10-40
based on our reviews.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced
a significant decline in market valuation driven primarily by
weakness in the marine retail industry and an overall soft
economy, which adversely affected our financial performance. As
a result of this weakness, we realized a goodwill and intangible
asset impairment charge, as noted above. Based on these events,
we reviewed the valuation of our investment in Gulfport in
accordance with ASC 323 and recoverability of the assets
contained within the joint venture. ASC 323 requires the
recognition of a loss in value of an investment, which is other
than a temporary decline. We reviewed our investment and assets
contained within the Gulfport joint venture, which consists of
land, buildings, equipment, and goodwill. As a result, we
determined that our investment in the joint venture was impaired
and recorded a non-cash charge of $1.0 million based on our
assessment. We will not be required to make any current or
future cash expenditures as a result of this impairment charge.
43
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective October 1, 2005, we adopted the provisions of
FASB Accounting Standards Codification 718,
Compensation Stock Compensation (ASC
718), previously referred to as Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment, for our share-based compensation plans. We
adopted ASC 718 using the modified prospective transition
method. Under this transition method, compensation cost
recognized includes (a) the compensation cost for all
share-based awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of
October 1, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of ASC 718
and (b) the compensation cost for all share-based awards
granted subsequent to September 30, 2005, based on the
grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of ASC 718. Additionally, we accounted for restricted
stock awards granted using the measurement and recognition
provisions of ASC 718. Accordingly, the fair value of the
restricted stock awards is measured on the grant date and
recognized in earnings over the requisite service period for
each separately vesting portion of the award.
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with FASB Accounting
Standards Codification 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740),
previously referred to as Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
and Financial Accounting Standard Board Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes. Under ASC 740, we recognize deferred tax assets and
liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to
temporary differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective
tax basis. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which we expect those temporary differences to be
recovered or settled. We record valuation allowances to reduce
our deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized by
considering all available positive and negative evidence.
Pursuant to ASC 740, we must consider all positive and negative
evidence regarding the realization of deferred tax assets,
including past operating results and future sources of taxable
income. Under the provisions of ASC 740, we determined that our
net deferred tax asset needed to be fully reserved given recent
earnings and industry trends.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, also included in ASC 740. The Interpretation clarifies
the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
enterprises financial statements and prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attributes of income tax
positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. The
impact of an uncertain tax position taken or expected to be
taken on an income tax return must be recognized in the
financial statements at the largest amount that is
more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant
taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be
recognized in the financial statements unless it is more likely
than not of being sustained.
For a more comprehensive list of our accounting policies,
including those which involve varying degrees of judgment, see
Note 3 Significant Accounting
Policies of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
44
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth certain financial data as a
percentage of revenue for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,255,985
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
885,407
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
588,585
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
956,251
|
|
|
|
76.1
|
%
|
|
|
679,164
|
|
|
|
76.7
|
%
|
|
|
499,925
|
|
|
|
84.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
299,734
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
206,243
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
88,660
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
245,224
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
%
|
|
|
217,426
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
%
|
|
|
159,998
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
122,091
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
54,510
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
(133,274
|
)
|
|
|
(15.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(71,338
|
)
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)%
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
26,955
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
20,164
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
14,064
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
27,555
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
(153,438
|
)
|
|
|
(17.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(85,402
|
)
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)%
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
7,486
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
(19,161
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(8,630
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
20,069
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
|
(15.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(76,772
|
)
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended September 30, 2009 Compared with Fiscal Year
Ended September 30, 2008
Revenue. Revenue decreased
$296.8 million, or 33.5%, to $588.6 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from
$885.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. Of this decrease, $234.4 million was attributable to
a decline in comparable-store sales and $62.5 million was
attributable to 26 stores closed in fiscal 2009 that are not
eligible for inclusion in the comparable-store base for the
12 months ended September 30, 2009. The decline in our
comparable-store sales was due to the widely reported weak
economic conditions and tighter retail lending environment,
which have adversely impacted our retail sales.
Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased
$117.5 million, or 57.0%, to $88.7 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from
$206.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased to 15.1%
for fiscal 2009 from 23.3% for fiscal 2008. The decrease in
gross profit dollars reflected the combination of the
significant reduction in revenue because of the soft economic
environment and the decreases in gross profit percentage. The
decrease in gross profit as a percentage of revenue was due to
margin pressure arising from the difficult retail environment
and the aggressive pricing strategy that we deployed to drive a
significant reduction to our inventory levels. Additionally,
during the fiscal 2009, we incurred losses and increased
reserves for expected losses associated with market declines in
brands we no longer carry by approximately $12.6 million.
Lastly, we strategically decided to forego certain manufacturer
purchase incentives and ordered substantially less boats in
fiscal 2009 than in fiscal 2008.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses decreased $57.4 million, or 26.4%, to
$160.0 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2009 from $217.4 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses as a percentage of revenue increased to 27.2% for the
year ended September 30, 2009 from 24.6% for the year ended
September 30, 2008. The fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009 included $6.2 million in charges
associated with store closures. The fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008 included $3.0 million in charges
associated with store closures, partially offset by
$1.0 million in gains recorded as an expense offset related
to proceeds from business interruption insurance claims and the
favorable settlement of certain interest rate swaps. Excluding
these items would result in a comparable selling, general, and
administrative expense reduction of $65.1 million, or
29.8%, and selling, general, and administrative expenses as a
percent of revenue increased to 26.0% for the year ended
September 30, 2009 from 24.7% for the year ended
September 30, 2008. This increase in selling, general, and
administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue was primarily
attributable to the reported same-store sales decline, which
resulted in a
45
reduction in our ability to leverage our expense structure. The
reduction in the dollar level of selling, general, and
administrative expenses was due to the significant reductions we
have made in personnel, retail locations, and most other expense
categories.
Goodwill and intangible asset
impairment. During the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, we were required to write-off our
goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets as a result of
the decline in our market valuation and the continuation of the
difficult retail environment, as prescribed by ASC 350.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$6.1 million, or 30.3%, to $14.1 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from
$20.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008. Interest expense as a percentage of revenue increased to
2.4% for fiscal 2009 from 2.3% for fiscal 2008. The decrease in
interest expense was primarily a result of the decline in
average borrowings throughout fiscal 2009.
Income Tax Provision. Our income tax benefit
decreased $10.5 million to a benefit of $8.6 million
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 from an income
tax benefit of $19.2 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of limitations on
the carryback of our pretax loss and recording a valuation
allowance on the carryforward pretax loss. The effective tax
rate for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 differed
from previous periods primarily as a result of the recording of
a non-cash valuation allowance that offsets the majority of
income tax benefit that would have arisen from the goodwill and
intangible asset impairment charge.
Fiscal
Year Ended September 30, 2008 Compared with Fiscal Year
Ended September 30, 2007
Revenue. Revenue decreased
$370.6 million, or 29.5%, to $885.4 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 from $1.3 billion
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. Of this
decrease, $27.4 million was attributable to stores opened,
closed, or acquired that were not eligible for inclusion in the
comparable-store base and $343.2 million was attributable
to a 28% decline in comparable-store sales in fiscal 2008. The
decline in our same-store sales resulted primarily from softer
economic conditions because of the turmoil in the financial
markets, which impacted our results as well as those of most
other retailers. In response to these declines, we are adjusting
our structure, including store closures, in a manner in which we
believe will reduce operating costs but not result in market
share losses.
Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased
$93.5 million, or 31.2%, to $206.2 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 from
$299.7 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased to 23.3%
for fiscal 2008 from 23.9% for fiscal 2007. The decrease in
gross profit was a result of the significant reduction in
revenue resulting from the soft economic environment. The
decrease in gross profit as a percentage of revenue was due to
margin pressure arising from the difficult retail environment
and a sales mix shift to larger products, which historically
carry lower gross margins.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses decreased $27.8 million, or 11.3%, to
$217.4 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2008 from $245.2 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses as a percentage of revenue increased to 24.6% for the
year ended September 30, 2008 from 19.6% for the year ended
September 30, 2007. The fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008 included $3.0 million in charges
associated with store closures, partially offset by
$1.0 million in gains recorded as an expense offset related
to proceeds from business interruption insurance claims
associated with ice storms damage at certain Missouri locations
in 2007 and the favorable settlement of certain interest rate
swaps accounted for as cash flow hedges. Additionally, the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 included
$3.7 million in gains recorded as an expense offset related
to business interruption insurance proceeds that was received
for claims associated with Hurricane Wilma in 2006, the sale of
our corporate jet, and insurance proceeds we received associated
with the ice storm damage at certain Missouri locations.
Excluding these items would result in a comparable selling,
general, and administrative expense reduction of
$33.3 million, or 13.4% and selling, general, and
administrative expenses as a percent of revenue increased to
24.4% for the year ended September 30, 2008 from 19.8% for
the year ended September 30, 2007. This increase in
selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of
revenue was primarily attributable to the reported same-store
sales decline, which resulted in a reduction in our ability to
leverage our expense structure.
46
Goodwill and intangible asset
impairment. During the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008, we were required to write-off our
goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets as a result of
the decline in our market valuation and the continuation of the
difficult retail environment, as prescribed by ASC 350.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$6.8 million, or 25.2%, to $20.2 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 from
$27.0 million for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007. Interest expense as a percentage of revenue increased to
2.3% for fiscal 2008 from 2.1% for fiscal 2007. The decrease in
interest expense was primarily a result of a more favorable
interest rate environment in fiscal 2008, which accounted for a
decrease of approximately $6.6 million in interest expense.
Income Tax Provision. Income taxes decreased
$26.6 million to a benefit of $19.2 million for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 from an income tax
expense of $7.5 million for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007, primarily as a result of our pretax
loss. The effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2008 differed from previous periods primarily
as a result of the recording of a non-cash valuation allowance
that offsets the majority of income tax benefit that would have
arisen from the goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge.
Quarterly
Data and Seasonality
Our business, as well as the entire recreational boating
industry, is highly seasonal, with seasonality varying in
different geographic markets. With the exception of Florida, we
generally realize significantly lower sales and higher levels of
inventories, and related short-term borrowings, in the quarterly
periods ending December 31 and March 31. The onset of the
public boat and recreation shows in January stimulates boat
sales and allows us to reduce our inventory levels and related
short-term borrowings throughout the remainder of the fiscal
year. Our business could become substantially more seasonal as
we acquire dealers that operate in colder regions of the United
States.
Our business is also subject to weather patterns, which may
adversely affect our results of operations. For example, drought
conditions (or merely reduced rainfall levels) or excessive rain
may close area boating locations or render boating dangerous or
inconvenient, thereby curtailing customer demand for our
products. In addition, unseasonably cool weather and prolonged
winter conditions may lead to a shorter selling season in
certain locations. Hurricanes and other storms could result in
disruptions of our operations or damage to our boat inventories
and facilities, as has been the case when Florida and other
markets were hit by hurricanes. Although our geographic
diversity is likely to reduce the overall impact to us of
adverse weather conditions in any one market area, these
conditions will continue to represent potential, material
adverse risks to us and our future financial performance.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our cash needs are primarily for working capital to support
operations, including new and used boat and related parts
inventories, off-season liquidity, and growth through
acquisitions and new store openings. We regularly monitor the
aging of our inventories and current market trends to evaluate
our current and future inventory needs. We also use this
evaluation in conjunction with our review of our current and
expected operating performance and expected customer demand to
determine the adequacy of our financing needs. These cash needs
have historically been financed with cash generated from
operations and borrowings under our line of credit facility. Our
ability to utilize our credit facility to fund operations
depends upon the collateral levels and compliance with the
covenants of the credit facility. Turmoil in the credit markets
and weakness in the retail markets may interfere with our
ability to remain in compliance with the covenants of the credit
facility and therefore utilize the credit facility to fund
operations. At September 30, 2009, we were in compliance
with all of the credit facility covenants. During the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, we did not
complete any acquisitions. We currently depend upon dividends
and other payments from our dealerships and our line of credit
facility to fund our current operations and meet our cash needs.
Currently, no agreements exist that restrict this flow of funds
from our dealerships.
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and 2009,
cash provided by operating activities approximated
$20.0 million and $209.1 million, respectively. For
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, cash used in
operating activities was approximately $8.8 million. For
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, cash provided by
operating activities was due primarily to net income, adjusted
for non-cash depreciation, amortization, and stock-based
compensation charges, and increases in customer deposits and
accrued expenses, partially offset by a decrease in accounts
payable and an increase in inventories to ensure appropriate
inventory levels. For the fiscal year ended
47
September 30, 2008, cash used in operating activities was
due primarily to our net loss, a decrease in accounts payable
because of reductions in purchases from our manufacturers, and a
decrease in customer deposits due to a reduction in pending
sales. These amounts were primarily offset by noncash charges,
including the impairment of goodwill, stock-based compensation,
and depreciation and amortization expense. The cash used in
operating activities was further offset by reductions in
inventories and accounts receivables due to the reduction in
sales trends. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009,
cash provided by operating activities was due primarily to the
significant reduction of inventories.
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2008, and
2009, cash used in investing activities was approximately
$9.4 million, $7.9 million, and $1.9 million,
respectively. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007,
cash used in investing activities was primarily used to purchase
property and equipment associated with opening new retail
facilities or improving and relocating existing retail
facilities and in the finalization of certain business
acquisitions, partially offset by proceeds received from the
sale and involuntary conversion of property and equipment. For
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, cash used in
investing activities was primarily used to purchase property and
equipment associated with opening new retail facilities or
improving and relocating existing retail facilities. For the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, cash used in
investing activities was primarily used to purchase property and
equipment associated with improving and relocating existing
retail facilities.
For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and 2009,
cash used in financing activities was approximately
$5.3 million and $212.0 million, respectively. For the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, cash provided by
financing activities was approximately $16.5 million. For
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, cash used in
financing activities was primarily attributable to purchases of
treasury stock and repayments of long-term debt, partially
offset by proceeds from net borrowings on short-term borrowings
as a result of increased inventory levels and proceeds from
common shares issued upon the exercise of stock options and
under the employee stock purchase plan. For the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2008, cash provided by financing
activities was primarily attributable to a net increase in
short-term borrowings, partially offset by repayments of
long-term debt. For the fiscal year ended September 30,
2009, cash used by financing activities was primarily
attributable to the repayments of short-term borrowings,
partially offset by proceeds from our common stock sale.
We are party to a second amended and restated credit and
security agreement, which has been amended on various occasions
since its original execution in June 2006. As amended, our
credit facility provides for a line of credit with asset-based
borrowing availability up to approximately $230 million,
stepping down to $175 million by September 30, 2010,
with interim decreases between such dates. The amended facility
has certain financial covenants as specified in the agreement.
The covenants include provisions that our leverage ratio not
exceed 2.75 to 1; that our current ratio must be greater than
1.25 to 1 or 1.20 to 1 depending on the time of year; and that
our maximum EBITDA loss and annual EBITDA, both as defined in
the agreement, comply with certain thresholds as described
below. The EBITDA covenant requires that we do not exceed the
allowable cumulative negative EBITDA, as defined in the
agreement, for the first nine months of fiscal 2010, which is
$22 million as of December 31, 2009 and March 31,
2010 and $15 million as of June 30, 2010. We are
required to have a cumulative EBITDA greater than or equal to
our interest expense for the fiscal year ending
September 30, 2010. EBITDA, as defined in the agreement, is
our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and
amortization plus an add back for stock-based compensation
expense and 50% of the proceeds of our September 2009 stock
offering or approximately $10 million. The amended facility
provides for a variable interest rate margin of LIBOR plus
490 basis points through September 30, 2010 and
thereafter at LIBOR plus 150 to 400 basis points, depending
upon our financial and operating performance. We paid the
lenders approximately $2.4 million in amendment fees during
fiscal 2009. The amended facility matures in May 2011, but
includes two one-year renewal options, subject to lender
approval.
As of September 30, 2008 and 2009, we owed an aggregate of
$372 million and $142 million, respectively, under our
revolving credit facility and were in compliance with all of the
credit facility covenants. Advances under the facility accrued
interest at a rate of 4.0% and 5.2%, as of September 30,
2008 and 2009, respectively. All indebtedness associated with
our real estate holdings were repaid during the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2009,
the facility provided us with an additional borrowing
availability of approximately $60 million.
Except as specified in this Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition, and Results of
Operations and in our consolidated financial statements,
we have no material commitments for capital for the next
48
12 months. We believe that our existing capital resources
will be sufficient to finance our operations for at least the
next 12 months, except for possible significant
acquisitions.
Contractual
Commitments and Commercial Commitments
The following table sets forth a summary of our material
contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of
September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term
|
|
|
Other Long-Term
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending September 30,
|
|
Borrowings(1)
|
|
|
Liabilities(2)
|
|
|
Leases(3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
142,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,401
|
|
|
$
|
149,401
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,831
|
|
|
|
6,671
|
|
|
|
10,502
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,104
|
|
|
|
5,104
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,674
|
|
|
|
3,674
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,660
|
|
|
|
2,660
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,232
|
|
|
|
6,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
142,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,831
|
|
|
$
|
31,742
|
|
|
$
|
177,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimates of future interest payments for short-term borrowings
have been excluded in the tabular presentation. Amounts due are
contingent upon the outstanding balances and the variable
interest rates. As of September 30, 2009, the interest rate
on our short-term borrowings was 5.2%. |
|
(2) |
|
The amounts included in other long-term liabilities consist
primarily of our estimated liability for claims on certain
workers compensation insurance policies. While we estimate
the amount to be paid in excess of 12 months, the ultimate
timing of the payments is subject to certain variability.
Accordingly, we have classified all amounts as due in the
following year for the purposes of this table. |
|
(3) |
|
Amounts for operating lease commitments do not include certain
operating expenses such as maintenance, insurance, and real
estate taxes. These amounts are not a material component of
operating expenses. |
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any transactions, arrangements, or other
relationships with unconsolidated entities that are reasonably
likely to affect our financial condition, liquidity, or capital
resources. We have no special purpose or limited purpose
entities that provide off-balance sheet financing, liquidity, or
market or credit risk support; we do not engage in leasing,
hedging, or research and development services; and we do not
have other relationships that expose us to liability that is not
reflected in the financial statements.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
At September 30, 2009, all of our short-term debt bore
interest at a variable rate, tied to LIBOR as a reference rate.
Changes in the underlying LIBOR interest rate or the spread
charged under our performance pricing grid on our short-term
debt could affect our earnings. For example, the 100 basis
point increase in the interest rate on our short-term debt, as
defined in our June 2009 amendment, is projected to result in an
increase of approximately $1.4 million in annual pre-tax
interest expense. This estimated increase is based upon the
outstanding balance of our short-term debt as of
September 30, 2009 and assumes no mitigating changes by us
to reduce the outstanding balances, no additional interest
assistance that could be received from vendors due to the
interest rate increase, and no changes in the base LIBOR rate.
Products purchased from Italian-based manufacturers are subject
to fluctuations in the euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate,
which ultimately may impact the retail price at which we can
sell such products. Accordingly, fluctuations in the value of
the euro as compared with the U.S. dollar may impact the
price points at which we can profitably sell Italian products,
and such price points may not be competitive with other product
lines in the United States. Accordingly, such fluctuations in
exchange rates ultimately may impact the amount of revenue, cost
of goods sold, cash flows, and earnings we recognize for Italian
product lines. We cannot predict the effects of
49
exchange rate fluctuations on our operating results. In certain
cases, we may enter into foreign currency cash flow hedges to
reduce the variability of cash flows associated with forecasted
purchases of boats and yachts from Italian-based manufacturers.
We are not currently engaged in foreign currency exchange
hedging transactions to manage our foreign currency exposure. If
and when we do engage in foreign currency exchange hedging
transactions, we cannot assure that our strategies will
adequately protect our operating results from the effects of
exchange rate fluctuations.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Reference is made to the financial statements, the notes
thereto, and the report thereon, commencing on
page F-1
of this report, which financial statement, notes, and report are
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed
to ensure that material information required to be disclosed by
us in Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and
that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of
the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation,
such officers have concluded that, as of the end of the period
covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective.
Changes
in Internal Controls
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, there were no
changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that
materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations
on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that
our disclosure controls and internal controls will prevent all
errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system
are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect
the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits
of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because
of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
company have been detected. These inherent limitations include
the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty,
and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or
mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people, or by management override of the control. The design of
any system of controls also is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can
be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a
control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a
cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.
50
CEO and
CFO Certifications
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 are the Certifications of the CEO
and the CFO, respectively. The Certifications are required in
accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (the Section 302 Certifications). This Item of this
report, which you are currently reading is the information
concerning the Evaluation referred to in the Section 302
Certifications and this information should be read in
conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more
complete understanding of the topics presented.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the supervision
and with the participation of the Companys management,
including its principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2009 as required by
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Rule 13a-15(c).
In making this assessment, the Company used the criteria set
forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control
Integrated Framework. Based on its evaluation, management
concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of September 30, 2009.
Our internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2009 has been audited by Ernst and Young LLP,
an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report which appears below.
51
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
MarineMax, Inc.
We have audited MarineMax, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of September 30, 2009, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). MarineMax,
Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting included in the accompanying
managements report on internal control over financial
reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, MarineMax, Inc. maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of September 30, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of MarineMax, Inc. as of
September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive income,
stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended September 30, 2009 of MarineMax,
Inc. and our report dated December 14, 2009 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
Certified Public Accountants
Tampa, Florida
December 14, 2009
52
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this Item relating to our directors
is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A of the
Exchange Act for our 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The
information required by this Item relating to our executive
officers included in Business Executive
Officers.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant
to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2010 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant
to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2010 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant
to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2010 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by
reference to the definitive Proxy Statement to be filled
pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act for our 2010
Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
53
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
(a)
|
Financial
Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(1) Financial Statements are listed in the Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements on
page F-1
of this report.
(2) No financial statement schedules are included because
such schedules are not applicable, are not required, or because
required information is included in the consolidated financial
statements or notes thereto.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant,
including all amendments to date(1)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant(13)
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock(1)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen of Common Stock Certificate(1)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated August 28, 2001 between Registrant
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as
Rights Agent(2)
|
|
10
|
.1(k)
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of March 30, 2006 among
MarineMax of New York, Inc.;
Surfside-3
Marina, Inc.; Matthew Barbara, Paul Barbara, Diane Keeney, and
Angela Chianese; and certain affiliates of Surfside-3 Marina,
Inc.
(Form 10-Q
filed May 10, 2006)(3)
|
|
10
|
.3(h)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Registrant and William H. McGill
Jr.(4)
|
|
10
|
.3(i)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Registrant and Michael H. McLamb(4)
|
|
10
|
.3(j)
|
|
Employment Agreement between Registrant and Edward A. Russell(4)
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
1998 Incentive Stock Plan, as amended through November 15,
2000(5)
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan(6)
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Agreement Relating to Acquisitions between Registrant and
Brunswick Corporation, dated December 7, 2005(9)
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Hatteras Sales and Service Agreement, effective August 1,
2006 among the Registrant, MarineMax Motor Yachts, LLC, and
Hatteras Yachts Division of Brunswick Corporation(7)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement dated
June 19, 2006 among the Registrant and its subsidiaries as
Borrowers, Keybank Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., and
various other lenders, as Lenders(8)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Agreement Relating to Acquisitions between Registrant and
Brunswick Corporation, dated December 7, 2005(9)
|
|
10
|
.20(a)
|
|
Sea Ray Sales and Service Agreement(9)
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit and Security Agreement dated
June 19, 2006 among the Registrant and its subsidiaries, as
Borrowers, and Bank of America, N.A., KeyBank, N.A., General
Electric Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation, Wachovia
Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., National City Bank, N.A.,
U.S. Bank, N.A., and Branch Banking and Trust company, as
Lenders(8)
|
|
10
|
.21(a)
|
|
First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement executed on June 5, 2007 effective as of
May 31, 2007 among the Registrant and its subsidiaries, as
Borrowers, and Bank of America, N.A., KeyBank, N.A., General
Electric Commercial Distribution Finance Corporation, Branch
Banking and Trust Company, as Lenders(10)
|
|
10
|
.21(b)
|
|
Third Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement executed on March 7, 2008, among
MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, and Bank of
America, N.A., Keybank, N.A., General Electric Commercial
Distribution Finance Corporation, Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., U.S. Bank, N.A., Branch Banking and
Trust Company, and Bank of the West, as Lenders(14)
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
10
|
.21(c)
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement executed on December 15, 2008, by and
among MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, and
Bank of America, N.A., Keybank, N.A., GE Commercial Distribution
Finance Corporation, Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., U.S. Bank, N.A., Branch Banking &
Trust Company, and Bank of the West, as Lenders(15)
|
|
10
|
.21(d)
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement executed on June 5, 2009, by and among
MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, and Bank of
America, N.A., Keybank, N.A., GE Commercial Distribution Finance
Corporation, Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., U.S.
Bank, N.A., Branch Banking & Trust Company, and
Bank of the West, as Lenders(16)
|
|
10
|
.21(e)
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit and
Security Agreement executed on September 10, 2009, by and
among MarineMax, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as Borrowers, and
Bank of America, N.A., Keybank, N.A., GE Commercial Distribution
Finance Corporation, Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., U.S. Bank, N.A., Branch Banking &
Trust Company, and Bank of the West, as Lenders
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
MarineMax, Inc. 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan(11)
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Form Stock Option Agreement for 2007 Incentive Compensation
Plan(11)
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Form Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for 2007
Incentive Compensation Plan(11)
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Director Fee Share Purchase Program(12)
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
and
Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
and
Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain information in this exhibit has been omitted and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the
omitted portions. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on
Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2001, as filed on
December 20, 2001. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated September 30, 1998, as filed on
October 20, 1998. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed on
May 10, 2006. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K,
as filed on June 13, 2006. |
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2001, as filed
on February 14, 2002. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on
Form S-1
(Registration
333-47873). |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q/A
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed on
September 23, 2008. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as filed on
August 4, 2006. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K
as filed on December 9, 2005. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K
as filed on June 11, 2007. |
55
|
|
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K
as filed on March 6, 2007. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form S-8
(File
No. 333-141657)
as filed March 29, 2007. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 8-K
as filed on November 26, 2008. |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
form 8-K
as filed on March 12, 2008. |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008, as filed
on February 9, 2009. |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registrants
Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 3, 2009, as filed on
June 3, 2009. |
|
|
(c)
|
Financial
Statements Schedules
|
(1) See Item 15(a) above.
56
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
MarineMax,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
H. McGill Jr.
|
William H. McGill Jr.
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Date: December 14, 2009
In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the date indicated have signed this report
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Capacity
|
|
Date
|
|
/s/ WILLIAM
H. MCGILL JR.
William
H. McGill Jr.
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
December 14, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL
H. MCLAMB
Michael
H. McLamb
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
and Director (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
|
|
December 14, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ HILLIARD
M. EURE III
Hilliard
M. Eure III
|
|
Director
|
|
December 14, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOHN
B. FURMAN
John
B. Furman
|
|
Director
|
|
December 14, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ ROBERT
S. KANT
Robert
S. Kant
|
|
Director
|
|
December 14, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ RUSSELL
J. KNITTEL
Russell
J. Knittel
|
|
Director
|
|
December 14, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOSEPH
A. WATTERS
Joseph
A. Watters
|
|
Director
|
|
December 14, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ DEAN
S. WOODMAN
Dean
S. Woodman
|
|
Director
|
|
December 14, 2009
|
57
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
MarineMax, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
MarineMax, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009
and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
comprehensive income, stockholders equity and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2009. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of MarineMax, Inc. and subsidiaries at
September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended September 30, 2009, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, in 2008
the Company changed its method for accounting for income tax
uncertainties.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
MarineMax, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting
as of September 30, 2009, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
and our report dated December 14, 2009 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
Certified Public Accountants
Tampa, Florida
December 14, 2009
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
30,264
|
|
|
$
|
25,508
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
28,931
|
|
|
|
35,497
|
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
6,744
|
|
|
|
9,983
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
468,629
|
|
|
|
205,934
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
7,949
|
|
|
|
12,314
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
542,824
|
|
|
|
289,236
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
113,869
|
|
|
|
102,316
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
3,424
|
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
661,323
|
|
|
$
|
393,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
4,481
|
|
|
$
|
15,847
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
6,505
|
|
|
|
4,882
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
25,380
|
|
|
|
29,328
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
372,000
|
|
|
|
142,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
408,366
|
|
|
|
192,057
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
4,374
|
|
|
|
3,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
412,740
|
|
|
|
195,888
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares
authorized, none issued or outstanding at September 30,
2008 and 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value; 24,000,000 shares
authorized, 19,215,387 and 22,496,659 shares issued and
18,424,487 and 21,705,759 shares outstanding at
September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
178,830
|
|
|
|
204,772
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
85,544
|
|
|
|
8,772
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 790,900 shares held at
September 30, 2008 and 2009
|
|
|
(15,810
|
)
|
|
|
(15,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
248,583
|
|
|
|
197,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
661,323
|
|
|
$
|
393,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
1,255,985
|
|
|
$
|
885,407
|
|
|
$
|
588,585
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
956,251
|
|
|
|
679,164
|
|
|
|
499,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
299,734
|
|
|
|
206,243
|
|
|
|
88,660
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
245,224
|
|
|
|
217,426
|
|
|
|
159,998
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
54,510
|
|
|
|
(133,274
|
)
|
|
|
(71,338
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
26,955
|
|
|
|
20,164
|
|
|
|
14,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
27,555
|
|
|
|
(153,438
|
)
|
|
|
(85,402
|
)
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
7,486
|
|
|
|
(19,161
|
)
|
|
|
(8,630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
20,069
|
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
(7.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
(7.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares used in computing net
income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
18,618,611
|
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
|
|
18,685,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
19,289,231
|
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
|
|
18,685,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
20,069
|
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,772
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair market value of derivative instruments, net of
tax benefit of $300 and $228 for the years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income,
net of tax of $62 and $211 for the years ended
September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
19,590
|
|
|
$
|
(134,305
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
BALANCE, September 30, 2006
|
|
|
18,529,524
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
156,618
|
|
|
$
|
200,306
|
|
|
$
|
507
|
|
|
$
|
(7,563
|
)
|
|
$
|
349,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,069
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(383,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,212
|
)
|
|
|
(7,212
|
)
|
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
78,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
149,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,587
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
5,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,307
|
|
Tax benefits of options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
769
|
|
Change in fair market value of derivative instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, September 30, 2007
|
|
|
18,379,864
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
167,912
|
|
|
|
220,375
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(14,775
|
)
|
|
|
373,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134,277
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(71,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
105,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
102,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
8,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,464
|
|
Tax benefits of options exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(554
|
)
|
Conversion of restricted stock awards to restricted stock units
|
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair market value of derivative instruments, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, September 30, 2008
|
|
|
18,424,487
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
178,830
|
|
|
|
85,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,810
|
)
|
|
|
248,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76,772
|
)
|
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
198,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
Shares issued upon vesting of equity awards
|
|
|
45,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
20,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
2,990,000
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
19,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,614
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
27,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, September 30, 2009
|
|
|
21,705,759
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
204,772
|
|
|
$
|
8,772
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15,810
|
)
|
|
$
|
197,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
20,069
|
|
|
$
|
(134,277
|
)
|
|
$
|
(76,772
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,350
|
|
|
|
11,090
|
|
|
|
10,969
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(1,367
|
)
|
|
|
(6,303
|
)
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
(1,030
|
)
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
Gain on involuntary conversion of property and equipment
|
|
|
(613
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
7,307
|
|
|
|
8,464
|
|
|
|
5,565
|
|
Tax benefits of options exercised
|
|
|
769
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(546
|
)
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
28,402
|
|
|
|
(6,566
|
)
|
Income tax receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,744
|
)
|
|
|
(3,239
|
)
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
(15,192
|
)
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
|
|
262,695
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(1,172
|
)
|
|
|
2,633
|
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
Increase (decrease) in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(17,418
|
)
|
|
|
(16,749
|
)
|
|
|
11,366
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
16,250
|
|
|
|
(26,915
|
)
|
|
|
(1,623
|
)
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
3,332
|
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
|
|
3,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
19,995
|
|
|
|
(8,786
|
)
|
|
|
209,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(9,507
|
)
|
|
|
(7,969
|
)
|
|
|
(2,101
|
)
|
Net cash used in acquisitions of businesses, net assets, and
intangible assets
|
|
|
(4,847
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
Proceeds from involuntary conversion of property and equipment
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(9,432
|
)
|
|
|
(7,857
|
)
|
|
|
(1,861
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(6,353
|
)
|
|
|
(30,833
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net (repayments) borrowings on short-term borrowings
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
|
|
46,000
|
|
|
|
(230,000
|
)
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(7,212
|
)
|
|
|
(1,035
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt modification costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,378
|
)
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,614
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock under option and
employee purchase plans
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
|
|
2,231
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(5,301
|
)
|
|
|
16,532
|
|
|
|
(211,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
|
|
5,262
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(4,756
|
)
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
|
|
|
25,113
|
|
|
|
30,375
|
|
|
|
30,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
|
|
$
|
30,375
|
|
|
$
|
30,264
|
|
|
$
|
25,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-7
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
COMPANY
BACKGROUND AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
|
We are the largest recreational boat retailer in the United
States. We engage primarily in the retail sale, brokerage, and
service of new and used boats, motors, trailers, marine parts,
and accessories and offer slip and storage accommodations in
certain locations. In addition, we arrange related boat
financing, insurance, and extended service contracts. As of
September 30, 2009, we operated through 55 retail locations
in 18 states, consisting of Alabama, Arizona, California,
Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota,
Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma,
Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Texas.
We are the nations largest retailer of Sea Ray, Boston
Whaler, Cabo, Hatteras, and Meridian recreational boats and
yachts, all of which are manufactured by Brunswick Corporation
(Brunswick). Sales of new Brunswick boats accounted for
approximately 51% of our revenue in fiscal 2009. Brunswick is
the worlds largest manufacturer of marine products and
marine engines. We believe we represented approximately 6% of
all Brunswick marine sales, including approximately 31% of its
Sea Ray boat sales, during our 2009 fiscal year.
We have dealership agreements with Sea Ray, Boston Whaler, Cabo,
Hatteras, Meridian, and Mercury Marine, all subsidiaries or
divisions of Brunswick. We also have dealer agreements with
Azimut. These agreements allow us to purchase, stock, sell, and
service these manufacturers boats and products. These
agreements also allow us to use these manufacturers names,
trade symbols, and intellectual properties in our operations.
We are party to a multi-year dealer agreement with Brunswick
covering Sea Ray products that appoints us as the exclusive
dealer of Sea Ray boats in our geographic markets. We are party
to a dealer agreement with Hatteras Yachts that gives us the
exclusive right to sell Hatteras Yachts throughout the states of
Florida (excluding the Florida panhandle), New Jersey, New York,
and Texas. We are also the exclusive dealer for Cabo Yachts
throughout the states of Florida, New Jersey, and New York
through a dealer agreement. We are also the exclusive dealer for
Italy-based Azimut-Benetti Groups product line Azimut
Yachts for the Northeast United States from Maryland to Maine
and for the state of Florida through a multi-year dealer
agreement. We believe the non-Brunswick brands offer a migration
for our existing customer base or fill a void in our product
offerings, and accordingly, do not compete with the business
generated from our other prominent brands.
As is typical in the industry, we deal with manufacturers, other
than Sea Ray and Azimut Yachts, under renewable annual dealer
agreements, each of which gives us the right to sell various
makes and models of boats within a given geographic region. Any
change or termination of these agreements, or the agreements
discussed above, for any reason, or changes in competitive,
regulatory, or marketing practices, including rebate or
incentive programs, could adversely affect our results of
operations. Although there are a limited number of manufacturers
of the type of boats and products that we sell, we believe that
adequate alternative sources would be available to replace any
manufacturer other than Brunswick as a product source. These
alternative sources may not be available at the time of any
interruption, and alternative products may not be available at
comparable terms, which could affect operating results adversely.
General economic conditions and consumer spending patterns can
negatively impact our operating results. Unfavorable local,
regional, national, or global economic developments or
uncertainties regarding future economic prospects could reduce
consumer spending in the markets we serve and adversely affect
our business. Economic conditions in areas in which we operate
dealerships, particularly Florida in which we generated 44%,
43%, and 45% of our revenue during fiscal 2007, 2008, and 2009,
respectively, can have a major impact on our operations. Local
influences, such as corporate downsizing and military base
closings, also could adversely affect our operations in certain
markets.
In an economic downturn, consumer discretionary spending levels
generally decline, at times resulting in disproportionately
large reductions in the sale of luxury goods. Consumer spending
on luxury goods also may decline as a result of lower consumer
confidence levels, even if prevailing economic conditions are
favorable. Although we have expanded our operations during
periods of stagnant or modestly declining industry trends, the
cyclical nature of the recreational boating industry or the lack
of industry growth could adversely affect our
F-8
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
business, financial condition, or results of operations in the
future. Any period of adverse economic conditions or low
consumer confidence has a negative effect on our business.
Lower consumer spending resulting from a downturn in the housing
market and other economic factors adversely affected our
business in fiscal 2007 and continued weakness in consumer
spending resulting from substantial weakness in the financial
markets and deteriorating economic conditions had a very
substantial negative effect on our business in fiscal 2008 and
fiscal 2009. These conditions caused us to defer our acquisition
program, delay new store openings, reduce our inventory
purchases, engage in inventory reduction efforts, close some of
our retail locations, reduce our headcount, and amend our credit
facility. We cannot predict the length or severity of these
unfavorable economic or financial conditions or the extent to
which they will adversely affect our operating results nor can
we predict the effectiveness of the measures we have taken to
address this environment or whether additional measures will be
necessary.
In order to provide comparability between periods presented,
certain amounts have been reclassified from the previously
reported consolidated financial statements to conform to the
consolidated financial statement presentation of the current
period. The consolidated financial statements include our
accounts and the accounts of our subsidiaries, all of which are
wholly owned. All significant intercompany transactions and
accounts have been eliminated.
We were incorporated in Delaware in January 1998 and commenced
operations with the acquisition of five independent recreational
boat dealers on March 1, 1998. Since the initial
acquisitions, we have acquired 20 recreational boat dealers, two
boat brokerage operations, and two full-service yacht repair
facilities. As a part of our acquisition strategy, we frequently
engage in discussions with various recreational boat dealers
regarding their potential acquisition by us. Potential
acquisition discussions frequently take place over a long period
of time and involve difficult business integration and other
issues, including, in some cases, management succession and
related matters. As a result of these and other factors, a
number of potential acquisitions that from time to time appear
likely to occur do not result in binding legal agreements and
are not consummated. We did not complete any significant
acquisitions during the fiscal years ended September 30,
2008 and 2009.
|
|
3.
|
SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
|
Statements
of Cash Flows
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, we
consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity
of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
We made interest payments of approximately $26.6 million,
$20.6 million, and $14.5 million for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively,
including interest on debt to finance our real estate holdings
and inventory. We made income tax payments of approximately
$26.0 million and $2.6 million for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2007 and 2008, respectively. No income
tax payments have been made for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009.
Vendor
Consideration Received
We account for consideration received from our vendors in
accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification 605,
Revenue Recognition, Customer Payments and
Incentives (ASC 605), previously referred to as Emerging
Issues Task Force Issue
No. 02-16,
Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for
Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor. ASC 605 most
significantly requires us to classify interest assistance
received from manufacturers as a reduction of inventory cost and
related cost of sales as opposed to netting the assistance
against our interest expense incurred with our lenders. Pursuant
to ASC 605, amounts received by us under our co-op assistance
programs from our manufacturers are netted against related
advertising expenses.
F-9
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventories
Inventory costs consist of the amount paid to acquire the
inventory, net of vendor consideration and purchase discounts,
the cost of equipment added, reconditioning costs, and
transportation costs relating to acquiring inventory for sale.
We state new boat, motor, and trailer inventories at the lower
of cost, determined on a specific-identification basis, or
market. We state used boat, motor, and trailer inventories,
including trade-ins, at the lower of cost, determined on a
specific-identification basis, or market. We state parts and
accessories at the lower of cost, determined on an average cost
basis, or market. We utilize our historical experience, the
aging of the inventories, and our consideration of current
market trends as the basis for determining lower of cost or
market valuation allowance. As of September 30, 2008 and
2009, our lower of cost or market valuation allowance was
$5.1 million and $17.7 million, respectively. During
the fiscal 2009, we incurred losses and increased reserves for
expected losses associated with market declines in brands we no
longer carry by approximately $12.6 million. If events
occur and market conditions change, causing the fair value to
fall below carrying value, the lower of cost or market valuation
allowance could increase.
Property
and Equipment
We record property and equipment at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation, and depreciate property and equipment over their
estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. We
capitalize and amortize leasehold improvements over the lesser
of the life of the lease or the estimated useful life of the
asset. Useful lives for purposes of computing depreciation are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
5-40
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3-10
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5-10
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
We remove the cost of property and equipment sold or retired and
the related accumulated depreciation from the accounts at the
time of disposition and include any resulting gain or loss in
the consolidated statements of operations. We charge
maintenance, repairs, and minor replacements to operations as
incurred; and we capitalize and amortize major replacements and
improvements over their useful lives.
Valuation
of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We account for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets in
accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification 350,
Intangibles Goodwill and Other (ASC
350), previously referred to as Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. Under this standard, we assess the
impairment of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets at
least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The
first step in the assessment is the estimation of fair value. If
step one indicates that impairment potentially exists, we
perform the second step to measure the amount of impairment, if
any. Goodwill and identifiable intangible asset impairment
exists when the estimated fair value is less than its carrying
value.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced
a significant decline in market valuation driven primarily by
weakness in the marine retail industry and an overall soft
economy, which hindered our financial performance. Accordingly,
we completed a step one analysis (as noted above) and estimated
the fair value of the reporting unit as prescribed by ASC 350,
which indicated potential impairment. As a result, we completed
a fair value analysis of indefinite lived intangible assets and
a step two goodwill impairment analysis, as required by
ASC 350. We determined that indefinite lived intangible
assets and goodwill were impaired and recorded a non-cash charge
of $121.1 million based on our assessment. We will not be
required to make any current or future cash expenditures as a
result of this impairment charge.
F-10
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
FASB Accounting Standards Codification
360-10-40,
Property, Plant, and Equipment, Impairment of Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets (ASC
360-10-40),
previously referred to as Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, requires that long-lived
assets, such as property and equipment and purchased intangibles
subject to amortization, be reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the
asset is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to
undiscounted future net cash flows the asset is expected to
generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which
the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair market value.
Estimates of expected future cash flows represent our best
estimate based on currently available information and reasonable
and supportable assumptions. Any impairment recognized in
accordance with ASC
360-10-40 is
permanent and may not be restored. As of September 30,
2009, we had not recognized any impairment of long-lived assets
in connection with ASC
360-10-40
based on our reviews.
Customer
Deposits
Customer deposits primarily include amounts received from
customers toward the purchase of boats. We recognize these
deposits as revenue upon delivery or acceptance of the related
boats to customers.
Insurance
We retain varying levels of risk relating to the insurance
policies we maintain, most significantly workers
compensation insurance and employee medical benefits. We are
responsible for the claims and losses incurred under these
programs, limited by per occurrence deductibles and paid claims
or losses up to pre-determined maximum exposure limits. Our
third-party insurance carriers pay any losses above the
pre-determined exposure limits. We estimate our liability for
incurred but not reported losses using our historical loss
experience, our judgment, and industry information.
Derivative
Instruments
We account for derivative instruments in accordance with FASB
Accounting Standards Codification 815, Derivatives and
Hedging (ASC 815), previously referred to as Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging
Activities, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative
Instruments and Certain Hedging Activity, an Amendment of
SFAS 133 and Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Under these
standards, all derivative instruments are recorded on the
balance sheet at their respective fair values.
We utilize certain derivative instruments, from time to time,
including interest rate swaps and forward contracts, to manage
variability in cash flows associated with interest rates and
forecasted purchases of boats and yachts from certain of our
foreign suppliers in euros. At September 30, 2008 and 2009,
no such instruments were outstanding.
When utilized we designate and account for our forward contracts
and interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges (i.e., hedging the
exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is
attributable to a particular risk). ASC 815 provides that
the effective portion of the gain or loss on a derivative
instrument designated and qualifying as a cash flow hedging
instrument must be reported as a component of other
comprehensive income and must be reclassified into earnings in
the same line item in the income statement as the hedged item in
the same period or periods during which the transaction affects
earnings. We recognize the ineffective portion of the gain or
loss on these derivative instruments, if any, in other
income/expense in current earnings during the period of change.
F-11
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For derivative instruments not designated as hedging
instruments, we recognize the gain or loss in other
income/expense in current earnings during the period of change.
When a cash flow hedge is terminated, if the forecasted hedged
transaction is still probable of occurrence, amounts previously
recorded in other comprehensive income remain in other
comprehensive income and are recognized in earnings in the
period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue from boat, motor, and trailer sales and
parts and service operations at the time the boat, motor,
trailer, or part is delivered to or accepted by the customer or
service is completed. We recognize commissions earned from a
brokerage sale at the time the related brokerage transaction
closes. We recognize revenue from slip and storage services on a
straight-line basis over the term of the slip or storage
agreement. We recognize commissions earned by us for placing
notes with financial institutions in connection with customer
boat financing when we recognize the related boat sales. We
recognize marketing fees earned on credit life, accident and
disability, and hull insurance products sold by third-party
insurance companies at the later of customer acceptance of the
insurance product as evidenced by contract execution or when we
recognize the related boat sale. Pursuant to negotiated
agreements with financial and insurance institutions, we are
charged back for a portion of these fees should the customer
terminate or default on the related finance or insurance
contract before it is outstanding for a stipulated minimal
period of time. We base the chargeback allowance, which was not
material to the consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole as of September 30, 2008 or 2009, on our experience
with repayments or defaults on the related finance or insurance
contracts.
We also recognize commissions earned on extended warranty
service contracts sold on behalf of third-party insurance
companies at the later of customer acceptance of the service
contract terms as evidenced by contract execution or recognition
of the related boat sale. We are charged back for a portion of
these commissions should the customer terminate or default on
the service contract prior to its scheduled maturity. We
determine the chargeback allowance, which was not material to
the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole as of
September 30, 2008 or 2009, based upon our experience with
repayments or defaults on the service contracts.
The following table sets forth percentages of our revenue
generated by certain products and services, for each of last
three years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
New boat sales
|
|
|
68.2
|
%
|
|
|
63.5
|
%
|
|
|
60.7
|
%
|
Used boat sales
|
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
|
|
20.5
|
%
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
Maintenance and repair services
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
Finance and insurance products
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
Parts and accessories
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Brokerage services
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective October 1, 2005, we adopted the provisions of
FASB Accounting Standards Codification 718,
Compensation Stock Compensation (ASC
718), previously referred to as Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment, for our share-based compensation plans. We
adopted ASC 718 using the modified prospective transition
method. Under this transition method, compensation cost
recognized includes (a) the compensation cost for all
share-based awards granted prior to, but not yet vested, as of
October 1, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of ASC 718
and (b) the compensation cost for all share-based awards
granted subsequent to September 30, 2005, based on the
grant-date
F-12
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of ASC
718. Additionally, we accounted for restricted stock awards
granted using the measurement and recognition provisions of ASC
718. We measure the fair value of the restricted stock awards on
the grant date and recognize them in earnings over the requisite
service period for each separately vesting portion of the award.
Advertising
and Promotional Costs
We expense advertising and promotional costs as incurred and
include them in selling, general, and administrative expenses in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Pursuant
to ASC
605-50, we
net amounts received by us under our co-op assistance programs
from our manufacturers against the related advertising expenses.
Total advertising and promotional expenses approximated
$19.6 million, $19.3 million, and $9.4 million,
net of related co-op assistance of approximately
$1.2 million, $700,000, and $526,000, for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively.
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with FASB Accounting
Standards Codification 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740),
previously referred to as Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
and Financial Accounting Standard Board Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes. Under ASC 740, we recognize deferred tax assets and
liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to
temporary differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective
tax basis. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which we expect those temporary differences to be
recovered or settled. We record valuation allowances to reduce
our deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized by
considering all available positive and negative evidence.
Pursuant to ASC 740, we must consider all positive and negative
evidence regarding the realization of deferred tax assets,
including past operating results and future sources of taxable
income. Under the provisions of
ASC 740-10,
we determined that our net deferred tax asset needed to be fully
reserved given recent earnings and industry trends.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, also included in ASC 740. The
Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial
statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attributes of income tax positions taken or expected
to be taken on a tax return. Under FIN 48, the impact of an
uncertain tax position taken or expected to be taken on an
income tax return must be recognized in the financial statements
at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be
sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An
uncertain income tax position will not be recognized in the
financial statements unless it is more likely than not of being
sustained.
See Note 22 Subsequent Events for
the disclosure regarding a tax law enacted after the balance
sheet date and prior to the issuance of the financial statements.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued FASB Accounting Standards Codification 820, Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), previously
referred to as Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. ASC 820
defines fair value, applies to other accounting pronouncements
that require or permit fair value measurements and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and
interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption ASC 820
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
F-13
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued FASB Accounting Standards Codification 825,
Financial Instruments (ASC 825), previously referred
to as Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159,
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities, which permits an entity to measure certain
financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. ASC
825 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The adoption ASC 825 did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued FASB Accounting Standards Codification 805,
Business Combinations (ASC 805), previously referred
to as Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R
Business Combinations. ASC 805 will require, among
other things, the expensing of direct transaction costs, in
process research and development to be capitalized, certain
contingent assets and liabilities to be recognized at fair value
and earn-out arrangements may be required to be measured at fair
value recognized each period in earnings. In addition, certain
material adjustments will be required to be made to purchase
accounting entries at the initial acquisition date and will
cause revisions to previously issued financial information in
subsequent filings. ASC 805 is effective for transactions
occurring after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and may have
a material impact on our consolidated financial position,
results from operations and cash flows should we enter into a
material business combination after the standards effective date.
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
FASB Accounting Standards Codification 815,
Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815), previously
referred to as Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities An Amendment to
SFAS 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 applies to
all derivative instruments accounted for under ASC 815 and
requires entities to provide greater transparency on how and why
entities use derivative instruments, how derivative instruments
are accounted for under ASC 815, and the effect the derivative
instruments may have on the results of operations and cash
flows. ASC 815 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. Since ASC 815 only
applies to disclosures it has not had a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results from operations, and
cash flows.
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(SFAS 167). SFAS 167, addresses the effects of
eliminating the qualifying special-purpose entity (QSPE) concept
from Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities and addresses certain
key provisions of FIN 46(R), including transparency of
enterprises involvement with variable interest entities
(VIEs). SFAS 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2009 and interim periods within those
fiscal years. We are currently assessing the implications of
this standard and evaluating the impact of adopting
SFAS 167 on our consolidated financial statements.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to
concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash and
cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Concentrations of
credit risk with respect to our cash and cash equivalents are
limited primarily to amounts held with financial institutions.
Concentrations of credit risk arising from our receivables are
limited primarily to amounts due from manufacturers and
financial institutions.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount of our financial instruments approximates
fair value due either to length to maturity or existence of
interest rates that approximate prevailing market rates unless
otherwise disclosed in these consolidated financial statements.
F-14
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Use of
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods.
Significant estimates made by us in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements relate to valuation
allowances, valuation of long-lived assets, and valuation of
accruals. Actual results could differ materially from those
estimates. We have evaluated subsequent events for recognition
or disclosure through December 14, 2009, the date which we
filed this
Form 10-K
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Trade receivables consist primarily of receivables from
financial institutions, which provide funding for customer boat
financing and amounts due from financial institutions earned
from arranging financing with our customers. We normally collect
these receivables within 30 days of the sale. Trade
receivables also include amounts due from customers on the sale
of boats, parts, service, and storage. Amounts due from
manufacturers represent receivables for various manufacturer
programs and parts and service work performed pursuant to the
manufacturers warranties.
The allowance for uncollectible receivables, which was not
material to the consolidated financial statements as of
September 30, 2008 or 2009, was based on our consideration
of customer payment practices, past transaction history with
customers, and economic conditions. When an account becomes
uncollectable, we expense it as a bad debt and we credit
payments subsequently received to the bad debt expense account.
We review the allowance for uncollectible receivables when an
event or other change in circumstances results in a change in
the estimate of the ultimate collectability of a specific
account.
The accounts receivable balances consisted of the following at
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
$
|
10,408
|
|
|
$
|
11,598
|
|
Amounts due from manufacturers
|
|
|
18,343
|
|
|
|
23,501
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,931
|
|
|
$
|
35,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net consisted of the following at September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
New boats, motors, and trailers
|
|
$
|
386,993
|
|
|
$
|
160,303
|
|
Used boats, motors, and trailers
|
|
|
72,627
|
|
|
|
39,113
|
|
Parts, accessories, and other
|
|
|
9,009
|
|
|
|
6,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
468,629
|
|
|
$
|
205,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT:
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following at
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
42,160
|
|
|
$
|
40,410
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
79,641
|
|
|
|
76,411
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
29,540
|
|
|
|
28,002
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5,809
|
|
|
|
4,982
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
6,863
|
|
|
|
5,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,013
|
|
|
|
155,522
|
|
Less Accumulated depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
(50,144
|
)
|
|
|
(53,206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
113,869
|
|
|
$
|
102,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment
totaled approximately $9.5 million, $10.9 million, and
$10.4 million for the fiscal years ended September 30,
2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively.
During fiscal 2008 and 2009, we closed certain owned retail
locations in an effort to better match our fixed costs with the
decline in retail business caused by the soft economic
conditions. Accordingly, we entered into plans to market and
sell certain locations we have exited. We assessed our plans to
sell certain locations with the criteria identified in FASB
Accounting Standards Codification 360, Property, Plant,
and Equipment (ASC 360), previously referred to as
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets, and determined the locations should be classified
as available for sale. As of September 30, 2008 and 2009,
we have reclassified $1.8 million and $4.8 million,
respectively, from property and equipment to prepaid expenses
and other current assets within the consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
7.
|
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
|
The changes in the carrying amounts of net goodwill and
identifiable intangible assets for the fiscal years ended
September 30, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
97,446
|
|
|
$
|
23,728
|
|
|
$
|
121,174
|
|
Changes during the period
|
|
|
(97,446
|
)
|
|
|
(23,728
|
)
|
|
|
(121,174
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, we
experienced a significant decline in market valuation driven
primarily by weakness in the marine retail industry and an
overall soft economy, which adversely affected our financial
performance. As a result, we completed a fair value analysis of
indefinite lived intangible assets and a step two goodwill
impairment analysis, as required by ASC 350. We determined that
indefinite lived intangible assets and goodwill were impaired
and recorded a non-cash charge of $121.1 million based on
our assessment. We will not be required to make any current or
future cash expenditures as a result of this impairment charge.
F-16
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
OTHER
LONG-TERM ASSETS:
|
During February 2006, we became party to a joint venture with
Brunswick that acquired certain real estate and assets of Great
American Marina for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$11.0 million, of which we contributed approximately
$4.0 million and Brunswick contributed approximately
$7.0 million. The terms of the agreement specify that we
operate and maintain the service business and that Brunswick
operate and maintain the marina business. Simultaneously with
the closing, the acquired entity became Gulfport Marina, LLC
(Gulfport). We account for our investment in Gulfport in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting
Standards Codification 323, Investment Equity
Method and Joint Venture (ASC 323), previously referred to
as Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, The
Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common
Stock. Accordingly, we adjust the carrying amount of our
investment in Gulfport to recognize our share of earnings or
losses.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we experienced
a significant decline in market valuation driven primarily by
weakness in the marine retail industry and an overall soft
economy, which adversely affected our financial performance. As
a result of this weakness, we realized a goodwill and intangible
asset impairment charge, as noted above. Based on these events,
we reviewed the valuation of our investment in Gulfport in
accordance with ASC 323 and recoverability of the assets
contained within the joint venture. ASC 323 requires the
recognition of a loss in value of an investment, which is other
than a temporary decline. We reviewed our investment and assets
contained within the Gulfport joint venture, which consists of
land, buildings, equipment, and goodwill. As a result, we
determined that our investment in the joint venture was impaired
and recorded a non-cash charge of $1.0 million based on our
assessment. We will not be required to make any current or
future cash expenditures as a result of this impairment charge.
|
|
9.
|
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITY:
|
During fiscal 2006, we entered into an interest rate swap
agreement with a notional amount of $4.0 million, which was
designated as a cash flow hedge, and effectively converted a
portion of the floating rate debt to a fixed rate of 5.67%. At
September 30, 2007, the swap agreement had a fair value of
approximately $45,000, which was recorded in other long-term
assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
During fiscal 2008, we entered into six interest rate swap
agreements with a total notional amount of approximately
$23.2 million, which were designated as cash flow hedges
that effectively converted a portion of the floating rate debt
to fixed rates ranging from 4.36% to 4.87%. During fiscal 2008,
we prepaid the outstanding balances of our long-term debt. With
this prepayment, the swaps were terminated and the pretax fair
market value of the swaps of approximately $550,000 was
reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income and
recognized as income in the statements of operations.
During fiscal 2009, we have not entered into any interest rate
swaps or currency hedging activity.
|
|
10.
|
SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS:
|
During fiscal 2008, we maintained our second amended and
restated credit and security agreement, entered into during June
2006. The credit facility provided us a line of credit with
asset-based borrowing availability of up to $500 million
for working capital and inventory financing, with the amount of
permissible borrowings determined pursuant to a borrowing base
formula. The credit facility accrued interest at the London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 150 to 260 basis
points, with the interest rate was based upon the ratio of our
net outstanding borrowings to our tangible net worth. The credit
facility was secured by our inventory, accounts receivable,
equipment, furniture, and fixtures. The credit facility required
us to satisfy certain covenants, including maintaining a
leverage ratio tied to our tangible net worth.
During fiscal 2009, we maintained our second amended and
restated credit and security agreement, which has been amended
on various occasions since its original execution in June 2006.
As amended, our credit facility
F-17
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
provides for a line of credit with asset-based borrowing
availability up to approximately $230 million, stepping
down to $175 million by September 30, 2010, with
interim decreases between such dates. The amended facility has
certain financial covenants as specified in the agreement. The
covenants include provisions that our leverage ratio not exceed
2.75 to 1; that our current ratio must be greater than 1.25 to 1
or 1.20 to 1 depending on the time of year; and that our maximum
EBITDA loss and annual EBITDA, both as defined in the agreement,
comply with certain thresholds as described below. The EBITDA
covenant requires that we do not exceed the allowable cumulative
negative EBITDA, as defined in the agreement, for the first nine
months of fiscal 2010, which is $22 million as of
December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010 and
$15 million as of June 30, 2010. We are required to
have a cumulative EBITDA greater than or equal to our interest
expense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010.
EBITDA, as defined in the agreement, is our earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization plus an add back
for stock-based compensation expense and 50% of the proceeds of
our September 2009 stock offering or approximately
$10 million. The amended facility provides for a variable
interest rate margin of LIBOR plus 490 basis points through
September 30, 2010 and thereafter at LIBOR plus 150 to
400 basis points, depending upon our financial and
operating performance. We paid the lenders approximately
$2.4 million in amendment fees during fiscal 2009. The
amended facility matures in May 2011, but includes two one-year
renewal options, subject to lender approval.
As of September 30, 2008 and 2009, we owed an aggregate of
$372 million and $142 million, respectively under our
credit facility and were in compliance with all of the credit
facility covenants. Advances under the facility accrued interest
at a rate of 4.0% and 5.2% as of September 30, 2008 and
2009, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, the facility
provided us with an additional borrowing availability of
approximately $60 million.
As is common in our industry, we receive interest assistance
directly from boat manufacturers, including Brunswick. The
interest assistance programs vary by manufacturer and generally
include periods of free financing or reduced interest rate
programs. The interest assistance may be paid directly to us or
our lenders depending on the arrangements the manufacturer has
established. We classify interest assistance received from
manufacturers as a reduction of inventory cost and related cost
of sales as opposed to netting the assistance against our
interest expense incurred with our lenders.
The availability and costs of borrowed funds can adversely
affect our ability to obtain adequate boat inventory and the
holding costs of that inventory as well as the ability and
willingness of our customers to finance boat purchases. As of
September 30, 2009, we had no long-term debt. However, we
rely on our credit facility to purchase our inventory of boats.
Our ability to borrow under our credit facility depends on our
continuing to satisfy our covenants and other obligations under
our credit facility. The aging of our inventory limits our
borrowing capacity as defined curtailments reduce the allowable
advance rate as our inventory ages. Our access to funds under
our credit facility also depends upon the ability of the banks
that are parties to that facility to meet their funding
commitments, particularly if they experience shortages of
capital or experience excessive volumes of borrowing requests
from others during a short period of time. A continuation of
depressed economic conditions, weak consumer spending, turmoil
in the credit markets, and lender difficulties could interfere
with our ability to utilize the credit facility to fund our
operations. Any inability to utilize our credit facility
resulting from a covenant violation, insufficient collateral, or
lender difficulties could require us to seek other sources of
funding to repay amounts outstanding under the credit agreement
or replace or supplement our credit agreement, which may not be
possible at all or under commercially reasonable terms.
Similarly, the decreases in the availability of credit and
increases in the cost of credit adversely affect the ability of
our customers to purchase boats from us and thereby adversely
affects our ability to sell our products and impact the
profitability of our finance and insurance activities. Tight
credit conditions during fiscal 2009 adversely affected the
ability of customers to finance boat purchases, which had a
negative affect on our operating results.
F-18
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of fiscal 2009, we had no long-term debt. During the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2008, we prepaid all outstanding
mortgages and accelerated the amortization of the associated
loan costs in the amount of approximately $160,000.
The components of our provision for income taxes consisted of
the following for the fiscal years ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Current provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
10,377
|
|
|
$
|
(12,776
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,004
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current provision (benefit)
|
|
|
8,853
|
|
|
|
(12,858
|
)
|
|
|
(10,143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|
|
(5,726
|
)
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
State
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(1,367
|
)
|
|
|
(6,303
|
)
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
7,486
|
|
|
$
|
(19,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below is a reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax
rate to our effective tax rate for the fiscal years ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Federal tax provision
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
State taxes, net of federal effect
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)%
|
State income tax settlement
|
|
|
(13.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(10.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, we settled
certain tax positions under an initiative offered by one of the
states in which we conduct operations. As a result of this
settlement, we reduced our reserve for contingent income tax
liabilities by approximately $5.2 million. Due to the
amount paid under the settlement, the reduction in income tax
expense was approximately $3.8 million for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2007. Without this reduction, the
effective tax rate would have been approximately 40.9% for the
year ended September 30, 2007.
F-19
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary
differences between the amount of assets and liabilities
recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts
recognized for income tax purposes. The tax effects of these
temporary differences representing the components of deferred
tax assets (liabilities) at September 30 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
3,225
|
|
|
$
|
5,169
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
4,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
6,140
|
|
|
|
9,262
|
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
(5,833
|
)
|
|
|
(9,262
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
24,483
|
|
|
$
|
21,393
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
6,582
|
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
FIN 48 deferred tax asset
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
Tax loss carryforwards
|
|
|
3,330
|
|
|
|
23,495
|
|
Other
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets
|
|
|
35,117
|
|
|
|
51,597
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(33,911
|
)
|
|
|
(51,597
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net long-term deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
1,206
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to ASC 740, we must consider all positive and negative
evidence regarding the realization of deferred tax assets,
including past operating results and future sources of taxable
income. Under the provisions of ASC 740, we determined that the
entire net deferred tax asset needed to be reserved given recent
earnings and industry trends. The total valuation allowance at
September 30, 2008 and 2009 was $60.9 million and
$39.7 million, respectively.
We have adopted the provisions of FIN 48, now under ASC
740. Under ASC 740, the impact of an uncertain tax position
taken or expected to be taken on an income tax return must be
recognized in the financial statements at the largest amount
that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the
relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will
not be recognized in the financial statements unless it is more
likely than not of being sustained. On October 1, 2007, we
recognized a charge of $554,000 to retained earnings as a result
of the adoption of FIN 48. As of September 30, 2008
and 2009, we had approximately $2.1 million and
$1.9 million, respectively, of gross unrecognized tax
benefits, of which approximately $1.4 million and
$1.3 million, respectively, if recognized, would impact the
effective tax rate.
The reconciliation of the total amount recorded for unrecognized
tax benefits at the beginning and end of the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at the beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
2,242
|
|
|
$
|
2,064
|
|
Increases in tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Decreases in tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits at September 30,
|
|
$
|
2,064
|
|
|
$
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Consistent with our prior practices, we recognize interest and
penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of
income tax expense. As of September 30, 2009, interest and
penalties represented approximately $660,000 of the gross
unrecognized tax benefits. There have been no significant
changes to the balance of interest and penalties subsequent to
adoption.
Since inception, we have been subject to tax by both federal and
state taxing authorities. Until the respective statutes of
limitations expire, we are subject to income tax audits in the
jurisdictions in which we operate. We are no longer subject to
U.S. federal tax examinations for fiscal years prior to
2006, and we are not subject to audits prior to the 2005 fiscal
year for the majority of the state jurisdictions.
It is reasonably possible that a change to the total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits could occur in the next 12 months
based on examinations by tax authorities, the expiration of
statutes of limitations, or potential settlements of outstanding
positions. It is not possible to estimate a range of the
possible changes at this time. However, we do not expect the
change to be significant to the overall balance of unrecognized
tax benefits.
|
|
13.
|
STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY:
|
In November 2005, our Board of Directors approved a share
repurchase plan allowing our company to repurchase up to
1,000,000 shares of our common stock. Under the plan, we
may buy back common stock from time to time in the open market
or in privately negotiated blocks, dependant upon various
factors, including price and availability of the shares, and
general market conditions. Through September 30, 2009, we
had purchased an aggregate of 790,900 shares of common
stock under the plan for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $15.8 million.
In September 2009, we completed a public offering of
2,990,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public
of $7.00 per share for total gross proceeds of
$20,930,000 million. The net proceeds of the offering were
used to reduce our short-term borrowings and general corporate
purposes.
|
|
14.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION:
|
In accordance with ASC 718, we use the Black-Scholes valuation
model for valuing all stock-based compensation and shares
granted under the ESPP. We measure compensation for restricted
stock awards and restricted stock units at fair value on the
grant date based on the number of shares expected to vest and
the quoted market price of our common stock. We recognize
compensation cost for all awards in earnings, net of estimated
forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period for each separately vesting portion of the award.
Cash received from option exercises under all share-based
compensation arrangements for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007, 2008, and 2009 was approximately
$3.2 million, $2.2 million, and $766,000,
respectively. Tax benefits realized for tax deductions from
option exercises for the fiscal years ended September 30,
2007 and 2008 was approximately $769,000 and $223,000,
respectively. There were no tax benefits realized for tax
deductions from option exercises for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2009. We currently expect to satisfy
share-based awards with registered shares available to be issued.
|
|
15.
|
THE
INCENTIVE STOCK PLANS:
|
During February 2007, our stockholders approved a proposal to
approve our 2007 Incentive Compensation Plan (2007 Plan), which
replaced our 1998 Incentive Stock Plan (1998 Plan). Our 2007
Plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock, stock units, bonus stock, dividend
equivalents, other stock related awards, and performance awards
(collectively awards), that may be settled in cash, stock, or
other property. Our 2007 Plan is designed to attract, motivate,
retain, and reward our executives, employees, officers,
directors, and independent contractors by providing such persons
with annual and long-term performance incentives to expend their
maximum efforts in the creation of stockholder value. The total
number of shares of our common stock that may be subject to
awards under the 2007 Plan is equal to 1,000,000 shares,
plus (i) any shares
F-21
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
available for issuance and not subject to an award under the
1998 Plan, (ii) the number of shares with respect to which
awards granted under the 2007 Plan and the 1998 Plan terminate
without the issuance of the shares or where the shares are
forfeited or repurchased; (iii) with respect to awards
granted under the 2007 Plan and the 1998 Plan, the number of
shares that are not issued as a result of the award being
settled for cash or otherwise not issued in connection with the
exercise or payment of the award; and (iv) the number of
shares that are surrendered or withheld in payment of the
exercise price of any award or any tax withholding requirements
in connection with any award granted under the 2007 Plan and the
1998 Plan. The 2007 Plan terminates in February 2017, and awards
may be granted at any time during the life of the 2007 Plan. The
Board of Directors or the Plan Administrator determines the date
on which awards vest. The Board of Directors or the Plan
Administrator also determines the exercise prices of options
which are at least equal to the fair market value of shares of
common stock on the date of grant. The term of options under the
2007 Plan may not exceed ten years. The options granted have
varying vesting periods. To date, we have not settled or been
under any obligation to settle any awards in cash.
The following table summarizes option activity from
September 30, 2008 through September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
for Grant
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
1,215,006
|
|
|
|
1,740,128
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18.41
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
(1,195,700
|
)
|
|
|
1,195,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options cancelled/forfeited/expired
|
|
|
920,080
|
|
|
|
(920,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units issued
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units cancelled
|
|
|
99,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(20,554
|
)
|
|
|
(20,554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
1,007,875
|
|
|
|
1,995,194
|
|
|
$
|
5,173
|
|
|
$
|
10.37
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
927,819
|
|
|
$
|
1,165
|
|
|
$
|
13.17
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted
during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2008, and
2009 was $12.13, $6.12, and $1.75, respectively. The total
intrinsic value of options exercised during the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2007, 2008, and 2009 was approximately
$2.0 million, $541,000, and $54,200, respectively.
As of September 30, 2008 and 2009, there was approximately
$2.1 million and $1.2 million, respectively, of
unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested options
that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period
of 2.5 years and 2.1 years, respectively. The total
fair value of options vested during the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007, 2008, and 2009 was approximately
$1.9 million, $2.1 million, and $1.2 million,
respectively.
We continued using the Black-Scholes model to estimate the fair
value of options granted during fiscal 2009. The expected term
of options granted is derived from the output of the option
pricing model and represents the period of time that options
granted are expected to be outstanding. Volatility is based on
the historical volatility of our common stock. The risk-free
rate for periods within the contractual term of the options is
based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the
time of grant.
F-22
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following are the weighted-average assumptions used for the
fiscal years ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.6%
|
|
3.4%
|
|
2.2%
|
Volatility
|
|
42.7%
|
|
44.2%
|
|
63.4%
|
Expected life
|
|
6.5 years
|
|
7.5 years
|
|
6.0 years
|
|
|
16.
|
EMPLOYEE
STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (THE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN):
|
During February 2008, our stockholders approved our 2008
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (2008 Plan). The 2008 Plan provides
for up to 500,000 shares of common stock to be available
for purchase by our regular employees who have completed at
least one year of continuous service. The 2008 Plan provides for
implementation of up to 10 annual offerings beginning on the
first day of October starting in 2008, with each offering
terminating on September 30 of the following year. Each
annual offering may be divided into two six-month offerings. For
each offering, the purchase price per share will be the lower of
(i) 85% of the closing price of the common stock on the
first day of the offering or (ii) 85% of the closing price
of the common stock on the last day of the offering. The
purchase price is paid through periodic payroll deductions not
to exceed 10% of the participants earnings during each
offering period. However, no participant may purchase more than
$25,000 worth of common stock annually.
During 2009, we continued using the Black-Scholes model to
estimate the fair value of options granted to purchase shares
issued pursuant to the Stock Purchase Plan. The expected term of
options granted is derived from the output of the option pricing
model and represents the period of time that options granted are
expected to be outstanding. Volatility is based on the
historical volatility of our common stock. The risk-free rate
for periods within the contractual term of the options is based
on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant.
The following are the weighted-average assumptions used for the
fiscal years ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.9%
|
|
2.3%
|
|
.5%
|
Volatility
|
|
43.4%
|
|
75.6%
|
|
160.4%
|
Expected life
|
|
six-months
|
|
six-months
|
|
six-months
|
As of September 30, 2009, we had issued 264,493 of the
500,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under
our 2008 employee stock purchase plan.
|
|
17.
|
RESTRICTED
STOCK AWARDS:
|
During fiscal 2007, 2008, and 2009, we granted non-vested
(restricted) stock awards or restricted stock units
(collectively restricted stock awards) to certain key employees
pursuant to the 1998 Plan or the 2007 Plan. The restricted stock
awards have varying vesting periods, but generally become fully
vested at either the end of year four or the end of year five,
depending on the specific award. The awards granted in fiscal
2008 require certain levels of performance by us before they are
earned. The performance metrics must be achieved by September
2011 or the awards will be forfeited. The stock underlying the
vested restricted stock units will be delivered upon vesting.
We accounted for the restricted stock awards granted during
fiscal 2007, 2008, and 2009 using the measurement and
recognition provisions of ASC
718-10.
Accordingly, we measure the fair value of the restricted stock
awards on the grant date and recognize the fair value in
earnings over the requisite service period for each separately
vesting portion of the award.
F-23
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity from
September 30, 2008 through September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Non-vested balance at September 30, 2008
|
|
|
830,000
|
|
|
$
|
23.25
|
|
Changes during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares granted
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.64
|
|
Shares vested
|
|
|
(220,887
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.38
|
|
Shares forfeited
|
|
|
(99,043
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested balance at September 30, 2009
|
|
|
520,070
|
|
|
$
|
6.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately
$3.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to restricted stock awards granted under the Plan. We
expect to recognize that cost over a weighted-average period of
1.5 years.
|
|
18.
|
NET
INCOME PER SHARE:
|
The following is a reconciliation of the shares used in the
denominator for calculating basic and diluted earnings per share
for the fiscal years ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding used in calculating
basic net income per share
|
|
|
18,618,611
|
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
|
|
18,685,423
|
|
Effect of dilutive options
|
|
|
670,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares used in
calculating diluted net income per share
|
|
|
19,289,231
|
|
|
|
18,391,488
|
|
|
|
18,685,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase approximately 742,000, 1,700,000 and
764,000 shares of common stock were outstanding at
September 30, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively, but were
not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share
because the exercise prices were greater than the average market
price of our common stock, and therefore, their effect would be
anti-dilutive.
|
|
19.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
|
Lease
Commitments
We lease certain land, buildings, machinery, equipment, and
vehicles related to our dealerships under non-cancelable
third-party operating leases. Certain of our leases include
options for renewal periods and provisions for escalation.
Rental expense, including
month-to-month
rentals, were approximately $13.2 million,
$13.9 million, and $9.2 million for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively.
Rental expense to related parties under both cancelable and
non-cancelable operating leases approximated $385,000 for each
of the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2008, and
2009.
The rental payments to related parties, under both cancelable
and non-cancelable operating leases during fiscal 2007, 2008,
and 2009, represent rental payments for buildings to an entity
partially owned by a former officer of our company. We believe
the terms of the transaction are consistent with those that we
would obtain from third parties.
F-24
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating
leases at September 30, 2009, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
7,401
|
|
2011
|
|
|
6,671
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5,104
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3,674
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,660
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
6,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
31,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Commitments and Contingencies
We are party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary
course of business. The ultimate liability, if any, associated
with theses matters was not believed to be material at
September 30, 2009. While it is not feasible to determine
the actual outcome of these actions as of September 30,
2009, we do not believe that these matters will have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results
of operations, or cash flows.
During fiscal 2007, we received approximately $2.0 million
of insurance proceeds, of which approximately $1.4 million
offset the related losses associated with the destruction of
marina docks and significant expenses we incurred regarding
damage and related clean up after the December 2006 snow and ice
storms in Missouri. The excess insurance proceeds received, of
approximately $600,000, were recorded as a gain on involuntary
disposal of assets. Additionally in fiscal 2007, we received
$2.1 million of business interruption insurance proceeds
for claims associated with Hurricane Wilma, which occurred in
October 2005. The business interruption insurance proceeds were
to reimburse us for the interruption in our operations that
resulted in lost revenue and related profits in addition to the
significant expenses incurred to move and repair inventory and
to reimburse us for uninsured losses recognized by certain
locations. The gain on disposal and insurance proceeds received
were recorded as a reduction to selling, general, and
administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of
operations during fiscal 2007.
During fiscal 2008 and 2009, we incurred costs associated with
store closings of approximately $3.0 million and
$6.2 million, respectively. These costs primarily related
to the future minimum operating lease payments of the closed
locations. The store closings were a key component in our effort
to better match our fixed costs with the decline in retail
business caused by the soft economic conditions. The store
closing costs have been included in selling, general, and
administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of
operations during fiscal 2008 and 2009.
We are subject to federal and state environmental regulations,
including rules relating to air and water pollution and the
storage and disposal of gasoline, oil, other chemicals and
waste. We believe that we are in compliance with such
regulations.
|
|
20.
|
EMPLOYEE
401(k) PROFIT SHARING PLANS:
|
Employees are eligible to participate in our 401(k) Profit
Sharing Plan (the Plan) following their
90-day
introductory period starting either April 1 or October 1,
provided that they are 21 years of age. Under the Plan, we
match 50% of participants contributions, up to a maximum
of 5% of each participants compensation. We contributed,
under the Plan, or pursuant to previous similar plans,
approximately $1.9 million, $1.5 million, and $167,000
for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, 2008, and
2009, respectively. Beginning January 1, 2009, our matching
was suspended in an effort to reduce overall costs.
F-25
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
21.
|
PREFERRED
SHARE PURCHASE RIGHTS:
|
During September 2001, we adopted a Stockholders Rights
Plan (the Rights Plan) that may have the effect of deterring,
delaying, or preventing a change in control that might otherwise
be in the best interests of our stockholders. Under the Rights
Plan, a dividend of one Preferred Share Purchase Right was
issued for each share of common stock held by the stockholders
of record as of the close of business on September 7, 2001.
Each right entitles stockholders to purchase, at an exercise
price of $50 per share, one-thousandth of a share of a newly
created Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.
In general, subject to certain limited exceptions, the stock
purchase rights become exercisable when a person or group
acquires 15% or more of our common stock or a tender offer or
exchange offer for 15% or more of our common stock is announced
or commenced. After any such event, other stockholders may
purchase additional shares of our common stock at 50% of the
then-current market price. The rights will cause substantial
dilution to a person or group that attempts to acquire us on
terms not approved by our Board of Directors. The rights should
not interfere with any merger or other business combination
approved by the Board of Directors. The rights may be redeemed
by us at $0.01 per stock purchase right at any time before any
person or group acquires 15% or more of the outstanding common
stock. The rights expire on August 28, 2011.
The Rights Plan adoption and Rights Distribution is a
non-taxable event with no impact on our financial results.
During November 2009, the Worker, Homeownership, and Business
Assistance Act of 2009 (the Act) was signed into
law. The Act contains a number of tax law changes, including a
provision that permits companies to carryback certain 2008 or
2009 net operating losses (NOL) up to five years. Under
existing tax law prior to the Act, we could only carryback an
NOL a maximum of two years to offset prior taxable income. The
excess net operating loss generated in fiscal 2009, which could
not be carried back under the prior law, will be able to be
carried back five years under the Act. The additional carryback
will generate an additional tax refund of approximately
$19 million. As a result, our effective tax rate in the
first quarter of fiscal year 2010 will be significantly impacted.
F-26
MARINEMAX,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
23.
|
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED):
|
The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly
financial data for each of our last eight quarters. The
information has been derived from unaudited financial statements
that we believe reflect all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair
presentation of such quarterly financial information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
215,268
|
|
|
$
|
233,262
|
|
|
$
|
271,277
|
|
|
$
|
165,600
|
|
|
$
|
100,224
|
|
|
$
|
129,608
|
|
|
$
|
151,514
|
|
|
$
|
207,239
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
167,143
|
|
|
|
178,783
|
|
|
|
209,432
|
|
|
|
123,806
|
|
|
|
76,521
|
|
|
|
109,894
|
|
|
|
118,898
|
|
|
|
194,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
48,125
|
|
|
|
54,479
|
|
|
|
61,845
|
|
|
|
41,794
|
|
|
|
23,703
|
|
|
|
19,714
|
|
|
|
32,616
|
|
|
|
12,627
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
53,191
|
|
|
|
56,198
|
|
|
|
51,623
|
|
|
|
56,414
|
|
|
|
38,862
|
|
|
|
36,360
|
|
|
|
38,975
|
|
|
|
45,801
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(5,066
|
)
|
|
|
(1,719
|
)
|
|
|
(111,869
|
)
|
|
|
(14,620
|
)
|
|
|
(15,159
|
)
|
|
|
(16,646
|
)
|
|
|
(6,359
|
)
|
|
|
(33,174
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,881
|
|
|
|
5,952
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
3,566
|
|
|
|
4,062
|
|
|
|
3,774
|
|
|
|
3,380
|
|
|
|
2,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax benefit
|
|
|
(10,947
|
)
|
|
|
(7,671
|
)
|
|
|
(116,634
|
)
|
|
|
(18,186
|
)
|
|
|
(19,221
|
)
|
|
|
(20,420
|
)
|
|
|
(9,739
|
)
|
|
|
(36,022
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(4,529
|
)
|
|
|
(4,162
|
)
|
|
|
(3,377
|
)
|
|
|
(7,093
|
)
|
|
|
(4,881
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
(3,039
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(6,418
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,509
|
)
|
|
$
|
(113,257
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,093
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,340
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,269
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,180
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32,983
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.78
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.72
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
18,364,676
|
|
|
|
18,363,692
|
|
|
|
18,415,790
|
|
|
|
18,421,629
|
|
|
|
18,500,794
|
|
|
|
18,512,104
|
|
|
|
18,575,332
|
|
|
|
19,148,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to provide comparability between periods presented,
certain amounts have been reclassified from the previously
reported interim financial statements to conform to the
consolidated financial statement presentation of the current
period.
F-27