Form 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009
Commission File Number 1-5620
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
23-1609753
(I.R.S. Employer ID No.) |
|
|
|
435 Devon Park Drive
Building 800
Wayne, PA
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
19087
(Zip Code) |
(610) 293-0600
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the
Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports) and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and
post such files). |
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). |
Yes o No þ
Number of shares outstanding as of August 6, 2009
Common Stock 122,339,312
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands except |
|
|
|
per share data) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
47,305 |
|
|
$ |
75,051 |
|
Cash held in escrow and restricted cash |
|
|
6,433 |
|
|
|
6,433 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
38,503 |
|
|
|
14,701 |
|
Restricted marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances ($8,045 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,465 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
92,921 |
|
|
|
120,147 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
12,369 |
|
Ownership interests in and advances to companies ($180,033 at fair value at June 30, 2009) |
|
|
262,957 |
|
|
|
85,561 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,729 |
|
Cash held in escrow and restricted cash long-term |
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
Other |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
357,453 |
|
|
$ |
232,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of credit line borrowings |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,104 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
3,337 |
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
5,758 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
5,415 |
|
|
|
8,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
7,899 |
|
|
|
31,747 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
345 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
5,265 |
|
|
|
9,600 |
|
Convertible senior debentures |
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.10 par value; 1,000 shares authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.10 par value; 500,000 shares authorized; 122,314 and 121,589 shares issued
and outstanding in 2009 and 2008, respectively |
|
|
12,231 |
|
|
|
12,159 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
778,383 |
|
|
|
763,323 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(532,325 |
) |
|
|
(669,526 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
258,289 |
|
|
|
104,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
357,453 |
|
|
$ |
232,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share data)
(Unaudited) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
11,647 |
|
|
$ |
16,916 |
|
|
$ |
34,839 |
|
|
$ |
32,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
4,845 |
|
|
|
8,510 |
|
|
|
13,811 |
|
|
|
15,907 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
10,983 |
|
|
|
14,266 |
|
|
|
28,072 |
|
|
|
28,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
15,828 |
|
|
|
22,776 |
|
|
|
41,883 |
|
|
|
44,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(4,181 |
) |
|
|
(5,860 |
) |
|
|
(7,044 |
) |
|
|
(11,327 |
) |
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
158,573 |
|
|
|
2,263 |
|
|
|
158,328 |
|
|
|
2,623 |
|
Recovery related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
1,719 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(817 |
) |
|
|
(1,191 |
) |
|
|
(1,743 |
) |
|
|
(2,565 |
) |
Equity loss |
|
|
(7,446 |
) |
|
|
(5,313 |
) |
|
|
(12,959 |
) |
|
|
(11,927 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
146,240 |
|
|
|
(9,308 |
) |
|
|
136,850 |
|
|
|
(21,473 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
146,254 |
|
|
|
(9,312 |
) |
|
|
136,864 |
|
|
|
(21,477 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
(8,101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
146,254 |
|
|
|
(10,335 |
) |
|
|
138,364 |
|
|
|
(29,578 |
) |
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
(1,163 |
) |
|
|
2,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. |
|
$ |
146,230 |
|
|
$ |
(8,567 |
) |
|
$ |
137,201 |
|
|
$ |
(27,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Income (Loss) Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Safeguard
Scientifics, Inc. common shareholders |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Safeguard
Scientifics, Inc. common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. common
shareholders |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Safeguard
Scientifics, Inc. common shareholders |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Safeguard
Scientifics, Inc. common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. common
shareholders |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares used in computing income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
121,768 |
|
|
|
122,275 |
|
|
|
121,707 |
|
|
|
122,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
134,324 |
|
|
|
122,275 |
|
|
|
133,968 |
|
|
|
122,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. common shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
146,230 |
|
|
$ |
(7,543 |
) |
|
$ |
136,306 |
|
|
$ |
(19,321 |
) |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,024 |
) |
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
(8,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. |
|
$ |
146,230 |
|
|
$ |
(8,567 |
) |
|
$ |
137,201 |
|
|
$ |
(27,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations |
|
$ |
(11,656 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,087 |
) |
Cash flows from operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(11,656 |
) |
|
|
(13,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of and distributions from companies and funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,496 |
|
Advances to partner companies |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(1,020 |
) |
Repayment of advances to companies |
|
|
5,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of ownership interests in partner companies and funds, net of
cash acquired |
|
|
(10,670 |
) |
|
|
(7,168 |
) |
Repayment of note receivable-related party, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Increase in marketable securities |
|
|
(38,503 |
) |
|
|
(3,455 |
) |
Decrease in marketable securities |
|
|
14,701 |
|
|
|
1,854 |
|
Increase in restricted cash, net |
|
|
(1,956 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(2,138 |
) |
|
|
(2,270 |
) |
Deconsolidation of subsidary cash |
|
|
(2,667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations, net |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
83,798 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(34,554 |
) |
|
|
72,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on revolving credit facilities |
|
|
23,726 |
|
|
|
10,543 |
|
Repayments on revolving credit facilities |
|
|
(33,237 |
) |
|
|
(15,540 |
) |
Borrowings on term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
672 |
|
Repayments on term debt |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(2,467 |
) |
Issuance of Company common stock, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
Issuance of subsidiary equity, net |
|
|
28,082 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
Repurchase of Company common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
18,464 |
|
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(27,746 |
) |
|
|
57,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Cash and Cash Equivalents from, and advances to Acsis, Alliance
Consulting and Laureate Pharma included in assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,055 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,746 |
) |
|
|
56,384 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
75,051 |
|
|
|
96,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
47,305 |
|
|
$ |
152,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
104,710 |
|
|
$ |
(669,526 |
) |
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
|
121,589 |
|
|
$ |
12,159 |
|
|
$ |
763,323 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
$ |
(1,217 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
138,364 |
|
|
|
137,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
Impact of subsidiary equity transactions |
|
|
12,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,163 |
) |
Issuance of restricted stock, net |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(1,162 |
) |
|
|
(929 |
) |
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive loss |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
258,289 |
|
|
$ |
(532,325 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
122,314 |
|
|
$ |
12,231 |
|
|
$ |
778,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. GENERAL
The accompanying unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements of Safeguard Scientifics,
Inc. (the Company) were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America and the interim financial statements rules and regulations of the SEC.
In the opinion of management, these statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year or for
any interim period. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations relating to
interim financial statements. The Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q
should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and included together with the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in the Companys 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
2. SUBSIDIARY EQUITY TRANSACTIONS
On March 25, 2009, Clarient, Inc. (Clarient) entered into a stock purchase agreement with
Oak Investment Partners XII (Oak), pursuant to which Clarient agreed to sell up to an aggregate
of 6.6 million shares of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock in two or more tranches for
aggregate consideration of up to $50.0 million. Each preferred share is initially convertible, at
any time, into four shares of Clarients common stock, subject to certain adjustments.
The initial closing of the Oak private placement occurred on March 26, 2009, at which time
Clarient issued 3.8 million preferred shares for aggregate consideration of $29.1 million. After
paying closing fees and legal expenses, Clarient used the proceeds to repay in full and terminate
its revolving credit agreement with a bank and repay a portion of the outstanding balance of its
credit facility with the Company. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company accounted for the
change in the Companys ownership interest in Clarient as an
equity transaction because the Company
retained its controlling financial interest in Clarient. The Company recorded a $14.1 million
credit to additional paid-in capital in the first quarter of 2009 which represented the Companys
increase in its investment in Clarient as a result of the Oak investment. In addition, the Company
recorded an additional noncontrolling interest of $14.0 million which represented the increase in
noncontrolling interest as a result of the Oak investment.
On May 14, 2009, Clarient completed the second closing of the Oak private placement and issued
1.4 million preferred shares for aggregate consideration of $10.9 million. Upon completion of the
second closing, Clarient repaid in full and terminated its credit facility with the Company.
Upon the second closing, the Companys ownership interest in Clarients issued and outstanding
voting securities, on an as-converted basis, decreased from 50.2% to 47.3% and the Company
deconsolidated its holdings in Clarient because it ceased to have a controlling financial interest
in Clarient as of such date. The Company recognized an unrealized gain on deconsolidation of
$106.0 million in Other income (loss), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The
entire unrealized gain on deconsolidation related to the remeasurement to fair value of the
Companys retained interest in Clarient as of the deconsolidation date of May 14, 2009.
3. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Companys Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Clarient in continuing
operations through May 14, 2009, the date of its deconsolidation. During 2008, certain
consolidated partner companies were sold and are reported in discontinued operations. See Note 4.
The Company has elected to apply the fair-value option to account for its retained interest in
Clarient. Unrealized gains and losses on the mark-to-market of its holdings in Clarient are
recognized in Income (loss) from continuing operations for all periods subsequent to the date that
Clarient was deconsolidated. See Note 7.
The Companys voting interest in Cellumen, Inc. (Cellumen) was 55.0% as of June 30, 2009, on
an as-converted basis. Due to the substantive participating rights of the minority shareholders in
the significant operating decisions of Cellumen, the Company continues to account for its holdings
in Cellumen under the equity method. See Note 16.
7
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Clarient Technology Business
In March 2007, Clarient sold its technology business and related intellectual property to Carl
Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc. (Zeiss) for an aggregate purchase price of $12.5 million. The $12.5
million consisted of $11.0 million in cash and an additional $1.5 million in contingent purchase
price, subject to the satisfaction of certain post-closing conditions through March 2009. Clarient
recorded the $1.5 million in income from discontinued operation
in the first quarter of 2009
and received the $1.5 million from Zeiss in the
second quarter of 2009.
Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate Pharma
In May 2008, the Company consummated a transaction (the Bundle Sale) pursuant to which it
sold all of its equity and debt interests in Acsis, Inc. (Acsis), Alliance Consulting Group
Associates, Inc. (Alliance Consulting), Laureate Pharma, Inc. (Laureate Pharma), ProModel
Corporation (ProModel) and Neuronyx, Inc. (Neuronyx) (collectively, the Bundle Companies).
Of the companies included in the Bundle Sale, Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate Pharma
were consolidated partner companies; Neuronyx and ProModel were minority-owned partner companies.
The Company has presented the results of operations of Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate
Pharma as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
In the first quarter of 2008, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $3.6 million to
write down the aggregate carrying value of the Bundle Companies to the total anticipated proceeds,
less estimated costs to complete the Bundle Sale. In the second quarter of 2008, prior to the
completion of the Bundle Sale, the Company recorded a net loss of $1.6 million in discontinued
operations related to the operations of Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate Pharma. In the
second quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a charge of $0.9 million in discontinued operations to
accrue for severance payments due to the former CEO of Alliance Consulting in connection with the
Bundle Sale and recorded a pre-tax gain on disposal of $1.4 million which was also recorded in
discontinued operations.
The gross proceeds to the Company from the Bundle Sale were $74.5 million, of which $6.4
million was placed in escrow pending expiration of a claims period (see Note 17), plus amounts
advanced to certain of the Bundle Companies during the time between the signing of the Bundle Sale
agreement and its consummation. Guarantees of certain Bundle Company credit facilities by the
Company of $31.5 million were eliminated upon the closing of the Bundle Sale.
Results of all discontinued operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,015 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
45,712 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,652 |
) |
Impairment of carrying value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,634 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,121 |
) |
Gain (loss) on disposal, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,023 |
) |
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
(8,101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No.
157) defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is
applicable whenever another accounting pronouncement requires or permits assets and liabilities to
be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing
the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that
should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or
a liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-tier
value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in the valuation methodologies in measuring fair
value:
Level 1Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets.
Level 2Include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.
Level 3Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
The following table provides the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement at |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
June 30, 2009 Using |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(in thousands)
(unaudited) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
47,305 |
|
|
$ |
47,305 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Cash held in escrow and restricted cash |
|
|
6,433 |
|
|
|
6,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities held-to-maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
13,317 |
|
|
|
13,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bills |
|
|
15,712 |
|
|
|
15,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government agency bonds |
|
|
8,574 |
|
|
|
8,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership interest in Clarient |
|
|
180,033 |
|
|
|
180,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash held in escrow and restricted cash long-term |
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
272,750 |
|
|
$ |
272,750 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys holdings in Clarient are measured at fair value using quoted prices for
Clarients common stock as traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market which is considered a Level 1 input
under the valuation hierarchy (see Note 7).
As of June 30, 2009, the contractual maturities of the marketable securities were less than
one year.
9
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
6. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events (SFAS No. 165). SFAS No. 165 establishes general standards of accounting for
and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements
are issued or available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet
date during which management shall evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential
recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity
shall recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial
statements and the disclosures that an entity shall make about events or transactions that occurred
after the balance sheet date. SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not have a material impact on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company evaluated subsequent events through August 7,
2009, the date the Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the period ended June 30, 2009
were issued.
In April 2009, the FASB released FASB Staff Position (FSP) 107-1 and Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,
which requires disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments (FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB
28-1) This pronouncement amends FASB 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,
to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in the interim financial
statements as well as in the annual financial statements. FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 also amends
APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized
financial information in interim financial statements. In addition, the FSP requires disclosures
of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of those financial
instruments. The Company adopted FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 on June 30, 2009 and has provided the
necessary additional disclosures.
In November 2008, the FASBs Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on EITF
Issue No. 08-6, Equity Method Accounting Considerations. EITF 08-6 continues to follow the
accounting for the initial carrying value of equity method investments in APB Opinion No. 18, The
Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock, which is based on a cost accumulation
model and generally excludes contingent consideration. EITF 08-6 also specifies that
other-than-temporary impairment testing by the investor should be performed at the investment level
and that a separate impairment assessment of the underlying assets is not required. An impairment
charge by the investee should result in an adjustment of the investors basis of the impaired asset
for the investors pro-rata share of such impairment. In addition, EITF 08-6 reached a consensus
on how to account for an issuance of shares by an investee that reduces the investors ownership
share of the investee. An investor should account for such transactions as if it had sold a
proportionate share of its investment with any gains or losses recorded through earnings. EITF 08-6
also addresses the accounting for a change in an investment from the equity method to the cost
method after adoption of Statement 160. EITF 08-6 affirms the existing guidance in APB 18, which
requires cessation of the equity method of accounting and application of SFAS No. 115, Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, or the cost method under APB 18 as
appropriate. EITF 08-6 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The
adoption of EITF 08-6 did not have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In June 2008, the EITF ratified Issue No. 07-5, Determining Whether an Instrument (or
Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entitys Own Stock (EITF 07-5). EITF 07-5 clarifies how to
determine whether certain instruments or features were indexed to an entitys own stock. The
consensus will replace EITF 01-6 as a critical component of the literature applied to evaluating
financial instruments for debt or equity classification and embedded features for bifurcation as
derivatives. EITF 07-5 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of EITF 07-5
did not have a material impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments
That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (FSP APB 14-1).
FSP APB 14-1 requires the issuer of convertible debt instruments with cash settlement features to
separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument. The debt is
recognized at the present value of its cash flows discounted using the issuers nonconvertible debt
borrowing rate. The equity component is recognized as the difference between the proceeds from the
issuance of the note and the fair value of the liability. FSP APB 14-1also requires an accretion of
the resultant debt discount over the expected life of the debt. The adoption of FSP APB 14-1 did
not have any impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements because the convertible
senior debentures issued by the Company do not include any cash settlement features within the
scope of FSP APB 14-1.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets (FSP FAS 142-3). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under Statement 142. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. The adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 did not have a material impact on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements.
10
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
No. 141(R)). SFAS No. 141(R) significantly changes the accounting for business combinations.
Under SFAS No. 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date at fair value with limited
exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R) further changes the accounting treatment for certain specific items,
including:
|
|
|
Acquisition costs will be generally expensed as incurred; |
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests (formerly known as minority interests see SFAS No. 160
discussion below) will be valued at fair value at the acquisition date; |
|
|
|
Acquired contingent liabilities will be recorded at fair value at the acquisition
date and subsequently measured at either the higher of such amount or the amount
determined under existing guidance for non-acquired contingencies; |
|
|
|
In-process research and development (IPR&D) will be recorded at fair value as an
indefinite-lived intangible asset at the acquisition date; |
|
|
|
Restructuring costs associated with a business combination will be generally
expensed subsequent to the acquisition date; and |
|
|
|
Changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties
after the acquisition date generally will affect income tax expense. |
SFAS No. 141(R) includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 141(R)
applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after
January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes new
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of
noncontrolling interests (minority interests) as equity in the consolidated financial statements
and separate from the parents equity. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parents ownership
interest in a subsidiary that does not result in deconsolidation are treated as equity transactions
if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. Losses attributable to the
noncontrolling interest that exceed its basis in the subsidiarys equity result in a deficit
noncontrolling interest reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Revenue, expenses, gains,
losses, net income or loss are reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations at the
consolidated amounts, which include the amounts attributable to the owners of the parent and
noncontrolling interest. The amount of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests will be
included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement. In addition, this
statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is
deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling
equity investment on the deconsolidation date. SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosure
requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160
is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. On January 1, 2009, the Company
adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 160. As a result, the Company reflects the portion of equity
(net assets) of its consolidated partner companies, if any, not attributable, directly or
indirectly, to the Company as a noncontrolling interest within equity, separate from the equity of
the Company.
7. OWNERSHIP INTERESTS IN AND ADVANCES TO COMPANIES
As discussed in Notes 2 and 3, the Company deconsolidated its holdings in Clarient as of May
14, 2009. The Company has elected to apply the fair-value option to account for its retained
interest in Clarient following deconsolidation.
For the period from May 14, 2009 through June 30, 2009, the Company recognized an unrealized
gain of $52.5 million on the mark-to-market of its holdings in Clarient which is included in Other
income (loss), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. At June 30, 2009, the fair value
of the Companys holdings in Clarient of $180.0 million was included in Ownership interests in and
advances to companies in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of that date (see Note 5).
The Company believes that accounting for its holdings in Clarient at fair value rather than
applying the equity method of accounting provides a better measure of the value of its holdings,
given the reliable evidence provided by quoted prices in an active market for Clarients publicly
traded common stock. The Company has not elected the fair value option for its other partner
company holdings, which are accounted for under the equity method or
cost method, due to less readily determinable evidence of fair value for these privately held companies and due to the
potential competitive disadvantage to the Company of such disclosure.
11
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following unaudited summarized financial information for Clarient at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, has been
compiled from the unaudited financial statements of Clarient and has been adjusted to correct for
an immaterial error (see Note 18).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
34,512 |
|
|
$ |
23,454 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
16,134 |
|
|
|
12,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
50,646 |
|
|
$ |
35,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
21,278 |
|
|
$ |
35,934 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
5,013 |
|
|
|
4,315 |
|
Shareholders equity (deficit) |
|
|
24,355 |
|
|
|
(4,740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders
Equity (Deficit) |
|
$ |
50,646 |
|
|
$ |
35,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Results of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
23,192 |
|
|
$ |
15,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,514 |
|
|
$ |
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(1,656 |
) |
|
$ |
(934 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognized an impairment charge of $3.3 million related to Rubicor in the three
months ended June 30, 2009, which is reflected in Equity loss in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The adjusted carrying value of Rubicor at June 30, 2009 was $0. The amount of the
impairment charge was determined by comparing the carrying value of Rubicor to its estimated fair
value.
Rubicor
has halted operations and furloughed or terminated employees. The Company previously recognized a $4.0
million impairment charge related to Rubicor in the fourth quarter of 2008 based on estimates of
fair value provided by an independent valuation firm and a range of values indicated by potential
investors in Rubicor. The carrying value of the Companys interest in Rubicor at December 31, 2008
was $4.2 million.
In July 2009, the Company, together with several other creditors, in response to a foreclosure
by Rubicors senior lender, filed a petition to take Rubicor into bankruptcy in order to affect an
orderly process to realize Rubicors value. Rubicor and the Company continue to have discussions
with several third parties who have expressed interest in funding or acquiring Rubicor. Based on
the range of values indicated by such potential investors, however, the Company believes it is
unlikely the Company will recover any of its investment.
12
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
8. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Comprehensive income (loss) is the change in equity of a business enterprise from transactions
and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources.
The following summarizes the components of comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
146,254 |
|
|
$ |
(10,335 |
) |
|
$ |
138,364 |
|
|
$ |
(29,578 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss), before taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
146,251 |
|
|
|
(10,392 |
) |
|
|
138,362 |
|
|
|
(29,634 |
) |
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to the
noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
(1,163 |
) |
|
|
2,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the
Company |
|
$ |
146,227 |
|
|
$ |
(8,624 |
) |
|
$ |
137,199 |
|
|
$ |
(27,477 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. LONG-TERM DEBT AND CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS
Consolidated long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Consolidated partner company revolving credit agreement (guaranteed by the
Company) |
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
Consolidated partner company secured credit agreement (not guaranteed by the
Company) |
|
|
5,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,104 |
|
Capital lease obligations and other borrowings |
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,712 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
(14,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, less current portion |
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
Except for the convertible senior debentures discussed in Note 10, all of the long-term debt
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2008 related to Clarient. On May 14, 2009, the
Company deconsolidated its holdings in Clarient. As a result, there is no long-term debt at June
30, 2009 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In February 2009, the Company entered into a new loan agreement which provides the Company
with a revolving credit facility in the maximum aggregate amount of $50 million in the form of
borrowings, guarantees and issuances of letters of credit (subject to a $20 million sublimit).
Actual availability under the credit facility will be based on the amount of cash maintained at the
bank as well as the value of the Companys public and private partner company interests. This
credit facility bears interest at the prime rate for outstanding borrowings, subject to an increase
in certain circumstances. Other than for limited exceptions, the Company is required to maintain
all of its depository and operating accounts and not less than 75% of its investment and securities
accounts at the bank. The credit facility matures on December 31, 2010. Availability under the
Companys revolving credit facility at June 30, 2009 was $50.0 million.
13
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In connection with the sale of CompuCom Systems, Inc. (CompuCom) in 2004, the Company
provided a letter of credit to the landlord of CompuComs Dallas headquarters, which letter of
credit will expire on March 19, 2019, in an amount equal to $6.3 million. At June 30, 2009, the
required cash collateral, pursuant to the Companys prior revolving credit facility, was $6.3
million, which amount was included within Cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance
Sheet as of that date.
10. CONVERTIBLE SENIOR DEBENTURES
In February 2004, the Company completed the sale of $150 million of 2.625% convertible senior
debentures with a stated maturity of March 15, 2024 (the 2024 Debentures). Interest on the 2024
Debentures is payable semi-annually. At the debentures holders option, the 2024 Debentures are
convertible into the Companys common stock through March 14, 2024, subject to certain conditions.
The conversion rate of the debentures is $7.2174 of principal amount per share. The closing price
of the Companys common stock at June 30, 2009 was $1.32. The 2024 Debentures holders have the
right to require the Company to repurchase the 2024 Debentures on March 21, 2011, March 20, 2014 or
March 20, 2019 at a repurchase price equal to 100% of their face amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest. The 2024 Debentures holders also have the right to require repurchase of the 2024
Debentures upon certain events, including sale of all or substantially all of our common stock or
assets, liquidation, dissolution, a change in control or the delisting of the Companys common
stock from the New York Stock Exchange if the Company were unable to obtain a listing for its
common stock on another national or regional securities exchange. Subject to certain conditions,
the Company may redeem all or some of the 2024 Debentures commencing March 20, 2009. The Company
has repurchased $64.0 million in face value of the 2024 Debentures. At June 30, 2009, the market
value of the $86.0 million outstanding 2024 Debentures was approximately $67.1 million, based on
quoted market prices as of such date.
11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Classification of Stock-Based Compensation Expense
Stock-based compensation expense from continuing operations was recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
999 |
|
|
$ |
855 |
|
|
$ |
2,164 |
|
|
$ |
1,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the Companys stock-based awards to employees was estimated at the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free rate was based on the U.S.
Treasury yield curve in effect at the end of the quarter in which the grant occurred. The expected
term of stock options granted was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees.
Expected volatility was based on historical volatility measured using weekly price observations of
the Companys common stock for a period equal to the stock options expected term.
During the first quarter 2009, the Company issued 1.2 million restricted shares to employees.
The restricted shares were issued in lieu of cash for of a portion of the 2008 management incentive
plan payment earned by certain senior employees. The restricted shares issued vest 25% on the first
anniversary of grant and the remaining 75% thereafter in 24 equal monthly installments over the
next two years.
The Company issued deferred stock units to non-employee directors for fees earned during the
preceding quarter of 234,000 and 90,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. All non-employee directors were required to defer at least 25% of directors fees
earned in the period and may have elected to defer up to 100% of directors fees earned. For prior
periods, certain directors elected to defer all or a portion of directors fees earned. Deferred
stock units issued to directors in lieu of directors fees are 100% vested at the grant date;
matching deferred stock units equal to 25% of directors fees deferred vest one year following the
grant date or, if earlier, upon reaching age 65. Deferred stock units are payable in stock on a
one-for-one basis. Payments in respect of the deferred stock units are generally distributable
following termination of employment or service, death or permanent disability.
Total compensation expense for deferred stock units and restricted stock was approximately
$0.1 million and $0.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and
$0.2 million and $0.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
14
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company issued no stock option awards to employees during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company issued 2.0 million
option awards to employees.
At June 30, 2009, the Company had outstanding options that vest based on three different types of
vesting schedules:
|
2) |
|
performance-based; and |
Market-based awards entitle participants to vest in a number of options determined by
achievement by the Company of certain target market capitalization increases (measured by reference
to stock price increases on a specified number of outstanding shares) over an eight-year period.
The requisite service periods for the market-based awards are based on the Companys estimate of
the dates on which the market conditions will be met as determined using a Monte Carlo simulation
model. Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service periods using the
straight-line method but is accelerated if market capitalization targets are achieved earlier than
estimated. During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, the Company issued 0
and 1.5 million market-based option awards to employees. During the six months ended June 30,
2009, no options vested based on achievement of market capitalization targets. The Company
recorded compensation expense related to these awards of $0.5 million and $0.7 million during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The Company recorded a $0.2 million benefit and a $0.0
million compensation expense related to these awards during the three and six months ended June 30,
2008. The benefit in the three months ended June 30, 2008 was due to the impact of forfeited
awards. Depending on the Companys stock performance, the maximum number of unvested shares at
June 30, 2009 attainable under these grants was 7.8 million shares.
Performance-based awards entitle participants to vest in a number of options determined by
achievement by the Company of target capital returns based on net cash proceeds received by the
Company on the sale, merger or other exit transaction of certain identified partner companies over
an eight-year period. Vesting may occur, if at all, once per year on the anniversary date of the
grant. The requisite service periods for the performance-based awards are based on the Companys
estimate of when the performance conditions will be met. Compensation expense is recognized for
performance-based awards for which the performance condition is considered probable of achievement.
Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service periods using the straight-line
method but is accelerated if capital return targets are achieved earlier than estimated. During
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, the Company did not issue any
performance-based option awards to employees. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, no
options vested based on the achievement of capital returns targets. The Company recorded
compensation expense related to these awards of $0.0 million and $0.1 million for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The Company had no outstanding performance based awards
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. The maximum number of unvested shares at June
30, 2009 attainable under these grants was 2.0 million shares.
All other outstanding options are service-based awards that generally vest over four years
after the date of grant and expire eight years after the date of grant. Compensation expense is
recognized over the requisite service period using the straight-line method. The requisite service
period for service-based awards is the period over which the award vests. During the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, the Company issued 0 and 0.5 million service-based
option awards to employees. The Company recorded compensation expense related to these awards of
$0.3 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and
$0.6 and $0.4 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
During the period from April 1, 2009 through May 14, 2009 and the three months ended June 30,
2008, Clarient recorded $0.3 million and $0.9 million of stock-based compensation expense,
respectively. During the period from January 1, 2009 through May 14, 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2008, Clarient recorded $0.8 million and $1.2 million of stock-based compensation expense,
respectively.
15
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
12. INCOME TAXES
The Companys consolidated income tax benefit (expense) was $14 thousand and $(4) thousand for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The net income tax benefit
recognized in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 resulted from the reversal of reserves
that related to uncertain tax positions for which the statute of limitations expired during the
period in the applicable tax jurisdictions. As discussed in Notes 2 and 3, as of May 14, 2009, the
Company deconsolidated Clarient and accounts for its retained interest in Clarient at fair value.
Accordingly, Clarients gross deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2008 of approximately $54.4
million have been deconsolidated. In addition, the Company recognized a gross deferred tax
liability of approximately $38 million as of June 30, 2009 based on the fair value of the Companys
retained interest in Clarient as of that date. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance to
reduce its net deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized in
future years. Accordingly, the income tax expense and benefit that would have been recognized in
2009 and 2008, respectively, were offset by a valuation allowance.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company had no material changes in uncertain
tax positions.
16
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
13. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
The calculations of net income (loss) per share attributable to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. common shareholders were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share data) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. common
shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
146,230 |
|
|
$ |
(7,543 |
) |
|
$ |
136,306 |
|
|
$ |
(19,321 |
) |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,024 |
) |
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
(8,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. |
|
$ |
146,230 |
|
|
$ |
(8,567 |
) |
|
$ |
137,201 |
|
|
$ |
(27,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. common shareholders |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.
common shareholders |
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
121,768 |
|
|
|
122,275 |
|
|
|
121,707 |
|
|
|
122,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. common
shareholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
146,230 |
|
|
$ |
(7,543 |
) |
|
$ |
136,306 |
|
|
$ |
(19,321 |
) |
Interest on convertible senior debentures |
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations for diluted per
share computation |
|
|
146,893 |
|
|
|
(7,543 |
) |
|
|
137,632 |
|
|
|
(19,321 |
) |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,024 |
) |
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
(8,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for diluted per share computation |
|
$ |
146,893 |
|
|
$ |
(8,567 |
) |
|
$ |
138,527 |
|
|
$ |
(27,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. common shareholders |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to
Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.
common shareholders |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in basic per share computation |
|
|
121,768 |
|
|
|
122,275 |
|
|
|
121,707 |
|
|
|
122,252 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior debentures |
|
|
11,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock and DSUs |
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in diluted per share computation |
|
|
134,324 |
|
|
|
122,275 |
|
|
|
133,968 |
|
|
|
122,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted average common shares outstanding for purposes of computing net loss per
share includes outstanding common shares and vested deferred stock units (DSUs).
If a consolidated or equity method partner company has dilutive stock options, unvested
restricted stock, DSUs, warrants or securities outstanding, diluted net loss per share is computed
by first deducting from net income (loss), the income attributable to the potential exercise of the
dilutive securities of the company. This impact is shown as an adjustment to net income (loss) for
purposes of calculating diluted net income (loss) per share.
17
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following potential shares of common stock and their effects on income were excluded from
the diluted net loss per share calculation for the three months and six month ended June 30, 2008
because their effect would be anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008 options to purchase 20.1 million shares of common stock at prices
ranging from $0.65 to $6.57 per share, were excluded from the calculations. |
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008, unvested restricted stock and DSUs convertible into 0.1
million shares of stock were excluded from the calculations. |
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008, a total of 17.9 million shares related to the Companys 2024
Debentures (see Note 10) representing the weighted average effect of assumed conversion
of the 2024 Debentures were excluded from the calculations. |
14. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Parent company financial information is provided to present the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company as if its previously consolidated partner companies were
accounted for under the equity method of accounting for all periods presented.
Parent Company Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
47,305 |
|
|
$ |
73,213 |
|
Cash held in escrow |
|
|
6,433 |
|
|
|
6,433 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
38,503 |
|
|
|
14,701 |
|
Restricted marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
92,921 |
|
|
|
96,693 |
|
Ownership interests in and advances to companies |
|
|
262,957 |
|
|
|
105,955 |
|
Cash held in escrow long-term |
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
357,453 |
|
|
$ |
204,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
7,899 |
|
|
$ |
8,173 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
5,265 |
|
|
|
5,630 |
|
Convertible senior debentures |
|
|
86,000 |
|
|
|
86,000 |
|
Total Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. shareholders equity |
|
|
258,289 |
|
|
|
104,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
357,453 |
|
|
$ |
204,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Parent Company Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Operating expenses |
|
$ |
(4,303 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,117 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,665 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,414 |
) |
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
158,573 |
|
|
|
2,263 |
|
|
|
158,328 |
|
|
|
2,623 |
|
Recovery related party |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
1,707 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(733 |
) |
|
|
(1,052 |
) |
|
|
(1,468 |
) |
|
|
(2,107 |
) |
Equity loss |
|
|
(7,429 |
) |
|
|
(5,422 |
) |
|
|
(12,167 |
) |
|
|
(12,134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
146,216 |
|
|
|
(7,543 |
) |
|
|
136,292 |
|
|
|
(19,321 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,024 |
) |
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
(8,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. |
|
$ |
146,230 |
|
|
$ |
(8,567 |
) |
|
$ |
137,201 |
|
|
$ |
(27,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(7,168 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sales of and distributions from companies and funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,496 |
|
Advances to partner companies |
|
|
(6,300 |
) |
|
|
(13,941 |
) |
Repayment of advances to partner companies |
|
|
21,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions of ownership interests in partner companies and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
funds, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(10,670 |
) |
|
|
(7,168 |
) |
Repayment of note receivable-related party, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Increase in marketable securities |
|
|
(38,503 |
) |
|
|
(3,455 |
) |
Decrease in marketable securities |
|
|
14,701 |
|
|
|
1,854 |
|
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,798 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(18,740 |
) |
|
|
64,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Company common stock, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
Repurchase of Company common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(25,908 |
) |
|
|
55,848 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
73,213 |
|
|
|
94,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
47,305 |
|
|
$ |
150,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company cash and cash equivalents excludes marketable securities, which consist of
longer-term securities.
19
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
15. OPERATING SEGMENTS
As discussed in Notes 2 and 3, for the period from January 1, 2009 through May 14, 2009, the
Company held an interest in one consolidated partner company, Clarient. As of May 14, 2009, the
Company deconsolidated Clarient and accounts for its retained interest in Clarient at fair value
with the unrealized gains and losses on the mark-to-market of its holdings included in Other income
(loss), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the second quarter of 2009, the
Company re-evaluated its reportable operating segments and made the determination that Clarient
would no longer be reported as a separate segment since the Company does not separately evaluate
Clarients performance based upon Clarients operating results. Clarient is now included in the
Life Sciences segment. The Company has restated the segment information for all of the periods
presented to report Clarient as part of the Life Sciences segment.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company held an interest in 17 non-consolidated
partner companies. The Companys reportable operating segments are as follows: i) Life Sciences
and ii) Technology.
The Life Sciences segment included the following partner companies as of June 30, 2009:
Advanced BioHealing, Alverix, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Cellumen, Clarient, Garnet
BioTherapeutics, Molecular Biometrics, NuPathe, Rubicor and Tengion.
The Technology segment included the following partner companies as of June 30, 2009:
Advantedge Healthcare Solutions, Authentium, Beyond.com, Bridgevine, GENBAND, Portico Systems and
Swaptree.
Results of the Life Sciences segment reflect the revenue, operating income (loss), and income
(loss) before taxes of Clarient for all periods prior to its deconsolidation on May 14, 2009,
equity income (loss) of equity method partner companies, impairment charges, other income (loss)
associated with cost method partner companies, gains or losses on the sale of partner companies
(except those reported in discontinued operations) and unrealized gains and losses on the
mark-to-market of the Companys holdings in Clarient.
Results of the Technology segment reflect the equity income (loss) of equity method partner
companies, impairment charges, other income (loss) associated with cost method partner companies,
and gains or losses on the sale of partner companies (except those reported in discontinued
operations).
Management evaluates the Life Sciences and Technology segments performance based on net
income (loss) which is based on the number of partner companies accounted for under the equity
method, the Companys voting ownership percentage in these partner companies and the net results of
operations of these partner companies, any impairment charges or gain (loss) on sale of partner
companies as well as the unrealized gains and losses on the mark-to-market of
the Companys holdings in Clarient.
Other Items include certain expenses which are not identifiable to the operations of the
Companys operating business segments. Other Items primarily consist of general and administrative
expenses related to corporate operations, including employee compensation, insurance and
professional fees, including legal and finance, interest income, interest expense, other income
(loss) and equity income (loss) related to private equity fund holdings. Other Items also include
income taxes, which are reviewed by management independent of segment results.
The following tables reflect the Companys consolidated operating data by reportable segment.
All significant intersegment activity has been eliminated in consolidation. Accordingly, segment
results reported by the Company exclude the effect of transactions between the Company and its
previously consolidated partner company.
Revenue related entirely to Clarient prior to its deconsolidation and was attributed to
geographic areas based on where the services were performed or the customers shipped to location.
A majority of the Companys revenue was generated in the United States.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Companys assets were primarily located in the
United States.
Segment
assets in Other items included primarily cash, cash equivalents, cash
held in escrow and marketable
securities of $92.7 million and $94.8 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
20
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following represents segment data from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
|
Sciences |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
Segments |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
11,647 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,647 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,647 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(4,303 |
) |
|
|
(4,181 |
) |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
152,492 |
|
|
|
(1,366 |
) |
|
|
151,126 |
|
|
|
(4,872 |
) |
|
|
146,254 |
|
Segment Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
212,442 |
|
|
|
42,519 |
|
|
|
254,961 |
|
|
|
102,492 |
|
|
|
357,453 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
84,508 |
|
|
|
41,050 |
|
|
|
125,558 |
|
|
|
106,844 |
|
|
|
232,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
|
Sciences |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
Segments |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
16,916 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,916 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,916 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(1,743 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,743 |
) |
|
|
(4,117 |
) |
|
|
(5,860 |
) |
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(5,437 |
) |
|
|
(1,800 |
) |
|
|
(7,237 |
) |
|
|
(2,075 |
) |
|
|
(9,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
|
Sciences |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
Segments |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
34,839 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,839 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,839 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
(8,665 |
) |
|
|
(7,044 |
) |
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
150,377 |
|
|
|
(3,445 |
) |
|
|
146,932 |
|
|
|
(10,068 |
) |
|
|
136,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
|
Sciences |
|
|
Technology |
|
|
Segments |
|
|
Items |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
32,802 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,802 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,802 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(1,913 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,913 |
) |
|
|
(9,414 |
) |
|
|
(11,327 |
) |
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(10,308 |
) |
|
|
(3,914 |
) |
|
|
(14,222 |
) |
|
|
(7,255 |
) |
|
|
(21,477 |
) |
21
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Corporate operations |
|
$ |
(4,886 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,071 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,082 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,251 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,872 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,075 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,068 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
In June 2009, the Company increased its ownership interest in Advantedge Healthcare Solutions
(AHS), to 39.0% from 37.6% for $2.5 million in cash. The Company previously deployed $9.0
million in AHS in May 2008 and November 2006. AHS is a New Jersey-based technology-enabled service
provider that delivers medical billing services to physician groups. The Company accounts for its
holdings in AHS under the equity method.
In May 2009, the Company deployed $2.7 of cash in Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. (Avid),to
maintain an ownership interest of 13.9%. The Company had previously acquired an interest in Avid
in May 2007 for $7.3 million in cash. Avid is developing molecular imaging agents to detect
neurodegenerative diseases. The Company accounts for its holdings in Avid under the cost method.
In May and February 2009, the Company provided additional funding to Cellumen as part of an up
to $2.5 million convertible note financing to be funded in five tranches. As part of this
financing, the Company has agreed to provide Cellumen up to $1.0 million (subject to certain
conditions), $0.5 million of which the Company funded as of June 30, 2009. The Company previously
acquired an interest in Cellumen in June 2007, paying $6.0 million in cash for shares of Cellumens
Series B preferred stock. In conjunction with the convertible note financing, the Series B
preferred stock conversion price was adjusted, and will receive further adjustments upon the
closing of future tranches, increasing the economic and voting interest of the Series B preferred
stock in Cellumen. The Companys voting interest in Cellumen increased to 55.0%, on an
as-converted basis, at June 30, 2009. Due to the substantive participating rights of the minority
shareholders in the significant operating decisions of Cellumen, the Company continues to account
for its holdings in Cellumen under the equity method. Cellumen delivers proprietary services and
products to support drug discovery and development.
In May and February 2009, the Company deployed an additional $2.5 million in Molecular
Biometrics, Inc. (Molecular Biometrics), increasing its ownership interest to 38.1%. The Company
had previously acquired an interest in Molecular Biometrics in September and December 2008, for
$3.5 million in cash, including the conversion into equity interests of $1.9 million previously
advanced to the company. Molecular Biometrics is a metabolomics company developing novel clinical
tools for applications in personalized medicine to more accurately characterize biologic function
in health and disease. The Company accounts for its holdings in Molecular Biometrics under the
equity method.
In April 2009, the Company deployed an additional $0.5 million of cash in Portico Systems, Inc
(Portico), in a transaction which resulted in a slight decrease in the Companys ownership
interest to 45.6% at June 30, 2009. The Company previously deployed $8.8 million in cash in
Portico in February 2008 and August 2006. Portico is a software solutions provider for regional
and national health plans looking to optimize provider network operations and streamline business
processes. The Company accounts for its holdings in Portico under the equity method.
In March 2009, the Company increased its ownership interest in Bridgevine, Inc. (Bridgevine)
to 24.4% from 21.1% for $2.0 million in cash. The Company had previously acquired an interest in
Bridgevine in August 2007 for $8.0 million in cash. Bridgevine is an internet media company that
enables online consumers to shop for special offers as well as compare and purchase digital
services and products such as internet, phone, VoIP, TV, wireless, music, entertainment and more.
The Company accounts for its holdings in Bridgevine under the equity method. The difference between
the Companys cost and its interest in the underlying net assets of Bridgevine was allocated to
intangible assets and goodwill as reflected in the carrying value in Ownership interests in and
advances to companies on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
22
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company and its partner companies are involved in various claims and legal actions arising
in the ordinary course of business. While in the current opinion of the Company the ultimate
disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated
financial position or results of operations, no assurance can be given as to the outcome of these
actions, and one or more adverse rulings could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position and results of operations or that of its partner companies.
Not including the Laureate Lease Guaranty described below, the Company had outstanding
guarantees of $3.8 million at June 30, 2009.
The Company has committed capital of approximately $5.0 million, including conditional
commitments to provide partner companies with additional funding and commitments made to various
private equity funds in prior years. These commitments will be funded over the next several years,
including approximately $2.5 million which is expected to be funded during the next 12 months.
Under certain circumstances, the Company may be required to return a portion or all of the
distributions it received as a general partner of certain private equity funds (the clawback).
The maximum clawback the Company could be required to return due to its general partner interest is
approximately $3.6 million of which $2.5 million was reflected in Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities and $1.1 million was reflected in Other long-term liabilities on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2009.
The Companys ownership in the funds which have potential clawback liabilities ranges from
19-30%. The clawback liability is joint and several; such that the Company may be required to fund
the clawback for other general partners should they default. The funds have taken several steps to
reduce the potential liabilities should other general partners default, including withholding all
general partner distributions and placing them in escrow and adding rights of set-off among certain
funds. The Company believes its potential liability due to the possibility of default by other
general partners is remote.
Notwithstanding the closing of the Bundle Sale, the Company remains a guarantor of Laureate
Pharmas Princeton, New Jersey office facility lease (the Laureate Lease Guaranty). Such
guarantee may extend through the office lease expiration in 2016 under certain circumstances.
However, the Company is entitled to indemnification in connection with the continuation of such
guaranty. As of June 30, 2009, scheduled lease payments to be made by Laureate Pharma over the
remaining lease term equaled $8.3 million.
As described in Note 4, in connection with the Bundle Sale, an aggregate of $6.4 million of
the gross proceeds of the sale were placed in escrow pending the expiration of a predetermined
notification period, subject to possible extension in the event of a claim against the escrowed
amounts. On April 25, 2009, the purchaser in the Bundle Sale notified the Company of claims being
asserted against the entire escrowed amounts. The Company does not believe that such claims are
valid and has instituted legal action to obtain the release of such amounts from escrow. The
proceeds being held in escrow will remain there until the dispute
over the claims has been settled
or determined pursuant to legal process.
In October 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with its former Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, to provide for annual payments of $0.7 million per year and certain health care
and other benefits for life. The related current liability of $0.8 million was included in Accrued
expenses and the long-term portion of $3.2 million was included in Other long-term liabilities on
the Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2009.
23
18.
CORRECTION OF AN IMMATERIAL ERROR IN THE PRIOR PERIOD
During the second quarter of 2009, Clarient identified an error in its accounting for revenue
and related bad debt expense for the quarter ended March 31,
2009. The error related to the pricing for certain of Clarients
services in the first quarter of 2009. The error resulted in the
understatement of revenue by $0.7 million and the understatement of bad debt expense by $0.1
million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
The Companys management evaluated the materiality of the error from
qualitative and quantitative perspectives, and evaluated the quantified error under both the iron
curtain and the roll-over methods. Management concluded that the error was immaterial to the first
quarter of 2009, but to remain consistent with revisions to be made by Clarient in its Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Company made such revisions to its Consolidated Financial
Statements contained herein, as summarized below.
The following table summarizes the effect of the revision on continuing operations as of and
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
(In thousands)
(unaudited) |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
25,486 |
|
|
$ |
26,151 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
245,023 |
|
|
|
245,688 |
|
Total Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. shareholders equity |
|
|
110,580 |
|
|
|
110,977 |
|
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary |
|
|
14,894 |
|
|
|
15,162 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
125,474 |
|
|
|
126,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Previously |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Revised |
|
|
|
(In thousands |
|
|
|
except per share data)
(unaudited) |
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
22,447 |
|
|
$ |
23,192 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
17,009 |
|
|
|
17,089 |
|
Total operating expense |
|
|
25,975 |
|
|
|
26,055 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(3,528 |
) |
|
|
(2,863 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
(8,555 |
) |
|
|
(7,890 |
) |
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(871 |
) |
|
|
(1,139 |
) |
Net loss attributable to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. |
|
|
(9,426 |
) |
|
|
(9,029 |
) |
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to Safeguard
Scientifics, Inc. common shareholders |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
24
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Cautionary Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that are based on
current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.
(Safeguard or we), the industries in which we operate and other matters, as well as
managements beliefs and assumptions and other statements regarding matters that are not historical
facts. These statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and
prospects. For example, when we use words such as projects, expects, anticipates, intends,
plans, believes, seeks, estimates, should, would, could, will, opportunity,
potential or may, variations of such words or other words that convey uncertainty of future
events or outcomes, we are making forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our
forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially, include, among others, managing rapidly changing technologies,
limited access to capital, competition, the ability to attract and retain qualified employees, the
ability to execute our strategy, the uncertainty of the future performance of our partner
companies, acquisitions and dispositions of companies, the inability to manage growth, compliance
with government regulation and legal liabilities, additional financing requirements, labor disputes
and the effect of economic conditions in the business sectors in which our partner companies
operate, all of which are discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in Safeguards Annual Report on Form
10-K and updated, as applicable, in Item 1A. Risk Factors below. Many of these factors are
beyond our ability to predict or control. In addition, as a result of these and other factors, our
past financial performance should not be relied on as an indication of future performance. All
forward-looking statements attributable to us, or to persons acting on our behalf, are expressly
qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. We undertake no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise, except as required by law. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the
forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report might not occur.
Business Overview
Safeguards charter is to build value in growth-stage technology and life sciences businesses.
We provide capital as well as a range of strategic, operational and management resources to our
partner companies. Safeguard participates in expansion financings, corporate spin-outs, management
buy-outs, recapitalizations, industry consolidations and early-stage financings. Our vision is to
be the preferred catalyst for creating great technology and life sciences companies.
We strive to create long-term value for our shareholders by helping our partner companies in
their efforts to increase market penetration, grow revenue and improve cash flow in order to create
long-term value. We concentrate on companies that operate in two categories:
Life Sciences including companies focused on molecular and point-of-care diagnostics,
medical devices and regenerative medicine/specialty pharmaceuticals; and
Technology including companies focused on healthcare information technology, financial
services information technology and new media and internet-based businesses.
Principles of Accounting for Ownership Interests in Partner Companies
We account for our interests in our partner companies and private equity funds using four
methods: consolidation, equity, cost or fair value. The accounting method applied is generally
determined by the degree of our influence over the entity, primarily determined by our voting
interest in the entity.
Consolidation Method. We account for our partner companies in which we maintain a controlling
financial interest, generally those in which we directly or indirectly own more than 50% of the
outstanding voting securities, using the consolidation method of accounting. Upon consolidation of
our partner companies, we reflect the portion of equity (net assets) in a subsidiary not
attributable, directly or indirectly, to the Company as a noncontrolling interest in the
Consolidated Balance Sheet. The noncontrolling interest is presented within equity, separately
from the equity of the Company. Losses attributable to the Company and the noncontrolling interest
may exceed their interest in the subsidiarys equity. As a result, the noncontrolling interest
shall continue to be attributed its share of losses even if that attribution results in a deficit
noncontrolling interest balance as of each balance sheet date. Revenue, expenses, gains, losses,
net income or loss are reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations at the consolidated
amounts, which include the amounts attributable to the Companys common shareholders and the
noncontrolling interest.
Equity Method. We account for partner companies whose results are not consolidated, but over
whom we exercise significant influence, using the equity method of accounting. We also account for
our interests in some private equity funds under the equity method of accounting, depending on our
respective general and limited partner interests. Under the equity method of accounting, our share
of the income or loss of the company is reflected in Equity Loss in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. We report our share of the income or loss of the equity method partner companies on a
one quarter lag.
25
When the carrying value of our holding in an equity method partner company is reduced to zero,
no further losses are recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Operations unless we have
outstanding guarantee obligations or have committed additional funding to the equity method partner
company. When the equity method partner company subsequently reports income, we will not record our
share of such income until it equals the amount of our share of losses not previously recognized.
Cost Method. We account for partner companies which are not consolidated or accounted for
under the equity method using the cost method of accounting. Under the cost method, our share of
the income or losses of such partner companies is not included in our Consolidated Statements of
Operations. However, the effect of the change in market value of cost method partner company
holdings classified as trading securities is reflected in Other income (loss), net in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Fair Value Method. We account for our holdings in Clarient, Inc. (Clarient), our publicly
traded partner company, under the fair-value option following its deconsolidation on May 14, 2009.
Gains and losses on the mark-to-market of our holdings in Clarient are recognized in Income (loss)
from continuing operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Accounting policies, methods and estimates are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial
Statements prepared by management and are based upon managements current judgments. These
judgments are normally based on knowledge and experience with regard to past and current events and
assumptions about future events. Certain accounting policies, methods and estimates are
particularly important because of their significance to the consolidated financial statements and
because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ from managements current
judgments. While there are a number of accounting policies, methods and estimates affecting our
consolidated financial statements, areas that are particularly significant include the following:
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts and bad debt expense; |
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets; |
|
|
|
Impairment of ownership interests in and advances to companies; |
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies; and |
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation. |
Revenue Recognition
As of May 14, 2009, the date that Clarient was deconsolidated, we no longer report revenue
from Clarients continuing operations. Prior to that date, all of our revenue from continuing
operations was attributable to Clarient.
Revenue for Clarients diagnostic testing and interpretive services was recognized at the time
of completion of such services. Clarients services were billed to various payors, including
Medicare, health insurance companies and other directly billed healthcare institutions and
patients. Clarient reported revenue from contracted payors, including certain health insurance
companies and healthcare institutions, based on the contracted rate or, in certain instances,
Clarients estimate of such rate. For billings to Medicare, Clarient utilized the published fee
schedules, net of standard discounts commonly referred to as contractual allowances. Clarient
reported revenue from non-contracted payors, including certain insurance companies and patients,
based on the amount expected to be collected for services provided. Adjustments resulting from
actual collections compared to Clarients estimates were recognized in the period realized.
26
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Bad Debt Expense
All trade accounts receivable on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2008 related
to Clarient. On May 14, 2009, all of the assets and liabilities of Clarient were deconsolidated.
We have no trade accounts receivable at June 30, 2009 on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
An allowance for doubtful accounts was recorded for estimated uncollectible amounts due from
various payor groups such as Medicare and private health insurance companies. The process for
estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts associated with Clarients diagnostic services
involved significant assumptions and judgments. Specifically, the allowance for doubtful accounts
was adjusted periodically, based upon an evaluation of historical collection experience. Clarient
also reviewed the age of receivables by payor class to assess its allowance at each period end.
The payment realization cycle for certain governmental and managed care payors can be lengthy;
involving denial, appeal and adjudication processes, and was subject to periodic adjustments that
may be significant. Accounts receivable were periodically written off when identified as
uncollectible and deducted from the allowance for doubtful accounts after appropriate collection
efforts had been exhausted. Additions to the allowance for doubtful accounts were charged to bad
debt expense within Selling, general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We test long-lived assets, including property and equipment and amortizable intangible assets,
for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that we may not be able to
recover the assets carrying amount. We evaluate the recoverability of an asset by comparing its
carrying amount to the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual
disposition of that asset. If the undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover the
carrying amount, we measure any impairment loss as the excess of the carrying amount of the asset
over its fair value.
Impairment of Ownership Interests In and Advances to Companies
On a periodic basis (but no less frequently than at the end of each quarter) we evaluate the
carrying value of our equity and cost method partner companies for possible impairment based on
achievement of business plan objectives and milestones, the financial condition and prospects of
the company, market conditions, and other relevant factors. The business plan objectives and
milestones we consider include, among others, those related to financial performance, such as
achievement of planned financial results or completion of capital raising activities, and those
that are not primarily financial in nature, such as hiring of key employees or the establishment of
strategic relationships. We then determine whether there has been an other than temporary decline
in the value of our ownership interest in the company. Impairment to be recognized is measured as
the amount by which the carrying value of an asset exceeds its fair value.
The fair value of privately held partner companies is generally determined based on the value
at which independent third parties have invested or have committed to invest in these companies or
based on other valuation methods, including discounted cash flows, valuations of comparable public
companies and valuations of acquisitions of comparable companies. The fair value of our ownership
interests in private equity funds is generally determined based on the value of our pro rata
portion of the funds net assets and estimated future proceeds from sales of investments provided
by the funds managers.
The new carrying value of a partner company is not increased if circumstances suggest the
value of the partner company has subsequently recovered.
Our partner companies operate in industries which are rapidly evolving and extremely
competitive. It is reasonably possible that our accounting estimates with respect to the ultimate
recoverability of the carrying value of ownership interests in and advances to companies could
change in the near term and that the effect of such changes on our Consolidated Financial
Statements could be material. While we believe that the current recorded carrying values of our
equity and cost method companies are not impaired, there can be no assurance that our future
results will confirm this assessment or that a significant write-down or write-off will not be
required in the future.
Impairment charges related to equity method partner companies are included in Equity loss in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Impairment charges related to cost method partner
companies are included in Other income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
27
Income Taxes
We are required to estimate income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate.
This process involves estimating our actual current tax exposure together with assessing temporary
differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These
differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our
Consolidated Balance Sheets. We must assess the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be
recovered from future taxable income and to the extent that we believe recovery is not likely, we
must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance in a period;
we must include an expense within the tax provision in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We have recorded a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax
assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized in future years. If we
determine in the future that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets would be
realized, then the previously provided valuation allowance would be reversed.
Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, we are a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions which arise in the
normal course of business. Additionally, we have received distributions as both a general partner
and a limited partner from certain private equity funds. In certain circumstances, we may be
required to return a portion or all the distributions we received as a general partner of a fund
for a further distribution to such funds limited partners (the clawback). We are also a
guarantor of various third-party obligations and commitments and are subject to the possibility of
various loss contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business (see Note 17). We are
required to assess the likelihood of any adverse outcomes to these matters as well as potential
ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of provision required for these
commitments and contingencies, if any, which would be charged to earnings, is made after careful
analysis of each matter. The provision may change in the future due to new developments or changes
in circumstances. Changes in the provision could increase or decrease our earnings in the period
the changes are made.
Stock-Based Compensation
We measure all employee stock-based compensation awards using a fair value method and record
such expense in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We estimate the grant date fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model which requires the input of highly subjective assumptions. These assumptions include
estimating the expected term of the award and the estimated volatility of our stock price over the
expected term. Changes in these assumptions and in the estimated forfeitures of stock option awards
can materially affect the amount of stock-based compensation recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. The requisite service periods for market-based stock option awards are
based on our estimate of the dates on which the market conditions will be met as determined using a
Monte Carlo simulation model. Changes in the derived requisite service period or achievement of
market capitalization targets earlier than estimated can materially affect the amount of
stock-based compensation recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The requisite
service periods for performance-based awards are based on our best estimate of when the performance
conditions will be met. Compensation expense is recognized for performance-based awards for which
the performance condition is considered probable of achievement. Changes in the requisite service
period or the estimated probability of achievement of performance conditions can materially affect
the amount of stock-based compensation recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
28
Results of Operations
Prior to deconsolidating Clarient on May 14, 2009, we presented Clarient as a separate
segment. As of May 14, 2009, we account for our retained interest in Clarient at fair value with
unrealized gains and losses on the mark-to-market of our holdings included in Other income (loss),
net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the second quarter of 2009, we
re-evaluated our reportable operating segments and we made the determination that Clarient would no
longer be reported as a separate segment since we do not separately evaluate Clarients performance
based upon its operating results. Clarient is now included in the Life Sciences
segment. We have restated the segment information for all of the periods presented to report
Clarient as part of the Life Sciences segment. The results of operations of all of our partner
companies are reported in our Life Sciences and Technology segments. The Life Sciences and
Technology segments also include the gain or loss on the sale of respective partner companies,
except for gains and losses included in discontinued operations.
Our management evaluates the Life Sciences and Technology segments performance based on net
income (loss) which is based on the number of partner companies accounted for under the equity
method, our voting ownership percentage in these partner companies and the net results of
operations of these partner companies, any impairment charges or gain (loss) on sale of partner
companies as well as the unrealized gains and losses on the mark-to-market of
our holdings in Clarient.
Other Items include certain expenses, which are not identifiable to the operations of our
operating business segments. Other Items primarily consist of general and administrative expenses
related to corporate operations, including employee compensation, insurance and professional fees,
including legal and finance, interest income, interest expense, other income (loss) and equity
income (loss) related to private equity holdings. Other Items also include income taxes, which are
reviewed by management independent of segment results.
The following tables reflect our consolidated operating data by reportable segment. Segment
results include the results of Clarient prior to its deconsolidation and our share of income or
losses for entities accounted for under the equity method when applicable. Segment results also
include the mark-to-market of our holdings in Clarient, impairment charges, gains or losses related
to the disposition of partner companies, except for those reported in discontinued operations, and
the mark-to-market of trading securities. All significant inter-segment activity has been
eliminated in consolidation. Accordingly, segment results reported by us exclude the effect of
transactions between us and our previously consolidated partner company.
Our operating results including net income (loss) before income taxes by segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Life Sciences |
|
$ |
152,492 |
|
|
$ |
(5,437 |
) |
|
$ |
150,377 |
|
|
$ |
(10,308 |
) |
Technology |
|
|
(1,366 |
) |
|
|
(1,800 |
) |
|
|
(3,445 |
) |
|
|
(3,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segments |
|
|
151,126 |
|
|
|
(7,237 |
) |
|
|
146,932 |
|
|
|
(14,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate operations |
|
|
(4,886 |
) |
|
|
(2,071 |
) |
|
|
(10,082 |
) |
|
|
(7,251 |
) |
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items |
|
|
(4,872 |
) |
|
|
(2,075 |
) |
|
|
(10,068 |
) |
|
|
(7,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
146,254 |
|
|
|
(9,312 |
) |
|
|
136,864 |
|
|
|
(21,477 |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
(8,101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
146,254 |
|
|
|
(10,335 |
) |
|
|
138,364 |
|
|
|
(29,578 |
) |
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
(1,163 |
) |
|
|
2,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. |
|
$ |
146,230 |
|
|
$ |
(8,567 |
) |
|
$ |
137,201 |
|
|
$ |
(27,421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is intense competition in the markets in which our partner companies operate, and we
expect competition to intensify in the future. Additionally, the markets in which these companies
operate are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, frequent
introduction of new products and services, shifting distribution channels, evolving government
regulation, frequently changing intellectual property landscapes and changing customer demands.
Their future success depends on each companys ability to execute its business plan and to adapt to
its respective rapidly changing markets.
29
Life Sciences
The following partner companies were included in Life Sciences during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008:
Safeguard
Ownership as of June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner Company |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Accounting Method |
Advanced BioHealing, Inc. |
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
Equity Method |
Alverix, Inc. |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
Equity Method |
Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
Cost Method |
Cellumen, Inc. |
|
|
55.0 |
% |
|
|
40.3 |
% |
|
Equity Method (1) |
Clarient, Inc. |
|
|
47.1 |
% |
|
|
58.3 |
% |
|
Fair Value Option/ Consolidation (2) |
Garnet BioTherapeutics, Inc. |
|
|
31.1 |
% |
|
|
N /A |
|
|
Equity Method |
Molecular Biometrics, Inc. |
|
|
38.1 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Equity Method |
NuPathe, Inc. |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
Equity Method |
Rubicor Medical, Inc. |
|
|
45.5 |
% |
|
|
35.7 |
% |
|
Equity Method |
Tengion, Inc. |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Cost Method |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In February and May 2009, our voting interest in Cellumen, Inc. increased
to 55.0%, on an as-converted basis, from 40.3%. Due to the substantive
participating rights of the minority shareholders in the significant operating
decisions of Cellumen, we continue to account for our holdings in Cellumen
under the equity method. |
|
(2) |
|
On May 14, 2009, Clarient, our then consolidated partner company,
completed the second closing of a private placement of its Series A convertible
preferred stock, decreasing our ownership interest from 50.2% to 47.3%. As a
result, we deconsolidated our holdings in Clarient as of May 14,
2009 because we
ceased to have a controlling financial interest in Clarient as of such date.
We have elected to apply the fair value option to account for our holdings in
Clarient following deconsolidation. Unrealized gains and losses on the
mark-to-market of our holdings in Clarient are recognized in income (loss) from
continuing operations for all periods subsequent to the date that Clarient was
deconsolidated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
11,647 |
|
|
$ |
16,916 |
|
|
$ |
34,839 |
|
|
$ |
32,802 |
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
4,845 |
|
|
|
8,510 |
|
|
|
13,811 |
|
|
|
15,907 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
6,680 |
|
|
|
10,149 |
|
|
|
19,407 |
|
|
|
18,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
11,525 |
|
|
|
18,659 |
|
|
|
33,218 |
|
|
|
34,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(1,743 |
) |
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
(1,913 |
) |
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
158,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
(458 |
) |
Equity loss |
|
|
(6,066 |
) |
|
|
(3,563 |
) |
|
|
(9,490 |
) |
|
|
(7,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
152,492 |
|
|
$ |
(5,437 |
) |
|
$ |
150,377 |
|
|
$ |
(10,308 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarient operates primarily in one business, the delivery of critical oncology testing
services to community pathologists, biopharmaceutical companies and other researchers.
30
Three months ended June 30, 2009 versus the three months ended June 30, 2008
Results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2009 included the results of
operations of Clarient for the 44 days in the period from April 1, 2009 through May 14, 2009 that
Clarient was consolidated. Upon the deconsolidation of Clarient on May 14, 2009, we no longer
reported revenue, cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses and interest expense,
net from Clarients continuing operations in our results of operations. Prior to that date, all of
our Life Science segments revenue, cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses and
interest expense, net from continuing operations was attributable to Clarient.
Revenue: Revenue of $11.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased 31.1%, or
$5.3 million, from $16.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales of $4.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
decreased 43.1%, or $3.7 million, from $8.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 were $6.7 million, a decrease of approximately $3.5 million, or
34.2%, compared to $10.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Other income (loss), net On May 14, 2009, we deconsolidated our holdings in Clarient because
we ceased to have a controlling financial interest in Clarient and recognized an unrealized gain on
deconsolidation of $106.0 million as of that date. In addition, we recognized an unrealized gain
of $52.5 million on the mark-to-market of our holdings in
Clarient as of June 30, 2009.
Interest expense. Interest expense, net, was $84 thousand for the three months ended June 30,
2009 as compared to $139 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the six months ended June 30, 2008
Results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 include the results of operations
of Clarient for the 134 days in the period from January 1, 2009 through May 14, 2009 that Clarient
was consolidated. Upon the deconsolidation of Clarient on May 14, 2009, we no longer reported
revenue, cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses and interest expense, net from
Clarients continuing operations in our results of operations. Prior to that date, all of our Life
Science segments revenue, cost of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses and interest
expense, net from continuing operations was attributable to Clarient.
Revenue: Revenue of $34.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased 6.2%, or
$2.0 million, from $32.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales of $13.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
decreased 13.2%, or $2.1 million, from $15.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 were $19.4 million, an increase of approximately $0.6 million, or 3.2%,
compared to $18.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Other income (loss), net On May 14, 2009, we deconsolidated our holdings in Clarient because
we ceased to have a controlling financial interest in Clarient and recognized an unrealized gain on
deconsolidation of $106.0 million as of that date. In addition, we recognized an unrealized gain
of $52.5 million on the mark-to-market of our holdings in
Clarient as of June 30, 2009.
Interest expense. Interest expense was $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Equity Loss. Equity loss fluctuates with the number of Life Sciences partner companies
accounted for under the equity method, our voting ownership percentage in these partner companies
and the net results of operations of these partner companies. We recognize our share of losses to
the extent we have cost basis in the equity partner company or we have outstanding commitments or
guarantees. Certain amounts recorded to reflect our share of the income or losses of our partner
companies accounted for under the equity method are based on estimates and on unaudited results of
operations of those partner companies and may require adjustments in the future when audits of
these entities are made final. We report our share of the results of our equity method partner
companies on a one quarter lag basis. Equity loss for Life Sciences increased $2.5 million and
$1.5 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, compared to the prior
year periods. The increase was attributable to an impairment charge of $3.3 million related to
Rubicor and two new equity method partner companies, each of which generated losses, partially
offset by a decrease in aggregate net loss for our existing equity method partner companies.
31
Technology
The following partner companies were included in Technology during the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008:
Safeguard
Ownership as of June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner Company |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Accounting Method |
Advantedge Healthcare Solutions, Inc. |
|
|
39.0 |
% |
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
Equity Method |
Authentium, Inc. |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
Equity Method (1) |
Beyond.com, Inc. |
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
|
37.1 |
% |
|
Equity Method |
Bridgevine, Inc. |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
20.8 |
% |
|
Equity Method |
Kadoo, Inc.(2) |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
Cost Method |
GENBAND, Inc. |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
Cost Method |
Portico Systems, Inc. |
|
|
45.6 |
% |
|
|
46.8 |
% |
|
Equity Method |
Swaptree, Inc. |
|
|
29.3 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Equity Method |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the third quarter of 2008, we increased our
ownership interest in Authentium, Inc. to the 20.0%
threshold at which we believe we exercise significant
influence. Accordingly, we adopted the equity method of
accounting for our holdings in Authentium. We have
adjusted the financial statements for all prior periods
presented to retrospectively apply the equity method of
accounting for our holdings in Authentium since the
initial date of acquisition in April 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we impaired the entire carrying value of Kadoo, Inc. which has since ceased operations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Equity loss |
|
$ |
(1,366 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,800 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,445 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Loss. Equity loss fluctuates with the number of Technology partner companies accounted
for under the equity method, our voting ownership percentage in these partner companies and the net
results of operations of these partner companies. We recognize our share of losses to the extent
we have cost basis in the equity partner company or we have outstanding commitments or guarantees.
Certain amounts recorded to reflect our share of the income or losses of our partner companies
accounted for under the equity method are based on estimates and on unaudited results of operations
of those partner companies and may require adjustments in the future when audits of these entities
are made final. We report our share of the results of our equity method partner companies on a one
quarter lag. Equity loss for Technology decreased $0.4 million and $0.5 million in the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, compared to the prior year periods. The decrease was
due to a decrease in the losses being generated by equity method partner companies partially offset
by the impact of one additional equity method partner company which generated a loss.
Corporate Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
General and administrative |
|
$ |
(3,364 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,119 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,094 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,852 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(1,497 |
) |
|
|
(469 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
1,707 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(733 |
) |
|
|
(1,052 |
) |
|
|
(1,468 |
) |
|
|
(2,107 |
) |
Other income (loss), net |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
2,627 |
|
Equity
income (loss) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,886 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,071 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,082 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Three months ended June 30, 2009 versus the three months ended June 30, 2008
General and Administrative Costs. Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of
employee compensation, insurance, outside services such as legal, accounting and travel-related
costs. General and administrative costs for the three months ended June 30, 2009
decreased $0.8 million as compared to the prior year period. The decrease is primarily
attributable to a $0.4 million decrease in professional fees, $0.1 million decrease in employee
costs and $0.2 million decrease in facility costs due to lower lease costs on our corporate
headquarters.
Stock-Based Compensation. Stock-based compensation consists primarily of expense related to
stock option grants and grants of restricted stock and deferred stock units to our employees. The
$1.0 million increase in compensation expense for the three month period ended June 30, 2009
compared to the prior year period relates to expense recognized for performance-based stock options
and restricted stock awards in the current period and stock option forfeitures in the prior year
period. Stock-based compensation expense related to corporate operations is included in selling,
general and administrative in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Interest Income. Interest income includes all interest earned on available cash and marketable
security balances. Interest income decreased $0.7 million in the second quarter of 2009 compared
to the prior year period due to a decrease in interest rates and a decrease in average invested
cash balances.
Interest Expense. Interest expense is primarily related to our 2.625% convertible senior
debentures with a stated maturity of 2024. Interest expense decreased $0.3 million in the second
quarter of 2009 as compared to the prior year period. The decline was attributable to
the repurchase of $43 million in face value of the 2024 Debentures in the second half of 2008.
Other income (loss), net. Other income (loss), net for the three months ended June
30, 2008 was primarily related to the net gain on the sale of companies, including the receipt of
escrowed funds from a legacy asset, and distributions from certain private equity funds accounted
for under the cost method.
Equity loss. Equity loss for both periods presented related to our private equity fund
holdings accounted for under the equity method.
Six months ended June 30, 2009 versus the six months ended June 30, 2008
General and Administrative Costs. Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily
of employee compensation, insurance, outside services such as legal, accounting and travel-related
costs. General and administrative costs decreased $1.8 million for the six month period ended June
30, 2009 compared to the prior year period. The decrease is primarily attributable to a $0.8
million decrease in professional fees, $0.3 million decrease in employee costs and $0.3 million
decrease in facility costs due to lower lease costs on our corporate headquarters.
Stock-Based Compensation. Stock-based compensation consists primarily of expense related to
stock option grants and grants of restricted stock and deferred stock units to our employees. The
$1.0 million increase in compensation expense for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 compared
to the prior year period relates to expense recognized for performance-based stock options and
restricted stock awards and stock option forfeitures in the prior year period. Stock-based
compensation expense related to corporate operations is included in selling, general and
administrative in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Interest Income. Interest income includes all interest earned on available cash and marketable
security balances. Interest income decreased $1.4 million for the six month period ended June 30,
2009 compared to the prior year period due to a decrease in interest rates and a decrease in
average invested cash balances.
Interest Expense. Interest expense is primarily related to our 2.625% convertible senior
debentures with a stated maturity of 2024. Interest expense decreased 0.6 million for the six month
period ended June 30, 2009 compared to the prior year period. The decline was
attributable to the repurchase of $43 million in face value of the 2024 Debentures in the second
half of 2008.
Other income (loss), net. Other income (loss), net for the six months ended June 30,
2009 included an impairment charge related to a private equity fund of $0.3 million. Other income
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was primarily related to the net gain on the sale of
companies, including the receipt of escrowed funds from a legacy asset, and distributions from
certain private equity funds accounted for under the cost method.
Equity loss. Equity loss for both periods presented related to our private equity fund
holdings accounted for under the equity method.
33
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit
Consolidated income tax (expense) benefit was $14 thousand and $(4) thousand for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The net income tax benefit recognized in
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 resulted from the reversal of reserves that related to
uncertain tax positions for which the statute of limitations expired during the period in the
applicable tax jurisdictions. We have has recorded a valuation allowance to reduce our net
deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized in future years.
Accordingly, the income tax expense and benefit that would have been recognized in 2009 and 2008,
respectively, were offset by a valuation allowance.
Discontinued Operations
In March 2007, Clarient sold its technology business and related intellectual property to Carl
Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc. (Zeiss) for an aggregate purchase price of $12.5 million. (the ACIS
Sale) The $12.5 million consisted of $11.0 million in cash and an additional $1.5 million in
contingent purchase price, subject to the satisfaction of certain post-closing conditions through
March 2009. In April 2009, Clarient received $1.5 million from Zeiss which was recorded in income
from discontinued operations within the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the six months
ended June 30, 2009.
In May 2008, we consummated a transaction (the Bundle Sale) pursuant to which we sold all of
our equity and debt interests in Acsis, Inc. (Acsis), Alliance Consulting Group Associates, Inc.
(Alliance Consulting), Laureate Pharma, Inc. (Laureate Pharma), ProModel Corporation
(ProModel) and Neuronyx, Inc. (Neuronyx). Of the companies included in the Bundle Sale, Acsis,
Alliance Consulting and Laureate Pharma were consolidated partner companies and are reported in
discontinued operations for all periods presented. The loss from discontinued operations, net of
tax, for the six month period ended June 30, 2008 of $8.1 million was primarily attributable to a
$3.6 million impairment loss related to the Bundle Sale, losses resulting from the operating
results of Acsis, Alliance Consulting and Laureate Pharma, a severance charge of $0.9 million
related to the Bundled Sale and a pre-tax gain on disposal of $1.4 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Parent Company
We fund our operations with cash on hand as well as proceeds from sales of and distributions
from partner companies, private equity funds and marketable securities. In prior periods, we have
also used sales of our equity and issuance of debt as sources of liquidity and may do so in the
future. Our ability to generate liquidity from sales of partner companies, sales of marketable
securities and from equity and debt issuances has been adversely affected from time to time by
adverse circumstances in the U.S. capital markets and other factors.
As of June 30, 2009, at the parent company level, we had $47.3 million of cash and cash
equivalents and $38.5 million of marketable securities for a total of $85.8 million. In addition,
we had $6.9 million of cash held in escrow, including accrued interest, related to the Bundle Sale
and the sale of Pacific Title and Art Studio.
In connection with the Bundle Sale, an aggregate of $6.4 million of the gross proceeds of the
sale were placed in escrow pending the expiration of a predetermined notification period, subject
to possible extension in the event of a claim against the escrowed amounts. On April 25, 2009, the
purchaser in the Bundle Sale notified us of claims being asserted against the entire escrowed
amounts. We do not believe that such claims are valid and have instituted legal action to obtain
the release of such amounts from escrow. The proceeds being held in escrow will remain there until
the dispute over the claims have been settled or determined pursuant to legal process.
In February 2004, we completed the sale of the 2024 Debentures. At June 30, 2009, we had
$86.0 million in face value of the 2024 Debentures outstanding. Interest on the 2024 Debentures is
payable semi-annually. At the holders option, the 2024 Debentures are convertible into our common
stock before the close of business on March 14, 2024 subject to certain conditions. The conversion
rate of the 2024 Debentures is $7.2174 of principal amount per share. The closing price of our
common stock on June 30, 2009 was $1.32. The 2024 Debentures holders have the right to require
repurchase of the 2024 Debentures on March 21, 2011, March 20, 2014 or March 20, 2019 at a
repurchase price equal to 100% of their respective face amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The 2024 Debentures holders also have the right to require repurchase of the 2024 Debentures upon
certain events, including sale of all or substantially all of our common stock or assets,
liquidation, dissolution or a change in control. Subject to certain conditions, we have the right
to redeem all or some of the 2024 Debentures. None of these conditions are satisfied as of today.
During 2008, we repurchased $43.0 million in face value of the 2024 debentures for $33.5
million in cash, including accrued interest. During 2006, we repurchased $21.0 million in face
value of the 2024 Debentures for $16.4 million in cash, including accrued interest.
34
On May 2, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized us, from time to time and depending on
market conditions, to repurchase shares of our outstanding common stock, with up to an aggregate
value of $10.0 million, exclusive of fees and commissions. The Board has also authorized us to
repurchase such of our 2024 Debentures as our current cash position and partner company exit
activity warrants from time to time. These repurchases have and will be made in open market or
privately negotiated transactions in compliance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
and other applicable legal requirements. The manner, timing and amount of any purchases have and
will be determined by us based upon an evaluation of market conditions, stock price, trading prices
of our 2024 Debentures and other factors. Our Board of Directors authorizations regarding common
stock and 2024 Debenture repurchases do not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of common
stock or 2024 Debentures and may be modified or suspended at any time at our discretion. During
the year ended December 31, 2008 we repurchased approximately 975 thousand shares of common stock
at a cost of $1.3 million.
On February 6, 2009, we entered into a new loan agreement which provides us with a revolving
credit facility in the maximum aggregate amount of $50 million in the form of borrowings,
guarantees and issuances of letters of credit (subject to a $20 million sublimit). Actual
availability under the credit facility is based on the amount of cash maintained at the bank as
well as the value of our public and private partner company interests. This credit facility bears
interest at the prime rate for outstanding borrowings, subject to an increase in certain
circumstances. Other than for limited exceptions, we are required to maintain all of our
depository and operating accounts and not less than 75% of our investment and securities accounts
at the bank. The credit facility matures on December 31, 2010. Availability under our new
revolving credit facility at June 30, 2009 was $50.0 million.
In connection with the sale of CompuCom Systems, Inc. (CompuCom) in 2004, we provided a
letter of credit to the landlord of CompuComs Dallas headquarters, which letter of credit will
expire on March 19, 2019, in an amount equal to $6.3 million. At June 30, 2009, the required cash
collateral, pursuant to our prior revolving credit facility, was $6.3 million, which amount was
included within Cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of that date.
We have committed capital of approximately $5.0 million, including conditional commitments to
provide non-consolidated partner companies with additional funding and commitments made to various
private equity funds in prior years. These commitments will be funded over the next several years,
including approximately $2.5 million which is expected to be funded in the next 12 months. We may
seek to further reduce our current ownership interests in, and our existing commitments to, the
funds in which we hold interests.
The transactions we enter into in pursuit of our strategy could increase or decrease our
liquidity at any point in time. As we seek to acquire interests in technology and life sciences
companies or provide additional funding to existing partner companies, we may be required to expend
our cash or incur debt, which will decrease our liquidity. Conversely, as we dispose of our
interests in partner companies from time-to-time, we may receive proceeds from such sales which
could increase our liquidity. From time-to-time, we are engaged in discussions concerning
acquisitions and dispositions which, if consummated, could impact our liquidity, perhaps
significantly.
In May 2001, we entered into a $26.5 loan agreement with our former Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer. In December 2006, we restructured the obligation to reduce the amount
outstanding to $14.8 million, bearing an interest rate of 5.0% per annum. Cash payments, when
received, are recognized as Recovery-related party in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Since 2001 and through June 30, 2009 we received a total of $16.3 million in cash payments on the
loan. The carrying value of the loan at June 30, 2009 was zero.
We have received distributions as both a general partner and a limited partner from certain
private equity funds. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to return a portion or all
the distributions we received as a general partner of a fund for further distribution to such
funds limited partners (the clawback). The maximum clawback we could be required to return for
our general partner interest is $3.6 million, of which $2.5 million was reflected in Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities and $1.1 million was reflected in Other long-term
liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2009.
Our previous ownership in the general partners of the funds which have potential clawback
liabilities ranges from 19-30%. The clawback liability is joint and several, such that we may be
required to fund the clawback for other general partners should they default. The funds have taken
several steps to reduce the potential liabilities should other general partners default, including
withholding all general partner distributions and placing them in escrow and adding rights of
set-off among certain funds. We believe our potential liability due to the possibility of default
by other general partners is remote.
For the reasons we presented above, we believe our cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2009,
availability under our revolving credit facility and other internal sources of cash flow will be
sufficient to fund our cash requirements for at least the next 12 months, including commitments to
our existing companies and funds, possible additional funding of existing partner companies and our
general corporate requirements. Our acquisition of new partner company interests is always
contingent upon our availability of cash to fund such deployments, and our timing of monetization
events directly affects our availability of cash.
35
Analysis of Parent Company Cash Flows
Cash flow activity for the Parent Company was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(7,168 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,553 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(18,740 |
) |
|
|
64,560 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(25,908 |
) |
|
$ |
55,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Used In Operating Activities
Cash
used in operating activities decreased $1.4 million. The change was primarily related to
working capital changes.
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities
Net
cash provided by investing activities decreased by $83.3 million. The decrease
primarily related to an $83.8 million decrease in the proceeds from the sale of discontinued
operations, a $22.2 million increase in cash used to purchase
marketable securities, a $3.5 million decrease in proceeds from
sales of and distributions from companies and funds and a $3.5
million increase in cash used for acquisitions of ownership interests in partner companies,
offset by a $21.2 million increase in repayment of advances to partner companies, a decrease of
$7.6 million in advances to partner companies and a $0.9 million decrease in restricted cash.
Net Cash (Used In) Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities decreased by $159 thousand. The decrease is
primarily related to cash used to repurchase the Companys common stock in the prior year
period.
Consolidated Working Capital from Continuing Operations
Consolidated working capital from continuing operations was $85.0 million at June 30, 2009,
a decrease of $3.4 million compared to December 31, 2008. The decrease was primarily due to the
deconsolidation of Clarient on May 14, 2009. The fair value of our retained interest in
Clarient is included in Ownership interests in and advances to companies on our Consolidated
Balance Sheet which is not a component of working capital.
Analysis of Consolidated Company Cash Flows
Cash flow activity was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(11,656 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,375 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(34,554 |
) |
|
|
72,372 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
18,464 |
|
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(27,746 |
) |
|
$ |
57,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities
Cash
used in operating activities decreased $1.7 million. The change was primarily related to
working capital changes.
36
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
Net
cash provided by investing activities decreased by $106.9 million. The decrease
primarily related to an $82.3 million decrease in the proceeds from the sale of discontinued
operations, a $22.2 million increase in cash used to purchase marketable securities, a $3.5
million increase in cash used for acquisitions of ownership interests in partner companies, a
$3.5 million decrease in the proceeds from the sale of and distributions from companies and
funds, a $2.7 million decrease in cash resulting from the
deconsolidation of Clarient and a $2.0
million increase in restricted cash offset by a $5.7 million
increase in repayments of advances to partner companies, and a
$2.9 million decrease in the cash used in discontinued operations.
Net Cash (Used In) Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $20.0 million. The increase is
primarily related to a $27.5 million increase in proceeds from the issuance of
subsidiary common stock offset by $2.8 million net repayments on outstanding borrowings and a
$4.8 million decrease in cash provided from discontinued operations.
Contractual Cash Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and other commercial commitments
related to continuing operations as of June 30, 2009 by period due or expiration of the commitment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of |
|
|
2010 and |
|
|
2012 and |
|
|
Due after |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Cash Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior debentures(a) |
|
$ |
86.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
86.0 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Funding commitments(b) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential clawback liabilities(c) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term obligations(d) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations |
|
$ |
101.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
87.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of |
|
|
2010 and |
|
|
2012 and |
|
|
After |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Other Commitments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit(e) |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In February 2004, we completed the issuance of $150.0 million in face value
of the 2024 Debentures with a stated maturity of March 15, 2024. During
2008 and 2006, we repurchased $43.0 million and $21.0 million,
respectively, in face value of the 2024 Debentures. The 2024 Debenture
holders have the right to require us to repurchase the 2024 Debentures on
March 21, 2011, March 20, 2014 or March 20, 2019 at a repurchase price
equal to 100% of their respective face amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest. |
|
(b) |
|
These amounts include funding commitments to private equity funds which
have been included in the respective years based on estimated timing of
capital calls provided to us by the funds management. Also included are
$4.3 million conditional commitments to provide non-consolidated partner
companies with additional funding. |
|
(c) |
|
We have received distributions as both a general partner and a limited
partner from certain private equity funds. Under certain circumstances, we
may be required to return a portion or all the distributions we received as
a general partner of a fund for a further distribution to such funds
limited partners (the clawback). The maximum clawback we could be
required to return is approximately $3.6 million, of which $2.5 million was
reflected in accrued expenses and other current liabilities and $1.1
million was reflected in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. |
|
(d) |
|
Reflects the amount payable to our former Chairman and CEO under a contract. |
|
(e) |
|
Letters of credit include a $6.3 million letter of credit provided to the
landlord of CompuComs Dallas headquarters lease in connection with the
sale of CompuCom in 2004. |
37
We have employment agreements with certain executive officers that provide for severance
payments to the executive officer in the event the officer is terminated without cause or in the
event the officer terminates his employment for good reason. The maximum aggregate exposure
under the agreements was approximately $8.0 million at June 30, 2009.
We are involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of
business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Factors That May Affect Future Results
You should carefully consider the information set forth below. The following risk factors
describe situations in which our business, financial condition or results of operations could be
materially harmed, and the value of our securities may decline. You should also refer to other
information included or incorporated by reference in this report.
Risks Related to our Business
Our business depends upon our ability to make good decisions regarding the deployment of capital
into new or existing partner companies and, ultimately, the performance of our partner companies,
which is uncertain.
If we make poor decisions regarding the deployment of capital into new or existing partner
companies, our business model will not succeed. Our success as a company ultimately depends on our
ability to choose the right partner companies. If our partner companies do not succeed, the value
of our assets could be significantly reduced and require substantial impairments or write-offs and
our results of operations and the price of our common stock could decline. The risks relating to
our partner companies include:
|
|
|
most of our partner companies have a history of operating losses or a limited operating
history; |
|
|
|
the intensifying competition affecting the products and services our partner companies
offer could adversely affect their businesses, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects for growth; |
|
|
|
the inability to adapt to the rapidly changing marketplaces; |
|
|
|
the inability to manage growth; |
|
|
|
the need for additional capital to fund their operations, which we may not be able to fund
or which may not be available from third parties on acceptable terms, if at all; |
|
|
|
the inability to protect their proprietary rights and/or infringing on the proprietary
rights of others; |
|
|
|
the certain of our partner companies could face legal liabilities from claims made against
them based upon their operations, products or work; |
|
|
|
the impact of economic downturns on their operations, results and growth prospects; |
|
|
|
the inability to attract and retain qualified personnel; and |
|
|
|
the existence of government regulations and legal uncertainties may place financial burdens
on the businesses of our partner companies. |
These risks are discussed in greater detail under the caption Risks Related to Our Partner
Companies below.
38
Our partner companies (and the nature of our interests in them) could vary widely from period to
period.
As part of our strategy, we continually assess the value to our shareholders of our interests
in our partner companies. We also regularly evaluate alternative uses for our capital resources. As
a result, depending on market conditions, growth prospects and other key factors, we may at any
time:
|
|
|
change the partner companies on which we focus; |
|
|
|
sell some or all of our interests in any of our partner companies; or |
|
|
|
otherwise change the nature of our interests in our partner companies. |
Therefore, the nature of our holdings could vary significantly from period to period.
Our consolidated financial results also may vary significantly based upon which partner
companies are included in our Consolidated Financial Statements. For example:
|
|
|
For the period from January 1, 2009 through May 14, 2009 and year ended December 31, 2008,
we consolidated the results of operations of Clarient in continuing operations. On May 14,
2009, we deconsolidated Clarient and subsequently account for our holdings in Clarient under
the fair value option. |
Our business model does not rely, or plan, upon the receipt of operating cash flows from our
partner companies. Our partner companies currently provide us with no cash flow from their
operations. We rely on cash on hand, liquidity events and our ability to generate cash from capital
raising activities to finance our operations.
We need capital to develop new partner company relationships and to fund the capital needs of
our existing partner companies. We also need cash to service and repay our outstanding debt,
finance our corporate overhead and meet our existing funding commitments. As a result, we have
substantial cash requirements. Our partner companies currently provide us with no cash flow from
their operations. To the extent our partner companies generate any cash from operations; they
generally retain the funds to develop their own businesses. As a result, we must rely on cash on
hand, liquidity events and new capital raising activities to meet our cash needs. If we are unable
to find ways of monetizing our holdings or to raise additional capital on attractive terms, we may
face liquidity issues that will require us to curtail our new business efforts, constrain our
ability to execute our business strategy and limit our ability to provide financial support to our
existing partner companies.
Fluctuations in the price of the common stock of our publicly traded holdings may affect the price
of our common stock and our net income (loss).
Fluctuations in the market prices of the common stock of our publicly traded holdings are
likely to affect the price of our common stock and our net income (loss). The market prices of our
publicly traded holdings have been highly volatile and subject to fluctuations unrelated or
disproportionate to operating performance. In addition, we have elected to apply the fair value
option to account for our retained interest in Clarient following its deconsolidation on May 14,
2009. As a result, gains and losses on the mark-to-market of our
holdings in Clarient will be
recognized in income (loss) from continuing operations for each
accounting period going forward for which we continue to maintain an
interest in Clarient. The aggregate market value of our holdings
in Clarient (Nasdaq: CLRT), our only public company holding, at June 30, 2009 was approximately
$180.0 million and at December 31, 2008 was approximately
$75.8 million and could vary significantly from period to period.
Intense competition from other acquirors of interests in companies could result in lower gains or
possibly losses on our partner companies.
We face intense competition from other capital providers as we acquire and develop interests
in our partner companies. Some of our competitors have more experience identifying, acquiring and
selling companies and have greater financial and management resources, brand name recognition or
industry contacts than we have. Despite making most of our acquisitions at a stage when our partner
companies are not publicly traded, we may still pay higher prices for those equity interests
because of higher valuations of similar public companies and competition from other acquirers and
capital providers, which could result in lower gains or possibly losses.
We may be unable to obtain maximum value for our holdings or sell our holdings on a timely basis.
We hold significant positions in our partner companies. Consequently, if we were to divest all
or part of our holdings in a partner company, we may have to sell our interests at a relative
discount to a price which may be received by a seller of a smaller portion. For partner companies
with publicly traded stock, we may be unable to sell our holdings at then-quoted market prices. The
trading volume and public float in the common stock of Clarient, our only publicly traded partner
company, are small relative to our holdings. As a result, any significant open-market divestiture
by us of our holdings in these partner companies, if possible at all, would likely have a material
adverse effect on the market price of their common stock and on our proceeds from such a
divestiture. Additionally, we may not be able to take our partner companies public as a means of
monetizing our position or creating shareholder value.
39
Registration and other requirements under applicable securities laws may adversely affect our
ability to dispose of our holdings on a timely basis.
Our success is dependent on our executive management.
Our success is dependent on our executive management teams ability to execute our strategy. A
loss of one or more of the members of our executive management team without adequate replacement
could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our business strategy may not be successful if valuations in the market sectors in which our
partner companies participate decline.
Our strategy involves creating value for our shareholders by helping our partner companies
build value and, if appropriate, accessing the public and private capital markets. Therefore, our
success is dependent on the value of our partner companies as determined by the public and private
capital markets. Many factors, including reduced market interest, may cause the market value of our
publicly traded partner companies to decline. If valuations in the market sectors in which our
partner companies participate decline, their access to the public and private capital markets on
terms acceptable to them may be limited.
Our partner companies could make business decisions that are not in our best interests or with
which we do not agree, which could impair the value of our holdings.
Although we may seek a controlling equity interest and participation in the management of our
partner companies, we may not be able to control the significant business decisions of our partner
companies. We may have shared control or no control over some of our partner companies. In
addition, although we currently own a controlling interest in some of our partner companies, we may
not maintain this controlling interest. Acquisitions of interests in partner companies in which we
share or have no control, and the dilution of our interests in or loss of control of partner
companies, will involve additional risks that could cause the performance of our interests and our
operating results to suffer, including:
|
|
|
the management of a partner company having economic or business interests or objectives
that are different than ours; and |
|
|
|
the partner companies not taking our advice with respect to the financial or operating
difficulties they may encounter. |
Our inability to control our partner companies also could prevent us from assisting them,
financially or otherwise, or could prevent us from liquidating our interests in them at a time or
at a price that is favorable to us. Additionally, our partner companies may not act in ways that
are consistent with our business strategy. These factors could hamper our ability to maximize
returns on our interests and cause us to recognize losses on our interests in these partner
companies.
We may have to buy, sell or retain assets when we would otherwise not wish to do so in order to
avoid registration under the Investment Company Act.
The Investment Company Act of 1940 regulates companies which are engaged primarily in the
business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities. Under the Investment
Company Act, a company may be deemed to be an investment company if it owns investment securities
with a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (excluding government securities and
cash items) on an unconsolidated basis, unless an exemption or safe harbor applies. We refer to
this test as the 40% Test. Securities issued by companies other than consolidated partner
companies are generally considered investment securities for purpose of the Investment Company
Act; unless other circumstances exist which actively involve the company holding such interests in
the management of the underlying company. We are a company that partners with growth-stage
technology and life sciences companies to build value; we are not engaged primarily in the business
of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. We are in compliance with the 40% Test.
Consequently, we do not believe that we are an investment company under the Investment Company Act.
We monitor our compliance with the 40% Test and seek to conduct our business activities to
comply with this test. It is not feasible for us to be regulated as an investment company because
the Investment Company Act rules are inconsistent with our strategy of actively helping our partner
companies in their efforts to build value. In order to continue to comply with the 40% Test, we may
need to take various actions which we would otherwise not pursue. For example, we may need to
retain a controlling interest in a partner company that we no longer consider strategic, we may not
be able to acquire an interest in a company unless we are able to obtain a controlling ownership
interest in the company, or we may be limited in the manner or timing in which we sell our
interests in a partner company. Our ownership levels also may be affected if our partner companies
are acquired by third parties or if our partner companies issue stock which dilutes our controlling
ownership interest. The actions we may need to take to address these issues while maintaining
compliance with the 40% Test could adversely affect our ability to create and realize value at our
partner companies.
Recent economic disruptions and downturns may have negative repercussions for the Company.
Recent events in the United States and international capital markets, debt markets and
economies generally may negatively impact the Companys ability to pursue certain of its tactical
and strategic initiatives, such as: accessing additional public or private equity or debt financing
for itself or for its partner companies and selling the Companys interests in its partner
companies on terms acceptable to the Company and in time frames consistent with our expectations.
40
We have material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and cannot provide
assurance that additional material weaknesses will not be identified in the future. Our failure to
effectively maintain our internal control over financial reporting could result in material
misstatements in our Consolidated Financial Statements which could require us to restate financial
statements, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, cause investors to lose confidence
in our reported financial information and/or have a negative effect on our stock price.
We have determined that we had deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2008 that constituted material weaknesses as defined by the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Boards Audit Standard No. 5. These material weaknesses are identified in Item
9A, Controls and Procedures within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.
We cannot assure that additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting will not be identified in the future. Any failure to maintain or implement required new
or improved controls, or any difficulties we encounter in their implementation, could result in
additional material weaknesses, or could result in material misstatements in our Consolidated
Financial Statements. These misstatements could result in a restatement of financial statements,
cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and/or cause investors to lose confidence in our
reported financial information, leading to a decline in our stock price.
If we do not meet the New York Stock Exchange continued listing requirements, our common stock may
be delisted.
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards require us, among other things, to
maintain an average closing price of at least $1.00 per share of common stock during any
consecutive 30-trading-day period. On November 4, 2008, we were notified by the NYSE that we were
not in compliance with the NYSE listing standard relating to minimum average share price. Based
upon the increase in our stock price since such time, we have regained compliance with such listing
standard. If our stock price were to decline below $1.00 once again, we would once again be out of
compliance and subject to possible delisting.
A delisting of our common stock from the NYSE would negatively impact us because it would,
unless we were able to obtain a listing for our common stock on another national or regional
securities exchange, trigger a situation where the holders of our currently outstanding convertible
debentures would have the right to cause us to redeem the convertible debentures held by such
holders at face value. It is uncertain whether the Company would be able to make such redemption,
based upon its available cash on hand, cash equivalents and other potential sources of funding. In
addition, any delisting by the NYSE could or would also: (i) reduce the liquidity and market price
of our common stock; (ii) reduce the number of investors willing to hold or acquire our common
stock, which could negatively impact our ability to raise equity financing; (iii) limit our ability
to use a registration statement to offer and sell freely tradable securities, thereby preventing us
from accessing the public capital markets, and (iv) impair our ability to provide equity incentives
to our employees.
There could be negative effects if we do effect a reverse split of our Common Stock
If we undertake a reverse split of our stock in order to address an NYSE compliance issue as
described above, or for other reasons, the immediate effect of a reverse stock split would be to
reduce the number of shares of our outstanding common stock and to increase the trading price of
our common stock. However, we cannot predict the specific effect of any reverse stock split upon
the market price of our common stock. Based on the data we have reviewed it appears that sometimes
a reverse stock split improves stock performance and sometimes it does not, and sometimes a reverse
stock split improves overall market capitalization and sometimes it does not. We cannot assure you
that the trading price of our common stock after the reverse stock split will rise in proportion to
the reduction in the number of shares of our common stock outstanding as a result of the reverse
stock split. Also, we cannot assure you that a reverse stock split would lead to a sustained
increase in the trading price of our common stock. The trading price of our common stock may change
due to a variety of factors, such as our operating results and other factors related to our
business and general market conditions. We also cannot predict other possible negative effects of a
reduction in the number of our common shares outstanding on the Company or on individual
stockholders.
Risks Related to our Partner Companies
Most of our partner companies have a history of operating losses or limited operating history and
may never be profitable.
Most of our partner companies have a history of operating losses or limited operating history,
have significant historical losses and may never be profitable. Many have incurred substantial
costs to develop and market their products, have incurred net losses and cannot fund their cash
needs from operations. We expect that the operating expenses of certain of our partner companies
will increase substantially in the foreseeable future as they continue to develop products and
services, increase sales and marketing efforts, and expand operations.
41
Our partner companies face intense competition, which could adversely affect their business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects for growth.
There is intense competition in the technology and life sciences marketplaces, and we expect
competition to intensify in the future. Our business, financial condition, results of operations
and prospects for growth will be materially adversely affected if our partner companies are not
able to compete successfully. Many of the present and potential competitors may have greater
financial, technical, marketing and other resources than those of our partner companies. This may
place our partner companies at a disadvantage in responding to the offerings of their competitors,
technological changes or changes in client requirements. Also, our partner companies may be at a
competitive disadvantage because many of their competitors have greater name recognition, more
extensive client bases and a broader range of product offerings. In addition, our partner companies
may compete against one another.
Our partner companies may fail if they do not adapt to the rapidly changing technology and life
sciences marketplaces.
If our partner companies fail to adapt to rapid changes in technology and customer and
supplier demands, they may not become or remain profitable. There is no assurance that the products
and services of our partner companies will achieve or maintain market penetration or commercial
success, or that the businesses of our partner companies will be successful.
The technology and life sciences marketplaces are characterized by:
|
|
|
rapidly changing technology; |
|
|
|
evolving industry standards; |
|
|
|
frequently introducing new products and services; |
|
|
|
shifting distribution channels; |
|
|
|
evolving government regulation; |
|
|
|
frequently changing intellectual property landscapes; and |
|
|
|
changing customer demands. |
Our future success will depend on our partner companies ability to adapt to these rapidly
evolving marketplaces. They may not be able to adequately or economically adapt their products and
services, develop new products and services or establish and maintain effective distribution
channels for their products and services. If our partner companies are unable to offer competitive
products and services or maintain effective distribution channels, they will sell fewer products
and services and forego potential revenue, possibly causing them to lose money. In addition, we and
our partner companies may not be able to respond to the rapid technology changes in an economically
efficient manner, and our partner companies may become or remain unprofitable.
Our partner companies may grow rapidly and may be unable to manage their growth.
We expect some of our partner companies to grow rapidly. Rapid growth often places
considerable operational, managerial and financial strain on a business. To successfully manage
rapid growth, our partner companies must, among other things:
|
|
|
rapidly improve, upgrade and expand their business infrastructures; |
|
|
|
scale up production operations; |
|
|
|
develop appropriate financial reporting controls; |
|
|
|
attract and maintain qualified personnel; and |
|
|
|
maintain appropriate levels of liquidity. |
If our partner companies are unable to manage their growth successfully, their ability to
respond effectively to competition and to achieve or maintain profitability will be adversely
affected.
42
Based on our business model, some or all of our partner companies will need to raise additional
capital to fund their operations at any given time. We may not be able to fund some or all of such
amounts and such amounts may not be available from third parties on acceptable terms, if at all.
We cannot be certain that our partner companies will be able to obtain additional financing on
favorable terms, if at all. Because our resources and our ability to raise capital are limited, we
may not be able to provide our partner companies with sufficient capital resources to enable them
to reach a cash flow positive position. We also may fail to accurately project the capital needs of
our partner companies for purposes of our cash flow planning. If our partner companies need to but
are not able to raise capital from us or other outside sources, then they may need to cease or
scale back operations. In such event, our interest in any such partner company will become less
valuable.
Recent economic disruptions and downturns may negatively affect our partner companies plans and
their results of operations.
Many of our partner companies are largely dependant upon outside sources of capital to fund
their operations. Disruptions in the availability of capital from such sources will negatively
affect the ability of such partner companies to pursue their business models and will force such
companies to revise their growth and development plans accordingly. Any such changes will, in
turn, affect the ability of the Company to realize the value of its capital deployments in such
companies.
In addition, the downturn in the economy as well as possible governmental responses to such
downturn and/or to specific situations in the economy could affect the business prospects of
certain of our partner companies, including, but not limited to, in the following ways: weaknesses
in the financial services industries; reduced business and/or consumer spending; and/or systematic
changes in the ways the healthcare system operates in the United States.
Our partner companies are subject to independent audits and the results of such independent audits
could adversely impact our partner companies.
As reported in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Clarients independent
auditors have determined that there is substantial doubt about Clarients ability to continue as a
going concern. The going concern explanatory paragraph in Clarients audit opinion could have a
negative impact on:
|
|
|
Clarients ability to extend, renew or refinance its bank credit facility or to secure
additional debt or equity financing in order to fund anticipated working capital needs and
capital expenditures and to execute its strategy; |
|
|
|
Clarients relationships with existing customers or potential new customers; and |
|
|
|
Clarients stock price. |
If any of such events were to occur, the value of our holdings in Clarient could be adversely
impacted.
Some of our partner companies may be unable to protect their proprietary rights and may infringe on
the proprietary rights of others.
Our partner companies assert various forms of intellectual property protection. Intellectual
property may constitute an important part of our partner companies assets and competitive
strengths. Federal law, most typically, copyright, patent, trademark and trade secret laws,
generally protects intellectual property rights. Although we expect that our partner companies will
take reasonable efforts to protect the rights to their intellectual property, the complexity of
international trade secret, copyright, trademark and patent law, coupled with the limited resources
of these partner companies and the demands of quick delivery of products and services to market,
create a risk that their efforts will prove inadequate to prevent misappropriation of our partner
companies technology, or third parties may develop similar technology independently.
Some of our partner companies also license intellectual property from third parties and it is
possible that they could become subject to infringement actions based upon their use of the
intellectual property licensed from those third parties. Our partner companies generally obtain
representations as to the origin and ownership of such licensed intellectual property; however,
this may not adequately protect them. Any claims against our partner companies proprietary rights,
with or without merit, could subject our partner companies to costly litigation and the diversion
of their technical and management personnel from other business concerns. If our partner companies
incur costly litigation and their personnel are not effectively deployed, the expenses and losses
incurred by our partner companies will increase and their profits, if any, will decrease.
43
Third parties have and may assert infringement or other intellectual property claims against
our partner companies based on their patents or other intellectual property claims. Even though we
believe our partner companies products do not infringe any third-partys patents, they may have to
pay substantial damages, possibly including treble damages, if it is ultimately determined that
they do. They may have to obtain a license to sell their products if it is determined that their
products infringe another persons intellectual property. Our partner companies might be prohibited
from selling their products before they obtain a license, which, if available at all, may require
them to pay substantial royalties. Even if infringement claims against our partner companies are
without merit, defending these types of lawsuits takes significant time, may be expensive and may
divert management attention from other business concerns.
Certain of our partner companies could face legal liabilities from claims made against their
operations, products or work.
The manufacture and sale of certain of our partner companies products entails an inherent
risk of product liability. Certain of our partner companies maintain product liability insurance.
Although none of our partner companies to date have experienced any material losses, there can be
no assurance that they will be able to maintain or acquire adequate product liability insurance in
the future and any product liability claim could have a material adverse effect on our partner
companies revenue and income. In addition, many of the engagements of our partner companies
involve projects that are critical to the operation of their clients businesses. If our partner
companies fail to meet their contractual obligations, they could be subject to legal liability,
which could adversely affect their business, operating results and financial condition. The
provisions our partner companies typically include in their contracts, which are designed to limit
their exposure to legal claims relating to their services and the applications they develop, may
not protect our partner companies or may not be enforceable. Also, as consultants, some of our
partner companies depend on their relationships with their clients and their reputation for
high-quality services and integrity to retain and attract clients. As a result, claims made against
our partner companies work may damage their reputation, which in turn could impact their ability
to compete for new work and negatively impact their revenue and profitability.
Our partner companies success depends on their ability to attract and retain qualified personnel.
Our partner companies are dependent upon their ability to attract and retain senior management
and key personnel, including trained technical and marketing personnel. Our partner companies also
will need to continue to hire additional personnel as they expand. At present, none of our partner
companies have employees represented by labor unions. Although our partner companies have not been
the subject of a work stoppage, any future work stoppage could have a material adverse effect on
their respective operations. A shortage in the availability of the requisite qualified personnel or
work stoppage would limit the ability of our partner companies to grow, to increase sales of their
existing products and services, and to launch new products and services.
Government regulations and legal uncertainties may place financial burdens on the businesses of our
partner companies.
Failure to comply with applicable requirements of the FDA or comparable regulation in foreign
countries can result in fines, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of
production, withdrawal of existing product approvals or clearances, refusal to approve or clear new
applications or notices and criminal prosecution. Manufacturers of pharmaceuticals and medical
diagnostic devices and operators of laboratory facilities are subject to strict federal and state
regulation regarding validation and the quality of manufacturing and laboratory facilities. Failure
to comply with these quality regulation systems requirements could result in civil or criminal
penalties or enforcement proceedings, including the recall of a product or a cease distribution
order. The enactment of any additional laws or regulations that affect healthcare insurance policy
and reimbursement (including Medicare reimbursement) could negatively affect our partner companies.
If Medicare or private payors change the rates at which our partner companies or their customers
are reimbursed by insurance providers for their products, such changes could adversely impact our
partner companies.
Some of our partner companies are subject to significant environmental, health and safety
regulation.
Some of our partner companies are subject to licensing and regulation under federal, state and
local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and human health and
safety, including laws and regulations relating to the handling, transportation and disposal of
medical specimens, infectious and hazardous waste and radioactive materials, as well as to the
safety and health of manufacturing and laboratory employees. In addition, the federal Occupational
Safety and Health Administration have established extensive requirements relating to workplace
safety.
44
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We are exposed to equity price risks on the marketable portion of our securities. At June 30,
2009, these securities included our equity position in Clarient, our publicly traded partner
company, which has experienced significant volatility in its stock price. Historically, we have
not attempted to reduce or eliminate our market exposure on publicly traded securities. Based on
closing market price at June 30, 2009, the fair market value of our holdings in Clarient was
approximately $180.0 million. A 20% decrease in Clarients stock price as of that date would
result in an approximate $16 million decrease in the fair value of our holdings in Clarient and a
corresponding charge in Other income (loss), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations
In February 2004, we completed the issuance of $150.0 million of our 2024 Debentures with a
stated maturity of March 15, 2024. During 2008 and 2006, we repurchased $43.0 million and $21.0
million, respectively, in face value of the 2024 Debentures. Interest payments of approximately
$1.1 million each are due March and September of each year. The holders of these 2024 Debentures
have the right to require repurchase of the 2024 Debentures on March 21, 2011, March 20, 2014 or
March 20, 2019 at a repurchase price equal to 100% of their face amount plus accrued and unpaid
interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Remainder of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
Value at |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 Debentures due by year (in
millions) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
86.0 |
|
|
$ |
67.1 |
|
Fixed interest rate |
|
|
2.625 |
% |
|
|
2.625 |
% |
|
|
2.625 |
% |
|
|
2.625 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
Interest expense (in millions) |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
27.6 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that, because of material weaknesses in internal control over financial
reporting discussed in Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting included in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 that were not remediated as of
June 30, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide reasonable
assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance that the
objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute
assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been
detected.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, our efforts continued in addressing the material
weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. The steps we have undertaken in 2009
are discussed in Item 9A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
We are in the process of evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting, which as a result of our remediation plan, include certain enhanced
controls within the accounts receivable, revenue and billing processes.
In light of our unremediated material weaknesses, we performed additional post-closing
procedures and analyses in order to prepare the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this
report. As a result of these procedures, we believe our Consolidated Financial Statements included
in this report present fairly, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
Each of the material weaknesses at December 31, 2008 related to Clarient, Inc., our then
consolidated partner company. As of May 14, 2009, we deconsolidated Clarient and account for our
holdings in Clarient under the fair value option.
No other change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during our most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting. Our business strategy involves the acquisition of
new businesses on an on-going basis, most of which are young, growing companies. Typically, these
companies have not historically had all of the controls and procedures they would need to comply
with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules promulgated there under.
These companies also frequently develop new products and services. Following an acquisition, or
the launch of a new product or service, we work with the companys management to implement all
necessary controls and procedures.
45
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in our risk factors from the
information set forth above under the heading Factors That May Affect Future Results and in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not
the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or
that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and/or operating results.
Fluctuations in the price of the common stock of our publicly traded holdings may affect the price
of our common stock and our net income (loss).
Fluctuations in the market prices of the common stock of our publicly traded holdings are
likely to affect the price of our common stock and our net income (loss). The market prices of our
publicly traded holdings have been highly volatile and subject to fluctuations unrelated or
disproportionate to operating performance. In addition, we have elected to apply the fair value
option to account for our retained interest in Clarient following its deconsolidation on May 14,
2009. As a result, gains and losses on the mark-to-market of our
holdings in Clarient will be
recognized in income (loss) from continuing operations for each
accounting period going forward for which we continue to maintain an
interest in Clarient. The aggregate market value of our holdings
in Clarient (Nasdaq: CLRT), our only public company holding, at June 30, 2009 was approximately
$180.0 million and at December 31, 2008 was approximately
$75.8 million and could vary significantly from period to period.
Our partner companies (and the nature of our interests in them) could vary widely from period to
period.
As part of our strategy, we continually assess the value to our shareholders of our interests
in our partner companies. We also regularly evaluate alternative uses for our capital resources. As
a result, depending on market conditions, growth prospects and other key factors, we may at any
time:
|
|
|
change the partner companies on which we focus; |
|
|
|
sell some or all of our interests in any of our partner companies; or |
|
|
|
otherwise change the nature of our interests in our partner companies. |
Therefore, the nature of our holdings could vary significantly from period to period.
Our consolidated financial results also may vary significantly based upon which partner
companies are included in our Consolidated Financial Statements. For example:
|
|
|
For the period from January 1, 2009 through May 14, 2009 and year ended December 31, 2008,
we consolidated the results of operations of Clarient in continuing operations. On May 14,
2009, we deconsolidated Clarient and subsequently account for our holdings in Clarient under
the fair value option. |
46
The following is a list of exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K filed as part of
this Report. For exhibits that previously have been filed, the Registrant incorporates those
exhibits herein by reference. The exhibit table below includes the Form Type and Filing Date of
the previous filing and the location of the exhibit in the previous filing which is being
incorporated by reference herein. Documents which are incorporated by reference to filings by
parties other than the Registrant are identified in a footnote to this table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated Filing |
|
|
|
|
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Form Type & |
|
Exhibit |
Number |
|
Description |
|
Filing Date |
|
Number |
10.1 *
|
|
Amended and Restated Loan
and Security Agreement
dated as of May 27, 2009,
by and among Silicon Valley
Bank, Safeguard
Scientifics, Inc.,
Safeguard Delaware, Inc.
and Safeguard Scientifics
(Delaware), Inc.
|
|
Form 8-K
5/28/09
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Peter J.
Boni pursuant to Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Stephen T.
Zarrilli pursuant to Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Peter J.
Boni pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Stephen T.
Zarrilli pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
|
|
Date: August 7, 2009 |
/s/ PETER J. BONI
|
|
|
Peter J. Boni |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Date: August 7, 2009 |
/s/ STEPHEN T. ZARRILLI
|
|
|
Stephen T. Zarrilli |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
48
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated Filing |
|
|
|
|
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Form Type & |
|
Exhibit |
Number |
|
Description |
|
Filing Date |
|
Number |
10.1 *
|
|
Amended and Restated Loan
and Security Agreement
dated as of May 27, 2009,
by and among Silicon Valley
Bank, Safeguard
Scientifics, Inc.,
Safeguard Delaware, Inc.
and Safeguard Scientifics
(Delaware), Inc.
|
|
Form 8-K
5/28/09
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Peter J.
Boni pursuant to Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Stephen T.
Zarrilli pursuant to Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Peter J.
Boni pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Stephen T.
Zarrilli pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49