Edgar Filing: Oak Valley Bancorp

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

o	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 001-34142

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

California	26-2326676
State or other jurisdiction of	I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization	Identification No.

125 N. Third Ave., Oakdale, CA 95361

(Address of principal executive offices)

(209) 848-2265

Issuer’s telephone number

Not applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 7,661,627 shares of common stock outstanding as of July 31, 2009.

Table of Contents

Oak Valley Bancorp

June 30, 2009

Index

		Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3

Item 1.	Financial Statements	3

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008		4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Month Periods Ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008		5

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes of Shareholders’ Equity for the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2009 and the Year Ended December 31, 2008		6

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008		7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		8

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	31

Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	31

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION		32

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	32
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	32
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	32
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	32
Item 5.	Other Information	32
Item 6.	Exhibits	33

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Item 1. Financial Statements

Table of Contents

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

AT JUNE 30, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008

	June 30,		December 31,
	2009		2008
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	12,206,546	$	9,072,860
Federal funds sold	4,880,000		765,000
Cash and cash equivalents	17,086,546		9,837,860

Securities available for sale	54,400,351		41,448,877
Loans, net of allowance for loan loss of $5,700,862 in 2009 and $5,569,496 in 2008	417,814,524		421,572,911
Bank premises and equipment, net	10,620,464		11,093,967
Other real estate owned	2,813,082		2,745,575
Accrued interest and other assets	22,871,107		21,503,821

	$	525,606,074	$	508,203,011

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Deposits	$	419,940,758	$	378,248,467
Accrued interest and other liabilities	2,935,252		2,968,465
FHLB advances	44,100,000		69,000,000

Total liabilities	466,976,010		450,216,932

Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock, no par value; $1,000 per share liquidation preference, 10,000,000 shares authorized and 13,500 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008	12,763,973		12,680,649
Common stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized and 7,661,627 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008	23,863,331		23,863,331
Additional paid-in capital	1,965,424		1,925,224
Retained earnings	19,037,025		19,226,645
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax	1,000,311		290,230

Total shareholders’ equity	58,630,064		57,986,079

	$	525,606,074	$	508,203,011

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND JUNE 30, 2008

	3 MONTHS ENDED					6 MONTHS ENDED
	JUNE 30,					JUNE 30,
	2009			2008		2009			2008
Interest and fees on loans	$	6,716,008		$	6,775,872	$	13,312,216		$	13,710,003
Interest on securities available for sale	676,522			408,651		1,288,679			803,331
Interest on federal funds sold	692			4,472		1,596			9,577
Interest on deposits with banks	869			308		1,632			1,026
Total interest income	7,394,091			7,189,303		14,604,123			14,523,937

Deposits	1,349,347			1,710,446		2,673,266			3,868,004
FHLB advances	157,686			397,226		387,139			758,898
Federal funds purchased	79			944		343			7,316
Total interest expense	1,507,112			2,108,616		3,060,748			4,634,218

Net interest income	5,886,979			5,080,687		11,543,375			9,889,719

Provision for loan losses	2,137,012			440,000		4,037,012			585,000

Net interest income after provision for loan losses	3,749,967			4,640,687		7,506,363			9,304,719

Service charges on deposits	292,562			344,365		574,947			647,292
Earnings on cash surrender value of life insurance	101,057			99,242		202,114			180,518
Mortgage commissions	46,472			21,719		89,017			71,449
Other income	207,286			207,043		379,607			386,693
Total non-interest income	647,377			672,369		1,245,685			1,285,952

Salaries and employee benefits	1,865,341			2,434,975		3,915,225			4,881,402
Occupancy expenses	677,518			670,393		1,372,916			1,339,946
Data processing fees	233,901			190,439		452,416			368,998
OREO expenses	933,724			451,078		1,058,752			451,078
Assessments (FDIC & DFI)	299,124			89,578		437,086			171,896
Other operating expenses	776,990			725,127		1,488,509			1,404,840
Total non-interest expense	4,786,598			4,561,590		8,724,904			8,618,160

Net (loss) income before provision for income taxes	(389,254		)	751,466		27,144			1,972,511

(Benefit) Provision for income taxes	(344,191		)	198,307		(358,103		)	643,555

Net (loss) income	$	(45,063	)	$	553,159	$	385,247		$	1,328,956

Preferred stock dividends and accretion	212,286			0		422,697			0
Net (loss) income available to common shareholders	$	(257,349	)	$	553,159	$	(37,450	)	$	1,328,956

Net (loss) income per common share	$	(0.03	)	$	0.07	$	0.00		$	0.17
Net (loss) income per common diluted share	$	(0.03	)	$	0.07	$	0.00		$	0.17

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009

	YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
													Accumulated
						Additional							Other		Total
	Common Stock			Preferred		Paid-in		Retained			Comprehensive		Comprehensive		Shareholders’
	Shares	Amount		Stock		Capital		Earnings			Income		Income		Equity

Balances, January 1, 2008	7,607,780	$	22,843,171			$	1,748,380	$	17,723,646				$	46,193	$	42,361,390
Stock options exercised	53,847	186,922													186,922
Issuance of preferred stock				$	12,666,762										12,666,762
Issuance of TCPP warrants		833,238													833,238
Preferred stock accretion				13,887				(13,887		)					0
Tax benefit of stock options exercised						54,195									54,195
Cash dividends ($0.075 per share)								(574,484		)					(574,484		)
Stock based compensation						122,649									122,649
Cumulative effect of adopting EITF 06-04								(70,459		)					(70,459		)
Comprehensive income
Net changes in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities (net of income tax of $158,664)											244,037		244,037		244,037
Net income								2,161,829			2,161,829				2,161,829
Comprehensive income											$	2,405,866
Balances, December 31, 2008	7,661,627	$	23,863,331	$	12,680,649	$	1,925,224	$	19,226,645				$	290,230	$	57,986,079
Preferred stock accretion				$	83,324			$	(83,324	)					0
Preferred stock dividend payments								(300,000		)					(300,000		)
Cash dividends ($0.025 per share)								(191,543		)					(191,543		)
Stock based compensation						40,200									40,200
Comprehensive income
Net changes in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities (net of income tax of $461,670)											710,081		710,081		710,081
Net income								385,247			385,247				385,247
Comprehensive income											$	1,095,328
Balances, June 30, 2009	7,661,627	$	23,863,331	$	12,763,973	$	1,965,424	$	19,037,025				$	1,000,311	$	58,630,064

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND JUNE 30, 2008

	6 MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
	2009			2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	385,247		$	1,328,956
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash from operating activities:
Provision for loan losses	4,037,012			585,000
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net	520,294			563,236
Stock-based compensation expense	40,200			73,128
Excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements	0			(54,195		)
Loss on sale of premises and equipment	0			1,434
OREO write downs and losses on sale	909,189			0
Gain on called available for sale securities	(54,380		)	0
Decrease in accrued interest payable and other liabilities	(33,213		)	(868,052		)
Decrease in accrued interest receivable	69,392			244,281
Increase in other assets	(1,898,248		)	(1,067,052		)
Net cash from operating activities	3,975,493			806,736

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of available for sale securities	(15,674,108		)	(6,459,330		)
Proceeds from maturities, calls, and principal paydowns of securities available for sale	3,971,251			4,872,433
Net increase in loans	(1,464,888		)	(17,103,135		)
Purchase of BOLI policies	0			(4,740,000		)
Proceeds from sale of OREO	209,467			0
Net purchases of premises and equipment	(69,277		)	(944,328		)
Net cash from investing activities	(13,027,555		)	(24,374,360		)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
FHLB advanced funds	43,700,000			151,294,000
FHLB payments	(68,600,000		)	(110,894,000		)
Federal funds advances	7,655,000			(59,435,000		)
Federal funds payments	(7,655,000		)	59,435,000
Shareholder cash dividends paid	(191,543		)	0
Preferred stock dividend payment	(300,000		)	0
Net increase in demand deposits and savings accounts	29,076,007			8,038,661
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits	12,616,284			(27,227,747		)
Excess tax benefits from stock-based payment arrangements	0			54,195
Proceeds from sale of common stock and exercise of stock options	0			176,047
Net cash from financing activities	16,300,748			21,441,156

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	7,248,686			(2,126,468		)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period	9,837,860			14,202,951

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$	17,086,546		$	12,076,483


SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest	$	1,637,974		$	5,577,095
Income taxes	$	1,014,000		$	800,000

NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Real estate acquired through foreclosure	$	1,186,263		$	3,547,193
Net change in unrealized gain/loss on available-for-sale securities	$	1,171,751		$	(311,122	)

NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Tax benefit from stock options exercised	$	0		$	54,195
Cumulative effect of adopting EITF 06-04	$	0		$	119,842
Accretion of preferred stock	$	83,324		$	0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

On July 3, 2008 (the “Effective Date”), a bank holding company reorganization was completed whereby Oak Valley Bancorp became the parent holding company for Oak Valley Community Bank ( the “Bank”). On the Effective Date, each outstanding share of the Bank was converted into one share of Oak Valley Bancorp and the Bank became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the holding company. The condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes are presented as if the reorganization occurred as of the earliest periods presented and are consistent with those of Oak Valley Community Bank, since prior to the Effective Date, Oak Valley Bancorp had no material assets, liabilities or operations.

The accounting principles followed by the Company and the methods of applying these principles conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and with general practices within the banking industry. In preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates common to the banking industry that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term include, but are not limited to, the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the estimation of compensation expense related to stock options granted to employees and directors, and valuation allowances associated with deferred tax assets, the recognition of which are based on future taxable income.

Management has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and/or disclosure through the issuance date of this Form 10-Q, and has determined that there were no subsequent events that require recognition or disclosure.

The interim consolidated financial statements included in this report are unaudited but reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results of a full year’s operations. For further information, refer to the audited financial statements and footnotes included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

NOTE 2 – CURRENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In February 2008, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position FAS SFAS157-2 (FSP 157-2), Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157. FSP SFAS 157-2 delayed the Company’s January 1, 2008, effective date of FAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually), until January 1, 2009. Implementation of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 amends SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, to amend and expand the disclosure requirements of SFAS 133 to provide greater transparency about (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedge items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. To meet those objectives, SFAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. SFAS 161 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2009 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS 162). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). The hierarchical guidance provided by SFAS 162 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position FAS SFAS 157-4 (FSP SFAS 157-4), Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. FSP SFAS 157-4 affirms that the objective of fair value when the market for an asset is not active is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction, and clarifies and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that asset is not active. FSP SFAS 157-4 requires an entity to base its conclusion about whether a transaction was not orderly on the weight of the evidence. FSP SFAS 157-4 also amended SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements, to expand certain disclosure requirements. The Company adopted the provisions of FSP SFAS

Table of Contents

157-4 during the first quarter of 2009. Adoption of FSP SFAS 157-4 did not significantly impact the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position FAS SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2 (FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2), Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2 (i) changes existing guidance for determining whether an impairment is other than temporary to debt securities and (ii) replaces the existing requirement that the entity’s management assert it has both the intent and ability to hold an impaired security until recovery with a requirement that management assert: (a) it does not have the intent to sell the security; and (b) it is more likely than not it will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. Under FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2, declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment is related to credit losses. The amount of the impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. The Company adopted the provisions of FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2 during the second quarter of 2009. Adoption of FSP SFAS 115-2 and SFAS 124-2 did not significantly impact the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position FAS SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 (FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1), Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends SFAS 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require an entity to provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial information and amends Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. Under FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, a publicly traded company shall include disclosures about the fair value of its financial instruments whenever it issues summarized financial information for interim reporting periods. In addition, entities must disclose, in the body or in the accompanying notes of its summarized financial information for interim reporting periods and in its financial statements for annual reporting periods, the fair value of all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value, whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of financial position, as required by SFAS 107. The new interim disclosures required by FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 are included in the Company’s interim financial statements beginning with the second quarter of 2009.

In May 2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS No. 165”, ASC 855), which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In particular, it sets forth: a) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements; b) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements; and c) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. We have adopted SFAS No. 165 in the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and the adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not have a significant impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS No. 168”). SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification TM (the “Codification” or “ASC”) to become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also included in the Codification as sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS No. 168 and the Codification are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. When effective, the Codification will supersede all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. Following Statement 168, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve only to: (a) update the Codification; (b) provide background information about the guidance; and (c) provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. We are following the guidelines in the Codification effective July 1, 2009.

NOTE 3 – SECURITIES

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of debt securities as of June 30, 2009 are as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Market Value
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. agencies	$	31,978,663	$	880,540	$	(64,152	)	$	32,795,051
Collateralized mortgage obligations	3,091,147		83,863		—			3,175,010
Municipalities	14,402,997		826,514		(35,116		)	15,194,395
SBA Pools	1,616,725		—		(48,403		)	1,568,322
Asset-Back Security	152,603		3,205		—			155,808
Mutual Fund	1,507,077		4,688					1,511,765
	$	52,749,212	$	1,798,810	$	(147,671	)	$	54,400,351

Table of Contents

The following tables detail the gross unrealized losses and fair values aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2009.

	Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total
			Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized					Unrealized
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Loss			Value		Loss			Fair Value		Loss

U.S. agencies	$	3,188,655	$	(64,152	)	$	—	$	—		$	3,188,655	$	(64,152	)
Collateralized mortgage obligations	—		—			—		—			—		—
Municipalities	3,862,681		(34,250		)	24,134		(866		)	3,886,815		(35,116		)
SBA Pools	—		—			1,568,322		(48,403		)	1,568,322		(48,403		)
Asset Backed Securities	—		—			—		—			—		—
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	7,051,336	$	(98,402	)	$	1,592,456	$	(49,269	)	$	8,643,792	$	(147,671	)

At June 30, 2009, a total of two SBA pools and one municipal security make up the total amount of securities in an unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months. Management periodically evaluates each available-for-sale investment security in an unrealized loss position to determine if the impairment is temporary or other than temporary. Management has determined that no investment security is other than temporarily impaired. The unrealized losses are due solely to interest rate changes and the Bank has the ability and intent to hold all investment securities with identified impairments resulting from interest rate changes to the earlier of the forecasted recovery or the maturity of the underlying investment security.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at June 30, 2009, by contractual maturity or call date, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

			Estimated
	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
Available-for-sale securities:
Due in one year or less	$	340,000	$	334,597
Due after one year through five years	1,334,882		1,363,653
Due after five years through ten years	13,221,843		13,406,697
Due after ten years	37,852,487		39,295,404
	$	52,749,212	$	54,400,351

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of debt securities as of December 31, 2008, are as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Market Value

Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. agencies	$	25,540,641	$	609,957	$	(65,680	)	$	26,084,918
Collateralized mortgage obligations	3,438,998		54,471		(8,861		)	3,484,608
Municipalities	9,970,961		14,829		(83,567		)	9,902,223
SBA Pools	1,820,810		—		(41,682		)	1,779,128
Asset-Back Security	198,081		—		(81		)	198,000
	$	40,969,491	$	679,257	$	(199,871	)	$	41,448,877

Table of Contents

	Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total
			Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized					Unrealized
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Loss			Value		Loss			Fair Value		Loss

U.S. agencies	$	2,900,405	$	(13,962	)	$	3,067,267	$	(51,718	)	$	5,967,672	$	(65,680	)
Collateralized mortgage obligations	618,552		(2,109		)	1,085,704		(6,752		)	1,704,256		(8,861		)
Municipalities	9,357,996		(83,567		)	—		—			9,357,996		(83,567		)
SBA Pools	—		—			1,626,502		(41,682		)	1,626,502		(41,682		)
Asset Backed Securities	198,000		(81		)	—		—			198,000		(81		)
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	13,074,953	$	(99,719	)	$	5,779,473	$	(100,152	)	$	18,854,426	$	(199,871	)

At December 31, 2008, a total of four U.S. agencies, one collateralized mortgage obligations and two SBA pools make up the total amount of securities in an unrealized loss position for greater than 12 months. Management periodically evaluates each available-for-sale investment security in an unrealized loss position to determine if the impairment is temporary or other than temporary. Management has determined that no investment security is other than temporarily impaired. The unrealized losses are due solely to interest rate changes and the Bank has the ability and intent to hold all investment securities with identified impairments resulting from interest rate changes to the earlier of the forecasted recovery or the maturity of the underlying investment security.

There were no realized gains or losses on sales of available-for-sale securities during 2009 and 2008, however the Company did recognize a gain of $54,380 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 on certain available-for-sale securities that were partially called. There were no other sales of available-for-sale securities during 2009 and 2008.

Securities carried at $38,371,793 and $30,117,814 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, were pledged to secure deposits of public funds.

Table of Contents

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 4 – LOANS

Loan totals were as follows:

	JUNE 30,			DECEMBER 31,
	2009			2008
Loans
Commercial real estate	$	274,579,225		$	268,741,826
Commercial	43,630,129			37,302,286
Real estate construction	58,927,733			73,321,446
Agriculture	24,851,631			25,916,928
Residential real estate and consumer	22,401,506			22,894,644

Total gross loans	424,390,224			428,177,130

Less:
Deferred loan fees and costs, net	(874,837		)	(1,034,723		)
Allowance for loan losses	(5,700,862		)	(5,569,496		)

Net loans	$	417,814,524		$	421,572,911

Changes in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:

	JUNE 30,			DECEMBER 31,
	2009			2008

Balance, beginning of year	$	5,569,496		$	4,506,753
Provision charged to operations	4,037,012			2,188,139
Loans charged off	(3,907,886		)	(1,114,534		)
Loan recoveries	2,240			4,745
Reclassification of reserve related to off-balance-sheet commitments	—			(15,608		)

Balance, end of period	$	5,700,862		$	5,569,496

Effective July 1, 2008, the expense associated with the allowance for off-balance-sheet commitments is recorded separately as a component of other expenses. In 2008, the $15,608 reclassification from the allowance for loan losses to other liabilities is a non-recurring adjustment.

The total recorded investment in impaired loans at June 30, 2009, was $7,364,249 which had a loan loss reserve of $452,416. The total recorded investment in impaired loans at December 31, 2008, was $4,078,765 which had a loan loss reserve of $768,719. No interest income was recognized on impaired loans, while considered impaired during 2009 and 2008. As of June 30, 2009, we had undisbursed funding commitments on three impaired loans to one borrower totaling $1,979,163.43 with maturity dates of April 2010, May 2010 and October 2010.

Table of Contents

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 5 – OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED

As of June 30, 2009, seven loans with outstanding balances of $2,813,082 were reclassified to other real estate owned.

Real estate properties acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are to be sold and are initially recorded at the lower of carrying amount of the loan or fair value of the property at the date of foreclosure less selling costs. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed and any subject revisions in the estimate of fair value are reported as adjustment to the carrying value of the real estate, provided the adjusted carrying amount does not exceed the original amount at foreclosure. Revenues and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in other operating expenses.

NOTE 6– OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS

During January 2008, the Bank has awarded certain officers a salary continuation plan (the “Plan”). Under the Plan, the participants will be provided with a fixed annual retirement benefit for twenty years after retirement. The Bank is also responsible for certain pre-retirement death benefits under the Plan. In connection with the implementation of the Plan, the Bank purchased single premium life insurance policies on the life of each of the officers covered under the Plan. The Bank is the owner and partial beneficiary of these life insurance policies. The assets of the Plan, under Internal Revenue Service regulations, are owned by the Bank and are available to satisfy the Bank’s general creditors.

During January 2008 the Bank awarded two of its directors a director retirement plan (“DRP”). Under the DRP, the participants will be provided with a fixed annual retirement benefit for ten years after retirement. The Bank is also responsible for certain pre-retirement death benefits under the DRP. In connection with the implementation of the DRP, the Bank purchased single premium life insurance policies on the life of each director covered under the DRP. The Bank is the owner and partial beneficiary of these life insurance policies. The assets of the DRP, under Internal Revenue Service regulations, are the property of the Bank and are available to satisfy the Bank’s general creditors.

Future compensation under both plans is earned for services rendered through retirement. The Bank accrues for the salary continuation liability based on anticipated years of service and vesting schedules provided under the plans. The Bank’s current benefit liability is determined based on vesting and the present value of the benefits at a corresponding discount rate. The discount rate used is an equivalent rate for investment-grade bonds with lives matching those of the service periods remaining for the salary continuation contracts, which average approximately 20 years.

During January 2008, the Bank purchased $4.7 million in bank owned life insurance policies and entered into split-dollar life insurance agreements with certain officers and directors. In connection with the implementation of the split-dollar agreements, the Bank purchased single premium life insurance policies on the life of each of the officers and directors covered by the split-dollar life insurance agreements. The Bank is the owner of the policies and the partial beneficiary in an amount equal to the cash surrender value of the policies.

The combined cash surrender value of all Bank-owned life insurance policies recorded in other assets on the balance sheet was $10,256,460 and $9,859,234 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

NOTE 7 – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair values of financial instruments — The financial statements include various estimated fair value information as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. Such information, which pertains to the Bank’s financial instruments, does not purport to represent the aggregate net fair value of the Bank. Further, the fair value estimates are based on various assumptions, methodologies, and subjective considerations, which vary widely among different financial institutions and which are subject to change. The following methods and assumptions are used by the Bank.

Cash and cash equivalents — The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair value.

Securities (including mortgage-backed securities) — Fair values for securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

Loans receivable — For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values for other loans (e.g., real estate construction and mortgage, commercial, and installment loans) are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of

Table of Contents

similar credit quality.

Deposit liabilities — The fair values estimated for demand deposits (interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings, and certain types of money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e. their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts for variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of the aggregate expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances — Rates currently available to the Bank for borrowings with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of the existing debt.

Accrued interest — The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate their fair value.

Off-balance-sheet instruments — Fair values for the Bank’s off-balance-sheet lending commitments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the credit standing of the counterparties.

The estimated fair values of the Bank’s financial instruments at June 30, 2009 are as follows:

				Estimated
	Carrying			Fair
	Amount			Value
Financial assets:

Cash and cash equivalents	$	17,086,546		$	17,086,546
Securities available for sale	54,400,351			54,400,351
Loans	424,390,224			442,308,938
Accrued interest receivable	1,816,967			1,816,967

Financial liabilities:

Deposits	(419,940,758		)	(421,403,568		)
FHLB advance	(44,100,000		)	(44,241,120		)
Accrued interest payable	(632,255		)	(632,255		)

Off-balance-sheet assets (liabilities):

Commitments and standby letters of credit				(607,317		)

The estimated fair values of the Bank’s financial instruments at December 31, 2008 are as follows:

				Estimated
	Carrying			Fair
	Amount			Value
Financial assets:

Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,837,860		$	9,837,860
Securities available for sale	41,448,877			41,448,877
Loans	428,177,130			429,344,847
Accrued interest receivable	1,886,359			1,886,359

Financial liabilities:

Deposits	(378,248,467		)	(378,041,128		)
FHLB advance	(69,000,000		)	(69,103,323		)
Accrued interest payable	(763,117		)	(763,117		)

Off-balance-sheet assets (liabilities):

Commitments and standby letters of credit				(630,751		)

Table of Contents

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 8– FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which the Company adopted effective January 1, 2008, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follow:

Level 1: Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2: Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls has been determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment , and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis are summarized below:

	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2009 Using
	June 30, 2009		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis:
Available-for-sale securities	$	54,400,351	$	—	$	54,400,351	$	—

Assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired Loans	$	6,911,831	$	—	$	—	$	6,911,831
Other real estate owned	$	2,813,082	$	—	$	—	$	2,813,082

The fair value of securities available for sale equals quoted market price, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is determined using quoted market prices for similar securities. Changes in fair market value are recorded in other comprehensive income net of tax.

SFAS No. 157 applies to loans measured for impairment using the practical expedients permitted by SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, including impaired loans measured at an observable market price (if available), or at the fair value of the loan’s collateral (if the loan is collateral dependent). Fair value of the loan’s collateral, when the loan is dependent on collateral, is determined by appraisals or independent valuation which is then adjusted for the cost related to liquidation of the collateral. At June 30, 2009, impaired loans had a principal balance of $7,364,247, with a valuation allowance of $452,416. Upon being classified as impaired, charge offs were taken to reduce the balance of each loan to an estimate of the collateral fair market value less cost to dispose. This estimate was a level 3 valuation. There was no direct impact on the income statement. The charge-offs were recorded as a debit to the allowance for loan losses.

Fair value of other real estate owned is determined by appraisals or independent valuation which is then adjusted for the cost related to liquidation of the property. Total fair market value at June 30, 2009 was $2,813,082 which was a level 3 valuation. There is a direct impact to the income statement as any market value write downs are charged directly to operating expenses. The Bank is required to perform this valuation every six months.

Table of Contents

OAK VALLEY BANCORP

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 9 – EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

The Bank computes earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. SFAS No. 128 requires the presentation of basic EPS, which does not consider the effect of common stock equivalents and diluted EPS, which considers all dilutive common stock equivalents.

	THREE MONTHS ENDED
	JUNE 30,
In thousands (except share and per share amounts)	2009			2008
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Net (loss) income available to common shareholders	$	(257,349	)	$	553,159
Weighted average shares outstanding	7,661,627			7,641,534
Net (loss) income per share	$	(0.03	)	$	0.07

DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Net (loss) income available to common shareholders	$	(257,349	)	$	553,159
Weighted average shares outstanding	7,661,627			7,641,534
Effect of dilutive stock options	—			56,147
Weighted average shares of common stock and common stock equivalents	7,661,627			7,697,681
Net (loss) income per diluted share	$	(0.03	)	$	0.07

	SIX MONTHS ENDED
	JUNE 30,
In thousands (except share and per share amounts)	2009			2008
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Net (loss) income available to common shareholders	$	(37,450	)	$	1,328,956
Weighted average shares outstanding	7,661,627			7,625,787
Net (loss) income per share	$	0.00		$	0.17

DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

Net (loss) income available to common shareholders	$	(37,450	)	$	1,328,956
Weighted average shares outstanding	7,661,627			7,625,787
Effect of dilutive stock options	—			70,193
Weighted average shares of common stock and common stock equivalents	7,661,627			7,695,980
Net (loss) income per diluted share	$	0.00		$	0.17

During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, all of the Company’s weighted average stock options of 413,310 and 414,970, respectively, to purchase shares of common stock were considered anti-dilutive because the Company recognized a net loss in both of these periods. Prices ranged from $4.58 to $15.67 on the outstanding options. Anti-dilutive weighted average options of 257,623 and 123,571 were outstanding during the same three and six month periods of 2008, respectively, with prices ranging from $7.51 to $15.67. These options were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares. These options begin to expire in 2013.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion explains the significant factors affecting our operations and financial position for the periods presented. The discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes related thereto which appear or that are referenced to elsewhere in this report, and with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in our 2008 Annual Report.

Forward-Looking Statements

Some matters discussed in this Form 10-Q may be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and therefore may involve risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results to be materially different from the results expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. These statements generally appear with words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “may,” “intend,” and “expect.” Although management believes that the assumptions and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from results discussed in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: economic conditions (both generally and in the markets where the Bank operates); competition from other providers of financial services offered by the Bank; government regulation and legislation; changes in interest rates; material unforeseen changes in the financial stability and liquidity of the Bank’s credit customers; and other risks as may be detailed from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, all of which are difficult to predict and which may be beyond the control of the Company or the Bank. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise forward-looking statements to reflect events or changes after the date of this discussion or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Accounting for allowance for loan losses involves significant judgment and assumptions by management and is based on historical data and management’s view of the current economic environment. At least on a quarterly basis, our management reviews the methodology and adequacy of allowance for loan losses and reports its assessment to the Board of Directors for its review and approval.

We base our allowance for loan losses on an estimation of probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio. Our methodology for assessing loan loss allowances are intended to reduce the differences between estimated and actual losses and involves a detailed analysis of our loan portfolio in three phases:

· the specific review of individual loans,

· the segmenting and review of loan pools with similar characteristics in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” and

· our judgmental estimate based on various subjective factors.

The first phase of our methodology involves the specific review of individual loans to identify and measure impairment. We evaluate each loan by use of a risk rating system, except for homogeneous loans, such as automobile loans and home mortgages. Specific risk rated loans are deemed impaired if all amounts, including principal and interest, will likely not be collected in accordance with the contractual terms of the related loan agreement. Impairment for commercial and real estate loans is measured either based on the present value of the loan’s expected future cash flows or, if collection on the loan is collateral dependent, the estimated fair value of the collateral, less selling and holding costs.

The second phase involves the segmenting of the remainder of the risk rated loan portfolio into groups or pools of loans, together with loans with similar characteristics, for evaluation in accordance with SFAS No. 5. We determine the calculated loss ratio to each loan pool based on its historical net losses and benchmark it against the levels of other peer banks.

In the third phase, we consider relevant internal and external factors that may affect the collectibility of loan portfolio and each group of loan pool. The factors considered are, but are not limited to:

· concentration of credits,

Table of Contents

· nature and volume of the loan portfolio,

· delinquency trends,

· non-accrual loan trend,

· problem loan trend,

· loss and recovery trend,

· quality of loan review,

· lending and management staff,

· lending policies and procedures,

· economic and business conditions, and

· other external factors.

Our management estimates the probable effect of such conditions based on our judgment, experience and known or anticipated trends. Such estimation may be reflected as an additional allowance to each group of loans, if necessary. Management reviews these conditions with our senior credit officers. To the extent that any of these conditions is evidenced by a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management’s estimate of the effect of such condition may be reflected as a specific allowance applicable to such credit or portfolio segment. Where any of these conditions is not evidenced by a specific, identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management’s evaluation of the inherent loss related to such condition is reflected in the unallocated allowance.

Central to our credit risk management and our assessment of appropriate loss allowance is our loan risk rating system. Under this system, the originating credit officer assigns borrowers an initial risk rating based on a thorough analysis of each borrower’s financial capacity in conjunction with industry and economic trends. Approvals are made based upon the amount of inherent credit risk specific to the transaction and are reviewed for appropriateness by senior line and credit administration personnel. Credits are monitored by line and credit administration personnel for deterioration in a borrower’s financial condition which may impact the ability of the borrower to perform under the contract. Although management has allocated a portion of the allowance to specific loans, specific loan pools, and off-balance sheet credit exposures (which are reported separately as part of other liabilities), the adequacy of the allowance is considered in its entirety.

Non-Accrual Loan Policy

Interest on loans is credited to income as earned and is accrued only if deemed collectible. Accrual of interest is discontinued when a loan is over 90 days delinquent or if management believes that collection is highly uncertain. Generally, payments received on nonaccrual loans are recorded as principal reductions. Interest income is recognized after all principal has been repaid or an improvement in the condition of the loan has occurred that would warrant resumption of interest accruals.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company recognizes in the income statement the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based forms of compensation issued to employees over the employees’ requisite service period (generally the vesting period). The Bank uses the straight-line recognition of expenses for awards with graded vesting. The Bank utilizes a binomial pricing model for all grants. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the price of the Bank’s stock for the period equal to the contractual stock option term. The Bank uses historical data to estimate option exercise and stock option forfeiture rates within the valuation model. The expected term of options granted for the binomial model is derived from applying a historical suboptimal exercise factor to the contractual term of the grant. For binomial pricing, the risk-free rate for periods is equal to the U.S. Treasury yield at the time of grant and commensurate with the contractual term of the grant.

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned, which represents real estate acquired through foreclosure, or deed in lieu of foreclosure in satisfaction of commercial and real estate loans, is carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value less the estimated selling costs of the real estate. The fair value of the property is based upon a current appraisal. The difference between the fair value of the real estate collateral and the

Table of Contents

loan balance at the time of transfer is recorded as a loan charge off if fair value is lower. Subsequent to foreclosure, management periodically performs valuations and the OREO property is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value, less costs to sell. The determination of a property’s estimated fair value incorporates (1) revenues projected to be realized from disposal of the property, (2) construction and renovation costs, (3) marketing and transaction costs, and (4) holding costs (e.g., property taxes, insurance and homeowners’ association dues). Any subsequent declines in the fair value of the OREO property after the date of transfer are recorded through a write-down of the asset. Any subsequent operating expenses or income, reduction in estimated fair values, and gains or losses on disposition of such properties are charged or credited to current operations.

Introduction

Oak Valley Community Bank commenced operations in May 1991. We are an insured bank under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and are a member of the Federal Reserve. Since its formation, the Bank has provided basic banking services to individuals and business enterprises in Oakdale, California and the surrounding areas. The focus of the Bank is to offer a range of commercial banking services designed for both individuals and small to medium-sized businesses in the two main areas of service of the Bank: the Central Valley and the Eastern Sierras.

The Bank offers a complement of business checking and savings accounts for its business customers. The Bank also offers commercial and real estate loans, as well as lines of credit. Real estate loans are generally of a short-term nature for both residential and commercial purposes. Longer-term real estate loans are generally made with adjustable interest rates and contain normal provisions for acceleration. The Bank introduced a mortgage-lending program, Community Bank Lending Exchange (“CBLX”), at the beginning of 2003. At June 30, 2009, the Bank has originated $220 million in loans for funding by CBLX.

The Bank also offers other services for both individuals and businesses including online banking, remote deposit capture, merchant services, night depository, extended hours, traveler’s checks, wire transfer of funds, note collection, and automated teller machines in a national network. The Bank does not currently offer international banking or trust services although the Bank may make such services available to the Bank’s customers through financial institutions with which the Bank has correspondent banking relationships. The Bank does not offer stock transfer services nor does it directly issue credit cards.

Effective July 3, 2008, Oak Valley Community Bank became a subsidiary of Oak Valley Bancorp, a newly established bank holding company. Oak Valley Bancorp operates Oak Valley Community Bank as a community bank in the general commercial banking business, with our primary market encompassing the California Central Valley around Oakdale and Modesto, and the Eastern Sierras. As such, unless otherwise noted, all references are about Oak Valley Bancorp.

Overview of Results of Operations and Financial Condition

The purpose of this summary is to provide an overview of the items management focuses on when evaluating the condition of the Company and its success in implementing its business and shareholder value strategies. The Company’s business strategy is to operate the Bank as a well-capitalized, profitable and independent community oriented bank. The Company’s shareholders value strategy has three major themes: (1) enhancing shareholders’ value; (2) making its retail banking franchise more valuable; and (3) efficiently utilizing its capital.

Management believes the following were important factors in the Company’s performance during the quarter ended June 30, 2009:

·	The credit crisis affecting the financial markets and residential housing that began in 2007 turned out to be just the flashpoint for a severe and prolonged recession. While recently published economic data indicates that the current downturn may be easing, the recession continues to affect the Company, the Bank, and the financial industry generally, and it is not clear when or at what speed the recession will end.

·	The Company recognized a net loss for common shareholders of $257,349 and $37,450 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 as compared with net income available to common shareholders of $553,159 and $1,328,956 for the same periods in 2008. The Company recognized a net loss before preferred stock dividends and accretion of $45,063 for the second quarter of 2009 and net income before preferred stock dividends and accretion of $385,247 for the first six months of 2009. The factors contributing to these results will be discussed below.

·	The Company recognized expense of $212,286 and $422,697 in the second quarter and six month period of 2009 associated with the accrual for preferred stock dividends and accretion of the preferred stock discount in connection with the 13,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock that the U.S. Treasury purchased from the Company in December 2008 under the TARP Program. So long as such preferred stock remains outstanding, it will pay quarterly cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per year for the first five years and thereafter at a rate of 9% per year. No expense was recognized in the second quarter and first six month period of 2008, as the Series A Preferred Stock was issued in December 2008.

·	Net interest income increased $806,292 or 15.9% and $1,653,656 or 16.7% for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2008. This increase was primarily due to the net interest margin increase of 20 and 24 basis points and increases in average earning assets of $55.4 million and $56.2 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively, as compared to the same periods of 2008. The net interest margin increase is attributable primarily to liabilities repricing faster than assets in the declining rate environment as described in further detail below.

·	The Company has taken significant steps to reduce the risk of loan losses. In the three and six month period ended June 30, 2009, the provision for loan losses increased by $1,697,012 and $3,452,012, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2008. These increases were mainly due to management’s assessment of the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses, an increase in the level of non-accrual loans and overall growth in gross loans. The Company continues to monitor its loan portfolio with the objective of avoiding defaults or write-downs. Despite these actions, the possibility of additional losses can not be eliminated, but the Board of Directors and all employees continue to work hard to make the best of these continuing challenging conditions.

·	For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, non-interest income decreased by $24,992 or 3.7% and $40,267 or 3.1% from the same periods in 2008, respectively, primarily due to decreased service charges on deposits of $51,803 and $72,345, as described below. The decrease in service charges on deposits is mainly attributable to decreased NSF income.

·	Non-interest expense increased by $225,008 or 4.9% and $106,744 or 1.2% for the three and six month periods ended June 30,

Table of Contents

	2009, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to write downs of OREO property values which was offset by decreases in salaries and benefits as described below.

·	Total assets increased $17.4 million or 3.4% from December 31, 2008. Total net loans decreased by $3.8 million or 0.9% and investment securities increased by $13.0 million or 31.2% from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009, while deposits increased by $41.7 million or 11.0%.

Income Summary

For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded net loss available to shareholders of $257,349 and $37,450, a decrease of $810,508 and $1,366,406, respectively, as compared to the $553,159 and $1,328,956 for the same periods in 2008. Return on average assets (annualized) was -0.03% and 0.15% for the second quarter and six month period of 2009, respectively, as compared with 0.47% and 0.58% for the same periods in 2008. Annualized return on average common equity was -2.24% and -0.17% for the second quarter and six month period of 2009, respectively, as compared with 5.01% and 6.09% for the same periods of 2008.

Net income before provisions for income taxes and preferred stock dividends and accretion for the second quarter and six month period of 2009 was down $1,140,720 and $1,945,367 from the comparable 2008 periods. The income statement components of these variances are as follows:

Pre-Tax Income Variance Summary

(In thousands)

	Effect on Pre-Tax Income			Effect on Pre-Tax Income
	Increase (Decrease)			Increase (Decrease)
	Three Months			Six Months
Change from 2008 to 2009 in:
Net interest income	$	806,292		$	1,653,656
Provision for loan losses	(1,697,012		)	(3,452,012		)
Non-interest income	(24,992		)	(40,267		)
Non-interest expense	(225,008		)	(106,744		)
Change in income before income taxes	$	(1,140,720	)	$	(1,945,367	)

These variances will be explained in the discussion below.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the largest source of the Bank’s operating income. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, net interest income was $5.89 million and $11.54 million, respectively, which represented an increase of $806,292 or 15.9% and $1,653,656 or 16.7%, respectively, from the comparable periods in 2008.

The net interest margin (net interest income as a percentage of average interest earning assets) was 4.97% and 4.92% for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, an increase of 20 and 24 basis points as compared to the same periods in 2008. The increase in the net interest margin in 2009 was primarily attributable to the impact that the decline in market interest rates had on our liability sensitive balance sheet which caused interest-bearing liabilities to decrease faster than the yields on earning assets. The compression of the yield on interest earning assets was lessened due to a portion of our loan portfolio that was at the contractual rate floors. In addition, yield on investments increased by 131 and 127 basis points for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively, as a result of approximately $12.5 million in municipal securities purchased in the fourth quarter of 2008 and first quarter 2009 and the related fully taxable equivalent benefit.

Table of Contents

The following tables shows the relative impact of changes in average balances of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, and interest rates earned and paid by the Company on those assets and liabilities for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:

Net Interest Analysis

(Dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2009						Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
	Average Balance		Interest Income/ Exp		Avg Rate/ Yield		Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Avg Rate/ Yield
Assets:
Earning assets:
Gross loans (1) (2)	$	428,797	$	6,726	6.29	%	$	393,044	$	6,796	6.93	%
Investment securities (2)	52,402		783		5.99	%	35,041		409		4.68	%
Federal funds sold	1,497		1		0.19	%	867		4		2.07	%
Interest-earning deposits	1,738		1		0.20	%	95		0		1.27	%
Total interest-earning assets	484,434		7,511		6.22	%	429,047		7,209		6.74	%
Total noninterest earning assets	37,975						37,796
Total Assets	522,409						466,843
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Money market deposits	175,067		652		1.49	%	143,698		842		2.35	%
NOW deposits	57,317		70		0.49	%	56,367		101		0.72	%
Savings deposits	15,057		33		0.87	%	17,993		73		1.62	%
Time certificates of deposit $100,000 or more	50,089		298		2.39	%	37,546		360		3.85	%
Other time deposits	54,961		296		2.16	%	39,684		335		3.38	%
Other borrowings	45,961		158		1.38	%	64,550		398		2.47	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	398,452		1,507		1.52	%	359,838		2,109		2.35	%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing deposits	61,533						60,034
Other liabilities	2,912						2,991
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities	64,444						63,025
Shareholders’ equity	59,512						43,980
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	522,409					$	466,843
Net interest income			$	6,004					$	5,100
Net interest spread (3)					4.70	%					4.39	%
Net interest margin (4)					4.97	%					4.77	%

(1) Loan fees have been included in the calculation of interest income.

(2) Yields on municipal securities and loans have been adjusted to their fully-taxable equivalents, based on a federal marginal tax rate of 34.0%.

(3) Represents the average rate earned on interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

(4) Represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

Table of Contents

	Six months ended						Six months ended
	June 30, 2009						June 30, 2008
	Average Balance		Interest Income / Expense		Avg Rate/ Yield		Average Balance		Interest Income / Expense		Avg Rate/ Yield
Assets:
Earning assets:
Gross loans (1) (2)	$	429,326	$	13,330	6.26	%	$	390,570	$	13,736	7.05	%
Investment securities (2)	49,716		1,491		6.05	%	34,212		816		4.78	%
Federal funds sold	1,440		2		0.22	%	732		10		2.62	%
Interest-earning deposits	1,619		2		0.20	%	394		1		0.52	%
Total interest-earning assets	482,101		14,825		6.20	%	425,908		14,563		6.86	%
Total noninterest earning assets	37,885						34,573
Total Assets	519,986						460,481
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Money market deposits	169,323		1,281		1.52	%	142,044		1,821		2.57	%
NOW deposits	55,643		145		0.53	%	55,137		196		0.71	%
Savings deposits	14,330		67		0.94	%	16,864		180		2.14	%
Time certificates of deposit $100,000 or more	46,049		586		2.57	%	42,573		887		4.18	%
Other time deposits	53,214		595		2.25	%	41,457		784		3.79	%
Other borrowings	57,951		387		1.35	%	53,803		766		2.86	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	396,510		3,061		1.56	%	351,878		4,634		2.64	%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing deposits	61,409						61,916
Other liabilities	2,920						3,191
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities	64,3329						65,107
Shareholders’ equity	59,144						43,496
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	519,985					$	460,481
Net interest income			$	11,764					$	9,929
Net interest spread (3)					4.64	%					4.22	%
Net interest margin (4)					4.92	%					4.68	%

(1) Loan fees have been included in the calculation of interest income.

(2) Yields on municipal securities and loans have been adjusted to their fully-taxable equivalents, based on a federal marginal tax rate of 34.0%.

(3) Represents the average rate earned on interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

(4) Represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

Shown in the following tables are the relative impacts on net interest income of changes in the average outstanding balances (volume) of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities and the rates earned and paid by the Company on those assets and liabilities for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Changes in interest income and expense that are not attributable specifically to either rate or volume are allocated to the rate column below.

Table of Contents

Rate / Volume Variance Analysis

(In thousands)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009 vs 2008
	Increase (Decrease)
	in interest income and expense
	due to changes in:
	Volume			Rate			Total
Interest income:
Gross loans (1)	$	618		$	(687	)	$	(69	)
Investment securities	202			172			374
Federal funds sold	3			(7		)	(4		)
Interest-earning deposits	5			(4		)	1
Total interest income	$	828		$	(526	)	$	302

Interest expense:
Money market deposits	184			(373		)	(189		)
NOW deposits	2			(33		)	(31		)
Savings deposits	(12		)	(28		)	(40		)
Time CD $100K or more	120			(182		)	(62		)
Other time deposits	129			(167		)	(38		)
Other borrowings	(115		)	(127		)	(242		)
Total interest expense	$	308		$	(910	)	$	(602	)

Change in net interest income	$	520		$	384		$	904

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009 vs 2008
	Increase (Decrease)
	in interest income and expense
	due to changes in:
	Volume			Rate			Total
Interest income:
Gross loans (1)	$	1,363		$	(1,769	)	$	(406	)
Investment securities	370			306			676
Federal funds sold	9			(17		)	(8		)
Interest-earning deposits	3			(3		)	0
Total interest income	$	1,745		$	(1,483	)	$	262

Interest expense:
Money market deposits	350			(890		)	(540		)
NOW deposits	2			(53		)	(51		)
Savings deposits	(27		)	(86		)	(113		)
Time CD $100K or more	72			(373		)	(301		)
Other time deposits	222			(411		)	(189		)
Other borrowings	59			(438		)	(379		)
Total interest expense	$	678		$	(2,251	)	$	(1,573	)

Change in net interest income	$	1,067		$	768		$	1,835

(1) Loan fees have been included in the calculation of interest income.

The table above reflects the market interest rate decline has impacted liabilities slightly more than assets as indicated by the increase of $768,000 in net interest income due to the rate change for the six month period of 2009. The increased loan volume and the overall change in mix of deposit balances contributed an increase of $1,067,000 to net interest income.

Table of Contents

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income represents service charges on deposit accounts and other non-interest related charges and fees, including fees from the sale of loans. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, non-interest income was $647,377 and $1,245,685, a decrease of $24,992 or 3.7% and $40,267 or 3.1%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2008.

The following table shows the major components of non-interest income:

Non-Interest Income

(In thousands)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,									For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		$ change			% change		2009		2008		$ change			% change
Service charges on deposits	$	293	$	344	$	(51	)	(14.8	)%	$	575	$	647	$	(72	)	(11.1	)%
Earnings on cash surrender value of life insurance	101		99		2			2.0	%	202		181		21			11.6	%
Mortgage commissions	46		22		24			109.1	%	89		71		18			25.4	%
Other	207		207		0			0.0	%	380		387		(7		)	(1.8	)%
Total Non-Interest Income	$	647	$	672	$	(25	)	(3.7	)%	$	1,246	$	1,286	$	(40	)	(3.1	)%

Service charges on deposits decreased by $51,803 or 14.8% and $72,345 or 11.1% in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2008. The decrease is primarily due to decreased NSF fee income. Offsetting the decrease to service charges on deposits, was an increase of $24,753 and $17,568 in mortgage commissions for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The Bank continues to expand its offerings to the consumer and business depositor.

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense represents salaries and benefits, occupancy expenses, professional expenses, outside services, and other miscellaneous expenses necessary to conduct business.

The following table shows the major components of non-interest expenses:

Non-Interest Expense

(In thousands)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,									For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		$ change			% change		2009		2008		$ change			% change
Salaries and employee benefits	$	1,865	$	2,435	$	(570	)	(23.4	)%	$	3,915	$	4,881	$	(966	)	(19.8	)%
Occupancy expenses	678		670		8			1.1	%	1,373		1,340		33			2.5	%
Data processing fees	234		191		43			22.5	%	452		369		83			22.5	%
OREO expenses	934		451		483			107.0	%	1,059		451		608			134.7	%
Assessments (FDIC & DFI)	299		90		209			233.9	%	437		172		265			154.3	%
Other operating expenses	777		725		52			7.2	%	1,488		1,405		83			6.0	%
Total Non-Interest Expense	$	4,787	$	4,562	$	225		4.9	%	$	8,725	$	8,618	$	107		1.2	%

Non-interest expenses increased by $225,008 or 4.9% and $106,744 or 1.2% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, as compared to the same periods of 2008. Salaries and employee benefits decreased $569,634 and $966,177 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, as compared to the same periods of 2008 as a result of a reduction in full time equivalent employees in effort to improve operating efficiency and an increase in deferred loan costs. Data processing fees increased by $43,462 and $83,418 for the three and six month periods 2009, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2008, as a result of an increased number of transaction accounts. FDIC and DFI assessments increased by $209,546 and $265,190, respectively, compared to the same three and six month periods of 2008. OREO expenses were $933,724 and $1,058,752 in the second quarter and six month period of 2009, respectively, compared to $451,078 for both comparable periods of 2008. These expenses resulted from various overhead costs and market value write downs associated with the five properties classified as other real estate owned.

Table of Contents

Management anticipates that noninterest expense will continue to increase as we continue to grow. However, management remains committed to cost-control and efficiency, and we expect to keep these increases to a minimum relative to growth.

Income Taxes

Provision for income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, was a net tax benefit of $344,191 and $358,103, respectively, a decrease in expense of $542,498 or 273.6% and $1,001,658 or 155.6% from the same periods in 2008. The tax benefits the Company recognized are disproportional compared to pre-tax income assuming marginal tax rates or historical effective tax rates are applied to pre-tax income. This is primarily due to tax credits from California Enterprise Zones and low income housing projects as well as tax free-income on loans within these enterprise zones and municipal securities and loans that comprise a larger proportion of pre-tax income in 2009 as compared to 2008. Certain tax credits and deductions are recognized by the Company regardless of the amount of pre-tax income or loss, which further increases the tax benefit and exaggerates the effective tax rates.

Asset Quality

Nonperforming assets consist of loans on non-accrual status, loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest, loans restructured, where the terms of repayment have been renegotiated resulting in a reduction or deferral of interest or principal, and other real estate owned (“OREO”).

Loans are generally placed on non-accrual status when they become 90 days past due, unless management believes the loan is adequately collateralized and in the process of collection. The past due loans may or may not be adequately collateralized, but collection efforts are continuously pursued. Loans may be restructured by management when a borrower has experienced some changes in financial status, causing an inability to meet the original repayment terms, and where we believe the borrower will eventually overcome those circumstances and repay the loan in full. OREO consists of properties acquired by foreclosure or similar means and which management intends to offer for sale.

Non-accrual loans totaled $7.4 million at June 30, 2009, as compared to $4.1 million at December 31, 2008. The non-accrual loans as of June 30, 2009 are loans made to three borrowers for purposes of real estate construction and commercial real estate.

OREO totaled $2.8 million as of June 30, 2009 and consists of five properties that were acquired through foreclosure including residential land lots and a commercial real estate property.

The following table presents information about the Company’s non-performing loans, including asset quality ratios as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

Non-Performing Assets

(in thousands)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2009			2008
Loans in nonaccrual status	$	7,364		$	4,078
Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing	—			643
Restructured loans	—			—
Total nonperforming loans	7,364			4,721
Other real estate owned	2,813			2,746
Total nonperforming assets	$	10,177		$	7,467

Allowance for loan losses	$	5,701		$	5,569

Asset quality ratios:
Non-performing assets to total assets	1.94		%	1.47		%
Non-performing loans to total loans	1.74		%	1.10		%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans	1.34		%	1.30		%
Allowance for loan losses to total non-performing loans	77.41		%	117.96		%

Table of Contents

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

In anticipation of credit risk inherent in our lending business, we routinely set aside allowances through charges to earnings. Such charges are not only made for the outstanding loan portfolio, but also for off-balance sheet items, such as commitments to extend credits or letters of credit. Charges made for the outstanding loan portfolio have been credited to the allowance for loan losses, whereas charges for off-balance sheet items have been credited to the reserve for off-balance sheet items, which is presented as a component of other liabilities. The Bank recorded loan loss provisions of $2,137,012 and $4,037,012 for the three and six month periods in 2009, respectively, which represented a $1,697,012 and $3,452,012 increase from the provisions recorded in the same periods of 2008.

The allowance for loan losses increased by 2.4%, or $131,366, to $5.70 million at June 30, 2009, as compared with $5.57 million at December 31, 2008. The Bank recognized the increase in the allowance for loan losses during the first six months of the year due to the loan loss provision of $2.14 million which was offset by loan charge-offs. The weak business climate adversely impacted the financial conditions of certain Bank clients in addition to decreases in collateral values which resulted in increased net loan charge-offs of $3.91 million for the first six months of 2009, compared to $759,000 for the first six months of 2008. The increase to the allowance for loan losses combined with a slight decrease in our loan portfolio resulted in an increase to the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans to 1.34% at June 30, 2009, as compared to 1.30% at December 31, 2008.

Management reviews these conditions with our senior credit officers. To the extent that any of these conditions may be attributed to a specifically identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management’s estimate of the effect of such condition may be reflected as a specific allowance applicable to such credit or portfolio segment. Where any of these conditions may not be attributed to a specific, identifiable problem credit or portfolio segment as of the evaluation date, management’s evaluation of the inherent loss related to such condition is reflected in the unallocated allowance. Although management has allocated a portion of the allowance to specific loan categories, the adequacy of the allowance is considered in its entirety as appropriate from time to time..

The following table provides an analysis of the changes in the ALLL for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

(dollars in thousands)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2009			2008
Balance at beginning of period	$	5,569		$	4,507
Provision for loan losses	4,037			585
Loans charged off	(3,907		)	(759		)
Recoveries of previous charge-offs	2			4
Net charge-offs	(3,905		)	(755		)
Reclassification of reserve related to off-balance-sheet commitments	—			(16		)
Balance at end of period	$	5,701		$	4,321

Allowance for loan losses to total loans	1.34		%	1.08		%
Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized)	1.83		%	0.39		%
Provision for loan losses to average loans (annualized)	1.90		%	0.29		%

The Bank makes provisions for loan losses when required to bring the total allowance for loan and lease losses to a level deemed appropriate for the level of risk in the loan portfolio. At least quarterly, management conducts an assessment of the overall quality of the loan portfolio and general economic trends in the local market. The determination of the appropriate level for the allowance is based on that review, considering such factors as historical experience, the volume and type of lending conducted, the amount of and identified potential loss associated with specific nonperforming loans, regulatory policies, general economic conditions, and other factors related to the collectibility of loans in the portfolio.

Although management believes the allowance at June 30, 2009 was adequate to absorb probable losses from any known and inherent risks in the portfolio, no assurance can be given that economic conditions which adversely affect our service areas or other variables will not result in increased losses in the loan portfolio in the future.

Table of Contents

Investment Activities

Investments are a key source of interest income. Management of our investment portfolio is set in accordance with strategies developed and overseen by our Investment Committee. Investment balances, including cash equivalents and interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions, are subject to change over time based on our asset/liability funding needs and interest rate risk management objectives. Our liquidity levels take into consideration anticipated future cash flows and all available sources of credits, and are maintained at levels management believes are appropriate to assure future flexibility in meeting anticipated funding needs.

Cash Equivalents and Interest-bearing Deposits in other Financial Institutions

The Bank holds federal funds sold, unpledged available-for-sale securities and salable government guaranteed loans to help meet liquidity requirements and provide temporary holdings until the funds can be otherwise deployed or invested. As of June 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008, we had $17.1 million and $9.8 million, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents.

Investment Securities

Management of our investment securities portfolio focuses on providing an adequate level of liquidity and establishing an interest rate-sensitive position, while earning an adequate level of investment income without taking undue risk. Investment securities that we intend to hold until maturity are classified as held-to-maturity securities, and all other investment securities are classified as available-for-sale. Currently, all of our investment securities are classified as available-for-sale. The carrying values of available-for-sale investment securities are adjusted for unrealized gains or losses as a valuation allowance and any gain or loss is reported on an after-tax basis as a component of other comprehensive income.

Management has evaluated the investment securities portfolio to determine if the impairment of any security in an unrealized loss position is temporary or other than temporary. Management has determined that no investment security is other than temporarily impaired. The unrealized losses are due solely to interest rate changes.

Deposits

Total deposits at June 30, 2009 were $419.9 million, a $41.7 million or 11.0% increase from the deposit total of $378.2 million at December 31, 2008. Average deposits increased $40.0 million to $400.0 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. We attracted deposits due to the safety and soundness of the Bank and our focus on customer service.

Deposits

(in thousands)

	June 30,		December 31,		Six month change
	2009		2008		$			%
Demand	$	60,197	$	64,277	$	(4,080	)	(6.3	)%
NOW	57,787		53,485		4,302			8.0	%
MMDA	183,372		157,351		26,021			16.5	%
Savings	15,366		12,532		2,834			22.6	%
Time < 100K	46,120		46,563		(443		)	(1.0	)%
Time > $100K	57,099		44,040		13,059			29.7	%
	$	419,941	$	378,248	$	41,693		11.0	%

Because our client base is comprised primarily of commercial and industrial accounts, individual account balances are generally higher than those of consumer-oriented banks. Three of our clients carry deposit balances of more than 1% of our total deposits, one of which had a deposit balance of more than 3% of total deposits at June 30, 2009.

Since our deposit growth strategy emphasizes core deposit growth we have avoided relying on brokered deposits as a consistent source of funds. The only brokered deposits the Bank holds are from CDARS, a certificate of deposit program that exchanges funds with other network banks to offer full FDIC insurance coverage to the customer. The Bank had $9.9 million in brokered deposits as of June 30, 2009 as compared to $10.5 million at December 31, 2008.

Table of Contents

Borrowings

Although deposits are the primary source of funds for our lending and investment activities and for general business purposes, we may obtain advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (“FHLB”) as an alternative to retail deposit funds. Our outstanding FHLB advances decreased by $24.9 million at June 30, 2009 to $44.1 million, compared to $69.0 million at December 31, 2008 due to the increase in deposits. See “Liquidity Management” below for the details on the FHLB borrowings program.

Capital Ratios

We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can trigger regulatory actions that could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements and operations. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that rely on quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

The following table shows the Oak Valley Community Bank’s and Oak Valley Bancorp’s capital ratios, as calculated under regulatory guidelines, compared to the regulatory minimum capital ratios and the regulatory minimum capital ratios needed to qualify as a “well-capitalized” institution at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

Oak Valley Community Bank Capital Ratios —

(dollars in thousands)

					Amount of Capital Required
					To Be				To Be Adequately
	Actual				Well-Capitalized				Capitalized
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
As of June 30, 2009:
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)	$	63,335	13.2	%	$	47,973	10	%	$	38,379	8	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)	$	57,467	12.0	%	$	28,784	6	%	$	19,189	4	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	57,467	11.0	%	$	26,114	5	%	$	20,891	4	%

As of December 31, 2008:
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)	$	63,379	13.3	%	$	47,758	10	%	$	38,206	8	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)	$	57,635	12.1	%	$	28,655	6	%	$	19,103	4	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	57,635	11.8	%	$	24,492	5	%	$	19,593	4	%

Oak Valley Bancorp Capital Ratios —

(dollars in thousands)

					Amount of Capital Required
					To Be		To Be Adequately
	Actual				Well-Capitalized		Capitalized
	Amount		Ratio		Amount	Ratio	Amount		Ratio
As of June 30, 2009:
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)	$	63,498	13.2	%	N/A	N/A	$	38,389	8	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)	$	57,630	12.0	%	N/A	N/A	$	19,194	4	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	57,630	11.0	%	N/A	N/A	$	20,896	4	%

As of December 31, 2008:
Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)	$	63,440	13.3	%	N/A	N/A	$	38,211	8	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)	$	57,696	12.1	%	N/A	N/A	$	19,106	4	%
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	57,696	11.8	%	N/A	N/A	$	19,594	4	%

Table of Contents

Liquidity Management

Since the Company is a holding company and does not conduct regular banking operations, its primary sources of liquidity are dividends from the Bank. Under the California Financial Code, payment of a dividend from the Bank to the Company is restricted to the lesser of the Bank’s retained earnings or the amount of the Bank’s undistributed net profits from the previous three fiscal years. The primary uses of funds for the Company are stockholder dividends, investment in the Bank and ordinary operating expenses. Management anticipates that there will be sufficient earnings at the Bank level to provide dividends to the Company to meet its funding requirements for the foreseeable future.

Maintenance of adequate liquidity requires that sufficient resources be available at all time to meet our cash flow requirements. Liquidity in a banking institution is required primarily to provide for deposit withdrawals and the credit needs of its customers and to take advantage of investment opportunities as they arise. Liquidity management involves our ability to convert assets into cash or cash equivalents without incurring significant loss, and to raise cash or maintain funds without incurring excessive additional cost. For this purpose, we maintain a portion of our funds in cash and cash equivalents, salable government guaranteed loans and securities available for sale. We obtain funds from the repayment and maturity of loans as well as deposit inflows, investment security maturities and paydowns, Federal funds purchased, FHLB advances, and other borrowings. Our primary uses of funds are the origination of loans, the purchase of investment securities, withdrawals of deposits, maturity of certificate of deposits, repayment of borrowings and dividends to common and preferred stockholders. Our liquid assets at June 30, 2009 were $80.6 million compared to $60.9 million at December 31, 2008. Our liquidity level measured as the percentage of liquid assets to total assets was 15.3% and 12.0% at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. We anticipate that cash and cash equivalents on hand and other sources of funds will provide adequate liquidity for our operating, investing and financing needs and our regulatory liquidity requirements for the foreseeable future. Management monitors our liquidity position daily, balancing loan funding/payments with changes in deposit activity and overnight investments.

As a secondary source of liquidity, we rely on advances from the FHLB to supplement our supply of lendable funds and to meet deposit withdrawal requirements. Advances from the FHLB are typically secured by a portion of our loan portfolio. The FHLB determines limitations on the amount of advances by assigning a percentage to each eligible loan category that will count towards the borrowing capacity. As of June 30, 2009, our borrowing capacity from the FHLB was approximately $120.5 million and the outstanding balance was $44.1 million, or approximately 37% of our borrowing capacity. We also maintain 2 lines of credit with correspondent banks to purchase up to $20 million in federal funds, for which there were no advances as of June 30, 2009.

Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements

During the ordinary course of business, we provide various forms of credit lines to meet the financing needs of our customers. These commitments, which represent a credit risk to us, are not represented in any form on our balance sheets.

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had commitments to extend credit of $60.7 million and $63.1 million, respectively, which includes obligations under letters of credit of $2.7 million and $3.5 million, respectively,

The effect on our revenues, expenses, cash flows and liquidity from the unused portion of the commitments to provide credit cannot be reasonably predicted because there is no guarantee that the lines of credit will be used.

Table of Contents

Recent Legislation and Other Regulatory Initiatives

On February 17, 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) went into effect and amended certain provisions of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”), including replacing Section 111 of EESA in its entirety. The new Section 111 allows a participant in the TARP — Capital Purchase Program (“TARP-CPP”), such as the Company, to repay any assistance previously received pursuant to the TARP-CPP without regard to the source of replacement funds or any waiting period subject to consultation with the appropriate Federal banking agency. In addition, the new Section 111 set forth in ARRA includes standards and requirements regarding executive compensation and corporate governance. On June 10, 2009, Treasury issued an interim final rule implementing and providing guidance on the executive compensation and corporate governance provisions of EESA, as amended by ARRA. The regulations were published in the Federal Register on June 15, 2009. In addition, on July 1, 2009, the SEC published a proposed amendment to the proxy rules which would implement the ARRA’s requirement that TARP-CPP participants provide a separate shareholder vote to approve the compensation of the company’s executives. Together, the Treasury’s interim final rule and the SEC’s proposed rule do (or would, in the case of the SEC’s proposed rule) impose:

· Limits on compensation that exclude incentives for the Company’s Senior Executive Officers to take unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten the value of the Company;

· A provision for the recovery of any bonus, retention award, or incentive compensation paid to the Company’s Senior Executive Officers or to any of the Company’s next twenty most highly compensated employees based on certain financial statements or other criteria that are later found to be materially inaccurate;

· A prohibition on the Company from making any payments to the Senior Executive Officers or to any of the next five most highly compensated employees for departure from the Company for any reason, except for payments for services performed or benefits accrued;

· A prohibition on the Company’s ability to pay bonuses and certain other compensation to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, except with respect to certain restricted stock awards or to the extent that a bonus is required by a valid employment contract;

· A prohibition on any compensation plan that would encourage manipulation of the Company’s reported earnings for the purposes of enhancing employee compensation;

· A requirement for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide certain certifications regarding the foregoing;

· Certain requirements with respect to the Company’s Personnel and Compensation Committee;

· A requirement to adopt a company-wide policy regarding excessive or luxury expenditures;

· A requirement to permit a nonbinding “say on pay” shareholder vote to be included in the Company’s proxy statement with respect to an annual meeting of stockholders; and

· Authorizing the Secretary of the Treasury to review certain compensation paid to the Company’s Senior Executive Officers and the next 20 most highly-compensated employees to determine whether any such payments were inconsistent with the purposes of the foregoing.

In light of the Treasury’s interim final rule and the SEC’s proposed rule, the Company intends to evaluate and amend any employment agreements, benefit plans and other arrangements, and take any other action necessary to ensure compliance with the applicable requirements.

The actions described above, together with additional actions announced by the Treasury and other regulatory agencies continue to develop. It is not clear at this time what impact EESA, ARRA, TARP, the Treasury’s interim final rule and the SEC’s proposed rule and other liquidity and funding initiatives of the Treasury and other bank regulatory agencies that have been previously announced, and any additional programs that may be initiated in the future will have on the financial markets and the financial services industry. The extreme levels of volatility and limited credit availability currently being experienced could continue to effect the U.S. banking industry and the broader U.S. and global economies, which will have an affect on all financial institutions, including the Company. We cannot predict the full effect that this wide-ranging legislation will have on the national economy or on financial institutions.

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13 a-15(e)and 15(d)-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”) have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company would be made known to them by others within the Company, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no significant change in the our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting subsequent to the Evaluation Date, nor there were any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in such controls requiring corrective actions.

Table of Contents

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

There are no material legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or to which any of its property is subject.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Not applicable.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The annual meeting of the shareholders of Oak Valley Bancorp was held on June 10, 2009. Three proposals were submitted to a vote of the shareholders as described in the Oak Valley Bancorp’s proxy statement dated April 30, 2009. The following is a brief description of the matters voted upon, as well as the outcome of the vote:

1. To elect ten members to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors to hold office until the 2010 annual meeting of the shareholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

Nominee	For	Withheld
Donald Barton	4,275,604	745,984
Christopher Courtney	4,275,604	745,984
James L. Gilbert	4,984,659	36,929
Thomas A. Haidlen	4,275,604	745,984
Michael Q. Jones	4,272,637	748,951
Arne J. Knudsen	4,984,642	36,946
Ronald C. Martin	4,275,604	745,984
Roger M. Schrimp	4,275,604	745,984
Danny L. Titus	4,275,604	745,984
Richard J. Vaughn	4,275,604	745,984

2. To ratify the appointment of Moss Adams LLP as our auditors, to perform audit services for the year 2009.

Votes For:		5,001,434
Against:		16,923
Abstain:		3,231

3. To approve the compensation of named executive officers, in a non-binding advisory vote as a result of the Company’s participation in the United States Treasury Capital Purchase Program:

Votes For:		4,179,401
Against:		825,559
Abstain:		16,628

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or hereby incorporated by reference to filings previously made with the SEC:

Exhibit		Description

31.01		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003
31.02		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003
32.01		Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Oak Valley Bancorp
Date: August 13, 2009	By:	/s/ RICHARD A. MCCARTY
		Richard A. McCarty
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer and duly authorized
		signatory)

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit		Description

31.01		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003
31.02		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003
32.01		Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003