SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2000 Commission File Number 0-11986
SUMMIT BANCSHARES, INC.
------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas 75-1694807
------------------------ ------------------------------------
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1300 Summit Avenue, Fort Worth, Texas 76102
-------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)
(817) 336-6817
----------------------------------------------------
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None Not Applicable
---------------- -------------------------------------------
(Title of Class) (Name of each exchange on which registered)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $1.25 par value
-----------------------------
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was authorized to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of the shares of voting stock held by non-affiliates
of the registrant at March 12, 2001 was approximately $101,172,000.
The number of shares of common stock, $1.25 par value, outstanding at March 12,
2001 was 6,379,478 shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of Registrant's Proxy Statement dated March 14, 2001 filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the 1999 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders of Summit Bancshares, Inc., are incorporated by
reference into Part III.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
The Corporation. Summit Bancshares, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation
---------------
incorporated under the laws of the state of Texas in 1979, is a bank holding
company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the
"BHC Act"). The Corporation maintains its principal office at 1300 Summit
Avenue, Suite 604, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. The Corporation's principal
activity is the ownership and management of its subsidiaries. The Corporation
owns all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of two national
banking associations, Summit National Bank and Summit Community Bank, N.A. (the
"Subsidiary Banks") and a nonbank subsidiary, Summit Bancservices, Inc., all
located in Fort Worth, Texas. In January 1997 Camp Bowie National Bank, at the
time a wholly-owned subsidiary, changed its name to Summit Community Bank, N.A.
and in March 1997 Alta Mesa National Bank merged with Summit Community Bank,
N.A. Alta Mesa National Bank was a former wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Corporation.
At December 31, 2000 the Corporation had consolidated total assets of
$619,121,000, consolidated total loans of $380,016,000, consolidated total
deposits of $539,666,000 and consolidated total shareholders' equity of
$55,571,000.
The Corporation provides advice and services to the Subsidiary Banks and
coordinates their activities in the areas of financial accounting controls and
reports, internal audit programs, regulatory compliance, financial planning and
employee benefit programs. However, each Subsidiary Bank operates under the
day-to-day management of its own officers and directors.
The Corporation's major source of income is dividends received from the
Subsidiary Banks which are restricted as discussed on page 12. Dividend
payments by the Subsidiary Banks are determined on an individual basis,
generally in relation to each Subsidiary Bank's earnings, deposits and capital.
The Corporation's business is neither seasonal in nature nor in any manner
related to or dependent upon patents, licenses, franchises or concessions and
the Corporation has not spent material amounts on research activities.
The Subsidiary Banks. The services offered by the Subsidiary Banks are
--------------------
generally those offered by commercial banks of comparable size in their
respective areas. Certain of the principal services offered by the Subsidiary
Banks are described below.
Commercial Banking. The Subsidiary Banks provide general commercial
banking services for corporate and other business clients principally
located in Tarrant County, Texas. Loans are made for a wide variety of
purposes, including interim construction and mortgage financing on real
estate and financing of equipment and inventories.
Consumer Banking. The Subsidiary Banks provide a full range of consumer
banking services, including interest and non-interest-bearing checking
accounts, various savings programs, installment and real estate loans,
money transfers, on-site ATM facilities and safe deposit facilities.
Securities Services. Summit Bancshares, Inc. through an agreement with LM
Financial Partners, Inc. offers investment brokerage services. LM
Financial Partners, Inc., a subsidiary of Legg Mason, Inc. is a registered
broker-dealer and member of the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. Investment executives are available at each of the Subsidiary Banks
and can provide information about tax-free municipals, government
securities, stocks, mutual funds, or annuities.
2
Certain information with respect to each Subsidiary Bank as of February 28, 2001
is set forth in the following table. Interbank balances have not been
eliminated in the table as such balances are not material to total deposits or
total assets.
As of February 28, 2001
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In Thousands)
Organiza- Acqui- Share-
Name and Address of tion sition Total Total Total holders'
Subsidiary Bank Date Date Assets Loans Deposits Equity
----------------------------- --------- -------- ------------- ------------ ------------- -------------
Summit National Bank 1975 1980 $239,625 $132,078 $203,553 $22,170
1300 Summit Avenue
Fort Worth, TX 76102
Summit Community Bank, N.A. 1984 1984 $360,995 $250,239 $325,042 $29,992
3859 Camp Bowie Blvd.
Fort Worth, TX 76107
Competition. There is significant competition among bank holding companies in
-----------
Tarrant County, Texas and the Corporation believes that such competition among
such bank holding companies will continue in the future.
Additionally, the Subsidiary Banks encounter intense competition in their
commercial banking businesses, primarily from other banks represented in their
respective market areas, many of which have far greater assets and financial
resources. The Subsidiary Banks also encounter intense competition in their
commercial banking businesses from savings and loan associations, credit unions,
factors, insurance companies, commercial and captive finance companies and
certain other types of financial institutions located in its own and in other
major metropolitan areas in the United States, many of which are larger in terms
of capital, resources and personnel.
Employees. As of December 31, 2000 the Corporation and the Subsidiary Banks
---------
collectively had a total of 167 full-time employees and 23 part-time employees.
REGULATION AND SUPERVISION
The Corporation and the Subsidiary Banks are subject to federal and state law
applicable to businesses generally and also to federal and state laws
specifically applicable to financial institutions and financial institution
holding companies. The laws and regulations governing financial institutions
and their parent holding companies are intended primarily for the protection of
depositors, the deposit insurance funds of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, and the banking system as a whole and not for the protection of
shareholders or creditors. Those laws give regulatory authorities broad
enforcement powers over banks and bank holding companies including the power to
require remedial actions and to impose substantial fines and other penalties for
violation of laws or regulations.
The following description of statutory and regulatory provisions does not
purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
applicable statutes and regulations. Any change in applicable statutes or
regulations or the policies of regulatory authorities may have a material effect
on the business, operations, and prospects of the Corporation and the Subsidiary
Banks. The Corporation is unable to predict the nature or extent of the affect
on its business and earnings that fiscal or monetary policies, economic
controls, or changes in federal or state statutes or regulations or regulatory
policies may have in the future.
The Corporation
General. The Corporation is a bank holding company within the meaning of the
BHC Act and as such is subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "FRB"). Under
federal law, bank holding companies are subject to restrictions on the types of
activities in which they may engage and to a wide range of supervisory
requirements and actions, including periodic examinations and reporting
requirements and regulatory enforcement actions for any violations of laws,
regulations, or policies. The FRB has authority to order a bank holding company
to cease and desist from unsafe or unsound practices, to assess civil money
penalties against holding companies and affiliated individuals who violate the
BHC Act or FRB regulations or orders, and to order termination by a bank holding
company of any activities or control of any nonbank subsidiary which the FRB
believes constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness, or
stability of a subsidiary bank and is inconsistent with sound banking principles
or the purposes of various provisions of law.
The Corporation is a legal entity, separate and distinct from its subsidiaries.
As a result, the Corporation's right to participate in the distribution of
assets of any subsidiary upon liquidation or reorganization of the subsidiary
will be subject to the prior claims of depositors and creditors of the
subsidiary. In the event of a liquidation or reorganization of a Subsidiary
Bank, the claims of depositors and creditors of the Bank will have priority over
the rights of the Corporation and its shareholders and creditors.
Scope of Permissible Activities. The BHC Act prohibits a bank holding company,
with certain limited exceptions, from directly or indirectly engaging in, or
from directly or indirectly acquiring ownership or control of more than 5% of
any class of voting shares of any company engaged in, any activities other than
banking or managing or controlling banks or certain other subsidiaries or other
activities determined by the FRB to be so closely related to banking as to be a
proper incident thereto. Some of the activities which have been determined by
FRB regulation to be closely related to banking are making or servicing loans,
performing certain data processing
3
services, acting as an investment or financial advisor to certain investment
trusts or investment companies, and providing certain securities brokerage
services. In approving or disapproving a bank holding company's acquisition of a
company engaged in bank-related activities or participation itself in bank-
related activities, the FRB considers a number of factors and weighs the
expected benefits to the public (such as greater convenience and increased
competition or gains in efficiency) against possible adverse effects (such as
undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of
interest, or unsound banking practices). In considering these factors, the FRB
may differentiate between a bank holding company's commencement of activities
itself and its acquisition of a going concern already engaged in those
activities.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the "GLB Act"), which became law on November 12,
1999, amended the BHC Act to permit the creation of a "financial holding
company," a new type of bank holding company with powers exceeding those of a
traditional bank holding company. A financial holding company may engage in,
and hold shares of any company engaged in, any activity which the FRB determines
by regulation or order to be financial in nature, or incidental to such
financial activity or complimentary to a financial activity, and not to pose a
substantial risk to the safety or soundness of depository institutions or the
financial system generally. Among the activities which will be considered to be
financial in nature are lending, investing or safeguarding money or securities,
underwriting insurance or annuities or acting as an insurance principal, agent,
or broker, providing financial or investment advice, issuing or selling
interests in pools of assets a bank could hold, underwriting, dealing in, or
making a market in securities, engaging in any activity which, prior to
enactment of the GLB Act, the FRB determined to be closely related to banking,
and, subject to certain limitations, merchant banking activities. The
amendments to the BHC Act made by the GLB Act, which became effective on March
11, 2000, allow qualifying bank holding companies to provide a wide variety of
financial services previously reserved for insurance companies and securities
firms. To become a financial holding company, a bank holding company must file
with its Federal Reserve Bank a declaration that it elects to become a financial
holding company along with a certification that all depository institutions
controlled by the company are well-capitalized and well managed. Such a
declaration will become effective 30 days after filing unless the FRB notifies
the bank holding company prior to that time that its declaration is ineffective.
Once the declaration becomes effective, the bank holding company can commence
activities permitted to a financial holding company unless the FRB imposes
supervisory limitations on the company. The FRB serves as the primary
"umbrella" regulator of a financial holding company. The primary regulatory
authority of a financial holding company subsidiary will depend upon the
activities in which the subsidiary is engaged.
The Corporation cannot at this time fully evaluate the effect on the Corporation
and the Subsidiary Banks of the changes made by the GLB Act, including possible
new opportunities for expansion of the Corporation's activities and changes in
competition for the Corporation and the Subsidiary Banks.
Safety and Soundness. Bank holding companies may not engage in unsafe or
unsound banking practices. For example, with some exceptions for well-
capitalized and well-managed companies, FRB regulations require a bank holding
company to give the FRB prior notice of any redemption or repurchase of its own
equity securities if the consideration to be paid, together with the
consideration paid for any repurchases or redemptions in the preceding twelve-
month period, is equal to 10% or more of the company's consolidated net worth.
The FRB may disapprove a redemption or repurchase if it finds the transaction
would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice or would violate any law or
regulation. A holding company may not impair the financial soundness of a
subsidiary bank by causing it to make funds available to nonbanking subsidiaries
or their customers when such a transaction would not be prudent. In some
circumstances, the FRB may take the position that paying a dividend would
constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice. The policy of the FRB is
generally that a bank holding company should pay cash dividends on common stock
only out of income available over the past year and only if prospective earnings
retention is consistent with the organization's future needs and financial
condition. This policy provides that a bank holding company should not maintain
a level of cash dividends that undermines the company's ability to serve as a
source of strength to its banking subsidiaries.
The FRB may exercise various administrative remedies to enforce safety and
soundness standards, including issuing orders requiring parent bank holding
companies and their nonbanking subsidiaries to refrain from actions believed by
the FRB to constitute a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness, or
stability of a subsidiary bank.
Source of Strength to Subsidiary Banks. FRB regulations require a bank holding
company to serve as a source of financial and managerial strength to its
subsidiary banks and commit resources to their support. This concept has become
known as the "source of strength" doctrine. The FRB takes the position that a
bank holding company should stand ready to use available resources to provide
adequate capital funds to its subsidiary banks during periods of financial
adversity and should maintain the financial flexibility and capital-raising
capacity necessary to obtain resources for assisting its subsidiary banks if
required. A bank holding company which fails to meet its obligations to serve
as a source of strength to its subsidiary banks may be considered by the FRB to
be engaged in an unsafe and unsound banking practice and in violation of FRB
regulations. Further, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act
of 1991 ("FDICIA") requires a bank holding company to guarantee, up to certain
limits, an undercapitalized subsidiary bank's compliance with any capital
restoration plan approved by the bank's primary federal regulatory authority.
See Imposition of Liability for Undercapitalized Subsidiaries below.
Enforcement. The Financial Institution Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of
1989 ("FIRREA") expanded the FRB's authority to prohibit activities of bank
holding companies and their nonbanking subsidiaries which are unsafe or unsound
banking practices or constitute violations of laws or regulations. Bank
regulatory authorities may issue cease and desist orders which may, among other
things, require affirmative action to correct conditions resulting from such a
violation or practice, including restitution, reimbursement, and indemnification
or guaranty against loss. Under FIRREA, a bank holding company or financial
institution may also be ordered to restrict its growth, dispose of certain
assets, or take other appropriate action as determined by the ordering agency.
FIRREA increased the amount of civil money penalties that the FRB and other
regulatory agencies may assess for certain activities conducted on a knowing or
reckless basis, if those activities cause a substantial loss to a depository
institution. The penalties may
4
reach as much as $1,000,000 per day. FIRREA also expanded the scope of
individuals and entities against whom such penalties may be assessed.
FIRREA contains a "cross-guarantee" provision which makes commonly controlled
insured depository institutions liable to the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (the "FDIC") for any losses incurred, or which the FDIC reasonably
anticipates incurring, in connection with the failure of an affiliated insured
depository institution. By law, the "cross-guarantee" liability to the FDIC of
an insured depository institution has priority over the rights of the
institution's shareholders including those of any parent holding company.
Anti-Tying Restrictions. Bank holding companies and their affiliates are
prohibited from tying the provision of certain services, such as extensions of
credit, to certain other services offered by a holding company or its
affiliates.
Reporting and Examination. The Corporation is required to file quarterly and
annual reports with the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (the "Federal Reserve
Bank") and to provide such additional information as the Federal Reserve Bank
may require pursuant to the BHC Act. The Federal Reserve Bank may examine the
Corporation and any nonbank subsidiary and charge the Corporation for the cost
of such an examination. The Corporation is also subject to reporting and
disclosure requirements under state and federal securities laws.
Capital Adequacy Requirements. The FRB monitors the capital adequacy of bank
holding companies using a combination of risk-based guidelines and leverage
ratios. Under the risk-based capital guidelines, asset categories are assigned
different risk weights based generally on perceived credit risk. These risk
weights are multiplied by corresponding asset balances to determine a "risk-
weighted" asset base. Certain off-balance sheet items are added to the risk-
weighted asset base by converting them to balance sheet components. For the
purposes of the guidelines, a bank holding company's qualifying total capital is
defined as the sum of its "Tier 1" and "Tier 2" capital elements, with the "Tier
2" element being limited to an amount not exceeding 100% of the "Tier 1"
element. "Tier 1" capital includes, with certain limitations, common
stockholders' equity, qualifying perpetual noncumulative and cumulative
preferred stock, and minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries. "Tier 2"
capital includes, with some limitations, certain other preferred stock as well
as qualifying debt instruments and all or part of the allowance for possible
loan losses.
The FRB guidelines require a minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to total
risk-weighted assets of 8.0% (of which at least 4.0% must be in the form of
"Tier 1" capital). At December 31, 2000, the Corporation's ratios of "Tier 1"
and qualifying total capital to risk-weighted assets were 13.72% and 14.97%,
respectively. At such date, both ratios exceeded regulatory minimums.
The FRB uses a leverage ratio as an additional tool to evaluate the capital
adequacy of bank holding companies. The leverage ratio is defined as a
company's "Tier 1" capital divided by its adjusted average total consolidated
assets. The FRB guidelines require a minimum ratio of 3.0% "Tier 1" capital to
total assets for bank holding companies having the highest regulatory rating.
For other bank holding companies, the minimum ratio of "Tier 1" capital to total
assets is 4.0%. Companies with supervisory, financial, or managerial
weaknesses, as well as those anticipating or experiencing significant growth,
are expected to maintain capital ratios well above the minimum levels. The
Corporation's leverage ratio at December 31, 2000, was 9.04% which exceeded the
regulatory minimum.
A bank holding company which fails to meet the applicable capital standards will
be at a disadvantage in several respects. For example, FRB policy discourages
the payment of dividends by a bank holding company if payment would adversely
affect capital adequacy and borrowing by a company with inadequate capital for
the purpose of paying dividends. In some circumstances, a failure to meet the
capital guidelines may also result in enforcement action by the FRB.
Imposition of Liability for Undercapitalized Subsidiaries. FDICIA requires bank
regulators to take "prompt corrective action" to resolve insured depository
institutions problems. In the event an institution becomes "undercapitalized,"
it must submit a capital restoration plan to its federal regulatory agency. The
regulatory agency will not accept the plan unless it meets certain criteria.
One requirement for acceptance of a capital restoration plan is that each
company "having control of" the undercapitalized institution must guarantee, up
to certain limits, the subsidiary's compliance with the capital restoration
plan. The Corporation has control of the Subsidiary Banks for purposes of this
statute. See below The Subsidiary Banks - Capital Adequacy Requirements below.
Under FDICIA, the aggregate liability of all companies controlling a particular
insured depository institution is generally limited to the lesser of 5% of the
institution's assets at the time it became undercapitalized or the amount
necessary to bring the institution into compliance with application capital
standards. FDICIA grants greater powers to regulatory authorities in situations
where an institution becomes "significantly" or "critically" undercapitalized or
fails to submit a timely and acceptable capital restoration plan or to implement
an accepted capital restoration plan. A bank holding company controlling an
undercapitalized insured depository institution may be required to obtain prior
FRB approval of proposed dividends or a consent to merger or to divest itself of
the troubled institution or other affiliates.
In the event of a proceeding for a bank holding company under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code, the trustee (or the debtor-in-possession) will, by law, be
deemed to have assumed, and required immediately to cure any deficit under, any
commitment made by the company to a federal regulatory agency to maintain the
capital of an insured depository institution, and any claim based upon such a
commitment will have a priority of payment.
Acquisition by Bank Holding Companies. The BHC Act prohibits a bank holding
company, with some limited exceptions, from acquiring direct or indirect control
of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of any class of voting stock or
substantially all of the assets of any bank or bank holding company, or merging
or consolidating with another bank holding company, without the prior approval
of the FRB. In approving acquisitions of a bank or bank holding company by a
bank holding company, the FRB is required to consider the financial and
managerial resources and future prospects of the bank holding company and the
banks concerned, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served, and
various competitive factors. The Attorney General of the United States may,
within 30 days after approval of an acquisition by the FRB, bring an action
challenging such acquisition under the federal antitrust
5
laws, in which case the effectiveness of such approval is stayed pending a final
ruling by the courts. In some circumstances, any such action must be brought in
less than 30 days after FRB approval.
The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the
"Interstate Banking Act") permits adequately capitalized and managed bank
holding companies to acquire banks located in other states, regardless of
whether the acquisition would be prohibited by applicable state law. An out-of-
state bank holding company seeking to acquire ownership or control of a state or
national bank located in Texas or any bank holding company owning or controlling
a state bank or a national bank located in Texas must obtain the prior approval
of both the FRB and the Banking Commissioner of Texas. If the FRB approves an
acquisition which the Texas Banking Commissioner disapproves, the Commissioner
may accept the FRB decision or attempt to have the decision overturned by a
federal court. Under the Interstate Banking Act, a bank holding company and its
insured depository institution affiliates may not complete an acquisition which
would cause it to control more than 10% of total deposits in insured depository
institutions nationwide or to control 30% or more of total deposits in insured
depository institutions in the home state of the bank sought to be acquired.
However, state deposit concentration caps adopted by various states, such as
Texas, which limit control of in-state insured deposits to a greater extent than
the Interstate Banking Act will be given effect. Texas has adopted a deposit
concentration cap of 20% of in-state insured deposits; therefore, the Texas
state deposit concentration cap will lower the otherwise applicable 30% federal
deposit concentration cap. State law may establish a minimum age (not to exceed
five years) of local banks subject to interstate acquisition. The minimum age
established by Texas is five years.
Acquisition of Bank Holding Companies. The Change in Bank Control Act of 1978
prohibits a person or group of persons from acquiring "control" of a bank
holding company unless the FRB has been given prior notice and has not
disapproved the acquisition. Acquisition of 25% or more of any class of voting
shares of a bank holding company constitutes acquisition of "control." The FRB
presumes that the acquisition of 10% or more of any class of voting stock of a
bank holding company constitutes acquisition of control if either the company
has securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, as does the
Corporation, or no other person will own or control a greater percentage of that
class of voting securities immediately after the transaction. That presumption
can be rebutted by showing the FRB that the acquisition will not in fact result
in control. Any company would be required to obtain the approval of the FRB
under the BHC Act before acquiring 25% or more (or more than 5% in the case of
an acquiror that is a bank holding company) of the outstanding common stock of
the company or otherwise exercising control or a "controlling influence" over
the company.
The Subsidiary Banks
General. The Subsidiary Banks are national banking associations organized under
the National Bank Act, as amended, (the "National Bank Act") and are subject to
regulatory supervision and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency (the "OCC"). Pursuant to such regulation, the Banks are subject to
various restrictions and supervisory requirements, and potentially to
enforcement actions. The OCC regularly examines national banks with respect to,
among other matters, capital adequacy, reserves, loan portfolio, investments and
management practices. The Subsidiary Banks must also furnish quarterly and
annual reports to the OCC, and the OCC may exercise cease and desist and other
enforcement powers over the Subsidiary Banks if their actions represent unsafe
or unsound practices or violations of law. Since the deposits of the Subsidiary
Banks are insured by the Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF") of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Company (the "FDIC"), the Subsidiary Banks are also subject to
regulation and supervision by the FDIC. Because the FRB regulates the
Corporation, the FRB has supervisory authority which affects the Subsidiary
Banks.
Banks are subject to the credit policies of governmental authorities that affect
the national supply of bank credit. Such policies influence the overall growth
of bank loans, investments, and deposits and may affect interest rates charged
on loans and paid on deposits. The monetary policies of the FRB have had a
significant effect on the results of operations of commercial banks in the past
and may be expected to continue to do so in the future.
Scope of Permissible Activities. The National Bank Act provides the rights,
privileges, and powers of national banks and defines the activities in which
national banks may engage. Permitted activities for a national bank include
making, arranging, purchasing, or selling loans, purchasing, holding, and
conveying real estate under certain conditions, dealing in investment securities
in certain circumstances, and, generally, engaging in the "business of banking"
and activities that are "incidental" to banking. Activities deemed "incidental"
to the business of banking include the borrowing and lending of money, receiving
deposits (including deposits of public funds), holding or selling stock or other
property acquired in connection with security on a loan, discounting and
negotiating evidences of debt, acting as guarantor (if the bank has a
"substantial interest in the performance of the transaction"), issuing letters
of credit to or on behalf of its customers, operating a safe deposit business,
providing check guarantee plans, issuing credit cards, operating a loan
production office, selling loans under repurchase agreements, selling money
orders at offices other than bank branches, providing consulting services to
banks, and verifying and collecting checks.
In addition to expanding permitted activities for qualifying bank holding
companies, the GLB Act also permits the creation of a "financial subsidiary"
which can be used by a national bank to engage in many of the activities
permitted for a financial holding company. The Corporation cannot at this time
fully evaluate the effect on the Subsidiary Banks of this change made by the GLB
Act.
Branching. National banks located in Texas may establish a branch anywhere in
Texas with prior OCC approval. For this purpose, a national bank is located in
Texas if it has either its main office or a branch in Texas. In acting on a
branch application, the OCC considers a number of factors, including financial
history, capital adequacy, earnings prospects, character of management, needs of
the community and consistency with corporate powers.
The Interstate Banking Act, which expanded the authority of bank holding
companies to engage in interstate bank acquisitions regardless of state law
prohibitions, also allows banks to merge across state lines and thereafter have
interstate branches by continuing to operate, as a main office or a branch, any
office of any bank involved in the merger. States were, however, permitted to
"opt-out" of
6
interstate mergers by enacting laws meeting certain requirements. The Texas
Legislature "opted out" of the interstate branching provisions during its 1995
Session. However, the Texas "opt-out" legislation, which by its terms was to
have expired in September of 1999, proved to be ineffective to prohibit
interstate mergers involving banks in Texas because it did not meet the
requirement of the Interstate Banking Act. The Texas Banking Commissioner
determined that, under federal law, the "opt-out" legislation was ineffective to
prohibit interstate mergers and began accepting applications for interstate
merger and branching transactions for state-chartered institutions before the
September, 1999, expiration date of the Texas "opt-out" legislation as enacted.
As a consequence, the Texas "opt-out" legislation did not have the effect of
prohibiting interstate merger and branching transactions otherwise allowed under
federal law.
The Interstate Banking Act also allows a bank to open new branches in a state in
which it does not already have banking operations if the laws of that state
permit a de novo branch of an out-of-state bank. A "de novo branch" is a branch
office of a bank originally established as a branch and not one becoming a
branch by acquisition or merger. In 1995, Texas elected not to permit de novo
branching, but the Texas legislation prohibiting de novo branching proved
ineffective. In 1999, the Texas law was amended to permit entry into Texas by
an out-of-state bank's establishing a de novo branch in Texas if the laws of the
home state of the out-of-state bank permit a Texas bank to establish a de novo
branch there. Out-of-state banks are also permitted to enter Texas by merger
with an in-state bank if the resulting bank in such a merger would not control
20% or more of total in-state deposits and the in-state bank has been in
existence and operation for at least five years. An out-of-state bank that has
established or acquired a branch in Texas may establish or acquire additional
in-state branches to the same extent that a Texas bank may acquire or establish
branches in Texas.
Restrictions on Transactions with Affiliates. The Subsidiary Banks are subject
to federal statutes which limit transactions with the Corporation and other
affiliates. One set of restrictions is found in Section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act, which limits loans to, purchases of assets from, and investments in
"affiliates" of the Subsidiary Banks. The term "affiliates" would include the
Corporation and any of its subsidiaries. Section 23A imposes limits on the
amount of such transactions and also requires certain levels of collateral for
such loans. In addition, Section 23A limits the amount of loans or extensions
of credit to third parties which are collateralized by the securities or
obligations of the Corporation or its subsidiaries.
Another set of restrictions is found in Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act.
Among the other things, Section 23B requires that certain transactions between a
Subsidiary Bank and its affiliates must be on terms substantially the same, or
at least as favorable to the Subsidiary Bank, as those prevailing at the time
for comparable transactions with or involving other nonaffiliated companies. In
the absence of such comparable transactions, any transaction between a
Subsidiary Bank and an affiliate must be on terms and under circumstances,
including credit underwriting standards and procedures, that in good faith would
be offered to or would apply to nonaffiliated companies. Each Subsidiary Bank
is also subject to certain prohibitions against advertising that suggest that
the Subsidiary Bank is responsible for the obligations of its affiliates.
The regulations and restrictions on transactions with affiliates may limit the
Corporation's ability to obtain funds from its Subsidiary Banks for its cash
needs, including funds for payment of dividends and operating expenses.
Under the Federal Reserve Act and FRB Regulation O, there are restrictions on
loans to directors, executive officers, principal shareholders and their related
interests (collectively referred to herein as "insiders") which apply to all
banks with deposits insured by the FDIC and their subsidiaries and holding
companies. These restrictions include limits on loans to one borrower and
conditions that must be met before such loans can be made. There is also an
aggregate limitation on all loans to insiders and their related interests. In
the aggregate, these loans may not exceed the bank's total unimpaired capital
and surplus. In some circumstances the OCC may determine that a lesser amount
is appropriate. Insiders are subject to enforcement actions for knowingly
accepting loans in violation of applicable restrictions.
Federal law and regulations also prohibit or limit "golden parachute payments"
by FDIC- insured depository institutions and their holding companies. Golden
parachute payments are defined generally as payments made by an insured
depository institution or its holding company to a director, officer, employee,
or other affiliated person contingent upon termination of the person's
employment by the depository institution or its holding company when the
institution or holding company is in troubled condition as determined by
regulatory authorities. Indemnification payments are also prohibited or limited
in certain instances.
Interest Rate Limits and Lending Regulations. The Subsidiary Banks are subject
to various state and federal statutes relating to the extension of credit and
the making of loans. The maximum legal rate of interest that the Subsidiary
Banks may charge on a loan depends on a variety of factors such as the type of
borrower, purpose of the loan, amount of the loan and date the loan is made.
Texas statutes establish maximum legal rates of interest for various lending
situations. Penalties are provided by law for charging interest in excess of
the maximum lawful rate.
Loans made by banks located in Texas are subject to numerous other federal and
state laws and regulations, including the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Texas
Finance Code, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Real Estate Settlement
Procedures Act, and the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. These laws provide
remedies for the borrower and penalties for the lender for failure of the lender
to comply with such laws. The scope and requirements of these laws and
regulations have expanded in recent years, and claims by borrowers under these
laws and regulations may increase.
Restrictions on Subsidiary Bank Dividends. Substantially all of the
Corporation's cash revenues are derived from dividends paid by the Subsidiary
Banks. Dividends payable by the Subsidiary Banks are restricted under the
National Bank Act. See Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and
Related Stockholder Matters - Dividends. The Subsidiary Banks' ability to pay
dividends is further restricted by the requirement that the Subsidiary Banks
maintain adequate levels of capital in accordance with guidelines promulgated
from time to time by the OCC. Moreover, the prompt corrective action provisions
of FDICIA and implementing regulations
7
prohibit a bank from paying dividends or management fees if, following the
payment, the bank would be in any of the three capital categories for
undercapitalized institutions. See Capital Adequacy Requirements below.
Examinations. The OCC periodically examines and evaluates national banks.
Based upon such evaluations, the OCC may require revaluation of certain assets
of a bank and require the bank to establish specific reserves to allow for the
difference between the regulatory-determined value and the book value of such
assets. The OCC is authorized to assess the institution an annual fee based on,
among other things, the costs of conducting the examinations.
Capital Adequacy Requirements. OCC regulations require national banks to
maintain minimum risk-based capital ratios similar to those for bank holding
companies discussed above. The applicable regulations establish five capital
levels, ranging from "well capitalized" to "critically undercapitalized." A
national bank is considered "well capitalized" if it has a total risk-based
capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or
greater, and a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater, and if it is not subject to an
order, written agreement, capital directive, or prompt corrective action
directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure.
A national bank is considered "adequately capitalized" if it has a total risk-
based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at
least 4.0% and leverage capital ratio of 4.0% or greater (or a leverage ratio of
3.0% or greater if the institution was given the highest rating in its most
recent report of examination) and the bank does not meet the definition of a
"well capitalized" bank. A national bank is considered "undercapitalized" if it
has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio that is less than 4.0%, or a leverage ratio that is less than 4.0%
(or a leverage ratio that is less than 3.0% if the institution received the
highest rating in its most recent report of examination). A "significantly
undercapitalized" national bank is one which has a total risk-based capital
ratio that is less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio that is less
than 3.0%, or a leverage ratio that is less than 3.0%. A "critically
undercapitalized" national bank is one which has a ratio of tangible equity to
total assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%.
At December 31, 2000, each of the Subsidiary Banks was "well capitalized." See
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations - Capital Resources.
Corrective Measures for Capital Deficiencies. FDICIA requires the federal
banking regulators to take "prompt corrective action" with respect to capital-
deficient insured depository institutions with the overall goal of limiting
losses to the depository insurance fund. FDICIA contains broad restrictions on
certain activities of undercapitalized institutions involving asset growth,
acquisitions, branch establishment and expansion into new lines of business.
With certain exceptions, national banks will be prohibited from making capital
distributions, including dividends, or paying management fees to a holding
company if the payment of such distributions or fees will cause them to become
undercapitalized. Furthermore, undercapitalized national banks will be required
to file capital restoration plans with the OCC. Such a plan will not be accepted
unless, among other things, the banking institution's holding company guarantees
the plan up to a certain specified amount. Any such guarantee from a depository
institution's holding company is entitled to a priority of payment in
bankruptcy. Undercapitalized national banks also will be subject to restrictions
on growth, acquisitions, branching, and engaging in new lines of business unless
they have an approved capital plan that permits otherwise. The OCC also may,
among other things, require an undercapitalized national bank to issue shares or
obligations, which could be voting stock, to recapitalize the institution or,
under certain circumstances, to divest itself of any subsidiary.
The OCC and other Federal banking agencies are authorized by FDICIA to take
various enforcement actions against any significantly undercapitalized national
bank and any national bank that fails to submit an acceptable capital
restoration plan or fails to implement a plan accepted to the OCC. These powers
include, among other things, requiring the institution to be recapitalized,
prohibiting asset growth or requiring asset reduction, restricting interest
rates paid, requiring FRB prior approval of any capital distributions by any
bank holding company which controls the institution, requiring divestiture by
the institution of its subsidiaries or by the holding company of the institution
itself, requiring new election of directors, and requiring the dismissal of
directors and officers.
Significantly and critically undercapitalized national banks may be subject to
more extensive control and supervision. A critically undercapitalized
institution may be prohibited from, among other things, entering into any
material transaction not in the ordinary course of business, amending its
charter or bylaws, or engaging in certain transactions with affiliates. In
addition, critically undercapitalized institutions generally will be prohibited
from making payments of principal or interest on outstanding subordinated debt.
Within 90 days of a national bank's becoming critically undercapitalized, the
OCC must appoint a receiver or conservator unless certain findings are made with
respect to the prospect for the institution's continued viability.
Deposit Insurance Assessments. The FDIC is required by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act to assess all banks a fee in order to fund adequately the Bank
Insurance Fund (the "BIF") so as to resolve any insured bank that is declared
insolvent by its primary regulator. FDICIA required the FDIC to establish a
risk-based deposit insurance premium schedule. The risk-based assessment system
is used to calculate deposit insurance assessments made on BIF member banks to
maintain the designated reserves for the fund. In addition, the FDIC can impose
special assessments to repay borrowings from the U.S. Treasury, the Federal
Financing Bank, and BIF member banks. Under the risk-based system, banks are
assessed insurance premiums according to how much risk they are deemed to
present to the BIF. Such premiums currently range from zero percent of insured
deposits to 0.27% of insured deposits. Banks with higher levels of capital and
involving a low degree of supervisory concern are assessed lower premiums than
those banks with lower levels of capital and a higher degree of supervisory
concern. Each of the Subsidiary Banks are currently being assessed at the
lowest rate of zero percent.
Under the Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996 (the "Funds Act"), beginning in
1997 banks insured under the BIF were required to pay a part of the interest on
bonds issued by the Financing Corporation ("FICO") in the late 1980s to
recapitalize the defunct Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. Before
the Funds Act, FICO payments were made only by depository institutions which
were
8
members of the Savings Association Insurance Fund (the "SAIF"). Under the
Funds Act, until January 1, 2000, BIF members were assessed for FICO payments at
only one-fifth the rate of assessment on SAIF members. The Funds Act required
that, as of January 1, 2000, all BIF- and SAIF- insured institutions will pay
FICO assessments at the same rate. For the first quarter of 2001, FICO rates
have been set at .01960% for both BIF and SAIF members. The FICO assessment
rates for both BIF and SAIF members for 2000 were:
Fourth Quarter .0202
Third Quarter .0206
Second Quarter .0208
First Quarter .0212
Internal Operating Requirements. FDICIA requires FDIC-insured depository
institutions with over $500 million in assets to file an annual report with the
FDIC and its primary federal regulator and any appropriate state banking agency
within 90 days after the end of its fiscal year. The report must contain
financial statements audited by an independent public accountant; a statement of
management's responsibilities for (1) preparing the financial statements and for
maintaining internal controls; (2) financial reporting and complying with
designated safety and soundness laws and regulations; and (3) assessing the
effectiveness of the institution's internal controls and compliance with safety
and soundness laws and regulations. The independent public accountant also must
report separately on the institution's internal controls and certain of the
statements made by management in the report. The requirement of an annual audit
of the Subsidiary Banks can be satisfied by an annual audit of the Corporation.
The annual report must be available for public inspection. Each institution to
which the annual report requirement applies must also have an independent audit
committee entirely made up of outside directors. The audit committee's duties
must include reviewing with management and the independent public accounts the
basis for the annual report. The requirement of audit committees for the
Subsidiary Banks can be satisfied by the services of an audit committee of the
Corporation.
Community Reinvestment Act. The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 ("CRA") and
the regulations issued by the OCC to implement that law are intended to
encourage banks to help meet the credit needs of their service area, including
low and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound
operations of the banks. These regulations also provide for regulatory
assessment of a bank's record in meeting the needs of its service area when
considering applications to establish branches, merger applications and
applications to acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of another bank.
FIRREA requires federal banking agencies to make public a rating of a bank's
performance under the CRA. In the case of a bank holding company, the CRA
performance record of its subsidiary banks is reviewed in connection with the
filing of an application to acquire ownership or control of shares or assets of
a bank or to merge with any other bank holding company. An unsatisfactory
record can substantially delay or block the transaction. A less than
satisfactory CFA rating can limit the extent to which a bank and its affiliates
can take advantage of the expanded range of activities permitted by the GLB Act.
Customer Privacy. The GLB Act enacted new measures to protect the security,
confidentiality, and integrity of information concerning customers of financial
institutions. The federal banking agencies were directed by the GLB Act to
adopt rules of carry out those measures, and were given broad authority to
enforce the privacy provisions of the Act and rules adopted to carry out those
provisions. The agencies have adopted guidelines for safeguarding customer
information which will become effective July 1, 2001. The agencies' guidelines
require each financial institution to establish an information security program
which will identify and assess risks that may threaten the confidentiality of
customer information. The institution must develop a written plan containing
policies and procedures to manage and control those risks and implement and test
the plan. The plan must be adjusted on a continuing basis for changes in
technology, the sensitivity of customer information, and internal and external
threats to information security. A financial institution's policy for
protecting the confidentiality and security of nonpublic personal information
must be disclosed to the customer at the time the customer relationship is
established and at least annually thereafter.
Expanding Enforcement Authority
One of the major effects of FDICIA was the increased ability of banking
regulators to monitor the activities of banks and their holding companies. The
Federal banking agencies have extensive authority to police unsafe or unsound
practices and violations of applicable laws and regulations by depository
institutions and their holding companies. For example, the FDIC may terminate
the deposit insurance of any institution which it determines has engaged in an
unsafe or unsound practice. The agencies can also assess civil money penalties,
issue cease and desist or removal orders, seek judicial enforcement of their
orders, and publicly disclose such actions.
Changing Regulatory Structure
Legislative and regulatory proposals regarding changes in banking, regulations
of banks, thrifts and other financial institutions, are being considered by the
executive branch of the federal government, Congress, and various state
governments, including Texas. Certain of these proposals, if adopted, could
significantly change the regulation of banks and the financial service industry.
The Corporation cannot predict accurately whether any of these proposals will be
adopted or, if adopted, how these proposals will affect the Corporation or the
Subsidiary Banks. Also, there will be regulatory changes to deal with the
expanded permissible activities permitted for financial holding companies and
financial subsidiaries of national banks. The Corporation cannot predict at
this time the effect of regulatory changes resulting from the enactment of the
GLB Act.
9
Effect on Economic Environment
The policies of regulatory authorities, including the monetary policy of the
FRB, have a significant effect on the operating results of bank holding
companies and their subsidiaries. Among the means available to the FRB to
affect the money supply are open market operations in U.S. Government
securities, control of borrowings at the "discount window," changes in the
discount rate on member bank borrowing, changes in reserve requirements against
member bank deposits and against certain borrowings by banks and their
affiliates and the placing of limits on interest rates that member banks may pay
on time and savings deposits. These means are used in varying combinations to
influence overall growth and distribution of bank loans, investments, and
deposits, and their use may affect interest rates charged on loans or paid for
deposits. FRB monetary policies have materially affected the operating results
of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the
future. The Corporation cannot predict the nature of future monetary policies
and the effect of such policies on the business and earnings of the Corporation
and the Subsidiary Banks.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
The principal offices of the Corporation are located at 1300 Summit Avenue, Fort
Worth, Texas 76102. The Corporation and Summit National Bank, a subsidiary,
lease space at this address from an unrelated third-party through leases that
expire December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Summit National
Bank owns a detached motor bank facility.
Summit Community Bank, N.A. owns the building at its principal office at 3859
Camp Bowie Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas. There are no encumbrances on this
property.
The Alta Mesa office of Summit Community Bank, N.A. is located at 3000 Alta Mesa
Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas. The building is owned by the Corporation with the
bank office using approximately 25% of the facility. The remainder of the
building is fully leased. There are no third-party encumbrances on the
property.
The Northeast office and motor bank facility of Summit Community Bank, N.A., at
9001 Airport Freeway, North Richland Hills, Texas, is leased from a third-party
under a lease agreement expiring in April 2008. Summit Community Bank, N.A.
owns a tract of land adjacent to the Northeast office to be used for building of
a new motor bank facility that would be owned by the bank.
The Fossil Creek office of Summit Community Bank, N.A., at 3851 NE Loop 820,
Fort Worth, Texas is located in a building that is a joint venture between the
Summit Community Bank, N.A. and an unrelated third party. The Fossil Creek
office occupies approximately 28% of the building under a long-term lease with
the joint venture.
Summit Community Bank, N.A. owns approximately 1.5 acres near the intersection
of Tarrant County Parkway and Davis Boulevard in Northeast Tarrant County. This
unimproved property is to be used to establish a new branch office in late 2001.
A subsidiary of the Corporation owns an improved tract of land that serves as
the site of the operations center which is the principal office of Summit
Bancservices Inc. This site is located at 500 Eighth Avenue, Fort Worth, Texas.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
In the opinion of management, there are no material pending legal proceedings,
other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the Corporation's business,
to which it or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their
property is the subject.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders through the solicitation
of proxies or otherwise, during the fourth quarter of 2000.
10
ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE CORPORATION.
The executive officers of the Corporation, each elected to serve at the pleasure
of the Board of Directors until the next annual meeting of the Board of
Directors to be held on April 17, 2001, their respective ages, and their present
positions with the Corporation are as follows:
Position With Position Held
Name Age the Corporation Since
---------------------------- --- ---------------------------------------- -----
Philip E. Norwood 51 Chairman/President 1998/2001
Bob G. Scott 63 Executive Vice President and 1998
Chief Operating Officer
The business experience of each of these executive officers during the past five
(5) years is set forth below:
Mr. Norwood became Chairman of the Board of Summit Bancshares, Inc. and Chairman
of Summit Community Bank, N.A. in January 1998 and President of Summit Community
Bank, N.A. in July 1994 and continues to serve in these capacities. In January
2001 Mr. Norwood also became President of Summit Bancshares, Inc. and President
and a director of Summit National Bank. From October 1993 to January 1998 Mr.
Norwood served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation. He
has served as a director of the Corporation since March 1984. Mr. Norwood served
as a director and senior officer of Alta Mesa National Bank (currently a banking
office of Summit Community Bank, N.A.) from April 1981 to December 1995. Mr.
Norwood served as a director of Summit National Bank from March 1983 to January
1996.
Mr. Scott became Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Secretary
and Treasurer in January 1998 and continues to serve in these capacities. He
served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from June 1994 to
January 1998. From February 1992 to June 1994 Mr. Scott was a Senior Vice
President with Alexander and Alexander of Texas, Inc. Prior to February 1992,
Mr. Scott was a financial officer with Team Bancshares, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas
and with Texas American Bancshares, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas.
No family relationships exist among the executive officers and directors of the
Corporation.
11
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Market Information. Since May 3, 1993 the Corporation's Common Stock has been
------------------
traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol "SBIT." The following table
sets forth the high and low stock prices as quoted for the Corporation's Common
Stock for the periods indicated:
High Low
------- -------
2000 Fiscal Year:
----------------
First Quarter $18.50 $14.50
Second Quarter 17.75 15.38
Third Quarter 18.06 14.75
Fourth Quarter 22.19 17.00
1999 Fiscal Year:
-------------------
First Quarter $18.13 $17.38
Second Quarter 20.00 16.88
Third Quarter 19.38 17.00
Fourth Quarter 20.00 17.75
On March 12, 2001 the closing price reported for the Common Stock was $18.81.
The foregoing quotations reflect prices quoted by market makers of the
Corporation's Common Stock, without retail markup, markdown or commissions, and
may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
Shareholders. At the close of business on March 12, 2001 there were 588
------------
shareholders of record of Common Stock of the Corporation. The number of
beneficial shareholders is unknown to the Corporation at this time.
Dividends. The Corporation has paid regular cash dividends on its common stock
---------
on a quarterly basis since the beginning of 1993. The following table sets
forth, for each quarter since the beginning of 1999, the quarterly dividends
paid by the Corporation on its Common Stock for the indicated periods.
2000 Dividends Per Share
--------------- -------------------
First Quarter $0.100
Second Quarter 0.100
Third Quarter 0.100
Fourth Quarter 0.100
1999
---------------
First Quarter $0.080
Second Quarter 0.080
Third Quarter 0.080
Fourth Quarter 0.080
Although the Board of Directors intends to continue to pay quarterly cash
dividends in the future, there can be no assurance that cash dividends will
continue to the paid in the future or, if paid, that such cash dividends will be
comparable to cash dividends previously paid by the Corporation, since future
dividend policy is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors of the
Corporation and will depend upon a number of factors, including future earnings
of the Corporation, the financial condition of the Corporation, the
Corporation's cash needs, general business conditions and the amount of
dividends paid to the Corporation by the Subsidiary Banks.
The principal source of the Corporation's cash revenues is dividends received
from the Subsidiary Banks. Pursuant to the National Bank Act, no national bank
may pay dividends from its paid-in capital. All dividends must be paid out of
current or retained net profits, after deducting reserves for losses and bad
debts. The National Bank Act further restricts the payment of dividends out of
net profits by prohibiting a national bank from declaring a dividend on its
shares of common stock until the surplus fund equals the amount of capital stock
or, if the surplus fund does not equal the amount of capital stock, until one-
tenth of a bank's net profits for the preceding half year in the case of
quarterly or semi-annual dividends, or the preceding two half-year periods in
the case of annual dividends, are transferred to the surplus fund. The approval
of the OCC is required prior to the payment of a dividend if the total of all
dividends declared by a national bank in any calendar year would exceed the
total of its net profits for that year combined with its net profits for the two
preceding years. Under FDICIA, a Subsidiary Bank may not pay a dividend if,
after paying the dividend, the Subsidiary Bank would be undercapitalized.
In addition, the appropriate regulatory authorities are authorized to prohibit
banks and bank holding companies from paying dividends which would constitute an
unsafe and unsound banking practice. The Subsidiary Banks and the Corporation
are not currently subject to any regulatory restrictions on their dividends.
12
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The following table sets forth summary historical data for the past five years
(in thousands except ratios and per share data). All share and per share
information has been restated to reflect a two-for-one stock split in 1997.
Years Ended December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Summary of Earnings:
Interest Income $ 47,609 $ 40,232 $ 37,065 $ 31,972 $ 27,577
Interest Expense 18,870 13,772 13,478 11,301 9,771
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net Interest Income 28,739 26,460 23,587 20,671 17,806
Provision for Loan Losses 2,606 1,001 785 900 819
Securities Gains (Losses) (2) (3) 35 (1) (14)
Non-interest Income 3,780 3,883 3,815 3,266 2,990
Non-interest Expense 16,170 15,224 14,173 12,318 10,917
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Earnings Before Income Taxes 13,741 14,115 12,479 10,718 9,046
Income Tax Expense 4,765 4,893 4,333 3,678 3,103
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net Income $ 8,976 $ 9,222 $ 8,146 $ 7,040 $ 5,943
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Balance Sheet Data (at period-end):
Total Assets $619,121 $564,786 $532,764 $459,794 $395,248
Investment Securities 149,647 156,440 148,012 105,627 117,013
Loans, Net of Unearned Discount 380,016 355,414 305,833 276,069 220,006
Allowance for Loan Losses 5,399 5,169 4,724 4,065 2,972
Demand Deposits 146,083 128,685 141,170 126,398 103,695
Total Deposits 539,666 480,546 465,500 401,724 345,023
Short Term Borrowings 19,910 32,091 17,839 14,689 13,209
Shareholders' Equity 55,571 48,709 46,235 41,112 35,080
Per Share Data:
Net Income - Basic $ 1.41 $ 1.44 $ 1.25 $ 1.09 $ 0.93
Net Income - Diluted 1.38 1.39 1.20 1.04 0.90
Book Value - Period-End 8.73 7.66 7.14 6.32 5.43
Dividends Declared and Paid 0.40 0.32 0.24 0.18 0.14
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (000) 6,364 6,411 6,497 6,479 6,399
Average Common Share Equivalents (000) 160 245 317 321 314
Selected Performance Ratios:
Return on Average Assets 1.54 % 1.72 % 1.70 % 1.70 % 1.60 %
Return on Shareholders' Equity 17.57 19.66 18.62 18.49 18.50
Net Interest Margin (tax equivalent) 5.25 5.31 5.28 5.47 5.24
Efficiency Ratio 49.71 50.14 51.60 51.42 52.50
Asset Quality Ratios:
Non-Performing Loans to Total Loans - Period-End 0.58 % 0.69 % 1.65 % 0.77 % 0.50 %
Non-Performing Assets to Total Assets - Period-End 0.61 0.78 1.00 0.49 0.32
Allowance for Loan Losses to Total Loans - Period-End 1.42 1.45 1.54 1.47 1.35
Allowance for Loan Losses to Non-Performing
Loans - Period-End 246.0 211.0 94.0 193.0 270.0
Net Charge-Offs (Recoveries) to Average Loans 0.64 0.16 0.04 (0.08) 0.17
Capital Ratios:
Shareholders' Equity to Total Assets - Period-End 8.98 % 8.62 % 8.68 % 8.94 % 8.88 %
Average Shareholders' Equity to Average Assets 8.74 8.71 9.11 9.21 8.66
Total Risk-based Capital to Risk Weighted Assets
- Period-End* 14.97 14.59 15.06 15.06 15.85
Leverage Ratio - Period-End* 8.88 8.77 8.52 8.83 8.82
*Calculated in accordance with Federal Reserve guidelines currently in effect.
13
Quarterly Results (Unaudited)
A summary of the unaudited results of operations for each quarter of 2000 and
1999 follows (in thousands except for per share data):
First Second Third Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
2000
----
Interest Income $11,150 $11,551 $12,230 $12,678
Interest Expense 4,091 4,443 4,985 5,351
Net Interest Income 7,059 7,108 7,245 7,327
Provision for Loan Losses 232 1,496 577 301
Non-interest Income 908 918 918 1,034
Non-interest Expense 3,993 4,449 3,708 4,020
Income Tax Expense 1,292 734 1,338 1,401
Net Income 2,450 1,347 2,540 2,639
Per Share Data:
Net Income:
Basic $ 0.38 $ 0.22 $ 0.40 $ 0.41
Diluted 0.37 0.21 0.39 0.41
Dividends Paid 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Stock Price Range:
High 18.50 17.75 18.06 22.19
Low 14.50 15.38 14.75 17.00
Close 15.50 17.25 17.88 21.69
First Second Third Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
1999
----
Interest Income $ 9,394 $ 9,721 $10,222 $10,895
Interest Expense 3,254 3,157 3,452 3,909
Net Interest Income 6,140 6,564 6,770 6,986
Provision for Loan Losses 220 418 140 223
Non-interest Income 1,031 902 894 1,053
Non-interest Expense 3,738 3,678 3,882 3,926
Income Tax Expense 1,117 1,159 1,259 1,358
Net Income 2,096 2,211 2,383 2,532
Per Share Data:
Net Income:
Basic $ 0.33 $ 0.34 $ 0.37 $ 0.40
Diluted 0.31 0.33 0.36 0.39
Dividends Paid 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08
Stock Price Range:
High 18.13 20.00 19.38 20.00
Low 17.38 16.88 17.00 17.75
Close 17.50 17.38 18.13 18.50
14
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of the Corporation analyzes the major elements of the Corporation's
consolidated balance sheets and statements of income. This discussion should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, accompanying
notes, and selected financial data appearing elsewhere in this report.
Performance Summary. Net income for 2000 was $9.0 million, a decrease of $.2
million, or 2.7%, compared to $9.2 million recorded for 1999. On a weighted
average share basis, net income for 2000 was $1.38 per diluted share as compared
to $1.39 per share for 1999, a decrease of .7%. The major decline in earnings
during 2000 was due to a significant increase in provision for loan losses and a
write- down of foreclosed assets. The increase in provision for loan losses
was related to the charge-off of $1.7 million of one loan and $.5 million of
another. Further explanations of these changes are set forth below.
Continuing to reflect the strong economy in the Corporation's market area, loans
increased 6.9% over the previous year-end to $380 million at December 31, 2000.
Total funding (deposits and short term borrowings) experienced similar growth,
increasing 9.2% over the same period to $560 million. Shareholders' equity was
$56 million at year-end, an increase of 14.1%.
Net income for 1999 was $9.2 million compared to net income of $8.1 million for
1998, an increase of 13.2%. The increase in earnings for 1999 was attributable
to a significant increase in net interest income.
The following table shows selected key performance ratios over the last three
(3) years:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------ ------
Return on Average Assets 1.54% 1.72% 1.70%
Return on Average Shareholders' Equity 17.57 19.66 18.62
Shareholders' Equity to Assets - Average 8.74 8.71 9.11
Dividend Payout Ratio 28.38 22.25 19.15
The ratio, return on assets, is calculated by dividing net income by average
total assets for the year. The return on equity ratio is calculated by dividing
net income by average shareholders' equity for the year. The equity to assets
ratio is calculated by dividing average shareholders' equity by average total
assets for the year. The dividend payout is determined by dividing the total
dividends paid by the total net income.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income is the difference between interest
earned on earning assets and interest paid for the funds supporting those
assets. The largest category of earning assets consists of loans to businesses
and individuals. The second largest is investment securities. Net interest
income is the principal source of the Corporation's earnings. Interest rate
fluctuations, as well as changes in the amount and type of earning assets and
liabilities supporting those assets, affect net interest income. Interest rates
primarily are determined by national and international market trends, as well as
competitive pressures in the Corporation's operating markets. For analytical
purposes, income from tax-exempt assets, primarily securities issued by or loans
made to state and local governments, is adjusted by an increment which equates
tax-exempt income to interest from taxable assets.
Net interest income (tax equivalent) for 2000 was $28.8 million, an increase of
$2.3 million, or 8.6% compared to the prior year. The net increase reflected a
$7.4 million increase in interest income which was offset by a $5.1 million
increase in interest expense. The Corporation's yield on earning assets
increased to 8.70% in 2000 from 8.06% for 1999. Rates paid on the
Corporation's interest-bearing liabilities, increased from 3.86% in 1999 to
4.76% in 2000. These shifts in yield on earning assets and cost of interest-
bearing liabilities resulted in the net interest margin decreasing from 5.31% in
1999 to 5.25% for 2000. Contributing to the improved net interest income for
2000 was the increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits. In 2000, the
average balance of demand deposits increased 3.2%. The average demand deposits
as a percent of average total deposits decreased to 26.7% in 2000 from 28.2% in
1999; however, this ratio remains very positive compared to the Corporation's
peers.
15
Summary of Earning Assets and Interest Bearing Liabilities
Although the year-end detail provides satisfactory indicators of general trends,
the daily average balance sheets are more meaningful for analysis purposes than
year-end data because averages reflect the day-to-day fluctuations that are
common to bank balance sheets. Also, average balances for earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities can be related directly to the components of
interest income and interest expense on the statements of income. This provides
the basis for analysis of rates earned and paid, and sources of increases and
decreases in net interest income as derived from changes in volumes and rates.
The following schedule presents average balance sheets for the most recent three
years in a format that highlights earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities.
2000 1999 1998
-------------------------------- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
Average Average Average
Average Yield/ Average Yield/ Average Yield/
(Dollars in Thousands) Balance Interest Rate Balance Interest Rate Balance Interest Rate
---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ---------- --------- ------------ ----------- ---------
Earning Assets:
Federal Funds Sold $ 24,659 $ 1,571 6.37% $ 21,277 $ 1,082 5.08% $ 38,112 $ 2,053 5.39%
Investment Securities
(Taxable) 148,598 9,253 6.23 145,109 8,496 5.85 115,663 6,963 6.02
Investment Securities
(Tax-exempt)(2) 348 26 7.50 745 52 7.03 1,103 76 6.90
Loans, Net of Unearned
Discount(1) 373,997 36,768 9.83 331,963 30,622 9.22 292,060 28,002 9.59
-------- ------- ----- -------- ------- ----- -------- ------- -----
Total Earning Assets 547,602 47,618 8.70 499,094 40,252 8.06 446,938 37,094 8.30
------- ------- -------
Other Assets:
Cash and Due From Banks 24,140 23,981 22,226
Other Assets 19,122 20,110 16,261
Allowance for Loan Losses (6,167) (4,886) (4,430)
-------- -------- --------
Total Assets $584,697 $538,299 $480,995
======== ======== ========
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Interest-Bearing Transaction
Accounts $158,476 6,168 3.89 $156,054 5,043 3.23 $144,133 5,186 3.60
Savings 93,594 4,472 4.78 85,571 3,440 4.02 68,011 2,972 4.37
Savings Certificates 67,605 3,808 5.63 55,169 2,543 4.61 52,261 2,631 5.03
Certificates of Deposit
$100,000 or more 50,625 2,978 5.88 36,463 1,772 4.86 36,752 1,948 5.30
Other Time 778 44 5.70 778 39 5.06 877 49 5.59
Other Borrowings 25,748 1,400 5.44 22,404 935 4.17 15,742 692 4.40
-------- ------- ----- -------- ------- ----- -------- ------- -----
Total Interest-Bearing
Liabilities 396,826 18,870 4.76 356,439 13,772 3.86 317,776 13,478 4.24
------- ------- -------
Other Liabilities:
Demand Deposits 135,165 131,002 116,428
Other Liabilities 1,607 3,953 3,030
Shareholders' Equity 51,099 46,905 43,761
-------- -------- -------
Total Liabilities and
Shareholders' Equity $584,697 $538,299 $480,995
======== ======== ========
Net Interest Income and
Margin (T/E Basis)(2) $28,748 5.25 $26,480 5.31 $23,616 5.28
======= ======= =======
(1) Loan interest income includes fees and loan volumes include loans on non-
accrual.
(2) Presented on a tax equivalent basis ("T/E") using a federal income tax rate
of 34% in all three years.
Net interest margin, the net return on earning assets which is computed by
dividing net interest income by average total earning assets, was 5.25% for
2000, a 6 basis point decrease from the previous year. This decrease in the
margin reflected a higher cost of funds of 90 basis points in 2000 compared to
the prior year somewhat offset by a higher yield on earning assets of 64 basis
points, resulting in the net interest spread decreasing from 4.20% to 3.94%. The
somewhat disproportionate increase in cost of funds compared to the increase in
yield of earning assets reflects the competitive pressures of funding asset
growth. The competitive pressures experienced by the Corporation are similar to
those pressures experienced throughout the industry at this time.
16
The table below analyzes the increase in net interest income for each of the
years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 on a fully tax equivalent basis. Non-
accruing loans have been included in assets for these computations, thereby
reducing yields on total loans. The changes in interest due to both rate and
volume in the rate/volume analysis table below have been allocated to volume or
rate change in proportion to the absolute amounts of the change in each.
2000 vs. 1999 1999 vs. 1998
Increase (Decrease) Increase (Decrease)
Due to Changes in: Due to Changes in:
-------------------------------- --------------------------------
(Dollars in Thousands) Volume Rate Total Volume Rate Total
--------- -------- -------- ---------- --------- ----------
Interest Earning Assets:
Federal Funds Sold $ 189 $ 301 $ 490 $ (861) $ (110) $ (971)
Investment Securities (Taxable) 208 549 757 1,729 (196) 1,533
Investment Securities (Tax-exempt) (29) 3 (26) (25) 1 (24)
Loans, Net of Unearned Discount 4,045 2,103 6,148 3,712 (1,092) 2,620
------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------
Total Interest Income 4,413 2,956 7,369 4,555 (1,397) 3,158
------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Transaction Accounts & Savings 380 1,779 2,159 1,075 (750) 325
Certificates of Deposit and Other Time 1,409 1,067 2,476 127 (401) (274)
Other Borrowings 153 313 466 280 (37) 243
------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------
Total Interest Expense 1,942 3,159 5,101 1,482 (1,188) 294
------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------
Changes in Net Interest Income $2,471 $ (203) $2,268 $3,073 $ (209) $2,864
====== ====== ====== ====== ======= ======
Net interest income for 2000 increased $2,268,000, or 8.6% over the prior year.
In this same period total interest income increased 18.4% and total interest
expense increased 37.0%.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income is an important contributor to net
earnings. The major component of the Corporation's non-interest income is
various charges and fees earned on deposit accounts and related services. The
following table summarizes the changes in non-interest income during the past
three years (dollars in thousands):
2000 1999 1998
------------------------ ------------------------ ---------
Amount % Change Amount % Change Amount
---------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ---------
Service Charges on
Deposit Accounts $1,998 (0.2) % $2,002 (0.8) % $2,018
Non-recurring Income 65 -- 475 15.3 412
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Investment
Securities (2) -- (3) -- 35
Other Non-interest Income 1,717 22.1 1,406 1.5 1,385
------ ------ ------
Total Non-interest Income $3,778 (2.6) $3,880 0.8 $3,850
====== ====== ======
Service charges on deposits decreased in 2000 as a result of customers
maintaining higher balances in accounts thereby avoiding service charges.
The non-recurring income in 2000 is primarily interest recovered on loans either
charged-off in prior years or loans that were on non-accrual status in prior
years. Non-recurring income in 1999 included refunds of state franchise tax of
$155,000, gain on sale of land of $105,000, a forfeited deposit of $100,000
related to sale of foreclosed property and interest recovered on loans either
charged-off in prior years or loans that were on non-accrual status in prior
years of $114,000.
The increase in other non-interest income in 2000 is primarily due to an
increase in income from debit card fees and mortgage brokerage/origination fees.
17
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense includes all expenses of the
Corporation other than interest expense, provision for loan losses and income
tax expense. The following table summarizes the changes in the non-interest
expenses for the past three years (dollars in thousands):
2000 1999 1998
------------------------ ------------------------ ---------
Amount % Change Amount % Change Amount
---------- ------------ ---------- ------------ ---------
Salaries and Employee Benefits $ 9,480 2.8 % $ 9,226 7.6 % $ 8,576
Occupancy Expense - Net 993 (3.7) 1,031 11.1 928
Furniture and Equipment Expense 1,391 15.7 1,202 4.5 1,150
Other Real Estate Owned Expense 324 -- 107 -- (1)
Other Expenses:
Business Development 601 (0.2) 602 (1.5) 611
Insurance - Other 116 (4.1) 121 18.6 102
Legal and Professional Fees 866 39.9 619 21.1 511
Other Taxes 116 (31.4) 169 (39.0) 277
Postage and Courier 332 5.1 316 10.5 286
Printing and Supplies 369 (2.6) 379 (2.1) 387
Regulatory Fees and Assessments 237 29.5 183 8.3 169
Other Operating Expenses 1,345 6.0 1,269 7.8 1,177
------- ------- -------
Total Other Expenses 3,982 8.9 3,658 3.9 3,520
------- ------- -------
Total Non-interest Expense $16,170 6.2 $15,224 7.4 $14,173
======= ======= =======
Total non-interest expense increased 6.2% in 2000 over 1999 reflecting increases
in salaries and benefits, furniture and equipment expenses, other real estate
owned expense, legal and professional fees and regulatory fees and assessments.
As a percent of average assets, non-interest expenses were 2.77%, 2.83%, and
2.95%, in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The "efficiency ratio" (non-
interest expenses divided by total non-interest income plus net interest income)
was 49.71% for 2000. The efficiency ratio measures what percentage of total
revenues are absorbed by non-interest expense. These measures of operating
efficiency compare very favorably to other financial institutions in the
Corporation's peer groups.
The increase in salaries and employee benefits for 2000 is due to routine salary
merit increases and additions to staff, offset by decreased incentive bonus
payments. The average number of full-time equivalent employees increased by 5.5
in 2000 to an average full-time equivalent of 179.5. At year end 2000 the full-
time equivalent staff was 178.5 versus 179 at the same time the prior year.
The increase in furniture and equipment expense is primarily a result of
depreciation and service contract expense for expanded data processing equipment
and software.
The increase in expenses for the other real estate owned ("ORE") reflects write-
downs of ORE of $426,000, gains on sales of ORE of $151,000 and expenses of
holding ORE prior to sale.
Legal and professional fees increased in 2000 and reflects increases in attorney
fees related to certain problem loans and fees paid to consultants and attorneys
for assistance in general corporate issues.
Regulatory fees and assessments increased primarily due to increases in the FDIC
assessment for deposit insurance.
Federal and State Income Tax Expense. The Corporation has adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." See Note
10 of the Corporation's Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details
of tax expense. The Corporation provided $4.8 million for federal income taxes
for 2000, resulting in an effective tax rate of 34.7%.
Investment Securities. The following table presents the consolidated investment
securities portfolio at amortized cost as of December 31, 2000, classified as to
--------------
whether the security is to be Held-to-Maturity or is Available-for-Sale (see
Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of
these designations), by stated maturity and with the weighted average interest
yield for each range of maturities. The yields on tax-exempt obligations are
computed on a fully taxable equivalent basis using statutory rates for federal
income taxes.
18
December 31, 2000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due 1 to Due 5 to Due After
Due 1 Year or Less 5 Years 10 Years 10 Years
------------------- -------------------- ------------------- ----------------------
Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Amount Yield Total
--------- -------- -------------------- --------- -------- ---------- ---------- --------
(Dollars in Thousands)
U.S. Treasury Securities - HTM $ 4,001 6.33% $ -- -- % $ -- -- % $ -- -- % $ 4,001
U.S. Treasury Securities - AFS 7,013 6.05 6,062 6.29 -- -- -- -- 13,075
Total 11,014 6.15 6,062 6.29 -- -- -- -- 17,076
U.S. Government Agencies - HTM 1,000 4.98 14,000 5.99 3,020 5.98 -- -- 18,020
U.S. Government Agencies - AFS 13,935 6.20 87,218 6.25 1,011 5.62 -- -- 102,164
Total 14,935 6.12 101,218 6.22 4,031 5.89 -- -- 120,184
U.S. Government Agency Mortgage -- -- 2,115 5.79 1,564 5.83 6,759 6.97 10,438
Back Securities - AFS
Obligations of States and
Political Subdivisions - AFS 115 7.27 125 7.42 -- -- -- -- 240
Total 115 7.27 2,240 5.88 1,564 5.83 6,759 6.97 10,678
Other Securities - AFS -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,277 6.20 1,277
------- ---- -------- ---- -------- ---- -------- ---- --------
Total $26,064 6.13 $109,520 6.21 $5,595 5.87 $8,036 6.85 $149,215
======= ==== ======== ==== ======== ==== ======== ==== ========
Held-to Maturity ("HTM") $ 5,001 6.06 % $ 14,000 5.99 % $3,020 5.98 % $ -- -- % $ 22,021
Available-for-Sale ("AFS") 21,063 6.15 95,520 6.25 2,575 5.75 8,036 6.85 127,194
The yield on the investment securities portfolio of the Corporation at December
31, 2000 was 6.22% and the weighted average life of the portfolio on that date
was approximately 2.3 years. At December 31, 1999 the yield of the portfolio
was 5.96% and the weighted average life was 2.8 years.
Note 2 to the Corporation's Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements shown in
this report reflects the estimated fair values for various categories of
investment securities as of December 31, 2000 and 1999. As of December 31,
2000, there was a net unrealized gain of $360,000 in the portfolio of which
$432,000 related to Available-for-Sale securities, or .3% of the amortized cost
of those securities.
The following table summarizes the book value of investment securities held by
the Corporation as of December 31 for the past five years (in thousands):
December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
----------- ----------- ------------ ---------- --------
U.S. Treasury Securities $ 17,162 $ 27,974 $ 41,672 $ 70,794 $ 77,678
U.S. Government Agencies
and Corporations 120,559 113,535 87,791 20,249 25,276
U.S. Government Agency
Mortgage Backed Securities 10,409 13,079 16,440 12,527 13,805
Obligations of States and
Political Subdivisions 240 637 1,037 1,142 -0-
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal
Home Loan Bank Stock 1,277 1,215 1,072 915 254
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total $149,647 $156,440 $148,012 $105,627 $117,013
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
In 2000, approximately $59.9 million of investment securities were sold,
resulting in a net loss on sale of securities of $2,000. Management of the
Corporation views these trades as an opportunity to restructure the portfolio
for future benefits.
19
Loans. The following schedule classifies loans according to type as of
December 31 for the past five years (dollars in thousands):
December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% of % of % of % of % of
2000 Total 1999 Total 1998 Total 1997 Total 1996 Total
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Commercial $167,818 44.2% $156,847 44.2% $133,066 43.5% $127,800 46.3% $103,414 47.0%
Real Estate
Mortgage 132,062 34.7 120,596 33.9 100,421 32.9 90,638 32.8 76,771 34.9
Real Estate
Construction 47,183 12.4 43,875 12.3 40,456 13.2 26,290 9.5 12,862 5.8
Loans to
Individuals,
Net of Unearned
Discount 32,953 8.7 34,096 9.6 31,890 10.4 31,341 11.4 26,959 12.3
-------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- ----- -------- -----
Total Loans, Net
of Unearned
Income $380,016 100.0 % $355,414 100.0% $305,833 100.0% $276,069 100.0% $220,006 100.0%
======== ===== ======== ===== ======== ===== ======== ===== ======== =====
The preceding loan distribution table reflects that total loans increased $24.6
million (6.9%) between year-end 1999 and 2000. Although this dollar increase was
significant, the Corporation is continuing to apply stringent credit criteria on
all loan applications. At December 31, 2000, loans were 70.4% of deposits
compared to 74.0% at the previous year-end reflecting a somewhat slower growth
in loans compared to deposits. Average loans were 73.9% of average deposits in
2000 compared to 71.4% in 1999.
Primarily, the commercial loan customers of the Subsidiary Banks are small to
medium-sized businesses and professionals and executives. The banks offer a
variety of commercial loan products that include revolving lines of credit,
letters of credit, working capital loans and loans to finance accounts
receivable, inventory and equipment. Generally, these commercial loans have
floating rates of interest with terms of maturity of three years or less.
A significant portion of the $132 million real estate mortgage portfolio is
loans to finance owner-occupied real estate. At December 31, 2000, $79 million
of loans, approximately 60% of the real estate mortgage portfolio, had been made
for this purpose. Also, approximately 36% of the loans in the real estate
mortgage portfolio have variable rates of interest with a significant portion of
the remaining portfolio having balloon terms at five to seven years and/or rate
adjustment clauses.
Real estate construction loans are made primarily to finance construction of
single family residences in the Corporation's market area of Tarrant County.
Construction loans generally are secured by first liens on real estate and have
floating interest rates. The Corporation's lending activities in this area are
primarily with borrowers that have been in the building trade for many years and
with which the banks have long standing relationships. The Corporation's
lending officers meet quarterly with consultants that carefully track the
residential building activities within the market. The Corporation will adjust
its construction lending activities based on the trends of housing starts and
absorption rates in the market.
The Corporation also lends to consumers for purchases of various consumer goods,
such as automobiles, boats and home improvements. The terms of these loans
typically are five years or less and are well secured with liens on products
purchased or other assets. These loans are primarily made to customers who have
other relationships with the banks. The Corporation does not issue credit cards
and does not have any credit card loans outstanding.
The following table presents commercial loans and real estate construction loans
at December 31, 2000, based on scheduled principal repayments and the total
amount of loans due after one year classified according to sensitivity to
changes in interest rates (in thousands):
Over
One Year
One Year Through Over Five
or Less Five Years Years Total
---------- ---------- --------- ---------
Commercial $141,206 $23,743 $2,869 $167,818
Real Estate Construction 41,563 2,200 3,420 47,183
---------- ---------- --------- ---------
Totals $182,769 $25,943 $6,289 $215,001
========== ========== ========= =========
Of the loans maturing after one year, all have fixed rates of interest, with
many having rate adjustment clauses during the remaining term of the loan that
allow for periodic adjustments to rates.
20
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is established through
charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. Loans, or
portions thereof, which are considered to be uncollectible are charged against
this allowance and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.
The allowance represents the amount which, in management's judgment, will be
adequate to absorb future charge-offs of existing loans which may become
uncollectible. The adequacy of the allowance is determined by management's
periodic evaluation of the loan portfolio and by the employment of third party
loan review specialists. All known problem loans, unknown inherent risks
generally associated with bank lending, past loan loss experience, delinquency
ratios and current and projected economic conditions are taken into account in
evaluating the adequacy of the allowance.
The Corporation has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114,
"Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan" ("SFAS No. 114"), as amended
by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 118, "Accounting by Creditors
for Impairment of a Loan -- Income Recognition and Disclosure" ("SFAS No. 118").
These standards specify how allowances for certain impaired loans should be
determined and the accounting for in-substance foreclosures.
Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when principal or interest is
past due 90 days or more and the loan is not both well-secured and in the
process of collection, or immediately, if in the opinion of management, full
collection of principal or interest is doubtful. Loans are charged against the
allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collectibility of
the principal is unlikely.
The following table presents average loans net of unearned income and an
analysis of the consolidated allowance for loan losses (dollars in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Average Loans Outstanding $373,997 $331,963 $292,060 $248,303 $201,506
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Analysis of Allowance for
Loan Losses:
Balance, Beginning of Year $ 5,169 $ 4,724 $ 4,065 $ 2,972 $ 2,500
Charge-Offs:
Commercial 2,429 376 128 148 424
Real Estate Mortgage -0- 3 39 -0- 2
Real Estate Construction -0- 230 6 -0- -0-
Loans to Individuals 171 118 170 98 36
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total Charge-Offs 2,600 727 343 246 462
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Recoveries:
Commercial 140 93 87 379 58
Real Estate Mortgage 10 44 111 56 54
Real Estate Construction -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
Loans to Individuals 74 34 19 4 3
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total Recoveries 224 171 217 439 115
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net Charge-Offs (Recoveries) 2,376 556 126 (193) 347
Provision Charged to Operating Expense 2,606 1,001 785 900 819
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Balance, End of Year $ 5,399 $ 5,169 $ 4,724 $ 4,065 $ 2,972
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Ratio of Net Charge-Offs (Recoveries)
to Average Loans Outstanding 0.64 % 0.16 % 0.04 % (0.08) % 0.17 %
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
The increase in provision for loan losses in 2000 over 1999 primarily recognizes
an increase in loans and a significantly higher loan charge-off rate.
21
The following table reflects the allowance for loan losses compared to total
loans at the end of each year (dollars in thousands):
December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total Loans $380,016 $355,414 $305,833 $276,069 $220,006
Allowance for Loan Losses 5,399 5,169 4,724 4,065 2,972
Allowance for Loan Losses
as a Percent of Total Loans 1.42% 1.45% 1.54% 1.47% 1.35%
Allowance for Loan Losses
as a Percent of Non-Performing Loans 246.0 211.0 94.0 193.0 270.0
The following table illustrates the allocation of the allowance for loan losses
to the various loan categories (dollars in thousands); see the table on page 35
for the percent of specific types of loans to total loans:
December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------
% of % of % of % of % of
Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total Amount Total
------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ -----
Allowance For
Loan Losses:
Commercial $2,066 38.3 % $2,686 52.0 % $2,713 57.4 % $1,729 42.5 % $1,072 36.1 %
Real Estate
Mortgage 1,095 20.3 1,050 20.3 818 17.3 699 17.2 556 18.7
Real Estate
Construction 381 7.1 371 7.2 452 9.6 184 4.5 81 2.7
Loans to
Individuals 374 6.9 375 7.3 372 7.9 272 6.7 165 5.6
Unallocated
Portion 1,483 27.4 687 13.2 369 7.8 1,181 29.1 1,098 36.9
------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ -----
Total $5,399 100.0 % $5,169 100.0 % $4,724 100.0 % $4,065 100.0 % $2,972 100.0 %
====== ===== ====== ===== ====== ===== ====== ===== ====== =====
The allocation is determined by providing specific reserves against each
criticized loan plus a general allocation against the remaining balance of the
portfolio based on experience factors. Management of the Corporation believes
that the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2000, is adequate to cover
losses inherent in the portfolio. There can be no assurance that the
Corporation will not sustain loan losses in future periods which could be
substantial in relation to the size of the current allowance. The total
allowance is available to absorb losses from any segment of loans.
Non-Performing Assets. Non-performing assets consist of non-accrual loans,
renegotiated loans and other real estate. Non-accrual loans are those on which
the accrual of interest has been suspended and on which the interest is recorded
as earned when it is received. Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status
when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more and the loan is not both
well-secured and in the process of collection, or immediately, if in the opinion
of management, full collection of principal or interest is doubtful. At the
time a loan is placed on non-accrual status, interest previously recorded but
not collected is reversed and charged against current interest income.
Renegotiated loans are loans on which the interest and/or the principal has been
reduced due to a deterioration in the borrower's financial condition. Even
though these loans are actually performing, they are included in non-performing
assets because of the loss of revenue related to the reduction of interest
and/or principal.
Other real estate is real estate acquired through foreclosure or through partial
settlement of debts and which is awaiting sale and disposition. At the time of
acquisition, other real estate is recorded at the lower of estimated fair value
or the loan balance or settlement agreement with any write-down charged to the
allowance for loan losses. Any further write-downs, expenses related to the
property, and any gain or loss resulting from the sale of the property are
recorded in current operating expenses.
The Subsidiary Banks are required, by the regulatory authorities, to have other
real estate evaluated periodically. In the event the new evaluation value is
less than the carrying value of the property, the excess is written off to
expense. Some properties are written down below their evaluation values when
management feels the economic value of the property has declined below the
evaluation value.
22
The following table summarizes the non-performing assets and loans 90 days past
due and still accruing as of December 31, (dollars in thousands):
December 31,
-----------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
----- ------ ------ ------ ------
Non-accrual Loans $2,182 $2,450 $5,049 $2,112 $1,102
Renegotiated Loans -0- 3 6 -0- -0-
Other Real Estate & Other Foreclosed Assets 1,595 1,947 281 151 166
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total Non-Performing
Assets $3,777 $4,400 $5,336 $2,263 $1,268
====== ====== ====== ====== ======
As a Percent of:
Total Assets 0.61% 0.78% 1.00% 0.49% 0.32%
Total Loans and Other
Real Estate & Other Foreclosed Assets 0.99 1.23 1.74 0.82 0.58
Loans Past Due 90 Days or
More and Still Accruing $ 10 $ -0- $ 3 $ 78 $ 36
Non-accrual loans at December 31, 2000, were comprised of $1,997,000 in
commercial loans, $72,000 in real estate mortgages and $113,000 in consumer
loans. Within the non-accrual commercial loans is one loan of $1,315,000 that
is performing as to payment of principal and interest, however, the borrower is
experiencing financial difficulty due to their line of business. Other Real
Estate and Other Foreclosed Assets includes two assets - the first is multi-
family residential units having a book value of $286,000; the second asset is
the projected wholesale value of text books taken in lieu of foreclosure of a
borrower that closed operations. It is anticipated that the multi-family
residential property will be sold in the second quarter of 2001 at a profit.
The impact on interest income from the above non-accrual loans and renegotiated
loans for the past five (5) years is provided below (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Gross Amount of Interest
That Would Have Been
Recorded at Original Rate $ 600 $ 427 $ 537 $ 272 $ 111
Interest Included in Income 206 68 312 154 30
----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Interest Not Recorded
in Income $ 394 $ 359 $ 225 $ 118 $ 81
===== ===== ===== ===== =====
Loans of each Subsidiary Bank are graded on a system similar to that used by the
banking industry regulators. The first level of criticized loans is "Other
Assets Especially Mentioned" (OAEM). These loans are fundamentally sound but
have potential weaknesses which may, if not corrected, weaken the asset or
inadequately protect the bank's credit position at some future date. The second
level is "Substandard", which are loans inadequately protected by current sound
net worth, paying capacity or pledged collateral. The last level of criticized
loans, before they are charged off, is "Doubtful". Doubtful loans are
considered to have inherent weaknesses because collection or liquidation in full
is highly questionable.
Non-accrual loans normally include weaker Substandard loans and loans that are
considered to be Doubtful.
23
The following table summarizes the relationship between non-performing loans,
criticized loans and the allowance for loan losses (dollars in thousands):
December 31,
------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Non-Performing Loans $ 2,182 $ 2,453 $ 5,055 $2,112 $1,102
Criticized Loans 11,536 11,804 10,468 9,295 4,589
Allowance for Loan Losses 5,399 5,169 4,724 4,065 2,972
Allowance for Loan Losses
as a Percent of:
Non-Performing Loans 247.0% 211.0% 94.0% 193.0% 270.0%
Criticized Loans 47.0 44.0 45.0 44.0 65.0
Independent third party loan reviews of the Subsidiary Banks were completed at
various times in 2000. In addition, regulatory examinations were completed in
late 2000. Based on the findings of these reviews and exams management
considers the Subsidiary Banks to be adequately reserved.
Management is not aware of any potential loan problems, that have not been
disclosed, to which serious doubts exist as to the ability of the borrower to
substantially comply with the present repayment terms.
Deposits. The primary source of the Corporation's funds is the deposits of the
Subsidiary Banks. The majority of the Corporation's deposits are considered
"core" deposits, that is, deposits that are not subject to material changes due
to customer withdrawal because of market rate changes. The Corporation does not
accept brokered deposits. Average demand deposits increased $4.2 million, or
3.2% in 2000. These deposits represented 26.7% of total deposits. Average
interest-bearing deposits increased $37.0 million, or 11.1%. The
deposit types' daily average balance and related average rates paid during each
of the last three (3) years are as follows (dollars in thousands):
2000 1999 1998
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amount Rate Paid Amount Rate Paid Amount Rate Paid
-------- ----------- -------- ----------- -------- -----------
Noninterest-Bearing Demand Deposits $135,165 $131,002 $116,428
Interest-Bearing Deposits:
Interest-Bearing Transaction
Accounts 158,476 3.89 % 156,054 3.23% 144,133 3.60 %
Savings 93,594 4.78 85,571 4.02 68,011 4.37
Savings Certificates 67,605 5.63 55,169 4.61 52,261 5.03
Certificates of Deposit of $100,000 or 50,625 5.88 36,463 4.86 36,752 5.30
More
Other Time Deposits 778 5.70 778 5.06 877 5.59
-------- -------- --------
Total Interest-Bearing 371,078 4.71 334,035 3.84 302,034 4.23
Deposits
-------- -------- --------
Total Deposits $506,243 $465,037 $418,462
======== ======== ========
The remaining maturity on certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 is presented
below (in thousands):
% of % of % of
Maturity 2000 Total 1999 Total 1998 Total
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
3 months or less $ 16,267 27.0 % $ 18,144 46.4 % $ 14,227 38.4 %
3 to 6 months 15,334 25.5 7,846 20.1 7,943 21.4
6 to 12 months 24,191 40.2 11,776 30.1 8,471 22.8
Over 12 months 4,403 7.3 1,312 3.4 6,458 17.4
Borrowings. Securities sold under repurchase agreements generally represent
borrowings with maturities ranging from one to thirty days. These borrowings
are with significant commercial customers of the banks that require short-term
liquidity for their funds. Information relating to these borrowings is
summarized as follows:
24
December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
Securities sold under repurchase agreements:
Average Balance $20,797 $20,488 $15,742
Year-end Balance 19,910 28,091 17,839
Maximum month-end balance during year 25,019 30,309 19,354
Interest Rate:
Average 5.19 % 4.04 % 4.40 %
Year-end 5.44 3.38 3.83
The Corporation, through one of its subsidiaries, has available a line of credit
with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas, which allows the subsidiary to borrow
on a collateralized basis at a fixed term. At December 31, 2000, the subsidiary
had no borrowings outstanding. For the year ended December 31, 2000, the
subsidiary had borrowed an average balance of $4,929,000 bearing an average
interest rate of 6.49%. At December 31, 1999, the subsidiary had borrowed
$4,000,000, bearing an interest rate of 5.43% and having a maturity of April
2000.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. The objectives of monitoring and managing the
interest rate risk of the balance sheet are to contribute to earnings by
minimizing adverse changes in net interest income as a result of changes in the
direction and level of interest rates and to provide liquidity to satisfy cash
flow requirements to meet customers' fluctuating demands.
Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship between changes in the market
interest rates and changes in net interest income due to the repricing
characteristics of assets and liabilities.
An asset-sensitive position in a given period will result in more assets than
liabilities being subject to repricing; therefore, market interest-rate changes
will be reflected more quickly in asset rates. If interest rates decline, such
a position will have an adverse effect on net interest income. Conversely, in a
liability-sensitive position, where liabilities reprice more quickly than assets
in a given period, a decline in market rates will benefit net interest income.
A mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities in which relatively
equal volumes reprice each period represents a matched interest sensitivity
"gap" position; any excess of these assets or liabilities results in an interest
sensitive gap.
The following table, commonly referred to as a "static gap report", indicates
the interest rate-sensitivity position at December 31, 2000 and may not be
reflective of positions in subsequent periods (dollars in thousands):
Repriced
Due in After 1
30 Due in Due in Total Year or
Days 31-180 181 Days Rate Non-Rate
Or Less Days to One Year Sensitive Sensitive Total
-------- -------- ----------- --------- --------- --------
Earning Assets:
Loans $217,476 $ 17,652 $ 19,232 $254,360 $125,656 $380,016
Investment Securities 4,328 21,100 11,495 36,923 112,724 149,647
Federal Funds Sold 46,461 --- --- 46,461 --- 46,461
-------- -------- ----------- --------- --------- --------
Total Earning Assets 268,265 38,752 30,727 337,744 238,380 576,124
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Interest-Bearing
Transaction Accounts
and Savings 250,362 --- --- 250,362 --- 250,362
Certificates of
Deposits > $100,000 6,803 24,798 24,191 55,792 4,404 60,196
Other Time Deposits 6,393 24,633 40,027 71,053 11,972 83,025
Repurchase Agreements 19,910 --- --- 19,910 --- 19,910
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total Interest-
Bearing Liabilities 283,468 49,431 64,218 397,117 16,376 413,493
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Interest Sensitivity Gap $(15,203) $(10,679) $(33,491) $(59,373) $222,004 $162,631
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Cumulative Gap $(15,203) $(25,882) $(59,373)
======== ======== ========
Cumulative Gap To
Total Earning Assets (2.64) % (4.47) % (10.31) %
Cumulative Gap To
Total Assets (2.46) % (4.18) % (9.59) %
25
In the preceding table under the "After 1 Year" category, $70,205,000 in
investment securities will reprice or mature within one to three years and
another $36,779,000 will reprice or mature within three to five years. The
average maturity of the investment portfolio is approximately 2.3 years. Also,
the above table reflects the call dates versus maturity dates and periodic
principal amortization of investment securities.
The preceding static gap report reflects a cumulative liability sensitive
position during the one year horizon. An inherent weakness of this report is
that it ignores the relative volatility any one category may have in relation to
other categories or market rates in general. For instance, the rate paid on
certain interest-bearing transaction accounts typically moves slower than the
three month T-Bill. Management attempts to capture this relative volatility by
utilizing a simulation model with a "beta factor" adjustment which estimates the
volatility of rate sensitive assets and/or liabilities in relation to other
market rates.
Beta factors are an estimation of the long term, multiple interest rate
environment relation between an individual account and market rates in general.
For instance, NOW, savings and money market accounts, which are repriceable
within 30 days will have considerably lower beta factors than variable rate
loans and most investment categories. Taking this into consideration, it is
quite possible for a bank with a negative cumulative gap to total asset ratio to
have a positive "beta adjusted" gap risk position.
As a result of applying the beta factors established by the Corporation's
management to the earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities in the static
gap report via a simulation model, the cumulative gap to total assets ratio at
one year of (9.59%) was reversed to a positive 10.70% "beta adjusted" gap
position. Management feels that the "beta adjusted" gap risk technique more
accurately reflects the Corporation's gap position.
In addition to gap analysis, the Corporation uses an interest rate risk
simulation model and shock analysis to test the interest rate sensitivity of net
interest income and the balance sheet, respectively. Contractual maturities and
repricing opportunities of loans are incorporated in the model as are prepayment
assumptions, maturity data and call options within the investment portfolio.
Assumptions based on past experience are incorporated into the model for
nonmaturity deposit accounts. Based on the December 31, 2000 simulation
analysis, it is estimated that a 200 basis point rise in rates over the next 12
month period would have an impact of approximately 5.5% on net interest income
for the period, while a 200 basis point decline in rates over the same period
would have an impact of approximately (7.2)% on net interest income for the
period. The results are primarily from the behavior of demand, money market and
savings deposits. The Corporation has found that, historically, interest
rates on these deposits change more slowly in a rising rate environment than in
a declining rate environment. This assumption is incorporated into the
simulation model and is generally not fully reflected in a gap analysis. The
analysis does not contemplate any actions that the Corporation might undertake
in response to changes in market interest rates. Accordingly, this analysis,
is not intended to be and does not provide, a forecast of the effect actual
changes in market rates will have on the Corporation.
The following table reflects the spreads and margins for the past three (3)
years:
2000 1999 1998 1997
------ ------ ------ ------
Yield on Earning Assets (T/E) 8.70 % 8.06 % 8.30 % 8.45 %
Cost of Funds 4.76 3.86 4.24 4.16
Net Interest Spread (T/E) 3.94 4.20 4.06 4.29
Net Interest Margin (T/E) 5.25 5.31 5.28 5.47
T/E = Tax Equivalent
Capital Resources. At December 31, 2000 shareholders' equity totaled $55.6
million, an increase of $6.9 million or 14.1% for the year. This increase
reflects retained earnings, i.e., earnings net of dividends to shareholders, and
the impact of the repurchase of shares of common stock of the Corporation. In
2000, $1.4 million of stock was repurchased.
Bank regulatory authorities have established risk-based capital guidelines for
U.S. banking organizations. The objective of these efforts is to provide a more
consistent system for comparing capital positions of banking organizations and
to reflect the level of risk associated with holding various categories of
assets. The guidelines define Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital. The only
components of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital, for the Corporation, are equity capital
and a portion of the allowance for loan losses, respectively. These two
components combine to become Total Capital. The guidelines also stipulate that
four categories of risk weights (0, 20, 50, and 100 percent), primarily based on
the relative credit risk of the counterparty, be applied to the different types
of balance sheet assets. Risk weights for all off-balance sheet exposures are
determined by a two step process, whereas the face value of the off-balance
sheet item is converted to a "credit equivalent amount" and that amount is
assigned to the appropriate risk category. Off-balance sheet items at December
1998, 1999 and 2000 included unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit.
The minimum ratio for qualifying Total Capital is 8%, of which 4% must be Tier 1
capital.
The Federal Reserve Board and the Comptroller of the Currency also have a
capital to total assets (leverage) guideline. These guidelines establish a
minimum level of Tier 1 capital to total assets of 3 percent. A banking
organization operating at or near these levels is expected to have well-
diversified risk, excellent asset quality, high liquidity, good earnings and in
general be considered a strong banking organization. Organizations not meeting
these characteristics are expected to operate well above these minimum capital
standards. Thus, for all but the most highly rated organizations, the minimum
Tier 1 leverage ratio is to be 3 percent plus minimum additional cushions of at
least 100 to 200 basis points. At the discretion of the regulatory authorities,
additional capital may be required.
26
The table below illustrates the Corporation's and its Subsidiary Banks'
compliance with the regulatory guidelines as of December 31, 2000 (dollars in
thousands):
The Summit Summit
Consolidated National Community
Corporation Bank Bank, N.A.
------------ ------------ ------------
Total Assets $619,121 $247,657 $366,806
Risk Weighted Assets 403,050 160,517 238,041
Equity Capital (Tier 1) 55,286 21,873 29,621
Qualifying Allowance For
Loan Losses 5,043 1,635 2,985
------------ ------------ ------------
Total Capital $ 60,329 $ 23,508 $ 32,606
=========== ============ ============
Leverage Ratio 8.88 % 8.77 % 8.01 %
Risk Capital Ratio:
Tier 1 Capital 13.72 % 13.63 % 12.44 %
Total Capital 14.97 14.65 13.70
The Corporation had an unrealized gain on Available-for-Sale securities, net of
deferred taxes, of $285,000 as of December 31, 2000. Under regulatory
requirements, the unrealized gain or loss on Available-for-Sale securities is
not included in the calculation of risk-based capital.
As can be seen in the preceding table, the Corporation and its Subsidiary Banks
exceed the risk-based capital and leverage requirements set by the regulators as
of December 31, 2000.
Also, as of December 31, 2000, the Corporation and its Subsidiary Banks met the
criteria for classification as a "well-capitalized" institution under the rules
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA").
Liquidity. Liquidity is defined as the Corporation's ability to meet deposit
withdrawals, provide for the legitimate credit needs of customers, and take
advantage of certain investment opportunities as they arise. While maintaining
adequate liquid assets to fulfill these functions, it must also maintain
compatible levels of maturity and rate concentrations between its sources of
funds and earning assets. The liability structure of the Corporation is short-
term in nature and the asset structure is likewise oriented towards short
maturities.
The Corporation's primary "internal" source of liquidity is its federal funds
sold and its marketable investment securities, particularly those with shorter
maturities. At December 31, 2000, federal funds sold and investment securities
maturing within 30 days represented $51 million or 8.2% of total assets.
Additionally, the Corporation's ability to sell loan participations and purchase
federal funds serves as secondary sources of liquidity. Each of the Subsidiary
Banks have approved federal funds lines at other banks.
The liquidity of the Corporation is enhanced by the fact that 88.7% of total
deposits at December 31, 2000, were "core" deposits. Core deposits for this
purpose are defined as total deposits less public funds and certificates of
deposit greater than $100,000. Also, the Corporation's loan to deposit ratio
averaged a somewhat conservative 73.9% for the year.
The parent Company's income, which provides funds for the payment of dividends
to shareholders and for other corporate purposes, is derived from the investment
in its subsidiaries and from management fees paid by the subsidiaries. See Note
16 - Dividends from Subsidiaries for limitations on dividends payable by
subsidiaries.
Impact of Inflation. The effects of inflation on the local economy and on the
Corporation's operating results have been relatively modest for the past several
years. Since substantially all of the Corporation's assets and liabilities are
monetary in nature, such as cash, investments, loans and deposits, their values
are less sensitive to the effects of inflation than to changing interest rates,
which do not necessarily change in accordance with inflation rates. The
Corporation attempts to control the impact of interest rate fluctuations by
managing the relationship between its interest rate sensitive assets and
liabilities.
Forward-Looking Statements. Certain statements contained in this document,
which are not historical in nature, including statements regarding the
Corporation's and/or management's intentions, strategies, beliefs, expectations,
representations, plans, projections, or predictions of the future, are forward-
looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provisions
for forward-looking statements contained in such Act. We are including this
statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions. Forward-
looking statements are made based on assumptions involving certain known and
unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Corporation's
control, and other important factors that could cause actual results,
performance or achievements to differ materially from the expectations expressed
or implied by such forward-looking statements.
27
ITEM 7 A. QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
For information regarding the market risk of the Corporation's financial
instruments, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations - Interest Rate Sensitivity and Liquidity." The
Corporation's principal market risk exposure is to interest rates.
28
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Data: Page
---------------------------------------------------- ----
Independent Auditor's Report 30
Management's Responsibility for Financial Reporting 31
Consolidated Balance Sheets of Summit Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999 32
Consolidated Statements of Income of Summit Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries
for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 33
Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity of Summit Bancshares, Inc. and
Subsidiaries for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
(Consolidated and Parent Company Only) 34
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows of Summit Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries
for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 35
29
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Summit Bancshares, Inc.
Fort Worth, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Summit
Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the
related statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ending December 31, 2000. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Summit Bancshares, Inc. and
Subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ending
December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
/s/ Stovall, Grandey, & Whatley, L.L.P.
STOVALL, GRANDEY, & WHATLEY, L.L.P.
Fort Worth, Texas
January 23, 2001
30
Management's Responsibility for Financial Reporting
The management of the Corporation is responsible for the preparation of the
financial statements, related financial data and other information in this
annual report. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with general accepted accounting principles and include amounts based
on management's estimates and judgment where appropriate. Financial information
appearing throughout this annual report is consistent with the financial
statements.
In meeting its responsibility both for the integrity and fairness of these
financial statements and information, management depends on the accounting
systems and related internal accounting controls that are designed to provide
reasonable assurances that transactions are authorized and recorded in
accordance with established procedures and that assets are safeguarded and that
proper and reliable records are maintained.
The concept of reasonable assurance is based on the recognition that the cost of
a system of internal controls should not exceed the related benefits. As an
integral part of the system of internal controls, the Corporation retains
auditors who monitor compliance with and evaluate the effectiveness of the
system of internal controls and coordinate audit coverage with the independent
auditors.
The Audit Committee of the Corporation and the Banking Subsidiaries' Board of
Directors, which are composed entirely of directors independent of management,
meet regularly with management, regulatory examiners, internal auditors, the
loan review consultants and independent auditors to discuss financial reporting
matters, internal controls, regulatory reports, internal auditing and the
nature, scope and results of audit efforts. Internal audit and loan review
personnel report directly to the Audit Committee. The banking regulators,
internal auditors and independent auditors have direct access to the Audit
Committee.
The consolidated financial statements have been audited by Stovall, Grandey &
Whatley, L.L.P., independent auditors, who render an independent opinion on
management's financial statements. Their appointment was recommended by the
Audit Committee and approved by the Board of Directors and by the shareholders.
The audit by the independent auditors provides an additional assessment of the
degree to which the Corporation's management meets its responsibility for
financial reporting. Their opinion on the financial statements is based on
auditing procedures, which include their consideration of the internal control
structure and performance of selected tests of transactions and records, as they
deem appropriate. These auditing procedures are designed to provide an
additional reasonable level of assurance that the financial statements are
fairly presented in accordance with general accepted accounting principles in
all material respects.
/s/ Philip E. Norwood /s/ Bob G. Scott
PHILIP E. NORWOOD BOB G. SCOTT
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
AND PRESIDENT AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
31
SUMMIT BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
------------------------------------
2000 1999
------------ ------------
ASSETS (In Thousands)
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS - NOTE 1 $ 27,595 $ 19,092
FEDERAL FUNDS SOLD & DUE FROM TIME 46,461 18,012
INVESTMENT SECURITIES - NOTE 2
Securities Available-for-Sale, at fair value 127,626 129,116
Securities Held-to-Maturity, at cost (fair value of $21,949,000 22,021 27,324
and $26,739,000 at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
LOANS - NOTES 3 AND 11
Loans, Net of Unearned Discount 380,016 355,414
Allowance for Loan Losses (5,399) (5,169)
------------ ------------
LOANS, NET 374,617 350,245
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT - NOTE 4 8,124 8,562
ACCRUED INCOME RECEIVABLE 5,133 4,503
OTHER REAL ESTATE - NOTE 5 286 1,947
OTHER ASSETS 7,258 5,985
------------ ------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 619,121 $ 564,786
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
DEPOSITS - NOTE 6
Noninterest-Bearing Demand $ 146,083 $ 128,685
Interest-Bearing 393,583 351,861
------------ ------------
TOTAL DEPOSITS 539,666 480,546
SHORT TERM BORROWINGS - NOTE 7 19,910 32,091
ACCRUED INTEREST PAYABLE 1,091 576
OTHER LIABILITIES 2,883 2,864
------------ ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES 563,550 516,077
------------ ------------
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES - NOTES 4, 8, 13, 15 AND 17
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY - NOTES 12, 14 AND 18
Common Stock - $1.25 Par Value; 20,000,000 shares authorized;
6,362,278 and 6,361,247 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. 7,953 7,952
Capital Surplus 6,678 6,469
Retained Earnings 40,655 35,474
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income - Unrealized Gain
(Loss) on Available-for-Sale Investment Securities, Net of Tax 285 (1,186)
------------ ------------
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 55,571 48,709
------------ ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 619,121 $ 564,786
============ ============
The accompanying Notes should be read with these financial statements.
32
SUMMIT BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
INTEREST INCOME
Interest and Fees on Loans $ 36,768 $ 30,620 $ 28,000
Interest and Dividends on Investment Securities:
Taxable 9,253 8,495 6,963
Exempt from Federal Income Taxes 17 35 50
Interest on Federal Funds Sold and Due From Time 1,571 1,082 2,052
----------- ----------- -----------
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME 47,609 40,232 37,065
----------- ----------- -----------
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest on Deposits 17,470 12,837 12,786
Interest on Short Term Borrowings 1,400 926 692
Interest on Note Payable -0- 9 -0-
----------- ----------- -----------
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE 18,870 13,772 13,478
----------- ----------- -----------
NET INTEREST INCOME 28,739 26,460 23,587
LESS: PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES - NOTE 3 2,606 1,001 785
----------- ----------- -----------
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES 26,133 25,459 22,802
----------- ----------- -----------
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Service Charges and Fees on Deposits 1,998 2,002 2,018
Loss on Sale of Investment Securities (2) (3) 35
Other Income 1,782 1,881 1,797
----------- ----------- -----------
TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME 3,778 3,880 3,850
----------- ----------- -----------
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries and Employee Benefits - NOTE 15 9,480 9,226 8,576
Occupancy Expense - Net 993 1,031 928
Furniture and Equipment Expense 1,391 1,202 1,150
Other Real Estate Owned Expense - Net 324 107 (1)
Other Expense - NOTE 9 3,982 3,658 3,520
----------- ----------- -----------
TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE 16,170 15,224 14,173
----------- ----------- -----------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 13,741 14,115 12,479
APPLICABLE INCOME TAXES - NOTE 10 4,765 4,893 4,333
----------- ----------- -----------
NET INCOME $ 8,976 $ 9,222 $ 8,146
=========== =========== ===========
NET INCOME PER SHARE - NOTE 14
Basic $ 1.41 $ 1.44 $ 1.25
Diluted 1.38 1.39 1.20
The accompanying Notes should be read with these financial statements.
33
SUMMIT BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000, 1999 AND 1998
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income - Net
Unrealized
Gain Total
Common Stock (Loss) on Share-
--------------------- Capital Retained Investment Treasury Holder's
Shares Amount Surplus Earnings Securities Stock Equity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
BALANCE AT
January 1, 1998 6,501,332 $ 8,127 $ 6,251 $ 26,491 $ 243 $ -0- $ 41,112
Stock Options Exercised 72,195 90 78 168
Purchases of Stock Held
in Treasury (1,948) (1,948)
Retirement of Stock Held
in Treasury (101,700) (127) (1,806) 1,933 -0-
Cash Dividend
$.24 Per Share (1,560) (1,560)
Net Income for the
Year Ended 1998 8,146 8,146
Securities Available-
for-Sale Adjustment 317 317
---------
Total Comprehensive
Income NOTE 23 8,463
--------- -------- -------- ---------- ---------- -------- ---------
BALANCE AT
December 31, 1998 6,471,827 8,090 6,329 31,271 560 (15) 46,235
Stock Options Exercised 63,320 79 140 219
Purchases of Stock Held
in Treasury (3,169) (3,169)
Retirement of Stock Held
in Treasury (173,900) (217) (2,967) 3,184 -0-
Cash Dividend -
$.32 Per Share (2,052) (2,052)
Net Income for the Three Months
Year Ended 1999 9,222 9,222
Securities Available-
for-Sale Adjustment (1,746) (1,746)
---------
Total Comprehensive
Income NOTE 23 7,476
--------- -------- -------- ---------- ---------- -------- ---------
BALANCE AT
December 31, 1999 6,361,247 7,952 6,469 35,474 (1,186) -0- 48,709
Stock Options Exercised 81,238 101 209 310
Purchases of Stock Held
in Treasury (1,348) (1,348)
Retirement of Stock Held
in Treasury (80,207) (100) (1,248) 1,348 -0-
Cash Dividend -
$.40 Per Share (2,547) (2,547)
Net Income for the
Year Ended 2000 8,976 8,976
Securities Available-
for-Sale Adjustment 1,471 1,471
---------
Total Comprehensive
Income NOTE 23 10,447
--------- -------- -------- ---------- ---------- -------- ---------
BALANCE AT
December 31, 2000 6,362,278 $ 7,953 $ 6,678 $ 40,655 $ 285 $ -0- $ 55,571
========= ======== ======== ========== ========== ======== =========
The accompanying Notes should be read with these financial statements.
34
SUMMIT BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For The Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -----------
(In Thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income $ 8,976 $ 9,222 $ 8,146
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net
Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization 1,054 1,081 1,037
Net Accretion of Investment Securities (142) (39) (31)
Provision for Loan Losses 2,606 1,001 785
Deferred Income Tax Benefit (194) (385) (465)
Net (Gain) Loss on Sale of Investment Securities 2 3 (35)
Writedown of Other Real Estate 426 -0- -0-
Net Gain From Sale of Other Real Estate (151) (36) (2)
Net Loss From Sale of Premises and Equipment -0- (105) (3)
Net Increase in Accrued Income and Other Assets (1,280) (33) (523)
Net Increase in Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities 232 250 921
----------- ----------- -----------
Total Adjustments 2,553 1,737 1,684
----------- ----------- -----------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES 11,529 10,959 9,830
----------- ----------- -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Net (Increase) Decrease in Federal Funds Sold (28,449) 20,694 (2,946)
Proceeds from Matured and Prepaid Investment Securities
. Held-to-Maturity 1,285 4,280 21,627
. Available-for-Sale 82,218 63,531 63,334
Proceeds from Sales of Investment Securities 59,922 71,214 11,992
Purchase of Investment Securities
. Held-to-Maturity -0- (6,037) (20,644)
. Available-for-Sale (134,263) (144,026) (118,148)
Loans Originated and Principal Repayments, Net 27,367 (52,828) (30,482)
Recoveries of Loans Previously Charged-Off 224 171 217
Proceeds from Sale of Premises and Equipment 23 567 6
Proceeds from Sale of Other Real Estate 666 559 82
Purchases of Premises and Equipment (639) (1,023) (2,206)
----------- ----------- -----------
NET CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES (46,380) (42,898) (77,168)
----------- ----------- -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net Increase in Demand Deposits, Savings
Accounts and Interest-Bearing Transaction Accounts 14,728 7,488 60,585
Net Increase in Certificates of Deposit 44,392 7,558 3,191
Net Increase (Decrease) in Repurchase Agreements (12,181) 14,252 3,150
Payments of Cash Dividends (2,547) (2,052) (1,560)
Proceeds from Stock Options Exercised 310 219 168
Purchase of Treasury Stock (1,348) (3,169) (1,948)
----------- ----------- -----------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES 43,354 24,296 63,586
----------- ----------- -----------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS 8,503 (7,643) (3,752)
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD 19,092 26,735 30,487
----------- ----------- -----------
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS AT END OF PERIOD $ 27,595 $ 19,092 $ 26,735
=========== =========== ===========
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF OPERATING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Interest Paid $ 18,355 $ 14,232 $ 13,120
Income Taxes Paid 5,097 5,198 4,815
Other Real Estate Acquired and Other Assets Acquired
in Settlement of Loans 1,538 2,188 210
Bank Financed Sales of Other Real Estate 1,250 180 --
The accompanying Notes should be read with these financial statements.
35
SUMMIT BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting and Reporting Policies
------
The accounting and reporting policies of Summit Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Corporation") and Subsidiaries are in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and the prevailing practices
within the banking industry. A summary of the more significant policies
follows:
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
-----------------------------------------------------
The consolidated financial statements of the Corporation include its accounts
and those of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Summit National Bank and Summit
Community Bank, National Association (the "Subsidiary Banks") and Summit
Bancservices, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary providing operational support to
it's affiliates. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
----------------
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Due From Banks
-----------------------
The Subsidiary Banks are required to maintain certain balances at the Federal
Reserve Bank based on their levels of deposits. During 2000 the average cash
balance maintained at the Federal Reserve Bank was approximately $975,000.
Compensating balances held at correspondent banks, to minimize service charges,
averaged approximately $18,729,000 during the same period.
Investment Securities
---------------------
The Corporation has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities ("SFAS 115").
At the date of purchase, the Corporation is required to classify debt and equity
securities into one of three categories: held-to-maturity, trading or available-
for-sale. At each reporting date, the appropriateness of the classification is
reassessed. Investments in debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity
and measured at amortized cost in the financial statements only if management
has the positive intent and ability to hold those securities to maturity.
Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them
in the near term are classified as trading and measured at fair value in the
financial statements with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings.
Investments not classified as either held-to-maturity or trading are classified
as available-for-sale and measured at fair value in the financial statements
with unrealized gains and losses reported, net of tax, in a separate component
of shareholders' equity until realized.
The Corporation has the ability and intent to hold to maturity its investment
securities classified as held-to-maturity; accordingly, no adjustment has been
made for the excess, if any, of amortized cost over market. In determining the
investment category classifications at the time of purchase of securities,
management considers its asset/liability strategy, changes in interest rates and
prepayment risk, the need to increase capital and other factors. Under certain
circumstances (including the deterioration of the issuer's creditworthiness, a
change in tax law, or statutory or regulatory requirements), the Corporation may
change the investment security classification. In the periods reported for 2000
and 1999 the Corporation held no securities that would have been classified as
trading securities.
All investment securities are adjusted for amortization of premiums and
accretion of discounts. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are
recorded to income over the contractual maturity or estimated life of the
individual investment on the level yield method. Gain or loss on sale of
investments is based upon the specific identification method and the gain or
loss is recorded in non-interest income. Income earned on the Corporation's
investments in state and political subdivisions is not taxable.
Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
-----------------------------------
Loans are stated at the principal amount outstanding less unearned discount and
the allowance for loan losses. Unearned discount on installment loans is
recognized as income over the terms of the loans by a method approximating the
interest method. Interest income on all other loans is recognized based upon the
principal amounts outstanding, the simple interest method. Direct costs related
to loan originations are not separately allocated to loans but are charged to
non-interest expense in the period incurred. The net effect of not recognizing
such fees and related costs over the life of the related loan is not considered
to be material to the financial statements. The accrual of interest on a loan is
discontinued when, in the opinion of management, there is doubt about the
ability of the borrower to pay interest or principal. Interest previously
earned, but uncollected on such loans, is written off. After loans are placed
on non-accrual all payments received are applied to principal and no interest
income is recorded until the loan is returned to accrual status or the principal
has been reduced to zero.
The Corporation has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114,
"Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan," as amended by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 118, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment
of a Loan - Income Recognition and Disclosure." Under this standard, the
allowance for loan losses related to loans that are identified for
36
NOTE 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (cont'd.)
------
evaluation in accordance with Statement No. 114 (impaired loans) is based on
discounted cash flows using the loan's initial effective rate or the fair value
of the collateral for certain collateral dependent loans.
The allowance for loan losses is comprised of amounts charged against income in
the form of a provision for loan losses as determined by management.
Management's evaluation is based on a number of factors, including the
Subsidiary Banks' loss experience in relation to outstanding loans and the
existing level of the allowance, prevailing and prospective economic conditions,
and management's continuing review of the discounted cash flow values of
impaired loans and its evaluation of the quality of the loan portfolio. Loans
are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that
the collectibility of the principal is unlikely.
The evaluation of the adequacy of loan collateral is often based upon estimates
and appraisals. Because of changing economic conditions, the valuations
determined from such estimates and appraisals may also change. Accordingly, the
Corporation may ultimately incur losses which vary from management's current
estimates. Adjustments to the allowance for loan losses will be reported in the
period such adjustments become known or are reasonably estimable.
Premises and Equipment
----------------------
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation expense is computed on the straight-line method
based upon the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from three to forty
years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to non-interest expense. Renewals
and betterments are added to the asset accounts and depreciated over the periods
benefited. Depreciable assets sold or retired are removed from the asset and
related accumulated depreciation accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in
the income and expense accounts.
Other Real Estate
-----------------
Other real estate is foreclosed property held pending disposition and is valued
at the lower of its fair value or the recorded investment in the related loan.
At foreclosure, if the fair value, less estimated costs to sell, of the real
estate acquired is less than the Corporation's recorded investment in the
related loan, a writedown is recognized through a charge to the allowance for
loan losses. Any subsequent reduction in value is recognized by a charge to
income. Operating expenses of such properties, net of related income, and gains
and losses on their disposition are included in non-interest expense.
Federal Income Taxes
--------------------
The Corporation joins with its Subsidiaries in filing a consolidated federal
income tax return. The Subsidiaries pay to the parent a charge equivalent to
their current federal income tax based on the separate taxable income of the
Subsidiaries.
The Corporation and the Subsidiaries maintain their records for financial
reporting and income tax reporting purposes on the accrual basis of accounting.
Deferred income taxes are provided in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes". Deferred income
taxes are provided for accumulated temporary differences due to basic
differences for assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax
purposes.
Realization of net deferred tax assets is dependent on generating sufficient
future taxable income. Although realization is not assured, management believes
it is more likely than not that all of the net deferred tax assets will be
realized. The amount of the net deferred tax asset considered realizable,
however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income
are reduced.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
-------------------------
For the purpose of presentation in the Statements of Cash Flows, cash and cash
equivalents are defined as those amounts included in the balance sheet caption
"Cash and Due from Banks."
Reclassification
----------------
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 1999 and 1998 financial
statements to conform to the 2000 presentation.
Earnings Per Common and Common Equivalent Share
-----------------------------------------------
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 ("SFAS 128"), "Earnings Per
Share," requires presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic
earnings per share has been computed by dividing net income available to common
shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
reporting period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution
that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common stock. Net income per common share for all
periods presented has been calculated in accordance with SFAS 128. Outstanding
stock options issued by the Corporation represent the only dilutive effect
reflected in diluted weighted average shares.
37
NOTE 2 - Investment Securities
------
A summary of amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities
is as follows (in thousands):
December 31, 2000
-----------------------------------------------------------
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Cost Gains Losses Value
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Investment Securities - Held-to-Maturity
U.S. Treasury Securities $ 4,001 $ 8 $ -0- $ 4,009
U.S. Government Agencies
and Corporations 18,020 7 (87) 17,940
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total Held-to-Maturity Securities 22,021 15 (87) 21,949
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Investment Securities - Available-for-Sale
U.S. Treasury Securities 13,075 92 (6) 13,161
U.S. Government Agencies
and Corporations 102,164 603 (228) 102,539
U.S. Government Agency Mortgage
Backed Securities 10,438 41 (70) 10,409
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions 240 -0- -0- 240
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home
Loan Bank Stock 1,277 -0- -0- 1,277
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total Available-for-Sale Securities 127,194 736 (304) 127,626
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total Investment Securities $ 149,215 $ 751 $ (391) $ 149,575
=========== =========== =========== ===========
In the above schedule the amortized cost of Total Held-to-Maturity Securities of
$22,021,000 and the estimated fair value of Total Available-for-Sale Securities
of $127,626,000 are reflected in Investment Securities on the consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2000 for a total of $149,647,000. A net
unrealized gain of $432,000 is included in the Available-for-Sale Investment
Securities balance. The unrealized gain, net of tax, is included in
Shareholders' Equity.
38
NOTE 2 - Investment Securities (con't)
------
A summary of amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities
is as follows (in thousands):
December 31, 1999
-----------------------------------------------------------
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Cost Gains Losses Value
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Investment Securities - Held-to-Maturity
U.S. Treasury Securities $ 8,995 $ 17 $ (2) $ 9,010
U.S. Government Agencies 18,043 -0- (600) 17,443
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions
and Corporations 286 -0- -0- 286
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total Held-to-Maturity Securities 27,324 17 (602) 26,739
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Investment Securities - Available-for-Sale
U.S. Treasury Securities 19,010 33 (64) 18,979
U.S. Government Agencies
and Corporations 97,107 68 (1,683) 95,492
U.S. Government Agency Mortgage
Backed Securities 13,231 35 (187) 13,079
Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions 350 1 -0- 351
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home
Loan Bank Stock 1,215 -0- -0- 1,215
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total Available-for-Sale Securities 130,913 137 (1,934) 129,116
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total Investment Securities $ 158,237 $ 154 $ (2,536) $ 155,855
=========== =========== =========== ===========
In the previous schedule the amortized cost of Total Held-to-Maturity Securities
of $27,324,000 and the estimated fair value of Total Available-for-Sale
Securities of $129,116,000 are reflected in Investment Securities on the
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1999 for a total of $156,440,000.
A net unrealized loss of $1,797,000 is included in the Available-for-Sale
Investment Securities balance. The unrealized loss, net of tax benefit, is
included in Shareholders' Equity.
A summary of the amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities by
contractual maturity as of December 31, 2000, is shown below (in thousands).
Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers
may have the right to call or repay obligations with or without call or
prepayment penalties.
December 31, 2000
-----------------------------------------------------------
Held-to-Maturity Available-for-Sale
--------------------------- ---------------------------
Amortized Fair Amortized Fair
Cost Value Cost Value
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Due in One Year or Less $ 5,001 $ 5,008 $ 21,063 $ 21,047
Due after One Year through Five Years 14,000 13,959 95,521 95,971
Due after Five Years through Ten Years 3,020 2,982 2,575 2,537
Due after Ten Years --- --- 8,035 8,071
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Total $ 22,021 $ 21,949 $ 127,194 $ 127,626
=========== =========== =========== ===========
Included in the investment securities is $8,323,000 and $13,231,000 at December
31, 2000 and December 31, 1999, respectively, of mortgage-backed securities
having stated maturities after five years. The estimated maturities on these
securities are between two and twelve years as of December 31, 2000, based on
estimated prepayments of the underlying mortgages. Eighty-one percent of these
securities have rates that will reset within one year and annually thereafter.
Investment securities with carrying values of $46,866,000 and $63,826,000 at
December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively, were pledged to secure federal, state
and municipal deposits and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.
Also, the fair values of those pledged securities totaled $46,804,000 and
$63,375,000 at December 31,2000 and 1999, respectively.
39
Proceeds from sales of investment securities were $59,922,000 during 2000,
$71,214,000 during 1999 and $11,992,000 during 1998. In 2000, gross losses from
sale of securities of $5,000 were realized but were partially offset by gross
gains of $3,000. In 1999, net losses from sale of securities of $3,000 were
realized. The total amount of proceeds from securities sales have been from
sales of securities included in the Available-for-Sale category.
The Corporation or Subsidiaries do not own any investment securities of any one
issuer (excluding U.S. Government or U.S. Government Agency Securities) of which
aggregate adjusted cost exceeds 10% of the consolidated shareholders' equity at
December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Effective October 1, 1998, the Corporation adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards Board No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities" ("SFAS No. 133") which establishes accounting and reporting
standards for derivative instruments and requires that an entity recognize all
derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and measure
those instruments at fair value. At the effective date, the Corporation
transferred approximately $17,448,000 of securities from Held-to-Maturity to
Available-for-Sale classification. At the time of transfer the securities had an
approximate unrealized gain of $349,000.
NOTE 3 - Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
------
The loan portfolio consists of various types of loans made principally to
borrowers located in Tarrant County, Texas. The book values of loans by major
type follow (in thousands):
December 31,
----------------------------------
2000 1999
--------------- ---------------
Commercial $ 167,818 $ 156,847
Real Estate Mortgage 132,062 120,596
Real Estate Construction
47,183 43,875
Loans to Individuals
32,996 34,261
Less: Unearned Discount
(43) (165)
--------------- ---------------
380,016 355,414
Allowance for Loan Losses
(5,399) (5,169)
--------------- ---------------
Loans - Net $ 374,617 $ 350,245
=============== ===============
At December 31, 2000 and 1999 the recorded investment in loans that are
considered to be impaired under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
114 was $2,122,000 and $2,403,000, respectively. These loans were on non-accrual
status. The related allowance for loan losses for these loans was $497,000 and
$837,000, respectively. The average recorded investment in impaired loans during
the year ended December 31, 2000 was approximately $3,826,000. For 2000 the
Corporation recognized no interest income on any loan classified as impaired.
Loans on which accrued interest has been discontinued or reduced amounted to
approximately $2,182,000, $2,453,000, and $5,055,000 at December 31, 2000, 1999
and 1998 respectively. If interest on these loans had been recorded in
accordance with their original terms such income would have approximated
$600,000 for 2000, $427,000 for 1999 and $537,000 for 1998. Interest income on
those loans included in net income was $206,000 for 2000, $68,000 for 1999 and
$312,000 for 1998.
Transactions in the allowance for loan losses are summarized as follows (in
thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Balance, Beginning of Period $ 5,169 $ 4,724 $ 4,065
Provisions, Charged to Income 2,606 1,001 785
Loans Charged-Off (2,600) (727) (343)
Recoveries of Loans Previously
Charged-Off 224 171 217
-------- -------- --------
Net Loans Charged-Off (2,376) (556) (126)
-------- -------- ---------
Balance, End of Period $ 5,399 $ 5,169 $ 4,724
======== ======== =========
40
NOTE 4 - Premises and Equipment
------
The investment in premises and equipment stated at cost and net of accumulated
amortization and depreciation is as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
Land $ 2,320 $ 2,320 $ 2,783
Buildings and Improvements 7,845 7,715 7,537
Furniture & Equipment 8,134 8,003 7,234
------- ------- -------
Total Cost 18,299 18,038 17,554
Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization 10,175 9,476 8,472
------- ------- -------
Net Book Value $ 8,124 $ 8,562 $ 9,082
======= ======= =======
Depreciation and amortization charged to expense amounted to $1,054,000,
$1,081,000 and $1,037,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively.
The Corporation has invested in a joint venture with a third party to own one of
the Corporation's bank facilities. The investment in the joint venture is
accounted for on the equity basis and had a book value of $1,387,000 at December
31, 2000.
At December 31, 2000, the Corporation and subsidiaries had certain noncancelable
operating leases which cover premises with future minimum annual rental payments
as follows (in thousands):
2001 $ 540
2002 540
2003 550
2004 560
2005 476
Thereafter 3,132
It is expected that in the normal course of business, leases that expire will be
renewed or replaced by leases on other property.
Rental income and rental expense of premises included in the consolidated
financial statements is computed as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
Total Rental Income $ 475 $ 390 $ 359
Less: Rental Expense 511 413 350
------ ------ ------
Net Rental Income (Expense) $ (36) $ (23) $ 9
====== ====== ======
NOTE 5 - Other Real Estate
------
The carrying value of other real estate is as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
--------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----------- ------------ ------------
Other Real Estate $ 286 $ 1,947 $ 281
Valuation Reserve -0- -0- -0-
----------- ------------ ------------
Net Other Real Estate $ 286 $ 1,947 $ 281
=========== ============ ============
There were direct write-downs of other real estate charged to income for the
year ended December 31, 2000 of $426,000. There were no direct write-downs of
other real estate for the years ended December 31, 1999 or 1998.
41
NOTE 6 - Deposits and Related Expense
------
At December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, deposits and related interest expense for
the related years ended December 31, consisted of the following (in thousands):
Deposits Interest Expense
----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- --------- ------- ------- -------
Noninterest-Bearing $ 146,083 $ 128,685 $ 141,170
Demand Deposits
Interest-Bearing Deposits:
Interest-Bearing Transaction
Accounts and Money
Market Funds $ 156,348 $ 154,304 $ 151,557 $ 6,168 $ 5,043 $ 5,186
Savings 94,014 98,728 81,503 4,472 3,440 2,972
Savings Certificates - Time 82,248 58,973 53,394 3,808 2,543 2,631
Certificates of Deposits
$100,000 or more 60,195 39,078 37,099 2,978 1,772 1,948
Other 778 778 777 44 39 49
--------- --------- --------- ------- ------- -------
Total 393,583 351,861 324,330 $ 17,470 $ 12,837 $ 12,786
--------- --------- --------- ======== ======== ========
Total Deposits $ 539,666 $ 480,546 $ 465,500
--------- --------- ---------
The Corporation has no brokered deposits and there are no major concentrations
of deposits.
The remaining maturity on certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more as of
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 is presented below (in thousands):
% of % of % of
Maturity 2000 Total 1999 Total 1998 Total
---------- ------- ------- ------- --------- -------
3 months or less $ 16,267 27.0% $18,144 46.4 % $ 14,227 38.4 %
3 to 6 months 15,334 25.5 7,846 20.1 7,943 21.4
6 to 12 months 24,191 40.2 11,776 30.1 8,471 22.8
Over 12 months 4,403 7.3 1,312 3.4 6,458 17.4
NOTE 7 - Short Term Borrowings
------
Securities sold under repurchase agreements generally represent borrowings with
maturities ranging from one to thirty days. Information relating to these
borrowings is summarized as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
-------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements:
Average Balance $ 20,797 $ 20,488 $ 15,742
Year-End Balance 19,910 28,091 17,839
Maximum Month-End Balance During Year 25,019 30,309 19,354
Interest Rate:
Average 5.19% 4.04% 4.40%
Year-End 5.44% 3.38% 3.83%
The Corporation, through one of its Subsidiaries, has available a line of credit
that had a balance of $53.6 million at December 31, 2000, with the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Dallas which allows the Subsidiary to borrow on a collateralized
basis at a fixed term. At December 31, 2000, the Subsidiary had no borrowings
outstanding. For the year ended December 31, 2000, the Subsidiary had borrowed
an average balance of $4,929,000 bearing an average interest rate of 6.49%. At
December 31, 1999, the subsidiary had borrowed $4,000,000, bearing an interest
rate of 5.43% and having a maturity of April 2000.
42
NOTE 8 - Notes Payable
------
The note payable at the Parent Company is an intercompany note and, therefore,
is reflected in the Parent Company financial statements but is eliminated in the
consolidated financial statements. The note balance at December 31, 2000 and
1999, was $533,000 and $650,000, respectively. This note matures December 15,
2004 and is secured by banking premises. The interest rate at December 31, 2000
was 9.5% and is fixed annually on the note's anniversary date.
The fair value of the note payable is its carrying value since the note is a
variable rate loan and the note is adjusted annually in December of each year at
prime rate.
On July 15, 2000, the Corporation obtained lines of credit from a bank under
which the Corporation may borrow $9,000,000 at prime rate. The lines of credit
are secured by stock of one of the Subsidiary Banks and mature in July 2001,
whereupon, if balances are outstanding, the lines convert to term notes having
five year terms. The Corporation will not pay a fee for any unused portion of
the lines. There were no borrowings outstanding on these lines of credit at
December 31, 2000.
NOTE 9 - Other Non-Interest Expense
------
The significant components of other non-interest expense are as follows (in
thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ---------
Business Development $ 601 $ 602 $ 611
Legal and Professional Fees 866 619 511
Printing and Supplies 369 379 387
Regulatory Fees and Assessments 237 183 169
Other 1,909 1,875 1,842
---------- ---------- ---------
Total $ 3,982 $ 3,658 $ 3,520
========== ========== =========
NOTE 10 - Income Taxes
-------
The consolidated provisions for income taxes consist of the following (in
thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
Federal Income Tax Expense
Current $ 4,959 $ 5,278 $ 4,798
Deferred (benefit) (194) (385) (465)
------- ------- -------
Total Federal Income Tax Expense $ 4,765 $ 4,893 $ 4,333
======= ======= =======
Effective Tax Rates 34.7% 34.7% 34.7%
The reasons for the difference between income tax expense and the amount
computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to operating earnings
are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
Federal Income Taxes at Statutory Rate of 34.0% $ 4,716 $ 4,847 $ 4,278
Effect of Tax Exempt Interest Income (6) (12) (19)
Non-deductible Expenses 66 64 58
Other (11) (6) 16
------- ------- -------
Income Taxes Per Income Statement $ 4,765 $ 4,893 $ 4,333
======= ======= =======
43
Federal income taxes included in the consolidated balance sheets were as follows
(in thousands):
December 31,
---------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
Current Tax Asset (Liability) $ 68 $ (70) $ 10
Deferred Tax Asset 1,693 2,257 973
------- ------- -------
Total Included in Other Assets $ 1,761 $ 2,187 $ 983
======= ======= =======
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) results from differences between amounts
of assets and liabilities as measured for income tax return and financial
reporting purposes. The significant components of federal deferred tax assets
and liabilities are in the following table (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
Federal Deferred Tax Assets:
Allowance for Loan Losses $ 1,494 $ 1,357 $ 1,107
Valuation Reserves - Other Real Estate 5 -0- 1
Interest on Non-accrual Loans 238 189 199
Deferred Compensation 505 458 414
Unrealized Losses on Available-for-Sale Securities -0- 611 -0-
Other 20 19 18
------- ------- -------
Gross Federal Deferred Tax Assets 2,262 2,634 1,739
------- ------- -------
Federal Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Depreciation and Amortization 318 321 301
Accretion 104 56 78
Unrealized Gains on Available-for-Sale Securities 147 -0- 289
Other -0- -0- 98
------- ------- -------
Gross Federal Deferred Tax Liabilities 569 377 766
------- ------- -------
Net Deferred Tax Asset $ 1,693 $ 2,257 $ 973
======= ======= =======
NOTE 11 - Related Party Transactions
-------
During 2000 and 1999 the Subsidiary Banks had transactions which were made in
the ordinary course of business with certain of their and the Corporation's
officers, directors and their affiliates. All loans included in such
transactions were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rate
and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with
other persons and all loans are current as to principal and interest payments. A
summary of these transactions follows (in thousands):
Balance at Net
Beginning Net Amounts Balance at
of Year Additions Collected End of Year
---------------------------------------------------------------
For the Year ended December 31, 2000:
25 Directors and Officers $ 3,488 $ 987 $(1,234) $ 3,241
For the Year ended December 31, 1999:
24 Directors and Officers $ 2,848 $ 2,545 $(1,905) $ 3,488
NOTE 12 - Stock Option Plans
-------
The Corporation has two Incentive Stock Option Plans, the 1993 Plan and the 1997
Plan, ("the Plans"). Each Plan has reserved 600,000 shares (adjusted for
two-for-one stock splits in 1995 and 1997) of common stock for grants
thereunder. The Plans provide for the granting to executive management and
other key employees of Summit Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries incentive stock
options, as defined under the current tax law. The options under the Plans will
be exercisable for ten years from the date of grant and generally vest ratably
over a five year period. Options will be and have been granted at prices which
will not be less than 100-110% of the fair market value of the underlying common
stock at the date of grant.
44
The following is a summary of transactions during the periods presented:
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------------------------ ------------------------------ -----------------------------
Wtd. Avg. Wtd. Avg. Wtd. Avg.
Shares Ex. Price Shares Ex. Price Shares Ex. Price
------------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Outstanding, Beginning of Period 445,497 $ 8.95 461,717 $ 7.24 543,112 $ 6.77
Granted 15,000 16.77 49,500 17.97 3,000 19.25
Exercised (81,238) 3.71 (63,320) 3.47 (78,995) 3.76
Canceled (19,700) 17.47 (2,400) 12.00 (5,400) 17.54
------------- ------------ ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------
Outstanding, End of Year 359,559 $ 9.96 445,497 $ 8.95 461,717 $ 7.24
============= ============ ============= ============ ============ ============
Exercisable at End of Year 302,327 $ 8.74 348,635 $ 7.13 354,825 $ 5.66
Weighted Average Fair Value of
Options Granted During the Year $ 5.34 $ 5.69 $ 7.09
The options outstanding at December 31, 2000, have exercise prices between $3.00
and $19.25 with a weighted average exercise price of $9.96 and a weighted
average remaining contractual life of 5.16 years. At December 31, 2000, there
remained 487,300 shares reserved for future grants of options under the 1997
Plan. Stock options have been adjusted retroactively for the effects of stock
splits.
The Corporation accounts for this plan under Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," under which no compensation
cost has been recognized for options granted. Had compensation cost for the plan
been determined consistent with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," the Corporation's net income and
earnings per share would have been reduced by insignificant amounts on a pro
forma basis for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999. The fair value of
the options granted in 2000 and 1999 were estimated as of the date of grant
using an accepted options pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 6.11% and 5.28% respectively; expected
dividend yield of 3.14% and 2.85%, respectively; expected volatility of 27.39%
and 28.57%, respectively; and expected life of 5.16 years.
NOTE 13 - Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
-------
The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk
in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.
These financial instruments include loan commitments, standby letters of credit
and documentary letters of credit. The instruments involve, to varying degrees,
elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in
the financial statements.
The Corporation's exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the
other party of these loan commitments and standby letters of credit is
represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Corporation uses
the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it
does for on-balance sheet instruments.
The total contractual amounts of financial instruments with off-balance sheet
risk are as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
-------------------------------
2000 1999
Contract Contract
Amount Amount
------------- -------------
Financial Instruments Whose Contract Amounts Represent Credit Risk:
Loan Commitments Including Unfunded Lines of Credit $ 120,209 $ 112,728
Standby Letters of Credit 2,536 2,545
Loan commitments are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally
have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment
of a fee. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments by the
Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The
credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as
that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
Since many of the loan commitments and letters of credit may expire without
being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent
future cash requirements. The Corporation evaluates each customer's credit
worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed
necessary by the Corporation upon extension of credit, is based on management's
credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include
accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, owner occupied
real estate and income-producing commercial properties.
The Corporation originates real estate, commercial and consumer loans primarily
to customers in the Tarrant County area. Although the Corporation has a
diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of its customers' ability to
honor their contracts is dependent upon the local economy and the real estate
market.
45
The Corporation maintains funds on deposit at correspondent banks which at times
exceed the federally insured limits. Management of the Corporation monitors the
balance in the account and periodically assesses the financial condition of
correspondent banks.
NOTE 14 - Earnings per Share
-------
The following data shows the amounts used in computing earnings per share
("EPS") and the weighted average number of shares of dilutive potential common
stock (dollars in thousands).
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------
Net income $ 8,976 $ 9,222 $ 8,146
========== ========== ==========
Weighted average number of common
shares used in Basic EPS 6,364,492 6,410,762 6,496,595
Effect of dilutive stock options 159,467 244,787 316,702
---------- ---------- ----------
Weighted number of common shares
and dilutive potential common
stock used in Diluted EPS 6,523,959 6,655,549 6,813,297
========== ========== ==========
The incremental shares for the assumed exercise of the outstanding options was
determined by application of the treasury stock method.
NOTE 15 - Employee Benefit Plans
-------
Pension Plan
------------
The Corporation had a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of
its employees. The benefits were based on years of service and the employee's
compensation history. The employee's compensation used in the benefit
calculation were the highest average for any five consecutive years of
employment within the employee's last ten years of employment.
Effective August 31, 1998, the accrual of benefits under this plan were
suspended. In February 1999, the Board of Directors chose to terminate the plan
effective April 15, 1999. The assets held in trust were distributed to the plan
participants in mid-1999 under terms of the plan.
During 1999 the Corporation expensed $321,000 in support of the plan.
401(k) Plan
-----------
The Corporation implemented a 401(k) plan in December 1997 covering
substantially all employees. The Corporation made no contribution to this plan
in 1999 or 1998. In 2000, the Corporation made matching contributions to the
participant's deferrals of compensation up to 100% of the employee contributions
not to exceed 6% of the employee's annual compensation.
For the year ending December 31, 2000, the Corporation expensed $334,000 in
support of the plan.
Management Security Plan
------------------------
In 1992, the Corporation established a Management Security Plan to provide key
employees with retirement, death or disability benefits. The expense charged to
operations for such future obligations was $203,000, $223,000 and $237,000
during 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively.
Employment Contracts
--------------------
Certain officers of the Company have entered into severance agreements providing
for salaries and fringe benefits in the event of termination for other than
cause and under certain changes in control.
Other Post Retirement Benefits
------------------------------
The Corporation provides certain health care benefits for certain retired
employees who bear all costs of these benefits. These benefits are covered under
the "Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act" (COBRA).
Compensated Absences
--------------------
Employees of the Corporation are entitled to paid vacation, paid sick days and
other personal days off, depending on job classification, length of service, and
other factors. It is impracticable to estimate the amount of compensation for
future absences, and, accordingly, no liability has been recorded in the
accompanying financial statements. The Corporation's policy is to recognize the
costs of compensated absences when actually paid to employees.
46
NOTE 16 - Dividends from Subsidiaries
-------
The primary source of funds for the Parent Company is cash dividends received
from the Subsidiary Banks. The amount of dividends that the Subsidiary Banks may
pay in any one year, without approval of the Comptroller of the Currency, is the
sum of the retained net profits for the preceding two years plus its total of
the net profits for the current year. Under this formula, in 2001 the Subsidiary
Banks can legally initiate dividend payments of $13,174,000 plus an additional
amount equal to their net profits, as defined, for 2001 to the date of any such
dividend payment. The Subsidiary Banks are also restricted from paying dividends
that would cause the Bank to be under-capitalized.
Internal dividend policies limit dividends paid by Subsidiary Banks if their
equity capital levels fall below certain minimums determined by the respective
Boards of Directors.
NOTE 17 - Litigation
-------
Certain of the Subsidiary Banks are involved in legal actions arising in the
ordinary course of business. It is the opinion of management, after reviewing
such actions with outside legal counsel, that the settlement of these matters
will not materially affect the Corporation's financial position.
NOTE 18 - Stock Repurchase Plan
-------
On April 18, 2000, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase plan. The
plan authorized management to purchase up to 322,232 shares of the Corporation's
common stock over the next twelve months through the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions in accordance with all applicable state and federal laws
and regulations. In 2000, 80,207 shares were purchased by the Corporation
through the open market.
Under similar programs approved by the Board in the years 1994 through 1999,
464,280 shares in the aggregate were purchased in those years, reflecting two-
for-one stock splits in years 1995 and 1997.
NOTE 19 - Regulatory Capital Compliance
-------
The Corporation and Subsidiary Banks are subject to various regulatory capital
requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. These requirements
assign risk factors to all assets, including off-balance sheet items such as
loan commitments and standby letters of credit. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can cause certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary
actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect
on the Corporation's consolidated financial statement. Capital is separated into
two categories, Tier 1 and Tier 2, which combine for Total Capital. At December
2000 and 1999, the Corporation's and Subsidiary Bank's Tier 1 capital consists
of their respective shareholders' equity and Tier 2 consists of the allowance
for loan losses subject to certain limitations. The guidelines require Total
Capital of 8% of risk-weighted assets, of which 4% must be Tier I capital.
In conjunction with risk-based capital guidelines, the regulators have issued
capital leverage guidelines. The leverage ratio consists of Tier 1 capital as a
percent of total assets. The minimum leverage ratio for all financial
institutions is 3%, with a higher minimum ratio dependent upon the condition of
the individual financial institution. The 3% minimum was established to make
certain that all financial institutions have a minimum capital level to support
their assets, regardless of risk profile.
In addition to the minimum guidelines stated above, the regulatory authorities
have established minimums for an institution to be classified as "well
capitalized." A financial institution is deemed to be well capitalized if the
institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10% or greater, a Tier 1
risk-based capital ratio of 6% or greater, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5% or
greater and the institution is not subject to an order, written agreement,
capital directive or prompt corrective action directive to meet and maintain a
specific capital level for any capital measure. The Corporation and Subsidiary
Banks currently exceed all minimum capital requirements and are considered to be
"well capitalized", the highest rating, by the regulatory authorities.
Management is not aware of any conditions or events that would have changed the
Corporation's capital rating since December 31, 2000.
47
The Corporation and Subsidiary Banks' regulatory capital positions as of
December 31, 2000, and 1999 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
To Be Well
Capitalized Under
For Capital Prompt Corrective
Actual Adequacy Purposes Action Provisions
------------------------- -------------------------- -------------------------
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
CONSOLIDATED:
As of December 31, 2000
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) $ 60,329 14.97% $ 32,244 8.00%
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) 55,286 13.72% 16,122 4.00%
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets) 55,286 9.04% 18,339 3.00%
As of December 31, 1999
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) $ 54,569 14.59% $ 29,919 8.00%
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) 48,894 3.34% 14,960 4.00%
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets) 48,894 8.77% 17,068 3.00%
SUMMIT NATIONAL BANK:
As of December 31, 2000
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) $ 23,575 14.69% $ 12,841 8.00% $ 16,052 10.00%
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) 21,940 13.67% 6,421 4.00% 9,631 6.00%
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets) 21,940 9.12% 7,199 3.00% 11,998 5.00%
As of December 31, 1999
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) $ 23,213 15.49% $ 11,992 8.00% $ 14,986 10.00%
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) 21,441 14.30% 5,996 4.00% 8,994 6.00%
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets) 21,441 9.71% 6,626 3.00% 11,044 5.00%
SUMMIT COMMUNITY BANK, N.A.:
As of December 31, 2000
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) $ 32,606 13.70% $ 19,043 8.00% $ 23,804 10.00%
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) 29,621 12.44% 9,522 4.00% 14,282 6.00%
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets) 29,621 8.06% 11,022 3.00% 18,369 5.00%
As of December 31, 1999
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) $ 28,374 12.88% $ 17,628 8.00% $ 22,035 10.00%
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) 25,619 11.63% 8,814 4.00% 13,221 6.00%
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets) 25,619 7.70% 9,980 3.00% 16,633 5.00%
NOTE 20 - Subsequent Event
-------
On January 15, 2001, the Board of Directors of the Corporation approved
consolidation of its two banking subsidiaries, Summit National Bank and Summit
Community Bank, N.A. The consolidation will require regulatory approval and is
expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2001.
On January 30, 2001, the Board of Directors of the Corporation approved a
quarterly dividend of $.11 per share to be paid on February 15, 2001 to
shareholders of record on February 1, 2001.
NOTE 21 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements
-------
The Corporation adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Board No.
131, "Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,"
("SFAS No. 131") effective January 1, 1998. This statement establishes standards
for reporting information about segments in annual and interim financial
statements. SFAS No. 131 introduces a new model for segment reporting called
"management approach". The management approach is based on the way the chief
operating decision-maker organizes segments within a company for making
operating decisions and assessing performance.
48
Reportable segments are based on products and services, geography, legal
structure, management structure and any other means in which management
disaggregates a company. Based on the "management approach" model, the
Corporation has determined that its business is comprised of a single operating
segment and that SFAS No. 131 therefore has no impact on its consolidated
financial statements.
NOTE 22 - Fair Values of Financial Instruments
-------
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107 ("SFAS 107"), "Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments" requires disclosure of fair value
information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the
balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases
where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates
using present value tables or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are
significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and
estimates of future cash flows. SFAS 107 excludes certain financial instruments
and all non-financial instruments from its disclosure requirements.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating
its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the balance
sheet for cash and due from banks and federal funds sold approximate
those assets' fair values. Investment securities (including mortgage-
backed securities): Fair values for investment securities are based on
quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not
available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable
instruments.
Loans: For variable-rate loans, fair values are based on carrying
values. The fair values for fixed rate loans such as mortgage loans
(e.g., one-to-four family residential) and installment loans are
estimated using discounted cash flow analysis. The carrying amount of
accrued interest receivable approximates its fair value. Deposit
liabilities: The fair value disclosed for interest bearing and
noninterest-bearing demand deposits, passbook savings, and certain
types of money market accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount
payable on demand at the reporting date or their carrying amounts. Fair
values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a
discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently
being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected
monthly maturities on time deposits.
Short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts of borrowings under
repurchase agreements approximate their fair values.
The estimated fair values of the Corporation's financial instruments
are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999
------------------------------ -------------------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
------------- ------------ ------------- ------------
Financial Assets
Cash and due from banks $ 27,595 $ 27,595 $ 19,092 $19,092
Federal funds sold 46,461 46,461 18,012 18,012
Securities 149,647 149,575 156,440 155,855
Loans 380,016 377,276 355,414 353,451
Financial Liabilities
Deposits 539,666 539,834 480,546 480,643
Short Term Borrowings 19,910 19,908 32,091 32,108
Off-balance Sheet Financial Instruments
Loan commitments 120,209 112,728
Letters of credit 2,536 2,545
49
NOTE 23 - Comprehensive Income
-------
The Corporation has adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 "Reporting Comprehensive
Income". This new standard requires an entity to report and display
comprehensive income and its components. Comprehensive income is as follows (in
thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- ------- -------
Net Income $ 8,976 $ 9,222 $ 8,146
Other Comprehensive Income:
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities
Available-for-Sale, net of tax 1,471 (1,746) 317
-------- ------- -------
Comprehensive Income $ 10,447 $ 7,476 $ 8,463
======== ======= =======
50
NOTE 24 - Condensed Parent Company Financial Statements
-------
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
-----------------------------
2000 1999
------------ ------------
ASSETS (In Thousands)
CASH IN SUBSIDIARY BANKS
Demand $ 25 $ 79
Time 977 301
INVESTMENTS IN SUBSIDIARIES
Bank Subsidiaries 51,846 45,953
Non-Bank Subsidiary 268 321
NOTE RECEIVABLE FROM SUBSIDIARY 703 587
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT - NET 1,471 1,526
OTHER ASSETS 2,512 2,045
------------ ------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 57,802 $ 50,812
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Note Payable to Subsidiary $ 533 $ 650
Other Liabilities 1,698 1,453
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 55,571 48,709
------------ ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 57,802 $ 50,812
============ ============
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
` For the Years Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ----------- ------------
(In Thousands)
INCOME
Dividends from Subsidiaries $ 5,125 $ 5,000 $ 3,200
Interest 90 52 76
Other Income 219 206 188
------------ ----------- ------------
TOTAL INCOME 5,434 5,258 3,464
------------ ----------- ------------
EXPENSES
Interest 52 64 70
Salaries and Employee Benefits 736 760 752
Occupancy and Furniture - Net (91) (18) (6)
Other Expense 416 277 347
------------ ----------- ------------
TOTAL EXPENSE 1,113 1,083 1,163
------------ ----------- ------------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT AND
EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED EARNINGS
OF SUBSIDIARIES 4,321 4,175 2,301
INCOME TAX BENEFIT 286 275 291
------------ ----------- ------------
INCOME BEFORE EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED
EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARIES 4,607 4,450 2,592
EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARIES 4,369 4,772 5,554
------------ ----------- ------------
NET INCOME $ 8,976 $ 9,222 $ 8,146
============ =========== ============
51
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
` For the Years Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ----------- ------------
(In Thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Income $ 8,976 $ 9,222 $ 8,146
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided
by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization 120 132 137
Deferred Federal Income Taxes (Benefit) (18) (11) (81)
Undistributed Earnings of Subsidiaries (4,369) (4,772) (5,554)
Increase in Other Assets (449) (21) (188)
Increase in Other Liabilities 245 108 107
------------ ----------- ------------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES 4,505 4,658 2,567
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net Funding to Non-Bank Subsidiary (116) (92) (105)
Purchases of Premises and Equipment (65) (5) (13)
------------ ----------- ------------
NET CASH USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES (181) (97) (118)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Principal Payments on Notes Payable (117) (112) (97)
Payments of Cash Dividends (2,547) (2,052) (1,560)
Receipts from Stock Options Exercised 310 219 168
Purchase of Treasury Stock (1,348) (3,169) (1,948)
------------ ----------- ------------
NET CASH USED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES (3,702) (5,114) (3,437)
------------ ----------- ------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 622 (553) (988)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - BEGINNING OF YEAR 380 933 1,921
------------ ----------- ------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - END OF YEAR $ 1,002 $ 380 $ 933
============ =========== ============
52
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
There have been no changes in accountants and no disagreements with accountants
on any matter of accounting principles or practices or financial statement
disclosures during the twenty-four (24) month period ended December 31, 2000.
53
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
The information set forth under the caption "PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF
DIRECTORS" on pages 3 through 7of the Corporation's Proxy Statement dated March
14, 2001, relating to the 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the
Corporation, the information set forth under the caption "STOCK OWNERSHIP OF
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT" on pages 13 through 14 of such Proxy
Statement, and the information set forth under the caption "EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
OF THE CORPORATION" on page 11 of Part I of this report is incorporated herein
by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The information set forth under the caption "EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER
INFORMATION" on pages 15 through 22 of the Corporation's Proxy Statement dated,
March 14, 2001 relating to the 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the
Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
The information with respect to shareholders of the Corporation who are known to
be beneficial owners of more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of
Common Stock of the Corporation set forth under the caption "STOCK OWNERSHIP OF
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT" on pages 13 through 14 of the
Corporation's Proxy Statement dated March 14, 2001, relating to the 2001 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders of the Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference.
The information relating to the beneficial ownership of the outstanding shares
of Common Stock of the Corporation by its directors and executive officers set
forth under the caption "STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT" on pages 13 through 14 of the Corporation's Proxy Statement dated
March 14, 2001, relating to the 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the
Corporation, is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
The information set forth under the caption "CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS" on page 25 of
the Corporation's Proxy Statement dated March 14, 2000, relating to the 2001
Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Corporation, is incorporated herein by
reference.
54
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a) (1) Financial Statements. The following financial statements are included
--------------------
in Part II, Item 8:
Independent Auditor's Report
Consolidated Balance Sheets of Summit Bancshares, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Consolidated Statements of Income of Summit Bancshares, Inc. and
Subsidiaries for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity of Summit Bancshares,
Inc. and Subsidiaries for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and
1998 (Consolidated and Parent Company Only)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows of Summit Bancshares, Inc. and
Subsidiaries for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Notes to Financial Statements
(2) Financial Statement Schedules. Financial statement schedules are
-----------------------------
omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are
required or because the required information is given in the financial
statements or notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report:
--------
3(a) Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation as of July
21, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998).*
3(b) Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Corporation dated April 21,
1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998).*
4(a) Summit Bancshares, Inc.'s Rights Agreement dated April 17, 1990
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1 to the
Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 18, 1990
filed on April 24, 1990).*
10(a) Lease Agreement dated August 28, 1985 by and between Alta Mesa
National Bank, as lessor, and the Corporation, as lessee
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1985).*
10(b) Lease Agreement dated October 1, 1986 by and between the
Corporation, as lessor, and Alta Mesa National Bank, as lessee
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(f) to the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1986).*
10(c) Promissory Note dated December 21, 1989 in the original principal
amount of $1,400,000 executed by Summit Bancshares, Inc. and
payable to the order of Summit National Bank (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10(s) to the Corporation's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989).*
10(d) Lease Agreement dated February 14, 1992 by and between
Zell/Merrill Lynch Real Estate Opportunity Partners Limited
Partnership, as landlord, and Summit Bancshares, Inc., as tenant
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(I) to the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1992).*
10(e) First Amendment dated May 3, 1994 to Lease Agreement dated
February 14, 1992 by and between Zell/Merrill Lynch Real Estate
Opportunity Partners Limited Partnership, as landlord, and Summit
Bancshares, Inc., as tenant (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10(k) to the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1994).*
55
10(f) Management Security Plan of Summit Bancshares, Inc. effective
September 1, 1992; Management Security Plan Agreement between
Summit Bancshares, Inc. and F. S. Gunn; and Management Security
Plan Agreement between Summit Bancshares, Inc. and James L.
Murray (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(k) to the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1992).*
10(g) Commercial-Industrial Lease Agreement dated January 1, 1993 by
and between Summit National Bank, as landlord, and Summit
Bancservices, Inc., as tenant (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10(m) to the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1992).*
10(h) 1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Summit Bancshares, Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(n) to the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1993).*
10(i) Loan Agreement dated July 12, 1995, between the Corporation and
The Frost National Bank (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10 to the Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the three months ended June 30, 1995).*
10(j) Lease Agreement dated July 6, 1989 by and between Zell/Merrill
Lynch Real Estate Opportunity Partners Limited Partnership, as
landlord, and Summit National Bank as tenant (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10(r) to the Corporation's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995).*.
10(k) First Amendment dated July 15, 1996 to Loan Agreement dated July
12, 1995, between the Corporation and The Frost National Bank
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(s) to the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1997).*
10(l) 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Summit Bancshares, Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to Annex I to the Corporation's
Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Shareholders, dated March
17, 1997.*
10(m) Second Amendment dated July 15, 1997 to Loan Agreement dated July
12, 1995, between the Corporation and The Frost National Bank
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(m) to the
Corporation's Annual Report or Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1997).*
10(n) Second Lease Amendment and Extension Agreement to the Lease
Agreement dated July 6, 1989, as amended by the Amendment of
Lease dated August 12, 1993, by and between EOP-Summit Limited
Partnership (as successor in interest to Zell/Merrill Lynch Real
Estate Opportunity Partners Limited Partnership), as landlord,
and Summit National Bank, as tenant (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(n) to the Corporation's Annual Report or
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997).*
10(o) Agreement of Limited Partnership of IDI Summit, Ltd. dated
November 6, 1997, between Summit Community Bank, N.A. and
Innovative Developers, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10(0) to the Corporation's Annual Report or Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1997).*
10(p) Lease Agreement dated November 6, 1997 between Summit Community
Bank, N.A., as tenant, and IDI - Summit, Ltd., as landlord
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(p) to the
Corporation's Annual Report or Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1997).*
10(q) Second Amendment dated July 8, 1998 to Lease Agreeement dated
February 13, 1992 by and between Zell/Merrill Lynch Real Estate
Opportunity Partners Limited Partnership, as landlord, and Summit
Bancshares, Inc., as tenant (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10(q) to the Corporation's Annual Report or Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1998).*
10(r) Third Amendment dated July 15, 1998 to Loan Agreement dated July
12, 1995, between the Corporation and the Frost National Bank
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(r) to the
Corporation's Annual Report or Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998).*
56
10(s) Third Amendment dated October 22, 1999 to Lease Agreeement dated
February 13, 1992 by and between EOP-Summit Limited Partnership
(as successors in interest to Zell/Merrill Lynch Real Estate
Opportunity Partners Limited Partnership), as landlord, and
Summit Bancshares, Inc., as tenant (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(s) to the Corporation's Annual Report or
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999).*
10(t) Fourth Amendment dated July 15, 1999, to Loan Agreement dated
July 12, 1995, between the Corporation and the Frost National
Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(t) to the
Corporation's Annual Report or Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999).*
10(u) Fifth Amendment dated July 15, 2000 to Loan Agreement dated July
12, 1995, between the Corporation and the Frost National Bank.**
10(v) Severance Agreements between the Corporation and Philip E.
Norwood, dated as of October 24, 2000.**
10(w) Severance Agreement between the Corporation and Jeffrey M. Harp,
dated as of October 24, 2000.**
21 Subsidiaries of the Corporation.
23 Consent of Stovall, Grandey & Whatley, independent certified
public accountants.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
The Corporation did not file during the last quarter covered by this
report any reports on Form 8-K.
* A copy of this Exhibit is available to any shareholders, at the actual cost
of reproduction upon written request to the Corporation.
** File herewith.
57
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SUMMIT BANCSHARES, INC.
DATE: March 23, 2001 By: /s/ Philip E. Norwood
-------------------------------
Philip E. Norwood, Chairman
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant in the capacities indicated on this 23rd day of March, 2001.
SIGNATURE TITLE
/s/ Philip E. Norwood
------------------------------------ Chairman, President and Director
Philip E. Norwood (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Bob G. Scott
------------------------------------ Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice
Bob G. Scott President, Secretary and Treasurer
(principal financial officer and principal
accounting officer)
/s/ D. Jerrell Farr
------------------------------------ Director
D. Jerrell Farr
/s/ Elliott S. Garsek
------------------------------------ Director
Elliott S. Garsek
/s/ Ronald J. Goldman
------------------------------------ Director
Ronald J. Goldman
/s/ F.S. Gunn
------------------------------------ Director
F.S. Gunn
/s/ Jeffrey M. Harp
------------------------------------ Director
Jeffrey M. Harp
/s/ Robert L. Herchert
------------------------------------ Director
Robert L. Herchert
/s/ William W. Meadows
------------------------------------ Director
William W. Meadows
/s/ James L. Murray
------------------------------------ Director
James L. Murray
/s/ Byron B. Searcy
------------------------------------ Director
Byron B. Searcy
58
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Page No.
------- --------
3(a) Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation
as of July 21, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3(a) to the Corporation's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998).*
3(b) Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Corporation dated
April 21, 1998 1998 (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 3(a) to the Corporation's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998).*
4(a) Summit Bancshares, Inc.'s Rights Agreement dated
April 17, 1990 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 1 to the Corporation's Current Report on Form
8-K dated April 18, 1990 filed on April 24, 1990).*
10(a) Lease Agreement dated August 28, 1985 by and between
Alta Mesa National Bank, as lessor, and the
Corporation, as lessee (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Corporation's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1985).*
10(b) Lease Agreement dated October 1, 1986 by and between
the Corporation, as lessor, and Alta Mesa National
Bank, as lessee (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10(f) to the Corporation's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1986).*
10(c) Promissory Note dated December 21, 1989 in the
original principal amount of $1,400,000 executed by
Summit Bancshares, Inc. and payable to the order of
Summit National Bank (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(s) to the Corporation's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1989).*
10(d) Lease Agreement dated February 14, 1992 by and
between Zell/Merrill Lynch Real Estate Opportunity
Partners Limited Partnership, as landlord, and Summit
Bancshares, Inc., as tenant (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(I) to the Corporation's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1992).*
10(e) First Amendment dated May 3, 1994 to Lease Agreement
dated February 14, 1992 by and between Zell/Merrill
Lynch Real Estate Opportunity Partners Limited
Partnership, as landlord, and Summit Bancshares,
Inc., as tenant (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10(k) to the Corporation's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994).*
10(f) Management Security Plan of Summit Bancshares, Inc.
effective September 1, 1992; Management Security Plan
Agreement between Summit Bancshares, Inc. and F. S.
Gunn; and Management Security Plan Agreement between
Summit Bancshares, Inc. and James L. Murray
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(k)
to the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1992).*
10(g) Commercial-Industrial Lease Agreement dated January
1, 1993 by and between Summit National Bank, as
landlord, and Summit Bancservices, Inc., as tenant
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(m) to
the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1992).*
10(h) 1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Summit Bancshares,
Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10(n) to the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1993).*
59
10(i) Loan Agreement dated July 12, 1995, between the
Corporation and The Frost National Bank (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to the
Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended June 30, 1995).*
10(j) Lease Agreement dated July 6, 1989 by and between
Zell/Merrill Lynch Real Estate Opportunity Partners
Limited Partnership, as landlord, and Summit National
Bank as tenant (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10(r) to the Corporation's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995).*
10(k) First Amendment dated July 15, 1996 to Loan Agreement
dated July 12, 1995, between the Corporation and The
Frost National Bank (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10(s) to the Corporation's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997).*
10(l) 1997 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Summit Bancshares,
Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Annex I
to the Corporation's Proxy Statement for Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, dated March 17, 1997).*
10(m) Second Amendment dated July 15, 1997 to Loan
Agreement dated July 12, 1995, between the
Corporation and The Frost National Bank (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(m) to the
Corporation's Annual Report or Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997).*
10(n) Second Lease Amendment and Extension Agreement to the
Lease Agreement dated July 6, 1989, as amended by the
Amendment of Lease dated August 12, 1993, by and
between EOP-Summit Limited Partnership (as successor
in interest to Zell/Merrill Lynch Real Estate
Opportunity Partners Limited Partnership), as
landlord, and Summit National Bank, as tenant
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(n) to
the Corporation's Annual Report or Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1997).*
10(o) Agreement of Limited Partnership of IDI Summit, Ltd.
dated November 6, 1997, between Summit Community
Bank, N.A. and Innovative Developers, Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(0) to
the Corporation's Annual Report or Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1997).*
10(p) Lease Agreement dated November 6, 1997 between Summit
Community Bank, N.A., as tenant, and IDI - Summit,
Ltd., as landlord (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10(p) to the Corporation's Annual Report
or Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997).*
10(q) Second Amendment dated July 8, 1998 to Lease
Agreeement dated February 13, 1992 by and between
Zell/Merrill Lynch Real Estate Opportunity Partners
Limited Partnership, as landlord, and Summit
Bancshares, Inc., as tenant (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(q) to the Corporation's
Annual Report or Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998).*
10(r) Third Amendment dated July 15, 1998 to Loan Agreement
dated July 12, 1995, between the Corporation and the
Frost National Bank (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10(r) to the Corporation's Annual Report
or Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998).*
10(s) Third Amendment dated October 22, 1999 to Lease
Agreeement dated February 13, 1992 by and between
EOP-Summit Limited Partnership (as successors in
interest to Zell/Merrill Lynch Real Estate
Opportunity Partners Limited Partnership), as
landlord, and Summit Bancshares, Inc., as tenant
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(s) to
the Corporation's Annual Report or Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1999).*
60
10(t) Fourth Amendment dated July 15, 1999, to Loan
Agreement dated July 12, 1995, between the
Corporation and the Frost National Bank (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(t) to the
Corporation's Annual Report or Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999).*
10(u) Fifth Amendment dated July 15, 2000 to Loan Agreement
dated July 12, 1995, between the Corporation and the
Frost National Bank.**
10(v) Severance Agreements between the Corporation and
Philip E. Norwood, dated as of October 24, 2000.**
10(w) Severance Agreement between the Corporation and
Jeffrey M. Harp, dated as of October 24, 2000.**
21 Subsidiaries of the Corporation.
23 Consent of Stovall, Grandey & Whatley, independent
certified public accountants.
61