10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended: September 30, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period From to .
Commission File Number: 001-33603
Dolan Media Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
43-2004527
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
222 South Ninth Street, Suite 2300,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(Address, including zip code of registrants principal executive offices)
(612) 317-9420
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
On November 4, 2009, there were 30,083,354 shares of the registrants common stock
outstanding.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
Dolan Media Company
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
20,640 |
|
|
$ |
2,456 |
|
Accounts receivable, including unbilled
services (net of allowances for doubtful
accounts of $914 and $1,398 as of September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively) |
|
|
53,338 |
|
|
|
38,776 |
|
Unbilled pass-through costs |
|
|
14,893 |
|
|
|
7,164 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
4,642 |
|
|
|
4,881 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
93,910 |
|
|
|
53,674 |
|
Investments |
|
|
16,923 |
|
|
|
16,663 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
15,534 |
|
|
|
21,438 |
|
Finite-life intangible assets, net |
|
|
166,515 |
|
|
|
254,917 |
|
Indefinite life intangible assets |
|
|
203,108 |
|
|
|
118,983 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
5,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
501,480 |
|
|
$ |
470,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
12,825 |
|
|
$ |
12,048 |
|
Due to sellers of acquired businesses |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
7,015 |
|
|
|
9,116 |
|
Accrued pass-through liabilities |
|
|
27,356 |
|
|
|
21,598 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
7,801 |
|
|
|
7,673 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
4,277 |
|
|
|
2,738 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
15,738 |
|
|
|
13,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
88,012 |
|
|
|
66,262 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
133,675 |
|
|
|
143,450 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
7,644 |
|
|
|
18,266 |
|
Deferred revenue and other liabilities |
|
|
4,772 |
|
|
|
5,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
234,103 |
|
|
|
233,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interest |
|
|
28,484 |
|
|
|
15,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value;
authorized: 70,000,000 shares;
outstanding: 30,079,014 and 29,955,018
shares as of September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value;
authorized: 5,000,000 shares; designated: 5,000 shares of Series A Junior
Participating Preferred Stock; no shares
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
285,513 |
|
|
|
291,310 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(46,650 |
) |
|
|
(69,373 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
238,893 |
|
|
|
221,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
501,480 |
|
|
$ |
470,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
1
Dolan Media Company
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
|
$ |
39,996 |
|
|
$ |
25,673 |
|
|
$ |
126,322 |
|
|
$ |
62,542 |
|
Business Information |
|
|
22,348 |
|
|
|
22,211 |
|
|
|
66,998 |
|
|
|
68,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
62,344 |
|
|
|
47,884 |
|
|
|
193,320 |
|
|
|
130,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct operating: Professional Services |
|
|
15,553 |
|
|
|
9,941 |
|
|
|
46,693 |
|
|
|
22,688 |
|
Direct operating: Business Information |
|
|
6,952 |
|
|
|
7,961 |
|
|
|
21,827 |
|
|
|
23,686 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
22,910 |
|
|
|
18,950 |
|
|
|
66,073 |
|
|
|
51,787 |
|
Break-up fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
3,924 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
13,219 |
|
|
|
7,587 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
2,264 |
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
6,738 |
|
|
|
3,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
51,603 |
|
|
|
42,903 |
|
|
|
154,550 |
|
|
|
111,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
3,461 |
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
11,472 |
|
|
|
6,310 |
|
|
|
42,231 |
|
|
|
24,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of interest income |
|
|
(1,607 |
) |
|
|
(1,851 |
) |
|
|
(5,305 |
) |
|
|
(4,611 |
) |
Non-cash interest income (expense) related to
interest rate swaps |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating expense |
|
|
(1,379 |
) |
|
|
(1,920 |
) |
|
|
(3,101 |
) |
|
|
(4,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
10,093 |
|
|
|
4,390 |
|
|
|
39,130 |
|
|
|
19,630 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(3,529 |
) |
|
|
(1,471 |
) |
|
|
(13,207 |
) |
|
|
(7,257 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
2,919 |
|
|
|
25,923 |
|
|
|
12,373 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to the
redeemable noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(694 |
) |
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
|
(3,200 |
) |
|
|
(1,516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company |
|
$ |
5,870 |
|
|
$ |
2,453 |
|
|
$ |
22,723 |
|
|
$ |
10,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
Accretion of redeemable noncontrolling
interest, net of tax |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media
Company common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
29,843,444 |
|
|
|
27,926,118 |
|
|
|
29,821,661 |
|
|
|
25,940,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
Accretion of redeemable noncontrolling
interest, net of tax |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media
Company common stockholders |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
29,932,275 |
|
|
|
28,059,701 |
|
|
|
29,908,462 |
|
|
|
26,105,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
2
Dolan Media Company
Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance (deficit) at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
25,088,718 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
212,364 |
|
|
$ |
(83,676 |
) |
|
$ |
128,713 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,303 |
|
|
|
14,303 |
|
Private placement of common stock, net
of offering costs |
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
60,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,487 |
|
Issuance of common stock in a business
acquisition |
|
|
825,528 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
16,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,461 |
|
Issuance of common stock pursuant to
the exercise of stock options under
the 2007 incentive compensation plan |
|
|
8,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense,
including issuance of restricted stock
(shares are net of forfeitures) |
|
|
32,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,918 |
|
Tax benefit on stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance (deficit) at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
29,955,018 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
291,310 |
|
|
$ |
(69,373 |
) |
|
$ |
221,967 |
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media
Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,723 |
|
|
|
22,723 |
|
Accretion of redeemable noncontrolling
interest, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media
Company common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,058 |
|
Issuance of common stock pursuant to
the exercise of stock options under
the 2007 incentive compensation plan |
|
|
5,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense,
including issuance of restricted stock
(shares are net of forfeitures) |
|
|
118,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance (deficit) at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
30,079,014 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
285,513 |
|
|
$ |
(46,650 |
) |
|
$ |
238,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
3
Dolan Media Company
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
25,923 |
|
|
$ |
12,373 |
|
Distributions received from The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC |
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
Distributions paid to holders of noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(3,145 |
) |
|
|
(1,351 |
) |
Non-cash operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
13,219 |
|
|
|
7,587 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
6,738 |
|
|
|
3,790 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
(3,461 |
) |
|
|
(4,355 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
1,861 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
(576 |
) |
Change in value of interest rate swap and accretion of interest on
note payable |
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
213 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
Change in accounting estimate related to self-insured medical reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(470 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of
business acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and unbilled pass-through costs |
|
|
(22,290 |
) |
|
|
(9,354 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
(1,840 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(507 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
7,110 |
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
2,600 |
|
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
32,104 |
|
|
|
16,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and investments |
|
|
(2,441 |
) |
|
|
(183,518 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(2,584 |
) |
|
|
(3,957 |
) |
Other |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(4,925 |
) |
|
|
(187,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net payments on senior revolving note |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
Proceeds from borrowings or conversions on senior term notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Payments on senior long-term debt |
|
|
(7,250 |
) |
|
|
(2,746 |
) |
Proceeds from private placement of common stock, net of offering costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,541 |
|
Capital contribution from holder of noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,179 |
|
Payment on unsecured note payable |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
Payment of deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(404 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Other |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(8,995 |
) |
|
|
171,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
18,184 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
|
$ |
20,640 |
|
|
$ |
1,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
4
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
Note 1. Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation: The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, which
has been derived from audited financial statements, and the unaudited condensed consolidated
interim financial statements of Dolan Media Company (the Company) have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial
information and the instructions to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation
S-X. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to these rules and regulations. Accordingly, these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated
financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in the
Companys annual report on Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2009, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial
statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys interim
financial results. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The results of
operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full calendar
year.
The
statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 changed
from the Companys previous presentation because a $1.5 million break-up fee recorded in the third
quarter of 2008 was previously classified as a non-operating expense and is now included as an
operating expense. See Note 3 for more information regarding the break-up fee.
The Company has also adjusted certain amounts on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 to
reflect the retroactive application of the equity method of accounting to reflect that portion of
the income and losses of GovDelivery, Inc. attributable to the Companys ownership from the date of
the income and investment. The Company had previously accounted for its investment in GovDelivery
under the cost method of accounting. See Note 4 for more information about the change in the
Companys investment in GovDelivery.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the
accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and it majority ownership interest in
American Processing Company, LLC d/b/a NDeX (NDeX). The Company accounts for the percentage
interest in NDeX that it does not own as noncontrolling interest.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Derivative Instruments: Under the Companys bank credit facility, it is required to
enter into derivative financial instrument transactions, such as swaps or interest rate caps, in
order to manage or reduce its exposure to risk from changes in interest rates. The Company uses
interest rate swaps because it is exposed to market risks related to interest rates, with its
exposure to changes in interest rates being limited to borrowings under its credit facility. The
Company has not designated these interest rate swap agreements for hedge accounting treatment. As
of September 30, 2009, the Company had swap arrangements that convert $40.0 million of its variable
rate term loan into a fixed rate obligation. The Company does not enter into derivatives or other
financial instrument transactions for speculative purposes. The interest rate swaps are valued
using market interest rates, and are included in deferred revenue and other liabilities in the
Companys unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet and were valued at $1.9 million at
September 30, 2009. These derivative instruments are classified within level 2 under Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 (formerly
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157).
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The carrying value of cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these
instruments. To estimate the fair value of debt issuances that are not quoted on an exchange, the
Company estimates an interest rate it would be required to
pay if it had to refinance its debt. At September 30, 2009, the estimated fair value of debt
was $133.4 million compared to a carrying value of $146.5 million.
5
New Accounting Pronouncements: In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 805 (formerly
SFAS No. 141R) which changes how the Company accounts for business acquisitions occurring after
January 1, 2009. ASC 805 requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction and establishes the acquisition-date
fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a
business combination. Certain provisions of this standard will, among other things, impact the
determination of acquisition-date fair value of consideration paid in a business combination
(including contingent consideration); exclude transaction costs from acquisition accounting; and
change accounting practices for acquired contingencies, acquisition-related restructuring costs,
in-process research and development, indemnification assets, and tax benefits. For the Company, ASC
805 was effective beginning January 1, 2009. Accordingly, the Company is now required to expense,
in the period incurred, acquisition-related costs, rather than including such costs in the purchase
price as it has historically done in prior year periods. The Company did not consummate any
acquisitions or incur any significant transaction related costs during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. See Note 14 Subsequent Events for information relating to acquisitions the
Company consummated after September 30, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 810 (formerly SFAS No. 160), which establishes new
standards governing the accounting for and reporting of noncontrolling interest (NCI) in partially
owned consolidated subsidiaries and the loss of control of subsidiaries. Certain provisions of this
standard indicate, among other things, that NCI (previously referred to as minority interest), in
most cases, be treated as a separate component of equity, not as a liability; that increases and
decreases in the parents ownership interest that leave control intact be treated as equity
transactions, rather than as step acquisitions or dilution gains or losses; and that losses of a
partially owned consolidated subsidiary be allocated to the NCI even when such allocation might
result in a deficit balance. This standard also requires the Company to change certain presentation
and disclosures in its financial statements. For the Company, ASC 810 was effective beginning
January 1, 2009. The Companys noncontrolling interest consists of the 15.3% aggregate membership
interest in its subsidiary, NDeX, held by APC Investments, LLC, Feiwell & Hannoy Professional
Corporation and the sellers of Barrett-NDEx (defined in Note 3 below) or their transferees (as a
group). Under the NDeX operating agreement, each of the holders of the noncontrolling interest has
the right, for a certain period of time, to require NDeX to repurchase all or any portion of the
NDeX membership interests held by such holder. To the extent any holder timely exercises this
right, the purchase price of such membership interest will be based on 6.25 times NDeXs trailing
twelve month earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization less the aggregate
amount of any interest bearing indebtedness outstanding for NDeX as of the date the repurchase
occurs. Because the NCI has a redeemable feature outside of the control of the Company, the Company
will continue to show the NCI on the mezzanine section of the balance sheet between Liabilities
and Stockholders Equity, rather than as a separate component of equity. Because the redeemable
feature of the NCI is based upon a formula, the Company is required to employ the provisions of ASC
480 (formerly EITF Topic D-98), which ASC 810 amended, and adjust the NCI to either the fair value
or the redemption amount at each reporting period. The Company has recorded its noncontrolling
interest at the redemption amount, with the adjustment recorded through additional paid-in capital
rather than directly as a charge against earnings, and has therefore employed the two-class method
as set forth in ASC 260 (formerly EITF 03-6) to calculate earnings per share based on net income
attributable to its common stockholders. The Company has recorded an adjustment of $0.4 million and
$7.7 million (both net of tax) to record the redeemable noncontrolling interest to its redemption
value for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. If ASC 810 was
effective at December 31, 2008, the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest of $15.8 million
would have been adjusted to reflect the redemption value of $16.8 million, resulting in a $0.6
million adjustment to additional paid-in capital (net of tax). The provisions of the standard have
been applied to the NCI prospectively for periods after January 1, 2009, except for the
presentation and disclosure requirements, which have been applied retrospectively to all periods
presented.
In March 2008, the FASB updated its guidance in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (formerly
SFAS No. 161), requiring companies to provide enhanced disclosures regarding derivative instruments
and hedging activities in order to better convey the purpose of derivative use in terms of the
risks that such companies are intending to manage. Disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted, and
(c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a companys financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows are required. This was effective
beginning January 1, 2009 for the Company. Accordingly, the Company has included the required
disclosures in Use of Derivative Instruments above.
6
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance regarding interim disclosures about the fair value of
financial instruments, which increases the frequency of certain fair value disclosures from annual
to quarterly. Such disclosures include the fair value of all financial instruments within the scope
of ASC 820 (formerly SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments) as well
as the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value. This guidance was effective
for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. Accordingly, the Company has included these
disclosures in Fair Value of Financial Instruments above.
In May 2009, the FASB updated its guidance in ASC 855 (formerly SFAS No. 165) regarding
subsequent events, establishing principles and requirements for subsequent events. In particular,
ASC 855 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management shall evaluate
events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial
statements, the circumstances under which an entity shall recognize events or transactions
occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an
entity shall make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This
updated guidance is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. Accordingly, the
Company has applied the provisions of this statement in the current reporting period. See Note 14
for information relating to any subsequent events.
Note 2. Basic and Diluted Income Per Share
Basic per share amounts are computed, generally, by dividing net income by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. As described in the Companys discussion of
ASC 810 in Note 1 above, the Company has employed the two-class method to calculate earnings per
share based on net income attributable to its common stockholders. At September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, there were no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. Diluted per
share amounts assume the conversion, exercise, or issuance of all potential common stock
instruments (see Note 12 for information on stock options) unless their effect is anti-dilutive.
The following table computes basic and diluted net income per share (in thousands, except per
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company |
|
$ |
5,870 |
|
|
$ |
2,453 |
|
|
$ |
22,723 |
|
|
$ |
10,857 |
|
Accretion of redeemable noncontrolling interest, net of tax |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company common
stockholders |
|
$ |
5,498 |
|
|
$ |
2,453 |
|
|
$ |
15,058 |
|
|
$ |
10,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
30,080 |
|
|
|
28,093 |
|
|
|
30,023 |
|
|
|
26,106 |
|
Weighted average common shares of unvested restricted stock |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in the computation of basic net income per share |
|
|
29,843 |
|
|
|
27,926 |
|
|
|
29,822 |
|
|
|
25,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company common
stockholders per share basic |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in the computation of basic net income per share |
|
|
29,843 |
|
|
|
27,926 |
|
|
|
29,822 |
|
|
|
25,940 |
|
Stock options and restricted stock |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in the computation of dilutive net income per
share |
|
|
29,932 |
|
|
|
28,060 |
|
|
|
29,908 |
|
|
|
26,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company common
stockholders per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, options to purchase approximately
1.6 million and 1.2 million weighted shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the
computation because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, options to purchase approximately 1.4 million and 13,000 weighted
shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the computation because their effect would
have been anti-dilutive.
7
Note 3. Acquisitions
Management is responsible for determining the fair value of the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed represent managements estimate of fair values. Management determines valuations through a
combination of methods, which include internal rate of return calculations, discounted cash flow
models, outside valuations and appraisals and market conditions. The Company did not consummate any
acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. See Note 14 for a discussion of
acquisitions that the Company consummated after September 30, 2009. For acquisitions consummated
in 2008, the Company has included the results of these acquisitions in the accompanying interim
condensed consolidated statement of operations from the respective acquisition dates forward.
Wilford & Geske: On February 22, 2008, NDeX acquired the mortgage default processing services
business of Wilford & Geske, a Minnesota law firm. Under the purchase agreement, NDeX was obligated
to pay up to an additional $2.0 million in purchase price depending upon the adjusted EBITDA for
this business during the twelve months ended March 31, 2009. In connection with the partial
achievement of this performance target, NDeX paid an additional $1.3 million in purchase price to
the sellers in the second quarter of 2009. The Company has allocated this amount to the long-term
service agreement entered into with the law firm Wilford & Geske, which is being amortized over the
remaining initial contract term.
Midwest Law Printing Co., Inc.: On June 30, 2008, the Company acquired the assets of Midwest
Law Printing Co., Inc., which provides printing and appellate services in Chicago, Illinois.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company paid to the seller $75,000, which it had held back
at the closing to secure indemnification claims. Under the purchase agreement, the Company was also
obligated to pay the seller up to an additional $225,000 in three annual installments of up to
$75,000 each based upon the revenues it earns from the assets in each of the three years following
closing. In connection with the satisfaction of the first revenue target, the Company paid the
seller $75,000 in additional purchase price, during the second quarter of 2009, which has been
allocated to a customer list.
National Default Exchange, L.P. and related entities: On September 2, 2008, NDeX acquired all
of the outstanding equity interests in National Default Exchange Management, Inc., National Default
Exchange Holdings, LP, THP/ NDEx AIV, Corp., and THP/ NDEx AIV, LP (all of such entities referred
to collectively as Barrett-NDEx). The table below (amounts in thousands) shows the Companys
preliminary allocation of purchase price, along with the final purchase price allocation completed
in the third quarter of 2009. The final allocation also includes adjustments to goodwill for the
achievement of the earnout ($13.0 million) as well as the adjustment to deferred income taxes
recorded as a result of the adjustments to the fair value of the intangible assets acquired in this
acquisition. See Note 8 for additional information relating to the deferred income taxes
adjustment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Preliminary |
|
|
Final |
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Allocation |
|
|
Allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term service agreement |
|
25 years |
|
|
$ |
154,000 |
|
|
$ |
59,728 |
|
Customer list |
|
15 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,565 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
5 years |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finite-life intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,000 |
|
|
|
82,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,537 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,827 |
|
|
|
116,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite life intangible asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,827 |
|
|
|
123,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software |
|
2 years |
|
|
|
6,949 |
|
|
|
5,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
203,776 |
|
|
$ |
211,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys preliminary purchase price allocation combined the services agreement with
the Barrett law firm and customer list related to California foreclosure files as a single
intangible asset. In completing the final allocation, the Company determined that the California
customer list is a separate identifiable asset from the services agreement because the services
agreement requires NDeX to provide mortgage default processing services only to the Barrett law
firm whereas NDeX provides these services directly to California customers under no specific
services agreement. The Companys initial assumptions regarding Barrett-NDExs California
operations also included
obtaining new customers in the California market, the value of which the Company preliminarily
allocated to the services agreement and later determined was goodwill.
8
The
values of the intangible assets and software acquired were estimated
by management with the assistance of an independent third-party valuation firm. The primary assets acquired were the
services agreement and the customer list. To estimate the fair value of these assets, the Company
used a discounted cash flow analysis (income approach) using an average annual growth rate of
approximately 3% and a discount rate of 15.4%.
The Company paid a premium over the fair value of the net tangible and identified intangible
assets acquired in connection with this acquisition (i.e. goodwill) because the acquired business
is a complement to NDeX and the Company anticipated cost savings and revenue synergies through
combined general and administrative functions. This goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.
In connection with the closing of this acquisition, the Company also recorded, as additional
purchase price, a liability of $1.5 million for the estimated severance costs related to
involuntary employee terminations resulting from the anticipated elimination of certain duplicative
positions, which was expected to be paid out in cash within the twelve months following the
acquisition. This liability was included as goodwill in the preliminary allocation of the purchase
price. In the second quarter of 2009, the Company eliminated certain positions in connection with
this plan for aggregate payments of approximately $453,000. Also in the second quarter, the Company
completed its plan of restructuring and determined that it will not be eliminating any additional
positions under this restructuring plan. Accordingly, the Company reduced the liability to zero as
a purchase price adjustment to goodwill.
Break-up Fee: Pursuant to its agreement with the sellers of a business that the Company
intended to acquire, the Company paid $1.5 million to such sellers during the three months ended
September 30, 2008 because the Company was unable to obtain debt financing on terms and timing
satisfactory to the Company to close the acquisition. During the three months ended September 30,
2009, the Company changed its presentation of this expense on the statement of operations for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, from a non-operating expense to an operating
expense because it determined that acquisitions are not an infrequent or unusual part of the
Companys operations.
Pro Forma Information: Actual results of operations of the companies acquired in 2008 are
included in the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements from the dates of
acquisition. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations of the Company,
set forth below, gives effect to the following acquisitions: (1) the mortgage default processing
services business of Wilford & Geske acquired in February 2008, (2) the assets of Legal & Business
Publishers, Inc. acquired in February 2008, (3) the assets of Midwest Law Printing Company, Inc.
acquired in June 2008, and (4) the business of Barrett-NDEx acquired in September 2008, using the
purchase method as if the acquisitions occurred on January 1, 2008. These amounts are not
necessarily indicative of the consolidated results of operations for future years or actual results
that would have been realized had the acquisitions occurred as of the beginning of each such year.
There is no corresponding pro forma data shown for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, as the Company has included each of the above acquisitions in its actual operating results
for the full periods (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
61,446 |
|
|
$ |
186,519 |
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company common stockholders |
|
|
2,566 |
|
|
|
11,446 |
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company common
stockholders per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual/Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
28,482 |
|
|
|
26,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
28,610 |
|
|
|
26,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Note 4. Investments
Investments consisted of the following at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Method |
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
$ |
15,680 |
|
|
$ |
16,226 |
|
GovDelivery, Inc. |
|
Equity |
(1) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,923 |
|
|
$ |
16,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The percentage of ownership for GovDelivery, Inc. is shown on a common stock
equivalent basis. |
For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the equity (loss)
in earnings is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC |
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
1,329 |
|
|
$ |
3,654 |
|
|
$ |
4,355 |
|
GovDelivery, Inc. |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
731 |
|
|
$ |
1,329 |
|
|
$ |
3,461 |
|
|
$ |
4,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded the
adjustment representing its share of the losses of GovDelivery, Inc. for 2009. This adjustment
resulted from the Companys application of the equity method of accounting for its investment in
GovDelivery, Inc. in the third quarter of 2009. See below for more information regarding this
change to the equity method of accounting.
The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC: The Company owns a 35% membership interest of The
Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC, or DLNP. The Company accounts for this investment using the
equity method. Under DLNPs membership operating agreement, the Company receives quarterly
distributions based on its ownership percentage.
The difference between the Companys carrying value and its 35% share of the members equity
of DLNP relates principally to an underlying customer list at DLNP that is being amortized over its
estimated economic life through 2015.
The following table summarizes certain key information relating to the Companys investment in
DLNP as of September 30, 2009 and December 31 2008, and for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Carrying value of investment |
|
$ |
15,680 |
|
|
$ |
16,226 |
|
Underlying finite-lived customer list, net of amortization |
|
|
9,298 |
|
|
|
10,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Equity in earnings of
DLNP, net of
amortization of
customer list |
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
1,329 |
|
|
$ |
3,654 |
|
|
$ |
4,355 |
|
Distributions received |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
10
DLNP publishes ten legal newspapers, along with one quarterly magazine, all located in
southern Michigan. Summarized financial information for DLNP for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
9,565 |
|
|
$ |
11,676 |
|
|
$ |
33,048 |
|
|
$ |
36,113 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
3,807 |
|
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
13,245 |
|
|
|
14,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
5,758 |
|
|
|
6,802 |
|
|
|
19,803 |
|
|
|
21,700 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
4,989 |
|
|
|
4,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
4,095 |
|
|
|
5,209 |
|
|
|
14,814 |
|
|
|
16,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,717 |
|
|
$ |
4,873 |
|
|
$ |
13,670 |
|
|
$ |
15,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys 35% share of net income |
|
$ |
1,301 |
|
|
$ |
1,706 |
|
|
$ |
4,784 |
|
|
$ |
5,486 |
|
Less amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of DLNP, LLC |
|
$ |
924 |
|
|
$ |
1,329 |
|
|
$ |
3,654 |
|
|
$ |
4,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GovDelivery, Inc.: In August 2009, the Company made an additional investment in
GovDelivery, Inc. by purchasing 1,000,000 shares of its preferred stock for $1,000,000. Prior to
this investment, the Company had accounted for its ownership in GovDelivery using the cost method
of accounting because the Company only owned approximately 15.0% of GovDeliverys outstanding
voting stock (on an as-converted basis) and did not have the ability to exert influence. The
additional investment increased the Companys ownership in GovDelivery to 21.9% of the outstanding
voting stock of GovDelivery (on an as-converted basis). As a result, the Company has determined
that it will account for this investment using the equity method. Therefore, the Company has
retroactively applied the equity method of accounting to reflect that portion of GovDeliverys
income and losses attributable to its ownership from the date of its original investment.
In addition to the Companys ownership in GovDelivery, James P. Dolan, the Companys Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer personally owns approximately 139,000 shares of preferred
stock of GovDelivery, or 1.0% (on an as-converted basis). He also served as a member of the
GovDelivery board of directors until his resignation in March 2008.
Note 5. Intangible Assets
Indefinite Life Intangible Assets: Indefinite life intangible assets consist of trade names
and goodwill. Trade names consist of trademarks and domain names associated with the Barrett-NDEx
acquisition. The Company has determined that these assets have an indefinite life and therefore
will not be amortized. The Company will review them annually for impairment. As of September 30,
2009, the trade names balance was $6.5 million. The Company had no balance for trade names as of
December 31, 2008.
The following table represents the goodwill balances as of September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008 and changes in goodwill by segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional |
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
Information |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
59,751 |
|
|
$ |
59,232 |
|
|
$ |
118,983 |
|
Barrett-NDEx |
|
|
77,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
137,339 |
|
|
$ |
59,232 |
|
|
$ |
196,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in goodwill in the Professional Services Division resulted from the completion
of the valuation of the assets acquired in the 2008 Barrett-NDEx acquisition as well as the $13.0
million earnout liability recorded as an addition to goodwill at September 30, 2009, in connection
with the satisfaction of the $28.0 million adjusted EBITDA earnout target.
11
Finite-Life Intangible Assets: The following table summarizes the components of finite-life
intangible assets as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in thousands, except amortization
periods):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2009 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mastheads |
|
|
30 |
|
|
$ |
11,965 |
|
|
$ |
(2,096 |
) |
|
$ |
9,869 |
|
|
$ |
11,965 |
|
|
$ |
(1,796 |
) |
|
$ |
10,169 |
|
Advertising customer lists |
|
|
5-11 |
|
|
|
16,566 |
|
|
|
(7,480 |
) |
|
|
9,086 |
|
|
|
16,566 |
|
|
|
(6,286 |
) |
|
|
10,280 |
|
Subscriber customer lists |
|
|
2-14 |
|
|
|
7,645 |
|
|
|
(3,218 |
) |
|
|
4,427 |
|
|
|
7,645 |
|
|
|
(2,666 |
) |
|
|
4,979 |
|
Professional services
customer lists |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7,707 |
|
|
|
(4,542 |
) |
|
|
3,165 |
|
|
|
7,632 |
|
|
|
(3,717 |
) |
|
|
3,915 |
|
Noncompete agreements |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3,948 |
|
|
|
(2,309 |
) |
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
5,750 |
|
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
5,084 |
|
NDeX long-term service
contracts |
|
|
15-25 |
|
|
|
120,857 |
|
|
|
(18,115 |
) |
|
|
102,742 |
|
|
|
213,877 |
|
|
|
(10,779 |
) |
|
|
203,098 |
|
NDeX customer lists |
|
|
14-15 |
|
|
|
32,831 |
|
|
|
(1,918 |
) |
|
|
30,913 |
|
|
|
13,267 |
|
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
|
|
12,202 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
(668 |
) |
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
2,787 |
|
SunWel contract |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
(1,263 |
) |
|
|
2,059 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
(919 |
) |
|
|
2,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
208,124 |
|
|
$ |
(41,609 |
) |
|
$ |
166,515 |
|
|
$ |
283,307 |
|
|
$ |
(28,390 |
) |
|
$ |
254,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in the finite-life intangible assets as of September 30, 2009 resulted from
the completion of the valuation of the assets acquired in the Barrett-NDEx acquisition; refer to
Note 3 for additional information pertaining to the valuation of these intangible assets. Total
amortization expense for finite-life intangible assets for the three months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 was approximately $3.9 million and $3.1 million, respectively, and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $13.2 million and $7.6 million,
respectively. In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company also recorded an additional
$0.9 million of amortization expense to write off the non-compete agreement with Michael Barrett, a
senior officer of Barrett-NDEx, who died in January 2009.
Note 6. Long-Term Debt, Capital Lease Obligation
A summary of long-term debt is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Senior secured debt (see below): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior variable-rate term note, payable in quarterly
installments with a balloon payment due August 8,
2014 |
|
$ |
146,500 |
|
|
$ |
153,750 |
|
Senior variable-rate revolving note due August 8, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total senior secured debt |
|
|
146,500 |
|
|
|
153,750 |
|
Unsecured note payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,746 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,500 |
|
|
|
155,498 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
12,825 |
|
|
|
12,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
$ |
133,675 |
|
|
$ |
143,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Debt: The Company and its consolidated subsidiaries have a credit
agreement with U.S. Bank, NA and other syndicated lenders for a senior secured credit facility
comprised of a term loan facility due and payable in quarterly installments with a final maturity
date of August 8, 2014 and a revolving credit facility with a final maturity date of August 8,
2012. In accordance with the terms of this credit agreement, if at any time the outstanding
principal balance of revolving loans under the revolving credit facility exceeds $25.0 million,
such revolving loans will convert to an amortizing term loan, in the amount that the Company
designates if it gives notice, due and payable in quarterly installments with a final maturity date
of August 8, 2014.
At September 30, 2009, the Company had net unused available capacity of $40.0 million on its
revolving credit facility, after taking into account the senior leverage ratio requirements under
the credit facility, and outstanding debt of $146.5 million (all of which was under the term loan
facility). At September 30, 2009, the weighted-average interest rate on the senior term note was
2.4%. The Company is subject to certain restrictions and covenant ratio requirements relating to
its financing arrangement, all of which were satisfied as of September 30, 2009.
Unsecured Note Payable: During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, NDeX made the final
$1.8 million payment to Feiwell & Hannoy on a $3.5 million non-interest bearing promissory note
NDeX issued in connection with the acquisition of the mortgage default processing services business
of Feiwell & Hannoy in January 2007.
12
Note 7. Common and Preferred Stock
At September 30, 2009, the Company had 70,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares
of preferred stock authorized and 30,079,014 shares of common stock and no shares of preferred
stock outstanding. On January 29, 2009, the Companys board of directors designated 5,000 shares of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, which are issuable upon the exercise of rights as
described in the Stockholder Rights Plan adopted by the Company on the same date. The rights to
purchase 1/10,000 of a share of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock were issued to
the Companys stockholders of record on February 9, 2009. All other authorized shares of preferred
stock are undesignated.
Note 8. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes is based upon estimated annual effective tax rates in the tax
jurisdictions in which the Company operates. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, the effective tax rate was 36.7% and 40.0%, respectively. The decrease in the Companys
effective income tax rate resulted primarily from the receipt of non-taxable life insurance
proceeds paid upon the death of Michael Barrett, a senior officer of Barrett-NDEx, in January 2009.
At September 30, 2009, excluding the impact of discrete items, the Company estimates an annual
effective tax rate for 2009 of 39.1%.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company completed its purchase price
allocation relating to the Barrett-NDEx acquisition. This resulted in a reduction of the estimated
net deferred tax liabilities related to the Barrett-NDEx intangible assets from $13.0 million to
$7.2 million due to changes in the tax basis of these assets and goodwill from the Companys
preliminary estimates.
Note 9. Other Income
In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded a net gain of $1.4 million
on a company-owned life insurance policy on the life of Michael Barrett, a senior officer of
Barrett-NDEx, who passed away in January 2009. This net gain includes a reduction for a $0.5
million contribution the Company made to Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law from
the life insurance proceeds, to establish a scholarship fund in Mr. Barretts name.
Note 10. Major Customers and Related Parties
In early 2009, NDeX and Trott & Trott, whose managing partner is NDeX chairman and chief
executive officer David A. Trott, agreed to increase the fixed fee per file NDeX receives for each
mortgage foreclosure, bankruptcy, eviction, litigation and other mortgage default file Trott &
Trott refers to NDeX for processing under NDeXs service agreement with Trott & Trott.
Note 11. Reportable Segments
The Companys two reportable segments consist of its Professional Services Division and its
Business Information Division. The Company determined its reportable segments based on the types of
products sold and services performed. The Professional Services Division comprises two operating
units providing support to the legal market, NDeX, which provides mortgage default processing
services, and Counsel Press, LLC, which provides appellate services. Both of these operating units
generate revenues through fee-based arrangements. The Business Information Division provides
business information products through a variety of media, including court and commercial
newspapers, weekly business journals and the Internet. The Business Information Division generates
revenues from display and classified advertising (which includes sponsorships and ticket sales for
events), public notices, circulation (primarily consisting of subscriptions), and sales from
commercial printing and database information. In addition, the Company reports and allocates
certain administrative activities as part of corporate-level expenses.
13
The tables below reflect summarized financial information concerning the Companys reportable
segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional |
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
Information |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
39,996 |
|
|
$ |
22,348 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
62,344 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
15,553 |
|
|
|
6,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,505 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
10,537 |
|
|
|
8,770 |
|
|
|
3,603 |
|
|
|
22,910 |
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
4,663 |
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
6,188 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
9,243 |
|
|
$ |
6,035 |
|
|
$ |
(3,806 |
) |
|
$ |
11,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
25,673 |
|
|
$ |
22,211 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
47,884 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
9,941 |
|
|
|
7,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,902 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
6,646 |
|
|
|
9,486 |
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
18,950 |
|
Break-up fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
3,059 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,027 |
|
|
$ |
4,818 |
|
|
$ |
(4,535 |
) |
|
$ |
6,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional |
|
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
Information |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
126,322 |
|
|
$ |
66,998 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
193,320 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
46,693 |
|
|
|
21,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,520 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
31,361 |
|
|
|
25,699 |
|
|
|
9,013 |
|
|
|
66,073 |
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
15,325 |
|
|
|
3,955 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
19,957 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
32,943 |
|
|
$ |
18,978 |
|
|
$ |
(9,690 |
) |
|
$ |
42,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
62,542 |
|
|
$ |
68,406 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
130,948 |
|
Direct operating expenses |
|
|
22,688 |
|
|
|
23,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,374 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
15,889 |
|
|
|
29,311 |
|
|
|
6,587 |
|
|
|
51,787 |
|
Break-up fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Amortization and depreciation |
|
|
7,124 |
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
11,377 |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
16,841 |
|
|
$ |
16,101 |
|
|
$ |
(8,677 |
) |
|
$ |
24,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12. Share-Based Compensation
Total share-based compensation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
was approximately $0.7 million and $0.5 million, respectively, before income taxes. Total
share-based compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, was
approximately $1.9 million and $1.3 million, respectively, before income taxes.
The Company has reserved 2,700,000 shares of its common stock for issuance under its incentive
compensation plan, of which there were 698,996 shares available for issuance under the plan as of
September 30, 2009.
Stock Options: Share-based compensation expense related to grants of options for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, was approximately $0.4 million and $0.4 million,
respectively, before income taxes and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, was
approximately $1.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively, before income taxes.
The following weighted average assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of stock
options granted in 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
48.0 |
% |
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Expected term of options |
|
4.75 years |
Weighted average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
5.35 |
|
14
The following table represents stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
Outstanding options at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,352,992 |
|
|
$ |
4.54 |
|
|
$ |
14.21 |
|
|
6.06 Yrs. |
|
Granted |
|
|
414,882 |
|
|
|
5.35 |
|
|
|
12.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(5,375 |
) |
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
2.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
(98,168 |
) |
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
14.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,664,331 |
|
|
$ |
4.73 |
|
|
$ |
13.81 |
|
|
5.56 Yrs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
571,290 |
|
|
$ |
4.31 |
|
|
$ |
13.21 |
|
|
5.10 Yrs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding was
approximately $1.0 million, and the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable was
approximately $0.8 million. At September 30, 2009, there was approximately $4.5 million of
unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options, which is expected to be recognized
over a weighted-average period of 2.7 years.
Restricted Stock Grants: The following table represents a summary of nonvested restricted
stock activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
149,296 |
|
|
$ |
15.30 |
|
Granted |
|
|
129,990 |
|
|
|
12.51 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(43,233 |
) |
|
|
15.06 |
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
(11,027 |
) |
|
|
14.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, September 30, 2009 |
|
|
225,026 |
|
|
$ |
13.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense related to grants of restricted stock for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, before income taxes and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, was
approximately $0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively, before income taxes. Total unrecognized
compensation expense for unvested restricted shares of common stock as of September 30, 2009, was
approximately $2.5 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
2.9 years.
Note 13. Contingencies and Commitments
Litigation: From time to time, the Company is subject to certain claims and lawsuits that
have arisen in the ordinary course of its business. Although the outcome of such existing matters
cannot presently be determined, it is managements opinion that the ultimate resolution of such
existing matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations or
financial position.
NDeX: Each of the holders of the noncontrolling interest in NDeX has the right to require NDeX
to repurchase all or any portion of the NDeX membership interest held by them. For APC Investments
and Feiwell & Hannoy, this right is exercisable until February 7, 2010. If both APC Investments
and Feiwell & Hannoy had exercised their respective put rights at September 30, 2009, NDeX would
have been obligated to pay an aggregate of $17.2 million, payable in the form of a three-year
unsecured note bearing interest at a rate equal to prime plus 2.0%. The put rights of other
holders of noncontrolling interest in NDeX have not yet become exercisable.
15
Note 14. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date this report was filed and those
are as follows:
Albertelli. On October 1, 2009, NDeX entered into an asset purchase agreement with James E.
Albertelli, P.A., The Albertelli Firm, P.C., Albertelli Title, Inc. and James E. Albertelli
(collectively, the Albertelli Sellers), under
the terms of which NDeX acquired the mortgage default processing services and certain title
assets of the Albertelli Sellers on that date. NDeX paid $7.0 million in cash at closing, held back
an additional $1.0 million to secure the Albertelli Sellers obligations under the asset purchase
agreement (including payment of any indemnification claims and working capital adjustments) and
will pay an additional $2.0 million in equal installments of $1.0 million on each of October 1,
2010 and 2011, respectively. In addition, NDeX may be obligated to pay the Albertelli Sellers up to
an additional $9.0 million in three annual installments of up to $3.0 million each. The amount of
these annual cash payments will be based upon the adjusted EBITDA for the acquired mortgage default
processing services and related title business during the twelve calendar months ending on each of
September 30, 2010, 2011, and 2012. The Company used available cash to fund the closing payment.
In addition, NDeX also entered into a twenty-year services agreement with James E. Albertelli,
P.A. which provides for the exclusive referral of residential mortgage default and related files
from the law firm to NDeX for processing in Florida.
DiscoverReady: On November 2, 2009, the Company acquired an 85% equity interest in
DiscoverReady, LLC under the terms of a membership interest purchase agreement with DiscoveryReady,
LLC, DR Holdco LLC, Steven R. Harber, David Shub, James K. Wagner, Paul Yerkes and C. Parkhill
Mays. The Company paid the sellers $28.9 million in cash at closing and placed an additional $3.0
million in escrow pursuant to the terms of an escrow agreement to secure the sellers obligations
under the purchase agreement (including payment of any indemnification claims and working capital
and capital lease liability adjustments). After closing, DR Holdco LLC holds a 15% noncontrolling
interest in DiscoverReady. The individual sellers of DiscoverReady, along with other DiscoverReady
employees, own all of the equity interests of DR Holdco. The Company used $22.9 million in a
combination of cash on the balance sheet at September 30, 2009 and cash flow from operations since
September 30, 2009, as well as $9.0 million from its revolving line of credit, to fund the closing
payments made in connection with this acquisition. At November 2, 2009, the Company had total
outstanding debt of $155.5 million and available credit of
approximately $31.0 million on our revolving line of credit, after
taking into account the senior leverage ratio requirements under the Companys credit agreement.
The Company will be required to record on its balance sheet an adjustment for that portion of
DiscoverReady which it does not own as a noncontrolling interest.
Because the redeemable feature of this noncontrolling
interest is based on fair value, the Company is not required to record this adjustment as an
item affecting net income attributable to Dolan Media Company common stockholders.
The Company expects to include the results of operations for this acquisition in its
Professional Services segment.
Purchase
Price Allocation and Pro Forma Financial Information. Since
the initial purchase accounting for both the Albertelli and
DiscoverReady acquisitions described above is not yet complete, it is
not practicable for the Company to provide these required disclosures
in this Form 10-Q.
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement. In connection with the acquisition of DiscoverReady, LLC
described above, the Company and its subsidiaries amended its credit agreement with the syndicate
of lenders that are party to that agreement. Under the terms of this amendment, the lenders
consented to the acquisition of DiscoverReady and no changes were
made to the material terms of the
credit agreement. The Company paid $0.5 million in fees to the lenders in connection with this
amendment.
16
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
We recommend that you read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our
unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and the related notes included in
this report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933.
We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about
our future results, performance, prospects and opportunities. Forward looking statements are
statements such as those contained in projections, plans, objectives, estimates, statements of
future economic performance, and assumptions relating to any of the foregoing. We have tried to
identify forward-looking statements by using words such as may, will, expect, anticipate,
believe, intend, estimate, goal, continue, and similar expressions or terminology. By
their very nature, forward-looking statements are based on information currently available to us
and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could
cause our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those
expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other
factors include:
|
|
|
our business operates in highly competitive markets and depends upon the
economies and the demographics of the legal, financial and real estate sectors in the
markets we serve and changes in those sectors could have an adverse effect on our revenues,
cash flows and profitability; |
|
|
|
NDeXs business revenues are very concentrated, as NDeX currently provides
mortgage default processing services to eight law firm customers, and if the number of case
files referred to our law firm customers, and ultimately to NDeX for processing, decreases
or fails to increase, it may affect the cash flow of our law firm customers and their
ability to pay us timely for services we perform and may also adversely affect our
operating results and ability to execute our growth strategy; |
|
|
|
the key attorneys at each of NDeXs law firm customers are employed by NDeX,
some of whom, including David A. Trott, the chairman and chief executive officer of NDeX,
also hold a direct or indirect equity interest in NDeX. As a result, these key attorneys
may, in certain circumstances, have interests that differ from or conflict with our
interests; |
|
|
|
government regulation of sub-prime, Alt-A and other residential mortgage
products, including bills introduced in states where we do business (such as recently
enacted foreclosure legislation in Michigan and Indiana), the Hope for Homeowners Act, the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act and Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, the
Streamlined Modification Program, Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2009, and
voluntary foreclosure relief programs developed by lenders, loan servicers and the Hope Now
Alliance, a consortium that includes loan servicers, may have an adverse affect on and
restrict our mortgage default processing services and public notice operations; |
|
|
|
we have owned and operated DiscoverReady, LLC for a very short period of time
and we are highly dependent on the skills and knowledge of the individuals serving as chief
executive officer and president of DiscoverReady as none of our executive officers have
managed or operated a discovery management and document review services company prior to
this acquisition; |
|
|
|
DiscoverReadys business revenues are very concentrated among a few customers
and if these customers choose to manage their discovery with their own staff or by engaging
another provider and if we are unable to develop new customer relationships, our operating
results and the ability to execute our growth strategy may be adversely affected; |
|
|
|
we are dependent on our senior management team, especially James P. Dolan, our
founder, chairman, president and chief executive officer; Scott J. Pollei, our executive
vice president and chief operating officer; Mark W.C. Stodder, our executive vice
president-business information; David A. Trott, chairman and chief executive officer, NDeX,
and Vicki J. Duncomb, our vice president and chief financial officer; |
17
|
|
|
the acquisition of DiscoverReady may expose us to particular business and
financial risks that include, but are not limited to: (1) diverting managements time,
attention and resources from managing the business; (2) incurring significant additional
capital expenditures and operating expenses to improve, coordinate or integrate managerial,
operational, financial and administrative systems; (3) failing to integrate the operations,
personnel and internal controls of DiscoverReady into our company or to manage
DiscoverReady or our growth; and (4) facing operational difficulties in new markets or with
new product and service offerings; |
|
|
|
we intend to continue to pursue acquisition opportunities, which we may not do
successfully and which may subject us to considerable business and financial risks, and we
may be required to incur additional indebtedness or raise additional capital to fund these
acquisitions and this additional cash may not be available to us on satisfactory terms or
at all; |
|
|
|
growing our business may place a strain on our management and internal
systems, processes and controls; and |
|
|
|
we incurred additional indebtedness to close the acquisitions of Barrett-NDEx
and DiscoverReady and this additional debt consumed a significant portion of our ability to
borrow and may limit our ability to pursue other acquisitions or growth strategies. |
See Risk Factors in Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K filed on March 12, 2009, with the
Securities Exchange Commission for a description of these and other risks, uncertainties and
factors that could cause our actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements.
You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Except as otherwise
required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed
circumstances or any other reason after the date of this report.
In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, unless the context requires otherwise, the terms we,
us, and our refer to Dolan Media Company. When we refer to NDeX in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q, we mean all of our mortgage default processing operations, including Barrett-NDEx
(defined below), all of which we formerly referred to as APC. When we refer to Barrett-NDEx in
this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we mean the mortgage default processing operations serving the
Texas, California and Georgia markets that NDeX acquired from National Default Exchange Management,
Inc., National Default Exchange Holdings, LP, THP/Barrett-NDEx AIV, Corp. and THP/Barrett-NDEx AIV,
LP on September 2, 2008. The term Barrett law firm refers to Barrett, Daffin, Frappier, Turner &
Engel, LLP and its two affiliated law firms.
Overview
We are a leading provider of professional services and necessary business information and to
legal, financial and real estate sectors in the United States. We serve our customers through two
complementary operating segments: our Professional Services Division and our Business Information
Division. Our Professional Services Division comprises three business lines: NDeX, Counsel Press,
and DiscoverReady. NDeX provides mortgage default processing services to eight law firms and also
directly to mortgage lenders and loan servicers on California foreclosure files, and began
processing Florida mortgage default files in early October in connection with the Albertelli
acquisition described below. Counsel Press provides appellate services to law firms and attorneys
nationwide. DiscoverReady, which we acquired on November 2, 2009 as described below, provides
outsourced discovery management and document review services to major United States companies and
their counsel.
Our Business Information Division publishes 64 print publications consisting of 14 paid daily
publications, 30 paid non-daily publications and 20 non-paid non-daily publications, along with
specialty publications and magazines. In addition, we provide business information electronically
through our 45 on-line publication web sites, our 34 event and other non-publication web sites and
our email notification systems.
18
Our total revenues increased $14.5 million, or 30.2%, from $47.9 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008, to $62.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, primarily
as a result of our acquisition of Barrett-NDEx. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, our
total revenues increased $62.4 million, or 47.6% over the same prior year period, all of which
resulted from businesses we acquired in 2008, including Barrett-NDEx. Our operating income
increased from $6.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 to $11.5 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009. On a year-to-date basis, our operating income has increased
to $42.2 million, up 74.0%, or $18.0 million, from the same period in 2008. Acquisitions,
primarily our acquisition of Barrett-NDEx in September 2008, accounted for the majority of the
39.2% increase in our operating expenses for the nine month periods. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, expense controls in our Business Information division was offset by increased
spending at NDeX, primarily as a result of file volume increases during that period. Further, net
income attributable to Dolan Media Company increased significantly to $5.9 million for the third
quarter of 2009 from $2.5 million for the same period in 2008. Net income attributable to Dolan
Media Company doubled, from $10.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to $22.7
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, primarily as a result of the Barrett-NDEx
acquisition.
Recent Developments
New Line of Business in Professional Services Division
On November 2, 2009, we entered a new line of business in our Professional Services division
with the acquisition of an 85% interest in DiscoverReady, LLC (as described in Recent
Acquisitions below). DiscoverReady is a leading provider of outsourced discovery management and
document review services to major United States companies and their counsel under fixed-fee
arrangements. DiscoverReady is headquartered in New York City, with an office in Charlotte, North
Carolina.
Discovery is the process by which parties use the legal system to obtain relevant information,
primarily in litigation and regulatory matters. This process can be expensive and time-consuming
for companies depending upon the number of e-mails, electronic files and paper documents a company
must review to respond to a document request. DiscoverReady assists these companies and their
counsel in document reviews and helping these companies manage the discovery process. DiscoverReady
also provides related technology management services.
This is a new line of business for us and one in which none of our key employees or executive
officers has any previous experience. In connection with the acquisition, we entered into
three-year employment agreements with DiscoverReady co-founders James K. Wagner, Jr. and Steven R.
Harber to continue to serve as DiscoverReadys chief executive officer and president, respectively.
We also entered into three-year employment agreements with Paul Yerkes and David Shub, two other
key employees of DiscoverReady. Messrs. Wagner, Harber, Yerkes and Shub and other employees of DiscoverReady,
together, indirectly own the remaining 15% equity interest in DiscoverReady.
Regulatory Environment
Over the past year, federal, state and local governmental entities have proposed, and in some
cases, enacted legislation or taken other action that may have, and some of which has had, an
adverse impact on the number of mortgage defaults case files referred to NDeX for processing, the
length of time it takes to process such files, the time periods over which we recognize revenue
associated with the processing of those files, and the number of foreclosure public notices placed
in our Business Information products and DLNP (our minority investment) for publication. This
enacted or proposed legislation includes the Hope for Homeowners Act of 2008, the Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act, the Streamlined Modification Program, laws passed in both California
and Maryland last year, and the Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, all of which are
described in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 12, 2009. Earlier this
year, the California legislature passed legislation, which extends the redemption periods on new
and pending foreclosures involving loans that certain criteria, including being owner-occupied when
the loan became delinquent. Further, on April 28, 2009, President Obama announced new details for
the Making Home Affordable program that is part of the Homeowner Affordability and Stability
Plan, which provides, among other things, that servicers who participate in a second lien program
will automatically reduce payments associated with a second lien mortgage when a borrower initiates
a Home Affordable Modification on a first lien mortgage. In May 2009, Congress enacted the Helping
Families Save Their Home Act of 2009, which includes the Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of
2009. Under the Protecting Tenants at
Foreclosure Act, the new owner of foreclosed property may not evict a tenant until the end of
any existing bona fide lease term, except in very limited circumstances, and such new owner is
further required to give the tenant 90 days advance notice before an eviction. During the third
quarter of 2009, referrals of eviction files declined in many of our NDeX operations, which we
believe to be a result of this legislation.
19
In addition, beginning in July 2009, changes in the relevant state foreclosure laws in Indiana
and Michigan require loan servicers to comply with additional notice requirements. Specifically,
the Indiana law requires loan servicers to send Indiana borrowers a pre-suit notice at least thirty
days prior to filing a foreclosure action, which we expect could delay a foreclosure at least 30
days. The Michigan law requires loan servicers to send and publish a special notice to certain
Michigan borrowers that would give the borrower an opportunity to arrange a meeting with loan
servicers to explore possible modification of the borrowers loan. We expect this legislation could
delay foreclosures for thirty to ninety days depending upon whether a borrower desires to meet with
the loan servicers. During the third quarter of 2009, these Indiana and Michigan legislative
changes caused a $3.0 million year-over-year decline in mortgage default processing services
revenues because these laws delay or extend the length of the foreclosure process, thereby
deferring a portion of our mortgage default processing services revenues on new files into future
periods. Because the Michigan law adds additional steps to the foreclosure process, the period of
time over which we recognize revenue on new foreclosure files lengthened. In Michigan,
foreclosure file counts for the third quarter of 2009 increased nearly 4.5% year-over-year. In
Indiana, foreclosure file counts in the third quarter 2009 decreased approximately 56% when
compared to the third quarter of 2008 because the new legislation delays when a foreclosure action
can be commenced, thus delaying when these files are referred to us for processing. As expected,
we began to see Indiana file referrals increase toward the end of the third quarter of 2009.
As this new legislation primarily affects the timing in which we recognize revenue in Michigan
and when we receive foreclosure file referrals in Indiana, we anticipate that we will begin to see
Michigan and Indiana revenues and Indiana foreclosure file volumes recover over time as mortgage
lenders and loan servicers refine processes they have developed in response to this legislation.
Other mortgage default processing revenues from our NDeX operations, including those from
Barrett-NDEx, offset revenue declines we experienced year-over-year as a result of this
legislation. When compared to the second quarter of 2009, mortgage default processing services
revenue declined $5.0 million, $3.3 million of which resulted from the new legislation in Michigan
and Indiana described above, and $1.7 million of which we believe resulted, in large part, from
continuing loan mitigation efforts on the part of loan servicers and federal agencies and other
regulatory efforts.
During late July 2009, mortgage lenders and loan servicers met with the Obama administration
and were asked to enter into at least 500,000 loan modifications under the Home Affordable
Modification Program by November 2009. We believe that, during the third quarter of 2009, these
mortgage lenders and loan servicers may have delayed the referral of some files to us so that they
could evaluate such files as candidates under this program in response to the administrations
request.
In addition to enacted or proposed legislation, certain state and local governments have
interpreted the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act as preempting state and local foreclosure
requirements. Further, various lender and mortgage servicers have voluntarily focused their
attention on loss mitigation, loan modification and similar efforts, including moratoria on certain
foreclosure sales, in an attempt to reduce the number of mortgage defaults. We believe these
efforts have caused lenders and mortgage servicers to delay when they refer mortgage default files
to us for processing.
Adoption of Stockholder Rights Plan
On January 29, 2009, our board adopted a Stockholder Rights Plan, which is designed to protect
our stockholders from potentially coercive takeover practices or takeover bids and to prevent an
acquirer from gaining control of the company without offering a fair price to our stockholders. The
plan is not intended to deter offers that are fair or otherwise in the best interests of our
stockholders.
This plan is similar to plans that other public companies have adopted and our adoption of
this plan was not prompted by any external actions. We have received no hostile communications or
takeover approaches of any kind. We adopted the plan to give our board time to evaluate and respond
to any unsolicited future attempts to acquire our company.
20
In connection with the adoption of this plan, our board declared a dividend of one junior
participating preferred stock purchase right for each outstanding share of our common stock,
payable to the stockholders of record on February 9, 2009. Stockholders may request a copy of this
plan by writing to our corporate secretary at our principal offices, 222 South Ninth Street, Suite
2300, Minneapolis, MN 55402.
Recent Acquisitions
We have grown significantly since our predecessor company commenced operations in 1992, in
large part due to acquisitions, such as the following:
DiscoverReady: On November 2, 2009, we acquired an 85% equity interest in DiscoverReady, LLC
under the terms of a membership interest purchase agreement with DiscoveryReady LLC, DR Holdco LLC,
Steven R. Harber, David Shub, James K. Wagner, Paul Yerkes and C. Parkhill Mays. We paid the
sellers $28.9 million in cash at closing and placed an additional $3.0 million in escrow pursuant
to the terms of an escrow agreement to secure the sellers obligations under the purchase agreement
(including payment of any indemnification claims and working capital and capital lease liability
adjustments). After closing, DR Holdco LLC holds a 15% noncontrolling interest in DiscoverReady.
The individual sellers of DiscoverReady, LLC, along with other DiscoverReady employees, own all the
equity interests of DR Holdco. We used $22.9 million in a
combination of cash on our balance sheet at September 30, 2009, cash
flow from operations received from September 30, 2009, through
November 2, 2009, as well as $9.0 million
from our revolving line of credit, to fund the closing payments in connection with this
acquisition.
In connection with the acquisition described above, DiscoverReady entered into employment
agreements with each of the individual sellers of DiscoverReady, under the terms of which they
serve as senior managers of DiscoveryReady. These employment agreements have a term of three years,
except the agreement with C. Parkhill Mays, which has a term of six months.
As part of this acquisition, we, along with DR Holdco, amended and restated DiscoverReadys
limited liability agreement. Under the terms of the limited liability agreement, DR Holdco has the
right, for a period of ninety days following November 2, 2012, to require DiscoverReady to
repurchase all of its equity interest in DiscoverReady. To the extent that DR Holdco timely
exercises this right, the purchase price of such equity interest will be based on the fair market
value of such interest. During that same period, we also have the right to require DR Holdco to
sell all or a portion its equity interest in DiscoverReady to us. If we timely exercise our right,
we would pay DR Holdco an amount based on the fair market value of the equity interest. These
rights may be exercised earlier under the following circumstances: An individual seller of
DiscoverReady, except Mays, may require DiscoverReady to repurchase the portion of DR Holdcos
interest in DiscoverReady that he beneficially owns if he is terminated without cause or quits for
good reason prior to the expiration of his employment agreement. If we terminate any individual
seller of DiscoverReady for cause or if such seller quits without good reason, we can require DR
Holdco to sell to us the portion of its interest in DiscoverReady
that reflects such sellers
beneficial interest in us. The purchase price for that portion of the equity interest repurchased
or sold if these rights are exercised will be based on fair market value. With respect to Mays,
DiscoverReady will repurchase that portion of DR Holdcos interest in DiscoverReady, which he
beneficially owns at fair market value upon the expiration of his employment agreement.
DiscoverReady will engage an independent third party valuation firm to assist management in
determining the fair market value of the equity interest being repurchased by DiscoverReady or sold
to us if any of the above-described rights are exercised. The purchase price for any equity
interests repurchased or sold pursuant to these rights, if exercised, will be paid in cash to the
extent allowed by the terms of our then-existing credit agreement, or pursuant to a three-year
unsecured promissory note, bearing interest at a rate equal to prime plus 1.0%.
Albertelli: On October 1, 2009, NDeX entered into an asset purchase agreement with James E.
Albertelli, P.A., The Albertelli Firm, P.C., Albertelli Title, Inc. and James E. Albertelli
(collectively, the Albertelli Sellers), under the terms of which NDeX acquired the mortgage
default processing services and related title business of the Albertelli Sellers on such date. NDeX
paid $7.0 million in cash at closing, held back an additional $1.0 million to secure the Albertelli
Sellers obligations under the asset purchase agreement (including payment of any indemnification
claims and working capital adjustments) and will pay an additional $2.0 million in equal
installments of $1.0 million on each of October 1, 2010 and 2011, respectively.
21
In addition, NDeX may be obligated to pay the Albertelli Sellers up to an additional
$9.0 million in three annual installments of up to $3.0 million each. The amount of these annual
cash payments will be based upon the adjusted EBITDA for the acquired mortgage default processing
services and related title business during the twelve calendar months ending on each of
September 30, 2010, 2011, and 2012. We used available cash to fund the closing payment.
NDeX also entered into a services agreement with James E. Albertelli, P.A. (the Albertelli
law firm) pursuant to which NDeX has agreed to provide mortgage default processing and related
title services to the Albertelli law firm in Florida. The services agreement provides for the
exclusive referral of residential mortgage default and related files from the Albertelli law firm
to NDeX for servicing. This agreement has an initial term of twenty years, which term may be
automatically extended for two successive ten-year periods unless either party elects to terminate
the term then-in-effect with prior notice. Under the services agreement, NDeX will be paid a fixed
fee for each residential mortgage default and other file referred by the Albertelli law firm to
NDeX for servicing, with the amount of such fixed fee being based upon the type of file. Beginning
on October 1, 2010, this fixed fee per file will increase or decrease on an annual basis based on
the yearly changes to an agreed-upon consumer price index. Under the services agreement, NDeX has
also agreed to provide mortgage default processing and related title services in the State of
Florida to the Albertelli law firm on an exclusive basis for a period of two years after the
closing.
In connection with the transactions described above, NDeX also has entered into an employment
agreement with James E. Albertelli, whereby NDeX employs him as an executive vice president. As a
result of these transactions, NDeX now provides mortgage default processing services to law firm
customers in California, Texas, Michigan, Indiana, Minnesota, Georgia and Florida as well as
directly to mortgage lenders and loan servicers for California foreclosure files.
Barrett-NDEx: On September 2, 2008, NDeX acquired the equity interests of Barrett-NDEx for a
total of $167.5 million in cash, of which $151.0 million was paid to or on behalf of the sellers of
Barrett-NDEx, $15.0 million was placed in escrow to secure payment of indemnification claims and an
additional $1.5 million was held back pending working capital adjustments. In addition to the cash
payments, NDeX also issued to the sellers of Barrett-NDEx an aggregate 6.1% interest in NDeX, which
had an estimated fair market value of approximately $11.6 million on July 28, 2008, the date the
parties signed the equity purchase agreement. We also issued to the sellers of Barrett-NDEx 825,528
shares of our common stock. In addition, at September 30, 2009, we recorded $13.0 million as an
addition to goodwill because Barrett-NDExs adjusted EBITDA for the four quarters ended September
30, 2009 exceeded the earn-out target of $28.0 million. We expect to use our available cash and, to
the extent necessary, funds from our credit facility to make this payment. The working capital
target of $2.0 million as set forth in the equity purchase agreement was not met, as there was an
actual working capital (deficit) of $(1.4) million. As a result, NDeX recovered the $3.4 million
shortfall by having the sellers of Barrett-NDEx release the $1.5 million holdback payable to them
and by taking receipt of $1.9 million out of the escrow in 2008.
We completed our final allocation of the Barrett-NDEx purchase price during the third quarter,
which resulted in the following changes from our preliminary purchase price allocation: (1) we
reduced the allocation for our service agreement with the Barrett law firm from $154.0 million to
$59.7 million; (2) we allocated $19.6 million to a customer list related to our loan servicer and
mortgage lender customers for whom we provide mortgage default processing services directly on
California foreclosure files; (3) we reduced the allocation for non-compete agreements from $5.0
million to $3.2 million; (4) we allocated $6.5 million to trade names associated with Barrett-NDEx;
(5) we increased our allocation to goodwill from $37.8 million to $116.9 million (which also
includes the $13.0 million adjustment to goodwill for the achievement of the earnout as well as the
working capital shortfall adjustment, both discussed above); and (6) we decreased our allocation to
software from $6.9 million to $5.5 million. Our preliminary purchase price allocation combined the
services agreement with the Barrett law firm and the California customer list as a single
intangible asset. In completing the final allocation, we determined that the California customer
list is a separate identifiable asset from the services agreement because the services agreement
requires us to provide mortgage default processing services only to the Barrett law firm whereas we
provide these services directly to California customers under no specific services agreement. Our
initial assumptions regarding this customer list also included obtaining new customers in the
California market, the value of which we preliminarily allocated to the services agreement and
later determined was goodwill.
22
In connection with this acquisition, we also recorded, as additional purchase price, a
liability of $1.5 million in estimated severance costs in connection with the elimination of
certain duplicative positions, which we expected to pay out in cash within the twelve months
following the close of the acquisition. In April 2009, we eliminated certain positions in
connection with this plan for aggregate payments of approximately $453,000. Also in the second
quarter, we completed our plan of restructure and determined that we will not be eliminating any
additional positions under the restructuring plan. Accordingly, we reduced the liability to zero,
as a purchase price adjustment to goodwill.
We have accounted for these acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting and have
included the operating results of Barrett-NDEx, and expect to include
the operating results of the Albertelli and DiscoverReady acquisitions, in the Professional Services segment in our
unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements since the date we acquired it. As
both the Albertelli and DiscoverReady acquisitions occurred after the end of the third quarter and
nine months ended September 30, 2009, the operating results of these acquisitions are not included
in the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements presented in this Form 10-Q.
Revenues
We derive revenues from two operating segments, our Professional Services Division and our
Business Information Division. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, our total
revenues were $62.3 million and $193.3 million, respectively, and the percentage of our total
revenues attributed to each of our segments was as follows:
|
|
|
64.2% and 65.3%, respectively, from our Professional Services Division; and |
|
|
|
35.8% and 34.7%, respectively, from our Business Information Division. |
Professional Services. Our Professional Services Division generates revenues primarily by
providing mortgage default processing, appellate services, and, beginning November 2, 2009 with the
acquisition of DiscoverReady, outsourced discovery management and document review services through
fee-based arrangements. Through NDeX, we assist eight law firms in processing foreclosure,
bankruptcy, eviction and, to a lesser extent, litigation and other mortgage default processing case
files for residential mortgages that are in default. We also provide these services directly to
mortgage lenders and loan servicers for California foreclosure files. In addition, NDeX provides
loan modification and loss mitigation support on mortgage default files to its customers and
related real estate title work primarily to the Barrett law firm and, since October 1, 2009, the
Albertelli law firm. We refer to revenues that NDeX derives from these sources collectively as
mortgage default processing service revenues. Shareholders and/or principal attorneys of our law
firm customers, including David A. Trott, chairman and chief executive officer of NDeX, are
executive management employees of NDeX.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we serviced approximately 83,300 and
267,500 mortgage default case files, respectively, of which approximately 53,900 and 168,000,
respectively, were processed by businesses we acquired in 2008, including Barrett-NDEx. Our
mortgage default processing service revenues accounted for 57.7% and 59.6%, respectively, of our
total revenues and 89.9% and 91.2%, respectively, of our Professional Services Divisions revenues
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. We recognize mortgage default processing
service revenues on a proportional performance basis over the period during which the services are
provided, the calculation of which requires management to make estimates. We consolidate the
operations, including revenues, of NDeX and record an adjustment for noncontrolling interest for
the percentage of NDeX that we do not own. See Noncontrolling Interest below for a description of
the impact of this noncontrolling interest in NDeX on our operating results.
23
NDeXs revenues are primarily driven by the number of residential mortgage defaults in each of
the states in which we do business, as well as the type of files we
process (e.g. foreclosures, evictions, bankruptcies or
litigation) because each has a different pricing
structure. Although the services agreements with our law firm customers contemplate the review and
possible revision of the fees for the services we provided, price increases have not historically
affected our mortgage default processing revenues materially. In most cases, our services
agreements adjust the fee paid to us for the files we process on annual basis pursuant to an
agreed-upon consumer price index. In other cases, our services agreements require us to agree with
our law firm customer
regarding the terms and amount of any fee increase. If we are unable to negotiate fixed fee
increases under these agreements that at least take into account the increases in costs associated
with providing mortgage default processing services, our operating and net margins could be
adversely affected. During the first quarter of 2009, we revised our fee arrangements with Trott &
Trott and Feiwell & Hannoy. During the second quarter of 2009, we revised our fee arrangement with
Wilford & Geske. To date, we have not revised our fee arrangement with the Barrett law firm. You
should refer to Managements Discussion and AnalysisRevenues in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC
on March 12, 2009 for more information about the conditions when the fixed fee per file we charge
our law firm customers may change.
Through Counsel Press, we assist law firms and attorneys throughout the United States in
organizing, preparing and filing appellate briefs, records and appendices, in paper and electronic
format, that comply with the applicable rules of the U.S. Supreme Court, any of the 13 federal
courts of appeals and any state appellate court or appellate division. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, our appellate service revenues accounted for 6.5% and 5.8%,
respectively, of our total revenues and 10.1% and 8.8%, respectively, of our Professional Services
Divisions revenues. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we provided appellate
services to attorneys in connection with approximately 2,300 and 6,600 appellate filings,
respectively, in federal and state courts. We recognize appellate service revenues as the services
are provided, which is when our final appellate product is filed with the court.
Beginning on November 2, 2009, we began to assist major United States companies and their
counsel in outsourced discovery management and document review through DiscoverReady. We will
consolidate the operations of DiscoverReady and record an adjustment for noncontrolling interest
for the percentage of DiscoverReady that we do not own. Because the
redeemable feature of this noncontrolling interest is
based on fair value (unlike the noncontrolling interest in NDeX), we are not required to
record this adjustment as an item affecting net income attributable to Dolan Media Company common
stockholders. See Noncontrolling Interest below.
Business Information. Our Business Information Division generates revenues primarily from
display and classified advertising, public notice and subscriptions. We sell commercial advertising
consisting of display and classified advertising in all of our print products and on most of our
web sites. We include within our display and classified advertising revenue those revenues
generated by sponsorships, advertising and ticket sales generated by our local events. Our display
and classified advertising revenues accounted for 10.5% and 10.5%, respectively, of our total
revenues and 29.4% and 30.2%, respectively, of our Business Information Divisions revenues for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. We recognize display and classified advertising
revenues upon publication of an advertisement in one of our publications or on one of our web
sites. Advertising revenues are driven primarily by the volume, price and mix of advertisements
published as well as how many local events are held.
We publish 305 different types of public notices in our court and commercial newspapers,
including foreclosure notices, probate notices, notices of fictitious business names, limited
liability company and other entity notices, unclaimed property notices, notices of governmental
hearings and trustee sale notices. Our public notice revenues accounted for 19.7% and 18.5%,
respectively, of our total revenues and 55.0% and 53.4%, respectively, of our Business Information
Divisions revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. We recognize public
notice revenues upon placement of a public notice in one of our court and commercial newspapers.
Public notice revenues are driven by the volume and mix of public notices published, which are
affected by the number of residential mortgage foreclosures in the 14 markets where we are
qualified to publish public notices and the rules governing publication of public notices in such
states. In six of the states in which we publish public notices, the price for public notices is
statutorily regulated, with market forces determining the pricing for the remaining states.
We sell our business information products primarily through subscriptions. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009, our circulation revenues, which consist of subscriptions and
single-copy sales, accounted for 5.1% and 5.1%, respectively, of our total revenues and 14.2% and
14.7%, respectively, of our Business Information Divisions revenues. We recognize subscription
revenues ratably over the subscription periods, which range from three months to multiple years,
with the average subscription period being twelve months. Deferred revenue includes payment for
subscriptions collected in advance that we expect to recognize in future periods. Circulation
revenues are driven by the number of copies sold and the subscription rates charged to customers.
24
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses consist of the following:
|
|
|
Direct operating expenses, which consist primarily of the cost of compensation and
employee benefits for the processing staff at NDeX and Counsel Press and our editorial
personnel in our Business Information Division, production and distribution expenses, such
as compensation (including stock-based compensation expense) and employee benefits for
personnel involved in the production and distribution of our business information products,
the cost of newsprint and delivery of our business information products, and packaging and
data service fees in connection with our California foreclosure files; |
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses, which consist primarily of the cost of
compensation (including stock-based compensation expense) and employee benefits for our
sales, human resources, accounting and information technology personnel, publishers and
other members of management, rent, other sales and marketing related expenses and other
office-related payments; |
|
|
|
Depreciation expense, which represents the cost of fixed assets and software allocated
over the estimated useful lives of these assets, with such useful lives ranging from two to
thirty years; and |
|
|
|
Amortization expense, which represents the cost of finite-lived intangibles acquired
through business combinations allocated over the estimated useful lives of these
intangibles, with such useful lives ranging from two to thirty years. |
Total operating expenses as a percentage of revenues depends upon our mix of business from
Professional Services, which is our higher margin revenue, and Business Information. This mix may
shift between fiscal periods.
Equity in Earnings of Affiliates
The Detroit Legal News Publishing, LLC. We own 35.0% of the membership interests in DLNP, the
publisher of The Detroit Legal News and ten other publications. We account for our investment in
DLNP using the equity method. Our percentage share of DLNPs earnings was $0.9 million and
$1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which we
recognized as operating income. This is net of amortization of $0.4 million for both periods. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, our percentage share of DLNPs earnings was $3.7
million and $4.4 million, respectively. This is net of amortization of $1.1 million for both
periods. NDeX handles all public notices required to be published in connection with files it
services for Trott & Trott pursuant to our services agreement with Trott & Trott and places a
significant amount of these notices in The Detroit Legal News. Trott & Trott pays DLNP for these
public notices. See Liquidity and Capital Resources Cash Flow Provided by Operating Activities
below for information regarding distributions paid to us by DLNP.
GovDelivery, Inc. In August 2009, we made an additional investment in GovDelivery by
purchasing 1,000,000 shares of its preferred stock for $1,000,000. Prior to this investment, we
had accounted for our ownership in GovDelivery using the cost method of accounting because we only
owned approximately 15.0% of GovDeliverys outstanding voting stock (on an as-converted basis) and
did not have any ability to exert influence. The additional investment increased our ownership in
GovDelivery to 21.9%. As a result, we have determined that we will account for this investment
using the equity method. Therefore, we have retroactively applied the equity method of accounting
to reflect that portion of GovDeliverys income and losses attributable to our ownership from the
date of our original investment. In the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we
recorded $0.2 million as the cumulative adjustment representing our share of the losses of
GovDelivery for 2009.
Noncontrolling Interest
Noncontrolling interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 consisted of an aggregate
15.3% minority interest in NDeX held by APC Investments, LLC (7.6%), Feiwell & Hannoy (1.7%) and
the sellers of Barrett-NDEx or their transferees (as a group) (6.1%). APC Investments, LLC is a
limited liability company owned by the shareholders of Trott & Trott, including NDeX chairman and
chief executive officer David A. Trott and NDeXs
two executive vice presidents in Michigan. Beginning on November 2, 2009, our noncontrolling
interest also includes a 15% minority interest in DiscoverReady held by DR Holdco LLC.
25
Under the terms of the NDeX operating agreement, each month, we are required to distribute
NDeXs earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization less debt service with
respect to any interest-bearing indebtedness of NDeX, capital expenditures and working capital
reserves to NDeXs members on the basis of common equity interest owned. We paid the following
distributions in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
APC Investments |
|
$ |
414 |
|
|
$ |
362 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
1,098 |
|
Feiwell & Hannoy |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
Sellers of
Barrett-NDEx (as a
group)* |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
834 |
|
|
$ |
443 |
|
|
$ |
3,145 |
|
|
$ |
1,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Members of NDeX since September 2, 2008. |
There is no similar distribution obligation under the DiscoverReady limited liability
company agreement; however, we are obligated to make quarterly tax distributions to each of the
members of DiscoverReady.
In addition, APC Investments and Feiwell & Hannoy each have the right, until February 7, 2010,
to require NDeX to repurchase all or any portion of their respective interest in NDeX. The sellers
of Barrett-NDEx, each as members of NDeX, also have the right, for a period of six months following
September 2, 2012, to require NDeX to repurchase all or any portion of their respective membership
interest in NDeX. To the extent any minority member of NDeX timely exercises this right, the
purchase price of such membership interest will be based on 6.25 times NDeXs trailing twelve month
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization less the aggregate amount of any
interest bearing indebtedness outstanding for NDeX as of the date the repurchase occurs. The
aggregate purchase price would be payable by NDeX in the form of a three-year unsecured note
bearing interest at a rate equal to prime plus 2.0%. To date, neither APC Investments nor Feiwell
& Hannoy have exercised their put right. However, had they both exercised this right at September
30, 2009, NDeX would have been obligated to pay them $17.2 million in the aggregate under the
terms described above.
Under the terms of the DiscoverReady limited liability agreement, DR Holdco has the right, for
a period of ninety days following November 2, 2012, to require DiscoverReady to repurchase all or
any portion of its equity interest in DiscoverReady. To the extent that DR Holdco timely exercises
this right, the purchase price of such equity interest will be based on the fair market value of
such interest. During that same period, we also have the right to require DR Holdco to sell its
entire equity interest in DiscoverReady to us. If we timely exercise our right, we would pay DR
Holdco an amount based on the fair market value of the equity interest. These rights may be
exercised earlier under the following circumstances: An individual seller of DiscoverReady, except
Mays, may require DiscoverReady to repurchase the portion of DR Holdcos interest in DiscoverReady
that he beneficially owns if he is terminated without cause or quits for good reason prior to the
expiration of his employment agreement. If we terminate any individual seller of DiscoverReady for
cause or if such seller quits without good reason, we can require DR Holdco to sell to us the
portion of its interest in DiscoverReady that reflects such sellers beneficial interest in us. The
purchase price for that portion of the equity interest repurchased or sold if these rights are
exercised based on the interests fair market value. With respect to Mays, DiscoverReady will
repurchase that portion of DR Holdcos interest in DiscoverReady, which he beneficially owns at
fair market value upon the expiration of his employment agreement.
DiscoverReady
will engage an independent third party valuation firm to assist it in
determining the fair
market value of the equity interest being repurchased by DiscoverReady or sold to us if any of the
above-described rights are exercised. The purchase price for any equity interests repurchased or
sold pursuant to these rights, if exercised, will be paid in cash to the extent allowed by the
terms of our then-existing credit agreement, or pursuant to a three- year unsecured promissory
note, bearing interest at a rate equal to prime plus 1.0%.
26
As of January 1, 2009, we are required to record the redeemable noncontrolling interest in
NDeX to its redemption amount at each reporting period. As a result, as of September 30, 2009, we
recorded an adjustment in the amount of $12.7 million ($7.7 million net of taxes) to additional
paid-in capital, which adjustment only reflects the noncontrolling interest in NDeX as we did not
have noncontrolling interest in DiscoverReady at September 30, 2009. Please see our condensed
consolidated statements of stockholders equity (deficit), as well as Note 1 to our unaudited
condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in this report on Form 10-Q for
further information regarding ASC 810 and its implications to our financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States and the discussion of our financial condition
and results of operations is based on these financial statements. The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities.
We continually evaluate the policies and estimates we use to prepare our condensed
consolidated financial statements. In general, managements estimates and assumptions are based on
historical experience, information provided by third-party professionals and assumptions that
management believes to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances at the time these estimates
and assumptions are made. Because of the uncertainty inherent in these matters, actual results
could differ significantly from the estimates, assumptions and judgments we use in applying these
critical accounting policies.
We believe the critical accounting policies that require the most significant assumptions and
judgments in the preparation of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include:
purchase accounting; revenue recognition in connection with mortgage default processing services;
impairment of goodwill, other intangible assets and other long-lived assets; share-based
compensation expense; capitalization of developed software for internal and external use; income
tax accounting; and allowances for doubtful accounts. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCritical Accounting Policies in Item 7 in our annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which we filed with the SEC on March 12,
2009, and is available at the SECs web site at www.sec.gov, for a discussion (in addition to that
provided below) as to how we apply these policies.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize mortgage default processing service revenues on a proportional performance basis
over the period during which the services are provided, the calculation of which requires
management to make significant estimates as to the appropriate timing of revenue recognition
periods. We base these estimates primarily upon our historical experience and our knowledge of
processing cycles in each of the states in which we do business, as well as recent legislative
changes which impact the processing period.
We record revenues recognized for services performed, but not yet billed, to certain of
our mortgage default processing customers as unbilled services, the calculation of which requires
management to make significant estimates. We base these estimates on the proportional performance
of the services provided in accordance with the revenue recognition policies discussed in the
paragraph immediately above. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we recorded an
aggregate $17.4 million and $12.5 million, respectively, as unbilled services to our mortgage
default processing customers and included these amounts in accounts receivable on our balance
sheet.
27
Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets
We assess our goodwill and finite life intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis
using a November 30 measurement date. We will conduct interim impairment assessments when
circumstances and events indicate that we may not be able to recover the carrying value of the
assets. These events include, but are not limited to, any strategic decisions we may make in
response to economic or competitive conditions affecting our reporting units and the effect of the
economic and regulatory environment on our business. We continue to evaluate whether circumstances
and events have changed, thereby requiring us to conduct an interim test of our goodwill and other
finite-lived assets. In particular, if we see an uncertain political and regulatory
environment regarding mortgage foreclosures, tight credit markets, or volatility in our stock price
with any resulting decline in our market capitalization, along with other uncertainties, an interim
impairment test of our goodwill, tradenames and other finite-lived intangible assets may be
triggered. This could result in a future material goodwill and/or intangible impairment charge,
which could materially adversely impact our operational results for the period in which such charge
is recorded.
We determine the estimated economic lives and related amortization expense for our intangible
assets. To the extent actual useful lives are less than our previously estimated lives, we will
increase our amortization expense. If the unamortized balance were deemed to be unrecoverable, we
would recognize an impairment charge to the extent necessary to reduce the unamortized balance to
the amount of expected future discounted cash flows, with the amount of such impairment charged to
operations in the current period. We estimate useful lives of our intangible assets by reference to
current and projected dynamics in the business information and mortgage default processing service
industries and anticipated competitor actions. The amount of net income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 would have been approximately $1.1 million higher if the actual useful lives of
our finite-lived intangible assets were 10% longer than the estimates and approximately
$1.2 million lower if the actual useful lives of our finite-lived intangible assets were 10%
shorter than the estimates.
Share-based Compensation Expense
We estimate the fair value of share-based awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
at the grant date, with compensation expense recognized as the requisite service is rendered. We
have reserved 2,700,000 shares of our common stock for issuance under our incentive compensation
plan, of which 698,996 shares were available for issuance under the plan as of September 30, 2009.
We grant both stock options and restricted stock under our incentive compensation plan.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we granted stock options exercisable for
414,882 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to $12.51. The following weighted average
assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of the
stock options we granted during 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
48.0 |
% |
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Expected term of options |
|
4.75 years |
|
Weighted average grant date fair value |
|
$ |
5.35 |
|
All options granted in 2009 are non-qualified options that vest in four equal annual
installments commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date and expire seven years after the
grant date.
Our share-based compensation expense for all options for the three months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 was approximately $0.4 million for both periods, before income taxes. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, our share-based compensation expense for all granted
options was approximately $1.2 million and $0.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively, before income taxes. Substantially all the expense related to our
stock options is included in selling, general and administrative expenses. As of September 30,
2009, our estimated aggregate unrecognized share-based compensation expense for all unvested stock
options was $4.5 million, which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of
approximately 2.7 years.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we granted 129,990 shares of restricted stock
to management employees. All of these restricted shares vest in four equal annual installments
commencing on the first anniversary of the grant date. The share-based expense for restricted stock
awards is determined based on the market price of our stock on the date of grant applied to the
total number of shares that are anticipated to fully vest. Compensation expense is amortized over
the vesting period.
28
Our share-based compensation expense for all restricted shares for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, before
income taxes. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, our share-based compensation
expense for all restricted shares was approximately $0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively,
before income taxes. The expense related to our restricted shares is split approximately 30% to
direct operating expense and 70% to selling, general and administrative expense. As of September
30, 2009, our estimated aggregate unrecognized share-based compensation expense for all unvested
restricted shares was $2.5 million, which we expect to recognize over a weighted-average period of
approximately 2.9 years.
Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rate in the first nine months of 2009 was 36.7% compared to 40.0% in
the first nine months of 2008. The decrease in our effective income tax rate resulted primarily
from the receipt of non-taxable life insurance proceeds paid upon the death of Michael Barrett, a
senior officer of Barrett-NDEx, in January 2009. The tax impact of these non-taxable proceeds was
treated as a discrete item in the first quarter of 2009. The Company expects an annual effective
tax rate for 2009 of 39.1%, excluding the impact of discrete items.
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts
We extend credit to our advertisers, public notice publishers, commercial printing customers
and professional service customers based upon an evaluation of each customers financial condition,
and collateral is generally not required. We establish allowances for doubtful accounts based on
estimates of losses related to customer receivable balances. Specifically, we use prior credit
losses as a percentage of credit sales, the aging of accounts receivable and specific
identification of potential losses to establish reserves for credit losses on accounts receivable.
We believe that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to our Business
Information Division. We had a significant concentration of credit risk with respect to our
Professional Services Division as of September 30, 2009, because the amount due from the Barrett
law firm was $14.9 million, or 27.8% of our consolidated net accounts receivable balance and the
amount due from Trott & Trott was $6.9 million, or 12.9% of our consolidated net accounts
receivable balance. However, to date, we have not experienced any problems with respect to
collecting payment from our law firm customers.
We consider accounting for our allowance for doubtful accounts critical to both of our
operating segments because of the significance of accounts receivable to our current assets and
operating cash flows. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in
an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances might be required, which
could have a material effect on our financial statements. See Liquidity and Capital Resources
below for information regarding our receivables, allowance for doubtful accounts and day sales
outstanding.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Please see Note 1 to our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements
included in this report on Form 10-Q as well as Note 1 to our audited condensed consolidated
financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 12,
2009, for information about new accounting pronouncements affecting us.
29
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth selected operating results, including as a percentage of total
revenues, for the periods indicated below (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
|
$ |
39,996 |
|
|
|
64.2 |
% |
|
$ |
25,673 |
|
|
|
53.6 |
% |
Business Information |
|
|
22,348 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
% |
|
|
22,211 |
|
|
|
46.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
62,344 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
47,884 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
|
|
30,753 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
% |
|
|
19,646 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
% |
Business Information |
|
|
17,044 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
18,722 |
|
|
|
39.1 |
% |
Unallocated corporate operating expenses |
|
|
3,806 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
4,535 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
51,603 |
|
|
|
82.8 |
% |
|
|
42,903 |
|
|
|
89.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
11,472 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
6,310 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
% |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(1,607 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
)% |
|
|
(1,851 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
)% |
Non-cash interest income related to interest rate swaps |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
Other income, net |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
10,093 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
% |
|
|
4,390 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(3,529 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
)% |
|
|
(1,471 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before noncontrolling interest |
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
|
2,919 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
Less: Net income attributable to the redeemable
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(694 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company |
|
$ |
5,870 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
$ |
2,453 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company per diluted
share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of redeemable noncontrolling interest, net of tax |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company common
stockholders per diluted share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
29,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenues |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
|
$ |
126,322 |
|
|
|
65.3 |
% |
|
$ |
62,542 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
% |
Business Information |
|
|
66,998 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
68,406 |
|
|
|
52.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
193,320 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
130,948 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Services |
|
|
93,379 |
|
|
|
48.3 |
% |
|
|
45,701 |
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
Business Information |
|
|
51,481 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
% |
|
|
56,660 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
% |
Unallocated corporate operating expenses |
|
|
9,690 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
8,677 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
154,550 |
|
|
|
79.9 |
% |
|
|
111,038 |
|
|
|
84.8 |
% |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates |
|
|
3,461 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
4,355 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
42,231 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
24,265 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
% |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(5,305 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
)% |
|
|
(4,611 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
Non-cash interest income related to interest rate swaps |
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Other income, net |
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
39,130 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
19,630 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(13,207 |
) |
|
|
(6.8 |
)% |
|
|
(7,257 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before noncontrolling interest |
|
|
25,923 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
12,373 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
Less: Net income attributable to the redeemable
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(3,200 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
|
|
(1,516 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company |
|
$ |
22,723 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
$ |
10,857 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company per diluted
share |
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of redeemable noncontrolling interest, net of tax |
|
|
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Dolan Media Company common
stockholders per diluted share |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
29,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
62.3 |
|
|
$ |
47.9 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
% |
Our revenues increased as a result of an increase in our countercyclical revenues
(mortgage default processing services and public notice), including $16.9 million of increased
revenues from Barrett-NDEx, which we acquired on September 2,
2008, as well as $0.8 million of
increased revenues from our other NDeX operations (before
considering the effects that new legislation in Michigan and Indiana
had on our revenues as discussed below). Please see Professional Services Divisions
Results below for more information. Organic growth (defined below) in our public notice revenues
of $2.1 million also contributed to this increase in total revenues. This increase was partially
offset by a $1.8 million organic decline in our cyclical display and classified advertising
revenues, which we believe primarily resulted from local economic conditions in the markets we
serve. Additionally, organic revenues at NDeX declined approximately $3.0 million during the
quarter from the effect of the legislative changes in Michigan and Indiana described in Recent
DevelopmentsRegulatory Environment above, which delay or extend the length of the foreclosure
process, and push a portion of our mortgage default processing revenues on new files to future
periods.
We derived 64.2% and 53.6% of our total revenues from our Professional Services Division and
35.8% and 46.4% of our total revenues from our Business Information Division for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. This change in mix resulted primarily from our
acquisition of Barrett-NDEx as well as general economic conditions in the markets we serve in our
Business Information Division. We expect that our Professional
Services Division revenues will
continue to grow, due in part to the mortgage default processing services business of the
Albertelli sellers, which we acquired on October 1, 2009, and DiscoverReady, which we acquired on
November 2, 2009.
We define organic revenue growth/decline as the net increase or decrease in revenue produced
by: (1) businesses we owned and operated prior to July 1, 2008, which we refer to as existing
businesses; (2) customer lists, goodwill or other finite-life intangibles we purchased on or after
July 1, 2008, and integrated into our existing businesses; and (3) businesses that we account for
as acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting, but do not report separately for internal
financial purposes, which we refer to as fold-in acquisitions. We refer to the net increase or
decrease in revenues produced by businesses that we owned and operated after July 1, 2008 and that
we account for as acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting, but which are not fold-in
acquisitions, as growth/decline from acquired businesses.
31
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
51.6 |
|
|
$ |
42.9 |
|
|
$ |
8.7 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
% |
Direct operating expense |
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
25.7 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
% |
Break-up fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
Not meaningful |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
50.8 |
% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
% |
Total operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 89.6% for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 to 82.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
largely due to strong third quarter 2009 revenues (when compared to third quarter of 2008) and
expense control measures that we have implemented across both divisions, as well as the break-up
fee paid in the third quarter of 2008. For the remainder of 2009, we expect total operating
expenses as a percentage of total revenues to remain relatively constant with the third quarter.
Direct Operating Expenses. The increase in direct operating expenses consisted of a $5.6
million increase in our Professional Services Division and a $1.0 million decrease in our Business
Information Division. You should refer to the more detailed discussions in the Professional
Services Division Results and Business Information Division Results below for more information
regarding the causes of these changes. Direct operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues
decreased to 36.1% as of September 30, 2009 from 37.4% as of September 30, 2008. For the remainder
of 2009, we expect our direct operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues to remain
relatively constant with the third quarter.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The increase in our selling, general and
administrative expenses consisted of a $3.9 million increase in these expenses in our Professional
Services Division, a $0.7 million decrease in these expenses in our Business Information Division,
and a $0.8 million increase in unallocated corporate costs. You should refer to the more detailed
discussions in the Professional Services Division Results and Business Information Division Results
below for more information regarding the causes of the changes in each divisions selling, general
and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses attributable to our
corporate operations increased $0.8 million, or 27.9%, to $3.6 million, for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, from $2.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. These
expenses consist primarily of the cost of compensation and employee benefits for our human
resources, accounting and information technology personnel, executive officers and other members of
management, as well as unallocated portions of corporate insurance costs and costs associated with
being a public company. The increase in operating expenses attributable to corporate operations
was primarily due to an increase of $0.4 million as we continued to accrue for performance-based
pay for our executive officers, as well as $0.3 million of severance accrued in connection with the
elimination of an executive officer position. Selling, general and administrative expense as a
percentage of revenue decreased to 36.7% as of September 30, 2009 from 39.6% as of September 30,
2008. This is largely due to expense control efforts that we have implemented across our
divisions, as well as the increase in mortgage default processing services revenues in the third
quarter of 2009 resulting from our acquisition of Barrett-NDEx.
Break-up Fee. In the third quarter of 2008, we paid $1.5 million to the sellers of a business
we intended to acquire, but did not. We made this payment pursuant to our agreement with such
sellers because we were unable to obtain debt financing on terms and timing that were satisfactory
to us to close the acquisition. We have not entered into such break-up or termination agreements
with other sellers of acquisition targets.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our depreciation expense increased due to increased
levels of property and equipment in the three months ended September 30, 2009, most notably due to
the Barrett-NDEx acquisition. Our amortization expense increased primarily due to the amortization
of finite-lived intangible assets acquired in the acquisition of Barrett-NDEx. Amortization expense
in future periods will decrease as a result of the completion of the purchase price allocation of
the assets acquired in the Barrett-NDEx acquisition by approximately $3.0 million annually, which
we expect will be partially offset by increased amortization expense related to the finite-life
intangible assets acquired in the Albertelli and DiscoverReady acquisitions.
32
Interest Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Total interest expense, net |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(13.2 |
)% |
Interest on bank credit facility |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(31.1 |
)% |
Cash interest expense on interest rate swaps |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
98.6 |
% |
Amortization of deferred financing fees |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Not meaningful |
|
Interest expense related to our bank credit facility decreased in the third quarter of
2009 due to decreased interest rates on our borrowings. The weighted average interest rate on our
bank credit facility was 2.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 5.6% for
the same period in 2008. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, our average outstanding
borrowings were $149.1 million compared to $102.5 million for the same period in 2008. This
increase in debt was primarily a result of the debt incurred to finance, in part, the acquisition
of Barrett-NDEx in September 2008. Cash interest incurred on our interest rate swaps increased
$0.2 million as a result of these interest rate changes.
Non-Cash Interest Income (Expense) Related to Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Non-cash interest income (expense)
related to interest
rate swaps |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
Not meaningful |
|
Non-cash interest income related to interest rate swaps increased as a result of a change
in the estimated fair value of our interest rate swaps driven by interest rate changes. The
estimated fair value of our fixed rate interest rate swaps recorded on our balance sheet is a
liability of $1.9 million and $1.3 million, respectively, at September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
|
139.9 |
% |
The increase in income tax expense was due to a $5.5 million increase in income before
taxes but after noncontrolling interests. The effective tax rate in both quarters was 37.5%.
Professional Services Division Results
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Total Professional Services Division revenues |
|
$ |
40.0 |
|
|
$ |
25.7 |
|
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
|
|
55.8 |
% |
Mortgage default processing service revenues |
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
69.6 |
% |
Appellate services revenues |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.5 |
)% |
Professional Services Division revenues increased due to the increase in mortgage default
processing service revenues, primarily from the acquisition of Barrett-NDEx in September 2008,
which added $16.9 million in revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2009. This increase
was partially offset by a decline in mortgage default processing service revenues resulting from
new legislation in Michigan and Indiana that took effect in July 2009. These legislative changes
are described under Recent DevelopmentsRegulatory Environment, above. While the Michigan
legislation did not adversely impact the number of files referred to us for processing during the
quarter (when compared to third quarter 2008), it did lengthen
the time over which we recognize revenue from these files because it
added steps to the foreclosure process. The Indiana
legislation negatively impacted the files referred to us for processing in that state, and
corresponding revenue (when compared to third quarter 2008), because it delays the start of a foreclosure action. For the three months
ended September 30, 2009, we serviced approximately 83,300 mortgage default case files compared to
approximately 50,000 mortgage default case files that we serviced for the three months ended
September 30, 2008. Barrett-NDEx accounted for approximately 50,500, or 60.6%, of the files we
processed in the third quarter of 2009. Barrett-NDExs total file volume for the third quarter of
2008 was 45,500, which includes 13,700 files processed during the month that we owned them. File
volume at Barrett-NDEx grew 11.0% from the third quarter of 2008 to
the third quarter of 2009, which includes the two month period in the
third quarter of 2008 when we did not own Barrett-NDEX.
33
The Barrett law firm and Trott & Trott each accounted for more than 10%, and together
accounted for approximately 80%, of our Professional Services Division revenues in the third
quarter of 2009. For the same period in 2008, Trott & Trott, Feiwell & Hannoy, and the Barrett law
firm each accounted for more than 10% of our Professional Services Division revenues.
Appellate services revenues decreased $0.4 million in the third quarter of 2009, while Counsel
Press assisted with 2,300 appellate filings as compared to 2,400 for the same period in 2008. This
slight decrease in the number of appellate filings was further compounded by lower average revenue
per filing, which was driven by smaller filings being processed and pricing pressures in the
market.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
$ |
19.6 |
|
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
|
56.5 |
% |
Direct operating expense |
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
56.5 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
90.2 |
% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
% |
Operating expenses increased primarily as a result of the operating costs of
Barrett-NDEx, which we acquired in September 2008. This added $10.8 million in operating expenses
and accounted for $5.4 million of the increase in direct operating expenses, and $3.7 million of
the increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses. NDeX, operating expenses (exclusive
of the effects of the Barrett-NDEx acquisition) increased slightly over the prior period due
primarily to increased personnel and health insurance costs.
Amortization expense increased from the amortization of finite-lived intangible assets
associated with the acquisition of Barrett-NDEx, which added $0.9 million in amortization expense.
Depreciation expense also increased as a result of the addition of the Barrett-NDEx assets.
Total operating expenses attributable to our Professional Services Division as a percentage of
Professional Services Division revenue increased slightly to 76.9% for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 from 76.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Business Information Division Results
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Total Business Information Division Revenues |
|
$ |
22.3 |
|
|
$ |
22.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Display and classified advertising revenues |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(21.7 |
)% |
Public notice revenues |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
% |
Circulation revenues |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
)% |
Other revenues |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
Our display and classified advertising revenues (which include revenues from events)
decreased primarily due to an approximate 19% decrease in the number of ads placed in our
publications, which we continue to believe is driven by the sluggish economy, as well as a decrease
in the average price paid per classified and display ad across our publications. A decrease in the
number and frequency of specialty publications and magazines published also contributed to the
revenue decline. As our customers continue to control spending in response to the general economic
conditions in the markets we serve, we expect our display and classified advertising revenues will
continue to decline in 2009 when compared to the same period in 2008.
Our public notice revenues increased due to an approximate 9% increase in the total number of
public notice ads placed in our publications, most of which are foreclosure notices. Foreclosure
notices tend to be larger ads, which we are generally required to publish multiple times and thus
they generate more revenue than other types of public notice. More than half of this revenue
increase was driven by the increased number of foreclosure notices placed in our Maryland
publication. Last year, a change in public notice laws in Maryland delayed the timing when
foreclosure notices were placed in this publication, thus negatively affecting third quarter 2008
public notice revenues.
34
Circulation revenues decreased due to a decline in the number of paid subscribers between
September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, our paid publications had
approximately 62,800 subscribers, a decrease of approximately 5,600, or 8.2%, from total paid
subscribers of approximately 68,400 as of September 30, 2008. The majority of this decrease in
paid subscriptions over these periods resulted from fewer responses to new subscription campaigns,
which we believe is a result of the sluggish economy. We believe reader preference for on-line and
web site access to our business journals, some of which we offer at discounted rates or no fee, has
also contributed to a decline in circulation revenues. Revenues lost from this decline in paid subscriptions were partially offset
by an increase in the average price per paid subscription.
The business information products we target to the Missouri, Minnesota, and Maryland markets
each accounted for over 10% of our Business Information Divisions revenues for the three months
ended September 30, 2009. For the same period in 2008, the business information products we target
to the Missouri and Minnesota markets each accounted for over 10% of our Business Information
Divisions revenues.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
|
$ |
18.7 |
|
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(9.0 |
)% |
Direct operating expense |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(12.7 |
)% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
)% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.3 |
% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
Direct operating expenses decreased primarily as a result of decreased production and
distribution costs. These costs declined by $0.5 million primarily due to a reduction in the pages
in our print publications, as well as the printing of fewer specialty publications and magazines
and negotiating contract price reductions with our printing vendors. Business units also reduced
their contract labor and freelance expenses as they relied more on in-house staff, thereby reducing
direct operating expenses by approximately $0.2 million. In addition, decreased headcount and
lower commissions and performance-based pay, which resulted from lower display and classified
advertising revenues, accounted for another $0.1 million of the decrease.
Selling, general and administrative expenses declined primarily as a result of a reduction in
personnel expenses, relating to a reduced headcount and lower commission and performance-based
payments ($0.7 million). A $0.3 million reduction in bad debt expense as a result of more focused
collection efforts also contributed to this decrease. Partially offsetting these decreases was an
increase in promotional spending as we maintain and build our brands in several of the markets we
serve. Total operating expenses attributable to our Business Information Division as a percentage
of Business Information Division revenue decreased to 76.3% for the three months ended September
30, 2009 from 84.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2008, largely as a result of an
increase in public notice revenues, which are higher margin revenues, and cost control efforts we
implemented over the last four quarters.
35
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
193.3 |
|
|
$ |
130.9 |
|
|
$ |
62.4 |
|
|
|
47.6 |
% |
Our countercyclical revenues (mortgage default processing services and public notice)
accounted for the increase in our revenues, including $65.2 million of revenues from acquired
businesses (defined below). These revenues primarily consisted of $64.2 million in revenues from
the Barrett-NDEx business acquired on September 2, 2008. An increase in public notice revenues of $4.4 million, along with $0.8 million in
revenues from the mortgage default processing services business of Wilford & Geske acquired on
February 22, 2008, also contributed to our total increase in revenues for the period. These
revenues were offset by a $5.1 million organic decline (defined below) in display and classified
advertising revenues in our Business Information Division as a result of the local economic
conditions in the markets we serve. Organic revenue decline in NDeX was $0.9 million for the nine
month period, which was caused by mortgage lender and loan servicer responses to recently enacted
legislation in Indiana as described in Recent DevelopmentsRegulatory Environment above.
We derived 65.3% and 47.8% of our total revenues from our Professional Services Division and
34.7% and 52.2% of our total revenues from our Business Information Division for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. This change in mix resulted primarily from the
Barrett-NDEx acquisition in September 2008 as well as general economic conditions in the markets we
serve.
We define organic revenue growth/decline as the net increase or decrease in revenue produced
by: (1) businesses we owned and operated prior to January 1, 2008, which we refer to as existing
businesses; (2) customer lists, goodwill or other finite-life intangibles we purchased on or after
January 1, 2008, and integrated into our existing businesses; and (3) businesses that we account
for as acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting, but do not report separately for
internal financial purposes, which we refer to as fold-in acquisitions. We refer to the net
increase or decrease in revenues produced by businesses that we owned and operated after January 1,
2008, and that we account for as acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting, but which
are not fold-in acquisitions, as growth/decline from acquired businesses.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
154.6 |
|
|
$ |
111.0 |
|
|
$ |
43.5 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
% |
Direct operating expense |
|
|
68.5 |
|
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
66.1 |
|
|
|
51.8 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
% |
Break-up fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
Not meaningful |
|
Depreciation expense |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
77.8 |
% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
74.2 |
% |
Total operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 84.8% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 to 79.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Direct Operating Expenses. The increase in direct operating expenses consisted of a $24.0
million increase in our Professional Services Division and a $1.9 million decrease in our Business
Information Division. You should refer to the more detailed discussions in the Professional
Services Division Results and Business Information Division Results below for more information
regarding the causes of these changes. Direct operating expenses as a percentage of total revenues
remained constant at 35.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The increase in our selling, general and
administrative expenses consisted of a $15.5 million increase in these expenses in our Professional
Services Division, a $3.6 million decrease in these expenses in our Business Information Division,
and a $2.4 million increase in unallocated corporate costs as discussed below. You should refer to
the more detailed discussions in the Professional Services Division Results and Business
Information Division Results below for more information regarding the causes of the changes in the
divisional selling, general and administrative expenses. The increase in operating expenses
attributable to corporate operations was primarily due to an increase in unallocated corporate
insurance costs ($1.5 million), $0.5 of which is attributable to a change we made in the second
quarter of 2008 in the accounting estimate related to our medical self-insurance reserve to more
closely reflect past claims history. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we accrued
$0.9 million for performance-based pay for our executive officers because, based on our financial
performance thus far, it is likely that the performance targets will be met. We did not make
similar accruals during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, because it was not likely, at
that time, that the 2008 performance targets would be met. These factors contributed to the
year-over-year increase in corporate operating expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expense as a percentage of revenue decreased to 34.2% as of September 30, 2009 from 39.5% as of
September 30, 2008. This is largely due to expense control efforts that have been put in place in
our various businesses, as well as the significant increase in revenues recorded in our
Professional Services Division in the first nine months of 2009 related to the Barrett-NDEx
acquisition.
36
Break-up Fee. There was no break-up fee paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
See Break-up Fee in the three-month discussion earlier in this report for more information about
the $1.5 million break-up fee paid in the third quarter of 2008.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our depreciation expense increased due to increased
levels of property and equipment in the nine months ended September 30, 2009, most notably due to
the Barrett-NDEx acquisition. Our amortization expense increased primarily due to the amortization
of finite-lived intangible assets acquired in the 2008 acquisitions, including Barrett-NDEx.
Additionally, in the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we fully amortized that portion of the
non-compete intangible asset attributable to Michael Barrett, a senior officer at Barrett-NDEx, as
a result of his death in January 2009, resulting in an additional $0.9 million in amortization
expense.
Other Income, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Other income, net |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
Not meaningful |
|
Other income, net increased by $1.5 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2009 as a result of the receipt of insurance proceeds on the company-owned life insurance of
Michael C. Barrett, a senior officer of Barrett-NDEx, who passed away in January 2009. We used
$0.5 million of these insurance proceeds to make a contribution to Southern Methodist University
Dedman School of Law to establish a scholarship fund in his name. We netted this contribution
against the gain recorded on the proceeds of the life insurance.
Interest Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Total interest expense, net |
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
% |
Interest on bank credit facility |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Cash interest expense on interest rate swaps |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
139.4 |
% |
Amortization of deferred financing fees |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
Other |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
Not meaningful |
|
Interest expense related to our bank credit facility increased slightly in the first nine
months of 2009 due to increased average outstanding borrowings when compared to the second quarter
of 2008. This was largely offset by a decline in our weighted average interest rate on these
borrowings as discussed in the three month section above. For the nine months ended September 30,
2009, our average outstanding borrowings were $151.6 million compared to $80.5 million for the same
period in 2008. This increase in debt was primarily a result of the debt incurred to finance, in
part, the acquisition of Barrett-NDEx in September 2008. Cash interest incurred on our interest
rate swaps increased as a result of interest rate changes.
Non-Cash Interest Income (Expense) Related to Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Non-cash interest income (expense)
related to interest
rate swaps |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
Not meaningful |
|
Non-cash interest related to interest rate swaps increased as a result of a change in the
estimated fair value of our interest rate swaps driven by interest rate changes. The estimated fair
value of our fixed rate interest rate swaps recorded on our balance sheet is a liability of $1.9
million and $1.3 million, respectively, at September 30, 2009 and 2008.
37
Income Tax Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
13.2 |
|
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
|
82.0 |
% |
The increase in income tax expense was due to a $17.8 million increase in income before
taxes but after noncontrolling interests which was partially offset by a decrease in effective tax
rate during the first nine months of 2009 (36.7%) compared to the same period in 2008 (40.0%). The
decrease in our effective tax rate resulted primarily from a decrease in the estimated state
effective tax rate and the impact of non-taxable life insurance proceeds from Michael Barretts
death.
Professional Services Division Results
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Total Professional Services Division revenues |
|
$ |
126.3 |
|
|
$ |
62.5 |
|
|
$ |
63.8 |
|
|
|
102.0 |
% |
Mortgage default processing service revenues |
|
|
115.2 |
|
|
|
51.1 |
|
|
|
64.1 |
|
|
|
125.6 |
% |
Appellate services revenues |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
)% |
Professional Services Division revenues increased due to the increase in mortgage default
processing service revenues primarily as a result of the acquisition of Barrett-NDEx in September
2008, which accounted for $64.2 million of this increase for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The mortgage default processing service businesses that we acquired from Wilford & Geske in
February 2008 accounted for an additional $0.8 million of the total increase in division and
mortgage default processing services revenues. These increases were partially offset by decreased
mortgage default processing services revenues primarily resulting from legislation in Indiana that
took effect in July 2009, which is described in Recent DevelopmentsRegulatory Environment above.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we serviced approximately 267,500 mortgage default
case files, compared to approximately 123,300 mortgage default case files that we serviced for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. Barrett-NDEx accounted for approximately 156,000, or 58.3%,
of the files we processed in the first nine months of 2009. Barrett-NDExs total file volume for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was 128,300, which includes 13,700 files processed during
the month that we owned them. File volume at Barrett-NDEx grew 21.6% from the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 to the nine months ended September 30,
2009, which includes the eight month period during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 when we did not own Barrett-NDEX.
The Barrett law firm and Trott & Trott each accounted for more than 10%, and together
accounted for approximately 80%, of our Professional Services Division revenues in the first nine
months of 2009. For the same period in 2008, Trott & Trott, Feiwell & Hannoy, and the Barrett law
firm each accounted for more than 10% of our Professional Services Division revenues.
Despite a slight increase in the number of appellate filings processed in the first nine
months of 2009 (Counsel Press assisted with 6,600 appellate filings as compared to 6,500 in the
first nine months of 2008), appellate service revenues decreased as a result of lower average
revenue per filing, driven by smaller filings being processed and pricing pressures in the market.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
93.4 |
|
|
$ |
45.7 |
|
|
$ |
47.7 |
|
|
|
104.3 |
% |
Direct operating expense |
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
105.8 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
97.4 |
% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
145.0 |
% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
104.7 |
% |
38
Operating expenses increased primarily as a result of the operating costs of Barrett-NDEx
acquired in September 2008. This added $45.5 million in operating expenses, including $23.1 million
of the increase in direct operating
expenses and $14.3 million of the increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses.
Direct operating expenses from NDeX (exclusive of those related to the Barrett-NDEx acquisition)
increased as a result of increased personnel costs and other production costs associated with
increased file volumes. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased resulting largely
from increased personnel costs and health insurance costs.
Amortization expense increased from the amortization of finite-lived intangible assets
associated with the 2008 acquisitions, most notably Barrett-NDEx, which added $5.3 million in
amortization expense, including $0.9 million of additional amortization expense as a result of
fully amortizing that portion of the non-compete intangible asset attributable to Michael Barrett
as a result of his death in January 2009. Depreciation expense increased as a result of the
addition of the Barrett-NDEx assets.
Total operating expenses attributable to our Professional Services Division as a percentage of
Professional Services Division revenue increased to 73.9% for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 from 73.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Business Information Division Results
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Total Business Information Division Revenues |
|
$ |
67.0 |
|
|
$ |
68.4 |
|
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
Display and classified advertising revenues |
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(20.1 |
)% |
Public notice revenues |
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
% |
Circulation revenues |
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
)% |
Other revenues |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(11.7 |
)% |
Our display and classified advertising revenues (which include revenues from events)
decreased primarily due to an approximate 18% decrease in the number of ads placed in our
publications, which we believe was driven by the sluggish economy, as well as a decrease in the
average price paid per classified and display ad across our publications.
Our public notice revenues increased due to an approximate 8% increase in the total number of
public notice ads placed in our publications, most of which were foreclosures notices as noted in
the third quarter discussion above. This increased revenue was primarily driven by the increased
number of foreclosure notices placed in our Maryland publication for the reasons described in our
three month discussion above. In addition, the acquisition of the assets of Legal and Business
Publishers, Inc. in February 2008 added $0.2 million in revenues for the full first nine months in
2009.
Circulation revenues decreased slightly due to a decline in the number of paid subscribers
between September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2009, as discussed in the three month section above.
The business information products we target to the Missouri, Minnesota, and Maryland markets
each accounted for over 10% of our Business Information Divisions revenues for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. For the same period in 2008, the business information products
we target to the Missouri and Minnesota markets each accounted for over 10% of our Business
Information Divisions revenues.
39
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
|
|
($s in millions) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
51.5 |
|
|
$ |
56.7 |
|
|
$ |
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
)% |
Direct operating expense |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
)% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
25.7 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(12.3 |
)% |
Depreciation expense |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
Amortization expense |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Direct operating expenses decreased primarily as a result of our decline in total revenue
in this division, which resulted in lower production and distribution expenses (a $1.0 million cost
savings). In addition, a reduction in personnel expenses related to a decrease in headcount as
well as lower commission and performance-based pay account for $0.6 million of this decrease.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased primarily as a result of a decline in
headcount and lower commission and performance based pay as a result of lower display and
classified advertising revenues ($2.0 million). A $0.9 million decline in bad debt expense
resulting from more focused collection efforts also contributed to this decrease. Total operating
expenses attributable to our Business Information Division as a percentage of Business Information
Division revenue decreased to 76.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 82.8% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, largely as a result of cost control efforts we implemented
over the last four quarters.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered into any off balance sheet arrangements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations, available capacity under our
credit facility, distributions received from DLNP, and available cash reserves. The following table
summarizes our cash and cash equivalents, working capital (deficit) and long-term debt, less
current portion as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, as well as cash flows for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
20,640 |
|
|
$ |
2,456 |
|
Working capital (deficit) |
|
|
5,898 |
|
|
|
(12,588 |
) |
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
133,675 |
|
|
|
143,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
32,104 |
|
|
$ |
16,211 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions and investments |
|
|
(2,441 |
) |
|
|
(183,518 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(2,584 |
) |
|
|
(3,957 |
) |
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(8,995 |
) |
|
|
171,817 |
|
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
The most significant inflows of cash are cash receipts from our customers. Operating cash
outflows include payments to employees, payments to vendors for services and supplies and payments
of interest and income taxes.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
increased $15.9 million, or 98.0%, to $32.1 million from $16.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. This increase was primarily the result of improved net income, largely as a
result of the acquired business of Barrett-NDEx in September 2008.
40
Working capital increased by $18.5 million, from a deficit of $(12.6) million at December 31,
2008, to $5.9 million at September 30, 2009, resulting primarily from strong cash collections in
2009 driven by increased revenues in our Professional Services division. A significant increase in
accounts receivable in 2009 due to increased sales and pass-through costs at Barrett-NDEx also
contributed to the increase, but was partially offset by the $13.0 million liability recorded in
connection with the achievement of the Barrett-NDEx earnout.
Our allowance for doubtful accounts, allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross
receivables and days sales outstanding, or DSO, as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is
set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts (in thousands) |
|
$ |
914 |
|
|
$ |
1,398 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross accounts receivable |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Day sales outstanding |
|
|
79.4 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
The decrease in allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of gross accounts
receivable primarily results from of the large increase in receivables from the Barrett law firm,
for which we carry no allowance for doubtful accounts. No allowance is carried on these accounts
because, to date, we have not experienced any problems in collecting payment from the Barrett law
firm. Additionally, focused collection efforts across our Business Information operating units has
resulted in a decrease in the estimated reserves.
We calculate DSO by dividing net receivables by average daily revenue excluding circulation.
Average daily revenue is computed by dividing total revenue by the total number of days in the
period. In calculating our DSO for the year ended December 31, 2008, we annualized the revenues
from Barrett-NDEx, which we have only owned since September 2, 2008. Our DSO increased
significantly from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009, primarily because (1) at December 31,
2008, Trott & Trott paid a significant portion of its accounts receivable balance early, which it
did not do at the end of September of 2009; and (2) the number of unbilled files from our Texas and
California operations as well as the number of billed pass through costs related to our California
operations grew, increasing accounts receivable from that operation.
We own 35.0% of the membership interests in The Detroit Legal Publishing, LLC, or DLNP,
the publisher of The Detroit Legal News, and received distributions of $4.2 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and $5.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The
operating agreement for DLNP provides for us to receive quarterly distribution payments based on
our ownership percentage, which are a significant source of operating cash flow.
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $182.5 million to $(4.9) million in the nine
months ending September 30, 2009 from $(187.4) million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
In the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, we used cash primarily in connection with acquisitions
and capital expenditures for offices, equipment, and software. Cash paid for acquisitions totaled
$183.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to $2.4 million paid during
the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Acquisition spending during the first nine months of
2009 relates to earnouts paid during that period as well as the investment in GovDelivery that we
made during the third quarter. Capital expenditures and purchases of software were approximately
$2.6 million and $4.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
About 30.0% of our capital spending in the first nine months of 2009 related to office moves and
related expenditures and a building restoration project at one of our facilities, as well as
upgrading our press equipment at our printing facilities, and another 24.0% related to spending on
various technology enhancements. We expect the costs for capital expenditures to range between
1.5% and 2.5% of our total revenues, on an aggregated basis, for the year ending December 31, 2009,
which we expect to use in the fourth quarter of 2009 for improvements to our proprietary case
management systems, for telecommunications equipment at NDeX and in connection with our business
continuity and disaster readiness initiatives. Since September 30, 2009, we paid an aggregate of
$38.9 million to close the Albertelli and DiscoverReady acquisitions discussed in Recent
Acquisitions above, which was funded by cash on our balance sheet at September 30, 2009, cash
flow from operations received from September 30, 2009, through November 2, 2009, and a $9.0 million
draw on our revolving line of credit.
41
Finite-lived intangible assets decreased $88.4 million, or 34.7%, to $166.5 million at
September 30, 2009 from $254.9 million as of December 31, 2008. The change in the finite-lived
intangible assets resulted primarily from the completion of the valuation of the assets acquired in
the Barrett- NDEx acquisition and the reclassification of amounts previously recorded as
finite-lived intangible assets. These assets, which were originally recorded in connection with the
Barrett-NDEx acquisition, were changed because the valuation of the acquired assets was completed
in September 2009. See Recent Acquisitions, above for a discussion on the particular changes.
Goodwill increased to $196.6 million as of September 30, 2009, from $119.0 million at
December 31, 2008. The change in goodwill resulted primarily from the completion of the valuation
of the assets acquired in the Barrett-NDEx acquisition (See Managements Discussion and
AnalysisRecent Acquisitions above for more information about the completion of this purchase
price allocation). In addition, we recorded $13.0 million as an adjustment to goodwill because
Barrett-NDEx satisfied the earnout target as more fully described in Recent Acquisitions above.
This adjustment also accounted for a portion of the change in goodwill that occurred as of
September 30, 2009.
Cash Flows (Used) Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities primarily includes borrowings under our revolving
credit agreement and the issuance of long-term debt. Cash used in financing activities generally
includes the repayment of borrowings under the revolving credit agreement and long-term debt and
the payment of fees associated with the issuance of long-term debt.
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities decreased $180.8 million to a $(9.0) million
use of cash in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $171.8 million of cash provided in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. In the first nine months of 2009, financing activity was
limited to payments on our senior long-term debt and our unsecured note payable to Feiwell &
Hannoy, as there were no new borrowings. Long-term debt, less current portion, decreased $9.8
million, or 6.8%, to $133.7 million as of September 30, 2009 from $143.5 million as of December 31,
2008.
Until February 7, 2010, APC Investments and Feiwell & Hannoy have the right to require NDeX to
repurchase all or any portion of their respective membership interest in NDeX on the terms and
conditions more fully described in Noncontrolling Interest above. To date, neither APC
Investments nor Feiwell & Hannoy have exercised their respective put right. If APC Investments and
Feiwell & Hannoys put rights had been exercised on September 30, 2009, NDeX would have been
obligated to pay APC Investments and Feiwell & Hannoy $17.2 million in the aggregate over a period
of three years with interest at a rate equal to prime plus 2.0%.
Credit Agreement. On August 8, 2007, we, including our consolidated subsidiaries, entered
into a second amended and restated credit agreement, effective August 8, 2007, with a syndicate of
bank lenders and U.S. Bank National Association, as lead bank and agent for the lenders, for a
senior secured credit facility comprised of a term loan facility due and payable in quarterly
installments with a final maturity date of August 8, 2014 and a revolving credit facility with a
final maturity date of August 8, 2012. On November 2, 2009, we entered into a second amendment to
our credit agreement with U.S. Bank and the syndicate of bank lenders under the terms of which such
lenders consented to our acquisition of DiscoverReady (described in Recent Acquisitions above).
There were no changes to material terms of the credit agreement under this amendment. In
connection with this amendment, we paid the lenders approximately $0.5 million in fees.
At September 30, 2009, we had $146.5 million outstanding under our term loan, and no amount
outstanding under our revolving line of credit and available capacity of approximately
$40.0 million, after taking into account the senior leverage ratio requirements under the credit
agreement. On November 2, 2009, we borrowed $9.0 million on our revolving line of credit to fund,
in part, our acquisition of DiscoverReady, leaving approximately
$31.0 million available on our revolving line of credit, after taking into
account the senior leverage ratio requirements on our credit facility. We will use the remaining availability under our credit
agreement, if at all, for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including the
financing of acquisitions.
42
At September 30, 2009, the weighted average interest rate on our senior term note was 2.4%. If
we elect to have interest accrue (1) based on the prime rate, then such interest is due and payable
on the last day of each month and (2) based on LIBOR, then such interest is due and payable at the
end of the applicable interest period that we elect, provided that if the applicable interest
period is longer than three months interest will be due and payable in three month intervals. At
September 30, 2009, all of the interest on our senior note was based on LIBOR.
Future Needs
We expect that cash flow from operations, supplemented by short and long-term financing and
the proceeds from our credit facility, as necessary, will be adequate to fund day-to-day
operations, capital expenditure requirements, and the $13.0 million owed to the sellers of
Barrett-NDEx in connection with the satisfaction of the earn-out target
(see Recent Acquisitions above) , along with any payment obligations upon the exercise of
the put right by APC Investments or Feiwell & Hannoy as described in Noncontrolling Interest
above. However, our ability to generate sufficient cash flow in the future could be adversely
impacted by regulatory, lender and other responses to the mortgage crisis, including new and
proposed legislation and lenders voluntary and required loss mitigation efforts and moratoria,
including those described in Recent Developments Regulatory Environment in our annual report on
Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 12, 2009 and earlier in this report. In addition, since
September 30, 2009, we also made aggregate payments of $38.9 million to close the Albertelli and
DiscoverReady acquisitions (See Recent Acquisitions and Cash Flows from Investing Activities
above).
We plan to continue to develop and evaluate potential acquisitions to expand our product and
service offerings and customer base and enter new geographic markets. We intend to fund these
acquisitions over the next twelve months with funds generated from operations and borrowings under
our credit facility. We may also need to raise money to fund these acquisitions, as we did for the
acquisition of Barrett-NDEx, through the sale of our equity securities or additional debt
financing.
Our ability to secure short-term and long-term financing in the future will depend on several
factors, including our future profitability and cash flow from operations, the quality of our short
and long-term assets, our relative levels of debt and equity, the financial condition and
operations of acquisition targets (in the case of acquisition financing), our stock price and the
overall condition of the credit markets (which currently are, and may continue to be in the near
future, difficult to access).
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
We are exposed to market risks related to interest rates. Other types of market risk, such as
foreign currency risk, do not arise in the normal course of our business activities. Our exposure
to changes in interest rates is limited to borrowings under our credit facility. However, as of
December 31, 2008, we had swap arrangements that convert $40.0 million of our variable rate term
loan into a fixed rate obligation. Under our bank credit facility, we are required to enter into
derivative financial instrument transactions, such as swaps or interest rate caps, in order to
manage or reduce our exposure to risk from changes in interest rates. We do not enter into
derivatives or other financial instrument transactions for speculative purposes.
We recognize all of our derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a
derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging
relationship, and further, on the type of hedging relationship. As of September 30, 2009, our
interest rate swap agreements were not designated for hedge accounting treatment and as a result,
the fair value is classified within other deferred revenue and other liabilities on our balance
sheet and as a component of interest expense in our statement of operations for the year then
ended. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized interest income of
$0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, related to the change in fair value of the interest
rate swap agreements. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized interest income
of $1.2 million, and, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized no interest
income or expense, related to the change in fair value of the interest rate swap agreements. At
September 30, 2009 and 2008, the estimated fair value of our fixed interest rate swaps was a
liability of $1.9 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
If the future interest yield curve decreases, the fair value of our interest rate swap
agreements will decrease and interest expense will increase. If the future interest yield curve
increases, the fair value of our interest rate swap agreements will increase and interest expense
will decrease.
Based on the variable-rate debt included in our debt portfolio, a 75 basis point increase in
interest rates would have resulted in additional interest expense of $0.6 million (pre-tax) and
$0.2 million (pre-tax) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
43
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on such evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have
concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
and provided reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
accurately and within the time frames specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules
and forms and accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer
and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were not any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended
September 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
We are from time to time involved in ordinary, routine litigation incidental to our normal
course of business, and we do not believe that any such existing litigation is material to our
financial condition or results of operations.
The following risk factors supplement the risk factors included in our annual report on Form
10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2009 and also update and
supersede those risk factors under the captions (which are being
updated to account for the
acquisition of DiscoverReady): (a) Regulation of the legal profession may constrain APCs and
Counsel Press operations, and numerous issues arising out of that regulation, its interpretation
or its evolution could impair our ability to provide professional services to our customers and
reduce our revenues and profitability; (b) Claims, even if not valid, that our case management
software systems, document conversion system or other proprietary software products and information
systems infringe on the intellectual property rights of others could increase our expenses or
inhibit us from offering certain services; and (c) We may be required to incur additional
indebtedness if any of the minority members of APC exercises its put right with respect to its
membership interest in APC.
Other than as set forth below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors we
previously disclosed in Part IItem 1A. Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2009, as updated by our disclosures in Risk
Factors in Item 1A of Part II of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 7,
2009.
44
We have owned and operated DiscoverReady, LLC for a very short period of time and none of our
executive officers have managed or operated a discovery management and document review services
company prior to this acquisition.
We acquired an 85% equity interest in DiscoverReady, LLC on November 2, 2009. DR Holdco, LLC, a
limited liability company owned by James K. Wagner, Jr., Steven R.
Harber, Paul Yerkes and David Shub,
along with other DiscoverReady employees, owns the remaining 15% membership interest in
DiscoverReady. DiscoverReady provides outsourced discovery management and document review services
to major United States companies and their counsel. Prior to our acquisition of this business, our
executive officers have not managed or operated a discovery management and document review
business. Thus, we will rely heavily on the management skills and
experiences of Messrs. Wagner and Harber, who have co-founded and built DiscoverReady and have a
deep understanding of the discovery management and document review business. If our executive
officers cannot effectively manage and operate this business, DiscoverReadys, and our Professional
Services divisions, operating results and prospects may be adversely affected and we may not be
able to execute our growth strategy with respect to DiscoverReady.
We have employment agreements with Messrs. Wagner and Harber; however, these employment agreements
do not ensure that either of them will not voluntarily terminate their employment with us. We also
do not have key man insurance for either of Messrs. Wagner or Harber. The loss of either Messr.
Wagner or Harber could require our executive officers to divert immediate attention to seeking a
replacement and operating a business in which our executive officers have no prior experience. Our
inability to find a suitable replacement for either of Messrs. Wagner or Harber on a timely basis
could adversely affect our ability to operate and grow DiscoverReady.
DiscoverReadys business revenues are very concentrated among a few customers and if these
customers choose to manage their discovery with their own staff or by engaging another provider and if
we are unable to develop new customer relationships, our operating results and the ability to
execute our growth strategy may be adversely affected.
DiscoverReady generates revenue through fixed-fee arrangements for outsourced discovery management
and document review services with major United States companies and their counsel. DiscoverReadys
top two customers are expected to account for more than 60% in the aggregate, of its projected
revenues for 2009. Once of these customers is projected to account
for 37% of its projected 2009 revenues and accounted for 33% of its 2008 revenues. Therefore, the success of our discovery
management business is tied to our relationships with these key customers as well as our ability to
develop new customer relationships. Our operating results and ability to execute our growth
strategy for DiscoverReady could be adversely affected if (1) we lose business from any of these
customers; (2) if these customers are affected by changes in the market and industry or other
factors that cause them to be unable to pay for our services; or (3) if we are unable to attract
additional business from current or new customers for any reason, including any of the following:
poor service, the loss of key employees, such as James K. Wagner, Jr. and Steven R. Harber, the
decision of our customers to perform document review services with its own staff or to engage the
services to one of our competitors. If any of these were to occur, it could reduce the cash flow of
DiscoverReady and adversely affect the results of operations of this business.
Regulation of the legal profession may constrain the operations of the businesses in our
Professional Services division, and numerous issues arising out of that regulation, its
interpretation or its evolution could impair our ability to provide professional services to our
customers and reduce our revenues and profitability.
Each state has adopted laws, regulations and codes of ethics that provide for the licensure of
attorneys, which grants attorneys the exclusive right to practice law and places restrictions upon
the activities of licensed attorneys. The boundaries of the practice of law, however, are
indistinct, vary from one state to another and are the product of complex interactions among state
law, bar associations and constitutional law formulated by the U.S. Supreme Court. Many states
define the practice of law to include the giving of advice and opinions regarding another persons
legal rights, the preparation of legal documents or the preparation of court documents for another
person. In addition, all states and the American Bar Association prohibit attorneys from sharing
fees for legal services with non-attorneys.
45
Pursuant to services agreements between NDeX and its law firm customers, we provide mortgage
default processing services to law firms and directly to mortgage lenders and loan servicers on
California foreclosure files. Through Counsel Press, we provide procedural and technical advice to
law firms and attorneys to enable them to file appellate briefs, records and appendices on behalf
of their clients that comply with court rules. Through DiscoverReady, we provide outsourced
discovery management and document review services under fixed fee arrangements. Current laws,
regulations and codes of ethics related to the practice of law pose the following principal risks:
|
|
|
State or local bar associations, state or local prosecutors or other persons may
challenge the services provided by APC, Counsel Press or DiscoverReady as constituting the
unauthorized practice of law. Any
such challenge could have a disruptive effect upon the operations of our business, including
the diversion of significant time and attention of our senior management. We may also incur
significant expenses in connection with such a challenge, including substantial fees for
attorneys and other professional advisors. If a challenge to any of these businesses were
successful, we may need to materially modify our professional services operations in a
manner that could adversely affect that divisions revenues and profitability and we could
be subject to a range of penalties that could damage our reputation in the legal markets we
serve. In addition, any similar challenge to the operations of NDeXs law firm customers
could adversely impact their mortgage default business, which would in turn adversely affect
our Professional Service Divisions revenues and profitability; |
|
|
|
The services agreements to which NDeX is a party could be deemed to be unenforceable if
a court were to determine that such agreements constituted an impermissible fee sharing
arrangement between the law firm and NDeX; and |
|
|
|
Applicable laws, regulations and codes of ethics, including their interpretation and
enforcement, could change in a manner that restricts NDeXs, Counsel Presss or
DiscoverReadys operations. Any such change in laws, policies or practices could increase
our cost of doing business or adversely affect our revenues and profitability. |
Claims, even if not valid, that our case management software systems, document conversion system,
document review systems or other proprietary software products and information systems infringe on
the intellectual property rights of others could increase our expenses or inhibit us from offering
certain services.
Other persons could claim that they have patents and other intellectual property rights that cover
or affect our use of software products and other components of information systems on which we rely
to operate our business, including our two proprietary case management software systems we use to
provide mortgage default processing services, our proprietary document conversion system we use to
provide appellate services and the proprietary document review systems we use to provide outsourced
discovery management and document review services. Litigation may be necessary to determine the
validity and scope of third-party rights or to defend against claims of infringement. Any
litigation, regardless of the outcome, could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources
and could have a material adverse effect on our business. If a court determines that one or more of
the software products or other components of information systems we use infringes on intellectual
property owned by others or we agree to settle such a dispute, we may be liable for money damages.
In addition, we may be required to cease using those products and components unless we obtain
licenses from the owners of the intellectual property or redesign those products and components in
such a way as to avoid infringement. In any event, such situations may increase our expenses or
adversely affect the marketability of our services.
46
We may be required to incur additional indebtedness if any of the holders of noncontrolling
interest in NDeX or DiscoverReady exercise their put rights with respect to their interest in such
entities or if we exercise our call right with respect to DiscoverReady.
Under the terms of NDeXs operating agreement (as amended and restated), the minority members of
APC have the right to require NDeX to repurchase all or any portion of their membership interests
in NDeX (currently 15.3%). As of September 30, 2009, the redemption value of the put right of the
minority members of NDeX was $28.5 million. APC Investments and Feiwell & Hannoy (holding 9.2% in
the aggregate) may exercise the put right until February 7, 2010 and, had they both exercised their
put right at September 30, 2009, we would be required to pay them an aggregate $17.2 million. The
remaining minority members of NDeX (holding 6.1% in the aggregate) may exercise this right within
the six month period following September 2, 2012.
We will incur additional indebtedness in the future if any minority member of NDeX exercises
its put right because the purchase price paid by NDeX in connection with any such repurchase would
be in the form of a three-year unsecured note. The principal amount of the note would be equal to
(x) 6.25 times NDeXs trailing twelve month EBITDA, less the aggregate amount of any
interest-bearing indebtedness of NDeX as of the repurchase date, multiplied by (y) such minority
members percentage ownership interest in NDeX. Such note would bear interest at a rate equal to
prime plus 2%. If we are required to incur this additional indebtedness, it could decrease the
amount of working capital available to fund our operations, which could impair our ability to operate
and grow our business as planned.
Under the terms of the DiscoverReady limited liability company agreement, DR Holdco (which
holds a 15% equity interest) has the right, for a period of ninety days following November 2, 2012,
to require DiscoverReady to repurchase all of its equity interest in DiscoverReady. During that
same period, we also have the right to require DR Holdco to sell all or a portion of it equity
interest in DiscoverReady to us. These rights may be exercised earlier in certain limited
circumstances. See Noncontrolling Interest above for more information about these circumstances.
If either of the rights described above are exercised, the purchase
price we will pay for the DR Holdco interest in DiscoverReady will be
based on fair market value. At November 2, 2009, the fair market
value of the DR Holdco interest in DiscoverReady was $5.6 million. We may be
required to incur indebtedness should we or DR Holdco exercise our respective rights as we will may
be required to pay the purchase price under the terms of a three-year unsecured note to the extent
our credit agreement limits our ability to use our available cash. The note would bear interest at
a rate equal to prime plus 1.0%.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None.
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other Information |
On November 2, 2009, we acquired an 85% equity interest in DiscoverReady, LLC under the terms
and conditions of a membership interests purchase agreement by and among the DiscoverReady, LLC, DR
Holdco LLC, Steven R. Harber, David Shub, James K. Wagner, Paul
Yerkes, C. Parkhill Mays and us.
In connection with this acquisition, DiscoverReady amended and restated its limited liability
company agreement as of November 2, 2009. We describe the material terms and conditions of the
purchase agreement and limited liability company agreement in more detail under Managements
Discussion and AnalysisRecent Acquisitions above, which is incorporated in this Item 5 by
reference. Such descriptions of the membership interest purchase agreement and limited liability
company agreement are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of such agreements
that are filed with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q as Exhibits 2.1 and 10.9, respectively,
and which are incorporated herein by reference.
Also, on November 2, 2009, we and our consolidated subsidiaries entered into a second
amendment to our second amended and restated credit agreement with the syndicate of lenders that
are party to that agreement under the terms of which such lenders consented to our acquisition of
an 85% equity interest in DiscoverReady. We paid $500,000 in fees to the lenders in connection with
this amendment. Such description of the second amendment is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the full text of the second amendment, which is filed with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q as
Exhibit 10.10 and which is incorporated herein by reference.
47
On November 6, 2009, we issued a press release announcing our acquisition of the membership
interest in DiscoverReady, LLC, a copy of which is attached to this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
as Exhibit 99.1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
No |
|
Title |
|
Method of Filing |
|
2.1 |
* |
|
Membership Interests
Purchase Agreement by and
among DiscoverReady LLC, DR
Holdco LLC, Steven R.
Harber, David Shub, James K.
Wagner, Paul Yerkes, C.
Parkhill Mays and Dolan
Media Company dated November
2, 2009
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to the
American Processing Company,
LLC Operating Agreement
dated July 1, 2009
|
|
Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of our
quarterly report on Form
10-Q filed with the SEC on
August 7, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Separation Agreement and
General Release between
Dolan Media Company and Mark
E. Baumbach dated July 28,
2009
|
|
Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of our current
report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on July 28,
2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement between
Dolan Media Company and
Scott J. Pollei dated August
1, 2009
|
|
Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of our current
report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on August 4,
2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Employment Agreement between
Dolan Media Company and
Vicki J. Duncomb dated
August 1, 2009
|
|
Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of our current
report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on August 4,
2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
Second Amendment to
Employment Agreement between
Dolan Media Company and Mark
W.C. Stodder dated August 1,
2009
|
|
Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 of our
quarterly report on Form
10-Q filed with the SEC on
August 7, 2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
Services Agreement among
American Processing Company,
LLC (d/b/a NDeX) and James
E. Albertelli, P.A. dated
October 1, 2009
|
|
Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of our current
report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on October 5,
2009. Portions of this
exhibit were omitted and
have been filed separately
with the Secretary of the
SEC pursuant to an
application for confidential
treatment under Rule 406 of
the Securities Act. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement
among Dolan Media Company,
American Processing Company,
LLC (d/b/a NDeX), James E.
Albertelli, P.A., The
Albertelli Firm, P.C.,
Albertelli Title, Inc. and
James E. Albertelli dated
October 1, 2009
|
|
Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 of our current
report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on October 5,
2009. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
Consulting Agreement between
Mark E. Baumbach and Dolan
Media Company dated
September 28, 2009
|
|
Filed herewith. |
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
No |
|
Title |
|
Method of Filing |
|
10.9 |
|
|
Third Amended and Restated
Limited Liability Company
Agreement of DiscoverReady,
LLC dated as of November 2,
2009
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
|
Second Amendment to Second
Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement with Dolan Media
Company, its consolidated
subsidiaries and a syndicate
of lenders dated November 2,
2009
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
James P. Dolan
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of
Vicki J. Duncomb
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
James P. Dolan
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 906 Certification of
Vicki J. Duncomb
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
|
Press Release of Dolan Media
Company dated November 6,
2009
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
* |
|
The schedules and exhibits to the Membership Interests Purchase Agreement have been omitted
pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. We agree to furnish supplementally to the SEC,
upon request, a copy of the omitted schedules and exhibits. |
49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: November 6, 2009 |
DOLAN MEDIA COMPANY
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ James P. Dolan
|
|
|
|
James P. Dolan |
|
|
|
Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and
President (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
Dated: November 6, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Vicki J. Duncomb
|
|
|
|
Vicki J. Duncomb |
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer) |
|
50
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
No |
|
Title |
|
Method of Filing |
|
2.1 |
* |
|
Membership Interests Purchase Agreement by
and among DiscoverReady LLC, DR Holdco
LLC, Steven R. Harber, David Shub, James
K. Wagner, Paul Yerkes, C. Parkhill Mays
and Dolan Media Company dated November 2,
2009
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
Consulting Agreement between Mark E.
Baumbach and Dolan Media Company dated
September 28, 2009
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Limited
Liability Company Agreement of
DiscoverReady, LLC dated as of November
2, 2009
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
|
Second Amendment to Second Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement with Dolan Media
Company, its consolidated subsidiaries and
a syndicate of lenders dated November 2,
2009
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of James P. Dolan
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Vicki J.
Duncomb
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 906 Certification of James P. Dolan
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Vicki J.
Duncomb
|
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
|
Press Release of Dolan Media Company dated
November 6, 2009
|
|
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
* |
|
The schedules and exhibits to the Membership Interests Purchase Agreement have been omitted
pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. We agree to furnish supplementally to the SEC,
upon request, a copy of the omitted schedules and exhibits. |