UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 | ||
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-16265
LIME ENERGY CO.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
36-4197337 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
16810 Kenton Drive, Suite 240, Huntersville, NC 28078
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(704) 892-4442
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o |
|
Accelerated Filer o |
|
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
23,842,556 shares of the registrants common stock, $.0001 par value per share, were outstanding as of August 5, 2011.
LIME ENERGY CO.
FORM 10-Q
For The Quarter Ended June 30, 2011
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Lime Energy Co.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 (1) |
| ||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
6,524 |
|
$ |
13,016 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
724 |
|
1,913 |
| ||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
25,205 |
|
26,393 |
| ||
Inventories |
|
1,026 |
|
998 |
| ||
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts |
|
13,094 |
|
15,417 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
1,206 |
|
985 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Current Assets |
|
47,779 |
|
58,722 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property and Equipment, Net |
|
5,860 |
|
2,940 |
| ||
Long-Term Receivables |
|
327 |
|
543 |
| ||
Deferred Financing Costs, Net |
|
20 |
|
|
| ||
Intangibles, Net |
|
5,137 |
|
5,444 |
| ||
Goodwill |
|
18,627 |
|
18,627 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
$ |
77,750 |
|
$ |
86,276 |
|
Lime Energy Co.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 (1) |
| ||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
108 |
|
$ |
115 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
17,769 |
|
19,143 |
| ||
Accrued expenses |
|
9,521 |
|
10,370 |
| ||
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts |
|
1,074 |
|
998 |
| ||
Customer deposits |
|
542 |
|
791 |
| ||
Total Current Liabilities |
|
29,014 |
|
31,417 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-Term Debt, less current maturities |
|
359 |
|
418 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Liabilities |
|
29,373 |
|
31,835 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized 23,822,941, and 23,662,172 issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
2 |
|
2 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
184,306 |
|
183,140 |
| ||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(135,931 |
) |
(128,701 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
48,377 |
|
54,441 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
$ |
77,750 |
|
$ |
86,276 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(1) Derived from audited financial statements in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010
Lime Energy Co.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
| ||||||||
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Revenue |
|
$ |
24,260 |
|
$ |
17,508 |
|
$ |
43,240 |
|
$ |
29,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cost of sales |
|
19,767 |
|
13,319 |
|
35,132 |
|
23,273 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Gross Profit |
|
4,493 |
|
4,189 |
|
8,108 |
|
6,048 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
6,794 |
|
6,094 |
|
13,967 |
|
12,527 |
| ||||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
153 |
|
163 |
|
307 |
|
325 |
| ||||
Restructuring charge |
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
1,109 |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Operating loss |
|
(3,563 |
) |
(2,068 |
) |
(7,275 |
) |
(6,804 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other Income (Expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest income |
|
34 |
|
48 |
|
75 |
|
98 |
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
(19 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(30 |
) |
(18 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Total other income |
|
15 |
|
40 |
|
45 |
|
80 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net loss |
|
|
(3,548 |
) |
|
(2,028 |
) |
|
(7,230 |
) |
|
(6,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share |
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
(0.30 |
) |
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding |
|
23,812 |
|
23,609 |
|
23,806 |
|
23,601 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
Lime Energy Co.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
Total |
| ||||
|
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
Paid-in |
|
Accumulated |
|
Stockholders |
| ||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Deficit |
|
Equity (Deficit) |
| ||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
23,662 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
183,140 |
|
$ |
(128,701 |
) |
$ |
54,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Shares issued for benefit plans and option exercises |
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,230 |
) |
(7,230 |
) | ||||
Balance, June 30, 2011 |
|
23,823 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
184,306 |
|
$ |
(135,931 |
) |
$ |
48,377 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
Lime Energy Co.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Loss |
|
$ |
(3,548 |
) |
$ |
(2,028 |
) |
$ |
(7,230 |
) |
$ |
(6,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Provision for bad debt |
|
19 |
|
30 |
|
95 |
|
12 |
| ||||
Share-based compensation |
|
818 |
|
368 |
|
1,166 |
|
743 |
| ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
309 |
|
290 |
|
597 |
|
571 |
| ||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
| ||||
(Gain) loss on disposition of property and equipment |
|
(1 |
) |
1 |
|
(3 |
) |
8 |
| ||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Accounts receivable |
|
3,549 |
|
(1,490 |
) |
1,309 |
|
1,622 |
| ||||
Inventories |
|
(149 |
) |
(18 |
) |
(28 |
) |
(93 |
) | ||||
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts |
|
(3,287 |
) |
(207 |
) |
2,323 |
|
115 |
| ||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
10 |
|
(88 |
) |
(221 |
) |
(321 |
) | ||||
Accounts payable |
|
(33 |
) |
1,779 |
|
(1,374 |
) |
(559 |
) | ||||
Accrued expenses |
|
1,721 |
|
(739 |
) |
(849 |
) |
292 |
| ||||
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts |
|
305 |
|
426 |
|
76 |
|
773 |
| ||||
Customer deposits |
|
(136 |
) |
(36 |
) |
(249 |
) |
(33 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
(416 |
) |
(1,712 |
) |
(4,378 |
) |
(3,594 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
1 |
| ||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
(2,101 |
) |
(119 |
) |
(3,210 |
) |
(231 |
) | ||||
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash |
|
1,190 |
|
(2,801 |
) |
1,189 |
|
(3,301 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(910 |
) |
(2,920 |
) |
(2,018 |
) |
(3,531 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Payments of long-term debt |
|
(27 |
) |
(109 |
) |
(65 |
) |
(141 |
) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of shares for benefit plans |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
72 |
| ||||
Cash paid for deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(27 |
) |
(37 |
) |
(96 |
) |
(69 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
(1,353 |
) |
(4,669 |
) |
(6,492 |
) |
(7,194 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, at beginning of period |
|
7,877 |
|
20,345 |
|
13,016 |
|
22,870 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, at end of period |
|
$ |
6,524 |
|
$ |
15,676 |
|
$ |
6,524 |
|
15,676 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
|
$ |
6 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
$ |
13 |
|
$ |
18 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
Lime Energy Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (the Financial Statements) of Lime Energy Co. (Lime Energy and, together with its subsidiaries, the Company, we, us or our) have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). In our opinion, however, the Financial Statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of and for the interim periods.
The results of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
The December 31, 2010 balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP.
For further information, refer to the audited financial statements and the related footnotes included in the Lime Energy Co. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Note 2 - Share-Based Compensation
Stock Options
A committee of the Board of Directors grants stock options and restricted stock under the Companys 2008 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended (the Plan). All of the options have been granted at a price equal to or greater than the market price of the Companys stock on the date of grant. Substantially all stock option grants outstanding under the Plan vest ratably over three years and expire 10 years from the date of grant. In addition to the Plan, the Company gave employees the right to purchase shares at a discount to the market price under its employee stock purchase plan (ESPP). The ESPP expired on November 30, 2010, however the Companys stockholders approved a new employee stock purchase plan which became effective July 1, 2011 and will continue for three years or until the 300,000 shares allocated to the plan have been exhausted. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company issued options to certain employees that vest upon achievement of certain financial objectives in combination with a minimum market price for its common stock during a five-year period (the Cliff Options). The Company assesses the probability of achieving these objectives at the end of each month and recognizes expense accordingly. In addition to the Plan and the ESPP, the Board of Directors grants restricted stock to non-employee directors under the Companys 2010 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan (the Directors Plan). Restricted stock granted to date under the Directors Plan vest 50% upon grant and 50% on the first anniversary of the grant date if the director is still serving on the Board of Directors on the vesting date.
The Company accounts for employee share-based awards in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718. This pronouncement requires companies to measure the cost of employee service received in exchange for a share-based award based on the fair value of the award at the date of
Lime Energy Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
grant, with expense recognized over the requisite service period, which is generally equal to the vesting period of the grant.
The following table summarizes the Companys total share-based compensation expense for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Stock options |
|
$ |
570 |
|
$ |
267 |
|
746 |
|
572 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Restricted stock |
|
248 |
|
90 |
|
420 |
|
145 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
26 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
$ |
818 |
|
$ |
368 |
|
$ |
1,166 |
|
$ |
743 |
|
The Company uses an Enhanced Hull-White Trinomial model to value its employee options. The weighted-average, grant-date fair value of stock options granted to employees and the weighted-average significant assumptions used to determine those fair values, using an Enhanced Hull-White Trinomial model for stock options under ASC 718, are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted average fair-value per option granted |
|
$ |
2.02 |
|
$ |
1.96 |
|
$ |
1.96 |
|
$ |
1.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Significant assumptions (weighted average): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Risk-free rate |
|
0.05 |
% |
0.16 |
% |
0.09 |
% |
0.13 |
% | ||||
Dividend yield |
|
0.00 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
0.00 |
% |
0.00 |
% | ||||
Expected volatility |
|
81.9 |
% |
80.3 |
% |
82.1 |
% |
81.2 |
% | ||||
Expected life (years) |
|
6.0 |
|
7.5 |
|
6.0 |
|
7.0 |
| ||||
Expected turn-over rate |
|
10.20 |
% |
9.41 |
% |
10.96 |
% |
9.25 |
% | ||||
Expected exercise multiple |
|
2.20 |
|
2.20 |
|
2.20 |
|
2.20 |
| ||||
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury Bill rates at the time of grant. The dividend yield reflects the fact that the Company has never paid a dividend on its common stock and does not expect to in the foreseeable future. The Company estimated the volatility of its common stock at the date of grant based on the historical volatility of its stock. The expected term of the options is based on the simplified method as described in the Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, which is the average of the vesting term and the original contract term. The expected turnover rate represents the expected forfeitures due to employee turnover and is based on historical rates experienced by the Company. The expected exercise
Lime Energy Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
multiple represents the mean ratio of the stock price to the exercise price at which employees are expected to exercise their options and is based on an empirical study completed by S. Huddart and M. Lang (1996).
Option activity under the Companys stock option plans as of June 30, 2011 and changes during the three months then ended are presented below:
|
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price Per |
|
Weighted |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Outstanding at March 31, 2011 |
|
3,765,207 |
|
$3.04 - $735.00 |
|
$ |
6.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Granted |
|
457,500 |
|
$4.23 - $4.70 |
|
$ |
4.24 |
|
Exercised |
|
(13,596 |
) |
$3.50 - $3.66 |
|
$ |
3.61 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(27,393 |
) |
$3.50 - $735.00 |
|
$ |
40.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
|
4,181,718 |
|
$3.04 - $263.55 |
|
$ |
5.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Options exercisable at June 30, 2011 |
|
2,271,239 |
|
$3.30 - $263.55 |
|
$ |
7.33 |
|
Option activity under the Companys stock option plans as of June 30, 2011 and changes during the six-month period then ended are presented below:
|
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price Per |
|
Weighted |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
3,374,045 |
|
$3.04 - $1,363.95 |
|
$ |
7.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Granted |
|
885,536 |
|
$4.04 - $4.70 |
|
$ |
4.15 |
|
Exercised |
|
(36,378 |
) |
$3.30 - $4.65 |
|
$ |
3.82 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(41,485 |
) |
$3.50 - $1,363.95 |
|
$ |
70.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Outstanding at June 30, 2011 |
|
4,181,718 |
|
$3.04 - $263.55 |
|
$ |
5.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Options exercisable at June 30, 2011 |
|
2,271,239 |
|
$3.30 - $263.55 |
|
$ |
7.33 |
|
Lime Energy Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at June 30, 2011:
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
Number |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Remaining |
|
Weighted |
|
Number |
|
Weighted |
| ||
|
|
at June 30, |
|
Contractual |
|
Average |
|
Exercisable at |
|
Average |
| ||
Exercise Price |
|
2011 |
|
Life |
|
Exercise Price |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
Exercise Price |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
$3.04 - $3.50 |
|
476,758 |
|
6.1 years |
|
$ |
3.43 |
|
368,425 |
|
$ |
3.41 |
|
$3.51 - $4.50 |
|
2,019,873 |
|
9.0 years |
|
$ |
4.28 |
|
228,560 |
|
$ |
4.05 |
|
$4.51 - $5.00 |
|
241,072 |
|
5.6 years |
|
$ |
4.66 |
|
230,239 |
|
$ |
4.65 |
|
$5.01 - $7.00 |
|
135,714 |
|
5.5 years |
|
$ |
6.65 |
|
135,714 |
|
$ |
6.65 |
|
$7.01 - $9.00 |
|
740,494 |
|
5.3 years |
|
$ |
7.29 |
|
740,494 |
|
$ |
7.29 |
|
$9.01 - $11.00 |
|
212,842 |
|
5.1 years |
|
$ |
10.28 |
|
212,842 |
|
$ |
10.28 |
|
$11.01 - $263.55 |
|
354,965 |
|
6.2 years |
|
$ |
13.80 |
|
354,965 |
|
$ |
13.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
$3.04 - $263.55 |
|
4,181,718 |
|
7.3 years |
|
$ |
5.93 |
|
2,271,239 |
|
$ |
7.33 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of the outstanding options (the difference between the closing stock price on the last trading day of the second quarter of 2011 of $5.36 per share and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on June 30, 2011 was approximately $3.3 million. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable options as of June 30, 2011 was approximately $1.2 million. These amounts will change based on changes in the fair market value of the Companys common stock.
As of June 30, 2011, there was approximately $1.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.74 years and unrecognized cost of $351,000 related to restricted stock which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 8.9 months. In addition, there was approximately $1.1 million of unrecognized expense related to the Cliff Options which may be recognized over the next 46 months.
Note 3 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the FASB issued an accounting pronouncement related to fair value measurement (FASB ASC Topic 820), which amends current guidance to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The amendments generally represent clarification of FASB ASC Topic 820, but also include instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements has changed. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. We will adopt this pronouncement for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012. The Company does not expect this pronouncement to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
Lime Energy Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
In June 2011, the FASB issued an accounting pronouncement that provides new guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income (FASB ASC Topic 220) in financial statements. Entities are required to present total comprehensive income either in a single, continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate, but consecutive, statements. Under the single-statement approach, entities must include the components of net income, a total for net income, the components of other comprehensive income and a total for comprehensive income. Under the two-statement approach, entities must report an income statement and, immediately following, a statement of other comprehensive income. Under either method, entities must display adjustments for items reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in both net income and other comprehensive income. The provisions for this pronouncement are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The the adoption of ASU 2011-05 will not impact the Companys operating results or financial position.
Note 4 Restructuring Charge
During the second quarter of 2011 the Company initiated a restructuring to reduce costs, better integrate its operations and consolidate certain accounting and administrative functions. In connection with this restructuring, it recorded a $1.1 million restructuring charge, consisting primarily of severance related costs. As of June 30, 2011, approximately $102 thousand remained in the restructuring reserve.
Note 5 Net Loss Per Share
The Company computes loss per share under ACS 260 Earnings Per Share, which requires presentation of two amounts: basic and diluted loss per common share. Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing loss available to common stockholders by the number of weighted average common shares outstanding, and includes all common stock issued. Diluted earnings would include all common stock equivalents. The Company has not included the outstanding options or warrants as common stock equivalents in the computation of diluted loss per share for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, because the effect would be anti-dilutive.
The following table sets forth the weighted average shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options and warrants that are not included in the basic and diluted loss per share available to common stockholders because to do so would be anti-dilutive:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options |
|
3,892,531 |
|
3,283,482 |
|
3,833,143 |
|
2,998,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants |
|
719,254 |
|
797,571 |
|
756,920 |
|
802,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
4,611,785 |
|
4,081,053 |
|
4,590,063 |
|
3,800,822 |
|
Lime Energy Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 6 Revolving Line of Credit
On March 9, 2011, the Company entered into a $7 million revolving line of credit agreement with American Chartered Bank. Availability under the line of credit is tied to eligible receivables and borrowings are secured by all the Companys assets. Borrowings will incur interest at the Prime Rate, plus 0.625%, with a minimum rate of 4.675%, and the line has an unused fee of 0.30% per annum. The line contains covenants that require the Company to maintain a minimum current ratio of 1.55 or greater and a maximum tangible leverage ratio of 1.30. The line has a term of one year. There were no borrowings under the line as of June 30, 2011.
Note 7 Lime Energy Asset Development
During 2010, the Company established Lime Energy Asset Development, LLC (LEAD), to develop, construct, operate and in certain situations own energy producing assets. In October 2010, LEAD acquired the gas rights to the Zemel Road landfill in Punta Gorda, Florida for $2.65 million. LEAD has since entered into a 20-year power purchase agreement with a utility for the sale of electricity and certain environmental attributes to be generated from the landfill gas. It has also begun construction of a generating facility on the property it is leasing from the landfill owner under a 20-year lease. The Company has ordered two generators for the facility with a combined capacity of 2.8 megawatts and is evaluating the possible purchase of a third generator that would bring the total capacity up to 4.2 megawatts. The total cost to construct the generating facility with two generators is projected to be approximately $6.3 million and the cost to include all three generators would be approximately $7.5 million. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had spent approximately $3.5 million on the facility. The Company believes that this investment will qualify for a renewable energy grant from the U.S. Treasury equal to 30% of certain qualifying construction costs. It believes that the grant will be approximately $1.8 million with two generators or $2 million with three generators and should be received approximately 60 days following completion of the facility.
The Company is currently in the process of arranging long-term financing for the project. It is seeking to obtain approximately $4.5 million to $5.0 million under a long-term loan.
The Company projects that the generating facility will be completed in September or October 2011.
Note 8 Business Segment Information
The Company operates in one business segment, the Energy Efficiency Services segment, through which is serves three markets: the commercial and industrial market, the public sector market and the utility market.
Lime Energy Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 9 Other Equity Issuances
(a) During the first quarter of 2011, the Company granted 29,700 shares of its common stock to six of its outside directors pursuant to the 2010 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan as compensation for their service on the Board. These shares vest 50% upon grant and 50% on the first anniversary of the grant date if the director is still serving on the Companys board of directors on the vesting date.
(b) During the first quarter of 2011, the Company issued 108,025 shares of restricted stock to eight senior employees. These shares vest equally on December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 if the holder is still employed by the Company on the vesting date.
(c) During the first six months of 2011, the holders of options to purchase 36,378 shares of the Companys common stock exercised their options on a cashless basis, exchanging 28,213 shares they were entitled to purchase pursuant to the options to satisfy the exercise price, receiving 8,165 shares.
(d) During the first six months of 2011, the Company issued 110 shares of its common stock to four employees as part of its Employee Recognition Program.
(e) During the second quarter of 2011, the Company granted 14,769 shares of its common stock to five of its outside directors pursuant to the 2010 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan as compensation for their service on various Board committees. These shares vest 50% upon grant and 50% on the first anniversary of the grant date if the director is still serving on the Companys board of directors on the vesting date.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
|
You should read the following discussion regarding the Company along with our financial statements and related notes included in this quarterly report. This quarterly report, including the following discussion, contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results, performance and achievements in 2011 and beyond may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. See Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
Overview
We are a provider of integrated energy engineering, consulting and implementation solutions focused on assisting our clients in the achievement of their energy efficiency goals. We operate in three specific markets: the commercial and industrial market, the public sector market, and the utility markets. We perform energy efficiency engineering and consulting as well as the development and implementation of energy efficient lighting, mechanical, electrical, water, weatherization, renewable energy solutions and on-site generation.
We serve a wide range of commercial and industrial, public sector and utility clients. Our commercial and industrial clients include many Fortune 500 companies for which we provide our energy efficiency solutions directly. We also work for a number of utilities for which we manage or operate under their energy demand-side management programs. Our public sector clients include federal, state and local government agencies and educational institutions, which we serve through our relationships with Energy Service Companies (ESCOs) and directly. ESCOs are awarded project contracts with the public sector, and we provide energy efficiency expertise to develop and implement tailored solutions under these contracts. In addition we also work directly for public sector clients when the services of an ESCO are not required.
The services we provide include:
· Energy Engineering and Consulting: We apply our engineering expertise to analyze each clients energy consumption and operational needs and develop customized energy efficiency and renewable energy solutions. Our energy engineering and consulting services include sustainability consulting, energy auditing, energy master planning, project development services, design engineering and facility retro-commissioning. We also provide design review and analysis of new construction projects to maximize energy efficiency and sustainability, project management of energy-related construction, and processing and procurement of incentive and rebate applications.
· Implementation: We provide complete turnkey implementation services for a range of energy efficiency and renewable energy projects, including energy efficient lighting upgrades, energy efficiency mechanical and electrical retrofit and upgrade services, water conservation, weatherization and renewable project development and implementation, including solar, biomass and geothermal. We consider factors such as current facility infrastructure, best available technologies, building environmental conditions, hours of operation, energy costs, available utility rebates and tax incentives, and installation, operation and maintenance costs of various efficiency alternatives. Our professionals extensive knowledge in energy efficiency solutions enables us to apply the most appropriate, effective and proven technologies available in the marketplace.
· Energy Asset Development and Management: We leverage our engineering and implementation capabilities and experience to provide energy asset development and management services to our clients who wish to benefit from alternative and/or renewable energy sources. In this role we serve two sets of clients: the energy consumer and investors. For the energy consumer, we perform project feasibility assessments, evaluate alternative technologies, estimate economic returns, arrange debt and equity financing, manage the design and construction process, and operate the asset under a long-term power purchase agreement. For our investor clients, we source, qualify and structure investment opportunities to maximize risk-adjusted returns, then manage the design and construction process and operate the assets under long-term power purchase agreements. In some limited situations we take equity positions in these investments.
Results of Operations
Revenue
We generate the majority of our revenue from the sale of our services and products that we purchase and resell to our clients. The substantial majority of our revenue is derived from fixed-price contracts, although we occasionally bill on a time-and-materials basis. Under fixed-price contracts, we bill our clients for each project once the project is completed or throughout the project as specified in the contract. Under time-and-materials arrangements, we bill our clients on an hourly basis with material costs and other reimbursable expenses passed through and recognized as revenue. Our projects take a couple days to a year or more to complete, with projects in our commercial and industrial markets typically taking less time to complete than the larger projects in our public sector markets. We recognize the revenue on smaller, shorter term projects on a completed contract basis and on larger, longer projects we utilize the percentage-of-completion method for revenue recognition. All of our revenue is earned in the United States and is somewhat seasonal, with the majority earned in the second half of the year.
Gross Profit
Gross profit equals our revenue less costs of sales. The cost of sales for our business consists primarily of materials, our internal labor, including engineering, and the cost of subcontracted labor.
Gross profit is a key metric that we use to evaluate our performance. Gross profit depends in large part on the volume and mix of products and services that we sell during any given period.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) include the following components:
· direct labor and commission costs related to our employee sales force;
· costs of our non-production management, supervisory and staff salaries and employee benefits, including the costs of share-based compensation;
· costs related to insurance, travel and entertainment, office supplies and utilities;
· costs related to marketing and advertising our products;
· legal and accounting expenses; and
· costs related to administrative functions that serve to support our existing businesses, as well as to provide the infrastructure for future growth.
Amortization of Intangibles
When we acquire companies we allocate the purchase price to tangible assets (such as property, equipment, accounts receivable, etc.), and any identifiable intangible assets (such as contract backlogs, customer lists, technology, trade name, etc.), with the balance recorded as goodwill. We amortize the value of certain intangible assets over their estimated useful lives as a non-cash expense.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income consists of interest earned on our investments, net of interest expense. Interest expense represents the interest costs and fees associated with the mortgage on our headquarters, our line of credit, including amortization of deferred financing costs, and various vehicle loans. Interest income includes earnings on our invested cash balances and amortization of the discount on our long term receivables.
Three months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three months Ended June 30, 2010
Consolidated Results (in thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
Change |
| |||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
|
% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Revenue |
|
$ |
24,260 |
|
$ |
17,508 |
|
$ |
6,752 |
|
38.6 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
19,767 |
|
13,319 |
|
6,448 |
|
48.4 |
% | |||
Gross profit |
|
4,493 |
|
4,189 |
|
304 |
|
7.3 |
% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
6,794 |
|
6,094 |
|
700 |
|
11.5 |
% | |||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
153 |
|
163 |
|
(10 |
) |
-6.1 |
% | |||
Restructuring charge |
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
1,109 |
|
100.0 |
% | |||
Operating loss |
|
(3,563 |
) |
(2,068 |
) |
(1,495 |
) |
72.3 |
% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other income |
|
15 |
|
40 |
|
(25 |
) |
-62.5 |
% | |||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,548 |
) |
$ |
(2,028 |
) |
$ |
(1,520 |
) |
75.0 |
% |
The following table presents the percentage of certain items to revenue:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||
|
|
June 30, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
81.5 |
% |
76.1 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
18.5 |
% |
23.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
28.0 |
% |
34.8 |
% |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
0.6 |
% |
0.9 |
% |
Restructuring charge |
|
4.6 |
% |
0.0 |
% |
Operating loss |
|
-14.7 |
% |
-11.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
0.1 |
% |
0.2 |
% |
Net loss |
|
-14.6 |
% |
-11.6 |
% |
Revenue. Our consolidated revenue for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011 increased $6.8 million or 38.6%, to $24.3 million from $17.5 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010. Revenue increased in all of our markets relative to the year earlier period except in our C&I market, where revenue declined approximately 17%. Revenue from our utility and public sector markets increased approximately 77% and 23%, respectively, compared to the same period last year. During the second quarter of 2010 our utility business was only working on one utility contract, whereas it was operating under two utility contracts during the second quarter of 2011. We expect to begin work under a third utility contract recently awarded by the Long Island Power Authority and another smaller utility contract during the third quarter of 2011. Our public sector markets benefited during the quarter from the
continued recovery in this market from the slowdown experienced during the first half of 2010, as well as from contracts we recently won from the U.S. Post Office. Revenue from our FRR contract with the Army Corps of Engineers increased approximately 150%, however this source of revenue only represents a little over 10% of our total consolidated revenue.
We expect to continue to experience higher revenue relative to 2010 levels for the balance of the year, driven primarily by our utility and public sector markets. Our revenue is also expected to continue to be seasonal, with revenue continuing to build throughout the year and peaking in the fourth quarter.
Gross Profit. Our gross profit for the second quarter of 2011 was $4.5 million, a $300,000 or 7.3% increase when compared to the $4.2 million in gross profit earned during the second quarter of 2010. Our gross profit margin for the second quarter of 2011 was 18.5%, compared to 23.9% for the same period in 2010. The gross profit margin realized during the second quarter of 2010 benefited from an unusually high portion of higher margin engineering revenue from our C&I market, whereas the second quarter of 2011 included very little of this engineering revenue but did include a higher portion of lower margin regional construction work and FRR revenue. We expect our gross margins to improve throughout the year as revenue from our higher margin C&I and utility markets become a larger portion of our total revenue.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Our selling, general and administrative expenses increased $700 thousand or 11.5%, to $6.8 million during the second quarter of 2012 from $6.1 million during the second quarter of 2010. All of the increase in our SG&A expense was related to our utility market, where we have experienced our most significant growth in revenue, as well as to LEAD, our new business initiative for 2011. This increase in SG&A expense was partially offset by reductions in SG&A expense associated with all our other markets and corporate overhead. The restructuring we implemented during the third quarter will further reduce the SG&A associated with the C&I market and corporate overhead in future quarters. On a full year basis, we expect our SG&A will increase less than 10% over 2010 levels, with all of the increase related to the growth of our utility program management and LEAD businesses. Our SG&A expense as a percentage of revenue declined from 34.8% during the second quarter of 2010 to 28.0% of revenue during the second quarter of 2011 as the growth rate of our revenue during the second quarter exceeded the growth rate of our SG&A.
Amortization of Intangibles. Amortization expense declined $10 thousand to $153 thousand in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $163 thousand for the second quarter of 2010. Our amortization expense has declined as intangible assets associated with acquisitions we made over the past five years have been fully amortized. Amortization expense is expected to be $153 thousand per quarter for the balance of 2011.
Restructuring Charge. We initiated a restructuring during the second quarter of 2011 which we expect will reduce our SG&A by approximately $3 million annually beginning in 2012. As part of this restructuring we realigned our C&I business unit to reduce costs, increase its efficiency and integrate it with the energy efficiency operations of our public sector group. This change permitted us to also reduce certain corporate overhead costs through the consolidation of accounting and administrative functions. We recorded a restructuring charge of approximately $1.1 million in connection with this restructuring, consisting primarily of severance related costs. We expect these moves will reduce our operating costs this year by approximately $0.6 million, after including the impact of the restructuring charge.
Other Income. Other income declined $25 thousand, to $15 thousand for the second quarter of 2011 from $40 thousand during the second quarter of 2010. Interest expense was $19 thousand for the second quarter of 2011, compared to $8 thousand for the year earlier period. The components of interest expense for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended June 30, |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Line of credit unused line fee |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Mortgage |
|
5 |
|
5 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other |
|
1 |
|
3 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total contractural interest and fees |
|
11 |
|
8 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Amortization of deferred issuanace costs |
|
8 |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
19 |
|
$ |
8 |
|
Total contractual interest and fees increased $3 thousand, to $11 thousand, during the second quarter of 2011 from $8 thousand during the second quarter of 2010. This increase was associated with the unused line fee on our line of credit, partially offset by lower interest on our vehicle loans. During the second quarter of 2011 we also recorded $8 thousand of amortization expense on deferred issuance costs related to our line of credit.
Interest income decreased $14 thousand to $34 thousand during the second quarter of 2011 from $48 thousand during the second quarter of 2010. This decline was the result of a lower average balance on long-term receivables held by Lime Finance and lower average invested cash balances.
Six months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six months Ended June 30, 2010
Consolidated Results (in thousands)
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
Change |
| |||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
|
% |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Revenue |
|
$ |
43,240 |
|
$ |
29,321 |
|
$ |
13,919 |
|
47.5 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
35,132 |
|
23,273 |
|
11,859 |
|
51.0 |
% | |||
Gross profit |
|
8,108 |
|
6,048 |
|
2,060 |
|
34.1 |
% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
13,967 |
|
12,527 |
|
1,440 |
|
11.5 |
% | |||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
307 |
|
325 |
|
(18 |
) |
-5.5 |
% | |||
Restructuring charge |
|
1,109 |
|
|
|
1,109 |
|
100.0 |
% | |||
Operating loss |
|
(7,275 |
) |
(6,804 |
) |
(471 |
) |
6.9 |
% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other income |
|
45 |
|
80 |
|
(35 |
) |
-43.8 |
% | |||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(7,230 |
) |
$ |
(6,724 |
) |
$ |
(506 |
) |
7.5 |
% |
The following table presents the percentage of certain items to revenue:
|
|
Six Months Ended |
| ||
|
|
June 30, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
81.2 |
% |
79.4 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
18.8 |
% |
20.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
32.3 |
% |
42.7 |
% |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
0.7 |
% |
1.1 |
% |
Restructuring charge |
|
2.6 |
% |
0.0 |
% |
Operating loss |
|
-16.8 |
% |
-23.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
0.1 |
% |
0.3 |
% |
Net loss |
|
-16.7 |
% |
-22.9 |
% |
Revenue. Our consolidated revenue for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 increased $13.9 million, or 47.5%, to $43.2 million from $29.3 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010. Revenue increased in all of our markets relative to the year earlier period, except for our C&I market where revenue declined approximately 7%. Revenue from our utility market increased approximately 114% when compared to the first six months of 2010, and revenue from our public sector market increased more than 30% during the same period. We entered the utility market late in 2009 and we were working on one relatively new utility contract during the first six months of 2010, whereas we have been working on two established contracts for all of the first six months of 2011. Our public sector markets has benefited from the continued recovery in this market from the slowdown experienced during the first half of 2010, as well as from contracts we recently won from the U.S. Post Office. Revenue under our
FRR contract with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers increased approximately 135% during the first six months of 2011 when compared to the same period in 2010, but still represents a relatively small portion of our total revenue.
Gross Profit. Our gross profit for the first half of 2011 was $8.1 million, a $2.1 million or 34.1% increase when compared to the $6.0 million in gross profit earned during the first half of 2010. Our gross profit margin for the first half of 2011 was 18.8%, compared to 20.6% for the same period in 2010. The decline in our gross profit margin was the result of a shift in the mix of our business to a mix that included less high margin engineering revenue and more low margin regional construction revenue.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Our selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1.4 million or 11.5%, to $13.9 million during the first half of 2011 from $12.5 million during the first half of 2010. All of the increase in our SG&A expense was related to our utility market, where we have experienced our most significant growth in revenue, as well as to LEAD, our new business initiative for 2011. This increase in SG&A expense was partially offset by reductions in SG&A expense associated with all our other markets and corporate overhead. Our SG&A expense as a percentage of revenue declined from 42.7% during the first half of 2010 to 32.3% during the first half of 2011 as the growth in our revenue for the most recent six-month period exceeded the growth of our SG&A expense.
Amortization of Intangibles. Amortization expense declined $18 thousand to $307 thousand for the first half of 2011 compared to $325 thousand for the first half of 2010. Our amortization expense has declined as intangible assets associated with acquisitions we have made over the past five years have been fully amortized.
Restructuring Charge. We initiated a restructuring during the second quarter of 2011, which we expect will reduce our SG&A by approximately $3 million annually beginning in 2012. As part of this restructuring we realigned our C&I business unit to reduce costs, increase its efficiency and integrate it with the energy efficiency operations of our public sector group. This change permitted us to also reduce certain corporate overhead costs through the consolidation of accounting and administrative functions. We recorded a restructuring charge of approximately $1.1 million in connection with this restructuring, consisting primarily of severance related costs. We expect these moves will reduce our operating costs this year by approximately $0.6 million, after including the impact of the restructuring charge.
Other Income. Other income declined $35 thousand, to $45 thousand for the second half of 2011 from $80 thousand during the first half of 2011. Interest expense increased $12 thousand, to $30 thousand, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to $18 thousand for the same period during 2010. The components of interest expense for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands):
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Line of credit unused line fee |
|
$ |
7 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Mortgage |
|
9 |
|
10 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other |
|
4 |
|
8 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total contractural interest and fees |
|
20 |
|
18 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Amortization of deferred issuanace costs |
|
10 |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
30 |
|
$ |
18 |
|
Total contractual interest and fees increased $2 thousand, to $20 thousand, for the first half of 2011, compared to $18 thousand for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010. A reduction in interest on our vehicle loans was partially offset by the unused line fee on the line of credit. During the second half of 2011 we also recorded $10 thousand of amortization expense on deferred issuance costs for our line of credit.
Interest income decreased $23 thousand, to $75 thousand, during the first half of 2011, from $98 thousand during the first half of 2010. This decline was the result of a lower average balance on long-term receivables held by Lime Finance and lower average invested cash balances.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of $7.2 million (including restricted cash of $724 thousand), compared to $14.9 million on December 31, 2010 (including restricted cash of $1.9 million). Our debt obligations as of June 30, 2011 consisted of a mortgage of $364 thousand on our facility in Elk Grove Village, Illinois and various vehicle loans totaling $103 thousand.
Our principal cash requirements are for operating expenses, the funding of inventory and accounts receivable, and capital expenditures. We have financed our operations since inception primarily through the sale of equity, as well as through various forms of secured debt.
The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, selected items in our consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):
Six months ended June 30, |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(4,378 |
) |
$ |
(3,594 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(2,018 |
) |
(3,531 |
) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(96 |
) |
(69 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
(6,492 |
) |
$ |
(7,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, at beginning of period |
|
13,016 |
|
22,870 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, at end of period |
|
$ |
6,524 |
|
$ |
15,676 |
|
Six months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six months Ended June 30, 2010
Net unrestricted cash decreased $6.5 million during the first six months of 2011 as compared to decreasing $7.2 million during the same period in 2010.
Operating Activities
Operating activities consumed cash of $4.4 million during the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared to consuming cash of $3.6 million during the same period of 2010.
Whether cash is consumed or generated by operating activities is a function of the profitability of our operations and changes in working capital. To get a better understanding of cash sources and uses, our management splits the cash used or provided by operating activities into two pieces: the cash consumed or generated by operating activities before changes in assets and liabilities; and the cash consumed or generated from changes in assets and liabilities. By splitting the cash used or provided by operating activities this way our management believes it is easier to understand how much of our operating cash flow is the result of the Companys current period cash earnings or loss and how much of our operating cash flow is due to changes in working capital. These two measures are calculated as follows (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net Loss |
|
$ |
(7,230 |
) |
$ |
(6,724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Provision for (recovery of) bad debt |
|
95 |
|
12 |
| ||
Share-based compensation |
|
1,166 |
|
743 |
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
597 |
|
571 |
| ||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
10 |
|
|
| ||
(Gain) loss on disposition of property and equipment |
|
(3 |
) |
8 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash consumed by operating activities before changes in assets and liabilities |
|
$ |
(5,365 |
) |
$ |
(5,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of business acquisitions and dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
1,309 |
|
$ |
1,622 |
|
Inventories |
|
(28 |
) |
(93 |
) | ||
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contacts |
|
2,323 |
|
115 |
| ||
Other current assets |
|
(221 |
) |
(321 |
) | ||
Accounts payable |
|
(1,374 |
) |
(559 |
) | ||
Accrued expenses |
|
(849 |
) |
292 |
| ||
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts |
|
76 |
|
773 |
| ||
Customer deposits |
|
(249 |
) |
(33 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash generated from changes in assets and liabilities |
|
$ |
987 |
|
$ |
1,796 |
|
The reconciliation to net cash used in operating activities as reported on our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows is as follows (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash consumed by operating activities before changes in assets and liabilities |
|
$ |
(5,365 |
) |
$ |
(5,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash generated from changes in assets and liabilities |
|
987 |
|
1,796 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(4,378 |
) |
$ |
(3,594 |
) |
The cash consumed by operating activities before changes in assets and liabilities declined $25 thousand, to $5.365 million, during the first six months of 2011 as compared to consuming $5.390 million during the first six months of 2010. The decline in the cash consumed by operating activities before changes in assets and liabilities was the result of the lower cash operating loss (excluding depreciation, amortization and share-based compensation) due to higher revenue, partially offset by lower gross profit margins and the restructuring charge. We believe that we will see additional improvements in the cash consumed by operating activities before changes in assets and liabilities if our revenue and profitability improve as we
believe they will during the balance of this year. In addition, we believe that this measure will turn positive during the second half of 2011.
We generated approximately $1.0 million of cash though the changes in assets and liabilities during the first six months of 2011, compared to generating $1.8 million during the first six months of 2010. Due to the seasonal nature of our business, in which our revenue and related working capital typically peak during the fourth quarter of the year and are at their lowest levels during the first half of the year, the first half usually is a period during which the changes in our current assets and liabilities generate cash. During the second half of 2010 and early 2011, a significant portion of our utility program work was supported by ARRA funds. Administrative delays resulting from increased documentation requirements for this work, in combination with federal processing timelines, has resulted in a significant increase in our accounts receivable related to this work. This was the principal reason the changes in our assets and liabilities generated less cash during the first half of 2011 than it did during the first half of 2010. This ARRA funded work has largely ended and we expect to replace it with work funded by utility assessments, which we believe will improve the timeliness of payments to us.
Over the longer term, we expect our working capital needs to increase with increases in our sales, though we continue to work to keep the growth in working capital to a rate that is lower than the growth of our future sales.
Investing Activities
We used $2.0 million in cash for investing activities during the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to using $3.5 million during the six-month period ended June 30, 2010. During the first half 2011, we invested $3.2 million in property and equipment, including approximately $2.6 million used to fund the construction of the Zemel Road landfill-gas generating facility. A significant portion of the amounts used to construct this facility will be refunded once permanent long-term financing is arranged for the facility, which we anticipate securing during the third quarter of 2011. The balance of the 2011 capital expenditures were for office equipment upgrades and software purchased primarily to support our engineering and utility activities. These capital expenditures were partially offset by a reduction in restricted cash used to support surety bonds. During the first half of 2010, we used $231 thousand of cash for fixed asset purchases, most of which was related to the opening of a new office to support our utility program management business and for enhancements to our accounting system. Also during 2010, we pledged $3.3 million as collateral to support the issuance of surety bonds. As of June 30, 2011, we had $724 thousand pledged to support surety bonds. We expect these bonds to run off before the end of 2011, at which time the restricted cash will be released.
Financing Activities
Financing activities consumed cash of $96 thousand during the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, as compared to consuming $69 thousand during the same period in 2010. During the first six months of 2011 we made principal payments of $65 thousand on our debt, compared to $141 thousand during the first half of 2010. Also during the first half of 2011, we incurred $31 thousand in expenses to obtain our line of credit. During the first half of 2010 we received $72 thousand from the sale of shares of our common stock to employees through our Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
SOURCES OF LIQUIDITY
Our primary sources of liquidity are our available cash reserves and availability under our $7 million line of credit.
Our ability to continue to expand the sales of our services will require the continued commitment of significant funds. The actual timing and amount of our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including the amount, timing and profitability of future revenues, working capital requirements, unfunded capital expenditures, the level and amount of product marketing and sales efforts, among other things.
We have raised a significant amount of capital since our formation through the issuance of shares of our common stock and secured debt, which has allowed us to acquire companies and to continue to execute our business plan. Most of these funds have been consumed by operating activities, either to fund our losses or for working capital requirements. While our operations generated positive cash flow during the second half of 2010 and positive GAAP earnings for the first time in our history during the fourth quarter of 2010, we need to continue to focus on moving the Company to the point that it is consistently generating positive earnings and cash flow. To do this we believe that we need to continue to increase our revenue while controlling the growth of our SG&A expense and maintaining or improving our gross margins. We believe the strategies we have implemented over the past two years, which are in part reflected in our new business initiatives and our recent restructuring, have positioned us where this objective could be achieved within the next 12 months.
Our newest business initiative, the asset development business, is more capital intensive than our other existing businesses. However, we believe that it will significantly benefit our other existing businesses by permitting us to offer this new service to current and future clients, thereby increasing the value of our offerings, hopefully resulting in increased opportunities to secure larger projects with higher margins. The future of the asset development business will depend on our ability to find investors willing to invest in the projects we plan to develop. Beyond the Zemel Road project, which will be largely funded by debt and a U.S. Treasury grant, we will not be dedicating significant amounts of our own capital to these projects.
We believe that our current cash, in combination with availability under our line of credit will provide sufficient liquidity to permit us to continue to operate until we reach the point that we turn cash flow positive on a consistent basis.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Our disclosure and analysis in this report, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, adopted pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not purely historical may be forward-looking. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of words such as anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, hope, intend, may, project, plan, goal, target, should, and similar expressions, including when used in the negative.
Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements, including but not limited to those described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Part II, Item 1ARisk Factors and the following:
· we have a limited operating history under our current business model in a rapidly evolving market, which may make it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects, and may expose us to increased risks and uncertainties;
· we have incurred significant operating losses since inception and may not achieve or sustain profitability in the future;
· the current economic downturn could diminish the demand for our services and products;
· it is difficult for us to estimate our future quarterly results;
· we operate in a highly competitive industry and if we are unable to compete successfully our revenue; and profitability will be adversely affected; and
· we may be unable to obtain sufficient bonding capacity to support certain service offerings.
All forward-looking statements in this report should be considered in the context of the risk and other factors described above and as detailed from time to time in the Companys Securities and Exchange Commission filings. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statement is made and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. It is not possible to identify all of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect future results. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report may not occur and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, users of this report are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements.
Except as otherwise required by federal securities laws, we do not undertake any obligation to publicly update, review or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason.
ITEM 3. |
|
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. |
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, maintains our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) and has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of June 30, 2011, such disclosure controls and procedures are effective for the purpose of ensuring that material information required to be in the reports that we submit, file, furnish or otherwise provide to the Securities and Exchange Commission is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls.
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations of the Effectiveness of Internal Control
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the internal control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations of any internal control system, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a company have been detected.
ITEM 2. |
|
On January 3, 2011 and June 2, 2011, we issued a total of 44,469 shares of our common stock to our six outside directors. These shares vest 50% upon grant and 50% on the first anniversary of the grant date if the director is still serving on the Companys board of directors on the vesting date. Such shares were issued in consideration of the recipients service on the Board and on Board committees and were issued in a transaction exempt from registration pursuant to section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
ITEM 6. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
The following financial information from Lime Energy Cos Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, filed with the SEC on August 8, 2011, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and six-month month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.* |
* |
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed part of a registration statement, prospectus or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filings. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
LIME ENERGY CO.: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 8, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ John ORourke |
|
|
John ORourke |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
(principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 8, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Jeffrey Mistarz |
|
|
Jeffrey Mistarz |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer (principal |
|
|
financial and accounting officer) |