Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration Nos. 333-150501
333-150501-01
333-150501-02
333-150501-03
333-150501-04
333-150501-05
333-150501-06
333-150501-07
333-150501-08
333-150501-09
333-150501-10
333-150501-11
333-150501-12
333-150501-13
333-150501-14
333-150501-15
POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST
POWERSHARES DB ENERGY FUND
POWERSHARES DB OIL FUND
POWERSHARES DB PRECIOUS METALS FUND
POWERSHARES DB GOLD FUND
POWERSHARES DB SILVER FUND
POWERSHARES DB BASE METALS FUND
POWERSHARES DB AGRICULTURE FUND
DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY MASTER TRUST
DB ENERGY MASTER FUND
DB OIL MASTER FUND
DB PRECIOUS METALS MASTER FUND
DB GOLD MASTER FUND
DB SILVER MASTER FUND
DB BASE METALS MASTER FUND
DB AGRICULTURE MASTER FUND
SUPPLEMENT DATED APRIL 10, 2009 TO
PROSPECTUS DATED JULY 14, 2008
This Supplement updates certain information relating to DB Commodity Services LLC, contained in the Prospectus dated July 14, 2008, as supplemented from time-to-time (the Prospectus) of PowerShares DB Multi-Sector Commodity Trust (the Trust), PowerShares DB Energy Fund, PowerShares DB Oil Fund, PowerShares DB Precious Metals Fund, PowerShares DB Gold Fund, PowerShares DB Silver Fund, PowerShares DB Base Metals Fund, PowerShares DB Agriculture Fund (the Funds), DB Multi-Sector Commodity Master Trust, DB Energy Master Fund, DB Oil Master Fund, DB Precious Metals Master Fund, DB Gold Master Fund, DB Silver Master Fund, DB Base Metals Master Fund and DB Agriculture Master Fund. All capitalized terms used in this Supplement have the same meaning as in the Prospectus.
Prospective investors in the Funds should review carefully the contents of both this Supplement and the Prospectus.
All information in the Prospectus is restated pursuant to this Supplement, except as updated hereby.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this Supplement is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
THE COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION HAS NOT PASSED UPON THE MERITS OF PARTICIPATING IN THIS POOL NOR HAS THE COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.
DB COMMODITY SERVICES LLC
Managing Owner
I. | Pages 36 through 38 of the Prospectus are hereby deleted and replaced, in their entirety, with the following: |
PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB ENERGY FUND (TICKER: DBE), A SERIES OF POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST
Name of Pool: PowerShares DB Energy Fund
Type of Pool: Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool
Inception of Trading: January 2007
Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of February 28, 2009: $233,296,578
Net Asset Value as of February 28, 2009: $44,132,818
Net Asset Value per Share as of February 28, 2009: $18.39
Worst Monthly Drawdown: (28.36)% October 2008
Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown: (66.18)% June 2008 February 2009*
Monthly Rate of Return |
2009(%) | 2008(%) | 2007(%) | ||||||
January |
(6.19 | ) | (1.17 | ) | 0.08 | ||||
February |
(5.93 | ) | 10.62 | 5.80 | |||||
March |
1.35 | 5.33 | |||||||
April |
10.21 | 0.86 | |||||||
May |
14.95 | (0.92 | ) | ||||||
June |
10.15 | 3.41 | |||||||
July |
(12.21 | ) | 2.26 | ||||||
August |
(6.72 | ) | (4.07 | ) | |||||
September |
(11.32 | ) | 7.78 | ||||||
October |
(28.36 | ) | 12.90 | ||||||
November |
(14.60 | ) | (2.56 | ) | |||||
December |
(13.74 | )** | 4.95 | *** | |||||
Compound Rate of Return |
(11.76 (2 months |
)% ) |
(40.74 | )% | 40.68 | % |
* | The Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown from June 2008 February 2009 includes the effect of the $0.44 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Please see Footnote **. |
** | The December 2008 return of (13.74)% includes the $0.44 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pools return for December 2008 was (11.92)%. |
*** | The December 2007 return of 4.95% includes the $0.90 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007. Prior to the December 28, 2007 distribution, the pools return for December 2007 was 7.64%. |
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB OIL FUND (TICKER: DBO), A SERIES OF POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST
Name of Pool: PowerShares DB Oil Fund
Type of Pool: Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool
Inception of Trading: January 2007
Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of February 28, 2009: $306,983,666
Net Asset Value as of February 28, 2009: $124,220,832
Net Asset Value per Share as of February 28, 2009: $18.27
Worst Monthly Drawdown: (29.20)% October 2008
Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown: (65.43)% June 2008 February 2009*
Monthly Rate of Return |
2009(%) | 2008(%) | 2007(%) | ||||||
January |
(5.87 | ) | (3.00 | ) | (2.08 | ) | |||
February |
(4.30 | ) | 10.99 | 6.13 | |||||
March |
0.30 | 4.77 | |||||||
April |
12.33 | (2.20 | ) | ||||||
May |
12.65 | (2.48 | ) | ||||||
June |
11.73 | 4.58 | |||||||
July |
(11.24 | ) | 2.65 | ||||||
August |
(5.82 | ) | (4.20 | ) | |||||
September |
(12.79 | ) | 9.59 | ||||||
October |
(29.20 | ) | 15.62 | ||||||
November |
(15.73 | ) | (2.39 | ) | |||||
December |
(11.79 | )** | 4.85 | *** | |||||
Compound Rate of Return |
(9.91 (2 months |
)% ) |
(41.42 | )% | 38.48 | % |
* | The Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown from June 2008 February 2009 includes the effect of the $0.12 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Please see Footnote **. |
** | The December 2008 return of (11.79)% includes the $0.12 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pools return for December 2008 was (11.27)%. |
*** | The December 2007 return of 4.85% includes the $1.28 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007. Prior to the December 28, 2007 distribution, the pools return for December 2007 was 7.93%. |
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
See accompanying Footnotes to Performance Information.
1
PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB PRECIOUS METALS FUND (TICKER: DBP), A SERIES OF POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST
Name of Pool: PowerShares DB Precious Metals Fund
Type of Pool: Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool
Inception of Trading: January 2007
Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of February 28, 2009: $202,551,080
Net Asset Value as of February 28, 2009: $128,558,524
Net Asset Value per Share as of February 28, 2009: $32.14
Worst Monthly Drawdown: (18.43)% October 2008
Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown: (31.88)% February 2008 October 2008
Monthly Rate of Return |
2009(%) | 2008(%) | 2007(%) | ||||||
January |
6.02 | 10.18 | 4.04 | ||||||
February |
1.97 | 7.34 | 2.77 | ||||||
March |
(7.24 | ) | (1.87 | ) | |||||
April |
(5.36 | ) | 2.10 | ||||||
May |
2.30 | (2.43 | ) | ||||||
June |
3.99 | (3.14 | ) | ||||||
July |
(0.88 | ) | 2.96 | ||||||
August |
(12.05 | ) | (0.77 | ) | |||||
September |
2.59 | 16.86 | |||||||
October |
(18.43 | ) | (5.36 | ) | |||||
November |
11.56 | 3.95 | |||||||
December |
6.94 | * | 4.04 | ** | |||||
Compound Rate of Return |
8.11 (2 months |
% ) |
(3.88 | )% | 23.72 | % |
* | The December 2008 return of 6.94% includes the $0.27 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pools return for December 2008 was 7.91%. |
** | The December 2007 return of 4.04% includes the $0.60 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007. Prior to the December 28, 2007 distribution, the pools return for December 2007 was 5.58%. |
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB GOLD FUND (TICKER: DGL), A SERIES OF POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST
Name of Pool: PowerShares DB Gold Fund
Type of Pool: Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool
Inception of Trading: January 2007
Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of February 28, 2009: $175,550,236
Net Asset Value as of February 28, 2009: $102,724,770
Net Asset Value per Share as of February 28, 2009: $ 34.24
Worst Monthly Drawdown: (18.06)% October 2008
Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown: (26.80)% February 2008 October 2008
Monthly Rate of Return |
2009(%) | 2008(%) | 2007(%) | ||||||
January |
4.85 | 9.67 | 3.44 | ||||||
February |
1.48 | 5.14 | 2.44 | ||||||
March |
(5.77 | ) | (1.02 | ) | |||||
April |
(5.92 | ) | 2.86 | ||||||
May |
2.54 | (2.93 | ) | ||||||
June |
4.17 | (1.99 | ) | ||||||
July |
(1.48 | ) | 2.61 | ||||||
August |
(9.22 | ) | 0.68 | ||||||
September |
5.49 | 9.81 | |||||||
October |
(18.06 | ) | 6.01 | ||||||
November |
13.29 | (1.26 | ) | ||||||
December |
6.66 | * | 3.54 | ** | |||||
Compound Rate of Return |
6.40 (2 months |
% ) |
2.00 | % | 26.20 | % |
* | The December 2008 return of 6.66% includes the $0.26 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pools return for December 2008 was 7.52%. |
** | The December 2007 return of 3.54% includes the $0.81 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007. Prior to the December 28, 2007 distribution, the pools return for December 2007 was 5.84%. |
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
See accompanying Footnotes to Performance Information.
2
PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB SILVER FUND (TICKER: DBS), A SERIES OF POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST
Name of Pool: PowerShares DB Silver Fund
Type of Pool: Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool
Inception of Trading: January 2007
Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of February 28, 2009: $113,636,190
Net Asset Value as of February 28, 2009: $61,139,590
Net Asset Value per Share as of February 28, 2009: $23.52
Worst Monthly Drawdown: (23.42)% August 2008
Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown: (51.35)% February 2008 October 2008
Monthly Rate of Return |
2009(%) | 2008(%) | 2007(%) | ||||||
January |
11.40 | 12.83 | 6.48 | ||||||
February |
4.16 | 16.53 | 4.13 | ||||||
March |
(12.95 | ) | (4.91 | ) | |||||
April |
(4.05 | ) | 0.49 | ||||||
May |
1.67 | (0.26 | ) | ||||||
June |
3.41 | (7.80 | ) | ||||||
July |
1.68 | 4.60 | |||||||
August |
(23.42 | ) | (6.71 | ) | |||||
September |
(10.23 | ) | 13.76 | ||||||
October |
(20.75 | ) | 3.92 | ||||||
November |
4.72 | (2.92 | ) | ||||||
December |
8.74 | * | 2.02 | ** | |||||
Compound Rate of Return |
16.03 (2 months |
% ) |
(27.16 | )% | 11.32 | % |
* | The December 2008 return of 8.74% includes the $0.22 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pools return for December 2008 was 9.92%. |
** | The December 2007 return of 2.02% includes the $0.87 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007. Prior to the December 28, 2007 distribution, the pools return for December 2007 was 5.24%. |
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB BASE METALS FUND (TICKER: DBB), A SERIES OF POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST
Name of Pool: PowerShares DB Base Metals Fund
Type of Pool: Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool
Inception of Trading: January 2007
Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of February 28, 2009: $225,198,820
Net Asset Value as of February 28, 2009: $50,474,365
Net Asset Value per Share as of February 28, 2009: $11.47
Worst Monthly Drawdown: (27.29)% October 2008
Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown: (60.29)% July 2007 January 2009*
Monthly Rate of Return |
2009(%) | 2008(%) | 2007(%) | ||||||
January |
(7.37 | ) | 8.82 | (5.84 | ) | ||||
February |
3.71 | 12.16 | 3.70 | ||||||
March |
(5.59 | ) | 1.88 | ||||||
April |
(0.87 | ) | 10.74 | ||||||
May |
(4.54 | ) | (2.40 | ) | |||||
June |
3.92 | (1.19 | ) | ||||||
July |
(4.21 | ) | 4.86 | ||||||
August |
(6.74 | ) | (7.61 | ) | |||||
September |
(11.14 | ) | 2.37 | ||||||
October |
(27.29 | ) | (2.43 | ) | |||||
November |
(6.46 | ) | (5.95 | ) | |||||
December |
(11.29 | )** | (8.98 | )*** | |||||
Compound Rate of Return |
(3.94 (2 months |
)% ) |
(45.73 | )% | (12.00 | )% |
* | The Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown from July 2007 January 2009 includes the effect of the $0.96 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007, and the effect of the $0.28 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Please see Footnotes ** and ***. |
** | The December 2008 return of (11.29)% includes the $0.28 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pools return for December 2008 was (9.21)%. |
*** | The December 2007 return of (8.98)% includes the $0.96 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007. Prior to the December 28, 2007 distribution, the pools return for December 2007 was (5.01)%. |
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
See accompanying Footnotes to Performance Information.
3
PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB AGRICULTURE FUND (TICKER: DBA), A SERIES OF POWERSHARES DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY TRUST
Name of Pool: PowerShares DB Agriculture Fund
Type of Pool: Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool
Inception of Trading: January 2007
Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of February 28, 2009: $3,670,423,110
Net Asset Value as of February 28, 2009: $1,205,150,589
Net Asset Value per Share as of February 28, 2009: $23.54
Worst Monthly Drawdown: (14.74)% September 2008
Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown: (43.49)% February 2008 February 2009*
Monthly Rate of Return |
2009(%) | 2008(%) | 2007(%) | ||||||
January |
(3.62 | ) | 12.47 | 3.44 | |||||
February |
(5.88 | ) | 12.90 | 3.91 | |||||
March |
(12.43 | ) | (5.81 | ) | |||||
April |
0.27 | (1.94 | ) | ||||||
May |
(1.56 | ) | 5.84 | ||||||
June |
13.41 | (0.04 | ) | ||||||
July |
(10.36 | ) | (0.50 | ) | |||||
August |
(3.28 | ) | 2.07 | ||||||
September |
(14.74 | ) | 10.20 | ||||||
October |
(14.44 | ) | (0.17 | ) | |||||
November |
(4.41 | ) | 4.94 | ||||||
December |
5.10 | ** | 6.56 | *** | |||||
Compound Rate of Return |
(9.29 (2 months |
)% ) |
(20.91 | )% | 31.24 | % |
* | The Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown from February 2008 February 2009 includes the effect of the $0.45 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Please see Footnote**. |
** | The December 2008 return of 5.10% includes the $0.45 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pools return for December 2008 was 6.93%. |
*** | The December 2007 return of 6.56% includes the $0.45 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007. Prior to the December 28, 2007 distribution, the pools return for December 2007 was 7.89%. |
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
See accompanying Footnotes to Performance Information.
Footnotes to Performance Information
1. Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions is the aggregate of all amounts ever contributed to the relevant pool, including investors who subsequently redeemed their investments.
2. Net Asset Value is the net asset value of each pool as of February 28, 2009.
3. Net Asset Value per Share is the Net Asset Value of the relevant pool divided by the total number of Shares outstanding with respect to such pool as of February 28, 2009.
4. Worst Monthly Drawdown is the largest single month loss sustained since inception of trading. Drawdown as used in this section of the Prospectus means losses experienced by the relevant pool over the specified period and is calculated on a rate of return basis, i.e., dividing net performance by beginning equity. Drawdown is measured on the basis of monthly returns only, and does not reflect intra-month figures. Month is the month of the Worst Monthly Drawdown.
5. Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown is the largest percentage decline in the Net Asset Value per Share over the history of the relevant pool. This need not be a continuous decline, but can be a series of positive and negative returns where the negative returns are larger than the positive returns. Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown represents the greatest percentage decline from any month-end Net Asset Value per Share that occurs without such month-end Net Asset Value per Share being equaled or exceeded as of a subsequent month-end. For example, if the Net Asset Value per Share of a particular pool declined by $1 in each of January and February, increased by $1 in March and declined again by $2 in April, a peak-to-valley drawdown analysis conducted as of the end of April would consider that drawdown to be still continuing and to be $3 in amount, whereas if the Net Asset Value per Share had increased by $2 in March, the January-February drawdown would have ended as of the end of February at the $2 level.
6. Compound Rate of Return is calculated by multiplying on a compound basis each of the monthly rates of return set forth in the respective charts above and not by adding or averaging such monthly rates of return. For periods of less than one year, the results are year-to-date.
4
II. | Pages 40 through 108 of the Prospectus are hereby deleted and replaced, in their entirety, with the following: |
5
SECTOR INDEXES OVERVIEW
Index |
Index Commodity |
Exchange (Contract Symbol)* |
Base Date | Index Base Weight | ||||
DBLCI-OY Energy ER |
Light, Sweet Crude Oil (WTI) | NYMEX (CL) | June 4, 1990 | 22.50% | ||||
Heating Oil | NYMEX (HO) | 22.50% | ||||||
Brent Crude Oil | ICE (LCO) | 22.50% | ||||||
RBOB Gasoline | NYMEX (XB) | 22.50% | ||||||
Natural Gas | NYMEX (NG) | 10.00% | ||||||
DBLCI-OY CL ER |
Light, Sweet Crude Oil (WTI) | NYMEX (CL) | December 2, 1988 | 100.00% | ||||
DBLCI-OY Precious Metals ER |
Gold | COMEX (GC) | December 2, 1988 | 80.00% | ||||
Silver | COMEX (SI) | 20.00% | ||||||
DBLCI-OY GC ER |
Gold | COMEX (GC) | December 2, 1988 | 100.00% | ||||
DBLCI-OY SI ER |
Silver | COMEX (SI) | December 2, 1988 | 100.00% | ||||
DBLCI-OY Industrial Metals ER |
Aluminum | LME (MAL) | September 3, 1997 | 33.33% | ||||
Zinc | LME (MZN) | 33.33% | ||||||
Copper - Grade A | LME (MCU) | 33.33% | ||||||
DBLCI-OY Agriculture ER |
Corn | CBOT (C) | December 2, 1988 | 25.00% | ||||
Wheat | CBOT (W) | 25.00% | ||||||
Soybeans | CBOT (S) | 25.00% | ||||||
Sugar | ICE (SB) | 25.00% |
*Connotes the exchanges on which the underlying futures contracts are traded with respect to each Index Commodity.
Legend:
CBOT means the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago Inc., or its successor.
COMEX means the Commodity Exchange Inc., New York or its successor.
ICE means the Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. or its successor.
LME means The London Metal Exchange Limited or its successor.
NYMEX means the New York Mercantile Exchange or its successor.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Volatility of the Various Indexes
The following table1 reflects various measures of volatility2 of the history of each Index as calculated on an excess return basis:
Volatility Type |
DBLCI-OY Energy ER3 |
DBLCI-OY CL ER4 |
DBLCI-OY Precious Metals ER4 |
DBLCI-OY GC ER4 |
DBLCI-OY SI ER4 |
DBLCI-OY Industrial Metals ER5 |
DBLCI-OY Agriculture ER4 |
||||||||||||||
Daily volatility over full history |
25.49 | % | 27.89 | % | 16.26 | % | 15.23 | % | 25.71 | % | 20.18 | % | 16.11 | % | |||||||
Average rolling 3 month |
23.58 | % | 25.93 | % | 15.00 | % | 13.92 | % | 23.73 | % | 18.42 | % | 15.21 | % | |||||||
Monthly return volatility |
25.74 | % | 26.70 | % | 15.55 | % | 14.66 | % | 24.72 | % | 20.82 | % | 15.92 | % | |||||||
Average annual volatility |
25.36 | % | 27.46 | % | 15.47 | % | 14.49 | % | 23.90 | % | 19.14 | % | 15.40 | % |
The following table reflects the daily volatility on an annual basis of each Index:
Year |
DBLCI-OY Energy ER3 |
DBLCI-OY CL ER4 |
DBLCI-OY Precious Metals ER4 |
DBLCI-OY GC ER4 |
DBLCI-OY SI ER4 |
DBLCI-OY Industrial Metals ER5 |
DBLCI-OY Agriculture ER4 |
||||||||||||||
1988 |
| 26.56 | % | 11.17 | % | 11.41 | % | 10.73 | % | | 9.60 | % | |||||||||
1989 |
| 28.11 | % | 13.57 | % | 13.14 | % | 18.53 | % | | 15.30 | % | |||||||||
1990 |
44.82 | % | 40.56 | % | 16.71 | % | 17.67 | % | 19.41 | % | | 12.77 | % | ||||||||
1991 |
31.03 | % | 29.57 | % | 13.63 | % | 12.63 | % | 23.40 | % | | 15.70 | % | ||||||||
1992 |
14.60 | % | 16.66 | % | 8.90 | % | 8.32 | % | 15.67 | % | | 12.02 | % | ||||||||
1993 |
15.25 | % | 17.70 | % | 16.81 | % | 14.44 | % | 28.37 | % | | 12.81 | % | ||||||||
1994 |
18.05 | % | 20.13 | % | 12.08 | % | 9.60 | % | 23.28 | % | | 13.20 | % | ||||||||
1995 |
13.45 | % | 17.07 | % | 9.89 | % | 6.62 | % | 26.37 | % | | 11.56 | % | ||||||||
1996 |
23.86 | % | 31.02 | % | 7.74 | % | 6.17 | % | 17.62 | % | | 14.73 | % | ||||||||
1997 |
18.29 | % | 21.51 | % | 13.51 | % | 12.60 | % | 24.68 | % | 11.99 | % | 12.85 | % | |||||||
1998 |
23.80 | % | 27.97 | % | 14.60 | % | 12.84 | % | 29.22 | % | 14.38 | % | 14.13 | % | |||||||
1999 |
24.43 | % | 27.10 | % | 16.54 | % | 17.35 | % | 21.74 | % | 14.07 | % | 17.49 | % | |||||||
2000 |
28.21 | % | 32.19 | % | 14.01 | % | 15.02 | % | 14.41 | % | 11.78 | % | 15.71 | % | |||||||
2001 |
27.56 | % | 29.77 | % | 13.79 | % | 14.44 | % | 17.22 | % | 12.57 | % | 14.55 | % | |||||||
2002 |
24.63 | % | 25.52 | % | 13.51 | % | 13.44 | % | 17.43 | % | 13.12 | % | 15.07 | % | |||||||
2003 |
26.34 | % | 26.59 | % | 16.17 | % | 16.66 | % | 20.32 | % | 13.86 | % | 12.47 | % | |||||||
2004 |
28.71 | % | 30.80 | % | 19.48 | % | 16.25 | % | 35.48 | % | 20.85 | % | 19.40 | % | |||||||
2005 |
27.49 | % | 26.55 | % | 13.23 | % | 12.38 | % | 21.32 | % | 18.18 | % | 16.31 | % | |||||||
2006 |
22.01 | % | 22.01 | % | 25.97 | % | 22.81 | % | 41.21 | % | 32.26 | % | 16.57 | % | |||||||
2007 |
19.54 | % | 21.17 | % | 14.96 | % | 13.91 | % | 21.28 | % | 20.35 | % | 14.65 | % | |||||||
2008 |
36.57 | % | 41.43 | % | 27.33 | % | 25.53 | % | 43.01 | % | 28.81 | % | 28.74 | % | |||||||
20091 |
38.58 | % | 44.18 | % | 26.73 | % | 25.63 | % | 35.07 | % | 36.63 | % | 23.28 | % |
1 |
As of February 28, 2009. Past Index levels are not necessarily indicative of future Index levels. |
2 |
Volatility, for these purposes, means the following: |
Daily Volatility: The relative rate at which the price of the Index moves up and down, found by calculating the annualized standard deviation of the daily change in price.
Monthly Return Volatility: The relative rate at which the price of the Index moves up and down, found by calculating the annualized standard deviation of the monthly change in price.
Average Annual Volatility: The average of yearly volatilities for a given sample period. The yearly volatility is the relative rate at which the price of the Index moves up and down, found by calculating the annualized standard deviation of the daily change in price for each business day in the given year.
3 |
As of June 4, 1990. Past Index levels are not necessarily indicative of future Index levels. |
4 |
As of December 2, 1988. Past Index levels are not necessarily indicative of future Index levels. |
5 |
As of September 3, 1997. Past Index levels are not necessarily indicative of future Index levels. |
14
ENERGY SECTOR DATA
RELATING TO
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY EXCESS RETURN
(DBLCI-OY ENERGY ER)
15
CLOSING LEVELS TABLES
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY EXCESS RETURN
CLOSING LEVEL | CHANGES | |||||||||
High1 | Low2 | Annual Index Changes3 |
Index Changes Since Inception4 |
|||||||
19905 |
179.19 | 96.66 | 45.52 | % | 45.52 | % | ||||
1991 |
147.42 | 107.20 | -20.99 | % | 14.98 | % | ||||
1992 |
137.39 | 110.88 | 9.57 | % | 25.99 | % | ||||
1993 |
138.78 | 100.51 | -20.19 | % | 0.56 | % | ||||
1994 |
122.19 | 95.20 | 6.96 | % | 7.56 | % | ||||
1995 |
119.82 | 102.02 | 11.00 | % | 19.39 | % | ||||
1996 |
197.83 | 111.99 | 63.92 | % | 95.71 | % | ||||
1997 |
204.30 | 159.71 | -18.40 | % | 59.71 | % | ||||
1998 |
160.51 | 97.65 | -36.95 | % | 0.70 | % | ||||
1999 |
178.20 | 92.77 | 72.80 | % | 74.00 | % | ||||
2000 |
298.97 | 167.50 | 41.06 | % | 145.44 | % | ||||
2001 |
278.42 | 192.42 | -16.74 | % | 104.36 | % | ||||
2002 |
298.19 | 194.55 | 41.97 | % | 190.12 | % | ||||
2003 |
391.72 | 284.31 | 32.29 | % | 283.81 | % | ||||
2004 |
715.99 | 383.42 | 54.72 | % | 493.84 | % | ||||
2005 |
1037.13 | 582.46 | 55.14 | % | 821.29 | % | ||||
2006 |
1074.96 | 812.65 | -10.74 | % | 722.36 | % | ||||
2007 |
1112.80 | 709.23 | 34.88 | % | 1009.21 | % | ||||
2008 |
1772.65 | 559.38 | -40.45 | % | 560.50 | % | ||||
20096 |
707.62 | 518.29 | -11.57 | % | 484.09 | % |
THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY EXCESS RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY TOTAL RETURN
CLOSING LEVEL | CHANGES | |||||||||
High1 | Low2 | Annual Index Changes3 |
Index Changes Since Inception4 |
|||||||
19905 |
183.60 | 97.33 | 51.88 | % | 51.88 | % | ||||
1991 |
154.30 | 112.85 | -16.53 | % | 26.77 | % | ||||
1992 |
155.82 | 122.35 | 13.48 | % | 43.86 | % | ||||
1993 |
160.01 | 118.31 | -17.71 | % | 18.38 | % | ||||
1994 |
147.06 | 112.95 | 11.67 | % | 32.19 | % | ||||
1995 |
155.68 | 127.46 | 17.38 | % | 55.17 | % | ||||
1996 |
270.11 | 146.19 | 72.56 | % | 167.77 | % | ||||
1997 |
279.83 | 227.35 | -14.08 | % | 130.07 | % | ||||
1998 |
232.17 | 147.51 | -33.81 | % | 52.29 | % | ||||
1999 |
282.30 | 141.11 | 81.15 | % | 175.87 | % | ||||
2000 |
496.29 | 265.84 | 49.64 | % | 312.83 | % | ||||
2001 |
476.58 | 334.41 | -13.77 | % | 255.97 | % | ||||
2002 |
527.96 | 339.16 | 44.32 | % | 413.72 | % | ||||
2003 |
700.53 | 505.36 | 33.65 | % | 586.61 | % | ||||
2004 |
1293.70 | 686.54 | 56.88 | % | 977.16 | % | ||||
2005 |
1917.92 | 1056.70 | 60.14 | % | 1625.00 | % | ||||
2006 |
2070.40 | 1595.93 | -6.33 | % | 1515.87 | % | ||||
2007 |
2285.06 | 1397.07 | 41.00 | % | 2178.45 | % | ||||
2008 |
3676.21 | 1165.04 | -39.62 | % | 1275.66 | % | ||||
20096 |
1473.82 | 1079.73 | -11.54 | % | 1116.91 | % |
THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY TOTAL RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
16
INDEX COMMODITIES WEIGHTS TABLES
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY EXCESS RETURN
CL7 | HO7 | LCO7 | XB7 | NG7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High1 | Low2 | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||||||||||
19905 |
21.8 | % | 21.9 | % | 21.4 | % | 22.6 | % | 27.2 | % | 22.2 | % | 23.4 | % | 22.4 | % | 6.2 | % | 10.9 | % | ||||||||||
1991 |
21.8 | % | 22.5 | % | 22.8 | % | 22.7 | % | 23.8 | % | 20.0 | % | 21.5 | % | 21.8 | % | 10.1 | % | 13.1 | % | ||||||||||
1992 |
21.3 | % | 22.3 | % | 23.1 | % | 23.1 | % | 21.6 | % | 21.5 | % | 21.7 | % | 22.2 | % | 12.3 | % | 10.8 | % | ||||||||||
1993 |
21.6 | % | 22.1 | % | 21.5 | % | 22.8 | % | 21.1 | % | 22.7 | % | 21.4 | % | 22.0 | % | 14.4 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||||||||
1994 |
20.6 | % | 21.7 | % | 22.4 | % | 22.5 | % | 24.7 | % | 21.9 | % | 23.0 | % | 21.8 | % | 9.3 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||||||||
1995 |
22.9 | % | 24.3 | % | 21.2 | % | 22.1 | % | 23.1 | % | 23.0 | % | 23.1 | % | 21.9 | % | 9.7 | % | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||
1996 |
22.6 | % | 22.6 | % | 21.6 | % | 21.1 | % | 22.0 | % | 22.5 | % | 21.8 | % | 22.9 | % | 12.0 | % | 10.9 | % | ||||||||||
1997 |
23.2 | % | 22.5 | % | 21.6 | % | 22.6 | % | 22.2 | % | 21.6 | % | 21.4 | % | 23.1 | % | 11.4 | % | 10.1 | % | ||||||||||
1998 |
22.4 | % | 22.7 | % | 22.9 | % | 23.4 | % | 21.3 | % | 21.1 | % | 23.5 | % | 22.5 | % | 9.9 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||||||||
1999 |
22.7 | % | 23.1 | % | 21.9 | % | 22.0 | % | 23.0 | % | 22.2 | % | 23.3 | % | 22.3 | % | 9.1 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||||||||
2000 |
21.8 | % | 22.9 | % | 22.5 | % | 22.2 | % | 21.2 | % | 22.8 | % | 23.2 | % | 23.2 | % | 11.4 | % | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||
2001 |
23.5 | % | 22.9 | % | 22.0 | % | 22.2 | % | 21.4 | % | 21.8 | % | 22.5 | % | 22.7 | % | 10.5 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||||||||
2002 |
21.4 | % | 23.2 | % | 22.4 | % | 22.5 | % | 24.2 | % | 22.6 | % | 21.8 | % | 23.2 | % | 10.3 | % | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||
2003 |
22.7 | % | 21.2 | % | 22.6 | % | 21.5 | % | 22.3 | % | 23.2 | % | 22.3 | % | 21.8 | % | 10.2 | % | 12.3 | % | ||||||||||
2004 |
23.9 | % | 22.6 | % | 23.0 | % | 22.2 | % | 23.2 | % | 21.8 | % | 21.0 | % | 22.9 | % | 8.8 | % | 10.5 | % | ||||||||||
2005 |
20.6 | % | 22.3 | % | 23.5 | % | 22.7 | % | 21.8 | % | 22.3 | % | 24.9 | % | 23.0 | % | 9.1 | % | 9.7 | % | ||||||||||
2006 |
23.3 | % | 22.8 | % | 22.7 | % | 22.7 | % | 23.2 | % | 22.9 | % | 25.3 | % | 22.8 | % | 5.5 | % | 8.7 | % | ||||||||||
2007 |
22.6 | % | 22.1 | % | 22.8 | % | 23.0 | % | 22.5 | % | 22.1 | % | 23.0 | % | 22.6 | % | 9.1 | % | 10.2 | % | ||||||||||
2008 |
22.2 | % | 21.8 | % | 24.2 | % | 21.3 | % | 22.3 | % | 22.8 | % | 21.3 | % | 21.7 | % | 10.1 | % | 12.4 | % | ||||||||||
20096 |
23.0 | % | 22.7 | % | 21.6 | % | 20.7 | % | 22.9 | % | 22.8 | % | 22.6 | % | 24.3 | % | 9.9 | % | 9.6 | % |
THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY EXCESS RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY TOTAL RETURN
CL7 | HO7 | LCO7 | XB7 | NG7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High1 | Low2 | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||||||||||
19905 |
21.8 | % | 21.9 | % | 21.4 | % | 22.6 | % | 27.2 | % | 22.2 | % | 23.4 | % | 22.4 | % | 6.2 | % | 10.9 | % | ||||||||||
1991 |
21.8 | % | 22.5 | % | 22.8 | % | 22.7 | % | 23.8 | % | 20.0 | % | 21.5 | % | 21.8 | % | 10.1 | % | 13.1 | % | ||||||||||
1992 |
21.3 | % | 22.3 | % | 23.2 | % | 23.1 | % | 21.6 | % | 21.5 | % | 21.5 | % | 22.2 | % | 12.5 | % | 10.8 | % | ||||||||||
1993 |
21.6 | % | 22.1 | % | 21.5 | % | 22.8 | % | 21.1 | % | 22.7 | % | 21.4 | % | 22.0 | % | 14.4 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||||||||
1994 |
20.6 | % | 21.7 | % | 22.4 | % | 22.5 | % | 24.7 | % | 21.9 | % | 23.0 | % | 21.8 | % | 9.3 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||||||||
1995 |
22.9 | % | 22.9 | % | 21.2 | % | 22.4 | % | 23.1 | % | 23.1 | % | 23.1 | % | 23.3 | % | 9.7 | % | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||
1996 |
22.6 | % | 22.6 | % | 21.6 | % | 21.1 | % | 22.0 | % | 22.5 | % | 21.8 | % | 22.9 | % | 12.0 | % | 10.9 | % | ||||||||||
1997 |
23.2 | % | 22.0 | % | 21.6 | % | 22.8 | % | 22.2 | % | 21.1 | % | 21.4 | % | 23.7 | % | 11.4 | % | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||
1998 |
22.4 | % | 22.7 | % | 22.9 | % | 23.4 | % | 21.3 | % | 21.1 | % | 23.5 | % | 22.5 | % | 9.9 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||||||||
1999 |
22.9 | % | 23.1 | % | 22.3 | % | 22.0 | % | 22.8 | % | 22.2 | % | 23.3 | % | 22.3 | % | 8.6 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||||||||
2000 |
21.8 | % | 22.9 | % | 22.5 | % | 22.2 | % | 21.2 | % | 22.8 | % | 23.2 | % | 23.2 | % | 11.4 | % | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||
2001 |
23.5 | % | 22.9 | % | 22.0 | % | 22.2 | % | 21.4 | % | 21.8 | % | 22.5 | % | 22.7 | % | 10.5 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||||||||
2002 |
21.4 | % | 23.2 | % | 22.4 | % | 22.5 | % | 24.2 | % | 22.6 | % | 21.8 | % | 23.2 | % | 10.3 | % | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||
2003 |
22.7 | % | 21.2 | % | 22.6 | % | 21.5 | % | 22.3 | % | 23.2 | % | 22.3 | % | 21.8 | % | 10.2 | % | 12.3 | % | ||||||||||
2004 |
23.9 | % | 22.6 | % | 23.0 | % | 22.2 | % | 23.2 | % | 21.8 | % | 21.0 | % | 22.9 | % | 8.8 | % | 10.5 | % | ||||||||||
2005 |
20.6 | % | 22.3 | % | 23.5 | % | 22.7 | % | 21.8 | % | 22.3 | % | 24.9 | % | 23.0 | % | 9.1 | % | 9.7 | % | ||||||||||
2006 |
23.3 | % | 22.8 | % | 22.7 | % | 22.7 | % | 23.2 | % | 22.9 | % | 25.3 | % | 22.8 | % | 5.5 | % | 8.7 | % | ||||||||||
2007 |
22.6 | % | 22.1 | % | 22.8 | % | 23.0 | % | 22.5 | % | 22.1 | % | 23.0 | % | 22.6 | % | 9.1 | % | 10.2 | % | ||||||||||
2008 |
22.2 | % | 21.8 | % | 24.2 | % | 21.3 | % | 22.4 | % | 22.8 | % | 21.3 | % | 21.7 | % | 10.0 | % | 12.4 | % | ||||||||||
20096 |
23.0 | % | 22.7 | % | 21.6 | % | 20.7 | % | 22.9 | % | 22.8 | % | 22.6 | % | 24.3 | % | 9.9 | % | 9.6 | % |
THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD ENERGY TOTAL RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
17
All statistics based on data from June 4, 1990 to February 28, 2009.
VARIOUS STATISTICAL MEASURES |
DBLCI-OY Energy ER8 |
DBLCI-OY Energy TR9 |
Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return10 |
||||||
Annualized Changes to Index Level11 |
9.9 | % | 14.3 | % | 5.1 | % | |||
Average rolling 3 month daily volatility12 |
23.6 | % | 23.6 | % | 29.3 | % | |||
Sharpe Ratio13 |
0.26 | 0.44 | 0.05 | ||||||
% of months with positive change14 |
56 | % | 56 | % | 52 | % | |||
Average monthly positive change15 |
6.1 | % | 6.3 | % | 7.8 | % | |||
Average monthly negative change16 |
-5.2 | % | -5.0 | % | -6.8 | % | |||
ANNUALIZED INDEX LEVELS17 |
DBLCI-OY Energy ER8 |
DBLCI-OY Energy TR9 |
Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return10 |
||||||
1 year |
-51.7 | % | -51.2 | % | -64.3 | % | |||
3 year |
-13.2 | % | -10.2 | % | -23.6 | % | |||
5 year |
6.5 | % | 9.7 | % | -9.1 | % | |||
7 year |
15.5 | % | 18.5 | % | 2.9 | % | |||
10 year |
19.7 | % | 23.5 | % | 11.0 | % | |||
15 year |
12.5 | % | 16.8 | % | 5.6 | % |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD JUNE 1990 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
18
COMPARISON OF DBLCI-OY ENERGY ER, DBLCI-OY ENERGY TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS US ENERGY TOTAL RETURN |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
Each of DBLCI-OY Energy ER, DBLCI-OY Energy TR and Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return are indices and do not reflect actual trading.
DBLCI-OY Energy TR and Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD JUNE 1990 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
19
COMPARISON OF DBLCI-OY ENERGY TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS US ENERGY TOTAL RETURN |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
Each of DBLCI-OY Energy TR and Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return are indices and do not reflect actual trading.
DBLCI-OY Energy TR and Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD JUNE 1990 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
20
NOTES AND LEGENDS:
1. | High reflects the highest closing level of the Index during the applicable year. |
2. | Low reflects the lowest closing level of the Index during the applicable year. |
3. | Annual Index Changes reflect the change to the Index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
4. | Index Changes Since Inception reflects the change of the Index level since inception on a compounded annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
5. | Closing levels as of inception on June 4, 1990. |
6. | Closing levels as of February 28, 2009. |
7. |
The Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Energy Excess Return and Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Energy Total Return reflect the change in market value of the following underlying index commodities: CL (Light, Sweet Crude Oil), HO (Heating Oil), LCO (Brent Crude Oil), XB (RBOB Gasoline) and NG (Natural Gas) on an optimum yield basis. |
8. |
DBLCI-OY Energy ER is Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Energy Excess Return. |
9. |
DBLCI-OY Energy TR is Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Energy Total Return. |
10. | Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return is Goldman Sachs US Energy Total Return. |
11. | Annualized Changes to Index Level reflect the change to the applicable index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
12. | Average rolling 3 month daily volatility. The daily volatility reflects the relative rate at which the price of the applicable index moves up and down, which is found by calculating the annualized standard deviation of the daily change in price. In turn, an average of this value is calculated on a 3 month rolling basis. |
13. | Sharpe Ratio compares the annualized rate of return minus the annualized risk-free rate of return to the annualized variabilityoften referred to as the standard deviation of the monthly rates of return. A Sharpe Ratio of 1:1 or higher indicates that, according to the measures used in calculating the ratio, the rate of return achieved by a particular strategy has equaled or exceeded the risks assumed by such strategy. The risk-free rate of return that was used in these calculations was assumed to be 3.79%. |
14. | % of months with positive change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
15. | Average monthly positive change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
16. | Average monthly negative change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
17. | Annualized Index Levels reflect the change to the level of the applicable index on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable time period (e.g., 1 year, 3, 5 or 7, 10 or 15 years, as applicable). |
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE
21
HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD JUNE 1990 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
ALTHOUGH THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL OBTAIN INFORMATION FOR INCLUSION IN OR FOR USE IN THE CALCULATION OF THE INDEX FROM SOURCE(S) WHICH THE INDEX SPONSOR CONSIDERS RELIABLE, THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY SUCH INFORMATION AND DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY AND/OR THE COMPLETENESS OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN. THE INDEX SPONSOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY ERROR IN THE INDEX AND THE INDEX SPONSOR IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO ADVISE ANY PERSON OF ANY ERROR THEREIN.
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, NO TRANSACTION RELATING TO THE INDEX IS SPONSORED, ENDORSED, SOLD OR PROMOTED BY THE INDEX SPONSOR AND THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO (A) THE ADVISABILITY OF PURCHASING OR ASSUMING ANY RISK IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH TRANSACTION (B) THE LEVELS AT WHICH THE INDEX STANDS AT ANY PARTICULAR TIME ON ANY PARTICULAR DATE (C) THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED BY THE ISSUER OF ANY SECURITY OR ANY COUNTERPARTY OR ANY SUCH ISSUERS SECURITY HOLDERS OR CUSTOMERS OR ANY SUCH COUNTERPARTYS CUSTOMERS OR COUNTERPARTIES OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FROM THE USE OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN IN CONNECTION WITH ANY LICENSED RIGHTS OR FOR ANY OTHER USE OR (D) ANY OTHER MATTER. THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN.
WITHOUT LIMITING ANY OF THE FOREGOING, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE INDEX SPONSOR HAVE ANY LIABILITY (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, CONSEQUENTIAL OR ANY OTHER DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOST PROFITS) EVEN IF NOTIFIED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
22
CRUDE OIL SECTOR DATA
RELATING TO
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL EXCESS RETURN
(DBLCI-OY CL ER)
23
CLOSING LEVELS TABLES
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL
EXCESS RETURN
CLOSING LEVEL | CHANGES | |||||||||
High1 | Low2 | Annual Index Changes3 |
Index Changes Since Inception4 |
|||||||
19885 |
112.02 | 97.53 | 12.02 | % | 12.02 | % | ||||
1989 |
192.01 | 110.98 | 71.41 | % | 92.01 | % | ||||
1990 |
294.82 | 160.13 | 24.79 | % | 139.61 | % | ||||
1991 |
238.71 | 175.06 | -15.63 | % | 102.15 | % | ||||
1992 |
224.82 | 189.93 | 0.68 | % | 103.52 | % | ||||
1993 |
217.01 | 152.46 | -24.79 | % | 53.08 | % | ||||
1994 |
173.31 | 142.13 | 5.59 | % | 61.64 | % | ||||
1995 |
202.32 | 157.90 | 25.16 | % | 102.32 | % | ||||
1996 |
414.35 | 185.87 | 104.80 | % | 314.35 | % | ||||
1997 |
425.66 | 303.27 | -26.65 | % | 203.93 | % | ||||
1998 |
302.95 | 171.33 | -40.94 | % | 79.51 | % | ||||
1999 |
346.30 | 165.23 | 85.26 | % | 232.56 | % | ||||
2000 |
551.67 | 325.69 | 31.04 | % | 335.79 | % | ||||
2001 |
532.29 | 390.80 | -3.95 | % | 318.57 | % | ||||
2002 |
608.00 | 399.11 | 41.61 | % | 492.76 | % | ||||
2003 |
847.48 | 574.29 | 39.55 | % | 727.21 | % | ||||
2004 |
1632.10 | 824.87 | 63.83 | % | 1255.23 | % | ||||
2005 |
2171.79 | 1319.88 | 42.95 | % | 1837.28 | % | ||||
2006 |
2389.01 | 1856.67 | -2.48 | % | 1789.17 | % | ||||
2007 |
2523.38 | 1571.31 | 33.12 | % | 2414.88 | % | ||||
2008 |
3955.92 | 1188.78 | -41.61 | % | 1368.33 | % | ||||
20096 |
1590.26 | 1147.41 | -9.81 | % | 1224.23 | % |
THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL EXCESS RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL
TOTAL RETURN
CLOSING LEVEL | CHANGES | |||||||||
High1 | Low2 | Annual Index Changes3 |
Index Changes Since Inception4 |
|||||||
19885 |
112.73 | 97.60 | 12.73 | % | 12.73 | % | ||||
1989 |
209.87 | 111.81 | 86.17 | % | 109.87 | % | ||||
1990 |
341.64 | 182.36 | 34.76 | % | 182.82 | % | ||||
1991 |
295.24 | 208.42 | -10.88 | % | 152.05 | % | ||||
1992 |
288.22 | 237.02 | 4.27 | % | 162.81 | % | ||||
1993 |
281.69 | 202.92 | -22.45 | % | 103.80 | % | ||||
1994 |
235.88 | 190.71 | 10.24 | % | 124.67 | % | ||||
1995 |
297.36 | 219.85 | 32.36 | % | 197.36 | % | ||||
1996 |
641.10 | 274.37 | 115.60 | % | 541.10 | % | ||||
1997 |
659.34 | 493.93 | -22.77 | % | 395.14 | % | ||||
1998 |
495.55 | 292.68 | -37.99 | % | 207.03 | % | ||||
1999 |
620.64 | 284.23 | 94.21 | % | 496.27 | % | ||||
2000 |
1035.63 | 584.55 | 39.02 | % | 728.92 | % | ||||
2001 |
1030.69 | 768.08 | -0.53 | % | 724.54 | % | ||||
2002 |
1217.32 | 786.82 | 43.96 | % | 1087.00 | % | ||||
2003 |
1713.97 | 1154.40 | 40.99 | % | 1573.50 | % | ||||
2004 |
3334.95 | 1670.29 | 66.12 | % | 2679.95 | % | ||||
2005 |
4541.88 | 2707.94 | 47.56 | % | 4002.06 | % | ||||
2006 |
5203.49 | 3969.14 | 2.34 | % | 4097.88 | % | ||||
2007 |
5859.72 | 3499.36 | 39.16 | % | 5741.98 | % | ||||
2008 |
9281.23 | 2799.96 | -40.80 | % | 3358.41 | % | ||||
20096 |
3745.67 | 2703.20 | -9.79 | % | 3020.00 | % |
THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL TOTAL RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
24
INDEX COMMODITIES WEIGHTS TABLES
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL EXCESS RETURN
CL7 | ||||||
High1 | Low2 | |||||
19885 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1989 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1990 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1991 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1992 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1993 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1994 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1995 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1996 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1997 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1998 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1999 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2000 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2001 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2002 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2003 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2004 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2005 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2006 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2007 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2008 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
20096 |
100 | % | 100 | % |
THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL EXCESS RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL TOTAL RETURN
CL7 | ||||||
High1 | Low2 | |||||
19885 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1989 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1990 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1991 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1992 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1993 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1994 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1995 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1996 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1997 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1998 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1999 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2000 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2001 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2002 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2003 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2004 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2005 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2006 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2007 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2008 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
20096 |
100 | % | 100 | % |
THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD CRUDE OIL TOTAL RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
25
All statistics based on data from December 2, 1988 to February 28, 2009.
VARIOUS STATISTICAL MEASURES |
DBLCI-OY CL ER8 |
DBLCI-OY CL TR9 |
Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index10 |
||||||
Annualized Changes to Index Level11 |
13.6 | % | 18.5 | % | 11.5 | % | |||
Average rolling 3 month daily volatility12 |
25.9 | % | 25.9 | % | 31.8 | % | |||
Sharpe Ratio13 |
0.37 | 0.56 | 0.23 | ||||||
% of months with positive change14 |
57 | % | 58 | % | 56 | % | |||
Average monthly positive change15 |
6.5 | % | 6.8 | % | 8.2 | % | |||
Average monthly negative change16 |
-5.4 | % | -5.2 | % | -7.4 | % | |||
ANNUALIZED INDEX LEVELS17 |
DBLCI-OY CL ER8 |
DBLCI-OY CL TR9 |
Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index10 |
||||||
1 year |
-50.9 | % | -50.4 | % | -69.2 | % | |||
3 year |
-12.0 | % | -9.1 | % | -25.7 | % | |||
5 year |
7.1 | % | 10.4 | % | -9.3 | % | |||
7 year |
16.9 | % | 19.9 | % | 4.5 | % | |||
10 year |
22.4 | % | 26.3 | % | 13.5 | % | |||
15 year |
15.6 | % | 20.1 | % | 11.3 | % |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN MAY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
26
COMPARISON OF DBLCI-OY CL ER, DBLCI-OY CL TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS CRUDE OIL TOTAL RETURN INDEX |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
Each of DBLCI-OY CL ER, DBLCI-OY CL TR and Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index are indices and do not reflect actual trading. DBLCI-OY CL TR and Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN MAY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
27
COMPARISON OF DBLCI-OY CL TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS CRUDE OIL TOTAL RETURN INDEX |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
Each of DBLCI-OY CL TR and Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index are indices and do not reflect actual trading. DBLCI-OY CL TR and Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN MAY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
28
NOTES AND LEGENDS:
1. | High reflects the highest closing level of the Index during the applicable year. |
2. | Low reflects the lowest closing level of the Index during the applicable year. |
3. | Annual Index Changes reflect the change to the Index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
4. | Index Changes Since Inception reflects the change of the Index level since inception on a compounded annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
5. | Closing levels as of inception on December 2, 1988. |
6. | Closing levels as of February 28, 2009. |
7. |
The Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Crude Oil Excess Return and Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Crude Oil Total Return reflect the change in market value of CL (Light, Sweet Crude Oil) on an optimum yield basis. |
8. |
DBLCI-OY CL ER is Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Crude Oil Excess Return. |
9. |
DBLCI-OY CL TR is Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Crude Oil Total Return. |
10. | Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index is Goldman Sachs Crude Oil Total Return Index. |
11. | Annualized Changes to Index Level reflect the change to the applicable index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
12. | Average rolling 3 month daily volatility. The daily volatility reflects the relative rate at which the price of the applicable index moves up and down, which is found by calculating the annualized standard deviation of the daily change in price. In turn, an average of this value is calculated on a 3 month rolling basis. |
13. | Sharpe Ratio compares the annualized rate of return minus the annualized risk-free rate of return to the annualized variabilityoften referred to as the standard deviation of the monthly rates of return. A Sharpe Ratio of 1:1 or higher indicates that, according to the measures used in calculating the ratio, the rate of return achieved by a particular strategy has equaled or exceeded the risks assumed by such strategy. The risk-free rate of return that was used in these calculations was assumed to be 4.08%. |
14. | % of months with positive change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
15. | Average monthly positive change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
16. | Average monthly negative change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
17. | Annualized Index Levels reflect the change to the level of the applicable index on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable time period (e.g., 1 year, 3, 5 or 7, 10 or 15 years, as applicable). |
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN MAY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP
29
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
ALTHOUGH THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL OBTAIN INFORMATION FOR INCLUSION IN OR FOR USE IN THE CALCULATION OF THE INDEX FROM SOURCE(S) WHICH THE INDEX SPONSOR CONSIDERS RELIABLE, THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY SUCH INFORMATION AND DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY AND/OR THE COMPLETENESS OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN. THE INDEX SPONSOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY ERROR IN THE INDEX AND THE INDEX SPONSOR IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO ADVISE ANY PERSON OF ANY ERROR THEREIN.
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, NO TRANSACTION RELATING TO THE INDEX IS SPONSORED, ENDORSED, SOLD OR PROMOTED BY THE INDEX SPONSOR AND THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO (A) THE ADVISABILITY OF PURCHASING OR ASSUMING ANY RISK IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH TRANSACTION (B) THE LEVELS AT WHICH THE INDEX STANDS AT ANY PARTICULAR TIME ON ANY PARTICULAR DATE (C) THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED BY THE ISSUER OF ANY SECURITY OR ANY COUNTERPARTY OR ANY SUCH ISSUERS SECURITY HOLDERS OR CUSTOMERS OR ANY SUCH COUNTERPARTYS CUSTOMERS OR COUNTERPARTIES OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FROM THE USE OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN IN CONNECTION WITH ANY LICENSED RIGHTS OR FOR ANY OTHER USE OR (D) ANY OTHER MATTER. THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN.
WITHOUT LIMITING ANY OF THE FOREGOING, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE INDEX SPONSOR HAVE ANY LIABILITY (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, CONSEQUENTIAL OR ANY OTHER DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOST PROFITS) EVEN IF NOTIFIED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
30
PRECIOUS METALS SECTOR DATA
RELATING TO
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS EXCESS RETURN
(DBLCI-OY PRECIOUS METALS ER)
31
CLOSING LEVELS TABLES
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS
EXCESS RETURN
CLOSING LEVEL | CHANGES | |||||||||
High1 | Low2 | Annual Index Changes3 |
Index Changes Since Inception4 |
|||||||
19885 |
99.45 | 94.47 | -5.10 | % | -5.10 | % | ||||
1989 |
95.07 | 78.33 | -10.54 | % | -15.10 | % | ||||
1990 |
88.33 | 70.07 | -12.51 | % | -25.72 | % | ||||
1991 |
75.34 | 62.42 | -15.60 | % | -37.30 | % | ||||
1992 |
64.28 | 56.55 | -9.44 | % | -43.22 | % | ||||
1993 |
71.31 | 55.38 | 18.49 | % | -32.72 | % | ||||
1994 |
68.95 | 61.70 | -6.24 | % | -36.92 | % | ||||
1995 |
65.86 | 60.00 | -4.13 | % | -39.53 | % | ||||
1996 |
65.24 | 54.89 | -9.22 | % | -45.11 | % | ||||
1997 |
55.35 | 43.82 | -17.28 | % | -54.59 | % | ||||
1998 |
48.63 | 40.62 | -7.08 | % | -57.81 | % | ||||
1999 |
45.88 | 37.10 | -1.70 | % | -58.53 | % | ||||
2000 |
44.35 | 36.32 | -11.36 | % | -63.24 | % | ||||
2001 |
37.53 | 33.78 | -2.66 | % | -64.22 | % | ||||
2002 |
42.57 | 35.33 | 18.95 | % | -57.43 | % | ||||
2003 |
50.84 | 39.24 | 19.06 | % | -49.32 | % | ||||
2004 |
57.55 | 46.00 | 6.35 | % | -46.10 | % | ||||
2005 |
64.36 | 50.94 | 16.97 | % | -36.95 | % | ||||
2006 |
89.86 | 63.88 | 21.19 | % | -23.60 | % | ||||
2007 |
93.76 | 72.62 | 20.64 | % | -7.82 | % | ||||
2008 |
111.75 | 70.48 | -4.17 | % | -11.67 | % | ||||
20096 |
102.67 | 80.96 | 8.37 | % | -4.28 | % |
THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS EXCESS RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS TOTAL RETURN
CLOSING LEVEL | CHANGES | |||||||||
High1 | Low2 | Annual Index Changes3 |
Index Changes Since Inception4 |
|||||||
19885 |
99.52 | 95.05 | -4.49 | % | -4.49 | % | ||||
1989 |
98.10 | 83.59 | -2.82 | % | -7.18 | % | ||||
1990 |
97.35 | 81.17 | -5.51 | % | -12.30 | % | ||||
1991 |
89.20 | 77.58 | -10.84 | % | -21.81 | % | ||||
1992 |
80.34 | 72.71 | -6.21 | % | -26.66 | % | ||||
1993 |
93.75 | 71.94 | 22.16 | % | -10.41 | % | ||||
1994 |
93.57 | 85.44 | -2.11 | % | -12.31 | % | ||||
1995 |
93.31 | 84.23 | 1.38 | % | -11.10 | % | ||||
1996 |
96.38 | 84.72 | -4.43 | % | -15.04 | % | ||||
1997 |
86.39 | 71.19 | -12.91 | % | -26.00 | % | ||||
1998 |
80.52 | 68.46 | -2.45 | % | -27.81 | % | ||||
1999 |
81.29 | 65.38 | 3.05 | % | -25.61 | % | ||||
2000 |
80.04 | 68.62 | -5.96 | % | -30.05 | % | ||||
2001 |
73.58 | 65.10 | 0.81 | % | -29.48 | % | ||||
2002 |
85.28 | 69.70 | 20.93 | % | -14.72 | % | ||||
2003 |
102.89 | 78.85 | 20.29 | % | 2.58 | % | ||||
2004 |
117.90 | 93.42 | 7.84 | % | 10.62 | % | ||||
2005 |
136.03 | 104.80 | 20.74 | % | 33.56 | % | ||||
2006 |
193.51 | 135.42 | 27.17 | % | 69.85 | % | ||||
2007 |
216.92 | 161.55 | 26.12 | % | 114.21 | % | ||||
2008 |
260.94 | 166.06 | -2.83 | % | 108.15 | % | ||||
20096 |
242.00 | 190.78 | 8.40 | % | 125.63 | % |
THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS TOTAL RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
32
INDEX COMMODITIES WEIGHTS TABLES
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS
EXCESS RETURN
GC7 | SI7 | |||||||||||
High1 | Low2 | High | Low | |||||||||
19885 |
80.0 | % | 79.6 | % | 20.0 | % | 20.4 | % | ||||
1989 |
79.7 | % | 80.9 | % | 20.3 | % | 19.1 | % | ||||
1990 |
81.2 | % | 80.0 | % | 18.8 | % | 20.0 | % | ||||
1991 |
80.9 | % | 80.5 | % | 19.1 | % | 19.5 | % | ||||
1992 |
78.8 | % | 80.1 | % | 21.2 | % | 19.9 | % | ||||
1993 |
77.3 | % | 80.3 | % | 22.7 | % | 19.7 | % | ||||
1994 |
76.6 | % | 81.7 | % | 23.4 | % | 18.3 | % | ||||
1995 |
78.7 | % | 82.3 | % | 21.3 | % | 17.7 | % | ||||
1996 |
79.9 | % | 79.8 | % | 20.1 | % | 20.2 | % | ||||
1997 |
77.8 | % | 77.0 | % | 22.2 | % | 23.0 | % | ||||
1998 |
75.9 | % | 78.5 | % | 24.1 | % | 21.5 | % | ||||
1999 |
80.0 | % | 77.2 | % | 20.0 | % | 22.8 | % | ||||
2000 |
80.1 | % | 80.4 | % | 19.9 | % | 19.6 | % | ||||
2001 |
82.1 | % | 81.0 | % | 17.9 | % | 19.0 | % | ||||
2002 |
80.7 | % | 79.5 | % | 19.3 | % | 20.5 | % | ||||
2003 |
78.6 | % | 80.4 | % | 21.4 | % | 19.6 | % | ||||
2004 |
79.7 | % | 77.9 | % | 20.3 | % | 22.1 | % | ||||
2005 |
79.3 | % | 81.2 | % | 20.7 | % | 18.8 | % | ||||
2006 |
76.1 | % | 79.6 | % | 23.9 | % | 20.4 | % | ||||
2007 |
81.1 | % | 80.1 | % | 18.9 | % | 19.9 | % | ||||
2008 |
78.4 | % | 81.4 | % | 21.6 | % | 18.6 | % | ||||
20096 |
79.1 | % | 80.9 | % | 20.9 | % | 19.1 | % |
THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS EXCESS RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS TOTAL RETURN
GC7 | SI7 | |||||||||||
High1 | Low2 | High | Low | |||||||||
19885 |
80.0 | % | 79.6 | % | 20.0 | % | 20.4 | % | ||||
1989 |
79.5 | % | 80.2 | % | 20.5 | % | 19.8 | % | ||||
1990 |
81.2 | % | 79.8 | % | 18.8 | % | 20.2 | % | ||||
1991 |
80.9 | % | 79.6 | % | 19.1 | % | 20.4 | % | ||||
1992 |
79.1 | % | 80.1 | % | 20.9 | % | 19.9 | % | ||||
1993 |
77.1 | % | 80.3 | % | 22.9 | % | 19.7 | % | ||||
1994 |
77.0 | % | 81.7 | % | 23.0 | % | 18.3 | % | ||||
1995 |
77.8 | % | 82.3 | % | 22.2 | % | 17.7 | % | ||||
1996 |
79.9 | % | 80.1 | % | 20.1 | % | 19.9 | % | ||||
1997 |
77.8 | % | 77.0 | % | 22.2 | % | 23.0 | % | ||||
1998 |
75.9 | % | 78.5 | % | 24.1 | % | 21.5 | % | ||||
1999 |
80.0 | % | 77.2 | % | 20.0 | % | 22.8 | % | ||||
2000 |
80.1 | % | 80.2 | % | 19.9 | % | 19.8 | % | ||||
2001 |
82.1 | % | 81.0 | % | 17.9 | % | 19.0 | % | ||||
2002 |
80.4 | % | 79.5 | % | 19.6 | % | 20.5 | % | ||||
2003 |
78.6 | % | 80.4 | % | 21.4 | % | 19.6 | % | ||||
2004 |
79.7 | % | 77.9 | % | 20.3 | % | 22.1 | % | ||||
2005 |
79.3 | % | 81.2 | % | 20.7 | % | 18.8 | % | ||||
2006 |
76.1 | % | 79.6 | % | 23.9 | % | 20.4 | % | ||||
2007 |
81.1 | % | 80.1 | % | 18.9 | % | 19.9 | % | ||||
2008 |
78.4 | % | 81.4 | % | 21.6 | % | 18.6 | % | ||||
20096 |
79.1 | % | 80.9 | % | 20.9 | % | 19.1 | % |
THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD PRECIOUS METALS TOTAL RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
33
All statistics based on data from December 2, 1988 to February 28, 2009.
VARIOUS STATISTICAL MEASURES |
DBLCI-OY Precious Metals ER8 |
DBLCI-OY Precious Metals TR9 |
Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return10 |
||||||
Annualized Changes to Index Level11 |
-0.2 | % | 4.1 | % | 4.4 | % | |||
Average rolling 3 month daily volatility12 |
15.0 | % | 15.0 | % | 14.4 | % | |||
Sharpe Ratio13 |
-0.29 | 0.00 | 0.02 | ||||||
% of months with positive change14 |
45 | % | 50 | % | 51 | % | |||
Average monthly positive change15 |
3.8 | % | 3.7 | % | 3.6 | % | |||
Average monthly negative change16 |
-3.0 | % | -2.9 | % | -2.8 | % | |||
ANNUALIZED INDEX LEVELS17 |
DBLCI-OY Precious Metals ER8 |
DBLCI-OY Precious Metals TR9 |
Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return10 |
||||||
1 year |
-12.0 | % | -11.1 | % | -8.6 | % | |||
3 year |
12.0 | % | 15.8 | % | 16.3 | % | |||
5 year |
13.8 | % | 17.3 | % | 17.9 | % | |||
7 year |
14.3 | % | 17.2 | % | 17.0 | % | |||
10 year |
8.4 | % | 11.9 | % | 12.4 | % | |||
15 year |
2.5 | % | 6.4 | % | 6.9 | % |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
34
COMPARISON OF DBLCI-OY PRECIOUS METALS ER, DBLCI-OY PRECIOUS METALS TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS US PRECIOUS METALS TOTAL RETURN INDEX |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
Each of DBLCI-OY Precious Metals ER, DBLCI-OY Precious Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return Index are indices and do not reflect actual trading. DBLCI-OY Precious Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return Index are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
35
COMPARISON OF DBLCI-OY PRECIOUS METALS TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS US PRECIOUS METALS TOTAL RETURN INDEX |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
Each of DBLCI-OY Precious Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return Index are indices and do not reflect actual trading. DBLCI-OY Precious Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return Index are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
36
NOTES AND LEGENDS:
1. | High reflects the highest closing level of the Index during the applicable year. |
2. | Low reflects the lowest closing level of the Index during the applicable year. |
3. | Annual Index Changes reflect the change to the Index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
4. | Index Changes Since Inception reflects the change of the Index level since inception on a compounded annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
5. | Closing levels as of inception on December 2, 1988. |
6. | Closing levels as of February 28, 2009. |
7. |
The Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Precious Metals Excess Return and Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Precious Metals Total Return reflect the change in market value of the following underlying index commodities: GC (Gold) and SI (Silver) on an optimum yield basis. |
8. |
DBLCI-OY Precious Metals ER is Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Precious Metals Excess Return. |
9. |
DBLCI-OY Precious Metals TR is Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Precious Metals Total Return. |
10. | Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return is Goldman Sachs US Precious Metals Total Return. |
11. | Annualized Changes to Index Level reflect the change to the applicable index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
12. | Average rolling 3 month daily volatility. The daily volatility reflects the relative rate at which the price of the applicable index moves up and down, which is found by calculating the annualized standard deviation of the daily change in price. In turn, an average of this value is calculated on a 3 month rolling basis. |
13. | Sharpe Ratio compares the annualized rate of return minus the annualized risk-free rate of return to the annualized variabilityoften referred to as the standard deviation of the monthly rates of return. A Sharpe Ratio of 1:1 or higher indicates that, according to the measures used in calculating the ratio, the rate of return achieved by a particular strategy has equaled or exceeded the risks assumed by such strategy. The risk-free rate of return that was used in these calculations was assumed to be 4.08%. |
14. | % of months with positive change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
15. | Average monthly positive change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
16. | Average monthly negative change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
17. | Annualized Index Levels reflect the change to the level of the applicable index on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable time period (e.g., 1 year, 3, 5 or 7, 10 or 15 years, as applicable). |
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE
37
HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
ALTHOUGH THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL OBTAIN INFORMATION FOR INCLUSION IN OR FOR USE IN THE CALCULATION OF THE INDEX FROM SOURCE(S) WHICH THE INDEX SPONSOR CONSIDERS RELIABLE, THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY SUCH INFORMATION AND DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY AND/OR THE COMPLETENESS OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN. THE INDEX SPONSOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY ERROR IN THE INDEX AND THE INDEX SPONSOR IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO ADVISE ANY PERSON OF ANY ERROR THEREIN.
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, NO TRANSACTION RELATING TO THE INDEX IS SPONSORED, ENDORSED, SOLD OR PROMOTED BY THE INDEX SPONSOR AND THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO (A) THE ADVISABILITY OF PURCHASING OR ASSUMING ANY RISK IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH TRANSACTION (B) THE LEVELS AT WHICH THE INDEX STANDS AT ANY PARTICULAR TIME ON ANY PARTICULAR DATE (C) THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED BY THE ISSUER OF ANY SECURITY OR ANY COUNTERPARTY OR ANY SUCH ISSUERS SECURITY HOLDERS OR CUSTOMERS OR ANY SUCH COUNTERPARTYS CUSTOMERS OR COUNTERPARTIES OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FROM THE USE OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN IN CONNECTION WITH ANY LICENSED RIGHTS OR FOR ANY OTHER USE OR (D) ANY OTHER MATTER. THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN.
WITHOUT LIMITING ANY OF THE FOREGOING, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE INDEX SPONSOR HAVE ANY LIABILITY (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, CONSEQUENTIAL OR ANY OTHER DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOST PROFITS) EVEN IF NOTIFIED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
38
GOLD SECTOR DATA
RELATING TO
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD GOLD EXCESS RETURN
(DBLCI-OY GC ER)
39
CLOSING LEVELS TABLES
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD GOLD EXCESS RETURN
CLOSING LEVEL | CHANGES | |||||||||
High1 | Low2 | Annual Index Changes3 |
Index Changes Since Inception4 |
|||||||
19885 |
99.43 | 94.00 | -5.59 | % | -5.59 | % | ||||
1989 |
94.66 | 79.15 | -7.60 | % | -12.77 | % | ||||
1990 |
91.16 | 72.70 | -9.12 | % | -20.72 | % | ||||
1991 |
80.68 | 66.43 | -15.91 | % | -33.34 | % | ||||
1992 |
67.23 | 60.20 | -9.29 | % | -39.53 | % | ||||
1993 |
73.24 | 59.14 | 14.87 | % | -30.54 | % | ||||
1994 |
70.04 | 64.50 | -5.82 | % | -34.58 | % | ||||
1995 |
66.28 | 61.54 | -4.98 | % | -37.84 | % | ||||
1996 |
66.44 | 57.01 | -8.28 | % | -42.99 | % | ||||
1997 |
56.60 | 42.01 | -25.00 | % | -57.24 | % | ||||
1998 |
46.03 | 39.77 | -3.80 | % | -58.87 | % | ||||
1999 |
44.76 | 34.92 | -3.54 | % | -60.32 | % | ||||
2000 |
43.19 | 34.95 | -10.07 | % | -64.32 | % | ||||
2001 |
36.96 | 32.79 | -2.15 | % | -65.08 | % | ||||
2002 |
43.15 | 34.85 | 23.03 | % | -57.04 | % | ||||
2003 |
50.90 | 39.63 | 18.18 | % | -49.24 | % | ||||
2004 |
54.99 | 45.62 | 3.76 | % | -47.33 | % | ||||
2005 |
61.77 | 49.36 | 14.51 | % | -39.68 | % | ||||
2006 |
82.59 | 61.37 | 16.20 | % | -29.91 | % | ||||
2007 |
87.24 | 66.67 | 23.43 | % | -13.49 | % | ||||
2008 |
102.34 | 70.49 | 1.73 | % | -11.99 | % | ||||
20096 |
99.76 | 80.47 | 6.58 | % | -6.20 | % |
THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD GOLD EXCESS RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD GOLD TOTAL RETURN
CLOSING LEVEL | CHANGES | |||||||||
High1 | Low2 | Annual Index Changes3 |
Index Changes Since Inception4 |
|||||||
19885 |
99.49 | 94.58 | -4.99 | % | -4.99 | % | ||||
1989 |
99.14 | 83.75 | 0.37 | % | -4.64 | % | ||||
1990 |
100.47 | 82.41 | -1.85 | % | -6.40 | % | ||||
1991 |
95.52 | 81.79 | -11.18 | % | -16.86 | % | ||||
1992 |
84.33 | 77.40 | -6.06 | % | -21.90 | % | ||||
1993 |
96.27 | 76.75 | 18.43 | % | -7.50 | % | ||||
1994 |
94.61 | 88.08 | -1.68 | % | -9.06 | % | ||||
1995 |
93.77 | 88.12 | 0.48 | % | -8.62 | % | ||||
1996 |
98.16 | 88.05 | -3.43 | % | -11.76 | % | ||||
1997 |
87.63 | 68.28 | -21.03 | % | -30.32 | % | ||||
1998 |
76.21 | 67.02 | 0.99 | % | -29.62 | % | ||||
1999 |
79.30 | 61.54 | 1.12 | % | -28.84 | % | ||||
2000 |
77.95 | 65.87 | -4.59 | % | -32.10 | % | ||||
2001 |
72.45 | 63.19 | 1.34 | % | -31.19 | % | ||||
2002 |
86.44 | 68.69 | 25.06 | % | -13.95 | % | ||||
2003 |
103.01 | 79.65 | 19.39 | % | 2.74 | % | ||||
2004 |
112.66 | 92.65 | 5.21 | % | 8.09 | % | ||||
2005 |
130.59 | 101.92 | 18.20 | % | 27.77 | % | ||||
2006 |
177.84 | 130.09 | 21.94 | % | 55.81 | % | ||||
2007 |
202.21 | 148.31 | 29.04 | % | 101.05 | % | ||||
2008 |
238.99 | 166.08 | 3.15 | % | 107.38 | % | ||||
20096 |
235.13 | 189.63 | 6.61 | % | 121.10 | % |
THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD GOLD TOTAL RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
40
INDEX COMMODITIES WEIGHTS TABLES
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD GOLD EXCESS RETURN
GC7 | ||||||
High1 | Low2 | |||||
19885 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1989 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1990 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1991 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1992 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1993 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1994 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1995 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1996 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1997 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1998 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1999 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2000 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2001 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2002 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2003 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2004 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2005 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2006 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2007 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2008 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
20096 |
100 | % | 100 | % |
THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD GOLD EXCESS RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD GOLD TOTAL RETURN
GC7 | ||||||
High1 | Low2 | |||||
19885 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1989 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1990 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1991 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1992 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1993 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1994 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1995 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1996 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1997 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1998 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
1999 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2000 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2001 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2002 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2003 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2004 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2005 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2006 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2007 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
2008 |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||
20096 |
100 | % | 100 | % |
THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD GOLD TOTAL RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
41
All statistics based on data from December 2, 1988 to February 28, 2009.
VARIOUS STATISTICAL MEASURES |
DBLCI-OY GC ER8 |
DBLCI-OY GC TR9 |
Gold Spot Fix pm10 | ||||||
Annualized Changes to Index Level11 |
-0.3 | % | 4.0 | % | 4.1 | % | |||
Average rolling 3 month daily volatility12 |
13.9 | % | 13.9 | % | 13.6 | % | |||
Sharpe Ratio13 |
-0.32 | -0.01 | 0.00 | ||||||
% of months with positive change14 |
45 | % | 49 | % | 51 | % | |||
Average monthly positive change15 |
3.6 | % | 3.6 | % | 3.5 | % | |||
Average monthly negative change16 |
-2.9 | % | -2.7 | % | -2.8 | % | |||
ANNUALIZED INDEX LEVELS17 |
DBLCI-OY GC ER8 |
DBLCI-OY GC TR9 |
Gold Spot Fix pm10 | ||||||
1 year |
-5.7 | % | -4.7 | % | -2.0 | % | |||
3 year |
12.9 | % | 16.7 | % | 19.6 | % | |||
5 year |
14.2 | % | 17.7 | % | 19.2 | % | |||
7 year |
14.1 | % | 17.0 | % | 18.1 | % | |||
10 year |
8.7 | % | 12.1 | % | 12.7 | % | |||
15 year |
2.2 | % | 6.1 | % | 6.3 | % |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN MAY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
42
COMPARISON OF DBLCI-OY GC ER, DBLCI-OY GC TR AND GOLD SPOT FIX PM |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
Each of DBLCI-OY GC ER and DBLCI-OY GC TR are indices and do not reflect actual trading. Gold Spot Fix pm reflects a composite of actual trading prices. DBLCI-OY GC TR is calculated on a total return basis and does not reflect any fees or expenses.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN MAY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
43
COMPARISON OF DBLCI-OY GC TR AND GOLD SPOT FIX PM |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DBLCI-OY GC TR is an index and does not reflect actual trading. Gold Spot Fix pm reflects a composite of actual trading prices. DBLCI-OY GC TR is calculated on a total return basis and does not reflect any fees or expenses.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN MAY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
44
NOTES AND LEGENDS:
1. | High reflects the highest closing level of the Index during the applicable year. |
2. | Low reflects the lowest closing level of the Index during the applicable year. |
3. | Annual Index Changes reflect the change to the Index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
4. | Index Changes Since Inception reflects the change of the Index level since inception on a compounded annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
5. | Closing levels as of inception on December 2, 1988. |
6. | Closing levels as of February 28, 2009. |
7. |
The Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Gold Excess Return and Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Gold Total Return reflect the change in market value of GC (Gold) on an optimum yield basis. |
8. |
DBLCI-OY GC ER is Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Gold Excess Return. |
9. |
DBLCI-OY GC TR is Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Gold Total Return. |
10. | Gold Spot Fix pm is an internationally published benchmark for gold and is available through The London Bullion Market Associations (the LBMA) website at http://www.lbma.org.uk/statistics_historic.htm. The fixings are fully transparent and are therefore used to determine the accepted average price of gold. As a benchmark, many other financial instruments (such as cash-settled swaps and options) are priced off the fixing. The gold fixing started in 1919. The gold fixing is conducted twice a day by telephone, at approximately 10:30 am and 3:00 pm. The five Gold Fixing members are the Bank of Nova ScotiaScotiaMocatta, Barclays Bank Plc, Deutsche Bank AG, HSBC Bank USA, NA and Société Générale. |
11. | Annualized Changes to Index Level reflect the change to the applicable index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
12. | Average rolling 3 month daily volatility. The daily volatility reflects the relative rate at which the price of the applicable index moves up and down, which is found by calculating the annualized standard deviation of the daily change in price. In turn, an average of this value is calculated on a 3 month rolling basis. |
13. | Sharpe Ratio compares the annualized rate of return minus the annualized risk-free rate of return to the annualized variabilityoften referred to as the standard deviation of the monthly rates of return. A Sharpe Ratio of 1:1 or higher indicates that, according to the measures used in calculating the ratio, the rate of return achieved by a particular strategy has equaled or exceeded the risks assumed by such strategy. The risk-free rate of return that was used in these calculations was assumed to be 4.08%. |
14. | % of months with positive change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
15. | Average monthly positive change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
16. | Average monthly negative change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
17. | Annualized Index Levels reflect the change to the level of the applicable index on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable time period (e.g., 1 year, 3, 5 or 7, 10 or 15 years, as applicable). |
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN MAY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
45
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH APRIL 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
ALTHOUGH THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL OBTAIN INFORMATION FOR INCLUSION IN OR FOR USE IN THE CALCULATION OF THE INDEX FROM SOURCE(S) WHICH THE INDEX SPONSOR CONSIDERS RELIABLE, THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY SUCH INFORMATION AND DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY AND/OR THE COMPLETENESS OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN. THE INDEX SPONSOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY ERROR IN THE INDEX AND THE INDEX SPONSOR IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO ADVISE ANY PERSON OF ANY ERROR THEREIN.
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, NO TRANSACTION RELATING TO THE INDEX IS SPONSORED, ENDORSED, SOLD OR PROMOTED BY THE INDEX SPONSOR AND THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO (A) THE ADVISABILITY OF PURCHASING OR ASSUMING ANY RISK IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH TRANSACTION (B) THE LEVELS AT WHICH THE INDEX STANDS AT ANY PARTICULAR TIME ON ANY PARTICULAR DATE (C) THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED BY THE ISSUER OF ANY SECURITY OR ANY COUNTERPARTY OR ANY SUCH ISSUERS SECURITY HOLDERS OR CUSTOMERS OR ANY SUCH COUNTERPARTYS CUSTOMERS OR COUNTERPARTIES OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FROM THE USE OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN IN CONNECTION WITH ANY LICENSED RIGHTS OR FOR ANY OTHER USE OR (D) ANY OTHER MATTER. THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN.
WITHOUT LIMITING ANY OF THE FOREGOING, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE INDEX SPONSOR HAVE ANY LIABILITY (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, CONSEQUENTIAL OR ANY OTHER DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOST PROFITS) EVEN IF NOTIFIED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
46
SILVER SECTOR DATA
RELATING TO
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD SILVER EXCESS RETURN
(DBLCI-OY SI ER)
47
CLOSING LEVELS TABLES
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD SILVER EXCESS RETURN
CLOSING LEVEL | CHANGES | |||||||||
High1 | Low2 | Annual Index Changes3 |
Index Changes Since Inception4 |
|||||||
19885 |
99.56 | 96.35 | -3.14 | % | -3.14 | % | ||||
1989 |
98.80 | 74.81 | -21.67 | % | -24.12 | % | ||||
1990 |
77.71 | 52.83 | -26.21 | % | -44.01 | % | ||||
1991 |
58.55 | 46.28 | -14.31 | % | -52.02 | % | ||||
1992 |
53.20 | 42.91 | -10.01 | % | -56.83 | % | ||||
1993 |
62.57 | 41.28 | 33.57 | % | -42.33 | % | ||||
1994 |
64.94 | 49.92 | -8.36 | % | -47.15 | % | ||||
1995 |
64.61 | 46.95 | -0.55 | % | -47.45 | % | ||||
1996 |
58.86 | 45.10 | -13.26 | % | -54.41 | % | ||||
1997 |
56.61 | 38.79 | 17.06 | % | -46.63 | % | ||||
1998 |
61.92 | 41.66 | -17.16 | % | -55.79 | % | ||||
1999 |
49.84 | 42.50 | 5.74 | % | -53.26 | % | ||||
2000 |
47.98 | 39.06 | -16.40 | % | -60.93 | % | ||||
2001 |
40.38 | 32.68 | -6.36 | % | -63.41 | % | ||||
2002 |
41.20 | 34.04 | 4.25 | % | -61.86 | % | ||||
2003 |
46.80 | 34.43 | 22.10 | % | -53.43 | % | ||||
2004 |
63.99 | 43.08 | 13.63 | % | -47.08 | % | ||||
2005 |
68.75 | 50.02 | 27.66 | % | -32.44 | % | ||||
2006 |
110.77 | 67.36 | 40.22 | % | -5.27 | % | ||||
2007 |
109.82 | 82.34 | 9.77 | % | 3.99 | % | ||||
2008 |
142.11 | 59.28 | -27.27 | % | -24.37 | % | ||||
20096 |
97.29 | 70.03 | 16.05 | % | -12.23 | % |
THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD SILVER EXCESS RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD SILVER TOTAL RETURN
CLOSING LEVEL | CHANGES | |||||||||
High1 | Low2 | Annual Index Changes3 |
Index Changes Since Inception4 |
|||||||
19885 |
99.79 | 96.94 | -2.52 | % | -2.52 | % | ||||
1989 |
100.47 | 80.40 | -14.91 | % | -17.05 | % | ||||
1990 |
85.46 | 62.18 | -20.31 | % | -33.89 | % | ||||
1991 |
70.97 | 55.14 | -9.48 | % | -40.16 | % | ||||
1992 |
66.46 | 55.38 | -6.80 | % | -44.23 | % | ||||
1993 |
82.27 | 53.55 | 37.71 | % | -23.20 | % | ||||
1994 |
87.23 | 69.13 | -4.33 | % | -26.53 | % | ||||
1995 |
91.63 | 65.91 | 5.16 | % | -22.73 | % | ||||
1996 |
86.97 | 69.54 | -8.67 | % | -29.44 | % | ||||
1997 |
92.17 | 61.74 | 23.25 | % | -13.03 | % | ||||
1998 |
101.42 | 70.42 | -13.04 | % | -24.37 | % | ||||
1999 |
88.05 | 73.64 | 10.85 | % | -16.16 | % | ||||
2000 |
86.50 | 74.17 | -11.31 | % | -25.64 | % | ||||
2001 |
77.17 | 64.30 | -3.02 | % | -27.89 | % | ||||
2002 |
81.81 | 67.18 | 5.98 | % | -23.58 | % | ||||
2003 |
94.72 | 69.16 | 23.36 | % | -5.73 | % | ||||
2004 |
129.84 | 87.49 | 15.21 | % | 8.61 | % | ||||
2005 |
145.33 | 102.71 | 31.78 | % | 43.13 | % | ||||
2006 |
238.54 | 142.80 | 47.15 | % | 110.61 | % | ||||
2007 |
254.17 | 188.78 | 14.75 | % | 141.68 | % | ||||
2008 |
331.73 | 139.67 | -26.26 | % | 78.23 | % | ||||
20096 |
229.33 | 165.04 | 16.09 | % | 106.91 | % |
THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD SILVER TOTAL RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
48
INDEX COMMODITIES WEIGHTS TABLES
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD SILVER
EXCESS RETURN
SI7 | ||||
High1 | Low2 | |||
19885 |
100% | 100% | ||
1989 |
100% | 100% | ||
1990 |
100% | 100% | ||
1991 |
100% | 100% | ||
1992 |
100% | 100% | ||
1993 |
100% | 100% | ||
1994 |
100% | 100% | ||
1995 |
100% | 100% | ||
1996 |
100% | 100% | ||
1997 |
100% | 100% | ||
1998 |
100% | 100% | ||
1999 |
100% | 100% | ||
2000 |
100% | 100% | ||
2001 |
100% | 100% | ||
2002 |
100% | 100% | ||
2003 |
100% | 100% | ||
2004 |
100% | 100% | ||
2005 |
100% | 100% | ||
2006 |
100% | 100% | ||
2007 |
100% | 100% | ||
2008 |
100% | 100% | ||
20096 |
100% | 100% |
THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD SILVER EXCESS RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD SILVER
TOTAL RETURN
SI7 | ||||
High1 | Low2 | |||
19885 |
100% | 100% | ||
1989 |
100% | 100% | ||
1990 |
100% | 100% | ||
1991 |
100% | 100% | ||
1992 |
100% | 100% | ||
1993 |
100% | 100% | ||
1994 |
100% | 100% | ||
1995 |
100% | 100% | ||
1996 |
100% | 100% | ||
1997 |
100% | 100% | ||
1998 |
100% | 100% | ||
1999 |
100% | 100% | ||
2000 |
100% | 100% | ||
2001 |
100% | 100% | ||
2002 |
100% | 100% | ||
2003 |
100% | 100% | ||
2004 |
100% | 100% | ||
2005 |
100% | 100% | ||
2006 |
100% | 100% | ||
2007 |
100% | 100% | ||
2008 |
100% | 100% | ||
20096 |
100% | 100% |
THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD SILVER TOTAL RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
49
All statistics based on data from December 2, 1988 to February 28, 2009.
VARIOUS STATISTICAL MEASURES |
DBLCI-OY SI ER8 |
DBLCI-OY SI TR9 |
Silver Spot Fix pm10 | ||||||
Annualized Changes to Index Level11 |
-0.6 | % | 3.7 | % | 3.9 | % | |||
Average rolling 3 month daily volatility12 |
23.7 | % | 23.7 | % | 24.9 | % | |||
Sharpe Ratio13 |
-0.20 | -0.02 | -0.01 | ||||||
% of months with positive change14 |
47 | % | 50 | % | 49 | % | |||
Average monthly positive change15 |
5.9 | % | 5.9 | % | 6.0 | % | |||
Average monthly negative change16 |
-4.9 | % | -4.8 | % | -4.6 | % | |||
ANNUALIZED INDEX LEVELS17 |
DBLCI-OY SI ER8 |
DBLCI-OY SI TR9 |
Silver Spot Fix pm10 | ||||||
1 year |
-35.5 | % | -34.9 | % | -32.7 | % | |||
3 year |
6.2 | % | 9.8 | % | 10.9 | % | |||
5 year |
10.9 | % | 14.3 | % | 14.9 | % | |||
7 year |
13.4 | % | 16.3 | % | 16.9 | % | |||
10 year |
6.2 | % | 9.6 | % | 9.0 | % | |||
15 year |
2.5 | % | 6.5 | % | 6.3 | % |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JUNE 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH MAY 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
50
COMPARISON OF DBLCI-OY SI ER, DBLCI-OY SI TR AND SILVER SPOT FIX PM |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
Each of DBLCI-OY SI ER and DBLCI-OY SI TR are indices and do not reflect actual trading. Silver Spot Fix pm reflects a composite of actual trading prices. DBLCI-OY SI TR is calculated on a total return basis and does not reflect any fees or expenses.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JUNE 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH MAY 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
51
COMPARISON OF DBLCI-OY SI TR AND SILVER SPOT FIX PM |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DBLCI-OY SI TR is an index and does not reflect actual trading. Silver Spot Fix pm reflects a composite of actual trading prices.
DBLCI-OY SI TR is calculated on a total return basis and does not reflect any fees or expenses.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JUNE 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH MAY 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
52
NOTES AND LEGENDS:
1. | High reflects the highest closing level of the Index during the applicable year. |
2. | Low reflects the lowest closing level of the Index during the applicable year. |
3. | Annual Index Changes reflect the change to the Index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
4. | Index Changes Since Inception reflects the change of the Index level since inception on a compounded annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
5. | Closing levels as of inception on December 2, 1988. |
6. | Closing levels as of February 28, 2009. |
7. |
The Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Silver Excess Return and Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Silver Total Return reflect the change in market value of SI (Silver) on an optimum yield basis. |
8. |
DBLCI-OY SI ER is Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Silver Excess Return. |
9. |
DBLCI-OY SI TR is Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Silver Total Return. |
10. | Silver Spot Fix pm is an internationally published benchmark for silver and is available through The London Bullion Market Associations (the LBMA) website at http://www.lbma.org.uk/statistics_historic.htm. The fixings are fully transparent and are therefore used to determine the accepted average price of silver. As a benchmark, many other financial instruments (such as cash-settled swaps and options) are priced off the fixing. The silver fixing started in 1897. Three market making members of the LBMA conduct the Silver Fixing meeting under the chairmanship of The Bank of Nova ScotiaScotiaMocatta by telephone at 12.00 noon each working day. The other two members of the Silver Fixing are Deutsche Bank AG and HSBC Bank USA, NA. |
11. | Annualized Changes to Index Level reflect the change to the applicable index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
12. | Average rolling 3 month daily volatility. The daily volatility reflects the relative rate at which the price of the applicable index moves up and down, which is found by calculating the annualized standard deviation of the daily change in price. In turn, an average of this value is calculated on a 3 month rolling basis. |
13. | Sharpe Ratio compares the annualized rate of return minus the annualized risk-free rate of return to the annualized variabilityoften referred to as the standard deviationof the monthly rates of return. A Sharpe Ratio of 1:1 or higher indicates that, according to the measures used in calculating the ratio, the rate of return achieved by a particular strategy has equaled or exceeded the risks assumed by such strategy. The risk-free rate of return that was used in these calculations was assumed to be 4.08%. |
14. | % of months with positive change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
15. | Average monthly positive change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
16. | Average monthly negative change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
17. | Annualized Index Levels reflect the change to the level of the applicable index on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable time period (e.g., 1 year, 3, 5 or 7, 10 or 15 years, as applicable). |
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JUNE 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
53
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH MAY 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
ALTHOUGH THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL OBTAIN INFORMATION FOR INCLUSION IN OR FOR USE IN THE CALCULATION OF THE INDEX FROM SOURCE(S) WHICH THE INDEX SPONSOR CONSIDERS RELIABLE, THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY SUCH INFORMATION AND DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY AND/OR THE COMPLETENESS OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN. THE INDEX SPONSOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY ERROR IN THE INDEX AND THE INDEX SPONSOR IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO ADVISE ANY PERSON OF ANY ERROR THEREIN.
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, NO TRANSACTION RELATING TO THE INDEX IS SPONSORED, ENDORSED, SOLD OR PROMOTED BY THE INDEX SPONSOR AND THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO (A) THE ADVISABILITY OF PURCHASING OR ASSUMING ANY RISK IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH TRANSACTION (B) THE LEVELS AT WHICH THE INDEX STANDS AT ANY PARTICULAR TIME ON ANY PARTICULAR DATE (C) THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED BY THE ISSUER OF ANY SECURITY OR ANY COUNTERPARTY OR ANY SUCH ISSUERS SECURITY HOLDERS OR CUSTOMERS OR ANY SUCH COUNTERPARTYS CUSTOMERS OR COUNTERPARTIES OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FROM THE USE OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN IN CONNECTION WITH ANY LICENSED RIGHTS OR FOR ANY OTHER USE OR (D) ANY OTHER MATTER. THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN.
WITHOUT LIMITING ANY OF THE FOREGOING, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE INDEX SPONSOR HAVE ANY LIABILITY (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, CONSEQUENTIAL OR ANY OTHER DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOST PROFITS) EVEN IF NOTIFIED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
54
INDUSTRIAL METALS SECTOR DATA
RELATING TO
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS EXCESS RETURN
(DBLCI-OY INDUSTRIAL METALS ER)
55
CLOSING LEVELS TABLES
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS EXCESS RETURN
CLOSING LEVEL | CHANGES | |||||||||
High1 | Low2 | Annual Index Changes3 |
Index Changes Since Inception4 |
|||||||
19975 |
100.17 | 82.95 | -16.46 | % | -16.46 | % | ||||
1998 |
83.89 | 66.04 | -20.69 | % | -33.75 | % | ||||
1999 |
80.73 | 63.87 | 21.85 | % | -19.27 | % | ||||
2000 |
82.74 | 73.17 | -7.70 | % | -25.49 | % | ||||
2001 |
75.56 | 56.04 | -19.70 | % | -40.17 | % | ||||
2002 |
64.83 | 55.75 | -4.02 | % | -42.57 | % | ||||
2003 |
74.28 | 56.70 | 29.34 | % | -25.72 | % | ||||
2004 |
98.27 | 74.78 | 31.88 | % | -2.04 | % | ||||
2005 |
143.70 | 91.01 | 46.59 | % | 43.60 | % | ||||
2006 |
275.22 | 144.73 | 80.98 | % | 159.88 | % | ||||
2007 |
288.44 | 215.81 | -14.86 | % | 121.26 | % | ||||
2008 |
277.42 | 113.65 | -45.29 | % | 21.06 | % | ||||
20096 |
130.41 | 111.76 | -3.74 | % | 16.53 | % |
THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS EXCESS RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS TOTAL RETURN
CLOSING LEVEL | CHANGES | |||||||||
High1 | Low2 | Annual Index Changes3 |
Index Changes Since Inception4 |
|||||||
19975 |
100.19 | 84.33 | -15.05 | % | -15.05 | % | ||||
1998 |
85.63 | 70.50 | -16.74 | % | -29.27 | % | ||||
1999 |
90.35 | 68.63 | 27.73 | % | -9.65 | % | ||||
2000 |
96.13 | 84.03 | -2.07 | % | -11.53 | % | ||||
2001 |
90.14 | 68.73 | -16.84 | % | -26.43 | % | ||||
2002 |
80.03 | 69.47 | -2.42 | % | -28.21 | % | ||||
2003 |
93.81 | 71.10 | 30.67 | % | -6.19 | % | ||||
2004 |
125.83 | 94.46 | 33.72 | % | 25.44 | % | ||||
2005 |
189.91 | 116.58 | 51.32 | % | 89.82 | % | ||||
2006 |
380.41 | 191.40 | 89.91 | % | 260.47 | % | ||||
2007 |
407.16 | 309.75 | -10.99 | % | 220.85 | % | ||||
2008 |
404.06 | 167.11 | -44.52 | % | 78.00 | % | ||||
20096 |
191.75 | 164.37 | -3.71 | % | 71.39 | % |
THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS TOTAL RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
56
INDEX COMMODITIES WEIGHTS TABLES
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS EXCESS RETURN
MAL7 | MZN7 | MCU7 | ||||||||||||||||
High1 | Low2 | High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||
19975 |
33.3 | % | 34.4 | % | 33.1 | % | 34.4 | % | 33.6 | % | 31.2 | % | ||||||
1998 |
34.0 | % | 34.0 | % | 34.8 | % | 34.2 | % | 31.1 | % | 31.8 | % | ||||||
1999 |
33.8 | % | 32.7 | % | 33.1 | % | 37.0 | % | 33.1 | % | 30.3 | % | ||||||
2000 |
33.9 | % | 33.5 | % | 33.1 | % | 32.9 | % | 32.9 | % | 33.7 | % | ||||||
2001 |
36.3 | % | 38.1 | % | 31.0 | % | 29.3 | % | 32.7 | % | 32.6 | % | ||||||
2002 |
32.8 | % | 33.3 | % | 32.2 | % | 31.9 | % | 34.9 | % | 34.8 | % | ||||||
2003 |
32.4 | % | 32.7 | % | 33.4 | % | 33.4 | % | 34.2 | % | 33.8 | % | ||||||
2004 |
32.7 | % | 32.2 | % | 34.6 | % | 33.3 | % | 32.7 | % | 34.5 | % | ||||||
2005 |
32.1 | % | 32.5 | % | 34.5 | % | 34.7 | % | 33.4 | % | 32.8 | % | ||||||
2006 |
33.9 | % | 32.2 | % | 33.4 | % | 34.9 | % | 32.7 | % | 32.9 | % | ||||||
2007 |
34.5 | % | 34.9 | % | 30.0 | % | 31.5 | % | 35.5 | % | 33.5 | % | ||||||
2008 |
35.1 | % | 30.2 | % | 30.0 | % | 39.9 | % | 34.9 | % | 29.9 | % | ||||||
20096 |
28.0 | % | 26.6 | % | 41.4 | % | 40.1 | % | 30.6 | % | 33.3 | % |
THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS EXCESS RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS TOTAL RETURN
MAL7 | MZN7 | MCU7 | ||||||||||||||||
High1 | Low2 | High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||
19975 |
33.3 | % | 34.4 | % | 33.1 | % | 34.4 | % | 33.6 | % | 31.2 | % | ||||||
1998 |
34.0 | % | 34.0 | % | 34.8 | % | 34.2 | % | 31.1 | % | 31.8 | % | ||||||
1999 |
33.8 | % | 32.7 | % | 33.1 | % | 37.0 | % | 33.1 | % | 30.3 | % | ||||||
2000 |
33.5 | % | 33.3 | % | 32.8 | % | 34.2 | % | 33.7 | % | 32.4 | % | ||||||
2001 |
36.3 | % | 38.1 | % | 31.0 | % | 29.3 | % | 32.7 | % | 32.6 | % | ||||||
2002 |
32.8 | % | 33.3 | % | 32.2 | % | 31.9 | % | 34.9 | % | 34.8 | % | ||||||
2003 |
32.4 | % | 32.7 | % | 33.4 | % | 33.4 | % | 34.2 | % | 33.8 | % | ||||||
2004 |
32.7 | % | 32.2 | % | 34.6 | % | 33.3 | % | 32.7 | % | 34.5 | % | ||||||
2005 |
32.1 | % | 32.5 | % | 34.5 | % | 34.7 | % | 33.4 | % | 32.8 | % | ||||||
2006 |
33.9 | % | 32.2 | % | 33.4 | % | 34.9 | % | 32.7 | % | 32.9 | % | ||||||
2007 |
34.5 | % | 40.9 | % | 30.0 | % | 29.0 | % | 35.5 | % | 30.1 | % | ||||||
2008 |
35.1 | % | 30.2 | % | 30.0 | % | 39.9 | % | 34.9 | % | 29.9 | % | ||||||
20096 |
28.0 | % | 26.6 | % | 41.4 | % | 40.1 | % | 30.6 | % | 33.3 | % |
THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD INDUSTRIAL METALS TOTAL RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
57
All statistics based on data from September 3, 1997 to February 28, 2009.
VARIOUS STATISTICAL MEASURES |
DBLCI-OY Industrial Metals ER8 |
DBLCI-OY Industrial Metals TR9 |
Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metal Total Return10 |
||||||
Annualized Changes to Index Level11 |
10.0 | % | 14.0 | % | 12.7 | % | |||
Average rolling 3 month daily volatility12 |
18.4 | % | 18.4 | % | 19.7 | % | |||
Sharpe Ratio13 |
0.37 | 0.59 | 0.48 | ||||||
% of months with positive change14 |
49 | % | 53 | % | 53 | % | |||
Average monthly positive change15 |
5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | 4.8 | % | |||
Average monthly negative change16 |
-4.2 | % | -4.3 | % | -4.5 | % | |||
ANNUALIZED INDEX LEVELS17 |
DBLCI-OY Industrial Metals ER8 |
DBLCI-OY Industrial Metals TR9 |
Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metal Total Return10 |
||||||
1 year |
11.8 | % | 16.4 | % | 18.3 | % | |||
3 year |
38.3 | % | 44.1 | % | 36.6 | % | |||
5 year |
34.8 | % | 39.0 | % | 34.2 | % | |||
7 year |
20.6 | % | 24.0 | % | 21.5 | % |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 1997 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
58
COMPARISON OF DBLCI-OY INDUSTRIAL METALS ER, DBLCI-OY INDUSTRIAL METALS TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS US INDUSTRIAL METALS TOTAL RETURN INDEX |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
Each of DBLCI-OY Industrial Metals ER, DBLCI-OY Industrial Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metals Total Return Index are indices and do not reflect actual trading.
DBLCI-OY Industrial Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metals Total Return Index are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 1997 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
59
COMPARISON OF DBLCI-OY INDUSTRIAL METALS TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS US INDUSTRIAL METALS TOTAL RETURN INDEX |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
Each of DBLCI-OY Industrial Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metals Total Return Index are indices and do not reflect actual trading. DBLCI-OY Industrial Metals TR and Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metals Total Return Index are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 1997 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
60
NOTES AND LEGENDS:
1. | High reflects the highest closing level of the Index during the applicable year. |
2. | Low reflects the lowest closing level of the Index during the applicable year. |
3. | Annual Index Changes reflect the change to the Index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
4. | Index Changes Since Inception reflects the change of the Index level since inception on a compounded annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
5. | Closing levels as of inception on September 3, 1997. |
6. | Closing levels as of February 28, 2009. |
7. |
The Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Industrial Metals Excess Return and Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Industrial Metals Total Return reflect the change in market value of the following underlying index commodities: MAL (Aluminum), MZN (Zinc) and MCU (CopperGrade A) on an optimum yield basis. |
8. |
DBLCI-OY Industrial Metals ER is Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Industrial Metals Excess Return. |
9. |
DBLCI-OY Industrial Metals TR is Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Industrial Metals Total Return. |
10. | Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metal Total Return is Goldman Sachs US Industrial Metal Total Return. |
11. | Annualized Changes to Index Level reflect the change to the applicable index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
12. | Average rolling 3 month daily volatility. The daily volatility reflects the relative rate at which the price of the applicable index moves up and down, which is found by calculating the annualized standard deviation of the daily change in price. In turn, an average of this value is calculated on a 3 month rolling basis. |
13. | Sharpe Ratio compares the annualized rate of return minus the annualized risk-free rate of return to the annualized variabilityoften referred to as the standard deviation of the monthly rates of return. A Sharpe Ratio of 1:1 or higher indicates that, according to the measures used in calculating the ratio, the rate of return achieved by a particular strategy has equaled or exceeded the risks assumed by such strategy. The risk-free rate of return that was used in these calculations was assumed to be 3.26%. |
14. | % of months with positive change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
15. | Average monthly positive change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
16. | Average monthly negative change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
17. | Annualized Index Levels reflect the change to the level of the applicable index on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable time period (e.g., 1 year, 3, 5 or 7 years, as applicable). |
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE
61
HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 1997 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
ALTHOUGH THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL OBTAIN INFORMATION FOR INCLUSION IN OR FOR USE IN THE CALCULATION OF THE INDEX FROM SOURCE(S) WHICH THE INDEX SPONSOR CONSIDERS RELIABLE, THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY SUCH INFORMATION AND DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY AND/OR THE COMPLETENESS OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN. THE INDEX SPONSOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY ERROR IN THE INDEX AND THE INDEX SPONSOR IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO ADVISE ANY PERSON OF ANY ERROR THEREIN.
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, NO TRANSACTION RELATING TO THE INDEX IS SPONSORED, ENDORSED, SOLD OR PROMOTED BY THE INDEX SPONSOR AND THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO (A) THE ADVISABILITY OF PURCHASING OR ASSUMING ANY RISK IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH TRANSACTION (B) THE LEVELS AT WHICH THE INDEX STANDS AT ANY PARTICULAR TIME ON ANY PARTICULAR DATE (C) THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED BY THE ISSUER OF ANY SECURITY OR ANY COUNTERPARTY OR ANY SUCH ISSUERS SECURITY HOLDERS OR CUSTOMERS OR ANY SUCH COUNTERPARTYS CUSTOMERS OR COUNTERPARTIES OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FROM THE USE OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN IN CONNECTION WITH ANY LICENSED RIGHTS OR FOR ANY OTHER USE OR (D) ANY OTHER MATTER. THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN.
WITHOUT LIMITING ANY OF THE FOREGOING, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE INDEX SPONSOR HAVE ANY LIABILITY (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, CONSEQUENTIAL OR ANY OTHER DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOST PROFITS) EVEN IF NOTIFIED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
62
AGRICULTURE SECTOR DATA
RELATING TO
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD AGRICULTURE EXCESS RETURN
(DBLCI-OY AGRICULTURE ER)
63
CLOSING LEVELS TABLES
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD AGRICULTURE
EXCESS RETURN
CLOSING LEVEL | CHANGES | |||||||||
High1 | Low2 | Annual Index Changes3 |
Index Changes Since Inception4 |
|||||||
19885 |
104.37 | 99.09 | 4.37 | % | 4.37 | % | ||||
1989 |
110.17 | 96.30 | -1.76 | % | 2.54 | % | ||||
1990 |
111.78 | 86.63 | -15.52 | % | -13.37 | % | ||||
1991 |
94.19 | 80.78 | 8.34 | % | -6.14 | % | ||||
1992 |
101.16 | 86.77 | -6.53 | % | -12.27 | % | ||||
1993 |
101.06 | 86.44 | 15.20 | % | 1.06 | % | ||||
1994 |
104.89 | 92.32 | 0.25 | % | 1.32 | % | ||||
1995 |
122.81 | 95.76 | 21.21 | % | 22.81 | % | ||||
1996 |
146.59 | 117.81 | -2.55 | % | 19.68 | % | ||||
1997 |
132.21 | 111.96 | 0.23 | % | 19.95 | % | ||||
1998 |
120.35 | 85.16 | -28.71 | % | -14.49 | % | ||||
1999 |
89.18 | 65.03 | -19.49 | % | -31.16 | % | ||||
2000 |
76.73 | 67.18 | 5.91 | % | -27.09 | % | ||||
2001 |
73.31 | 57.42 | -20.62 | % | -42.12 | % | ||||
2002 |
70.67 | 53.68 | 10.37 | % | -36.12 | % | ||||
2003 |
75.17 | 63.93 | 15.51 | % | -26.22 | % | ||||
2004 |
91.37 | 69.95 | -2.26 | % | -27.88 | % | ||||
2005 |
81.36 | 68.79 | 10.53 | % | -20.29 | % | ||||
2006 |
90.17 | 72.91 | 10.36 | % | -12.03 | % | ||||
2007 |
111.62 | 83.37 | 25.54 | % | 10.44 | % | ||||
2008 |
144.19 | 72.19 | -19.87 | % | -11.50 | % | ||||
20096 |
92.20 | 78.86 | -9.57 | % | -19.97 | % |
THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD AGRICULTURE EXCESS RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD AGRICULTURE TOTAL RETURN
CLOSING LEVEL | CHANGES | |||||||||
High1 | Low2 | Annual Index Changes3 |
Index Changes Since Inception4 |
|||||||
19885 |
105.04 | 99.16 | 5.04 | % | 5.04 | % | ||||
1989 |
114.82 | 100.49 | 6.72 | % | 12.09 | % | ||||
1990 |
125.53 | 102.27 | -8.76 | % | 2.27 | % | ||||
1991 |
117.41 | 98.27 | 14.44 | % | 17.04 | % | ||||
1992 |
128.33 | 111.30 | -3.20 | % | 13.30 | % | ||||
1993 |
134.56 | 111.98 | 18.77 | % | 34.56 | % | ||||
1994 |
142.25 | 125.30 | 4.66 | % | 40.84 | % | ||||
1995 |
180.52 | 135.44 | 28.18 | % | 80.52 | % | ||||
1996 |
221.45 | 174.03 | 2.60 | % | 85.21 | % | ||||
1997 |
208.25 | 177.92 | 5.53 | % | 95.45 | % | ||||
1998 |
197.05 | 143.55 | -25.15 | % | 46.28 | % | ||||
1999 |
152.70 | 113.95 | -15.60 | % | 23.47 | % | ||||
2000 |
140.72 | 121.57 | 12.36 | % | 38.73 | % | ||||
2001 |
139.73 | 113.13 | -17.79 | % | 14.05 | % | ||||
2002 |
140.95 | 106.30 | 12.19 | % | 27.96 | % | ||||
2003 |
152.04 | 128.48 | 16.69 | % | 49.32 | % | ||||
2004 |
185.37 | 143.05 | -0.89 | % | 47.99 | % | ||||
2005 |
169.50 | 141.45 | 14.10 | % | 68.85 | % | ||||
2006 |
195.55 | 159.95 | 15.82 | % | 95.55 | % | ||||
2007 |
259.27 | 187.33 | 31.24 | % | 156.65 | % | ||||
2008 |
336.39 | 170.08 | -18.75 | % | 108.52 | % | ||||
20096 |
217.25 | 185.86 | -9.54 | % | 88.63 | % |
THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD AGRICULTURE TOTAL RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
64
INDEX COMMODITIES WEIGHTS TABLES
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD AGRICULTURE EXCESS RETURN
C7 | W7 | S7 | SB7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
High1 | Low2 | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||||||
19885 |
25.7 | % | 25.1 | % | 25.0 | % | 24.9 | % | 25.9 | % | 25.1 | % | 23.4 | % | 24.9 | % | ||||||||
1989 |
24.4 | % | 24.0 | % | 25.1 | % | 26.6 | % | 24.9 | % | 24.0 | % | 25.5 | % | 25.4 | % | ||||||||
1990 |
26.5 | % | 25.8 | % | 22.2 | % | 23.8 | % | 25.7 | % | 25.6 | % | 25.6 | % | 24.8 | % | ||||||||
1991 |
24.0 | % | 24.8 | % | 27.3 | % | 24.2 | % | 24.1 | % | 24.1 | % | 24.6 | % | 26.8 | % | ||||||||
1992 |
23.4 | % | 20.7 | % | 25.7 | % | 26.8 | % | 24.5 | % | 24.0 | % | 26.5 | % | 28.5 | % | ||||||||
1993 |
25.1 | % | 25.5 | % | 26.1 | % | 25.3 | % | 24.7 | % | 25.8 | % | 24.1 | % | 23.4 | % | ||||||||
1994 |
24.6 | % | 23.0 | % | 24.4 | % | 26.1 | % | 25.4 | % | 24.2 | % | 25.6 | % | 26.6 | % | ||||||||
1995 |
24.8 | % | 26.5 | % | 24.3 | % | 24.3 | % | 25.3 | % | 25.4 | % | 25.6 | % | 23.7 | % | ||||||||
1996 |
27.1 | % | 24.3 | % | 22.2 | % | 25.2 | % | 24.0 | % | 25.1 | % | 26.7 | % | 25.5 | % | ||||||||
1997 |
23.8 | % | 22.6 | % | 28.4 | % | 25.2 | % | 23.8 | % | 23.6 | % | 24.0 | % | 28.6 | % | ||||||||
1998 |
25.9 | % | 25.5 | % | 24.9 | % | 23.5 | % | 25.2 | % | 27.2 | % | 24.0 | % | 23.8 | % | ||||||||
1999 |
24.9 | % | 27.2 | % | 24.1 | % | 25.3 | % | 24.4 | % | 24.7 | % | 26.6 | % | 22.8 | % | ||||||||
2000 |
25.4 | % | 27.4 | % | 22.9 | % | 24.8 | % | 26.2 | % | 27.6 | % | 25.5 | % | 20.1 | % | ||||||||
2001 |
24.5 | % | 24.9 | % | 24.9 | % | 24.5 | % | 23.6 | % | 25.2 | % | 27.1 | % | 25.4 | % | ||||||||
2002 |
25.3 | % | 25.1 | % | 25.4 | % | 25.8 | % | 27.4 | % | 27.8 | % | 21.9 | % | 21.3 | % | ||||||||
2003 |
24.6 | % | 22.3 | % | 25.2 | % | 25.4 | % | 25.6 | % | 26.4 | % | 24.6 | % | 25.9 | % | ||||||||
2004 |
27.4 | % | 24.4 | % | 23.6 | % | 23.4 | % | 26.5 | % | 26.1 | % | 22.5 | % | 26.0 | % | ||||||||
2005 |
24.3 | % | 24.3 | % | 22.5 | % | 23.3 | % | 29.4 | % | 25.2 | % | 23.8 | % | 27.2 | % | ||||||||
2006 |
23.7 | % | 26.0 | % | 24.7 | % | 27.7 | % | 20.6 | % | 22.2 | % | 31.0 | % | 24.0 | % | ||||||||
2007 |
23.9 | % | 25.7 | % | 26.2 | % | 25.9 | % | 25.7 | % | 28.4 | % | 24.2 | % | 19.9 | % | ||||||||
2008 |
21.9 | % | 23.0 | % | 28.6 | % | 25.9 | % | 25.2 | % | 24.3 | % | 24.3 | % | 26.8 | % | ||||||||
20096 |
24.1 | % | 23.2 | % | 27.0 | % | 25.3 | % | 24.5 | % | 23.1 | % | 24.3 | % | 28.4 | % |
THE FUND WILL TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD AGRICULTURE EXCESS RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD AGRICULTURE TOTAL RETURN
C7 | W7 | S7 | SB7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
High1 | Low2 | High | Low | High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||||||
19885 |
25.7 | % | 25.1 | % | 25.0 | % | 24.9 | % | 25.9 | % | 25.1 | % | 23.4 | % | 24.9 | % | ||||||||
1989 |
24.8 | % | 24.0 | % | 24.7 | % | 26.6 | % | 25.2 | % | 24.0 | % | 25.3 | % | 25.4 | % | ||||||||
1990 |
26.5 | % | 25.8 | % | 22.2 | % | 23.8 | % | 25.7 | % | 25.6 | % | 25.6 | % | 24.8 | % | ||||||||
1991 |
24.0 | % | 24.8 | % | 27.3 | % | 24.2 | % | 24.1 | % | 24.1 | % | 24.6 | % | 26.8 | % | ||||||||
1992 |
23.4 | % | 20.9 | % | 25.7 | % | 26.9 | % | 24.5 | % | 23.7 | % | 26.5 | % | 28.5 | % | ||||||||
1993 |
25.1 | % | 25.5 | % | 26.1 | % | 25.3 | % | 24.7 | % | 25.8 | % | 24.1 | % | 23.4 | % | ||||||||
1994 |
24.0 | % | 23.0 | % | 24.5 | % | 26.1 | % | 23.9 | % | 24.2 | % | 27.6 | % | 26.6 | % | ||||||||
1995 |
24.8 | % | 26.5 | % | 24.3 | % | 24.3 | % | 25.3 | % | 25.4 | % | 25.6 | % | 23.7 | % | ||||||||
1996 |
27.1 | % | 25.1 | % | 22.2 | % | 23.9 | % | 24.0 | % | 26.1 | % | 26.7 | % | 24.9 | % | ||||||||
1997 |
24.4 | % | 22.6 | % | 24.4 | % | 25.2 | % | 24.8 | % | 23.6 | % | 26.3 | % | 28.6 | % | ||||||||
1998 |
25.9 | % | 25.5 | % | 24.9 | % | 23.5 | % | 25.2 | % | 27.2 | % | 24.0 | % | 23.8 | % | ||||||||
1999 |
24.9 | % | 27.2 | % | 24.1 | % | 25.3 | % | 24.4 | % | 24.7 | % | 26.6 | % | 22.8 | % | ||||||||
2000 |
25.4 | % | 27.4 | % | 22.9 | % | 24.8 | % | 26.2 | % | 27.6 | % | 25.5 | % | 20.1 | % | ||||||||
2001 |
24.5 | % | 24.9 | % | 24.9 | % | 24.5 | % | 23.6 | % | 25.2 | % | 27.1 | % | 25.4 | % | ||||||||
2002 |
25.3 | % | 25.1 | % | 25.4 | % | 25.8 | % | 27.4 | % | 27.8 | % | 21.9 | % | 21.3 | % | ||||||||
2003 |
24.6 | % | 25.0 | % | 25.2 | % | 24.3 | % | 25.6 | % | 25.5 | % | 24.6 | % | 25.1 | % | ||||||||
2004 |
27.4 | % | 21.0 | % | 23.6 | % | 22.4 | % | 26.5 | % | 22.6 | % | 22.5 | % | 34.0 | % | ||||||||
2005 |
24.3 | % | 24.3 | % | 22.5 | % | 23.3 | % | 29.4 | % | 25.2 | % | 23.8 | % | 27.2 | % | ||||||||
2006 |
25.6 | % | 26.0 | % | 25.4 | % | 27.7 | % | 25.7 | % | 22.2 | % | 23.3 | % | 24.0 | % | ||||||||
2007 |
23.9 | % | 25.6 | % | 26.2 | % | 24.8 | % | 25.7 | % | 25.9 | % | 24.2 | % | 23.6 | % | ||||||||
2008 |
21.9 | % | 23.0 | % | 28.6 | % | 25.9 | % | 25.2 | % | 24.3 | % | 24.3 | % | 26.8 | % | ||||||||
20096 |
24.1 | % | 23.2 | % | 27.0 | % | 25.3 | % | 24.5 | % | 23.1 | % | 24.3 | % | 28.4 | % |
THE FUND WILL NOT TRADE WITH A VIEW TO TRACKING THE DEUTSCHE BANK LIQUID COMMODITY INDEXOPTIMUM YIELD AGRICULTURE TOTAL RETURN OVER TIME. NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
65
All statistics based on data from December 2, 1988 to February 28, 2009.
VARIOUS STATISTICAL MEASURES |
DBLCI-OY Agriculture ER8 |
DBLCI-OY Agriculture TR9 |
Goldman Sachs US Agriculture Total Return10 |
||||||
Annualized Changes to Index Level11 |
-1.1 | % | 3.2 | % | -2.0 | % | |||
Average rolling 3 month daily volatility12 |
15.3 | % | 15.3 | % | 15.5 | % | |||
Sharpe Ratio13 |
-0.34 | -0.06 | -0.39 | ||||||
% of months with positive change14 |
49 | % | 54 | % | 47 | % | |||
Average monthly positive change15 |
3.6 | % | 3.5 | % | 3.9 | % | |||
Average monthly negative change16 |
-3.3 | % | -3.4 | % | -3.5 | % | |||
ANNUALIZED INDEX LEVELS17 |
DBLCI-OY Agriculture ER8 |
DBLCI-OY Agriculture TR9 |
Goldman Sachs US Agriculture Total Return10 |
||||||
1 year |
-42.8 | % | -42.2 | % | -47.9 | % | |||
3 year |
-2.5 | % | 0.8 | % | -4.8 | % | |||
5 year |
-0.6 | % | 2.5 | % | -7.1 | % | |||
7 year |
5.5 | % | 8.2 | % | -1.0 | % | |||
10 year |
0.6 | % | 3.9 | % | -4.7 | % | |||
15 year |
-1.5 | % | 2.2 | % | -3.4 | % |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
66
DBLCI-OY AGRICULTURE ER, DBLCI-OY AGRICULTURE TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS US AGRICULTURE TOTAL RETURN INDEX |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
Each of DBLCI-OY Agriculture ER, DBLCI-OY Agriculture TR and Goldman Sachs US Agriculture Total Return Index are indices and do not reflect actual trading. DBLCI-OY Agriculture TR and Goldman Sachs US Agriculture Total Return Index are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
67
COMPARISON OF DBLCI-OY AGRICULTURE TR AND GOLDMAN SACHS US AGRICULTURE TOTAL RETURN INDEX |
NEITHER THE PAST PERFORMANCE OF THE FUND NOR THE PRIOR INDEX LEVELS AND CHANGES, POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE, SHOULD BE TAKEN AS AN INDICATION OF THE FUNDS FUTURE PERFORMANCE.
DBLCI-OY Agriculture TR and Goldman Sachs US Agriculture Total Return Index are indices and do not reflect actual trading. DBLCI-OY Agriculture TR and Goldman Sachs US Agriculture Total Return Index are calculated on a total return basis and do not reflect any fees or expenses.
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
See accompanying Notes and Legends.
68
NOTES AND LEGENDS:
1. | High reflects the highest closing level of the Index during the applicable year. |
2. | Low reflects the lowest closing level of the Index during the applicable year. |
3. | Annual Index Changes reflect the change to the Index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
4. | Index Changes Since Inception reflects the change of the Index level since inception on a compounded annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
5. | Closing levels as of inception on December 2, 1988. |
6. | Closing levels as of February 28, 2009. |
7. |
The Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Agriculture Excess Return and Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Agriculture Total Return reflect the change in market value of the following underlying index commodities: C (Corn), W (Wheat), S (Sugar) and SB (Soybeans) on an optimum yield basis. |
8. |
DBLCI-OY Agriculture ER is Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Agriculture Excess Return. |
9. |
DBLCI-OY Agriculture TR is Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity IndexOptimum Yield Agriculture Total Return. |
10. | Goldman Sachs US Agriculture Total Return is Goldman Sachs US Agriculture Total Return. |
11. | Annualized Changes to Index Level reflect the change to the applicable index level on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable year. |
12. | Average rolling 3 month daily volatility. The daily volatility reflects the relative rate at which the price of the applicable index moves up and down, which is found by calculating the annualized standard deviation of the daily change in price. In turn, an average of this value is calculated on a 3 month rolling basis. |
13. | Sharpe Ratio compares the annualized rate of return minus the annualized risk-free rate of return to the annualized variabilityoften referred to as the standard deviation of the monthly rates of return. A Sharpe Ratio of 1:1 or higher indicates that, according to the measures used in calculating the ratio, the rate of return achieved by a particular strategy has equaled or exceeded the risks assumed by such strategy. The risk-free rate of return that was used in these calculations was assumed to be 4.08%. |
14. | % of months with positive change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
15. | Average monthly positive change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
16. | Average monthly negative change during the period from inception to February 28, 2009. |
17. | Annualized Index Levels reflect the change to the level of the applicable index on an annual basis as of December 31 of each applicable time period (e.g., 1 year, 3, 5 or 7, 10 or 15 years, as applicable). |
WHILE THE FUNDS OBJECTIVE IS NOT TO GENERATE PROFIT THROUGH ACTIVE PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, BUT IS TO TRACK THE INDEX, BECAUSE THE INDEX WAS ESTABLISHED IN JULY 2006, CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO INDEX CLOSING LEVELS MAY BE CONSIDERED TO BE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION MAY HAVE CERTAIN INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW.
NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE INDEX WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CLOSING LEVELS CONSISTENT WITH OR SIMILAR TO THOSE SET FORTH HEREIN. SIMILARLY, NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT THE FUND WILL GENERATE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THE FUNDS PAST PERFORMANCE, WHEN AVAILABLE, OR THE
69
HISTORICAL ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE CHANGES IN THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY INVESTMENT METHODOLOGIES, WHETHER ACTIVE OR PASSIVE.
ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL INFORMATION IS THAT IT IS GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. TO THE EXTENT THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED HEREIN RELATES TO THE PERIOD DECEMBER 1988 THROUGH JUNE 2006, THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS REFLECT THE APPLICATION OF THE INDEXS METHODOLOGY, AND SELECTION OF INDEX COMMODITIES, IN HINDSIGHT.
NO HYPOTHETICAL RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE ARE NUMEROUS FACTORS, INCLUDING THOSE DESCRIBED UNDER THE RISKS YOU FACE HEREIN, RELATED TO THE COMMODITIES MARKETS IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FUNDS EFFORTS TO TRACK ITS INDEX OVER TIME WHICH CANNOT BE, AND HAVE NOT BEEN, ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF SUCH INDEX INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES, ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS FOR THE FUND. FURTHERMORE, THE INDEX INFORMATION DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK OR ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FEES AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FUND.
THE MANAGING OWNER HAS HAD LIMITED EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CLIENTS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE INDEX CLOSING LEVELS SET FORTH HEREIN, PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THE ANNUAL OR CUMULATIVE INDEX RESULTS.
ALTHOUGH THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL OBTAIN INFORMATION FOR INCLUSION IN OR FOR USE IN THE CALCULATION OF THE INDEX FROM SOURCE(S) WHICH THE INDEX SPONSOR CONSIDERS RELIABLE, THE INDEX SPONSOR WILL NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY SUCH INFORMATION AND DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY AND/OR THE COMPLETENESS OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN. THE INDEX SPONSOR SHALL NOT BE LIABLE (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY ERROR IN THE INDEX AND THE INDEX SPONSOR IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO ADVISE ANY PERSON OF ANY ERROR THEREIN.
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, NO TRANSACTION RELATING TO THE INDEX IS SPONSORED, ENDORSED, SOLD OR PROMOTED BY THE INDEX SPONSOR AND THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO (A) THE ADVISABILITY OF PURCHASING OR ASSUMING ANY RISK IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH TRANSACTION (B) THE LEVELS AT WHICH THE INDEX STANDS AT ANY PARTICULAR TIME ON ANY PARTICULAR DATE (C) THE RESULTS TO BE OBTAINED BY THE ISSUER OF ANY SECURITY OR ANY COUNTERPARTY OR ANY SUCH ISSUERS SECURITY HOLDERS OR CUSTOMERS OR ANY SUCH COUNTERPARTYS CUSTOMERS OR COUNTERPARTIES OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FROM THE USE OF THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN IN CONNECTION WITH ANY LICENSED RIGHTS OR FOR ANY OTHER USE OR (D) ANY OTHER MATTER. THE INDEX SPONSOR MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO THE INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN.
WITHOUT LIMITING ANY OF THE FOREGOING, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE INDEX SPONSOR HAVE ANY LIABILITY (WHETHER IN NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) TO ANY PERSON FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, CONSEQUENTIAL OR ANY OTHER DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOST PROFITS) EVEN IF NOTIFIED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
70
PERFORMANCE OF COMMODITY POOLS OPERATED BY THE MANAGING OWNER AND ITS AFFILIATES
General
The performance information included herein is presented in accordance with CFTC regulations. The Funds differ materially in certain respects from the following pools performance which are included herein. The following sets forth summary performance information for all pools operated by the Managing Owner (other than the Funds).
The below pools, the performance of which are summarized herein, are materially different in certain respects from the Funds and the past performance summary of such pools are generally not representative of how the Funds might perform in the future. These pools also have material differences from the Funds, such as different investment objectives and strategies, leverage, employment of short in addition to long positions and fee structures, among other variations. The performance record of these pools may give some general indication of the Managing Owners capabilities by indicating the past performance of other pools sponsored by the Managing Owner.
All summary performance information is current as of February 28, 2009. Performance information is set forth, in accordance with CFTC Regulations, since (i) January 31, 2006 (inception with respect to PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) and (ii) September 18, 2006 (inception with respect to PowerShares DB G10 Currency Harvest Fund (DBV)), (iii) February 20, 2007 (inception with respect to each of PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) and PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund (UDN)). CFTC Regulations require inclusion of only performance information within the five most recent calendar years and year-to-date, or, if inception of the pool has been less than five years and year-to-date, then since inception.
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS, AND MATERIAL DIFFERENCES EXIST AMONG THE FUNDS AND THE POOLS WHOSE PERFORMANCE ARE SUMMARIZED HEREIN.
INVESTORS SHOULD NOTE THAT INTEREST INCOME MAY CONSTITUTE A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF A COMMODITY POOLS INCOME AND, IN CERTAIN INSTANCES, MAY GENERATE PROFITS WHERE THERE HAVE BEEN REALIZED AND UNREALIZED LOSSES FROM COMMODITY TRADING.
PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB COMMODITY INDEX TRACKING FUND (TICKER: DBC)
Name of Pool: PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
Type of Pool: Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool
Inception of Trading: February 2006
Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of February 28, 2009: $2,887,414,586
Net Asset Value as of February 28, 2009: $1,376,623,980
Net Asset Value per Share as of February 28, 2009: $19.17
Worst Monthly Drawdown: (23.77)% October 2008
Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown: (57.34)% June 2008 February 2009*
Monthly Rate of Return |
2009(%) | 2008(%) | 2007(%) | 2006(%) | ||||||||
January |
(5.18 | ) | 3.24 | (2.36 | ) | |||||||
February |
(5.61 | ) | 11.21 | 5.30 | (4.66 | ) | ||||||
March |
(0.61 | ) | 0.67 | 3.63 | ||||||||
April |
4.46 | 0.55 | 6.51 | |||||||||
May |
8.32 | (0.51 | ) | (0.42 | ) | |||||||
June |
10.64 | 1.22 | (0.29 | ) | ||||||||
July |
(10.61 | ) | 1.94 | 1.65 | ||||||||
August |
(5.97 | ) | (2.21 | ) | (2.71 | ) | ||||||
September |
(11.01 | ) | 8.58 | (4.54 | ) | |||||||
October |
(23.77 | ) | 8.58 | 1.21 | ||||||||
November |
(10.38 | ) | 0.26 | 6.40 | ||||||||
December |
(6.71 | )** | 3.76 | *** | (4.70 | )**** | ||||||
Compound Rate of Return |
(10.50 (2 months |
)% ) |
(31.91 | )% | 28.15 | % | 1.23 (11 months |
% ) |
* | The Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown from June 2008 February 2009 includes the effect of the $0.34 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Please see Footnote **. |
** | The December 2008 return of (6.71)% includes the $0.34 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pools return for December 2008 was (5.23)%. |
*** | The December 2007 return of 3.76% includes the $0.76 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007. Prior to the December 28, 2007 distribution, the pools return for December 2007 was 6.23%. |
**** | The December 2006 return of (4.70)% includes the $0.61 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 20, 2006. Prior to the December 29, 2006 distribution, the pools return for December 2006 was (2.33)%. |
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
See accompanying Footnotes to Performance Information.
71
PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB G10 CURRENCY HARVEST FUND (TICKER: DBV)
Name of Pool: PowerShares DB G10 Currency Harvest Fund
Type of Pool: Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool
Inception of Trading: September 2006
Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of February 28, 2009: $736,149,024
Net Asset Value as of February 28, 2009: $262,590,558
Net Asset Value per Share as of February 28, 2009: $19.03
Worst Monthly Drawdown: (14.37)% October 2008
Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown: (36.85)% October 2007 January 2009*
Monthly Rate of Return |
2009(%) | 2008(%) | 2007(%) | 2006(%) | ||||||||
January |
(5.33 | ) | (1.31 | ) | 1.01 | | ||||||
February |
3.09 | (0.96 | ) | 0.65 | | |||||||
March |
(4.00 | ) | 2.47 | | ||||||||
April |
4.28 | 2.27 | | |||||||||
May |
1.34 | 2.14 | | |||||||||
June |
(0.70 | ) | 3.09 | | ||||||||
July |
(0.04 | ) | (0.97 | ) | | |||||||
August |
(4.01 | ) | (3.94 | ) | | |||||||
September |
(5.84 | ) | 2.79 | (0.24 | ) | |||||||
October |
(14.37 | ) | 3.10 | 1.92 | ||||||||
November |
(3.21 | ) | (3.76 | ) | (1.30 | ) | ||||||
December |
(3.42 | )** | (2.67 | )*** | 2.99 | **** | ||||||
Compound Rate of Return |
(2.41 | )% | (28.78 | )% | 5.96 | % | 3.36 | % | ||||
(2 months | ) | (3 1/2 months | ) |
* | The Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown from October 2007 January 2009 includes the effect of the $0.80 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007, and the effect of the $0.27 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Please see Footnotes ** and ***. |
** | The December 2008 return of (3.42)% includes the $0.27 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pools return for December 2008 was (2.08)%. |
*** | The December 2007 return of (2.67)% includes the $0.80 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007. Prior to the December 28, 2007 distribution, the pools return for December 2007 was 0.14%. |
**** | The December 2006 return of 2.99% includes the $0.06 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 20, 2006. Prior to the December 29, 2006 distribution, the pools return for December 2006 was 3.23%. |
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB US DOLLAR INDEX BULLISH FUND (TICKER: UUP), A SERIES OF POWERSHARES DB US DOLLAR INDEX TRUST
Name of Pool: PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
Type of Pool: Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool
Inception of Trading: February 2007
Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of February 28, 2009: $1,114,496,386
Net Asset Value as of February 28, 2009: $349,173,302
Net Asset Value per Share as of February 28, 2009: $26.45
Worst Monthly Drawdown: (6.89)% December 2008
Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown: (10.19)% February 2007 March 2008*
Monthly Rate of Return |
2009(%) | 2008(%) | 2007(%) | ||||||
January |
5.02 | (1.47 | ) | | |||||
February |
1.89 | (1.84 | ) | (0.32 | ) | ||||
March |
(2.48 | ) | (0.32 | ) | |||||
April |
0.80 | (1.29 | ) | ||||||
May |
0.31 | 1.55 | |||||||
June |
(0.62 | ) | 0.00 | ||||||
July |
0.93 | (0.92 | ) | ||||||
August |
5.42 | 0.57 | |||||||
September |
1.88 | (3.31 | ) | ||||||
October |
8.49 | (1.17 | ) | ||||||
November |
0.38 | 0.04 | |||||||
December |
(6.89 | )** | 0.04 | *** | |||||
Compound Rate of Return |
7.00 | % | 4.17 | % | (5.08 | )% | |||
(2 months | ) | (10 1/4 months | ) |
* | The Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown from February 2007 March 2008 includes the effect of the $0.20 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007. Please see Footnote ***. |
** | The December 2008 return of (6.89)% includes the $0.17 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pools return for December 2008 was (6.25)%. |
*** | The December 2007 return of 0.04% includes the $0.20 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007. Prior to the December 28, 2007 distribution, the pools return for December 2007 was 0.76%. |
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
See accompanying footnotes to performance information.
72
PERFORMANCE OF POWERSHARES DB US DOLLAR INDEX BEARISH FUND (TICKER: UDN), A SERIES OF POWERSHARES DB US DOLLAR INDEX TRUST
Name of Pool: PowerShares DB US Dollar Index Bearish Fund
Type of Pool: Public, Exchange-Listed Commodity Pool
Inception of Trading: February 2007
Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions as of February 28, 2009: $381,847,096
Net Asset Value as of February 28, 2009: $176,088,053
Net Asset Value per Share as of February 28, 2009: $24.46
Worst Monthly Drawdown: (8.37)% October 2008
Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown: (17.03)% March 2008 February 2009*
Monthly Rate of Return |
2009(%) | 2008(%) | 2007(%) | ||||||
January |
(4.70 | ) | 2.14 | | |||||
February |
(1.92 | ) | 4.28 | 0.64 | |||||
March |
2.65 | 0.99 | |||||||
April |
(0.68 | ) | 2.01 | ||||||
May |
(0.27 | ) | (0.73 | ) | |||||
June |
0.82 | 0.74 | |||||||
July |
(0.71 | ) | 1.54 | ||||||
August |
(5.30 | ) | 0.38 | ||||||
September |
(1.99 | ) | 3.82 | ||||||
October |
(8.37 | ) | 1.68 | ||||||
November |
(0.48 | ) | 0.68 | ||||||
December |
5.78 | ** | (1.92 | )*** | |||||
Compound Rate of Return |
(6.53 | )% | (2.94 | )% | 10.16 | % | |||
(2 months | ) | (10 1/4 months | ) |
* | The Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown from March 2008 February 2009 includes the effect of the $0.15 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Please see Footnote **. |
** | The December 2008 return of 5.78% includes the $0.15 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 17, 2008. Prior to the December 30, 2008 distribution, the pools return for December 2008 was 6.39%. |
*** | The December 2007 return of (1.92)% includes the $0.40 per Share distribution made to Shareholders of record as of December 19, 2007. Prior to the December 28, 2007 distribution, the pools return for December 2007 was 0.39%. |
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
See accompanying Footnotes to Performance Information.
Footnotes to Performance Information
1. Aggregate Gross Capital Subscriptions is the aggregate of all amounts ever contributed to the relevant pool, including investors who subsequently redeemed their investments.
2. Net Asset Value is the net asset value of each pool as of February 28, 2009.
3. Net Asset Value per Share is the Net Asset Value of the relevant pool divided by the total number of Shares outstanding with respect to such pool as of February 28, 2009.
4. Worst Monthly Drawdown is the largest single month loss sustained since inception of trading. Drawdown as used in this section of the Prospectus means losses experienced by the relevant pool over the specified period and is calculated on a rate of return basis, i.e., dividing net performance by beginning equity. Drawdown is measured on the basis of monthly returns only, and does not reflect intra-month figures. Month is the month of the Worst Monthly Drawdown.
5. Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown is the largest percentage decline in the Net Asset Value per Share over the history of the relevant pool. This need not be a continuous decline, but can be a series of positive and negative returns where the negative returns are larger than the positive returns. Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown represents the greatest percentage decline from any month-end Net Asset Value per Share that occurs without such month-end Net Asset Value per Share being equaled or exceeded as of a subsequent month-end. For example, if the Net Asset Value per Share of a particular pool declined by $1 in each of January and February, increased by $1 in March and declined again by $2 in April, a peak-to-valley drawdown analysis conducted as of the end of April would consider that drawdown to be still continuing and to be $3 in amount, whereas if the Net Asset Value per Share had increased by $2 in March, the January-February drawdown would have ended as of the end of February at the $2 level.
73