UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM N-Q
QUARTERLY SCHEDULE OF PORTFOLIO
HOLDINGS OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY
| Investment Company Act file number: | 811-07410 |
| Exact name of registrant as specified in charter: | Delaware Investments® National |
| Municipal Income Fund | |
| Address of principal executive offices: | 2005 Market Street |
| Philadelphia, PA 19103 | |
| Name and address of agent for service: | David F. Connor, Esq. |
| 2005 Market Street | |
| Philadelphia, PA 19103 | |
| Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: | (800) 523-1918 |
| Date of fiscal year end: | March 31 |
| Date of reporting period: | December 31, 2013 |
Item 1. Schedule of Investments.
Schedule of investments
Delaware
Investments®
National Municipal Income
Fund
December 31, 2013
(Unaudited)
| Principal | Value | ||||
| Amount° | (U.S. $) | ||||
| Municipal Bonds – 147.23% | |||||
| Corporate Revenue Bonds – 15.78% | |||||
| Buckeye, Ohio Tobacco Settlement | |||||
| Financing Authority Asset-Backed | |||||
| Asset-Backed -2 Series A-2 | |||||
| 6.50% 6/1/47 | 430,000 | $ | 348,936 | ||
| City of Valparaiso IN | |||||
| (Pratt Paper Project) | |||||
| 7.00% 1/1/44 (AMT) | 240,000 | 241,685 | |||
| Gaston County Industrial Facilities & | |||||
| Pollution Control Financing | |||||
| Authority | |||||
| (Exempt Facilities-National Gypsum | |||||
| Project) 5.75% 8/1/35 (AMT) | 290,000 | 252,532 | |||
| Golden State, California Tobacco | |||||
| Securitization Corporation | |||||
| Settlement Revenue (Asset-Backed | |||||
| Senior Notes) Series A-1 | |||||
| 5.75% 6/1/47 | 1,000,000 | 743,190 | |||
| Harris County, Texas Industrial | |||||
| Development Corporation Solid | |||||
| Waste Disposal Revenue | |||||
| (Deer Park Refining project) | |||||
| 5.00% 2/1/23 | 150,000 | 159,036 | |||
| Illinois Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement | |||||
| Authority | |||||
| 6.25% 6/1/24 | 500,000 | 536,675 | |||
| Louisiana Local Government | |||||
| Environmental Facilities & | |||||
| Community Development Authority | |||||
| (Westlake Chemical) | |||||
| Series A 6.50% 8/1/29 | 645,000 | 706,617 | |||
| Series A-1 6.50% 11/1/35 | 255,000 | 272,932 | |||
| Maryland Economic Development | |||||
| Corporation Facilities Revenue | |||||
| (CNX Marine Terminals) | |||||
| 5.75% 9/1/25 | 600,000 | 622,104 | |||
| M-S-R Energy Authority, California | |||||
| Gas | |||||
| Series C 7.00% 11/1/34 | 1,000,000 | 1,231,190 | |||
| Navajo County, Arizona Pollution | |||||
| Control Revenue | |||||
| (Arizona Public Services-Cholla) | |||||
| Series D 5.75% 6/1/34• | 500,000 | 551,225 | |||
| New Jersey Economic Development | |||||
| Authority Special Facility Revenue | |||||
| (Continental Airlines project) | |||||
| 5.25% 9/15/29 (AMT) | 500,000 | 457,395 | |||
| Ohio State Air Quality Development | |||||
| Authority Revenue Environmental | |||||
| Improvement | |||||
| (First Energy Generation) Series A | |||||
| 5.70% 8/1/20 | 260,000 | 286,853 | |||
| Pima County, Arizona Industrial | |||||
| Development Authority Pollution | |||||
| Control Revenue | |||||
| (Tucson Electric Power San Juan) | |||||
| 5.75% 9/1/29 | 250,000 | 254,093 | |||
| Salt Verde Financial, Arizona Gas | |||||
| Revenue Senior Note | |||||
| 5.00% 12/1/37 | 400,000 | 384,196 | |||
| St. John the Baptist Parish, Louisiana | |||||
| (Marathon Oil) Series A | |||||
| 5.125% 6/1/37 | 500,000 | 493,600 | |||
| Suffolk County, New York Tobacco | |||||
| Asset Securitization | |||||
| Series B 5.00% 6/1/32 | 750,000 | 731,460 | |||
| Tobacco Settlement Financing | |||||
| Corporation, Louisiana | |||||
| Asset-Backed Note | |||||
| Series A 5.25% 5/15/35 | 460,000 | 447,589 | |||
| Tobacco Settlement Financing | |||||
| Corporation, New Jersey | |||||
| Series 1A 5.00% 6/1/41 | 500,000 | 353,230 | |||
| Town of Shoals, Indiana | |||||
| (Amt-National Gypsum Project) | |||||
| 7.25% 11/1/43 | 310,000 | 307,709 | |||
| 9,382,247 | |||||
| Education Revenue Bonds – 24.98% | |||||
| Bowling Green, Ohio Student Housing | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (CFP I State University project) | |||||
| 6.00% 6/1/45 | 260,000 | 256,903 | |||
| California Statewide Communities | |||||
| Development Authority School | |||||
| Facility Revenue | |||||
| (Aspire Public Schools) | |||||
| 6.125% 7/1/46 | 625,000 | 589,438 | |||
| California Statewide Communities | |||||
| Development Authority Student | |||||
| Housing Revenue | |||||
| (Irvine, LLC - UCI East Campus) | |||||
| 6.00% 5/15/23 | 470,000 | 504,611 | |||
| Deephaven, Minnesota Charter School | |||||
| (Eagle Ridge Academy Project) | |||||
| Series A 5.50% 7/1/43 | 500,000 | 467,580 | |||
| Delaware County, Pennsylvania | |||||
| Authority | |||||
| (Villanova University) | |||||
| 5.00% 8/1/20 | 390,000 | 447,326 | |||
| Health & Educational Facilities | |||||
| Authority of the State of Missouri | |||||
| (St. Louis College of Pharmacy | |||||
| Project) 5.25% 5/1/33 | 500,000 | 501,060 | |||
(continues) NQ- OV9 [12/13] 2/14 (12140) 1
Schedule of investments
Delaware Investments® National Municipal Income Fund
| Principal | Value | ||||
| Amount° | (U.S. $) | ||||
| Municipal Bonds (continued) | |||||
| Education Revenue Bonds (continued) | |||||
| Health & Educational Facilities | |||||
| Authority of the State of Missouri | |||||
| (Washington University) Series B | |||||
| 5.00% 11/15/30 | 600,000 | $ | 658,404 | ||
| Marietta, Georgia Development | |||||
| Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Life University Income project) | |||||
| 7.00% 6/15/39 | 430,000 | 428,461 | |||
| Maryland Health & Higher Educational | |||||
| Facilities Authority | |||||
| (Loyola University) Series A | |||||
| 5.00% 10/1/39 | 650,000 | 659,152 | |||
| Maryland State Economic | |||||
| Development Student Housing | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (University of Maryland College | |||||
| Park projects) 5.75% 6/1/33 | 370,000 | 377,045 | |||
| Massachusetts State Health & | |||||
| Educational Facilities Authority | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (Harvard University) Series A | |||||
| 5.00% 12/15/29 | 600,000 | 654,936 | |||
| Monroe County, New York Industrial | |||||
| Development Revenue | |||||
| (Nazareth College Rochester | |||||
| project) 5.50% 10/1/41 | 495,000 | 503,385 | |||
| Montgomery County, Pennsylvania | |||||
| Higher Education & Health | |||||
| Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Arcadia University) Series ARCADI | |||||
| 5.25% 4/1/30 | 550,000 | 565,279 | |||
| New Jersey Economic Development | |||||
| Authority Revenue | |||||
| (MSU Student Housing Project) | |||||
| 5.875% 6/1/42 | 735,000 | 767,230 | |||
| New York City, New York Trust For | |||||
| Cultural Resources | |||||
| (Whitney Museum of American Art) | |||||
| 5.00% 7/1/31 | 500,000 | 516,995 | |||
| New York State Dormitory Authority | |||||
| (Columbia University) Series | |||||
| COLUM 5.00% 10/1/41 | 600,000 | 632,766 | |||
| Oregon State Facilities Authority | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (Concordia University project) | |||||
| Series A 144A 6.125% 9/1/30# | 135,000 | 136,937 | |||
| Pennsylvania State Higher Educational | |||||
| Facilities Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Edinboro University Foundation) | |||||
| 5.80% 7/1/30 | 400,000 | 397,068 | |||
| (University Properties - East | |||||
| Stoudsbourg University) | |||||
| 5.25% 7/1/19 | 510,000 | 547,796 | |||
| Phoenix, Arizona Industrial | |||||
| Development Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Eagle College Preparatory Project) | |||||
| Series A 5.00% 7/1/43 | 500,000 | 425,155 | |||
| (Rowan University project) | |||||
| 5.00% 6/1/42 | 1,000,000 | 963,260 | |||
| Pima County, Arizona Industrial | |||||
| Development Authority Education | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (Edkey Charter School Project) | |||||
| 6.00% 7/1/48 | 500,000 | 443,235 | |||
| Private Colleges & Universities | |||||
| Authority Revenue, Georgia | |||||
| (Mercer University) Series A | |||||
| 5.00% 10/1/32 | 135,000 | 130,837 | |||
| St Lawrence County, New York | |||||
| Industrial Development Agency | |||||
| (St. Lawrence University project) | |||||
| 5.00% 7/1/26 | 270,000 | 296,773 | |||
| Swarthmore Borough Authority, | |||||
| Pennsylvania | |||||
| (Swarthmore College Project) | |||||
| 5.00% 9/15/32 | 490,000 | 525,398 | |||
| Troy, New York Capital Resource | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (Rensselaer Polytechnic) Series A | |||||
| 5.125% 9/1/40 | 600,000 | 605,520 | |||
| University of Arizona | |||||
| Series A 5.00% 6/1/39 | 500,000 | 521,150 | |||
| University of California | |||||
| Series AI 5.00% 5/15/32 | 1,000,000 | 1,071,010 | |||
| Wyoming Community Development | |||||
| Authority Student Housing Revenue | |||||
| (CHF-Wyoming LLC) 6.50% 7/1/43 | 250,000 | 256,363 | |||
| 14,851,073 | |||||
| Healthcare Revenue Bonds – 21.20% | |||||
| Arizona Health Facilities Authority | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (Catholic Healthcare West) Series D | |||||
| 5.00% 7/1/28 | 500,000 | 510,960 | |||
| Brevard County, Florida Health | |||||
| Facilities Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Health First Project) 7.00% 4/1/39 | 90,000 | 96,773 | |||
| Butler County, Pennsylvania Hospital | |||||
| Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Butler Health System project) | |||||
| 7.125% 7/1/29 | 450,000 | 515,826 | |||
| Colorado Health Facilities Authority | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (Healthcare Facilities - American | |||||
| Baptist) 8.00% 8/1/43 | 330,000 | 323,558 | |||
2 NQ- OV9 [12/13] 2/14 (12140)
| Principal | Value | ||||
| Amount° | (U.S. $) | ||||
| Municipal Bonds (continued) | |||||
| Healthcare Revenue Bonds (continued) | |||||
| Duluth, Minnesota Economic | |||||
| Development Authority Revenue | |||||
| (St. Luke’s Hospital Authority | |||||
| Obligation Group) 5.75% 6/15/32 | 400,000 | $ | 390,224 | ||
| Hawaii Pacific Health Special Purpose | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| Series A 5.50% 7/1/40 | 300,000 | 303,837 | |||
| Illinois Finance Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Silver Cross & Medical Centers) | |||||
| 7.00% 8/15/44 | 950,000 | 1,024,452 | |||
| Koyukuk, Alaska Revenue | |||||
| (Tanana Chiefs Conference Health | |||||
| Care Facility project) | |||||
| 7.75% 10/1/41 | 300,000 | 315,510 | |||
| Louisiana Public Facilities Authority | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (Ochsner Clinic Foundation project) | |||||
| 6.50% 5/15/37 | 105,000 | 114,301 | |||
| Lycoming County, Pennsylvania | |||||
| Authority Health System Revenue | |||||
| (Susquehanna Health System | |||||
| Project) Series A 5.50% 7/1/28 | 500,000 | 513,465 | |||
| Maine Health & Higher Educational | |||||
| Facilities Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Maine General Medical Center) | |||||
| 6.75% 7/1/41 | 300,000 | 311,232 | |||
| Maricopa County, Arizona Industrial | |||||
| Development Authority Health | |||||
| Facilities Revenue | |||||
| (Catholic Healthcare West) Series A | |||||
| 6.00% 7/1/39 | 500,000 | 525,010 | |||
| Maryland Health & Higher Educational | |||||
| Facilities Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Carroll Hospital) Series A | |||||
| 5.00% 7/1/37 | 315,000 | 307,138 | |||
| Monroe County, Pennsylvania Hospital | |||||
| Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Pocono Medical Center) Series A | |||||
| 5.00% 1/1/41 | 500,000 | 466,710 | |||
| Montgomery County, Pennsylvania | |||||
| Industrial Development Authority | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (Mortgage - Whitemarsh | |||||
| Continuing Care) 6.25% 2/1/35 | 675,000 | 653,474 | |||
| New Hampshire Health and Education | |||||
| Facilities Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Dartmouth - Hitchock Medical | |||||
| Center) 6.00% 8/1/38 | 300,000 | 321,147 | |||
| New Jersey Health Care Facilities | |||||
| Financing Authority Revenue | |||||
| (St. Peters University Hospital) | |||||
| 6.25% 7/1/35 | 300,000 | 307,110 | |||
| New Mexico Hospital Equipment Loan | |||||
| Council Revenue | |||||
| (Presbyterian Healthcare) | |||||
| 5.00% 8/1/39 | 500,000 | 499,260 | |||
| New York State Dormitory Authority | |||||
| Revenue Non State Supported Debt | |||||
| (Orange Regional Medical Center) | |||||
| 6.25% 12/1/37 | 500,000 | 479,990 | |||
| Orange County, Florida Health | |||||
| Facilities Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Mayflower Retirement Center) | |||||
| Series REF 5.00% 6/1/32 | 400,000 | 386,208 | |||
| Series REF 5.00% 6/1/36 | 250,000 | 236,303 | |||
| Series REF 5.125% 6/1/42 | 750,000 | 709,253 | |||
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Hospitals & | |||||
| Higher Education Facilities | |||||
| Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Temple University Health System) | |||||
| Series A 5.50% 7/1/30 | 300,000 | 259,803 | |||
| St. Cloud, Minnesota Health Care | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (Centracare Health System project) | |||||
| Series A 5.125% 5/1/30 | 820,000 | 862,681 | |||
| State of Ohio | |||||
| (Cleveland Clinic Health) Series A | |||||
| 5.50% 1/1/39 | 300,000 | 323,946 | |||
| University of Medical Center, Tuscon, | |||||
| Arizona Hospital Revenue | |||||
| 6.50% 7/1/39 | 500,000 | 533,575 | |||
| West Virginia Hospital Finance | |||||
| Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Highland Hospital Obligation | |||||
| Group) 9.125% 10/1/41 | 500,000 | 595,100 | |||
| Yavapai County, Arizona Industrial | |||||
| Development Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Yavapai Regional Medical Center) | |||||
| Series A 5.00% 8/1/28 | 720,000 | 719,597 | |||
| 12,606,443 | |||||
| Housing Revenue Bonds – 2.68% | |||||
| California Municipal Finance Authority | |||||
| Mobile Home Park Revenue | |||||
| (Caritas Project) Series A | |||||
| 5.50% 8/15/47 | 750,000 | 735,278 | |||
| (Caritas Projects) Series A | |||||
| 6.40% 8/15/45 | 430,000 | 442,036 | |||
| City of Williston, Neveda | |||||
| (Eagle Crest Apartments Project) | |||||
| 7.75% 9/1/38 | 255,000 | 248,673 | |||
(continues) NQ- OV9 [12/13] 2/14 (12140) 3
Schedule of investments
Delaware Investments® National Municipal Income Fund
| Principal | Value | ||||
| Amount° | (U.S. $) | ||||
| Municipal Bonds (continued) | |||||
| Housing Revenue Bonds (continued) | |||||
| Florida Housing Finance Homeowner | |||||
| Mortgage Revenue | |||||
| Series 2 | |||||
| 5.90% 7/1/29 (NATL-RE) (AMT) | 165,000 | $ | 166,214 | ||
| 1,592,201 | |||||
| Lease Revenue Bonds – 14.36% | |||||
| California State Public Works Board | |||||
| Lease Revenue | |||||
| (Various Capital Projects) Series A | |||||
| 5.00% 4/1/37 | 1,000,000 | 1,002,600 | |||
| California Statewide Communities | |||||
| Development Authority Student | |||||
| Housing Revenue | |||||
| (Lancer Plaza project) | |||||
| 5.625% 11/1/33 | 1,000,000 | 889,890 | |||
| Idaho State Building Authority | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (Health & Welfare project) Series A | |||||
| 5.00% 9/1/24 | 135,000 | 152,717 | |||
| (State Police) Series I 5.00% 9/1/23 | 760,000 | 862,775 | |||
| Minnesota State General Revenue | |||||
| Appropriations | |||||
| Series B 5.00% 3/1/29 | 2,000,000 | 2,184,660 | |||
| New Jersey Economic Development | |||||
| Authority | |||||
| (School Facilities Construction) | |||||
| Series EE 5.00% 9/1/18 | 100,000 | 115,321 | |||
| New York City, New York Industrial | |||||
| Development Agency | |||||
| (Senior Trips) Series A | |||||
| 5.00% 7/1/28 | 250,000 | 237,143 | |||
| Pima County, Arizona Industrial | |||||
| Development Authority Metro | |||||
| Police Facility Revenue | |||||
| (Nevada Project) | |||||
| Series A 5.25% 7/1/31 | 500,000 | 509,795 | |||
| Series A 5.375% 7/1/39 | 500,000 | 511,570 | |||
| Public Finance Authority, Winconsin | |||||
| Airport Facilities Revenue | |||||
| (AFCO Investors II) | |||||
| 5.75% 10/1/31 (AMT) | 500,000 | 449,855 | |||
| San Jose, California Financing | |||||
| Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Civic Center Project) Series A | |||||
| 5.00% 6/1/28 | 500,000 | 536,865 | |||
| Tobacco Settlement Financing | |||||
| Corporation, New York Revenue | |||||
| Asset-Backed | |||||
| Series B 5.00% 6/1/21 | 1,000,000 | 1,082,660 | |||
| 8,535,851 | |||||
| Local General Obligation Bonds – 2.44% | |||||
| City of New York, New York | |||||
| Series A-1 5.25% 8/15/21 | 250,000 | 285,635 | |||
| Series I-1 5.375% 4/1/36 | 250,000 | 274,958 | |||
| County of Ramsey, Minnesota Capital | |||||
| Improvement | |||||
| Series B 5.00% 2/1/18 | 300,000 | 348,318 | |||
| Gila County, Arizona Unified School | |||||
| District No. 10 | |||||
| (Payson School Improvement | |||||
| Project of 2006) Series A | |||||
| 5.25% 7/1/27 (AMBAC) | 500,000 | 539,205 | |||
| 1,448,116 | |||||
| Special Tax Revenue Bonds – 24.60% | |||||
| Anne Arundel County, Maryland | |||||
| Special Obligation Revenue | |||||
| (National Business Park - North | |||||
| project) 6.10% 7/1/40 | 200,000 | 205,502 | |||
| Brooklyn Arena Local Development, | |||||
| New York Pilot Revenue | |||||
| (Barclays Center Project) | |||||
| 6.25% 7/15/40 | 940,000 | 987,047 | |||
| 6.50% 7/15/30 | 300,000 | 322,554 | |||
| California State Economic Recovery | |||||
| Series A 5.25% 7/1/21 ST GTD | 260,000 | 305,141 | |||
| California Statewide Communities | |||||
| Development Authority Revenue | |||||
| (Statewide Inland Regional Center | |||||
| project) 5.375% 12/1/37 | 500,000 | 501,635 | |||
| Guam Government Business Privilege | |||||
| Tax Revenue | |||||
| Series A 5.00% 1/1/22 | 775,000 | 868,713 | |||
| Series B-1 5.00% 1/1/42 | 545,000 | 525,129 | |||
| Massachusetts Bay Transportation | |||||
| Authority Senior | |||||
| Series A 5.25% 7/1/29 | 200,000 | 228,548 | |||
| Miami-Dade County, Florida Special | |||||
| Obligation | |||||
| (Capital Appreciation & Income) | |||||
| Series B 5.00% 10/1/35 (NATL-RE) | 1,000,000 | 1,000,830 | |||
| Mosaic District, Virginia Community | |||||
| Development Authority Revenue | |||||
| Series A 6.875% 3/1/36 | 520,000 | 572,114 | |||
| New Jersey Economic Development | |||||
| Authority Revenue | |||||
| 5.00% 6/15/28 | 200,000 | 200,406 | |||
| 5.00% 6/15/29 | 800,000 | 792,336 | |||
| (School Facilities Construction) | |||||
| Series AA 5.50% 12/15/29 | 900,000 | 968,760 | |||
| New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund | |||||
| Series A 5.00% 6/15/42 | 110,000 | 110,827 | |||
| Series AA 5.00% 6/15/44 | 340,000 | 340,755 | |||
4 NQ- OV9 [12/13] 2/14 (12140)
| Principal | Value | ||||
| Amount° | (U.S. $) | ||||
| Municipal Bonds (continued) | |||||
| Special Tax Revenue Bonds (continued) | |||||
| New York City, New York Industrial | |||||
| Development Agency Civic Facility | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (YMCA of Greater New York | |||||
| project) 5.00% 8/1/36 | 880,000 | $ | 880,176 | ||
| New York State Dormitory Authority | |||||
| Series A 5.00% 3/15/33 | 1,000,000 | 1,061,280 | |||
| (State Personal Income Tax | |||||
| Revenue-Education) Series A | |||||
| 5.00% 3/15/38 | 570,000 | 602,165 | |||
| Northampton County, Pennsylvania | |||||
| Industrial Development Authority | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (Route 33 Project) 7.00% 7/1/32 | 230,000 | 218,813 | |||
| Peoria, Arizona Municipal | |||||
| Development Authority Sales Tax & | |||||
| Excise Shared Revenue | |||||
| (Senior Lien & Subordinate Lien) | |||||
| Series SR LIEN 5.00% 1/1/18 | 1,085,000 | 1,244,636 | |||
| Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| Series A 6.00% 8/1/42 | 235,000 | 175,625 | |||
| Series C 6.00% 8/1/39 | 300,000 | 225,204 | |||
| Regional Transportation District, | |||||
| Colorado Tax Revenue | |||||
| (Denver Transit Partners) | |||||
| 6.00% 1/15/41 | 500,000 | 509,715 | |||
| (Fastracks project) Series A | |||||
| 5.00% 11/1/26 | 500,000 | 555,935 | |||
| Virginia Public Building Authority | |||||
| Series A 5.00% 8/1/26 | 1,000,000 | 1,106,670 | |||
| Wyandotte County, Kansas City, | |||||
| Kansas Unified Government Special | |||||
| Obligation Revenue | |||||
| (Capital Appreciation) Sales Tax | |||||
| Subordinate Lien 0.00% 6/1/21^ | 165,000 | 111,731 | |||
| 14,622,247 | |||||
| State General Obligation Bonds – 8.56% | |||||
| California State Various Purposes | |||||
| 5.00% 10/1/41 | 440,000 | 446,459 | |||
| 5.25% 11/1/40 | 320,000 | 332,246 | |||
| 6.00% 4/1/38 | 105,000 | 117,912 | |||
| State of Minnesota Various Purposes | |||||
| Series F 5.00% 10/1/20 | 2,000,000 | 2,373,537 | |||
| State of New York | |||||
| Series A 5.00% 2/15/39 | 300,000 | 318,639 | |||
| State of Oregon | |||||
| Series K 5.00% 5/1/22 | 1,275,000 | 1,499,834 | |||
| 5,088,627 | |||||
| Transportation Revenue Bonds – 25.47% | |||||
| Bay Area, California Toll Authority | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (San Francisco Bay Area) | |||||
| 5.00% 4/1/27 | 750,000 | 827,715 | |||
| Central Texas Regional Mobility | |||||
| Authority Revenue | |||||
| Senior Lien 6.00% 1/1/41 | 520,000 | 529,802 | |||
| City of Chicago, Illonis O’Hare | |||||
| International Airport Revenue | |||||
| (General-Senior Lien) Series D | |||||
| 5.25% 1/1/34 | 1,000,000 | 1,017,940 | |||
| Foothill-Eastern, California | |||||
| Transportation Corridor Agency | |||||
| Series A 5.00% 1/15/42 (AGM) | 460,000 | 434,833 | |||
| Maryland State Economic | |||||
| Development Revenue | |||||
| (Transportation Facilities Project) | |||||
| Series A 5.75% 6/1/35 | 255,000 | 257,338 | |||
| Metropolitan Transit Authority of | |||||
| Harris County, Texas | |||||
| Series A 5.00% 11/1/24 | 500,000 | 559,565 | |||
| Metropolitan Transportation Authority, | |||||
| New York | |||||
| Series A 5.00% 11/15/41 | 500,000 | 501,585 | |||
| Series C 5.00% 11/15/30 | 500,000 | 515,800 | |||
| Metropolitan Washington D.C. Airports | |||||
| Authority Dulles Toll Road Revenue | |||||
| (First Senior Lien) Series A | |||||
| 5.25% 10/1/44 | 245,000 | 247,156 | |||
| New Jersey State Turnpike Authority | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| Series A 5.00% 1/1/27 | 1,000,000 | 1,076,690 | |||
| New York Liberty Development | |||||
| Revenue | |||||
| (1 World Trade Center Port | |||||
| Authority Construction) Series TRD | |||||
| CTR 5.00% 12/15/41 GO OF AUTH | 500,000 | 504,890 | |||
| North Texas Tollway Authority Special | |||||
| Projects System | |||||
| Series A 5.00% 9/1/20 | 250,000 | 291,090 | |||
| Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission | |||||
| Subordinate | |||||
| (Special Motor License Foundation) | |||||
| Series SPL MTR LICENS | |||||
| 5.00% 12/1/22 | 500,000 | 556,550 | |||
| Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission | |||||
| Suboridnate | |||||
| (Special Motor License Foundation) | |||||
| Series B 5.00% 12/1/41 | 500,000 | 500,950 | |||
| Port Authority of Allegheny County, | |||||
| Pennsylvania | |||||
| 5.75% 3/1/29 | 900,000 | 986,670 | |||
(continues) NQ- OV9 [12/13] 2/14 (12140) 5
Schedule of investments
Delaware Investments® National Municipal Income Fund
| Principal | Value | |||||
| Amount° | (U.S. $) | |||||
| Municipal Bonds (continued) | ||||||
| Transportation Revenue Bonds (continued) | ||||||
| Port Authority of New York & New | ||||||
| Jersey Special Project | ||||||
| (JFK International Air Terminal) | ||||||
| 6.00% 12/1/42 | 230,000 | $ | 244,681 | |||
| 6.50% 12/1/28 | 500,000 | 521,120 | ||||
| St. Louis Missouri Airport Revenue | ||||||
| (Lambert St. Louis International) | ||||||
| Series AMT 5.00% 7/1/32 (AMT) | 1,000,000 | 969,490 | ||||
| St. Louis, Missouri Airport Revenue | ||||||
| (Lambert St. Louis International) | ||||||
| Series A-1 6.625% 7/1/34 | 325,000 | 360,906 | ||||
| State of Oregon Department of | ||||||
| Transportation | ||||||
| Series A 5.00% 11/15/26 | 1,000,000 | 1,146,870 | ||||
| Texas Private Activity Bond Surface | ||||||
| Transportation Corporate Senior | ||||||
| Lien Revenue | ||||||
| (LBJ Infrastructure) | ||||||
| 7.00% 6/30/40 | 285,000 | 308,909 | ||||
| 7.50% 6/30/33 | 665,000 | 742,632 | ||||
| (Mobility Partners) 7.50% 12/31/31 | 500,000 | 555,910 | ||||
| (NTE Mobility Partners) | ||||||
| 6.75% 6/30/43 (AMT) | 225,000 | 235,872 | ||||
| 6.875% 12/31/39 | 1,000,000 | 1,072,100 | ||||
| 7.00% 12/31/38 (AMT) | 165,000 | 177,202 | ||||
| 15,144,266 | ||||||
| Water & Sewer Revenue Bonds – 7.16% | ||||||
| Atlanta, Georgia Water & Wastewater | ||||||
| Revenue | ||||||
| Series A 6.25% 11/1/39 | 950,000 | 1,069,016 | ||||
| Los Angeles, California Wastewater | ||||||
| System Revenue | ||||||
| Series A 5.00% 6/1/27 | 500,000 | 556,140 | ||||
| New York City, New York Municipal | ||||||
| Water Finance Authority | ||||||
| (Second General Resolution) Series BB | ||||||
| 5.25% 6/15/44 | 525,000 | 547,864 | ||||
| Phoenix, Arizona Civic Improvement | ||||||
| Wastewater Systems Revenue | ||||||
| (Junior Lien) Series A 5.00% 7/1/39 | 900,000 | 941,238 | ||||
| San Francisco, California City & | ||||||
| County Public Utilities Commission | ||||||
| Water Revenue | ||||||
| Series F 5.00% 11/1/27 | 500,000 | 557,425 | ||||
| Texas State | ||||||
| Series C 5.00% 8/1/22 | 500,000 | 584,540 | ||||
| 4,256,223 | ||||||
| Total Municipal Bonds | ||||||
| (cost $87,189,721) | 87,527,294 | |||||
| Short-Term Investments – 1.26% | ||||||
| Variable Rate Demand Notes – 1.26%¤ | ||||||
| California State Series B-7 0.01% | ||||||
| 5/1/40(LOC- JPMorgan Chase Bank | ||||||
| N.A.) | 250,000 | 250,000 | ||||
| Minneapolis - St. Paul, Minnesota | ||||||
| Housing & Redevelopment | ||||||
| Authority Health Care Revenue | ||||||
| Series B-2 (Allina Health System) | ||||||
| 0.02% 11/15/35(LOC- JPMorgan | ||||||
| Chase Bank N.A.) | 500,000 | 500,000 | ||||
| Total Short-Term Investments | ||||||
| (cost $750,000) | 750,000 | |||||
| Total Value of Securities – 148.49% | ||||||
| (cost $87,939,721) | 88,277,294 | |||||
| Liquidation Value of Preferred | ||||||
| Stock – (50.46%) | (30,000,000 | ) | ||||
| Receivables and Other Assets Net | ||||||
| of Liabilities – 1.97% | 1,173,640 | |||||
| Net Assets Applicable to | ||||||
| 26,729,377 Shares | ||||||
| Outstanding – 100.00% | $ | 59,450,934 | ||||
| # | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. At Dec. 31, 2013, the aggregate value of Rule 144A securities was $136,937, which represents 0.23% of the Fund’s net assets. See Note 4 in “Notes.” |
| ¤ | Tax-exempt obligations that contain a floating or variable interest rate adjustment formula and an unconditional right of demand to receive payment of the unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest upon a short notice period (generally up to 30 days) prior to specified dates either from the issuer or by drawing on a bank letter of credit, a guarantee or insurance issued with respect to such instrument. The rate shown is the rate as of Dec. 31, 2013. |
| ° | Principal amount shown is stated in U.S. Dollars unless noted that the security is denominated in another currency. |
| • | Variable rate security. The rate shown is the rate as of Dec. 31, 2013. Interest rates reset periodically. |
| ^ | Zero coupon security. The rate shown is the yield at the time of purchase. |
6 NQ- OV9 [12/13] 2/14 (12140)
Summary of
abbreviations:
AGM – Insured by
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation
AMBAC – Insured by AMBAC Assurance
Corporation
AMT – Subject to Alternative Minimum Tax
NATL-RE – Insured by National Public Finance Guarantee
Corporation
(continues) NQ- OV9 [12/13] 2/14 (12140) 7
Notes
Delaware Investments® National Municipal Income Fund
December 31, 2013 (Unaudited)
1. Significant Accounting Policies
The following accounting policies are in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) and are consistently followed by Delaware Investments National Municipal Income Fund (Fund). This report covers the period of time since the Fund’s last fiscal year end.
Security Valuation — Debt securities are valued based upon valuations provided by an independent pricing service or broker and reviewed by management. To the extent current market prices are not available, the pricing service may take into account developments related to the specific security, as well as transactions in comparable securities. Valuations for fixed income securities utilize matrix systems, which reflect such factors as security prices, yields, maturities, and ratings, and are supplemented by dealer and exchange quotations. Generally, other securities and assets for which market quotations are not readily available are valued at fair value as determined in good faith under the direction of the Fund’s Board of Trustees (Board). In determining whether market quotations are readily available or fair valuation will be used, various factors will be taken into consideration, such as market closures or suspension of trading in a security.
Federal Income Taxes — No provision for federal income taxes has been made as the Fund intends to continue to qualify for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and make the requisite distributions to shareholders. The Fund evaluates tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Fund’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the “more-likely-than-not” threshold are recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Management has analyzed the Fund’s tax positions taken for all open federal income tax years (March 31, 2010–March 31, 2013), and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in the Fund’s financial statements.
Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the fair value of investments, the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and the differences could be material.
Other — Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged directly to the Fund. Other expenses common to various funds within the Delaware Investments® Family of Funds are generally allocated among such funds on the basis of average net assets. Management fees and some other expenses are paid monthly. Security transactions are recorded on the date the securities are purchased or sold (trade date) for financial reporting purposes. Costs used in calculating realized gains and losses on the sale of investment securities are those of the specific securities sold. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Discounts and premiums on debt securities are amortized to interest income over the lives of the respective securities using the effective interest method. The Fund declares and pays dividends from net investment income monthly and distributions from net realized gain on investments, if any, annually. The Fund may distribute more frequently, if necessary for tax purposes. Dividends and distributions, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2. Investments
At Dec. 31, 2013, the cost of investments federal income tax purposes has been estimated since final tax characteristics cannot be determined until fiscal year end. At Dec. 31, 2013, the cost of investments and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) for the Fund were as follows:
| Cost of Investments | $ | 87,964,583 | |
| Aggregate unrealized appreciation | $ | 2,054,117 | |
| Aggregate unrealized depreciation | (1,741,406 | ) | |
| Net unrealized appreciation | $ | 312,711 |
For federal income tax purposes, at March 31, 2013, capital loss carryforwards of $407,888 may be carried forward and applied against future capital gains. Capital loss carryforwards will expire as follows: $407,888 expires in 2018.
On Dec. 22, 2010, the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the Act) was enacted, which changed various technical rules governing the tax treatment of regulated investment companies. The changes were generally effective for taxable years beginning after the date of enactment. Under the Act, the Fund is permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after the date of enactment for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those future taxable years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years, which carry an expiration date. As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryforwards may be more likely to expire unused. Additionally, post-enactment capital loss carryforwards will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered all short-term as permitted under previous regulation.
U.S. GAAP defines fair value as the price that the Fund would receive to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. A three level hierarchy for fair value measurements has been established based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability. Inputs may be observable or unobservable and refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available under the circumstances. The Fund’s investment in its entirety is assigned a level based upon the observability of the inputs which are significant to the overall valuation. The three level hierarchy of inputs is summarized below.
| Level 1 – | inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical investments (e.g., equity securities, open-end investment companies, futures contracts, exchange-traded options contracts) |
| Level 2 – | other observable inputs (including, but not limited to: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in markets that are active, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates) or other market-corroborated inputs) (e.g., debt securities, government securities, swap contracts, foreign currency exchange contracts, foreign securities utilizing international fair value pricing, broker-quoted securities, fair valued securities) |
8 NQ- OV9 [12/13] 2/14 (12140)
Notes
Delaware Investments® National Municipal Income Fund
2. Investments (continued)
| Level 3 – | inputs are significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions used to determine the fair value of investments) (e.g., broker-quoted securities, fair valued securities) |
Level 3 investments are valued using significant unobservable inputs. The Fund may also use an income-based valuation approach in which the anticipated future cash flows of the investment are discounted to calculate fair value. Discounts may also be applied due to the nature or duration of any restrictions on the disposition of the investments. Valuations may also be based upon current market prices of securities that are comparable in coupon, rating, maturity and industry. The derived value of a Level 3 investment may not represent the value which is received upon disposition and this could impact the results of operations.
The following table summarizes the valuation of the Fund’s investments by fair value hierarchy levels as of Dec. 31, 2013:
| Level 2 | ||
| Municipal Bonds | $ | 87,527,294 |
| Short-Term Investments | 750,000 | |
| Total | $ | 88,277,294 |
During the period ended Dec. 31, 2013, there were no transfers between Level 1 investments, Level 2 investments or Level 3 investments that had a significant impact to the Fund. The Fund’s policy is to recognize transfers between levels at the beginning of the reporting period.
3. Preferred Stock
On March15, 2012, the Fund issued $30,000,000 Series 2017 Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred (VMTP) Shares, with $100,000 liquidation value per share in a privately negotiated offering. Proceeds from the issuance of VMTP Shares, net of offering expenses, were invested in accordance with the Fund’s investment objective. The VMTP Shares were offered to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.
The Fund is obligated to redeem its VMTP Shares on April 1, 2017, unless earlier redeemed or repurchased by the Fund. VMTP Shares are subject to optional and mandatory redemption in certain circumstances. The VMTP Shares may be redeemed at the option of the Fund, subject to payment of a premium until April 1, 2014, and at par thereafter. The Fund may be obligated to redeem certain of the VMTP Shares if the Fund fails to maintain certain asset coverage and leverage ratio requirements and such failures are not cured by the applicable cure date. The redemption price per share is equal to the sum of the liquidation value per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends. Dividends on the VMTP Shares (which are treated as interest payments for financial reporting purposes) are set weekly.
The Fund uses leverage because its managers believe that, over time, leveraging may provide opportunities for additional income and total return for common shareholders. However, the use of leverage also can expose common shareholders to additional volatility. For example, as the prices of securities held by a fund decline, the negative impact of these valuation changes on common share net asset value and common shareholder total return is magnified by the use of leverage; accordingly, the use of structural leverage may hurt the Fund’s overall performance.
Leverage may also cause the Fund to incur certain costs. In the event that the Fund is unable to meet certain criteria (including, but not limited to, maintaining certain ratings with Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s), funding dividend payments or funding redemptions), the Fund will pay additional fees with respect to the leverage.
4. Geographic, Credit and Market Risk
The Fund concentrates its investments in securities issued by municipalities, and may be subject to geographic concentration risk. In addition, the Fund has the flexibility to invest in issuers in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam whose bonds are also free of individual state income taxes. The value of the Fund’s investments may be adversely affected by new legislation within the states, regional or local economic conditions, and differing levels of supply and demand for municipal bonds. Many municipalities insure repayment for their obligations. Although bond insurance reduces the risk of loss due to default by an issuer, such bonds remain subject to the risk that value may fluctuate for other reasons and there is no assurance that the insurance company will meet its obligations. A real or perceived decline in creditworthiness of a bond insurer can have an adverse impact on the value of insured bonds held in the Fund. At Dec. 31, 2013, 3.60% of the Fund’s net assets were insured by bond insurers. These securities have been identified in the schedule of investments.
The Fund invests a portion of its assets in high yield fixed income securities, which are securities rated BB lower or by Standard & Poor’s (S&P) and/or Ba or lower by Moody’s, or similarly rated by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Investments in these higher yielding securities are generally accompanied by a greater degree of credit risk than higher rated securities. Additionally, lower rated securities may be more susceptible to adverse economic and competitive industry conditions than investment grade securities.
The Fund may invest in advanced refunded bonds, escrow secured bonds or defeased bonds. Under current federal tax laws and regulations, state and local government borrowers are permitted to refinance outstanding bonds by issuing new bonds. The issuer refinances the outstanding debt to either reduce interest costs or to remove or alter restrictive covenants imposed by the bonds being refinanced. A refunding transaction where the municipal securities are being refunded within 90 days from the issuance of the refunding issue is known as a “current refunding”. “Advance refunded bonds” are bonds in which the refunded bond issue remains outstanding for more than 90 days following the issuance of the refunding issue. In an advance refunding, the issuer will use the proceeds of a new bond issue to purchase high grade interest bearing debt securities which are then deposited in an irrevocable escrow account held by an escrow agent to secure all future payments of principal and interest and bond premium of the advance refunded bond. Bonds are “escrowed to maturity” when the proceeds of the refunding issue are deposited in an escrow account for investment sufficient to pay all of the principal and interest on the original interest payment and maturity dates.
Bonds are considered “pre-refunded” when the refunding issue’s proceeds are escrowed only until a permitted call date or dates on the refunded issue with the refunded issue being redeemed at the time, including any required premium. Bonds become “defeased” when the rights and interests of the bondholders and of their lien on the pledged revenues or other security under the terms of the bond contract are substituted with an alternative source of revenues (the escrow securities) sufficient to meet payments of principal and interest to maturity or to the first call dates. Escrowed secured bonds will often receive a rating of AAA from Moody’s, S&P, and/or Fitch Ratings due to the strong credit quality of the escrow securities and the irrevocable nature of the escrow deposit agreement.
NQ- OV9 [12/13] 2/14 (12140) 9
Certain obligations held by the Fund may have liquidity protection to ensure that the receipt of payments due on the underlying security is timely. Such protection may be provided through guarantees, insurance policies or letters of credit obtained by the issuer or sponsor from third parties, through various means of structuring the transactions or through a combination of such approaches. The Fund will not pay any additional fees for such credit support, although the existence of credit support may increase the price of a security.
The Fund may invest up to 15% of its net assets in illiquid securities, which may include securities with contractual restrictions on resale, securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and other securities which may not be readily marketable. The relative illiquidity of these securities may impair the Fund from disposing of them in a timely manner and at a fair price when it is necessary or desirable to do so. While maintaining oversight, the Fund’s Board has delegated to Delaware Management Company, a series of Delaware Management Business Trust, the day-to-day functions of determining whether individual securities are liquid for purposes of the Fund’s limitation on investments in illiquid securities. Securities eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144A, which are determined to be liquid, are not subject to the Fund’s 15% limit on investments in illiquid securities. As of Dec. 31, 2013, no securities have been determined to be illiquid under the Fund’s Liquidity Procedures. Rule 144A securities have been identified on the schedule of investments.
5. Subsequent Events
Management has determined that no material events or transactions occurred subsequent to Dec. 31, 2013 that would require recognition or disclosure in the Fund’s schedule of investments.
10 NQ- OV9 [12/13] 2/14 (12140)
Item 2. Controls and Procedures.
The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of the filing of this report and have concluded that they are effective in providing reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant in its reports or statements filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
There were no significant changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 3. Exhibits.
File as exhibits as part of this Form a separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)), exactly as set forth below: