NOTICE OF 2012

ANNUAL MEETING AND

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR MARCH 20, 2012

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

ii

		The Toro Company
		8111 Lyndale Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420-1196
		Telephone 952-888-8801

February 7, 2012

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

I am pleased to invite you to join us for The Toro Company 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Tuesday, March 20, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., Central Daylight Time, at our corporate offices. A live, listen-only audio webcast of the meeting will be available at www.thetorocompany.com/proxy. Details about the annual meeting, nominees for election to the Board of Directors and other matters to be acted on at the annual meeting are presented in the notice and proxy statement that follow.

It is important that your shares be represented at the annual meeting, regardless of the number of shares you hold and whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person. Accordingly, please exercise your right to vote by following the instructions for voting on the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials you received for the meeting or, if you received a paper or electronic copy of our proxy materials, by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card or by Internet or telephone voting as described in the proxy statement.

On behalf of your Toro Board of Directors and Management, it is my pleasure to express our appreciation for your continued support.

Sincerely,

Michael J. Hoffman

Chairman and CEO

You can help us make a difference by eliminating paper proxy mailings. With your consent, we will provide all future proxy materials electronically. Instructions for consenting to electronic delivery can be found on your proxy card or at www.proxyvote.com. Your consent to receive shareholder materials electronically will remain in effect until canceled.

iii

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

The Toro Company 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held on Tuesday, March 20, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., Central Daylight Time, at our corporate offices located at 8111 Lyndale Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota, 55420-1196, for the following purposes:

We currently are not aware of any other business to be brought before the annual meeting. Shareholders of record at the close of business on January 23, 2012, the record date, will be entitled to vote at the annual meeting or at any adjournment or postponement of the annual meeting.

A shareholder list will be available at our corporate offices beginning March 9, 2012, during normal business hours for examination by any shareholder registered on our stock ledger as of the record date for any purpose germane to the annual meeting.

Since a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock must be represented either in person or by proxy to constitute a quorum for the conduct of business, please promptly vote your shares by following the instructions for voting on the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials you received for the meeting or, if you received a paper or electronic copy of our proxy materials, by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card or by Internet or telephone voting as described in the proxy statement.

February 7, 2012

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

TIMOTHY P. DORDELL

Vice President, Secretary and

General Counsel

v

THE TORO COMPANY

8111 Lyndale Avenue South

Bloomington, Minnesota 55420-1196

PROXY STATEMENT

2012 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 2012

1:30 p.m. Central Daylight Time

The Toro Company Board of Directors is using this proxy statement to solicit your proxy for use at The Toro Company 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 1:30 p.m., Central Daylight Time, on Tuesday, March 20, 2012. We intend to send a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the annual meeting and make proxy materials available to shareholders (or for certain shareholders and for those who request, a paper copy of this proxy statement and the form of proxy) on or about February 7, 2012. Please note that references in this proxy statement to “Toro,” our “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms refer to The Toro Company.

NOTE ABOUT FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this proxy statement are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and are subject to the safe harbor created by those sections. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by words such as “expect,” “strive,” “looking ahead,” “outlook,” “forecast,” “optimistic,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “plan,” “estimate,” “believe,” “should,” “could,” “will,” “would,” “possible,” “may,” “likely,” “intend,” and similar expressions or future dates. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include factors that affect all businesses operating in a global market as well as matters specific to us. The most significant factors known to us that could materially adversely affect our business, operations, industry, financial position, or future financial performance are described in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on December 21, 2011, in Part I, Item 1A,”Risk Factors.” You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement, which speaks only as of the date made. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements. You should consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our future Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K that we file with or furnish to the SEC.

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting To Be Held on Tuesday, March 20, 2012.

This proxy statement and our 2011 Annual Report, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, are available at www.thetorocompany.com/proxy.

Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials to our shareholders of record and beneficial owners (other than those beneficial owners who hold shares

1

of our common stock in The Toro Company Investment, Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan, or IS&ESOP, The Toro Company Profit Sharing Plan for Plymouth Union Employees, The Toro Company Deferred Compensation Plan for Officers, or the Deferred Plan for Officers, The Toro Company Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, or the Deferred Plan for Directors, and those record and beneficial owners who previously have requested that they receive electronic or paper copies of our proxy materials). All shareholders have the ability to access our proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials (www.proxyvote.com) or request to receive a printed set of our proxy materials. Instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the Internet or request a printed copy of our proxy materials may be found in the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials. In addition, shareholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis.

When and Where Will the Annual Meeting Be Held?

The annual meeting will be held on Tuesday, March 20, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., Central Daylight Time, at our corporate offices located at 8111 Lyndale Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota, 55420-1196.

What Are the Purposes of the Annual Meeting?

The purposes of the annual meeting are to vote on the following items:

Who Is Entitled to Vote at the Annual Meeting?

Shareholders of record at the close of business on January 23, 2012, the record date, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the annual meeting. As of January 23, 2012, there were 30,066,881 outstanding shares of our common stock. Each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted on at the annual meeting. Shares of our common stock that are held by us in our treasury are not counted as outstanding shares and will not be voted.

What Does It Mean If I Receive More Than One Notice or Set of Proxy Materials?

If you hold shares in more than one account, you may receive multiple copies of the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials and/or electronic or paper copies of our proxy materials. If you are a participant in our Dividend Reinvestment Plan, shares registered in your name are combined with shares you hold in that plan. Similarly, where possible, shares registered in your name are combined with shares you hold, if any, as a participant in certain Toro employee benefit plans. However, shares you hold in “street name” (through a broker, bank or other nominee) are not combined with shares registered in your name or held as a participant in Toro employee benefit plans. If you receive more than one Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials and/or electronic or paper copies of our proxy materials, you must vote separately for each notice, e-mail notification or proxy and/or voting instruction card having a unique control number to ensure that you vote all of your shares.

2

What Different Methods May I Use to Vote My Shares?

Your vote is important. If your shares are registered in your name, you may vote your shares in person at the meeting or by one of the three following methods:

If you hold shares as a participant in certain Toro employee benefit plans, you may vote your shares by one of the three methods noted above. If your shares are held in “street name,” you may receive a separate voting instruction form with this proxy statement or you may need to contact your broker, bank or other nominee to determine whether you will be able to vote electronically using the Internet or by telephone.

How Will My Shares Be Voted?

If you return your signed proxy card or use Internet or telephone voting before the annual meeting, the named proxies will vote your shares as you direct. If you hold shares as a participant in certain Toro employee benefit plans, the trustee for such plan will cause your shares to be voted confidentially in accordance with your instructions.

For Proposal One—Election of Directors, you may:

For Proposal Two—Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Proposal Three—Executive Compensation Advisory Vote, you may:

If your shares are registered in your name and you send in your proxy card or use Internet or telephone voting but you do not specify how you want to vote your shares, the proxies will vote your shares FOR all three nominees for election to the Board in Proposal One—Election of Directors, FOR Proposal Two—Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, and FOR Proposal Three—Executive Compensation Advisory Vote. If you hold shares as a participant in certain Toro employee benefit plans and you do not provide voting instructions for such shares, in accordance with the terms of each respective plan, the trustee for such plan will vote your shares in the same proportion as the votes actually cast by participants.

If your shares are held in “street name” and you do not indicate how you wish to vote, under the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, rules, your broker is permitted to exercise its discretion to vote your shares only on certain “routine” matters. Proposal One—Election of Directors and Proposal

3

Three—Executive Compensation Advisory Vote are not “routine” matters. Accordingly, if you do not direct your broker how to vote on those proposals, your broker may not exercise discretionary voting authority and may not vote your shares on such proposals. This is called a “broker non-vote” and although your shares will be considered to be represented by proxy at the annual meeting, as discussed below, they are not considered to be shares “entitled to vote” at the annual meeting and will not be counted as having been voted on the applicable proposal. Proposal Two—Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm is a “routine” matter and, as such, your broker is permitted to exercise discretionary voting authority to vote your shares “For” or “Against” the proposal in the absence of your instruction.

How Does the Board Recommend that I Vote?

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote:

How Can I Revoke or Change My Vote?

If your shares are registered in your name, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by one of the following methods:

If you hold shares as a participant in certain Toro employee benefit plans, you may revoke or change your proxy by submitting another proper proxy with a more recent date than that of the proxy first given by following the Internet or telephone voting instructions or completing, signing, dating and returning a proxy card. If your shares are held in “street name,” you may revoke your proxy by following instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee.

How Many Shares Must Be Present to Hold the Annual Meeting?

The presence at the annual meeting, in person or represented by proxy, of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of the record date will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the annual meeting. Your shares will be counted toward the quorum if you submit a proxy or vote at the annual meeting. Shares represented by proxies marked “Abstain” and “broker non-votes” also are counted in determining whether a quorum is present for the transaction of business at the annual meeting.

What Vote Is Required for Each Proposal?

Proposal One—Election of Directors will be decided by the affirmative vote of a plurality of shares of our common stock as of the record date present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting. A “plurality” for Proposal One means the individuals who receive the greatest number of votes cast “For” are elected as directors. However, under our Amended and Restated Bylaws, if a majority of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the annual meeting are

4

designated to be “Withheld” from or are voted “Against” a nominee for director in an uncontested election, that director must tender his or her resignation for consideration by the Nominating & Governance Committee. The Nominating & Governance Committee then must evaluate the best interests of our Company and its shareholders and recommend the action to be taken by the Board with respect to such tendered resignation.

Proposal Two—Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm will be decided by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares, present in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote at the annual meeting.

Proposal Three—Executive Compensation Advisory Vote will be decided by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares, present in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote at the annual meeting. This is a non-binding advisory vote; however, our Compensation & Human Resources Committee and Board expect to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.

Proxies marked “Withheld” on Proposal One—Election of Directors or “Abstain” on Proposal Two—Ratification of Section of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm or Proposal Three—Executive Compensation Advisory Vote proposal will be counted in determining the total number of shares “entitled to vote” on such proposal and will have the effect of a vote “Against” a director or a proposal. However, “broker non-votes” are not considered to be shares “entitled to vote” at the annual meeting and, as such, will not be counted as having been voted on the applicable proposal.

Who Will Count the Votes?

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. has been engaged to tabulate shareholder votes and act as our independent inspector of elections for the annual meeting.

Are There Any Matters To Be Voted On at the Annual Meeting that Are Not Included in this Proxy Statement?

We currently are not aware of any business to be acted upon at the annual meeting other than that described in this proxy statement. If, however, other matters properly are brought before the annual meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the annual meeting, your proxy includes discretionary authority on the part of the individuals appointed to vote your shares or act on those matters according to their best judgment.

How Will Business Be Conducted at the Annual Meeting?

The presiding officer at the annual meeting will determine how business at the meeting will be conducted. Only nominations and other proposals brought before the annual meeting in accordance with the advance notice and information requirements of our Amended and Restated Bylaws will be considered, and no such nominations or other proposals were received. In order for a shareholder proposal to have been included in our proxy statement for the annual meeting, our Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel must have received such proposal not later than October 4, 2011. Under our Amended and Restated Bylaws, complete and timely written notice of a proposed nominee for election to our Board at the annual meeting or a proposal for any other business to be brought before the annual meeting must have been received by our Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel not later than December 16, 2011, nor earlier than November 16, 2011, and must have contained the specific information required by our Amended and Restated Bylaws.

5

STOCK OWNERSHIP

Significant Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth information known to us as of January 23, 2012, as to entities that have reported to the SEC or have otherwise advised us that they are a beneficial owner, as defined by the SEC’s rules and regulations, of more than five percent of our outstanding common stock.

6

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth information known to us regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of January 23, 2012, by (i) each of our directors and nominees for director, (ii) our “principal executive officer,” “current principal financial officer,” “former principal financial officer,” and the next three most highly compensated executive officers named in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 54 (we collectively refer to these persons as our “named executive officers”), and (iii) all current directors and executive officers as a group.

7

8

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

The rules of the SEC require us to disclose the identity of directors, executive officers and greater than 10% owners of our common stock who did not file on a timely basis reports required by Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Based on review of reports filed by these reporting persons on the SEC’s electronic filing, or EDGAR, system and written representations by our directors and executive officers, we believe that all of our directors, executive officers and greater than 10% owners complied with all filing requirements applicable to them during our fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, or fiscal 2011.

9

PROPOSAL ONE—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Number of Directors; Board Structure

Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that our Board of Directors may be comprised of between eight and twelve directors. Our Board currently is comprised of 10 directors. As provided in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, our Board is divided into three staggered classes of directors of the same or nearly the same number, with each class elected in a different year for a term of three years. Our current directors and their respective current terms are as follows:

Nominees for Director

The Board has nominated each of Janet K. Cooper, Gary L. Ellis and Gregg W. Steinhafel for election to the Board to serve for a three-year term ending at the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Each of these nominees is a current member of the Board and has consented to serve if elected. Proxies only can be voted for the number of persons named as nominees in this proxy statement, which is three.

Board Recommendation

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the election to the Board of the three nominees for director.

If prior to the annual meeting the Board should learn that any nominee will be unable to serve for any reason, the proxies that otherwise would have been voted for that nominee will be voted for a substitute nominee as selected by the Board. Alternatively, at the Board’s discretion, the proxies may be voted for that fewer number of nominees as results from the inability of any nominee to serve. The Board has no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unable to serve.

Information About Board Nominees and Continuing Directors

The following paragraphs provide information about each nominee for election to the Board at the annual meeting and each other member of the Board, including all positions he or she currently holds, his or her principal occupation and business experience for the past five years, and the names of other publicly held companies of which he or she currently serves as a director or has served as a director during the past five years. We believe that all of our director nominees and other directors display personal and professional integrity; satisfactory levels of education and/or business experience; business acumen; an appropriate level of understanding of our business, its industry and other industries relevant to our business; the ability and willingness to devote adequate time to the work of our Board and its committees; a fit of skills and personality with those of our other directors that helps build a Board that is effective, collegial and responsive to the needs of our Company; strategic thinking and a willingness to share ideas; a diversity of experiences, expertise and background; and the ability to represent the interests of all of our shareholders. The information presented below regarding each director nominee or director also sets forth specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board to conclude that he or she should serve as a director in light of our business and structure.

10

Nominees for Election to the Board—Current Term Ending at the 2012 Annual Meeting

Janet K. Cooper, age 58, was the Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Qwest Communications International Inc., Denver, Colorado (a U. S. telecommunications company that merged with and now does business as CenturyLink), from September 2002 to June 2008. From 2001 to 2002, she served as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of McDATA Corporation. From 2000 to 2001, she served as Senior Vice President, Finance of Qwest. From 1998 to 2000, she served in various senior level finance positions at US West Inc., including as Vice President, Finance and Controller and Vice President and Treasurer. From 1978 to 1998, Ms. Cooper served in various capacities with the Quaker Oats Company, including as Vice President, Treasurer and Tax from 1997 to 1998 and Vice President, Treasurer from 1992 to 1997. First elected to the Toro Board in 1994, she is the Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Finance Committee. Ms. Cooper has served as a director of Lennox International Inc. since 1999, and also currently serves as a director of MWH Global.

Through her experience in various senior level financial positions with Qwest, McDATA Corporation, US West and Quaker, Ms. Cooper has developed a substantial financial and accounting background and expertise, which she contributes to our Board and more specifically to our Audit Committee, in her role as Chair, and to our Finance Committee. Ms. Cooper’s financial expertise and acumen in capital markets, audit, tax, accounting, treasury and risk-management matters assists our Board in providing oversight to Management on these matters. Ms. Cooper’s senior leadership experience also enables her to provide strategic input to our Board, in addition to her financial expertise, discipline and oversight.

Gary L. Ellis, age 55, is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota (a global medical technology company). Mr. Ellis has held these positions since May 2005. Previously, he was the Vice President, Corporate Controller and Treasurer of Medtronic from 1999 to May 2005. First elected to the Toro Board in 2006, he is the Chair of the Finance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Ellis previously served as the Chairman of the Board of the American Heart Association from 2007 to 2008 and currently serves on the boards of the Science Museum of Minnesota and the Greater Twin Cities United Way.

As Chief Financial Officer of Medtronic, a Fortune 500 public company with global operations, Mr. Ellis possesses and brings relevant financial leadership experience and expertise to our Board and more specifically to our Finance Committee, in his role as Chair, and our to Audit Committee. Such experience assists our Board in providing oversight to Management regarding capital structure, financial condition and policies, long-range financial objectives, tax strategies, financing requirements and arrangements, capital budgets and expenditures, risk-management, insurance coverage, and strategic planning matters. Additionally, Mr. Ellis contributes his international experience managing worldwide financial operations and analyzing financial implications of merger and acquisition transactions, as well as aligning business strategies and financial decisions. As a result, Mr. Ellis provides our Board valuable perspectives as our Company continues its efforts to improve revenue growth and profitability, including specifically growth in international markets, and maintain a strong balance sheet.

Gregg W. Steinhafel, age 57, is the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Target Corporation, Minneapolis, Minnesota (a variety retailing company). Mr. Steinhafel was appointed as Chairman of Target in February 2009, was elected as Chief Executive Officer in May 2008, and was elected as President in 1999. First elected to the Toro Board in 1999, he is a member of the Compensation & Human Resources Committee and the Nominating & Governance Committee. Mr. Steinhafel has served as a director of Target since 2007 and also currently serves on the board of the Retail Industry Leaders Association.

11

Mr. Steinhafel brings to our Board meaningful leadership experience and retail knowledge that he has developed in his more than 30 years with Target, a Fortune 500 public company. As Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Target, Mr. Steinhafel is responsible for Target’s strong brand recognition, devotion to innovation, strong supply chain initiatives, and disciplined approach to managing its business and investing in future growth, all of which are important to our Company’s business strategies. In addition, he contributes executive decision-making skills and valuable strategic planning expertise, as well as significant and relevant knowledge of public company requirements and issues. Mr. Steinhafel’s significant retail knowledge assists our Board in providing guidance with respect to our residential business, which is affected by consumer confidence and spending levels, changing buying patterns of customers and the amount of product placement at mass retailers, such as The Home Depot.

Continuing Members of the Board—Current Term Ending at the 2013 Annual Meeting

Robert C. Buhrmaster, age 64, was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Jostens, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota (a designer and producer of athletic championship and scholastic products), until his retirement in 2004. Mr. Buhrmaster was appointed Chairman of Jostens in 1998 and was elected as Chief Executive Officer in 1994. He also served as President of Jostens from 1994 to January 2003. First elected to the Toro Board in 1996, he serves as our presiding non-management director, or lead director, is the Chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee and is a member of the Finance Committee. Mr. Buhrmaster has served as a director of SurModics, Inc. since January 2008 and as its Chairman since January 2009. Since August 2009, he has also served as a director of Caraustar Industries, Inc. From December 2004 through February 2008, Mr. Buhrmaster served as a director of Innovex, Inc.

Mr. Buhrmaster has developed and brings to our Board strong business leadership, corporate strategy and operational expertise that he acquired throughout his long career at Jostens, including as its Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President. Additionally, as an experienced public company director, Mr. Buhrmaster contributes an enhanced knowledge of public company requirements and issues, including corporate governance matters, which are specifically relevant to his role as our lead director and to his service on our Nominating & Governance Committee, in his role as Chair. As a result, Mr. Buhrmaster is able to draw on his management and boardroom experiences to foster active discussion and collaboration among the independent directors of the Board and with our Management.

Robert H. Nassau, age 70, was the Regional Director of Corporate Accounts of F2 Intelligence Group, Minneapolis, Minnesota (a provider of consulting and due diligence services for mergers and acquisitions), from November 2003 until his retirement in November 2006. Previously, he was the owner and Chief Executive Officer of Nasly Inc., from February 2000 to November 2003. He also previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of St. Raymond Wood Products Holding Limited from January 1997 to August 1999. First elected to the Toro Board in 1988, he is a member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee and the Nominating & Governance Committee.

Mr. Nassau has developed and brings to our Board many years of business, management and operations expertise, including specific experience with lawn and garden tractors and riding mowers acquired early in his career through previous executive and management positions with J.I. Case Company and Ford Motor Company. Additionally, as our longest serving director having 23 years of Board service with us, Mr. Nassau has developed deep and meaningful knowledge of our Company, our business and our industry over the long term. As a result, Mr. Nassau provides valuable historical perspective, as well as insight regarding future strategic opportunities and challenges.

Christopher A. Twomey, age 63, is the Chairman of Arctic Cat Inc., Thief River Falls, Minnesota (a manufacturer of all-terrain vehicles and snowmobiles), a position he has held since August 2003. Previously, Mr. Twomey was the Chief Executive Officer of Arctic Cat from 1986 until his retirement in

12

December 2010. First elected to the Toro Board in 1998, he is the Chair of the Compensation & Human Resources Committee and a member of the Nominating & Governance Committee. Mr. Twomey has been a director of Arctic Cat since 1987.

Mr. Twomey brings to our Board meaningful strategic, management and operational experience and knowledge developed in his more than 25 years with Arctic Cat. As a result of Mr. Twomey’s long career in a business and industry dependent on distributor relationships and financing sources, and affected by weather conditions and seasonality considerations, he provides valuable knowledge and insight with respect to similar issues faced by our Company in our industry. Also, as Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer of a public company, Mr. Twomey contributes a solid understanding of public company requirements and issues, including executive compensation and corporate governance issues, which are relevant to his service on our Compensation & Human Resources Committee, in his role as Chair, and as a member of our Nominating & Governance Committee.

Continuing Members of the Board—Current Term Ending at the 2014 Annual Meeting

Jeffrey M. Ettinger, age 53, is the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Hormel Foods Corporation, Austin, Minnesota (a multinational manufacturer and marketer of consumer-branded food and meat products). Mr. Ettinger has held these positions since November 2006. Previously, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Hormel Foods from January 2006 to November 2006, and was President and Chief Operating Officer from 2004 to 2006. First elected to the Toro Board in July 2010, he is a member of the Audit Committee and the Compensation & Human Resources Committee. Mr. Ettinger has served as a director of Hormel Foods since 2004, and currently serves on the boards of the Grocery Manufacturers of America, the American Meat Institute, the Minnesota Business Partnership, the Austin Medical Center Foundation and The Hormel Foundation.

Mr. Ettinger has developed throughout his career, and brings to our Board, strong business acumen, significant executive leadership attributes and relevant experience of driving growth through innovation and strategic acquisitions. As Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Hormel Foods, a Fortune 500 public company with global operations, Mr. Ettinger provides our Board and Management relevant insight and guidance with respect to numerous issues important to our Company, including in particular our strategy of driving growth in our business through the development of innovative, customer-valued products and expansion of our global presence through targeted acquisitions. Additionally, he contributes knowledge of public company requirements and issues, which are helpful to his service a member of our Audit Committee and Compensation & Human Resources Committee.

Katherine J. Harless, age 60, was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Idearc Inc., Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas (a provider of sales, publishing and related services including Verizon Yellow Pages and SuperPages.com), from November 2006 until her retirement in February 2008. On March 31, 2009, Idearc Inc. and all of its domestic subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, seeking reorganization relief under the provisions of Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. On December 31, 2009, Idearc emerged from the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings and under its plan of reorganization has, among other things, changed its name to SuperMedia Inc. and now trades on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “SPMD.” Ms. Harless also previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Verizon Information Services Inc. from 2000 to November 2006, when it was spun off by Verizon Communications, Inc. to become Idearc, and was a director of Idearc from November 2006 to May 2008. First elected to the Toro Board in 2000, she is a member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee and the Nominating & Governance Committee. Ms. Harless also currently serves on the advisory board of the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas, Austin, and is a director for the North Texas Chapter of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

13

Ms. Harless brings to our Board executive leadership and management skills that earned her positions as former President and Chief Executive Officer of Idearc and as former President of several strategic business units at Verizon Communications, Inc. and GTE Corporation. Ms. Harless was the first woman to become President of an operating company of GTE Corporation. Ms. Harless provides our Board with a seasoned business perspective and provides valuable business, leadership and management insights with respect to our strategic direction. Through her position as former President and Chief Executive Officer of Idearc, a public company, Ms. Harless gained experience and knowledge of financial, executive compensation, corporate governance and other requirements and issues applicable to public companies, which are helpful to her service as a member of our Audit Committee, Compensation & Human Resources Committee and Nominating & Governance Committee.

Inge G. Thulin, age 58, is the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of 3M Company, Saint Paul, Minnesota (a global diversified technology and manufacturing company). Mr. Thulin has held these positions since May 2011. Previously he was Executive Vice President, International Operations of 3M from 2003 to 2011, Area Vice President, Asia Pacific from 2003 to 2004 and Area Vice President, Europe, Central/East Europe & Middle East from 2002 to 2003. First elected to the Toro Board in September 2007, he is a member of the Audit Committee and the Finance Committee. Mr. Thulin also currently serves on the boards of the United States Counsel for International Business and the Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota.

Through his tenure with 3M, a Fortune 500 public company with global diversified manufacturing operations and, in 2010, international operations representing approximately 66 percent, or $17.5 billion, of 3M’s $26.7 billion in sales, Mr. Thulin has developed and brings to our Board significant leadership skills, strong international expertise and a proven ability to develop successful growth strategies in global organizations. He also contributes international structuring, operational and acquisition experience gained through his various previous positions with 3M, including as the leader of several businesses and subsidiaries in Sweden, France, Belgium and Russia. Mr. Thulin is a native of Sweden. As a result of his background and experience, Mr. Thulin provides valuable insight as our Company continues to focus on increasing global presence to grow our revenues by investing in new products designed specifically for international markets and in infrastructure around the world that will connect us more closely to international customers.

Michael J. Hoffman, age 56, is our Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, and we generally refer to him in this proxy statement as our Chairman and CEO. Mr. Hoffman was appointed as Chairman in March 2006, was elected as Chief Executive Officer in March 2005, and was elected as President in October 2004. He was our Chief Operating Officer from October 2004 to March 2005. Mr. Hoffman was first elected to the Toro Board in March 2005, and since November 2005 has also served as a director of Donaldson Company, Inc.

In his 34 years with our Company, Mr. Hoffman has developed and brings to our Board leadership experience and extensive knowledge of all aspects of our Company, business, industry, markets and day-to-day operations. Mr. Hoffman contributes an unwavering commitment to quality and innovation in our products, customer service, manufacturing, and marketing, and is a strong steward of our culture and ethical “tone at the top.” Mr. Hoffman’s role as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of our Company creates a critical link between our Board and our Management. As a result of his dual role, Mr. Hoffman provides unique insight into our Company’s future strategies, opportunities and challenges, and serves as the unifying element between the leadership and strategic direction provided by our Board and the implementation of our business strategies by Management. Additionally, Mr. Hoffman’s service on the board of directors of Donaldson enables him to bring an enhanced understanding of, and experience with, public company requirements and issues.

14

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which describe our corporate governance practices and policies and provide a framework for our Board governance. The topics addressed in our Corporate Governance Guidelines include: director qualifications, responsibilities, compensation and independence; Board committees; director access to officers and employees; related party transactions; Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, evaluation and succession; and annual performance evaluation. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide, among other things, that:

15

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines can be found on our website at www.thetorocompany.com (select the “Investor Information” link and then the “Corporate Governance” link). From time to time the Board, upon recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee, reviews and updates our Corporate Governance Guidelines as it deems necessary and appropriate.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that (i) our Board has no policy with respect to the separation of the offices of the Chairman and the CEO; (ii) our Board believes that this issue is part of the succession planning process and will be reviewed as the Nominating & Governance Committee deems it appropriate; and (iii) at any time that (a) the offices of Chairman and CEO are held by the same person, or (b) the Chairman does not meet the criteria for “independence” as established by applicable law, the rules and regulations of the SEC or the NYSE listing standards, then the Board, upon recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee, shall appoint a lead director who shall have such duties as are described in the Corporate Governance Guidelines or otherwise determined by the Board. The Board believes it is appropriate not to have a policy requiring the separation of the offices of the Chairman and the CEO so that it may make this determination based on what it believes is best under the current circumstances. However, the Board endorses the concept of an independent director being in a position of leadership and, thus, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require a lead director when the Chairman is not independent.

Our Board is currently chaired by Michael J. Hoffman, our Chairman and CEO. Our lead director is Robert C. Buhrmaster. Our Nominating & Governance Committee and full Board believe that our current leadership structure is appropriate for several reasons, including: (i) Mr. Hoffman’s extensive knowledge of our Company, our business and our industry, obtained through his 34 years of service to our Company, which benefit Board leadership and the Board’s decision-making process through his active role as Chairman; (ii) it unifies Board leadership and strategic direction as implemented by our Management; and (iii) we are able to appropriately balance risks relating to concentration of authority through the oversight of our independent and engaged lead director and Board. Mr. Hoffman’s biography is set forth on page 14.

As our lead director, Mr. Buhrmaster (i) presides at regularly scheduled executive sessions of the non-employee directors; (ii) provides direction on Board meeting agendas and other materials; (iii) manages the Board’s annual self-assessment process; and (iv) together with the Chair of the Compensation & Human Resources Committee, communicates to Mr. Hoffman the results of his annual performance review and compensation. With more than 15 years of continuous service on our Board, Mr. Buhrmaster has considerable knowledge of our Company, our business and our industry. Mr. Buhrmaster also has significant public company board experience. In addition to serving as our lead director, Mr. Buhrmaster serves as the Chair of our Nominating & Governance Committee. Mr. Buhrmaster’s biography is set forth on page 12.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Management is primarily responsible for the identification, assessment and management of the key risks faced by our Company. Our risk assessment processes are coordinated primarily through our business risk and process improvement function, which is our internal audit function, and involve (i) the identification by senior leaders of our business functions and divisions of the particular risks relevant to their respective areas; (ii) assessment of the materiality of those risks, based on expected probability of occurrence and severity of impact; and (iii) to the extent prudent and feasible, development of strategies and plans to mitigate, monitor and control such risks.

The Board’s oversight of these risks primarily occurs in connection with the exercise of its responsibility to oversee our business, including through the review of our long-term strategic plans,

16

annual operating plans, financial results, merger and acquisition related activities, material legal proceedings, and management succession plans. In addition, the Board uses its committees to assist with risk oversight within their respective areas of responsibility and expertise as follows:

The Chair of each Board committee provides a summary of the matters discussed in their committee meeting to the full Board. Additional information regarding the responsibilities of each of these committees can be found under “Board Committees” beginning on page 18.

The Board believes that its oversight of risk is enhanced by its current leadership structure, as previously discussed, because our Chairman and CEO, who is ultimately responsible for our Management’s risk responsibility, also chairs regular Board meetings and, with his in-depth knowledge and understanding of our Company, is well positioned to bring key business issues and risks to the attention of the full Board.

Director Independence

The Board, following consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances and upon recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee, has affirmatively determined that each director who served as a member of our Board during fiscal 2011 (Robert C. Buhrmaster, Gary L. Ellis, Jeffrey M. Ettinger, Janet K. Cooper, Katherine J. Harless, Robert H. Nassau, Gregg W. Steinhafel, Inge G. Thulin and Christopher A. Twomey), other than Michael J. Hoffman, our Chairman and CEO, is independent in that each such person has no material relationship with our Company, our Management or our external auditor, and otherwise meets the independence requirements as established by applicable law, the rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE listing standards. The Board determined that Michael J. Hoffman is not independent due to his status as an executive

17

officer of our Company. The Board based its independence determinations, in part, upon a review by the Nominating & Governance Committee and the Board of certain transactions between us and the employers of certain of our directors, each of which was deemed to be pre-approved under our Corporate Governance Guidelines in that each such transaction was made in the ordinary course of business, at arm’s length, at prices and on terms customarily available to unrelated third party vendors or customers generally, in amounts that are not material to us or such unaffiliated corporation, and in which the director had no direct or indirect personal interest, nor received any personal benefit.

Director Attendance; Executive Sessions

The Board held six meetings during fiscal 2011 and took action by unanimous written consent once in fiscal 2011. At each regular Board meeting, our non-employee directors met in executive session without Management present and presided by our lead director. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the aggregate total number of meetings held by the Board and all committees on which he or she served.

We encourage all of our directors to attend our annual meeting of shareholders and we customarily schedule a regular Board meeting on the same day as our annual meeting. Nine of our ten directors attended the annual meeting held in March 2011.

Board Committees

The Board has four committees with their respective principal functions and membership described below. Each committee has a charter that is posted on our website at www.thetorocompany.com (select the “Investor Information” link and then the “Corporate Governance” link). On an annual basis, including in fiscal 2011, each committee reviews the adequacy of its charter and its performance.

The following table indicates the current membership of our four Board committees. Each of the members of the Audit Committee, Compensation & Human Resources Committee and Nominating & Governance Committee meets the independence and other requirements established by applicable law, the rules and regulations of the SEC, the NYSE listing standards and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or Code. Mr. Hoffman is not a member of any Board committee but does attend committee meetings, or portions of such meetings as appropriate, as a member of Management at the invitation of such Board committees.

Audit Committee.    The Audit Committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes and audits of our consolidated financial statements. The Committee assists the Board in oversight of the quality and integrity of our financial reports, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence of our external auditor, and the performance of our

18

business risk and process improvement function, which is our internal audit function. More specifically, the Committee’s duties and responsibilities include, among others:

The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee, in addition to being independent under the rules and regulations of the SEC and the NYSE listing standards, are financially

19

literate and that Audit Committee Chair Janet K. Cooper meets the definition of “audit committee financial expert” as a result of her experience in senior corporate executive positions with financial oversight responsibilities, including her previous experience as the Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Qwest Communications International Inc. and as the Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration of McDATA Corporation, as well as other finance positions with Qwest and The Quaker Oats Company. Shareholders should understand that this designation is an SEC disclosure requirement related to Ms. Cooper’s experience and understanding with respect to certain accounting and auditing matters. The designation does not impose upon her any duties, obligations or liability greater than are generally imposed on her as a member of the Audit Committee and the Board, and her designation as a financial expert pursuant to this SEC requirement does not affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the Audit Committee or the Board. Other members of the Audit Committee who currently are serving or have served as chief executive officers or chief financial officers of other public companies also may be considered financial experts, but the Board has not so designated them.

The Committee held 11 meetings during fiscal 2011 and took action by unanimous written consent once in fiscal 2011. At five of these meetings the Committee met in private session independently without Management present. At three of these meetings the Committee met in separate private sessions with our external auditor, Senior Management, and the director of business risk and process improvement. Additional information regarding the Committee and our external auditor is set forth in “Proposal Two—Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” on page 31.

Compensation & Human Resources Committee.    The Compensation & Human Resources Committee is responsible for discharging the Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of our CEO and other executive officers and reviewing and monitoring our human resource and organizational matters. The Committee has overall responsibility for approving and evaluating all of our compensation plans, policies and programs, as well as our philosophy and strategy, as they affect the CEO, other executive officers and senior management employees. More specifically, the Committee’s duties and responsibilities include, among others:

20

The Committee held three meetings during fiscal 2011 and took action by unanimous written consent twice in fiscal 2011. At each meeting, the Committee met in private session without Management present.

Determining Executive Compensation.    At the beginning of each fiscal year, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee reviews and approves compensation for our Chairman and CEO and each other executive officer, including each of the other named executive officers, which includes:

In connection with this review and approval, the Committee receives information regarding (i) market base salary, total cash compensation and total direct compensation data and analysis prepared by its independent executive compensation consultant, Towers Watson; (ii) total cash compensation to be paid for the current fiscal year if annual cash incentive awards are achieved and paid at target; (iii) prior fiscal year target equity values; and (iv) total direct compensation for the current fiscal year for equity awards at target. Additionally, the Committee obtains compensation recommendations from our Chairman and CEO, Vice President, Human Resources and Business Development, and Director, Total Rewards and HR Services that reflect individual performance; corporate and/or division performance, as applicable; tenure in the position; and outside market factors, including general economic conditions. Neither the Chairman and CEO nor the Vice President, Human Resources and Business Development provides input or recommendations with respect to his own compensation. The Chair of the Committee is also responsible for coordinating a performance evaluation for the Chairman and CEO based on feedback from all non-employee directors in connection with the ratification of the Chairman and CEO’s compensation by the Board. Information on the compensation of our named executive officers is found under “Executive Compensation” beginning on page 35. Also, at the beginning of each fiscal year, the Committee confirms the achievement of performance goals previously established by the Committee at the beginning of the prior fiscal year for

21

annual cash incentive awards and previously established by the Committee at the beginning of the performance period for performance share awards and approves resulting payouts, if any.

The Compensation & Human Resources Committee has retained Towers Watson to assist in the design and review of our executive compensation program. Additional information regarding the role of Towers Watson is found under “Role of the Compensation Consultant” on page 39. Additionally, from time to time, the Committee has engaged Towers Watson to perform other executive compensation consulting services, which in fiscal 2011 included a non-employee director compensation analysis. Towers Watson does not provide any services to our Company other than those for which it has been retained by the Committee. Representatives from Towers Watson periodically attend meetings of the Committee as resources for the Committee in carrying out its responsibilities. The Committee, through its Chair, can request an independent meeting with representatives from Towers Watson at any time. The Committee also has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from external legal, accounting or other advisors.

Nominating & Governance Committee.    The Nominating & Governance Committee’s duties and responsibilities include, among others:

With respect to recommending director nominees for re-election at the annual meeting, the Nominating & Governance Committee, with the participation of the Chairman and CEO, annually polls the members of the Board about each director whose term is expiring. If the Committee determines that a director does not continue to have the affirmative support of a majority of the members of the Board, the Committee does not recommend the director to stand for re-election.

The Committee held two meetings during fiscal 2011. At each of these meetings, the Committee met in private session without Management present.

Identifying New Director Nominees.    In identifying new nominees for election to the Board when vacancies occur, the Nominating & Governance Committee first may solicit recommendations for nominees from persons whom the Committee believes are likely to be familiar with candidates having the skills and characteristics required for Board nominees. Such persons may include members of the Board and our Senior Management. In addition, the Committee may engage a search firm to assist it in identifying and evaluating qualified nominees. The Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate any search firm to be used to identify director candidates and has sole authority to approve the search firm’s fees and other retention terms.

When reviewing the requisite skill and characteristics of potential new director nominees, the Nominating & Governance Committee, pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, will consider a variety of criteria, including an individual’s independence, diversity, age, skills and experience, each

22

in the context of the needs of the Board as a whole. Although the Committee does not have a formal policy regarding consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees, the Committee will evaluate a nominee based on his or her diversity of background, skills, experiences, viewpoints, and geographical representation, as well as more traditional diversity factors. As a result, the composition of the current Board reflects diversity in age, gender, skills, and business and professional experiences.

The Nominating & Governance Committee may solicit the views of Senior Management, Board members and any other individuals it believes may have insight into a candidate. The Committee may designate one or more of its members and/or other Board members to interview any proposed candidate. The Committee then will recommend a director nominee to the Board based on its evaluation of such criteria.

The Nominating & Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended to it by our shareholders. Those candidates must be qualified and exhibit the experience and expertise required of the Board’s own pool of candidates, as well as have an interest in our business, and the demonstrated ability to attend and prepare for Board, committee and shareholder meetings. Any candidate must state in advance his or her willingness and interest in serving on the Board. Candidates should represent the interests of all shareholders and not those of a special interest group. The Committee will evaluate candidates recommended by shareholders using the same criteria it uses to evaluate candidates recommended by others as described above. A shareholder that desires to nominate a person for election to the Board at a meeting of shareholders must follow the specified advanced notice requirements contained in, and provide the specific information required by, our Amended and Restated Bylaws, as described under “Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations for the 2013 Annual Meeting” on page 73.

Finance Committee.    The Finance Committee’s duties and responsibilities include, among others:

23

The Committee held three meetings during fiscal 2011. At each of these meetings, the Committee met in private session without Management present.

Director Compensation

Overview.    Our non-employee director compensation program generally is designed to attract and retain experienced and knowledgeable directors and to provide equity-based compensation to align the interests of our directors with those of our shareholders. In fiscal 2011, our non-employee director compensation was comprised of equity compensation, in the form of automatic annual stock and stock option awards, and cash compensation, in the form of annual retainers and meeting fees. Each of these components is described in more detail below. This compensation program structure, together with the feature of The Toro Company 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan, or 2010 Plan, that enables our directors to elect to receive a portion or all of their cash compensation in the form of our common stock, causes a substantial portion of our non-employee director compensation to be linked to our common stock performance. Mr. Hoffman, our only employee director, does not receive any additional compensation for his director service.

Processes and Procedures for Consideration and Determination of Director Compensation.    The Board has delegated to the Compensation & Human Resources Committee the responsibility, among other things, to annually review and recommend to the Board any proposed changes in non-employee director compensation. The Committee previously deferred such review in each of fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 given the then worldwide recessionary economic conditions, the resulting impact on our Company’s business and the uncertainty regarding the level and rate of recovery that our Company’s business would experience. In fiscal 2011, after our Company had experienced improved performance in fiscal 2010 and to-date in fiscal 2011, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee engaged its compensation consultant, Towers Watson, to provide an analysis regarding non-employee director compensation. As a result of that analysis, giving consideration to various factors, in September 2011 the Committee recommended and the Board approved changes to the non-employee director compensation program consisting of: (i) increases to annual stock and stock option award values, annual Board and committee chair retainers and per meeting fees; (ii) in connection with increases in committee chair retainers, elimination of additional per meeting fees for each committee chair; and (iii) in conjunction with increased equity awards, retainers and per meeting fees, an increase in the stock ownership guideline to a multiple of five times the non-employee director annual Board retainer from the previous multiple of three.

24

Elements of Our Non-Employee Director Compensation Program.    The following table sets forth our fiscal 2011 non-employee director compensation program from November 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011, and as changed effective as of October 1, 2011.

Stock Awards.    Stock awards are designed to link non-employee director compensation with shareholder interests. On the first business day of our fiscal year (usually November 1), each non-employee director is automatically awarded shares of our common stock under the 2010 Plan. In fiscal 2011 (November 1, 2010), the value of this non-employee director stock award was $20,000 and in fiscal 2012 (November 1, 2011) was and thereafter until otherwise changed by the Committee will be $44,000. The stock award is determined by dividing the stock award value by the average of the closing prices of our common stock, as reported on the NYSE, during the three months prior to the award. Accordingly, on November 1, 2010, the first day of fiscal 2011, 369 shares were awarded to each non-employee director based on a stock award value of $20,000 and a three-month average closing price of our common stock, as reported on the NYSE, of $54.15. The shares awarded are fully vested at the time of grant.

Stock Option Grants.    Stock option awards also are designed to align non-employee director compensation with the interests of our shareholders. On the first business day of our fiscal year, each non-employee director is automatically awarded a stock option to purchase shares of our common stock. In fiscal 2011, the value of this non-employee director stock option award was $40,000 and in fiscal 2012 was and thereafter until otherwise changed by the Board will be $44,000. The stock option award is determined by dividing the stock option award value by the grant date fair value of a stock option to purchase one share of our common stock. For fiscal 2011, the fair value used for purposes of calculating the number of options awarded was based on a Black-Scholes model valuation of $17.31 per share. Accordingly, on November 1, 2010, each non-employee director received a stock option to purchase 2,311 shares of our common stock based on a stock option award value of $40,000. The exercise price per share of these stock options is equal to 100% of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of grant, as determined by the closing price of our common stock, as reported on the NYSE, which was $56.48 on November 1, 2010. Except as described below, these

25

stock options vest in three equal installments on each of the first, second and third year anniversaries of the date of grant and remain exercisable for a term of ten years after the date of grant.

If a director becomes disabled or dies and the director’s outstanding unvested stock options awarded prior to March 16, 2010 under The Toro Company 2000 Directors Stock Plan, or the 2000 Directors Stock Plan, or under the 2010 Plan, as applicable, have not expired previously, all outstanding unvested stock options will vest in full on the date the director’s service ceases by reason of such disability or death. In addition, the director’s guardian or legal representative may exercise the stock options up to the earlier of the date the stock options expire or one year after the date the director’s service ceased by reason of such disability or death.

If a director has served as a member of the Board for ten full fiscal years or longer and terminates his or her service on the Board, his or her outstanding unvested stock options will continue to vest in accordance with their terms and the director may exercise the vested portions of the stock options for up to four years after the director’s date of termination, but not later than the date the stock options expire. If a director has served as a member of the Board for less than ten full fiscal years and terminates his or her service on the Board, his or her outstanding unvested stock options will expire and be canceled and the director may exercise any vested portions of the stock options for up to three months after the director’s date of termination, but not later than the date the stock options expire. The following directors have served as a member of the Board for ten full fiscal years or longer: Robert C. Buhrmaster, Janet K. Cooper, Katherine J. Harless, Robert H. Nassau, Gregg W. Steinhafel and Christopher A. Twomey.

Stock options granted under the 2000 Directors Stock Plan will vest if there is a change in control of our Company and will remain exercisable for three years following the change in control, but not later than the date the stock options expire, and stock options granted under the 2010 Plan will vest if there is a change in control of our Company and will remain exercisable for the entirety of the term. Generally, and subject to some exceptions, a change in control is deemed to have occurred under the 2000 Directors Stock Plan and the 2010 Plan, as applicable, if: (i) another person becomes the beneficial owner of a specified percentage of our then-outstanding common stock or the combined voting power of our then-outstanding voting stock, which is 15% under the 2000 Directors Stock Plan and 20% under the 2010 Plan; (ii) a majority of the Board becomes comprised of persons other than those for whom election proxies have been solicited by the Board; (iii) the completion of certain business combinations, including certain reorganizations, mergers, consolidations, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets or the acquisition by us of assets or stock of another entity, where the shareholders before the business combination fail to beneficially own and have voting power for more than 50% of our Company or the resulting company after the business combination; or (iv) our shareholders approve a complete liquidation or dissolution of our Company.

Common Stock In Lieu of Annual Retainers and Meeting Fees.    Under our 2010 Plan, our non-employee directors may elect to convert a portion or all of their calendar year annual retainers and/or per meeting fees otherwise payable in cash into shares of our common stock. Annual retainers and per meeting fees earned after the date a director makes a stock-in-lieu election for a calendar year are issued in shares of common stock in December of that year. The number of shares of our common stock to be issued is determined by dividing the dollar amount of the annual retainers and per meeting fees earned in the calendar year and elected to be converted into shares of our common stock by the closing price of our common stock, as reported on the NYSE, on the date that the shares are issued. For calendar 2011, such shares were issued on December 15, 2011, based on that day’s closing stock price of $57.81. Details regarding the number of shares received by our non-employee directors who elected to receive common stock in lieu of cash paid in calendar 2011 may be found in the “Director Compensation for Fiscal 2011” table and footnotes beginning on page 28.

26

Deferred Compensation Plan.    Non-employee directors may elect to defer receipt of all or a part of his or her stock award and/or cash compensation on a calendar year basis under the Deferred Plan for Directors. Stock awards deferred by a director are credited to a bookkeeping common stock unit account maintained for the director participant and such common stock units fluctuate in value with the market price of our common stock. Dividends paid on our common stock are credited to a director’s account as additional common stock units. Cash amounts deferred by a director are credited to a bookkeeping cash account maintained for the director participant and such account accrues interest with the rate of return based on funds that are comparable to the funds available to our employees through the IS&ESOP.

A director participant’s common stock units and cash account are at all times fully vested. Distributions under the Deferred Plan for Directors are payable in accordance with the director participant’s prior distribution elections upon the earliest of retirement, prior to retirement if a valid election has been made or in an unforeseeable financial emergency.

Details regarding deferred compensation elections may be found in the “Director Compensation for Fiscal 2011” table and footnotes beginning on page 28.

Stock Ownership Guidelines.    In September 2011, in conjunction with its approval of other changes to the non-employee director compensation program and to further align the interests of our directors with those of our shareholders, the Board approved an increase in the non-employee director stock ownership guideline to a multiple of five times the non-employee director annual Board retainer from a multiple of three. Previously, non-employee directors were expected to meet the three times multiple within five years of joining the Board. As of September 2011, each non-employee director who had served for five years or more satisfied the three times multiple stock ownership guideline. In connection with the increase to the five times multiple, it was determined that each non-employee director who did not then meet such guideline would have five years from the date of adoption to comply with the five times stock ownership guideline. As of January 23, 2012, each of our non-employee directors who is required to meet the five times multiple stock ownership guideline has met such guideline.

Company Products.    Each of our non-employee directors is entitled to receive certain Company products and related parts and accessories for his or her personal use at no cost; provided, however, that directors are responsible for payment of applicable taxes attributable to the value of such items and there is an $8,000 lifetime limit on installation and parts for an irrigation system. The value of products, parts and accessories is deemed to be our distributor net price or its equivalent, which is also the price at which such items are generally available to our employees for purchase. This value is generally included on the director’s IRS Form 1099 for the year in which the product, part or accessory was ordered. However, for certain consumer rider products, professional products, commercial vehicles and related accessories, a director may elect at the time he or she orders the product to return such product in the future and, in that case, the director’s IRS Form 1099 for each year in which the product is in his or her possession will include the depreciable amount for such year using the IRS prescribed MACRS depreciation rate.

Charitable Giving.    We support our directors’ charitable organizations through our director matching gift program, which provides that a gift in the amount of $25 to $1,000 by a director and/or his or her spouse to one or more tax exempt 501(c)(3) charitable organizations located in the United States will be matched by us in an aggregate amount of up to $1,000 per director per year.

Indemnification and Directors and Officers Insurance.    Each director is a party to an indemnification agreement with us pursuant to which we have agreed to provide indemnification and advancement of expenses to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law and our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and continued coverage under our D&O insurance.

27

Director Compensation for Fiscal 2011.    The following table provides summary information concerning the compensation of each individual director who served during fiscal 2011, other than Michael J. Hoffman, our Chairman and CEO, who is not compensated separately for his service as a director and whose compensation is discussed in the “Executive Compensation” section beginning on page 35.

28

Policies and Procedures Regarding Related Person Transactions

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth in writing our policies and procedures regarding the review, approval and ratification of related person transactions. All reportable related person transactions must be reviewed, approved or ratified by the Nominating & Governance Committee. In determining whether to approve or ratify such transactions, the Committee will take into account, among other factors and information it deems appropriate:

Transactions in the ordinary course of business, between us and an unaffiliated corporation of which one of our non-employee directors serves as an officer, that are at arm’s length, at prices and on terms customarily available to unrelated third party vendors or customers generally, in which the

29

non-employee director had no direct or indirect personal interest, nor received any personal benefit, and in amounts that are not material to our business or the business of such unaffiliated corporation, are deemed conclusively pre-approved.

Board of Directors Business Ethics Policy Statement

It is our policy to maintain the highest level of moral, ethical and legal standards in the conduct of our business. Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board has adopted, and each director annually signs, a Business Ethics Policy Statement. The policy can be found on our website at www.thetorocompany.com (select the “Investor Information” link and then the “Corporate Governance” link).

Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for our CEO and Senior Financial Officers

All of our employees are required to comply with our Code of Conduct to help ensure that our business is conducted in accordance with the highest level of moral, ethical and legal standards. We also have a Code of Ethics for our CEO and Senior Financial Officers applicable to our Chairman and CEO (our principal executive officer), our Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (our principal financial officer), our Vice President, Corporate Controller (our principal accounting officer and controller), and to all business unit controllers and senior accounting personnel identified by our Vice President, Corporate Controller who are also bound by the provisions set forth in the Code of Conduct relating to ethical conduct, conflicts of interest and compliance with the law. Our Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for our CEO and Senior Financial Officers can be found on our website at www.thetorocompany.com (select the “Investor Information” link and then the “Corporate Governance” link). If necessary, we intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements of Item 5.05 of the Current Report on Form 8-K regarding amendments to or waivers from any provision of our Code of Ethics for our CEO and Senior Financial Officers by posting such information on our website at www.thetorocompany.com (select the “Investor Information” link and then the “Corporate Governance” link).

Communications with Directors; Complaint Procedures

Shareholders and other interested parties may communicate directly with our Board, non-employee directors as a group, lead director or any other specified individual director in writing by sending a letter addressed to The Toro Company Board of Directors, c/o Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, 8111 Lyndale Avenue South, Bloomington, Minnesota, 55420-1196. Each communication will be reviewed by our Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel and then forwarded to the relevant director(s) unless it is unrelated to Board or shareholder matters, such as a communication regarding a job inquiry, survey, offer for goods or services, a donation request, or product idea. In addition, shareholders and other interested parties may communicate with any of our directors by calling 952-887-7268 and leaving a message in our lead director’s confidential voicemail account, to which only he has access.

We also maintain procedures to receive, retain and treat complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and to allow for the confidential and anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. A 24-hour, toll-free confidential ethics hotline and a confidential web-based reporting tool are available for the submission of concerns regarding these and other matters by any employee. Concerns and questions received through these methods relating to accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters are promptly brought to the attention of the Chair of the Audit Committee and are handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee. Complete information regarding our complaint procedures is contained within our Code of Conduct, which may be accessed on our website as noted above.

30

PROPOSAL TWO—RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee again has selected KPMG LLP, or KPMG, to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm, or external auditor, for fiscal 2012. Although it is not required to do so, the Board, as it traditionally has done in the past, is asking our shareholders to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG. If our shareholders do not ratify the selection of KPMG, the Audit Committee may reconsider its selection. Even if the selection is ratified by our shareholders, the Audit Committee in its discretion may change the appointment at any time during the year, if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of our Company and our shareholders.

Representatives of KPMG will be present at the annual meeting to answer appropriate questions. They also will have the opportunity to make a statement if they wish to do so.

Audit, Audit-Related, Tax and Other Fees

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to us for professional services rendered by KPMG for fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 by category, as described in the footnotes to the table.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee Charter requires that the Audit Committee review and approve in advance the retention of our external auditor for all types of audit and non-audit services to be performed for us by our external auditor and approve the fees for such services, other than de minimus non-audit services allowed by relevant rules and regulations. All of the services provided to us by KPMG for which we paid Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax Fees, as shown in the table above, were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with this pre-approval policy and procedures.

Board Recommendation

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2012.

31

Audit Committee Report

This report is furnished by the Audit Committee with respect to our financial statements for fiscal 2011. The Committee operates pursuant to a written charter.

Ultimate responsibility for good corporate governance rests with our Board, whose primary roles and responsibilities involve oversight, counseling and providing direction to our Management in the best long-term interests of Toro and our shareholders. As set forth in its charter, the Audit Committee assists our Board by, among other things, providing oversight of our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our annual financial statements. A copy of our Audit Committee Charter, which further describes the role and responsibilities of the Committee, is available online at www.thetorocompany.com (click on “Investor Information” and “Corporate Governance”).

Management is primarily responsible for the establishment and maintenance of our accounting and financial reporting processes, including our internal controls, and for the preparation and presentation of complete and accurate financial statements. Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, is responsible for performing an independent audit of our financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (U.S.), or PCAOB, expressing an opinion as to their conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, and expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

In performing its oversight role, the Audit Committee has (i) reviewed and discussed with Management our audited financial statements for fiscal 2011, (ii) discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as in effect for fiscal 2011, (iii) received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by the PCAOB independence and ethics rule, Rule 3526 (Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence), as in effect for fiscal 2011, and (iv) discussed with KPMG its independence and concluded that it is independent from Toro and its Management.

Based on the review and discussions referred to in the foregoing paragraph, in reliance on the unqualified opinion of KPMG regarding our audited financial statements, and subject to the limitations on its responsibilities set forth in its charter, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board that our audited financial statements for fiscal 2011 be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, for filing with the SEC.

Audit Committee:

Janet K. Cooper (Chair)

Gary L. Ellis

Jeffrey M. Ettinger

Katherine J. Harless

Robert H. Nassau

Inge G. Thulin

32

PROPOSAL THREE—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ADVISORY VOTE

The Board is providing our shareholders with an advisory vote on executive compensation. This advisory vote, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” vote, is a non-binding vote on the compensation paid to our named executive officers as set forth in the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement beginning on page 35, including in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the accompanying compensation tables and the corresponding narrative discussion and footnotes. At the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on March 15, 2011, over 94% of the votes cast by our shareholders were in favor of the say-on-pay vote. The Compensation & Human Resources Committee generally believes that such results affirmed shareholder support of our approach to executive compensation.

Our executive compensation program is generally designed to attract, retain, motivate and reward highly qualified and talented executive officers, including our named executive officers, that will enable us to perform better than our competitors and drive long-term shareholder value. The underlying core principles of our executive compensation program include (i) linking pay to performance and aligning the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders by providing compensation opportunities that are tied directly to achievement of financial performance goals and long-term stock price performance; and (ii) providing competitive compensation opportunities targeted at the market 50^th percentile for both individual elements of compensation and total direct compensation at target levels of financial performance, which allows us to attract and retain the necessary executive talent while motivating and rewarding the accomplishment of annual and long-term financial performance goals and maintaining an appropriate cost structure. The “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” which begins on page 35, describes our executive compensation program and the executive compensation decisions made by the Compensation & Human Resources Committee in fiscal 2011 in more detail. Important considerations include:

33

We believe that our executive compensation objectives and core principles have resulted in an executive compensation program and related decisions that have appropriately incentivized the achievement of financial goals and produced financial results that have benefited our Company and our shareholders and are expected to drive long-term shareholder value over time. For example:

Accordingly, the Board recommends that our shareholders vote in favor of the say-on-pay vote as set forth in the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that our shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the accompanying compensation tables and the corresponding narrative discussion and footnotes, and any related material disclosed in this proxy statement.

Shareholders are not ultimately voting to approve or disapprove the Board’s recommendation. As this is an advisory vote, the outcome of the vote is not binding on us with respect to future executive compensation decisions, including those relating to our named executive officers, or otherwise. Our Compensation & Human Resources Committee and Board expect to take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.

Board Recommendation

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR the advisory vote on executive compensation, or say-on-pay vote.

34

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation & Human Resources Committee Report

The Compensation & Human Resources Committee has reviewed and discussed the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with Management and, based on such review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this proxy statement and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011.

Compensation & Human Resources Committee:

Christopher A. Twomey (Chair)

Jeffrey M. Ettinger

Katherine J. Harless

Robert H. Nassau

Gregg W. Steinhafel

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview.    In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, we describe the key principles and approaches used to determine elements of compensation paid to, awarded to and earned by the following named executive officers whose compensation is set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 54:

This CD&A should be read in conjunction with the accompanying compensation tables, corresponding footnotes and narrative discussion, as they provide information and context to the compensation disclosures. Additionally, this CD&A should be read in conjunction with our advisory vote on executive compensation, which can be found under “Proposal Three—Executive Compensation Advisory Vote” beginning on page 33, as it contains information relevant to your voting decision.

Executive Summary

Financial Results and Impact On Variable Compensation.    As described in more detail in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of our most recent Annual Report Form 10-K, fiscal 2011 was a strong year with double digit net sales and earnings growth. Included below is a brief summary of our fiscal 2011 financial performance that relates to the key financial metrics that we used in evaluating our performance for the purposes of making compensation decisions, as well as some other financial highlights.

35

One of our key executive compensation objectives is to link pay to performance. As a result of our strong net sales and diluted EPS performance, annual cash incentive award payouts to our executive officers, including our named executive officers, were well above target, with corporate results at 164% of target and division results of up to 191% of target. Our performance share award payouts for the fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2011 performance period were 50% of target. The difficult economic situation in fiscal 2009 had a significant impact on our ability to achieve the three-year cumulative performance goals established for the fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2011 performance period. Both cumulative three-year revenue growth and cumulative net income plus after-tax earnings were below minimum, or threshold, levels of performance, resulting in no payout for either of those performance measures. However, during that three-year timeframe, we strengthened our focus on asset efficiency and, as a result, we exceeded the maximum goal established for cumulative corporate average net assets turns for the fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2011 performance period, which resulted in 200% payout for that performance measure. When factoring in the 25% weighting on the cumulative corporate average net assets turn performance measure, the overall performance share award payout for the fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2011 performance period was 50% of target.

Fiscal 2011 Compensation-Related Actions and Highlights of Compensation Practices.      During fiscal 2011, we took a number of actions that supported our executive compensation philosophy of ensuring that our executive compensation program is reflective of our financial performance, is market competitive and is aligned with and responsive to the interests of our shareholders.

36

In addition to the compensation-related actions we took during fiscal 2011, we maintain other compensation practices that support our executive compensation philosophy, as well as benefit our shareholders. Some of these practices include the following:

37

Compensation Program Objectives.    Our guiding compensation philosophy is to maintain an executive compensation program that allows us to attract, retain, motivate and reward highly qualified and talented executive officers that will enable us to perform better than our competitors and drive long-term shareholder value. The following core principles provide a framework for our executive compensation program:

Our compensation policies, practices and programs are designed such that we believe that they do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company.

38

Additional detail regarding our risk assessment of our compensation policies, practices and programs is set forth under “Assessment of Risk Related to Compensation Programs” on page 53.

How We Make Compensation Decisions.    In order to most effectively implement our established compensation philosophy, there are several stakeholders involved in making executive officer compensation decisions. These stakeholders and their roles are described briefly below.

Role of the Compensation & Human Resources Committee.    The Compensation & Human Resources Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, oversees our executive compensation program. Within its duties, the Committee approves compensation for our Chairman and CEO, which is then submitted to the other independent directors for ratification, and each other executive officer, who we define as any employee at or above the vice president level. In doing so, the Committee:

The Committee is supported in its duties, and receives input from, Towers Watson, its independent executive compensation consultant, and our Management, including our Chairman and CEO, our Vice President, Human Resources and Business Development and our Director, Total Rewards and HR Services.

Role of the Compensation Consultant.    The Committee has sole authority to hire consultants, approve their fees and determine the nature and scope of their work. The Committee may replace consultants or hire additional consultants at any time.

A representative from Towers Watson attended each Committee meeting in fiscal 2011 and occasionally communicates with the chair of the Committee in advance of, or following, Committee meetings. Each year, Towers Watson provides market data for all of our executive officers, including our named executive officers, along with a comparison of their base salaries, target total cash compensation and target total direct compensation to the market 25^th, 50^th and 75^th percentile. Additionally, Towers Watson reviews all executive officer compensation recommendations in advance of the Committee meetings and participates in discussions at the Committee meetings regarding those recommendations.

Towers Watson is engaged by the Committee from time to time to perform other compensation consulting services, which in fiscal 2011 included a review of non-employee board of director compensation and completion of work from fiscal 2010 relating to supplement benefit plan practices.

Role of Management.    Management’s role is to provide current compensation information to Towers Watson and provide analysis and recommendations on executive officer compensation to the Committee based on the comparison to market; the executive’s level of professional experience; individual performance as assessed during an annual performance evaluation; tenure; historic

39

corporate and division performance; and internal pay comparisons. Neither the Chairman and CEO nor the Vice President, Human Resources and Business Development provides input or recommendations with respect to his own compensation.

Use of Market Data.    Since one of the objectives of our executive compensation program is to provide market competitive target total direct compensation opportunities, the Committee uses market data provided by Towers Watson to help evaluate and make compensation decisions. Market data provided by Towers Watson each year is derived from the executive database within the Towers Watson Compensation Data Bank, which is a published compensation survey. The data in the compensation survey (there were 411 participating companies in the 2011 survey) is size adjusted, using a regression analysis, for our revenue size. If regression data is not available, data is provided for a sub-set of companies with annual revenue between $1 billion and $3 billion (there were 105 participating companies in the 2011 survey in this revenue range). For executive officers with divisional responsibilities, the data is size adjusted for specific division revenue. We believe that the market for our executive officer talent is not limited to the manufacturing industry; therefore, we do not focus specifically on manufacturing companies within the database, nor do we identify a separate group of peer companies within the manufacturing industry. The market data provided by Towers Watson is in aggregate form and individual data for participating companies in the survey is not provided and, therefore, not considered when determining executive officer compensation in total or for any individual element.

Market data is obtained for comparable positions in which each of our executive officer serves. Due to their broad and varying scope of responsibilities, fiscal 2011 market data obtained for Messrs. Ramstad and Drazan did not fully represent the scope of their respective positions. Mr. Ramstad has responsibility for both the human resources and business development functions. When evaluating the appropriate market data for Mr. Ramstad, we determined that within the Towers Watson Compensation Data Bank, the “top human resources executive” most closely matched Mr. Ramstad’s duties and responsibilities; therefore, market data was obtained for that position. The fact that the market data reflected only a portion of Mr. Ramstad’s duties and responsibilities was considered by the Committee when evaluating and determining Mr. Ramstad’s compensation. Mr. Drazan is our Chief Information Officer and, during fiscal 2011, had three divisions reporting directly to him, which included our Exmark, Micro Irrigation and Sitework Systems divisions. There were two positions within the Towers Watson Compensation Data Bank that reflected Mr. Drazan’s responsibilities, which included a “chief information officer” and a “multi-profit center executive”, and both sets of market data were considered by the Committee when evaluating and determining Mr. Drazan’s compensation.

40

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program.    During fiscal 2011, our executive compensation program consisted of the following key elements: base salary, annual cash incentive, long-term incentives, health and welfare benefits, retirement plans and perquisites. The following table provides some of the key characteristics of and purpose for each element along with some key actions taken during fiscal 2011.

41

During fiscal 2011, in addition to the elements described above, our executive compensation program for Ms. Peterson and Mr. Wolfe included certain other unique elements of compensation. These elements included special, one-time cash bonuses, relocation benefits and a restricted stock grant and are described briefly below. Additional information can be found in the “Summary Compensation Table” footnotes relating to the “Bonus” and “All Other Compensation” columns, beginning on page 54.

We believe that a significant portion of our executive officers’ target total compensation package should be comprised of short-term and long-term variable “performance-based” or “at risk” compensation. As described previously, such compensation comprised 63% to 80% of the target total direct compensation package for our currently employed named executive officers. This compensation consisted of both short-term in the form of our annual cash incentive awards, and long-term in the form of stock options and three-year performance share awards.

The overall mix of annual base salaries, target annual cash incentive awards and grant date fair value long-term incentive awards as a percent of target total direct compensation for our Chairman and CEO and the other named executive officers as a group for fiscal 2011 is provided below. Given our strong fiscal 2011 results, an even greater percentage of the total direct compensation package was “performance-based.” The value of the long-term incentives represented is based on the grant date fair value of stock options and performance share awards granted during fiscal 2011. Actual long-term

42

incentive value will be based on long-term stock price performance for the stock options and on results achieved against three-year cumulative financial goals for the performance share awards.

We describe each key element of our executive compensation program in more detail in the following pages, along with the compensation decisions made in fiscal 2011.

Base Salary

General.    We review base salaries for our executive officers on an annual basis. Specifically, the base salaries for our executive officers are reviewed and discussed at the regular meeting of the Compensation & Human Resources Committee held in November or December of each year and base salary increases, if any, for our executive officers are approved at that meeting and prior to fiscal 2012, were effective as of December 1. Effective in fiscal 2012, base salary increases are effective as of November 1, the first day of our fiscal year.

Discussion and Analysis.    When we determined and recommended fiscal 2011 base salaries for our executive officers, including each of our named executive officers other than Ms. Peterson, the following factors were considered: current base salary, base salary relative to the market 50^th percentile, historical and current levels of individual performance, scope and complexity of the position and internal pay comparisons. Ms. Peterson commenced employment in August 2011 and in determining her base salary we considered market data for the “top financial executive” position, Ms. Peterson’s previous experience, her base salary in effect at the time the employment offer was extended and the base salary of our former Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer. Fiscal 2011 annual base salaries (effective as of December 1, 2010), fiscal 2011 annual base salary increases compared to fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2011 annual base salaries compared to the market 50^th percentile are provided in the table below for each of our named executive officers:

43

Generally, the base salaries of our named executive officers are very close to the market 50^th percentile. As described previously, market data for Mr. Ramstad’s position as Vice President, Human Resources and Business Development does not fully reflect the scope of his individual duties and responsibilities. The Committee takes this into account when determining his annual base salary and believes it is appropriate that his base salary exceeded the market 50^th percentile for a “top human resources executive” given his overall responsibilities for both the human resources and business development functions. The comparisons to market for Mr. Drazan’s position include both a comparison to a “multi-profit center executive,” which is listed first, and to a “chief information officer.” As indicated in the table, Mr. Drazan’s base salary compared to the market 50^th percentile ranges from 1.6% below for a “multi-profit center executive” to 12.7% above for a “chief information officer.” As previously described, Mr. Drazan has overall responsibility for three different divisions, including our Exmark, Micro Irrigation and Sitework Systems divisions, and is also our Chief Information Officer. Due to the scope and scale of both of these positions, when evaluating Mr. Drazan’s total compensation and each element of total compensation against the market, we considered market data for both of those positions and the Committee believed it was appropriate that his base salary was between the market 50^th percentile for these two positions.

Actual base salary earnings for the fiscal year are set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” on page 54 in the “Salary” column. Fiscal year base salary earnings set forth in the table vary from December 1, 2010, base salaries because the effective date of the base salary increases for fiscal 2011 were one month into the fiscal year. Fiscal year base salary earnings set forth in the table for Ms. Peterson represent base salary earned from August 22, 2011, the date her employment commenced, through October 31, 2011. Fiscal year base salary earnings for Mr. Wolfe represent base salary earned through July 31, 2011, the date of his retirement.

To align with the beginning of our fiscal year and for proxy disclosure and Code Section 162(m) compliance purposes, base salaries for all executive officers for fiscal 2012 became effective as of November 1, 2011.

Annual Cash Incentives

General.    To help ensure we meet our compensation program objective of linking pay to performance, we provide the opportunity for our executive officers to earn an annual cash incentive, which is designed to motivate attainment and reward accomplishment of annual financial business goals. This is done by establishing financial goals for our annual incentive plan that link closely to our annual financial business plan.

At the beginning of each fiscal year, during its regular meeting held in November or December, the Compensation & Human Resources Committee approves a target award expressed as a percentage of base salary for each executive officer, including each of our named executive officers. Additionally, the Committee approves specific performance measures, weightings, goals and performance adjustment events, if any, at both the corporate and division level for the new fiscal year. For each performance measure, a threshold, target and maximum level of performance is defined, which have corresponding payout percentages. During the fiscal year, the Committee reviews progress against the established corporate and division goals. Following the end of the fiscal year, at its regular meeting held in November or December, Management presents a summary of, and the Committee confirms, actual performance in comparison to the established corporate and division goals along with a corresponding payout percent, which is expressed as a percent of target performance. Annual cash incentive awards are paid out to the executive officers in December and are contingent on our final earnings release for the recently completed fiscal year.

Target Awards.    When determining the target award, as a percent of base salary, for each executive officer, we review the market 50^th percentile for target total cash compensation (sum of base

44

salary and target annual cash incentives) for the positions in which such executive officer serves. Our objective is that when we achieve target levels of performance, resulting total cash compensation paid to our executive officers is within a reasonable range of the market 50^th percentile. Actual total cash compensation will exceed the market 50^th percentile if performance exceeds established annual financial business goals and will be less than the market 50^th percentile if actual performance is below established annual financial business goals. In addition to considering the market data, the Committee also considers experience, scope and complexity of the executive officer’s position, as well as individual contributions and performance. Actual awards can range from 0% (if threshold levels of performance are not met) to 200% of the target award (if maximum levels of performance are met for all of the performance measures).

In December 2010, the Committee approved the fiscal 2011 target awards shown below for each of our named executive officers other than Ms. Peterson. Since Ms. Peterson commenced employment in August 2011, during our fiscal 2011 fourth quarter, she was not granted an annual cash incentive award for fiscal 2011 and, therefore, did not receive any annual cash incentive payout for fiscal 2011. The fiscal 2011 target annual cash incentive award, resulting fiscal 2011 target total cash compensation (sum of fiscal 2011 annual base salary and fiscal 2011 target annual cash incentive award) and the comparison to the market 50^th percentile are also provided.